Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 08-15-2000-8i
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: August 15, 2000 Action A ends Item #~ SUBJECT: Pleasant Green Woods II -Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: Planning & Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) C ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: 1) Resolution of Approval 2) Application Eddie Kirk, Extension 25$2 3) Vicinity Map 4) Agency Comments _ TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 5) Fiscal Impact Analysis Hillsborough 732-8181 6) 7-12-00 Draft Planning Board Minutes Durham 688-7331 7) Preliminary Plan Mebane 227-2031 Chapel Hill 967-9251 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Conservation -Cluster Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green Woods II Subdivision. BACKGROUND: Request -Preliminary Plan Owner: John Link Sr. • Twenty (20) residential lots proposed on a 50.32 acre tract. • The average lot size is 1.51 acres; with the smallest lot being 1.03 acre. • Minimum to Actual Lot Size Ratio (MTAR) is 2.73. Location The property is located at the end of Jomali Drive (Phase 1) off the east side of Pleasant Green Road in Eno Township. Existin and Pro os Conditions Existing: • Current zoning is Rural Residential (Rl). • The property is in the Lower Eno protected watershed. Physical Features: • Several existing drainageways on the property with a creek n~nning through the center. • The site is entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines. Adjacent Land Use: • Properties to the north, south and east are wooded. • Property to the west has been developed in single family residential lots. Proposed: Roads: • Access is from Jomali Drive, a public road constructed to state standazds in Phase 1. • Jomali Drive will be extended and Avon Brook Lane is a proposed cul-de-sac off Jomali. Both roads are to be constructed to NCDOT standazds. (Stubout is proposed at the end of Jomali Drive with a temporary cul-de-sac.) Buffers: • Stream buffers are proposed along the streams running through the property with 33.2% open space provided. • Open Space: 33.2% located along the drainageways and creek running through the property. Water-Sewer: • Private wells and septic tanks. Recreation: • Chapel Hill District Park • Dedication of land would be = .35 acres • Payment in Lieu = $9,100.00 • No dedication is warranted because no county recreation area or conservation area has been identified at this time. D veld went Process Schedule -and ction Planning Board: • First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Boazd August 4, 1999 with the eight following conditions: 1. The Intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT 'standards. 2. The Preliminary Plat should display the entire Pleasant Green Woods subdivision, including Phases ] and II. (Phase I could be `dashed in'.) 3. The 15' open space strip azound the perimeter of Phase I must be combined with, or connected to, the open space to be dedicated in Phase II. This recombined open space should include the Type `A' 30' buffer along Pleasant Green Road within Lot 1 and Lot 11, with appropriate restrictions upon its use (i.e., no removal of existing vegetative buffer). Please ensure that the existing trees aze within this proposed HOA common area buffer to provide for appropriate screening. If not, widen the buffer accordingly while maintaining adequate lot size. Lot 1 and Lot 11 will decrease in size. 4. The open space strip located north and south of the lots in Phase I appears to be of two different dimensions without closure, tract(s) identification and tract(s) acreage. 5. The 15' open space strip around the perimeter of Phase I should be connected to Phase II via a connection to Avon Brook Lane between Lots 20 and 21. 6. The Homeowners' Association (HOA) should be made awaze of the extent of its open space dedication and maintenance responsibilities with the recombination of open space in Phases I and II. Also, locate the project entrance sign to ensure it is within the HOA common area. 7. The recombined open space of Phases I and II should be clearly identified on the Preliminary Plat. 8. Total acreage of Phase I should be denoted on the Preliminary Plat. • Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan. • Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan approval July 12, 2000, • Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan Options: 1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time. 2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Boazd may defer consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review. 3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall have one (1) yeaz to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-yeaz extension from the Planning Director. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment. RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. lannin Board Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. Planning Director and.Coun Attorney Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION OF TTI~E ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date August 1.5, 2000 Name of Subdivision Pleasant Green Woods Il Owner/Applicant John Link Sr. The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Pleasant Green Woods II preliminary plat, dated March 28, 1999 and containing 201ots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standazds of the North Cazolina Department of Transportation. ,The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they aze accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Pleasant Green Woods II can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate azea for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access 1. Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane shall be constructed to standazds of the North Cazolina Department of Transportation, within a SO foot right-of--way with 5 foot utility easements on each side, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR construction of Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guazantee must reflect 110 % of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Cazolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads. No driveways shall be permitted within 50~ of a street intersection. 