HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-05-2000-9f
:~,
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: September 5, 2000
Action Agenda
Item No. ~~`
SUBJECT: North Field at Creek Wood -Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Resolution of Approval
2) Application
3) Vicinity Map
4) Agency Comments
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis
fi) 8-2-00 Draft Planning Board Minutes
7) Preliminary Plan
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y!N) ON
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddie Kirk
Extension 2582
TELEPHONE NUMBERS;
Hillsborough 732-81$1
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane (336)227-2031
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for North Field at Creek Wood Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
Request - Preliminary Plan
Applicant: S&H Development, LLC
• Ten (10) residential lots proposed on a 32.41 acre tract .
• Minimum lot size is 2.00 acres.
• Average lot size (Net of Street Right-of--Way) - 2.9 acres
• Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTAR) is 1.4fi. 0% common area open space is provided.
• Two lots (1 fi.1 fi acres, 10.02 acres), recorded as exempt after concept approval, are adjacent
to the subdivision area and will access the proposed road.
Location
South side of Mt. Sinai- Road in Chapel Hill Township.
Existin Pro ed Conditions
Existing:
• Current zoning is Rural Buffer (RB) (min. lot size = 2 Acres)
• The property is not in a designated protected watershed.
Physical Features:
• There are no designated streams on the property.
• The site is mostly wooded.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the east and south are owned by the Triangle Land Conservancy and were a
part of the original tract, of which this is the remaining tract.
• Falls of New Hope subdivision is to the north across Mt. Sinai Road, and the property to the
west is undeveloped.
z
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Mt. Sinai Road with'two new public roads proposed in the subdivision.
• One cul-de-sac will extend south from Mt. Sinai Road and another shorter cul-de-sac will
extend east from the first cul-de-sac.
• All roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
Open Space/Buffers:
• Triangle Land Conservancy owns property to the east and south. This tract is the remaining
parcel of the Creek Wood development.
• Type A 30 foot buffer required along Mt. Sinai Road.
Water-Sewer:
• Community Water system.
• Septic systems with an easement provided for lots 2 and 3.
Recreation:
• Chapel Hill District Park
• Dedication of land would be = .5 acres
• Payment in Lieu = $4,550.00
• No dedication is warranted because no county recreation area or conservation area has
been identified at this time.
Agencx Comments:
• Comments attached from Environmental Health, NCDOT, and Emergency Management.
Develoement Proces .Schedule, and Action
Planning Board:
• First Action; Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board March 1, 2000 with the
following condition:
1. The intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT
standards.
Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
approval August 2, 2000.
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan
Options:
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall
have one (1) year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-year
extension from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Planninc Sta
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Planning Board
Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
Administration
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
3
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date September 5, 2000
Name of Subdivision North Field at Creek Wood
Owner/Applicant Sass Properties, Inc.
The Boazd of County Commissioners hereby approves North Field at Creek Woad subdivision
Preliminary Plat, dated Apri15, 2000, and containing l O lots, subject to the fulfillment of
requirements specified herein.
All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standazds of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and
directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public
generally, the offer of dedication of Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court. This
acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Old North Field Drive,
and Mill Ridge Court shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they aze accepted for maintenance by the
North Cazolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the
Final Plat of North Field at Creek Wood can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal and Water Supply
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal and repair
area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. Lots 2,
and 3 will require septic easements. Lots created in this development cannot be
connected to public water and sewer and public water and sewer will not be
provided to the lots.
2. Construction plans for the private community water system shall be approved by
The NC ISepaztment of Environment and Natural Resources Division of
Environmental Health Public Water Supply Section. Maintenance Documents for
the community water system shall be reviewed and approved by the Orange
County Attorney.
3. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of
improvements shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall
also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is
available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental
Health.
4
4. Septic lines in the easements on Lots 3 and 4 shall be sleeved by a minimum 4
inch ductile iron pipe under driveways.
B. Roads and Access
1. Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court shall be constructed to standazds of
the North Cazolina Department of Transportation, within a 45 ft. right-of--way, and
the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Old North Field Drive, and Mill Ridge Court to the
standazds of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the
construction cost must be prepazed by a certified/licensed engineer or grading
contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The
construction estimate must include a 10% contingency factor. The financial
guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited
financial institution licensed to do business in North Cazolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road
construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. An erasion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control
Division.
