HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-21-1999 - 2From: David Stencil Environment and Resource Conservation Dept. Fax: 7324438 or 6443002 Voice: 732-8181, x2590 To: Margaret Brown at: BOCC Page 4 of 5 Thursday, September 16,1999 1:22:21 PM
Guess Road Area
As you may know, Triangle Land Conservancy and Durham officials
have expressed an interest in exploring alternatives for the potential
C &D landfill site ( Cavin estate property) and an adjacent piece owned
by the Triangle Community Foundation that straddles the county line.
The adjacent TCF piece is 390 acres (245 acres in Durham, 145 in
Orange), and is being marketed by Whit Morrow for the Foundation.
Mr. Morrow has indicated that the Foundation is interested in exploring
options. The Foundation property abuts Little River and appears to be
a priority for open space and watershed protection for Durham, and
the Little River corridor is also a TLC priority for preservation.
Commission Jacobs and I joined representatives from Durham and TLC
for a look at the properties last week. TLC and Durham officials may be
interested in discussing a collaborative, consortium venture on these
properties. There also appears to be a citizens group that has made a
back -up offer on the Cavin (potential C &D) property. I will keep you
apprised of any future contacts or proposals on these properties.
Timeframe for Sale: Immediate for Cavin piece (option expires
9/30/99), Intermediate for Triangle Community Foundation piece (end
of year /early 2000)
Potential Purpose: Watershed protection, active and low- impact
recreation, open space.
Cost Estimate: Current option for Cavin piece (landfill) is $497,000.
Cost for Triangle Community Foundation parcel is unknown, but would
likely be higher per acre due to higher development potential and
configuration.
Potential Funding Sources: County: Parks land acquisition bond,
School /Park Reserve. Other: Durham County, private landowners
group with TLC, Clean Water Management Trust Fund, Parks and
Recreation Trust Fund.
Other Notes of Interest
...We have had an exploratory discussion with a longtime landowner in
Bingham Township about potential donation of a 125 -acre
conservation easement to the County. I will keep you apprised if there
is further interest by the property owner.
...As a final note, the Pickard Mountain purchase has been finalized
with Carrboro landowner Tim Toben, who now holds title to the 300
acres of this land and most of the identified natural area. We have
offered to assist Mr. Toben in any preservation efforts.
F: \US E RS\DS TAN CI MAN D -ACQ \LAN D-UP D_ DOC
li�
i�
Ll'-
1�woo
~r�
4
1 f r rA
•ME i
��r
• The Landfill Owners Group began discussions regarding property
acquisition for the management of Construction & Demolition (C &D)
waste materials in 1996.
• We have conducted a preliminary review, including site visits, on
twenty five sites within the past 2 years.
• A C &D Site Search Task Force was created by the Landfill Owners
Group in December, 1998 to guide the search process.
• Two final candidate sites have resulted from the search process.
Eubanks Road Site
Size - 32.7 acres
(Capacity -14 years)
Guess Road Site Size - 179 acres (Capacity - 62 years)
• Siting, design, construction, and operation of
landfills is highly regulated and actively managed
by County, State and Federal regulations
• The North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR) is the lead agency
and coordinates review and approval by all other
regulatory agencies
CRITERION
GUESS ROAD SITE
EUBANKS SITE
Wetlands
Less than 1/2 acre disturbed
< 1 acre disturbed
Neuse River Basin Buffers
Facility has been designed to
Not applicable
avoid infringement of buffers
Floodplains
100 year floodplain out of
No 100 year floodplain on the
development area
site
Threatened and endangered
No species or habitat in the
Possible habitat of listed flora
(1992 survey on nearby
species
development area
property)
CRITERION
GUESS ROAD SITE
EUBANKS SITE
Archaeological or historical
sites
Site survey in progress
No sites listed in county
inventory
State -owned recreational lands
Not applicable
Not applicable
Airport location restriction
Not applicable
Not applicable
Cover soils
Both sites may require off -site borrow source
• Site will be operated by professional staff trained in
landfill operations and safety
• Access control through fencing and gates
• Acceptable wastes: C &D only - wood, masonry, metals,
wallboard, shingles
• Prohibited waste: Liquids and hazardous waste
• Waste screening to preclude acceptance of hazardous
0
0
0
Guess Road Site
20 miles from waste
generation center
Expected increase in traffic
does not approach design
capacities
Bridge / weight limits
Eubanks Road Site
• Approximately 2 miles from
waste generation center
• Vehicles would use same
access routes that are
currently used
Guess Road Site
• Intensive sedimentation/
erosion control and
stormwater management to
control runoff
• Short and predictable
groundwater pathways allow
effective groundwater
monitoring
Eubanks Road Site
• Surface discharge travels
through engineered channels
at the closed landfill
• Short and predictable
groundwater pathways allow
effective groundwater
monitoring
LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED
W3 -II Classification (NC Division of Water QuaUty)
F
ORAIi 1
11.1
Critical Area
Eubanks Rol-
Sim lo�
Salence of
Watershed
SCALE
5 miles
" , �.
Downstream surface water quality protected by:
• Surface water diverted from waste
• Minimized cleared areas, prompt revegetation
• Collecting runoff in gently sloped, armored channels
• Detention basins sized to accept peak storm flows and allow sediment
to settle
• 200 -foot forested buffers between waste and property lines; 50 -foot
stream buffers
Groundwater quality near the landfill protected by:
• Denial of site approval if any threat to supply wells
• Proven ability to monitor site before permit is granted
• Comparison of site groundwater samples to drinking water standards
through operation and 30 years or more post closure
• Remediation if standards are exceeded
Guess Road
Site
Figure A
SCALE
o too loco woo
(w Ain
�► �r
LEGEND
GROUNDWATER 01
MONITORING WELL
RESIDENCE WITH cl
WELL
C
STREAMS AS ! 90
DETERMINED BY
NCDWC
1 °
SITE SURFACE
DRAINAGE °
DIRECTION
°
ll
i
Eubanks Road
Site
Figure B
SCALE
0 Soo 1000 1500
(IN FEET)
\ ❑
❑
�'E�.ISTING
C &D LANDFILL ❑ ;
r
r ❑
/ O
m
O ❑
X0
Pl i
EUBANKS ROAD
❑ ❑
❑
CLOSED
DUKE
LANDFILL
UNIVERSITY
C &D
DISPOSAL
AREA
T ,•
LEGEND
� •••''��
LINED
RESIDENCE
❑
_
EVB
LANDFILL
WITH WELL
AIVKS ROAD
❑
C &D MONITORING
WELL
WETLANDS
>;
❑ ❑
p °
STREAM AS
SHOWN ON USGS
j
❑ o OPO
TOPO MAP
:�
❑
SITE SURFACE
�O
DRAINAGE
DIRECTION
❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 9Q
❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 13
❑ 00 ❑ ❑ ❑ ° ❑
❑
❑
EUBANKS ROAD
❑ ❑
❑
Eubanks Road
Site
Figure C
Road
SCALE
0 Boo 1000 1500
(IN FEET)
CLOSED
DUKE LANDFILL
UNIVERSITY
C&D
DISPOSAL
LEGEND AREA
BOUNDARY OF
RURAL BUFFER �.
LINED
RESIDENCE p EUBANKS LANDFILL
WITH WELL
ROAD
CAD MONITORING
WELL
0
WETLANDS IX M ❑ 0 ❑
❑ 1:3
STREAM AS
SHOWN ON USGS ❑ 0 COQ
TOPO MAP 0
13
SITE SURFACE ❑ 10%
DRAINAGE
DIRECTION 0 0 0 0 13 00 ❑
❑ ❑ C300 C3 00 0 0
- -
Ml
0
ANKS ROAD
0
0
❑
IEYJSTING
C&D LANDFILL
0
0
X
0
CLOSED
DUKE LANDFILL
UNIVERSITY
C&D
DISPOSAL
LEGEND AREA
BOUNDARY OF
RURAL BUFFER �.
LINED
RESIDENCE p EUBANKS LANDFILL
WITH WELL
ROAD
CAD MONITORING
WELL
0
WETLANDS IX M ❑ 0 ❑
❑ 1:3
STREAM AS
SHOWN ON USGS ❑ 0 COQ
TOPO MAP 0
13
SITE SURFACE ❑ 10%
DRAINAGE
DIRECTION 0 0 0 0 13 00 ❑
❑ ❑ C300 C3 00 0 0
- -
Ml
0
ANKS ROAD
0
0
❑
MEMORANDUM
TO: GAYLE WILSON, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JOYCE ENGINEERING, INC.
RE: RESPONSES TO PUBLIC QUESTIONS ON PROPOSED C &D
LANDFILL SITES
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1999
At the Orange County Board of Commissioners meeting held on September 7, 1999, a
brief presentation was held regarding the siting process for a C &D landfill in Orange
County. Questions were received from speakers from the floor, and in written format
from concerned citizens. In an effort to address the citizens' concerns, the following
responses have been prepared with the support of the Orange County Department of
Solid Waste staff. Similar questions have been combined, allowing a single response.
We have tried to answer all questions to the best of our knowledge and ability. However,
we have not attempted to respond to statements of personal opinion or to questions
involving policy matters or requiring speculation on our part.
1. What is the mileage on the access routes, including 151501 and Guess Road?
For I -85, 15 -501, Guess Road: Beginning at town limits of Chapel Hill, distance is 19
miles to the site; measured at 29 minutes by solid waste staff.
For I-40, US 70 Bypass, Hwy 57, Guess Road: 27 miles; measured at 30 minutes
For Hwy 86, US 70 Business, Lawrence Road, US 70 Bypass, St. Mary's Road, New
Sharon Church Road: 20, miles; measured at 28 minutes.
2. What is the design capacity of the 151501 route? Any traffic counts?
We are in the process of obtaining this information.
3. Please confirm speed limit on Guess Road
A speed limit sign on Guess Road to the south of the proposed site states that the speed
limit is 55 mph.
4. Discuss bridges on access routes, the impact of the proposed elementary school
behind Mars Hill Baptist Church, and of the school on St. Mary's Road
There is a 13 -ton weight limit posted on the New Sharon Church Road bridge, and also a
61/2-ton per axle weight limit on that road. Repairs or replacement of that bridge, perhaps
in 2001, could cause traffic to be temporarily rerouted. We are unaware of a school on St.
Responses to Questions I Joyce Engineering, Inc.
Mary's Road between US. 70 and New Sharon Church Road. We have no specific
knowledge of a proposed elementary school behind Mars Hill Baptist Church, and cannot
comment on its impact.
5. How many trucks will be using the site in 62 years?
Regarding projections of future traffic, it would be difficult to state definitively how
many trucks will be using the site. if it is in operation 62 years from now. For design
purposes, we have assumed that the C&D waste stream will increase from the current
33,557 tons/year to about 62,000 tons/year in 2062. This would equate to about 166
trucks per day near the end of the facility's life.
6. Why wasn't accessing the site via I5-501 considered?
Interstate 85 and 15 -501 to Guess Road was and is considered to be a potential access
route to the facility.
7. "What is the environmental impact of relocating C&D landfill (emissions, fuel
consumption), etc. "
There would be increased fuel consumption and vehicle emissions if the haul distance
were increased for landfill users. This increase would be complex to quantify, as each
load originates in a different location within the County. If, however, no site is located in
the county, these costs would increase significantly, because the haul would be much
longer and would result in greater environmental impact.
8. "What is the impact of moving the C&D landfill 20 miles from MSW regarding
people who go to the wrong site? "
If a new facility were developed, the County would notify the public in a variety of ways.
All account holders and known users would receive a mailing; educational press releases
and public announcements would be published. Other mechanisms could include notices
to the Durham/Orange County Home Builders Associations, notices to Local Chambers
of Commerce, and signage at current landfill announcing the relocation. Building
inspection departments would be asked to distribute notices with each permit issued.
9. Is there a cortf lict of interest with JFV How would they be compensated if one site
is chosen over another, or if no site is chosen?
If a landfill site (either Guess Road or Eubanks Road) is selected, and if Joyce
Engineering (JEI) is chosen to continue permitting and design work on that site, they
would be compensated for their services. The compensation received by JEI would not
differ significantly with either site. As licensed engineers and geologists, we are bound
by the laws that govern the practice of engineering and geology, and by professional rules
of conduct and a code of ethics. We have never, and will not in the future, make decisions
based on potential economic benefit to our company. JEI has no preference between the
Responses to Questions 2 Joyce Engineering Inc.
two sites, but desires to assist Orange County in obtaining access to environmentally
sound, cost - efficient waste disposal capacity.
10. "Who pays Joyce Engineering? - Can we have another engineering firm give a
competing presentation? "
For the work performed by Joyce Engineering for the site search process, funds are available
in the landfill operating budget. Once a site is selected, remaining permitting work would
be funded from the Acquisitions and Construction reserve fund of the Landfill Fund Budget.
We see no basis on which we should obtain another consulting firm to review the work
performed by Joyce Engineering. Any other experienced solid waste consulting firm would
conduct their work in much the same manner as Joyce Engineering. The Solid Waste
Management Department has on staff a licensed professional engineer with 32 years of solid
waste experience, a landfill manager with 31 years of solid waste disposal experience, and a
solid waste director with 20 years of solid waste experience. These individuals have been
involved throughout the siting process in reviewing/coordinating all siting work between the
local governments and Joyce Engineering. In addition, State engineers and geologists will
comprehensively review all work of Joyce Engineering.
11. "Have you figured the additional cost of litigation for Durham County and
surrounding property owners? Is this possible additional cost acceptable?"
We have no reason to believe that there are grounds for litigation at this time. Litigation
costs would be very difficult to predict before the nature of the complaint or case is
known. However, funds for any litigation are available within the Landfill Fund Budget,
should the Board of County Commissioners choose to litigate.
12. Comment on the possible lack of soil cover on the Guess Road site.
Much of Orange County has thin soil profiles, relative to other areas of the State. The
availability of properties with sufficient cover soil has been problematic throughout
Orange County's search for new landfill sites over the past decade, and is a common
problem with potential landfill sites in general. A significant percentage of sites
evaluated during past searches were lacking in this regard. The few sites reviewed that
did have ideal quantities of cover soil were omitted for other deficiencies. Eubanks Road
site has cover soil available on landfill owned property. On the Guess Road site,
sufficient cover will be available throughout much of its operating life; the deficit will
occur toward the end of the facility life. The availability of cover soil will affect
operating costs at the Guess Road site and the Eubanks Road site, and this has been
considered along with the many other factors that go into a siting decision.
Responses to Questions 3 Joyce Engineering, Inc
13. Numerous questions were related to water quality issues. They inquired about
potential contamination of Durham's water source; the fact that the Guess Road
site is underlain by fractured bedrock; long -term runoff into the Little River; what
will happen if the contamination reaches bedrock ( "It can go for miles in the
aquifer and contaminate wells for miles'); how potential contamination of private
wells will be prevented.
A detailed hydrogeologic study is required by the NC Solid Waste Section prior to
issuing a permit to construct a landfill to address these types of questions. They will not
approve a landfill site unless the operator has demonstrated the following:
a. that groundwater flow rates and pathways at the site are understood, predictable
and characterized,
b. that locations of, and pathways to, groundwater supply wells in the vicinity are
likewise characterized;
c. that the landfill is not located such that potentially short and direct pathways from
waste to supply wells will occur; and,
d. that a network of monitoring wells will be able to detect the release of landfill
constituents before any exceedence of the Drinking Water Standards occurs at the
point of compliance.
The Solid Waste Section requires more detailed investigations at those sites located over
fractured bedrock, such as this one. The site subsurface investigation was conducted to
identify the character and orientation of the subsurface fractures, the flow directions of
groundwater in soil and bedrock beneath and around the site, and to identify the limits of
possible groundwater pathways away from the site. At both of the proposed sites,
groundwater flow pathways do not extend "for miles ", but rather for several hundred feet.
If monitoring wells immediately adjacent to the facility were ever to detect
contamination, the State would require actions to prevent contamination from reaching
any residential supply wells.
Surface water monitoring data collected from closed unlined landfills across the state
over the past ten years suggest that groundwater flowing from landfills at either of the
two sites is not likely to have a measurable impact on downstream surface water. For the
mass of landfill surface water data that has been collected to date, laboratory detection of
landfill compounds is extremely rare. Most recorded detections have been limited to
instances where surface monitoring points are located in very small streams or drainage
ditches adjacent to the edge of landfill waste.
Responses to Questions 4 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
14. "What are the SS chemical constituents that will be tested in the groundwater
monitoring wells? "
The chemical constituents required for analysis of water samples from monitoring wells
and surface water sampling points at Construction and Demolition landfills are listed in
the attached memorandum from the NC Solid Waste Section.
15. `If remediation is necessary, to what extent; and when would remediation be
terminated? "
Under current regulations, any necessary remediation would continue until groundwater
at the facility boundary met the North Carolina Drinking Water Standards, and surface
streams below the facility met the State Surface Water Quality Standards.
16. "What amount of time would be required from the moment of exceedence of water
standards to the implementation of remediation? "
Upon receiving sampling reports with analyses showing an exceedence of the
groundwater or surface water standards, the NC Solid Waste Section issues a letter
requiring the operator to submit the following within 60 days:
(a) a survey of all drinking water supply wells in the vicinity of the facility;
(b) a plan to assess the nature and extent of the release; and,
(c) a survey of other potential sources of contamination in the vicinity.
Upon receipt of this plan, Solid Waste Section review and cooperative revision of the
plan is carried out as soon as possible. The operator is normally required to execute the
plan within 90 days, and required to notify immediately any threatened well owners and
sample their well water. If a water supply well was found to be contaminated by a
landfill, the Solid Waste Section would require the landfill operator to provide an
alternate source of drinking water to the well owner. Regardless of the existence of any
impact on existing supply wells near the landfill, the owner would be required to
implement remediation, as discussed above. This process would take place over several
years, with the time frame determined by the nature of the remedy and the level of risk
associated with the release.
17. "The proposed well nest seems insufficient. Please address. "
The reasoning that underlies the water quality monitoring system design is contained in
the Site Study Application for the Guess Road site, which is currently being reviewed by
the Solid Waste Section. After review of the Site Study Application; the Solid Waste
Section may approve the monitoring system design, require modifications, or deny the
site permit.
Responses to Questions 5 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
18. Concern was expressed about wood waste causing more porous soil, resulting in
groundwater contamination.
Wood or other waste will not be mixed into the subsurface soil, but placed on top of it.
The waste will be covered, and kept in a relatively dry state.
19. Why was the site suitability process completed over a period of months, and
during a drought, rather that over the one-year period mentioned by Joyce
Engineering?
The permitting process occurs in two phases. The Solid Waste Section will not grant
approval of the Construction Plan Application until winter groundwater measurements,
taken when levels are highest, are available. These measurements will help determine the
final design for the landfill and its water quality monitoring system. The winter levels
should not affect the overall suitability, but will be used to fine -tune the grading plan.
20. Several questions related to the perceived connection between the water quality in
wells on Rogers Road and the nearby landfills. Some specific questions were as
follows: "When was this (perceived contamination) discovered? What
remediation has been done? What was the time lapse between the two? What is
the total financial outlay on this to date? What contaminants have shown up in
surface runoff and well water samples at the present C&D site or landfill site? "
An independent environmental consultant,'Buxton Environmental, Inc., has completed a
draft report entitled "Assessment of Environmental Concerns — Orange Regional
Landfill' dated August 27, 1999, which addresses the issue of a potential connection
between nearby wells and the existing Eubanks Road landfills. The report is available for
review by interested parties.
Investigation into the nature and extent of trace organic constituents in one monitoring
well at the closed municipal landfill at Eubanks Road began immediately after the traces
were detected. This action predated concerns voiced by residents of the Rogers Road
neighborhood. The above referenced report by Buxton Environmental was prepared at a
cost of $2,500 from the Landfill Fund Budget.
21. Why did the property owner surrounding the Eubanks site knowingly purchase
land adjacent to a landfill ?.
We cannot speculate as to why Ms. Deng purchased property. There have been a lot of
properties sold and houses built near the Eubanks Road facility since the first landfill was
built there.
22. What other sites have been considered for a C&D landfill in Orange County and
what was the basis of their elimination from the process?
A list of sites considered during the site search process for a C &D landfill in Orange
County is contained in the attached Table 2. The screening process for identifying
Responses to Questions 6 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
potential C &D landfill sites was conducted by solid waste staff pursuant to LOG criteria.
The primary criteria guiding the search was:
➢ The site must be freely offered for sale (initial criteria)
➢ The site must be relatively inexpensive
➢ The site should not be located in the rural buffer (an exception was made for the
Eubanks Rd. site)
After the LOG, who initially led the siting process, was unable to agree on the first site
recommended by staff (Site #1), the three (elected) member C &D Task Force was
established to guide the process of site identification. The Task Force was briefed on most
of the twenty seven sites listed below (except Site #1) over three separate meetings and
indicated their preferences from among those not sold, taken off of the market, or otherwise
found to be inadequate by the solid waste staff or Joyce Engineering. A real estate agent
was utilized by staff so that all available properties were identified. Joyce Engineering was
asked to conduct on -site walkovers to assess each site considered by staff to be promising
candidates.
It should be noted that we also placed advertisements in local newspapers that local
governments were looking for property on which to develop a C&D facility. We were not
contacted by anyone wishing to have their property considered.
The attached table presents the sites that were evaluated by solid waste staff and reviewed
by the Task Force. All of the sites were visited by staff, with the most promising sites also
examined by Joyce Engineering.
Initially, Site #1 was recommended to the LOG, which could not agree to approve the site
primarily due to an perceived unreasonable asking price. This site was also formally
discussed by the three elected boards, but abandoned due to lack of consensus. Negotiations
to reduce the price were not successful.
Secondly, Site #12 was recommended by staff to the Task Force, who requested that staff
obtain an option to purchase. The owner subsequently decided to take it off the market,
presumably preferring it not become a C&D landfill.
Once Site #12 was removed from consideration, Site #8 became the Task Force's preferred
site. Given the screening criteria, few other good potential sites were identified and
available for serious consideration. An option was obtained on this property.
Site #27 also became an option when Duke University agree to supply site buffer areas and
regulators indicated this would be acceptable. The LOG already owns about 20% of this
site.
Responses to Questions 7 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
23. Please comment on endangered species, owls in particular, and explain why no
natural heritage inventory was taken for the Guess Road site.
The siting process is being carried out with reference to the inventories maintained by the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCDENR — Division of Parks and Recreation),
and Orange County. Orange County's inventory had no information regarding
endangered species in this area. The state issued a letter dated June 3, 1999 in response to
our request regarding the potential. presence of threatened or endangered species and their
habitats in the proposed site. They stated that there was no information regarding
threatened or endangered species or their habitat on the site. This would include owls.
However, because there are records of rare species, high quality natural communities, and
a Significant Natural Heritage Area (the Little River Aquatic Habitat) within a 1.0 mile
radius of the site, they request that U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Best Management
Practices be followed to prevent siltation in the North Fork/Little River aquatic habitat:
The loss of silt from the site into the streams in this area is considered to be the greatest
threat to these creatures, since the listed rare species are all aquatic (fish or freshwater
mussels). Therefore, sediment and erosion control measures on the site will be designed,
constructed and maintained in accordance with the most stringent standard or better.
24. "Please clarify the 25, 50 & 100- year flood zones. "
The terms refer to the probability that a flood of a certain size will occur in a given year.
For example, the 25 -year flood has a 1 -in -25 probability of occurring in a given year.
25. "What is Orange County going to do about property devaluation? "
We have no reason to believe that property values will decrease, based on Eubanks Road
and other facilities in the state as a model.
