HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-19-2000-9fORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: September 19, 2000
Action Ag d
Item No.
SUBJECT: Section Two -Beaver Valley -Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Resolution of Approval
2) Application
3) Vicinity Map
4) Agency Comments (EH, FM)
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis
5) 8-2-00 Draft Planning Board Minutes
7) Preliminary Plan (Previously provided)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Page 3 Eddie Kirk, Planner II
Page 7 Extension 2582
Page 10 TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Page 11 Hillsborough 732-8181
Page 14 Chapel Hill 968501
Page 30 Durham 688-7331
Mebane (336)227-2031
NOTE: Please bring previously provided
_ _ _ preliminary plan to the meeting. __ _
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Section Two -Beaver Valley Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
Request - Prelim,inarv Plan
Applicant: Bruce and Sara Curtis, owners.
• Subdivision follows the conventional plan with 22.3% open space
• Twenty-two (22) residential lots proposed on a 39.79-acre tract. The average lot size is 1.24
acres outside the common area open space. The minimum lot size is 40,000 square feet.
Location
West of Mace Road and Beaver Valley Section One in Cheeks Township.
Existing and Prop~ged Conditions
Existing:
• Zoned Rura! Residential (R1).
• Back Creek Protected Watershed.
Physical Features:
• One designated stream running along the east boundary of the property.
• Entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the west and south are medium to large acreage single family residential lots.
• Property to the east is the first section of Beaver Valley.
• Properly to the north is owned by the Town of Mebane with Lake Michael located on the
property.
2
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Beaver Valley Drive, a new public road to be constructed to state standards.
• Beaver Valley Drive extends through Section One from Mace Road, an existing state
secondary road..
• All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
• Proposed public right-of-way connection to the western property line.
Open Space:
• A 150 foot open space buffer is proposed along the stream on the east side of the property.
• 8.89 acres; 22.3% common area open space proposed on the conventional plan; 25% in-lot
open space.
• Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) = 1.97
Water-Sewer:
• Water will be from individual wells
• Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable soils, to locate a septic system.
Recreation:
• Cheeks District Park
• Dedication of land would be = 1.1 acres
• Payment in Lieu = $10,010.00 (22 lots X $455 per lot)
• No dedication is warranted because no county recreation area has been identified at this
time and the resource protection areas (non transistion areas) are protected by common
area covenants.
Agency,.Comments:
• Comments attached from Environmental Health and Emergency Management.
Development Process.. Schedule, and ction
Planning Board:
• First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board June 17, 1996. A Phasing
Plan was approved by the Board of Commissioners June 30, 1997 with Section One to be
completed December 2001.
• Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
approval August 2, 2000.
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan
,Options:
1. The Board shall consider the, application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.'
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall
have one (1) year to prepare and 1'tle a Final Plat or to request aone-year
extension from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Plannin Staff Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
Plannin Bard Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the
attached Resolution of Approval.
ministrafon
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date September 19, 2000
Name of Subdivision Section Two Beaver Valley
Owner/Applicant Bruce W. Curtis
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Section Two Beaver Valley subdivision
preliminary plat, dated June 7, 2000 and containing 221ots, subject to the fulfillment of
requirements specified herein.
Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road shall be irrevocably dedicated to
the general public and be constructed to standazds of the North Cazolina Department of
Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County
Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of
dedication of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road. This acceptance by
Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road
and Hawk Rest Road shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted far maintenance by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat
of Section Two Beaver Valley Subdivision can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
Each residential lot shall contain an adequate azea far septic disposal, and repair
area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall
also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is
available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental
Health.
4
B. Roads and Access
1. Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest Road shall be constructed
to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50'
right-of--way with 5 foot utility easements on each side, and the construction shall
be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Beaver Valley Drive, Heron Hill Road, and Hawk Rest
Road to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An
estimate of the construction cost must be prepazed by a certified/licensed engineer
or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department.
The fmancial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an
accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Cazolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road
construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads. Lots 43 and 55
shall receive access from Heron Hill Road. Lots 56 and 63 shall receive access
from Hawk Rest Road. No driveways shall be permitted within 50' of a street
intersection.
3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review and approval.
4. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 ofthe Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place, or a copy of
the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
5
D. Drainage
1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article b.23.3c.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions
and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat. The impervious surface limitations for each lot shall indicate
whether the impervious surface includes or excludes one-half (1/2) of the road
width in the calculations.
2. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the
Erosion Control Plan.
3. Stream buffers shall be contained entirely within the open space azeas as indicated
on the preliminary plan.
4. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the
Orange County Erosion Control Officer.
E. Parkland
Cash in the amount of $10,010.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in
lieu of pazkland dedication.
2. The entirety of the open space to be shown on the Final Plats shall be irrevocably
dedicated to the homeowners association for recreation/open space use by
residents of the subdivision.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity rnap in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
a. drainage easements as required by D.2. above.
3. Minimum building setbacks shall be as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and
of no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded.
6
G. Certifications
A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall
be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the farm provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner
and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document
describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
3. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Beaver Valley
Drive, Heron Hi11 Road, and Hawk Rest Road have been constructed to State
standazds or that construction plans have been approved prior to Planning
Department signatures on final plat.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
I, ,accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant
Date
APPLICATION FOR P,~?EL1~111NARY PLAN APPROVAL
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
ORANGE COUNTY
8/93
DATE: Ca 2.~p-~
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLYI •
SUBDIVISION NAME: ~'W O " ~~~E.1~ ~Arl-LC b
LOCATION: ~ ~~11 ~'
OWNER/DEVELOPER: ~RvCti G~]~~~,-5
ADDRESS: 2 L.. p•}7 TELEPHONE NO.:
_'l~~ "~3 134 )?ro ~ ~1 C1 ~~ d ~ Z
AGENT ONTACT: ' f TELEPHONE NO
31
~-~(
(
~
..
~~
~
.:
A. SUMMARI'~ INFORMATION: ' I
Orange County Tex Map L~ •- Black --• ~ Lotls- ~
Township ~
Zoning District(sl:~ ~pcy4.-.~ W ~
Total Number of Acres: 'J S. ~ ~ Phases: t ~ - '- "'
Total Number of Lots: Z~ Average Lot Size: Minimum Lot Size: Q
Z
Number/7ypa of Structures: (existing) .
Ipropased) CL~ mlt„
Lineal Faet in Streets: Z1'DD Acres in Open Space: q
Water Supply: Public (specify) Community \~ Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community _
y0 Individual
S
h
c
aal District: Q ~
Fire•Diatrict: /K
General Land Usas in Aree:
Critical Areas: stream/drainegeweya _ ~~ r,~~~_ flood prone areas
wat ershed (specify) _ /jack' 'Cr~~~
historic sites
other (explain) _~~
Iv the property to be subdivided currently unde r 'term use value taxation'? Yea
Nagy . If 'yes',
please contact the Orange County Tax Office. _
Subdivision of the praperry may require payment of
deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation' .
g. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smalle r than one inch equals two-hundred feat (1'~2QQ') and
na Inrgar than one inch equals twenty feat (1' ~ ZO') and must contain the }oflawinQ'information:
v subdivision Hems
#;:v?~ ''' zoning of tract and adjacent
~ •"' •
Hams & address of owner(s)
-~:,:~-~*
.~~ r:.,n name ~ address of subdivider ,
properties
~ "': building setback lines by notation
lif other than owner)
/ / or rypicaf lot layout
"
,~
name of surveyor, engineer, / '~~°•:,'
~"ys location and width of existing and
~ landscape architect or architect,
a proposed easements (drainage,
eddrsss, registration ~ end seal
y ~
'
~'•
`
•''
utilities, roads, etc.)
"""
••?~•t
to ~i:..•
•
•
ititl4! Preliminary Plan
~ ~"~
exlaLln
~„~;;;~ q, proposed and adjoining
~
seals. north .arrow
• rights-of-way including dimensions
~: data GncludinQ revision dates)
y v
/ k
~~ t
hi
end arrest nemss and state road
~ ~
•
owns
p, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal fast of road
+~ ~+ references
~~ ~ ~ :s~~ Parent Pa-esl Identification
f centerlines end appraximaie
,
y•.
y o ~ deed 6oak and page ~ of property acreage of new strssL rights~f-
m ""' to be subdivided `
~ ~o
~ <
y
r
.
