Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-30-2000- r ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS WORK SESSION AGENDA Orange County Commissioners Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough, Mebane Orange County Board of Education, Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education March 30, 2000 7:30 p.m. Southern Human Services Center School Adequate Public Facility Ordinance (School APFO) 1) Introduction of Topic and Brief History; Purpose and Intent; NEXT STEPS 2) a. Memorandum of Understanding including a draft School Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. b. Attorney/Planners/School Representatives Workgroup letter to Schools & Land Use Council (SLUG) Chair c. County Planner letter to SLUG members 3) School APFO Decision Matrix a. Level of Service (LOS); Capacity b. Student Enrollment Projections/Growth Plan 1. Hypothetical Chapel Hi1UCarrboro School District Area Projection 2. Hypothetical Orange County School District Area Projection (Table Sc and 7) c. Capital Investment Plan/Capital Costs Per Year 4) School Site Needs Analysis (briefing by Chapel HilUCarrboro School District) 5) School District Administration of School APFO a. Process b. Adequacy Test 6) Brochure of Typical Questions and Answers from Various Interested Parties 7) Consensus to proceed from Assembly of Governments (AOG) to disseminate School APFO program to general public and private sector 8) Implementation Timeline 1.3 ITEM DEFINITION SAPFO A school adequate public facilities ordinance (SAPFO) is a zoning and/or land development regulation with the goal of synchronizing development with the availability of public facilities needed to support that development. The location, amount, type or mix of development is a product of the county and town's comprehensive and zoning plans. The SAPFO does pace growth by affecting the timing of development to ensure that it is matched with the availability of public facilities as noted by a jointly prepared Capital Improvement Plan. CIP =SCHOOLS =NEW CAPACITY =ENROLLMENT =STUDENT GENERATION =HOUSING GROWTH ~~~ ITEM ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES (a) PURPOSE AND INTENT (1) To ensure that Public Facilities needed to support new development meet or exceed the Level of Service standazds established herein. (2) To ensure that no applications for development approval aze approved which would cause a reduction in the levels of service for any Public Facilities below the Adopted Level of Service established in this Section; (3) To ensure that adequate Public Facilities needed to support new development aze available concurrent with the impacts of such development; (4) To establish uniform procedures for the review of development applications subject to the standards and requirements of this Section; (5) To facilitate implementation of goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and any applicable Area Plan relating to adequacy of Public Facilities and Level of Service standazds; and (6) To ensure that all applicable legal standards and criteria aze properly incorporated in these procedures and requirements. (b) SECONDARY BENEFITS (1) Provide reasonable student enrollment projections. (2) Regulate student enrollment growth'spikes.' (3) Act as a school needs projection tool. (4) Create a stronger link between the School Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and facility needs. (5) Assist in identifying gmwth patterns and attendance zones. (6) Provide short and long-range facility projections so funding sources can be identified in advance. (7) Estimate when new schools need to be built and'come on line.' (8) Permit changes in DPUrules to be included in long-range capacity figures. (9) Further regional communication and cooperation and information exchange. (10) Provide an environment that enables the management of a high quality education system for existing and future residents and which builders can rely. .~ • (a. MEMQRANDUM QF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into this day of , 2000, by and between the Town of ,the City of ,Orange County, and the (the "School District"). WHEREAS, the. portion of Orange County, served by the [name of school district] has for the past decade been experiencing rapid growth in population; and WHEREAS, this growth, and that which is anticipated, creates a demand for additional school facilities to accommodate the children who reside within new developments; and WHEREAS, the responsibility for planning for and constructing new school facilities lies primarily with the (Orange County School District or Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District), with funding provided by Orange County; and WHEREAS, ,Orange County and the School District have recognized the need to work together to ensure that new growth within the School District occurs at a pace that allows Orange County and the School District to provide adequate school facilities to serve the children within such new developments; WHEREAS, pazties have worked cooperatively and developed a system wherein school facilities aze currently adequate to meet the needs of the citizens of the county and will continue to maintain a Capital Investment Plan (CIP) that is financially feasible and synchronized with historical growth patterns; NOW, THEREFORE,~the parties to this memorandum hereby agree as follows: Section 1. The parties will work cooperatively to develop a realistic capital facilities program for~the construction of schools such that, from the effective date of this Memorandum; a. No school level (i.e. elementary, middle or high) is more than 1. Elementary School % of Building Capacity 2. Middle School % of Building Capacity 3. High School % of Building Capacity (% limit of capacity may vary for each level and/or if number of schools within a level is very low) b. The term "the school districts building capacity" will be determined by State guidelines and the school district guidelines (consistent with CIP School Construction Guidelines/policies developed by the school districts and the Boazd of County Commissioners) and as used herein refers to permanent buildings. Mobile classrooms and other temporary student accommodating classroom spaces are not permanent buildings and may not be counted in determining the school districts building capacity. c. The capital facilities program shall utilize a projected growth rate for student enrollment agreed upon by the parties, which growth rate may differ from 2.2a Section 2. The towns and the county will adopt amendments to their respective ordinances, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to coordinate the approval of residential", developments within the School District with the. adequacy of existing and proposed school facilities. Section 3. The School District will establish an administrative process to receive and take action upon applications for Certificates of Adequacy of Public Schools Facilities. ("CAPS") submitted by developers who are required by an implementing ordinance conceptually similar to that attached as Exhibit A to have such certificates before obtaining development permission from the town or the county. The School District will issue a CAPS for a proposed development if it concludes that, given the number of school age children projected to reside in that development, and considering all of the factors listed immediately below, the number of students projected to attend the applicable school district elementary, middle, and high school levels will not exceed the capacities noted in Section 1 of this memorandum. Factors to be considered by the School District in making this determination include the following: a. The number of students attending elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools and the building capacity at each school level. b. Projected or ongoing construction of new schools or permanent expansion of existing schools as planned in the adopted CIP. If the completion of such school construction is necessary for a CAPS to be issued for a particulaz development project, then there must be a reasonable expectation that such construction will be completed in time to be of benefit to such project. A "reasonable expectation" of a proposed completion date requires, at the very least, that construction of a proposed new school has received all necessary governmental approvals and that funding is in place, ar that such approvals and funding appeaz "reasonably certain." c. Projected increases in enrollment due to residential growth. The following will be taken into consideration in determ;n;ng projected enrollment increases: (i) Single-family residential building lots that have received final plat approval, or have been created by a plat exempt from subdivision regulation approval, but that do not contain a completed dwelling; (ii) Single-family or multi-family residential building lots far which: (1) preliminary subdivision plat approval, (2) minor subdivision final plat, (3) zoning compliance permit approval or special ar conditional use permit approval have been granted so long as such approvals have not expired; , ~~3a (iii) Developments for which subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat or site plan approval applications have been submitted but not yet granted, so fang as CAPS for such projects have been issued and remain unexpired or special exceptions that have been granted; (iv) Any phasing and time schedule for project development consistent with preliminary plat and/or master plan application and, if applicable, approval. d. Any other factors deemed relevant by the School District in determining whether each school level will meet the level of service described herein if the proposed project is constructed. Section 4. A CAPS that has been obtained before an application for approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permit has been submitted shall expire uriless the developer submits and the [Town/County] accepts as complete an application for its approval within 90 days~of the date of the CAPS and receives the requested approval within two years of the date of the CAPS. A CAPS issued in connection with approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permit shall expire automatically upon the expiration of such plat, plan, or permit approval. Section 5. The towns and the county will provide to the School District all information reasonably requested by the School District to assist the District in making its determination ,as to whether the CAPS should be issued, including without limitation all ii~..,formation the other parties to this agreement have regarding the matters specified in Section 3.c.(i) through (iv) above. Section 6. The School district will use its best efforts to construct schools and/or permanent expansion/additions in accordance with the C1P referenced in Section 1 above. Section 7. Qrange County will use its best efforts to provide the funding to carry out the capital facilities program referenced in Section 1 above. Section 8. The parties acknowledge that this Memorandum of Understanding is not intended to and does not create legally binding obligations on any of the parties to act in accordance with its provisions. Rather, it constitutes a good faith statement of the intent of the parties to cooperate in a manner designed to meet the mutual objective of all the parties that the children who reside within the School District are able to attend school levels that satisfy the level of service standards set forth herein. ~- ~! AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE _ _ DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE THAT IN MOST CASES THE ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONSIDERED IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS WHEREAS, the portion of Orange County served by the [Chapel Hill/Carrboro] [Orange County] school system, has for the past decade been experiencing rapid growth in population; and WHEREAS, this rapid growth, and that which is anticipated, creates a demand for additional school facilities to 'accommodate the children who reside within new developments; and WHEREAS, the responsibility for planning for and constructing new school facilities lies primarily with the [Chapel HilUCazrboro School Boazd] [Orange County School Boazd], with funding provided by Orange County ;and WHEREAS, [Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Orange County and the Chapel Hi1UCarrboro School District] [Orange County, Hillsborough, and the Orange County School District] have recognized the need to work together to ensure that new growth within the School District occurs at a pace that allows Orange County and the School District to provide adequate school facilities to serve the children within such new developments; and WHEREAS, to implement the Memorandum of Understanding between [Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and the Chapel HilUCarrboro School Boazd] [Orange County, Hillsborough, and the Orange County School Board], the [governing body] desires to provide a mechanism to assure that, to the extent possible, new development will take place only when there aze adequate public school facilities available, or planned, which will accommodate such new development; NOW THEREFORE, [THE GOVERNING BODY] ORDAINS: Section 1. Section of the Development Ordinance is amended by adding a new to read as follows: ADEQUATE PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to ensure that, to the maximum extent practical, new residential development will be approved only when it can reasonably be expected that adequate public school facilities will be available to accommodate such new development. 2. Certificate of Adequacy of Public Schools Facilities. (a) Subject to the provision of Section S, no application for approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site' plan, or conditional or special use ~. the date of such acceptance there exists a valid and current Certificate of Adequacy of Public Schools Facilities (CAPS) applicable to the project for which such approval is sought. ' (b) A CAPS shall not be required for a general use or conditional use rezoning or for approval of a master land use plan. However, if a rezoning or master plan is approved, a CAPS will be required before any residential development of the property is authorized pursuant to any of the approvals specified in subsection (a) of this section, and the rezoning of the property or approval of a master plan provides no indication as to whether the CAPS will be issued. The application for rezoning or master plan approval shall contain a statement to this effect. (c) A CAPS must be obtained from the School District. The School District will issue or deny a CAPS in accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between [Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Orange County, and the Chapel Hill Carrboro School District] [Orange County, Hillsborough, and the Orange County School District] dated (d) An applicant shall seek from the School District a CAPS for a proposed residential development before an application for approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permits submitted to the [town] [county]. The CAPS, if issued, shall expire as provided in Section 4. (e) A CAPS attaches to the land in the same way that development permission attaches to the land. A CAPS may be transferred along with other interests in the property with respect to which such CAPS is issued, but may not be severed or transferred separately. 