26. "What is going to be done about air quality (dust) and noise? "
The facility will be designed with minimum 200 -foot buffers between any property
boundary and the actual landfill footprint. The working face of the fill area (from which
most dust and noise would originate) is likely to be much further from the property
boundary at any given time during the life of the facility. This distance will serve to
attenuate noise and dust effects from earth moving activities. Additionally, water trucks
will be used on cleared areas as needed to suppress dust during dry periods.
27. "Will the State of N. C. do an engineering report? "
Engineers and geologists at the NC Solid Waste Section review the Site Applications and
the Design Applications for C&D landfills, and issue a response requiring any necessary
changes to the plans. They may also choose to deny a permit for the site if it does not
meet regulatory requirements.
Responses to Questions 8 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
28. "Can we ship out of State? "
Although it is possible to transfer C &D waste to distant facilities, this is generally not a
satisfactory and cost - effective solution to managing this waste stream, due to its weight
and bulkiness. We understand that this issue has been previously considered by the LOG.
29. "Is it not true that even good or "best" designs for waste facilities have failed?
(example: hog lagoons or other dump sites across the country.) "
Engineered designs are the product of trained, licensed professionals who incorporate
site - specific data, empirical knowledge and educated assumptions into the final product.
As with any human endeavor, it is true that some designs do not perform their intended
function as well as expected. There are a multitude of reasons for this, and failure
analysis is an important area of study for engineering professionals. Regarding hog
lagoon failures in particular, the lack of careful design and regulation is at least part of
the problem. Such lagoons have not been subject to close regulation in North Carolina,
and those facilities that have failed are certainly not examples of "best" designs. Failures
at older waste facilities of all types, including landfills, are the very reason that the
current set of comprehensive environmental regulations is in place.
30. "Is the Landfill Owners Group still in existence?
The Landfill Owners Group has not formally been dissolved, however, as you state, for
all intents and purposes, it no longer exists. Solid waste management in Orange County
is currently in flux. The assumption of countywide solid waste management
responsibilities by Orange County from Chapel Hill is imminent. It is awaiting only the
final signatures on the legal agreement. Once this document is finalized, Chapel Hill and
Carrboro will relinquish all solid waste management responsibilities to Orange County,
maintaining essentially only an advisory involvement thereafter. The current Chapel Hill
Solid Waste Management Department will be transferred to Orange County.
As a part of this transfer of responsibilities, a Solid Waste Advisory Board will be created
which will consist of representatives of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, and Orange
County. It will function as an advisory board to the Board of Orange County
Commissioners on matters involving solid waste management.
31. "Has the Board responded to the request by the Durham County Commisioners to
conduct an independent assessment of the Guess Road site? "
The only request formally received by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners
is a Sept 25 letter requesting that Orange County allow Durham County representatives to
make an inspection of the proposed site to determine if endangered and threatened species
are found on the site. Orange County agreed to this request.
Responses to Questions 9 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
32. "Why is there so little discussion of the Chapel Hill Site?
While there has been equal opportunity for input concerning the Eubanks Road site, it is true
that most of the discussion appears to be centered on the Guess Road site. While we choose
to limit any speculation on this apparent imbalance in the discussion, it is true that more
information is being generated and distributed by the Guess Road site neighbors, and
meetings are attended by more Guess Road opponents. It is likely that at least one reason is
that the Guess Road site has a more organized opposition. Also, the area adjacent to the
existing landfill on Eubanks Road has been discussed for various potential solid waste uses
over a several year period, with the current landfill discussions not a new topic here as it is
in the Guess Road area. Additionally, the local governments in Durham County have
become involved with the Guess Road site.
33. `Please prepare a map showing the relation of the rural buffer to the Eubanks
Road proposed site, and to the existing landfill facility. "
An attached map (Figure C) shows the boundary of the rural buffer relative to the
proposed and existing sites.
34. "Are CH and Carrboro voting or are the S OCC voting? "
Historically, all three governing boards have voted on major solid waste issues such as land
acquisition for a new C&D facility. Due to certain time constraints governing the C&D
siting decision, the Board of Orange County Commissioners has suggested that Carrboro
and Chapel Hill cede decision making authority to Orange County to expedite the final
decision. Chapel Hill agreed on September 13, to cede authority to Orange County. On
September 7, Can-boro also approved ceding authority to Orange County. The full authority
for final decision making regarding the selection of a C&D site now rests with the five
Orange County Commissioners.
35. Why was no Environmental Impact Statement done for the Guess Road site?
North Carolina Statutes exempt landfills from state requirements for an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) because permitting requirements of the North Carolina Solid
Waste Management Rules equal or exceed EIS requirements. However, local
requirements may involve preparation of an EIS prior to receiving zoning approval for a
site. If either of the two proposed sites is pursued, then Orange County Planning
Department will determine if preparation of an environmental document will be required.
(end)
Responses to Questions 10 Joyce Engineering, ngineering, Inc.
I)
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILLS
and CLOSED SANITARY LANDFILLS
N.C. SOLID WASTE SECTION
LAB CERT FIdATION REQUIREMENTS:
The Soliq Waste Section now requires water quality sample anal
by a laboratory certified by the Division of Environme
Management for groundwater analysis (15A NCAC 2H .0800).
laborato ies used for water quality analysis for Solid W
Section facilities shall be certified under the Division
Environmental Management (DEM) Certification program for
approved methods and at the approved levels of certification.
SAMPLING ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REPORTING LIMITS:
Each parameter on the following constituent list shall be certi
at the designated level and an appropriately certified method
for the sample analysis. The data shall be reported at
specif ie4 Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) .
Paramet
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Volatile
For the I
analysis,
organic
GC /MS Met
EPA Methc
SAMPLING
In additi
sampling
specif is
filtering
metals ar
Certification by DEM
PQL in ppb
Metals,
Group
I -
low
level
10
Barium
(20)
500
Metals,
Group
I -
low
level
1
Metals,
Group
I -
low
level
10
Metals,
Group
I -
low
level
10
Mercury
( 21)
1
Metals,
Group
I -
low
level
20
Metals,
Group
II
- low level
10
'sie
tal
The
ste
of
the
ied
ised
the
organic Compounds
tameters and PQLs required for volatile organic compound
refer to the next page of this attachment. For volatile
ialysis the laboratory shall be certified for an SW 846
od (8240 or 8260). The recommended method of analysi is
l 8260.
RD ANALYSIS:
n to sampling for the constituents referenced above, all
hould also include field testing of pH, temperature, and
onductivity. EPA requires analysis for total metals. No
of samples is allowed. The 3030C preparation method for
ilysis is not allowed.
January 1995
P.01
r. c
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOINDS
IC
ITUENT
PQL
(UGiL)
ORGANIC
CONSTITUENT
PQ
(UG/
)
ETONE
100
(40) T- 1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE
1
RYLONITRI
I
200
(41) ETHYLBENZENE
NZENE
5
(42) METHYL BUTYL KETONE
OMOCHLOR
ETHANE
5
(43) METHYL BROMIDE
1
(20) BROMODICHLO
OMgTHANE
5
(44) METHYL CHLORIDE
1
(21) BROMOFORM
5
(45) METHYLENE BROMIDE
1
(22) CARBON DISULI IDE
100
(46) METHYLENE CHLORIDE
i
(23) CARBON TETRA
HLORIDE
10
(47) MEK; 2- BUTANONE
1
(24) CHLOROBENZ
E
5
(48) METHYL IODIDE
I
(25) CHLOROETHAN
10
(49) METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
100
(26) CHLOROFORM
5
(50) STYRENE
1
(27) CHLORODIBRO
OMETHANE
5
(51)1,1,1,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE
5
(28) DBCP
25
(52) 1,1,2,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE
5
(29) ETHYLENE DIB
MIDE
5
(53) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
5
(30) G- DICHLOROBE
ZENE
5
(54) TOLUENE
5
(3I) P- DICHLOROBE
ENE
5
(55) 1,1,1.- TRICHLOROETHANE
5
(32) T- 1,4- DICHLORO
- BUTENE
100
(56) 1,I,.2- TRICHLOROETHANE
5
(33) 1,1- DICHLOROE
5
(57) TRICHLOROETHYLENE
5
(34) ETHYLENE DIC
RIDE
5
(58) CFC -11
5
(35) VINYLIDENE C
ORIDE
5
(59) 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROPROPANE
I
(36) CIS- 1,2- DICHLO
ETHANE
5
(60) VINYL ACETATE
5
(37) T- 1,2- DICHLORO
THEME
5
(61) VINYL CHLORIDE
10
(3 8) PROPYLENE DIC
LORIDE
5
(62) XYLENES
5
(39) CIS- 1,3- DICHLOR
PROPENE
10
ALSO KNOWN AS: (21) BROMOMETHANE, (25) -ETHYL CHLORIDE, (26)- TRICHLOROMETHANE,
(27)- DIBROMOCHLORO ETHANE, ( 28 )- 1,2- DIBROMO.3- CHLOROPROPANE. (29)- 1.2- DIBROMOETHANE,
(34)- 1,2- DICHLOROBEN ENE, (31)- 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE, (33)- ETHYLWENE CHLORIDE,
(34)- 1.2- DICHLOROETH E, (35)- 1,1- DIC4LOROETHENE (ETHYLENE), (36)- CIS- 1,2- DICHLOROETHYLENE,
(37)- TRANS- I,2 -DICHL OETHYLENE. (38)- 1.2- DICHLOROPROPANE, (42)- 2- HEXANONE, (43)- BROMOMET
(44)- CHLOROMETHAN , (45 )-DIBROMOMETHANE, (46)- DICHLOROMETHANE, (47)- METHYL ETHYL KET(
(48)- I0DOMETHANE, (9)-4- METHYL- 2- PENTANONE, (53)- TETRACHLOROETHENE. P£RCHLOROETHYLE1,
(55)- METHYLCHLORO RM, (57)- TRICHLOROETHENE, (58)- TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
** *END * **
SEP -16 -1998 12:09 95% P.02
TABLE 2. SITES EVALUATED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILL
SITE
LOCATION
AREA
EVALUATED
PROPOSED
ACTION
#
(AC)
BY JOYCE
FOR
CONSIDERATION
1
Old NC 86
130
YES(4 /98)
YES
Lack of unanimity among governing boards (excessively priced and rural buffer).
Consideration by all boards prior to establishment of C &D task force.
2
Old NC 86
52
NO
NO
Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable. Site located in
rural buffer. Site price was excessively priced.
3
Old NC 86
86
NO
NO
Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable. Site located in
rural buffer. Site price was excessively priced.
4
Ford Road
68.8
YES(4 /98)
NO
Owner contacted for site walk. Taken off market by owner when told site was
4a
69.69
YES(4 /98)
NO
being considered for C &D landfill.
5
lWombles
185
NO
NO
Site required a one mile long access road. Development costs would be
Loop
excessive.
6
H
312
YES(4 /98)
NO
Western portion of site OC -9 identified during siting study for a municipal waste landfill
in Orange County. Wet conditions and shallow bedrock limit development areas.
7
1 Mt. Willing
75.57
NO
NO
Site located on either side of road. Resulting parcels are too small to develop
Rd.
landfill.
8
Guess Rd.
178
YES(2 /99)
YES
Selected by C &D Task Force for evaluation. Option negotiated with executor.
Proposed for Board consideration.
9
Mt. Carmel
67.65
NO
NO
Site configuration long and narrow. Located in rural buffer
Church Rd.
10
Hwy. 54
59
YES(4 /98)
NO
Site was sold during the evaluation before a decision
could be made to investigate further.
11
Stagecoach
144
NO
NO
Long and narrow. Stream cuts property into two pieces resulting in two long
Road
parcels that are undevelopable.
12
Hwy. 86 & 49
169
YES(2 /99)
YES
Site favored by C &D Task Force. Taken off market by owners when told site was
being considered fo a C &D landfill.
13
Hwy. 70
62.65
NO
NO
Site offered by Duke University. Stream cut property in half making property
undevelopable for a C &D landfill.
14
Brook Hollow
53.08
NO
NO
Stream and pond cut property into thirds making properety undevelopable for
a C &D landfill.
15
Jones Ferry
431
YES(4 /98)
NO
Only 180 acres located in Orange County. Site has rock outcrops and little soil
Rd.
available for cover. Owner would only sell entire site.
16
New Sharon
61
NO
NO
Site configuration long and narrow making site undevelopable.
Church Rd.
17 1
Mill House
113.8
YES(4 /98)
YES
Mrs. Blackwood's property. LOG voted not to pursue.
Rd.
9/20/99
TABLE 2. SITES EVALUATED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILL
SITE
LOCATION
AREA
EVALUATED
PROPOSED
ACTION
#
(AC)
BY JOYCE
FOR
CONSIDERATION
18
Lebanon
117.66
Yes(2 /99)
YES
Site eliminated by C &D Task Force.
Church Rd.
19
INC 49
107.06
NO
NO
Site is actually located in Caswell County.
North
20
New Sharon
54.95
NO
NO
Rock outcrops and power line made site undevelopable.
Church Rd.
21
Little River
67.44
YES(2 /99)
NO
Thin soil profile. Stream located on north side of site reducing area available for
Church Rd.
landfill.
22
Little River
85.26
NO
NO
Stream divides property into two long and narrow parcels making site impractical
Church Rd.
for landfill.
23
Hester Rd
84
NO
NO
Site located on either side of road. Resulting parcels are too small to develop
landfill.
24
East
56.4
NO
NO
Eno River cuts property into two parcels. resulting parcels are too small to
Lebanon Rd
develop a landfill.
25
Saddle Club
80.98
NO
NO
Subdivision established. One lot sold. LOG would have to purchase or
condemn lot.
26
Greene Tract
169
YES(2 /98)
YES
LOG ruled out burial of any waste on site. It can be used
for other purposes such as recycling, transfer, etc.
27
E
32.7
YES(3 /99)
YES
Site adjacent to existing site. Site includes 11.4 ac. of Duke
property and 6.2 ac. of landfill property.
9/20/99
Eubanks Road
Site
Figure C
SCALE
0 Soo 1000 1500
(IN FEET)
DUKE O&W
UNIVERSITY LANDFILL
C&D
DISPOSAL
'EXISTING
C&D LANDFILL ❑ m
x—
O
C
%w
LEGEND
AREA
BOUNDARY OF
RURAL BUFFER
LINED
RESIDENCE
❑ WITH WELL
ElJOANKS
LANDFILL
nOA0
❑
C&D MONITORING
WELL
WETLANDS
❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑
STREAM AS
❑
❑ ❑
00 ❑ 0
0 ❑
SHOWN ON USGS
❑
TOPO MAP
❑
❑
0
t%
❑
SITE SURFACE
DRAINAGE
❑
❑
❑
DIRECTION
❑
❑ 00 ❑ 0
❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑
❑
0 ❑ 000 ❑ 000 ❑
—
❑
❑
Al
0 0
0
UBANKS ROAD
❑
❑
❑ ❑
MEMORANDUM
TO: GAYLE WILSON, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JOYCE ENGINEERING, INC.
RE: RESPONSES TO BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
QUESTIONS ON PROPOSED C &D LANDFILL SITES
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1999
At the Orange County Board of Commissioners meeting held on September 7, 1999, a
brief presentation was held regarding the siting process for a C &D landfill in Orange
County. Questions asked by the Commissioners during that meeting are answered below:
1. What improvements are proposed, or likely to be needed, on Guess Road near the
entrance to the proposed facility?
The need for specific improvements to the proposed entrance has yet to be determined.
Final detailed design will begin after a site is selected for development. However, at this
stage of conceptual design, we do believe that it is possible to design a safe entrance for
this facility. This entrance design would be reviewed and commented upon by NCDOT,
as well as the Board of County Commissioners, and all their requirements would be met
prior to finalizing the design. Existing traffic conditions and site distances would be
carefully considered during this design process. Because this detailed design work has
not yet been performed, we cannot describe the specific features of this entrance. If
adjacent property owners are agreeable to selling, additional property could be purchased
if it appears to improve safety in the area.
2. Is a traffic study going to be completed?
Orange County does not require such a study unless expected traffic increase reaches 800
or more vehicles per day. However, one would be performed if the Board requested it.
3. What recycling rates were assumed when calculating the expected years of
capacity for the two sites? Please furnish expected years of capacity for a
number of different recycling rates.
The attached Table 1 shows expected years of capacity for each facility, based on three
different recycling rates. The baseline case assumes a 10% recycling rate, and is the
basis for our original capacity projections of 12 and 62 years for the Eubanks Road and
Guess Road options. Additional projections are based on recycling rates of 25% and
40 %. For all of the cases, recycling rates are assumed to increase gradually over a period
of about five years before reaching a maximum rate.
Responses to Questions 1 Joyce Engineering, ngineering, Inc.
4. In the presentation, some uncertainty was mentioned concerning the agreement
with Duke University for use of some of their property adjoining the Eubanks
Road Site as administrative buffer. What is the basis of this uncertainty?
Duke University has indicated that they are willing, in principle, to consider such an
agreement. The Attorneys General Office of the NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources has also informed the Chapel Hill- Orange County Department of
Waste Management that an agreement to include leased buffer property into the facility
boundary could be worked out in a manner that is acceptable to the State. However, the
Attorneys General Office emphasized that such an agreement would be the first of its
kind, and that it would need to be crafted as an agreement among three parties: the
landfill owner, Duke University, and the State. The details of the agreement need to be
worked out.
5. What are the distances between each of the two sites and the nearest downstream
surface drinking water supply intakes?
Drinking water supply intakes serving the City of Durham, on the Little River Reservoir,
are approximately six miles downstream from the proposed Guess Road Site. Drinking
water supply intakes serving the Town of Cary, on Jordan Lake, are approximately
twenty -six miles downstream from the proposed Eubanks Road Site.
6. What is the scale for the figures?
Revised Figures A and B are attached with the scale indicated
7. Is there a monitoring network for Eubanks Road? It is not shown.
Revised Figure B shows the well network proposed for Eubanks Road.
8. Report is misleading with respect to traffic impacts. Design capacity of access
routes is not the issue — report does not address the aesthetic impact of 90
additional vehicles per day.
It is true that approximately 90 additional vehicles per day would be traveling the roads
leading to the Guess Road site. They would be using a variety of different routes,
including some not shown on our figures, as each load would originate in a different
location. It would be difficult or impossible to determine the additional vehicle loading
on any given thoroughfare, except to say that it would be less than the total of 90
vehicles. If the Guess Road site were developed, some residents could experience
discomfort and/or inconvenience from truck traffic passing in front of their homes. These
effects were not ignored in an attempt to mislead the reader, but were not discussed
because aesthetic impacts such as these are difficult to measure or quantify.
Responses to Questions 2 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
9. Are the Durham County Commissioners and the Durham City Council being
provided copies of the reports and presentation material concerning this site
selection process?
Copies of permit applications for both sites, the September 1, 1999 Landfill Siting Report,
responses to questions from the Orange County Commissioners and from the public, and
notices of meetings concerning the siting process are being furnished to both governing
bodies as they become available.
Responses to Questions 3 Joyce Engineering, Inc.
TABLE 1 YEARS OF CAPACITY FOR DIFFERENT RECYCLING RATES
Original Baseline Case 10% 25% Recycling Goal 40% Recycling Goal
Recycling Goal
Area #1 GUESS ROAD
Facility Reaches Full 12 14 16
Capacity
Area #2 GUESS ROAD
Facility Reaches Full 62 71 82
Capacity
EUBANKS ROAD Facility
Reaches Full Capacity
14
16
Notes: 1. Initial waste stream data provided by Orange County.
2. Assume 1 % increase per year in waste stream.
3. Assume in place waste density of 1000 pounds per cubic yard.
19
Guess Road
Site
Figure A
SCALE
o soo moo woo
40 FEET!
LEGEND
GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL
RESIDENCE WITH o
WELL
STREAMS AS
DETERMINED BY j
NCDWa
SITE SURFACE
DRAINAGE
DIRECTION
■ .
g�rr o�° Y5'
o / U
i
�I
p
°
-
Z
/
C&D DISPOSAL
AREA
g�rr o�° Y5'
o / U
i
�I
p
F s Road
te
re B
SCALE
0 S00 1000 1500
ON FEET)
DUKE J
UNIVERSITY T
_.y
DISPOSAL
AREA y '
LEGEND II - • - -�'-
RESIDENCE ❑ L'UBAN
WITH WELL KS ROAD ❑
C &D MONITORING ,
WELL
`EXISTING
C &D LANDFILL
f ��c
CLOSED
LANDFILL
LINED
LANDFILL
❑ ❑
WETLANDS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ °
v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
STREAM AS ! ° 0 0
SHOWN ON USGS ❑ ❑ �0C
TOPO MAP ° ❑ ❑ F
SITE SURFACE ° ❑ .Q
DRAINAGE O
DIRECTION ° ❑ 00 ❑ ° 90
❑ ❑
n
r
r ❑
O
E C
Nil
0 CD
fiv
W
EUBANKS ROAD
❑ ❑
`\ ❑..
\ ❑ ❑
1
W- -
;
\
~,"�-_
All
LCIDWEB
LAND CLEARING AND INERT DEBRIS FACILITY LIST
http:// wastenot. ehm .state.nc.us/swhometUicUst.htm
c�;, k � %' k' • .:.\;4•:,:•:r•• . .:. •.,,.? , l. k�. ?.. ,: • k . .. . y �: ♦ .y �, \ \ :. ..�: •, . :.+ �.r . 1 � :yy �y\ kti: \i k£ �� .,. i n'v.�kc• a av .} . S ' �v. . .r.�.. .. o•q.•y..\.. ;..••',.,':, ?. . yy.»\., y+` +�:y:4.».+r .y::a<.v ,y,r } a ,:•, :J,+ • :., ;''.t, 4•. : : :\�'y ..+. ;, . \.,,.:. : . \ ••,.•, ....'� \ •. \ \ �u�� ykb am�� v}. • .+r r \rr`G ;. : : "\' •++v ;•fi .::.}:.,r , , . � . +:A.'v.. '. . � + 'v . y' \„� � ',' '+'�:, . :.' .'', : ' :5xrk .,:',�, \ \ ' .� .':.•.�\. ,+ ..'.•. �>; \`',••'•k.� MCC,••:,. . .A\'`».:a.,::;•. a.: .G: ;ak 'r., :r . :. ; x;.; .. :,S.r;} :;.. �::.,xk ,\ ...r . ' r+y ,, ••: .� • ' {. � �: : v:. r�kc .r :��: ,,.` a y� \.;t .t •a. .L.. 4 q \,w '.ti 3 \.>, . ... •?: ,.• : •,f�;x. ;'`\,:,; '}. ,. y. \ yr , . < •\r,.•.�\:v„. :,•y ...+:. o'y•y y . ,. , ..�� a, , :v . .: • ? '; A; . : •",'r",.w: . .; \'�' v+a�,.: 3 n? 'k�,• a;n +..f..t .k?a;rv. :., : : u .. :.\ \. y : r4• r ,?}+.,+y. �'n •.'a. yti
';, ,' •t ^� C^k \ ^>,, �.? •:rq+.:..'.i.+tit yy?.a . } •\, �.\.. . , , , : \: a .} , : :%,•: ':v v' , �i }� . . ' , . $ \ 4 ' * V +`
`+• '+\�C.': �: y r. '\ ..,:
, y
'° :.� • . ,y .�:,?:;:{ },r�
� ', •
, -•. ':
k
, �• . ,; -+?,y .: ,..:
;: <::•.: ,,:.,•.:•:::: ;::A:•. +:..A•:.,..'� : �•: .:,k:...:..A.+.: \,::5:,:�.:::�� .�„ :\ :..�:�,•. y.,::..,:\„•.:.::.,:,,.,+....,,,•:..,,,• �,•::.,•..»,•::::.,•: x„•..: iS..�'+r.:,•.y�k,..�r.:,•.�:.:, ... ..,....:. \:..:....:......,.,.., C.,k..rn:::a kv :.':?.:..:,:,....:.,'•'ti..�.. 'y: . kv \4...r.