b
d way
~ ":~ existing end proposed utilities,
_
,
<
••
;..
oun
ary described w(th bearings
E
em
~~ including type, sizssy hydrants,
F
. end distances •,
_
r, / ~ total ears
~ ~ aQa -of the tract and ~ valves
_ • manhalss• ~', ti:~:
<;r, •
~""
~'"~
i
i
d
.
ex
st
ng en
proposed curbs,
Y y acreage of lots, including end
U 'd '
_ gutters and culverts, including
excluding area within rights-of- sizes end Qradsa
,
W°y
~ .~ "~`~ location end width •of ~elleys, ~ ~
~~
:~•y>
. canuol comer sidewalks, bike lanes, transit
systems, end bus slaps
In ~~~a~ wN~.wls 1. .~..~--_ _:J~1
1
f proposed lot lines with dimensions ~
lot & block numbers typical street cross-sections and
.~/J`
phasing lines intarsec:ion details including
},
/
topography at ten foot (101 design end width of travelway end
shoulder
'~'
Q
/ -
intervals ,/
water bodies, streams
flcodway s
horizontal alignment and general
c
~ ,
end floodpleins urve data (public raedsl
~
•~ ':''.
stream buffers ~ • centerline radius on all proposed
'>
location ehd size of parcels ~~ '~:' streets
~ .U
,dedicated for public use, permanent features such as
buildings
cem
i
~ ,`,~'
recraetianal use ar reserved in ,
eter
es, historic
landmarks
'~ 4 . -. •••••
' common, with purpose Hated ~L" adjoining lot layout name
f
ti s~.
~
~ 1 >'~
:<:N impervious surface data (if located s o
adjoining property own
If
a
.,
i 4 w>.K
'~ ~' ~•• in water supply watershed) ers.
subdivided, subdivision plat name
,~ ~
:k
vicinity map showing general ,
plat book & page n
b
a- ~
u m
location of subdivision with streets
d um
er, and
perimeter lot numbers.
en
roads identified 6y State road ~ ~'' location end size aF lots of
-~
,Yj ~
"4"""''~
~ • '`:~>:~`~?'?•'•~• number end name
landscaping and buffer restricted develo ment
P potential
a' ~
i • and notation on plat regarding
~ ~
~ ~
:µ~;,~r•:
~'%{"~~: <- requ
rements ~ •
~ ~
township, corporate and extro-
same i
t
territorial planning jurisdiction fines ~ s
ormwater detention and/or
retention sites and
di
t
which cross the property un
s
urbed
areas for infiltration purposes (if
located in water supply
watershed)
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS
1 • Twenty-five (25J copies of the preliminary plat.
2- One full size copy of en Orange Caunry Tax map (with tax parcels involv
d
l
l
pencitl- e
c
ear
y marked in
3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Oepertrnent soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized
representative which acts forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the
Orange County $ubdivision Regulations).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of, this Ordinance
which assure completion end/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance.
Such doeumsnta may include, but not bs limit'ed to, a private road maintenance •~rnornent, and
erticlsa of incorporation and raateictive eovennnti pertaining to a homeowner's association.
Thass documents may bs required as necessary es evidence that the ordinance requirements
era being.met.
e. Fea: - 500 plus 35.00 per lot (1 lea for preliminary end final plat).
7. If tf't~ tubcliviaian contains 10 lots ar mare the following information shalt 6e submitted with the
apgE+cs~art:
e• Number of ysera to buildaut,
b• Number of hauaaa to be built during each year to buildaut.
c• Avaraga price of haua+es including lots far each year to buildaut. •
1. 'the applicant, hereby certify that~the foregoing application is eamplets end accurate.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~ aWNER'S SIGNATURE _
ao
DAT D E
8
~ 4 -~ ~...
• - - °,~ r
'
~-
•~ _ ~:
~.
~
r ~' r
~ -
I
i
I
S ~
+ )
•
11
~~ ~
~ _
~
i /
®
~ / /
i ~ fJiK ~® 1/ i;
r
a
1
_
1 ~i~h~ ~
_
~ ~~ ~ ~
\
1 I
\
\
\, a
~1
.
~
~~
r
o}T~~ • y~ ® y ~ ~ ~~ C~ ~
~ r
.