3. Sight triangles shall be shown at each intersection as required by NCDOT.
4. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. This restriction shall be
stated~~n a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be
prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required ~in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the signs are in place or a copy
of the receipt for purchase. of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
6. All streets shall have 7.5 foot utility/drainage easements on each side of the right-
of-way.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
The applicant shall secure installation of required landscaping through a letter of
credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required plantings
and their installation must be provided. The estimate for landscaping must
include a 10% contingency factor. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of
the estimate and be issued by an accredited fmancial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Mt Sinai Road. The buffer
shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards o€
Section IV-B-B-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on
the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
D. Drainage
1. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the
Erosion Control Plan.
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of $4,550.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in
lieu of parkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title black and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
a_ drainage easements as required by D.1 above.
b. septic easements as indicated on the Preliminary Plan.
6
Minimum building setbacks shall be as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and of
no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall
be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate, of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner
and developer shall be an the face of the plat and included in a document
describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
3. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant
Clerk to the Board
I, - - ,accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant Date
APPLICATION FOR PREVPi IIN~.RY PLAl~f e1.PpR0V?~L
iVIAJ'OR SUBDIVXSION
ORANGE COUNTY '
Pt,F~+,SE'L'YPE QR PRBY'l' (>r!K ONL'n
7
4/98
~~,-~ x/5/00
Revised 06/30/OC
SUBDIVISION NAIv~: North Field a .reek [,1~~,~ ,..,,,
LOCATION: South of rlount Sinai Roa
OWNER/DEVELOPIrR: ~ & H Develo went, LLC
ADDRESS: 104 Sout 'IELEPHONENO.: X919) 932-9b64 _
Suite 20S Cho el Hi7.1 NC
AGENT/CONTACT: Kimle -Ho rid Ass.c~'a eG TELEPHONENO.: ..(919) 677-2000
A. SIJNII~IA,RY INFORMATION:
OrangeCauaryTaxMap 16A Elock Lot(s)-2/2~-Township shape
Zoning District(s): -1;B -Rural Buffer
Total Number of Acres: 32': 4
Total Number of Lots• Average Lat Size: 2.9 Minimum Lot Size: y~^
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) N/A (proposed)
Linear Feet is Streets: 1810 LF Acres is Open Space:
Water Supply: Public (specify) X Community Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify). ~ Comtattairy X ~Iadividual
School District: Oran a County FireDisttict: ;,New Hone Rut;~l ^
General Laad Uses in Area: Vac n t__Land or Rest ~r*~h1:Ian - tr_~$~_~
Critical Areas: su'eam/dtitinagerr'ays flood prone areas
watershed (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property W be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes ~ No X .' If'~es,"please
contact the Osage County Tax OFf'ice. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under
"farm use value taxation." -
H. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals twahundred feet (1"=200') and no larger titan
one inch equals twenty fees (I"=20') and must contain the fallowing information;
X - ~::<" subdivision name
% ~.~r.
'~ name Sc address of owner(s)
X ~~.`, name & address of subdivider
~. ~~ . (if other than owner)
X ~~;> name ofsurveyor, engineer, landscape
architect or architect, address,
registration T 8t seal
X '` (title) Preliminary Plan
Scale, north arrow
Y i~>~~~'"r date of plan preparation and rovisions
X -{{<{<.>;? ~ rownship, ~r map-block-lot references
!{ ;;x<~~=~~~{ Parent Parcel Identification
:C ;<x-'=~:`u deed book and pave ~ of property to l:e
~.. subdivided
!C" boundary described with bearings and
distance
`C _.,~ total arrange of the tract and acreage of
lots, including and zxcluding area within
rights-af--way
X `~` zuaing of tract and adjacent properties
X but7ding setback lines by notation
or typical lot layout
X :<~~;, locarioa and width of existing and
proposed easements (draina;e, utilities,
roads, etc.)
% ~,"'~ ' s" e:cisdng, proposed and adjoinin; ti;hts-
of-way including dimensions and strut
names and State Road numbers. Linear
feat of road centerlines and approximate
acreage of new street rights-of--way
X .<~
s existing and proposed utilities, including
type, sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes
~~ ' `~``°'>~' existin; and proposed curbs, gutters and
culverts, including sizes and ,wades
:C `~-.~ Iocuion and width of alleys, sidewalks,
bike lanes, txartsit systems, and bus stops
:( _ ~' typical sweat cross-sections and
intersection details includin; desi?n and
X ' ~ ~~,`.,"~ proposed lot lines with dimensions
'~ lot 3c block numbers
N/A ~;~ phasing line(s)
X - topography at ten (10) foot intervals
N A ><~;~~'>:~>~ water bodies, streams, floodways and
L•- ....:
floodplains
N/A ::~,.