3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review and approval. 4. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection as required in Section 1V-B-3~-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt far purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 5. Prior to any construction or alteration of any existing access within the right-af- way of Jomali Drive, the developer/owner shall secure a driveway permit from the NCDOT District Office. Submit a copy of the NCDOT- approved permit and letter to the Planning Department at the same time as the request for Planning Department signatures on the Final Plat. 6. Sight triangles (lOr x 70~~ shall be shown on the Final Plat at each intersection. 7. Lot 20 shall receive access from Avon Brook Lane. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. Landscaping shall be placed behind the sight triangles at intersections. OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, ar bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Cazolina. 6 Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Pleasant Green Road. The buffer shall be 30 feet in width as shown on the Preliminary Plan and shall provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standazds of Section 1V-B-$-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. 2. Drainage culverts. shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the Orange County Erosion Control Officer. 3. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3c.1 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing. development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The impervious surface. limitations for each lot shall indicate whether the impervious surface includes or excludes one-half (1/2) of the road width in the calculations. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $9,100.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of pazkland dedication. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by D.1. above. 3. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and of no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of tie Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Jomali Drive and Avon Brook Lane have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved prior. to Planning Department signatures an final plat. 4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, ,accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. Applicant Date ~~N~"i~ ~~~~~ va~~ ~a~ ~ ~a~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ - i ~~~~a ; 3 ~~ ~~ ~ a ~ d ~ ~~ ~ ~.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ,,paw ~ __- ~ ~~~ ~ 4 ~ ;~~f i ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ Rj~ ~ n ~ ` R ~ ~ ~i, F ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~~ i 4 1~~ ~+~~ ~~~q~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~R~~~ N ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~~, ~ i {^ ~ ~~ i ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~a ~ ~a Any ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ .~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ i~ ~ u ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~ r _ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ 'til I ~ $~ _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n ~ ~ i w ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ D~~ t ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~~o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ;~~ ~ ~ /~ . ~ ~~ //~ / _ .~ ~~" ~: ~. '"ice ~. "" a.~+ ~. e , ~ ; /_ ~ b i ~•,~~ ~ ~ ! _~~ ~` 9~I1_ ~ ~ Jam.., ` :~",~. ~' ~ ~.J" w !~ 1 7 ~. 'tea©/ ~ ~ I .. ~~ / i r ~`~l ~ ~n~ i i ~n~ ~ ~ ~ f~~ ~r~ w +~ 4 ~p~.,.w ~1'PLICATIpN FOR PRELIlYIINARY PLAN ~PPRflVA,L NL~.roR sUBr~rvzszoN ORANGE COUNTY PLEASE TYPE QR PRIIJT (ilYtC QNLY) ~ 9 ~/9 DATE 4 25 00 SUBDIVISION NAME: pleasant Green Woods Phase 2 LOCATION: Jomali Drive off pleasant Green Road OWNERJDEVEyOPER: Cathy Carroll ~~-,--.- ADDRESS; t 's Road TELEPHONE NO.: Hillsborou h NC 27278 AGENT/CONTACT: ker Sniffen TELEPHONE NO.: 1.~?_3883 „ A. B. Callemyn-Parker Inca ~Nte Drive Vie. 101 Iiillsborough NC 27278 SITNIIVL~RY C Ar 1NF0R1 vI 1I Orange County Tax Map 24 Block - .Lot(s) 4 Township Eno Zoning Disttlct(sp Rl Total Number of Acres• Total Number ofLots:.? o -Average Lot Sire: 1 .5 C Minim~wn Lot Size: 0.92 Number/Type of Structures: (existing) __ 0 _,,_ (proposed) 20 SincZle Fami lY Homes Linear Feet in Streets:~52 !' Acres in Open Space: 16a. 7 ^~ , _ Water Supply: Public (specify) Community / Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community / Individual _ School District Fire Disttxcn " General ):rand Uses in Area: Critical Arees• / stream/drainageways -~~~ flood prone areas ~~ (sP~~Y) historic sites other (explain) Is the property to be. subdivided currently under "farm~use value taxation"7 Yes No / . If `~+es," please contact the Orange County Tax Of~"tce. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation." All plats must 6e submitted on sheet no smaller thaw one: itch equals two-hundred feet (1"=2D0') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information: / ry,:::;:;y>:. subdivision name ~ ~'>>'`~°' name & address of owner(s) ~ >`>~~~`~ ». ~.. . name & address of subdivider (if other thaw owner) / ': name of surveyor, eagitteer, landscape architect ar architect', address, registration # ~ seal ~ (title) Preliminary Plan / ~°~ .«•. scale, north arrow `>a.~"?~' date of plan preparation and revisions ~ '~=~.+ township, tax map-block lot references ~,,/ a Parent Parce! Identification # ~! °''~~~ deed book and page # of property to be subdivided / `<:~'. boundary described with bearings and distaates / :'~:>~°, total acreage of the tract and acreage of lots, including and excluding area.within rights-af-way '~ .''~`. control corner / ~~. zoning of tract and adjacent properties ~ ~ ~~ building setback lines by notation or typical lot layout / $.: location and width of existing and proposed easements (drainage, utilities, ~ `~<>.: existing proposed and adjoining rights- of-way including dimensions and street names and State Road numbers. Linear feet of rand centerlines and approximate acxeage of new street rights-of-way .