HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-03-2000-9fORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 3, 2000
Action Ager,~dal
Item No. ~`
SUBJECT: North Field at Creek Wood -Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) CN ~]
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Resolution of Approval
2) Application
3) Vicinity Map
4) Agency Comments
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis
6) 8-2-00 Draft Planning Board Minutes
7) Preliminary Plan (Previously provided)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddie Kirk
Extension 2582
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-$181
Chapel Hill 968501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane (336)227-2031
NOTE: Please bring previously provided
relimina Ian to the meetin .
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for North Field at Creek Wood Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
Request -Preliminary Plan
Applicant: SOH Development, LLC
• Ten (10) residential lots proposed on a 32.41 acre tract .
• Minimum lot size is 2.00 acres.
• Average lot size (Net of Street Right-of--Way) -- 2.9 acres
• Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) is 1.46. 0% common area open space is provided.
• Two lots (16.16 acres, 10.02 acres), recorded as exempt after concept approval, are adjacent
to the subdivision area and will access the proposed road.
Location
South side of Mt. Sinai Road in Chapel Hill Township.
Existing_and Prouosed Conditions
Existing:
• Current zoning is Rural Buffer (RB) (min, lot size = 2 Acres)
• The property is not in a designated protected watershed.
Physical Features:
• There are no designated streams on the property.
• The site is mostly wooded.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the east and south are owned by the Triangle Land Conservancy and were a
part of the original tract, of which this is the remaining tract.
• Falls of New Hope subdivision is to the north across Mt. Sinai Road, and the property to the
west is undeveloped.
2
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Mt. Sinai Road with two new public roads proposed in the subdivision.
• One cul-de-sac will extend south from Mt. Sinai Road and another shorter cul-de-sac will
extend east from the first cul-de-sac.
• All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
Open Space/Buffers:
• Triangle Land Conservancy owns property to the east and south. This tract is the remaining
parcel of the Creek Wood development.
• Type A 30 foot buffer required along Mt. Sinai Road.
Water-Sewer:
• Community Water system.
• Septic systems with an easement provided for lots 2 and 3.
Recreation:
• Chapel Hill District Park
• Dedication of land would be = .5 acres
• Payment in Lieu = $4,550.00
• No dedication is warranted because no county recreation area or conservation area has
been identified at this time.
A enc Comments:
• Comments attached from Environmental Health, N~DOT, and Emergency Management.
Develo ment Process Schedul and Action
Planning Board:
• First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board March 1, 2000 with the
following condition:
1. The intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT
standards.
Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
approval August 2, 2000.
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan
Options:
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall
have one (1) year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-year
extension from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Sta_ff_
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Planning Board
Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
Administration
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date October 3, 2000
Name of Subdivision North Field at Creek Wood
Owner/Applicant Sass Properties, Inc.
The Boazd of County Commissioners hereby approves North Field at Creek Wood subdivision
Preliminary Plat, dated Apri15, 2000, and containing 10 lots, subject to the fulfillment of
requirements specified herein.
All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and
directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public
generally, the offer of dedication of Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court. This
acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Old North Field Drive,
and Mill Ridge Court shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they aze accepted far maintenance by the
North Carolina Department of Transportarion or some other governmental body. Before the
Final Plat of North Field at Creek Wood can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal and Water Supply
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate azea for septic disposal and repair
azea, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. Lots 2,
and 3 will require septic easements. Lots created in this development cannot be
connected to public water and sewer and public water and sewer will not be
provided to the lots.
2. Construction plans for the private community water system shall be approved by
The NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of
Environmental Health Public Water Supply Section. Maintenance Documents for
the community water system shall be reviewed and approved by the Orange
County Attorney.
3. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of
improvements shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall
also disclose that information regazding the tentative location of septic systems is
available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental
Health.
4
4. Septic lines in the easements on Lots 3 and 4 shall be sleeved by a minimum 4
inch ductile iron pipe under driveways.
B. Roads and Access
Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court shall be constructed to standards of
the North Cazolina Department of Transportation, within a 45 ft. right-of--way, and
the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court to the
standards of the North Cazolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the
construction cast must be prepazed by a certified/licensed engineer or grading
contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The
construction estimate must include a 10% contingency factor. The financial
guazantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited
financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina:
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road
construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control
Division.
3. Sight triangles shall be shown at each intersection as required by NCDOT.
4. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. This restriction shall be
stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be
prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the signs aze in place or a copy
of the receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
6. All streets shall have 7.5 foot utility/drainage easements on each side of the right-
of-way.
