HomeMy WebLinkAboutLRC Exec Comm Meeting Minutes_1.12.2026 ORANGE COUNTY
,' LOCAL
R E E NTRY
},*COUNCIL
RC
Orange County Local Reentry Council (LRC)
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
January 12, 2026
Danielle Carman, Director of the Orange County Criminal Justice Resource Department
(CJRD) and member of the Orange County LRC Executive Committee, convened the initial
organizational meeting of the Executive Committee at 3:30 pm at the Bonnie B. Davis
Environment&Agricultural Center in Hillsborough.
Executive Committee Members in Attendance:
• Danielle DeCaprio, Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness Homeless
Program Manager
• Kathleen Ferguson, Hillsborough Board of Commissioners
• Paula Harrington, Oxford House, Inc. Special Projects Coordinator
• Toni Lewis, Department of Adult Correction (DAC) Chief Probation Parole Officer
• Candace Rashada, Durham Tech Human Resources Development Director
• Julia Sendor, Justice United Lead Organizer
• Joseph Whatley, Caramore Employment Specialist
Executive Committee Members Unable to Attend:
• Amanda Cobb, Orange Correctional Center Warden
• Crystell Ferguson, Inter-Faith Council (IFC) Community Service Navigation Manager
• Celisa Lehew, Chapel Hill Chief of Police
Others Present:
• Tiffany Bullard, LRC Case Manager
• Shalishah Foster, DAC Community Development Specialist
Welcome and Introductions
Everyone present introduced themselves.
Executive Committee Roles and Responsibilities
Foster said DAC has been working to be more strategic about who is included at the table and
what the expectations are, with the goal of being more effective at reducing barriers to reentry.
She explained the structure of reentry councils, both at the state and local levels, and noted
that CJRD is the Intermediary Agency in Orange County that handles the administration of the
DAC grant. She said DAC has issued state-level guidelines, but the department understands
that some local nuances are needed to match local needs and culture.
Foster reviewed some administrative matters, including the roles of the Executive
Committee's elected officers, and noted that a Chair, Vice-Chair, and Secretary are required
roles, but a Treasurer is optional. Ferguson asked about access to LRC financial reporting and
Foster said members would have access to such reporting but not to staff salary information.
Carman said the LRC staff would work with the Executive Committee to determine the type of
financial reporting that would be most helpful. She noted that the DAC grant funding does not
fully cover the two LRC staff salaries and benefits, so operating expenses and client needs are
funded through a small county appropriation and a supplemental American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA)grant from DAC for client transportation. Carman added that, moving forward, the
Committee may be able to help identify additional funding streams. Foster agreed and said
Local community members are in the best position to know about potential sources of
supplemental local funding.
Foster said the Executive Committee will have a role in voting on various LRC policies, such as
time limits on expenditures for housing and other client needs. She added that members can
send designees if they are unable to attend a meeting, but those designees will not be able to
vote. She said the bylaws are subject to the Executive Committee's approval, but they are fluid
and can be changed at anytime.
Foster said the elected Chair will preside over meetings. Meetings should be held monthly in
the initial organizational phase but can then move to every other month. Meetings can be
virtual, but DAC asks that at least one meeting each year be in person.
Foster and Carman explained that the full LRC is a loose group of people and organizations
committed to reentry in Orange County, and the Executive Committee is the governing body.
There should also be an Advisory Group of local community leaders who bring information to
and receive information from the Executive Committee. Foster added that members of the
Advisory Group might also come to meetings and give presentations.
Review and Approval of Proposed LRC Mission and Bylaws
Carman reviewed the proposed draft bylaws with the Committee members. The draft bylaws
included provisions governing the full LRC's mission, membership, and meetings; the
Executive Committee's membership, roles and responsibilities, terms of service, elected
officers, and meetings; the Advisory Group roles and responsibilities; the required
Subcommittees; general provisions on quorums and voting; and confidentiality and conflict
policies.
Committee members suggested a number of revisions to the proposed bylaws as drafted.
Carman said she would incorporate the Committee's suggested changes in track edits and
resend the document to the members for additional review and comments.
Officer Nominations
Nominations for officer positions, including Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary, Basic Needs
Subcommittee Chair, and Housing Subcommittee Chair, will be received from the floor at the
second organizational meeting, to be scheduled for February, and by email after that meeting.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 5:00 pm.