HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-29-2000-9ei
r
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 29, 2000
Action Agenda
Item No. ~~
SUBJECT: Bricewood Acres Subdivision -Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) ~IJ
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Stream Buffer Protection Methods
2) Resolution of Approval
3) Application
4) Vicinity Map
5) Agency Comments
6) Fiscal Impact Analysis
7) 3-1-00 Planning Board Minutes
8) Draft 4~-00 County Commissioner Minutes
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddie Kirk
Extension 25$2
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 96$-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane (336)227-2031
PURPOSE:
Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Bricewood Acres Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
This item was tabled on April 4, 2000 to examine multiple approaches for protecting the stream
buffer. The four approaches are elaborated in the staff report but are described as follows:
1. Stream buffer on lot
2. Stream buffer on lot with conservation easement
3. Stream buffer as a common area
4. Stream buffer as part of a public park dedication
(See attachment 1 for explanation of methods and preferred approach and recommendation.)
Request -Preliminary Plan
Applicant: Joe Phelps, agent; Steve Yuhasz, surveyor
• Subdivision follows the conventional plan. A Conservation Easement is proposed on the
area designated as Stream Buffer.
• 15single-family lots on 27.04 acres (including rights-of way) Average lot size -- 1.63 ac.
• Fourteen (14.49) acres in the critical area (U-ENO-CA): max. density = 1du/2 ac.;
• Twelve (12.55) acres in the balance of the watershed: max. density = 1 du/ .92 ac.
Location
The property is located off the south side of Governor Scott Road east of Mill Creek Road in Cedar
Grove Township.
Existing and Proposed Conditions
Existing:
• Current zoning is Agricultural Residential (AR).
• The property is located in the Upper Eno protected and critical area watershed.
Physical Features:
• There is one intermittent stream in the southwestern portion of the property.
• The site is entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the south and east are wooded.
• Properkies to the north and west are developed in single family residential lots.
Proposed: .
Roads:
• Access is from Gov. Scott Road (SR 1351).
• Proposed public streets to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
• Propased public right-of--way connection to the. southern properly line.
Water-Sewer:
• Water will be from individual wells.
• Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable sails to locate a septic system.
Agency Comments:
• Comments attached from NCDOT, Environmental Health, and Emergency Management.
Develo ment Process Schedule and Action
Planning Board:
• First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board October 6, 1999 with the
three following conditions:
1. The Intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT
standards.
2. A publicly dedicated right-of-way should be provided to the southern property line to allow
for future interconnectivity of public roads (in accordance with County policy).
3. With the Preliminary Plat, submit a plat indicating areas for on-site infiltration of storm
water that demonstrates compliance with Article 6.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning
Ordinance.
• Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
approval March 1, 2000.
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider the Preliminary Plan
continued from April 4, 2000 meeting.
Options:
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the, County Commissioners the applicant shall have
one (1) year to prepare and file a Final' Plat or to request aone-year extension from the
Planning Director.
In the April 4, 2000 meeting the Board of County Commissioners requested
information on 'the nature of the stream buffer and how it connected to open space
and adjoining properties' and 'whether there might be another approach to protecting
the stream buffer.'
3
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Planning Staff
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Plannin Board
Unanimous Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Administration
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval which includes Method 2
stream buffer protection method for the reasons stated in the Method 2 analysis. This
method:
• provides for a conservation easement within the stream buffer located on the property
unencroached by uses prohibited by law or ordinance in the stream buffer;
• removes and incorporates Lot 8 into an adjacent lot or lots to increase the
unencumbered size of the adjacent lot or lots and to eliminate a lot which has the
potential for stream buffer encroachment problems in the future.
4
ATTACHMENT 1
STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION METHODS
METHOD 1
1) Stream buffer on lot
This method was originally proposed by applicant. The following issues apply to the
stream buffer;
a) i's.~art of a minimum sized lot
b) does not offer secondary means of monitoring protection of area
c) permits disturbance of azea by well construction
d) severely limits the use of a minimum sized lot (40,000 SF) because the stream
buffer encumbers a large percentage of the lot and the remainder mazginally
permits the septic field, house, accessory structures, driveway and other front/side
yazd buffers. (See Lot 8 septic field sketch. In the case of lot 8, 75% of the lot
would be consumed by the conservation easement.)
e) the limited usable area increases the likelihood the encroachment of the stream
buffer may occur and restricts the use of the lot as compazed to others in the
subdivision and zoning district.
METHOD 2
2) Stream buffer or lot with conservation easement
This method is a proposal by the applicant in response to concerns of the Apri14,
2000 Board of Commissioners meeting to enhance preservation and protection of
stream buffer. The following conditions apply;
a) is part of minimum sized lot
b) does offer secondary controls for monitoring by easement language
c) as written the easement permits disturbance of the stream buffer by allowing well
construction, however item d) should supplant this item c)
d) administration recommends: Lot 8 does not have enough unencumbered azea to
provide for a septic field, house, driveway and typical single family home
accessory structures. It is likely that the owner of lot 8 would want one or more
accessory structures further raising the likelihood that stream buffer
encroachments, especially as to structures typically constructed without building
permits, will occur. Therefore Lot 8 would need to be incorporated into Lot 7
and/or 9, or both. Lot 8 is only marginally sized anyway and can only be used as a
lot if its well is located in the stream buffer.
(See preliminary sketch by Environmental Health of septic system layout of Lot $)
5
METHOD 3
3) Stream buffer as a common area
This method is commonly used within flexible development subdivisions to sepazate
protection/open space areas as the common protection value and enjoyment by the
Homeowners Association (HOA). The applicant's proposal is presently a
conventional subdivision with 0% open space and in most cases with lots of
minimum size.
For example:
within critical area (min. 2 acre lot size)
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are 2.00 acres
within protected are
Lot 7 - .95 acres
Lot 9 - 1.00 acres
Lot 11 - 2.62 acres
Lot 13 -1.66 acres
Lot 15 - 2.11 acres
'a (min .92 acre lot size)
Lot 8 - .93 acres
Lot 10 - .93 acres
Lot 12 -1.55 acres
Lot 14 - .92 acres
Conventional subdivisions may include common area open space (up to 33% after
which the subdivision is considered 'flexible') and in this case if the stream buffer was
protected by this method, then Lots 7, 8, 9 would not meet minimum lot size since the
buffer would not be part of lot and approximately 21ots would most likely be deleted.
This method is not recommended because open space is not required by the
Subdivision Regulations for a conventional subdivision. The following conditions
apply;
a) Buffer is not part of individual lot.
b) Method does provide secondary means of protection/monitoring/maintenance.
c) does not permit disturbance by individual activities (well, accessory structures,
etc.)
d) owners of adjacent lots would need a minimum sized unencumbered lot which
would provide for a proper usable area for house, well, septic, etc.
METHOD 4
4) Stream buffer as a public dedication
Stream buffer would be a land dedication instead of payment in lieu for pazks and
recreation impact.
In some cases, where the stream buffer is part of a wildlife/conservation corridor this
method is preferred. The dedication in this case would only be 15/57 of an acre
(11325 SF or .26 acre). This immediate azea has not been designated as a corridor
therefore we do not recommend a public dedication. For comparison purposes,
a) the dedication would not~art of the lot
b) secondary means of protection is provided by county ownership, monitoring and
maintenance
c) azea would not be disturbed by material intrusion such as a well.
~~~
6
C,~<<c ~~
~~~~
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date June 29.2000
Name of Subdivision Bricewood Acres
Owner/Applicant Joe Phelps ,
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Bricewood Acres subdivision preliminary
plat, dated November 2$, 1999, containing 141ots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements
specified herein.
Dustin Drive and McCray Lane shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be
constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of
this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County
and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Dustin Drive, and McCray Lane.
This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Dustin Drive, and
McCray Lane shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by
the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Cazolina
Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of
Bricewood Acres Subdivision can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal and Water Supply
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate azea for septic disposal, and repair
area, located outside of the Stream Buffer Conservation Easement and shall be
approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health.