S
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
The applicant shall secure installation of required landscaping through a letter of
credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required plantings
and their installation must be provided. The estimate for landscaping must
include a 10% contingency factor. The financial guazantee shall reflect 110% of
the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Mt Sinai Road. The buffer
shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standazds of
Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on
the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
D. Drainage
1. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the
Erosion Control Plan.
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of $4,550.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in
lieu of pazkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous....
The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
a. drainage easements as required by D.1 above.
b. septic easements as indicated on the Preliminary Plan.
6
3. Minimum building setbacks shall be as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and of
no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall
be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declazation and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-b-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner
and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document
describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
3. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant
Clerk to the Boazd
I, ,accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
acknowledge that each must be rnet prior to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant
Date
APPLICATION FOR PREVII~L[YARY PLAN ~PPROV_-~,L
MAJOR SUBDIVISION ~ ~/gg
OR~vGE COUNTY
DATc 4/5/00
' Revised 06/30/00
PL~SE TYP1r OR PRWT (IlYK ONLY)
SUBDIVISIONNAIVCE• North Field at Cree [~ ~d_.__.___ .,,_ ._~_
LOCATION: South of Mount Sinai Roa
OWNER/DEVELOP£R.: S & H Develo went, LLC
ADDRESS: 104 Sout TELEPHONENO.; ~(919Z 932-9604
Suite 205 Clza el Hill NC
AGENZYCONTACT: ICimlev-Ho_rrt_and Associates TELEPHONENO.: ..(919) 677-2000
A. SUD+IMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map 16A Block Lot(s) ~2/ 2A_____ Township shape
Zoning District(s): -I;B -Rural Buf f pr
Total Number of Acres: 3 2': 4
Total Number of Lots: Average Lac Size: 2.9 41inimuttr Lat Size: ~,
Number~ype of Strttcnues: (existing N/A (proposed)
Linear Feet is 5treees: 18~ 0 LF Acres in Open Space: N
Water Supply: Public (specify) X Community Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) ~ Community X Individual
School District Oran a County Fire District: ;New Hnpe .Rural ,__ ,-~.
General Land Uses in Area: V - _ d
Critical Areas: streatn/drainagewaYs flood prone areas
wazershcd (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes ~ No X . If `des,"please
contact the Orange County Tax Office. 5ubdivisioa of the property may require payment of deferred taxes uader-
"farm use value taxation."
B. All plats must be submitted as sheet as smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"300') and no larger than
one itch equals twenty fees (1"=30') and trust contain the following iaforatation:
X , :;~:y: ~.....
~~>~.fi~. subdivision name
X w~•
name k address of owner(s)
X name & address of subdivider
.__.. „~::..: ('tf other than owner)
X ., aaatie of surveyor, engine-~, laridscape
arrhitea or architect, address,
regi:~adoa M ,~ seal
Y '-'" (title) Preliminary Plan
Y >":':r°`:`~~ scale, north arrow
X ~~~~>~~ {~°`r~ date of plan preparation and rovisions
~~~} township, tax map-block-lot references
Y `=~->'` Parent Parcel Identification
X r decd book and pave K of property to t:e
subdivided
:{ ,~ r boundary descrtbcd with bearings and
disrartces
X ,~ total acreage afthe tract and acreage of
- ~:: lots, including and zxcludin; area within
rights-of--way
X '` }? zoning of tract and adjacent properties
. ?._ _ y_.. K~ J
X ~ building setback lines by notation
or typical lot layout
X "~=~~s~, location and width of existing and
proposed easements (draiaa;e, utilities,
roads, etc,)
X .~°` esting, proposed and adjoining ri;ltts-
of-way iacludin; dimensions and strut
names and State Raad numbers. Linear
feet of road centerlines and approximate
_ acreage of new stre:t rights-of-way
Y ~~~~~~ existing and ro osed utilities, including
type, sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes
:{ ` ~'~~`~<~`} existin; and proposed curbs, ;utter and
__... 1 culveru, includin; sizes and grades
:( ~~~~ location and width of alleys, sidewalks,
bike lanes, transit systems, and bus craps
:( ~``' typical sweet crass-sections and
intzrsection details includin; design and
X ~' proposed lot Lines with dimensions
Y ~; lot & black numbers
~.r•:<
N/A - phasing Line(s)
X ~' topo~aphy at ten (10) foot intervals
NL .;::::::'.:mac water bodies, streams, floodways and
floodplains
N/A :~~'~'"" stream buffer
~~::.:.<
N/A ~>?~~V locauoa and size of parcels dedicated for
~~.
public use, recreadanal use ar reserved in
comutoa,'with purpose noted
NL ~ impervious surface data (if located in
water supply watershed)
X ='~':~ vicinity map showia4 oetseral location of
subdivision with streets and roads
identified by State Road number and name
~' X :':~:,_„T>>~~ landscaping and buffer requirements
N/A ~~~_;~:~` township, corporate and extraterritaria!
planain$ jnrisdictioa lines which cross the
property .
