HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 10-21-2025; 6-a - Review of Design Options for the Crisis Diversion Facility 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 21, 2025
Action Agenda
Item No. 6-a
SUBJECT: Review of Design Options for the Crisis Diversion Facility
DEPARTMENT: Asset Management Services
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Presentation Travis Myren, County Manager, 919-
245-2308
Caitlin Fenhagen, Deputy County
Manager, 919-245-2303
Alan Dorman, Director of AMS, 919-245-
2627
PURPOSE: To review design options and associated project budgets for the Crisis Diversion
Facility, select a preferred option, and direct the Manager to finalize the design with the architect
and construction manager in order to prepare a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) for Board
consideration in late 2025.
BACKGROUND: The development of a Crisis Diversion Facility has evolved and progressed
over the last six (6) years:
2019 — The Board established The Orange County Behavioral Health Task Force (BHTF), and its
Crisis Diversion Facility Subcommittee. The Crisis Diversion Facility Subcommittee brought
together subject matter experts in behavioral health clinical services, emergency services, law
enforcement, and criminal justice with Orange County government.
2021 —The Subcommittee received approval from the Board of County Commissioners("BOCC")
in April 2021 to develop a recommendation for the Crisis Diversion Facility, along with $250,000
for pre-planning services. The County completed a request for qualifications (RFQ) process and
selected CPL Architecture to perform preliminary and schematic-level design and analysis
services for further development of the Crisis Diversion Facility.
2023 — The Board approved the FY 2023-33 Capital Investment Plan ("CIP"), which included
$2,047,155 for design services and $22,952,845 for construction for the Crisis Diversion Facility
in FY 2024-25.
2024—The Board approved $1,100,000 for land acquisition. CPL Architects was selected through
an RFP process to begin detailed design at a cost of$1,172,000.
2
2025 — In April 2025, the firm Gilbane was selected through an RFQ process to be the
Construction Manager at Risk for the project. Gilbane began working with CPL to advise on
constructability of the design, value engineer the design, and provide cost estimates through each
step of the design process. The Board agreed to pay Gilbane $179,928 for pre-construction
services.
At its April 15, 2025 Business meeting, the Board approved the purchase of a five-acre plot of
land close to UNC Hospital in Hillsborough for $1,350,000.
Original Scope of the Facility
The facility was originally programmed and designed to have two primary functions, with additional
space for coordinated discharge services and community resources.
Behavioral Health Urgent Care ("BHUC") — This is a service for individuals four (4) years or
older who are experiencing a behavioral health crisis related to a substance use, mental health
disorder, and/or an intellectual/developmental disability diagnosis. The BHUC offers a safe
alternative for up to 23 hours for triage, stabilization, and assessment and provides a diversion
from the hospital emergency departments and the detention center. The current design calls for
twelve (12) bays to serve patients: eight (8) bays for adults and four (4) bays for children.
Facility-Based Crisis and Non-hospital Medical Detox Services ("FBC") —This service offers
longer term therapeutic interventions and stabilization services for individuals experiencing mental
health crises as well as those struggling with substance use and addiction. The current design
calls for sixteen (16) beds, the maximum allowed under current regulations. Through the FBC
services, individuals will receive assessment, treatment, 24-hour medical supervision, case
management, and group and individual therapy in a residential setting. Individuals will spend time
with clinicians and peer support specialists, both individually and in groups, to identify strengths,
individual support, and treatment needs, and to make a plan for recovery. An important part of the
treatment process is to prepare individuals to return home and arranging for further treatments so
that individuals can continue their path towards recovery.
Coordinated Discharge and Resource Space—The original concept also included a peer living
area, a resource room with information about behavioral health resources, a large conference
room, and several offices for County staff to support the coordinated discharge planning for
patients of the Crisis Diversion Facility as well as resources to establish and maintain connections
in the community.
Current Available Budget:
Crisis Diversion Facility Budget
Description Budget Spent/Encumbered Available
Land $1,360,000.00 $1,353,265.54 $6,734.46
Professional Services $2,322,155.00 $2,035,272.00 $286,883.00
Construction $21,813,484.00 $179,928.00 $21,633,556.00
Equipment $557,711.00 $0.00 $557,711.00
Total: $26,053,350.00 $3,568,465.54 $22,484,884.46
3
Proiect Budget:
Gilbane, the Construction Manager at Risk, provided a budget estimate for the project in July 2025
of$25,700,000. However, that budget was incomplete as it did not include estimates for furniture,
fixtures and equipment (FFE), owner's contingency, or commissioning services. Given the
significant increase over the approved budget, the County asked CPL and Gilbane to provide
several options for reducing the scope of the facility.