07A BEAUFORT COUNTY ASR 1334 BATH ::DONALD PO BOX 1027 TWA:
DEMO LANDFILL ......................... ............................... DAVENPORT €..........
07B WASHINGTON CITY IMARKET WASHINGTON RUSSELL PO BOX 1988 zWA:
OF STREET WATERS z
10A SOMERSETT SITE FSR 1154 SHALLOTTE SAM B ROUTE 1 BOX 378 A
.............. _.._......_........._.......... €
SOMERSETT €
10C CAROLINA POWER & <HWY 87 SOUTHPORT KERRY A 3932 NEW NEVI
LIGHT CO MACPHERSON HILL- HOLLEMAN ROAD
v .:......:.......:.... .v., .�. ww -.,,, ,:..:.:., :::.:.::.: ET �10D
ILANDSCAPING ENNETH KMC LAIN fPO BOX 10381 SOUTHPORT KENNA NH PO BOX 10381 tsou
10E : BRUNSWICK COUNTY;PO BOX 249 SUPPLY JIMMY VARNER COUNTY MANAGER PO BOX 249 BOL
LCID LANDFILL _
}
.:.........::..........
11A L T PAR LOTT DEMO {HWY 191 ASHEVILLE LT PARROTT 643 BREVARD ROAD ;ASH
1302 CABARRUS COUNTY £SR 2411 :CONCORD RICK PAYNE PO BOX 707 CO�
LANDFILLLCID ...... ...................................................................... ...............................
13D : CHARLOTTE MOTOR - CONCORD ROBERT DAVIS PO BOX 600 - lCOh
SPEEDWAY V
18B NEWTON LCID SITE €SR 1152 CATAWBA S.C. STOWE CITY OF NEWTON PO BOX 550 NEVI
18E HUFFMAN GRADING 34TH STREET HICKORY DOUG HUFFMAN ROUE 2 BOX 20 {HICI
NE
18H CATAWBA COUNTY ISR2019 NEWTON TOMMY LONDON CATAWBA COUNTY! PO BOX 389 NEVI
DEMO LANDFILL
19A WOMBLE - ARRINGTON HWY 15/501 S CHAPEL HILL BOBBY ROUTE 3 BOX 322 CHA
LANDFILL # ARRINGTON
........... 1 ...................................................................... ..............................; ............ .................................; ... ............. ..... ............................... ..................................................... ...........
........ -..
19B WILLIAMETTE SR1916 MONCURE JIM MULLINS PO BOX 230 MOB
INDUSTRIES INC
19C M & W DEMO LYSTRA ROAD CHAPEL HILL ': NELSON WALL 64 WILLOW WAY CHA
LANDFILL 1
........................ .........................................:................................................. ..........:.................... ................ ................................... :.............................................. .................... }..........
24A NANCE SITE SR 1503 CHADBURN RALPH NANCE PO BOX 374 1CHA
................
25B U.S. MARINE CORP #RIFLE RANGE HAVELOCK DOUG NELSON MCAS -NREA ACHE
CHERRY POINT ROAD
25D POINT PROPERTIES US 101 HAVELOCK WILLIAM W PO BOX 1595 ENVI
} g
:...................... ............................... .........................................:............................ ............................... TAYLC
25G CIESZKO lHWY 101 E HAVELOCK EDWARD ICIESZKO P BOX 506 HAV
CONSTRUCTION CO CIESZKO lCONSTRUCTION
Of 9 7/28/99 6:26 PM
ILC]DWFB
W WILKES ROAD 1601 WILKES FAYETTEVILLE
SITE/CUMBERLAND ROAD
COUNTY
iG US ARMY - FORT LAMONT ROAD FORT BRAGG
BRAGG _
>I FAYETTEVILLE CITY AIRPORT ROAD FAYETTEVILLE
OF /AIRPORT
iJ ANDREWS SITE DOC BENNETT FAYETTEVILLE
.'ROAD
iK CROWELL SITE FAYETTEVILLE .
iL SNOW HILL LCID 'SR 2219 FAYETTEVILLE
LANDFILL f
........................................................................,.......................................:....... ............................... .
IA HILL & SONS DEMO 'MIDWAY DAVIDSON
SITE 'TOWNSHIP
A : CALYPSO TOWN OF €PO BOX 327 CALYPSO
,SR1311
............................................................................................................................... ...............................
!B . DURHAM CITY OF FERRELL ROAD:: DURHAM
::...:::. w ::.,,.:0.0. :...::.,w: :.,,,. :.,:
CURRIN "LANDFILL� .m 'SR 1900 :DURHAM
!E LATTA EARL J INC JEAST CLUB :DURHAM
IBLVD
F FOGLEMAN} LAND
FILL JRED MILL ROAD DURHAM
'
H MIDLAND TERRACE t DURHAM
LCID LANDFILL z
_ ....................._...... ...............y............... ...................._ _............_...........
I CURRIN LANDFILL #2 S.R. 1900 DURHAM
B CLARK- LANGLEY INC ASR 1243 ROCKY MOUNT
C BARNHILL ISR 1243 : TARBORO
CONTRACTING
COMPANY
D BARNHILL 'SR 1268 :ROCKY MOUNT
CONTRACTING -GAY
PIT .
..... ...............; ............ ...............................
E BARNHILL 'NCSR 1518 TARBORO
CONTRACTING - ;
APCO
8801 WALTER S FOSTER WINSTON SALEM
2of9
http: / /wastenot.ehnr .state.nc.us /swhomeA- cidisthtm I
LARRY S CARTER 698 ANN STREET £FAY
MICHAEL J DIRECTORATE OF AFZA -DE -DV FOR
ACKERMAN -PUBLIC WORKS....",. :
LEE BRINSON MAINTENANCE PO BOX 642181 »� 'FAY
SUPERVISOR
JACQUELINE CK ANDREWS :1057 ANDREWS ROAD ;FAY
ANDREWS CONTRACTING
JAMES SAFETY DIRECTOR PO BOX 53645 ;FAY
BALLENGEE £
STEVE WATERS SAFETY DIRECTOR :2515 MURCHISON ROAD ;FAY
}
. ...... _ ......... ..........................._...... ...........
................................................:......>_....-
PHILLIP HILL ROUTE 9 BOX 149 TWIN
i
CECIL LANGLEY PO BOX 327 KCAL
t
.......................... .............................................................................................. ...............................
THOMAS A 101 CITY HALL PLAZA # R
BASTABLE_
GLENN CURRIN CURRIN l PO BOX 547Vy YY� �A » I UQ
BROTHERS, INC.
ONSLOW PO BOX 2508 DUFI
PAINTER
JAMES KENTYN FOGLEMAN DEMO» : ROUTE 5 BOX 170 =11
FOGLEMAN LANDFILL
EARL LATTA PO BOX 2508 'DUR
lkLLEN R GLENN OWNER PO BOX 547 'FUQ
CURRIN
R C CLARK 401 FARM ROAD ROC
ROBERT ROSE PO BOX 1529 STAR
BARNHILL IBARNHILL IPO BOX 1529
BARNHILL BARNHILL j1PO BOX 1529
CONTRACTING
BEEMAN 1 1751 PALMER LANE
AR
AR
7/28/99 6:26 PM I
Critique of the Hydrologic Parts of:
1. Orange County Construction and
Demolition Landfill Siting Report
for the Guess Road Site, and
2. Site Plan Application, Site CD -8,
Construction and Demolition Landfill,
Orange County, North Carolina
Z.J. KABALA, PH.D., P.E.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
1
OUTLINE
1. Nature of subsurface environments.
2. The extent of the required hydrologic characteriza-
tion.
3. The size of the proposed Landfill.
4. The extent of the conducted hydrologic characteriza-
tion.
5. Problems with the conducted hydrologic characteri-
zation.
6. Required hydrologic characterization - Revisited.
7. Conclusions.
2
Nature of Subsurface Environments
1. Hydrologic parameters highly spatially variable, as ac-
knowledged in the report (p. ...)
2. Data — the "bottleneck" of hydrogeology.
I Approaches to aquifer characterization.
• Evaluation of water resources —large-scale mea-
surements OK
• Evaluation of contaminant transport — small -scale
measurements necessary!
3
Required Hydrologic Characterization
Citing from your own Landfill Siting Report:
Landfill permitting regulations are structured
such that, before receiving site approval,
and before proceeding to the design phase,
an applicant must demonstrate the following:
• that groundwater flow rate and pathways
at the site are understood, predictable
and characterized,
• that locations of, and pathways to groundwate
supply wells in the vicinity are likewise
characterized,
• that the landfill is not located such
that potentially short and direct pathways
from waste to supply wells will occur;
and that a network of monitoring wells
will be able to detect the release of
landfill constituents before any exceedence
of the Drinking Water Standards occurs
at the points of compliance.
4
The Size of the Proposed Landfill
The size of the proposed landfill is .... (... p. )
Alandf ill —178 acres = 720,340 m2
The Extent of the Conducted
Hydrologic Characterization
The hydrologic characterization was conducted profes-
sionally and within the allocated budget. It probably
produced as much information as the budget
allowed, which is VERY LITTLE.
Let us compare the size of the area of the region influ-
enced by the conducted hydrologic testing with the size of
the proposed landfill. ONLY 4 piezometers and 4
monitoring wells were tested via SLUG TEST
(p. 9 of the Site Plan Application) . No data is provided
in the report to estimate the exact radius of influence.
The radius of influence of a slug test can be safely over-
estimated as R = 10m. Thus the ares hydrologically
surveyed is
Asurveyed _87T10"' m2 = 2513.27 m2
5
The percentage of the tested area is, therefore,
Aland zll . 100% —0.35 %
Asurveyed
IT IS UNACCEPTABLY SMALL.
Problems with the Conducted
Hydrologic Characterization
1. Only much less than 0.5% of the proposed area has
been hydrologically tested.
2. Although the slug test method, used in the hydrologic
characterization along with the Bouwer and Rice in-
terpretation methodology provide the fastest way to
conduct such characterization, THEY ARE THE
LEAST ACCURATE, as demonstrated in a re-
cently published book:
• James J. Butler, The Design, Performance, and
Analysis of Slug Tests, CRC Press, New York, pp.
252, 1998
• Hyder, Z., and J.J. Butler, Slug tests in unconfined
formations - an assessment of the Bouwer and Rice
Technique, Ground Water, 33(1), 16 -22, 1995.
QUOTE FROM THE Abstract:
9
... For slug tests performed in
homogeneous, isotropic formations that
would be classified as aquifers, the
Bouwer and Rice model provides estimates
within 30values. In less - permeable,
clay -rich formations, however, estimates
may overpredict formation conductivity
by more than 100 %. The Bouwer and Rice
model introduces the largest error
(can easily exceed an order of
magnitude) in the presence of a
low - permeability skin. Uncertainty
about anisotropy can also be the
source of considerable error. ...
3. No large scale testing was performed - no pumping
tests
4. No downhole distribution of the hydrologic parame-
ters were obtained - no flowmeter tests
5. Only one temporal snapshot of the water table
was obtained DURING THE DRY SEASON.
Seasonal water table fluctuations and their implica-
tions for leaching contaminants from the landfill have
not been investigated.
6. Wetlands within the landfill indicate groundwater -
surface water interactions. Yet their implications for
7
contaminant transport have not been investigated. Ground-
water level map seems to be rather inaccurate. For
example, it does not indicate any influence of the wet-
lands.
7. A number of hypotheses were posed in the report
and accepted without proof. Also, a number
of incorrect or unsupported statements are in-
cluded and accepted. Among them are claims that:
• There are no flowpaths under the river through the
fractured -rock lower aquifer (Report, p. 22) . This
claim is based only on just two measurements used
to estimate the vertical hydraulic gradient. A large
scale pumping test is needed to demonstrate the
claim.
• Report, p. 12 "For this reason, bulk hydraulic con-
ductivities indicated by the slug tests should be
assumed to represent maximum values." Although
this statement may be true for relatively homoge-
neous formations, it clearly does not cover the
fractured -rock aquifer. In my own flowmeter test
investigations at Duke Forest Gate 11 Site (geologi-
cally similar to the site of the proposed landfill) it is
not uncommon (eg., well MW -3) to encounter just
one 1/2 -foot fracture per 20 feet of a well screen. If
one assumes that the formation can be treated as
a porous medium, as is the case in the report, the
hydraulic conductivity from the slug test will be
underestimated by a factor of 20/(1/2) = 40.
• Applying the concepts of porous medium (Report,
p. 19) and hydraulic conductivity (Report, p. 20)
to the fractured bedrock is highly questionable, es-
pecially for contaminant transport.
• The effective porosity has not been even measured.
The accepted value of "less than M' is taken from
literature [Heath, 1989] that was not subjected to
the stringent quality control of peer- review process.
• The reference relied on in establishing the flow
regime [LeGrand, 19881 is not listed in bibliog-
raphy.
• Report, p. 18, "[The upper aquifer] material can
be reasonably described as hydraulically isotropic."
• The 25 -year storm design criterion for storm wa-
ter control is highly questionable in the vicinity of
drinking water wells and the stream, as demon-
strated by the recent storm.
• Waste screening process in admitting waste to the
landfill has been assumed perfect. Note that small
amount of paint solvents can easily be missed and
can reach groundwater leaching from the landfill
proposed to be constructed WITHOUT A LINER.
• Lead from painted wood and arsenic from pres-
sure treated lumber scrap were assumed to be im-
mobile. However, recent research indicates new
relevant mechanism for their mobilization
— Newman DK, Kennedy EK, Coates JD, Ah-
mann D, Ellis DJ, Lovley DR, Morel FMM,
Dissimilatory arsenate and sulfate reduction in
Desulfotomaculum auripigmentum sp. nov.,
ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 168(5),
380 -3881 1997.
— Newman DK, Ahmann D, Morel FMM, A brief
review of microbial arsenate respiration, GE-
OMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 15(4), 255-
268, 1998.
— Ahmann D, Krumholz LR, Hemond HF, Lov-
ley DR, Morel FMM, Microbial mobilization of
arsenic from sediments of the Aberjona Water-
shed, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECH-
NOLOGY, 31(10), 2923 -29307 1997. ABSTRACT:
Arsenic mobilization from aquatic
sediments is an issue of concern, as
water -borne arsenic can migrate into
pristine areas, endangering aquatic
organisms and people. Such mobilization
in the Aberjona Watershed has distribute(
nearly 20 t of arsenic throughout river,
10
and lake sediments. To gain an
understanding of possible biological
mechanisms contributing to this
transport, mobilization of solid -phase
arsenic was investigated in upper
Aberjona sediment microcosms. Microcosms
catalyzed rapid dissolution of arsenic
from iron arsenate, a solid -phase
surrogate for sedimentary arsenic,
mobilizing 20 -28% of the arsenic
present. Sterilization prevented this
transformation. Reduction of arsenate
to arsenite accompanied iron arsenate
dissolution, suggesting that reduction
was driving dissolution.
Sediment - conditioned, filter - sterilized
medium showed no arsenic - transforming
activity. A native enrichment culture
of sulfate-reducing bacteria possessed
one-fifth of the microcosm activity,
while strain MIT -13, a native
arsenate - reducing microorganism, showed
much greater activity, dissolving 38%
of the arsenic present. Furthermore,
strain MIT -13 mobilized arsenic from
presterilized, unamended upper Aberjona
11
sediments. These observations indicate
that a direct microbial
arsenic - mobilizing activity exists
in the sediments, show that strain
MIT -13 is a strong arsenic - transforming
agent native to the sediments, and
suggest that dissimilatory arsenic
reduction may contribute to arsenic
flux from anoxic sediments in the
most arsenic - contaminated region of
the Aberjona Watershed.
12
Required Hydrologic Characterization
Again, let me cite from your the Landfill Siting Report:
Landfill permitting regulations are structured
such that, before receiving site approval,
and before proceeding to the design phase,
an applicant must demonstrate the following:
• that groundwater flow rate and pathways
at the site are understood, predictable
and characterized,
• that locations of, and pathways to groundwate
supply wells in the vicinity are likewise
characterized,
• that the landfill is not located such
that potentially short and direct pathways
from waste to supply wells will occur;
and that a network of monitoring wells
will be able to detect the release of
landfill constituents before any exceedence
of the Drinking Water Standards occurs
at the points of compliance.
13
CONCLUSIONS
• NEITHER OF THE REQUIRED POINTS
HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY DEMON-
STRATED
• Further study is needed.
14
MEMORANDUM 0-
To: John Link, County Manager W
From: Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste Director
Subject: Response to September 21.Comments by Dr. Z.J. Kabala
Date: September 27, 1999
Attached is a response, prepared by Joyce Engineering, Inc., to the
technical issues. raised by Dr. Kabala at the September 21, 1999
Public Hearing.
In addition to the technical issues raised by Dr. Kabala, there
were repeated references made regarding budgetary restrictions for
the site studies. The implication was that Orange County was not
conducting an adequate environmental evaluation -of the candidate
landfill sites in the interest of meeting some arbitrary budget
constraint. I wish to assure you that this is not the case.
Funds are available within the landfill budget to conduct whatever
environmental analysis is necessary to determine that a site can
be safely developed and operated. Joyce Engineering, Inc. is well
aware of our demand for a high standard of environmental excellence
and thoroughness.
Route Comparison
(measured from intersection of Franklin St. and Columbia St.)
Proposed Route
Probable Route
(86 to 140 to US70 to
(US15 -501 to 185
86 to 57 to Guess Rd.)
to Guess Rd.)
33 miles
23 miles
100% Orange County Rds.
26% Orange County Rds.
1600 VPD East
74% Durham County Rds.
Roadway Design Capacity
per Joyce Engineering
Study dated Sept. 1, 1999
Roadway
Design Capacity
Traffic Counts
Vehicles Per Day
NC 57
13000
New Sharon Church Road
13000
Guess Road
13000
Probable Route
Traffic Counts
per DOT, 1997
(intersection of Carver and Guess Rd.)
North /South Average
16,700
Traffic Counts per Joyce Engineering
Study dated Sept. 1, 1999
Roadway
I Intersection
Traffic Counts
NC 57
INC 57 and Guess Road
3200 VPD South
2200 VPD North
Guess Road
INC 57 and Guess Road
2100 VPD West
1600 VPD East
New Sharon Church I
New Sharon and Guess
700 VPD South
1500 VPD North
Probable Route Traffic Counts
per DOT, 3/30/98
(intersection of St. Mary's/Mason Rd. and Guess Rd.)
2946 South 4242 North
TO: Gayle Wilson, Director,
Orange County- Chapel Hill Department of Solid Waste Management
FR: Jim Bateson, P.G., and Jan McHargue, P.E., Joyce Engineering, Inc.
RE: Response to the September 21, 1999 Comments by Dr. Z.J. Kabala,
concerning Guess Road site characterization
DATE: September 27,1999
This memo is in response to comments by Dr. Z.J. Kabala during the September 21 public hearing on
C &D landfill siting. Our purpose is to clear up any confusion that those comments may have caused, so
that the Board can make informed decisions based on accurate information. Setting the record straight is
important for Orange County and the County's Department of Solid Waste Management. Over the long
run, inflated public perceptions of environmental risk cripple a community's, efforts to find safe,
equitable and affordable solutions to its waste disposal needs.
What perceptions were left with the audience? One was that arsenic from construction and demolition
waste will contaminate large areas around such landfills. Dr. Kabala repeated tonnage figures from a
Superfund site in Massachusetts where arsenic- bearing industrial waste was dumped over a period of
decades onto a floodplain. Comparing this disaster with a modern landfill is not relevant,
particularly in light of the trace levels of arsenic listed in the Environmental Protection Agency's C &D
Leachate Database, or contained in the mass of groundwater monitoring data for North Carolina
landfills.
A second perception was that the engineering and hydrogeologic investigations performed to date at the
Guess Road site were inadequate and poorly designed. Dr. Kabala stated that the arsenic threat
warranted the use of expensive multi -well pumping tests, normally required only at sites with
significant known groundwater contamination. Our methods are industry standard procedures
required by the NC Solid Waste Management Rules. Our study design, and its pre - approval by the NC
Division of Waste Management, were based on the known risks of existing landfills in North Carolina,
and on the accumulated experience of the community of consultants, regulators, and university faculty
who tackle groundwater problems in this state.
We would be happy to discuss these issues with Dr. Kabala in regard to either of the two sites. Specific
comments, with our responses, are attached. We appreciate that Dr. Kabala's arguments for caution in
siting a landfill in the Little River watershed were made in the spirit of public service. However,
influencing public perception through sensationalism, by using information from sites which are not
comparable to C &D landfills, is a disservice to the community. We hope that impressions left by his
words will not prevent reasoned discussion about how best to meet Orange County's solid waste
challenges.
Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala 1 Joyce Engineering, Inc
C &D Landfill Siting September 27, 1999
Orange County, North Carolina
Responses to specific comments by Dr. Z. J. Kabala:
Every single one of the points in Dr. Kabala's review are well known to the community of
environmental consultants, regulators, and university faculty members who work on groundwater
problems in the Piedmont of North Carolina. This community of practitioners maintains an open
dialogue in daily efforts to write, implement, and meet effective environmental regulations and policies.
These efforts aim to match the levels of detail and effort to the level of potential risk at any given site.
An example of this process is NCDENR's review of our investigation plans prior to drilling at the two
Orange County sites.
1. "Only much less than 0.5% of the proposed area has been hydraulically tested."
The calculations presented by Dr. Kabala imply that the required goal of our study is to create a
quantitative model of groundwater flow at the site. This is not the case. His contention that we
achieved only 0.35% of this goal obscures the fact that landfill siting study requirements are designed to
reach a different goal. That goal is to delineate the nature of and limits of groundwater flow paths at the
site. This goal is met through gathering and analyzing water level data, geological data from the
literature, outcrop, drill core, and auger cuttings, grain size analyses, topographic data, and the other
types of information presented in our report. Groundwater flow at landfill sites is to be characterized
not only through the use of numerical models based on well test information from slug tests or pumping
tests. Such reasoning would require several hundred wells at the Guess Road Site.
2. Accuracy of Slug Tests
A large portion of Dr. Kabala's presentation consisted of his criticism of our use of slug tests. He
implied that these tests form the only basis for our site characterization, by ignoring much of the careful
and informed geological reasoning and data contained in the report. JEI and State regulators, are
familiar with the references he cited and fully aware of the limitations of using slug tests. In landfill
siting studies, slug tests are used mainly to provide a relative comparison of the transmissive capability
of the soil profile at different depths. JEI employed the Bouwer and Rice method, which is
recommended by NCDENR for such purposes in shallow wells. We have attached a policy
memorandum issued by the Groundwater Section of NCDENR, that concerns applicability and
acceptable methods for slug tests in groundwater investigations.
The comparative study of slug test methodology contained in the book (Butler, 1998) cited by Dr.
Kabala is based on tests performed in a shallow sand aquifer, and the comparison is not valid for
weathered crystalline rock
3. 'Wo large scale testing was performed —no pumping tests."
Dr. Kabala argued that the risk of dissolved arsenic from pressure - treated wood reaching the Little River
warranted the use of expensive multiple well pumping tests. To our knowledge, such tests have not
been employed prior to siting a landfill anywhere in this state. These tests are normally only required at
sites where groundwater contamination has been identified, and where that contamination poses an
imminent threat to public health and safety. See the attached Policy Memorandum referenced above.
Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala 2. Joyce Engineering, Inc
C&D Landfill Siting September 27, 1999
Orange County, North Carolina
4. "No downhole distribution of the hydrologic parameters were obtained — no flowmeter. "
See #3 above. The potential risk associated with C &D landfills does not warrant such expense at the
siting stage. It would take numerous of these flowmeter tests to be able to know much more about
groundwater flow at the site than is already known on the basis of existing information.
