Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-065-E-County Mgr-Trees for the Triangle-Tree Planting and EducationClimate Action Grant Program Revised 04/23 Page 1 of 10 COMMUNITY CLIMATE ACTION GRANT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the sixteenth day of February 2026, (“Effective Date”) by and between the County of Orange, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, Post Office Box 8181, Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278, ("County") and Trees for the Triangle, a not-for-profit corporation, located at 2509 Holbrook Ct, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 (“Provider”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is in the interests of the County that said program be assisted by the County and thereby enhance its availability to residents of the County, and said program addresses an important community human services need, as identified by the Board of Commissioners. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants and conditions hereafter set forth, the County and Provider agree as follows: 1. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be two years beginning February 16, 2026 to February 16, 2028. 2. Scope of Services. a. Provider will provide services, as outlined in the attached Community Climate Action Grant Application and any amendments or revision thereto which is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference, to the residents of Orange County. The Scope of Services and the Program Budget may be different from the original application based on County appropriation; however, any revisions or amendments to this Agreement must be approved in writing by the County and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B. b. The Provider shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequence, safety program and procedures necessary to properly and fully complete the work set forth in the Scope of Services. 3. Funding. a. The County agrees to appropriate for the provision of services described in Exhibit A, the Community Climate Action Grant Program Application, Exhibit b, the Revised Scope of Services and more particularly described in the Revised Program Budget, the maximum sum of $ 30,000. b. All funds appropriated shall be used for purposes described in Exhibit A. Any funds not used for the purposes stated shall be returned to the County. Any changes in the use of funds must be authorized in writing by the County prior to any expenditure of the funds by the Provider. If the funds are expended not in accordance with the Scope of Services, at the discretion of the County the Provider may be required to repay the funds to the County. c. The Provider shall be paid in installments in the amount of see Exhibit C. The first payment is contingent upon receipt of the agency’s performance agreement; the remaining payments are contingent upon receipt of the request for reimbursement and related supporting documentation. If the project described in Exhibit A requires funds to be provided on a different or more accelerated schedule, the Provider may request an alternative payment schedule, which, if approved, will be attached to this agreement as Exhibit C, Alternative Payment Schedule. Should an alternative payment schedule be approved, the Provider will Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 2 of 10 Rev.04/23 still be required to submit quarterly Progress Reports for the duration of the Term of the Agreement. d. The County’s obligation to make the quarterly payments is contingent upon receipt of Progress Reports, which show satisfactory progress toward completion of performance measures and an accounting of expenditures as detailed in the attached Exhibits B and C. e. Once Provider has satisfied its obligations as provided in (d) payment will be made 21 days after receipt of the Progress Report and Request for Reimbursement or 21 days after due date of Progress Report whichever is later. f. The County is not obligated to provide any other support to Provider in this or in succeeding fiscal years. 4. Agency Reporting. a. Provider will provide Orange County a Progress Report that includes a fiscal report and updates on performance measures as outlined in the Scope of Services. Progress Report dates are: January 1-March 31, April 1- June 30, July 1- September 30, October 1-December 31. Reports are due on April 15, July 15, October 15 and January 15 of the program fiscal year. b. Provider agrees to allow the County to inspect its financial books and records, which document costs of those services, upon reasonable notice during normal working hours. 5. Termination. a. Termination for Cause. In the event of any of the circumstances set forth below (hereinafter referred to as “default”), the County may immediately terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, and from time to time. Notice of termination must be in writing, state the reason or reasons for the termination, and specify the effective date of the termination: i. In the event that Provider shall cease to exist as an organization or shall enter bankruptcy proceedings, be declared insolvent, or liquidate all or substantially all of its assets, or significantly reduce its services or accessibility to Orange County residents during the term of this Agreement; or ii. In the event that Provider shall fail to render a satisfactory accounting as provided section 4 above, the County may terminate this Agreement and Provider shall return all payments already made to it by the County for services which have not been provided or for which no satisfactory accounting has been rendered; or iii. In the event of any fraudulent representation by the Provider in an invoice or other verification required to obtain payment under this Agreement or other dishonesty on a material matter relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. iv. Nonperformance, incomplete service or performance, or failure to satisfactorily perform any part of the work identified in the Scope of Services or to comply with any provision of this Agreement, as determined by the County in its sole discretion. v. Failure to adhere to the terms of applicable county, state or federal laws, regulations, or stated public policy. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 3 of 10 Rev.04/23 b. In the event of default by the Provider, the county may elect to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part and/or require the Provider to repay the funds within ten (10) business days from written notice of default. The County may (but shall not be required to) grant the Provider an opportunity to cure the default without termination of this Agreement. This clause shall not be interpreted to limit the County’s remedies in law or in equity. c. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate the agreement at any time without penalty; provided that written notice of such termination is furnished to the other party at least 30 days prior to termination. In the event of such termination, any payment due shall be prorated to the date of termination and any unused funds shall be returned to the County within 10 days of termination. d. Any termination of this Agreement for default under this section that is later deemed to be unjustified shall be deemed a termination for convenience. e. Waiver. The payment of any sums by the County under this Agreement or the failure of the County to require compliance by the Provider with any provisions of this Agreement or the waiver by the County of any breach of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim for damages by the County for any breach of this Agreement or a waiver of any other required compliance with this Agreement. 6. Responsibilities of the County. Cooperation and Coordination. The County has designated (Amy Eckberg) to act as the County's representative with respect to the Project who shall have the authority to render decisions within guidelines established by the County Manager or the County Board of Commissioners and who shall be available during working hours as often as may be reasonably required to render decisions and to furnish information. 7. Insurance. a. General Requirements. The Provider shall purchase and maintain, during the period of performance of this Agreement, insurance: i. Worker’s Compensation. For protection from claims under workers' or workmen's compensation acts; ii. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance covering claims arising out of or relating to bodily injury, including bodily injury, sickness, disease or death of any of the Consultant's employees or any other person and to real and personal property including loss of use resulting thereof; iii. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, including hired and non-owned vehicles, if any, covering personal injury or death, and property damage; and iv. Professional Liability Insurance, covering personal injury, bodily injury and property damage and claims arising out of or related to the performance under this Agreement by the Consultant or his agents, consultants and employees. v. Sexual Misconduct. Sexual Abuse/Molestation Insurance is required when Provider works directly one-on-one with children, elderly or other at-risk populations. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 4 of 10 Rev.04/23 b. Limits of Coverage: Minimum limits of insurance coverage shall be as follows: INSURANCE DESCRIPTION MINIMUM REQUIRED COVERAGE • Worker's Compensation Limits for Coverage A - Statutory State NC & Coverage B - Employers Liability $500,000 each accident, disease policy limit and disease each employee • Commercial General $1,000,000 Each Occurrence Liability $2,000,000 Aggregate • Automobile Liability $500,000 Combined Single Limit • Professional Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate • Sexual Misconduct $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate c. All insurance policies (with the exception of Worker's Compensation and Professional Liability) required under this Agreement shall name the County as an additional insured party and as a certificate holder. For more information see the Orange County Risk Transfer Policy and Orange County Minimum Insurance Coverage Requirements, (each document is incorporated herein by reference and may be viewed at http://www.orangecountync.gov/departments/purchasing_division/contracts.php.) Evidence of such insurance and all correspondence shall be sent to: Orange County Risk Manager Post Office Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 d. Nothing in this section is intended to affect or abrogate the County’s sovereign immunity defenses. 8. General Provisions. a. Governing Law. This Agreement and the duties, responsibilities, obligations and rights of respective parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina. By executing this Agreement Provider affirms that Provider and any subcontractors of Provider are and shall remain in compliance with Article 2 of Chapter 64 of the North Carolina General Statutes. By executing this Agreement Provider certifies that Provider has not been identified, and has not utilized the services of any agent or subcontractor identified, on the list created by the State Treasurer pursuant to G.S. 147-86.58. By executing this Agreement Provider certifies that Provider has not been identified, and has not utilized the services of any agent or subcontractor identified, on the list created by the State Treasurer pursuant to G.S. 147-86.81. b. Non-Discrimination. Provider agrees as part of consideration of the granting of funds by Orange County the parties hereto for themselves, their agents, officials, employees and servants agree not to discriminate in any manner of these basis of race, color, gender, national origin, age, handicap, religion, sexual orientation, familial status or veterans status with reference to any activities carried out by the grantee, no matter how remote. The parties hereto further agree in all respects to conform to the provision and intent of Orange County Civil Rights Ordinance, as amended and the Orange County Non-discrimination Policy, which is incorporated herein by reference and can be viewed at http://www.orangecountync.gov/departments/purchasing_division/contracts.php. The Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 5 of 10 Rev.04/23 County may enforce this provision by an action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or other remedy as by law provided; this provision shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the above subject manner. c. Dispute Resolution. Any and all suits or actions to enforce, interpret or seek damages with respect to any provision of, or the performance or non-performance of, this Agreement shall be brought in the General Court of Justice of North Carolina sitting in Orange County, North Carolina. It is agreed by the parties that no other court shall have jurisdiction or venue with respect to such suits or actions. Binding arbitration may not be initiated by either Party, however, the Parties may agree to nonbinding mediation of any dispute prior to the bringing of such suit or action. d. Living Wage. Orange County is committed to providing its employees with a living wage and encourages agencies if funds to pursue the same goal. The Orange County Living Wage Policy, which is incorporated herein by reference, can be viewed at: http://www.orangecountync.gov/departments/purchasing_division/contracts.php. The County’s living wage is $22.60 per hour. To the extent possible, Orange County recommends that Provider provide a living wage to its employees. e. Relationship of the Parties. Provider is an independent contractor of the County. Provider represents that they have or will secure, at his own expense, all personnel required in performing the services under this Agreement. Such personnel shall not be employees or have any contractual relationship with the County. All personnel engaged in work under this Agreement shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted under federal, state and local law to perform such services. f. Compliance with all Laws. The Provider, at its sole expense, shall comply with all laws, ordinances, orders and regulations of the federal, state or local governments, as well as their respective departments, commissions, boards, and officers, which are in effect at the time of execution of this Agreement or are adopted at any time following execution of this agreement. g. Subcontract. The County and Provider deem the services provided under this Agreement to be personal in nature and Provider may not subcontract any rights or duties under this Agreement to any other party without prior written consent from the County. h. Assignment. The Provider shall not assign this Agreement, including the rights to payment, to any other party without the prior written consent of the County. i. Indemnification. Provider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, for all loss, liability, claims or expense (including reasonable attorney's fees) arising from bodily injury, including death or property damage, to any person or persons caused in whole or in part by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Provider, except to the extent same are caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the County. It is the intent of this section to require Provider to indemnify the County to the extent permitted under North Carolina law. Nothing in this section is intended to affect or abrogate the County’s sovereign immunity defenses. j. Non-Appropriation. This Agreement is subject to the availability of funds to purchase the specified services and may be terminated at any time if such funds become unavailable. k. Severability. All clauses found herein shall act independently of each other. If a clause is found to be illegal or unenforceable, it shall have no effect on the other provisions of this Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 6 of 10 Rev.04/23 Agreement. It is understood by the parties hereto that if any part, term or provision of this Agreement is by the Courts held to be illegal or in conflict with any laws of the State of North Carolina or the United States, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular part, term or provision held to be invalid. l. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the County and the Provider and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties. Modifications may be evidenced by facsimile signatures. m. Notices. Any notice required by this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested to the following: Orange County Provider’s Name Trees for the Triangle Attention: Amy Eckberg Attention: Dave Klemp P.O. Box 8181 Address: 2509 Holbrook Ct Hillsborough, NC 27278 Raleigh, NC 27604 Email:aeckberg@orangecountync.gov Email: Dave@treesforthetriangle.org n. Signatures. This Agreement together with any amendments or modifications may be executed electronically. All electronic signatures affixed hereto evidence the intent of the Parties to comply with Article 11A and Article 40 of North Carolina General Statute Chapter 66. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Orange County and the Provider have signed this Agreement, effective on the last date this Agreement is signed by both parties as indicated by the dates set forth under signatures below. For and on behalf of the Provider _____________________________ _______________________ , Date For and on behalf of Orange County Government _______________________________ ________________________ Travis Myren, County Manager Date Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 2/18/2026 2/25/2026 Climate Action Grant Program Page 7 of 10 Rev.04/23 ORANGE COUNTY—INTERNAL USE ONLY ______________________________________________________________________________ Finance Information Vendor Name: Trees for the Triangle Vendor Contact Person: Dave Klemp Phone: 9192634181 Address: 2509 Holbrook Ct City Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27604 Department: County Manager Amount: $ 30,000 Purpose: Tree Planting and Education Budget Code(s): 61210335-803105-30052 Vendor # 68831 Vendor Status with NCSOS: Vendor is a BOCC consultant: Yes No Contract Details Contract Type: New Amendment (Original Contract: ) (Most Recent Amendment ) Effective Date February 16,2026 End Date February 16, 2028 Notice Date (Notice Purpose ) Award Approved by Board (Agenda Date: January 20, 2026); Made or Administered by Signature Authority - BOCC Express Delegation (Agenda Date: ) - Policy 9.4: Under $5,000; Service Under $90,000; Construction Under $250,000 - Budget Policy Section XV (Capital Improvement Project: ) Bidding Informal Bidding ($30k-$90k); Formal RFP ($90k+); Other (<$30k); Exception(# ) Department Affirmation This agreement is approved as to technical form and content and I as Department Director affirmatively state work on this project has not been initiated prior to execution of the agreement. Services related to this agreement have already begun or been completed. Description of the nature of the emergency condition that was addressed: Department Director’s Signature ________________________________________ Date: ________ Information Technologies This agreement has been reviewed and is approved as to information technology content and specifications: Office of the Chief Information Officer___________________________________ Date: ________ Inapplicable because no hardware/software purchases or related services Risk Management This agreement is approved for sufficiency of insurance standards, specifications, and requirements: Office of the Risk Management Officer___________________________________ Date: _________ Financial Services This instrument has been pre-audited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act: Office of the Chief Financial Officer ____________________________________ Date: _________ Legal Services This agreement is approved as to legal form and sufficiency: Office of the County Attorney __________________________________________Date: ________ Clerk to the Board All Docusign contracts must be copied to the Clerk upon completion: occlerkdocs@orangecountync.gov The following signature block is for hard copies only and is not required for Docusign contracts: Received for record retention: Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 2/18/2026 2/23/2026 2/24/2026 2/24/2026 Climate Action Grant Program Page 8 of 10 Rev.04/23 Office of the Clerk to the Board __________________________________________Date:_________ Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 9 of 10 Rev.04/23 Exhibit A Community Climate Action Grant Application Board of Orange County Commissioners Agenda 1-20-26 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 10 of 10 Rev.04/23 Exhibit B Provider’s Revised Scope of Services • 100 Native Trees: • We will provide 50 households in priority census tracts with two professionally planted trees at no cost • Pay-What-You-Can (PWYC): • Any trees requested beyond the initial two per household will be provided via our PWYC model • 1,200 Seedlings: • Distributed at workshops & broadly for community-wide impact • 3 Hands-on Workshops: • Focused on tree selection, planting, and maintenance Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 11 of 10 Rev.04/23 Exhibit C Alternative Payment Schedule Payment Period Amount Justification / Project Milestone Quarter 1 $10,000 Upfront Mobilization: Initial tree/seedling procurement, marketing/outreach materials, educational preparation. Quarter 2 $7,500 Active Planting Phase: Labor costs for professional installation, soil/mulch delivery, and execution of the first two workshops. **Assumes planting season timeframe Quarter 3 $7,500 Completion of Planting: Finalizing the 100-tree goal and third workshop; distribution of the remaining seedlings. Quarter 4 $3,000 Survival Audit & Follow-up: Health checks for 100 trees and continued care. Quarter 5 $2,000 Final Reporting & Sustainability: Close-out reporting and funding for our "in-perpetuity" replacement reserve. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Climate Action Grant Program Page 12 of 10 Rev.04/23 ATTACHMENT “A” Orange County Certifications – FY 2025-2026 Chief Contact, Administrators, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer I certify that I have provided a list of the chief contact, administrators, chief executive officer and chief financial officer for my agency with this Agreement and that I will keep it current to the County of Orange. The list should be in writing with the name, title, residential address; phone and email address and if possible, fax number. Officers and Board of Directors I certify that I have provided a current list of the Officers and Board of Directors with this Agreement and that we will continue to update the list as changes occur. The list should be in writing, with the name, physical address, mailing address and if possible, phone, fax and email address. Budget Submission I certify that I have provided a budget for the period to be covered by funding Orange County, and that any substantive changes made to this budget have been in advance authorized in writing by Orange County. Annual Financial Review I certify that I have provided a copy of the latest annual Financial Review for our agency and the budget adopted by the agency for the fiscal years encompassing this Agreement. If not, please explain on a separate sheet of paper. Alignment with Organization’s Mission I certify that the programs and services for which this funding is requested align with the mission of the organization. Intended Purpose I certify that the funds provided to the agency under the terms of this Agreement will be used for a public purpose and shall only be used for the purposes intended and any money not used for those purposes will be promptly returned to Orange County. Certified by: _______________________ Title: __________________________ Date: ___________ (Provider’s Signature) Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 2/18/2026Executive Director Orange County Sustainability Powered by Submittable Title Tree Pl anti ng and Educati on by Dav e Klemp in 2026 Orange County Community Climate Action Grant Application dave@treesforthetriangle.org 08/15/2025 id. 51373200 Post Award - Active Vendor Score n/a Original Submission 08/21/2025 Score n/a Table of Contents: Section A. Applicant Organization’s Contact Information Section B. Collaborators and Partners Section C. Project Information Section D. Scored Criteria You can invite additional people to complete this form as a collaborator. Follow this link for additional information * The owner of this application (the person who started it and added the collaborators) is the only person who is able to submit. Once submitted, ownership is able to be transferred to another person. Click on Invite Collaborators. A Dialog box will appear, asking you to enter the email addresses of your collaborators. Enter those addresses, then click Invite. Invited collaborators will receive an email, letting them know you've invited them to collaborate on a draft submission using Submittable. In order to communicate with collaborators through the Submittable platform, all invitees must accept the invite BEFORE the owner of the submission (that's you!) hits Submit. After you've sent invitations to collaborate, you can click on the Invite Collaborators link again anytime to see the status of your invitations. In the row for each invitee who has not yet accepted their invitation, you will see a Pending indication. There will also be a trash can next to each person’s name so that the Submission Owner can remove anyone that they no longer want to collaborate on the submission. Section A. Applicant Organization’s Information A1. Organization’s Legal Name Trees for the Triangle A2. Physical Address 2509 Holbrook Ct Raleigh NC 27604 US 35.816625 -78.561691 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 A3. Is your mailing address different than your physical address? No A4. W eb Address (if applicable) https://www.treesforthetriangle.org/ A5. Preferred Phone Number +19192634181 A6. E-Mail Dave@treesforthetriangle.org A7. Tax ID Number 82-2343798 A8. W here did you hear about this grant opportunity? Other A8a. Please describe how you heard about this grant opportunity. Current recipient for a different project A9. Have you applied to this grant opportunity before? Yes A9a. Did you receive funding when you previously applied? Yes Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Non- Discrimination Clause Are any of the Board Members or employees of the organization which will be carrying out this project or their named project collaborators/partners or members of their immediate families, or their business associates: A10. Select any of the following that apply: e. Not applicable / NA Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 A11. NON- DISCRIMINATION Provider agrees as part of consideration of the granting of funds by funding agencies to the parties hereto for themselves, their agents, officials, employees and servants agree not to discriminate in any manner on the basis of race, color, gender, national origin, age, handicap, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, familial status or veterans status with reference to any activities carried out by the grantee, no matter how remote. The parties hereto further agree in all respects to conform to the provision and intent of Orange County Civil Rights Ordinance, as amended and the Orange County Anti-discrimination Policy. This provision is enforced by action for specific performance, injunctive rel ef, or other remedy as by law provided; this provision shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto with reference to the above subject manner. To the best of my knowledge and belief all of the above information is true and current. I acknowledge and understand that the existence of a potential conflict of interest does not necessarily make the program ineligible for funding, but the existence of an undisclosed conflict may result in the termination of any grant awarded. checked A12. Primary Contact Name Dave Klemp A13. Primary Contact Title Executive Director A14. Primary Contact Preferred Phone Number +19192634181 A15. Primary Contact Email Address Dave@treesforthetriangle.org A16. Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director Dave Klemp A17. Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director Title Executive Director Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 A18. Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director Preferred Phone Number +19192634181 A19. Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director Email Address Dave@treesforthetriangle.org A20. Date of Incorporation (Month/Year): 08/2017 A21. Applicant Organization’s Purpose/Mission: (100 word limit) Improve the ecological and social resilience of the Triangle area through the planting of trees. W e envision a future where the Triangle is home to an interconnected network of native trees and ecosystems that sustain thriving human communities. These communities are inspired to preserve local natural resources for current and future generations. Trees for the Triangle promotes tree equity and environmental justice by planting native trees and engaging diverse communities. W ith social justice and racial equity at our core, we ensure all communities benefit from green spaces and have meaningful, lasting involvement in creating a resilient, climate- ready region. A22. Living W age: Does this organization pay employees a minimum living wage* (A living wage is $17.65/hr or $16.15/hr with employer provided health insurance.)? Yes A23. Is this organization an Orange County Living W age Certified Employer*? No A23a. If no, please explain why your organization is not an Orange County Living W age Certified Employer? (100 word limit) Currently no employees from Orange County Schedule of Positions: Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 A24. Number of Full- Time Paid Positions: 2 A25. Number of Part- Time Paid Positions: 1 A26. Number of Volunteers: 30 Section B. Collaborators and Partners In some projects, collaborators and partners provide essential capacity and connections. If collaborators or partners are an essential part of your project, whether or not they are receiving grant funds, please use this section to provide more details. If you are not working with collaborators or partners, please feel free to write N/A in this section and move to the Project Information section. B1. Are you working with any collaborators or partners on this project? No Section C. Project Information C1a. Project Name (This will be used as the name of your submission; please keep your project name to less than 5 words. Examples: Tree Planting, LED Lights, Rain Garden, Rooftop Solar) Tree Planting and Education Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 C1b. Please describe the proposed project. (300 word limit) Trees for the Triangle (TftT) will expand native tree canopy in Orange County through a Pay-W hat-You-Can (PW YC) residential planting program, targeting neighborhoods with low Tree Equity Scores and heightened climate vulnerability, especially flood-prone areas impacted by Tropical Storm Chantal. The program will plant 200 native trees, distribute 2,000 seedlings, and host four hands-on educational workshops on tree selection, planting, and maintenance. The need is urgent. In summer 2025, Chantal caused $56M in flood damage across Orange County, displacing nearly 200 residents and setting record crests on the Haw and Eno rivers. W ith only 19% of damaged homes confirmed to have flood insurance and 43% of flooded buildings statewide located outside FEMA high-risk zones, proactive flood-mitigation strategies are essential. Native trees, strategically placed, reduce flooding impacts by intercepting rainfall, improving infiltration, and stabilizing soils. W orkshops will equip residents to choose species suited to their sites - including water-tolerant species for floodplains - ensuring plantings are resilient and beneficial for decades. W e will leverage volunteer labor for planting events, fostering stewardship while maximizing cost efficiency. Partnerships with developers, community groups, and the Chapel Hill Public Library will extend our reach, providing venues for workshops and additional tree distribution. Seedling giveaways at events will enable immediate action and amplify community-wide impact. This project directly advances the Orange County Climate Action Plan goals: GC 2: Increase tree canopy by giving away seedlings (1,000 per year) and expanding plantings GC 6: Broaden outreach and provide resources through education and partnerships By combining equitable access to trees with climate resilience education, we will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance flood resilience, and empower residents to create greener, healthier, and more connected communities. The result will be long-term ecological and social benefits, especially for those most affected by climate change. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 C1c. Please describe your project’s benefits, including those that are quantifiable. (150 word limit) Planting 200 native trees will sequester approximately 9,600 lbs. of CO annually at maturity and intercept an estimated 1.2 million gallons of stormwater each year, reducing flooding risk and erosion in vulnerable neighborhoods. Strategically placed shade trees will lower surrounding air temperatures by up to 10°F, decreasing energy use and cooling costs. The distribution of 2,000 native seedlings will expand impact beyond our plantings, enabling residents to apply workshop skills immediately. Educational workshops will directly engage at least 100 residents, equipping them to select, plant, and maintain trees for long-term success. Socially, this project prioritizes low Tree Equity Score neighborhoods, improving access to green space, enhancing air quality, and strengthening community connections. These outcomes align with Orange County’s Climate Action Plan goals, advancing equity while building a resilient, climate-ready region prepared for future flooding events. C1d. Please choose the best description for the type of project*: Other (Please describe) Please describe what type of project this is. (100 word limit) This project combines tree planting, community education, and seedling giveaways to expand canopy and reduce flood impacts. W e will plant 200 native trees in low Tree Equity Score, flood-prone areas; host workshops on species selection, planting, and maintenance; and distribute 2,000 seedlings for immediate resident action. This integrated approach cools neighborhoods, intercepts stormwater, cuts emissions, and empowers communities to sustain climate resilience long after the project ends. C1e. W hat is the main way that this project helps fight climate change? (select one): Carbon Sequestration C1f. Please select the jurisdiction(s) where your project is focused and briefly state how your project aligns with the relevant Climate Action Plans: Orange County/Orange County Climate Action Plan Town of Carrboro/Town of Carrboro Community Climate Action Plan Town of Chapel Hill/Town of Chapel Hill Climate Action and Response Plan Town of Hillsborough/Town of Hillsborough Comprehensive Sustainability Plan Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Please name the action items from the Carrboro Climate Action Plan that best align with your proposed project. (200 word limit) Community Integration Recommendation #1: Create new Grass Roots Partnerships and Engage Community to be a Part of the Solution. Community Integration Recommendation #3: Create Green Neighborhood Program. Community Integration Recommendation #8: Environmental Justice and Climate Equity. Ecosystem Recommendation #4: Tree Preservation, Protection and Conservation. • Increase public awareness of the intrinsic value and beauty of trees. • Provide oversight for a community scale urban forestry program. • Educate citizens about proper tree selection, planting, and care. • Educate citizens about the health of the larger community forest, its importance for both human and environmental health, and ways in which they can support it. • Partner with local government and civic groups to improve and expand the Town’s tree canopy. Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Challenge #6: Pursue W atershed Restoration Actions to Protect Local Streams from Changes in Rainfall Due to Climate Change • Forested riparian buffers are a critical component of stream health Ecosystem Recommendation #5: Improve Regulations and Community Capacity to Discourage Invasive Plants and Encourage Native Plants Please name the action items from the Chapel Hill Climate Action Plan that best align with your proposed project. (200 word limit) Action: Enhance Green Infrastructure • Plant an average of 200 or more canopy trees every year • Trees and green spaces can help to mitigate heat effects. Trees provide shade, and open spaces reduce the amount of paved surfaces that increase heat. Green infrastructure provides critical habitat and ecosystem service benefits. As new development occurs over time, it will be critically important to balance these changes with continued investment in the protection, conservation and enhancement of our natural environment. Action: Expand Climate Action Education, Outreach, and Awareness • Education, outreach and awareness can help equip our community to understand why climate action and response are important and how it can take action. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Please name the action items from the Town of Hillsborough Comprehensive Sustainability Plan that best align with your proposed project. (200 word limit) Smart Growth • Principle 6. Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas Environment & Natural Systems • Topography • Air Quality • Soil • Native Plants Tree Preservation • Tree preservation and maintenance of the tree canopy, is essential for establishing a healthy natural landscape. Trees offer many ecological benefits. They function as habitats for wildlife, provide wildlife food, produce oxygen to breathe, store carbon, clean the air and reduce stormwater runoff impacts and urban heat island effects.... The tree canopy is particularly important in the developed areas of the town because the greater the urban tree canopy cover, the more ecosystem services are provided. Please name the action items from the Orange County Climate Action Plan that best align with your proposed project. (200 word limit) Goal: GC 2 Increase the tree canopy community-wide • Target: Give away 10,000 tree seedlings in 10 years (1,000 a year) GC 2.1.2 • Utilize “community scientists,” residents that support tree inventory efforts; partner with Trees for the Triangle GC 2.1.3 • Organize a bi-annual tree giveaway program and a native plant sale/seed giveaway. Maintain and make available a list of local native plant growers Goal: GC 6 Broaden outreach and resources to better support the community • Target: Identify partnerships and internal funding support to build a more natural community GC 6.1 • Develop programs and educational resources to promote native landscaping and support pollinators, leveraging partnerships with organizations GC 6.1.1 • Organize community workshops on the importance of native landscaping and pollinators C2. Do you have another project to add? No Funding Request Summary Please list all proposed projects (please list project name only) for which you are requesting Community Climate Action Grant funding for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Make sure to include a brief description of the proposed use of funds. Applicants will be asked to provide more details on their proposed project budget in the Budget W orksheets linked template. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 C3. Total Funding Request 50000 C4. Describe your proposed use of funds. (150 word limit) Total Request: $50,000 Tree Purchase & Planting – $40,000 • 200 native trees for low Tree Equity Score, flood-prone neighborhoods • Species selected for site conditions and flood mitigation (e.g., water- tolerant species) • Includes delivery, soil amendment, planting materials • Volunteer-powered planting events to maximize efficiency and foster stewardship Seedling Distribution – $4,000 • 2,000 native seedlings for giveaways at workshops and events • Enables residents to take immediate, independent action to expand canopy W orkshops & Project Administration – $6,000 • Facilitation of 4 community workshops on species selection, planting, and maintenance • Development and printing of educational materials • Coordination of volunteers and planting logistics • Project management and reporting requirements C5. If a full award for your project is not possible, can/will you accept partial funding and still be successful? Yes Please explain how your project can still be successful if you don't receive the full requested amount. (200 word limit) W ith reduced funding, we would scale back trees, seedlings, and workshops proportionally, prioritizing low Tree Equity Score and flood-prone areas. Fewer households would be reached, but core goals - expanding canopy, intercepting stormwater, and building community capacity for climate resilience - would still be achieved, with potential for future expansion. Section D. Scored Criteria Criterion 1 - Social Justice and Racial Equity This criterion has a maximum score of 6 points (out of a total of 26 points). Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D1. W ho will directly or indirectly benefit from your project? Please be as specific as possible on the characteristics of those who will benefit including, gender, race, age, income level and geographic location. (200 word limit) Our project prioritizes Orange County neighborhoods with high heat exposure, low tree cover, and elevated social vulnerability, based on combined data—Urban Heat Island patterns, road network buffers, EPA’s Disadvantaged Communities data, the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and Tree Equity Score canopy gaps. These areas typically include economically diverse, lower-to-moderate income households, often incorporating Black, Indigenous, Hispanic/Latino, and other people of color. Although we do not collect participant demographics, area-wide Census data show higher proportions of BIPOC and lower-income residents living in hotter, canopy-deficient zones often correlated with historic disinvestment. Our Pay-W hat-You-Can model ensures that households of any gender, age, race, or income - especially those facing financial and vulnerability barriers - can access professionally planted native trees. Indirect beneficiaries include neighbors and community members who enjoy improved shade, reduced ambient temperatures, better air quality, and enhanced stormwater absorption. These benefits extend across urban, suburban, and forging resilience in disadvantaged and marginalized communities most impacted by heat and flooding. D2. W hat are the demographics of the area where your project takes place? (150 word limit) Orange County, NC has an estimated population of ~150,600. According to the 2020 Census, its racial composition is approximately 65% W hite (non- Hispanic), 10% Black or African American, 8.5% Asian, 10.6% Hispanic or Latino, and 5% multiracial/other. The median household income is about $88,553. Areas of focus - those with heat islands, canopy gaps, and higher SVI - frequently overlap with census tracts featuring lower-income brackets, greater racial diversity, and higher housing cost-burden or vulnerability, as suggested by SVI data. D3. Does your project help to address any racial disparities in the location it is proposed for? (200 word limit) Yes. W e target census tracts flagged by the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index and EPA Disadvantaged Communities data, where racial and socioeconomic minorities disproportionately reside. These tracts often display higher land surface temperatures, canopy deficits, and flooding risk - legacies of historic structural inequities such as redlining and disinvestment. National studies link low-income and racially marginalized neighborhoods with significantly lower tree coverage and elevated Urban Heat Island effects. By using the combined mapping - heat exposure (Landsat 8), road- network heat retention buffers, SVI, EPA data, and Tree Equity Score - we ensure our intervention directly targets communities where racial disparities in environmental conditions are most pronounced. By delivering native tree plantings through an equitable Pay-W hat-You-Can model, we actively reduce resource access barriers for BIPOC and lower- income families, promoting climate resilience, health equity, and environmental justice in the communities that need it most. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D4. Please list any data sources used in reference to D1, D2, and D3 and show the steps of any calculations. (300 word limit) 1. Data Sources Used: -Population & Demographics: Orange County population (~150,626, 2023) and racial composition from the 2020 Census (DataUSA). -Median Household Income: $88,553 (Orange County Demographics Appendix A) -Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) leveraged to identify vulnerable census tracts (UNC ArcGIS Orange County Tree Planting Map). -Tree Equity Score to select project zones (TreeEquityScore.org) -Environmental Justice Context: Studies linking low-income and communities of color to reduced canopy and higher heat impacts. [Gorrell, J., Jean-Philippe, S. R., Ries, P. D., Richards, J. K., Poudyal, N. C., & Butler, R. (2024). Geospatial Analysis of Urban Heat Island Effects and Tree Equity. Open Journal of Forestry, 14, 1-18.] 2. Calculation & Methodological Steps: -Step 1: Retrieved overall Orange County demographics and income data from Census sources for baseline context (D2). -Step 2: Identified target census tracts using Orange County's integrated mapping approach, layering: ---Urban Heat Island data (Landsat 8, 2022) ---Heat-retaining roads buffer zones ---EPA Disadvantaged Communities designation ---CDC/ATSDR SVI (2020) ---Tree Equity Score for canopy gaps -Step 3: Noted that these tracts often correlate with greater concentrations of BIPOC residents and households below median income, per national patterns and local SVI themes (e.g., Minority Status, Socioeconomic Status). -Step 4: Framed direct beneficiaries as households in those high-need areas, emphasizing inclusivity across gender, race, age, income spectrum. -Step 5: Understood indirect beneficiaries as local neighbors and community members impacted by improved environmental conditions. -Step 6: Cited literature reinforcing how UHI disproportionately impacts communities of color and low-income neighborhoods. Hsu, A., et al. (2021). Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major U.S. cities. Gronlund, C. J. (2014). Racial and socioeconomic disparities in heat related health outcomes: A review of evidence. Chakraborty, T. C., et al. (2023). Residential segregation and outdoor urban moist heat: evidence from a national-scale analysis. Science of The Total Environment Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D4a. Optional file upload to show the steps of any calculations. D5. Please describe any ways in which low-income or marginalized communities/households were engaged in the creation of this project proposal. (150 word limit) Through initial site assessments and tree requests in our current heat island planting project, we heard directly from residents that one free tree was not enough to achieve meaningful cooling and stormwater benefits. Many expressed the need for multiple trees to shade homes, lower energy bills, and improve neighborhood comfort. W e also engaged key stakeholders with deep community ties, including Amy Eckberg (Orange County Sustainability Manager), Melony Gilles (Sustainability Projects Analyst), and Kimya Swann (Executive Director, United Voices of Efland Cheeks). Their insights helped us understand the environmental and social challenges these neighborhoods face, including high summer heat, low canopy, and flooding risks. This feedback shaped our Pay-W hat-You-Can planting model and site selection criteria. Moving forward, we will collaborate with residents on tree species selection, planting locations, and maintenance planning to ensure community voices directly guide project implementation. D6. Please describe any potential negative side effects of the project and describe the steps you are taking/will take to eliminate or minimize these impacts to any low- income or marginalized communities/households. (200 word limit) W hile tree planting projects have overwhelmingly positive outcomes, we recognize potential unintended impacts on low-income or marginalized households and have taken steps to address them. Potential impacts include: -Maintenance burden: Residents may worry about costs or labor for watering and care. -Root or infrastructure conflicts: Poorly sited trees could interfere with driveways, sidewalks, or utilities. -Allergies or safety concerns: Certain species may trigger allergies or be perceived as unsafe near homes. Mitigation measures: -W e use a collaborative planning process with residents to determine species and placement, prioritizing low-maintenance native trees with non- invasive roots. -W e provide clear, simple care instructions and offer follow-up support during the establishment period. -W e select species that are safe for residential planting, avoiding high- allergen and brittle-wood varieties. -W e coordinate with utility companies and follow siting best practices to prevent infrastructure conflicts. -Our Pay-W hat-You-Can model ensures cost is never a barrier, and planting is voluntary with informed consent. By actively engaging residents and applying best-practice forestry guidelines, we ensure the project’s benefits are realized while avoiding or minimizing potential burdens. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D7. Are the impacted residents already aware of the potential positive and negative impacts of your project and the steps you are taking? If not, please describe your plan to engage with them and how you will act based on their input. (200 word limit) Some residents are already aware of the potential benefits and considerations of our planting projects through past participation in Trees for the Triangle programs and community events. However, for new neighborhoods identified through our heat island and tree equity mapping, we will implement a proactive engagement plan before planting begins. Our approach includes: -Direct outreach via door-to-door visits, flyers, and emails to explain both the benefits (shade, cooling, flood mitigation, air quality improvement) and potential responsibilities (watering, seasonal care). -Community meetings and site visits to discuss species options, placement preferences, and any concerns about maintenance, safety, or infrastructure. -Transparent communication on our Pay-W hat-You-Can model and voluntary participation to ensure no financial or social pressure to join. -Feedback integration, where resident input on tree type, location, and timing directly shapes the planting plan. By creating space for dialogue and incorporating local knowledge, we ensure residents feel informed, respected, and confident about the project. This process builds trust, reduces potential conflicts, and ensures the environmental and social benefits are tailored to community priorities. D8. During and after the project, what will your continued engagement with the impacted community be? (200 word limit) Our commitment to impacted communities extends well beyond the initial planting. During the project, we will maintain regular contact with participating households to provide guidance on tree selection and placement then watering, mulching, and seasonal care. This includes optional phone access to TftT staff to troubleshoot issues. TftT has a policy to replace any dead tree in perpetuity. W e will also invite residents to community tree care workshops that cover pruning basics, storm preparation, and the broader benefits of a healthy canopy. These workshops will be hosted in or near participating neighborhoods to ensure accessibility. After the project, we will continue engagement through: -A volunteer network to provide peer-to-peer support. -Inclusion in our newsletter and event invitations to foster connection with the wider Trees for the Triangle community. This community serves as a resource for tree care along with fostering a greater sense of stewardship over our natural resources. By maintaining consistent relationships, we ensure that trees thrive, residents feel supported, and the project’s environmental and social benefits grow over time. Our goal is to transform each planting into a long- term partnership that empowers communities to take pride in and advocate for their expanding tree canopy. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D9. Please describe any other aspect of your project that is relevant to Social Justice, Environmental Justice and Racial Equity. (200 word limit) All people deserve a healthy environment, and our project is deeply rooted in the principles of social justice, environmental justice, and racial equity. By targeting underserved Orange County neighborhoods with low Tree Equity Scores, high Social Vulnerability Index ratings, and pronounced Urban Heat Island effects, we ensure that residents - many of whom are in low-income or racially marginalized communities - gain equitable access to the benefits of a healthy tree canopy. This focus on environmental justice directly improves public health, energy resilience, and climate adaptation, particularly for households most vulnerable to heat stress, flooding, and poor air quality. Through our Pay- W hat-You-Can model, cost is never a barrier, and residents collaborate in species selection, placement, and maintenance planning. Beyond immediate environmental gains, the project fosters community empowerment. W e involve residents, local leaders, and partner organizations in decision-making, ensuring the work reflects neighborhood priorities and builds long-term stewardship. TftT is committed to upholding and strengthening a culture of equity, diversity, and inclusion in our operations, partnerships, and Board governance. These values directly inform how we design and deliver projects that close gaps in environmental access while fostering pride, ownership, and lasting community benefit. For more, see our JEDI statements: https://www.treesforthetriangle.org/our-core-beliefs--treethos.html Criterion 2 - Emissions Reduced This criterion has a maximum score of 4 points (out of a total of 26 points). Please see the Grant Project website for estimation tools and the Background and Information document for information about technical assistance. Applicants are encouraged to ask for clarification and technical assistance as early as possible and no later than the posted deadline for questions. D10a. Does your project save on electricity (solar projects should say "yes" to this)? Yes Is your project a solar project? No How many kW h are saved per year? (Solar projects should provide the number of kW h produced per year and should enter 25 for the number of years that the project will have an impact.) Criterion 2_ kW h CO2e (3).xlsx D10b. Does your project save on gasoline? No Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D10c. Does your project save on natural gas? No D10d. Does your project save on food waste? No D10e. Is your project nature-based? (For example, community gardens, tree plantings, soil health practices, and prairie restoration projects) Yes If you have a nature-based project, these tools can help you calculate greenhouse gas emission reductions: COMET-Planner W ebsite (http://comet-planner.com) Best for: Soil health, forest restoration, grasslands, conservation practices. Select state and land management practice - Get GHG reduction estimates per acre - User-friendly | - USDA- backed | - No login required i-Tree Tools W ebsite (https://www.itreetools.org) Best for: Tree planting, urban forestry, community canopy projects. Note: Requires tree species and location W ant help estimating your project’s emissions reductions? Orange County staff can assist! Email: sustainability@orangecountync.gov for support. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 How does your nature-based project reduce greenhouse gas emissions and what metrics can you share that help quantify this impact? (Example metrics are the number of acres restored and the number of trees planted) Tree Planting: -Number of Trees: 200 trees -Carbon Dioxide (CO ) Sequestration per Tree: 0.060 metric tons CO /year -Total CO Sequestered by Trees: 200 × 0.060 = 12.0 metric tons CO /year Seedling Distribution: -Number of Seedlings Distributed: 2,000 seedlings -CO Sequestration per Seedling: 0.060 metric tons CO /year (mature equivalent) -Total CO Sequestered by Seedlings: 2,000 × 0.060 = 120.0 metric tons CO /year Combined Total CO Sequestration: -From Trees: 12.0 metric tons CO /year -From Seedlings: 120.0 metric tons CO /year -Total: 132.0 metric tons CO /year -40 year Total: 132 metric tons CO2/year x 40 years = 5,280 metric tons CO2 sequestered Direct and Indirect GHG Emission Reduction: -Direct: CO sequestration from planted trees and distributed seedlings. -Indirect: Increased shade reduces urban heat island effects and cooling demand for homes and public spaces, lowering energy consumption and associated emissions. -Educational Impact: 4 community workshops will increase climate literacy, helping residents adopt additional nature-based climate solutions, compounding long-term carbon reduction benefits. The emissions reduction calculated is based on tree modeling which assumes sequestration continues through the functional life of the tree, typically 40–100 years for native species, depending on maintenance and site conditions. 40 was used as a conservative estimate. D10f. Does your project reduce emissions in some way other than what was listed above? No Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D11. How many TOTAL metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions will your project reduce or avoid OVER THE LIFETIME of the project? [Please use the number(s) calculated above (row 4 of tables), or provide your own estimate if those figures were insufficient or if you have additional measures to include.] 5280 D12. W ere any additional calculations required in coming up with the number entered above (this includes adding two or more numbers together)? No D13a. How many YEARS will this emissions reduction take place as a result of your project? Please consider the expected lifetime of the technology/program/impact, etc. Note: Solar installations should enter 25 years as the project lifetime. 40 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D13b. Please explain how you came up with the number of years in the previous question and add any other relevant information. Please list any sources used. (200 word limit) W e estimate the emissions reduction will take place ov er minimum 40 years. This is a conservative estimate used in urban forestry. U.S. Forest Serv ice – Urban Tree Longev ity Roman, L. A., & Scatena, F. N. (2011). Street tree survival rates: Meta- analysis of previous studies and application to a field survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.008 Finding: W hile some urban street trees die within the first 10 years, well-sited and maintained trees often live 40+ years in cities, with much longer lifespans in less constrained suburban/rural conditions. U.S. Forest Serv ice – i-Tree Carbon Modeling Guidance U.S. Forest Service. (n.d.). i-Tree Eco Carbon Storage and Sequestration. Retrieved from https://www.itreetools.org/ Finding: i-Tree modeling assumes sequestration continues through the functional life of the tree, typically 40–100 years for native species, depending on maintenance and site conditions. Nowak et al., USDA Forest Serv ice (2002) Nowak, D. J., & Crane, D. E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116(3), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7 Finding: Mature urban trees provide consistent sequestration over decades, with lifespan averages of 40–60 years for many species in urban forestry studies. D14. Please describe the location of the emissions reduction. W here would fossil fuels have been burned if not for your project? For projects that reduce electricity usage or that generate solar energy, feel free to state “grid-tied electricity reduction” if you cannot determine the location of emissions produced from electric power generation. (200 word limit) By reducing the urban heat island effect through strategic tree planting, the program will decrease the need for air conditioning in the homes. This reduction in cooling demand translates to lower electricity consumption and, consequently, a decrease in fossil fuel use associated with electricity generation. The emissions reductions primarily impact local and regional air quality by mitigating the need for additional electricity production, which would otherwise rely on fossil fuels. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D15. Please describe any other aspect of your project that is relevant to the amount of emissions that it will reduce or avoid. (250 word limit) In addition to their primary roles in providing shade and sequestering CO2, the trees planted offer several systemic environmental and public health benefits that contribute to overall emissions reduction: • Temperature Regulation: By providing shade and cooling, trees help mitigate the urban heat island effect. This cooling effect reduces the need for air conditioning, which in turn lowers energy consumption and fossil fuel use for electricity generation. • Air Quality Improvement: Trees play a crucial role in improving air quality by filtering particulate matter and other pollutants from the air. This purification of the air can help reduce respiratory problems among community members, leading to better public health outcomes. • Stormwater Management: The tree roots and the soft, non-compacted soil around them absorb and manage stormwater runoff. This absorption helps reduce the risk of flooding and erosion, and the water is then transpired back into the atmosphere, contributing to local and regional hydrological balance. • Educational Impact: The program includes an educational component where residents learn about the environmental benefits of trees, air quality, and energy efficiency. This knowledge encourages citizens to adopt energy-efficient practices at home and in their communities. As they share what they've learned, they can influence their community and peers to also engage in sustainable practices, amplifying the program's impact beyond individual homes. Criterion 3 - Efficient Use of Funds This criterion has a maximum score of 4 pts (out of a total of 26 pts). Please see the Grant Project website for further guidance and the Background and Information document for information about technical assistance. Applicants are encouraged to ask for clarification and technical assistance as early as possible and no later than the posted deadline for questions. D16. Is this a new project? Yes The table below is meant to support the calculations of your project's impact; however, it may not capture all aspects of a project. If the table is not able to capture the correct numbers for your project, please enter "N/A" in those specific fields and upload an additional document with this information. Project Impact (do not enter a $ in front of the numbers) Criterion 3 - Project Impact (New) (7).xlsx Optional file upload for project impact calculations. D17. Are there additional impacts? No Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D18. Please describe any avoided financial costs or savings related to the project and over what period of time those costs will be avoided/reduced. (250 word limit) Cost Efficiency in Planting: -By leveraging Trees for the Triangle’s expertise and volunteer network, our planting costs are significantly lower than hiring commercial landscapers. All plantings are supervised by a certified arborist, ensuring proper species selection, planting, and care, which reduces long-term replacement costs. Our all-inclusive cost per planted tree includes community outreach, education, and follow-up support. Energy Savings: -As the 200 planted trees mature, they will shade homes and community spaces, reducing summer cooling needs and lowering winter heating demand. These energy savings will persist for decades. Stormwater Management Savings: -Mature trees capture thousands of gallons of stormwater annually, reducing runoff, flood risk, and strain on municipal systems (i-Tree Tools, USFS). This provides measurable cost savings for communities, especially in flood-prone areas. Health-Related Savings: -Increased canopy coverage improves air quality and reduces heat exposure, lowering medical costs associated with respiratory and heat- related illnesses (USFS). Ecological Value: -According to the National Tree Benefit Calculator (based on i-Tree), a mature yard tree provides approximately $100 in combined annual benefits, including energy savings, air quality improvement, stormwater capture, carbon storage, and property value enhancement. For 200 trees, this equates to about $20,000 in annual benefits once established. Period of Benefit: -These avoided costs and savings will grow as trees mature and continue for an estimated 40+ years (USFS, Nowak et al., 2002). Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D19. Does your project accelerate or expand on existing programs that already show positive impact? (150 word limit) Yes. This project expands on Trees for the Triangle’s proven Pay-W hat- You-Can tree planting model, successfully implemented in other Triangle counties, by establishing it as a targeted initiative in Orange County neighborhoods with low Tree Equity Scores, high heat exposure, and elevated social vulnerability. The grant will enable us to refine and expand outreach, engagement, and educational materials that explain the benefits of urban trees, tree care best practices, and how residents can participate. These resources can be adapted for use in other counties, allowing the program to grow into a regional model. The success of this expanded initiative - measured through canopy gains, community participation, and resident satisfaction - will strengthen our case for future funding to replicate the program in additional underserved areas. By building on a track record of impact, this project accelerates environmental and social benefits while ensuring long-term sustainability across the Triangle. D20. Does your project take advantage of other funding sources? If yes, please describe. (150 word limit) TftT actively seeks additional funding sources through our Board of Directors’ Grants Coordinator and Grants & Fundraising Committee to strengthen and expand our programs. Our Pay-W hat-You-Can model generates some revenue from well-resourced residents who “pay it forward,” but this alone is not sufficient to fully fund program management, community workshops, and seedling giveaways. This grant is critical to ensuring that financial barriers are eliminated for lower-income households in Orange County while enabling us to scale impact through targeted planting in high-need areas. It will also help us deliver high-quality educational materials and maintain professional arborist oversight to ensure tree survival and long-term benefits. W ith many federal environmental programs experiencing funding reductions and restrictions, local initiatives like ours can fill the gap - ensuring that urban canopy expansion continues equitably. Success from this grant will also position us to attract future philanthropic, corporate, and government funding for ongoing and regional expansion. D21. W ould your proposed project help you to take advantage of funding from other sources besides this grant in the future? (250 word limit) Yes. This project is designed to use this grant as a springboard for attracting additional funding from diverse sources. W hile this grant is the primary funding source for the Orange County Pay-W hat-You-Can program, it will provide measurable outcomes - such as the number of trees planted, seedlings distributed, workshops delivered, and canopy improvements in high-need areas - that can be showcased to future funders. W e will leverage these results in applications to other local, regional, and national grant programs, and in outreach to corporate sponsors, foundations, and individual donors. Our communications strategy includes sharing project impact through our website, social media, newsletter, and community events to build credibility and donor confidence. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D22. Please describe any other aspect of your project that is relevant to the efficient use of grant funds. (150 word limit) The efficient use of grant funds is a core value of the Orange County Pay- W hat-You-Can program. W e maximize cost-effectiveness through extensive volunteer involvement, enabling us to reach high-need neighborhoods while keeping labor costs low. Our Board includes skilled environmental and community engagement professionals, including Certified Arborists, who contribute expertise. Bulk purchasing of native trees and seedlings reduces unit costs, and partnerships with local suppliers allow us to secure in-kind donations of compost, mulch, and other materials. Community workshops will be hosted in donated spaces, as much as possible, to avoid venue costs. Our streamlined project management process ensures minimal administrative overhead while maintaining professional planting standards. This strategic approach ensures every grant dollar directly supports planting, education, and the removal of financial barriers for lower-income households. Criterion 4 - Capacity of Applicant This criterion has a maximum score of 3 pts (out of a total of 26 pts). D23. Has your organization completed projects of this type in the past? Yes If so, what funds were used? (100 word limit) Trees for the Triangle has successfully completed similar projects that expand tree canopy, improve environmental equity, and provide community education. Past funding sources have included individual donations from residents, “pay-it-forward” contributions from our Pay-W hat-You-Can model, and support from local businesses. W e have also secured local and regional grants, including community climate action funds and private foundation awards, to scale these efforts. These funding streams have enabled us to plant thousands of trees across the Triangle, demonstrating our capacity to deliver impactful, cost-effective, and community-supported urban forestry projects. D24. Have you completed similar projects in the past and successfully met the proposed budgets and timelines? Yes Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Please provide a description of similar past achievements or projects and evidence of successfully meeting proposed budgets and timetables. (150 word limit) Trees for the Triangle has a strong track record of delivering tree planting and giveaway projects on time and within budget. Tree + Seedling Giveaway: Sponsored by a local insurance company, we successfully organized and executed a drive-thru style event that distributed 132 seven-gallon trees to residents. W e have also sourced, potted, and distributed 1,071 seedlings at community tabling events across the Triangle. Residential Tree Planting: Since our founding 8 years ago, we have implemented our Pay-W hat-You-Can model, which includes an online request form, site assessment, collaborative species and placement selection, and coordinated planting with volunteers. This model has resulted in 2,223 trees planted to date. Both initiatives demonstrate our ability to secure funding, engage volunteers, manage logistics, and meet project deadlines, while delivering measurable environmental and social benefits to the communities we serve. D25. If you are proposing to collaborate with other organizations on this project, please describe their relevant experience to the project and/or the target population. (150 word limit) N/A D26. Have your collaborators/partners completed projects of this type in the past? N/A (not applicable) Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D27. Please describe any other relevant expertise or capacity to carry out the project in your application. (250 word limit) Trees for the Triangle has the expertise, partnerships, and infrastructure to successfully execute this project. Our Executive Director, Dave Klemp, is a Certified Arborist accredited by the International Society of Arboriculture, ensuring that all site assessments, species selection, and plantings are done to the highest professional standards. Chelsie Azevedo, MPH, Operations & Programs Manager, brings 8 years of experience as a workshop facilitator and educator and 5 years in program management, including financial tracking, grant reporting, work planning, and stakeholder coordination. Jean-Luc Duvall, Volunteer & Events Coordinator, has a background in grassroots organizing and community campaigns, ensuring strong volunteer engagement. W e excel at training volunteers for site assessments and plantings, enabling us to scale impact while maintaining quality. Our Board of Directors and advisors bring deep expertise in sustainability, conservation, stormwater management, environmental health, and organizational leadership: Megan Pendell, Board Chair – Sustainability Specialist, Durham County Adam DaLand, Treasurer/Advisor - VP of Finance, Retired Richard Carroll, Grants Coordinator – W orld W ildlife Fund Conservationist Ellie Kinsey, Education Coordinator – Stormwater Education Specialist, Durham County George McDowell, Board Advisor – Director, Cary Tree Archive Dan Nifong, Board Member - Principal, Investors Management Corporation Archana Lamichhane, PhD, Board Member – Health Scientist, US EPA Jeff Benavides, Board Chair – Director of Portfolios Performance, US Green Building Council Jordyne Krumroy, Board Member – Director of Partnerships, W elcoming America This collective expertise ensures operational efficiency, technical excellence, and community trust. D28. Please describe any prior challenges you have encountered in past grants and how you have worked through them. How may this impact this proposed project? (150 word limit) In previous grant projects with organizations like the Arbor Day Foundation and One Tree Planted, we encountered challenges related to tree mortality caused by environmental factors beyond the control of our tree planting experts. To address these issues, we implemented comprehensive strategies including training volunteers on proper tree planting techniques, utilizing tree guards for protection, and replacing any trees that did not survive. For this project, we’ll continue using these successful practices, focusing on strict adherence to our planting guidelines, regular monitoring, and ongoing maintenance. Our aim is to ensure that every tree we plant grows into a thriving canopy, providing long-lasting sustainability and maximizing the environmental benefits of our work. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D29. Please describe one to three key partnerships/ collaborations that add the most value to the success of the proposed project. (250 word limit) Trees for the Triangle has established partnerships that will directly contribute to the success of this project: 1. Orange County Government - W e are currently collaborating on two initiatives: -Shade for Schools: Planting 260 native trees and distributing 2,000 seedlings during educational seminars in schools across the county. -Heat Island Reduction: Targeted tree planting in high-priority neighborhoods, including Efland and Mebane, identified through county heat mapping and social vulnerability data. These collaborations provide a strong foundation for site selection, community engagement, and resource alignment for the proposed project. 2. Chapel Hill Public Library – W e have engaged with Dale Morgan, Environmental Educator, to plan an Arbor Day event featuring a public educational workshop on tree benefits and a community tree planting. This partnership expands our reach to urban residents and strengthens public awareness of environmental equity issues. D30. If this project is not selected for funding in this round, what other funding might be used to support it within the next 5 years? Unknown (please describe) Please describe what other funding might be used to support it within the next 5 years. (150 word limit) If this project is not selected for funding in this round, TftT will actively seek alternative funding sources to support its completion within the next 5 years. W hile we cannot guarantee a specific timeline for project completion without this funding, we will explore various avenues including grants from other environmental organizations, corporate sponsorships, and community fundraising efforts. Our commitment to the project remains steadfast, and we will persist in our efforts to secure the necessary resources to realize our goals. Criterion 5 - Local Economic Development This criterion has a maximum score of 3 points (out of a total of 26 points). D31. How many Orange County residents are employed by your organization? W e have 3 employees and 0 are Orange County residents. This grant will help fund the hiring of a part-time employee who lives in Orange County who is dedicated to this project and other pay-what-you-can planting. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D32. W hat project materials will be purchased from sources within Orange County or North Carolina? W hat percent of the total materials do these represent? (200 word limit) TftT is committed to sourcing as many project materials as possible from Orange County. Most, if not all, of the trees will be purchased from local nurseries within Orange County, Durham County, and W ake County. For any additional materials, tools, mulch, and related items that we cannot obtain locally, we will ensure they are sourced from within North Carolina. Our goal is to maximize local procurement and support the Triangle region's economy, aiming for 100% of materials to be sourced within North Carolina. D33. Please describe any other aspect of your project that is relevant to local economic development. (100 word limit) The Orange County Pay-W hat-You-Can program supports local economic development by creating paid opportunities for contractors to conduct site assessments and tree plantings - work that directly improves community infrastructure and resilience. W e already have interest from Chapel Hill- based applicants eager to enhance the local canopy. The project also strengthens the green economy by sourcing trees, seedlings, and materials from local nurseries and suppliers whenever possible. In addition, volunteer engagement and skill-building opportunities foster environmental stewardship and workforce awareness in natural resources, landscaping, and arboriculture, helping connect residents with potential career pathways in the growing field of urban forestry. Criterion 6 - Amount and Duration of Engagement This criterion has a maximum score of 3 pts (out of a total of 26 pts). D34. Please describe the target population to benefit from the project. (200 word limit) The Orange County Pay-W hat-You-Can Tree Planting Program is designed to benefit residents in neighborhoods with low Tree Equity Scores, high heat exposure, and elevated social vulnerability, as identified by county heat maps, Social Vulnerability Index data, and Tree Equity Score canopy gap analysis. The primary beneficiaries are low- and moderate-income households, including many Black, Indigenous, Hispanic/Latino, and other residents of color, who have historically had less access to the environmental and health benefits of tree canopy. By removing financial barriers, we ensure these households can receive professionally planted native trees, which provide shade, reduce energy costs, improve air quality, and mitigate flooding. Indirect beneficiaries include neighbors who share in cooling and stormwater benefits, local volunteers who gain skills in urban forestry, and the broader community through improved climate resilience and ecological health. By targeting the areas most impacted by climate and environmental inequities, this program delivers measurable environmental, health, and social benefits to those who need them most, while fostering long-term community pride and stewardship of the urban canopy. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D35a. How many people will benefit from your project in one year? (This is the same number from row 8 in the D16 table above) 1350 D35b. Please describe how you arrived at this number. (200 word limit) W e estimate approximately 1,350 unique individuals will benefit from this project in the first year, based on participation in tree planting, seedling distribution, and educational workshops, adjusted to avoid double-counting. Tree Planting (100 trees): Each tree is planted at a residential or community site. Using the U.S. Census Bureau’s average household size of 2.42, this reaches about 242 people directly. Including immediate neighbors who benefit from shade, cooling, and flood mitigation increases this to ~500 people. Seedling Distribution (1,000 seedlings): Assuming 2 seedlings per household, 500 households × 2.42 people per household = 1,210 people. W orkshops & Community Events (2 total): W e expect about 20 participants per event, for a total of 40 attendees. Some overlap with other groups is expected, so we conservatively count ~25 unique additional individuals. After applying a 20% overlap reduction across all groups, we arrive at ~1,350 unique beneficiaries in year one. This includes direct participants - those receiving trees, seedlings, or training - and indirect beneficiaries, such as neighbors sharing environmental benefits. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D36. Please describe how you will engage with and/or educate project participants and/or the community. (250 word limit) Our engagement strategy combines direct outreach with community-based partnerships to ensure we reach residents in the neighborhoods most in need of increased tree canopy. W e will connect with potential participants through community forums, presentations to HOA boards, referrals from partner organizations, tabling at local events, and door-to-door outreach in targeted areas. This personal, place-based approach builds trust and ensures residents understand the benefits of participating. Education is delivered through interactive workshops hosted in accessible community spaces such as libraries, community centers, and neighborhood gathering areas. These sessions will follow adult learning principles, emphasizing real-world relevance, interactive dialogue, and practical application. Participants will learn about the environmental, economic, and health benefits of trees; proper planting and care techniques; and how to advocate for continued canopy growth in their community. By combining technical instruction with hands-on demonstrations, we ensure participants not only understand the content but feel confident applying it. Every household receiving a tree or seedling will also receive printed and digital care guides to reinforce learning and promote long-term tree health. This blended outreach and education approach empowers residents to become active stewards of their environment, creating a ripple effect of environmental awareness and action that extends well beyond the project’s duration. D37. How will you measure the success of that engagement or educational effort? (200 word limit) W e will measure the success of our engagement and educational efforts through a combination of participation tracking, knowledge assessment, and qualitative feedback. Tracking Participation: W e will maintain records of households receiving trees, individuals receiving seedlings, and attendees at each workshop. This will provide a clear count of direct beneficiaries and help us assess reach across target neighborhoods. Knowledge Gains: At workshops, we will administer brief pre- and post-session questions to measure changes in participants’ understanding of tree benefits, planting techniques, and care practices. This will allow us to quantify learning outcomes while keeping assessments short and accessible. Responsive Facilitation: Recognizing the importance of reducing survey fatigue, our facilitators will use real-time observation, participant questions, and interactive discussions to gauge comprehension and adjust instruction accordingly. This ensures educational content meets participants at their current level and builds practical skills within a reasonable range. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D38. Is there anything else you would like to add about the benefits of your project, how much community engagement and/or education it will create, or how long it will last? (150 word limit) This project delivers lasting environmental, social, and educational benefits well beyond the grant period. By planting 100 native trees per year and distributing 1,000 seedlings annually, we create a living legacy that will provide shade, reduce heat, improve air quality, and manage stormwater for 40+ years. Our engagement strategy ensures deep community involvement, from initial outreach through ongoing tree care. Residents will help select species and planting locations, attend interactive workshops, and receive resources to support long-term maintenance. This participatory approach builds ownership and fosters environmental stewardship. The educational component extends impact by equipping participants with practical skills and knowledge they can share with neighbors, multiplying the benefits over time. Even after the project concludes, the trees will continue to enhance property values, improve health outcomes, and strengthen climate resilience - making this a high-value, community-driven investment in Orange County’s environmental future. Criterion 7 - Time to Complete This criterion has a maximum score of 3 points (out of a total of 26 points). D39. How long will it take your project to complete and demonstrate the positive impacts you describe? (200 word limit) It will take 2 years to complete the full project, but we will have educational events, seedlings giveaways, and tree planting underway in the first 6-12 months of the grant period, depending on timing of grant funding vs. tree planting season of October through April. Section 5. Attachments D40. Applicant Organization’s Budget Please complete your organization budget using the template that can be found here. Please submit the budget in PDF form. Applicant Organization’s Budget File Upload Organization_Annual_Budget.xlsx_-_Organization_Annual_Budget_1.pdf D41. Applicant Project Budget Please complete your project budget using the template that can be found here. Please submit the budget in PDF form. Applicant Project Budget File Upload Project_Budget.xlsx_-_Project_Budget_1.pdf Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 D42. IRS Federal Form 990 or 2024 Tax Returns A copy of the applicant organization’s most recent IRS Form 990 or IRS Tax Return is required to determine eligibility. The specific form depends upon the applicant organization’s financial activity. Review the IRS guide for more details. For Form 990-N (e-postcard) filers, include a copy of the postcard, with the organization’s application materials. �� Redact/black out all sensitive information such as social security numbers, personal home addresses, and personal phone numbers from all individuals before uploading these documents. IRS Federal Form 990 or 2024 Tax Returns File Upload Tax_Year_2023_From_990_07-23_to_06-24.pdf D43. If awarded, a Certificate of Liability Insurance (COI) will be required of the organization. Organizations that have not already provided an EFT and W -9 to Orange County will need to do so. Certificate of Liability Insurance A copy of the applicant organization’s current certificate, from the organization’s insurance carrier. Table 1 below outlines insurance types and minimums required, for each jurisdiction. If exempt from W orker’s Compensation compliance, include a statement explaining why, with the applicant organization’s application materials. The copy of the applicant organization’s current certificate must include all information in the highlighted sections and be worded exactly as presented in the example linked here. NOTE: Proof of insurance is not required at the time of application submission. If your agency is approved for funding, documentation of insurance must be provided to the jurisdiction awarding the funding when the contract is awarded. The insurance certificate should reflect the funding jurisdiction as an additional insured party and certificate holder and provide coverage for the duration of the funding period (two years, beginning as early as October 1, 2024). If proof of insurance can only be written for one year, an update will be required for all ongoing projects. Renewal certificates must be sent to the jurisdiction 30 days prior to any expiration date, cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. NOTE: Upon request, insurance requirements may be reviewed on a case by case basis by the County. Please contact the staff identified on the Submission Requirements on Page 12 if you have questions or would like to request a review of your insurance requirements. The table below includes guidance regarding the forms of liability insurance and minimum policy amounts that are required if a grant is awarded. Table 1. Forms of Liability Insurance and Minimum Policy Amounts Required (1).xlsx I understand that if awarded, my organization will have to submit a Certificate of Liability Insurance (COI). A W -9 and an EFT (Electronic Funds Transfer) are also required if applicable. checked D44. List of Board of Directors (if applicable) Board of Directors.xlsx Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 W e welcome your thoughts on how to improve our application! Please add those thoughts below. You are about to submit your application. Orange County Sustainability will not accept any applications after the due date. Correcting mistakes or making edits after your application has been submitted is not allowed. For any technical questions about the platform, please visit THIS W EBSITE. To complete and submit your application click ‘Submit'. Your email service provider will sometimes try to predict incoming spam mail on your behalf and filter it into your spam folder before you ever see it. If you're not receiving expected emails from notifications@email.submittable.com, you will want to safelist the address to help ensure that these emails reach you. Safelisting an email address means explicitly telling your email service provider that emails from notifications@email.submittable.com are not spam or junk mail. How can I safelist notifications from Submittable?Orange Internal Form Score n/a Internal Review - GHG Data Are the numbers in D16 (row 8) and D35a the same? Yes Project Impact Lifetime (years) 40 Project Impact Lifetime (years) Comments They noted 100 years in the section about electricity saved but 40 years in Criterion 3. GHG Reduction (Annual, metric tons CO2e) 132 GHG Reduction (Annual, metric tons CO2e) Comments This annual reduction would only be true once the seedlings were mature. GHG Reduction (Lifetime, metric tons CO2e) 5280 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 GHG Reduction (Lifetime, metric tons CO2e) Comments This does not include the electricity savings calculated. I did not add it in, though, because I think the 5280 figure is generous because not all seedlings will survive and the seedlings will have limited impact until they are mature. # of people served in one year 1350 # of people served in one year comments GHG Data Complete checked GHG Data Comments Lifetime reduction is based on 40 years. Please note that estimated reduction does not account for the following: Not all seedlings will survive and the seedlings will have limited impact until they are mature. Other Staff Comments BOCC & CFE Review Data and Notes Overall Comments from HRC (BOCC Report) This project combines beautification of neighborhoods with practical use of trees and plantings to reduce flooding and water damage to homes, and includes community education, consideration of income levels and the use of library/community center. Concerns: W hile it is highly likely that this project will support communities that are often marginalized, it cannot be guaranteed. A great climate project, but certainly not prioritizing or addressing social justice or racial equity concerns in any direct way, including recognition of specific communities. Very general about its impact, though as with all tree planting initiatives, a valuable response to climate mitigation. The requesting program itself lacks diverse leadership, doesn't appear to have significant experience with a project like this, and leaves doubt about whether it would successfully be able to engage and work collaboratively in and with communities of color and low resourced communities. No specific plan was shared to target certain populations, but data shows that target populations will benefit. Recommended Application checked CFE Recommended Funding (enter $0 if not recommending) 30000 Application Ranking 3 Overall Comments from CFE Meeting (BOCC Report) Targeted approach to planting trees in disadvantaged communities and educating residents. Plan in place to engage and educate tree owners and keep trees alive. Strong partnerships. Deducted $7,000 for admin costs and $3,000 to round down. Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Notes for Applicant Contracting Award Amount (Format as follows: $XX,XXX.XX) $30,000.00 Does this applicant have a W 9 and EFT in the system? Yes Correctly Submitted Contracting Documents: Contracting Status Vendor Number Grant Project Implementation GHG Reduction (Annual, metric tons CO2e) / GHG Reduction (Lifetime, metric tons CO2e) have adjusted. unchecked Post Award Status Comments Award Tracker Notes Grant Project Completion Payment Complete.unchecked Final Reported GHG Reduction (Lifetime, metric tons CO2e) Final Reported GHG Reduction (Lifetime, metric tons CO2e) Comments Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 FY 2018-19 Agency Budget Applicant Organization's Budget (Most recent complete calendar year or fiscal year) Starting date: 07/01/2024 Ending Date: 03/31/2025 ORGANIZATION NAME: Trees for the Triangle ORGANIZATION REVENUE Actual Total for Previous Year Estimated Total for Current Year Projected Total for Next Year Percent Change Private Donations ($11,500) ($36,000) ($120,000) 233% Generated Revenue (fees, sales, etc)($1,000) ($6,000) ($10,000) 67% Local Government Grants (Please list individually): Orange County Climate Action - Shade for Schools OCSD ($-  ) ($38,000) ($12,000) -68% Orange County - Free Trees OC (Heat Island Mitigation)($-  ) ($23,000) ($-  ) -100% ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Other Government Grants: Local Government ($142,500) ($62,500) ($150,000) 140%State Government Federal Government (CDBG/HOME/etc.) Private Foundation Grants (Truist, TCF) Other Revenue: Interest ($2,530) ($5,000) 97.63% Total Organization Revenue ($155,000) ($168,030) ($297,000) 77% AGENCY EXPENSES Compensation ($-  ) ($113,000) ($160,000) 42% Rent & Utilities ($-  ) ($7,200) ($7,200) 0% Supplies & Equipment ($-  ) ($41,000) ($100,000) 144% Travel & Training ($-  ) ($5,400) ($10,000) 85% Other Expenses: Events ($-  ) ($8,000) ($15,000) 88% Total Agency Expenses ($-  ) ($174,600) ($292,200) 67% SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) FOR PERIOD:($155,000) ($(6,570) ($4,800) 173% Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 FY 2018-19 Program Budget Project Budget PROJECT NAME: Use only if project is ongoing Use for all projects PROJECT REVENUE Actual Total for Previous Year Estimated Total for Current Year Projected Total for Next Year Percent Change Private Donations ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Project Generated Revenue:($-  ) ($-  ) ($12,000) 0 Local Government Grants (Please list individually): Orange County Community Climate Action Grant ($-  ) ($-  ) ($50,000) 0 ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Other Government Grants Local Government ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 State Government ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Federal Government (CDBG/HOME/etc.)($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Private Foundation Grants ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Other Revenue: please briefly explain here ($-  ) ($-  ) ($-  ) 0 Total Project Revenue ($-  ) ($-  ) ($62,000) 0 PROJECT EXPENSES Labor ($-  ) ($-  ) ($25,000) 0 Overhead / Admin ($-  ) ($-  ) ($5,000) 0 Trees ($-  ) ($-  ) ($15,000) 0 Tools and Materials ($-  ) ($-  ) ($5,000) 0 Marketing and Outreach ($-  ) ($-  ) ($5,000) 0 Total Project Expenses ($-  ) ($-  ) ($55,000) 0 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) FOR PERIOD:($-  ) ($-  ) ($7,000) 0 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date:January 20, 2026 Action Agenda Item No.6-a SUBJECT: Community Climate Action Grant (CCAG) –FY 2025-26 Project Selection DEPARTMENT: County Manager ATTACHMENT(S): 1. CCAG 2025-26 Project Descriptions, Scoring and Comments 2. CCAG Project Status Summary Including Estimated GHG Reductions 3. PowerPoint Presentation 4. INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Eckberg; (919) 245-2626 PURPOSE: 1. To receive the grant project funding recommendations from the Commission for the Environment (CFE) and the overall scores and comments from the CFE and Human Relations Commission (HRC) for the FY 2025-26 Orange County Community Climate Action Grant Program; and 2. Approve funding for the recommended Community Climate Action Grant projects for FY 2025-26 as outlined in the table below and further described in Attachment 1. BACKGROUND: As part of the FY 2019-20 budget, the Orange County Board of Commissioners (BOCC) established the Orange County Community Climate Action Fund to accelerate climate mitigation efforts. The Fund supports the Board’s commitment to ambitious targets, including a transition to 100% renewable energy by 2050. The Climate Action Plan further builds on this commitment by defining additional targets and identifying the actions and strategies needed to achieve them. For the FY 2025-26 funding cycle, $267,750 was allocated to general applicants to support climate action projects designed to benefit Orange County residents both socially and financially. The Board did not approve any climate funding for schools this year. In alignment with BOCC direction, the selection process for awarding funds was conducted through the Community Climate Action Grant program. Sixteen (16) applications were received this year from applicants representing nonprofits, small businesses and public organizations whose total requests add up to $619,095. Grant applications were completed over the summer and reviewed by both the Commission for the Environment (CFE) and the Human Relations Commission (HRC) in fall 2025. The following is a rank-order summary table of the combined project scoring and recommendations for funding. More details on each project are available in Attachment 1. 1Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Project Summary Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 1 Table Ministries, Inc. Twin Creeks Farm Expansion A partnership between Wildflower Lane Farm and Table to use unused land at an undeveloped Orange County Park (Twin Creeks) to increase locally sourced, nutritious food to feed children served by Table. $50,000 $30,000 21.57 2 Urban Sustainability Solutions, Inc. High-School Students Installing Riparian Buffers Installation of sustainable stormwater management measures in historically underserved communities utilizing public HS teachers and students in a certified green infrastructure training program to implement these measures, especially in areas affected by tropical storm Chantal. $52,000 $38,000 21.35 3 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC Weatherization & Disaster Resilient Housing Weatherization repairs for 11 homes $150,000 $0 20.56 4 Town of Carrboro Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program This initiative reduces energy burdens in Carrboro by providing residents with education, home energy audits, energy-saving kits, and guided access to rebates and electrification upgrades through trained community leaders, resulting in lower bills for over 230 households. $29,145 $29,145 20.31 5 Trees for the Triangle Tree Planting and Education The project will plant 200 trees, distribute 2,000 seedlings, and offer workshops on climate-resilient tree care to expand the native tree canopy in low-equity, climate-vulnerable neighborhoods through a Pay- What-You-Can planting program. $50,000 $30,000 20.10 6 Red Hawk Farm, LLC Renewable Energy Infrastructure for the Future of Farms 52-acre organic farm supplying high-quality produce year-round using soil-based greenhouse production and technical growing strategies seeks funds to transition from fossil-fuel dependence to renewable energy systems by replacing single phase with 3- phase power to enable solar installation. $30,000 $30,000 19.74 7 Upstream Works — on behalf of Carolina Community Compost Carolina Community Compost Supplies, services, outreach materials and labor to expand a compost program into 7 new neighborhoods and 1 church $30,478 $21,300 19.70 2Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Project Summary Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 8 Weaver Community Housing Association Energy Efficient Windows Installation Replacement of windows in 7 residential units with energy efficient models $61,352 $61,305 18.64 9 Hillsborough Community Garden Solar powered community garden irrigation Solar-powered well on nearby church property to provide sustainable, cost-effective irrigation that remains functional during drought or emergencies $18,000 $0 18.27 10 Solar Equity Inc. St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project Installation of a 23.4kW solar array on the roof of St. Joseph’s CME Church, located in Chapel Hill’s Northside Neighborhood $28,000 $28,000 17.83 11 Pee Wee Homes Native focused landscaping for 10 dignified and affordable tiny homes Native, climate-resilient landscaping for 10 affordable tiny homes of formerly homeless residents $4,000 $0 17.68 12 Town of Chapel Hill Extension of E- Bike Lending Library Program Extension of a previously successful E-bike program for an additional 8-12 months to offer E-bike experiences to more residents and staff. $25,920 $0 16.58 13 Town of Carrboro E-Bike Voucher and Education Program Pilot program to provide 20 income-eligible residents with vouchers for free e-bikes, reducing transportation insecurity and emissions. $33,400 $0 16.09 14 The Arts Center Cellular Blinds for The Arts Center Installation of highly efficient interior cellular shades on windows to boost the energy performance of the building $21,800 $0 15.73 15 Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health, and Equity Climate-informed Prenatal Care Introductory climate health education sessions for health professionals to reduce climate-related pregnancy risks, with a focus on extreme heat. $10,000 $0 15.29 16 Bluestem Community NC Rooftop Solar Installation for Bluestem Community NC Installation of a 9.628 kW solar array with battery backup on a new barn extension to move toward net- zero energy use $25,000 $0 14.67 Total $619,095 $267,750 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The $267,750 funding for Community Climate Action Grants for FY 2025- 26 is designed to identify and support impactful projects, with a focus on accelerating meaningful action on the urgent issue of climate change. ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: This item supports:  GOAL 1: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CLIMATE ACTION OBJECTIVE 1. Identify the priorities and resources necessary to implement the Climate Action Plan. OBJECTIVE 3. Improve educational opportunities for County staff and community members on climate action and available resources to advance climate action projects.  GOAL 2: HEALTHY COMMUNITY 3Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 OBJECTIVE 7. Invest in services and programs that improve the health and quality of life of the community (e.g., recreation and public open spaces, arts, etc.) RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board: 1. Receive the grant project funding recommendations from the Commission for the Environment for the FY 2025-26 Orange County Community Climate Action Grant program; and 2. Approve funding for the recommended Community Climate Action Grant projects for FY 2025-26. 4Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 P.O. Box 8181 * Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278  Telephone: (919)245‐2625   Attachment 1 Date:     January 20, 2026  To:     Board of Orange County Commissioners  From:    Amy Eckberg, Sustainability Programs Manager  RE: Orange County Community Climate Action Grant – Project Descriptions, Scoring, and Comments for  General Applicants  For the 2025‐26 funding cycle of the Orange County Community Climate Action Grant program, $267,750 was  budgeted to support climate action projects that benefit Orange County residents both socially and financially.   In response to feedback from the Board in previous years, the Sustainability team continues its outreach efforts to  publicize the grant opportunity to broaden the applicant pool and increase community awareness of this impactful  climate action program. Staff conducted targeted outreach to local businesses, community groups, and nonprofits  through email campaigns, social media, newsletters, and other promotional media. Our applicant pool continues to  grow and diversify every year as a result of these efforts.  The Community Climate Action grant program received a  total of 16 applications in this round whose total requests added up to $619,095.   Following the scoring and eligibility guidelines established by the Board of Orange County Commissioners (BOCC), the  applications were reviewed and scored by the Commission for the Environment (CFE) and the Human Relations  Commission (HRC). The BOCC asked the Human Relations Commission to score the applications on the Social Justice  and Racial Equity criterion, as this pertains to their expertise and because the racial representation of the CFE as a  whole does not reflect the racial diversity of Orange County.   The following is a rank‐order summary table of the combined project scoring and funding recommendations. A full  table showing the scores for each project on each of the 7 scoring elements is included in the Appendix.  Rank Applicant Name Project Name Project Summary Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 1 Table Ministries, Inc. Twin Creeks Farm Expansion A partnership between Wildflower Lane Farm and Table to use unused land at an undeveloped Orange County Park (Twin Creeks) to increase locally sourced, nutritious food to feed children served by Table. $50,000 $30,000 21.57 2 Urban Sustainability Solutions, Inc. High-School Students Installing Riparian Buffers Installation of sustainable stormwater management measures in historically underserved communities utilizing public HS teachers and students in a certified green infrastructure training program to implement these measures, especially in areas affected by tropical storm Chantal. $52,000 $38,000 21.35 5Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Project Summary Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 3 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC Weatherization & Disaster Resilient Housing Weatherization repairs for 11 homes $150,000 $0 20.56 4 Town of Carrboro Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program This initiative reduces energy burdens in Carrboro by providing residents with education, home energy audits, energy-saving kits, and guided access to rebates and electrification upgrades through trained community leaders, resulting in lower bills for over 230 households. $29,145 $29,145 20.31 5 Trees for the Triangle Tree Planting and Education The project will plant 200 trees, distribute 2,000 seedlings, and offer workshops on climate-resilient tree care to expand the native tree canopy in low-equity, climate-vulnerable neighborhoods through a Pay- What-You-Can planting program. $50,000 $30,000 20.10 6 Red Hawk Farm, LLC Renewable Energy Infrastructure for the Future of Farms 52-acre organic farm supplying high-quality produce year-round using soil-based greenhouse production and technical growing strategies seeks funds to transition from fossil-fuel dependence to renewable energy systems by replacing single phase with 3- phase power to enable solar installation. $30,000 $30,000 19.74 7 Upstream Works — on behalf of Carolina Community Compost Carolina Community Compost Supplies, services, outreach materials and labor to expand a compost program into 7 new neighborhoods and 1 church $30,478 $21,300 19.70 8 Weaver Community Housing Association Energy Efficient Windows Installation Replacement of windows in 7 residential units with energy efficient models $61,352 $61,305 18.64 9 Hillsborough Community Garden Solar powered community garden irrigation Solar-powered well on nearby church property to provide sustainable, cost-effective irrigation that remains functional during drought or emergencies $18,000 $0 18.27 10 Solar Equity Inc. St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project Installation of a 23.4kW solar array on the roof of St. Joseph’s CME Church, located in Chapel Hill’s Northside Neighborhood $28,000 $28,000 17.83 11 Pee Wee Homes Native focused landscaping for 10 dignified and affordable tiny homes Native, climate-resilient landscaping for 10 affordable tiny homes of formerly homeless residents $4,000 $0 17.68 12 Town of Chapel Hill Extension of E- Bike Lending Library Program Extension of a previously successful E-bike program for an additional 8-12 months to offer E-bike experiences to more residents and staff. $25,920 $0 16.58 6Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Project Summary Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 13 Town of Carrboro E-Bike Voucher and Education Program Pilot program to provide 20 income-eligible residents with vouchers for free e-bikes, reducing transportation insecurity and emissions. $33,400 $0 16.09 14 The Arts Center Cellular Blinds for The Arts Center Installation of highly efficient interior cellular shades on windows to boost the energy performance of the building $21,800 $0 15.73 15 Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health, and Equity Climate-informed Prenatal Care Introductory climate health education sessions for health professionals to reduce climate-related pregnancy risks, with a focus on extreme heat. $10,000 $0 15.29 16 Bluestem Community NC Rooftop Solar Installation for Bluestem Community NC Installation of a 9.628 kW solar array with battery backup on a new barn extension to move toward net- zero energy use $25,000 $0 14.67 Total $619,095 $267,750 Below is a set of expanded details for each proposed project, in rank order per HRC and CFE scoring. The quoted text  was pulled directly from various sections of the submitted applications. Also summarized below are the comments  from the HRC and the CFE, along with scores and funding recommendations.  #1 Ranked Project – Table Ministries, Inc – Twin Creeks Farm Expansion  Applicant (Collaborators): Wildflower Lane Farm  Funding Requested: $50,000  Recommended Funding Level: $30,000  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 21.57  Project Description: A partnership with Wildflower Land Farm at Twin Creeks, an undeveloped Orange County Park.  The expansion funding sought will cover labor. TABLE provides weekly nutritious food to 1,125 children and plans to  expand service using organic produce grown through supplies, tools and equipment. The Twin Creeks partnership will  supply produce at a fraction of retail cost, enabling TABLE to feed more children and support local farmers.  Project Benefits: Increasing local sourcing at Twin Creeks will provide children with fresher, healthier produce while  strengthening revenue for small farmers. Reducing food miles from thousands to just five significantly lowers  emissions and environmental impacts. The project also promotes a sustainable, pesticide‐free food system that  improves long‐term health and climate outcomes. The project reduces food miles and waste, improves soil health,  supports pollinators, and reduces runoff—strengthening local climate and air quality.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE strongly supports this project but provided partial funding since the group has access  to other funding sources. HRC scored them #1. There is a high Orange County economic impact (for families who  receive food; all food grown locally) and social justice component.  #2 Ranked Project – Urban Sustainability Solutions – High‐School Students Installing Riparian  Buffers  Applicant (Collaborators): Burt’s Bees, Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ)  Funding Requested: $52,000  Recommended Funding Level: $38,000  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 21.35  7Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Project Description: Urban Sustainability Solutions will train teachers and youth in certified green‐infrastructure  curricula through afterschool and weekend programs. The program will end with planting projects to restore storm‐ damaged riparian buffers, with funds covering training stipends and implementation. Field work will include stream  cleanup, buffer restoration, and planting live tree stakes to stabilize stream banks, especially those damaged by  tropical storm Chantal.  Project Benefits: Restoring low‐lying areas with native vegetation will reduce erosion, stabilize soils, and protect  downstream low‐income communities from future storm impacts. These plantings will improve water quality in Bolin  Creek by filtering pollutants, increasing biodiversity, and boosting carbon sequestration. The project also safeguards  Jordan Lake’s drinking water by preventing sediment and nutrient contamination.  Reviewer Comments:  The CFE supports this request because it has strong educational and community connections. USS has a solid, proven  track record. The HRC appreciated that the community would be involved in this project.  The CFE deducted $14,000  that was for the administration of other grants.   #3 Ranked Project – Habitat for Humanity – Weatherization & Disaster Resilient Housing  Applicant (Collaborators): N/A  Funding Requested: $150,000  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 20.56  Project Description: Habitat for Humanity of Orange County will expand its Home Repair program to address  increased weatherization needs caused by Tropical Storm Chantal, in 11 older, vulnerable homes.   Project Benefits: Integrating weatherization into essential home repairs will lower utility bills for low‐income  households and reduce approximately 11 metric tons of emissions annually. Improved insulation, HVAC systems, and  windows will enhance indoor air quality, comfort, and resilience to extreme weather. Local contractors and materials  will support the regional economy while extending the lifespan of affordable housing.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE recognizes and values the proposed project and Habitat’s longstanding contributions to the  community. The CFE also noted that Habitat has access to a variety of funding sources and has previously received support  through this program ($300k). Given the limited funds available, the CFE is thoughtfully distributing resources across a range of  organizations, including smaller groups that may particularly benefit at this time. The HRC supports the initiative due to its  positive impact on low‐income residents and noted that additional information regarding how beneficiaries would be identified  or prioritized would be helpful.  #4 Ranked Project – Town of Carrboro – Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program    Applicant (Collaborators): Preserving Home Inc., Hope Renovations  Funding Requested: $29,145  Recommended Funding Level: $29,145  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 20.31  Project Description: This initiative trains community leaders to assist more than 230 high‐burden households in  cutting energy costs through education, home energy audits, hands‐on projects, and connections to weatherization,  rebates, and efficiency upgrades.  Project Benefits: Energy audits and education will help residents cut utility costs, lower emissions, and make  informed decisions about efficiency upgrades. The program is expected to reduce town‐wide energy use by over  249,000 kWh annually, equivalent to 67.4 metric tons of CO₂e. Households that act on recommendations will benefit  from long‐term energy savings and increased home value.  Reviewer Comments: Carefully thought‐out project with good metrics to measure success. Applicant is well suited to  carry out the project and the costs are relatively modest. Community outreach and partnerships are positive  8Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 features. Education and monitoring are part of lowering energy cost/uses. Simple concept that targets low‐ and  middle‐income residents. Short turnaround time (6 months‐year).  #5 Ranked Project – Trees for the Triangle – Tree Planting and Education  Applicant (Collaborators): Triangle Prescribed Burn Association (Through NC Cooperative  Extension), Bluestem Community NC  Funding Requested: $50,000  Recommended Funding Level: $30,000  Total Score (Out of 25 pts): 20.10  Project Description: Trees for the Triangle will expand the native tree canopy in low‐equity, climate‐vulnerable  neighborhoods through a Pay‐What‐You‐Can planting program. The project will plant 200 trees, distribute 2,000  seedlings, and offer workshops on climate‐resilient tree care. This approach improves flood resilience, reduces  emissions, and empowers residents to build greener, healthier communities.  Project Benefits: Planting 200 native trees and distributing 2,000 seedlings will reduce flooding, sequester carbon,  cool neighborhoods, and improve air quality in vulnerable areas. Workshops will equip residents to care for their  trees, extending benefits across the county. These efforts advance climate equity by expanding green space and  strengthening community resilience for future storm events.  Reviewer Comments: Targeted approach to planting trees in disadvantaged communities and educating residents.  Plan in place to engage and educate tree owners and keep trees alive. Strong partnerships. Deducted funding to  reduce administrative costs.  #6 Ranked Project – Red Hawk Farm – Renewable Energy Infrastructure  Applicant (Collaborators): Piedmont Electric Cooperative  Funding Requested: $30,000  Recommended Funding Level: $30,000  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 19.74  Project Description: Red Hawk Farm (52‐acre organic farm supplying high‐quality produce year‐round using soil‐ based greenhouse production and technical growing strategies) seeks funds to transition from fossil‐fuel dependence  to renewable energy systems to strengthen resilience and reduce operating costs. This shift will also advance climate‐ conscious farming and help peers adopt similar solutions.  Project Benefits: Bringing three‐phase power to this farm will enable solar and geothermal systems that significantly  reduce greenhouse gas emissions and eliminate major energy costs. Savings can be reinvested in staff wages and  shared as a model for other regional farms seeking climate‐smart operations. The project also strengthens Orange  County’s agricultural sector and expands hands‐on learning opportunities for students and community partners.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE was very impressed by this grant. They applied last year and were turned down but  took advice and recommendations to make this year's grant request very appealing with stronger, more realistic  business/farm application than last year's with increased partnerships/collaborators.  The HRC acknowledged  wanting to encourage businesses like this which support our regional county education systems,    #7 Ranked Project – Upstream Works/Carolina Community Compost – Compost Collection in 7  neighborhoods and 1 church   Applicant (Collaborators): Compost Now  Funding Requested: $30,478  Recommended Funding Level: $21,300  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 19.7  9Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Project Description: Carolina Community Compost will expand its successful neighborhood‐led composting model to  7 additional Orange County neighborhoods and one church, significantly reducing landfill waste and greenhouse gas  emissions and supplying compost to community gardens in low‐income areas, improving soil health and access to  fresh food. A part‐time Compost Ambassador will support outreach and education for one new 24/7 CompostNow  bin placed near a low‐income neighborhood, helping lay the groundwork for broader countywide composting.  Project Benefits: Expanding to new neighborhoods will divert 77 tons of food waste and cut 52 tons of CO₂e,  annually, and reduce landfill fees for local governments. Participating households also gain climate education,  stronger social connections, and healthier habits. The compost produced will support community gardens, benefiting  more than 700 additional residents with fresh food and improved soil.  Reviewer Comments: Interesting project with qualified organizers that have implemented a highly successful  program with expansion opportunities. This project can easily accommodate partial funding. CFE is interested in  seeing how it works for its potential for broader adoption and impact.  #8 Ranked Project – Weaver Community Housing Association– Energy Efficient Window  Installation    Applicant (Collaborators): Farewell Earth   Funding Requested: $61,352  Recommended Funding Level: $61,305  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 18.64  Project Description: Weaver Community Housing Association (WCHA), an affordable community housing co‐ operative, seeks funding to replace 55 aging, inefficient, and leaking windows across seven cooperative housing  units. The project benefits 24 residents, including eight children, and will be completed with a long‐time local  contractor.  Project Benefits: Replacing failing, single‐pane windows will reduce energy waste, lower utility bills, and improve  ventilation and indoor air quality for seven low‐income households. The upgrades will prevent mold, moisture  intrusion, and long‐term structural damage. These custom windows protect a unique affordable housing asset while  improving comfort and reducing climate‐related energy burdens.  Reviewer Comments: Fully funded because other organizations who applied for CCAG have access to other funding.  #9 Ranked Project  – Hillsborough Community Garden – Solar Powered Community Garden  Irrigation  Applicant (Collaborators): N/A  Funding Requested: $18,000  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 18.27  Project Description: The Hillsborough Community Garden needs a reliable water supply independent of the town  system to remain functional during drought or emergencies. A proposed solar‐powered well on nearby church  property would provide sustainable, cost‐effective irrigation. This solution also models environmentally friendly  practices for other community gardens.  Project Benefits: All the produce grown by the Hillsborough Community Garden (HCG) for the past three years has  gone to food insecure families via PORCH Hillsborough, providing needed fresh vegetables to over 1000 people. At  our previous location in 2024 we grew and distributed more than 1500 pounds of fresh produce.  Reviewer Comments: CFE members support the idea of community gardens that feed others in need but were not  convinced a well would be needed in downtown Hillsborough. CFE also felt the GHG estimates might be too high.   The HRC mentioned that they would like to see communication with the communities supported by PORCH.  10Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 #10 Ranked Project – SolarEquity – St. Joseph’s CME Church Solar Project  Applicant (Collaborators): Saint Joseph's Christian Methodist Episcopal Church  Funding Requested: $28,000  Recommended Funding Level: $28,000  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 17.83  Project Description: SolarEquity proposes installing a 23.4 kW solar array on St. Joseph’s CME Church to reduce utility  costs for a historically Black, low‐income community. The system will save the church over $1,200 annually and offset  about 150 metric tons of carbon emissions over 25 years.  Project Benefits: The solar array will cut nearly 6 metric tons of CO₂ annually and save the church over $1,200 per  year in utility costs, easing financial burdens on a historically low‐income congregation. Over its lifespan, the system  will offset nearly 150 metric tons of emissions and strengthen energy resilience. As a visible community institution,  the church’s adoption of solar will also inspire broader climate action within the Northside community.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE supports this grant request so that St. Joseph's can complete their original request  from 2024 to install solar panels after a roof repair. Once the panels are in place, St. Joseph's community (and  Northside in general) would have a place to go for shelter, cooling, etc. during extreme events and power losses. The  HRC noted the project’s value in supporting long‐time residents in an historically underserved community while offering  opportunities for cost savings and future community benefit.  #11 Ranked Project – Pee Wee– Native Focused Landscaping for 10 Tiny Homes  Applicant (Collaborators): N/A  Funding Requested: $4,000  Recommended Funding Level:  $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 17.68  Project Description: This project will add native, climate‐resilient landscaping to 10 affordable tiny homes for  formerly homeless residents. The plantings will reduce runoff, support biodiversity, and lower emissions from  mowing while beautifying shared spaces. With community input and local expertise, the initiative supports county  climate goals and long‐term stewardship.  Project Benefits: Native landscaping at 10 tiny homes will reduce mowing‐related emissions, improve stormwater  absorption, and support pollinators and local biodiversity. The project engages residents directly in planning and  stewardship, building climate awareness and community pride. These improvements also reduce flooding risks and  strengthen ecosystem resilience in underserved neighborhoods.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE loved the idea of the native plant gardens but felt the cost per person was high. The  HRC appreciated that the project targeted low‐income recipients with environment impact.  #12 Ranked Project – Town of Chapel Hill – Extension of E‐bike Lending Library Program  Applicant (Collaborators): The Bicycle Chain, East Coast Electric Speed Shop, and Trek  Funding Requested: $25,920  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 16.58  Project Description: The Town of Chapel Hill launched a free e‐bike lending program in April with enough federal  funding to cover a 1‐year pilot. We currently offer 18 E‐bikes for public use at two local bike shops and 23 E‐bikes for  staff at more than 7 Town facilities. This program has been very successful and we are seeking support to extend this  program another 8‐12 months to offer E‐bike experiences to more residents and staff.  11Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Project Benefits: The E‐bike lending library gives residents free, short‐term access to e‐bikes, reducing car trips,  emissions, and transportation costs. Exposure to multiple bike types helps users discover accessible, healthier travel  options. The program also supports local bike shops and increases community adoption of low‐emission mobility.  