2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of
unprovements shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall
also disclose that information regazding the tentative location of septic systems is
available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental
Health.
B. Roads and Access
1. Dustin Drive and McCray Lane shall be constructed to standards of the North
Cazolina Department of Transportation, within a 50' right-of--way, and the
construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Dustin Drive, and McCray Lane to the standards of the
North Cazolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction
cost must be prepazed by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and
submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guazantee
must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial
institution licensed to do business in North Cazolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the f nancial guazantee will not be released until the road
construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division far review and approval.
3. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place, or a copy of
the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
4. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. No driveways shall be
permitted within 50' of a street intersection.
5. A 50 foot public right-of-way designated as tract C shall be provided to the
southern property line with 20' temporary construction easements as indicated on
the Preliminary Plan.
6. All streets shall have 5 foot utility easements on each side of the right-of--way.
7. The applicant shall request the posted speed limit on Gov. Scott Road to be
lowered to X15-mph as recommended by NCDOT prior to Planning Department
signatures on the final plat.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
9
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepazed by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
3. A conservation easement to a homeowners association created by the owner/
applicant shall be provided on the azea designated as Stream Buffer on the
Preliminary Plan. The conservation easement shall prohibit the use of the
easement for any purposes prohibited in the stream buffer by any State Law or
Orange County Ordinance. The documents creating the homeowners association
shall provide far successor owners of the conservation easement whose purposes
and responsibility shall include ownership and maintenance of the conservation
easement as provided for in the easement. The documents creating the
homeowners association shall require Orange County approval before the
responsibility for ownership and maintenance of the conservation easement aze for
any reason extinguished.
D. Drainage
1. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the
Erosion Control Plan.
2. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the
Orange County Erosion Control Officer.
3. A stream buffer shall be provided as indicated on the preliminary plan.
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of $5,915.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in
lieu of pazkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
a. Drainage easements as required by D.1. above.
b. A conservation easement shall be provided on the azea designated as
Stream Buffer on the Preliminary Plan.
zo
Minimum building setbacks shall be as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
~. Sign easement location to be shown on final plat. Sign shall be landscaped, and if
lighted, at a wattage to avoid casting light on adjacent properties.
5. Lot 8 shall be deleted and the land within lot 8 shall be combined with lots '1, 9 or
both.
6. Lot 6 shall meet minimum lot size requirements of 2 acres.
7. If any condition of this Resolution shall be determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or void, then this Resolution is void in its entirety and of
no effect and the Preliminary Plat approval granted herein is rescinded.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
4. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner
and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document
.describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
5. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Dustin Drive
and McCray Lane have been constructed to State standazds or that construction
plans have been approved.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant
Clerk to the Board
I, ,accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant/ Owner
Date
APPLICATION FOR P;~FLIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
ORANGE COUNTY e/s3
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) / '
SUBDIVISION NAME; /4G 44L ~C~r~S
LOCATION: Pc~yL' /~~ ~w
OWNER/QEVELOPER: ~Lt/ ~ ~J~
ADDRE55: ~Z~ S. C ~w•Q/m1 1.'~r£LEPHONE N0.:7~~ [~Z~
•'~ ~ V ~p--T„~
AGENT/CONTACT: TELEPHONE NO.:
,~
A. SUMMARY' INFDRMATION:
Dranpe County Tex Mep `~-~ Slack ~
i
Z
D
' // /
Lat(sl `~~ Township G~Gyr~ ~
an
np
istrictlsl: ~
It/o , U
Total Number of Acres: . Q Phesas:
Total Number pf Lots: 1 ~ Average l.ot Size: Minimum Lot Size: Z
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) r(tc ~
(proposed) ,N
Lineal Feet in Streets: /LIO ~
Acres in Open Space:
Water Supply: Public (specify) Communi
Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specif
) C
School District: y
ommuni
tY Individual
Fire•District; E'y'f
General Land Uses in Aree: far
Critical Areas: stream/dreinnpeweys flood prone a-eas
watershed (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property to be subdivided currently under 'farm use value taxation'? Yes
No
It 'yes'
_
_.
,
please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require
a
m
f
deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation'. p
y
ent o
8. All plats must be submitted on sheet na smeller th en one inch equals two-hundred feet (1'-200') and
no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'20') and must contain the followinp'informetio
n;
V'~` suhdiv.ision name
;.' ~•.~•.• ,.','~ ~ ••<.a>~ ~ ~~~ .
.i'a:•. zoning of tract and adjacent
~~
Hems & address of ownerls)
nema ~
dd
f .
properties
„ a
ress o
subdivider / ""? building setback lines by notation
7.
'~ (if other than owner)
+>.ry~;:>~:
or typical lot layout
,..~
~ ~» nema of surveyor, engineer, ''~~ location and width of existing and
0 landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage
at
/
address, registration ~ and seal
~
•~~ ,
utilities, roads, etc.)
w
~ (title) Preliminary Plen
~'~ '~b••• .:
~ ;;}~ existing, proposed end adjoining
scale, north arrow
a~ .<~
~ v
•.~
::
. date Cncludinp revision dates) ri hte~f-we p
0 y includin dimensions
-~-
~
~
`F`+~"<•~a township, tex.map-block-lot and street nema^ end elate toed
refarsnces numbers. Lineal het of road
~ O '~
~ Perant Parcel Idantificetion N centerlines and approximate
ti ~, ~
y p ,rr~
deed book end peps M of property acreage of new street rights-of-
~'' ~'
°~
'~ ny
to be subdivided '
~ b
, way
~ ' existing end proposed utilities,
E ti +
eundery described with 6eerinpe
• includin
p type, sizes, hydrants
o ~ /
v
end distances
~~~ total eeraapa of the tract and ,
~ valves, manholes
C° ~
%
x m
acreage of lots, including and >;;i::
existing end proposed curbs.
excluding eras within rights-of- putters and culverts, including
~ sites and prade~
U ~ /
V ~
~m way S t i ~ t '`
~' '
~% ~ ~
y-~ I,~• ~ location end width bf alleys,
'
r'
~
n control corner T
sidewalks, bike lance, transit
systems, end~bus stops
(please complete r everse sidal
1~
~/
/ proposed lot lines with dimensions
lot & bl
k
~,~
~`A/'`~~~ ac
numbers
phasing lines
~, / / topography at ten foot (101
"~
c intervals
~ ~
;~: ft.,
water bodies, streams, flocdway
~
v1 end flogdplains
a `~ stream buffers '
a~ ~ ~ location and size of parcels
N U
~ •~ dedicated far- public use,
~ 4"'
~~ recreetianal use or reserved in
"'~ O cammgn, wish purpgse noted
'd ~+ V `:ye~ impervious surface date (if located
+~.+ ~ in water supply watershed)
,~ ~ ~~~ ~;~~ vicinity map showing general
~ ~ location of subdivision with streets
v co end roods identified by Stnte road
~ number and Hems
~ ~ /'~ ~'~'• landscaping end buffer
U ~ requirements
township, corpareta end extre-
territoriel planning jurisdiction lines
which crass the property
~• OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
~ l
tY
~c
, e
p
street Crag5,4eCtjanS and
intersection details including
design and width of travelway and
"`'i/~`i shoulders
h
i
or
zontal alignment and general
curve data (public roads)
cent
li
er
ne radius on ell proposed
/ streets
J ~ permanent Features such es
buildings, cemeteries, historic
/ landmarks
v ~ adjoining lot layout names of
adjoining Property owners, If
subdivided, subdivision plat name,
plat book & page number, end
A':
'''JV perimeter lot numbers,
, location end size of Iqts of
restricted development potential
- end ngtation on plat regarding
r same ~
:;:~
.:<, stormwater detention an~/or
retention sites end undisturbed
arses far infiltration purposes (if
located in water supply'
watershed)
t • Twenty-five (Z5) copied of the preliminary plat.
Z- One full size copy of en Orange County Tex map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in
pencil).
3• Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Oepertment soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
¢• Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized
representative which sets forth the justification far a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the
Orange County Subdivision Raguletions).
5- Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section Vl ot. this Ordinance
' tivhich assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance,
Such documents may include, but not bs limited to, a private road maintenance ~~reciTent, and
articles of incorpgration end restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association.
These documents may ba required as nacersary es evidence that the ordinance requirements
are being~g.//m~~at,
6• Fee - S357g.00 plus 55.00 per lot f1 fee for proliminary and final plat).
7- If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall 6s submitted with the
application:
a. Number of years to buildout, Z
b- Number of houses to ba built during each year to buildout. 7r$
c. Average pries of hau:as including lots for each year to buildout. 1~- zO IOOQ
I, t applicant, here y certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate.
.~ ,
AP IICANT'S SIGNATU E
DATE
_~,~
12
~t-a4oeee~
i
,,, w
zv
~Q
~Q
~~
W
4 V
,~
~ ~~
~ ~$
.. ~ ~ ~
~o ~
$ 4
13
'S ~ N ~ \N\11UIItlllry~i~ 3
.4 $C ~ H~ ~ ` e~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3sr~y~~~
~ ~a
~ ~ Y Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ '~, >~ ~ ~ ~~.' d ~ ~ E a ~iii~Vlutaltu+\`a' ~
as to e ~ g $e~ ~i ~~~~,
n r FL~ w^ $ ~ ~~m
nom rt~na~~~8
'~ ~ 2
~ _ ~ 3 -- ~sy
~ ~ ;~_
~e~
~a ~e~
~~~ 7N ~ LIL1r
~ 0~
1
s •_ ~
I `` ~
I; ~; ~~
I
9aoyr~b'[ ]7rxt'
a
time ~ ~~
I ~ ~ • ~r
1 1 , 4
I 1 Saeto•1s1" stssy
I I ~ 4~M1~,~ \ O
1 ~ M
AGOltl''l '~ ~
II ~ r ~/
1 -r F ~ - ~
~ I 3 ~ a w ~~~_ ~iw~
~~~~ .l~ ~ g1 "~
1 1 M.
1 ~ 1
..
a
:~ ~s ~ ~
1 ~,
R srl
4
' ~~ ~ R O~
1 R/A~ .Q- ~` d .
~"'~ tr _ ~ ~ 3sR ai
.~~ _ ~s ~-
6,Saj ~ ~x a
C 4
o~
}O~ ~__ ~I
~~p ~ ~ "~ ~
~~ o ~ ~ fie: 1
w ,», ~~:
o$
N
_,+~ ~ ^~ a
O$
._
~~ / ~'
~ e~~~ ~.
/ ~ ~ ~~~~'
pn
~$~ S~~ 1
~ ~^~'~
h~
a ~~g8~.
~-
~"
~~
i'd'
~, ~ B
~~
~_
~ }t-~e
~'~ ~ ~~~=
L~
~.
i
Jo ~P~~N ,-
_ -~-
~-
~kPor~ ..
D ..
~,
.. ~ -..
-.
lA TUM LNG -
~i ~..
. ~ r
'~ r!
~ _ .. ..
.. ,
~/. ~-{11/~ .~
.- •\ r~ 1
~~O
~~
GO OL T `
15
,. n"Tr-
z a~° ; ~~
3 r t~ ~ ~
~~
.~ ~:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR..
GOVERNOR
16 September 1999
ORANGE COUNTY
Robert Davis
Orange County Planning Department
306E Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919 732 8181 Ext. 2595
Subject: Proposed Sricewood Subdivision on SR 1351 (Governor Scott Road)
Dear Mr. Davis:
~~D
David McCoy
SECRETARY
Per your request, a review of the above mentioned subject has been completed by the NCDOT
Graham District. Attached for your files are a copy of the revised plans and a list of our
comments and recommendations for the subject. We respectfully request that you provide a
copy of this letter and any necessary referenced documents to the owner/developer so they may
be fully informed.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Mr. Michael Venable, Assistant District
Engineer, at (336) 570-6833.
Yours very truly,
'^~.~' -~
Tommy 7. Dyer, P.
DISTRICT ENGINEER
Attachment
TJD/MSV/msv
P. O: Box 766 Graham NC 27253-0766
16
NCDOT REVIEW NOTES FOR DHR
Bricewood Subdivision on SR I35I (Governor Scott Road))
16 September 1999
COMMENTS & REQUIREMENTS:
1. Prior to construction of any new access or alteration of any existing access within the right of way, the
developer/owner is required to secure a permit with this office. It is the responsibility of the
owner/developer to obtain a permit.
2. The owner/developer should dedicate 10' x 70' Sight Triangles at each proposed intersection. Please
refer to the attached figure regarding the minimum design. Please note that the subject site has a
limited 400' to 420' of sight distance. Normally, the minimal sight distance for S5-mph speed zone is
S50'; therefore, we recommend the developer provide additional safety improvements and/or the
pasted speed limit is lowered to 45-mph.
3. We are concerned with the existing lake and how the owner is proposing to develop the roadway and
the lot. No part of the lake or dam is permitted within the right of way.
4. The proposed 50' right of way is an acceptable design; however, it has been our experience that the
owner/developer will have trouble, maintaining the typical ditch section in the small right of ways. In
addition, we have received complaints from the local utility companies about the limited workspace.
Therefore, we recommend the owner/developer provide a b0' right of way or some type of an
additional easement along the roadway.
S. Prier to any construction, the owner~developer will need to submit their final plans for review. The
final plans should include the horizontal and vertical alignment information, a typical section, drainage
facilities, vicinity map, and the number of lots with the proposed driveway location.
6. The owner/developer should be aware of General Statute 136-102.2, in which new roads are not
eligible for the State Maintenance system unless certain requirements are mac. An explanation of these
requirements can be found on pages 13, 14 and 15 of the current (January 1999) NCDOT
Subdivision Roads Manual. Particular attention should be placed on items 2 (petition for addition), 5
and 7 (occupied housing requirement), 11, 12, and 13.
17
IINARY PLAT
Racordation~
~ce~ or Sales';
1
r
Mpr~n
aq 22~
va sss
~.e Far
uSOM
~Sp1"
27
r
OB 227 ~° jqy I
C! 25p pp ip72
/ '
~~
GOV. SCOTT F~1D (SR l.75T)
~_
_~
'DSO ~ e~ yia ~y Q ~ ~ ~
Reed ~ ~ ~..,~ .. ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
' I
la 1
i
~
w
p" R
-- CONCEPT PLAN -
- CLUSTER SUED/VISION
~ 3 BRICEWDOD A CRS
~,. _ ,T~ a..~ ,~
1j~ ~~ scv,~ T •_ rAV'
~ lao soa
~ -~ ~~ ~~
-~~ ~
~-~-- comae Van. Srt
~~-- VaNrnaC(cpl Pt.
.` • Mpp SN
rarC wrv g ~,.,y,,,r.
27.04 Ac. taU
11 Ac. P11T (p
16AcG 2.
2.2Z 11C, rop
15.61 Ae. b!~
Il~li® KMG PAi'Ip•~•
PS 31 py 117
1$
•
' •
-.----- 5q'IRW ~~
• . CL
20.00'
FlRST 1q0' STA71gN -
•• '~ PAST ROAM TAPER ~ •
R/1H WIDENING
I - ~ .