Please note that the cost figures below do not include the cost of land acquisition or professional
services, which have already been encumbered or spent.
Original Option Option Option Option Option Option
Design
Total Square Ft. 22,405 10,080 10,275 17,575 15,850 16,000 15,000 19,825
Cost $28.2 $20.8 $21.5 $26.6 $25.4 $25.6 $24.9 $27.2
million million million million million million million million
FBC Beds 16 8 8 8 16 16 16 16
8
BHUC Bays 12 6 6 Expansion 12 12 6 12
Possible
Coordinated Discharge Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Resource Space Yes No No Yes No No No Yes
Dual Entrance Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Front/Back Front/Back Front/Back Front Front Front Front/Back
Simplified Design No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tax Impact:
The County maintains a debt model that tracks the debt service and associated tax impacts
related to the 10 year Capital Investment Plan. The different design options were analyzed
through the debt model to identify impacts to the tax rate and the resulting total property tax bill
for a $400,000 home, as detailed below:
Current Original
Budget iDesign loption A 10ption A.1 10ption A.2.10ption B 10ption 13.1 10ption 13.2 loption C
Total Cost of $22,484,884$28,190,991 $20,791,005$21,446,865$26,565,095$25,402,124$25,550,015$24,980,984$27,180,542
Construction
Construction
Cost $5,706,107 $(1,693,879)$(1,038,019) $4,080,211 $2,917,240 $3,065,131 $2,496,100 $4,695,658
Change from
Budget
Debt Service
Change from $424,562 $(126,033) $(77,234) $303,587 $217,057 $228,060 $185,722 $349,379
Budget
Tax Rate
Change from 0.09 cents -0.03 cents -0.02 cents 0.07 cents 0.05 cents 0.05 cents 0.04 cents 0.08 cents
Budget
ChangeTax Impact on
from
Budget
4
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No additional funding is necessary at this time. However, if a design option
is selected above the current project budget, additional funding would be needed when the Board
is presented with the guaranteed maximum price in late 2025.
ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: This item supports:
• GOAL 2: HEALTH COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVE 1. Improve harm reduction, prevention, and support services for adults and
children experiencing behavioral health issues, substance use disorder, and intellectual or
developmental disability.
OBJECTIVE 4. Reduce impacts and barriers for justice-involved children and adults
through deflection, diversion, therapeutic interventions, and re-entry support, including
housing.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board:
1.) Select an option from the alternative design options; and
2.) Direct the Manager to finalize the design with the architect and construction manager in
order to prepare a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) for Board consideration.
- - 5
OR- -A-NGE COUNTY
NORTH CAR(3LINA
Design Options for Crisis Diversion
Facility
10-21 -2025
6
PURPOSE
• Review design options and associated project budgets for the Crisis
Diversion Facility
• Select a preferred option
• Direct the Manager to finalize the design with the architect and
construction manager in order to prepare a guaranteed maximum
price (GMP) for Board consideration in late 2025
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
CLOSING GAPS IN THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE 7
CONTINUUM
1 . Provides a diversion option for individuals experiencing a BH crisis from the
emergency department, the court system, or the detention center to immediate,
specialized services
2. Enables stakeholders, especially law enforcement and emergency medical services, to
provide a more appropriate and efficient response to a behavioral health crisis
3. Integrates County treatment services and resources through coordinated discharge
planning
4. Provides care at a substantially lower overall cost compared to reliance on emergency
departments and inpatient hospital-based services
5. Provides individuals and families with access to information, clinical care, support
services, and assistance to navigate the complexities of BH challenges to mitigate the
risk of repeat crisis episodes
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
8
THE NEED : CURRENT DEMAND
■
Concerns by
r • � • ■ r 1 r - r
■
fipp
519*
Spa
416
400
383
371
*2025 is projected based on activity from January 1-August 31.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2425
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
BUILDING FEATURES 9
• Behavioral Health Urgent Care (BHUC) unit for individuals four years
and older for short- term triage, stabilization, assessment and
observation
• Facility Based Crisis (FBC) unit for adults needing longer term (more
than 23 hours) care
• Peer living room and resource center to support discharge and offer
resources to navigate and maintain connection with treatment and
supportive services
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
' 10
OPERATING MODF
• County to construct and be responsible for major building systems on an
ongoing basis
• County will contract with a third-party provider for clinical and medical services
through Alliance Health.