3. Service Levels. (a) This section describes the service levels regarded as adequate by the parties to the Memorandum of Understanding described in subsection (b) with respect to public school facilities. (b) As provided in the Memorandum of Understanding between [Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and the Chapel Hi1UCarrboro School District] [Orange County, Hillsborough, and the Orange County School District], adequate service levels for public schools shall be deemed to exist with respect to a proposed new residential development if, given the number of school age children projected to reside in that development, and considering all the factors listed in the Memorandum of Understanding, the number of students projected to attend the elementary schools, the middle schools, and the high school[s] within the [Chapel HilUCarrboro] [Orange County] School District will not exceed the following percentages of the building capacities of each of the following three school levels: elementary school level middle school level high school level Far purposes of this ordinance, the term "building capacity" means the capacity of permanent buildings, not mobile units or trailers. -~O~ 4. Expiration of Certificates of Adequacy of Public Schaals Facilities. (a) A CAPS that has been obtained pursuant to Subsection 2(d) before an application for approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permit has been submitted shall expire unless the developer submits and the [Town] [County] accepts as complete an application for approval of that subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permit within 90 days of the date of the CAPS and receives the requested approval within two yeazs of the date of the CAPS. (b) A CAPS issued in connection with approval of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, or conditional or special use permit shall expire automatically upon the expiration of such plat, plan, or permit approval. 5. Exemption From Certification Requirement for .Small and Low Density Developments. A CAPS shall not be required under the following circumstances: (a) Zf the density of the proposed residential development does not exceed (i) one dwelling unit per 10 acres of the development tract, or (ii) a total of four dwelling units on any lot that was in existence on the effective date of this ordinance: (b) For a residential development restricted to housing for the elderly. 6. Applicability to ~J Previously Approved Projects and Projects Pending Approval (a) This ordinance and the Memorandum of Understanding between the [governing body], Orange County and the School District aze general in nature and applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the [governing body]. Except as otherwise provided herein, the provisions of this ordinance shall apply to applications for approval of subdivision preliminary plats, site plans and' conditional or special use permits that aze submitted for approval after the effective date of this ordinance . (b) The provisions o£ this ordinance shall apply to subdivision preliminary plats, site plans and conditional or special use permits that have expired. (c) The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to amendments to subdivision preliminary plat, site plan, or special or conditional use permit approvals issued prior to the effective date of this ordinance so long as the approvals have not expired and the proposed amendments do not increase the number of dwelling units authorized within the development by more than five percent. (d) The [governing body] shall issue a special exception to the CAPS requirement to an applicant whose application for approval of asubdivision preliminary plat, minor ~.~G1 within a planned unit development or master plan project that was approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance, if the [governing body] fords, after an evidentiary hearing, that the applicant has (1) applied to the .School District for a CAPS and the application has been denied, (2) in good faith made substantial expenditures or incurred substantial binding obligations in reasonable reliance on the previously obtained planned unit development or master plan approval, and (3) would be unreasonably prejudiced if development in accordance with the previously approved development or plan is delayed due to the provisions of this ordinance. In deciding whether these findings can be made, the [governing body] shall consider the following, among other relevant factors: (1) Whether the developer has installed streets, utilities, or other facilities or expended substantial sums in the planning and prepazation for installation of such facilities which were designed to serve or to be paid for in part by the development of portions of the planned unit development or master planned project that have not yet been approved for construction; (2) Whether the developer has installed streets, utilities, or other facilities or expended substantial sums in the planning and prepazation for installation of such facilities that directly benefit other properties outside the development in question or the general public; (3) Whether the developer has donated land to the School District for the construction of school facilities or otherwise dedicated land or made improvements deemed to benefit the School District and its public school system; (4) Whether the developer has had development approval for a substantial amount of time and has in good faith worked to timely implement the plan in reasonable reliance on the previously obtained approval; (5) The duration of the delay that will occur until public school facilities are improved or exist to such an extent that a CAPS can be issued for the project, and the effect of such delay on the development and the developer. The decision of the [governing body] is subject to review by the Orange County Superior Court by proceedings in the nature of certiorari. Any petition for review by the Superior Court shall be filed with the Clerk of Superior Court within 30 days after a written copy of the decision [of the governing body] is delivered to every aggrieved party who has filed a written request for such copy with the Clerk to the [governing body] at the time of its hearing on the application for a special exception. The written copy of the decision of the [governing body] may be delivered to the aggrieved party either by personal service or by certified mail, return receipt requested. The [chair or the mayor] of the [governing body] or any member temporarily acting as [chair or mayor] may, in his or her official capacity, administer oaths to witnesses in any hearing before the [governing body] concerning a special exception. 7. Appeal of School District Denial of a CAPS. The applicant for a CAPS which is denied by the School District may, within 30 days of the date of the denial, appeal the denial to the [governing body] of [local ~, by the [governing body] at an evidentiary hearing before it. At this hearing the School District will present its reasons for the denial of the CAPS and the evidence it relied on in denying the CAPS. Thd applicant appealing the denial may present its reasons why the CAPS application should have, in its view, been approved and the evidentiary basis it contends supports approval. The [governing •body] may (l) affirm the decision of the School District, (2) remand to the School District for further proceedings in the event evidence is presented at the hearing before the [governing body] not brought before the School District or, (3) issue a CAPS. The [governing body] will only issue a CAPS if it finds that the CAPS should ,have been issued by the School District as prescribed in the Memorandum of Understanding among the School District, Orange County and the [governing body]. A decision of the [governing body] afFirming the School District may be appealed by the applicant for a CAPS by .proceedings in the nature of certiorari and as prescribed for an appeal under Section 6(d) of this ordinance. 