HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-03-2000-9gORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 3, 2000
Action Age a
Item No.
SUBJECT: Section Two -Beaver Valley- Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Resolution of Approval Page 3
2) Application Page 7
3) Vicinity Map Page 10
4) Agency Comments (EH, FM) Page 11
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 14
G) 8-2-00 Draft Planning Board Minutes Page 30
7) Preliminary Plan (Previously provided)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddie Kirk, Planner II
Extension 2582__ _ _
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane (33fi1227-2031
NOTE: Please bring previously provided
relimina Ian to the meetin .
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Section Two -Beaver Valley Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
Request -Preliminary Plan
Applicant: Bruce and Sara Curtis, owners.
• Subdivision follows the conventional plan with 22.3% open space
• Twenty-two (22) residential lots proposed on a 39.79-acre tract. The average lot size is 1.24
acres outside the common area open space. The minimum lot size is 40,000 square feet.
Location
West of Mace Road and Beaver Valley Section One in Cheeks Township.
Existing and Prop~~ed,Conditions
Existing:
• Zoned Rural Residential (R1).
• Back Creek Protected Watershed.
Physical Features:
• One designated stream running along the east boundary of the property.
• Entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the west and south are medium to large acreage single family residential lots.
• Property to the east is the first section of Beaver Valley.
• Property to the north is owned by the Town of Mebane with Lake Michael located on the
property.
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Beaver Valley Drive, a new public road to be constructed to state standards.
• Beaver Valley Drive extends through Section One from Mace Road, an existing state
secondary road.
• All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
• Proposed public right-ofi way connection to the western property line.
Open Space:
• A 150 foot open space buffer is proposed along the stream on the east side of the property.
• 8.89 acres; 22.3% common area open space proposed on the conventional plan; 25% in-lot
open space.
• Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) = 1.97
Water-S®w®r:
• Water will be from individual wells
• Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable soils to locate a septic system.
R®creation:
• Cheeks District Park
• Dedication of land would be = 1.1 acres
• Payment in Lieu = $10,010.00 (22 lots X $455 per lot)
• No dedication is warranted because no county recreation area has been identified at this
time and the resource protection areas (non transistion areas) are protected by common
area covenants.
Agency Comments:
• Comments attached from Environmental Health and Emergency Management.
Develoament Process. Schedule. and Action
Planning Board:
• First Action: Concept Ptan approved by the Planning Board June 17, 1996. A Phasing
Plan was approved by the Board of Commissioners June 30, 1997 with Section One to be
completed December 2001.
• Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
approval August 2, 2000.
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan
Options:
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall
ha~re one (1) year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-year
extension from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: 1=fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Plannind_Sta_ff Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
Planning Board Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the
attached. Resolution of Approval.
Administration
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
2
3
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date October 3, 2000
Name of Subdivision Section Two Beaver Valley
Owner/Applicant Bruce W. Curtis
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Section Two Beaver Valley subdivision
preliminary plat, dated June 7, 2000 and containing 221ots, subject to the fulfillment of
requirements specified herein.
Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road shall be irrevocably dedicated to
the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County
Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of
dedication of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road. This acceptance by
Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road
and Hawk Rest Road shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation or same other governmental body. Before the Final Plat
of Section Two Beaver Valley Subdivision can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair
area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall
also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is
available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental
Health.
4
B. Roads and Access
1. Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road shall be constructed
to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50'
right-of--way with 5 foot utility easements on each side, and the construction shall
be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest
Road to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An
estimate of the construction cost must be prepazed by a certified/licensed engineer
or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department.
The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an
accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road
construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads. Lots 43 and 55
shall receive access from Heron Hill Road. Lots 56 and 63 shall receive access
from Hawk Rest Road. No driveways shall be permitted within 50' of a street
intersection.
3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review and approval.
4. Approved street name, signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place, or a copy of
the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
5
D. Drainage
1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3c.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions
and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat. The impervious surface limitations for each lot shall indicate
whether the impervious surface includes or excludes one-half (1/2) of the road
width in the calculations.
2. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the
Erosion Control Plan.
3. Stream buffers shall be contained entirely within the open space areas as indicated
on the preliminary plan.
4. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the
Orange County Erosion Control Officer.
E. Parkland
Cash in the amount of $10,010.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in
lieu of pazkland dedication.