% ~ :: ~{ ~ existing and proposed utilities, including type, sizes, hydran~, valves, manholes / :~... ~>,4:. existing and proposed curbs, gutters and culverts, including sues and grades / ''~: .,~~$: location and width of alleys, sidewallcs, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops / ry ~~,,, typical street cross-sections and intersec~an details including design and width of travelway and shoulders J I'~~ proposed lot lines with dimensions ~/ '<`< lot .4t block numbers ~ ~~'<,,~,,,~ phasing line(s) _ }%,.; i'{ >~~v,~>::':_. topography at ten (10) foot intervals ~ . ``l..s water bodies, streams, tloodways and floodplains / ti, streatn 6u$'ers / ''` h location and size of parcels dedicated for . public usc, recreational use or reserved in common, with purpose noted ~ ~~~'v a~ impervious surface data (lf located in water supply watershed) •;~j vicinity reap showing gareral location of , subdivision with sn~eets and roads identified by State Road number and mate :.`~• <~ K landscaping and buffer requirements /' township, corporate and extrazerritorial planning jurisdiction lines which cross the ProP~y C. OTHI~t SUBNIITI'AL R1rQiJRENIENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the Preliminary Plat. / ~>,`~~ horizontal alignment, centerline radius, and general curve data on all proposed sweets ~~;`~~"~~~~ ,...'~ pernnanent features such as building . s> cemeteries, historic landmarks ./ ~``f'`'~"V~' :~4 ~ j icing lot layout names of ad'oinin ado J g property owners, If subdivided, subdivision plat name, plat book ~ page number, and gerimeter lot numbers. ~ ~`•„ location and size of lots of restricted development potential and notation on `..<?^; : < plat.regarding same stormwater detention and/or retention sites and undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply ~ ~:~•. identifted nature! areas and wildlife corridors 2. One Full size copy of as Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department approvaVdeaia! For each Iot shown thereon. ~. Where a private road is proposed, a written statement by the applicant or hisiher authorized representative which sets Forth the jusitification for a private road (see Section iV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County. Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section vI of this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be liatited to, a private road maintenance agreement and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowners association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. fi. Fee -$470 plus 55.00 per lot (one fee for Preliminary and Fins! Plat). 7. If the subdivision contains l O lots or more, the following information shall be submitted with the application: a. Number ofyears to buildout. 3 y~g b. Number of houses to be built during each year until buildout: 7 Houses c. Avaraga price of houses including lots for each year to buildout: $z 60, 000 , 00 1, the' applicant, hereby certif~+ that the Foregoing application is consplete and acctirdte. • APPLICANT'S S GNAT[TRE ~-3-'Od DATE OWNER'S SIGNATURE 5-. 3 0 ~ DATE FEES: Amount ~ S 7S ~G Date Paid ~v -~ '~ d ~ Receipt # 2 d4~.~ ~.~, w..~ ~rr:ry~re ~~ ` ~' ,~ I a ~ ~~ ..n„ 5.23..3 ,., ,,.. ~ ..,, , ~ '~ .~ ' 5, 35 ~ ~ 7,,~,.2fia. d 11 I 5.23..34 n - a ~ 3..26D 4 ~ ~'~ „", ~ ~ _ ' ' 5.23..32 ~ „~ X23..268 ~ ~ 5.23..26C ~ I I ,~• a'°' ^ 5.23..26E ' ,,,~ 5.23 33 $ _ w5.23..32A ~ ~ I y. ~ nno, IY y . ~ 3..33A .~'.. ~, ~ '~" R 5. ..4G: " ' ' _ ~ 4..4K~ l ~, ~ _ I ~ ~ 1.,~ ' ,..~, ~ ~ .4F 5.2 ~ ..4H 5. .~L " I _ I / f ..4~ ~„ _ ,... `'+ a row~u ~\ 5.24..1H ~ ~ ~.. «'" ~ x.7 I / '~ $ ~ \ `~ ,.; 5 4..46 ~ 1 a ~, "' S.2 .~4 '_ 4S ~ °""'E ~„ 5.2$.25 / / _ ~ "? ,r' c~.24..4N ^ f~ \\ . "5.?~ . ~~ r / ~,,,, / I / \ , 4 4~. ~ i / ~ • / m./ mug ,~ f / b~ / a? 5.24..1 d man /I / / ~'aco +„` ""ce .,., ' 5.24..1 N / l / I I / / ~ ,x~ / ' / i .a~„ / / I / 5.24..15 K,. / / 1]1M IA.q / / ~ ~ 5.24..1 R A~ ~ ~ ~~24..1 P 5.24..4 / / ~ ,~~ / ,.,M "' / / / ,a,w / / ~ / 5.24..2E amp 5.24..1Q / / / ' /~/ / / ~ / / I ""'" / / r / ~ / /, ' / ~ » ,~ar a ~ /. / ~ r / ~ ~ ~i I ~~- ~ rty a r ~r r / ~ ~ - ~ 5. 4.. ~C \ r - ,..,. ` y~t ~ y _ ~ ~ "• ,, ~ •~ ' ~ ~ ' ~~ , a ~ ~ y R~ ~ ,,,~5.2 ..~ ~ ' ~ ~ 23 i ~ ~ ~ i I aA. _ 5.24..13 3 ao.~ , ow ~ ,~, 5.24. 'L,a,E~ ~ I . .24..12 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 5.24..1 na W~ , 4 4 g - ~ nwr ~ ur ~ ~ 5 24 11A ` ~ ~ Y 1w . .. °" - 'e ~ ~ 5.24..11 arrtev ~`'>s `°q a"' 5. 1 ~ i °;a ~ r 5 2 I 1 C ' ~ 524..8C 5.: . ' i ,. ~ ~, ..~, 24..25 ~ ^ - 5:2.13 '~~3a ,..e., .24,.24 ^ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 24 0 , w / ~ . . ~ ,, ~ a~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ >w~ >~. v ~ ~i arww / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r a.w~ _ Major Roads ,r,, r„~ ~,n,~ln, $ p,~r~ ~ t,,a ~~~~ of real propary within Parcels Orange County, and is compiled Tram recorded deed, plem, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby nadAed that the aforementioned x ! \ / Background public primary Informadon stwrces stwuW be consulted Tor veriflcatldn of the initmtatlan contained do ws map The county and its ma in com anies ass me ~ " . pp g p u (~ County no legal resP~ibillry for tha informatlon Wntained on this map. 4.unt/ a/ e v q ~ W 52 e .