8. Information Required From Applicants. The applicant for a CAPS shall submit to the School District all information reasonably deemed necessary by the School District to determine whether a CAPS should be issued under the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the [governing body], Orange County, and the School District. An applicant for a CAPS special exception or an applicant appealing a CAPS denial by the School District shall submit to the [governing body] all information reasonably deemed necessary by the [governing body] to determine whether a special exception should be granted as provided in Section 6(d) of this ordinance or for the hearing of an appeal of a School District denial of a CAPS as provided in Section 7 of this ordinance. A copy of a request for a CAPS special exception or of an appeal of a School District denial of a CAPS shall be served on the superintendent of the School District. Service may be made by personal delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective The foregoing ordinance, having been submitted to a vote, received the following vote and was duly adopted this day of __ , 2000. Ayes: Noes: Absent or Excused: ~^ ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING 8~ INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director L tOyPI~ Oj e' Administration ~~ ' ; SOGF Revere Road (919) 245-2575 u ~ P O Box 8181 (919) 644-3002 (F~-x) ~,~ Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us '`~<<6 ~.~~~"' North Carolina, 27278 Mazch 23, 2000 Alice M. Gordan Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chair, Schools &. Land Use Councils 282 Edgewood Drive Chapel Hill, NC 27S 14 Re: Schaal Adequate Public Facility Ordinance Deaz Commissioner Gordon: The Schoals & Land Use Council charged a subcommittee to develop a Memorandum of Understanding and Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance to assist in the research and implementation program for the aforesaid ordinance. The subcommittee included: Craig Benedict Mike Brough Geaf&ey Gledhill Stephen Halkiatis Margaret Hauth Ralph Karpinos John McCormick Bill Mullen Mike Pazker Roger Waldan Roy Williford Planning Director, Orange County Attorney, Town of Hillsbaraugh/Town of Cazrboro Attorney, Orange County County Commissioner/Orange County Schools Planning Director, Town of Hillsborough Attorney, Town of Chapel Hill Attorney, Chapel Hi1UCarrbora Schoals Chapel Hill/Cazrboro Schools Attorney, Orange County Schaols Planning Director, Town of Chapel Hill Planning Director, Town of Carrboro This group met on a regulaz basis since November 1999 to refine an early draft by examining the fallowing aspects: • Tailoring the ordinance for use in Orange County local governments. • Gauging the pazameters of various decisions so that the SAPFO is both implementable and legally defensible. 26~ Alice M. Gordon March 23, 2000 Page 2 Decision areas were identified by the subcommittee with the understanding that different entities (i.e., Boazd of County Commissioners, school district or local government) ultimately and jointly make the decision. The decision azeas included: ^ Level of Service (i:e., When would a school be considered to be critically over capacity?) ^ Timing of Request for a Certificate of Adequate Public Schools (CAPS) ^ Vesting of previous approvals ^ Student Enrollment Rates and Projections ^ Management of SAPFO systemi/;Data Sharing ^ SAPFO Agreements (two separate interlacal agreements by school district) ^ Capital Investment Plan (CIP) The Draft Memorandum of Understanding and SAPFO is herein submitted back to the chair and the council for fwrther distribution and local governmentlschaol district consideration. All of the members of the subcommittee now strongly believe that with the combined insight and input from all participants in the development of the Memorandum of Understanding and SAPFO that both documents are reasonable and achievable. My office is in the process of reducing the legal, technical, and procedural aspects of the documents to a "bullet point", graphic and operational version for presentation purposes at the March 30, 2000 Assembly of Governments meeting. Please let me know how you would like to proceed with the distribution of this document. On behalf of the subcommittee members, we thank the SLUC for giving us the opportunity to develop some progressive land development regulations that accent the importance of intergovernmental coordination and the provision of school adequate public facilities. Sincerely, G' ` Craig .Benedict, AICP Planning Director CNB/dg xc: Subcommittee John M. Link, Jr., County Manager 2~ ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING &. INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director ~ `e~stt of e' Administration m~` * ~ '': 306E Revere Road (919) 245-2575 ~ ~ P O Box 81$1 (919) 644-3002 (FAx) ~~ Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us "~~,b ~.t~~~°~ North Carolina, 27278 :~i March 24, 2000 School & Land Use Council (SLUG) Members Dear Member: The subcommittee composed of local government and school district attorneys, planning directors and representatives have completed their work on the Memorandum of Understanding ,and the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO). Their responsibility is noted in the attached letter. The draft documents have been refined over the last few months taking into consideration various comments far SLUG meetings and other questions prompted from presentations to the eventual parties to the interlocal agreement. The draft documents are enclosed which represent a well thought through effort of the subcommittee to present documents that are workable far our next step. As discussed in previous meetings, we wanted an opportunity to present the work of the SLUG and subcommittee to the Assembly of Governments, which will be on March 30, 2000 at the Southern Human Services Center. The presentation to the Assembly of Governments in this early timeframe will give all porkies the time to consider the Memorandum of Understanding and use the concept in upcoming budget planning. This is not a fmal document and we look forward to receiving additional input to make the proposed ordinance understandable and fair. On March 30, I expect to present the fallowing information: 1) Memorandum of Understanding 4) Hypothetical Pmcess 2) SAPFO with annotations 5) Hypothetical Adequacy Test 3) Decision Matrix 6) Question & Answer Brochure These additional items will be sent with the Assembly of Governments agenda early next week. Thank you for your input and feel free to prepare questions for the meeting ar for my research in advance. Sincere , ~ ` Craig .Benedict, AICP Planning Director CNB/dg SCHOOL ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE SAPFO DECISION MATRIX SUBJECT BOCC OCSD CH/ CSD CH CARR HILL MEB/ DUR CITIZENS PRIVATE SECTOR (1) Level of Service (LOS) X X Per school Per level X X Per district (2) Adequacy Test (CAPS) X X (3) Reservation System (90 days) X X (4) Vesting (ECAPS) X X X X X (S) Information Exchange 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 (6) . Student Enrollment Projection/ Growth Plan X X X X X X X (~ CIP X (8) SAPFO Agreements A B A B B B A A (9) SAPFO Management System X X Note: Items 1 and 6 are critical elements of the SAPFO in determining the CIP (Item ~. X - Suggested/Recommended Agency 1 -Primary Responsibility; Lead Agency 2 -Secondary Responsibility CAPS -Certificate of Adequate Public Schools ECAPS -Exempted project due to size lot, vested rights, etc. Exempt Certificate... given so cumulative impact can be recorded A -Partners in Interlocal SAPFO Agreement B -Farmers in Interlocal SAPFO Agreement ~b~.