Reviewer Comments: GHG reduction is based on total project lifetime, but the funding request is only for an  additional year of operations. The CFE was concerned about the sustainability of the e‐bike program long‐term and  what would happen if the project ended due to lack of funding. Most of the reduction in gasoline is tied to people  purchasing their own e‐bikes and assumptions (e.g., number of e‐bikes purchased) are not substantiated with data.  The HRC commented that having targeted communities that are low‐income or partnership ideas to target minority  populations could be considered.  #13 Ranked Project – Town of Carrboro – E‐bike Voucher and Education Program  Applicant (Collaborators): Back Alley Bikes, Shift Chapel Hill‐Carrboro  Funding Requested: $33,400  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 16.09  Project Description: This pilot will provide 20 income‐eligible residents with vouchers for free e‐bikes, reducing  transportation insecurity and emissions. Modeled on successful programs in Raleigh and Durham, the initiative will  include safety gear, outreach, and workshops.  Project Benefits: Providing e‐bike vouchers to low‐income residents will replace car trips, reducing over 100 metric  tons of CO₂ and improving air quality. The program expands mobility for people who cannot afford cars or electric  vehicles, improving access to work, healthcare, and daily needs. Supporting local bike shops keeps economic benefits  within Carrboro.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE and HRC scores were closely aligned and suggested a comparatively lower return relative to  other proposals. Reviewers noted that the cost per recipient is relatively high and would be most impactful if the program  encouraged broader e‐bike adoption. The HRC also emphasized the importance of meaningful community engagement and  raised questions about the extent to which the program would reach communities of color or advance social justice and racial  equity goals.  #14 Ranked Project – The ArtsCenter – Cellular Blinds  Applicant (Collaborators): N/A  Funding Requested: $21,800  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 15.73  Project Description: The ArtsCenter plans to install high‐efficiency cellular shades to improve building energy  performance. Installation will be done by a long‐standing local, veteran‐owned business.  Project Benefits: Installing high‐efficiency cellular shades will reduce heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer,  lowering energy use throughout the building. Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that cellular shades outperform  vinyl blinds, delivering up to 20% heating energy savings and up to 15% total heating‐and‐cooling energy savings  compared to homes without shades.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE did not feel this was a high priority project, given limited funding and the quality of  other applications. The HRC rank was low and GHG reductions were minimal. The Arts Center has been a grant  recipient in the past and the CFE wanted to give others an opportunity.  12Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 #15 Ranked Project – Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health and Equity – Climate Informed  Prenatal Care  Applicant (Collaborators): UNC Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal Fetal Medicine Division, Orange County Health Department (OCHD)  Funding Requested: $10,000  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 15.29  Project Description: This project will deliver climate‐health training to maternity care providers, focusing on reducing  pregnancy risks from extreme heat. It will develop evidence‐based materials, co‐design content with clinicians and  patients, and provide a one‐hour educational webinar.  Project Benefits: Training maternity‐care providers in climate‐related health risks will improve prenatal counseling  and help pregnant patients protect themselves during extreme heat events. The program will enhance provider  capacity and support Orange County’s heat‐action goals. Long‐term benefits include reduced pregnancy  complications, improved maternal health equity, and greater climate preparedness across the healthcare system.  Reviewer Comments: The CFE loves this project idea but it does not align with the goal of GHG reductions for the  CCAG. This heat mitigation project aligns nicely with the Heat Action Plan that is in development. The HRC  appreciated that from a social justice side, this is an innovative idea to support low income families early on in life,  addressing health disparities stratified by income & race.  #16 Ranked Project – Bluestem Community NC– Rooftop Solar Installation  Applicant (Collaborators): N/A  Funding Requested: $25,000  Recommended Funding Level: $0  Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 14.67  Project Description: Bluestem Community plans to install a 9.628 kW solar array with battery backup on a new barn  extension to move toward net‐zero energy use. The project aligns with the organization’s conservation‐focused  mission and supports its community and ecological programming. The south‐facing roof will host 16 solar panels to  meet current and future energy needs.  Project Benefits: Installing on‐site solar with battery storage will move Bluestem toward net‐zero operations and  eliminate dependence on fossil‐fuel‐generated electricity. The system will reduce emissions from equipment and  vehicle charging while lowering long‐term utility costs. Savings can be reinvested in community programming,  accessibility improvements, and environmental stewardship.  Reviewer Comments: This project doesn't seem to meet the objective of working towards racial equity or working  for the broader community within Orange County.  Appendix: Full Scoring Table:  Final Rank Applicant Name Project Name Amount Requested 1. Average Social Justice and Racial Equity (0-6 pts) 2. Average Emissions Reduced (0-4 pts) 3. Average Efficient Use of Funds (0-4 pts) 4. Average Capacity of Applicant (0-3 pts) 5. Average Local Economic Development (0-3 pts) 6. Average Amount and Duration of Engagement (0-3 pts) 7. Average Time to Complete (0-3 pts) Total Average Score 1 Table Ministries, Inc. Twin Creeks Farm Expansion $50,000 5.67 2.80 2.70 2.70 2.50 2.60 2.60 21.57 2 Urban Sustainability Solutions, Inc. High-School Students Installing Riparian Buffers $52,000 4.17 3.36 3.36 2.73 2.27 2.73 2.73 21.35 13Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Final Rank Applicant Name Project Name Amount Requested 1. Average Social Justice and Racial Equity (0-6 pts) 2. Average Emissions Reduced (0-4 pts) 3. Average Efficient Use of Funds (0-4 pts) 4. Average Capacity of Applicant (0-3 pts) 5. Average Local Economic Development (0-3 pts) 6. Average Amount and Duration of Engagement (0-3 pts) 7. Average Time to Complete (0-3 pts) Total Average Score 3 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC Weatherizati on & Disaster Resilient Housing $150,000 4.83 2.45 2.18 3.00 2.64 2.55 2.91 20.56 4 Town of Carrboro Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program $29,145 3.86 2.64 3.09 2.73 2.55 2.64 2.82 20.31 5 Trees for the Triangle Tree Planting and Education $50,000 3.29 3.27 3.18 3.00 2.00 2.64 2.73 20.10 6 Red Hawk Farm, LLC Renewable Energy Infrastructure for the Future of Farms $30,000 2.83 3.64 3.73 2.73 1.82 2.45 2.55 19.74 7 Upstream Works — on behalf of Carolina Community Compost Carolina Community Compost $30,478 4.33 2.73 2.82 2.82 1.82 2.45 2.73 19.70 8 Weaver Community Housing Association Energy Efficient Windows Installation $61,352 4.00 2.27 2.64 2.91 1.82 2.09 2.91 18.64 9 Hillsborough Community Garden Solar powered community garden irrigation $18,000 4.17 2.30 3.00 2.10 2.10 2.00 2.60 18.27 10 SolarEquity Inc. St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project $28,000 4.29 2.36 2.45 2.55 1.45 2.27 2.45 17.83 11 Pee Wee Homes Native focused landscaping for 10 dignified and affordable tiny homes $4,000 4.86 1.18 2.00 2.73 2.27 2.00 2.64 17.68 12 Town of Chapel Hill Extension of E-Bike Lending Library Program $25,920 2.67 2.45 2.45 2.55 1.73 2.00 2.73 16.58 13 Town of Carrboro E-Bike Voucher and Education Program $33,400 3.00 2.09 1.64 2.82 1.91 1.82 2.82 16.09 14 The Arts Center Cellular Blinds for The ArtsCenter $21,800 2.00 1.55 2.00 2.82 2.45 2.09 2.82 15.73 15 Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health, and Equity Climate- informed Prenatal Care $10,000 3.29 0.45 2.27 2.73 1.64 2.27 2.64 15.29 16 Bluestem Community NC Rooftop Solar Installation for Bluestem Community NC $25,000 1.67 2.09 2.36 2.18 1.45 2.36 2.55 14.67   14Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Attachment 2 - Community Climate Action Grant Project Status Fiscal Year Project  Organization Award Amount Estimated Annual GHG Reduction metric tons CO2e Project Status 19‐20 Solar for Schools (a) Orange County Schools$150,00025In progress19‐20 Solar for Schools (b) Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools$150,000194In progress19‐20 Supplemental Weatherization Orange County$150,00022 In progress19‐20 LED Light Campaign  Orange County$19,2724COMPLETED20‐21  Tree Planting Program Town of Chapel Hill$40,000 880 (pounds)COMPLETED20‐21  Electric Vehicle Charging Station Town of Chapel Hill$18,500 6COMPLETED20‐21  Cedar Falls Park LED Light Conversion  Town of Chapel Hill$128,057 9  COMPLETED20‐21  Cane Creek Reservoir 352.4 kW Solar OWASA$75,000 110COMPLETED20‐21  Water heater replacements NAACP$122,100 26 COMPLETED20‐21  Solar Panels on Affordable Habitat Homes Habitat for Humanity of Orange County  $95,000 16 COMPLETED21‐22 Low Income HVAC Replacement Rebuilding Together of the Triangle$113,00034 COMPLETED21‐22 Neighborhood Energy Resiliency ProjectNC Sustainable Energy Association$90,00010 COMPLETED21‐22 Food Waste Monitor Eno River Farmer’s Market$4,00019COMPLETED21‐22 Food Waste Monitor Town of Carrboro$3,76519COMPLETED21‐22 Bike Rack and EV Charging Station The ArtsCenter$17,0006COMPLETED21‐22 203 Project Solar Array and Green RoofTown of Carrboro$40,567See FY 22‐23COMPLETED21‐22 Solar for Schools (b) Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools$250,00See FY 19‐20In progress22‐23  Habitat Rooftop Solar Habitat for Humanity$100,000 22COMPLETED22‐23  Weatherization Rebuilding Together of the Triangle $25,0005COMPLETED22‐23  Food Waste Monitors Eno River Farmers’ Market$4,500 19COMPLETED22‐23  203 Solar Project Town of Carrboro$40,575 21COMPLETED22‐23  Fleet Electrification Project Town of Chapel Hill$50,000 33 In progress22‐23  Solar Roof The ArtsCenter$55,000 27COMPLETED22‐23  Emission Reductions Through HVAC Replacements Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools $275,075 147 In progress23‐24 Supplemental weatherization to home repair projects Habitat for Humanity$55,0007COMPLETED23‐24 Green infrastructure and apprenticeship program for Orange County Schools Urban Sustainability Solutions$69,1565COMPLETED23‐24 Rooftop solar Hillsborough United Church of Christ $10,0007COMPLETED23‐24 Rooftop solar Binkley Baptist Church$49,0365COMPLETED23‐24 Rooftop solar on Peach Apartments EMPOWERment$61,62312In progress15Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Attachment 2 - Community Climate Action Grant Project Status (a) Installing two 54 panel bi‐facial solar pedestals and fast charger to power electric school buses (b) Northside Elementary School solar installation project is complete; working on leveraging direct pay funding to be able to complete a solar installation project on Morris Grove Elementary now. Fiscal Year Project  Organization Award Amount Estimated Annual GHG Reduction metric tons CO2e Project Status 23‐24 Installation of gardens, terrace and greenhouse, plant‐based diets Club Nova$37,2275COMPLETED23‐24 LED light campus changeover CHCCCS$94,01424COMPLETED23‐24 54‐panel solar panel pedestal with battery storage and EV charging station (a) Orange County Schools$188,02936In progress24‐25  Shade For Schools Trees for the Triangle$50,000 172In progress24‐25  Rooftop Solar on Habitat Homes Habitat for Humanity$50,00022COMPLETE24‐25  Peach Apartments Solar Project Empowerment$19,800 11In progress24‐25  Nature Based Solutions at the Confluence Natural Area Eno River Association $22,600 23 In progress24‐25  St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project  Solar Equity $50,0006 In progress24‐25  Orange County Green Infrastructure Workforce Development Program  Urban Sustainability Solutions $58,100 9 COMPLETE24‐25  Food Forest Jubilee Healing Farm$12,000 14In progress16Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Community Climate Action Grant (CCAG)Project Selection FY25-26January 20, 202617Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 CCAG BackgroundCommunity Climate Action Grant:•Established in FY 2019–20to support community led climate action •In its sixth year, with increasing impact, demand, and community engagement•Complements and advances Orange County’s Climate Action Planby funding projects that reduce emissions, build resilience, and deliver community co-benefits•Board-approved scoring and eligibility guidelines•Projects prioritized for social justice and racial equity benefits18Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 CCAG Eligibility Guidelines•Non-profits, public entities, and small businesses• All funds spent in Orange County•Must have legal standing to receive funds•Ongoing projects eligible if expanding or accelerating•Replacement and repair projects are eligible if not likely to be funded within 5 years19Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 CCAG Scoring Criteria• 26-point scale•Social Justice and Racial Equity (6pts) •GHG emissions reduced (4 pts)•Efficient use of Funds (4 pts)•Capacity of Applicant (3 pts)•Local Economic Development (3 pts)•Amount and Duration of Engagement (3 pts)•Time to complete (3 pts)*All applications are reviewed and scored by the Commission for the Environment and the Human Relations Commission 20Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 New This Year•Community Outreach–Signage– Promoted at Ag Summit– Targeted email list–Various media•New Grant Portal Launched–16 applications!•Diverse and Innovative Projects–solar, nature-based, energy efficiency, micro-mobility• $619,095 in grant funding requested ($267,750 available)21Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Advisory Board Recommendations:• 8 projects recommended for full/partial funding• Partial funding was applied when projects:• Were designed to be scalable• Could leverage other funding sources• Applicants indicated they could successfully proceed with partial funding22Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 1 Table Ministries, Inc. Twin Creeks Farm Expansion $50,000 $30,000 21.57 2 Urban Sustainability Solutions, Inc. High-School Students Installing Riparian Buffers $52,000 $38,000 21.35 3 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC Weatherization & Disaster Resilient Housing $150,000 $0 20.56 4 Town of Carrboro Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program $29,145 $29,145 20.31 5 Trees for the Triangle Tree Planting and Education $50,000 $30,000 20.10 6 Red Hawk Farm, LLC Renewable Energy Infrastructure for the Future of Farms $30,000 $30,000 19.74 7 Upstream Works — on behalf of Carolina Community Compost Carolina Community Compost $30,478 $21,300 19.70 8 Weaver Community Housing Association Energy Efficient Windows Installation $61,352 $61,305 18.64 9 Hillsborough Community Garden Solar powered community garden irrigation $18,000 $0 18.27 10 Solar Equity Inc. St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project $28,000 $28,000 17.83 11 Pee Wee Homes Native focused landscaping for 10 dignified and affordable tiny homes $4,000 $0 17.68 12 Town of Chapel Hill Extension of E-Bike Lending Library Program $25,920 $0 16.58 13 Town of Carrboro E-Bike Voucher and Education Program $33,400 $0 16.09 14 The Arts Center Cellular Blinds for The Arts Center $21,800 $0 15.73 15 Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health, and Equity Climate-informed Prenatal Care $10,000 $0 15.29 16 Bluestem Community NC Rooftop Solar Installation for Bluestem Community NC $25,000 $0 14.67 Total Total Amount Requested $619,095 Total Amount Recommended $267,750 Rank Applicant Name Project Name Amount Requested Recommended Funding Total Score (out of 26) 1 Table Ministries, Inc. Twin Creeks Farm Expansion $50,000 $30,000 21.57 2 Urban Sustainability Solutions, Inc. High-School Students Installing Riparian Buffers $52,000 $38,000 21.35 3 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC Weatherization & Disaster Resilient Housing $150,000 $0 20.56 4 Town of Carrboro Carrboro Energy Efficiency Program $29,145 $29,145 20.31 5 Trees for the Triangle Tree Planting and Education $50,000 $30,000 20.10 6 Red Hawk Farm, LLC Renewable Energy Infrastructure for the Future of Farms $30,000 $30,000 19.74 7 Upstream Works  on behalf of Carolina Community Compost Carolina Community Compost $30,478 $21,300 19.70 8 Weaver Community Housing Association Energy Efficient Windows Installation $61,352 $61,305 18.64 9 Hillsborough Community Garden Solar powered community garden irrigation $18,000 $0 18.27 10 Solar Equity Inc. St. Joseph's CME Church Solar Project $28,000 $28,000 17.83 11 Pee Wee Homes Native focused landscaping for 10 dignified and affordable tiny homes $4,000 $0 17.68 12 Town of Chapel Hill Extension of E-Bike Lending Library Program $25,920 $0 16.58 13 Town of Carrboro E-Bike Voucher and Education Program $33,400 $0 16.09 14 The Arts Center Cellular Blinds for The Arts Center $21,800 $0 15.73 15 Carolina Advocates for Climate, Health, and Equity Climate-informed Prenatal Care $10,000 $0 15.29 16 Bluestem Community NC Rooftop Solar Installation for Bluestem Community NC $25,000 $0 14.67 Total Total Amount Requested is $619,095Total Amount Recommended is $267,750 23Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 2025 Project HighlightsDrakeford LibraryRooftop solar & educational signageExpanding renewable energy while creating learning opportunitiesUrban Sustainability SolutionsGreen infrastructure & workforce developmentPartnering with schools to manage stormwater and build career pathwaysTrees for the TriangleTree planting in schoolsIncreasing tree canopy and engaging students Binkley Baptist ChurchRooftop solarAdvancing clean energy through on-site renewable generation24Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579 Docusign Envelope ID: CB1A7685-96B7-4FBD-80E0-8CF756D5E579