2. The entirety of the open space to be shown on the Final Plats shall be irrevocably
dedicated to the homeowners association for recreation/open space use by
residents of the subdivision.
F. Miscellaneous
The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
a. drainage easements as required by D.2. above.
3. Minimum building setbacks shall be as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and
of no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded.
6
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall
be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declazation and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner
and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document
describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
3. The North Cazolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Beaver Valley
Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road have been constructed to State
standazds or that construction plans have been approved prior to Planning
Department signatures on final plat.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant
Clerk to the Boazd
I, __ _, accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
_ - -
acknowledge that each must be met prior. to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant
Date
APPLICATION FOR P~?IrLIU11NARY PLAN APPROVAL
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
ORANGE COUNTY a/s~
• DATE: C.v 7..t]p-~
PLEASic TYPE OR PRINT IINK ONLY)
SUBDIVISIQN NAME: `Z-W O 11 ~~~~,}~ V~c~.C a
LOCATION: {'~ ~•Da+1~ ~
OWNER/DEVELOPER: ~R`~G~ G~]~.~~~
ADDRESS: Z~~ ~~-L~~~.Opl7 TELEPHQNE NO.:
AGENT ONtAGT: ' { TELEPHONENO.: 3Z.--Cs~(aL
~?.Set.~~i~~~a1, .~-
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: I
Orengs County Tex Map _ ~ ~ Black -•-+ ~ Lolls) ~~
Township ~
Zoning bistrictlsl: ,~ {~~~ ~ `
Tatel Number of Acres: .~ `Z• ~ ~ Phases: t
Total Number of Lots: 2 ~ Averagq Lot Size: Minimum Lot Size: d
~
Number/Typa of Structures: (existing) ,
,
(proposed) (
~ m
~
Lineal Feat in Streets: 1~-pp ,
l
Acres in Opan Space: q
Water Supply: Public (specify)
Weatewater Disposal: ~ Public (specif Community ~• Individual .
) C
School District: Q y
ommunity , ~ Individual
Fire•Disirict: /~(
General Land Usas in Aree:
Critical Areas: sireem/drainageweys _ Fact r,~~ 0 (lord prone areas
~
weternh ed (specify) ~ac,L!'Cr~{
historic sites
other lexplain) i
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"7 Yes
Nom, If 'yes'
_
,
please contact the Orange County Tax Oftice. Subdivision of the property may require payment of
deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation",
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet na smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1'+200') and
na larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'-ZO') and must contain the following'inform
ti
a
on:
'
/ )::. '~~
~ subdivision Hems
}?#
'
`~
r:.•
'~" zoning of tract end adjacent
~: ;::
~
^
Hama ~ address cf owner(s) •
properties
`) L •' Hama & eddross of subdivider '~ .'~•''.'•.,~~i•§:. building setback lines by notation
lif other than owner)
'" / or typical lot layout
name of wrva or, an meer,
^~ y g
~ landecepa archksct or architect Rk.
«•„~>>:~ location and width of existing end
,
addraas
rsgiatrstion ~- and seal proposed easements (drainage,
,
u~ ~ ~ Itide- Preliminary Plan utilities, roads, ate.)
exi
ti
~ ~~'
°
~ ,,~
~,. a~4. rwrth arrow
~ •`
' :
n
• •
- g. Proposed end adjoining
rights-of-way including dimensions
~;
s: data (includin revision dates)
E •~ ~ Y g
and street names and state road
township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal fast of road
/ refe-eneoe
• •••~>.~:. Parent Peresl Identification A centerlines and approximate
~
:~%~ dead book and papa A- of property acreage of Haw street rights~f-
~
to he subdivided `
~
,--~ efl
d
~ way
•1
existing and proposed utilitisa,
,,,,_~ boun
ary described with bearings
C ~
•• including typo, sixesy hydrants
E ti and distancer•
total screeQa pf the tract end ,
~ valves, menholds• .', . ,,•.
~ t:
>• ;
~
~ .