• Provider contract can limit access to patients who experience a behavioral
health crisis in Orange County
• Provider will seek reimbursement for services through private insurance,
Medicaid, etc.
• County will be required to subsidize BHUC services that are not reimbursed to
the provider through insurance, Medicaid, etc.
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
11
DESIGN OPTIONS
1110 - �r
. . d
r
. Y
,3 '. v MS""yam. T ..,;: 4 ''•"yy..A, ",'"` .> � w
., .,r iii res;
Cl)CPL
ORANGE COUNTY ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING
NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING
CPLteam.com
Original Design 12
Current Project Budget Available - $22,484,884
Building Size o
Iw
22,405 sf BHuc
Cost Estimate � o ^°
o _ D
$28,190,991
0
ti ® p `0
CE
FBC Beds: 160 Q o
BHUC Bays: 12 o o 'mooUU`
(4 Pediatric, 8 Adult) 0 o 0 4
Q p o`
Dual-Side Entry J o o
FBC Requested Room Count
B H U C Requested Bay Count
FBC Courtyard v . , ,.
COURTYARD
Conference Space _
Peer Living
Resource Center
County Offices/Discharge
Design Option A 13
Reduce BHUC from 12 to 6 and FBC from 16 to 8
No coordinated discharge/resource space
BHUC
1Nuc019V FNucONIV
ME FKS AT TRANSFERVESNAULE 1RRLIC WAITING
Cl SF Ml SF S7 pF0 AaR1E50.A CRY 11731 5091E -
IRRSF ICOMMUNITY E"
Building Size ra/SroNoweR SF�ORY MILE EXPANSION
'WAU
I IUNA! Yh
10,080 Sf ":` 3313` �5F
RFONMIbN 135E 11013E I
1819 °
coxsuL7 coNsun
srANnT w51 lesF
Cost Estimate "" -----------------------
UlRoo 9E BHUC NURSE
C AODM 517115f EI13/N0 BMW P CdMIlAID
$20,791,005 1035E 17951 11dSf WOARAOOM ERAM OFFICE OFFICE ACIMrI X19 H
c 1005E WSF 107 fF MSF 111 SF
MW 7NAOF [�]EA. FBC
ASF
Future Community Addition rArAooM 1ATROOM FA7AOOM IA7AooM
RY5 EWIN ftllfIMWFR AAFPft7 CLEAN PA1NM ftilSHWA
$842,526 AORAOE �7A�NWR 7d9 019 10 51 1019 019
69 AF
HUM 9A"M
RHUC OSSN RNUC OARY OFFN:E a FORAGE SIAR/47 IM SI
FBC Beds: 8 �F °69F KAP 71 Si A9
ElK MUCH/ RlOCUG lAVNOA b DINING iLT/SHWR RA7 ROOM MT ROOM FA7 ROOM rAi A00M
INIIC OSSIY INUC OABV AFF WEAN 1699 1115E M9l 169 UOSP 101 Sf 101 Sf 1019 1013f
BHUC Bays: 6 R39 RAF d7 AF i
0179
(2 Pediatric,4 Adult)
Dual-Side Entry
FBC Requested Room Count
BHUC Requested Bay Count
FBC Courtyard
Conference Space Other: Reduced S F by 55%
Peer Living Split Entrances,Same Vestibule
Resource Center Squared up building architecture
County Offices/Discharge Reduced Parking from 50 to 25
• No Underground Stormwater Retention
Design Option A.1 14
Option A with rear entrance
No coordinated discharge/resource space
BHUC
NNCONFV INUCOMV
FED, MW M�flIAGF VFS11EVlE PUOIiC WAl11NG 1
12 IT LOU STAFFER" 1n x 1_ my sr {-
LOOM
1
IN SF = 1 COM
Building Size mnNowFF SNOOFr Ivs F MUNI
bfF 10
IT A/x IEWNEANON �I TY 11
msx
10,275 sf TOILET ' EXPA
vanit7�K u9 i NSIO °
1 1
TOlINDWN FdAAE NTAI� toms 1 N 1
3fAFFnT F/9 n9 $79 TEL, 1 1
TEST � SF �
Cost Estimate OETIFUNK51 NNC NIUM
FOOM
11A11(N! s/ eMUC G
$21,446,865 u19 799 O{fF WOFEFOOM EAAMFE-11.