~ 0 0 U O a~ ~. o ~ ~ U~ ~~_..11 ~ F-~d N W D .fir N V ~. Dq ~ ~ ~+ w, O N ~~ Q N ~ . ~..~ CO ~ .~ S-r a~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~. w a o ~ c~ ~~ Q~ Wo ~~ W 3 w z a N O N y~ O N o ~ ~, N~ 0 0 N 0 a N °o o °0 0 N -~ o o~ ~ b (. 2 \tl O M N ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ N I ~ C j G ~ ~ E e t p ~ W L ,0 1 ~ d ~ > > W M 3 {~0 O d ~ ~ ~ U O ~~ 1 R ~ ~ ` Ci v ~' a ~ C ~ _ ~ ~ v a d O F`. ~ v O 19 S ~ f~1 ~ C ~ ~ i ~ ~c G1 ~ U ~ P J f`7 CG 7 p'f M ~ W _Oee T 1 oA C off N CO 6 E ~ N N N ~ C W ~'o p M m ~ N ep') ~ CNO N N O C Kl CV r qCj P~'7 ~ ~ o E ~ c"'v c~Dv N ~ C W {Q~ '~j Ca0 CD O {p ~ N M ~ N r ti 7 eV Qi Ott ~ r ti m m y Off O Z ~ ~ N OQ N W N~1 ~` Q O 3 lef V p ~ ~ ~y ~' N C7 ~ n7 1~ ~ a ad ui 1- ~ r a~ ~ , Sym m ~ ~ M P ~ O N N P W y wl~ ~ o r~i m ~ x N ('p7 m ~ 4 "' ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~? N N N ~ C W ~j O O !~ ~ ~ N l~rJ C m b ~ .~ C ~ ~ ~ 5 y ~ ~ ~ p N rn ,,I to di m O ~ LL1 ($ _ ~~ ~ N \ ~ Q C -- ~+ o ~ ~ C N -"~ !~ CN ~ ~ ~` ('~ f~ N O Q N { O N ° o ~ ~,,[ '. W `A v n ,o m ~ '~ ~ chi m tl1 0 9 '~ N 10 C C. m G ~ ~ ~~ °~ ~ 0 m o O ~ ~ N C ~ Q ` S Y u, 3 ~ ,~ ~ t , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. V ~ ~ ~ ~ e m O ~ { jj tll 16 g J J m ~ ~ 7 r ~ rr~ ~ m ~ I f f o ~ ,,,, L ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ v~ ~ ~ y ~ ~' O ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ V e ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ y a z~a ~ ~ a~ N {+f ~, ~ r 7 N th O ~ ~ ~~ ~ p\ Of ~ ~ 4~7 ti 4 p t N ~ o N fh G W 0 o fi ~ ~ N a 1 1 7 4 W V m ~ ~ N O u'~! C ~ ~ ~ m O ~ '~ tD N ~ N tC1 l f C W ~+` 4 O 1+~7 ~~ ~ N M G W U ~ ~ ~ N w fD l ~J P C N N ~ ~ [~ N ~ N C N P I c W w. C C e~7 ~ ~ N M ~v U ~ ~ ou' M g ao of ui y r ~ ~ ~ O ~ . N O N 1 + N v N 4 7 V C W i!J ~ ~ °w ~ ~a°o N 0 c] U `m ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ T ti Oi ~ Q _., 47 N N N C W ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ N {rJ U Z' ~ m m m ~ 'n w ~ z ~ N ~ ~ 9 O ~ Q fV O ~ c' v a° r ~ tpD N P7 O N C W y"O O M 'V ~ W N ~p fD N eT W U C7 ~ ~ 0 ~~ M 1+ t E ~ ~ ~ N C7 O I~ ~ ~ ~ 4~'f N @N7 t N ~ 1 W U .~.' Opp 4 l~f j ~ rD N M • d. U ~ N W ~ ~ p ^ t0 m m m C ?. ~ N `~ Eu~Oi oN M N ~ W H! ~ o d o r~i ~ ~ ~ N ~ a U ~ ~ r~i v ~c c v N ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~[ N t+f N Q c W ' ... C 6 R] ~ N C7 m U d ~ ~ ~ ~ r N ~ O ~ Y E ~ N f'rY N 'O G W ~ ~ ~ U ~ N M O ~ R U U ~ Z C m A ~ ~_ _~ m U IJJ ~ ~ ~ .= O O l~q z m a ro L V ~ ~ ~ N - O H ~ ~ r ~ r e G N ~ u7 y ~ ~ w O ~[! 7 ~ N ~ O C7 f G lLl ~' O O <+f 'V pp O tD O t'/ N ~ a CD U ~ Q O Qf 7 ill N 1~ ~ ~ i 0 C ~ ti ~ CD ~ ~ @d7 Q ~ r N tO ~J p7 ~ C W ~`' O O (~ uVi tOD 1~7 ~ as a~ ao ~ a ri ai CCl Q 9 Y e ro m m ~ m ~ Z r~i ~ E w M o M O N C W W N .~ a NzN ~ d tD 1- N 1- 4/ r y h N N O O N O C W m tdD N ~ ~ of M d O ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~ m ~ m Q' M+~ e ~ c v c N G W O O M ... Q N a m r D O O d ~2 m a ~a Z C,7 ~ M ~ h7 7 O CD tt y CND N N y ~ ~ eN] cd+'i N C W .. O Q c'f ~ ~ 1~7 ~ ~ ~ um7 ~ O O a~ ~ i ~ d N d y '? O O N _~ ~ M ~ N C W ... 6 6 M 'V tD ~ N m tD ("~ ~ ~ ~ r~ n eo ai vi , 1 ~ ~ m m z ~ 0 N E l [) to p i~ cn N ~ t W N ~` S ~ a ~ ~ t0 = M ~ G W V ~ O 4'f N ti Of ~ ti Q1 u7 O r ~ ~ ~ y N ~ i 0 t D ~ e+f e~+f N C W .-. O O cd+f 'V W O ~Lf tD M N ~ t) `m °° ~ ref ~ o ec c ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ M C7 r ~ C W ~ ~ M ~ 1~ O 7 r ~ ~'1 ~ O N w ~ N ~ O ~ ~ Q! ~ pp 1 G t N N D n~ r] C W T C O M 'V i 0 47 N ~ c p r~ ~' W ~ N m O ~ r ~ {r! Q r~ 0 ~ A ~ N W ~ t p ~ NO N 7 ~1 d C C W o ~' .., o e +'+ ~ ~ ~ M t0 U a ~• ~ m o ~ s d t ~ t` i Q ~ r P ~ d ~ m w ~ `~° ee ~ `~.o, a N C W eo d u~ ... O d M ~ m ~ ' m 1+ 9 m It) @7 ~D O 1 ~ l+f i m e+f u~ u7 N ~ N ~ G O C 7 N C W W 7 Q C e+ '~ ~ ~l7 N W ~D [•f V' U r n ~ ~ o r pi r ~ m m N Q E t +i t~ D e N C W ~ O ~ M ~ D U ~ Y ~ z m m m m ~ 6 ~ r ~ Ca W ~ ~ V ~ N ~ O a r u? eri O 0 ~ ago n ago ~ m° M M O C W 4 O ~+Mf m Cdp M 7 bbl Chapel Will Enrollment Projections: Beginning with 300 new students in 2000; decreasing rate of increase each year. Year New students Total Enrollrrient Elementary Middle Wigh 2000 30D 8993 4167 2189 2637 2001 300 9293 4554 2230 25D9 2002 290 9583 4696 2300 2587 2003 280 9863 4833 2367 2663 2D04 27D 10133 4965 2432 2736 2005 260 10393 5093 2494 2806 2006 250 1D643 5215 2554 2874 2007 240 1D883 5333 2612 2938 2008 230 11113 5445 2667 3001 2009 22D 11333 5553 2720 3060 2010 210 11543 5656 2770 3117 2011 200 11743 5754 2818 3171 2D12 19D 11933 5847 2864 3222 2013 180 12113 5935 2907 3271 2014 170 122$3 6019 2948 3316 2015 160 12443 6097 2986 3360 2016 15D 12593 6171 3022 34D0 2017 140 12733 6239 3056 3438 2018 130 12$63 6303 3087 3473 2018 120 12983 6362 3116 3505 2020 110 13093 6416 3142 3535 2021 100 13193 6465 3166 3562 2022 90 13283 6509 3188 3586 2023 80 13363 6548 3207 3608 2024 70 13433 6582 3224 3627 2025 60 13493 6612 3238 3643 2026 50 13543 6636 3250 3657 2027 40 13583 6656 3260 3667 2028 30 13613 '6670 3267 3676 2029 2Q 13633 66$0 3272 3681 2030 10 13643 6685 3274 3684 ~'b 2.J U~ a ~ m s .C ~" t ~ a m f. ~ o ~ ~- m e~+ ~ ~~ ~ o O ~ W ~q ~ m ~ ~ n m M ~ N `m 7 ~ 'a 3i O 1[l N 0 ~ ~ N 1- ~ yy O ~ p p P~f ~ r C m N C 7 W ~ iq c N N m 7 C Q W p7 ~ N ~ C~D ~j O N .~2~ •- .C m ~ N M N m d ~ 0 ~ !r1 ~ ~ M N ~ O C C m r K7 ~ C Z ~) m ~ ~ W my N Q ~ ~ W ~ Ni . N N N y e m ~ ~ Q O y ~ tl7 ~ N O m ~ U J r~.`o~ m' m ~ m f N ~ COO. 1 p m E r O ~ ~ ~ W ~ m ~ ;e ~ Q N K m n lr7 ~ E~~ D m O E lN9 ~ r '~. m G m a m 'r N C sp G m~ m W C .~,,, ~ 0 C ~ N q ~ r r m 0 ~ r m y l 7 M ~ ~ ~ ~ O C p H ~ ~ C,4j ~ N 4w'1 r aD C ~ ~ p z ~ m. w N ~ ~ ~ m O m m g + ~ ~ ~ ~ s m m Qo Cp w ~ C C ` C m g ~ ~ ~ j m ~p r+ CD E m p ~ ~ M ~ ~ W ~ D ~ N Q ~ ~ ~ r W ~ W ~ ~ w W w C O l N O V ~ E . Q~Q r ~ C) m r C7 w S ~ W m ~ ~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C w ~ ~ m ~ U ~ o° m z c m ° m m E m Z G p ~ 9 ~ ~ m x~ a V1 C7 e +f W ~ _ . V . m N Cff C7+ ^ r• ~ o w N O m O ~ ~ m N O Q(pp C 9 N N c W ~ N m N N N ~ r N m U ro n ~ ~ O CA ~A ~ CV per' ~ N N to m m ~ n n o cn r C W N N NN m N ^ N N m O CV N d ~ O r hl 1 N ~ m O ~ fi t[! r ~ ~ C W ~~yy ~ V O n {p N N N m U m eD e° a 4 p p N N 3E -` C ~ ~ m a E ~ ~ ~ ~ P N ~ C W N N r N N N W N ~ O ~ m N N ~ b m ~ m ~ p] •+ r e W N ~~yy N N W N N N •-. ~ m ~ ~ S U mw a~ ~. O' Y g' p~ E ~ . N C W ego Q ro df ~ 'N ~ ~ ~ ~ r m r o mxm cu'•~ ~ w ~ O ~ N O N W ~ m m N ~ N N ~ O n iD A {+I ~ t r ~ ~ N D e W ~ m N ~ m N N N m 0 C p ~ N W r N ~ N O N N N u~'y o ~ N N N N N m b _ ~ Z 3b2.: OI U m N ~ ~. 9 0 ~T ~ ~ O! ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~pp w ~ ~ R N N N C W ~ ' N N . . N ~ ee ~~ N ' m N U m 'n M ~ N C+j O ~ m ~ M ~ tl ' N N N 4 N C W ~ N N N f~6 ~ N N N ~ Q ~ Q ~ N i ~ d '~ E ~ ~ r" W N N Q N LJ,I N N N C~ W ~ N - - N W U ~ m ~ o ~ th o m W n "~ ~ N N ~ _ ~ N Q C W .~`. CQV ~N~yy N ~ N ~ ' ? N m U m '? N N N ~ ~ O w , o O M O m ~ N N T ~ H W ~' N N N ~ N °o N m ~] e m ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ of U N ~ l~7 O" O7 C,~ ip iV pe ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ . N N _ N C W ~" V oNp ~y N N l p Kl N N l6 U ~ ~ ^ ~ iV ~ p~ qCj O N N ~y N ~ ~ N N _ N Q C W .