:>w:: stream bufi'ers
N /A `;~>~~ location and size of parcels dedicated for
public use, recreational use or reserved in
comutton,'with purpose noted
..~«..;
N~ ;>:~~;:>,~;~ impervious surface data (if located in
water supply watershed)
:•>r,,crr,~o;•~ v o
X ~~:~~~$ vicittiry map showing oenera! location of
subdivision with sa eets and roads
identified by State Road number and name
X >:~~v:~~5~r landscaping and buffer requirements
N/A ;hex:>::~.?" township, corporate and extraterritorial
planning juTisdict7an lines which cross the
ProPenY
C. OTHER SLTSMITTAL R>rQURE~1~tENTS
1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary Plat.
~-.
~ ` horizontal aligiment, centerline radius,
and ;eneral curve data on all proposed
streets
w.~.."`"'`' pertnanent features such as buildin;s,
N1~ <T
cemeteries, historic landmarks
~ ~~>~'~ adjoining lot layout names of adjoiting
__~.. property owners. If subdivided,
subdivision plat name, plat book & page
number, and perimeter lot numbers.
N/A Y:~v location and size of lots of restricted
development potential and notation on
plat regarding same
R stormwater detention and/or retention
sites and undisturbed areas for infiltration
purposes ('tf locatcd in water supply
watershed)
X ~<.", ~~:i~ identified natttral areas and wildlife
corridors ~ ~ -
2. One full size copy of as Orange Couary Tati map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked). -
3. Where municipal ar OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health
Department approvaVdenial for each lot shown thereon..
4. Where a private road is proposed, a written statement by the applicant orhis/her authorized representative
which sets forth the jusitification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3~-1 of the Orange County Subdivision
Regulations). • ~ ~ - , . ~- .
S. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance wirh Section VI of this Ordinance which assure
completion and/or maintenance of intprovemeats required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include,
but not be limited ta, a private mad maintenance agreement and articles of incorporation and restrictive
covenants pertaining m a homeowners association. These documents maybe required as necessary as evidence
that the ordinance requirements are being tact.
6. Fee -5470 plus.SS.t]0 per lot (one fee for Preliminary and Final Plat).
7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more, the following information shall ba submitted with the application:
a. Numbett of years to buildout: 2 Years
b. Number of hound to be built during each Year until buildout. 7 / 7
c. Average price of houses includ'utg lots for each year to buildout. $600, 000
I, the apa ' t, hereby certify that the foregoing application is co to and acc te.
' ~ ~ ~,~~ ~
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~O r 'S SIGNATURE
p ~ i - DATE
FEES: Amount ~ 5~t~, d~ Date Paid _ ~ ~ 7 ~ ZOnO Rtceipt T /q S ~~~
n
~M~ ~ ~~
~.•hr.. rw _..r,.n ra
+ ~
' ~
~ 41
Q
r
_ w A
'~:a
.
+ _. M .
...., . ~.... ~;..n°_
ti
.F Pir~wlq L~I1.L-
w GC`EL: vnEfl r, LL.
~vr4 !'. IG- Cvr.E
ynTE .5
-'•I+NCL NrLL. Ili :pia
r•rrLEi-•x~Nrl .u lCr~r rl ~~`ni~-r Ems. fK
- r+EiT~~rl Pa F,.~~al
ai.l r al-._i Yr
• i; TaL ti1TE •14l.C~ ,r'~l ~~
• _- a ... GB AL~fa.~ 6•i i-1'F
. rr.%rM nuneER cw r, rrp ~.
• C:[FC FAQ'.. of-5+~r
• P+w.;EA ~C.. 'HU•!:-eau;
,ie~E•><. aEEi a.!AG: fin. -
µ:F[<~:E v~r flrirl n.. r. r ..
rte.. _
(17t`_ ~~ "~~~\`- 290 'AG \\ -i.•.f>r e'sal' ~ '. `
3.64 AC ... - d; `~\` ` _.t ~~ ws "'~ j; ~ ~ .` . ( r
t ~uaSz~e.r, I- ~otiwui•` 3.07 AC~ ~Qr ; r
(p y.°ri~~_~ w 'ice ~~ rf-ir rr ' 6 \I :rr.c. ` a ,t.