+ 1 C~rttr~~.e C~nru~t~~ ~H~ttl~ ~p~ttr~~t.ert~ G~°,.., .. a~ Jonathan 1:. Klein, chair Rosennazy L. Summers, MPH, D;rPH Qrange County Board of Health. Health Director Environmental Health Division Ron Holdway, Division Director 306.0 Revere Road, P.O. Box $181 Hillsborough, NC 2737$ Betty Borland Barbara Pacurson ww~~~.c~.e,ranzr.ncd~s/~~r,.ingr/em;~~lrli/ Administrative Assistant OlficeAsaistant May 31, 2000 SOIL /SITE Evaluation Summary for PLEASANT GREEN WOODS II Eno Township Map 24 Lat 4 Map Date May 30, 2000 1anet H. S014CheYland, VICE Cha{Y O C Qrartge County Board o(HEahh MwM Phone: (919) 7328181, x2360 FAXs (919) 644-. Chapel Hill Durham Meban (919) 968501 (919) fi$&7331 (919) 22' LOT # DESIGN FLOW TYPE SYSTEM 1 480 GPD CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 11 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 20 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 21 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 22 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 23 480GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 24 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 25 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 26 4$0 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 27 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 28 480 GPD - SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 29 4$0 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 30 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 31 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 32 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 33 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 34 480 GPD ULTRA-SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/ pump 35 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL w/pump 36 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 1.3 37 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 38 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL 39 480 GPD SHALLOW TRENCH CONVENTIONAL The design flow is based upon the number of bedrooms applied for by the property owner or developer. The design flow for a bedro~ 120 gallons/day (gpd). (e. g, 480 gpd = 4 bedrooms) The property owner or developer as required by 15A NCAC 18A .1900 - .1969 (The Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disp~ Systems) provides proposed house locations. The pump requirement is a function of house location and proximity to the provisional] suitable soil area. The design flow, type system, and pump requirement are subject to change based upon the application and site plan or plat submitted the Construction Authorization for a Wastewater Systexn. The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the limits of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the Orange County Healt Department. It should be noted that all lots having a pump system are reviewed at a minimum of every five years by the health department as requi by 15A NCAC 18A .1961 (Maintenance of Sewage Systems). Conventional Systems are placed in.areas with 36 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics. Shallow Trench Conven4onal Systems are placed in areas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 24 inches or more of provisionally suitable characteristics. 14 ~~a~ ~~ ,F ~- ~~ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION J.a~iES B. HuivT J2 DIVISIC)N OF HIGHWAYS David McCoy GOVERNpK SECR&TARY JUNE 21, 2000 ORANGE COUNTY Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning Department 306E Revere Rd. Hillsborough, NC 27278 9 19-688-7331 SUBJECT: Concept Plan Review: Pleasant Green Woods II offJomali Drive near SR 1567 Dear Mr. Kirk: This office has completed its review of the subject's proposed concept plans for compliance with current Department of Transportation minimum subdivision construction standards. We wish to advise that the concept plans received at this office on ]une 7, 2000 could be built to NCDOT Standards provided the owner/developer addresses the following problems noted in red on the submitted plans. Prior to any construction, the owner/developer will need to submit their final plans for review. The final plans should include the horizontal and vertical alignment information, a typical section, drainage facilities, vicinity map, and the number of lots with the proposed driveway location. if you have any questions, call Mr. Derek Dixon or me at (336) 570-6833 Sincerely, Vi Q • T. A. Kallam DISTRICT ENGINEER Attachments cc: J. M. Mills, P.E., Division Engineer TAK/SDD/sdd SCA000621.DOC ~. Residential Collector Roads include: a. Read l;nd Roads -More than 2500 feet in length b. Connecting roads between the local residential subdivision roads and the thoroughfare rystem c. Loop Roads - Morc than one (1) mile in length d. Other roads having a "collector" type function in the thoroughfare system TERRAIN CLASSiFICA7IgN LEVEL ROLLING I•IILLY Terrain Classification Definition Leve! -Cross slope range of 0% to 8% Rollintt -Cross Slope range of 8.1% to 15% Hi~IY -Crass slope over 15% _ . Rig}tc of Way Width Curb and Gutter Section 50' S0' S0' Shoulder Section 50' , S0' S0' Pavement Width 1 Curti and Gutter Section 34' G~'i 34' G-G 34' G~', Shoulder Section ZO' 20' 20' G~'i refers to face to face of standard curb and gutter section, 6ottota of the "V" to the bottom of the "V^ for the valley types section Other types will be reviewed by the Division Engineer with the G-G limits applicable. Minimum Shoulder Width Shoulder Scctian 6' 6' b' Maximum Cut and Fiil Slopes 2: l 2:1 1 12:1 Design Speed 35 mph 30 mph 25 mph blinimum Sight Distance on Vertical Curves Z50' 200' 150' Minimum Centerline Radius 310' 230' l50' Minimum 5uperclevation Rate for Minimum Radius .08 ft/R .06 ft/ft .04 R/8 Maximum Grade 6% 9% 12% Grades far 100' esch way frgrrt intersection tatcxeding 5 percent ('/°) may be reviewed 6y Distrito Engineers for consideration. Grades less thorn 0.5 percent should not be used unless reviewed individually by the District Engineer to deterrt»rte potential maintenance problems. K =Rate of Vertical Curvature _ for minimum sight distance CREST 45 SAG a5 STQP 20 Formula for determination of length of vertical curve required W provide minimum sight distance. IL ° ~-] L =Length of verdcal curve in feet K =Rate of vertical curvature in feat per percent of A A =Algebraic diBerence in gradas in percart 30 20 30 20 14 9 15 i• t I eoxa ~ FT 1 n a J ~~ ~ 4, ~ rl n~ 2 "r Boost se rr erg r I ~ ' a^~^: ~~l l is ~ a i' i ~~ L ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ / LO(T 36 ~ Ja'y ~~7 ~ N7gg054• /^~ !p~~~ I ~e .7~/ 1.77 AC/` ~ . e7 a °t~w ~ ~r ~ ~~ ~~ 3 G 8458'«, i !j ~ s• ~ / / \ ~~ ~ o 1 ( 70.71'' C2r ~9j~ B~ )~jen' ' C \ ~•1~a ~ I $ Il ~St l'3nv ~PtaE ~, s2"~~ ~"~9p.T4t \. yeti°% CEP ~\` ~ 6~ S6" R ~~•~ ~ ~y l~ \ c~ ~ 1'~~~5 I ! ~4 rc °0' ri 4 90. O ~ / ~ ~ B~'~TA y'~ OT 35 . $ ~ a l '~ , `165 A,C. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j yryq ~~3 / 1;OT 24 N .... ~ \ „~ m ~ 4 ~ 4 ~, a ~ 5 89'46"13" E 248.8<' ' ~ A O `'a • . r s ` . ~ ..., . ` I v ss' PmESTRIAN w,ulrwAY cn ~ y ~ I~ .`7. e$. 49• E ~ r ~S 89'46'13^ E~ 2.01' ~~ '~~J ~ ~ J~'//L/OT 25` ~ ~ I ~ ~ - 6q. m /' 79 °1 r , 1.03 A,C. LET'' 3~ e 7s. ~/ . r ~~ ~ I ~r ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~Z99. 8• y tit ~ L I 0 y ~ . ~ ~ ~ y ;,~ !194:7959^ /~ ~ -~ - o a ~ ~ 47etR m n I y ti ~?~ ~ // LOT 33 / "' -}-. o `" ~ 1. 7A~ _ ~ w ~/ ~ ' S86~3'24~ M =~ n ' !4 h /~rC _ 3 1100 I ' ~ ~ y ,r`j ^ N84w1'09"W . 2G I ~ it Q ~ 100' L T 27 I~ ~~ y ~/~ 1 1 / Wis. 1.~$AC. ~ J v I 1~~ AC / ~ s 1 ~ ~ ~ ` ^~ ~ Spa 7g,~ ~ ri i c / - 8 I n ~a S o 0 I ~ 1 'r I! s89• 'sl sum l \ ~ `S ~ \ c1o _ ~a oz' 1 ~,p~ ~u ~ \~ ~, ~ \ 1.~~ AC~ ~ w ~, ~. ~ 1.62 A~ / J c ~ ~°' } w rr h ~ ~` \ ~ 1 v x~r~(~ a ¢ ~~~ ~ J ~ 1 ~I N7 ~ . ~'~ OPEN SPACI~, I N ~ ~i,~,~ w o ~ /nh • LOT ~,p,1 \~ atm. m rr ~ LOT 29 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.70 s~C I ~ I _I I~ ~ ~ 'gy'm ~ L T30 ~ ~J/ :~ ~ I a~ a~ I 1.$~ACI ~~ / -~~ N~~~N I aw~sart I N~ r.1 $ N V J~2 s ~ y' \ ~ 4 4 ~ ,F \ ~ \ R~r s• ` \_1 13.00'. r 1500' ~,~~ ~q~f ~~ •~ \ ~ S 8959.40" W 189. 89'98'40" W 255,60' ti \ \ ~\ 5895q'40"W 243.28' X13 ~ 3 N89'S8'4p"E ITQ49" 1 ~ r CN.POE SAC CONTROL x~~ ~S~~ ~ ( HN ~M. LI K. $R. i ~ ~T TWUE~A ~ CORNER v 09 B/Si AS Pq7 ` , /' ~I7Q ACRES RE'MAWNG C74 PB 81/193_ 16 ~~ ~~ ~~~ ' Orange County Emergency Management P.O. Box $181 Hillsborough North Cazolina 27278 9-1-1 Communications 24 Hour Warning Point 919-732-$1 b 1 •933-2600 24-Hour Fax Machine 919-967-9026 ~~a~r °~ e ~ ~i • 4~ + ~- V 3 Emergency Medical Services Fire Marshal Disaster Response Hazardous Materials 919-644-3030. 968-2050 TO: EDDIE KIK, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Administrative Fax Machine 919-968066 FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/FIRE MARSHAL RE: PLEASANT GREEN WOODS II DATE: JUNE 8, 2000 We have reviewed the preliminary plan of Pleasant Green Woods II and find the plan acceptable. Please send us a copy of the plan, upon approval, for distribution. 17 If you need additional information, please call me. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PLEASANT GREEN WOODS II RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department July, 2000 PROJECT. DESCRIPTION .. PLEASANT GREEN WOODS II subdivision contains 20 buildable lots and is located in Ena Township. The' lots are accessed by new public roads which will intersect with Phase 1 and Pleasant Green Road. The cun'ent zoning is R1 -- Rural Residential. The average lot size is approximately 1.51 acres. Lots will be served by individual wells and individual septic systems. Project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 2000, with completion of .the project scheduled for 2002. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be $260,000 including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projeckion of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary casts that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita.and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 -Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation ...._. Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 -Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1 DDD Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 - Prfljected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 -Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Govemment Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts 20 EXPLANATION OF TERIVI'S AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name ofi the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are. completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for aten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent frgure. Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit) .based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N.C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees for Financing Public School Capital Needs, Orange County, N.C. (1996). Children/Household: The estimated average number of schaol age children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent study is A' Study of Housing Characterisfics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N. C. (1995). Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption #o the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. 21 Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. SECTION Z -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local govemment data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project:. is.. considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local govemment revenue and expenditure. information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following: Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1996-97. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes -Other Than Properly: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the farm of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive govemmental services or use govemmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and pem~it fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of govemment. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of Counfy-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. 22 Human Services: Depar[ments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new equipment/fumishings and vehicle maintenance. _ Non-Departmen#al: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, '.Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as apposed to a per employee basis. Per Student Expenditures: Information regarcling expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current ,Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. - County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category. are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category .includes personnel, operating and capital costs. Other Data: " County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of .assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rat®: The supplementary tax. assessed on behalf ofi the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose ofi computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively far elderly (65 and older) ar disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student, in a specific school district. SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development. Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. 24 Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. 25 School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based an the project development. SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Re~renues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county govemment tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact; The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to ,provide services to a project than it receives in. revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it casts to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED., PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE; SERVICE STANDARD METHOD ~ Bureau of Economic ~ Business Research -University of Florida Modified 4/15/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: L PROJECT: Pleasant Green Woods II TOWNSHIP: Eno CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: ~ 2000 Ending Year: 200 Inflation Rate: 2 50% CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.47 Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APP LICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.33 Non-Elderly: 100.00% HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes (S) by Year 2000 7 260,000 35.00% 2001 7 260,000 35.00% 2002 6 260,000 30.00% 2003 0 0 0.00% 2ooa o 0 o.oo°i° 2005 0 0 0.00% 2006 0 0 0.00% 2007 0 0 o.oo°i° 2ooa o 0 o.oo°i° 2009 0 0 0.00% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCH OOL TYPE. School District: - School Attendance: Orange County ( 1) Elementary School 64% Middle School 17% Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0) High School 19% SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA ~ BUDGET YEAR: COUNTY POPULATION: SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 1996-97 105898 5680 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services ~ Education (School District) 108.60 142.95 50.00 264.07 81$.00 0.0010 0.0013 0.0005 0.0025 0.0077 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT Total 818.00 0.1440 COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes -Other Than Property Intergovernmental Service Charges Miscellaneous 4653250 9007481 3388055 1738939 43.94 85.06 31.99 16.42 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($ : EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA General Govemment Public Safety Public Works Human Services Education (Recurring Capital) Non-Departmental 6804231 7274334 2871690 17112641 750000 3163481 64.25 68.69 27.12 161.60 7.08 29.87 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services Education (Recurring Capital) 6804231 7274334 2871690 17112641 750000 62654.06 50887.26 57433.80 64803.43 916.87 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT County Govemment School District State 10121760 0 21523177 1782.00 0.00 3789.29 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE County Govemment School District State 10121760 0 21523177 12373.79 0.00 26311.95 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: County Tax Rate ($) School District Tax Rate ($) Assessment Ratio 0.9190 Per $100 Assessed Valuation 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation 100.00 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPWIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA ~ YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 200 HOUSING UNITS 7 14 20 20 20 POPULATION 17 35 49 49 49 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 4 4 4 Middle 0 1 1 1 1 High School 0 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Govemment 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.0~ Public Safety 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 Public Works 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Human Services 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 TOTAL 0.09 0.78 0.26 0.25 0.25 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.13 0.27 0.3$ 0.38 0.38 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES YEAR 2005 2005 2007 2008 2009 HOUSING UNITS 20 20 20 20 20 POPULATION ~ 49 49 49 49 49 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 4 4 4 4 4 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL - 7 7 7 7 7 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Govemment 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Public Safety 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Public Works 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Human Services 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 TOTAL 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.26 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT ~ YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 TAX BASE ($1000) 1820 3686 5338 5471 5608 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 16726 33870 49053 50279 51536 Other Taxes 760 1557 2281 2338 2396 Intergovernmental 1471 3015 4415 4525 4638 Service Charges 553 1134 1660 1702 1745 Miscellaneous 284 582 852 874 895 TOTAL ($) 19793 40158 58261 59717 61210 EXPENDITURES ($) General Govemment 1111 2277 3335 3418 3504 Public Safety 1188 2435 3565 3654 3746 Public Works 469 961 1407 1443 1479 Human Services 2794 5728 8387 8597 8812 Education 4239 8690 12724 13042 13368 Non-Departmental 517 1059 1550 1589 1629 TOTAL (3) 10317 21150 30969 31743 32537 NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 9476 19009 27292 27974 28674 'YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TAX BASE ($1000) 5748 5892 6039 6190 6345 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 52825 54145 55499 56886 58308 Other Taxes 2456 2517 2580 2645. 