~'+ N N N W ~ N N A T Ql a ~ ~ q C N ~ ~y ~ a N N N o N C W N N ry V ~ N N N N y ~; ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - m ~ m "[ ~' x1 ~, N ~ ~ ~ y D N H ~ N Z 4J d7 N ~ ~ !V yrN N U ~ ~ W '~ r 4 ~ ? r O m ~ O ~ N N N ti W ,~ N N N ~ N N ltl U Z' ~ m ~ ~ ti _~ m W :~ ~ y ~ Ci e+i r 7 tG fV K7 0 ~ C ~ ~ ~. ~ N N C W ~'N N N m ~ N N ~ O I[j (V ~ ~ 7 r C ~' ti N Q N t p N N N C W ~ ~ N N' ~ ~ rj a tp °~' V O { C ~ ~ ~ ^ E _ i[l N ' N W O N Q to ~ N N `m 4 ~ ~ ni eD c r ~o°~ a ti N ~ IC! . N N N W N ~ N m ~ N N ~ ~p Cs 4i O' o ti 4 ~4q ~ CN 0 IJ.I dJ •~IdCJ N ~N 0 U ~- a+ n eo 1ti ~ ad r 'f7 ~ m N /Z' O/ ~ u7 ~~ c~ ~ t W fwA ~I N ~ ONE A m ~ N N V N ~_~ ~, ~~ .~ b 2 tD O O r C ~ W ~~ a° o C. N ~ o N U O ~ w+ ~ C ~ ~ O ~ .5 ~. ~ ~ C rr C ~ O .C C 0 W q) ~ ~ m m C .~ .... ~ o O 0 47 0 N V ~ ~ C ~+ C _ "" V W ~ m ~~ 3 v O ~ V ~ C ~ c ~ .ar~i . p n o ®•>` c~ c H ~ Cs 1- CO r] N hpj~ M~N p ~ O 4 4] $~ cncti~ N ~ ~ ~ 1~ N 4] f~ Qf p C9 O Q1 N `pr Mt00 m es a cta eo a~ ~c~am N M Y7 m t~ 4n ap r r m o N M ~ r O r ~ <D aD N ~ r r ~j ~ to 4] r p r M ~ n NI !r1 r r q r N ~ f~ N ~+-~- ~ 47 0 O ti ~ eT^ N ~ ti N ~ ~ r O ~ O O q +r e- ~ tD N C9 r r ~ ' ~ ~ ~ m `~ ~, ~ .~ v~ ~ m a m~ ~ }z w~= h m ti ~ N p ~' ~ ~ ~ h/ ~ N N p1 r CO ~ r p I ~ ~~v c o• N ~ N N N Lp f~ 4] ~ 4] Q~ i t. tD r 07 1~ o r- vary o• N '~t N N N ~. ~ crlvo oo~ `'' c `i ' a ~ c ~1 c ~ o N ~ N N N p o cn4~cp ~. O O O ~ N N C i' ~ N N N y ~ ti ~ ~ r - N ~ ~ N ~ N N r p O 41 N p N ~ ~ N N N1 O N N O d' ~ a ° ~ o o 1 c N Q. ~" N ~ N N 1- C! <D Cp p'j ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o N ~t"N N ~ A D O N Q C D O D ~y cr1 r N N w ~ ~ rn 0 N a+ air~ N c N m ~ wiz ~ N ~ 40] Q ~ N M ~ GO N O N ~ ~ ~ 4~ N N N ~ aND 4] N N r ~ ti ~ N N ~ O N 40'1 N N a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N N O ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N N m b w~= 3e (. ~ New Schools Needed, 2gg0-203q Based on a scenario of 150 new students per year CO Year Elementary Middle Migh Total Cast 2000 6+1 2 1 10 2001 7 2 1 10 2002 7 2 1+1 11 2003 7 2 2 11 2004 7 2+1 2 12 2005 7 3 2 12 2006 7 3 2 12 2007 7 3 2 12 2008 7 3 2 12 2009 7 3 2 12 2010 7 3 2 12 2011 7 3 2 12 2012 7 3 2 12 2013 7+.1 3 2 13 2014 8 3 2 13 2015 8 3 2 13 2016 8 3 2 13 2017 8 3 2 13 2018 8 3 2 13 2019 8 3 2 13 2020 8 3 2 13 2021 8 ' 3 2 13 2022 8+1 3 2 14 2023 9 -~ 3 2 14 2024 9 3 2 14 2025 9 3 + 1 2 15 2D26 9 4 2 15 ,2027 9 4 2 15 2028 9 4 2 15 2029 9 4 2 15 2030 9+1 4 2 1B Total New Schools Needed 7 n ~~ ~. Projected costs of elementary, middle and high schools Assuming 2.5% yearly increase in construction cost Elementary Middle Migh 2000 $14,000,000 $20,000,000 $35,000,000 2001 $14,350,000 $20,500,000 $35,875,000 2002 $14,708,750 $21,012,500 $36,771,875 2003 $15,076,469 $21,537,813 $37,691,172 2004 $15,453,380 $22,076,258 $38,633,451 2005 $15,839,715 $22,628,164 $39,599,287 2006 $16,235,708 $23,193,868 $40,589,270 2007 $16,641,601 $23,773,715 $41,604,001 2008 $17,057,641 $24,368,058 $42,644,101 2009 $17,484,082 $24,977,259 $43,710,204 2010 $17,921,184 $25,601,691 $44,802,959 2011 $18,369,213 $26,241,733 $45,923,033 2012 $18,$28,444 $26,$97,776 $47,071,109 2013 $19,299,155 $27,570,221 $48,247,8$7 2014 $19,781,633 $28,259,476 $49,454,084 2015 $20,276,174 $28,965,963 $50;690,436 2016 $20,783,079 $29,690,112 $51,957,697 2017 $21,302,656 $30,432,365 $53,256,639 201$ $21, 835,222 $31,193,174 $54, 5$8,055 2019 $22,381,103 $31,973,004 $55,952,756 2020 $22,940,630 $32,772,329 $57,351,575 2021 $23,514,146 $33,591,637 $58,785,365 2022 $24,102,000 $34,431,428 $60,254,999 2023 $24,704,550 $35,292,214 $61,761,374 2024 $25,322,163 $36,174,519 $63,305,408 2025 $25,955,217 $37,078,882 $64,$88,043 2026 $26,604,09$ $38,005,854 $66,510,245 2027 $27,269,200 $38,956,000 $68,173,001 2028 $27,950,930 $39,929,900 $69,877,326 2029 $28,649,704 $40,928,148 $71,624,259 2030 $29, 365,946 $41, 951, 352 $73,414, 865 2031 $75,250,237 2032 $77,131,493 2033 $79,059,780 2034 $81,036,275 2035 $83,062,182 ~C(,: 0 U OCO c~ d 0 3 m m ~ y y` m C G ry. b '~ b ~ ~ Q ~ r .~ OQ N . -- v~ n N b9 6 4 C ~ ~ r F O 4 O ) V _ = 3 m c m g h ~ 3 C 9 O Q t ~ 4 v v d ~ ~ m m m ~ C C C ~ Cl Ol O r N erg 4! ~p I- Cf Of O ~ N C9 ~ 47 tD N O 01 O r» N df V' Kl rD A d tl7 O 0 r ~ r N N N N N N N N N N (7 O C? O O~ O O O Y ~ g N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~~ ~'"> N ~ 4N] in w7 N ~ W S r v w z~ .~ ~ )" N N ~ + N W ~ • f r ~ r ~ O O ~ ~ 1 _ m a 3 m o b y ~ O ~ .~. E b ~ ~ m ~- C ~ ~ ~ Q1 d Q r N M ~ tp tD l~ pq pl'C r N M ~ Y'1 Cp lr rA OI O r ~y e+f ~ K1 eD l~ a7 0 0 oO00000000Crrrr~'+"rrrr NNNNNNNNNNC7 i ~ i~ i 01 r ~ O O O O O O O Q O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Q O O O O O C 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -. G~ pCp tJ O ~ ~~p C m ~ D ~. C 'p m C '~ m a ~3 6 C ~ ~ `? N ~ 47 W 1CJ N M O O L V V a o ~m 0 d r a N n N C m w N O O M N m C 'O y+ S p N 4~ a ~_ N ~ O N ~ V m ~ ~ O ~~ m ~ ~ C O G ~" N C 'O W 3 m w ~ ~~ o Q Q W C O :~ a E 3~r.~ .Q 0 c'~i y ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ w ~ O m a y a~ C m ro 3 'd m m ~ 6 ~ N pC U V y ~ 3 m m T c ` o m ~ a ~~ m c ~ ~ ~ m3 b m m~ ~e ~~ ~ ~ 41 O N N ~ * ui 0f u7 O C ~ 401 C) N N i_ 0 i 0 iri N 0 O O N N ~ tD N N df K 4 9 Ey 6 9 • r r r r r r O ~ O U t ~ N m C m C r 9 v ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ c m °o °o °o c °o m y c=i v v u h fA tl0 y aq m m m d LL ~ C . C C C ~ 0 d1 0 N l+J 0 0 0 0 to 1~ O g 4 O ~p 6 r N~ a to t0 ~ 0 01 4 N l" f 7 4'f iO 1~ CC Of 0 ~ ~ N N N N N 0 0 0 r~ N N N N N N N N N ~y N N N N N N N N N C7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r t0 Of W ~ ~ M yy 0 • b N N U o ~ n w r N M N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r r r D ~ V 2 ~ m C m O Q 'C7 ~ W m C ~' m G O S ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W m C m C C C W } D1 01 ~ O N (•! K1 tD 1~ CO W O r N {+J ~ ~[f tp N C0 W O N !+7 ? u1 ~O 1- Cp 0 0 0000600000 r r rNNNNNNNNNNI'7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0Oi ~ N C N W ~ N eD w r O O V ~ ~ ~U a. w~ !. N Cep ti N ~ m `o 0 r V fq ~' V x ~ o 3~ ~. L c pCp C1 m C v.. O .y. O b m 6t T ~m Q C d 'O r,+ tl0 3 m C 0 0 eh O y pC U y 3 C O qqy G) a C W m U a~ C m C O N r ~ ('1 O tD Cp ~ t0 ° * ( ) v ~ cQO n cp'p ern ~ cNn 4Y I~ 4y~ of Q' N P7 uj CD ~ ~ r r r r r r~ r r r r o o ~ s r ~ N ~ ~ ~ 3 o m C c 0 0 0 0 0 0 v W v N w W ~ m ~ m C C C 6 p S O O ! O O O O O O O W O y W O N N N w N O m d m ~ ~ m m W C C C C C C C ~ D Qf Q1 O .•- N f'7 ~ O i0 1~ CD tlf O r ^ M ~ 4 fP h CD O! O r c] ~ 4] !p ~- Cp 4i p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r N N N N N N N N !7 N d O Q O O O Q O 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~` r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p~j ~ H ~ ~ N ~ M O O r V m 2 ~ ~ A ~ ~ ti ~ ~ d ~ 1 ~ ~ 1~ N N l0 u i 1~ u i 1p d h ~ i w rn c ~ n ~ U • ° ~ ~ ~ a~ r> ~ r~ a; n o ~ 47 4 tD r t!7 ~ (~ 4 W W K ~ ~ ~ d? H W ~ + r µ r r r r r r r 1 H q O O O ~ ~ ~ W ~ 3 O O C C O O ~ m 0O D O + f3 C7 <7 ~ y p IA ~ ~ ~ ;g C C C O O O T ~ O ~ a m w ~ w m m m } , tlf ;d ~ - W C C C C C C ~ CI 6! pprNM K9 1-CDQ~4+"NP7~LpfD1-COOICrN~Q~R')<DPCOCf pjo O OO~O~~ OO*~rrrrrr rrNNNNNNN~VNN!~ a O N N N c N N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V Iq ~/ ~ :m D A' V N R b O O V w ~ V ~ +.+~ 4 ~( ~~ C 8 y ~ ~ d m ~ C ` 6 pVl C U m ~3 ~ m m~ U ~ ~ ~ W m A ~. m a e m 'e W m C O M ar ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m $ ~ n n _ ,- o .: a~ ep cp ~ u~ N N tp ui e"i . th O d N' C M CV Oi U • n eh n N N Of cD O ~ u~ N lD O N n Of Wi N of [+f O O M N O tD f'7 n u7 pf O N n 47 n w i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ w W N A R s W ~ m p • r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r r .- N r .- F' O r r h m m C C ~ O m ~ O Q b ~_ N M ~ t7 ~ ~ ~ m m m C C C C C ~ Z ~ L Z O Z fi ~ . C L m N N M w W ~ ~ ~ C 0 f A M _m 3 3 ; ~ 3 3 3 ~ ; W C G C C C C C C C m Of Q! O r N l'~7 LL7 1p n eD Ql O r N t+f ~7 1{7 m n eo O O N l'7 ~ ief tO n O O7 O O S7 O ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0 0 O O O w ~- r N N N N N N N spOyy N N Nf N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 07 r- O O t7 n 7 ~ ~ u7 O t+f O O ~ C t D 4 N t+ f ~ u 9 a0 N N V ` tp o CO ~ M Oi 1~ 1D ~ N N `•' 00 ~ O .