HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-07-1999 - 9bs
c 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: December 7, 1999
Action Agenda
Item No. j - b
SUBJECT: Correspondence to Chapel Hill Town Council Regarding Greene Tract
DEPARTMENT: County Manager /Planning PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT-
Draft 1217/99 Letter to CH Town Council John Link or Rod Visser, ext 2300
Proposed Rezoning Process Schedule Craig Benedict, ext 2585
11/18/99 Letter from Mayor Waldorf TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Greene Tract Map Hillsborough 732 -8181
Chapel Hill 968 -4601
Durham 688 -7331
Mebane 336- 227 -2031
PURPOSE: To discuss the form and substance of proposed correspondence to the Chapel
Hill Town Council concerning rezoning of a portion of the Greene Tract.
BACKGROUND: At several meeting this fall, most recently the November 22, 1,999 work
session, the Board of Commissioners has discussed the steps involved in the rezoning of a 60
acre portion of the Greene Tract, as provided for in the recently approved solid waste
management interlocal agreement. The County's Planning staff, in collaboration with the
Chapel Hill planning staff,' have developed a proposed schedule of activities that would lead to
that rezoning and would keep on track the proposed transfer of solid waste management
responsibility from the Town to the County on March 20, 2000.
A draft letter has been pIrepared that would formally communicate to the Chapel Hill Town
Council the BOCC's proposals and concerns regarding the rezoning process. The Board may
wish to discuss and revise the proposed letter and provide direction to staff regarding the final
version to be sent to the Town Council.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact associated with the preparation and
transmission of this letter.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board discuss the proposed
letter and provide direction to staff regarding the final version to be transmitted to the Town
Council.
December 7, 1999
The Honorable Rosemary Waldorf, Mayor
Town of Chapel Hill
306 N: Columbia St.
Chapel.Hill, NC 27516
Dear Rosemary:
At the most recent work session of the County Commissioners on November 22, we
discussed some of the steps that will be necessary to accomplish the planned transfer of
solid waste management responsibility from the Town to the County on March 20, 2000. Of
particular importance to our two boards is the completion of all steps that will lead to rezoning
a portion of the Greene Tract, as provided for in the solid waste management interlocal
agreement, to permit certain solid waste management facilities and activities.'
We acknowledge the preference expressed by the Town Council in your November 18 letter
that sites other than the Greene Tract be considered for future solid waste activities. I think it
is fair to say that the Board of. Commissioners would .likewise prefer not to use the Greene
Tract for solid waste activities. When the time comes for siting decisions, we will certainly
consider all reasonable alternatives. However, the interlocal agreement was drawn up in its
final form to reflect the reality that the Board of Commissioners best choice may be to. use a
portion of the Greene Tract for solid waste facilities essential to our collectively meeting our
established solid waste reduction` goals.
County staff has developed the attached possible timetable to review a zoning application for
the Greene Tract. With the March 20 handover date as a planned deadline, staff have
worked backwards through the zoning application process to establish other public meeting
requirements such as the joint planning area public hearing (JPAPH). Town and County
zoning processes are somewhat different, but they will of necessity intersect at the JPAPH,
which is proposed to take place on February 21,-2000.
At the request of the Board of Commissioners, the Solid Waste Department is collaborating
with the County's Environment and Resource Conservation Department to contract for
several surveys of the Greene Tract. These include biological resources, archeological, and
cultural surveys of the entire 169 -acre parcel that will help determine the most appropriate
60 -acre site for the eventual 'material handling district. The exact 60 acre delineation of the
DRAFT 3
proposed zoning area will not be known until approximately March 1, 2000, so we propose
for the first stages of review that the 169 acre area (less a portion that is explained below) be
considered with a clear statement that only 60 acres will be designated before final
adoptions. We also propose that this request for rezoning be given expedited review.
The Board of Commissioners also requests that the Town Council entertain an expedited
process to consider text amendment changes regarding the buffers specified in the recently
established materials handling district. We believe that a requirement for a 200 foot
perimeter buffer that would be designated within the 60 acre portion of the Greene Tract,
particularly as that would apply to the 60 acre portion of the Greene Tract under
consideration, would unnecessarily constrain the County in making the best possible use of
the property. By way of example, there is already extensive buffering in place along the
railroad track on the eastern portion of the tract and in the northwest portion of the property
adjacent to the Neville Tract.