~
•
~-
10' x 70'
: ' o
`~
10' x 70'
SIGHT TRIANGLE .'•
R=30' 3 ~
0' R•~ 0' ~
1 51GHT TRIANGLE
~ ~
EDGE GF pAVE1AENT p EDG>± OF PAVf]AENT
EDG>~ OF PAVE~AENT - ~ - ~ EXISTING ROAD ~ ~^' `
EDGE OF PAVt31ENT
- RIw - •
TYPICAL
' ROAD CONNECTION
' STOP CONDITION
FIG D7D1 7-94
-~ 19
`~~r .r e•r (~rttlt~E (~IILLI:[~~ ~Ett~~ ~E.~1FiZ~ITtPI~~ a o~~~Y ~e
G
r' ~ ;' i
" ~I ~= ~ ~ Timothy). Ivey, chair Roselxlary L. Summers, I~tPH, DrPH Brenda Crowder•Gaines, vice Cha, o °
~-
~" Orange County Board o(Heal[h Health Director Orange County Board of Heal[h
^~ ~ : ~ ~ •"•, LtJ.~,W,1.1,IJ,1
w.». a..w. nw. r.
lrnvironmental Health Division
lion Holdway, Division Director
30(rC revere Road, P.Q. $oz 8181 Phone: (919) 732.8181, x7,360 F.a.X[ (919) 644.3
Hillsborough, NC ?7273 $etty Dorland Barbara Patterson Chapel Hill Durham h(ebane
www.m.oran~e.ns.us x ;~envhlth/ Administrative Assistant Office Aaeistant (919) 968-{501 (919) 688.73}1 (919) 227•
B~ucEwoon AcREs
TMBL: 2.40..15
~; MAP DATED NOVEMBER 28, 1999
PROPOSED
LOT AVAYLABLE SYSTEM TYPES PUMP REQ? COMMEN"
CONVENTIONAL INNOVATIVE ALTERNATIVE
1 X X X NO
2 X X X NO
3 X X X NO
4 X X X NO
5 X X X NO
6 X X X NO
7 X X X YES
8 X X X NO
9 X X X YES
1 D X X X YES
11 X X X NO
12 X X X NO
13 X X X YES
14 X X X NO
15 X X X NO
zo
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
Narth Carolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications
24 Hour Warning Point
919-732-8161 •933-2600
24-Hour Fax Machine
919-967-9026
,~
Lrrr~~ y e
~~
4 * ~
'~
~^ ~
''~+ ert•`''
Januazy 20, 2000
TO: Eddie Kirk, Planning Depaz~nent
FROM: Mike Tapp, Deputy Director/Fire Mazshal ~~
RE: Bricewood Acres Subdivision
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Marshal
Disaster Response
Hazardous Materials
919-b44-3030. 968-2050
Administrative Fax Machine
919-968-4066
We have reviewed the Bricewood Acres Subdivision and find the plan acceptable. As with all
new requested subdivisions, additional staffing for 9-1-1, EMS and Fire will have to be taken
into consideration. Please send us a final plat, if approved, for distribution
Please feel free to contact us if you need additional information.
21
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR WINDFALL
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
February, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bricewood Acres subdivision contains 15 buildable lots and is located in Cedar
Grave Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will intersect with
Gov. Scott Road. The current zoning is AR -Agricultural Residential. The average lot
size is approximately 1.63 acres. Lots will be served by wells and individual septic
systems.
Project build-out is estimated at two years. Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 2000, with completion of the project scheduled for 2001. Units will
consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales
price to be $120,000, including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and
revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in
which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact
in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate
revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a
development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact
analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with
public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard
Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per
Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of
additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth.
This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per
employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees
are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes
personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then
weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to praject the total net fiscal impact
of the development.
~z
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 -Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 -Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
ether Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 -Projected Net Fiscal ,Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 -Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts •,
23
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much,
if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
To~ivnship: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The
template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for aten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal
impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the
Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling
unit) based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent
studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange
County, N. C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees
for Financing Public School Capital Needs, Orange County, N. C. (1996).
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age
children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per
household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent study
is A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N. C.
(1995).
Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled. who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of
the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will
automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in
each year.
24
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based an the
number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to
provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County
budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered far approval. All
information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per
capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total
expenditures far a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated
population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for
approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 199$-97.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes -Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service' (or user) charges .support numerous functions and are
charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental
facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,
proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and
legal functions of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
25
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school
system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. This category includes
appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items.
Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services
outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include
equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees
generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be
included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be
calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal
year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government
Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government
Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction
and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues
such as f=und Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for
educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to
be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school
system budgets.
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systems by Orange County for Cun-ent Expense. The minimum level of per
student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education.
School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro
school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment
of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board
of Education.
26
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school
district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service
category per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per
employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes
personnel, operating and capital costs.
z~
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation.
Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is
reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for
capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel
Hill-Carrboro school system.
Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on
information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market
value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: Far projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and
older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an
$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a
specific school district.
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and
school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.
Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service
function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing lJnits: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by
project development.
Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per
household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children.
per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per
service category based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
zs
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required
per school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax' Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected
each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and
are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and
the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly
exemption are also used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita
revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this
is the properly tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section
3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County
more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net
balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.
Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in
another.
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures
by County government (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are
derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are
derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected
number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each ,per
student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children
(Section 3) and adding the results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures
and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it casts the school
system more to provide educational services far children in a project than it receives in
revenues. A positive net balancd ,indicates that mare revenues are received than it
costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset
negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
2~
SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic 8 Business Research -University of Florida
Modified 4!15/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
3a
_...
.... '. -
,~_ Bricewood Acres
....~ ..
... --__~__. ...,u.. _ __..
.....:._ ~.._...,_....__ ... w ... . „
....._ ..._.._. _....______..._...._ Ce,__..._,.......e
TOWNSHIP: -
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
.BeginningyYear. ______....~,~ :~.~-,.r,~,d....wW,.,__,..~.~...._._w.__ . _ ...~.~..,..~,.~~.~~.~,~~.~._.~~::.._.~-._.....~ ._ ~..:y.~.~.~.. ~:~..w_ __..__w ,_.M~ _.200(
Ending Year
.9,.~.,...---,... - - z 200"
Inflation Rate. ;1 ~ .~ 2,50°i
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
x
r
~~ ,~ 2.4 ~
Persons/House _ ` ~ ENTER 1 LL BESIDE APPLICABLE~SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW '
.., .. ...._..__.,. _L~.~... ....__.._ _. ,,. ..~.,~. .
Children/House' ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW.'..- ~' WW~.~..... µ _ - ~~~• ~~%~
•M ~~, ,_ ,.,,m _ 0.3;
_ - :_100.00°lc
HOMS SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes (S) by Year
.. ~._...., ..._._...~,. 2000„-..~,_.._..~_ ~....._~... ~.. , _ ..~.. .... .~ _ a .........,7 _..._... ~ _... . ~.~..<,~, ~ _ 1217;OOOJ.. ~ s,.. ~ °
2001 8 120,000 83,33°~
?002:.,
~a y O, ~- a.
a`
.~.,~_.. _- ~
2003 0 0 0,00°
~
Zoos o o
0.0
o°r
.,, .~ , ~. ,~.....
2006
~ , mF. T-.T
:
d
?
~~
:~ ,~
~ .....
~~°
d
__ . _ .. ........_
..Y ,._ .~.....~
~~...._._ _
_
.
. _ ~__..~ _.
...,:.:
. ...._~.. ,.. . _.._~._
..~,_...~~_. _~.W~. - - _~~ .... /
.._...
_
zoo? 0 0 0.00°~
zoos - ~o >, - -
~~
~ o ooh
w . ~
.. .. ... .. ,._._._ .. _......~..,.-......~_.... .. .. .......,..~. _~...._..,. -.... .e...~...._ ..14.....1 ~~.....-w ~._M..~.....1.. ~.
. ....1_ ... _l.w
.i-4u._r....a. ~...~_ .a.. .. _ ..W..w... _
204.7 o O O~QQ°~
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN (')BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
.Orange Gounty~. `, r ~ ' ~ 1 )~..~ ~ Elementar;`i School.. &4~
Middle School 17°
~ Chapel Hill-Carrboro ~'--~iwu'~• ('• •'`~x~ - T p ~) ';~,t.'"„~ ~ ~' Hi hvSchool,- z "y~ ~ 19 ~
9 °
n~r.T~.~u n ~ .-. r... .-...•..~..~....~..r. ..... ..... ~.~.~~ n~1.T191/~T l1ATw
31
BUDGET YEAR: 1996-97
COUNTY POPULATION: 0589E
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5680
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government - ; ,' :
-.:.. . - -
... ,:.:..:. 10B 6
,. .. .: ,:,.... 0.0010
. -
Public Safety
... .. _. 142.95 - - .... `_ ..----_.