® / I ® ®
, .
•
~y LICK r
S!K i ~ - ~
wn
' `
s
~ /
1~
~
"
"
~
w7n~
\
W~ ~K+
.
\
I K•
`
_
~ /iR
'~ ~~
\
~K ~
\
~ ~~ ~~ ~
I rr~'9~.ia w ~_ . L ~ ~
wn~rer ~~ ® 1
3 a1 ~
~ Z ~
®
I ~ K ~~ \
~y ~
I ~ wK \ ~r
~.
ii~wM
~ 1~r \ .
I ~ n `
.
w~ ~ ~
~
!
~
•
~
~Y
w.l w. I ~'~~ ~'.
I a
'~~
COMrE7if10NAL 3UBDIVISiON
~
I I~
~` w `
~ r1I~LYWfAR1' MAN
L ~J .. SfC1R7N T1Y0
BEAVER VALLEY
~ ~ _ _
•"' (~ are t1~r. argr a0. ~ eroar
~ r ~ ~ ~xarr
ifP4L !R 1 w`w ~ ~ w~ii ~
~~~ ~s~ar[ w ~ s
1. wrr wa .~ t!~ w*w~1w i4M M 7M1
sr r~
----~ r all
rr ~~ ~-~ ~ wr aw
!. Ar/ O.1 r Oy w • M rrr ~ AM Aw 7L7~ IIL ~M47~ M 141a ~~~ R
~~ r r
r ~ IrrprlR wwMr ~ ^~K nr r 4 MrM~ M 4 Mf r rw r rte. rr.r
a. 4r ur.w. w w+rr w r w~.1 ~ ~.r` ~ ~ ~ w +a~ ~ .r1 PREWIINARY PLAT
"'~~' ~ nr~ a aM~ tlr rN r ur.r- NaF far ncorggNan.
rWt IM
•4
~Y ~MM MM Ilr ar b~p
~
~
awl 4r1 G~IY~ ~ t~ ~iYr~i ~~ +Y Y! ~I~N
~ ~ ~ ~~ r r~ ~ 1wr~ M
wa~lru~~ ar rrra
~
1
~1 N
~
'
~
~~Il M~ 4w1~~~]i~
~Kw~w~~
`.
~ ~`~... a r v~ ~w.wM w M .+ N ENT
~na~n
~~ ~
tr
e M wo
~ w
r r
K
~
r1
,.....
r~.
w
iMru
r
r
M AM wwiw w rw 1~ 1+ M M M11~R ~M111r ~. ~ 4.1.. w rww r
111 114
1111 Mf-~r/wl1 w1r.
9
61 360 GPD CONVENTION:~L w,'PU~IP
6? 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL wr'PU~IP
63 360 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PU1~IP
F15CAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR SECTION TWO BEAVER VALLEY
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
July, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SECTION TWQ BEAVER VALLEY subdivision contains 22 buildable lots and is
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much,
if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
To~+rnship: Township in which the project is located.
12
1~1
16
School District: School district in which the project is located.
17
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the
number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to
provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County
budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
,,
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per
capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total
expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated
population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for
approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1996-97.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes -Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise. taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are
charged tv those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental
facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,
proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and
legal functions of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the mainterFance of County-owned properly and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
18
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports ,two school units, the Orange County school
system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system.- This category includes
appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items.
Recurring Capital funds are used for general. maintenance, purchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services
outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include
equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees
generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be
included in Section 4, 'Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be
calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based an the approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government
Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government
Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction
and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues
such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for
educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to
be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school
system budgets..
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systenjs by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per
student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education.
School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro
school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment
of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board
of Education.
19
School District Per .Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school
district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service
category per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per
employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes
personnel, operating and capital costs.
20
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate;, The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation.
Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is
reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for
capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel
Hill-Carrboro school system.
Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on
information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market
value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: For projects'. developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and
older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an_-.
$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting .the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a
specific school district.
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and
school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.
Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service
function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by
project development.
Total Population: The total papulation added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per
household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children
per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per
service category based on project development.
Total: Total ofi all additional county employees required based on project development.
z~
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required
per school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in .assessed property value expected
each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and
are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and
the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly
exemption are also used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita
revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this
is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section
3).
