HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 11-18-2008 - 6cORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: November 18, 2008
Action Agenda
Item No. (p -- G
_SUBJECT: Third Party Presence in the Employee Disciplinary Process
DEPARTMENT: County Manager
Human Resources Department
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
1- Survey of Counties
2- Amended Article IX, Section4d(1)
Personnel Ordinance
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Blackmon, County Manager,
245-2300
Michael McGinnis, Human Resource
Director, 245-2550
Annette Moore, Staff Attorney, 245-2317
PURPOSE: To provide information and a possible recommendation of an amendment to the
Orange County Personnel Ordinance Article IX, Section 4d(1); third party presence or
representation for eligible employees at a pre-disciplinary conference involving demotion,
suspension or termination.
BACKGROUND: At the October 28, 2008 Work Session, the Board discussed having third party
presence at pre-disciplinary conference during the disciplinary process involving demotion,
suspension, or termination of an employee. The Board requested additional information on
whether other counties and the Office of State Personnel provided employees with the option of
having a third party present and, if so, what models were being used. Additionally, staff was
asked to propose a recommended amendment to the Personnel Ordinance to provide a third
party presence during pre-disciplinary conferences involving demotion, suspension or termination
of eligible County employees.
The Orange County Personnel Ordinance Article IX, Section 4d(1) currently states third parties,
including attorney or other third parties representatives, may not be at the pre-disciplinary
conferences.
Article IX, Section 4d(1)
d. The department head and/or management representative(s) hold the pre-dismissal
conference with the employee.
(1) No third parties, including attorneys or other representatives may be present at
this conference. The Personnel Director or the Personnel Director's designee
may be present at management's or the employee's request.
Note: This prohibition may be waived with the consent of the department head
and the employee.
2
This provision can be waived with the consent of both management and the employee. Staff
surveyed Human Resource Directors in other counties and in the Office of State Personnel on
allowing a third party presence or representation in pre-disciplinary conferences. (See
Attachment 1.) None of the counties or the Office of State Personnel either through ordinance or
policy provide for third party presence at pre-disciplinary conferences. Alamance County's policy
does not provide for third party presence; however, in practice a third party presence is allowed.
Several reasons stated by the Office of State Personnel and others for not allowing a third party
presence or representation in pre-disciplinary conferences were:
• a third party presence would make the conference more of a hearing and less of meeting;
• the pre-disciplinary conference is a time of information sharing and having a third party
present or representation may make it more adversarial and reduce the opportunity to
resolve both performance and conduct concerns at a lower level.
The lack of a third party presence was also countered by the thorough review made by the
Human Resources Department of the circumstances surrounding the incident prior to the
consideration of discipline. Many indicated Human Resources staff served as a neutral part of
the disciplinary process assisting both the employee and management and not advocating for
either side.
Models
While none of the counties surveyed or the Office of State Personnel provide third party presence
or representation at pre-disciplinary conference, staff, as requested, has provided several models
of third party presence or representation and the pros and cons of each for the Board's
consideration:
1. The employee is permitted to select a person of their choice to accompany them to the
Pre-disciplinary Conference. This person may be a friend, family member or another
employee, but not an attorney. This person is considered a support person only and is not
allowed to participate in any way in the conference.
• This may help the employee feel more at ease in the proceeding and provide a
second set of ears to hear information enhancing the employee's ability to
comprehend the information being provided.
• There would be no cost to the employee or management unless the person
selected was an employee (employee time off would not be charged to leave.)
• The support person would not be allowed to actively participate in helping the
employee and must remain mute during the conference.
• The support person may not. have any training or specific ability to provide the
assistance needed by the employee.
2. An employee- would be allowed to select a person from a diverse group of human
resources professionals and other staff specifically trained to provide assistance to
employees in the Pre-disciplinary Conference. This specifically trained person would act as
an ombudsman in helping the employee prepare for the conference and accompanying the
3
employee to the conference. This position is allowed to assist the employee in
understanding information being provided by the department or in providing additional
information for consideration. The human resources professional would not be the person
who helped the supervisor or department in preparing for the disciplinary proceedings.
• This would provide the employee with a trained human resources professional to
assist them throughout the process including during the conference.
• This would not have an additional cost outside of human resources or other
County employee staff time.
• This would limit the employee's choice to the specifically trained County
personnel.
3. The Employee is permitted to select a person of his/her choice that will be allowed to
advocate for the employee during the Pre-disciplinary conference. The person
representing the employee may be an attorney.
• The recommendation would provide the greatest level of advocacy for the
support of the employee.