S. "Only one temporal snapshot of the water table was obtained during the dry season. Implications of
seasonal water table fluctuations and variability of groundwater flow direction as well as their
implications for leaching contaminants from the landfill have not been investigated. "
Additional wet season water level measurements will be taken at the site before completion of the
second part of the application, the Design Study Application. The Solid Waste Section does not issue
landfill permits unless wet season water level information has been collected at a site. In addition, the
applicant must submit and analyze sufficient archival meteorological data and regional recording well
hydrograph data to support a conservative estimate of future long -term seasonal high water levels
beneath a site. Design base grade elevations are required to be a minimum of four feet above these
conservatively estimated long term high elevations, to prevent the interaction of waste and groundwater
and minimize leaching of contaminants.
6 "Wetlands within the landfill indicate groundwater- surface water interactions, yet their implications
for contaminant transport have not been investigated. Groundwater level map seems to be rather
inaccurate. For example, it does not indicate any influence of the wetlands. "
A properly constructed groundwater level map based on July conditions at the site should not reflect any
influence of the wetlands. At the time represented by the water level map (July) the areas classified as
wetlands on the site, each smaller than one -third acre, were dry. During July hand auger investigations
within the delineated wetland areas, we did not locate any confining layer that would indicate perching
of groundwater, nor did we encounter moist soils indicating discharge of deeper water. Water levels in
our wells near the wetland were well below ground surface. Our water level maps and cross sections do,
however indicate the influence of the pond on the site. The groundwater level map required for the
Design Study will be based on wet season data, and may reflect some influence of the wetlands at that
time of year.
7. "A number of hypotheses were posed in the report and accepted without proof. Also, a number of
unsupported statements were included and accepted. "
• Our statements concerning the effectiveness of the nearby stream as a downgradient discharge point
are based not only on our measurement of vertical gradients in the well pair. The vertical foliation
of the subsurface rock units, and the high density of vertically oriented fractures in core samples and
site outcrop indicate high transmissivities in the vertical dimension. No shallow confining layer was
encountered in the area near this stream.
• Our statement that slug test values should be assumed to represent maximum values was meant to
reflect our interpretation of results for those wells screened near the transition from regolith to
bedrock. Most of the wells in our study were screened in this horizon, as it is a critical horizon,
Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala
C&D Landfill Siting
Orange County, North Carolina
Joyce Engineering, Inc
September 27, 1999
where the bulk of the lateral groundwater flow in Piedmont surficial aquifers is known to occur.
Wells screened within this horizon of high fracture density and of high local fracture connectivity
will have "fast" near -field responses, resulting in slug test overestimates of bulk hydraulic
conductivity. Measurements obtained from core at the Guess Road Site indicate fracture densities at
least an order of magnitude greater than those reported by Dr. Kabala for the Duke Gate 11 site.
JEI and the NC Solid Waste Section are well aware of the limitations associated with applying
porous media concepts to fractured bedrock aquifers. The approximations arrived at on the basis of
a porous media approach are justifiable partly on the basis of the high fracture densities in the lower
parts of the weathering profile beneath the site, and in the upper parts of bedrock. Use of these
approximate methods are also justifiable on the basis of the low environmental risk associated with
C &D waste.
• Questions about the accuracy of the 1% effective porosity estimate used for our calculations are
moot, as the magnitude of this value is critical only for calculations applicable to the porous media
approach.
• The uppermost parts of regolith referred to on page 18 of the Site Application are composed of
completely weathered predominantly silty material, and can indeed be expected to act in an isotropic
manner.
• The 25 -year storm design criterion for storm water control is not "highly questionable ". This
criterion exceeds the 10 -year design storm required by the sedimentation and erosion control rules
implemented by the North Carolina Land Quality Section, and is equivalent to the standard used for
lined municipal landfills. Design parameters for sedimentation and erosion control devices proposed
at the facility are yet to be established. Criteria for these will be established during the detailed
design required by the Construction Plan Application process, and could be based on a larger, less
frequent storm.
The EPA recently published results of extensive research in support of its decision to recommend
disposal of lead -based paint debris in C &D landfills rather than lined municipal landfills. In their
report, they state: "Thus, at the national level, the modeling results indicate that the impact on
groundwater at drinking -water wells down gradient of C &D landfills accepting LBP debris appears
to be very low and would only occur after an extremely long period of time. " (Federal RegisterNol.
63, No. 243/Friday, December 18, 1998/ Proposed Rules; Lead; Management and Disposal of Lead -
Based Paint Debris).
• In making the case for a high risk from dissolved arsenic, Dr. Kabala cited three laboratory studies
about the role bacteria play in dissolving arsenic under conditions devoid of oxygen. While correct
in stating that landfill waste becomes oxygen - starved, he says nothing about just how quickly these
extreme conditions change with distance from waste. He mentions nothing about the acidity of the
site subsurface, its high clay content, or its high iron oxide and sulfide contents, all of which tend to
adsorb free arsenic or limit its solubility. Nothing was mentioned about the concentrations of arsenic
found in the EPA's C &D Leachate Database (May 18, 1995 Draft Report on Construction and
Demolition Landfills, prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available online.
Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala 4 Joyce Engineering, Inc
C&D Landfill Siting September 27, 1999
Orange County, North Carolina
Contact JEI if you would like to obtain the web address.). His statements were not made with the
benefit of existing data on the trace concentrations measured in monitoring wells at existing older
unlined landfills in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Any ability of an aquifer to dilute and disperse
these trace concentrations was not considered in his arguments.
Instead, Dr Kabala repeated tonnage figures from a Superfund site in Massachusetts where
concentrated arsenic- bearing industrial waste was dumped over a period of decades onto a floodplain
above a shallow water table. The arsenic traveled in an aquifer of glacial sediment, which lacks the
sorptive capabilities of the red clay soil typical of both sites under consideration. The next
morning's Raleigh News and Observer reported "pressured wood" as having been shown to mobilize
20 tons of arsenic from a landfill. Such confusion may not have been Dr. Kabala's intent, but his
remarks have further distorted the public's perception of the environmental risk associated with
landfills.
Response to Comments of Dr. Z.J. Kabala
C&D Landfill Siting
Orange County, North Carolina
Joyce Engineering, Inc
September 27, 1999
SEP -27 -1999 •14 24 JOYCE ENGINEERING, INC.
Sicte of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmentol Management
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretory
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.. Director
1 336 323 0093 P.02iO4
C.�EHNF41
GROUMWATFR SECTION
October 6. 1995
Environmental Service Companies
and Consubtats
Subject: Changes in Technical-Policy Concerning Slug Tests
This is to notify you of specific corrections and revisions that were made to the slug t St
Policy statement that was issued on Am 30, 1994. The June 30; 1994 statement indicated that she
Division of Environmental Management (DEK would only reimburse for slug tests per ormea iti
monitoring wells that were constructed withthe calk* length of well screen and sand pack within The
saturated zone. Based on further evaluation of the published scientific literature, the DEM has
amended its policy to allow for retmbum mart of slug tests-performed in mordtori.ng wells that :ire
screened across the water table, provided that these tests are implemented and analyzed in accordance
with the peer- reviewed, published test method utilized.
Bouwer and Rice (1976 and 2989) and Hvorslev (1951) are the most common test niedicds
used for partially penetrating wells in unconfined aquifers These mediods may be used fur both
"slug -in" tests .(falling head tests) and "slug -out" tests (rising head, recovery or bait tests) . in
monitoring wells where the well screen .and sand pack are entirely below the water table. For
monitoring wells screened across the water table, these methods may only be used for slug -out
tests. Slug -in tests are not appropriate, since part of the water added, would flow out of the well into
the vadose zone resulting in an overestimation of the hydraulic conductivity. Furthennore, it should
be noted that only the length ofwell screen located in the saturated zone should be used ro: ralculatc
hydraulic conductivity. Using the total screen length would result in under estimating tlds ;gar 3:r. t r
The June 30, 1994 policy statement also indicdFd that hydraulic conductivity value btained
thorn slug tests would not be allowable for use in groundwater models. However, Since slug Cests sera
generally considered an appropriate means of estimating the ordcr of inagnitudc of hydraulic
conductivity, the DEM has revised its .policy to allow for the use of slug test data tc model
groundwater flow at locations where there are no potentially impacted receptors that pose a risk ro
lurman health and the enviroriment'and.where corrective action under NCAC 15.E 2L.0106 (k).(1)' q;
(in) is proposed. Pumping tests will still be required for locations where it is necessary .o o timin the
most accurate hydrogeologic data possible (e.g., there are potentially impacted receptors that may
P= a risk to human health or the environment, or for designing groundwater remediation systcn:s
that involve the withdrawal of groundwater).
P.O. Sox 29635. RGielgh. North Caroino 276260SX Telephone 919- 733 -7015 FAX 914- 733 -2496
An Fgvd opp*OUM VA*matkm Action FrmMoyor 6D% recycled/ 10%x- conwTier popor
SEP -27 -1999 14:25 JOYCE ENGINEERING INC. 1 336 323'0093 P.03/04
Envirorunental Service Companies and Consultants
October 6, 1995
past
Please be advised that :slug:ta4 generally underesti=te-hydraulic conductivity. Therefore,
it is reconuncnded that soil/sedimgnt.-•samples. be colleetia from the saturated zone from the most
transmissive layers in which the weft are-screened and that these sarnples.be analyzed for grain size
distribution. Hydraulic conductivity a say;be.calculated from the =grain size distribution data using an
appropriate method [e.g., IWO (1911), March and Dewy (1966) or Sherard. Dunningan and ralbot
(1984)]. The slug test values should .then be compared to the grain size analysis hydraulic
conductivity values as well as topubhshed lrydraulie conductivity values for the specific soil/sedirnent
type, additionally. to detcrmiite the variability in hydraulic conductivity at a site, slug ?ests should
be performed is monitoring wells located in strata likely to exhibit differing hydrogeologic properties,
(The DEM will currently reimburse up to $1,500.00 for implernwtadon. of 0 necessary slug tests at
a site.) For purposes of modeling groundwater flow, the greatest hydraulic conductivity values
should then be used to ensure conservative model output
Y would h1ce to take this opportunity to'stress that the-DEM will not reimburse for slug tests
or any other aquifer tests that are-performed improperly. -If you have any questions or would like
further information concerning dug-tests, please contact Ruth Strauss at (519). 733.1330.
Sincerely,
Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Chief, Groundwater Section
cc: Regional Mace Groundwater Supervisors
Burrie Boshoff
Bill Reid
George MatWs f
Ruth Strauss
SEP -27 -1999 14:25 JOYCE ENGINEERING, INC. 1 336 323 0093 P.04/04
MERF.NCES
Bouwer, 11, and R.C. Rice, 1976, "A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity or
Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Pu ially Penetrating Wells," Water Resources
Research v.12, no, 3, pp. 423 - 428,
Bouwer, H., and R.C. Rice, 1989, "The Bouwer and-Rice Slug Test - An Update, 4SToundurater,
v. 27, no. 3., pp. IS - 20.
Hazen, A,., 1911, "Discussion of `Damson Sand Foundations,' by A.C. Koenig," Transactions of
the American Society of Cavil Engineers, v. 73, p. 199.
Horslcv, M.J., 1951. "Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Groundwater Observations," U.S..ArMy
Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin 36. Vicksburg, isissippi.
Masch, F.D., tmd X1. Denny, 1966, "Grain -Size Distribution and its Effect on the Permeability of
Unconsolidated Sands," Water Resources Research, v. 2, pp. 665.677.
Sherard, J.L., L.P. Dunningan and J.R. TaIbot, 1984, `Basic Propetties of Sand and Gravel
Filters," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v. 110, no. GT6, pp, 684 -700.
f
TOTAL P.04
Zibegniew Kabala Duke University, Durham, NC 660 -5479
Jerry Greene 8601 Doughton Drive Bahama, NC 27503 479 -6624
Carrie Oren 8609 Doughton Drive Bahama, NC 27503 477 -3712
Ram Oren Duke University, Durham, NC 613 -8032
Tom Dunne 6539 New Sharon Church Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572 644 -1330
Dennie Newton8917 Millers Bend Bahama, NC 27503 477 -9748
Frances Fletcher 8602 Doughton Bahama, 27503
479 -1105
y
Richard Ebersohl 6519 New Sharon Church Rd. 27572
644 -0814
Lynn Karatz 6535 New Sharon Church Rd. 27572
732 -5212
644 -7238
Emily Martin 4605 Guess Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572
Lisa Winstead 8516 Doughton Dr. Bahama, NC
644 -7238
471 -6920
Rob Fletcher 8602 Doughton Bahama, 27503
Joyce Beasley 8710 McBroom Rougemont, NC 27572
644 -0779
Larry Johnson, NC 5815 Jamison Rougemont, NC 27572
732 -1637
m Campbell 8208 Bromley Hillsborough, NC 27278
Barry Marlowe 4517 Guess Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572
644 -6895
643 -1608
Darlene Marlowe 4517 Guess Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572
644 -6895
Nancy Schilke 6311 Acorn Ridge Hillsoborough, NC 27278
643 -1608
Sandra Toler 8709 Mill House Lane Bahama, NC 27503
471 -0314
7� n Karatz 6535 New Sharon Church Rd. 27572
Zathy
732 -5212
E bersoh16519 New Sharon Church Rd. 27572
-
644 0814
en Martin, 4605 Guess Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572
644 -7238
can Dunne 6539 New Sharon Church Rd. Rougemont, NC 27572
644 -1330
Rob Fletcher 8602 Doughton Bahama, 27503
479 -1105
L. Forrestek 1210 Cole Mill Rd. Durham, NC 27715
383 -8551
m Campbell 8208 Bromley Hillsborough, NC 27278
471 -3608
ike Schilke 6311 Acorn Ridge Hillsoborough, NC 27278
643 -1608
POSSIBLE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
TO C &D AISPOSAL IN ORANGE COUNTY
1 _ Reject the Little River site.
2. Accept the need to take local responsibility for C &D recycling and disposal.
3. Use Eubanks Road as an interim option.
4. Aggressively explore a fresh perspective on siting and recycling C&D and other solid
waste facilities_
1. Little River
There are many reasons to reject this site for landfilling purposes:
a. Orange County s historical commitment to watershed protection, with or
without the appreciation of neighboring jurisdictions;
b. Transportation issues that include excessive distances traveled, leading to
greater costs and pollution; accident hazards on a local road in a rural community not
zoned for high - intensity, non - residential uses; the likelihood of truckers traveling through
downtown Hillsborough and through Durham city and county rather than choose less
deleterious routes;
c. A 60 -year burial horizon is excessive and counter to placing an emphasis on
recycling.
d. Regional cooperation mandates treating our neighbors, and their concerns, as
we ourselves wish to be treated;
e. The safety of disposal at the site is open to question, both in geological and
oversight terms.
SUGGESTED ACTION: Reject the Little River site and direct the planning Board and
Commission for the Environment, working with appropriate staff, to develop and
recommend criteria for restricting the location of landfills and other, similar operations in
watersheds, the rural buffer, etc.
2. C&D Disposal
Despite the unlikely prospect a new mixed -waste landfill will be sited in Orange
County, it remains important to take responsibility for disposal of our own wastes to the
greatest degree possible. Construction and demolition waste particularly lends itself to
recycling, and its collection helps defray other recycling costs.
Any C&D burial site must be created as part of an aggressive recycling strategy,
and should not function as a witting or unwitting subsidy for development.
SUGGESTED ACTION: See 4, below.
3. Eubanks Road
There are as many reasons to reject the Eubanks Road site for reasons of equity
and long -terra viability as there are to accept it for reasons of cost and convenience.
Disadvantages:
a. Continued adverse impacts on the same, long-suffering neighborhood;
b. Possible need to conderm property;
c. Limited life expectancy of site.
Advantages:
a. Proximate to primary sources of waste generation;
b. Readily accessible via major transportation corridors;
c. Convenient to current solid waste operations;
d. Adjacent to property owned by landfill and potentially available for expansion of
solid waste operations (NW, transfer station).
SUGGESTED ACTION: Accept Eubanks Road as an interim option. Develop a C &D
landfill there but pledge to thoroughly seek other sites, with the stated intention of finding
an alternative by the time the current MSW landfill is projected to close. (Simply choosing
to bury C&D in the MSW landfill is also an option, but one that's costly and tends to
impose greater time pressure on the process of developing alternative sites and
approaches.)
4. C &D Recycling
We need to go beyond current efforts to explore C &D recycling. Greater emphasis
must be placed on developing a creative, proactive, comprehensive C&D recycling
program_ This might include:
a. A source separation ordinance, perhaps including on -site burial in some cases,
that would increase the efficiency of recycling efforts;
b. Exploration of cynergies such as that between school and government use of
mulch, the need to find good alternatives to burning debris from site clearing, and
construction scraps brought to the landfill Similar wholistic approaches can be taken
toward agricultural waste, municipal biosolids (sludge), and other supposedly unwanted
byproducts generated within the county;
c. Explore whether C&D recycling is a viable economic development opportunity,
and whether it should be pursued and sited as such.
SUGGESTED ACTION: Seek a grant from the N.C. Department of Commerce to
develop a C &D site- separation recycling ordinance (unknown in the state) and to explore
the economic viability of C&D recycling in relation to current and projected markets and
as a public, private, or public /private venture. This would include studying what is done
elsewhere within and beyond North Carolina, and would be a joint undertaking of the
Economic Development Commission, the current solid waste staff, and the new Solid
Waste Advisory Board. The grant application deadline is Oct. 29_
Relations with Durham County L 1444-
There is considerable (and understandable) anger growing within Durham County with
regard to this project. It has not escaped notice that while on the one hand Carrboro,
citing the potential pollution of drinking water, recently turned down a request to put an
organic golf course in the University Lake watershed, while Orange County is proceeding
full speed ahead to put a C &D landfill within a stone's throw of Durham's Lime River.
The assumption made in Durham County is that the difference here has to do with whose
watershed is threatened.
This issue has the potential to poison relations between Durham and Orange Counties for
years to come. Consider:
- -The Durham County Commissioners have already expressed their opposition to this
project.
-- Durham County is intervening with the state DNER to oppose the issuance of a permit
for this facility.
-- Durham County's zoning ordinance would not allow the development of any C&D
landfill this close to the Little River. If this site were a few hundred yards to the east it
would not be permitted because of Durham County's watershed protection zoning.
-- Consider what will happen the first time wastes from this facility are found floating
down the Little River?
-- Consider what will happen the first time there is a serious accident along Guess Road
(or elsewhere along the transportation route) due to debris falling onto the roadway from
trucks heading to this facility?
http: / /wastenot. ehnr .state.nc.us /swhome /Cdwaste.txt
6-r -- " f411
SOLID WASTE SECTION
CLARIFICATION OF MATERIALS ACCEPTABLE
FOR DISPOSAL AT A
CONSTRUCTION /DEMOLITION LANDFILL
MAY 1, 1997
This memo provides clarification of the types of materials acceptable for disposal at a
construction /demolition landfill.
A construction /demolition debris landfill (CDLF) is not defined in the statutes or rules,
but is generally permitted to accept construction /demolition debris, wastes acceptable for
disposal in a land clearing -inert debris landfill, and other wastes approved by the Division.
Construction /demolition debris is defined in the statutes as waste or debris resulting
solely from construction, remodeling, repair, or demolition operations on pavement, buildings, or
other structures. Land clearing debris is defined in the rules as waste that is generated solely
through land clearing activities such as stumps, trees, limbs, brush, grass, and other naturally
occurring vegetative matter.
A land clearing -inert debris landfill is defined in the rules as a facility for the land
disposal of land clearing waste, concrete, brick, concrete block, uncontaminated soil, gravel and
rock, untreated and unpainted wood, and yard trash. Yard trash is defined as solid waste resulting
from landscaping and yard maintenance such as grass, tree limbs, and similar material.
A CDLF may also accept asbestos waste for disposal as long as it is managed in
accordance with the Rule .0505(11)(d) of the solid waste management rules. In accordance with
Rule .0505(11)(b) no hazardous or liquid waste may be accepted for disposal.
The Division may approve other wastes for disposal in CDLFs that are similar to wastes
typically found in the land clearing -inert debris and construction /demolition waste streams.
Examples would be wastes generated by a roofing shingle manufacturer, waste building
materials from a mobile home manufacturer, and wooden pallets.
Also, The Division may approve wastes to be disposed in a CDLF that can be
demonstrated to be "inert" through the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure(TCLP).
7/28/99 6:30 PM
1of1
From: Christopher J. Oliver <coliver @dot. state. nc.us>
To: bnitram @earthlink.net <bnitram @earthlink.net>
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 12:55 PM
Subject: Crash Statistics
September 21, 1999
Ms. Emily Martin
4605 Guess Road
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
Dear Ms. Martin,
Subject: Crash Listing for the Section of NC 157 -Guess Road from
1 -85 to the Orange County
me i ur am oun y
Enclosed you will find the requested information for the time
period from January 1, 1996 through June 30, 1999. The crash
statistics have been generated and are available through North
Carolina's Crash Database. This database provides an inventory
of reported crashes on record that have occurred at this
location. Please note that many traffic crashes go unreported
for a variety of reasons, and this report simply provides a
listing of all crashes on record as occurring within 0 feet of
the section described above.
If you need any further assistance, please contact me at your
convenience at (919) 715 -0140.
Sincerely,
Christopher J. Oliver, E.I.T.
Traffic Safety Engineer
CJO:co
Attachments
9/21/99
Page 1 of 1
--r � 5 �:[- s ~tie -
I � " \,e 5
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 1
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
1 052909 3/16/96 1122 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
2 055802 3/21/96 0803 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
3 061459 3/30/96 2005 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2300 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
4 069686 4/12/96 2145 SIDESWIPE $1500 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
5 087618 5/09/96 1642 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
6 088350 5/10/96 1541 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =E
7 097001 5/23/96 0729 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $8000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
8 106144 6/06/96 1852 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
9 118009 6/23/96 1434 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
10 124230 7/03/96 1740 ANGLE $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
11 131864 7/15/96 1100 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1150 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 2
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
12 143958 8/02/96 0806 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
13 144696 8/03/96 1132 ANGLE $8000 1 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
14 144716 8/03/96 0701 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $7000 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 060,DIR =S
15 152912 8/15/96 1642 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
16 158243 8/23/96 1750 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
17 158953 8/24/96 2228 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2200 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
18 169217 9/07/96 0938 ANGLE $3900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
19 175788 9/16/96 1429 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
20 211781 11/02/96 1434 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6000 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
21 211794 11/02/96 1629 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
22 216746 11/08/96 0816 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 3
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
23 230324 11/25/96 1726 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3000 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
24 234123 11/30/96 1816 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4000 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
25 237346 12/04/96 2123 ANGLE $6900 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
26 248549 12/17/96 1756 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3800 4 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
27 258023 12/30/96 1903 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $10000 2 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
28 258027 12/30/96 2050 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $800 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
29 015317 1/24/97 1729 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 1 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
30 032125 2/18/97 1121 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1550 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
31 061144 4/02/97 0220 NO- COLLISION - OVERTRN $5000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY = NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
32 070049 4/15/97 0758 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
33 071448 4/17/97 1220 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION — T'RAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 4
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
... I�OCAT I ON .. .