2711 Intergovemmental 4754 4873 4995 5120 5248 Service Charges 1788 1833 1879 1926 1974 Miscellaneous 918 941 964 988 1013 TOTAL (a) 62741 64309 65917 67565 69254 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 3591 3681 3773 3867 3964 Public Safety 3839 3935 4034 4135 4238 Public Works 1516 1554 1592 1632 1673 Human Services 9032 9258 .9489 9726 9969 Education 13703 14045 14396 14756 15125 Non-Departmental 1670 1711 1754 1798 1843 TOTAL ($) 33350 34184 35038 35914 36812 NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 29390 30125 30878 31650 32441 SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 31 YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 200 REVENUES ($) County 4239 8690 12724 13042 13368 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 8753 17944 26275 26932 27606 TOTAL ($) 12992 26634 39000 39975 40974 EXPENDITURES ($) County 4239 8690 12724 13042 13368 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 8753 17944 26275 26932 27606 TOTAL (~) 12992 26634 39000 39975 40974 NET FISCAL IMPACT (a) 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 REVENUES ($) County 13703 14045 14396 14756 15125 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 28296 29003 29728 30471 31233 TOTAL (S) 41998 43048 44124 45228 46358 EXPENDITURES (y) County 13703 14045 14396 14756 15125 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 28296 29003 29728 30471 31233 TOTAL (S) 41998 43048 44124 4522$ 46358 NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0 SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 3 YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 HOUSING UNITS 7 14 20 20 20 POPULATION 17 35 49 49 49 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 4 4 4 Middle 0 1 1 1 1 High School 0 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.09 0.1$ 0.26 0.26 0.26 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.13 0.27 0.38 0.38 0.38 TAX BASE ($1000) 1$ZO 3fi8fi 533$ 5471 5fi08 COUNTY BUDGET ($) Revenues 19793 40158 58261 59717 61210 Expenditures 10317 21150 30969 31743 32537 BALANCE 9476 19009 27292 27974 28fi74 SCHOOL DISTRICt BUDGET ($) Revenues 12992 26634 39000 39975 40974 Expenditures 12992 26634 39000 39975 40974 BALANCE 0 0 D 0 0 COMBINED BUDGETS ($) Revenues 32785 66792 97260 99692 102184 Expenditures 23309 47783 69969 71718 73511 BALANCE 9476 19009 27292 27974 28674 YEAR 2005 2006 2007 200$ 2009 HOUSING UNITS 20 20 20 20 20 POPULATION 49 49 49 49 49 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 4 4 4 4 4 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.2fi 0.2fi SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.38 0:38 0.38 0.3$ 0.38 TAX BASE ($100D) 5748 5$92 6039 6190 6345 COUNTY BUDGET ($) Revenues 62741 64309 65917 67565 69254 Expenditures 33350 34184 35038 35914 36812 BALANCE 29390 30125 30878 31650 32441 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($) Revenues 41998 43048 44124 45228 46358 Expenditures 4199$ 43048 44124 45228 46358 BALANCE. 0 0 0 D 0 COMBINED BUDGETS ($) Revenues 104739 107357 110041 112792 115612 Expenditures 75348 77232 79163 81142 83171 BALANCE 29390 30125 30$78 31650 32441 y SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS ~ SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: School District: School Attendance: Orange County YES ) Elementary School 64~~ Middle School 170 Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 1 god YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 4 4 4 Middle 0 1 1 1 1 High School 0 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7 YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 4 4 4 4 4 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7 SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS Elementary 3328 Elementary 2822 Middle 1522 Middle 1240 High School 1520 High School 1457 TOTAL 6370 TOTAL 5519 YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2823 2825 2826 2826 282fi Middle 1240 1241 1241 1241 1241 High School 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458 TOTAL 5521 5524 5526 5526 5526 YEAR - 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2826 2826 2826 2826 2826 Middle 1241 1241 1241 1241 1241 High 5ohool 1458 1458 1458 145$ 1458 TOTAL 5526 5526 5526 5526 5526 DRAFT 7-12-00 PLAPPlUVG BD~ NEETlJVG 1 Katz asked if the board could suggest a water budget before this subdivision is approved. Benedict said 2 that the board could suggest that the developer have a water resource professional to comment on this 3 area. The board could also direct the staff to bring this to the attention of ERCD and the Board of County 4 Commissioners. 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2'S 26 27 2t3 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4a 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4S 49 50 51 52 S3 Preston is really concerned about the small lot sues. Barrows is concerned about the water and the possible drainage. She asked if condition #4 would address the neighbors' concerns about the drainage. Davis answered her question, but 1 could not hear him. Goodwin would like to work with the neighbors to find some resolutions to the concerns, Gooding-Ray asked if there was anything that this board could do about the small lot sizes to satisfy the neighbors. Fleener said that it would help if there were some type of hill or barrier between her property and the subdivision, Benedict said that there could be some type of increased buffer and plantings beriveen the subdivision and the larger fats. MUTTON; Gooding-Ray moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning staff to approve the Concept Plan far High. Rock Village Subdivision subject to the conditions as stated above, with a recommendation to include a wider buffer with planting on the eastern side and to address the stormwater concerns. (I could not hear the wording for the stormwjater issue). Seconded by Goodwin. Strayhom does not think that the additional buffer would accomplish anything. Discussion, ensued about the size of the buffer. Alois Callemyn said that they could work with the neighbors and the staff to come up with a suitable buffer. MUTTON: Gooding-Ray moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning staff (Restated) to approve the Concept Plan for High Rock Village Subdivision subject to the conditions as stated above, with a recommendation to include additional planting in the buffer and to have mediation between the Plannir~ staff, the developers, and the neighbors on the buffer area. The mediation will occur prior to the preliminary stage. Seconded by Goodwin. voTE:. Unanimous Ralph Edwards said that he would like to see if there was any room to make his property and the developer's property more compatible. He would like the lot size and the square footage to be increased. Kirk made the presentation. c. Prelirninary Pls~ns (1) Pleasant Green tVaods II (Hillsborough Township - ZO Lots} 34 35 2 PURPOSE: 3 Consideration of the Conservation -Cluster Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green Woods II Subdivision. 