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL, REQUREr1dBM5
1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the Preliminary Flat.
~ ~~'~ `~ horizontal alignment centerline radius,
and ;eneral curve data on all proposed
streets
Nye `~~ permanent features such as buildings,
cemeteries, historic landmarks
X~ adjoining loc layout names of adjoining
property owners. If subdivided,
subdivision plat name, plat book & page
number, and perimeter lot numbers.
~.~A:nwn>y~
N/A location and size of lots of restricted
development potential and notarion on
plat regarding same .
X ~~>~"<•.~•.;' stormwater detention and/or retention
sites and undisturbed areas for infiltration
purposes (iflacated in water supply
watershed)
X -::<?. identified natural azeas and wildlife
- corridors ~ ~ --
2. Oae full size copy of an Orange County Tax tnap (with tax parcels involved clearly marked).
3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Flat indicating Health
Department approvaUdenial for each lot shown thereon..
4. Where a private road is proposed, a written statement by the applicant or hisJher authorized representative
which sets forth the jusitification far a private road (see Secrion N-1~-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdlvisian
Regulations). .:.. ~ ~ , . ~ .
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Sectiaa VI of this Ordinance which assure
completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include,
but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreemeaat and articles of incorporation and restrictive
covenants pertaining to a homeowners association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence
that the ordinance requirements arc being mes
b. Fee -5470 plus. 55.00 per lot (one fem for Preliminary and F'u3al Plat).
7. If the subdivision contains IQ lots ar more, the following iafortnation shall be submitted with the application:
a. Number of years to buildout. 2 Years
b. Nuarbex. of houses to be built during esch year until buildaut. 7 / 7
c. Average price-of houses including lots for esch year co buildout. 5600, 000
i, the app],inant, hereby certify that the fore;oing application is ca to and ace e.
,~
i _
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~OW~ER'S SIGNATUIt[+
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
D TI~ ~ DATE
FEES: Atnaunt ~ s~t~. ~~ Dace Paid ~ _ 7 -- za0~ Receipt : /9 ~ 7~~
N ~ IH9Rj11111• ABOMEId - - _• -.. ~ pin .._
w.s or .c+•.aPi ~ A ._.
i ` , ? '.
~ YS. J,i • \ N I ~.
- tY1 ~~ r
/ .
~ 6•~ ~.
;•~ ..
~ ~ _ • i-_
~~ ,
- ; ~,~
~.~
.V B9'JB'!J'
M' DI ~iG enwTP \•,
(r:rAF.11 X11 G'.ENFlIT '~.' y
~~ O
i~p fro.OBEDJ , Q
~~
. ~~
i
11
~,w,w c I~imN°
rat ,
3pMA M
~hw
.r..... d,...
~
- - .~ .•.r
.w. 6
.
• •dYCY~" -
N Gfl EI,: PHErI I,LL~
r ~fE _N
(Myl Yf_.~y.`J
rIC1LE rr-•K.lll .u IC' ~5`nilir Ems, •w,
~ yil IvEaT Y~a~ FI..~.e I
er, u:
~, am 1 :r-aixi
_ ., cE P~'P~ ~Vr PL'F
• T.i. rFaR•:EL. r _ •rID ~ Wa _~
• Tt%Y~I. II~FIBlR Ii,F I•~Y: ii
• cerc ~ ~r~ •.s-va
w~EE iCr, rvl-':-w:
v~Ifiw P!!T P•~aG• ~nl
• :<F a-~i! r.111y11 n.:l: . t •+
v.l ~w,...E 17 , _
,``ri... ir~w'~ ~~.~ - 'c 3.44 •AC . I a . Ta..tu ~~ awuwt
+L R ~r~,7 \, :+- ._. ', 1 ~' a aw.i ~c r'.f' 8S"/•Y'y: " ,I '
~# i1R1`-, . - p ~~~\~_ 2.90~..AC (~ _ ira b'~.BI'
I 3.68 AC 1~;~ t\J f -'~4 ~.rv vc ~~~ i ~ 1 n I
nrtP IIS `, - '~ ~ ~
~~ -;s Ft°.1'~ ,!- ,~°I~ 3:07 e,c' nQ rw. ,.- '.