~ a r i ~ O 47 cp ~ N OO CD O O N ~ QO 1[f K iFF b 4 !f~ ~ ~ K ~ ~ q ~ p • r ~ ~ .-- .-~ r ~ ,- - ~ . N O O p rn O O O ~ z N ~ C C C L t C ~ W 01 YOp ~ 3 ; ~ C ~ C C o O S O m O O O O ° U V V V i = m ~ W m m i i ~ m ~ m V m Cl m _m 3 3 3 ; 3 ; ; W C C C C C C C _ ~ Q7 O rNM u7 tD na001O~Nnf ~~[l ~p nap Ql4 Ne+7~Uf 1D ne0 OfO ~ m Ql O p OOO OOpppp ~~"^ ~~ NNNNN S 0 0 0 0 ~ O Q NNNNNI"f 7" ~ 0 0 0 0 O g 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~~ ago ~ C7 p tD A ww _m O O Z W ~ z ~' o F ~~ Iff ~ ~ }}p..; P7 fl- w m a 0 fi ~ r q ~y O .~ ~•~ C D 0 fiU H V ~ ~ m ~ C ~ O m h O pH U y O W ~ 3 b ~ m O h ~ d U 3 m C 0 pH c7 m m 'OO m V N N N d ti ~ ~ N ~ t D 4 t 0 ti r O O n d n ~ _ ~ O _ ~ O O N ~ ^ I D t l! l '1 ~ O 1 N I (,~ 1~ ~ O A ID f+ I~ 61 O ~ r i i W 64 ~ ~ ~ W fO9 H K fOR 6N4 ~ l0 0 - e-~ N r r N r N r r N r ~ irf F" p O O O O O O O ~ y w w a ~ ~ N ~ m C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V b w ~ 3 3 3 3 3 ~ e c c c c ~+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 10 O O O O O O O O O Q O C fi t Z L .C .C ~ ~ ~ X r ~ (~ W 6? V 67 O O V O V V N IA W fA 117 N tl0 N W 10 tl7 ~ m m m m W m m m m , Sf W C C C C C C G G C C C 4 O 0) O r N P'/ u7 ~p 1~ m Ol O r N C~7 ~ 47 t0 1~ 0 0) O N /rf ~ 149 fD (~ 0 0] O N N N N N N N N N N ~j ~ W O O O O O O G O O O r r r r N N N N ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a N O ON1 ~ ~ a W ~ W O O Z Ll N1 y m V ~ ~, w a ~m O ~ r M ~ O7 m o ~ ~ I n : v I p ~y ~r7 N ID m u i m +7 4 a a p C7 1- w n CD ao t Qf t+'> w f~ O7 N N d'I O r ~y e N ~! CV O 10 ~ to W ~ p () s O 1~ ~~jj Q1 {O r ICJ O O tp ~ P1 h 0 Ill 1! O f? r cq 1 ~ 1- O r tD W tP ~ 11'1 !r! 1~ ~ CD N Of r u7 ~ ~ lp 00 OD r r ~ r r N r N 47 47 N N P7 14 9 {F! fft iA [A V) H !N K i9 W i i "O' O • r r r r r r r r r N r r r r r E ~ O = _ m ~ t C C ~ ~ O ~ C H - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ m o ° ° ° ° ° c ° ° G .¢ ~ ~ o s a r o ~ o r o ~ o ~ s O ~ a .c e m a y v a c7 a ~ a- v u- v w v w v m v In v a a E °' m 3 m m ~ m ~ ~ ~ m m W C ~ G C C m c m C C C G ~ ~ O) OrNd7~tl7~ ••O01OrNlh ~'t17tD1+O OC Nl~f ~ N N N N N t[7101.0DGlO N N N N N M N ~ ~ i 67 Of 4 G] 4O p G CSO O ~OO O O~ OO$ r r .^~ ~^ r r ooooo0 r r r 000 0000oo OOa ooo } i i i r N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ti 4~7 ~a ~~ 1'x'7 ti ~a a 0 O t V N ++ N r~ fd ~ ~" ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS March 30, 2000 Agenda Ttem 4 School Site Needs Analysis (briefing by Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District) A School APFO to be comprehensive includes: 1. Level of Service Capacity 2. Student Enrollment Projections 3. Capital Investment Plan (CIP) (Financially Feasible Funding) 4. School APF Ordinance 5. Potential school sites identified in comprehensive plan or CIP to exhibit school site feasibility Steve Scroggs of Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District will briefly show the limitations on the quantity of remaining sites for future school needs in both quantity and geographic. location. ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS March 30, 2000 Agenda Item Sa School District Administration of School APFO -Process 1. Developer/Subdivider creates aconcept/sketch subdivision plan (or other development permit) including proposed timeline or construction that meets local codes. 2. Developer/Subdivider meets with applicable school district and presents preliminary info about type of housing and approximate schedule of housing completions. 3. School District performs a schools adequacy test using a database of existing school capacity, existing school enrollment, proposed/funded schools and previously approved development of two types; one type is vested or grandfathered (ECAPS) and the other has been issued a Certificate of Adequate Public Schools (CAPS). 4. If capacity is available in the projects proposed yeaz then an interim CAP is issued to the Developer/Subdivider. S. If capacity is not available in the proposed yeaz then the Developer/Subdivider may consider deferral of the project until additional capacity is scheduled. 6. The valid CAP after Step S is part of the required application material for the subdivision submitted to local government. Any changes during the local government review process that affects unit or number or housing type could be reissued CAPS of appropriate consistency. 7. Ongoing data exchange is transferred amongst jurisdictions and districts to keep updates on subdivision approval, housing starts, certY~"icates of occupancy and annual student enrollment. Agenda Item Sb School District Administration of School APFO -Adequacy Test Program The attached spreadsheet is a basic example of the development tracking system that will be used to test the adequacy of schools in future years. The computer program will be explained at the meeting. ~~ (- 1 d 0 m -~ m a a ~a ~a m L~ m e d s 0 ~. c m Q c m 0 0 r w Z c w E m W ~ l_ r ~~ °, ~ k M , v , 4 O O O O ~ ~ O ti N k;' ~t °DI ~~NI moo Q ~_ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ O O ~ ti r M ~ ti ' O ~ N ~ ~I COD ~ NI ~ tO Vj t~/ y v d1 ny.. y C O m ~ ~ O pO m Q ~ 4 o b ~ p d ~ 4 ~ O ~ N y N y N y m N y ~ w ~ a 0 o a c o o °o a m ~ m C o ~ ~' ~ R b ~ O C- a m 1q O ' ~ b ro ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ + ~ yt c .y .~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~a ~ ~ in a V1 (f ~ Vl 1~ C7 1~ W Q u) (Q .1 SCHOOLS ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE (SAPFO) QUESTIONS d~ ANSWERS 1. BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS (BOCC) Q. What primary benefit accrues to BOCC with a SAPFO7 A. The school district budgets account for nearly SO% of total, county budget and accordingly, unplanned critical construction and operational dollar needs create major fiscal pressure to balance the provision of many diverse county and public services. Health, social, transportation, aging and EMS, etc. services are part of the budget equation. A SAPFO creates a long range plan so the impact of school needs (capital and operational) can be gauged and complement the needs of other county budgeted areas. Q. Can a SAPFO effect economic development? A. Orange County has and will have an adequate housing stock to provide homes for the employees of new businesses and will likely reduce traffic and commuting times. Q• A. Q• A. ~.z Z. LOCAL GOVERNMENT Q. How does a SAPFO effect Local Government? A. The ordinance has a series of benefits and responsibilities. 1. A SAPFO can be another factor in the decision of development proposals. A memo or Certificate of Adequate Public Schools (CAPS) will came from the school district outlining the status of schools and their capacity. 2. A responsibility includes providing development project information back to the county as a central source of combined housing data that can then be accessed by all jurisdictions and the school district. The Orange County Information Exchange Team (OCTET), a team of planning and information service staff is in the process of collecting, determining a common format, and exchanging data. This process is also helping with Census 2000. Q. Can affordable housing be exempted from a SAPFO? A. Yes. The quantity and location of affordable housing will still be considered in the total generation of students for a district and school level but will be given an exempt certificate (ECAPS) in any event. Q. Is redevelopment (infill) development effected by a SAPFO? A. Tt depends on the size, scale and location. If one house is removed and another replaced then the S'APFO can be developed to provide an exemption. Tf a 100 unit multi-family is demolished, a redevelopment limit of 110% would be established to encourage yet quantify the changes. Q. Does a SAPFO favorably effect the comprehensive package of CIP and public services that the county and municipalities create and offer? A. Yes. There are competing interests for the scaze resources of tax and bond dollazs. A long range school CIP can identify and regulate ('smooth out') critical construction deadlines and permit a balanced expenditure of service programs for 1) affordable housing, 2) pazks and recreation, 3) open space/environmental preservation, and 4) police/fire/jails, etc. (P .3 3. SCIi00L DISTRICT Q. How does a SAPFO effect the school district? A. A SAPFO matches housing growth with the available (existing and planned) capacity of schools so primarily two products aze created. 