5 BACKGROUND: o Re uest - Prelimina Plan 7 Owner: Jahn Link, Sr. ~ Twenty (20) residential lots proposed on a 50.32-acre tract. ~ The average lot size is 1. S 1 acres; with the smallest lot being 1.03 acre. 10 Location 11 The property is located at the end of Jomali Drive (Phase 1) off the east side of Pleasant Green Road in 12 Eno Township. 13 Existin and Pro osed Conditions 14 Existing: 15 • Current zoning is Rural Residential (Rl). 16 • The property is in the Lauver Eno protected watershed. 17 Physical Features: 1 S • Several existing drainage ways an the property with a creek running through the center. 19 • The site is entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines. 20 Adjacent Land Use: z 1 • Properties to the north, south and east are wooded. 22 Property to the west has been developed in single family residential lots. 23 Proposed: ?~ Roads: 25 • Access is from Jomali Drive, a public road constructed to state standards in phase 1. ?e • Jomali Drive will be extended and Avan Brook Lane is a proposed cul-de-sac off Jomali. Both roads 27 are to be constructed to NCDOT standards. Stub out is ~ ( proposed at the end of Jomali Drive with a 8 temporary cul-de-sac. ) ~~ Buffers: 30 • Stream buffers are proposed along the streams thro the roe of 31 provided. ~ ~ P P rty with 33.2, o open space -~~ Open Space: 33.2% located alo ~ the dra' 33 Water-Sewer: r'° usage ways and creek running through the property. 3~ • Private wells and septic tanks. 35 3o Develo went Process Schedule And Action 37 Planning Board: 38 • First Action: Concept Flan approved by the Plannin Board A 39 following conditions: g ~t 4, 1999 with the eight 40 1. The Intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary plan shall meet NCDOT standards. `tl 2. The Preliminary Plat should display the entire Pleasant Green Woods subdivisio a2 Phases I and II. (Phase I could be `dashed in'.) ~ including 43 3. The 15' open space strip around the perimeter of Phase I must be combined wi ~4 to, the open space to be dedicated in Phase II. This recombined open space should in lode the 45 Type `A' 30' buffer along Pleasant Green Road within Lot l and Lot 11, with appropriate `tb restrictions upon its use (i.e., no removal of existing vegetative buffer). Please ensure that the `17 existing trees are within this proposed HOA common area buffer to provide For appropriate `~ screening. If not, widen the buffer accordingly while maintaining adequate lot size, Lot 1 and ~~ Lot 11 will decrease in size. ~0 4. The open space strip located north and south of the lots in phase T appears to be of two 51 different dimensions without closure, tract(s) identification and tract(s) acreage. 36 1 5. The 1 S' open space strip around the perimeter of Phase I should be connected to Phase II via 2 a connection to Avon Brook Iaane between Lots 20 and 21. 3 6. The Homeowners'' Association (HOA) should be made aware of the extent of its open space 4 dedication and maintenance responsibilities with the recombination of open space in Phases I ~ and IL Also, locate the project entrance sign. to ensure it is within the HOA common area. 6 7. The recombined open space of Phases I and II shauld be clearly identified on the Preliminary 7 Plat. 8 S. Total acreage of Phase T should be denoted on the Prelirnincuy Plat. 9 1Q 11 12 13 14 15 16 1T 1S 19 24 21 22 23 24 25 26 ?~ 2S 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 3fi 3"~ 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4,5 46 47 48 49 • Second Action: 1. Action within two regularly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or extension thereof; 2. If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to BOCC with the Planning Board minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions. • Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan. FINANCIAL IIVTPACT: Fiscal Impact ,Analysis included as an attachment. REC~MNIEI~IDATIO~N{S): Pl Staff Approval, in accordance with the, attached Resolution oF~pproval. MUTTON: Barrows moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning sta#Tto approve the Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green Woods II with the conditions as stated above. Seconded by Mr. Speaker. VUTE: Unanimous AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS SCHEI]ULED FUR PUBLIC HEARING 028/00) a. Public Hearing Advertisement Approved by Board of Commissioners on June 29, 2000 These were discussed at the earlier 5:30 p.m. meeting and include: Stream Buffers, Towers, Rural Industrial Activity Node, Hillsborough North Planned Development, Stormwater Amendment, Schaal Impact Fees, and Shaping Orange County's Future. Chair Allison said that he would like to talk about the Cnunt~s position on the water situation. Benedict said that he just received a map of the Orange/Alamance water system. He said that there were limitations in the Upper Eno area. He said that the board could give a statement, based on the comments tonight, and ask the County Commissioners to have water resource holding capacity as one of their goals. Goodwin requested a review of the question of having an easement through someone's property. Katz disagrees with the process of how the Planning Board receives requests far subdivisions. He thinks there is not enough time to consider the appropriate actions. AGENDA ITEM #10: PLANNING BOARD ITEMS AGENDA ITEM #11: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Planning Calendar - (distributed at meeting} b. Next Planning Board Meeting -August 2, 2000