.:.
existing end proposed curbs
yc y acreage of Iota, including and _
excluding arse within rights-of- ,
_ putters and culverts, including
~
~ N / way ~ -
' , _
' r_ sizes and gredes,.•.~
`(J-~ >?""`'"<`~ location end width af~allsys
^ ~•
;
~ control comer ,
sidewalks, hike lanes, transit
systems, end bus stcps
~ ~
proposed lot lines with dimentians ~
~' lot & block numbers typical street cross sections and
.~(,f~ phasing lines intersection details including
design end width of
~.,
'-'
/ tppopraphy at ten foot (10) /
i travalway and
shoulders
c
O ntervals ~/
~ harizgntal alignment and general
water bodies, streams, flaadway curve data (public roads)
N
~ and flaodplains
~ ~ ~antarline radius on all proposed
~ : stream buffers
~ ~` l
i
•
~`
streets
~ ocat
on grid size of parcels ~
' permanent features such as
E ,,U,i ,dedicated Far public use, buildings, cemeteries
historic
~ `'-'
~~ recraetianal .use ar reserved in ,
landmarks
'~ 4 common, with purpose Hated _~ ~:''?„~~
` adjoining lot layout names of
-d s~ ~ "
~`~`'~~ impervious surface data (iF located adjoining property owners
If
~ Q
°~ ~ in water supply watershed)
'~ "'
">~
` .
subdivided, subdivision plat name
~ ~
•
:.~
vicinity map showing general ,
plat book & page number
end
~ ~ location of subdivision with streets
d
~ ,
perimeter lot numbers.
u cII an
reeds identified 6y State road ~ •~ location end size of lots of
'o
U .o number end Hems
/ landscaping and buffer restricted development potential
and notation on plat regarding
~ ~
~ ~ requirements
:k7;~.. i ~
same
U cn
~ ::~_ township, CCrparate end extra. ~ i
stormwater detention and/or
territorial planning jurisdiciian lines ~ retention sites and undisturbed
which crass the property areas far infiltration purposes lif
located in wafer supply
' watershed) -
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REaUIREMENTS
1. Twenty-five (Z5) copies of the preliminary plat.
~. Ona full size copy of en Orange Caunry Tax map (with tax p arcels involved clearly merited in
pencil)-
~• Where municipal or OWASA sewer is Hat available, a copy o f the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant ar his/her authorized
representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the
Orange Caunry Subdivision Rsgulationc).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordenee with Section VL of. this Ordinance
which assure completion and/ar maintenance of improvements required 6y this Ordinance.
Such documents may include, but Hat bs limited ta, a private road maintenance ~grac~nent, and
articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association.
These documents may be required as necessary es evidence that the ardinant:s requirements
ere laainp.mat.
s. Fes - 5OO plus 55,00 per lot (1 fee for preliminary end final plat).
7.. If the subdivision contains 10 lots ar mare the fallowing information shall bs submitted with the
ep~licedi~~
e• Number at years to buildout.
b• Number of houses to be built during each year to 6uildaut.
~• Average pries of houses including Iota far each year to buildout. "'
8
1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is camptats end accurate. ,.
,
/t C
r ~.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
ao P
DAT
__-_ ~n n 110
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
D E
~ V ~_
` =
o
~ _o
R~ir M - Lq h
~~ ~
~
® as r
w .r ,~
r ~~
1 ~ .I ~ 1
~~... z;
` a
.~_
,
.~_
' ~ ~~ ..~L
\ .~+rr\
'
i
~:. R..,. ~
; ~_,
. .~
; ~..~.
, ® s
~,~,
-
` ~
' ,~~ S
'
~ ~
~ ` . ~
~
/ r r ~
\\'
"
' `
1`
\
~iw
w ~
~...
N
I 'f '
~ t.
~ I
I
1
~ /
i ~
~
i~ ~
~
" ~
I
w~
~
~:~~
;,
Y
.~,
,\\ .
w! Oa r.r
• ~~ ~r -
1 ® w~
~r `
~ ~ ~_
~
1
..rte. C-~rra w _;~
Y ~
~ 7
a.
\
I
'~ _ ~ C-2 \
~ ~ s~ ~~
~
~ yr ~ ~
AS'
~~a.