ACIIF IT COUa m
IOOx sow 1219 W9
9171 WAKE C5V
MIN
Future[Community Addition tMwwr FAT Foots FATl00M IAT Foots FATFooM
$842,526 OST Esu PATVff MTES/NOUF "T'""' tot SF 1Nx tofu 1 107Y
ntAAwEF O ! 109 my � fI01AOF
B.ssn A FWIlD/ WELL HAIM
FTONIG leo INN
iC e
IMONSEV MAIC WIAV OFPCE A7�� �x ILL.
k
FBC Beds: 8
B H U C Bays: 6 o o " F ASN/M IY N/sem MTIOOM /ArFOOM IATEOOM FATFOOM
Ex�Sowv ENuc�ouro ANpsl tux NRIItN It�i9 mx tofu tmx t01x tatx
tosF
(2 Pediatric,4 Adult)
Dual-Side Entry
FBC Requested Room Count
B H U C Requested Bay Count
FBC Courtyard
Conference Space Other: Reduced S F by 540
Peer Living Squared up building architecture
Resource Center Reduced Parking from 50 to 25
County Offices/Discharge No Underground Stormwater Retention
Design Option A.2 15
Option A.l .with expansion capability and
coordinated discharge/resource space
BHUC )A COMMUNITY
r----------� »P
1 II vlsneulF F.OFlyd
1 1 osoxmlcF msr mxe coxre®!c!
Building Size 1
1 808 SF EXPANSION ,1 vas`x amxc
17,575 sf 1 1 6E5i 4 n�
1
(expansion to 19,825 sf) 1 1 n,x nF 1
1 1 xsf J oafew caxacr I r�a�u4 malr :ouxnomc�o�Rlro sru Nm
Cost Estimate
$26,565,095 rN! ! NNSG xXX! xu!! xox! Off CF 9FACF
FBC
WGF•Cgff 9RICF 519 A V
!MW NY13l4A !N 1%y HSf 419 V x161 4V 6l9
]MSI 2119 II/>i MV 4R9 4P9 HV
MIC[O{MI ftS I EXAM RCORKF Ac[NRCF 1!C[NPfF ACIMxT
Future BHUC /FBC Addition k EZ: Tg "" J MY
M31$5,306,209 LIM
M 105 NCe »�t rl;Y1NM! M'p MMI P Q'E�W1 R't�lOOM RA�'Appµ
J MC MIIC! MF➢5
F B C Bed s: 8 (Later Expansion to 16) `"�0'S" 1WJCO"" 10/7_ mu
uw n9 iNr� IwalNunaN
SU9
B H U C Bays: 8 (Later Expansion to 12)
IM9 nolo ��� if4u4! I`naFlly �V �����
wuc MSHtl 11MCa55FN IENSUG Nwwwr lyuN 90FAQ r,R51MM rarwW� arleoM rrroMf rarleaM
p9 89 IS2SP ISP4 10'iV IrV TiV IM9 ,MV IMV FMV
PAl11gN _
1xxC M6M1 IMIGQIRY 1519 �.l3lC9!°Y _ _
Dual-Side Entry r5>s tlV m9 '� N IM c FIF
yg ! IMV t/5 V fFf V Xmt V
FBC Requested Room Count
,m 9
BHUC Requested Bay Count
XGSF
FBC Courtyard 1
1
Conference Space Other: Squared up building architecture 1
Peer Living Designed for expansion to original FBC &BHUC 1
counts (2,250 sf) 1 1
Resource Center 1 1,442 S F EXPANSION 1
• Central Core designed Day 1 to support expansion 1 1
County Offices/Discharge for less disruption in the future.Patient wing 1
additions only will limit construction impact to site 1
and existing patient/staff spaces. 1 1
L------�
Design Option B 16
Dual entry for at front of facility
No coordinated discharge/resource space
BHUC
en�losSRV RXUC OBSRV
ROE ROS EMS WEST COIISIIO WANING MAIN VEST
1013P IM SF 111 51 97 SF 1333F 111 IF
Building Size EXPANSION INUCOIfRV BNIIC OBSRV PAIIMNSFER AEG/SECUR17Y RlGFWANMG