Net Fiscal Impact:- The net balance is the. difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County
more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net
balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.
Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in
another.
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures
by County government (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are
derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are
derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected
number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per
student expenc~ture (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children
(Section 3) anct`adding the results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it casts the school
system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in
revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it
costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset
negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 24
~...... ~-- -- -_..._-__ .19a~_o~
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 26
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
TAX BASE ($1000) 1260 2622 4287 4394 4504
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 11579 24092 39398 40383 41392
Other Taxes 760 1557 2509 2571 2636
Intergovernmental 1471 3015 4856 4977 5102
Service Charges 553 1134 1827 1872 1919
Miscellaneous 284 582 937 961 985
TOTAL ($)
( 14647 30380 49527 50765 52034
EXPENDITURES ($)
i General, Government 1111 2277 3668 3760 3854
Public Safety 1188 2435 3922 4020 4120
Public Works 469 961 1548 1587 1627
Human Services 2794 5728 9226 9456 9693
Education 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
Non-Departmental 517 1059 1705 1748 1792
TOTAL ($) 10317 21150 34066 34917 35790
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
YEAR 2005 2006 2p07 2008 2009
TAX BASE ($1000) 4617 4732 4850 4972 5096
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 42427 43488 44575 45689 46832
Other Taxes 2702 2769 2838 2909 2982
Intergovernmental 5229 5360 5494 5632 5772
Service Charges 1967 2016 2067 2118 2171
Miscellaneous 1010 1035 1061 .1087 1114
TOTAL ($) 53335 54668 56035 57438 58872
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 3950 4049 4150 4254 4360
Public Safety 4223 4329 4437 4548 4662
Public Works 1667 17p9 1752 1795 1840
Human Services 9935 10183 10438 10699 10966
Education 15073 15450 15836 16232 16638
Non-Departmental 1837 1883 1930 1978 2027
TOTAL ($) 36685 37802 38542 39508 40494
L
27
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
REVENUES ($)
County 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 8753 17944 28903 29626 30366
TOTAL ($) 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 4239 8690 13997 14347 14705
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 8753 17944 28903 29626 30366
TOTAL ($) 12992 ~ 26634 42900 43972 45071
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
REVENUES ($)
County 15073 15450 15836 16232 16638
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 31125 31903 32701 33519 34357
TOTAL ($) 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 15073 15450 15836 16232 16638
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 31125 31903 32701 33519 34357
TOTAL ($) 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 28
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
HOUSING UNITS 7 14 22 22 22
~ POPULATION 17 35 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 5 5 5
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.09 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.13 0.27 0.42 0.42 0.42
TAX BASE ($1000) 1260 2622 4287 4394 4504
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
,Revenues 14647 30380 49527 50765 52034
Expenditures 10317 21150 34066 34917 35790
BALANCE 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
Expenditures 12992 26634 42900 43972 45071
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 27639 57014 92426 94737 97105
Expenditures 23309 47783 76965 78890 80862
BALANCE 4330 9230 15461 15847 16243
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
HOUSING UNITS 22 22 22 22 22
POPULATION 54 54 54 54 54
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 5 5 5 5 5
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
TAX BASE ($1000) 4617 4732 4850 4972 5096
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 53335 54668 56035 57436 58872
Expenditures _ 36685 37602 38542 39506 40494
BALANCE 16650 17066 17492 17930 18378
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 46198 47353 48537 49750 50994
Expenditures 4619$ 47353 48537 49750 50994
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 99533 102021 104572 107186 109866
Expenditures 82883 84955 87079 89256 91488
BALANCE 16650 17066 17492 17930 18378
SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SGHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
29
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County YES ) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 19%
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 5 5 5
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 200$ 2009
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 5 5 5 5 5
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7
SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
5519
YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2823 2825 2827 2827 2827
Middle 1240 1241 1241 1241 1241
High School 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5521 5524 5526 5528 5526
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2827 2827 2827 2827
Middle 1241 1241 1241 1241
High School 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5526 5526 5528 5526
CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS
3328 Elementary
1522 Middle
1520 High School
6370 TOTAL
2822
1240
1457
2827
1241
1458
5526