`
I
~ ~ ~
~
~ d \~
{
~.. I ~. ~
~ ~ ~_~
a
w
~ ~
~
COl1
EN11011
I
I
~: I ~wr
~~r.r ~ ~
.,,,,~ N `
~'
~Nh
~ ~ ~I~ip~A1Pf PIAM
J~ SEC7XdN 1MG
s~ vER vatlEr
' ~ ~ - ~ . ~ .a w.r m. ~ aou,
1. ~ ~ r r/~r r 1~ ~rw~ ~~ ~~.a ~
~~ ~~ ~1~•i~ ~ ~y- y
s Irk YN ~ OM w r M rr1 a 41 Mr 7a7~ ~ ~NI.'w ~ W wr.rr w
w wr
r ~ ~r ~r~ ~ rwrr w r ~ r~rr r ar 14P r
r~+• ~ ~ .. r ar ur°`Z .r .r^. p.a. r ry
wrrtM
~r
l
~ r~rr~~
r
p
~
it ~!
Y ~r ~y w ^rW ^M ~ 1~ r ~r 7a Aa PRELg11NARY PLAT
a '~• ~'
~ rt ~ ~~
a Nf~ ~ f~00f'~OMg4
I
F4
~
~~ 1~0/~ OI ~OIw
4r (
~
ilh 7 1r ~r~i ~ ~y ~ ~ Ir+n
rrrM ~ ,rte r Ya ~
• trwt ~~~ w ~alr ~~ ~
1
1~
Iw~
~
~
~
t~rr
~
!l~7~ M r ~ ~r~/~F ~ wF~~M~
~~1
~~ 4r1 w*r M1YY ~~~
°~'~~c~~ artw~~~Mw~
"'
ENT
~ ~
~~ r wt
:
w ~
r
~
:
i
r
r
r
~ r.r.r
r~
.
,rr
9
1C
- ~ •' y1 -
_ - •- _ '
-
I
~ ~
-
~ _
_ -
`
\
~
~ r _
i
i r ,
/ f ` ti ~
" r
~1
J
1 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ \ t `J r 1
-
~ 1r r~•. ~
_
i ! ti ~
hael ~
• ~ 3.11
, ..5
ke Mic
~`d ~~ - ~~\ 11 23 1-1 _
't1, 68 /
.1~. 331.1. 73 11 ,69 3.111.,8
'
.1T.. ~ .~ ~_ -
3.11..4 ~
~~ .tl•.. 5•
.11.
,~
' , ~
~
r
i .
..
.11.6
1
.1~.. 6' ~: ..51. "3. .6D
3.12..1
3.11..36,4 11~.. 3.t1:. ,1-1.. 11..f.
1'1. .1.1 ' ~ .11..6
3. ..6 3 11.. ~~ 1 ..5
~ .-- 1 .5 t1. 1 ~
3.11..37 ~ 3
1 .. ~r ~ J 31'1 51 3. T 1
3.11..26
! 1 ~ 3
11A 1
.4 - .C '
3
~G
.
3
1
i A,1.1 :1-1pr. - .
.
iy. §. 2 C.4
r .
~ . 1. . OH
~ ~ 1
3' ~ -i ~ T3. 2 '
3.11..36 3.1 i..26B '
.1
~ - 11..4 3.1 C
3.ti1..25
1 A.
-• - .
1.1.,.62 3. 1 .B ~ 1
13\ ~
ry
...1
--
3.11..28- ` 1.2 (
y 1
3 1 .1 '~
.r_r~
.23; ,ti /, r _3.'4:1.:29 ` r 3.11.
1
~
~ ~
= 3.11..19 .11 B _ ~ -
~ S$
'
~
~ .1 d _ I
.1 1'2 - -
~~_
3
~. ." 3
11 .1
1.. 4
1
.
$ 1~.1~B,.1
i 1 ~
20 ' r--
.1 :7~'
I
..
.
3. 2~ •~ `~=. .1 . 3.1'1..20 ~ ; r t 3.11..12 I i ~ 3.11..9
3.11..18C . I ; ~ ~
~ ~ .tfi..1" _B~A
3.11. .1 "3.1 1..34A - i ~ I ~) r .11., i
~- _ - - I ,
-
- I
- ~ :~
_
• ~,• i , ! I
I
~ ~ I ; I
=
I
.;; r ' \
1 ~ `~ i I I
_
.
ti I I
I I
Major Roads
rnie map mntains part~la prepared for the irnentary of real prepery wiwn
ParCelS grenge County, and is compiled from recorded deed, pleb, and other puhlle
f this ma
are hereb
natltled the! the a(orementlaned
t
U
d d N
/ \ /
Background p
y
a
a
sers o
recorW an
Publlc primary Information sources should be consulted far venflcatlan of tl,e
Infarrnatlon contained on this map. fie aunty and Its mapping companies assume
/ no legal respansibiFty for the infonnatlon contained an this map.