In developing the formal rezoning request, we propose that the 169 acre parcel noticed for
possible rezoning be reduced by a 100 foot area around its perimeter in certain places, as
noted on the attached map. This will reduce the likelihood of a rezoning protest petition by
creating what is essentially and practically a 100 foot buffer in the areas surrounding the
Greene Tract, adjacent to areas where the adjacent property owners would ,want such a
buffer. Presumably, the buffers that are or will be adopted by the Council surrounding the
60 acres could be located in this 100 foot perimeter area. ` We also propose that the buffer
requirement elsewhere be limited to 100 feet and not be required adjacent to the Neville
Tract and the railroad.
Please review the proposed schedule with the Town Council and your administration to
determine the feasibility of this timeline. The County Manager and his staff are available to
meet with the Town Manager and his staff to discuss the scheduling and substance of this
proposal. We appreciate your cooperation and look forward to accomplishing a timely and
effective transfer of solid waste management responsibilities on March 20, 2000.
Sincerely,
Alice M. Gordon, Chair
Board of County Commissioners
Enclosures
xc: John M. Link, Jr., County Manager
y
DRAFT 4
PROPOSED REZONING PROCESS SCHEDULE
RURAL TRANSITION (RT -1)
TO MATERIALS HANDLING DISTRICT
JAN 18
BOCC ADVERTISEMENT OF JPA
PUBLIC HEARING - -
JAN
CHAPEL HILL ADVERTISEMENT OF JPA
PUBLIC HEARING
FEB
CHAPEL HILL PLANNING BOARD
REVIEW OF REZONING
FEB 21
JPA PUBLIC HEARING
MAR 1
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION OF
..REZONING
MAR
CHAPEL HILL TOWN BOARD REVIEW
AND ADOPTION OF REZONING
MAR 14
BOCC REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF
REZONING (New Meeting)
MAR 20
BOCC ACCEPTS SOLID WASTE
OPERATIONS (PROPOSED)
MAR 21
REGULAR BOCC MEETING
L��LS� V LS
�) NOV 1 9. 1999
ETA cAIS
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL
306 NORTH COLUMBIA STREET
CHAPEL HmL, NORTH CAROLINA 27516
OFMCE of ttffi MAYOR (919) 968 -2714
5
Attachment l
ip
/
16BANKS RdAD
r _
1 ' +`\mil• i 1•''
Y 1 1 1
\`\ 1 j'• ( \• ! \ trig \ � `\ � / � 1 i � �; \\
r ; • ! � � ` \� .\ � \\ `\ 520
Ir
\ ` ♦ I
IRA
Lc
OA
WO
A 550
t� 510 '-ft r/ i i 11 r
LIJ -_- - -` 1
� � i, -' Gam_ -► ' � \t 1 1 f ++ ii '
00199 • FA a
LoA
/.-, J_n_-t4� S. A V,I
MOSES CAREY, JR., CHAIR ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STEPHEN H. HAUdOT/S, V /CE CHAIR P.O. BOX
MARGARET W. BROWN
ALICE M. GORDON ,200 S. CAMERON STREET
BARRYJACOBS HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278
December 9, 1999
The Honorable Rosemary Waldorf, Mayor
Town of Chapel Hill
306 N. Columbia St.
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Dear Rosemary:
At the most recent work session of the County Commissioners on November 22, we
discussed some of the steps necessary to accomplish the planned transfer of solid waste
management responsibility from the Town to the County on March 20, 2000. Of particular
importance to our two boards is the completion of all steps that will lead to rezoning a portion
of the Greene Tract, as provided for in the solid waste management interlocal agreement, to
permit certain solid waste management facilities and activities.
We acknowledge the preference expressed by the Town Council in your November 18 letter
that sites other than the Greene Tract be considered for future solid waste activities. The
Board of Commissioners would likewise prefer not to use the Greene Tract for solid waste
activities. When the time comes for siting decisions, we will certainly consider all reasonable
alternatives. However, the interlocal agreement reflects the reality that the Board of
Commissioners' best choice may be to use a portion of the Greene Tract for solid waste
facilities essential to our collectively meeting our established solid waste reduction goals.
The County staff has attached a proposed timetable to review a zoning application for the
Greene Tract. With a March 20 handover as a planned deadline, the staff has worked
backwards through the zoning application process to establish other public meeting
requirements such as the joint planning area public hearing (JPAPH). Town and County
zoning processes are somewhat different, but they will of necessity intersect at the JPAPH,
which is proposed to take place on February 21, 2000.