15,850 Sf RDS PEDS EXPANSION
104 SP 104 SF 1/051 45655 16131
%TK3 1,200 SF
167 fF STAR BRRAII
nT/SXWR fENSORY 1NSAKF N9 fF COBWSFIT
FI lF p5P 11331
Cost Estimate 1
$25,402,124 FBC
CONSUR/ F 66 IF FIC PIC RC41
Fac
BMIC 013 IHUC NUBS! SOISORYI INTAKE OFFICE
96 IF BB SF INTAKE INTAK! B13f 94 E1 443i 9A Si ��
113 Ef SNI/MEAS 11135 RN fI 11351 _
F L1'2IF
IAS ROOM IAS ROOMMFuture Community Addition CA`S ,,,Sf �11 SF ,,,SF
$842,526 IMAKe Ri/SXWI �� 113 Sf
96EF BI fP
OLFAN IIOAKE lXAM MlOf
BHUC OBSRVI BXDC OBSRV ,115E
1111 IN IF 13051 I�fP
16 SF 163P Ri(EMWR PBO NURSl11N /�
FBC B e d s: 16 9155 096`Ei R12HWR/ �\ 11/fP I�
VIEWING 6roA 51AR nT �IIII
BHUC OBSRV BXUC OISRV 122 SP f06[DGIlD ni/SXWR ppS p00M PAT AODM PAT ROOM PAT AODM
BHUC Bays: 12 165E 161F R 711'7
111 7'S' Mf' F3SF 11131 11151 F113f 11135
bd IF 119 fP PAI310R F�
iTARRI MRF mm
(4 Pediatric,8 Adult) BHUC OBSW BHUC 065RY '055 ° `I
Id sf 1d EF LAUNDRY ACIIUITr
1B sF
INUC MlCM ERG WARMING
BXU7 OBSRV BHUC OBSRV. 1178 16x31 19351 KITCHEN
165f ]d Sf WORKROOM �VIBEG GAIL 166 IF
Dual-Side Entry 3i451 6 S
FBC Requested Room Count ntnxKN ';iu`
11 Sr COURRARO
BHUC Requested Bay Count
FBC Courtyard FATRooM FIC'ATOM,:,EF 1211 I
Conference Space Other: Reduced S F by 26%
FA4 ROOM [PA
M
Peer Living • Split Entrance Vestibules,Some Side
Resource Center • Squared up building architecture ,A7RpOA FATROOM
121 fF 111 IF
County Offices/Discharge Reduced Parking from 50 to 40
• 25% Decrease of Underground Stormwater P"'Roo"" FAT100M
12151 1]135
Retention
Design Option B. I . 17
Option B with coordinated discharge
No resource space
BHUC
exu��ols4w Rx�o�ury F4A5]YFA cawuu AuaSvur
9FGrslcuRm
Building Size 3695E NX7
msr COMMUNITY
RxIlC OL4V RIIKCORSAV ORICE OFi6E
rEa PEa rA1 rR,AfbR]7 FasF Nsf EXPANSION
16,000 sf d3f °` ""` UGMAMNG TzoosF
cox3uui asl of
N/SxMA SENSORY IMAR1 06CH1K� N 001611L1
913i 935E lla 3F 4015! NSF NSF
Cost Estimate
$25,550,015 F B C
OONSIAf/ RYIME D PA91�OA DaO�
URIC eNUC MORSE 5@ISORYa T/Sf eb SF xiARE MAKE tlTY NSF MSF N3F
1183E irN/M�5 Il]3F 14W I4a 5F
Future Community Addition N15F
NlAMl FAS ROOMk�[P�$842,5264F SF
LINTAKE Nr3xWR
16 SF OI SF �� FAMR(
WUC OK3RY �� IC]R 6`P 1143E color lIDY Lil
]i SF 111F Nr1NxR P3L IARif SSN
FBC Beds: 16 RlNIO exuco� nr SHWR/ a493F ��
YIErAFIG S70R SrAFfN U
144 SF sauol REo ]fR µ5f NJSIMAI PAS AODM PAI k00M PA(ROOM lAE ROOM
BHUC Bays: 12 143E ]F SF R 1UG AI f AF R FAR n sP 1415 1215 al SF PI SF
SSAlFFSF 665f 1145E II)3F 4113E I GN
(4 Pediatric,8 Adult)
]as 7FY ISO Sf
MEc AIGN eec WauuNc
Wi
OM NOEOCAIS la]SF 1NEF ng 1915f RLi
Dual-Side Entry Ia 3f le SF 935f
FBC Requested Room Count 14Sf Nsxvne
nttsxxx 9xs!