u,r`rli,r...» • •. ~~ r-~.• ..i ~'b ~) 'r ;1., ur ;• rr- f ~ `\• i M.r..•. aN i
' 2.50 AC .~ _ •1 f..•t _ •~_ ~ - ,. sir- }~ •~
~, .'~ ~ ~.' `.. ~ 1t
y. ~' ,
2.97 AC ~ •~:d::f 1 E xcl + ~r,,~t
i 71 j~utiw.r"Ef _~ ,..rrPlr o-. ~('-. _~ - , lfi.l6 AC 1 ~ r, ~
~' 2.33~AC .,, .r ~~ ~ i i Y
/ 1 ,.C~a wr 'i',,wili I ~l 1 .I .1 r,~ ~ ~ ' J
i X11. 11 = -__..., - ~ ~ ~! '`~rf
~ 1` ~°1 1 _- - ,r,
1 -~ - _
-+ _,.
~ ~ 112.55 AC '•+.-iw 1`_ra ~ /~~ ~ ~ i
1 1 III _:~- ' ~ ~ ,. ' - . rcnclrw ~ ~ '
i 11 jar ~ ani'~ ~ ••clacsrr.N 1~
M~, i ,i 1.
.. 4 11 • / J ~
11`~ ~I /
1 1 ,1 . 1
1 Il . 10.02 AC ~ 1 '. ~, 0 F?; 1
I ~,+, J, ~,
. 1 l // 'Y.'='Y ~• ~
-~ _ - -__. - . i saEm lu '
G`@ '~'- 1.
_ MYwL Ewa ~vw1Cr
. .mm. Ir , 1~' ~
~M
w~
1..L.'~'•~,
•'rY
x r .~ i. ~.. 1 nu "x •yr•~•rrr~
+til err-~ r rwl . ~~ ~~
.r ~w _.~r~ -r.e ~_ M1 ww wy
_ - p..^'•
av ~
_ ~ °'
ai r-~
PRELIMINARY PLAT QF ~.~--..-..._ .- ^-^
NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD _~:_::_ _:_=W_=-: Kimlev-Hom
.. ,~. ~ ;'
~Il.. n - Yl _ i ^`'_ _ 3I ~ f ~ .~
~ I w ~
..
~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~ _ ~` !
~ ~ Q ~ y .
~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~} ,
r
. ~~ 1 j r ~ I 1'q ~ /' ;i
~, I I i w ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ n Y f` f ~>
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i -
'I~; I NA ~ D ~ R .~
~. _
.. ;..
~ J ' -- < <' ,~ r
~. .; . ;
- . ~ ..
R O~hL ~ C I R ~ ,~ -`'~ ~~~ ~
,,. ~
,,
r.
..
. , ,~ ;.
- - . ; ~ ,-
E CIR `~~
- _ ;- `
.-
_ r
• ~ ~ ` ~ I1 ~
1 y I , J ,
.,
~ ~ I ~~~TTT y
S, ~ ..- 1. ! 1 ~
~ `. ,
~_ ~ I ,~ / ~
~ ...
_ i _
- i~. I .~.
i D ~ i ~ r.
w~';/'
~. ,-,~'r
-,; ,~~
1
~ Leung of a~
~• ; •:
~, ~~~ ,, ;
,~ ~.
(~rttrr~~ ~~uzt~~..~Pttl~~ ~E~ttrtnt~n~ ~`o~~tr H
loanthon E. Klein, Chair Kosemary L. Summers, MPH, DrPH Janet H. $ouher(nnd, Vice Choir o
Orange County Board of Health Health D1reCCOr Orangt Cuuney Board of Health
/~WJJJ.ELIJ
Mwrn Ce.~IW -uYW 1
306-0 Revere Road, P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
«•ww.rn.unnee.nc.us/nnm~r nvhlth(
July 6, 2000
Environmental Health Division
Ron Holdtivay, Division Director
Phone: (919) 732.81$1, X360 PAX: (9l9) fi4d-:
Betty Borland Barbara Parcerson Chapel Hill Durham b[e6an
Administrative Assistant Office Assistant (919) 96$-=}SOl (9l9) 6$$7331 (9l9) 22 ;
SOIL /SITE Evaluation Summary for:
NORTI~ FIELD AT CREEK WOOD
CHAPEL HILL Township Map 16A Lot 2
Ivlap Date June 30, 2000
LOT # DESIGN FLOW TYPE SYSTEM
1 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
Z 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP TO EASEMENT
3 600. GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP TO EASEMENT
4 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL
5 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
6 b00 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
7 600 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
8 600 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
9 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
10 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
NOTES:
The design flow is based the number of bedrooms applied for by the property owner or developer. The design flow for a bedroa
120 gallons day (GPD). (e, g: 600 GPD = 5 bedrooms)
Proposed house locations are provided by the property owner or developer as required by 15A NCAC 18A .1900 - .1969. (The Laws
Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems)
The design flow, type system, and pump requirement are subject to change based upon the application and site plan or plat submitted f
the Construction Authorization.