SECTION OF NC 157 —GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
34 080336 4/29/97 0815 LEFT TURN —SAME ROAD $8500 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =020,DIR =S
35 084456 5/05/97 1823 LEFT TURN —SAME ROAD $3400 NS NS
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
36 110207 6/11/97 1503 SIDESWIPE $3700 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
37 133343 7/16/97 2216 ANGLE $1800 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
38 138840 7/24/97 1042 LEFT TURN —SAME ROAD $900 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
39 182799 9/28/97 1456 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $950 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
40 184734 10/01/97 0853 RAN OFF ROAD — LEFT $59300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =W
41 189729 10/07/97 1144 ANGLE $800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
42 190322 10/01/97 0853 RAN OFF ROAD — LEFT $59300 1 DRY DAY"
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =W
43 199700 10/21/97 1154 LEFT TURN —SAME ROAD $2800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
44 202017 10/24/97 1531 LEFT TURN —SAME ROAD $2000 1 DRY DA's'
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 5
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
45 207062 10/30/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
46 227713 11/22/97
VEHICLE 1 =VAN
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK
47 245845 12/16/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
48 251614 12/23/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2 =VAN
49 258609 12/16/97
VEHICLE 1 =VAN
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
50 009041 1/15/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
51 009066 1/15/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK
52 014771 1/23/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
53 020755 1/31/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
54 032686 2/18/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON
55 044004 3/08/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
1649 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $800
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0730 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1739 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $10300
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1334 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3000
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1739 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $750
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0717 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4000
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0828 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $6200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
2115 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2800
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1814 ANGLE $1200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1913 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1637 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
WET DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
3 DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
1 1 WET DAY
,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
WET DAY
,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
WET DUSK
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
WET DAY
,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 6
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
56 051803 3/19/98 2042 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
57 076924 4/24/98 0852 BACKING UP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
58 086962 5/08/98 1931 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1800 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
59 089012 5/11/98 1802 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
60 099205 5/27/98 1759 SIDESWIPE $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
61 104875 6/04/98 1346 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3250 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
62 110720 6/12/98 0815 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
63 115803 6/20/98 1228 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY= NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
64 136722 7/22/98 1655 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
65 137366 7/23/98 1744 ANGLE $4000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
66 150220 8/10/98 1604 SIDESWIPE $1700 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK TRACTOR O,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 7
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
67 152924 8/14/98 1715 SIDESWIPE $800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
68 155030 8/17/98 1208 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $850 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
69 160202 8/24/98 2128 ANGLE $5000 2 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - IMPAIRMENT UNKNWN,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
70 166061 9/02/98 2345 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
71 166880 9/03/98 2135 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 3 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
72 189075 10/04/98 0528 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3700 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
73 195490 10/13/98 0748 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
74 197822 10/16/98 1555 ANGLE $3500 1 3 NS NS
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
75 204822 10/25/98 2216 SIDESWIPE $1300 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY = NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
76 216006 11/08/98 1222 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 8
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
77 232605 11/29/98 1647 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 060,DIR =W
78 241011 12/10/98 1738 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
79 250279 12/21/98 1613 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
80 006433 1/11/99 1559 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
81 019051 1/30/99 1853 SIDESWIPE $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
82 022321 2/04/99 0849 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5300 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
83 028969 2/14/99 2354 SIDESWIPE $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
84 039143 2/28/99 1353 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $600 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
85 046096 3/09/99 1221 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
86 054434 3/24/99 2032 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3000 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
87 077670 4/27/99 0822 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 9
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
88 078374 4/28/99 1801 ANGLE $1500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
89 084430 5/05/99 1642 ANGLE $6000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
90 087560 5/04/99 1728 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
91 093466 5/18/99 1250 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $9000 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
92 105738 6/04/99 1808 ANGLE $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
93 115058 6/17/99 0933 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1100 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
94 118257 6/21/99 1403 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $150 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
95 234103 11/30/96 1822 SIDESWIPE $200 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
96 234124 11/30/96 1822 SIDESWIPE $500 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
97 037075 2/26/97 1703 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $5000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
98 180813 9/25/97 0841 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2400 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 10
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
99 180831 9/25/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK
100 215651 11/09/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON
101 217871 11/12/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
102 234994 12/02/97
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 4 AXLES
103 245055 12/15/97
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
104 054751 3/23/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK
105 069849 4/14/98
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK TRACTOR
106 199931 10/19/98
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
107 229877 11/25/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
108 010931 1/18/99
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES
109 109182 6/09/99
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
1055 RGHT TURN -SAME ROAD $6500
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1618 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3800
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1910 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1320 SIDESWIPE $103
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1716 SIDESWIPE $2900
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1335 REAREND TURN $2250
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0258 FIXED OBJECT $0
S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1408 SIDESWIPE $2250
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1655 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0529 ANGLE $6500
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0021 SIDESWIPE $600
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
WET DARK
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
DRY DUSK
,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
WET DARK
,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 11
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
110 126370 3/09/99 0904 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1900 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
111 001702 1/03/96 1905 SIDESWIPE $2500 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
112 090400 5/13/96 1749 HEAD ON $500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 110,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
113 132692 7/16/96 2333 REAREND TURN $500 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - IMPAIRMENT UNKNWN,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
114 244531 12/12/96 1516 ANGLE $2800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
115 007150 1/12/98 0639 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3500 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
116 009043 1/15/98 1630 ANGLE $900 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
117 025350 2/07/98 2146 SIDESWIPE $3100 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
118 069874 4/14/98 1314 BACKING UP $1000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
119 216502 11/09/98 1553 ANGLE $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
120 122795 6/28/99 1532 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $5000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 12
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
121 242900 12/10/96 1737 ANGLE $1600 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
122 067942 4/12/99 1036 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
123 152704 8/14/97 1734 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
124 075379 4/22/98 1907 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2250 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
125 061343 4/02/98 0744 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2600 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
126 230302 11/25/96 0741 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
127 002576 1/05/99 1446 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3200 1 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
128 002879 1/06/97 2058 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5000 2 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
129 067217 4/10/98 1628 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $8000 3 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
130 033456 2/20/99 1449 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
131 084418 5/05/99 1854 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 13
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
132 068383 4/10/96 1400 SIDESWIPE $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
133 201291 10/19/96 1748 ANGLE $700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =E
134 250484 12/22/97 0810 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
135 252483 12/24/97 1345 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3700 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
136 192834 10/09/98 0849 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
137 066744 4/10/99 1439 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
138 098795 5/25/99 1810 SIDESWIPE $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
139 115972 6/20/96 1311 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1075 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
140 223421 11/18/97 0707 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 11 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
141 052792 3/20/98 1545 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR -DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
142 065545 4/08/98 1755 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 14
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
143 145649 8/04/98 1229 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $7000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
144 151495 8/22/98 1319 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
145 005389 1/09/99 1457 ANIMAL $1000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
146 034032 2/21/99 0513 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $5000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
147 039801 3/01/99 1657 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
148 046011 3/08/99 1157 RGHT TURN -SAME ROAD $3000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
149 055501 1/02/99 0838 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
150 073640 4/21/99 1920 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
151 086075 5/07/99 1736 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
152 095031 5/20/99 2108 BACKING UP $2400 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
153 099508 5/26/99 1344 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $750 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 15
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
154 121513 6/26/99 1824 SIDESWIPE $900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
155 085747 5/06/96 1501 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3600 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
156 148799 8/09/96 1312 ANGLE $2000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
157 199918 10/19/98 1313 ANGLE $4500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY=HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= MOTORCYCLE ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
158 003269 1/06/99 0817 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
159 054922 3/25/99 0820 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
160 014073 1/18/96 1230 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2750 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
161 170459 9/09/96 1242 ANGLE $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
162 223159 11/16/96 1615 SIDESWIPE $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
163 007461 1/12/97 2012 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3900 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
164 065211 4/08/97 1635 ANGLE $6000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR-
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 16
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
165 109579 6/10/97 0719 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $300 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= SCHOOL BUS ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
166 212053 11/04/97 1734 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
167 252078 12/23/98 1157 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1150 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
168 152703 8/14/97 1108 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6500 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
169 194803 10/11/96 1715 HEAD ON $2800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
170 195721 10/12/96 1751 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =W
171 037039 2/25/98 1423 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4100 NS NS
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
172 164755 8/31/98 1137 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
173 108321 6/08/99 1134 ANGLE $3000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
174 139250 7/26/96 1334 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4695 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 17
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
175 153401 8/15/97 1031 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
176 199714 10/21/97 1716 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6800 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
177 219111 11/13/97 1504 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
178 054160 3/22/98 1141 REAREND TURN $1300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
179 081664 5/01/98 1751 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3500 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
180 203317 10/22/96 1449 RAN OFF ROAD RIGHT $1100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED
,SPEED= OOO,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
181 184725 10/01/97 1107 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3200 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
182 134801 7/18/97 1227 ANGLE $1800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
183 207929 10/31/97 1752 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $15500 1 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
184 037474 2/19/96 1847 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3400 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
185 081844 5/01/97 0821 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 18
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
186 120156 6/26/98 1816 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
187 142076 7/30/98 1412 ANGLE $900 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
188 091653 5/15/96 1651 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
189 092426 5/16/96 0806 REAREND TURN $1250 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
190 045950 3/01/99 1157 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $12950 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
191 065205 4/08/97 1634 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $9000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
192 155125 8/18/97 1642 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
193 165395 9/02/97 1748 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $7000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
194 216150 11/10/97 1658 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $12000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
195 023172 2/04/98 1745 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1100 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
196 055964 3/25/98 1707 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8000 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 19
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
197 100157 5/28/98 1645 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
198 152938 8/14/98 1707 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5500 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
199 219107 11/13/97 1529 ANGLE $200 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
200 133319 7/16/97 1617 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
201 190823 10/08/97 1616 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
202 237136 12/05/97 1627 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
203 041681 3/04/97 1701 ANGLE $9500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR=
204 161600 8/28/96 1741 ANGLE $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR=
205 099525 5/26/99 1804 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
206 123470 7/02/96 1310 BACKING UP $1800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
207 185942 9/30/98 1825 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $650 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 20
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
208 046676 3/12/98 1815 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
209 241409 12/08/96 1750 RGHT TURN -SAME ROAD $600 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
210 010075 1/16/97 1732 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1350 1 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
211 043644 3/07/97 1721 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2020 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
212 125339 7/03/97 1515 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $6800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
213 179939 9/24/97 1402 HEAD ON $750 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
214 040407 3/02/99 1243 SIDESWIPE $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= COMMERCIAL BUS ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
215 069872 4/14/98 1705 SIDESWIPE $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
216 100166 5/28/98 1702 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
217 254657 12/04/98 2057 ANGLE $2000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 21
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
218 008277 1/14/99 0816 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $700 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
219 015805 1/20/96 1609 SIDESWIPE $1600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
220 059948 3/28/96 2124 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
221 062031 3/31/96 1053 ANGLE $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
222 064676 4/04/96 2041 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
223 120370 6/27/96 1836 RGHT TURN -SAME ROAD $4800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
224 168192 9/06/96 1031 ANGLE $5500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
225 256464 12/27/96 1232 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
226 013835 1/22/97 0805 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DAY,
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
227 056534 3/26/97 2031 SIDESWIPE $3000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
228 112576 6/14/97 2059 ANGLE $3000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 22
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
229 201021 10/23/97 0830 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
230 023221 2/04/98 1900 ANGLE $2200 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
231 053577 3/21/98 1443 ANGLE $8000 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
232 059025 3/30/98 0946 ANGLE $4400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
233 102593 6/01/98 2460 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
234 106692 6/06/98 1336 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
235 184070 9/27/98 1235 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
236 229887 11/25/98 1158 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
237 003270 1/06/99 0943 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
238 029392 2/15/99 1823 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
239 032332 2/19/99 1313 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 23
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
240 046093 3/09/99 1216 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
241 065226 4/08/99 1603 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
242 118406 6/22/99 1606 MOPED $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =MOPED ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
243 166271 8/04/96 0822 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
244 223791 11/17/96 1316 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
245 013834 1/22/97 0805 SIDESWIPE $2350 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
246 136602 7/21/97 1014 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
247 212061 11/04/97 1603 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
248 204080 10/24/98 0958 ANGLE $2100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
249 231271 11/27/98 1310 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5100 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
250 026132 2/10/99 1624 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 24
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
251 118501 6/24/96 0807 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2900 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR-
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR-
252 013836 1/22/97 0805 SIDESWIPE $2800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
253 090272 5/13/98 0811 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
254 139204 7/26/98 1509 ANGLE $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
255 093480 5/18/97 0917 SIDESWIPE $1900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
256 010925 1/18/99 1441 NO- COLLISION - OVERTRN $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
257 204091 10/29/98 1332 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
258 110511 6/11/99 0756 SIDESWIPE $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
259 090922 5/14/99 1025 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1600 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
260 038764 2/21/96 1718 ANGLE $4200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =O10,DIR =W
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 25
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
261 026640 2/11/97 0741 ANGLE $1750 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
262 134807 7/18/97 0853 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
263 174980 9/14/98 0805 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
264 231285 11/27/98 1238 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $16500 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
265 200274 10/22/97 0738 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
266 066759 4/10/99 2338 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $10000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY = NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
267 110215 6/11/97 0759 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1950 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
268 110721 6/12/98 1620 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
269 208446 10/29/96 1330 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $11200 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =E
270 056519 3/26/97 0708 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2100 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED=025,DIR =S
271 007751 1/13/98 1821 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4700 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 26
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
272 108650 6/09/98 0858 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1400 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
273 256460 12/27/96 1239 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
274 184617 9/28/98 1507 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
275 117278 6/20/99 1705 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6750 2 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
276 201023 10/23/97 1323 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
277 027236 2/12/97 0746 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
278 013363 1/22/99 0752 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
279 020784 1/29/96 1010 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1400 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
280 098229 5/25/97 0951 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $9500 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
281 220413 11/14/97 1829 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR.DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
282 197006 10/15/98 1456 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4000 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 27
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
283 123464 6/29/99 1448 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $9000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
284 258737 12/03/97 2240 HEAD ON $17000 1 1 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY = NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 050,DIR =S
285 060828 4/01/99 1407 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $2800 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
286 082547 5/02/97 1728 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2800 1 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
287 125318 7/03/97 0902 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
288 179918 9/24/97 1604 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $0 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
289 188447 10/03/98 2018 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $12500 3 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
290 054917 3/25/99 1634 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
291 084460 5/05/97 1806 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $15000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
292 078750 4/27/98 0801 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
293 029381 2/15/99 1120 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1250 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 28
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
294 015624 1/25/99 1337 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
295 015807 1/20/96 1343 REAREND TURN $2750 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
296 184068 9/27/96 1924 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5500 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
297 099507 5/26/99 1203 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
298 176070 9/18/97 1458 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
299 030944 2/16/98 1640 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3400 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
300 208432 10/29/96 1103 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5500 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
301 047506 3/13/98 1759 PARKED VEHICLE $6000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
302 076461 4/24/97 1340 OTHER OBJECT $1575 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
303 119750 6/26/96 0925 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
304 073655 4/21/99 1640 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $900 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 29
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
305 041420 2/26/96 0928 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7500 1 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
306 003268 1/06/99 1540 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
307 152693 8/14/97 1816 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
308 142736 7/31/98 2311 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $2550 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
309 037825 2/27/97 0715 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
310 058930 3/29/97 0950 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
311 219105 11/13/97 0730 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5250 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
312 069678 4/12/96 1814 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
313 234888 12/02/98 1757 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
314 179031 9/27/96 0630 ANIMAL $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
315 198344 10/19/97 1551 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 30
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
316 092875 5/17/99 1443 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 1 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
317 070470 4/13/96 2104 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
318 028345 2/06/96 0950 ANGLE $3500 ICY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
319 028372 2/06/96 1000 PARKED VEHICLE $1000 ICY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
320 091641 5/15/96 1800 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1700 1 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
321 091655 5/15/96 1801 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2900 MUD NS
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
322 063918 4/06/97 1603 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6800 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
323 123468 6/29/99 2126 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3850 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
324 002288 1/04/99 1507 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
325 088656 5/11/99 1709 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
326 242337 12/11/97 2232 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 31
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
327 007161 1/12/98 1646 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2800 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
328 075508 4/24/99 1603 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
329 058131 3/25/96 1728 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8200 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
330 080733 4/30/98 1640 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
331 033084 2/13/96 1830 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1500 2 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
332 035140 2/16/96 1223 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 036,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
333 035100 2/23/99 2460 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
334 092684 5/17/97 1530 ANGLE $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
335 101562 5/30/97 1928 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
336 064181 4/16/98 0800 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
337 218165 11/11/98 1823 ANGLE $4000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 32
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
338 054598 3/19/96 0729 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
339 194774 10/11/96 1523 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
340 222222 11/15/96 0944 SIDESWIPE $1950 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
341 044158 3/02/96 1345 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
342 084628 5/04/96 1251 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =E
343 212549 11/03/96 2111 ANGLE $10300 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
344 224426 11/18/96 1729 ANGLE $2400 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 002,DIR =S
345 234114 11/30/96 1607 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1100 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
346 087222 5/09/97 1510 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
347 139619 7/25/97 1812 REAREND TURN $300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
348 157514 8/20/97 2202 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1800 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 33
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
349 209627 11/02/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
350 245065 12/15/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON
351 245833 12/16/97
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
352 009957 1/16/98
VEHICLE 1 =VAN
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
353 025328 2/07/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
354 105775 6/05/98
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES
355 053385 3/23/99
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
356 098153 5/24/99
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
357 032104 2/18/97
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
358 034011 2/21/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
359 210055 9/10/97
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH
2200 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $900
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED
1752 BACKING UP $300
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
T,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED
0807 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $250
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1510 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2500
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1415 ANGLE $1100
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1937 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $100
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY = NUNKNOWN
1522 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1500
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0802 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1600
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
0715 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1400
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1818 ANGLE $4500
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
1814 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1200
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
,SPEED= 003,DIR =W
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
WET DAY
,SPEED= 025,DIR =E
,SPEED= 008,DIR =S
WET DAY
,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
1 DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
DRY DAY
,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
DRY DARK
,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
1 WET DAY
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 34
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
360 132145 7/16/98 1636 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
361 158844 8/22/98 1747 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 4 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 003,DIR =N
362 000818 1/02/96 1555 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2300 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
363 069697 4/12/96 2205 PEDESTRIAN $2000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PEDESTRIAN ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 000,DIR=
364 243529 12/23/98 1804 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4700 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
365 175792 9/16/96 0756 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
366 062131 4/03/98 1915 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $7000 4 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
367 195507 10/13/98 0809 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $5000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
368 215709 11/07/96 0734 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
369 005390 1/09/99 1840 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
370 171192 9/10/96 1534 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $5000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 35
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
371 205423 10/26/98 1747 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7300 2 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
372 098151 5/24/99 1800 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
373 032729 2/19/97 1404 ANGLE $1000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
374 214379 11/06/98 1817 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
375 128793 7/09/97 0534 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $2100 DRY DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
376 019031 1/30/97 1720 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2600 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
377 148778 8/08/97 1208 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
378 257229 12/30/97 2130 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $200 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
379 031788 2/17/98 0754 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $600 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
380 100826 5/29/98 1834 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
381 115104 6/19/98 1713 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 36
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
382 133914 7/18/98 1658 ANGLE $24000 1 1 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
383 177160 9/17/98 0728 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
384 032361 2/19/99 0756 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $50 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
385 058807 3/29/99 0734 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