SF
C OIrAF®
BHUC Requested Bay Count "�
nrRaoM rRc rnrla
FBC Courtyard al sf Ia15FoM
Conference Space Other: Reduced S F by 25%
TAIPAI I.ODM
1a13F5F 121 SF
Peer Living Split Entrance Vestibules,Some Side
Resource Center Squared up building architecture PAY1 P".41"6FA
County Offices/Discharge Reduced Parking from 50 to 40
• 25% Decrease of Underground Stormwater Retention r"4113 r"1211 RE
• Added space for Community Offices and Discharge
Design Option B.2. 18
Option B.I . with decreased BHUC bays from 12 to 6
BHUC
exuc axsx7
PPLt xxs7ar xFG/7fCU[xY MSCNAxcP A1AM 7P9
lag 1vss 9nss m9ss noss
Building Size exueoxsxv �'�W"xQ1G COMMUNITY
Pe7,ulma us mss LLT
15,000 sf 101
EXPANSION
9 1167E 715E
1,200 SF
COIWx1/ 1 79 I�F
SBISOlT 11
xOAxP OIxfE 7COIOiIxi
Cost Estimate �.
$24,980,984FBC
NUCIRV NIRSE 7W]
Ofgft MAQ MAS PAnssstDe 741L':-.
Ili]
l49 ln9
Ri/SXWx PAix00A1 PAT xOOAY PAixOOM PATYOOM
Future Community Addition xue __]L
ss 1315P 319 ,3,9
xDOCAIP07 N/AIPIx MAxO mnxn
$842,526 �° �� u9 519 PaAU PMYLr
Ing
uss ssAwN Mne � nel�wiRPs,x
169 % FIE'
FBC Beds: 16 no<XM®/5tD W RMFIIdA[ A9 MSP Rr/Sxwx PR121x00M PA Y1�pM PI]1x00M PR 2�AOOMJ
BHUC Bays: 6 c04Ugl uss „ 0115 219 BO
9160NT mxixx
a•sP
(2 Pediatric,4 Adult) °"uc°°'" uDxOxr GM"
ab Y 1909
exuc BE[ AIPG, � P59[ wA119xIG
xXUC a15x7 wWPPOOM tog IM9 )99 ,q,y vlCPel
NSf 11x 5P ���
Dual-Side Entry ""
FBC Requested Room Count
n9
C.RIIxITAm
BHUC Requested Bay Count
PArxooAl WPATxOOW
FBC Courtyard 1119 1319
Conference Space Other: • Reduced S F by 30% [PA:1 is19
Peer Living Split Entrance Vestibules,Some Side
Resource Center Squared up building architecture PATxaoAl PAT NOW -
1919 1319
County Offices/Discharge Reduced Parking from 50 to 40
• 25% Decrease of Underground Stormwater Retention1711 SP1A
• Added space for Community Offices and Discharge
Design Option C 19
Original Design
Eliminated architectural features
BHUC COMMUNITY
Exec ouXv Rxlcaearvl ss Movlu
rEm rEar IIl�1�y
ESSE Nn pECIMEOE 90R EGR4 lCEN4F! C13YItmrYtY
Building Size II wl�coElsry S1RMW"NG
633P
19,825 sf 6
nsF f �QQu slxs�
E3x Ir IIr q1I E1En
NIIMOVIEI �R s�Rg 6�YR I LE9n� �1R I Stn ,�V�R'�j��6rt5i�I S'Rin' Y
Cost Estimate
$27,180,542 � Rg�
XOOM xxnERMIIX4 1 w loexue'aM wssE NS1 T xsF uv µy $m$ ET12D nn l ux� F B C
XQlx QIVP W&F
SCF. W -�VYk[4011l 1 EXM1 HSE OTR 'Z9 s+OI1NIW
FBC Beds: 16 an MNslvJ
B H U C Bays: 12 NP,wawb QM�X. x-0,a` g � Q 1MMX "1 N�w! I.1M Fr
FNM F
Iola
(4 Pediatric,8 Adult) sC GR CE MRs
iNIIC015FV WVC W38V 10 SF 41n
tlx ux INTAKE NM1A bIxxON
IQs 1f S10NGX RNFf TIT 9bn
nnCOSNV XNxCOMQY � I uVNOlV „,,,, I l�xl fln f isn 1 rtt/yPMI 14tpOM IxI roOM ��eOOM/
Eos/ RSF 10QR 10QR II `lQU"R' SPEF /I 15n lO1n 1019E 1015E IQI SE
/Ai iQXNS1EX
IMICOISry MNC OISx1/ lull XEGlSECXAIIT
alx q1F
Dual-Side Entry x"`
Ytl1IXiR 906n ITER QO1x raex
IMIEOKry MING OLSNII ESn COItl0O6
FBC Requested Room Count NQx Nll J ,ten
B H U C Requested Bay Count
N/ENw! N/SIxXI OOOHiFY
nx xis 1AQ03!