• This may provide unequal treatment and unfair results for persons who could not
afford attorneys.
• An attorney's presence at pre-disciplinary conferences in cases of serious work
performance deficiencies endangering the safety of persons or property may
slow the process when resolving the issue may be in the best interest of all
parties.
• This would increase the County's costs because if the employee had an
attorney, the County would also seek to be represented to provide legal support
to the supervisor and the department head.
Staff Recommendation
The County must ensure all employees are treated fairly and have the opportunity to resolve
issues at the lowest level possible. Staff recommends the Board continue the current system of
not allowing a third presence or representation at pre-disciplinary conferences involving
demotion, suspension or termination for the following reasons:
• Third party representatives would create an inequity among employees within
the personnel system applying to only 53% of Orange County employees;
• The personnel system currently allows for third party representation if both
parties agree.
• Human Resource professionals are present in the process to ensure the system
is followed and all parties are treated fairly;
• Employees view the disciplinary system as fair (as evidenced by a recent
employee survey); and
• The presence of third parties and attorneys at the pre-disciplinary conference
could make the process more adversarial and decrease the likelihood of the
issue being resolved. .
However, if the Board is not inclined to leave the current system in place, staff would recommend
the Board select Model 2 above. Attached are proposed amendments to the Personnel
Ordinance to accommodate each model. (See Attachment 2)
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There will be no additional cost if the policy is not changed. However, if
the Ordinance is changed to allow legal representation, there may be a cost to adequately
represent the Department and County.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends:
1. The Board approve no changes to the current Article IX, Section 4d(1) of the Orange
County Personnel Ordinance; or
2. Select Model 2 above and amend Article IX, Section 4d(1) of the Orange County
Personnel Ordinance as provided in Attachment 2, to be effective on the date printed in
the Administrative Rules and Regulation promulgated by the County Manager.
0
3rd Party Representation attachment ~
3rd Party Representation in Pre-
Coun Disciplinary Conference HR Involvement
Alamance Representation is not referred to in HR is involved in the process and may
olic , in ractice it is allowed artici ate in the conference
Bertie Representation is not allowed HR with Department director conducts the
conference
Cabarrus Representation is not allowed HR is informed prior proposed conference and
participates and monitors conference to ensure
employment laws, rules, regulations are
followed and fair treatment.
Chatham Representation is not allowed HR is contact person and helps supervisor
determine appropriateness of discipline, meets
with employee to help prepare for conference.
Durham Representation is not allowed HR works with supervisor and employee and
may participate in conference
Forsyth Representation is not allowed HR must be consulted prior to action and upon
request by supervisor or employee will
artici ate in conference
Guilford Representation is not allowed HR may be involved in the process to support
process for emplyee or department
Representation is not allowed The employee, their supervisor and the
department director or their designee. Prior to
the conference a fact finding conference is held
between the employee and the supervisor. At
the fact finding conference information is
gathered to evaluate a situation information that
may lead to discipline.
Mecklenber
Wake Representation is not allowed HR does not attend the the conference. Works
behind the scene with supervisors and
employees to prepare for the conference.
Department directors are also not encouraged
to attend so that it remains between employee
and supervisor.
( ~l
Office of
Representation is not allowed .~
HR is involved in reviewing the actions and
State assisting the supervisor in determining the
Personnel appropriate action. HR provides training on
problem resolution for supervisors and
employees.
0
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORANGE COUNTY PERSONNEL
ORDINANCE ARTICLE IX, SECTION 4d(1)
MODEL 1
d. The department head and/or management representative(s) hold the pre-dismissal
conference with the employee.
(1) An eligible employee may have a third party, present at this
conference as provided in the Rules and Regulations adopted for this
Section. The third party may be a friend, family member, or another
employee but not an attorney. The third party is an observer and may
not participate in the conference. The Human Resource Director or the
Human Resource Director's designee may be present at management's
or the employee's request.
MODEL 2
d. The department head and/or management representative(s) hold the pre-dismissal
conference with the employee.
(1) An eligible employee may have a third party present at this conference
as provided in the Administrative Rules and Regulations adopted for
this Section. The Human Resource Director or the Human Resource
Director's designee may be present at management's or the
employee's request.
MODEL 3
d. The department head and/or management representative(s) hold the pre-dismissal
conference with the employee.
(1) An eligible employee may have third parties, including attorneys or
other representatives present at this conference as provided in the
Administrative Rules and Regulations adopted for this Section.. The
Human Resource Director, the Human Resource Director's designee
or the County Attorney or the County Attorney's designee may be
present at management's request.