386 065997 4/09/99 0800 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5250 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
387 218662 11/10/96 1022 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 075,DIR =N
388 019216 1/29/98 0725 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $2700 ICY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
389 090390 5/13/96 1625 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
390 019213 1/29/98 0737 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $100 ICY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
391 206362 10/29/97 2307 ANIMAL $1500 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
392 250473 12/22/97 2041 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1300 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
393 022376 2/03/98 0432 ANIMAL $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 37
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
394 033467 2/20/99 1925 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $4000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
395 122203 3/27/99 1421 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1200 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
396 013844 1/22/97 1450 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4300 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
397 003097 1/05/96 0755 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =S
398 187581 10/02/98 0828 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
399 086456 5/07/96 1810 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
400 188650 10/03/96 0720 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4600 2 DRY DAWN
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
401 109574 6/10/97 1735 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2050 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
402 037679 2/26/98 0654 ANGLE $300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
403 100834 5/29/98 0733 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $12000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 003,DIR =W
404 162213 8/27/98 0803 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2150 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 38
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
405 037847 2/26/99 1743 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
406 109571 6/10/97 1730 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3400 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
407 183444 9/29/97 1622 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
408 066107 4/06/96 1535 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2400 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
409 072351 4/16/96 1535 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $600 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
410 241428 12/08/96 0205 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3000 ICY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
411 185940 9/30/98 1713 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
412 088384 5/10/96 0800 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
413 008267 1/14/99 2017 ANGLE $3300 2 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 003,DIR =W
414 190831 10/08/97 1654 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 39
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
415 007071 2/06/98 1744 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2200 1 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
416 118727 6/24/98.0040 RAN OFF ROAD - STRAIGT $11000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 100,DIR =E
417 175639 9/15/98 0716 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =N
418 042536 3/05/99 1841 ANGLE $8000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
419 037828 2/27/97 1100 ANGLE $15100 1 1 3 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
420 244520 12/12/96 0730 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $14500 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
421 043755 3/07/99 1215 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1050 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
422 105235 6/04/97 0730 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
423 013841 1/22/97 1500 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $10100 3 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
424 090391 5/13/96 0735 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1550 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
425 172035 9/11/96 1845 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $800 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 40
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
426 147298 8/08/98 0832 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
427 105101 6/03/99 0748 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
428 029943 2/14/98 0939 ANIMAL $6000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
429 077165 4/25/97 1655 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $10000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
430 037470 2/19/96 0630 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $4100 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
431 092396 5/16/96 2330 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $5000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 085,DIR =N
432 128180 7/08/97 0600 SIDESWIPE $900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
433 239643 12/08/97 0435 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
434 115946 6/20/96 1855 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $1000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
435 227285 10/22/97 2350 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $6000 2 2 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 075,DIR =N
436 204057 10/23/96 1145 ANGLE $2700 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
437 242904 12/10/96 1755 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5300 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 41
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06 /30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
438 183266 9/26/96 1250 PEDESTRIAN $700 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PEDESTRIAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR-
439 091898 5/16/97 1445 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3200 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
440 128181 7/08/97 0604 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
441 008459 1/14/98 0912 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $7000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
442 018262 1/29/99 0954 ANIMAL $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
443 050046 3/17/99 2117 ANIMAL $1000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
444 156767 8/20/97 1455 PARKED VEHICLE $400 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY= NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
445 156768 8/20/97 1450 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $16000 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
446 011908 1/19/98 1142 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $5000 SNO DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
447 205632 10/25/96 1445 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5800 4 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
448 136599 7/21/97 0856 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
449 046693 3/12/98 0753 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 42
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
450 241449 12/10/97 1520 ANGLE $1000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
451 014990 1/19/96 0745 OTHER OBJECT $500 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
452 025853 2/10/97 1845 ANGLE $2000 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =W
453 219094 11/13/97 0730 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =W
454 060860 4/01/99 1318 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
455 056515 3/26/97 0825 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $2000 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
456 223799 11/17/96 1355 ANIMAL $1100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
457 021516 2/03/97 1800 PEDESTRIAN $0 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PEDESTRIAN ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING -NOT IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 000,DIR=
458 191437 10/07/96 1417 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $5000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
459 053397 3/21/97 1825 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $3300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
460 242319 12/11/97 1049 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $3700 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 043,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 43
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
461 009035 1/15/98 1258 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2500 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
462 059035 3/30/98 0728 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =S
463 210404 11/01/98 2460 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $6500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 028,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =W
464 256994 12/30/98 0658 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $11000 1 2 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
465 214880 11/06/96 1815 ANIMAL $1000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
466 092484 5/16/98 1802 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
467 244358 12/14/98 0809 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= OOOfDIR =S
468 031648 2/17/99 0802 BACKING UP $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= SCHOOL BUS ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
469 014988 1/19/96 0740 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 2 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
470 077684 4/27/99 0725 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
471 124980 7/04/98 1152 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $12000 2 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 44
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
472 190257 10/05/96 1030 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= MOTORCYCLE ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
473 060151 3/31/99 1921 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =N
474 000835 1/02/96 0715 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1100 DRY DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
475 031587 2/10/96 1325 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
476 072981 4/17/96 1820 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 3 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
477 081657 4/30/96 1615 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
478 094476 5/19/96 1800 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
479 111318 6/13/96 1330 BACKING UP $3800 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 3 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
480 140588 7/28/96 0930 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1250 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
481 223157 11/16/96 1750 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1800 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= NUNKNOWN ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
482 100892 5/29/97 1730 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $6500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =040,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 45
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
483 114922 6/18/97 1650 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $5500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 030,DIR =S
484 127525 7/07/97 1717 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
485 138845 7/27/97 1442 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,DIR=
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 045,DIR=
486 182288 9/27/97 1645 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1750 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =N
487 037668 2/26/98 1015 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =NOT STATED ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 045,DIR =E
488 048175 3/14/98 1847 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2250 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
489 097582 5/24/98 1504 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
490 137377 7/23/98 1929 ANGLE $3500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
491 147287 8/06/98 1146 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $4000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
492 177880 9/18/98 1147 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5110 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
493 199910 10/19/98 0836 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 46
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
494 233223 11/30/98 1401 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $1500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
495 024025 2/05/98 0731 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $0 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
496 168110 9/04/98 0735 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3950 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
497 049537 3/16/99 1615 BICYCLE $250 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= BICYCLE ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR-
498 118151 6/23/97 1640 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
499 123851 7/01/98 0650 ANIMAL $2000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =S
500 220440 11/14/97 1915 ANIMAL $3000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
501 064160 4/06/98 0817 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $300 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
502 065539 4/08/98 2231 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $7250 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 065,DIR =S
503 099615 5/27/97 1827 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $7500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS
,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
504 135381 7/20/96 1630 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2100 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 47
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
505 038716 2/28/97 0645 SIDESWIPE $8500 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS .,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
506 028157 2/13/97 0755 SIDESWIPE $3500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
507 212876 11/04/98 1600 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $900 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
508 090540 5/14/97 1300 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $14000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 065,DIR =N
509 162855 8/28/98 1958 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $8100 1 1 DRY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 075,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY=HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
510 035115 2/16/96 1215 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $4000 SNO DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
511 088057 5/10/99 0615 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1535 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
512 143153 8/01/96 1825 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4800 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
513 121782 6/29/96 1920 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $9300 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
514 004037 1/06/96 1615 PARKED VEHICLE $700 SNO DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =NOT STATED ,SPEED= 000,1)IR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =S
515 004038 1/06/96 1545 SIDESWIPE $6500 1 SNO DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
516 023344 2/02/96 1700 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3600 ICY DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 48
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
517 126507 7/07/96 0425 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $5025 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 065,DIR =S
518 253661 12/25/97 1615 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $2500 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
519 249620 12/18/96 1740 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $5000 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
520 172258 8/10/97 0830 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $1600 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
521 030658 1/22/99 0930 ANGLE $3300 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
522 100880 5/29/96 0125 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $9050 1 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 070,DIR =S
523 004754 1/09/97 2025 SIDESWIPE $14000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
524 042969 3/06/97 2055 SIDESWIPE $5000 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2 =PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
525 004533 1/08/99 0200 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1020 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 065,DIR =N
526 145865 8/05/96 0825 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =S
527 068975 4/27/99 1030 ANIMAL $1200 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
528 009032 1/15/98 1630 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $6400 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
529 129449 7/10/97 0720 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1850 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
1T07509/TO7513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 49
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
530 135945 7/21/98 1045 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $500 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= MOTORCYCLE ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 110,DIR =S
531 223402 11/18/97 1905 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $18000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
532 246664 12/17/97 1030 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $4600 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 065,DIR =S
533 133918 7/18/96 1740 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $8500 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =E
534 246082 12/16/98 1845 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3200 1 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
535 175805 9/16/96 1720 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $200 1 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 035,DIR =N
536 042400 2/28/96 1845 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $1400 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK 2 AXLES ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =E
537 088344 5/10/96 0940 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $10000 1 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =TRUCK TRACTOR S,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
538 214902 11/06/96 0735 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4000 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 040,DIR =N
539 044928 3/09/97 1550 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $5000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
540 085160 5/06/97 1745 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $8000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 50
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE
PROP INJURIES CONDITION
DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
541 198919 10/20/97 1830 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 1 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON T,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =N
542 226284 11/21/97 1820 ANGLE $1400 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =E
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
543 247443 12/18/97 2015 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $7400 4 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 015,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
544 075363 4/22/98 1750 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $9200 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =S
545 195395 10/15/97 0650 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $2100 1 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED =045,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 025,DIR =S
546 054146 3/16/99 0735 LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF $4700 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 020,DIR =W
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
547 069009 4/05/99 1750 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $7000 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
548 200178 10/18/96 1000 BACKING UP $6000 1 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 003,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= STATION WAGON ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 110,DIR =N
549 072962 4/15/99 1745 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $3150 WET DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 060,DIR =N
550 016260 1/21/96 1149 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $7450 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
551 034250 2/15/96 2100 FIXED OBJECT $450 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
552 221383 11/15/97 1250 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $9000 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 51
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
ACC STATE ACCIDENT ACC ACCIDENT PROP INJURIES CONDITION
NO. NUMBER DATE TIME TYPE DAMAGE F A B C ROAD LIGHT
553 063310 4/02/96 1645 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1600 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
554 066113 4/06/96 1800 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $1300 WET DUSK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - IMPAIRMENT UNKNWN,SPEED= 050,DIR =N
555 040482 2/24/96 0700 RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF $2600 1 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
556 182812 9/28/97 2010 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $3500 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1 =VAN ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 000,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - IMPAIRMENT UNKNWN ,SPEED= 040,DIR =S
557 017810 1/24/96 0655 LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD $2200 WET DAWN
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 010,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =N
558 137818 7/24/96 1700 REAREND SLOW OR STOP $12000 2 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
VEHICLE 2= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 065,DIR =S
559 139721 7/24/98 1617 ANGLE $4000 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 045,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 005,DIR =E
560 186761 10/04/97 2145 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $10200 1 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 065,DIR =N
561 112979 6/09/98 2320 HEAD ON $23000 2 WET DARK
VEHICLE 1= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - ABILITY IMPAIRED ,SPEED= 060,DIR =N
VEHICLE 2= PASSENGER VEH ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
562 021723 2/03/99 1930 ANIMAL $500 DRY DARK
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY =HAD NO DRINKING OR DRUGS ,SPEED= 055,DIR =S
563 019973 1/30/98 0925 RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT $9000 1 DRY DAY
VEHICLE 1= PICKUP TRUCK ,SOBRIETY= DRINKING - IMPAIRMENT UNKNWN ,SPEED= 080,DIR =S
REPORT INCLUDES ACCIDENTS THAT OCCURRED WITHIN 0 FT OF THE INTERSECTION
FALL 1997 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
Grants
SPRING 1999
African American Cultural Complex $20,000
To educate the community on African American history and
culture through the complex's wide -range of exhibits and an
upcoming outdoor drama, The Amistad Saga: Reflections
Glaxo Wellcome Endowment Fund, Irene Rand Poole Endowment Fund
Regional Community Endowment Fund Barrie Wallace Fund for the Arts,
Faith and Arnold Shertz Fund Jefferson Fund Moffitt Triangle Fund
Josephus Daniels Charitable Fund, Quintiles Gives Back Fund
— Club Nova $15,000
To address the needs pf Orange and northern Chatham county residents
living with mental ill ess by hiring additional staff to help club members
secure adequate heath care and housing and provide job training and
employment opportunities.
George and Beverly 41itchings Endowment Fund, George Watts Hill, Thomas S
Kenan III Endowment, Donna Cederberg Memorial Endowment, Fair Fund
Claude and Eleanor f eorge Fund
Communities in Schgols of Durham $12,000
To increase parent volvement, parent- teacher dialogue, and student success
through the creatioiof a comprehensive family resource center at W.G.
Pearson Elementary Pchool in partnership with the Durham Public School
System and New Dad Community Services.
Bobbie Fletcher Fu Regional Community Endowment Fund, Elizabeth
Wade Grant Endow nt Fund Jeanette A. Gates Fund James E. and
Margaret R Davis 1 �dawment Fund Willie S and Bruce A. Hill, Sr. Fund
Quintiles Gives Back Fund, Horton -Carr Fund
Communities in Schopls of Wake County $9,655
To improve the literafy of 160 students in Wake County elementary schools
by expanding the Grf at Leaps Reading Program, which provides individual
tutors to work with 0 ildren reading below grade level.
American Airlines Kills Are Something Special Fund
Durham P.R.O.U.D. 13,000
To offer conflict management, self- esteem building, community awareness
and involvement, anal communication skills to juvenile offenders in a
school -based setting,
Bobbie Fletcher Fund Willie S and Brice A. Hill, The Kristen Fund Ed S
and Mary Hayes HolfM Fund
Durham Teen Court end Restitution Program $13,086
To eliminate substanfe abuse and repeat arrests among juvenile offenders by
involving them in community service at TROSA (Triangle Residential
Options for Substanle Abusers) and offering them additional workshops and
information on posigve community resources.
Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
Edgemont Communi Center $9,850
To enhance academitperformance, self-esteem, and decision - making skills
1 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
among children in the Edgemont community in Durham through the I Am
Somebody: Arts Toolbar for Asset - Building project, an after - school program
that uses media, theater, and visual arts to involve children and parents in
productions.
American Airlines Kids Are Something Special Fund, Halcyon Fund
EL Pueblo $11,812
To assist the Latino community in increasing knowledge of immigration and
other laws and exploring cultural identity issues by holding monthly
roundtables for Latipos and others working with the Latino community in
the Triangle area.
E. and E. Chanlett Fund Quintiles Gives Back Fund, Glaxo Wellcome
Endowment Fund '
Food Bank of North Carolina $25,055
To relieve hunger and improve school performance among disadvantaged
Triangle -area children by establishing a Kids Cafe, which would provide
100 -250 children wit'! nutritious after - school meals three days a week and
offer tutoring, mentoring, and educational activities.
Josephus Daniels Ch 'table Fund, James F. and Alice E Newsome
Endowment Fund P*oenix Fund
Genesis Home $7,500
To assist Genesis Ho ;e in continuing its mission of providing transitional
housing to homeless amilies and helping them reestablish healthy households
by hiring a developtnt director to ensure the strength of the organization in
the future.
Bobbie Fletcher Fun4
Good Work $14,936
To assist more low- ingome entrepreneurs in creating and sustaining healthy
businesses by supporting Good Work's research and implementation of a new
business venture in addition to their child care and construction enterprises.
Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
A Growing Place $3,000
To help homeless ch dren in Wake County keep up with their studies and
meet their basic needs by supporting this interim school's Emergency Fund,
which provides necelsities such as new eyeglasses, clothing, and after - school
care.
American Airlines Ki's Are Something Special Fund
Haw River Assembly $2,500
To engage over 1,500 fourth graders and their teachers in hands -on activities
in art, science, music, and nature and to enhance their appreciation of the
Haw River as a valuable environmental resource by holding a moving festival
along the river bank.
Marcia Angle and Mark Trustin Fund Moffitt Triangle Fund
..► A Helping Hand $13,200
To expand nutrition0l, transportation, and respite care services to the elderly
and disabled in Oragge and Durham counties by adding a program
coordinator who can link those needing help with willing volunteers.
Regional Community rAdowment Fund Village Companies Foundation
Endowment, George Isabel Fowler Fund Alice F. Eure Charitable
Endowment Fund A Southern Season Community Service Fund, Quintiles
Gives Back Fund, BeFton Dickinson Research Center Fund
2 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
FALL 1997 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
Lutheran Family Services $9,000
To increase matriculation and graduation rates among refugee adolescents by
initiating a school -baFed mentoring program in collaboration with the Hart
Leadership Program pf the Sanford Institute of Public Policy.
Glaxo Wellcome Endowment Fund Ajinomoto U.SA. Inc. Fund, Mitsubishi
SemiconductorAmerira Inc. Community Ventures Fund Quintiles Gives Back
Fund
Mission House for W men $15,000
To break the cycle of self- destructive behavior and homelessness among the
female residents of this east Raleigh center by hiring additional staff to
provide more intensive, one-on -one assistance.
Afiehael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
North Carolina Health Career Access Program $2,725
To increase the num er of minority and low- income individuals pursuing
health professions b supporting a workshop to educate middle - school
students in Chatham Founty about health career options, in addition to an
effort to encourage undergraduates pursuing health professions to focus their
service on rural, low,mcome areas of North Carolina.
Michael Warner and Flizabeth Craven Fund
North Carolina PUBS IC ALLIES $12,600
To provide youth and young adults with new skills and knowledge through a series
of trainings to inspire Them to participate in community initiatives that have an
impact on their lives.
Central Carolina Ba4 Endowment Fund, Triangle Community Foundation
Endowment, Peoples Security Insurance Endowment Fund, John and Oteha
Stewart Endowment Frd, Elizabeth Wade Grant Endowment Fund, Optimist Club
of Durham Fund, Margaret G. Altvater Fund Quintiles Gives Back Fund
Orange County Disppte Settlement Center $9,014
To reduce the number pf juvenile offenders in the justice system by expanding a
restorative justice program that offers mediation between the victim and the
offender and provides conflict resolution classes and specialized training.
George and Beverlv Hitchings Endowment Fund Regional Community
Endowment Fund, Ckqude and Adele Thomas Fund, C. Perry Col►vel[Betty J.
Neese Donor Advised Fund
Raleigh Chamber Music Guild $3,000
To offer workshops nd master classes py the Ahn Trio, Korean sisters in
their twenties who p ay the piano, violin and cello, for teachers, students,
musicians, and volu teers at Exploris and the Korean Language School.
Quintiles Gives Back fund
SAFEchild $10,796
To support a collaborative project with Southlight to prevent child abuse and
neglect by increasing the parenting skills and providing a social network for
30-40 mothers in sub tance -abuse treatment.
Carolyn Underwood and
Senior PHARMAssis ' Inc. $15,000
To expand financial iccess to medications for low- income seniors and to
monitor seniors usin multiple medications by training staff to care for an
additional 160 Meth id patients.
Glaxo Wellcome Ena owment Fund, George and Isabel Fowler Fund Charles
Chase Pratt Memorid I Fund Bobbie Fletcher Fund Claude and Adele Thomas
Fund
3 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
FALL 1997 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
Stone Circles $10,000
To create greater focus and concentration, stronger relationships and more
effective teamwork, better crisis management, and renewed commitment to
mission among 15 nonprofit staff, board members, and /or volunteers by
supporting "Ripples," a two-year pilot project that will train attendees to
facilitate spiritual and reflective practice within their organizations.
Michael Warner and ,�lizabeth Craven Fund, InSight Fund
— Strengthening the Black Family, Inc. $13,776
To improve academic performance, provide a safe after - school environment,
and encourage comiqunication among teachers, parents, and children in
southeast Raleigh by expanding the Crosby After- School/Summer
Enrichment and Tutprial Program.
Michael Warner and plizabeth Craven Fund
Teer House $3,100
To promote healthy behaviors and increase self - esteem among at -risk
preadolescent girls by providing educational information, experiential
learning activities, aqd mentoring.
E. and E. Chanlett FXnd, Tyler /Berger Family Fund, Carolyn Underwood Fund
Triangle AIDS Organizations $28,000
To support the final hases of the Strategic Workgroup, which will
consolidate the AI IService Agency of Orange County, the Triangle AIDS
Interfaith Network, And the AIDS Service Agency of Wake County.
Magnolia Fund
Wake Friends of the Romeless, Inc. $15,000
To provide educatiolal opportunities to homeless youth in Wake County
through Project Dis overy, an after - school program that promotes creative
learning and ipereasfd self - esteem through tutoring and mentoring sessions,
counseling, and seminars.
American Airlines Kills Are Something Special Fund, Jon and Jane G Cook
Fund
FALL 1998
AIDS Community Residence Association $2,000
To improve the quality of service to residents of this AIDS -care facility and
permit access to electronic resources by upgrading the Association's computer
and software techno'ogy. Magnolia Fund
Arc of Durham Con ty $10,000
To provide appropriate care during school closings for pre - school and school -age
children with mental rgtardation and other disabilities by offering adapted
recreational and learning opportunities such as field trips, music appreciation, arts
and crafts activities, and physical exercise. Michael, Fotini, and Otis Capsalis
Memorial Endowment Fund; Bobbie Fletcher Fund; Glaxo Wellcome Endowment
Fund; George Watts Dill Fund, Peoples Security Insurance Endowment Fund,•
Regional Community Endowment Fund, Carl G. Ward Fund and Ajinomoto
U.S.A., Inc. Fund
Arts Together $10,001
To offer stimulating and creative opportunities for 100 children with developmental
disabilities by sponsoring educational activities involving music, art, dance or
creative movement, cgoking, and science through a partnership among Arts
4 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
FALL 1997 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
Together, Learning Together, and Playspace in Wake County. Regional
Community Endowment Fund, • Barrie Wallace Fund for the Arts; Claude and
Adele Thomas Fund; American Airlines Kids Are Something Special Fund,
Quintiles Gives Back Fund; Moffitt Triangle Fund, and Michael and Cynthia
F rankers Fund
Burton Geo -World Elementary School $13,500
To build on the reading skills of 168 Burton Geo -World and E.K. Powe elementary
students during the summer months by holding the Summer STARS Reading
Camp, which emphasises the importance of family and community involvement in
enhancing the literacy skills of young children. Michael Warner and Elizabeth
(.-raven Fund
Capital Area YMCA p0,000
To provide more at -risk children with mentors by expanding the YMCA
PARTNERS program; which creates active partnerships between motivated adults
and troubled or alienated youths referred by Juvenile Court and the Wake County
School Svstem. Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
Catholic Social Minigtries $15,000
To acclimate new Latino residents to Wake County by providing a variety of
services such as crisis intervention, job placement, and assistance with obtaining
county resources through the outreach of several faith -based and community
organizations. Glaxo Wellcome Endowment Fund; Triangle Communitv
Foundation Endowment Fund, George Watts Hill Fund; Mitsubishi
Semiconductor America Inc. Community Ventures Fund; Irene Rand Poole
Endowment; Regional Community Endowment Fund; Willie B. and Bruce A. Hill,
Sr. Fund, and A Southern Season Community Service Fund
Chapel Hill- Carrborp YMCA $5,000
To provide a safe recrFational and learning environment for 25 low- income
minority children who are residents of the South Estes Public Housing community
in Chapel Hill by providing after- school supervision at the South Estes Community
Center. Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
Cornucopia House C ricer Support Center $2,525
To help cancer patientspand their families deal with the emotional and spiritual toll
that cancer brings into their daily lives by offering free support groups, educational
forums, and holistic thgrapies.George and Beverly Hitchings Endowment Fund;
11age Companies Foundation Endowment; Donna Cederberg Memorial
Endowment Find, Quintiles Gives Back Fund, • and Francis J. Grolimund and
Joseph Costa Fund
Crafts of Hope $11,000
To expand Crafts of Hope's ability to provide job and managerial skills and
entrepreneurial opportpnities to jobless people through the hands -on production of
candles by doubling th amount of participants in this program and funding
research and developrr�ent of a new line of candles. Michael Warner and Elizabeth
Craven Fund
Durham Affordable ousing Coalition $7,000
To assist more people living with HIV /AIDS find housing, secure utilities, access
housing funds, and w k with landlords in Durham, Orange, Chatham, and Franklin
counties by expandin a part-time Housing Counselor position to full -time.
Magnolia Fund
Durham Family Presprvation & Support Committee $15,000
To nurture the development of healthy and stable families in Northeast Central
5 of 14 8/16199 7:19 PM
Durham by providing individualized tutoring in math and reading to approximately
100 students at Eastway Elementary School and encouraging families to participate
in a series of six parenting workshops. Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven
Fund
FIGS of Wake Co. $5,000
To prevent unnecessary hospital visits and needless suffering among
medically indigent residents of Wake County by providing essential
prescription medications and medical supplies to treat health
conditionsJosephus paniels Charitable Fund
Habitat for Humanity, Chatham Co. $15,000
To double Habitat's p1ce of home construction and increase the amount of
homeownership opportunities available to low- income families by hiring a
construction manager to oversee all construction activities and supervise
volunteers. Glaxo Wellcome Erulowment Fund, • George and Beverly Hitchings
Endowment Fund, Jo4n and Oteha Stewart Endowment Fund; Claude and Adele
Thomas Fund; Willie B. and Bruce A. Hill; Sr. Fund, and A Southern Season
Commumty Service Fund
Healing Waters Chriptian Fellowship $2,050
To provide academic and cultural enrichment to 40 low- income youths in Chatham
County by supporting the Youth Empowerment Program, a Saturday academy and
summer enrichment program that educates children in art, math, reading, conflict
resolution, personal etiquette, and computer technology. American Airlines Kids
Are Something Special Fund
Helping Hands Centel• $12,000
To enhance work conditions and interpersonal relations for Spanish - speaking
Chatham County poultry workers by providing instruction in the English language,
focusing on workplace safety, health, and workers' rights, while also offering
Spanish classes to their English- speaking co- workers and friends to create a better
flow of communication on the job and at home. E. and E. Chanlett Fund
Hispanic Liaison Program $10,955
To prevent Latino residents of Chatham County who are ineligible for emergency
financial assistance frgm facing financial crises by creating the Emergency
Assistance Program, which will provide 0% interest loans up to $500 and offer
counseling sessions designed to cultivate money management skills. Glaxo
Wellcome Endowment Fund,• Triangle Community Foundation Endowment Fund,•
George Watts Hill Fugd,• George and Beverly Hitchings Endowment Fund;
Freudenberg Nonwoven Fund, • Regional Community Endowment Fund; Jefferson
Fund; George and Isqbel Fowler Fund, and C. Perry Colwell /Betty J. Neese
Donor Advised Fund
Loaves and Fishes $6,000
To help at -risk youth succeed academically and socially by expanding a mentoring
program that provides, academic enrichment and cultural opportunities for
middle - school children. Josephus Daniels Charitable Fund and Quintiles Gives
Back Fund
Mallarme Chamber Inayers $1,500
To stimulate educati n and music appreciation among English- and
Spanish - speaking co munities by supporting a spring 1999 concert to
celebrate the openin of the Butterfly House at the Museum of Life and
Science, with music 4l compositions by Latin - American and American artists.