I-I County
1
1~
,nn ar r~~}~ }~ rt~t}~+}~ p } ~p y~}yam }~} ~
y~ tp a• ~X~It~~ ~ 1~1Lllly ~I~L~~1~ .~JL~.T~11~1~~L~i m~'oJ~
'"~~~"~~ ~ Rosemary L. Suncl~mers 1~tPH DrPH I •
~~ ~ ~ laanchpn E. k.ein, Cr+,iir > > Janrt H. Souhtrfand. 4'icz Chair o
y '~, Orange Caunry Board of Health Health Director Orange Coienry Board a/Health
e e~~'v°' /.LW.WJ,L
M«.h C«Wn. tih
Environmental Health Division
Ron Holdti~av, Division Director
3~~6•C Revere Ruad, P.Q. Box 9191 Phone: (9l9) 7333131, nI360 F.~.rC: (919) 6-4
Hillsburoueh, tiC ?7273 petty Borland Barbara Patrerson Chapel Hill Durham b[cb:
~±~+u.rc+.ann~!r u~ t~lnrtmzr/rn+hlrh/ Adminisrrrtive Aisistlnt Of4ice dssisWnt (9l9) 969-1•SOl (9L9) 633-7}31 (9l9) ?
June l~, ?000
SOIL /SITE Evaluation Summary for:
BEAVER VALLEY PHASE 2
CHEEKS Township lbtap 11 Lot 6
ivlap Date June 7, 2000
LOT # DESIGN FLOW TYPE SYSTEM
4? 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
43 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUIVIP
44 360 GPD SHALLOW.TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PU11~IP
~4S 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
46 360 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
47 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PLIVIP
43 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL
49 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PU1dP
50 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
51 360 GPD SHALLO`V TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUi/IP
S2 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL
53 360' GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
54 360 GPD• CONVENTIONAL w/PUNIP
SS 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
56 360 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
S7 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUitiIP
58 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUNIP
S9 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL
60 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL
12
61 360 GPD CDNVENTION~L wiPUI~IP
6? 360 GPD CONVEtiTIDNAL wiPUivIP
63 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
NOT>~S:
The design flow is based upon the number of bedrooms applied for by the property owner or developer. The design flow for a bedr
120 gallons/day (GPD). (e. g. 360 GPD w 3 bedrooms)
Proposed house locations are provided by the property owner or developer as required by 1SA NCAC 18A .1900 - .1969. (The Law
Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems)
The design flow, type system, and pump requirement are subject to change based upon the application and site plan or plat submitte~
the Construction Authorization.
The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the limits of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the Orange County Hea
Department.
It should be noted that all lots having a conventiorial-type drain field with pump are reviewed at a minimum of every five years by tl
health department as required by 15 A NCAC 18A .1961 (1blaintenance of Sewage Systems).
Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 2~1 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics and
inch soil cap is placed over the trenches.
Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics.
Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 36 inches or mare of provisionally suitable characteristics.
The approved septic areas should be kept free of all vehicular traffic, logging, grading and compacting activities.
This report is for planning purposes only and does not constitute any approval. Lot approval is granted only in the form of an Imprc
Permit.
a;;:
13
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
North Carolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications Emergency Medical Services
24 Hour Warning Point t,,.~~ ~~ a
Fire Marshal
919-732-8161 •933-2600 Y
,;~ ~ Disaster Response
«~
,~ ~ Hazardous Materials
24-Hour Fax Machine - 919-644-30.10. 968»2050
919-967-9026 ~"
a, ,
Administrative Fax Machine
919-968-4066
TO: Eddie Kirk, Planning Department
FROM: Mike Tapp, Deputy Director/Fire Marshal
RE: Section Two Beaver Valley Preliminary
DATE: June 21, 2000
We have completed plans review and find the plan acceptable. Please send us a copy of the
final plan, when approved, for distribution to fire and EMS.
Please contact me if you need further information.