Public
..
_......_.. -. Works:. - - :. _ -
..
,,
5
.0.00 - -
-
- ._ p.0005
Human Services 264.07
.,
. .
.,
..
Education (School Distract ~` - -
.. _
.
-
.....
_ -. -
,. 81 BAOF
_= - ' "~ "
-
O.OQ77
,. ,"_
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
,_
_
.. .. "
..Total ~
.
,." ,
. ..,. ,-
-
,,
r , . r~ 18.00'.. " .,
~.:.
0:1440
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
.- Taxes ~ Other Than Property . _.,_.___, .,~,,,.~... ..M _. _~...-. ...~.y,_..._w~ .._ ... ~ 4653250
-_
~ ~~
Intergovernmental
_..
.
..
.
9
007481 ,
85 06
,,
, .
,.
. _ .., ... , .. ._ .
Service Cha es t
.. r9
~
~.
~ _
`"~ `"'.`.. ,. -.,_.
3$$8t]55
~:
.:
~ _~
3199:
_.
_..._.
._._..._..._.__...~..~.,_.._...
..._ _.~,.~ ....u -__~ .~ .
;~.~~.~..,-.~........
._
. r ~....~
.,.~._ _.. ._......_ ,-_
Miscellaneous 1738939 16.42
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES (S): EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA
General' Gavernment. :~~.._
,...~.
..,- -
_~ ' "
~ 6804231
`" 64
Public Safety
- 7274334 68.69
Public Works ~ _
. ,- .~.,.__...__ .~ _~ ____. . ~s
_y_ ___, -_--,.._„~,_~W._._....,.,..w _ -^ 2$71,690 _
_. ..~... ~ r.~ ~r
27;12
~
Human Services
, 17112641 161.60
.:Education
(Recurring Caprtal). _ ~..~ -_, .. _ _
,.,-..
. _ . .._ __~ -_ ~ ='~~? ,._. ~.. ,750000 7.08
Non-Departmental 3163481 29.87
SCHOOL D15TRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT
:w ~ ~.
Coun Govemment - ,~ - ~ =
School District ~0 0.00
State ,~ -~ - . T . „_. „~ _. „ . ^ .,w . ~. --... , .. , ..
~'~* 21523177.w ~ 3789.29`
SCHOOL D15TRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE5 ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
. ~ f~"~~x ~- ' a> ~ .~
County Govemment ~ _ . ._.~~ t. " '~ ..,.•, ......10121760 ~ .
, . ~.-_
.
School District _ .
0 0.00
• State. ~ F- `r' -
'r' ro. - 't c ^~•- .•.-...r'-- •rp.•-•---r - _ . . r. _ ._ . .
-•t ~ 21523177 _ .. ti :26311.95 `
32
YEAR 2000 , 2001 2002 ; 2003 200
HOUSING UNITS T ` 15 15 ! 15 15
POPULATION 17 ~~ 37 37 37 37
.'r3
'r
SCHOOL CHILDREN -
Elementary ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ` 3'~ ~ - _
' ..~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , .~ 3
Middle "r ,:r R ' ,'' '1~~ 1 1
.,~; t ,
High School ~ Y ' ~ b~ 1 ' k' ~~ 1:~~ 1 ,°~.1
TOTAL ~ ~ {t ~ $.,, 5
w2 5 ~ ~> ~ 5
, Mfr ~.a r it r } i + i
COUNTY GOVERNMENT r 2="'~~r i ~` ( , s`~~` ; ~ ~ l -'-
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ~' ~ 4~ s ` ' ~ ~ 1 ~' -~~ `
General Government ~ , ~ . ~ 0 Q2_ 0.04 '- ~ x ~ .:- 0 04,~ 0:04 0,0~
Public Safety - ', ~ r "4`F~'0~ Q2~ 0.05 .~;, ~ ~ {F~x~W 0 05,E 0.05 • , ~ ' 0.0!
Public Works =~ ~ ~kxM~O, Q1. 0.02 N'~z;~n<~ ~~i ~0 Q2J~ 0.02 ~ ~ , .~, ~ ,
' o.o
Human Services ;~~~'~ ~ 0"'04. 0.09 ~ '~~' ~ ~x~0 p9 0.09 , ~ ° ~ r,,, ' f <(l 0!
,~~,.,~, ~. ~ r~'f~ ~ "~ :„~" r~ :;;021
TOTAL i;,~,~'da:v~ 09; 0.20 yw;,y~ irk ,~„0:20' 0:20
,d~~Y~Y,`~i~~ ~„~ aria f5~t~~s"f i~°° }~,~iS ..":~
SCHOOL DISTRICT `~~'~~ f ~'~ ' + ' '` ~- ~ "''~`
:.,~ 1.13;, 0.29 ,~', ~ 0.29 ~ 0.29 ,. ~, 0.2!
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES `~} '~ '~~; '~°°~ J~~ ~`{ ~ ~~ -~; `_
_ $ . •,
YEAR a 2005« 2006 , ,~, `^" :.2007 2008 ,~ ;'~.~ ` .'200!
HOUSING UNITS '; ta;w. 15 15 ,., ~," '~~
~~ ,~,. ~ ~, ~ 15 _.~ 15 15
POPULATION = a x.°~7}~ 37 ~,, ~ rk .~ ~~~ 37 + 37 ; •, - 37
t k~ - - i ~ 1
~.^ ~ ~x!t~ ,~ r~
SCHOOL CHILDREN .~, ~ r ~''~;,,. ~~ ~ n~a..1 ~~ ~. ;'~
Elementary , ~ ~ F ,, W * t~7 r „3;°°i' 3 ~„ -~ x,f 3 3
Middle ~ ~ 1~~~~~ 1 1 ~~"~ , ~ ~ , . A..
High School ~ s,.~yE .~ 1.'0 1 Fsuy~t -, , 1
TOTAL ~:,, - 5;;: 5 ~ ~~ r, ~, ~. 5 5 ~ ~ ,~ a. e
COUNTY GOVERNMENT ~ "~ ~~~`'"'~ `y~`~~ ~ ~ ~~
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES y ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ `~=»~ ~' ~ ~- ~ ~.~ ~~
General Governm - ~ N ~ ~ ,a '
ent ~ ~ TO-Q4 0 04 ~~ .,. , 0` ~. 0.04 ~, ~ Q.a
Public Safety ~ 0`05 0 05 ~ b5' 0.05 _~'' ' ; } ~ 0.0!
Public Works y_~ ~~~' ~; ~Q 02~: 0 02 ~' ~,~~ x ~ ~d2,y 0.02 ~~ ~• : 0.0'
~ tl~~" -w ' i '-~ , Ada • ~<~s ~'? . , '
Human Services ~>'!~ ~<'~ ~ 0 Q9 0 09 ~~ ~ ~~'.~ 0'09 0.09 ._ ~ ; ~ Q 0!
TOTAL ~ li, ~ ~ ~; ~t ~~:~; ~ ,„ ~, ~~,a~ ~„~_~, ,~~~ .
t ~~ 020 0 20 rJ~~: ~ ~~ ~ `~ 0 20'" Q.20 ' ~_ 0.2i
SCHOOL DISTRICT , ,_ ~, 0.29.; 0 29 k ~ ~~"'~~- ,0.~9 ~ 0.29 ~ 0.2!
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES :,. ~,, • ~ ,~~ { ~`' ~;'`" F'''~ -
33
YEAR
TAX BASE ($1000)
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax
Other Taxes
Intergovernmental
Service Charges
Miscellaneous
TOTAL ($)
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education
Non-Departmental
TOTAL ($)
NET FISCAL IMPACT I
. 2000
840 .::,
6813' ~:
760
- ..'9471:;
-„ ~ 553
.-
284
~- ,~
9881•
ti; ~ ~ 'a
i .~
~ Iii ~
j s ,~w~1111
-1188
s~.