Central Carolina Ba#k & Trust Company Unrestricted Endowment, Asa T. and
Elna S Spaulding Endowment Fund, and Quintiles Gives Back Fund
6 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
FALL 1997 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
Meals on Wheels of Durham $8,409
To assist more people who are living alone and are homebound due to a physical
disability, chronic illness, or malnourishment by expanding this program to serve
low - income Durham residents who are under 60 years old. George and Isabel
Fowler Fund: Robert and Christine Maehemer Fund; and Oualex Fund
Methodist Home for hildren $10,000
To assist young male adolescents who are abusing drugs in understanding the
causes behind their substance abuse, expand their vocational potential, and improve
their family relations ley establishing a group home in Durham, which will provide
direct treatment as well as additional counseling in collaboration with the Durham
Center and Duke University. American Airlines Kids Are Something Special Fund
and Phoenix Fund
New Bethel Baptist Church $10,000
To increase the gradpation rate and the academic performance of youth,
grades K -12, living ih the Crest Street Community in Durham by expanding
a tutorial and mentoring program in math and reading. American Airlines
Kids Are Something Special Fund, Qualex Fund, Kristen Fund; and Halcyon
Fund
North Carolina Rural Communities Assistance Project $15,000
To improve the public health conditions of rural, low- income, mostly minority
residents of Chatham County by increasing their access to clean water and safe
sewage disposal with the assistance of an agency outreach provider. Michael
Warner and Elizabet4 Craven Fund
Piedmont Youth Orc estra $1,035
To enhance the music ikifls and opportunities for middle school children by
forming a Wind Ensemble for woodwind and brass players that will join the
intermediate orchestra in a performance.Kathryn "Kay" Segee Memorial Fund
Prison Match $15,OOQ
To improve communication and family bonding between women incarcerated at the
North Carolina Correctional Institute and their children by providing transportation
and other necessary services to children living in Wake, Durham, Orange, and
Chatham counties, providing opportunities for families to interact with one another
on a regular basis. American Airlines Kids Are Something Special Fund and
Phoenix Fund
Triangle AIDS Collakorative $40,000
To offer diverse sgrvices and more efficient management to local
AIDS sufferers aqd their families by supporting the Triangle
AIDS Organizati n's Strategic Workgroup, which will
consolidate the S Service Agency of Orange County, the
Triangle AIDS I 'terfaith Network, and the AIDS Service
Agency of Wakeounty. Magnolia Fund
Triangle AIDS Inter aith Network $6,000
To reduce the HIV i fection rate and increase awareness of HIV /AIDS
resources and servic in the Triangle by providing education to faith
communities that then coordinate care teams to provide services for
persons living with q1V /AIDS and their families. Magnolia Fund
Triangle Rails to Trails Conservancy $5,000
7 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
To increase recreational opportunities and beautify the Triangle area by
transforming an abandoned rail corridor into a series of managed trails for walking,
running, bicycling, and equestrian use that will traverse Durham, Chatham, and
Wake counties. Josepints Daniels Charitable Fund
�= Triangle Residential Options for Substance Abusers (TROSA) $15,000
To increase the amount of people participating in this long -term residential
substance program by hiring a staff member to oversee the renovation of
three buildings that will house additional residents. Central Carolina Bank &
Trust Company Unrestricted Endowment, Bobbie Fletcher Fund, Peoples
.Security Insurance Endowment Fund, Elizabeth Wade Grant Endowment
Fund, Optimist Club 'of Durham Fund Rickenbacker Fund; and Katherine and
Frank Woodman Megsorial Fund
Wake Education Partnership $4,000
To increase kn ow led a of the arts among schoolchildren by supporting the
Heroes in Art Proje of the Newspapers in Education Program, a cooperative
effort between the N�ws & Observer and area art museums that will produce a
16 -page educational Insert to be distributed to more than 3,000 teachers
Triangle -wide for classroom use. American Airlines Kids Are Something
Special Fund
Wake Forest Cultura Arts Association $4,500
To commemorate an preserve the historic heritage of the DuBois School in
Wake Forest, which perved the African - American community from 1926 to
1970, by sponsoring 1l series of arts and cultural programs involving students
at the Wake Forest- Ikolesville High School that will culminate in a
community-wide celfbration. Michael Warner and Elizabeth Craven Fund
Wake Interfaith Hos itality Network $7,500
To help this agency double the amount of homeless families it serves in Wake
County by hiring a volunteer coordinator tp manage the increasing number
of volunteers and chprches participating in the Alliance. Glaxo Wellcome
Endowment Fund T�omas S Kenan, III Endowment Fund; Willie R and
Bruce A. Hill, Sr. Fupd Ajinomoto USA., Inc Fund and George and Isabel
Fowler Fund
SPRING 1998
A total of $247,17796 was given out to 24 agencies.
Agricultural Resources Center $8,000
To reduce exposure tp pesticides in the Triangle area by promoting the
PESTicide Educatioq Project, which helps citizens evaluate their risk, offers
safer alternatives to chemical pesticides, and provides a voice on pest control
issues. Central Carolira Bank & Trust Company Unrestricted Endowment,
Glaxo Wellcome Endowment Fund, George and Beverly Hitchings Endowment
Fund Petersen/You jg Fund Regional Community Endowment Fund and
Triangle Community Foundation Endowment Fund
��- Casa Multicultural $10,000
To train and organ" the residents of eight Hispanic neighborhoods in
Orange County in otjJer to successfully address such issues as accessibility to
medical care, Witerafy, drug abuse, and gang violence-fefJ'erson Fund
Quintiles Gives Back Fund, Regional Community Endowment Fund and
Claude and Adele Thgmas Fund
8 of 14 8/16/99 7:19 PM
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 52
0 DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
TOTAL ACCIDENTS
FATAL ACCIDENTS
NON -FATAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
TOTAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY ACC.
NIGHT ACCIDENTS
WET ACCIDENTS
ALCOHOL INVOLVED ACCIDENTS
NUMBER
PERCENT OF
OF ACCIDENTS
TOTAL ACCIDENTS
563
100.0
5
0.8
203
36.0
208
36.9
355
63.0
114
20.2
124
22.0
14
2.4
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC= 11,000 VEHICLES ENTERING THE INTERSECTION
NUMBER OF PEOPLE INJURED
NUMBER
PERCENT OF
BY TYPE OF INJURY SUMMARY
INJURED
TOTAL INJURIES
FATAL INJURIES
6
CLASS A INJURIES
21
1.8
CLASS B INJURIES
58
6.3
CLASS C INJURIES
246
17.5
74.3
TOTAL NON -FATAL INJURIES
325
98.2
TOTAL INJURIES
331
100.0
ACCIDENT TYPE SUMMARY
NUMBER OF
PERCENT
OF
ACCIDENTS TOTAL ACCIDENTS
NOT STATED
0
RAN, UFF- ROWW - RIGRT = < . ,
35
6.2
RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT
14
2.5
RAN OFF ROAD - STRAIGT
1
.2
NO- COLLISION- OVERTRN
2
.4
NO- COLLISION -OTHER
0
PEDESTRIAN
3
.5
PARKED VEHICLE
4
7
TRAIN
0
BICYCLE
1
2
MOPED
1
.2
ANIMAL
13
2.3
FIXED OBJECT
2
.4
OTHER OBJECT
2
.4
SIAW stow
REAREND TURN
6
1.1
LEFT TURN -SAME ROAD
74
13.1
LEFT TURN -CROSS TRAF
52
9.2
RGHT TURN -SAME ROAD
4
.7
RGHT TURN -CROSS TRAF
8
1.4
HEAD ON
5
.9
SIDESWIPE
35
6.2
ANGLE
60
10.7
BACKING UP
8
1.4
** *ACCIDENT
TOTALS * **
PEOPLE
* * * * * * * * * ** *ACCIDENT TYPES * * * * * * * * * **
INJURED
RAN
TOTAL
F INJ
PDO
F ABC
PROPERTY
LEFT
RIGHT
REAR
OFF
SIDE
YEAR
ACC ACC
ACC
ACC
INJ INJ
DAMAGE
TURN
TURN
E D
ROAD ANGLE
SWIPE
OTHER
1996
153
63
90
99
$500,695
39
3
16
17
9
14
1997
159
3 71
85
4 104
$761,048
42
3
17
15
12
9
1998
153
2 49
102
2 91
$531,710
27
3
10
20
7
g
1999
98
20
78
31
$253 705
18
3
7
8
7
10
TOTL
563
5 203
355
6 325.
126
12
60
35
41
PDO=
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY
INJ = INJURY
F =FATAL INJURY
ABC =AN
"A ",
"B ",
OR "C"
INJURY
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 53
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
0 ...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
MONTH, DAY, AND
HOUR SUMMARIES
MONTHLY
NUMBER
PERCENT
HOURLY
NUMBER
PERCENT
SUMMARY
OF
OF
SUMMARY
OF
OF
ACCIDENTS
TOTAL
ACCIDENTS
TOTAL
JANUARY
60
10.7
0000 -0059
2
.4
FEBRUARY
56
9.9
0100 -0159
1
.2
MARCH
49
8.7
0200 -0259
4
.7
APRIL
52
9.2
0300 -0359
MAY
59
10.5
0400 -0459
3
.5
JUNE
43
7.6
0500 -0559
4
.7
JULY
38
6.7
0600 -0659
12
2.1
AUGUST
34
6.0
0700 -0759
51
9.1
SEPTEMBER
33
5.9
0800 -0859
48
8.5
OCTOBER
48
8.5
0900 -0959
21
3.7
NOVEMBER
49
8.7
1000 -1059
18
3.2
DECEMBER
42
7.5
1100 -1159
24
4.3
1200 -1259
25
4.4
1300 -1359
30
5.3
DAY /WEEK
NUMBER
PERCENT
1400 -1459
33
5.9
SUMMARY
OF
OF
1500 -1559
32
5.7
ACCIDENTS
TOTAL
1600 -1659
58
10.3
MONDAY
84
14.9
1700 -1759
68
12.1
TUESDAY
81
14.4
1800 -1859
56
9.9
WEDNESDAY
105
18.7
1900 -1959
20
3.6
THURSDAY
96
17.1
2000 -2059
17
3.0
FRIDAY
93
16.5
2100 -2159
15
2.7
SATURDAY
64
11.4
2200 -2259
9
1.6
SUNDAY
40
7.1
2300 -2359
9
1.6
1T07509/T07513 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
RUN 09/21/99 (TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SPOT /STRIP ANALYSIS) PAGE 54
DIV 05 COUNTY DURHAM CITY NEAR DURHAM N 01/01/96 THRU 06/30/99
0 ...LOCATION...
SECTION OF NC 157 -GUESS ROAD FROM I -85 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY LINE
REQUESTED BY: MS. EMILY MARTIN
FIXED OBJECTS NUM OF
PERCENT OF
VEHICLE TYPE NUMBER
OF
PERCENT
STRUCK SUMMARY OBJECTS
TOTAL OBJECTS
SUMMARY VEHICLE
TYPE
OF TOTAL
STRUCK
STRUCK
INVOLVED
IN
VEHICLES
THE ACCIDENTS
PARKED VEHICLE
10
10.2
NOT STATED
9
.8
BICYCLE, MOPED
2
2.0
PASSENGER VEH``
1
65.6
PEDESTRIAN
4
4.1
STATION WAGON
79
7.4
ANIMAL
14
14.3
STATION WAGON TRUCK
22
2.1
TREE
9
9.2
COMMERCIAL BUS
1
.1
UTILITY POLE
7
7.1
SCHOOL BUS
2
.2
NON -BREAK LUM POLE
1
1.0
ACTIVITY BUS
BREAKAWAY LUM POLE
TRUCK 2 AXLES
26
2.4
NON -BREAK SIGN
3
3.1
TRUCK 3 AXLES
1
.1
BREAKAWAY SIGN
TRUCK TRACTOR SEMI
8
.8
COMMERCIAL SIGN
1
1.0
TRUCK TRACTOR ONLY
1
.1
END SHOULD GUARDRAIL
TAXICAB
FAC SHOULD GUARDRAIL
1
1.0
FARM EQUIPMENT
END MEDIAN GUARDRAIL
1
1.0
FARM TRACTOR
FAC MEDIAN GURADRAIL
2
2.0
MOTORCYCLE
3
.3
END SHOULDER BARRIER
MOPED
1
.1
FAC SHOULDER BARRIER
MOTOR SCOOTER
END MEDIAN BARRIER
AMBULANCE
FAC MEDIAN BARRIER
BICYCLE
1
.1
END BRIDGE RAIL
RECREATIONAL VEH
FACE BRIDGE RAIL
2
2.0
TRUCK CAMPER
OV -HEAD OF UNDERPASS
1
1.0
PEDESTRIAN
3
.3
PIER ON SHOULDER
OTHER MOTOR VEH
PIER IN MEDIAN
PICKUP TRUCK
133
12.5
ABUTMENT
TRUCK 4 AXLES
1
.1
TRAFFIC ISLAND
2
2.0
VAN
75
7.1
SHLD BASIN- CULVERT
1
1.0
TOTAL VEHICLES
100.0
MEDIAN BASIN - CULVERT
1
1.0
DITCH BANK
25
25,5
MAILBOX
8
8.2
FENCE OR FENCE POST
1
1.0
CONSTRUCTION BARRIER
CRASH CUSHION
OTHER OBJECT
2
2.0
TOTAL FIXED OBJECTS
98
100.0
* ** END OF T07513 REPORT
* **
------- - - - - -- ____ ___ ______________
---------------
INJURIES REFER TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INJURED, NOT TO THE NUMBER
F
OF ACCIDENTS
= NUMBER
OF
PEOPLE KILLED
A
= NUMBER
OF
A INJURIES (AN A INJURY IS AN INCAPACITATING INJURY
SERIOUS
ENOUGH
TO
PREVENT CARRYING ON NORMAL ACTIVITIES FOR AT LEAST 24
HOURS)
B
= NUMBER
OF
B INJURIES (A B INJURY IS A NONINCAPACITATING INJURY
EVIDENT AT
THE SCENE)
C
= NUMBER
OF
C INJURIES (A C INJURY IS AN INJURY WITH NO VISIBLE
SIGN OF
INJURY
BUT
COMPLAINT OF PAIN OR MOMENTARY UNCONSCIOUSNESS
4_ h!
Town
Country
InterstIte
Mx1os goad
1 * ** STRIP DIAGRAM * **
30000157 - DURHAM - NEAR DURHAM
INTERSECTING ROADS & FEATURES MILE ACCIDENTS OCCURRING AT MILEPOST
POST (NO. REFER TO ACCIDENT -NO IN LISTING)
BEGIN MILEPOST
.00
* 1
2
3
4
5
6
i
.00
* 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.00
* 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
.00
* 22
23
24
25
26
27
2E
.00
* 29
30
31
32
33
34
3E
.00
* 36
37
38
39
40
41
42
.00
* 43
44
45
46
47
48
4S
.00
* 50
51
52
53
54
55
5E
.00
* 57
58
59
60
61
62
63
.00
* 64
65
66
67
68
69
7C
.00
* 71
72
73
74
75
76
77
.00
* 78
79
80
81
82
83
84
.00
* 85
86
87
88
89
90
91
.00
* 92
93
94
BRIDGE
.00
*
10000085
.00
*
20000070
.00
20000015
.00
20000501
.00
.01
* 95
96
97
98
99
100
101
.01
* 102
103
104
105
106
107
108
.01
* 109
110
.02
* 111
112
113
114
115
116
117
.02
* 118
119
120
.03
* 121
122
.04
*
.05
* 123
124
.06
* 125
.07
*
.08
* 126
127
.09
* 128
129
130
131
WOODMONT
.10
* 132
133
134
135
136
137
138
NORTH POINT
.11
* 139
140
141
142
143
144
145
.11
* 146
147
148
149
150
151
152
.11
* 153
154
ALBANY
.11
*
.12
* 155
156
157
.13
* 158
159
DUKE HOMESTEAD
.14
* 160
161
162
163
164
165
166
.15
* 167
.16
*
.17
*
.18
*
.19
* 168
.20
*
.21
* 169
170
171
172
173
FAWN
.22
* 174
175
176
177
178
179
.23
* 180
181
.24
*
.25
*
.26
*
01-1 1
LOMBARD
CARVER
ELLEN
CAMMIE
.27 *
.28 * 182
.29 * 183
.30 * 184 185 186 187
.31 * 188
.32 *
.33 *
.34 * 189
.35 * 190
.36 * 191 192 193 194 195 196 197
.36 * 198
.37 * 199
.38 * 200 201
.39 *
.40 * 202
.41 *
.42 * 203
.43 * 204
.44 * 205
.45 * 206 207
.46 * 208
.47 * 209 210 211 212 213 214
.48 * 215 216 217 218
.49 * 219 220 221 222 223 224 225
.49 * 226 227 228 229 230 231 232
.49 * 233 234 235 236 237 238 239
.49 * 240 241 242
.50 * 243 244 245 246 247 248 249
.50 * 250
.51 * 251 252 253 254
.52 * 255 256
.53 * 257
.54 *
.55 * 258
.56 * 259
.57 * 260
.58
.59 * 261 262 263 264
.60 * 265
.61
.62
.63
.64
.65
.66 * 266
.67
.68
.69 * 267
.70 * 268
.71 * 269 270 271 272
.72 * 273
.73
.74 * 274 275
.75
.76
.77
.78
.79
*
.80
*
.81
*
276
.82
*
277
.83
*
278
KIRKWOOD
.84
*
279
280 281 282 283
.85
*
CHAMBLEE
.86
*
.87
*
284
285
.88
*
BOGART
.89
*
286
287
.90
*
288
.91
*
289
290
.92
*
.93
*
.94
*
291
292 293
.95
*
294
.96
*
.97
*
.98
*
.99
*
295
296
1.00
*
1.01
*
1.02
*
1.03
*
1.04
*
1.05
*
1.06
*
1.07
*
1.08
*
1.09
*
297
1.10
*
1.11
*
298
299
1.12
*
1.13
*
1.14
*
300
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.20
1.21
1.22
1.23
*
301
1.24
*
1.25
*
302
1.26
*
1.27
*
303
1.28
*
1.29
*
1.30
*
304
40001412
1.31
*
305
306
CRYSTAL LAKE
1.31
*
1.32
*
1.33
*
1.34
*
CANNON
PEPPERTREE
1.35
*
1.36
*
1.37
* 307
1.38
*
1.39
* 308
1.40
* 309
310
1.41
* 311
1.42
*
1.43
*
1.44
* 312
1.45
*
1.46
* 313
1.47
*
1.48
*
1.49
*
1.50
*
1.51
1.52
* 314
1.53
1.54
* 315
316
1.55
* 317
1.56
* 318
319 320 321 322 323
1.57
* 324
1.58
* 325
1.59
* 326
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65
* 327
328
1.66
* 329
1.67
1.68
1.69
1.70
1.71
1.72
1.73
1.74
1.75
1.76
1.77
1.78
1.79
1.80
1.81
* 330
1.82
*
1.83
*
1.84
*
1.85
*
1.86
*
1.87
* 331
1.88
1.89
1.90
1.91
1.92
*
1.93
*
1.94
*
1.95
*
1.96
*
1.97
*
332
1.98
*
1.99
*
333
2.00
*
2.01
*
2.02
*
2.03
*
334
335
336
2.04
*
2.05
*
337
2.06
*
338
339
340
40001443
2.07
*
341
342
343
344
345 346 347
2.07
*
348
349
350
351
352 353 354
2.07
*
355
356
HORTON
2.07
*
2.08
*
357
358
359
360
361
2.09
*
362
363
364
2.10
*
2.11
*
CITY -LINE
2.12
*
2.13
*
365
366
367
2.14
*
368
369
2.15
*
2.16
*
2.17
*
370
371
2.18
*
2.19
*
2.20
*
2.21
*
2.22
*
2.23
*
2.24
*
372
2.25
*
2.26
*
2.27
*
373
374
2.28
*
2.29
*
2.30
*
2.31
*
375
2.32
*
2.33
*
VICTORY
2.34
*
376
377
378
379
380 381 382
2.34
*
383
384
385
386
2.35
*
2.36
*
387
2.37
*
2.38
*
388
2.39
*
2.40
*
2.41
*
389
390
40001413
2.42
*
391
392
393
394
395
HILLANDALE
2.42
*
PRISON CAMP
2.42
*
2.43
* 396
2.44
*
2.45
*
2.46
*
2.47
*
2.48
*
2.49
*
2.50
*
2.51
* 397
2.52
*
2.53
*
2.54
*
2.55
*
2.56
*
2.57
*
2.58
*
2.59
*
2.60
*
2.61
* 398
2.62
*
2.63
*
40001540
2.64
* 399
400 401 402 403 404 405
LAND
2.64
*
2.65
* 406
407
2.66
* 408
2.67
* 409
410
2.68
* 411
2.69
* 412
413
2.70
* 414
40001404
2.71
* 415
416 417 418
SHARON
2.71
*
2.72
*
2.73
*
2.74
*
2.75
*
2.76
*
2.77
*
2.78
* 419
2.79
*
2.80
*
2.81
* 420
421
2.82
*
2.83
*
2.84
* 422
2.85
* 423
2.86
*
40001484
2.87
* 424
425 426 427
OLD
2.87
*
2.88
*
2.89
*
2.90
*
2.91
* 428
2.92
* 429
2.93
*
2.94
2.95
2.96
BRIDGE
40001446
LEBANON
2.97
*
430
431
2.98
*
2.99
*
3.00
*
3.01
*
3.02
*
3.03
*
3.04
*
3.05
*
432
3.06
*
3.07
*
433
3.08
*
3.09
*
3.10
*
3.11
*
3.12
*
3.13
*
3.14
*
3.15
*
3.16
*
3.17
*
434
435
3.18
*
3.19
*
3.20
*
436
437
3.21
*
3.22
*
3.23
*
3.24
*
3.25
*
3.26
*
3.27
*
438
439
3.28
*
3.29
*
3.30
*
3.31
*
3.32
*
3.33
*
3.34
*
3.35
*
3.36
*
440
3.37
*
441
442 443
3.38
*
3.39
*
3.40
*
3.41
*
3.42
*
3.43
*
3.44
*
3.45
*
444
445 446
3.45
*
3.46
*
447
3.47
*
3.48
*
3.49
*
3.50
*
3.51
*
3.52
*
448
449
3.53
*
3.54
*
OPEN AIR CAMP
3.55
*
450
3.56
*
3.57
*
3.58
*
40001447
3.59
*
451
452 453
CAMP
3.59
*
40001446
3.59
*
LEBANON
3.59
*
3.60
*
3.61
*
3.62
*
3.63
*
454
3.64
*
3.65
*
3.66
*
3.67
*
3.68
*
3.69
*
455
3.70
*
3.71
*
3.72
*
3.73
*
3.74
*
3.75
*
3.76
*
3.77
*
3.78
*
3.79
*
456
3.80
*
3.81
*
3.82
*
3.83
*
3.84
*
3.85
*
457
3.86
*
40001448
3.87
*
458
459 460 461 462 463 464
LATTA
3.87
*
3.88
*
465
3.89
*
3.90
*
3.91
*
466
3.92
*
3.93
3.94
*
3.95
*
40001574
3.96
*
467
468
GRADY
3.96
*
3.97
*
469
3.98
*
470
3.99
*
4.00
*
471
4.01
*
4.02
*
472
4.03
*
473
40001449
4.04
*
474
475 476 477 478 479 480
4.04
*
481 482 483 484 485 486 487
4.04
*
488 489 490 491 492 493 494
REDMAN
4.04
*
UMSTEAD
4.04
*
4.05
*
495 496
4.06
*
4.07
*
4.08
*
4.09
*
4.10
*
4.11
*
4.12
*
497
4.13
*
40002322
4.14
*
498
4.15
*
4.16
*
4.17
*
4.18
*
4.19
*
4.20
*
4.21
*
4.22
*
4.23
*
4.24
*
4.25
*
40002399
4.26
*
499
4.27
*
4.28
*
500
4.29
*
501
4.30
*
502
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
*
503
4.40
*
4.41
*
4.42
*
4.43
*
4.44
*
4.45
*
4.46
*
4.47
*
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
4.52
4.53
4.54
4.55
4.56
4.57
40002366
4.58 *
4.59 *
4.60 *
4.61 * 504
4.62 *
4.63 *
4.64 *
4.65 *
4.66 *
4.67 *
4.68 *
4.69 *
4.70 *
4.71 * 505
4.72 *
4.73 *
4.74 *
4.75 *
4.76 *
4.77 *
4.78 *
4.79 *
4.80 *
4.81 *
4.82 *
4.83 *
4.84
4.85
4.86
4.87
4.88
4.89
4.90
4.91
4.92
4.93
4.94
4.95
4.96
4.97
4.98
4.99
5.00
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04 *
5.05 *
5.06
5.07
5.08
5.09
5.10
5.11 * 506
5.12 *
5.13 *
5.14 *
40002345
40001455
5.15 *
5.16 *
5.17 *
5.18
5.19
5.20
5.21
5.22
5.23
5.24
5.25
5.26
5.27
5.28
5.29
5.30
5.31
5.32
5.33
5.34
5.35 *
5.36 * 507
5.36 *
5.37 *
5.38 *
5.39 *
5.40 *
5.41 *
5.42 *
5.43 *
5.44 *
5.45 *
5.46 * 508 509
5.47 *
5.48 *
5.49 *
5.50 *
5.51 * 510
5.52 *
5.53 *
5.54 *
5.55 *
5.56 *
5.57 *
5.58 *
5.59 *
5.60 *
5.61 *
5.62 *
5.63 *
5.64 *
5.65 *
5.66 * 511
5.67 *
5.68 *
5.69 *
5.70 *
40002360
5.71
*
5.72
*
5.73
*
5.74
*
5.75
*
5.76
* 512
5.77
*
5.78
*
5.79
*
5.80
*
5.81
*
5.82
*
5.83
*
5.84
*
5.85
5.86
5.87
5.88
5.89
5.90
5.91
* 513
5.92
5.93
5.94
5.95
5.96
* 514 515 516
5.97
5.98
5.99
6.00
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
6.08
6.09
6.10
6.11
*
6.12
*
6.13
*
6.14
*
6.15
*
6.16
*
6.17
*
6.18
*
6.19
*
6.20
*
6.21
*
6.22
*
6.23
*
6.24
*
6.25
*
6.26
*
6.27
*
40001456
6.28
*
6.29
*
6.30
*
6.31
*
6.32
*
6.33
*
6.34
*
6.35
*
6.36
*
517
6.37
*
6.38
*
6.39
*
518
6.40
*
6.41
*
6.42
6.43
6.44
6.45
6.46
6.47
6.48
6.49
*
519 520 521
6.50
*
6.51
6.52
6.53
6.54
6.55
6.56
6.57
*
6.58
*
6.59
*
522 523 524 525
6.60
*
6.61
*
6.62
*
6.63
*
6.64
*
6.65
*
6.66
*
6.67
*
6.68
*
6.69
*
526
6.70
*
6.71
*
6.72
*
6.73
*
6.74
*
6.75
*
6.76
*
6.77
*
6.78
*
6.79
*
527
6.80
*
6.81
*
6.82
*
6.83
*
6.84
*
40001451
6.85
*
6.86
*
6.87
*
528
6.88
*
6.89
*
6.90
*
6.91
*
6.92
*
6.93
*
6.94
*
6.95
*
6.96
*
6.97
*
6.98
*
6.99
*
529
7.00
*
7.01
*
7.02
*
530
7.03
*
7.04
*
7.05
*
7.06
*
7.07
*
531 532
7.08
*
7.09
*
7.10
*
7.11
*
7.12
*
7.13
*
7.14
*
7.15
*
7.16
*
7.17
*
533 534
7.18
*
7.19
*
7.20
*
7.21
*
7.22
*
7.23
*
7.24
*
7.25
*
7.26
*
7.27
*
7.28
*
7.29
*
7.30
*
7.31
*
7.32
*
7.33
*
7.34
*
7.35
*
7.36
*
7.37
*
7.38
*
7.39
*
7.40
*
7.41
*
40001002
40001592
40002389
40002396
7.42 *
7.43 *
7.44 *
7.45 *
7.46 * 535
7.47 * 536 537
7.47 * 543 544
7.48 * 545 546
7.49 *
7.50 *
7.51 *
7.52 *
7.53 *
7.54 *
7.55 * 547
7.56 *
7.57 *
7.58 *
7.59 *
7.60 *
7.61 *
7.62 *
7.63 *
7.64 *
7.65 *
7.66 *
7.67 *
7.68
7.69 *
7.70 *
7.71 *
7.72 *
7.73
7.74 *
7.75 *
7.76 *
7.77 *
7.78 *
7.79 *
7.80 *
7.81 *
7.82 *
7.83 *
7.84 *
7.85 *
7.86 *
7.87 *
7.88 *
7.89 * 548
7.90 *
7.91 * 549
7.92 *
7.93 *
7.94 * 550 551
7.95 *
7.96 * 552
7.97 *
538 539 540 541 542
40001445
CULVERT
40001461
40002315
8.55 *
8.56 *
8.57 *
8.58 *
8.59 *
8.60 *
8.61 *
8.62 *
8.63 *
8.64 *
8.65 *
8.66 *
8.67 *
8.68 *
8.69 *
8.70 *
8.71 *
8.72 *
8.73 *
8.74 *
8.75 *
8.76 *
8.77 *
8.78 *
8.79 *
8.80 *
8.81 *
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.88 *
8.89 *
8.90 *
8.91 *
8.92 *
8.93 *
8.94
8.95 *
8.96 *
8.97 *
8.98 *
8.99 *
9.00 *
9.01 *
9.02 *
9.03 *
9.04 *
9.05 *
9.06 *
9.07 *
9.08 *
9.09 *
9.10 *
9.11 *
557 558 559
560
40002396
BRIDGE
7.98 *
7.99 *
8.00 *
8.01 *
8.02 *
8.03 *
8.04 *
8.05 *
8.06 *
8.07 *
8.08 *
8.09 *
8.10 *
8.11 *
8.12 *
8.13 *
8.14 *
8.15
8.16
8.17
8.18
8.19
8.20
8.21
8.22
8.23
8.24
8.25
8.26
8.27
8.28
8.29
8.30
8.31
8.32
8.33
8.34
8.35 *
8.36 *
8.37 *
8.38 *
8.39 *
8.40 *
8.41 *
8.42 *
8.43 *
8.44 *
8.45 *
8.46 *
8.47 *
8.48 *
8.49 *
8.50 *
8.51 *
8.52 *
8.53 *
8.54 *
553
554
555 556
BRIDGE
GUESS
9.12 *
9.13
9.14 *
9.15 *
9.16 *
9.17 *
9.18 *
9.19 *
9.20 *
9.21 *
9.22 *
9.23 *
9.24 *
9.25 *
9.26 *
9.27 *
9.28 *
9.29 *
9.30 *
9.31 *
9.32 *
9.33 *
9.34 *
9.35 * 561
9.36 *
9.37 *
9.38 *
9.39 *
9.40 *
9.41 *
9.42 *
9.43 *
9.44 *
9.45 *
9.46 *
9.47 *
9.48 *
9.48 *
9.49 *
9.50 * 562
9.51 *
9.52 *
9.53 *
9.54 *
9.55 * 563
9.56 *
9.57 *
9.58 *
9.59 *
9.60 *
9.61 *
9.62 *
9.63 *
9.64 *
9.65 *
9.66 *
9.67 *
9.68
9.69
40002371 9.70
END MILEPOST 9.71
COUNTY -LINE 9.71
* ** END OF T07511M REPORT * **
� ���
:�° �� �
���tc�.