The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the limits of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the Orange County Healtl
Department.
12
It should be noted that all lots having aconventional-type drain field with pump are reviewed at a minimum of every five years by the
health department as required by 15 A i`1CAC 13A .1961 (iVlaintenance of Sewage Systems).
Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 2~ inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics and a
inch soil cap is placed over the trenches.
Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics.
Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 36 inches or more ofprovisionally suitable characteristics.
The approved septic areas should be kept free of vehicular traffic, logging, grading and compacting activities. We recommend that the
septic areas be roped or fenced during raad and home: construction to minimize soil disturbance.
This report is for planning purposes only and does not constitute any approval. Lot approval is granted only in the form of an Improve
Permit.
13
~sr..n
~~~
~ ~-
.~~~,.
STATE of NQRTH CARQLINA
DEPAR'ITIVIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES $. HUNT JR DAVID M`COY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
' 20 Apri12000
ORANGE COUNTY
Eddie Kirk
Orange Counry Planning Departtent
306E Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919 732-8181
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plan Review: Creek Wood II Subdivision off Mt. Sinai Road
Dear Mr. Kirk:
This office has completed its review of the subject's proposed concept plans for compliance with current
Department of Transportation minimum subdivision construction standards. We wish to advise that the preliminary
plans received at this office could be built to NCDOT Standards provided the attached redlines are addressed before
final plan submittal.
Prior to any construction, the owner/developer will need to submit their final plans for review. The final plans
should include the horizontal and vertical alignment information, a typical section, drainage facilities, vicinity map,
and the number of lots with the proposed driveway location.
If you have any questions, feel free to call Mr. Michael Venable or me at (336) 570-6833.
Sincerely,
1J. ~•L
T. A. Kallam, P.E.
DISTRICT ENGINEER
cc: J. M. Mills, PE, Division Engineer
Kimley-Horn
TAK/MSV/msv
SCA00420.DOC
P. O. Box 76b Graham NC 27233-0766
14
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Sox 8181
Hillsborough
North Cazolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications Emergency Medical Services
24 Hour Warning Point ~..e~- v- o~ Fire Marshal
919-7328161 •933-2600 ~• ~ ~, ' ~ Disaster Response
24-Hour Fax Machine u ~ Hazardous Materials
= 919-d44-3030. 968-2050
919-967-9026
~``''
*''~
' e'•
Administrative Fax Machine
919-9b8-4066
TO: EDDIE KIRK, PLANNllVG DEPARTNLENT
FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/FIRE MARSHAL
RE: CREEKWOOD II SUBDIVISIOl~i
DATE: APRIL 2S, 2000
We have reviewed the preliminary plans for Creek Wood II Subdivision and find the plan
acceptable. Please send us a copy of the plan, upon approval, for distribution.
If you need additional information, please call me.
15
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
July, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD subdivision contains 10 buildable lots and is
located in Chapel Hill Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will
intersect with Mt. Sinai Road. The current zoning is RB -Rural Buffer. The average
lot size is approximately 2.9 acres. Lots will be served by a community well and
individual septic systems.
Project build-out is estimated at two years. Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 2000, with completion of the project scheduled for 2001. Units will
consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales..
price to be $600,000 including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and
revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in
which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact
in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate
revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a
development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact
analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with
public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method.=used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard
Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per
Capita Method; the Service Standard method determines the total number of
additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth.
This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per
employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees
are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes
personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then
weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact
of the development.
16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 -Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cast Data
Serrtion 2 -Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data -
OtherModel Constants
School District Data
Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
t~evenues
E~ipend'~tures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 -Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Govemment Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts
17
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much,
if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The
template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for aten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal
impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the
Finance Deparkment must be contacted for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling
unit) based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent
studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange
County, N.C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees
for Financing Public School Capital Needs, Orange County, N.C. (199fi).
Children/Household: .The estimated average number of school age
children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per
household for-.the. school district in which the project is located. The most recent study
is A Study o~Hpusing Characteristics and Studenf Generation Rates for Orange County, N. C.
(1995). -
Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of
the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will
automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in
each year.