At the request of the Board of Commissioners, the Solid Waste Department is collaborating
with the County's Environment and Resource Conservation Department to contract for
several surveys of the Greene Tract. These include biological resources, archeological, and
cultural surveys of the entire 169 -acre parcel that will help determine the most appropriate
60 -acre site for the eventual 'materials handling district'. The exact 60 -acre delineation of
the proposed zoning area will not be known until approximately March 1, 2000, so we
propose that during the first stages of review, including the February 21 JPA public hearing,
that the 169- acre area (less a portion that is explained below) be considered with a clear
statement that only 60 acres will be designated before final adoptions. We also propose that
this request for rezoning be given expedited review.
You Count In Orange County
(919) 245-2130 . FAX(919) 644 -0246
The Honorable Rosemary Waldorf, Mayor
December 9, 1999
Page 2
The Board of Commissioners also requests that the Town Council entertain an expedited
process to consider text amendment changes regarding the buffers specified in the recently
established materials handling district. We believe that a requirement for a 200 -foot
perimeter buffer within the 60 -acre portion of the Greene Tract, particularly as that would
apply to the 60 -acre portion of the Greene Tract under consideration, would unnecessarily
constrain the County from making the best possible use of the property. The 60 -acre
property would effectively be reduced by about 53% with the imposition of a 200 -foot
perimeter buffer. By way of example, there is already extensive buffering in place along the
railroad track on the eastern portion of the tract and in the northwest portion of the property
adjacent to the Neville Tract.
In developing the formal rezoning request, we propose that the 169 -acre parcel noticed for
possible rezoning be reduced by a 100 -foot area around its perimeter in certain places, as
noted on the attached map. This will reduce the likelihood of a rezoning protest petition by
creating what is essentially and practically a 100 -foot buffer in the areas surrounding the
Greene Tract, abutting areas where the adjacent property owners would want such a buffer.
Presumably, the buffers that are or will be adopted by the Council surrounding the 60 acres
could be located in this 100 -foot perimeter area. We also propose that the buffer
requirement elsewhere be limited to 100 feet and not be required adjacent to the Neville
Tract and the railroad.
Please review the proposed schedule with the Town Council and your administration to
determine the feasibility of this timeline. The County Manager and his staff are available to
meet with the Town Manager and his staff to discuss the scheduling and substance of this
proposal. We appreciate your cooperation and look forward to accomplishing a timely and
effective transfer of solid waste management responsibilities on March 20, 2000.
Sincerely
Moses Carey Jr., Chair
Board of County Commissioners
Enclosures
xc: John M. Link, Jr„ County Manager
PROPOSED REZONING PROCESS SCHEDULE
RURAL TRANSITION (RT -1)
TO MATERIALS HANDLING DISTRICT
JAN 18 BOCC ADVERTISEMENT OF JPA PUBLIC
HEARING
JAN CHAPEL HILL ADVERTISEMENT OF JPA
PUBLIC HEARING
FEB CHAPEL HILL PLANNING BOARD REVIEW OF
REZONING
FEB 21 JPA PUBLIC HEARING
FEB CARRBORO TOWN BOARD REVIEW AND
APPROVAL OF REZONING
MAR 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION OF
REZONING
MAR CHAPEL HILL TOWN BOARD REVIEW AND
ADOPTION OF REZONING
MAR 14 BOCC REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF
REZONING (New Meeting)
MAR 20 BOCC ACCEPTS SOLID WASTE
OPERATIONS (PROPOSED)
MAR 21 REGULAR BOCC MEETING
- ' .• a / i i j 1♦ `-' r' /' r' i // I ,;�1• `— � � - -.` � � AttSC.Ilme2lt
5 IHDF�iLt 1 J 16MANKS RdAD
� fife`
_.
• I � f i ♦ l 11 r i� \ � 11 l 1 / / �
IAI 1.
\N All
_ •SJ ,, 1y�e/£ ..c •• '\ `♦ 1 1 1 .�� r' - \` \J, 1 1 1 —
V'r 71
f}' ; `\� ` �� ♦♦ `� 520 4 %� ,1\ �� ` \♦ `
PMVUE
GRE
•" ' '
X30
• .?• {• \�.�; ..' �' yam• •"+►'�* �•�'O `} % �Y
k `
-7 — � � \ , ; ,mil /1/8 -3
• °: J /I i % i $ \ ` . ♦` +� =_ =f �.�� is
/ J 540 X550
\�
r
• • "� ` `` �- L_ .*._ — %� �—` \\ 520 - - - - -.�
It
,.;:y• L t
y �
�m lea ' E,1 a /