3 �'
3� �� � *�
��
;� v� � �� y � � �a
��� � ���
����3����y��
��
ti � � �,�
t �
�t ��i i � �
� � -. � � ��
1 � 1 �
ti i
� 4 1
i y i
i � , ` �
�'
� , � ., r,
� �, \ ►
,� �
� � 11 � � `
1 � 4
�` \ ,l ` �, , i 1
�� �� �
� � � � � �►
,�
. �
ti
< �
�� ��,�'�
\ i
� �� � `'
1,� � y �
� � �,
� \ q i � �
i
� .
� � � � �
i , �; ` �
� � �
�� � ����
� � ���� � c
g ��� ��� ���� A �`�� ����� ��
:� �_ �
�,
.��� � ���� � ����4����
3 e � � s �,� �� ����s � � �
/'�.JGf /'...�� • L��/ /� `� i��.Q/�ie� ���L•�iC %�2�� L`"7�/c/G i���. -.�G�/ L %2 %�iZ� .
o J
a-it �l-ezl
7 e-
0 Ve r-
14
MaryAnn E. Black
Chairman
615 Orindo Drive
Durham, NC 27713
Ellen W. Reckhow
Vice - Chairman
11 Pine Top Place
Durham, NC 27705
N
SEP 17 1999
COUNTY OF DURHAM
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
September 14, 1999
Ms. Alice Gordon, Chairman
Coun Board of Commissioners p�STR�B'``
Orange �'
PO Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Dear Ms. Gordon:
William V. Bell
1003 Huntsman Drive
Durham, NC 27713
Joe W. Bowser
9 Druid Place
Durham, NC 27707
Becky M. Heron
4425 Kerley Road
Durham, NC 27705
I am writing to inform you about an action taken by the Durham County Board of
Commissioners at their meeting on Monday, September 13. The action is related to the
site on the Orange/Durham County line that your Board is considering for possible
acquisition for a construction and demolition landfill (C &D) or for other county use.
As you may be aware, in 1992, as part of a countywide open space plan, Durham County
adopted the Little River Corridor as one of five "natural area corridors" due to its
outstanding natural significance. Special open space protection plans have been or will be
prepared for each of these corridors. The New Hope Creek Corridor was one of the
designated corridors, and Durham County, the City of Durham, Chapel Hill, and Orange
County worked cooperatively to prepare a plan for the preserving the most important
elements of that area.
The Little River Corridor is strategically important for Durham and Orange Counties for
several reasons. The protection of the upstream portions of the Little River is.important
to help preserve the water quality for the Little River Reservoir. The existing high quality
and purity of the water is evidenced by a number of rare mussel species that depend on
very clean waters, including four species that are state listed as threatened and candidates
for the federal endangered species list. The Little River corridor is also important for
wildlife habitat and for its excellent potential for low - impact recreation opportunities for
Durham and Orange residents. The Durham Board of County Commissioners previously
approved spending $400,000 in county park and recreation bond funds to acquire lands
along the Little River corridor. The County has already acquired 50 acres of land along
this corridor at US 501 North using $204,000 of these funds.
The 178 -acre tract in Orange County presently being considered for a C & D landfill
(labeled `B" on the attached map) is bordered on the south and east by a 390 -acre
Durham County Administrative Complex, 200 E. Main Street, Durham, NC 27701 (919) 560 -0027 Fax (919) 560 -0020
Equal Employment / Affinnative Action Employer
Durham County Board of Commissioners
September 14, 1999
Page 2
undeveloped tract that is also for sale. This larger tract is split by the Orange/Durham
line, with 255 acres in Durham County (shown as "Al "), and 135 acres in Orange County
(shown as A2). It was owned by George Newton and is now held in trust by the Triangle
Community Foundation until sold. Together these two properties comprise almost 570
acres, and when preserved together present an exciting opportunity for Durham and
Orange to work cooperatively to provide additional recreation and open space
opportunities for our county residents. Such an opportunity could be lost if these tracts
were to be sold and developed in the coming years. From very preliminary investigations,
the site is generally felt to be appropriate for a number of recreation and open space uses.
Few undeveloped areas of this size remain on the Little River corridor, and we invite
Orange County to join with us to plan soon for the acquisition and preservation of both
parcels for park, recreation, and open space uses. The Triangle Land Conservancy is
prepared to assist Durham and Orange Counties with the coordination and acquisition of
this critical Little River land assemblage. The New Hope Creek Corridor open space
effort provides a model for how our communities can plan for and work cooperatively to
protect our region's most significant and sensitive open spaces. We feel that the potential
to plan jointly for a 570 -acre park and open space preserve along the Little River corridor
presents a similar opportunity.
To convey formally our intent, the Durham County Board of Commissioners voted
unanimously on Monday September 13 to pursue acquisition of the Durham County
portion of the Newton Tract and to urge the Orange County Board of Commissioners to
also acquire the Orange County portion of the site, to combine it with the 178 acre
"landfill" parcel, and to develop jointly a master plan for the use of these lands as a
recreation and open space amenity for our growing communities.
We look forward to hearing from you and to working with you on this exciting
opportunity.
Sincerely,
at"n) 9. ,A
MaryAnn E. lack, Chairman
Durham County Board of Commissioners
Attachment
cc: Kate Dixon, Executive Director, Triangle Land Conservancy
Dick Hails, Interim Planning Director
Jane Korest, Senior Planner
1 M,44
1 =�
OWN
a Prnn artias
Sep 21 99 02:42p Philip Post & Rssociates 919 493 6548 p.l
PHILIPXWMA67.TMK.092199,K
POST
ASSOCIATES
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Alice Gordon- Chair, County CU11U1 issiV11CfS
From: Phil Post- Philip Post & Associates, Inc.
Subject: C& D Landfill
Date: September 20,1999
I write to encourage you to select a C &D Landfill site in southern Orange County.
First, we need and must have a municipal C & D site.
Second, the site should be in southern Orange County, that is south of interstate 40.
I, of course, dV uvt have access to exact generation rates, but C& D landfill is generated by urban
activities and urban growth. l believe the preponderance of C & D waste in this county has come
and will come from south of I -40 and even though I own business property and a home in Chapel
Hill south of I -40,1 believe the problems of urban growth and development should be solved
right here. We do not need to export our C& D waste to another part of Orange County nor to an
out -of- county site.
Our big OWASA Sewage treatment plant is in southern Orange, and so our C& D landfill ought
to remain somewhere in southern Orange. We need a site.
I urge you to select a C& D site in southern Orange.
ENGINEERS
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
401 Providence Road
P.O. Box 2134
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 -2134
(919) 929 -1173
(919) 493 -2600
(919) 493 -6548 FAX
Post -Ir Fax Note 7671
DO- 9�yr�4ry
pages
To a6-"!"C
From
COA)CP1.0p r7;1s.
Co.
Phone #
Phone # Q yq _ It 7,3
Fax#
Fax# +17),(Oilf
RI
m
ca
m
O
m
a-
m
m
DURHAM
1 8 6 9
CITY OF MEDICINE
September 21, 1999
Orange County Commissioners
CITY OF DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
Nicholas J. Tennyson
Mayor
101 City Hall Plaza
Durham, NC 27701
(919) 560 -4333
(919) 560 -4801 (Fax)
Your decision concerning the C & D Landfill is of direct interest to me as a
citizen and public official in Durham. Our City Council was briefed on the
plan, but we took no official action and I am writing this on my own
behalf, not as a representative of, or at the direction of, Council.
I understand that you have a difficult challenge in siting a landfill to serve
your citizens. You are fortunate that your current landfill site gives you an
expansion option for a few years and I hope that you act to use that
C
IT expansion, as opposed to developing a satellite facility.
L
O
E The tract on the Durham County /Orange County line has been discussed as
M particularly problematic because of its proximity to our water supply.
L Having made decisions with regional impact, I can understand that you do
3 not need me to tell you which decision to make.
ra
I will rely completely on your judgment, so long as your decision is made
= as if the reservoir in question were Cane Creek, or University Lake. If you
would put a C & D Landfill in your own watershed, then you could decide
to put one in ours.
ca I don't think you would and I hope that you won't.
n Sincerel ,
n
n
1
u Nicholas J. Tennyson
Mayor
u
_`J NOT PRINTED AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE
t
On -site Disposal of Construction &
Demolition Waste
(The information in this report has been excerpted from "The Regulation of Solid
and Hazardous Wastes: A Builder's Guide", published by the rational Association
of Home Builders.)
Introductory Comments
By Mark Marcoplos
Several weeks ago I proposed that developments greater than twenty acres be
required to have the C&D waste generated on that site disposed of there as well.
The benefits include:
• Less landfill space consumption.
• The cost of disposal is borne by the developers, builders, and homebuyers
instead of the taxpayers at- large.
• The waste does not have to be transported which means less traffic, less
pollution, less noise in communities on the way to the dump, and less litter on
the roadsides.
• Since valuable land will be at stake, the developers and builders will have real
incentives to reduce the amount of waste they generate.
• Since they will also be liable for any toxins that may be detected on the site, less
hazardous materials will be utilized. This benefits both the natural environment
and the construction workers who handle these materials.
It is my observation as a builder that benign materials can be used in construction
and that it is a simple matter to dispose safely of construction waste. The fact that so
many states allow on -site disposal seems to substantiate that assumption.
Marls Marcoplos
marcoFlos(a�ol.com
968 -0056
I
California
• Ground gypsum and wood chips may be incorporated into soil as soil amendments
Florida
• C &D debris may be disposed of on the property where it is generated, or on property
which is adjacent or contiguous to the property where it is generated, provided that
adjacent or contiguous property is owned by the generator of the C&D waste.
Illinois
• The practice of burying C &D on site is not addressed in the I.E.P.A. Waste Disposal
Regulations. On site burial of "clean construction or demolition debris" (as defined
above) is allowed. All other C &D must be disposed at either a municipal solid waste
landfill, or at a construction and demolition landfill.
Indiana
• Land clearing debris and clean fill may be buried on the site of generation. All other
C &D waste may not be buried on site.
Kentucky
• Kentucky's Permit -by -rule policy allows for the disposal of certain solid wastes by a
practice common to the industry, such as burial of C &D wastes by developers. This is
permitted as long s the burial does not pose a threat to human health or substantial
environmental impact. The following may be disposed of according to the Permit -by-
Rule policy:
Construction Wastes: One time disposal of construction material is permitted if disposal
is (a) at the point of generation; (b) during the period of construction; and (c) if the
wastes do not contain leachable hazardous constituents or asbestos.
Demolition Wastes: Disposal of demolition waste is permitted on the property where the
demolition occurs during the period of demolition except for materials containing
asbestos.
Land Clearing Debris: This is permitted if disposal occurs on the property where
clearing occurred.
Louisiana
• Persons wishing to bury C &D waste on site must notify the Solid Waste Division of
such activity for each site.
Maine
• C &D waste can be buried on site under the following conditions: (1) the waste must be
buried on the same parcel of land in which it was generated; (2) the burial site must be
smaller than one acre.
Massachusetts
•C &D waste can never be buried on site, with the exception of some land clearing waste
(stumps, trees, brush, etc.) Before these wastes can be buried on site, a developer must
apply for a Site Assignment permit from the local board of health.
Michigan
• C &D waste can be buried on -site.
Missouri
• C &D waste can be buried on -site, subject to the following limit:
(1) any area receiving only uncontaminated soil, rock, sand, gravel, concrete
with minimal rebar, asphaltic concrete, cinder blocks and bricks for fill or
reclamation, need not obtain a permit to dispose of such wastes on site;
(2) the disposal by an individual of solid wastes resulting from his/her own
residential activities on property owned or lawfully occupied by him/her,
does not require a permit prior to disposal of such wastes. This does not
include remodeling, but only
If a contractor wishes to bury anything on site other than these materials, the
contractor must first contact the Department of Natural Resources.
Nebraska
• C &D waste may be buried on site, as long as it is buried directly below the foundation
of the house.
4
New Jersey
• A contractor may dispose of construction debris, which is generated on -site, provided
that the contractor meets several restrictions. For example:
(a) The construction waste must have been generated on -site and must be less
than 1000 cubic yards. No other waste may be transported to the construction
site for disposal;
(b) The waste must be limited to Category T stumps and tree parts, scrap wood,
cardboard, paper waste, non - asbestos insulation, asphalt, plaster and wall
board; or Category H. rock/gravel, glass, masonry material (e.g., brick
cement, and concrete)
(c) Category I waste must be placed so as to remain at least three feet above the
high water table; and
(d) All fill areas must be at least 25 feet from any foundation utility line, or
roadway, and at least ten feet from septic system.
New Mexico
• C &D waste can be buried on -site, provided that the C&D waste is buried on the site of
generation.
North Dakota
• This may be allowed on a case by case basis. For more information, contact the
Department of Health.
Ohio
• Construction wastes may be buried at the construction site only, and only if done in
accordance with traditional practices.
"Clean hard fill" is exempt from regulation. Clean hard fill includes inert materials such
as stone, brick, concrete or asphalt block, etc. These materials may be used as fill by
contractor at any time on the contractor's own site, or at any additional site when the
local health department is provided with seven days notice of the intended use.
Rhode Island
• Certain materials are allowed to be buried on -site. These include, but are not limited to:
concrete, cement, brick, inert materials that are free of other organic or hazardous
materials, etc. These materials may be used as fill.
fl
South Carolina
• The disposal of trees, stumps, wood chips, and yard waste is permitted as long as the
waste is generated on property under the same ownership, as it is disposed.
Tennessee
• Disposal of C&D is permitted without obtaining a permit from the Department of
Environment and Conservation, at facilities which are located on the site of generation
and which will have a fill area of less that one acre in areal extent when completed. Also,
solely natural rock and dirt, pavement, and/or concrete or brick rubble may be used as fill
material.
Utah
* C&D waste can be buried on -site, as long as there is no environmental threat, or public
nuisance.
Vermont
• Developers must obtain an Insignificant Waste Disposal Event Permit from the
Department of Environmental Conservation. This permit allows for a one -time disposal
of limited materials (untreated wood, stumps, brush, clean non - recycled glass, clean
pavement (bituminous concrete), bricks, masonry and mortar; and other inert materials
that may be approved by the Agency).
A further limitation is that these materials be buried on the site on which they are
generated. Prohibited areas include, but are not limited to the Green Mountain National
Forest, regulated wetlands, National Wildlife Refuge, etc.
The following minimum siting criteria apply to the disposal of inert wastes in
non - prohibited areas
(1) Minimum distance from the edge of the disposal area to the adjoining property
lines: 50 feet;
(2) Minimum distance from the edge of the disposal area to a perennial stream or
other surface waters: 100 feet;
(3) Minimum distance to seasonal high ground water: 3 feet;
(4) Minimum distance to bedrock: 10 feet;
(5) Minimum distance to surface waters or drinking water supplies: 100 feet;
(6) Maximum slope for disposal areas: 1:3 (33 ' /Z %)
Virginia
•Yes, subject to local ordinances. If not prohibited by local ordinance, limited quantities
of inert wastes may be buried on the site of generation. Open dumps are strictly
prohibited.
i
West Virginia
• With a D -2 permit this is possible for developers and remodelers. D-3 permits only
apply to an individual homeowner wishing to dispose of existing materials on the
owner's property.
Wisconsin
• Yes, under certain circumstances: (1) Developers may obtain permission from D.N.R.
for a one -time disposal of demolition waste; (2) developers may open a Small Demolition
Waste Landfill (see above); and (3) developers may use the following materials as fill:
clean soil, brick, building stone, concrete, re- enforced concrete, broken pavement,
unpainted or untreated wood, sand, gravel or stone, and similar nonmetallic earth
materials.
Relations with Durham County f� o,, g, L. -fey �-,e f4el
There is considerable (and understandable) anger growing within Durham County with
regard to this project. It has not escaped notice that while on the one hand Carrboro,
citing the potential pollution of drinking water, recently turned down a request to put an
organic golf course in the University Lake watershed, while Orange County is proceeding
full speed ahead to put a C &D landfill within a stone's throw of Durham's Lime River.
The assumption made in Durham County is that the difference here has to do with whose
watershed is threatened.
This issue has the potential to poison relations between Durham and Orange Counties for
years to come. Consider:
- -The Durham County Commissioners have already expressed their opposition to this
project.
-- Durham County is intervening with the state DNER to oppose the issuance of a permit
for this facility.
-- Durham County's zoning ordinance would not allow the development of any C&D
landfill this close to the Little River. If this site were a few hundred yards to the east it
would not be permitted because of Durham County's watershed protection zoning.
-- Consider what will happen the first time wastes from this facility are found floating
down the Little River?
-- Consider what will happen the first time there is a serious accident along Guess Road
(or elsewhere along the transportation route) due to debris falling onto the roadway from
trucks heading to this facility?