FBC Courtyard
Conference Space Reduced S F by 1 1% INTlWM rlcXaaM
Other: Imn � 1uR
Peer Living Squared up building architecture
IQl se 101n
Resource Center
County Offices/Discharge IN LOOM `■rloaM
IQ1sF mlx
E
113lOOM lux
CONSTRUCTION COST COMPARISON 20
Original Option Option Option Option Option Option
Design
ISquarleFt. 22,405 10,080 10,275 17,575 15,850 16,000 15,000 19,825
Cost $28.2 $20.8 $21 .5 $26.6 $25.4 $25.6 $24.9 $27.2
million million million million million million million million
FBC Beds 16 8 8 8 16 16 16 16
8
BHUC Bays 12 6 6 Expansion 12 12 6 12
Possible
Coordinated Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Discharge
Resource Yes No No Yes No No No Yes
Space
Dual Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Entrance Front/Back Front/Back Front/Back Front Only Front Only Front Only Front/Back
Simplified No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Design
TAX IMPACT COMPARISON 21
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • tion
Total Cost of $22,484,884 $28,190,991 $20,791,005 $21,446,865 $26,565,095 $25,402,124 $25,550,015 $24,980,984 $27,180,542
Construction
Cost of Construction $5,706,107 $(1,693,879) $(1,038,019) $4,080,211 $2,917,240 $3,065,131 $2,496,100 $4,695,658
Change from Budget
Average Annual Debt
Service $424,562 $(126,033) $(77,234) $303,587 $217,057 $228,060 $185,722 $349,379
Change from Budget
Tax Rate 0.09 cents -0.03 cents -0.02 cents 0.07 cents 0.05 cents 0.05 cents 0.04 cents 0.08 cents
Change from Budget
Tax Impact on
$400,000 Home $3.60 80 80 $2.00 $2.00 $1.60
Change from Budget
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
22
OPERATING COST COMPARISON
Revenu Ek__ 116 Bed FBC 112 BHUC Bays . BHUC Bays
Medicaid, IPRS, 3rd Party $3,061 ,846 $320,416 $217,816
TOTAL REVENUE $3,061,846 $320,416 $217,816
Labor $1 ,960,782 $2,003,289 $1 ,453,610
Contract Labor $435,413 $301 ,600 $301 ,600
Non-Labor $359,467 $446,656 $433,736
TOTAL Operating Expense $2,755,662 $2,751,545 $2,188,946
Rent $0 $0 $0
Administrative Costs $306,185 $305,727 $243,216
TOTAL EXPENSES $3,061,847 $3,057,727 $2,432,162
Non-UCR (County Responsibility) $0 $2,736,856 $2,214,346
$52Z510 difference
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
CRISIS DIVERSION SUBCOMMITTEE 23
• Subcommittee members (including law enforcement chiefs, EMS and behavioral
health experts) engaged in a ranking exercise based on the significance of each
of the building features on future operations and policy landscape:
1 . C Original design with simplified architectural features
2. B1 Includes coordinated discharge space with 12 BHUC bays
3. B Retains 12 BHUC bays
4. B2 Retains dual entrance but reduces BHUC bays to 6
• Option A was considered by the subcommittee as unacceptable because it only
has one entrance at the front of the building and lacks sufficient BHUC space
• Option B2 was also ranked low because it, along with Option A, has a reduced
number (6) BHUC observation bays
• Option C was ranked as most desirable because it contains all the CDF
subcommittee's recommended features
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
20
24
TIMELINE
2019 ✓ Orange County SIM Workshop identifies gaps and action items (April 2019).