18
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the
number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to
provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County
budget far the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
~,
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per
capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total
expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated
population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for
approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year, i.e., 1996-97.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes -Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are
charged to those who voluntarily receive govemmental services or use govemmental
facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous .revenues include interest eaming~ on investments,
proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and
legal functions of govemment.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
19
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County .school
system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. This category includes
appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items.
Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services
outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include
equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees
generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be
included in Section .4, 'Total. Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be
calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. Ali
information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government
Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government
Current Expense funds are used far general operation purposes including Instruction
and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues
such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for
educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to
be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school
system budgets,
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systems. by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per
student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education.
School Distriict: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro
school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment
of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board
of Education.
zo
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school
district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service
category per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per
employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes
personnel, operating and capital costs.
21
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation.
Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is
reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for
capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel
Hill-Carrboro school system.
Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on
information supplied by the Tax OfFce. The assessment ratio is used to convert market
value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and
older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an
$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting.the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student; The number of employees per student in a
specific school district.
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and
school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.
Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service
function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by
project development.
Total Poputatiion: The total population added each year by a project derived by
multiplying thy, number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per
household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children
per household (see Section 1 }.
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per
service category based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
2~
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required
per school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected
each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and
are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and
the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly
exemption are also used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita
revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this
is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section
3). -
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County
more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net
balance indicates that. more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.
Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in
another.
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures
by County govemment (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are
derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are
derived by multiplying the per student expenditure fgure times the total projected
number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditurese Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per
student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children
(Section 3) and. adding the results.
Net. Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and. projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school
system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in
revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it
costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset
negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
23
SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 24
Bureau of Economic $~ Business Research -University of Florida
Modified 4/15/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: North Field at Creek Wood
TOWN5HIP: Chapel Hill
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year: 1998
Ending Year: 2001
Inflation Rate: 2.50%
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.47
Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.33
Non-Elderly: 100.00%
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
1999 5 600,000 50.00%
2000 5 600,000 50.00%
2001 0 0 0.00%
2002 0 0 0.00%
2003 0 0 0.00%
2004 0 0 0.00%
2005 0 0 0.00%
2006 0 0 0.00%
2007 0 0 0.00%
2008 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County (~ 1) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0) High School 19%
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
BUDGET YEAR:
COUNTY POPULATION:
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION:
25
1996-97
105898
5680
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (School District) 108.60
142.95
50.00
264.07
81$.00 0.0010
0.0013
0.0005
0.0025
0.0077
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
Total 81$.00 0.1440
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes -Other Than Property
Intergovernmental
Service Charges
Miscellaneous 4653250
9007481
3388055
1738939 43.94
85.06
31.99
16.42
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital)
Non-Departmental 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000
31634$1 64.25
68.69
27.12
161.60
7.08
29.87
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital) 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000 62654.06
50887.26
57433.80
64803.43
916.87
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 17$2.00
0.00
37$9.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 12373.79
0.00
26311.95
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate ($) 0.9190 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
Assessment Ratio 100.00
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON'PROJECT DATA
26
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 5 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 12 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2 2 2
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 3 3 3 3