Rw~.: ~~'- '7.16 AC ~ I r~ ;ter. ~, ~
2.50 AC °:~ -_ _ _-~ ~•. ,ter ,~•; - _
• r~i. c.,n. •.ifm ,
.:rte C. i' - Y ~ ,`\ :4 ` '~ F~
l ~ . py ~ •{ • \ rIL
•r~ «y.. r~c .tie, ~~, \~ -
'~ l 81 - -~ .'.i'.. -' ti~a ~ - - 1 ~--~--'' _ _ -.
2.97 AC ' _ I.~ ~'~ 4'f''~~i i \ ° ; i:'
-~ ~ r n
7) ''~,~W W"",rr~c- -e' •r•+rw.rro-~ I ~l : ~ 16.16 AC ~ ` i , r~ •. JJ
2.33tAC ..} r ~l ! +
1 i 0.0 u'~4,rv ,• \rv 1 ,
I ._. /
• \ 12.55 ACt +._irn ,1• r•_a / 6. r
' iril:4wf / ~ ' r,
l •1 - ~~1 ~ ~..
,/
~~ 1\•' --
.. /
\~ ~~ - -M-. :"III .\p f~
\ \\ _'- - - I ~ ~ 1
1
I u ~ i ~ ,. 1
I 10.02 AC ~I ~ /gyp .:? t~:' 1 ,
4Nxwr •1 ~ ~ _ a • -_ _, ,
I~ I _ .. ld, ~~ j f ,
. I _ J~°:• :~~~
~• I
~ ' ~ ^.j
~. ynJ.r.Y• ~ nnlwr<u,oa~ri
-- - ~~•• ~ arilf~ p
~ ~~l 1
~ .~
iyMICL LM0 ~vrw'I _ ~ ~
~la.rs~..
~~~
~~.
+++.r.~+~y+ nfL
- 0~
• .X.~`.~ ~l~w. rr
~ ~
- '° I ~
i~
u..~ a.r _• ~ - ~ r.t 1-.ti II y onw wr
LSE-7 l W~
~rr
PRELIMINARY PLAT QF
NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD •~_-_.- ..~_=--~=
iiiiiiiiiii,
Kimley-Hom
./ . i/ . _ ~~ i~
CAPR ACT ,. ~ : ~ ,. ~ ; . ..
I •.I _ ,_ .
., ._
. ~ yl t
Z'
~ I '~ ..
I ~ n 'l_-_
~ I _ ~ ., . , ,_ .+ .` f
t - ~ I I I ~ _ - r r
°IVI~ NA I D r
~ I ~ n : f
,r _ ~ ,. .r
/.
i l rr Y ..
~ i~
r ..
r ,:~..
K R O~LL = CIR ,r'`"
f rr ~
- - _ , r
r ~.
I :' . r
. rr. ~ ` r
' ~ r~ ~
~ ~
r !
E CIR
- 1
~ - ~
~ ~ _ rr
~ I }
V - ~ ~ ~• }
._ I '
... ;.
- . ~,`. i .
~ ~ J `.
~ ~ ~
1,l- ~ ~ `~ i ,_ ~
,:
,. .~~~
• ~,~~« o, a_ (~rttr~~~ C~vuztll~ ~i~tt1~1~ ~~~ttrtm.~rtt G°°°`" F
~• .~
m
" ~ ''+ JoantMn E. Klein, Chair Rosemary L. Summers, MPH, DrPH
Janet H. Swiherland, Vice Chuir o
Prange County board o(Ffeakh Health D1reCtQr Orange County Aoard o(Heakh
~~... .?..V~'
306-0 Revere Road, P.O. Sox 8181
Hillshorough, NC 27278
a~tvw.ca.nnn~r.~~,gs/ortn;~r/~iit; filth/
July 6, 2000
Environmental Eiealth Division
Ron Hold~vay, Division Director
~JJ~WJJ,LL
M.nA iwWy-WM
Phone: (9191 7328181, x2360 FAX: (919) 6q4
Berry $orland $arbara Patterson Chapel Hill Durham h(ebat
Administrative Assistant Office Assistant (919) 96&}501 (919) 688.7331 (919) 22
SOIL /SITE Evaluation Summary for:
NORTI-I FIELD AT CREEK WOOD
CHAPEL HILL Township Map 16A Lot 2
Map Date June 30, 2000
LOT # DESIGN FLOW TYPE SYSTEM
1 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
2 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP TO EASEMENT
3 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP TO EASEMENT
4 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL
$ 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL; w/PUMP
6 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
7 600 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
8 600 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
9 600 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
10 600 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/PUMP
NOTES:
The design flow is based upon the number of bedrooms applied for by the property owner or developer. The design flow for a bedroc
120 gallons/day (GPD). (e. g. 600~PD = 5 bedrooms)
Proposed house locations aze provided by the property owner or developer as required by 15A NCAC 18A .1900 - .1969. (The Laws ;
Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems)
The design flow, type system, and pump requirement are subject to change based upon the application and site plan or plat submitted i
the Construction Authorization.