°~ ~ 469 ~~
a 32794''•°
` ~aJ'~' x r.=:
.~yw f ' '~ , ~~.~
.r .'r 1 Di
.'+~ ~ w _ }
~ .a°
2001 2002`
1821 -. 1867 =
14770 ~•i
~ ~ 15139~y
~
1669 -
1710
3230 3311
1215 r
-- ~ ` ~ 1245 ,
624 ~,. `639 a
{.
~_~a. ,
21508 ~,'' ;'~' 22045
2440
2609 ~l
1030
6137
9310
1134 ,".-
22660
-1153 `
2003 2004
1913 - .. 1961 .
15518 15906
1753 - ~ 1797
3394 3479.
1277 _ - ,~,,1308~
1
655 672
22596 ~123161~~
~
,~'
' `'~
:,
2564 '
' °. 2628:
2741 ~ ~ ~ .:2809.:
,
1082 , _ ~,
''' -x 1109"
6447 ~ ~ i`~ s', 6609
9782 ,a
' - ~ ' 10026`
1192 ~ ~~~„~
~1222a
~ ~ j~
-~
23807 ' ~_,,' ~ ,~~` ' ;24403
F
'
-1211 ~, ,..1241
YEAR ,, 2005 ~ 2006 ': ~ 20p7. 2008 ~ 2009
,1.; ,.
TAX BASE ($100D) "~" 2010 ~ 2060 ~'.~ r "2112. _~ 2165 - 2219
~~
REVENUES ($) ~ "`', 9 ~~ ,~{'t~~~ ~~~ `~~r~, ~ ,t
Property Tax .16303 16711 , ~- ~ pr1.7129•x~ 17557 _ a~ 17996.:
Other Taxes r, - 1842 ~ 1888 `~~~ ~ 1935~~ 1984 ~' " 2033;
~,
z~
Intergovernmental , A. ~ ~3566,~~ 3655 j~~~~ ,3746 3840 tk ~ ;~~~ 3936:
., t~.r ~+ ~ +, ~ r
Service Charges ~' '1341 1375 1 ~~h~~ ~ ~• 1409 ~ 1444 ' ~ , ' s~" ~:= " 1~1$D
Miscellaneous ~s ~,~ 688 `t 706 ~ ~., ' x:723'• 741 - ~ ' 760:
TOTAL ($) ~ , , 23740 ~ 24334 , ., ~~ ;,~ 24942;:, 25566 • '~ ~,{ 4 ."..26205'-.
r
ff r
EXPENDITURES ($) Y ~ ~ } ,~ ~ ~ ~~~L
General Government w ~ '.'2693-:, 2761 •; r:~~:; 2830 ~ 2900 ~ ; t' 2973
Public Safe ~ ~~ 2 79+' 2951 g ~.• ~ 7~ ;
' ~~'' 8 ~ ~ '~~~''~3025, 3101 ~ ' 31.78.E
Public Works ~. ~ .~: , 1137.;; 1165 -• ~ :~ ~1.194,~ 1224 ~~ ~$ ,. ~' .1255:
Human Services 'n ~ ~ ~ 6T,~14?tip 6943 ~~ ~~ « ~7~1 ~ 7295 ~ f, ~;~ ~ ~ 7477;
Education ~ •~• ~`~ 1027 10534 3 , ~~ ~ 1Q79j"~ 11067 ; ~~'~ ~ X11344:
Non-Departmental _' ~.~~252_,~ 12$4 ~`T~~~~~ 131 r' 1349 ~ ~~ -~' ` 1382'
,ry. ~r F 7 ~~Ik ~ q. ~ 7 ~.~ 0 ~ :4
TOTAL ($) 25013~~ 25638 ~ ,
~- ' r'~~26279 -:~ 26936 . ~ 27609
~ r
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) r .`=1272 ~~ -1304 ` _F -1337'` -1370 ~-1404
34
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 20Q0 ',: 2001 ~- 2002 2003. 200
REVENUES ($) K '' -_
County 4239 9310 9543- , 9782 1002E
School District `` p = 0 0 ~ 0 _
~~~
State 8753 , ~ 1922fi ~ 19707 ~ 201.99 z070e
, ~: ~ ~.
TOTAL ($) ;`
12992
r' 28536 ,
` 29250~~ 29981 ~
,
. r , 3073C
.. rT •~ U,.~ _.f-i! ~ ~ 'P 4 -F ,~~ a y~ .y ?i
EXPENDITURES ($) ~~ ~~`~ ~# ~ ~, ` ~ k~ ~ ~y~,"
County ,, ~~ ~r ~'k~ -
4239
~
; ~
~~"~,€ ~
9310 i.' + n ' o
<
,
;~ '> ;
~ 9543 r t
~ ~ '~
~`
, Y
r ,~ ,
,
~ ~ , ?
~
~;~
;
~;~ 9782 ~ 1002E
School District ; t"r~ ~ ~ ~ Q=
} 0 ', 0 ,
~:~~, ~~ 0
State
$753 a~~
19226 t
; .~ ~. r , ~
.
,
'19707 , ,
~~
Y' ,
~~ , , ,
~rv~ 20199 _ 20704
./ "$
_~ •1~ ~ A ' '. YAF
- ~a~ ~
~ .1 f.v 'n '/
~IVCK r t~',: 1 r .v n
';P ~ ~ ., ~ ~~ .
' y
f.
',; ~~
TOTAL $
() ' " x,12992 'i 28536 ~'
~`29250' 29981 ~- 30730
~ ` - ~ F,
I
~
'
~' ~
'
»
~ ~
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) P ' ~
3 ~ ~
N~'~~[ ~ l
i
n
~?;A
'~'0~ {
'~f F ~~
~
~
.
'"'~ a,;~
~
~
' TS.F,~
`~ ~ ~
~.
,
s 0 k
~
"
~
r 0 0 ,: ,_. .:~
YEAR 2005 7 2006 ~~~•'.' °, ,'~. 2007:,8 2008
. < . ZDO
y T J I
REVENU () .ca ;r x ~~~~: ~~ ~~ ~" ~.r y'yy`~~. f
ES $ ,,
~ ;,. M
~ .~., -~.; C ,
County r }f f '; ,„,~ .; ~`.
.4, -10277;,":J 10534 `' 10797,~~~ 11067 r '.,11344
School District s 0',~~ 0 ~ ~ 1 ; '~~"'~ ~„~~
1 ~ ,.._ , 0. 0 ~: ._., ~.~
State ~ ' " A21222,~°~ 21752 =~~ ~' `~` 222g$ `~ 22854 ~ " ` 2342
~~ ~~,
" ~ s. 5 ~u , ~ f9~ v`.
TOTAL ($) , _ •31499 ~~~, 32286 ~ ~ 33093 ~ 33921 34769
it
- ~- tia ~} G~[ 1
~~ 5~"~~ m, ~ d 3'~~ ~ t
EXPENDITURES ($) ~`~ ~' ~~~ -~ ~~ ~ x'`~ ~~'' '
+~ 'Jib rv 4~ 9PP i` i~~,r.~
County , °~' }a~~}{,.V10277°.' 10534 4i~~ - 10797.:-~ 11067 .113,44
School District W `"~ ~ ^~~ "" '; >n~
i State ~ ~ ~ ~
~3<, ,21222~~ 21752 -;;w ~~2229~ ° 22854 f ~ .'2342
~vla<' .ly f ~M ~~f ~~~ i~ ~1
L ($) ;y '" 31499 ~ 32288 f•~ ~ s~t"~ ~~ ~~~
~d ~ 33093 -: 33921 ~ 34769
j Q.4 1 y l .•~$»~
~ r ~~ ~
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) ::~ ~~ ~~. ,~d.~ 0 ' 0 ~'t ~.~ ~Y 0;.'. 0 ' ~.. ~~ : j
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
YEAR ;' 2DQ0 2001 ~ : ~ :2002-~ 2003 200
HOUSING UNITS 7..; 15 15 :; 'r 15 1:
35
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary ... 1: 3 ::: 3. 3 3
Middle ~.. 0''> 1 - . ~ 1 1
High School 0~ 1 1 1 1
~ `
... 5 5 ,..