1) A financially feasible short range CIP as part of a longer range (up to as much as 30 yeazs) plan leads to good operational plan as well. 2) Regulation of over-capacity situations and ability to gauge growth patterns of new development assists in reducing the need for redistricting. 4. CITIZENS Q. What benefit does a SAPFO have for citizens? A. 1. A SAPFO maintains the school district within an acceptable level of service which means a critical school over-capacity situation does not effect the quality of education. 2. The tax and bond burden of school construction can be examined in a short and long range plan which typically distributes the high spikes in fiscal/tax reconciliation. (P . ~f 5. PRIVATE SECTQR Q. Will SAPFO pertain to non-residential development? A. No. Only residential development is directly effected by a SAPFO since it relates to development that indirectly generates student populations. Q. Does a SAPFO effect the rate of growth of residential development? A. Generally yes. In order to ensure that a critical over-capacity situation does not occur in various school levels, development will be synchronized (i.e., rate of growth change) to match what is and planned to be available within the school level. Q. Why would housing sector businesses support a SAPFO? A. The number one reason for housing location decisions far families relates directly to the quality of education. A SAPFO preserves the educational quality of life that interests builders and future citizens in Orange County by having awell- planned CIP (and associated stabilizing tax and bond program), quality student- teacher ratios and public school facilities that aze not overburdened. Q. Can a SAPFO effect the vested rights to build a multiphase project? A. Vested rights aze in accordance with NC Statutes. The specifics of each project will be tested in"accordance with that law. Q. What would developer/builders have to do differently with a SAPFO in place? A. They would obtain a CAPS (Certificate of Adequate Public Schools) during the approval process and also submit an anticipated schedule of completion which is often typical. ~S 6. TECHNICAL ISSUES Q. Does a SAPFO relate directly to the number of housing units each year? A. No. . The SAPFO is intended to relate directly to the number of students that are generated from housing type. Therefore if a school system anticipates an accommodation of 300 students a yeaz distributed amongst its various school levels, then the 300 students can be estimated from a combination of housing types; For example: (Note: Student generation rates by housing type are under study by a consultant) Hypothetically: 300 students could be generated from; 1. 600 single family homes each at .5 students per household or 2. 400 single family homes each at .5 students per household 200 400 multi-family homes each at .25 students per household 100 800 units Total 300 Indirectly, there is a relationship. Q. Is senior citizen or student housing included in a SAPFO? A. This housing may be exempted since it does nat generate students but if the housing is converted to a student generation type development, then the conversion decision becomes subject to the SAPFO. Q. Can a SAPFO be adjusted to account for changes in growth? A. Yes. The CIP serves as the foundation for the provision of future school construction and the associated amount of new'student stations' that aze created. The most important facet is that the CIP be financially feasible and understand that the CIP cannot be overly. adjusted to accommodate growth spurts to be effective. Q. How is student generation and enrollment projected? A. There are a variety of methods to project total population and within those projections are the school aged children component. Over the last 10 years and more recently with SOCF population projections have been developed for Orange County and its municipalities. Historical patterns of growth as well as 'build-out' factors aze considered. The projections aze also an important element of a SAPFO but the SAPFO can also be a determinant of growth by matching school facilities with the amount of housing with children. Some municipalities have finite limits of growth and accordingly will have a buildout or ceiling density. The county area however is at least in the 30 year time horizon unlimited in its growth potential because of the large area of undeveloped land. (P. ~ Q. What is the rough breakdown of the number of students that enter a school system and what school levels do they enter into? A. Chapel Hi1UCarrlioro school district had approximately 300 new students per yeaz, Orange County school district had approximately 150 new students per year. Both districts experienced an approximately SO% share in elementary and 25% share in both middle and high school. These numbers illustrate a growing school district since percentage numbers aze proportionally higher in the eazlier grades. ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS March 30, 2000 Agenda Item 7 Consensus to proceed from Assembly of Governments (AOG) to disseminate School APFO School program to general public and private sector Prior to presenting a SAPFO program to the general public and private sector for their additional input and information, the County planning director wanted to receive any additional direction or comment from the AOG and school districts. Input on the format, time and place will also be welcomed. One meeting could include a brief information release and presentation and questions and answers period in an open forum. ITEM sArFo Policy & Implementation Steps (1) Create consensus of SAPFO concept among all jurisdictions and districts. (2) Research development activity and school enrollment trends. (3). Examine various SAPFO policy issues (e.g., Level of Service, CIP, Vesting, etc.) (4) Review of SAPFO by attorneys and planning directors for ordinance integrity. (5) Develop SAPFO assumptions and scenarios for presentation purposes. (~ Forward and decide on SAPFO basics noted in a Memorandum ofUnderstanding by all jurisdictions and districts. ('~ Discuss the implications of a SAPFO with the general public and development community. ($) Formulate agreed upon enrollment projections and facility needs to be the base of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). (9) Create drafts of implementing SAPFO for eventual incorporation into local government land development codes. (10) Develop dialogue on CIP planning and financial feasibility of SAPFO scenarios and match CIl' and needs assessment. (11) Present findings of SAPFO implications to general public and development community. (12) Create a computer spreadsheet based SAPFO management system. (13) Verify subdivision and building data and develop base SAPFO program. (1~4) Adopt interlocal agreements and SAPFO and determine effective date concurrent with adopted CIP.