The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the linuts of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the Orange County Healt]
Department.
12
It should be noted that all lots having aconventional-type drain field with pump are reviewed at a minimum of every five years by the
health department as required by 15 A NCAC 18A .1961 (Maintenance of Sewage Systems).
Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 24 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics and a i
inch soil cap is placed over the trenches.
Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics.
Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 36 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics.
The approved septic areas should be kept free of vehicular traffic, logging, grading and compacting activities. We recommend that the
septic areas be raped or fenced during road and home construction to minimize soil disturbance.
This report is for planning purposes only and does not constitute any approval. Lot approval is granted only in the form of an Improve
Permit.
J
13
~~
d wr ~~
.~ o.. ~~
S?ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES 13. HUNT JR. DAVID M`COY
GOVERxOR S~ECREr.~,RY
' 20 Apri12000
ORANGE COUNTY
Eddie Kirk
Orange County Planning Department
306F Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919 732-8181
SUBJECT: Preliminary plan Review: Creek Wood ll Subdivision off Mt. Sinai Road
Dear Mr. Kirk: `
This office has completed its review of the subject's proposed concept plans for compliance wit4 current
Deparanent of Transportation minimum subdivision construction standards, We wish to advise that the preliminary
plans received az this office. could be built to NCDOT Standards provided the attached redlines are addressed before
final plan submittal.
prior to any construction, the owner/developer will need to submit their final plans for review. The final plans
should include the horizontal and vertical alignment information, a typical section, drainage facilities, vicinity map,
and the number of lots with the proposed driveway location.
If you have any questions, feel free to call Mr. Michael Venable or me az (336) 570-6833.
Sincerely,
~J. Q
T. A. Kallam, P.E:
DISTRICT ENGINEER
cc: J, M. Mills, PE, Division Engineer
Kimley-Horn
TAK/MSV/msv
SCA00420.DOC -
P. O. Box 766 Graham NC 2723-076b
14
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
North Carolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications Emergency Medical Services
24 HOUR Warning l?aint ~~`°`r °r a Fire Marshal
'
919-732-8161 •933-2600 ,,••
'*; Disaster Response
24-Haar Fax Machine u ~ Hazardous Materials
919-644-3030. 968-2050
919-967-9026
*O•r
`~i~~
3 tat
Administrative Fax Machine
,~
919-968-4066
TO: EDDIE KIRK PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: IviIK,E TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTORIFIltE MARSHAL
RE: CREEKWOOD II SUBDIVISION
DATE: APRIL 25, 2000
We have reviewed the preliminary plans for Creek Wood II Subdivision and find the plan
acceptable. Please send us a copy of the plan, upon approval, for distribution.
If you need additional information, please call me.
15
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
July, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NORTH FIELD AT CREEK WOOD subdivision contains 10 buildable lots and is
located in Chapel Hill Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will
intersect with Mt. Sinai Road. The current zoning is RB -Rural Buffer. The average
lot size is approximately 2.9 acres. Lots will be served by a community well and
individual septic systems.
Project build-out is estimated at two years. Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 2000, with completion of the project scheduled for 2001. Units will
consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales
price to be $600,000 including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and
revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in
which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact
in that it projects only the primary casts that will be incurred and the immediate
revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a
development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact
analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with
public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard
Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per
Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of
additional employees--by service function that will be required as a result of growth.
This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per
employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees
are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes
personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then
weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact
of the development.
16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 -Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Sebtion Z -Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 -Projected IYe# Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 -Summary of'Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Govemment Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts
17
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA, SOURCES
SECTION 1 - PRO.lECT DATA
.Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much,
if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Tov~vnship: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The
template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for. aten-year period.