:,
,.
5.
COUNTY EMPLOYEES _ ~.0.09,Q 0.20 , ~ 020' 0.20 ,0.2L
- ,.. -.
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ~ ` - " 0.13 ~ 0.29 `.` . ': 0 29 0.29 '' 0.2~
TAX BASE ($1000) = 840 •~ 1821 .1$67 ~~ 1913 ~°~ 1961
COUNTY BUDGET ($) ~ ,~j
- __
Revenues -9881 '° 2150$ - 22045 ~ 22596 23161•.
Expenditures ~ ^ ~, 10317 .~ 22660 ~ 23227 ~ 23807 - 244p3,
BALANCE ~- d ;;,~36 ,~ -1153 -11$1., ~ -1211 ~, . -1241:;
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET "~~ ' •':'~
1
Revenues < .•12992 ~~ 28536 ' ~ 29250 ;~ 29981 ;. 30730;
,~:
Expenditures ~, 12992 N 2$536 .29250 29981 _ -~ 30730.;:
BALANCE Y ~ ~ ^ {~0°~ 0 F, , ~; ,Q 0 Q
'' `
COMBINED BUDGETS ($) ~ `t ~ ~~~ tip,' ~ ~ '
Revenues r ~ ~ 22873 ~~ 50044 ~ ~ ~. 51295.. a± 52577 ~ '-53892y
Ex enditures '~' "~~23309' 51196 ~ •52478: 53788 ~~,~ ~~ ~''; 55133`
BALANCE ~~y`i~: r~~'-;~`~"436: -1153 "` -1181. -1211 "`.~ ~ ~~ ~` , ~ "- '
.1241?
YEAR ,~ t `2oos;~ 2o0s ~ ~ zo07 200$ h ~~n X2009:
HOUSING UNITS ~ ~ 15 :~ 15 ~ ~ 15 ~' 15 ~'~- "'y ' =15
POPULATION ~;; : ~. - 37:,,, 37 ~ ~ ;~ '3X;°a 37 ' ' , ,. 37
F ~ ~ y
SCHOOL CHILDREN g°'s ~ `:
1 ,
t,. ~ ~~,
~ Elementary '_~ ~ . ,; :g ~ 3 : r ,:_ ; 3 ; 3 ~ 3
~, Middle ., , F -- "1;. 1 1 t 1 _s _ 1
r tik.. 4 f.. ~ i y~y .~ L
High School y , ~" 1 ~~ 1 ter ;~~, 1 ~ 1 ' 1
TOTAL 4'' ~ ~ ;~ 5. { 5 ~ - .~ '- ~~
COUNTY EMPLOYEES ,~~ i0.20'I 0.20 ~ } ~,:~~0,20.~ 0.20 - 0.2~
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES t , r: ,029 0.29 ~ ,,;0~9~ 0.29 ~ ;. ;K' '~ Q.2S
TAX BASE ($1000) ~ :2010 ' 20s0 ~ 2112 ~ 2165 ~ 2219
COUNTY BUDGET ($) r :~ ~ # ~» ~ >~ +~~~ _
Revenues '~~` ~~r -23740 ~' 24334 ~ 24942 •.~q 25566 26205
Expenditures ~'~~~ ~~~~5013`,~ 25638 ~~, t , 26278;' 26936 ~` .~ 27609:
BALANCE ~'.~ 1272 -1304 _,~,; ~~ -1337•: -1370 ~r ~ ` `,-1404
SCHOOL DISTRICT BU ~ •r' "`~ ~ ~` ~ ~ s n
Revenues DGET ($) '~: ~~ '~' ~"~~~ ~ ~;~ X., ,~~~~~ ~; ;"
,fig ~ 31499 ~ 32286 ~ 4 33093
~,._,-~,,,~„~ ; ~ ~ .~ 33921 ~ 34769;
Expenditures "" ~~~3~499:~r: 32286 . ,;• 33093 .~ 33921 ~ 34769
BALANCE ~'~ :~~~r~`'' 0~ 0 ~~= ~`0 ~ '~
COMBINED BUDGETS ~ ~~ l a~ _} N ~r ij,~J~~ - `
Revenues ~ ,~y@~Q55235:`- 56620 ~ , ,58036~~ 59487 ~° 60974
Expenditures ~ _ ~ 56511 ~ 57924 r ..: k 59372 60857 '. 62378;
BALANCE ~'~, 1272;' -1304 . "~ ~:=133T.:.. -1370 F -1404
SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance: ~~
36
Oran a Coun __ Elementary School _ .. _ 64~
9 tY .:...........:... ;~ _......,::.... .....YES ... j.... __..:.....:.:....... _ ..... _... _ . _
_ ~.~ .. - - .. _ ._ Middle School . - 17~
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO j High School 19~
YEAR ~ 2000 2001 __ 2002 2003 200
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 200'
SCHOOL CHILDREN )1' ~ r, ~ ~ `
Elementary't ~ ' ~, ` 9.~ 3 x ~ ; 3
j 3 °'
Middle ~ ~'~` ~ w~~~.. 1 ,
, - ~ a _~ ~ ~'
High School ~' ~ 1
' ' 1 4 1 ~; 1 -
TOTAL ' , ~ ~'~
r., v
5 ,
~ k
,, ,..
SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS
,.Elementary~_~~,~ r.~:::a =;: .~ yah~.~:~y~ ~'~3328
w
.
.
' `_~ Elementar~l
;aw
`a~
~
~~
a~ ~ ..: _ 2822
_... ...
.
.
.
, ~ ,
.
,
.
.
~ ~~
Middle 1522 Middle 1240
High School ~~ 1520 •
~
Hi h S
ho
l°3 ~
~
"' '~ "
a
w
c
o
~
~ ~~~~,
.1487
TOTAL 6370 TOTAL 551'
YEAR ~ 2000 2001 2002 2003 200
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT ~;~ ; ,`.::;„~' r. , .1, , 4
Elementary -~~~~~~~ ,2$23µe 2825 ~ ;'~' 2825 ~'~ 2825 r 2$25
Middle ~ ~~; `.-~"~~, -Ti~,1240:"';~ 1241 ' ',~ X1241 ;~ 1241 1241
High School
,
' ~ ~ ~ ";1457y~~ 1458 Y a ' 1458 1458 1458
OTAL
t, ~ , ,;. ,~,~-
~., r, ~~., , ~.
- .~ 5521
524 ,
~"^ - ~~ 6524.. ~
, •.~~,~
5524
.. .5524
YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 200
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT .' = 6 ~~~
Elementary e i ~'
~ .2825 ~~'
2825 ~ ' p ~„,~'~ 1
~ :2825 ~
2825 -
2625
Middle : , } '~~" ~k;~ 1241 1241 I ": ` ~~,~ y~1241 j~ 1241 -~- . _ 1241
~ `
High School ~~- ~-
~'1458~' 1458 - :,:' ~ ~
'r1458 .~ 1458 - ~° 1458
TOTAL ~ ~ ~
~~
5524`~ 5524 '
~'
`:5524 552
p
, - _- .
:.
. 4 ~.. 5524
3-1-00 PLANNING BOARp MINUTES 37
Strayhorn said that the people in the subdivision would prefer it to be a private subdivision with as few
access points as possible. He said that the one house in the open space would have a significant bearing
on whether the field would stay farmed.
MOTION: Katz moved acceptance of the Concept Plan for Creek Wood subdivision as
presented without the condition of the stub out. Seconded by McAdams.
VOTE: Unanimous.
9 Barrows made reference to something that she did not see before. She said that under "Landscape Notes"
l o there are exceptions. She is concerned about items b and d that speak to looking at trees that are aged.