✓ Crisis-Diversion Facility recommended to and endorsed by BOCC (April
2021 ).
✓ Preliminary facility design and cost estimation completed (early 2023).
✓ Site location and land purchase (June 30, 2025).
• Final facility architectural design work (4Q2025).
• Construction Documents/Permitting/Bid/GMP Approval (2Q 2026).
2027 • Construction complete (2Q 2027).
• CDF start up and begin operation (3Q 2027).
25
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
• Select an option from the alternative design options; and
• Direct the Manager to finalize the design with the architect and
construction manager in order to prepare a guaranteed maximum
price (GMP) for Board consideration.
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
26
Questions?
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
27
BHUC
RxucoRSRv___^___'
1 AXUC OSSR4 AXUPE05SRV' �ci T
1 VSr \
Design Option A.1 " - AT SP - --- ----`°"
INIIC OFSRV 1
• _. sF STAR RAEAA Mm 13uGF IVBHWIt PIMU3D9 Sf lING
Expansion �M e
1mzP Biu a17sF
RI/SNOWN SENSORY
m5f mR M3F 1[GN1RA1101/ PEER 1141NG
1 MATT 374 SF
Community Addition: VMG sss
1,200 S Fr ,Lr/3110. RrtARe VAST I eON30lr [ ofn[F oux -11111
1 RAARNT m5F 673f 1751 1 73R 03 SF 531 sz sF
mnPun e 1L.AIM
BHUC Addition: Roots 1 /705 SF 1176 Sr WO�M' EAAM OrHtE MFRCF ACRYIIY GOURiYAAO
800$F 1 laoss 1 TO St
107 SF RSF _. 1718 5/6 Sf
R.... r... un SF L�]
as FBC
FBC Addition:
WIwORr I PATR00M rAT ROOM rAi AOOM IAf ROOM
1,450$F xTMxowFR GrP� 7 �t1SMr uRsneW �IWAKI usr NS SPI STORAGE MEN NOUN i MrRoom
1019 101 SF 10Iu 1015E
41 SF
NWMM
Expansion of Central Support ewucmSssAv a�ooEv ua Ar mR
I"IF G srGRAGF sr71 SF �unr NSF
Space + Existing BHUC/FBC
MFc
Spaces: RNC ouAv 3H0C OAsry AR 513f 7'---
T/SHWA�W, SFNODRY {AT FAi IOOM IA11I. IAS°001M
`5,750 SF u3P ezu msF w° KNOW 313ss mu 107 IOIu 101ss 101u
usr
OXUC�003RV �BH0C053A41
SF SF
Notes:
In order to expand/add,patientenuc� sRV SKUSF
4�oRSRv
spaces would be highly disrupted _ II
nvsxwE r--' 1
t / 1
during construction.This is not .. I W/M nSF
I11 1
recommended for this patient nu J 4 COURTYARD i
population. g i� FSC
1
Additional spaces I PAT FecPAT100M 11 1
No reduction in site development �E G E N D Additional spaces needed to support growth of needed to support ,z,sr ,71 u 1�___________�
costs. overall patient count growth of FBC I 1
No reduction in underground PAi AOOM PAT ROOM i
9 C Expansion on 10 � WEEoeAu i t71sF 171 sr 1
retention orparking. L exlsrin boiIdin 1
g g1°09 Sfe 1•0e ]1 sf °�GAlll°G°7 1
Rather than explore cost to expand Qss D D 173 RF RcoFncE IPAI d rRr AaoM 1
12581 I VISP 171ST 1
this option,see option C.1. OfF10E nss 1 - - 1
coNsuu
Existing room would 32A °"` 1�d
need row to gHn—
FAPM1718 1
accommodate 7m 3F GNsuer FRC GFwOE
neater patient count ` °� uARnr
745E NSF