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Safety 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
TOTAL 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007
HOUSING UNITS 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 2 2 2
Middle 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 3 3 3 3
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Safety 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
TOTAL 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJE CT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 27
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
TAX BASE ($1000) 3000 6075 6227 6383 6542
REVENUES {$)
Properly Tax 27570 55829 57225 58656 60122
Other Taxes 543 1112 1140 1169 1198
Intergovernmental 1050 2153 2207 2262 2319
Service Charges 395 810 830 851 872
Miscellaneous 203 416 426 437 448
TOTAL ($) 29761 60321 61829 63375 64959
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 794 1627 1667 1709 1752
Public Safety 848 1739 1783 1827 1873
Public Works 335 687 704 721 739
Human Services 1996 4091 4193 4298 4406
Education 3028 6207 6362 6521 6684
Non-Departmental 369 756 775 795 814
TOTAL ($) 7369 15107 15484 15872 16268
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 22392 45214 46344 47503 48691
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
TAX BASE ($1000) 6706 5873 7045 7221 7402
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 61625 63166 64745 66363 68023
Other Taxes 1228 1259 1290 1322 1355
Intergovernmental - 2377 2436 2497 2560 2624
Service Charges 894 916 939 963 987
Miscellaneous 459 470 482 494 507
TOTAL ($) 66583 68248 69954 71703 73495
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 1796 1840 1886 1934 1982
Public Safety 1920 1968 2017 2067 2119
Public Works - 758 777 796 816 836
Human Services 4516 _ 4629 4745 4863 4985
Education 6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
Non-Departmental 835 856 877 899 921
TOTAL ($) 16675 17Q92 17519 17957 18406
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 49908 51156 52435 53745 55089
2$
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
REVENUES ($)
County 3028 6207 6362 6521 6684
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State
I 6252 12817 13138 13466 13803
TOTAL ($) 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 3028 6207 6362 6521 66$4
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 6252 12817 13138 13466 13803
TOTAL ($) 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
REVENUES ($)
County 6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 14148 14502 14864 15236 15617
TOTAL (S) 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 14148 14502 14864 15236 15617
TOTAL ($) 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
I
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($)
0
0
_ 0
0
0
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 29
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 5 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 12 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2 2 2
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 3 3 3 3
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
i5CHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
TAX BASE ($1000) 3000 6075 6227 6383 6542
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 29761 60321 61829 63375 64959
Expenditures 7369 15107 15484 15872 16268
BALANCE 22392 45214 46344 47503 4$691
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
Expenditures 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
(BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 39041 79345 81329 83362 85446
Expenditures 16649 34131 34984 35859 36755
BALANCE 22392 45214 46344 47503 48691
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
HOUSING UNITS 10 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 25 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 2 2 2 2
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 3 3 3 3 3
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
TAX BASE ($1000) 6706 6873 7045 7221 7402
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 66583 68248 69954 71703 73495
Expenditures 16675 17092 17519 17957 18406
BALANCE 49908 51156 52435 53745 55089
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
Expenditures 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 87582 89772 92016 94316 96674
Expenditures 37674 38616 39581 40571 41585
BALANCE 49908 51156 52435 53745 55089
SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
30
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District:
Orange County YES )
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO )
School Attendance:
Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
High School 19%
YEAR
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
1 2 2 2 2
0 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1
2 3 3 3 3
YEAR
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
2 2 z 2 2
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
3 3 3 3 3
SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS
3328 Elementary 2822
1522 Middle 1240
1520 High School 1457
6370 TOTAL 5519
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2823 2824 2824 2824 2824
Middle 1240 1241 1241 1241 1241
High School 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5521 5522 5522 5522 5522
YEAR 200a 2005 2006 2007 2008
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
2824 2824 2824 2824
1241 1241 1241 1241
1458 1458 1458 1458
5522 5522 5522 5522
2824
1241
145$
5522
DRAFT AUGUST 2, 2000 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
1 Water-Sewer:
2 • Water will be from individual wells
3 Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable soils to locate a septic system
4
5 A enc Comments•
6 • Comments attached from Environmental Health and Emergency Management
7 Develo meet Process Schedule and Action
8 Planning Board:
9 First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board June 17, 1996. A Phasing Plan was
10 approved by the Board of Commissioners June 30, 1997 with Section One to be completed December 2001.
11 Second Action:
12 1. Action within two regularly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or extension thereof;
13 2. If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to
14 BOCC with Planning Board minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions.
15 Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
16
17 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
18
19 RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning_Staff
20 Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
21
22
23 Selkirk asked if anything was going to be done along the stub out road related to development, and Kirk said
24 that it would only be public right-of--way for now.
25
26 MOTION: Strayhorn moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for Section Two Beaver
27 Valley as recommended-by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Selkirk.
28
29 VOTE: Unanimous
30
31 (2) North Field at Creekwood
32 (Chapel Hill Township - 10 Lots)
33
34 Kirk made the presentation.
35
36 PURPOSE:
37 Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for North Field at Creek Wood Subdivision
38
39 BACKGROUND: -
40 Request - Preliminary Plan
41 Applicant: S&H I~eyelopment, LLC
42 • Ten (10) resideetial lots proposed on a 32.41-acre tract
43 Minimum lot size is 2.0'0 acres.
44 • Average lot size (Net of Street Right-of--Way) - 2.9 acres
45 Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) is 1.46. 0% common area open space is provided.
46 Location
47 South side of Mt. Sinai Road in Chapel Hill Township
48 Existin and Pro osed Conditions
49 Existing:
50 • Current zoning is Rural Buffer (RB) (min. lot size = 2 acres).
51 • The property is not in a designated protected watershed.
52 ,Physical Features:
31
32
1 • There are no designated streams on the property.
2 • The site is mostly wooded.
3 Adjacent Land Use:
4 • Properties to the east and south are owned by the Triangle Land Conservancy and were a part of the
S original tract, of which this is the remaining tract.,
6 • Falls of New Hope subdivision is to the north across Mt. Sinai Road, and the property to the west is
7 undeveloped.