11 She thinks an expert should be consulted about these kinds of decisions about trees and forestry.
12
13 Benedict said that there is someone on the staff that has a degree in Landscape Architecture.
14
15 ~ b. Preliminary Plans
16 (1) Bricewood Acres
17 (Cedar Grove Township - 15 Lots)
18
19 Eddie Kirk made the presentation.
BACKGROUND:
Re oast --Preliminary Plan
Applicant: Joe Phelps
• Subdivision follows the conventional plan.
• 15 single-family lots on 27.04 acres (including rights-of way) Average lot size - 1.63 ac.
• Fourteen (14.49) acres in the critical area (U-ENO-CA): max. density = ldu/2 ac.;
• Twelve (12.55) acres in the balance of the watershed: max. density = 1 du/ .92 ac.
Location
The property is located off the south side of Governor Scott Road east of Mill Creek Road in Cedar Grove Townshi
Existing and,Proposed Conditions
Existing:
• Current zoning is Agricultural Residential (AR).
• The property is located in the Upper Eno protected watershed.
Physical Features:
• There is one intermittent stream in the southwestern portion ofthe property.
• The site is entirely wooded with mixed hardwoods and pines.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the south and east are wooded.
• Properties to the north and west are developed in single family residential lots.
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Gov. Scott Road (SR 1351).
• Proposed public streets to be constructed to NCDOT standards.
• Proposed public right-of--way connection to the southern property line.
Water-Sewer:
• Water will be from individual wells.
• Health Department verified that each lot contains suitable soils to locate a septic system.
Agency Comments:
• Comments attached from NCDOT, Environmental Health, and Emergency Management.
Develo ment Process Schedule a d Action
Planning Board:
• First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board October 6, 1999 with the three following
conditions:
38
I. Action within forty-five (45) days of this meeting;
2. Or within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant.
3. If the Planning Board fails to prepare its recommendation to the Board of Commissioners w
the specified time period, approval recommended without conditions.
• Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
l .The Intersection and road alignment on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT standards.
2. A publicly dedicated right-of way should be provided to the southern property line to allow
for future interconnectivity of public roads (in accordance with County policy).
3.With the Preliminary Plat, submit a plat indicating areas far on-site infiltration of storm Ovate
demonstrates compliance with Article 6.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.
• Second Action:
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Kirk made reference to item B6 in the resolution and said that all streets shall have five-foot utility
easements on each side of the right-of--way. Also, item 7 says that the posted speed limit on Governor
Scott Road should be reduced to 45 miles per hour. He said that if the County Camrnissioners approve
this resolution as written, then they would be recommending to NCDOT that the speed limit be reduced.
Barrows asked about lots seven and eight and said that there was a significant stream buffer. She was told
that Environmental Health has assured that two lots can goon this area.
10
lz
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2p
21
22
23
24
2S
?6
27
78
7th
30
Steve Yuhasz said that he vas concerned that lot eight was a little tight. He said that there was some
additional room on lots nine and ten that could give lot eight a little more room.
MOTION: Holtkamp moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for Bricewood Acres.
Seconded by Katz.
Chair Allison made reference to page 50 and that NCDOT recommended a 60-foot right-of--way, and in
some places there is going to be a 50-fast right-af--way. He asked Yuhasz how he proposed to deal with
this.
Yuhasz said that an additional 5-foot utility easement would be added on each side of the 50-foot right-of-
way.
Benedict said that even though the Fiscal Impact Analysis does need some updating from 1997, it does
show that there is negative impact. There is a net loss between the expenditures for County public
services and the revenue that comes forth from the subdivision.
VOTE: Unanimous.
AGENDA ITEM 11: ITEM FROM JPA PUBLIC HEARING 2/Z1/00
31 Benedict gave an update on the Greene Tract. The Commissioners met last night to discuss the Greene
32 Tract, and the original proposal that came forward was a zoning for 169 acres. In the interlocal
33 agreement, it said that only 60 acres had to be assigned. The decision last night was to determine the
34 most appropriate 60 acres. The County Commissioners did not have enough information last nighk to
35 make a decision on what was the most appropriate 60 acres. The County Commissioners made a motion
36 to not have the rezoning a part of the interlocal agreement before the County takes over solid waste
pRAFT 4-4--00 COUNTY COMMISSIONER MINUTES
8
The Board approved the submission of an application for $10,778 in federal grant funds to the
Corporation for National Service to provide school-based literacy assistance.
f. RFP Award -Printing of the Chapel Hill/Orange County Visitors Guide
This item was removed and considered at the end of the Consent Agenda.
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
S1
52
53
5a
55
56
57
V07E ON CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
c. Bricewood Acres Subdivision -Preliminary Plan
The Board considered a preliminary plan far the proposed Bricewood Acres subdivision, located
on a 27.04-acre tract near the intersection of Governor Scott and Mill Creek roads in Cedar Grove Township.
Commissioner Jacobs questioned the nature of the stream buffer and haw it connected to open
space and adjoining properties. He asked about one of the circles in the drawing and if it was a pond. He
also had some questions about having a pond on several properties and how it would be maintained. He
asked about the note indicating that dwellings are prohibited an a portion of lot #15.
Planning Director Craig Benedict said that each subdivision plan that is submitted to the County
is submitted bath as a conventional plan (no open space requirement) and a flexible plan (at least 33% open
space is required). In this case both a conventional plan and a flexible plan were submitted and the staff and
Planning Board approved both of the plans. The developer chose the conventional plan with no open space.
He said that any environmental areas, such as the stream buffer, could be incorporated in the lot. He showed
on a map the lots and said that the lot sizes were down to .9 acres. Since this project is subdivided by a water
quality critical area to the east only development could occur an the western side of the line on lot 15. The
developer has used the amount of density that could be created within the critical area, so lot 15 lies within
the protected watershed. He said that the pond would be filled in and would not be part of this development
plan. A future road will go through the pond area. In regards to the stream branch, the staff still has the
opportunity, as development continues deeper into the Upper Eno critical area, to suggest open space
planning for flexible development to preserve the stream buffer. Also, incorporated in this conventional plan,
there is a stub out of a public road to future undeveloped properties to the south.
Chair Carey asked about the difference in the number of lots and Craig Benedict said that there
would be 15 lots in the flexible plan and 15 lots in the conventional plan.
Commissioner Brown made reference to the fiscal impact analysis and asked about the net loss
between expenditures for County public services and the revenues that would come from this subdivision.
Craig Benedict said that the fiscal impact analysis needed to be updated. It has not been
updated to include the current rates.
Commissioner Jacobs said that he has a problem with accepting the payment in lieu instead of
the stream buffer.
Craig Benedict said that at this location it did not seem that the staff was ready to suggest
dedication of one acre versus payment in lieu in this case. He said that the staff is continuing to look at the
best way to handle preservation of these areas.
Commissioner Gordon agrees with Commissioner Jacobs' concerns.
A motion was made by Chair Carey to approve a preliminary plan for the proposed Bricewood
Acres subdivision, located on a 27.04-acre tract near the intersection of Governor Scott and Mill Creek roads
in Cedar Grove Township.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Commissioner Jacobs would like some more detailed information about how this fits in to
adjoining waterways and properties. He would like the staff to talk to Mr. Phelps and Mr. Yuhasz about
whether there might be another approach to protecting the stream buffer.
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Brown to send the
preliminary plan for Bricewood Acres back for additional information.
VOTE: AYES, 3; N0, 1 (Chair Carey)
f. RFP Awarder Printing of the Chapel Hill/Orange,County Visitors Guide
The Board considered awarding a bid to Hickory Printing of Raleigh in the amount of $28,386 for
the printing of 40,000 Orange County visitor guides.
Commissioner Jacobs asked if the brochures went to the welcome centers on the interstates. He
suggested that these brochures go to the welcome centers outside of the County.
A copy of this brochure will be distributed to the members of the Board.
39
~_
~.
...~~...
~~ ~
.• ~.