Inflation. Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal
impacts based on constant dollars. Si foethe most recent figure~nges frequently, the
Finance Department must be contacted
PersonslHousehold: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling
unit) based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent
studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange
County, N.C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees
for Financing Public Schoo! Capital Needs, Orange County, N. C. (1996}.
ChildrenlHousehold: The estimated average number of school age
children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which thetudent Generat on Rates for Orange tCounty, N. C.
is A Study of Housing Characteristics and. S
(1995). - -
Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes pem~it an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of
the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will
automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in
each year.
.~; , .
20
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based an
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school
district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Pooulatien~ Tno n~~mho.- ..r _~_~__
22
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 26
iYEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2D03
HOUSING UNITS 5 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 12 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2 2 2
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 3 3 3 3
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Safety 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
TOTAL 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
HOUSING UNITS 10 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 25 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT z~
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
TAX BASE ($1000) 3000 6075 6227 6383 6542
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 27570 55829 57225 58656 60122
Other Taxes 543 1112 1140 1169 1198
Intergovernmental 1050 2153 2207 2262 2319
Service Charges 395 _ 81 Q 830 851 872
Miscellaneous 203 416 426 437 448
TOTAL ($) 29761 60321, 61829 63375 64959
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 794 1627 1667 1709 1752
Public Safety 848 1739 1783 1827 1873
Public Works 335 687 704 721 739
Human Services 1996 4091 4193 4298 4406
Education 3028 6207 6362 6521 6684
Non-Departmental 369 756 775 795 814
TOTAL ($) 7369 15107 15484 15872 16268
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 22392 45214 46344 47503 48691
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2D08
TAX BASE ($1000) 6706 6873 7045 7221 7402
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 61625 63166 64745 66363 68023
Other Taxes 1228 1259 1290 1322 1355
Intergovernmental 2377 2436 2497 2560 2624
Service Charges 894 916 939 963 987
Miscellaneous 459 470 482 494 507
TOTAL ($) 66583 68248 69954 71703 73495
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 1796 1840 1886 1934 1982
Public Safety 1920 1968 2017 2067 2119
Public Warks - - 758 777 796 816 836
Human Services 4516 4629 4745 4863 4985
Education 6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
Non-Departmental 835 856 877 899 921
TOTAL ($) 16675 17092 17519 17957 18406
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 49908 51156 52435 53745 55089
2$
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YCF1K
REVENUES ($)
County
School District
State
TOTAL ($)
EXPENDITURES ($)
County
School District
State
TOTAL ($)
NET FISCAL IMPACT
r~wR
REVENUES ($)
County
School District
State
TOTAL ($)
EXPENDITURES ($)
County
School District
State
TOTAL ($)
1999 2000 2001 2002 2pp~
3028 - 6207 6362 6521 6684
0 0 p 0 p
6252 12817 13138 13466 13803
9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
3028 6207 6362 6521 6684
0 0 0 p p
6252 12817 13138 13466 13803
9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
~) 0 0 p p 0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
0 0 0 0 p
14148 14502 14864 15236 15617
20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
6851 7023 7198 7378 7563
0 0 0 0 0
_ 14148 14502 14864 15236 15fi17
20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
i 0 _ 0 0 0 O
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 5 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 12 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2 2 2
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 3 3 3 3
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
5CHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
TAX BASE ($1000) 3000 5075 6227 6383 6542
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 29761 60321 61829 63375 64959
Expenditures 7369 15107 15484 15872 16268
BALANCE 22392 45214. 46344 47503 48591
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
Expenditures 9280 19024 19500 19987 20487
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 39041 79345 81329 83362 85446
Expenditures 16649 34131 34984 35859 36755
BALANCE 22392 45214 46344 47503 48591
29
YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
HOUSING UNITS 10 10 10 10 10
POPULATION 25 25 25 25 25
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 2 2 2 2
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 3 3 3 3 3
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.1:
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.1~
TAX BASE ($1000) - - 6706 6873 7045 7221 7402
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 66583 68248 69954 71703 73495
Expenditures 16675 17092 17519 17957 18406
BALANCE 49908 51156 52435 53745 55089
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
Expenditures 20999 21524 22062 22614 23179
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 87582 89772 92016 94316 96674
Expenditures 37674 38616 39581 40571 41585
BALANCE 4990$ 51156 52435 53745 55089