8 Proposed:
9 Roads:
10 • Access is from Mt. Sinai Road with two new public roads proposed in the subdivision.
11 • One cul-de-sac will extend south from Mt. Sinai Road and another shorter cul-de-sac will extend east
12 from the first cul-de-sac.
13 • All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standazds.
14 Open SpaceBuffers:
15 • Triangle Land Conservancy owns property to the east and south. This tract is the remaining parcel of the
16 Creek Wood development.
17 • Type A 30-foot buffer required along Mt. Sinai Road.
18 Water-Sewer:
19 • Community water system
20 • Septic systems with an easement provided for lots 2 and 3
21 Agency Comments:
22 Comments attached from Environmental Health, NCDOT, and Emergency Management.
23 Development Process, Schedule, and Action
24 Planning Board:
25 • First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board March 1, 2000 with the following
26 condition:
27 1. The intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT standards.
28 • Second Action:
29 1. Action within two regulazly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or extension thereof;
30 2. If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to BOCC
31 with Planning Boazd minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions.
32 Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
33 FINANCIAL ]MPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
34
35 RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff
36 Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
37
38
39 Kirk clarified that there would be separate septic systems, but a community well system.
40
41 Barrows asked about: the septic easement for lots 2 and 3. Kirk said that the easement was 300-400 feet.
42
43 Woods asked why the septic easement for lots 2 and 3 follow outside the right-of-way of the cul-de-sac
44 instead of crossing it. Jack Srnyre with Kimley-Horn said that this was done on purpose because there was
45 ,some discomfort from the County Attorney and NCDOT when the right-of-way was crossed in the earlier
46 section of Creek Wood. He said that the owner of lot 4 was aware that the septic line would cross the
47 driveway.
48
49 Benedict asked if there was a way to add a sleeve in between lots 3 and 4 to provide extra protection from the
50 septic line far lot 4.
51
33
McAdams verified that lot 16, the 16-acre tract, was not part of the subdivision. The owner of this lot is also
the developer, Tom Heffner.
4 Woods asked what instruments the developer had put in place to ensure the continued maintenance and
5 reliability of the community water system. Smyre said that the entity that owned and would be operating the
6 water system would be in discussions with them. Woods would like to see a copy of the documentation that
7 would ensure the maintenance of the community water system. He said that it should appear in the Planning
8 Board's documentation as a stipulation.
9
10 Benedict said that the staff was concerned that there were two lots that were not within the subdivision but
11 yet have some involvement within the subdivision. The staff wanted to make it known that this was peculiar
12 and that two additional properties must be added into the homeowner's association.
13
14 Kirk said that the County Attorney would review the community water system maintenance agreement and
15 that it would be a stipulation of the approval of the subdivision.
16
17 Woods asked about the 20-foot drainage easement. Smyre said that there was a swell down through there
18 and they were recognizing the fact that water was moving through that location. A pipe will be installed
19 from the road for improved drainage.
20
21 Woods asked if the easement was anticipated to be used by NCDOT. Smyre said that NCDOT did not
22 require that the easements be given to them, but that the easements actually exist if needed.
23
24 Chair Allison pointed out the two exceptions -the sleeving under the driveway of lot 4 and the review of the
25 maintenance of the community water system.
26
27 MOTION: Woods moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for North Field at Creek
28 Wood Subdivision with the exceptions as noted above. Seconded by
29 Selkirk.
30
31 VOTE: Unanimous
32
33 Chair Allison asked about the average square footage of the homes and it was answered that it was 3,500.
34
35 AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC FIEARING (5/22/2000)
36
37 _ a. Zoning Ordinance Amendments
3 8 (1) Alternative Notification Requirements
39
40 Davis made this presentation. He said that this particular item was still in public hearing. This is back to the
41 Planning Board tonight for a recommendation back to the County Commissioners. This item deals with how
42 to handle non-petitioning owners that are pursuing a zoning amendment, and also to provide an alternative
43 method of doing a public notification concerning large areas. He summarized the alternative notification
44 requirements as stated, beginning on page 87 of the agenda abstract.
45
46 Woods asked why the non-petitioning owner issue was coming up. Davis said that the staff was looking at a
47 rewrite of the ordinance, and while the other section was added, they were trying to take care of all of it at
48 one time.
49
50 Davis made reference to page 88, section 20.6.2 and said that this was the way the state law was right now,
51 with the exception of the certified mail. Also, state law requires letters to be mailed within 10 days, and the
52 County's requirement is 15 days. Adjacent property includes property within 500 feet. He pointed out one