14
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR SECTION TWO BEAVER VALLEY
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
July, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SECTION TWO BEAVER VALLEY subdivision contains 22 buildable lots and is
located in Cheeks Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will
intersect with Section 1 and Mace Road. The current zoning is R1 -Rural Residential
and Back- PW. The average lot size is approximately 1.24 acres. Lots will be served
by individual wells and individual septic systems.
Project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 2000, with completion of the project scheduled for 2002. Units will
consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales__
price to be $190,454 including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and
revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in
which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact
in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate
revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current casts and revenues such a
development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact
analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with
public (governmental) casts and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard
Approach. White only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per
Capita Method,` the Service Standard method determines the total number of
additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth.
This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per
employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees
are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes
personnel, operating and capital casts) per employee. These average costs are then
weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact
of the development.
15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 -Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Locat Government and School Distric# Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures.
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School Distric#
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 » Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Govemment Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts
16
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes infiormation about the specific development project. Much,
if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Toinrnship: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are. completed and
occupied.
Ending. Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The.
template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for, aten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal
impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the
Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling
unit) based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per
household far the school district in which the project is located. The most recent
studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange
County, N.C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees
for Financing Public School Capital Needs, Orange County, N.C. (1996).
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age
children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent study
is A Study of Hrxrsing Characteristics and Student Generafion Rates for Orange County, N. C.
(1995). ---
Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of
the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will
automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in
each year.
17
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the
number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to
provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County
budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approva! of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per
capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total
expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated
population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for
approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1996-97.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes -Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are
charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental
facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,
proceeds fro~tt license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and
legal functions of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
18
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school
system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system.- This category includes
appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items.
Recurring Capital funds are used for general, maintenance, purchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services
outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include
equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees
generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be
included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be
calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Infom~ation regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system
budgets for the i:lscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government
Current Expense, School District and ,State appropriations. County Government
Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction
and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues
such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for
educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to
be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school
system budgets_
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systems.: by- Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per
student appropriation.is determined by the State Board of Education.
School District; Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro
school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment
of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board
of Education.
19
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school
district employees.
Employees Per '1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service
category per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per
employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes
personnel, operating and capital costs.
za
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation.
Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is
reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for
capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel
Hill-Carrboro school system.
Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on
information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market
value to assessed value far the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and
older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed .$12,000, an
$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a
specific school district.
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and
school children anticipated in Orange County. resulting from project development.
Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service
function and school district as a result of the. new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by
project development.
Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the.:number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per
household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children
per household (see Section 1).
Additiional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per
service category based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
21
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required
per school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected
each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and
are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and
the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly
exemption are also used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita
revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this
is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section
3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County
more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net
balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.
Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in
another.
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transfen-ing education expenditures
by County govemment (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are
derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues. are
derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected
number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a fom~ula which multiplies each per
student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children
(Section 3) and adding. the results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school
system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in
revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it
costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset
negative balances in another.
SECTION G -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
22
SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
•1~,'. ~, ..~
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 23
Bureau of Economic ~ Business Research -University of Florida
Modified 4/15197 -Orange Caunty, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Section Two Beaver Valley
TOWNSHIP: Cheeks
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year: 2000
Ending Year: 2002
Inflation Rate: 2.50%
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.47
Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. D.33
Non-Elderly: 100.00%
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
2000 7 180,000 31.82%
2001 7 190,000 31.82%
2002 8 200,000 36.36%
2003 0 0 0.00%
2004 0 0 0.00%
2005 0 0 0.00%
2006 0 0 0.00%
2007 0 0 0.00%
2008 0 0 0.00%
2009 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County ( 1) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0) Wigh School 19%
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 24
BUDGET YEAR:
COUNTY POPULATION:
5CHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 1996-97
105898
5680
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
j Education (School District) 108.60
142.95
50.00
264.07
818.00 0.0010
0.0013
0.0005
0.0025
0.0077
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
Total 818.00 0.1440
!COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes -Other Than Property
Intergovernmental
'~~ Service Charges
Miscellaneous 4653250
9007481
3388055
1738939 43.94
85.Q6
31.99
16.42
,COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital)
Non-Departmental 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000
3163481 64.25
68.69
27.12
161,60
7.08
29.87
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital) 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000 62654.06
50887.26
57433.80
64803.43
916.87
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 1782.00
0.00
3789.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 12373.79
0.00
26311.95
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate ($) 0.9190 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
School District Tax Rate (~) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed valuation
Assessment Ratio 100.00
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA ~5
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
HOUSING UNITS 7 14 22 22 22
POPULATION 17 35 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 5 5 5
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.06
Public Safety 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07
Public Works 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03
Human Services 0.04 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.14
TOTAL 0.09 0.1$ 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.13 0.27 0.42 0.42 0.42
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
HOUSING UNITS 22 22 22 22 22
POPULATION 54 54 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 5 5 5 5 5
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEESn _
General Govemment 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Public Safety 0.07 D.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Public Works 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Human Services 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
TOTAL 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 26
YEAR _2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TAX BASE ($1000) 1260 2622 4287 4394 4504
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 11579 24092 39398 40383 41392
Other Taxes 760 1557 2509 2571 2636
Intergovernmental 1471 3015 4856 4977 5102
Service Charges 553 1134 1827 1872 1919
Miscellaneous 2$4 582 937 961 985
TOTAL ($) 14647 303$0 49527 50765 52034
FJCPENDITURES y$)
General Government 1111 2277 3668 3760 3854
Public Safety 1188 2435 3922 4020 4120
Public Works 469 961 1548 1587 1627
Human Services 2794 5728 9226 9456 9693
Education 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
Non-Departmental 517 1059 1705 1748 1792
TOTAL ($) 10317 21150 34066 34917 35790
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
TAX BASE ($1000) 4617 4732 4850 4972 5096
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 42427 43488 44575 45689 46832
Other7axes 2702 2769 2838 2909 2982
Intergovernmental 5229 5360 5494 5632 5772
Service Charges 1967 2016 2057 2118 2171
Miscellaneous 1010 1035 1051 1087 1114
TOTAL ($) 53335 54668 56035 57436 58872
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 3950 4049 4150 4254 4360
Public Safety 4223 4329 4437 4548 4662
Public Works - 1657 1709 1752 1795 1840
Human Services 9935 10183 10438 10699 10955
Education 15073 15450 15836 15232 16538
Non-Departmental 1837 1883 1930 1978 2027
TOTAL ($) 36685 37602 38542 39506 40494
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 16650 17066 17492 17930 18378
27
_
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
REVENUES ($)
County 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 8753 17944 28903 29626 30366
TOTAL ($) 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 8753 17944 28903 29626 30366
TOTAL ($) 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 p
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
REVENUES ($)
County 15073 15450 15$36 16232 16638
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 31125 31903 32701 33519 34357
TOTAL ($) 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 15073 15450 15836 16232 16638
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 31125 31903 32701 33519 34357
TOTAL ($) 46198 47353 48537 49750 5D994
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 28
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
HOUSING UNITS 7 14 22 22 22
POPULATION 17 35 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 5 5 5
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.09 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.13 0.27 0.42 0.42 0.42
TAX BASE ($1000) 1260 2622 4287 4394 4504
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 14647 30380 49527 50765 52034 ,
Expenditures 10317 21150 34066 34917 35790
BALANCE 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
Expenditures 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 27639 57014 92426 94737 97105
Expenditures 23309 47783 76965 78890 80862
BALANCE 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
HOUSING UNITS 22 22 22 22 22
POPULATION 54 54 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 5 5 5 5 5
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
TAX BASE ($1000) 4617 4732 4850 4972 5096
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 53335 54668 56035 ,57436 58872
Expenditures _ 36685 37602 38542 39506 40494
BALANCE 16850 17066 17492 17930 18378
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
Expenditures 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 99533 102021 104572 107186 109866
Expenditures 82883 84955 87079 89256 91488
BALANCE 16650 17066 17492 17930 18378
SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
29
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County YES ) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 19%
YEAR 20D0 2001 2002 2003 20D4
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 5 5 5
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 5 5 5 5 5
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7
SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary 3328 Elementary 2822
Middle 1522 Middle 1240
High School 1520 High School 1457
TOTAL 6370 TOTAL 5519
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2823 2$25 2827 2827 2827
Middle 1240 1241 1241 1241 1241
High Schaal 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5521 5524 5526 5528 5526
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2827 2827 2827 2827 2827
i Middle 1241 1241 1241 1241 1241
High School 1458 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526
DRAFT AUGUST 2, 2000 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
b. Agricultural Districts Advisory Soard - no report available
c. Ordinance Review Committee - no meeting
4 Chair Allison asked about transportation and said that there had not been any feedback in the last few
S months. Benedict said that the private road standards that were reviewed by this board and were at a public
6 hearing in February would be coming up for a decision at the August 15`'' Board of County Commissioners'
7 meeting.
9 McAdams made reference to the Wilson Efland subdivision and said that on the map that was presented by
10 the staff it was difficult to see that the 10 feet that was requested was in front of the 100-year floodplain.
11 Benedict said that this could have been clearer. He said that this item had not proceeded to the Commission
12 yet. The ERCD and Planning staff is working on a program for everyone to understand what the master
13 program is.
14
1S
16
17
~18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
AGENDA ITEM #$:
Kirk made the presentation.
SUBDIVISIONS
a. Preliminary Plans
(1) Section Two Beaver Valley
(Cheeks Township - 22 lots)
PURPOSE:
Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Section Two Beaver Valley Subdivision.
26 BACKGROUND:
27 Request -Preliminary Plan
28 Applicant: Bruce and Sara Curtis, owners.
29 • Subdivision follows the conventional plan.
30 • Twenty-two (22) residential lots proposed on a 39.79-acre tract. The average lot size is 1.24 acres
31 outside the common area open space. The minimum lot size is 40,000 square feet.
32 Location
33 West of Mace Road and Beaver Valley Section One in Cheeks Township.
34 Existin and Pro osed Conditions
35 Existing:
36 • Zoned Rural Residential (Rl)
37 • Back Creek Protected Watershed
38 Physical Features:
39 • One designated stream running along the east boundary of the property
40 • Entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines
41 Adjacent Land User
42 • Properties to the west and south are medium to large acreage single family residential lots
43 • Property to the east is the first section of Beaver Valley
44 • Property to the north is owned by the Town of Mebane with Lake.Michael located on the property
45 Proposed:
46 Roads:
47 • Access is from Beaver Valley Drive, a new public road to be constructed to state standards
48 • Beaver Valley Drive extends through Section One from Mace Road, an existing state secondary road
49 Open Space:
SO • A 150-foot open space buffer is proposed along the stream on the east side of the property
S l • 8.89 acres; 22.3% common area open space proposed on the conventional plan; 25% in-lot open space.
52 • Minimum to actual lot ration (MTAR) =1.35
~a
31
1 Water-Sewer:
2 • Water will be from individual wells
3 • Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable soils to locate a septic system
5 A~en~~Comments:
6 • Comments attached from Environmental Health and Emergency Management
7 DeveloPmeat Process, Schedule, and Action
8 Planning Board:
9 First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board June 17, 1996. A Phasing Plan was
10 approved by the Board of Commissioners June 30, 1997 with Section One to be completed December 2001.
11 Second Action:
12 1. Action within two regularly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or extension thereof;
13 2. If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to
14 BOCC with Planning Board minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions.
15 Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
16
17 FINANCIAL IlVIPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
18
19 RECOMMENDATION(S): Plannin Staff
20 Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
zl
22
23 Selkirk asked if anything was going to be done along the stub out road related to development, and Kirk said
24 that it would only be public right-of--way for now.
25
26 MOTION: Strayhorn moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for Section Two Beaver
27 Valley as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Selkirk.
28
29 VOTE: Unanimous
30
31 (2) North Field at Creekwood
32 (Chapel Hill Township - 10 Lots)
33
34 Kirk made the presentation.
35
36 PURPOSE:
37 Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for North Field at Creek Wood Subdivision
38
39 BACKGROUND:
40 Request -Preliminary Plan
41 Applicant: S&H Development, LLC
42 Ten (10) residential lots proposed on a 32.41-acre tract
43 • Minimum lot size is 2.OQ acres.
44 • Average lot size (Net of Street Right-of--Way) - 2.9 acres
45 • Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) is 1.46. 0% common area open space is provided.
46 Location
47 South side of Mt. Sinai Road in Chapel Hill Township
48 Existin and Pro osed Conditions
49 Existing:
50 • Current zoning is Rural Buffer (RB) (min. lot size = 2 acres).
51 • The property is not in a designated protected watershed.
52 Physical Features: