The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda 06-03-2025; 5-b - Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment – 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, Little River Township 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 3, 2025 Action Agenda Item No. 5-b SUBJECT: Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment — 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, Little River Township DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. Application, including Site Plan and Ashley Moncado, Planner III, 919-245-2589 Supplemental Materials Taylor Perschau, Current Planning and 2. Staff Report Zoning Manager, 919-245-2597 3. Notification Materials and Certification Cy Stober, Planning Director, 919-245- 4. Neighborhood Information Meeting Report 2592 Form 5. Development Advisory Committee and Courtesy Review Comments 6. Excerpt of Approved April 9, 2025 Planning Board Meeting Minutes and Signed Statement of Consistency 7. Statement of Consistency 8. Statement of Inconsistency 9. Ordinance Approving Zoning Atlas Amendments, Including Proposed Conditions 10. PowerPoint Presentation PURPOSE: To hold a public hearing, receive the Planning Board and staff recommendations, and public comment, close the public hearing, and consider action on an applicant-initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone +/- 11.22 acres (PIN: 0910-24-6642) located at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, within the Little River Township of Orange County. The proposed rezoning is: FROM: AR (Agricultural Residential) TO: REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District) BACKGROUND: A Conditional Zoning Atlas Amendment application (Attachment 1) was received proposing to rezone approximately 11 .22 acres of an +/- 80.52-acre parcel located at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont. The Staff Report in Attachment 2 contains additional information, maps, and analysis in regard to the application's consistency with County-adopted plans. Approval of a site-specific plan is part of the conditional district rezoning process, and the site plan and any agreed-upon conditions are binding to the development permitted for the zoning district. 2 Basic Review Process: A conditional district rezoning application requires submission of a site plan and other documents, in accordance with Section 2.9.1(C) of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Sections 2.8 and 2.9 of the Orange County UDO require the following review: • FIRST ACTION — Applicant holds a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). Staff Comment: The NIM was held on December 30, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. at the Orange County Main Library. • SECOND ACTION — The Planning Board reviews the application at a regular meeting and makes a recommendation to the BOCC. Staff Comment: The Planning Board reviewed this application at its regular meeting on April 9, 2025. • THIRD ACTION — The BOCC receives the Planning Board and staff recommendations at an advertised public hearing and makes a decision on the application. Staff Comment: The public hearing is scheduled for June 3, 2025. A formal site plan is required as part of a conditional rezoning application and has been submitted. The required site plan identifies the proposed structures, parking, landscaping, and setback information for the project (Attachment 1). The applicant is proposing "Storage of Goods" (Use 62(P), LIDO Table of Permitted Uses) to locate a self-storage business on this site. This use would include a total of 41 storage buildings, including an office, to be developed in three (3) phases. Proposed Conditions Per Section 2.9.1(F)(3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part of this process if they address: a. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, b. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways, and access points, screening and buffer areas, the timing of development, etc.), and/or c. All other matters the County may find reasonable and appropriate or the petitioner may propose. Orange County Development Advisory Committee staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as included in the Ordinance in Attachment 9. Public Notification: In accordance with Section 2.8.7 of the UDO, notices of the Public Hearing were mailed via first class mail to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject parcel. These notices were mailed on May 19, 2025 — 15 days before the hearing. Staff also posted the subject parcel with signs on May 19, 2025 — 15 days before the hearing. See Attachment 3 for the notification materials. Planning Board Recommendation: The Planning Board reviewed the zoning atlas amendment at its April 9, 2025 regular meeting. At this meeting the Board voted 10-1 to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment (Attachment 9), as presented, with the exception of amending Condition #15 to state all required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 3 An excerpt of the approved minutes from the meeting, as well as the Planning Board's signed Statement of Consistency, are included in Attachment 6. Agenda materials from the meeting can be viewed at: https://www.orangecountync.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/ 04092025-2215. Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1) Consider the matter for action; 2) Acknowledge that legally-sufficient public notice was given for the application and this meeting, in accordance with State law and the Orange County UDO; 3) Review the staff report (Attachment 2), featuring analyses of UDO compliance, impact of the use to the surrounding area, safety and efficiency of land use, and consistency of the application with Orange County's adopted plans; 4) Allow for the applicant's presentation of materials; 5) Conduct the public hearing, receive public comments, and consider the Planning Board recommendation; 6) Close the public hearing; and 7) Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and Zoning Atlas Amendment Ordinance (Attachment 9) OR Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendments, including a statement as to why the application is not reasonable and/or not in the public interest, as detailed in the Statement of Inconsistency (Attachment 8). FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including the public hearing notice and mailings, are covered by the application fee. ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: This item supports: • GOAL 1: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CLIMATE ACTION OBJECTIVE 6. Protect water supply/watersheds. • GOAL 6: DIVERSE AND VIBRANT ECONOMY OBJECTIVE 2. Review and revise County policies and regulations to support business investment in Orange County. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board: 1. Conduct the public hearing and receive the Planning Board and staff recommendations and public comments; 2. Close the public hearing; and 3. Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and Zoning Atlas Amendments (Attachment 9). OR Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendments, including a statement as to why the application is not reasonable and/or not in the public interest, as detailed in the Statement of Inconsistency (Attachment 8). 4 Attachment 1 Orange County Planning & Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 200, Hillsborough, NC 27278 NORTH CAROLINA 919-245-2575 or plan ningapps(Dorangecountync.gov Zoning Atlas Amendment — Rezoning Application Please check all applicable boxes and complete the required documentation. Additional information and submittal requirements are contained in Sections 2.8 and 2.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or blue ink. * Please fill out all re uired fields Date: 04/05/2024 Rezoning Request: Conventional District ❑✓ Conditional District Contact Information* Property Owner(s): Justin Chandler Mailing Address: 9900 NC 57 Phone: 336-583-9674 Email: jchandler@aggies.ncat.edu Applicant (if different than property owner): Justin Chandler Mailing Address: 9900 NC 57 Phone: 336-583-9674 Email: Jchandler@aggies.ncat.edu Property Information* Parcel ID Number (PIN): 0910-24-6642 Total Acreage: 80.52 Address: 9900 NC 57 Future Land Use Map Classification: AR Current Zoning Designation: AR Requested Zoning Designation: REDA (storage of goods) If applicant/owner are different people, include a signed, notarized, statement indicating that the owner has authorized the applicant to submit the request. In cases where there are multiple property owners, please attach an additional document containing their signatures authorizing the submission of the application or other legal documentation establishing the applicants' right to file on their behalf. Other Submittal Requirements* Conventional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.8.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): ❑✓ A map, at a legible scale, showing the property(s) subject to the request. A map may be procured at the Planning Department for a fee in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. ❑✓ A legal description of the property(s) proposed for rezoning. ❑✓ A list showing the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners within 1000-feet of the subject property. ❑✓ A detailed narrative denoting the following: i. The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request. Page 1 of 2 5 ii. The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. iii. How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of the adopted Orange County Comprehensive Plan, or part thereof. ❑ The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule. Conditional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.9.2 (C) of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): ❑✓ A site plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.5 of the UDO. Applications for a Master Plan Development (MPD) Conditional District (CD) shall adhere to the site plan preparation requirements outlined in Section 6.7 of the UDO. ❑✓ All CD applications, regardless of type, shall include a detailed landscape plan showing the location of on-site significant trees; proposed screening, buffers, and landscaping; and any proposed treatment of any existing natural features. ❑✓ A detailed description of the proposed use of property including an outline of the proposed development. This will include a detailed summary of proposed utility services. The utility service plan for applications for a Home Park (HP) CD shall specify if the proposed services are temporary or permanent connections. ❑✓ A detailed traffic survey, regardless of estimated daily trips, prepared in accordance with North Carolina Department of Transportation requirements and Section 6.17 of the UDO. ❑✓ The appropriate environmental document(s) prepared in accordance with Section 6.16 of the UDO. ❑✓ A schedule of construction of all elements of the proposal. ❑✓ Other information identified during the pre-application conference deemed essential to demonstrate the project's compliance with these regulations. ❑ The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule. Certification and Signatures* I (we), the undersigned, have been made aware of the process for the review and action associated with a UDO Zoning Atlas Amendment application and understand only completed applications, containing all information required by the Orange County UDO, shall be reviewed and acted upon by the County. Further I (we) understand that any assistance I (we) may receive from County staff in preparing this application in no way guarantees a favorable recommendation by staff on the merits of this proposal nor does it guarantee an approval of the proposed atlas amendment by the County. Digitally signed by Justin Chandler Justin Chandler DN:CN=Justin Chandler,pU=St.Paul,OU=Users,OU=UEI. DC=UEI,DC-conn Owner Signature(s) Applicant Signature (if different from owner) 11/01/2024 Date Date Page 2of2 6 Submitted November 4, 2024 Amended April 30, 2025 Protect Overview Purpose And Intent Self-storage facilities are a necessity in modern society due to various reasons. With rapid urbanization and limited living spaces, many individuals and businesses face challenges in managing their belongings or inventory. Self-storage facilities offer a practical solution, providing secure and flexible spaces for storing possessions, seasonal items, business supplies, or equipment.They serve as extensions of living and working spaces, allowing people to de-clutter their homes or offices,while still retaining access to their belongings whenever needed. Moreover, during transitional periods like moving, downsizing, or renovating, self-storage facilities provide a convenient option to safeguard belongings temporarily.As the demands of modern living continue to evolve, self-storage facilities play a vital role in addressing the storage needs of individuals and businesses, offering convenience, security, and flexibility to accommodate various storage requirements. This project narrative highlights the multifaceted approach undertaken by Bully Self Storage to improve convenience for local residents. Bully Self Storage is a state-of-the-art storage facility located in the heart of our community. One of the primary objectives is to provide convenient storage solutions to the local community.The facility is strategically located in a central area, easily accessible to nearby neighborhoods, businesses, and schools.This accessibility reduces travel times,fuel consumption, and traffic congestion for individuals seeking self-storage options. Ultimately, providing a net decrease in traffic within the immediate and surrounding area.The facility is equipped with a modern online booking system, allowing customers to reserve storage units, manage their accounts, and make payments from the comfort of their homes. Additionally, extended operating hours accommodate the diverse schedules of residents, making it more convenient for them to access their stored belongings when needed. Bully Self Storage is committed to leaving a sustainable footprint and actively engages in eco- friendly practices throughout its operations. Including the use of #57 stone aggregate for ground water infiltration. Using#57 stone aggregate in its isles provides a permeable surface while promoting ground water infiltration. The permeable nature of the stone aggregate allows rainwater to penetrate into the ground naturally, replenishing underground aquifers and reducing runoff.The facility is designed to employ solar applications for energy efficiency where possible, and ultimately leave a sustainable footprint. At Bully Self Storage, sustainability is at the forefront of design and operations.The facility harnesses the power of solar energy through a photovoltaic system,which is installed on various essential components used in daily operation of the facility.These solar components generate clean, renewable energy that is used to power lighting, security systems, and other operational aspects of the storage facility. In addition to employing solar components, the facility incorporates energy-efficient lighting and appliances, reducing overall energy consumption. By utilizing solar applications, Bully Self Storage reduces its dependence on traditional energy sources,thereby decreasing its carbon footprint and contributing positively to the fight against climate change.The storage units are designed with eco- friendly materials, contributing to the reduction of waste and resource consumption. Furthermore,the facility will participate in local recycling programs, minimizing waste production and encouraging customers to recycle responsibly. Additionally,water-saving measures are implemented, including the installation of low-flow faucets and water-efficient landscaping practices. 7 Prosect Location and History Bully Self Storage is strategically situated within the REDA district, an area characterized by a diverse mix of commercial and industrial activities.This location is surrounded by several non-conforming entities, including a concrete plant, a racetrack, a solar plant, and a rock quarry. Our objective is to establish a self-storage facility that not only meets the needs of the community but also maintains a harmonious relationship with the existing commercial landscape. The request for this parcel is to rezone the existing parcel from agricultural residential to REDA-CD-1. The existing parcel falls within the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Small Area Plan. It consists of 80.52 acres, proposing and initial build of 3 buildings with demand extending to 41 buildings.The total development holds an area of 150,550 square feet. Upon BOCC approval the existing parcel will be subdivided into an approximate 11.22-acre and 69.33-acre tract for the proposed storage facility. The project is broken down into 10 phases.The proposed construction will begin in the 2025 year, depending on supply chain and material availability the completion date varies. Tentative scheduling pending BOCC approval on March 5t" 2025 land disturbance to commence on the following week and continue until May. Construction will begin May and continue until August.The current utilities of the Orange County Kart Speedway will be repurposed to the storage facility. Reducing water usage, wastewater and pollutants to the surrounding areas. Location Context: The REDA district is designed to foster economic development, and Bully Self Storage is ideally positioned to capitalize on this vision.The surrounding non-conforming entities provide a dynamic backdrop that enhances the appeal of our facility.There are 5 main entities in the surrounding area. 1. Concrete Plant:The nearby concrete plant operates as a key player in the local construction industry. By aligning our services with the needs of construction contractors and businesses, Bully Self Storage aims to support the economic activities in the area while maintaining a respectful distance from the industrial operations. 2. Race Track:The race track contributes to the vibrant energy of the district, attracting large crowds for events. Bully Self Storage plans to offer tailored services for event participants and attendees, ensuring our operations complement the race track's activities without causing disruption. 3. Solar Plant:The solar plant represents a commitment to sustainability and innovation. Bully Self Storage intends to adopt environmentally friendly practices, such as energy-efficient lighting and potential renewable energy solutions,thereby enhancing our compatibility with the green initiatives of the solar facility. 4. Rock Quarry:The rock quarry supports construction and landscaping businesses, creating demand for storage solutions. Bully Self Storage will focus on accommodating the specific needs of these industries while ensuring our operations do not interfere with the quarry's activities. 8 w YA gYi. �I I I {+ OfIP.F'�rr — �i f. a I r R ki Project Objectives: 1. Maintain Harmony with Existing Entities: Bully Self Storage is dedicated to integrating seamlessly into the REDA district. Our design and operations will be mindful of the surrounding businesses, prioritizing compatibility in terms of noise, traffic, and aesthetics. 9 2. Community-Centric Approach: We aim to engage with the local community and businesses to identify their storage needs.This will enable us to offer customized services that align with the expectations and requirements of our neighbors. 3. Sustainable Operations: In line with the eco-friendly practices of the solar plant, Bully Self Storage will implement sustainability initiatives that minimize our environmental impact, such as utilizing solar energy and green building materials. 4. Support Local Economic Growth: By offering storage solutions that cater to both residential and commercial clients, Bully Self Storage will contribute to the economic vitality of the REDA district, providing valuable resources for local businesses and residents alike. Stormwater Management Bully Self Storage is committed to environmental responsibility, and this includes preserving the delicate watershed in which it is situated. The facility employs self-imposed innovative techniques, such as using #57 stone aggregate in its landscaping to promote ground water infiltration.The permeable nature of the stone aggregate allows rainwater to penetrate into the ground naturally, replenishing underground aquifers and reducing runoff. By minimizing stormwater runoff,the risk of erosion and pollutants entering nearby water bodies is significantly reduced, ultimately preserving the local watershed and contributing to the overall ecological health of the region. Vegetated Buffers At our eco-conscious development, we have incorporated thoughtfully designed vegetated buffers that seamlessly blend in with the native flora of the surrounding landscape.These buffers serve as natural barriers, protecting sensitive areas, while creating a harmonious transition between developed spaces and the untouched wilderness.The project's primary focus is on preserving the existing biodiversity of the region.Therefore,we have meticulously chosen native plant species that thrive in the local climate and soil conditions.These plants are well-adapted to the area, requiring minimal maintenance and reducing the need for artificial inputs like fertilizers or pesticides.To mimic the natural diversity found in the nearby wilderness, we have created a mosaic of plant communities within the vegetated buffers. This includes a mix of grasses, shrubs, and canopy trees, replicating the layers of vegetation commonly found in native ecosystems.This diversity can also provides habitat for a some of of local wildlife, including birds, insects, and small mammals. In conclusion, our landscape features thoughtfully blended vegetated buffers with native flora, creating a picturesque and ecologically conscious setting. By incorporating diverse communities,graded slopes, and wildlife-friendly design, we ensure the protection and enhancement of the surrounding environment.This approach not only preserves the beauty and ecological balance of the area, but also fosters a deeper connection between residents and the natural world that surrounds them. 10 Bully Self Storage sets a benchmark for sustainable and environmentally conscious storage facilities. By focusing on improved convenience for the community,ground water infiltration through 57 stone aggregate,the utilization of solar applications, and leaving a sustainable footprint, Bully Self Storage exemplifies how businesses can integrate eco-friendly practices into their operations. The facility's commitment to environmental responsibility not only benefits the local community but also serves as an inspiration for other businesses to adopt sustainable practices.Through these efforts, Bully Self Storage continues to make a positive impact on the community and the environment,fostering a greener and more sustainable future for all. During the spring of 2007 our fellow neighbors, county officials as well as the founder of Bully Storage procured the "NC HIGHWAY 57 SPEEDWAY AREA SMALL AREA PLAN TASK FORCE REPORT".The report is intended to provide development recommendations to existing commercial entities operating within the REDA district.To new entities the report is to act as a tentative guide during the development process. Bully Storage is committed to re-purposing the parcel to create cohesiveness with the surrounding community before, during, and after the construction process. Currently,the 9900 NC 57 parcel contains commercial infrastructure for a Kart Speedway.The Bully Storage development plan will decommission existing Kart Speedway infrastructure in order to incorporate land conservation,which will protect the watershed. Previous concerns discussed during the Task Force meetings regarding the Kart Speedway included noise pollution, chemical contamination in water runoff during events, light pollution, odor pollution,trash and debris from participants and spectators.The latter portion of the report provides recommendations for the Speedway to incorporate. PG 3-4 TASK FORCE REPORT The four planning Principles contained within the report include: L Preservation and protection of the rural character and nature of the area, 2. Minimization of negative impacts to natural systems/environmentally sensitive areas, 3. Restrict growth and development so that it complements the rural character and lifestyles, and 4. Maintenance of present service levels for existing infrastructure. As stated in the introduction, Bully Storage is committed to preserving the rural character of the area. On a personal note, I have lived in the REDA district for 20 years. Preserving the lifestyle for our community is at the forefront of this project. Bully Storage will be adhering to the stipulation that 12% or less of land be developed within the parcel, or 9.62 acres of BUAs. The total lot size is 80.52 acres, meaning 70.86 acres will remain undeveloped in its natural form in perpetuity. The development plan will minimize negative impact on the surrounding area by maintaining timber and pasture land adjacent to the project area. The project 11 is strategically positioned to the south end of the land parcel, directly across the road from existing storage infrastructure. The proposed positioning of the new infrastructure will avoid the most sensitive areas of the land parcel and will allow for the least amount of existing vegetation removal. To implement these Principles the following Goals are put forward: 1. The Study Area is located in a rural portion of the County where local residents have chosen to reside in an effort to escape the congestion and hectic pace of urban areas. Any additional development within the area shall augment or enhance, rather than detract from, the rural character and nature of the area. 2. The Study Area represents a gateway'into the County that establishes an entry corridor where travelers form opinions as to the quality of life within the area as a whole. To that end, steps should be taken to address design elements within the Study Area to aesthetically enhance this entranceway into Orange County. 3. The lack of reliable, consistent potable water supplies and poor soil conditions for septic drain fields limit development opportunities within the Study Area. Future development proposals should not adversely impact existing groundwater supplies and should be reviewed and approved with this factor in mind. 4. Stormwater runoff shall be maintained on site in conformity with existing standards and policies regardless of the age or approval date of the project. S. Air quality issues shall be an intricate part of any future permit reviewed within the Study Area. 6. Existing non-residential, non-conforming land uses should be made into conforming uses of property through amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan and should then be brought into compliance with existing, or proposed, development criteria to address off-site impacts. 12 F,eree believes that the GoHn�y shoHN take apprepiciate aetion to a"-e�ys- the off site ptiblie asset is AveHty, to)Vty year-s off, dependiHg oH aggregate roek market eoHdifioHs. 8. Each existing non-residential land use should be held to specific development/re-development criteria if they choose to take advantage of the sanctioned approval process for becoming conforming land uses. Any improvements to the existing raceway facilities or the stone quarry site should take the existing community character and form into consideration. 9. Infrastructure management is an important component to allowing for additional development within the Study Area. No new development should be allowed that negatively impacts existing infrastructure (i.e. groundwater, traffic generation, etc) unless an appropriate and viable solution has been approved by the County to mitigate these conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 1- Noise a. Elimination of Vehicle & Event Noise i. The Orange County("OC) Kart track formerly hosted racing events and other motorsport competitions, which can generate significant noise during their duration. The facility infrastructure was approved for a 500+spectator capacity. The cheering crowds, public announcements, and disruptive vehicle noises can disturb the peace of the surrounding neighborhood. With a storage facility in place,these loud events are no longer conducted, leading to a considerable reduction in event-related noise pollution. With the elimination of race-related noise,the number of noise complaints from residents is likely to decrease significantly. A storage facility, when well-designed and managed, operates quietly and unobtrusively.This leads to improved neighborly relations and a more peaceful coexistence between the facility and the community. 13 b. Reduced Traffic i. The OC Kart track attracted a large number of visitors during events, in past events 500+spectators, racers and staff.This lead to increased traffic on surrounding roads.This influx of vehicles adds to the overall traffic noise in the area, causing disturbance to both residents and wildlife. Converting the racetrack into a storage facility significantly reduces and essentially eliminates the traffic flow, resulting in a calmer and quieter neighborhood. c. Enhanced Property Values: i. A reduction in noise pollution and a transition to a quieter neighborhood can positively impact property values. Homes and properties located in peaceful surroundings are generally more appealing to potential buyers and renters. Therefore,the conversion of the OC Kart track into a storage facility could potentially enhance property values. In conclusion, converting a race track into a storage facility offers significant noise-related benefits to the surrounding community.The elimination of vehicle and event-related noise, reduced traffic, and sound absorption, contribute to a more peaceful and pleasant living environment for residents. Noise pollution is a significant concern addressed in the task force planning for rezoning. 2- Emissions and Air Pollution a. Emission Reduction from Racing Vehicles i. The OC Kart track is known for hosting high-performance racing events that involve powerful and high-revving engines.These engines emit exhaust fumes containing harmful pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx),volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and particulate matter(PM). By converting the race track into a storage facility,the constant emissions from racing vehicles are eliminated, leading to a significant reduction in air pollution. b. Decreased Traffic-Related Emissions: i. The racing events often attracted a substantial number of spectators, resulting in increased traffic on nearby roads.The additional vehicles contributed to air pollution through their emissions from combustion engines. By converting the racetrack, which was a major source of traffic during events, into a storage facility,the traffic flow is significantly reduced.This decrease in vehicular activity leads to lower emissions and improved air quality for the surrounding area. c. Lower Energy Consumption and Emissions: i. The OC Kart track requires substantial energy for various purposes, such as lighting, sound systems, and other event-related infrastructure.This high energy demand can lead to increased emissions from power generation sources. However, with the sustainable design of Bully Storage, it will require less energy for lighting and operational purposes, resulting in reduced overall energy consumption and associated emissions.This conversion contributes to a decrease in the carbon footprint of the site, benefiting air quality and the environment. d. Mitigation of Dust and Aerosols: 14 i. The OC Kart tracks can produce dust and aerosols from the racing surface, especially during dry and windy conditions.These airborne particles contribute to poor air quality and can negatively affect respiratory health. By converting the race track into a storage facility, dust and aerosol emissions from racing activities are significantly minimized. Proper dust control measures can be implemented to further mitigate potential airborne particulate matter, leading to cleaner air for the community. In conclusion, the conversion of the Orange County race track into a storage facility brings substantial air pollution benefits to the local community and the environment. By eliminating racing vehicle emissions, reducing traffic-related pollution, mitigating dust and aerosols, and promoting sustainable practices,this transformation significantly improves air quality and fosters a healthier living environment.This conversion represents a proactive step towards environmental responsibility and showcases a commitment to enhancing the well-being of the community and its surroundings. 3- Hazardous Waste and Materials a. Hazardous Materials Elimination: i. All race tracks handle various hazardous materials required for racing events, such as fuels, lubricants, and chemicals used in vehicle maintenance and cleaning. With the conversion into a storage facility,the need for these hazardous materials is eliminated entirely.This eliminates the risk of accidental spills or leaks, preventing potential contamination of soil and groundwater in the vital watershed in which it is located. b. Proper Waste Management: i. The racetrack have generates various forms of waste, including waste from concessions, maintenance, event-related materials and event spectators on adjacent highways. As a storage facility, responsible waste management practices can be implemented. Waste segregation, recycling initiatives, and proper disposal methods can be enforced to minimize the environmental impact and reduce the overall waste generated. c. Environmental Compliance and Regulations: i. The conversion allows the facility to adhere to strict environmental regulations and standards related to hazardous materials and waste management. By way of not allowing any hazardous chemicals to be stored within the facility.The storage facility can ensure the safety of its employees, customers, and the surrounding community,while also eliminating the potential liabilities associated with hazardous waste interactions. d. Reducing Risk of Contamination: i. The OC Kart track is located in close proximity to natural habitats and water bodies, most importantly a delicate watershed. By converting the race track into a storage facility,the risk of hazardous materials or waste contaminating nearby ecosystems and water sources is significantly reduced.This protective measure benefits local wildlife and the delicate balance of the ecosystem. e. Promoting Sustainability: 15 i. The converted storage facility can embrace sustainability that are not achievable by the current racetrack by implementing eco-friendly practices.This includes reducing overall waste generation, increasing recycling efforts, and implementing renewable energy options. By adopting these sustainable measures, the facility reduces its environmental impact, contributing positively to the community and the environment. 4- Solid Waste Management a. Reduced Event-Related Waste Generation: i. The racetrack typically generates significant amounts of waste during racing events, including food containers, beverage cups, and other single-use items. With the conversion into a storage facility, eliminates of large-scale events is reduced, leading to a substantial decrease in event-related waste generation. This reduction aligns with waste reduction and conservation efforts, benefiting the environment. In conclusion, converting the Orange County race track into a storage facility offers significant hazardous materials and waste benefits that prioritize safety, environmental protection, and sustainability.The elimination of hazardous materials associated with racing events, responsible material handling, and proper waste management practices ensure a reduced risk of contamination and promote a healthier living environment. Embracing sustainable practices and adhering to environmental regulations further exemplify the commitment of the storage facility to be a responsible and conscientious neighbor in the community. 5- Erosion Control a. Construction Criteria i. Standards of the facility willfully adhere with "Orange County Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Ordinance" and other requirements. ii. Pre-construction conference will be held before any disturbance to ensure that all contractors understand existing regulations. 6- Stormwater management a. Impacts to the Neuse stream buffers on site shall comply with the uses listed in the Neuse Rules and the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. Examples of listed uses include utilities, roadways, etc. b. The project will adhere with the stormwater requirements listed in the Falls Lake Rules. i. Project site Nitrogen and Phosphorus load contributions leaving the site must be held to 2.2 lbs per acre per year and .33 lbs per acre per year respectively.These standards will be met via BMPs approved by North Carolina Division of Water Quality(NCDEQ). ii. No net increase in peak flow leaving the site from the predevelopment conditions for the 1-year, 24-hour storm; c. A Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed to address stormwater runoff for the project site. Design calculations will be based on stormwater best management practices (BMPs). 16 d. Sustainable and Innovative stormwater BMPs and practices may be utilized that meet or exceed the requirements of the current version of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual (Latest Edition). Addendum • To note, the project owner resides on the parcel connected to the OC Kart track.There are no intentions to utilize the track for motor use or to re-open it to the public as a sports facility. In accordance to the condition of approval number two,the track shall be terminated and no longer operate on site. Eventually, it will be demolished, but this has not yet happened due to time and budget constraints.The parcel was purchased in 2021 amid the steep price hikes and inflation that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.This inflation in addition to an already tight budget resulted in the delay of this aspect of the project. • Bully Storage has created a set of rules that renters will receive upon initiation of a rental contract, and they address the planning board's concerns regarding the storage of hazardous materials.These rules are included on the approved site plan, and they are listed as follows: o "Tenant/lessee may not store at this facility, or use this facility under any circumstances of the following—contraband, weapons, explosive fireworks, flammable chemicals, illegal or legal drugs, ammunition, toxic or hazardous materials or waste, petroleum products of any kind, oil, gas,tires etc., batteries, paint, items with a foul smell at management discretion, stolen property, gasoline or diesel fuel containers or anything that would hold combustible liquid, propane, oxygen, or acetylene tanks, any tanks that contain explosive contents, no agriculture chemicals of any kind, gas powered equipment or any items that would, or could be illegal under state or federal law, or could damage the storage unit, or facility in any way. No animals of any kind shall be kept in the rental unit. Lessee shall not perform work of any kind in any unit.Tenant shall not reside, sleep, cook, or consume alcohol beverages on said leased unit. Tenant acknowledges that this storage center shall not be used as a site for hobbies, garage sales, band practices, parties, social gatherings, staging area for an event, etc. tenant acknowledges that the use is exclusively for residential, incidental, self-storage of merchandise related to off-site business or commercial enterprise. Management holds full discretion on all the above issues and will enforce them accordingly." o While it is noted that people can and ultimately will break the rules, Bully Self Storage is committed to ensuring the safety of renters at this facility. On this note,feedback from the fire marshal codes were incorporated into the site plan, such as a hammerhead turn around, expanded drive isle widths, and widened turn radii. • All landscaping features to be installed will be in full compliance and will be installed per phase of project construction.There are multiple vegetated buffers that serve as natural barriers and are intended to blend in with the surrounding environment. With that in mind, plant species were selected that well-adapted to the area and will thrive in this environment. We ensured that all species were selected from the Orange County Planning Department Preferred Plant List and will be in full compliance. 17 • As previously stated, any opportunities during the construction phase of this project to use eco- friendly practices and infrastructure will be utilized whenever it is practical. 18 Ufillllfill�Illliii ooc Na 3010300 Recorded; 45!2912024 01:55,34 PM Fee Amt: 526.00 Page 1 of 2 Orina Excise Orange County North Carol Orange Mark Chilton,Register of Deeds gK 6847 PO 1221 -1222(2) Prepared by Jennifer L. Allen,Attorney (Without Title Exam or Legal Advice) Mail to Grantee at: 9900 NC Highway 57,Rougemont, NC 27572 Excise Tax: $0 Tax I.D. 0910246642 North Carolina } DEED Orange ) This deed made and entered into this day of4aw/ ,2024, by Kristen D. Hurdle, ("Grantor"),and Justin M. Chandler, of Orange County,North C roa Lina, ("Grantee"),whose address is 9900 NC Highway 57,Rougemont,NC 27572, in Fee Simple Absolute. WITNESSETH: That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of$85,000.00(Eight-Five Thousand Dollars) to her in hand paid,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has remised and released and by these present does remise,release, convey, and forever quitclaim unto the Grantee,his heirs and/or successors and assigns,all right,title claim and interest of the Grantor in and to a certain lot or parcel of land lying and being in the County of Orange and State of North Carolina, consisting of two combined parcels, and more particularly described as follows: BEING at a stake in the Northwest right of way of NC Highway 57 at a Northeast corner of property belonging now or formerly to Charles F. Evans in Little River Township Orange County,North Carolina and running thence along the Northwest right of way of NC Highway 57 North 400 40' 40"East 2119.92 feet to a stake, said stake being in the Southwest corner of property belonging now or formerly to Toby K. Poole;thence North 640 45' 35"West 438.98 feet to a stake; thence North 000 16' 38"East 867.00 feet to a stake;thence North 840 16' 17"Westl377.67 feet to a stake; thence South 030 43' 23"West 264.16 feet to a stake; thence South 020 58 '38" West 1096.87 feet to a stake; thence South 03° 01' 00" West 1423.87 feet to a stake, thence South880 00' 01" East 531.27 feet to a stake,the point and place of beginning and being 80.52 acres as shown on plat and survey entitled: "SURVEY FOR W. A. MCFARLAND", dated November 1992 by Ernest R. Wood,Jr., Registered Land Surveyor,to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description. All or a portion of the property being conveyed includes the primary residence of the Grantor. 19 BK 6847 PG 1222 DOC# 301 03005 **This deed is being recorded to vest title in the Grantee in Fee Simple Absolute. For Chain of Title, see deed recorded in Book 6710 Page 828,Orange County Registry. To have and to hold the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges thereunto belonging to him the said Grantee and his heirs and assigns free and discharged from all right, title,claim, or interest of the said Grantor or anyone claiming by,through or under her. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,feminine or neuter as required by context. This conveyance is made subject to: a) Restrictions of record affecting the title to said real estate and all easements or rights-of-way visible upon the property; b) ad valorem property taxes for 2024; In Testimony Whereof, said Grantor has hereunto set his nand and seal and have r� " 'rr instrument to be signed in its the day and year first above written. �.a ----- - � U}: KRISTEN D H r� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ffiQff=LQ_,COUNTY I, \�<< ,allotary Public in and for said County and State,do hereby certify that Kristen D Hurdle,personally appeared before me this day and, being duly sworn, acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. ad �'' J �RTili Witness my hand and notarial seal,this a—day of r� !0�<A`R� : Q �AnnL r , N ry ublic Z,� •.:'n�s,�° ''� J Printed name of Notary Public My Commission expires: to- �2 ZO Z 20 SUB-DIVIDED PARCEL Legal description: Being at a stake in the Northwest right of way of NC Highway 57 at a Southeast corner of property belonging now or formerly to Charles F. Evans in Little River Township Orange County North Carolina and running thence along the Southwest right of way of NC 57 North 36 degrees 55'20.5"S 515.8 feet to a stake, said stake being in the southwest corner of property belonging now or formerly to Charles F. Evans: thence North 65 degrees 41'47" West 132.79 feet to stake: thence North 19 degrees 51'04"West 945.00 feet to a stake: thence North 70 degrees 07'44: East 542.83 feet to a stake: thence South 64 degrees 57' 00": East 34.80 feet to a stake, thence South 35 degrees 33' 59": East 29.93 feet to a stake, thence South 34 degrees 04'25":West 42.59 feet to a stake, thence South 18 degrees 37' 57": East 676.74 feet to a stake the point and place of beginning and being 11.22 acres. Pin: TBD Township: LITTLE RIVER Parcel size: +/-11.22 ACRES Book/Page: TBD Date Recorded: TBD Tax Owner: CHANDLER JUSTIN M Address: 9900 NC 57 City: ROUGEMONT State: NC Zip Code: 27572 21 Orange County Planning & Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 200, Hillsborough, NC 27278 NORTH CAROLINA 919-245-2575 or planningapps(a)orangecountync.gov Environmental Assessment Please check all applicable boxes and complete the required documentation. Additional information is contained in Section 2.25 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or blue ink. * Please fill out all required fields An Environmental Assessment(EA)shall be required for each individual parcel proposed for development consistent with applicable criterial as detailed within the UDO. Date: 04/05/2024 Contact Information* Property Owner(s): Justin Chandler Mailing Address: 9900 NC 57 Phone: 336-583-9674 Email: Jchandler@aggies.ncat.edu Applicant (if different than property owner): Justin Chandler Mailing Address: 9900 NC 57 Phone: 336-583-9674 Email: Jchandler@aggies.ncat.edu I. Property Information* Parcel ID Number (PIN): 0910-246-642 Address: 9900 NC 57 Acreage: 80.52 Township: Rougemont Zoning District: AR Watershed Overlay: Flat River Other Overlay: II. General Site Information* A. Adjacent Property Zoning North: AR South: REDA-CZ-1 East: EC5 West: AR Land Use North: Pasture and agg use South: Commercial Storage East: Commercial Supply West: Single family home B. Topography ■ Highest Elevation: 611.00 FT ■ Lowest Elevation: 585.00 FT ■ General direction of slope: West Page 1 of 6 22 ■ Estimated % of property with: 0- 5% slope: 57,194 (Proposed Delvp) 245,521 Entire Parcel (SQFT) 5- 15% slope: 382,761 (Proposed Delvp) 3,261,929 Entire Parcel (SQFT) 15- 25% slope: N/A More than 25% slope: N/A C. Water features and Drainage The following water features are located on the property: ✓/ Streams ❑Wetlands ❑✓ Ponds❑ Drainage Easements ❑ Special Flood Hazard Area Describe The property contains a single pond on the north east side that sits outside of the proposed development zone. There are also 3 intermittent and perennial streams identified. Only 1 is in proximity of the proposed development. The identified stream will maintain an appropriate stream buffer. The property line for the proposed development area will not encompass the stream buffer or stream area. (attach additional sheets if needed) D. Does the property contain any of the following Inventory of Natural or Cultural Resources? As identified in the "Inventory of Sites of Cultural, Historical, Recreational, Biological, and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated Portions of Orange County" or the "Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, North Carolina". 1. Cemeteries ElYes❑✓ No 2. Archaeological sites ❑ Yes❑✓ No 3. Historic sites ❑ Yes❑✓ No 4. Areas of geological significance ❑ Yes 0✓ No 5. Designated natural areas ❑ Yes❑✓ No 6. Designated habitat ❑ Yesk/-1 No For each yes answer above, please indicate the location on the site plan and complete Attachment A. tl;fro' ct Cescriira* p A. Describe proposed use of property: The site will consist of 40 commercial storage buildings within the bounds of the proposed development subdivided portion. The remaining property has 3 structures. Used for storage of goods B. Number of lots: 2 C. Number of structures: 43 Page 2 of 6 23 D. Estimated square footage of area to be graded for development of attached residential units (excluding roads, but including parking areas) 0 Sqft E. Estimated square footage of area to be graded for non-residential use (excluding roads) 439,956 Sqft of disturbance area F. Estimated area to be graded for roads 47970 ■ Road type: ❑ Public ✓❑ Private ❑ Class A ❑ Class B ■ Total road length: Illf.State Permits Requjred, A. Does the project involve the mining of earth products? ❑ Yes❑ No ■ If yes, how many cubic feet of material are expected to be excavated? ■ Has an application for a Mining Permit been submitted to NCDRCD? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No Please attach map indicating expected extent of proposed activity. B. Does the project involve generation or storage of hazardous or toxic wastes, as identified by the Environmental Protection Agency? ❑ Yes ONo ■ Describe the wastes to be enerated: ■ How much material is expected to be generated per month? ■ Will any material be treated onsite? ❑ Yes Z No If yes, indicate volume: Will any material be stored onsite? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate volume: ■ Where will disposal of the material take lace? ■ How will materials be transported to the disposal site? ■ What measures are proposed to protect water quality and air quality in case of spills? Page 3 of 5 24 C. Will the project involve a land application system for treatment of wastewater? ■ ❑Yes❑✓ No - If yes, describe F_ ■ Has an application for a non-discharge permit been submitted to the NC Department of Environmental Management or Orange County Department of Environmental Health?❑ Yes❑ No D. Is a septic tank systemproposed which has a design capacity of more than 3,000 gallons per day? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No - If yes, describe E. Does the activity involve sludge disposal? ❑ Yes Q✓ No ■ If ves, where is the source of the sludge? ■ Describe where and how the sludge is being disposed E: ■ Has a NPDES permit from the NC Division of Environmental Quality been issued? Yes F✓ No F. Water Usage ■ Estimated number of employees: 1 x 25 gallons per day (gpd) = 25 gpd ■ Estimated water use for climate control = 5 gpd ■ Process Water 25 % Consumed 0 % Discharged to septic system 0 % Discharged to surface (including storm sewers - Describe: 100 % Evaporated 0 % Reclaimed/reused 0 % Other = 100% ■ Water used for cooling, heating, etc., in association with production or manufacturing 0 % Reused 0 % Consumed 0 % Discharged - Describe: = 100% 0 gpd Total Water Usage ■ Describe source of water: Well Page 4 of 6 25 Attachment A* To be completed only if inventory sites are identified in I.D. (attach additional sheets if necessary) 1.a. Impact on Resource from Proposed Development 1.1b. Proposed Mitigation 2.a. Impact on Resource from Proposed Development 2.1b. Proposed Mitigation Certification and Signatures* Statement by Applicant - I certify that the information presented by me in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. JustinChandler °�' H Ws Pal. 04/05/2024 W=Users,OU=UEI,—O EI,OC=mm Applicant Date Page 5 of 5 26 Mr. Justin Chandler i ustinmchandlerg amai 1.com 336-583-9674 June 9, 2024 Dear Mr. Chandler, This report documents our analysis of groundwater and water supply conditions for Orange County parcel 0910246642 which is located at 9900 NC Highway 57. The property comprises approximately 80 acres and is bounded on the east by Highway 57 and on the north by the boundary between Orange and Person Counties as shown on Figure 1. 5n tl5 Fiat o r i 'I EXPLANATION ® Water wells i --•Force Main wW Pipe`{ '-Septic ld(+1PPrvximate) W W Tank 12562.60 129 250 375 500 —Topographic Contour Feet �qjec�—P-PeftY Figure 1.--Project Location and Site Features. The topography of the site' is flat to rolling with an average elevation of approximately 610 feet (NAVD88). The site drains to the west and northeast to tributaries of the South Flat River. The Hanson Stone Quarry(Rougemont Quarry) is located approximately 3,000 feet south/southeast of the property as shown on Figure 1. Wastewater at the site is treated using a septic holding tank with the liquids piped to a pump house and distributed to a septic field. The two water wells shown on Figure 1 provide the water supply to the property. 'NC Onemap,3-foot Digital Elevation Model(DEM)grids for Durham,Orange,and Person Counties: hgps:///www.nconemapgov/datasets/d04l6b6d7b994575b2b6Oce749leO2c6/ex lore?location=25.356651%2Cgov/datasets/d04l6b6d7b994575b2b6Oce749leO2c6/explore?location=25.356651%2C- 37.502400%2C0.00 Eagle Resources, P.A. 1 215 West Moore Street Southport, NC 28461 919-345-1013 www.eagieresources.com 27 ea*&MM5 Geology The property is underlain by metamorphosed intrusive and volcanic units of the Hyco Formation that are 615 to 633 million years old' as shown in Figure 2. The western majority of the site is underlain by mixed epiclastic-pyroclastic rocks with interlayered dacitic lavas (Zhe/pl) and the eastern portion is underlain by dacitic shallow intrusive of the upper portion of the Hyco Formation(Zhdsi/u). r• A rj 11 � f� M1' �I 5� •"�,- ��. • Figure 2.--Bedrock Geology. These rocks contain steeply dipping (near vertical)joints and fractures and are overlain by a regolith of weathered-in-place materials that comprise partially weathered rock and saprolite. Based upon the reported depths of surface casings in the two water wells on the property this depth of weathering is 50 to 65 feet. The upper part of the regolith comprises saprolite and soil and typically does not provide significant groundwater to wells. The bottom of the regolith is referred to as Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) and generally has a greater permeability than the overlying materials. The bedrock provides water to wells from interconnected fractures and joints that are intercepted by the well bore. Hydrogeology The hydrogeologic conditions for the property have been generally described in are report by the U.S. Geological Survey for Orange County'. The hydrogeologic units of the bedrock identified by the USGS report are shown in Figure 3. The site is contained in the Phyllite (PHL)and Metavolcanic felsic (MVF) units. 'Philip J.Bradley,Heather D.Hanna and Randy Bechtel, 2011: Geologic map of the Rougemont 7.5 min Quadrangle, Orange,Durham and Person Counties,North Carolina. NCGS open-file Report 2011-8. 3 William L. Cunningham and C.C.Daniel lII,2000. Investigation of Ground-Water Availability and Quality in Orange County,North Carolina:U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 2000-4286. 2 28 ePMM05 79°15' 79°G713V 790 36°15' Project Property The USGS study for well yields was based upon 1 ; NH— M a county-wide inventory of 649 wells that are NH'- r'`1..-: -,` completed in in nine hydrogeologic units in the MIF county. Estimates of ground-water availability "NL were based upon the well completion records for i t ` Nvl these wells that provide information on the drilled i Mn depth, reported yields, and depths to water levels. MIF —MV1 The USGS study concluded the following: � MIN\ MIM " The typical well in Orange County has an MIF NVI average depth of 208 feet, an average casing AN 1 --"!L M,N length of 53.6 feet, a static water level of 26.6 Ulm feet, a yield of 17.6 gallons per minute, and a well no `, Fm q casing diameter of 6.25 inches. The saturated MVF thickness of the regolith averages 27.0 feet and the yield per foot of total well depth averages o I 0.119 gallon per minute per foot. Well yields in NIF Orange County show little correlation with p �— IF } Y MIF topographic or hydrogeologic setting." 11111) I SAVF t- 35°52TV NIF ? v D 5 10 MILES G 5 10KILOMEIERS EXPLANATION HYDRGGEDLGGIC UNITS ❑(ARM ARGILLITE ❑ IMYFI MERVOLCANIC,FELSIC ❑(MIF)METAIGNEDUS,FELSIC M IMVII METAVDLCAMC,INTERMEDIATE ❑(Mill METAIGNEGUS,INTERMEDIATE ❑ (PHL)PHYLLTrE 0(NIIM)METAIGNEDUS,MAFIC ❑ (THQTKIASSICSEDIMENTARYROCK$ ❑Iwo METAVOLCANIC,EPICIASTIC -"'-BASIN BOUNDARY Figure 3.--Hydrogeologic Units of Orange County. Property Wells Information on the two wells on the property is shown in Table 1 was provided by Justin Chandler. The locations are based upon aerial imagery shown in Figure 1 and ground elevations are from intersecting the well locations with the 3-ft DEMI. Depths Water Levels Ground Pumping Static Static East North Elevation Drilled Casing Depth Depth Elevation Yield Well ID NAD83 Ft NAD83 Ft NAVD88 Ft Feet Feet Feet Feet NAVD88 Ft GPM WW-1 1 2012780 1 904816 1 614 1 230 63 1 125 32 582 120 WW-2 12012680 1 904608 613 240 63 120 34 579 30 Table 1.Property Well Information. 3 29 e &arce5 Table 2 shows estimates of the transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity of the producing intervals for the site wells. The average yield per foot of drilled depth of 0.106 is approximately the average of 0.119 that the USGS found for the county. Producing Pumping Specific Transm- Hydraulic Depth Yield Yield/Depth Interval Drawdown Capacity issivity Conductivity Feet GPM GPM/Ft Feet Feet GPM/Ft GPD/Ft Ft/Day 235 25 0.106 7 172 90 70.279 419 0.33 Table 2.--Estimates of transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock under the property. The value of transmissivity shown in Table 2 was based upon the calculated specific capacity (Yield/Drawdown) using a multiplier of 1,500 for an unconfined aquifer'. The estimated hydraulic conductivity was determined by dividing the transmissivity by the producing interval. Groundwater Occurrence and Movement The general conceptual model of the occurrence of groundwater in the Piedmont' shown in Figure 3 is applicable to the property. This model shows that the directions of groundwater movement are generally from topographic high to low areas and towards water wells and excavations. Bedrock Feultzone Joint —Dike Modified from Freeze and Cherry,1979 Figure 4.--Conceptual model of the occurrence of groundwater in the Piedmont of NC. To illustrate the application of this model to the property, a generalized three-dimensional groundwater flow model using the USGS Modflow6 Model' was constructed for the project using available information. The model uses finite difference approximations to solve the groundwater flow equation. The model covered an area of approximately 2,000 acres centered on the property as shown in Figure 5. ' Driscoll,F.G. (1986)Ground Water and Wells.2nd Edition,Johnson Division, St.Paul. s R.Alan Freeze and J.A. Cherry, 1979: Groundwater, 1St Edition. 6 https://www.usgs.gov/software/modflow-6-usgs-modular-h d�gic-model 4 30 The modeled area was 48s— ,— discretized by 20,000 square cells 100 feet on a side. The top of the model was the land surface as defined by the 3-ft s r' DEM. The model comprised two layers: Layer 1 represented the regolith from EXPLANATION the land surface to a uniform — Modeled steady state Watertable Elevation depth of 55 feet; and Layer 2 0 Water Wells Model Boundary - represented the fractured Pro'ect Property bedrock from the base of the s regolith to an elevation of 325 s^ feet, or an approximate so thickness of 230 feet. ')0 The initial hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock was set at 0.33 ft/day based on the analyses shown in Table 3. The hydraulic conductivity of the regolith was set at 2 ft/day based on our experience with testing of oW values for the regolith at similar sites. $0 The effects of the assumed 5$5 dewatering for the Hanson Quarry at the south edge of =SgD the model shown in Figure 5 were simulated using a Drain N f,/ boundary condition with a constant drain invert 500250 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Fee, s a Sss elevation of 470 feet and a f conductance of 500 ft/day. 4�5 Figure 5.--Model area and modeled steady state watertable elevations with no pumping from project wells. Recharge to the model was computed using the USDA Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)model. This model simulates a water balance of the soil zone using daily precipitation as input and outputs by evapotranspiration ET, surface runoff, and deep percolation below the root zone when the soil moisture holding capacity of the soil is exceeded. The deep percolation is routed to the watertable and becomes recharge to the watertable surface. Soil moisture storage capacity used for the model was from the 5 31 ea*&WCes SSURGO database' supplied with the SWAT model as assigned to areas defined by the NRCS soil series units' that cover the model area. Vegetative cover used to compute ET within the SWAT model was defined by the USGS land cover database'. Climatic data for the SWAT model was used for the 4 km x 4 km grid cell of the national PRISM database10 centered on the property and comprised daily values of precipitation, and minimum and maximum daily temperature for the 42 year period from January 1, 1982, to December 31, 2023. Figure 6 shows the distribution of annual precipitation and groundwater recharge computed with the SWAT model. Mean annual precipitation is 47.06 inches and mean annual recharge is 12.06 inches. Figure 6 shows the annual distribution of recharge and the values for 1983 through 2023. 100% 25 90% • • • SWAT Recharge • 80% 20 —Normal 704 Distribution w m 60% - 15 X z 60% lap m m 40% 10 CC s 30% • c a 20% ¢ 5 a o- 10% • 0% ° ta 0 6 10 15 20 25 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 Annual Recharge Inches Figure 6.--Annual distribution and annual recharge computed with the SWAT model. The steady state watertable elevations shown in Figure 5 were computed using the mean annual recharge. To assess the values of hydraulic conductivity used for the model it was run with both wells pumping at an average of 25 gallons/minute. This assessment required a slight reduction of the hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock to 0.25 ft/day from the initial estimated value of 0.33 in Table 3 to reasonably reproduce the reported drawdowns in the wells when pumping. Figure 7 shows the computed steady state water drawdown with both wells pumping. The average of the modeled drawdown in the wells is 87 feet which is close to the reported values shown in Table 3 of 90 feet 7 https://www.nres.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/soil-survey_geographic-database-ssurgo s https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 9 htt2s://www.usgs.gov/node/279743 10 https://prism.oregonstate.edu/ 6 32 We r Z, 3:1 �7 a EXPLANATION 500 750 1,QOC1 Fe Figure 7.--Modeled steady state drawdown with both wells pumping at 25 gallons/minute. Water Use and Wastewater Treatment We understand that the proposed use of the property will be a materials and equipment staging facility to be used by subcontractors in the construction industry. Based upon the on Orange County Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Regulations'',the daily water for this use is 12 gallons/day/employee for 8-hour shifts. We understand from Mr. Chandler that the maximum onsite employees would be approximately 20,resulting in a daily wastewater generation and water supply requirement of only 240 gallons/day. The water supply from the two water wells on site is more than adequate to meet this demand. The latest information available to us on the permitted septic system (Orange County Permit H18281I) shows that 2050 gallons/day of permitted will also be adequate for the proposed site use assuming the system will operate as permitted. " https://www.oran eg coun nc. ov/DocumentCenterNiew/25372/ORANGE-COUNTY-RULES-FOR-WASTEWATER- TREATMENT-AND-DISPOSAL-2024-PENDING?bidId= 7 33 t &mrce5 We hope this report satisfies the request from Orange County for a groundwater study of your property. Let us now if we need to make any modifications or updates to this report. Sincerely yours, 1-000 401 Eric G. Lappala, P.E., P.H. 8 34 phase gross square feet storage units Rate weekday traffic units daily trips #of employees units Rate weekday traffic dailytrips 1 14,400 28 0.25 storage unit 7 1 per employee 3.89 3.89 2 15,400 32 0.25 storage unit 8 0 peremployee 3.89 0 3 15,750 32 0.25 storage unit 8 0 peremployee 3.89 0 4 15,500 28 0.25 storage unit 7 0 peremployee 3.89 0 5 21,200 36 0.25 storage unit 9 0 per employee 3.89 0 6 10,200 20 0.25 storage unit 5 0 peremployee 3.89 0 7 16,200 24 0.25 storage unit 6 0 peremployee 3.89 0 8 16,200 24 0.25 storage unit 6 0 per employee 3.89 0 9 15,000 24 0.25 storage unit 6 0 peremployee 3.89 0 10 9,100 16 0.25 storage unit 4 0 peremployee 3.89 0 Grand Total 148,950 264 66 1 3.89 35 BULLY SELF-STORAGE CENTER COVER SI-IEET COME PHASE I—X - LASTING CONDITIONS&DEMO PLAN E-100 LNPI P1 PLAN L-100 9900 NC HWY 57 SITETEPLAN AN C-100 SITEPLANP3 C-101 SITE PLAN ROUGEMONT, NC 27572 D C-1 003 SITE PLAN DETAILS C-103 SITE DETAILS D-100PIN# 0910246642 SITE DETAILS' D-1011 O CASE NUMBER: M24-0006 GFWR&AJ,EI T"µA PROJECT CONTACTS SRA"BE "-4S REIATEE OlIENERAINETILl SS AS E "KE OR 0" E REN ITAllowns �orvoiE NO—11 Ea re;�A°o" RosoN oN�.�oR o ESM N EMENioF re,a,=° as"`Ll— E,a EEows,oNsoEi„EO GESorvNr„rv�HEo IAII-11 N III 111ANIEll TY AND Ia a µR`oan.<<'o`°oAEow"i�EryIS TENLNEE-1 AS 7M.._rvLEEiorv<.zoiimE�o =i„6 ANGE UNT' �KE RALTEI.Sl 13'Ll LW MAR ARE LA TE OS I „Pa w m T EST.--E .E�ME oEc Ro of �o, az<fzzis ry,n.e AL 11SL-E-IS 14 ALL REELANESCA puiEaAN SIALL NsiM.Eo I TS TNEMQ�U aEOE w.NS,.,o,wNs ATNE�u,i— -SUMITTAL&REVIEW LOG OSITEILANANOINA.—SEVATI E S ry rv_SALL.AEAA.S. TTAI .�u o� IS T” .LAlO"N_ ory mo.uFo E men oMEa,,ry EC TO NO rvrv,.ioC o�� sso,mac, IS TI s. E VA ESTIO OF nrvow,..aE—ESiErvorvirvESIiEAsaVA.i n r rvµ ROLK ' o EM000TFo o xaa sEN'TME,Sao of d d rviErvon�, AS ...aE,ru„AooP,EnE.,~EaoEeory .�• a.mE NERS I INE ow..E E EMaEEo N.. orvn..mEneoE ,Eo.ry R ISR LANOsE _lEISIEE"oTEoTION OVERLAY-ICT IN 'ON"' A NE— U rTE LL L. _ IARS.ILIVALo,tAwn U 'WEA RE ATT. RnlA SIA A.2" F 3 LE rvNnS=NAPPROVED io rta,IE AZATE iNESE cex CSC E 10 =.A. — 0 PRET 0.11nh= 5 Ei- COVER 36 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 3�SroR EFq Lryo Logo BOUNDARY&TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FOR NO HWY 57&MILE BRANCH ROAD TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY STEVE YUHASZ ALL OTHER EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UTILITY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ORANGE COUNTY GIS DATA AND AUTODESK AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Zss-nE eo 2. ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN AND ANY PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS MAY NEED TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING DATA THAT MAY VARY. sEo 3. THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED AR(AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL)AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN.THE PROPERTY IS uu wgsmwwoxro rnE LOCCTEDVATHIN THE FIAT RIVER PROTECTED WATERSHED DISTRICT AS DETAILED WITHIN SECTION 4.2 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE [Rosicu corvmot m c[ia[xioi 4. PER SECTION 4.2.5 OF THE ORANGE ZONING ORDINANCE,THE PROPERTY IS LIMITED TO A TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA cT"A orn nrmiare m mrcaswexcwaEm oFce new ALLOTMENT OF 12%. A-1111 DEMOLITION NOTES: IV'ireirvEP�V'I orvs oma nexsaamEPxre 1. ALL DEMOLITION,TRANSPORT,AND DISPOSAL OFWASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE TOWN,COUNTY, STATE,AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 2. REGULATED MATERIALS SUCH AS ASBESTOS.LEAST ETC.MAY EXIST ON SITE AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND A PLAN FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSALPREENTER TO AND APPROVEDOWN BY THE TAND OWNERS PRIOR TO COMMENCING DEMOLITION ON CORRESPONDING MA UPE STRUCTURESS '� rwcrgsuFrw�o wimm sEenoxazar mE urviRev orevEfocmEnr 3. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS SHEET—E PROVIDED AS PART OF THE SURVEYS BY BILLINGS LAND S PLLC.OTHER UNIDENTIFIED UTILITIES OR SITE FEATURES ESPECIALLY RELATED TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE,MAY EXIST AND \\h\'-� _ / SPECIAL CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED DURING ANY SUBGRADE WORK OR DEMOLITION _ —' .- TAlllMlR stgc[vLw[Maov¢ausf s>nc[v[R fowwnovat OR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY PERMITS FOR WORK IN THE NCDOT ANDbR LOCAL RIGHTS-OF WAY.ANY DAMAGED \\\y\j� \\ _/5� � 'TSE�j�\/ 33'sS 4'E/ / // '�� }_ 4 INFRASTRUCTURE IN THERIGHTSOFWAV GLSEDBVCONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES MUSTREREPAIREDTONCUOTANCYCRLOCAL \ \\�1f\�\ __ �� fi ,923/ //a v T, a / , \ oR[MExc[xcvvaucLEacc[ss To aRov[Sry STANDARDS THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO UTILITIES SIDEWALKS CURB&GUTTER AND PAVEMENT. 'p 1 - V r 1 ix M a 5 CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PRIOR TO ANY WORK WTTHIN THE NCDOT RIGHTA Y mE xrsore 6 ALL UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED DISPOSED OF AND/OR ABANDONED PER THE CORRESPONDING SERVICE PROVIDERS GUIDELINES \ \\\�Fu��\ / . iEosouvary uowrxoR urvnsro AE ]. CONSTRUCTION WASTE SHALL NOT BE BURIED ON SITE ccreoAxcrm ro o 0 o s, .34 rvrerereos �ory&rPM�s,x w,vaEL.—SEP�RmEPRo�cT LEGEND � <s x10 I—N srgxs oe Mme: EAl g "��pti pJ vwwv TREE LINE \\�AAAv Av�� \I\ I� I III 1 / _�` �u reo�� .YPgreY ��dp� ^✓�,�M/'✓�/`/�.^. TREE PROTECTION AREA _A_ UX' 9 PROPERTY LINE \\\\\\\\\o\�\\\ / / / O '_ g&c 911 FENCE \V \\VAiAA�VA �// /� .•� \ i So GATE v \\VAS V A VA / N i�°1111 (III 1 / I v / // fi ATE e s EDGE OF PAVED ROAD V A\\V A\\VA\ \\VA I I I ( I I I I I I I I I �. / / _IITIAT 111E.PROPERTY LINE V A V A�q V I I I I V A \ \ II /�,,. / i EDGE OF RIGHT-RANAv A� A\\V �A,I'A \ I I I I A\I\� V A\ V \ \\ / � /� ExwrecE,rvEMA AG g000R-Tl ` 'ter x ^". s nLLo,a� Toxo qu mregreo,��se�� D,wu F o ox Dx� OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNELWITH FLOWDIRECTION -- H--+—+�H—T�H— BAFFLE8. NCHWY57RIGHTOFWAY EXISTING CONTOURS,I.UFT INTERVAL fa' r _— — — — PTtOPGBEDCONT6LRB.,.eFTINTERVAL TY)GILT PENCE DLTLEi V A 'Vv y\\VA�AA VA I A \\ \11 I I I I /� •u'�.5a / •'. / vTe V \ \ vvvv vvv v� m,rn AeAP TorTY)SCALE z o Wo YY' CLEAN NS]STONE \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\Nt9'51'9ge4 \ I/// II I I I I I 11 \ / // I SITE p O " I I I ( I EXIST-AND PROPOSED \\ \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \ 1 \ \ O ASPHALT ETGCKPILE LOCAIIGN \\\\\ \\ \�\\ \ \\ \\ \`\\ \ // / I I �\ II I I \ \\ I I q / I /-�- �\ \ vso§ns�wpe I • m X Ll i �I 14 S) /NS 41'S%.&5o 58542 %' I— W E-100 V 37 SNA17 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: s' Vp S65°33'59.94"E SITE INFORMATION OBTAINAPPROVEDSETOE CONSTRUCTIONORAWINGS.AGRADINGPBFMITER TYWILL BE SQUIRED BEFORk kiki'' GRAall i ." B PIN:0910-24-6642 CnVIrv.KEEPA COPY OF BOTH ITEMS ONSITE TIImD9limlt CONSTRUCTION.CONTAC - @919-24 IORTG1iIIATy LAND OIsiueng ACTIVITIES. P* i%yi� )29 .URIBSHIP LIT ORANGE COUNTY CAMaei ORaNGEcouNiv ERosloN coNTROL s1a34s25eTTo seHEDULE APRE-CONsiRucnoN coNEERE cE i 'ONNSHIP LITTLE RIVER 2 ` ✓ ,! �42 4 536'W COUNTY:ORANGE 3. CLEARONLVASNECESSARYTOINSTALL THE EROSIONCONTROLDEVICESASSHOWN _ ^" _ ATE:NORTH CAROLINA RATERSHEAD:FLAT RIVER(PROTECTED) 4. TREE PROTECTiDNFENCING SHALL BEIA5TALLE0 P10NG THE DISTURBANLELIMITS WHERE,, SBARY €a 1 5 � .f k R BASIN:NEUSE B. INSTALL THETEMPoRARYSEDIMENTBASINASSHOWNTOPROVIOETHEPROPERSURFACEAREAAND VOLUMEA < LE FFREFERENCE DB 6710 PG 828 N4 OTAL NET AREA. 3,50],451.2 SF(80.52 AC)LOT EXISPNG B. INSTALLAIIPERIMETERDITCHINGTHATLEADSTOTHETEMPORARYSELYMENTBASIN '\\ ��4 -� TOTAL NET AREA:434,728.8 SF(11.22 AC)PROPOSED SURDIADED LOT T INSTALL-ION BERMS DOWN SLOPE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO Contain ALL ON BITE RUNOFFAND IVERTITTO E SEdMENTEASIN INSTALL ' P IVERS7R POSED USE:SELF STORAGE ,� ` e \\ e 1RNING REOA CD-1 TEMPoRARV SEED MULCH ANDSTABILIZ4 PONTOTHEBERMS \ / � JACENT.AN&REBA-W-1 A TEMPoRAR LVSEED,MULCH ANCHOR ANO STABILIZEALL ERDSIDNCONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCn .ENS E CTAL BUILDING SQUARE FT:150,050 Sp FT,PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT LESS THAN 25 FT THAT wRENRSON THE EROSIOIN CONTROL IOEVIC SE S�EDIME�NLB OIANO VEIGE�AIONSS�ESTA(iDISHEDTHCONT�ACEREROOSBIONCONNING TROL OF NDI Oo BASI ONi SETBACKS 40FT—REAR AND 510E SETBACKS 30FT ERoR.OnSITE TRAFFIC:AM PEAK:33.PM PEAK:30,TOTAL DAILY:66 9NSPEcnoN AND APPROVAL I:xISTINO IMPERVIOUS:91,210 5F(2.09 AC) REMOVED IMPERVIOUS:12,225 SF 0.28 AC 0. BEGINCLEARINGANDGROSBINGOF THEVEGETATIONANDDEMOLIPONOFOTHERSITEITEMSASSHOWNONTHISSHEETASWELL THE EXISTING COffJJ��ITI \ a S18°3T 573eE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:324,015 SF(7.44 AC) PLAN A'SPOSEOF ALL WASTE MATERIALS WACCORDANCE WITH THEAPEROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTPLANAND ALL APPLICABLE IDELINES OF ORANSE 6T6 T38 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS.403,000 OF(9.25 AL)-9.20% COUNTY5SOLIDWASTEMANAGEMENTONinenm PARKING-CALCULATED TOTAL 1 PER 10 INDIVIDUAL STORAGE AREAS= \ -.1 KI TOTAL BUILD OUT 11. Ba B U LLA,ti dies TDOBTAINFINISHEDGRADESASSHOWNONTHEPIANS.REMOVE AND STOCKPILE ANY TOPSOIL FOR FUTUR AP GATIONINALOCAi. d \ [ROPOSEO I PER 10 INDIVIDUAL STOAGE AREAS+1 EMPLOYEE=5 SUITABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVIrvWITH MINIMAL HINDRANCE \ -CTAL \ L's[Ing BUA:91 210 sf(2.09 oc) 12 MONITOR MAINTAIN MOVEANDA)R ADDSILT FENCE FENCEOUTLETS ANO JNOOH AS NEEDED BASED ON FIELD ANDRUNOFF CON¢,'TIONB DASORBSCTEDB)L' r- \ UA to be Demo'sM1etl.10,1]3 sf(0.23 ac) THE ENGINEER ANLVOR ERASION CONTROL OFFICER. ,q PrpposeI BUA:320,500 sf(].3A pc) E MAINTENgNCE AND INSPEcnONOF THEERosIONCONTROLDEVICESAFTERRUNOFFPRODUCINGSTORMEVENTS.Now TURSELI AR AIS TOBELEFT\,\�'1 X 9`I TOW EGA:401,537 AT(9.22 pc)-9.16% WITHOUT) OTEcPI COVEREORMORETHANI<cALENDARDAYSAFTERCOMPL ONOECONSTR ONORDEVELOP TACVVO ouRlNG co STFUCTION OR \\ \ / \ Disturbed Area:930718 sf 21.37 ac Dere F.-1 ALnvinEG ANY DISTURBED AREAS SRALL BE—TRONSDANG STABaIZEDA�bib9 TO THEsraBluunoN nMEERAMEGRA SHOwNBEL REED ,y�'p GENERALNOTES- AR SFOR ANYPoeTION OFTHE SITESHALL BESTABILIZEDWITHINIDAYS UPONCOMPLETIDNOF CONSTRUCTIONOROEVELOPMENTA nVInES INTRA A \ ,¢t ` 14�CONPNUEGRADINGOPERAPONSASNECESSARYTOOBTATNFINISHGRADESASSHOWNONhI ANS. 1 S u aciFsrangcvvaucmnvvciovee 15 MOTEORAINAGETOWAROSTHEDIVERSIONOITCHESANDSEOIMENTBASINASSHOWN 1 �\', \ ss II.EPoBb [TCGJTArvbsxattrvbT OL MEASIlRE3 ARETD BE REMOVED WITHOUTAPPROVAL OF OL INSPECTOR. 2 _ - 1T UPoNACHIEVING ROUGH GRADE DF FINISHED ELEVATIONS,APELYTOPSOILAIEF-AR MINI�M OF 4'THICK TOALLAREAS \ - uD wasiE vmGe io THE seD FA REOUIRINGPERMANENTVEGETAnON.INSTALLGRAVELATTHEOESIREDTHICKNESSWALAREASTHATVALLHAVEAPERMANENTGRAVEIISURFACE 1 \I - R bonfE iB UPON APPROVAL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING SILTFENCE, 1 \\} t y r -t % \ A an ro mvcp.wwrucvuvnrov Ewi INLETPROTECTIONANDSEDIMENTSARIAIS.FINEGRADE CLEANSEDIMENTEFOMPERM'ENTONSTEDITCHES, 5j _8 axs Iv EFAU nrorxrcaumcrvevravuraveansTnucnary AODGRAVEL.PERMANENTLY-,AND STABILIZEAREAS DISTURBED FROM REMOVAL O DEVICES AS NEEDEO. 1 \t N Y fZ' x.4AII V, WDLLYSTABILI2EDAND RERMANENTVEGETATIDNISEBTABLIGRE � wP E RDYNIpM bFPEbR NDEb 19 REN THE SITE ISF pM IHED CONTACT THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR FOR ONSITEINSPECTVON ANO FINPL APPR VAC. 111171,1 '.'.ALL 1ER111RE1 TO rsaysecnbn se OF Txsasanrs ° LEGEND \\\\T / \ 4 \ 11 E s. meareaT en Iszoneo STE(D rA.Ll.uxeslowTAuS.isiaareownxle tri P 1" TREE LINE i i ZLNERIVERflasw.THE PROVERTYistodaiED wlmlxixEFlAT RIVERVROTEciED C C A \ \ micrna DeraleowTmx OF-10.1 rxeimisieooevFio=T TREE PROTECTION AREA \ Tne vsasPnrvisumlTeD roa IO ^°A'\ \ - �J Ivamrine svac[ifx[wvovv[ausl svacevnz iolxwvlwu o PROPERTY LINE i�' ( ' ox EwexsruevvvxleiFae vnaaxHry 'IN 'OFO IAIM 'T SF is SILTFENCE I \1� \ TbNxaixw sroRAt[AS CEUnIiE En IxFGRu CKTNbF Nn DATE eai A 6AT71 111111S,1AVO EDGEGFPAVEDRC,YD F OR TRS 1ITS KRIALLSORRIIR DRnHGA OFbGC aGYutbNN OR*NoiNnccoHnTOw AZ STREAM ' - IVAIPSM A'SLIVAII u+ PROPERTY LINE \ =Y n 51 4 FO IN OA E. ATAT EDGE OF RIGHT-0FWAY `° \ _ �\ sI ronvDs 9 OVERHEAOELECTRICAL rbl4ma IN ---.- PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION 9 $ z z „��, ;T BN19'51'0 II AFFLE 944.B3T }S.4 24-Wd t 4OFfSEfBACK \ 4 ) _ .•far V / .xflFOR.NaMCEs u� sizr=,BbuvGS Eic.luv valtY OUSPA EXISTING CONTOURS,I.OFT INTERVAL �( \ _ �® , nrvD wlue ascTsoox Txesnsas suer PROPOSED CONTOURS.LOFT INTERVAL 1 \ \\i \ \ \ Z od. V SILT FENCE OUTLET /,/ F t � OU GLEAN ]STONE � � � KM�11AllAVIAI1ABlBSlNrCHAL1N.TRSREE SLS Co — i v < _ ' �r — t E%ISPNG AND PROPOSED �/ ——— _ bry Is u ASPHALT G31 ss'0.5 I-- NE5°41'43.25W y / sTocKPILE LocgnoN «°'" I s �� pb°,` "', \ 41 .1 e� ON' ?/ LT. C-100 38 31797 / 535'33 59.94"E CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: \ III � ;�., 29926 � SITE INFORMATION OBTAINAPPROVEDSETOFCONGARUGONORAWINGS.AG N 4 WILL BE REQUlf�EDBEFORE THE DNSETOFAll GRA NO / /\/ ,,W N*1111-211111 cnVIT'.KEEPACOPYOFSOiHITEMSONSiJETAmu9 tc Ns TY�91 5-256k I�¢ TO INITIATING LANOOrsiuieng ACTIVInES. �� " _G CSVV 'a%® PURISDICTON:ORANGE COUNTY 'C MSHIP LITTLE RIVER COMACTORANGECOUNTV EROSIONCOMROL 919-2 4 5 2 58 UC NCONFERENCE P R a LOUNTV:ORANGE 3 —RONLVASNECESSARYTOINSTALLTHEEROSION CONTROL DEVICESA SH N Vf� _I/ /— STATE:NORTH CAROLINA / �' NATERSHEAD:FLAT RIVER(PROTECTED) 4. TREE PROTECTIDNFENCING SHALL REINSTALLED PLONG THE DISTURBANCEL WH EC SARY \ 9J EBF / / 6$ LIVER BASIN:NEUSE \D REFERENCE:OR 6710 PC 828 5. INSTALL THE iEMPoRARYSE0IMENT BASINAS SHOWN TO PROVIOETHE PROPERS FACE AREA VOLAS TE IN TIRE BASIN SCHEDULE N -� _ / .�) _ TOTAL NET AREA: 3,5O7,451.2 SF(80.52 AC)LOT EXISTING 6. INSTALLALLPERIMETERD'TCHING THATLEADGTOJHETEMPORARYS AIENTBA IN �� " / ''TOTAL NET AREA:434,728.8 SF(11.22 AC)PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT ] INSTALL DIVERSION BERMS DOWNSLOPE FROM TOE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIEST COn(aInALL ON SITE UNOFF AN(�DIVERTij TOTEEHAEOIMENT BANIN I�NST IX{"�.;y _ �i /// ;�. \ PROPOSED USE:SELF STORAGE n.-.lFE sl(H r \ /ONING RILDING -1 TEMPoRARYSEED MULCH AND STABILIZATION iOTHEBERMS \ 7 DJACENT.AN B REDA-CD-1 TEMPoRARILYSEED,MULCH ANCHOR AND STABILIZEALL EROSIONCONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELYAFTER.OVIST HEIGHT BUILDING N 25 FT:150,050 Sp FT,PROPOSED BUILDING AREASINTO JHE SEDIMENTBASIN ARELINED ANO STABiLIZEDANDTNATDIVERSIONS AND LINING EXTEND INTO BA O HEIGHT LESS THAN 25 FT S_ \' I NA_- .a. 4 �. RE NT SETBACKS 40FT—REAR AND TOE SETBACKS 30FT 9 WHENTHE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE STABILIZED ANOVEGETATIONIS ESTABLISHED CONTACTEROSION ROL OFFICERF O Tql SPE AFFIC:AM PEAK.33.PM PEAK:30,TOTAL DAILY:66 APPROVAL. I.XI STING IVPERVOUS:91,210 SF(2.09 AC) BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THEVEGEATIONANDDEMOLITIONOFOTHERSITEITEMSASSHCWNDNTHISS EETAS—LAS THKE. TI r` _ \ e 3J ST 34E MOVED IMPERVIOUS.12,225 SF(0.28 AC) PLAN.DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCEWITN THE APPROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTPLAN AND A APPLICABLEGUICx E 0 NG -" "l - '1.' 676]38 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:324,015 SF(7.44 AC) ..I, TOTAL IMPERVIOUS.403,000 SF(9.25 AC)-9.20% COUNTY5SOIJDWASTE MANAGEMENTONinance. I \ \ PARKING-CALCULATED TOTAL 1 PER 10 INDIVIDUAL STORAGE AREAS= BaB LL ""sTO OBTRIN FINISHED GFADES AS SHOWN ON THE PIANS.REMOVE ANO STOCKPILEANVTOPSt111LF FUTURE APPLICAO TITVA( N - .1 AT TOTAL BUILD-OUT SIUITABLEt Trhte CONSTRUCTIONACTIVIT'WITH MINIMAL HINDRANCE \\\1� i - (OROAPOSED 1 PER 10 NDIVIDUAL STOAGE AREAS+1 EMPLOYEE=5 2. MONITOR MAINTAIN,MOVEAND,OR ADD SILT FENCE FENCEOUTLETS ANO JHOO AlNEEDED BASEDON FIELD AN RUNOF CONDIRONS ANDA9 RE 7 9 _ \ F's H.9 BUA.91 210 sf(2.09 oc) THE ENGINEER AND-0R EROSION CONTROL OFFICER \ '\ UA to be Demo'sbetl 10173 sf(023 ac) iENANCE AND INSPECnONOFTHE EROSION coNrnoL DEVICE NO PRODUCINGslClf-A NVI 6TURBEDAREAIS � ^ Proposed BUA 320500 sf(]38 ac) J400TROTE DJ COVERFORMDRETHANf4CALENDARDAVSAFTERCOMPLE NS cnON OR DEv ACTIVIn URINGCONSTR _ / Total BUA.401,537 If(9.22 ac) 916% Ibve pment AGAVITEs,ANYgSTUR AREASSHALLBEPROJECTEDANOSTAe ,qT HESTABIUZ ON Ti \ '!•"\ `Y D'sturbed Area.930]18 sf 21.3]ac AREAS FOR ANYPoRTION OF JHE SITE SHALL BESTABILIZEDWITHIN]DAYS UP9NC EJIONOF GONSrRI1CTIDNOROE IdPhEENTAc V VIES 11111TIARF.�\4 � /1 � � GENERAL NOTES: 14. CONTNUEGRADING OPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TOOBTAIN FINISH GRADE SA55HOWNONTTBAANS. `` \4 s s \ um zEo oucrasgsuFaroawEFayfmoevcTOpEo 5 PROMOTE DRAINAGE TOWAR0.4 THE DIVERSION DITCHES INSGFDIMENTBASIN ASSHOWN ral�ws aEurEo 1 _ n ^ I. mrmaxxnsxuL er x coN51sTENiWYM ME51ceM 1) UPONACHIEVING1—GRADE DF ARE1 EDELEVATIOAl9—11 APPROVAL 11—EROSION CONTROL INSPECTO�2. \ \1� " t - i 6' z. Rriau scars rRON rnr snau eruwiro t6 NO SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARETO BE REMOVED - ro iREmo ry[. a II—A NMRIALs[ic.)arvo snau nor I II� / APPLYTOPSOILAMINIMUMOF4'THICKTOALLAREAS \I _ s� REQUIRING PERMANENT VE ETAn INSTALL GRAVEL AT THE DESIRED THICKNESS IN AR--I—HAVEA ANEMGRA-11P C- \ \\2 iI�' 4' - / uowasrEwtloRminE 1 6 UPoNAPPROVAL,REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,INCLUING SILTFENCE \ \ =.i y�' / xccuiBOLVMoB is inE conn[+ICEN[xioi a..wi 'i - _- 4_ � uwLvr Tn INLETPRO OON ANO SEDIMENTBASINS.FINEGRADE CLEAN SEDIMENTFR9 —MANENT—TEDITCHES E * - j rENSNoi woo oRlnxs ORomrnsrwuR �vERMRSFro RMWATERANO ERosloN coxmoL rw. ' wMFu xaLt BEREo oBTaINBNLWNG FERM is FRaM ME ORANGE ADO GRAVEL PERMANENttYSEED ANO STABILIZEAREASDISTURBEDFROMREMOVALOFDEVICESAS NEEDED, \ \ " ' Ixsvrcncxs orv,wrurnrwaw ra mrca.wwrucrurm orcaxarRvcnau 19. WHENTHESITEISFULLYSTABILIZEDANOPERMANENTVEGETAn MI TABLISHE, \ \ - / rvisH.Ts LLer RralxRm TaaerawslrxrrRNlTs rRaN mr vuxnlxa CONTACT THE EROSION CONTROL INGFECTOR FOR ONGITEINSPECTIONANDFINAL APPR VAL. \ \ISc a U calix TRE l=Rovls oxs oirn[o6axOEccuxivumilEo \�l` / rvn orsrononrte or mr onanor '""w"`"'XB % a vrRvrnll _I couxttu amorvxm.•.unme olnwsrwas TaKrx"INsunvry xn.eurnma.ann..m.m`ePo`M. LEGEND \. er rvps A\ :g 6's /- uRONonan .A`c LFTc`iocanorousM TREE LINE \\ / crasoriarL wnx oxazarmrvT Aro orvrlovMrrvI r wow i. _TFFOIVE C C warrRsnr TREE PROTECTION AREA i Bron '"eFurR veR RRorEc>Eo �� -, ,RaRK,xAIA sRaEl LL�rFrRrNaorrr-1--l—GLIAL w S S PROPERTY LINE \ e ,r sF mox wnHlxsioRgc[vuitFasEOocuN[Ntt IxiORwxcc lL Exiso sLr FENCE ° g„o'`• DAT I DIN DT Ell E PA vEO RonD ." ✓ �ERrFoareoipoEwAxo'AL :row �° EDGEO' srREAM 6 _ _ PROPERTY LINE w \� ` 51 SJ ff s EDGE.—H- aA, , rovRotrvo[aoIEo coxvlxACLTY EACH"TN"cE vrL uc O Ox Rr— OVERHEADELECTRICAL \\�5 „t� a4F / axu cu n wrc ---- PRDP08ED DRAINAGE FLOWDIRECTION N19°51'0424"W t ed' gra '41 OR ISASR s[vrvui[o wR mE RRa[ei 40FT SETBACK 94499] \\� // / ucnox o[ewsassOcuiEo N S _ NO H 57 RIGHT OF WAY \\ axo wlu e[REia[ci[a ox in[slrtassulLi voui sxELeouxOs E}CMAY VARY EXISTING CONTOURS,1SFr INTERVAL zl PERSEcroNsE Wf vnovosrOmo4rcr zo- zx OOE mVNioRESEEN SITECO PROPOSED CONTOURS.LOFT INTERVAL iaclun oR usEmsFacluirvxo[R Afn SILT FENCE OUTLET \1 'U,/ ��1\� w A ANN-1.1 AAR I, T77 1 IX lE o a B CLEAN-7 STORE I'll IALL 11-1 ' O -W E%ISTNG AND PROPOSED > ruu wsefernax azul mraeevrlsauragrvo wu )- ASPHALT �\� 536°55' .5 / I / 'mac O N65'4t'432es'w S 90 VBG I eIA,P` STOCKPILE LOCATON — 515j / EA-Eil C-101 39 9 B `3YVAR4"E SITE INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: 2992 OBTAINAPPROVEOBETOFCONSTRUCTIONORAWINGS.AG N REQUIR£O14EF _ ,,((� ;,pt PN:0910-24-6642 CTIVIT'.KEEPACOPYOFSOiHiT ONSlTETomu9 tCONS 7PRXOI�TO INITIATINGLANOOrsiuDMACOTIVG IES. / x`53 04'35.36'W e4CQ JURISDICTION:ORANGE COUNTY t. WILL BE �1 ORE THE ONSETOFA // / 3A / A - 9ts24szse 'ONNSHIP LITTLE RIVER 2. COMACTORANGECOUNTV EROSIONCOMROL B-112591N ONFERENCE ''-- 1' _ 43'59 .OUNTY:ORANGE 3. CLEARONLYASNEGESSARYTOINSTALL THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICESA H WN �. rV/ 'TATE:NORTH CAROLINA YATERSHEAD:FLAT RIVER(PROTECTED) 4. TREE PR TECTIDNFENCING SHALL BEIA5TALLE0 PLONG TH T ECESS Y / I / \ ap+x —I BASIN NEUSE O i / t \ EFERENCE DB 6710 PG 628 Ni0"07 44.37 E- 5. INSTALL THETEMPoRARYSEOIMENT BASINAS SHOWN TO PROVIOETHE PROPER SURFACE AREA AND LUME AS NOTE INPHE BASIN SCHEDULE 543534 ' /_ a „� -+_ OTAL NET AREA: 3,507,451.2 IF(60.52 AC)LOT EXISTING 6. INSTALL ALLPERIMETERLYTCHING THATLEASS TO THE TEMPORARVGELYMENTBAJN \ 'OTAL NET AREA:434,726.8 SF(11.22 AC)PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT ] INS TALL DIVERSION BERMS DOWNSLOPEFROM THECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO CORta1R ALL ON SITE RU FFAND:I FTITTOTHESEDIMENTEABIN INSTALL I`ROPOSED USE:SELF STORAGE y'I TION/ /�'� / \i{ �,vr 'A \ HENING REOA-CD-1 TEMPoRARYSEED MULCH AND STABILIZATIONTOTHEBERMS I \ Y \ IRJAL BUILDING AN&REARE FT:1 8 TEMPORARILY SEED,MULCH ANCHOR ANO STABILIZEALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEOIATEL YAFTER CO OAC BUILDING SOEBA FT:150,050 Sp FT,PROPOSED BUILDING TRUC ON.ENSI/RBTHATOIVE HEIGHT LESS THAN 25 FT AREASINTO JHE SEOIMENTBASIN ARELINEO ANO STABILIZEOANDTNATOIVERSIONS AND LINING EXiENOINTO BASINS. ONr SETBACKS 40FT--REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS SOFT 9 WHENTHE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE STABILIZED ANOVEGETATIONIS ESTABLISHED CONTACTEROSION CO Rd OFFICER FOR Dry\SITER CTIO D - ;+'�'� RAFFIC:AM PEAK.33.PM PEAK 30 TOTAL DAILY:66 APPROVAL. \ \I - '(1 IN MOVED MPERNOUS 12.225 SF(.,SF 2S AC) BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THEVEGETATIONANDDEMOLIT)ONOFOTHERSfAAH SASSHOWNDNTHIS SH -Al THE E%TI `* 516°37'5134"E PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS.324,015 OF(7.44 AC) PLAN.DISPOSE FALL WASTE MATERIALS INACCORDANCE VJITHTHEAPPROVEDSOLIDWASTEMANAGEMENTPLANAND ALL A LICABLE GUIDELINES OF 6]6.]36 -GOAL IMPERVIOUS:403.000 SF(OF(AC)-9.20% CO"lOSOIJDWASTE MANAGEMENTONInanca m- ', ( IARKIN- ILPER AT Np TOTAL 1 PER 10 INDINOUAL STORAGE AREAS= � \ PgRKING CALOUS: P. 1, P-g I"tate CON STO OBTRIN FINISHED GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE PIANS.RE OVE ANO STOCKPILEANVTOPSOIL R TGREAPPLI RONHJ LN ,t r n H U; SUITABLET STRUCTIONACTIVC`YWITHMINIMALHINORANCE -" INDIVIDUAL STOAGE AREAS+1 EMPLOYEE=5 \ \ _ \ OTAL 12. MONITOR MAINTAIN MOVEANDAJRADDSILTFENCE FENCEOUTLE75ANO OK ASNEEDEDBASEDONFI—ANDR OFF DI PONS ANDAS DIR IS ,a \ F' ng FLA:91,21D sf(2.09 oc) THE ENGINEER AND-0R EROSION CONTROLOFFICER \ be D mo sbetl:10173 If(0.23 ac) 13 GONTINUE--INSPECTION OF THE EROSION CIV ROL OF—AFTER RUNOFF PROOUCINGSTOIRG is.NO. RBED AREA IS To y`" Proposed BU:320,500 If(].36 oc) WIT 40OTPROT Dc COVERFORMDRETHANt4cALENDAROAVSAFTERCOMPLEDONOFCONSTRUCTIONOROEVELOPME IVInES. URING coNSTRUCi - ,S Total BUA:401,537 sf(9.22 ac)-9.162 OeveGP-ACTIVITIES,ANYDISTURBEOAR£ASSHALLBEPROTECTEDANOSTABILI � i DI--d Area.930718 sf(21.37 ac)' R SFDRANYPDRTIDNDFTHESI ESHALLBESTABILI2EDWRHIN7DAYSDPDNc �o�o A oNORO E TACT IDWN11 AA-RET `- GENERAL NOTES: 14. CONTINUEGRADING OPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TOOBTAIN FINISH GRADES AS SFOWNON hIEPLANS. 1 \ lra x / d \ f. ,xEmOxRttsxut BEunt ioRACEi4cnmoEVEtovEo 15. PROMOTEORAINAGETOWAR0.5TRA[X RSIONOITCHESANOS£DIMENTBASINASfRCNVl \ ToZETrvxru4rn FROM PHEPRvn SnatLSEUMIrm TonEMSRELATED 1 \ Y., k r. RETAIL SALES FROM inEPRo FA xe Mar[_vrc)axe snnu xaT t6 NO SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARETO BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF EEROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR 4% x rc m[vrsawsmevsw[ss li[. NvoLVE rxE SALEoicmERALR Foo'gR Fs, 11ER SM'UR 1) UPoNACHIEVING ROUGH GRADE DF FINISHED ELEVATIOA6 APPLYTOPSOILAMINI UM OF 4'THICK TO ALL AREASE. " A � r[Ms ucrcorvs sr'�urwrrx rx MFucANi SHAtt BEREp rvnsAs¢Fsraxac[vAcum- REOUIRINGPERMANENTVE T N LGRAVEL ATTHE DESIRED THICKNESS IN AREA.]HATWILL HAVEAPERMAN GRAVEL SURFAC. 1 \ - ` ouxvsrvx vao Lacancuvx0M ownro6 roi E�Posm aryENr gl�rT y / �/( Z r \ 16 UPONAPPROVAL,REMOVEALL TEMPGRARYEROB—CONTROLMEASURES,INCLU INGSILTFENCE coMwExcEl.IExioT EARixos,u ul,M,arvrzaxo ruasrox rourx INLET PROTECTION ANO SED'MENTBASINS.FINEGRADE CLEAN SEOIMENTFROM PERMAWENTONBITE DITCHES, \IS �_. ox08A wtloRio,xEcoMumcErrExioT vERMliSTRaMORANGE couxiv r I eaRrn vlsrvxaNcacnvrv. ADO GRAVELPMUANENttYSE ,ANO STABILIZEAREASDISTURBEDFROMREMOVALOFDEVICESAENEEDED, \t / xvPutrMwrvxlox rcorvs e mveonwwcvMemm ovruucnax 19. WHEN THE SITE IS FULLY STABILIZED ANO PERMANENT VEGETATC1.ESTABLISHED, 1 \ ' uvrx sloes ovm[ozwcvice rvuvl m � a i I o[vaR wENr�uacccaxwucvEoul Rm is OBTAIN'pN PERMIT'FROM mEELANNING s CONTACT THE EROSION CONTROL IA6PECTOR FOR OA6ITEINSPECTIONAND FINAL APPR VAL. ,sa r I (\� oEVELOPMmioROlrvalcE rav�w \ \4 4 / —All V'R_ roV'RY_xooeivp¢apwrvRacAuPxrIiPA—A"E LEGEND I. rIREM pP ED,Ipn4.4oP EaRAnEE Ix ORMAnoxARp o W,iw sT KmFRrvMsuRU y^ o sa":N-;Po�, A. '-: E TREE LINE n2_-F`Z.Rioimµ�so HE5u1)sx �i>"uiEE TMVIIF"'xs irvaE AKoAo — FL mRo S2tlxm e m xE�,Earp¢�aAslx,nE�p,>�R,vrsLa9.,EaWrxlx n M EHarRIY�'9xo �,Eo �r= �ti, � \ wATERSxmaarab,AsoETNtmwnxlnsmntln4.,oP,xEM41RmoEVELaH,Ex, s TREE PROTECTION AREA t '` mEPRovmnlSUMIrm TOA / ORP S PRDPDBEp o a.°."n E w a o EP REMPLOYm 5,=PArvE�IplxaMo At PROPERTY LINE -A\ -aT co REMEn—YVEnctEAccESSTOPR—1 'F SF SILTFENCE \L FS v GATE ' \ mou WlmN sroR.aar urt�A nc cuvNrsou crnnvlcar[oFoccuvaxcvau src sc IS EOGEOF PAVED ROADd \ ¢ pNOIx ADDaROARCB N9 STREAM Yg/ .\ / / J 50.57' O G _ PROPERTY LINE EDGEOF RIGHT-0E-WAY , ro vRovloEAooEo eoxvlrveE vnuEEsaaeEano REoueEuxo c __ z. LA—L— CVERHEADELECTRICAL 1 �- r cuv / FROnioF o[v¢omf �4 uRPARKNc sracrse En ---- PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLDW DIRECTION PaRPRosPEcnvE cu mFT SErBACK N19 9a4.ss7 \ i /' �'T' 1L eI.no oEexIAASAoraarEo d d NCH VY57RIGHT OF WAY \ . / (u/ u+cs snauevMvrvoR rxv i EXISTING CONTOURS,ISIFr INTERVAL \\\, F"y / dS' // ¢ axo lMu sE REPtEcim on inEsnEAsewti vaur srzc xounw vrc Marvaxv --- PR OPOSEDCONTOURS.I.OFTINTERNAL \ _ £ �/ -IG /r w SILT FENCE ouTLET / = 9 a CLEAN WSJ STGNE � � V O Wl W i J EXISTING AND PROPOSED 7:S W\ / G /_ -- wu clscrtmax. Issues axo wnt O ASPHALT 414 5 / E. 133.790 � 51a655 S STO � R OKPILE LOCATIONHas 8888"' Ei. 40 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIESAND PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: POLE LOCATIONS LOCATED PRIOR TO INSTALLING PLANT MATERIAL z. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH SIZING AND GRADING STANDARDS OF THE LATEST 20'WIDE BUFFER PLANTING 10'WIDE BUFFER PLANTING PLAN ,wxTV PaEPwawpLeNT LIST PROMOE Sv oaANCEcouxtt PuxMNc owARTMwT. FDTTION aF THE"AMERICAN STANDARD.FOR NURSERY STOCKBY THE AMERICAN PLAN FOR NC HWY 57 FOR NORTHERN RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN NAN). ,O TERIALIN CRITICAL ROOT ZONES DF s�nri. /TKRs wLI 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NDE PAND NEW PLANT MA " x°' E%ISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND, ON SITE: 4. ANY DISTURBED AREAS NOT SCHEDULED FOR HARDSCAPE,PLANTING OR MULCH SHALL BE 1R rvEM UIMu cN+OcrR APPROVED BUFFERS(AS SHOWN): SEEDED LAWN PER NOTES ON PUN. ;p nu*uxE xeaxroFas' p 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL AMEND ALL PROPOSED PLANT BEDS WITH ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT (VT �ono� x x xc xvry s� =ITR[Esaza1TRUN (COMPOST).RT LL BEDS TO A DEPTH OF 8',ADD Y'OF COMPOST AND ROTOTILL AGAIN. — ———— ———— REMOVE ALL EXISTING WEEDS.GRASS AND ROOTS Fssivix..R.—LIN CONTRACTOR6. SHALL RAKE SMOOTH ALL UwN AREAS REEIVING SEED,REMOVE ALL aE"ETM =T TRE,1111HRUM EXISTINGWEEDS,GRASS AND RCOTS —SYN—BEITYUNE.TOR—Nulsnxcxn-TEEANov .AnoN 7. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE SPECIFIED DYER OF MULCH. NoaTHwxPROPwrvLIxETORETNN.I.IN. TNETaEEAxO TON * FOR PUNTING DETAILS SEE SHEET G-101. B. 107 LANDSCAPING BUFFER SHALL BE MET. P 5 E 033 3479] 994E a .a4 zs.3e'w 07' LEGEND \� � \ T14 CCI TREE LINE V A '"� d \ OO ma TREE PROTECTION AREA \\ \ PROPOSED LINE \ \ g a —SF — SILT FENCE —X—X-1— GATE EDGE OF PAVED ROAD CENTERLINE OF TRANSMISSION I-- PROPERTY LINE IGHTOF-WAvPRGPERavurvE \ e m EDGE OF RIGHE OF.wAY / 4 CENTERLINE OF EXITING DISTRIBUTION LINE \ Ox OHS— PROPOSED OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL EXISTING OVERHEADSTATIC LINE PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH FLOW OIREDNON III I V 1 i R -IklHllIil-TlklHlllTlliiHIT BAFFLE DRAINAGE BOUNDARY M�� EXISTING CONTOURS 1.07 INTERVAL 'ICINITY NWP NOT TO SCALE W PROPOSED CONTOURS,1.07 INTERVAL v SILT PENCE OUTLET 8 //'P / i O� .may U N19'S1 0 EIX C Z 944.9w i' SITE / Q cLeAN-1 STONE \t\t44 ,✓J'V `C' z VI J y Q i;..;. EXISTING AND PROPOSED. ASPHALT rn�Eu� F 2 �t _8 ° — m s GRASS ABC STONE Nfi5°41'47.85'Vl � 132790 �� Y✓J � y" / LS-100 41 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES: SITE INFORMATION OBTAINAPPROVED SETOF CONSTRUCTIONORAWINGS.AGRADING PERMITFROM ORANGE COUNTYWILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE ONSETOF ANY GRAgrvG PIN:0910-24-6642 COVIT'.KEEPA COPY OF 807RITEMS ONSITE TIImuAl CONSTRUCTION.CONTACTORANGE COUNTY@913245258]PRIOR TO INITIATING LANG Disiur,ACTIVITIES. JURISDICTION:ORANGE COUNTY TONNSHIP LITTLE RIVER COMACTORANGECOUNTV EROSIONCOMROL 919-2 4 5 2 58 7 TO SCHEDULEAPRELONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE COUNTY:ORANGE 3. BLEAR ONI.vas NECEssaavro lNsrau rHEEROsION coNrROL DEVICES as-srlowN NA SECONDARY ACCESS,OFFSITE WATER AND UTILITY STATE NORTH LAT RIVE WATER HASIN FLAT RIVER(PROTECTED) 4 TREE TECTIDNFENCING SHALL REINSTALLED ALONG THE DISTURBANCELIMITS WHERE NECESSARY RIVER BASIN:NEUSE REFERENCE:DB 6710 PG 828 5. INSTALL THE iEMPoRARYSE0IMENT BASINAS SHOWN TO PROVIDETHE PROPERSURFACE AREAAND VOLUME AS NOTED INTHE BASIN SCHEDULE :.ORAL NET AREA: 3,507,451.2 SF(80.52 AC)LOT EXISTING INSTALLALLPERIMETERLYTCHINGTHATLEADSTOTHETEMPORARVSELYMENTBASIN _ 'ORAL NET AREA:434,]28.8 SF(11.22 AC)PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT T INSTALL DIVERSION BERMS DOWNSLOPEFROM THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO COR(ain ALL ON SITE RUNOFF ANDDIVERTIT TO THESEDIMENTBASAI INSTALL PROPOSED USE:SELF STORAGE TURING REDA-CD-1 TEMPoRARYSEED,MULCH AND STABILIZATION iOTHEBERMS ADJACENT:AN&REDA-CO-1 TEMPO RILY SEED,MULCH ANCHOR ANO STABILIZEALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATEL Y AFTER CONSTRUCTION.ENSURETHATOIIE ONTRANSITIGN -OTAL BUILDING SQUARE FR:150,050 SO FT,PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS INTO JHE SEDIMENTBASIN ARELINED ANO STABILIZEDANGTNATDIVERSIONS ANDLINING EXTEND INTO BASINS. b HEIGHT LESS THAN 25 FT FRONT SETBACKS 40FT—REAR AND 510E SETBACKS 3DFT 9 V RAFFIC:AM PEAK:33,PM PEAK:30,TOTAL DAILY:66 APPROVAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS:91,210 SF(2.09 AC) BEGIN CLEARING ANG GRUBBING OF THE VEGE ATION AND DEMOLITION OFOTHERSITE ITEM SAS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET AS WELL AS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS _ REMOVED IMPERIOUS:12.225 SF(0.28 AC) PLAN.DISPOSEOF ALL WASTE MATERIALS IN ACCORDANOB MTN THEAPPROVED SOLID WASTEMANAGEMENTPLAN AND ALL APPLICABLE GUIDELINES OF GRANGE - PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:324,015 SF(7.44 AC) COUNN5SOIJDWASTE MANAGEMENi0rtlinance. -ORAL IMPERVIOUS: 03.000 (9.25 AC)DI 9.20% AT PARKING-CALCULED TOTALL 1 1 PER 10 INDINOUAL STORAGE AREAS= B.9 LL OBTRIN FINISHED GRADES AS SHOWN ON TI/E PLANS REMOVEANGSTOCKPILEANVTOPSOILFORFUtt REAPPL10ATIONINALOCATION q. -.1 AT TOTAL BUILD-OUT I SUITABLEt Trhte CONSTRUCtIONACTIVIT'WITH MINIMAL HINDRANCE ROPOSED I PER 10 INDIVIDUAL STOAGE AREAS+1 EMPLOYEE=5 t OTAL 2. MONITOR MAINTAIN,MOVEANDARADDSILTFENCEFENCEOUTLETSANO OKSASNEEDEDBASEDONFIELDANDRUNOFFCONDIPONSANDASgRECTEDBY kg9 r F' ing FLA:91210 sf(2.09 oc) THE ENGINEER ANDOR EROSION CONTROL OFFICER '� UA to be D sbee:10173 sf(0.23 ac) 13 ViENANCEANDINSPEcnONOF TREEROSION CONTROL DEIDGES AFTER ATINUFF PRODucING sioRM EVENTS.NODISTURBFDAREA IS JOBELEFT Proposed BU:320500 If(].36 Oc) AD THOUiPROTEcnVE COVER FOR MORE THAN fd cALErvDAR DA vs AFTER coMPLEnONOF conISTRucnON OR DEVELOPMENT AcnvInES.DURING coNSTRUcnONOR +I" Tota BUA: Ot,53T sf(9.22 ac) 9162 vbebpmACTIVITIES,ANYOISTURBEDAREASSHALLBEPROJECTEDANOSTABILI2EDAccDN TO THESTABILIZATION TIMEERAMECHARTSHOWNBELOW.DISTURBED T / Dsturbed Area.930.]18 0(213]ac) DARREASFORANYPORnONOFJHESITESHALLBESTABIuzEDwI N7DYS UPONCOMPLEDONOFCONSTRUCTIONORDEVELOPMENJAcnvfnE81NJHATARE. GENERAL NOTES' 14. CONTINUEGRADINGOPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TO OB TAINFINISHGRADES AS SHOWNON THEPLANS57 0 E ) 1 k vin.sroaacrvacvmoElrvlOvvo 3479 5. PROMOTEDRAINAGETOWAR0.4THEDIVERSIONDITCHESANOSEDIMENTBASINASSHOWN �i Ry Y 9.eAE 16 NOSEDIMENTCONTROLMEASURESARETOBEREMOVEDMN UTAPPROVALOF THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR Afiob .926 6 17 UPONAGHIEVINGROLAS4 DEOFF 14EDELEVATIONlS APPLYTOPSOILAMINNOLMOF4'74ICKTOALLAREAS =A11=1 ERF ASAS�EI ITY REQUIRING PERMANENT VE STATION INSTALL GRAVEL ATTHE DESIRED THICKNESS IN ALL AREA.THATWILLHAVEAPERMANENTGRAVELSUREACE. 0425.36"W Y4" d pTW` G 1I� uowgsTvveloR ro TxE sm 16 UPoNAPRROVAL,REMOVEALL TEMPORARYEROSIONCONTROLMEASURES,INCLUDINGSILTFENCE -= A CTIONANOSEDIMENTBASINS.FINEGRADE CLEANSECIMENTFROMPERMANENTONSITED'TOMES, �\ 1 ', EROslox coxraoLVRIOR io m[comM[xcEwl6xioE .wI ADO GRAVEL PERMANENTLY SEED AND STABILIZE AREAS DISTURBED FROM REMOVAL OFDEVICESASNEEDED. + cnaxsII Rruwrvw1111111-1 JamEcaiwwExcEUEx1 BE—sRRucnax III WHENTHE SITE IS FULLY STABILIZED ANO PERMANENTVEGETATIONIS ESTABLISHED, CONTACT THE EROSION CONTROL NA6PEOTOR FOR ONISITEINSPECTIONANDFINAL APPROVAL. hp,y wlTx mEVRonsloxs oEmEORuucEcc rvuvmm 6 Q LEGEND \\ >ex�rvmaccoaw cx iFw I covrmux FlEDOEVE�aPmERJ. e ERSw s. B'u DoARvY xD rowcRavnl raDMsunvrr v ev uxo suRVEnxo au OTxRA I TaNEn EROMORAxcecourvivclswra oxs Ano ` ElEvnnansmAr vAA FROM Rn woElEVA—M ^ nwvxrm r0 eeEleLoaovsreo , reuv vaRr. e m TREE LINE x[USE—RIVE TRE1SAIIls zoxmaRl SIDE w orsLocaTm wvTxw mE n '1`� — mw mEEuiRrvm vRorEciEo M - taa`az•_.34°E TAI TRIlJasxETAI. ,xEM,IHmxE--T TREE PROTECTION AREA 2�8 =1 m[vROVERnIs uMlim Toa c a PROPERTY LINE \\ Tf Y V _O, R[wErtc[ncvvEnfcLEacc[55.romovEe" 'F SF SILTEENCE E b i'{ / p d.4" S a � IusroRacE vurtlFnsEcocuwExTSlxraRwxc cuEursoR G T I{ TEoroccx�gl�r.Nl pR,L S A o EDGEOFPAVEDRDAD vy STREAM \\ X J ,i"• d'`\ alclxnccoRoaxcE Hf k _ PROPERTY LINE 55 O WF r „- MAY EIrroOof orop ADccoOwxvlsxmpEvacMLIEEXEIsArclNx cunortilAslEusx1u1 EDGE OF RGHT-0WAY NEm Eo oNmaMnnr REorxl_vaUMRRY�N.cI x rc armO VE ESPAOEAmRED Euxp Ox H� CVERHEADELECTRICAL w ---' PRDP08ED DRAINAGE ROVVDIRECTION _ EaRvvOsffcnvEcusrcaERs.rn z z aBET SETBACK / / MIIExnoxnExRlAAsmrax dd NC Hwr sT RIGHT DFwAv - - �_.. / Axo wru eeREELccim on ineslTEAsewLr °xr s:E Eoxxx�wroMArwRr „. smTloxa<o - 'PRorosmvRo.IEcr`J / zz.xxETo xxEORESEEx sITEoo EXISTING CONTOURS,I.OFT INTERVAL A'. Y / ` ' buuvsm=siovwbecExrerslwLESABEaswuays: --- PROPOSED CONTOURS.LOFT INTERVAL V / w TEnnxT SILT FENCE OUTLET ry d+” / cIR usl omR / m Z vRoouc - `GA EOI/t�eeEll W .AM N w I. xi ro~ CLEAN-7 STONE E%ISING AND PROPOSED / s* // Tuu ascREncx. AU TnEgeaWlssuES AxR wnl ASPHALT IB B.IKIL, STOCKPILE LOCATIONEA by Ei. C-103 42 1.SET STEEL POSTS 2'-0'DEEP AND EXCAVATE 3.ATTACH THE SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILED �5'MIN._ sLLT FENCE 12 em bK D—A.—sausnm RUN A 4"X R"TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE FABRIC TO THE SECOND WIRE FROM x sxmsaaD. OF POSTS. THE TOP ON THE WRE FENCE AND TOP OF SILT FENCE EXTEND IT INTO THE TRENCH. MUST BEAT LEAST I' 2,ATTACH WIRE FENCING TO q,THE ENO OF THE SILT FENCE NEEDS ABOVE THE TOP OF MIN.10:GA. THE POS15. TO BE TURNED UPHILL THE WASHED STONE 1 MIN. __ LINE WIRES 5.BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL. UFT v oEN6lry / 9} INTAN—DPaocma PLASTIC OR WIRE FE HARDWARE CLOTH FROxT WEw DEHARDW ECPER E 4„ �i WIRE TIES /��/ HARDWARE CLOTH NC TEFL FENCE POST 1 LTH N MIN.12-1/2 GA. r 4 xA i n oansRAx. \� / INTERMEDIATE WIRES -- E CH POST ��- / FA C EMAX N2 APART OUNO RR i0 SOLD 11INI OR x su TAaLE MATmwAs gREttm ov TxEEPC PEm.wo EOE.—I.— _ EXTENSION OF FABRIC AND FILTER STONE xD WIRE INTO THE TRENCH Nb1Es coxnnoNINT.EHPEI.uNDAnoN 1. REMOVE SED HALF OF.TONE olREttixu TEMPoxnxv Fiowlxio sulTAazE ERopoP coPmoL OEvcm - 3pN� REEL POST - ml- BUURRYWWWIRRE CEONCE AN FlIL1EReFAOF BRIC INETRENCH OF 2. REPLACESTONEAS NEEDED i0 ENSURE FILTER FABRIC DEWATERING�� -JLVERT CROSSING FILL FW AND CGVER SPECIFICATION IR BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT— SILT FENCE OUTLET x.T.s. THOROUGHLY RUN. NP PONA 14E 4EA T6 'T CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE PRaPmL. . oreANA�AeeA xAs eEE. wZ 1 eLAH"Kw PARK. PARK..srnxDARD To MIFT THE uoG e...10 leo sa KT WTx.FT Mw xlDTx PARKING DETAIL R.m.N.nwz sl sn, 0 dRN h rc To N MSwlasTioAE r0 0 GcaE.ATE BASE R,EM x MeFs DMsA \\ \ o g o ILI a•MNUM TYPE sFs.sA 5 � ss%Vi RC DTM.ERT NON—FABRIC D-D (cuss%V)RCP mEVFRT To;° \\\ \ 1L 1B'dla,H APPROPRIATE LENGTH U �— \ \ \ canvsL U IVE (CLASS-V)RCP CULVERT J E U m BIMLWE4Y aF PAVEMENT Eledw OF PAVEMENT \\ 4 Q O r ESSNG f r MAN TA DIE SRA-PAU IN A CONOTSN TO IME—T MUD OR 11O.E.1 PRO. °AD�mA E BASE mxR r r s ADDREDATE BASE mDR.E Dx F nDxAeLF 11 MAWRIALEINE �ILLm.WA.nm,lFNAl DR A Km INTO PD MUN ALL I lei ✓,, �>� i iNO LWY 17DO ' F "DRF. ADN Nsw "DTs. ' I PAD ENTRAKE"' DEAN THE C11111111 STORE AND ,RE IS To E RE.D.D asnsERu os°x'c'c n"T'AcnNcixcc ONAL ODOT —TINGR cOLOxAL OOT 11 PAID ENTRANCE"ll I LEII PROM NODOT ........APPO-O......TAT OF_CON.TROCnON, sNO�NFSRAPPRONERPPOR,START OF OR�NE D—WAY PERMIT C..P.CnON. � .•��•� POST-CONSTRUCTION BSC POST-CONSTRUCTION BSC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION cmRFxmE Pon-wGNEx FAeRIc DRIVE ENTRANCE DETAIL ENTRANCE DETAIL ENTRANCE DETAIL D-100 43 G O O O 0 0 O Ao i - �✓" mE�e.�.E�=. P-VII A 11—IR ENCI-URE J. �sLeva*iaa u v v DUMPSTER DETAIL DUMPSTER DETAIL H.T.s. N.T.S. wrs Sgt w�8 1.5"C.R. RESERVED PARKING 18' { —IIII u _ �__ Fill 'j I ��-�� ea :•.9�. r � o ILI II—I ll � c e.�L All l H 12 EEI r.ilrl STREETSCAPE PLANTING DUMPSTER PAD DEL all AL, - L DETAIL PLAN VIEW D-101 44 Proposed Conditions MA24-0006 (Chandler)Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, Little River Township 1. The property shall be developed consistent with the reviewed site plan and application as acted upon by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 3, 2025. 2. The existing Go Kart use and tract contained on the existing 80.52-acre tract shall be terminated and shall no longer operate on site. 3. Retail sales from the proposed rental office shall be limited to packing supplies (i.e. boxes, tape, packing materials, etc.) and shall not involve the sale of general retail items such as food, drinks, or other similar items not consistent with the use of the property as a self-storage facility. 4. No ancillary commercial or residential use of individual storage facilities shall be permitted. This includes the use of storage facilities for automotive repair or retail sales. 5. No hazardous materials shall be stored on the property. 6. The applicant shall contract with a private solid waste contractor to remove trash from the site consistent with the submitted site plan and in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirements of the State of North Carolina Building Code. 8. The storage facility's hours of operation shall not be before 6:00 am nor after 9:00 pm. 9. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 25-feet in height from ground level. All lighting shall be downward to minimize light trespass and obtrusive lighting. 10. The property owner shall record a final plat dividing the +/- 11.22-acre parcel from the existing +/- 80.52-acre tract within 120 days of BOCC approval of the rezoning application. 11. Offsite easements for water, wastewater, utilities, and access shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 12. Offsite landscape preservation easement shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 13. Impervious surface transfer shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 14. The project shall maintain the existing vegetation on the north, south, and west sides of the site and incorporate an offsite easement area of approximately 1.28 acres along the northern, southern, and western parcel lines in lieu of standards contained in Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection: Street Trees, Between Lot Plantings, Foundation Plantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance. 15. The final landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the Zoning Compliance Permit process. If existing vegetation contained onsite or within the recorded landscape preservation easement area does not meet UDO standards, additional plantings shall be required. All required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 16. All required landscaping for Phase 1 shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for Phase 1 allowing for the units to be rented/occupied. Required landscaping shall be installed per phase. 17. The applicant shall be required to maintain all required land use buffers, including those of preserved vegetation, in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection. 45 18. Proposed driveway connections with NC-57 shall be paved with asphalt. 19. The parking and drive aisles shall be surfaced with Type 57 washed stone. 20. The Planning Director shall have the authority to review and approve minor changes to the approved plan, per Section 2.9.1(1), Alterations to an Approved Conditional District of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, specific to the location and arrangement of development within the limits of disturbance and the proposed "activity area". The "activity area" shall be defined as the edge of gravel as shown on the provided conditional zoning plan set. Digitally signed by Justin Chandler Justin Chandler Date:2025.04.30 10:39:55-04'00' Applicant/Property Owner Date 4 Staff Report Attachment 2 Zoning Atlas Amendment — Conditional District 7 Basic Information Vicinity Map for Rezoning Application-PIN :bfs Parcel Identification N0910-24-6642 Number (PIN) ^Ky� �. Justin Chandler rf: = P _ Applicant Name 9900 NC 57 and Address Rougemont, NC 27572 #- t Property Owner l _ Name and Address (if different from SAME Applicant) R. � qkb PraycYA _1 Agent(s), if _ r applicable N/A ',k' PiX-9'A19I%W i uive Wwr Teewenp zW— ,We1 Parcel Size +/- 80.52 acres tract Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 0910246642 Depicted Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Agricultural Residential Designation FLUM Overlay(s) N/A - Growth Management Rural Designated System Desi,nation Definition of FLUM Agricultural activities and Designation associated residential and 0990246642 commercial uses predominate. Interlocal Agreement • + Applicable No Y/N '� FalRiver Rr @ sd Applicable ILA N/A s �, Future Land Use N/A Classification N/A— parcel within the geography o nN 4 0910. _ rA '..t.Iw—s Plv w."v % !P Description addressed by the 2007 NC 57 — Ltl Riv p ,.,Ltd i Speedway Small Area Plan 4 lure LmxlI Celxywie: 1 Rezoning Application to REDA-CD for PIN 0910246642 Current Zoning District AR (Agricultural Residential) \ +/- 11.22 acres proposed for ` Requested Zoning REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 District Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area 5 Conditional District Plat River Protected 0910246642 Requested Zoning District Consistent • ' with Appendix F of N/A; REDA zoning district not 2030 featured in Appendix F Comprehensive Plan Existing Zoning Overla Districts Flat River Protected Y Q PIN:0910246642-'��/j`--. yrrnxao Amendments �,h-'iYII3— G Proposed for cnunry annndan, Little River Protected 1 No Z-:1 W.I rsnpplyWstersheds Overlay Districts oning o ARY/N M EC6 m F... ( ) 2 AR Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Aerial image with Parcel 09E0246642 outlined eta - North AR (Agricultural Residential), EC-5 (Existing Commercial), and R: Residential (Person County) ■ Non-Residential (warehouse, storage of r . goods) and low density residential 1 South ■ AR (Agricultural Residential) ■ Low density residential "_ I East ■ REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area j Conditional District) ` '•t `� �`' ' ■ Non-Residential (storage ofgoods) West ■ AR (Agricultural Residential) _ ■ Low density residential Existing Roads ' North None A, - V South None East NC Highway 57 r- West None IN`°" Existing Conditions/Physical Features The 80.52-acre parcel contains the Orange County go-kart track, which is no longer in operation. In addition to the track, the existing site includes an access drive, residential structure, and accessory structures. The property contains three stream features and a water body, all of which are outside the proposed development footprint. The +/- 11.22-acre portion proposed for rezoning is wooded and undeveloped. Public Water and Sewer Water and wastewater services will be provided via a private well and septic system that meet Orange County Environmental Health standards. Proposed Project Proposed Development The Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Table of Permitted Uses (Article 5, Section 2) allows for "Storage of Goods" to be permitted in the REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District) zoning district, subject to specific conditions, including a site-specific plan, required by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The applicant and property owner is requesting a rezoning of +/-11.22 acres of the 80.52 acre tract to REDA-CD-1. Following BOCC approval, the applicant shall proceed with a subdivision to divide the 11.22- acre parcel from the existing 80.52-acre tract, as depicted on page 4. The applicant has provided a site-specific plan illustrating the three development phases and 41 storage buildings. The first development phase shall include three storage buildings, including an office. The site plan identifies landscaping, parking, water and wastewater utilities, and stormwater control measures that conform to the Orange County UDO. In addition, the applicant is proposing an offsite easement area which will be located along the perimeter of the 11.22-acre site to provide additional landscape buffering. 3 49 The applicant is proposing to terminate the existing go-kart use which may eliminate concerns related to the go-kart use including noise, light, pollution, trash, and traffic. Following BOCC approval, the applicant will pursue an impervious surface transfer, per Section 4.2.8 of the UDO- This document shall allocate impervious surface area from the +/- 69-acre tract to the +/- 11.22-acre tract. The impervious surface transfer shall be reviewed by Planning staff prior to recording at the Orange County Register of Deeds Office. A formal site plan is required to be submitted as part of a conditional rezoning application. Approval of the site plan is part of the REDA-CD-1 rezoning process. Any agreed-upon conditions are binding to the development footprint permitted for the zoning district. Staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as featured in the Ordinance. Vill Person County Orange Coun I 'Vi r r i i Iii - i i ©9102:5542 i i i Durham County I i i r' i r � r e �9ti i c I - 1 ,,,CON RD i I I I im County BoPIN:0910248642(80 acres) { Cxyrii A `" ° 5nn J Proposed Parcel(91.22 acres) V615 4 Rn Site Plan COIN91R MO\SEQUE\CL\.G NOTES: 'IIE L4-FOHJ,LM1 O\ xE-TM r arc i '[rP�M FSr. ^^i'Mu.' ErII+O NCMW IGNK'+Y wrdM++[wlxrew[ revr EiF`ER-f F . LIE•- ZZ 11 �•S GF r [ --C [rt c rce+nnrYKarcww YR+rYdr S4fr-n rte+,:... .. _ K• _ Obocr 416 MC NCH r+w- v[n.r.�.'*a rrven.rw m.svrs,wr '.ti rr. l [ R•A _ R • K F'f 4C0[MG, Y.Y PA4M 6r -.� ��rwmw wwa rfraK r�crawarrr A-rr A,...«.xrr�Fx. �M� $id. �lY� g® I E K r t.L ut a......xYvrs ,m w..r �e,.a.a.,a�.w.• rum ... L.E„L E,F:L .. ur..e uow urravw. mr.swuea .w��nrRr -- Lij uw...ra..Fe.eir aaa,.+,vnr.r�rr.+rr,e P-aes _ - ...nY...r.._�.n u.�.•w�.noe.rc+a.rr,rr.. I �'� _� � �` ' � .• ...,_ '�. -- - ua vw,uw..errwxrw, � r `'- J� � Irl. � �r f. .✓/J � �' c-iaz 5 5 Proposed Access and Transportation Network Improvements The project is proposing main access to the site to be provided via a 25-ft. wide paved driveway connecting to NC 57. In addition, the project is proposing a secondary access north of the proposed 11.22- acre parcel, in order to meet NC Fire Code regulations. Per NCDOT, the secondary access shall meet its minimum design guidelines and include a 25-ft. wide paved driveway connecting to NC 57. Prior to performing work in the NCDOT right of way, the applicant will need to obtain an approved NCDOT driveway permit. Based on the application and total number of trips to be generated, a TIA was not required, per Section 6.18.2 of the UDO. No roadway capacity improvements are warranted or required, per NCDOT guidelines. Summary of Transportation Information Existing Roadway Characteristics Affected Roadway NC Highway 57 Type of Roadway Major Collector Current Roadway Capacity 10,000 Latest Traffic Volume Estimated 2,100 Traffic Generation Number of Trips Expected to be Generated by 66 Total Daily Proposed Project 33 Total AM Peak 30 Total PM Peak Proposed Utilities Water and wastewater services will be provided via a private well and septic system that meet Orange County Environmental Health standards. Erosion Control/Stormwater Regulations The applicant has indicated the project will conform to existing stormwater management (Section 6.14) and erosion and sedimentation control (Section 6.15) regulations of the UDO. See Attachment 5: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management. Land Use Buffers/Setbacks North 30 ft. building setback, 10 ft. landscape buffer South 30 ft. building setback, 10 ft. landscape buffer East 40 ft. building setback, 20 ft. landscape buffer West 30 ft. building setback, 10 ft. landscape buffer Applicant-offered Condition: Offsite easement area along the perimeter of the site shall provide additional landscaping and screening. Environmental Assessment (EA) The applicant has provided an Environmental Assessment (EA) application and supporting materials with their submittal, as required in Section 6.16 of the UDO. These materials have been shared with various State agencies via the NC Department of Administration's State Clearinghouse. Planning and DEAPR 6 52 Staff have jointly reviewed the materials and agree with a determination of"Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)" as required in Section 2.25.1(13)(5) of the UDO (Attachment 5). This determination eliminates a requirement from the applicant to provide a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement, as outlined in Sections 2.25.2 and 6.16.4 of the UDO. Solid Waste The applicant has indicated development within the project will conform to the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance (Attachment 5). Proposed Conditions Per NCGS 160D-703, imposed conditions and site-specific standards are limited to those that address conformance of the development and use of the site to local government ordinances and adopted plans or the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development or use of the site. Per Section 2.9.1(F)(3) of the LIDO, the following conditions are proposed: 1. The property shall be developed consistent with the reviewed site plan and application as acted upon by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 3, 2025. 2. The existing Go Kart use and tract contained on the existing 80.52-acre tract shall be terminated and shall no longer operate on site. 3. Retail sales from the proposed rental office shall be limited to packing supplies (i.e. boxes, tape, packing materials, etc.) and shall not involve the sale of general retail items such as food, drinks, or other similar items not consistent with the use of the property as a self-storage facility. 4. No ancillary commercial or residential use of individual storage facilities shall be permitted. This includes the use of storage facilities for automotive repair or retail sales. 5. No hazardous materials shall be stored on the property. 6. The applicant shall contract with a private solid waste contractor to remove trash from the site consistent with the submitted site plan and in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirements of the State of North Carolina Building Code. 8. The storage facility's hours of operation shall not be before 6:00 am nor after 9:00 pm. 9. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 25-feet in height from ground level. All lighting shall be downward to minimize light trespass and obtrusive lighting. 10. The property owner shall record a final plat dividing the +/- 11.22-acre parcel from the existing +/- 80.52-acre tract within 120 days of BOCC approval of the rezoning application. 11. Offsite easements for water, wastewater, utilities, and access shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 12. Offsite landscape preservation easement shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 13. Impervious surface transfer shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 14. The project shall maintain the existing vegetation on the north, south, and west sides of the site and incorporate an offsite easement area of approximately 1.28 acres along the northern, southern, and western parcel lines in lieu of standards contained in Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection: Street Trees, Between Lot Plantings, Foundation Plantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance. 15. The final landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the Zoning Compliance Permit process. If existing vegetation contained onsite or within the recorded landscape preservation easement area does not meet UDO standards, additional plantings shall be required. All required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 16. All required landscaping for Phase 1 shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of 7 53 Compliance for Phase 1 allowing for the units to be rented/occupied. Required landscaping shall be installed per phase. 17. The applicant shall be required to maintain all required land use buffers, including those of preserved vegetation, in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection. 18. Proposed driveway connections with NC-57 shall be paved with asphalt. 19. The parking and drive aisles shall be surfaced with Type 57 washed stone. 20. The Planning Director shall have the authority to review and approve minor changes to the approved plan, per Section 2.9.1(1), Alterations to an Approved Conditional District of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, specific to the location and arrangement of development within the limits of disturbance and the proposed "activity area". The "activity area" shall be defined as the edge of gravel as shown on the provided conditional zoning plan set. Review Milestones Application Submittal Date November 7, 2024 Development Advisory Committee December 5, 2024 DAC Review Neighborhood Information Meeting December 30, 2024 NIM Note: the DAC is a staff/agency committee, established in Section 1.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Courtesy Review Jurisdiction Date Sent Comments Received (Y/N) State Clearing House November 11, 2024 Yes Analysis Staff Analysis As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director shall cause an analysis to be made of the application. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers a full analysis of the application's consistency with the adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. See the drafted Statement of Consistency (Attachment 6) in which the relevant Goals and Objectives of the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan have been analyzed in full detail. 1. The application is complete in accordance with the requirements of the UDO. Staff review determined that the application is complete and all submitted materials are in compliance with the following applicable sections of the UDO: ■ Section 2.8, Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments ■ Section 2.9, Conditional Districts In accordance with Section 2.9.1(F), Approval and Conditions, the applicant has submitted conditions which are to be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners for a determination as to whether such conditions will afford protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. "Storage of Goods" are defined as Use #62 (P) in the Table of Permitted Uses and within Article 10, Definitions of the LIDO as: 8 RA "A land use where secured space, indoors or outdoors, is rented to tenants for the safeguarding and/or keeping of general merchandise, refrigerated goods, and other personal items on a short- or long-term basis". Section 5.2, Table of Permitted Uses of the UDO identifies "Storage of Goods" as a permitted use within the REDA-CD-1 zoning district. There are no additional use standards related to the "Storage of Goods" use contained in the UDO. Per Section 3.8 of the UDO, the purpose of the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1) is to encourage additional, compatible, and unique non-residential development opportunities in a predefined area of the County as identified within the adopted 2007 NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan. Further, this district is intended to provide existing non-conforming land uses an opportunity to become conforming through a development review process so that property owners can upgrade their existing business to address changing needs while recognizing, and being consistent with, local land use regulations. The REDA-CD-1 district shall be located consistent with the parcels designated as "Rural Economic Development Area" within the aforementioned Small Area Plan. The subject parcel is located within the Rural Economic Development Area of the NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan allowing for rezoning to the REDA-CD-1 to be considered. 2. Staff review of the application included considerations for how the request relates to the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The staff analysis outlines elements of the Plan which staff identified as relevant to the consideration of this request. 3. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies Agricultural Residential as land designated in the Comprehensive Plan as land for agricultural activities and associated residential and commercial uses. 4. The applicant has provided a basic environmental assessment as part of this submittal. Staff has reviewed and determined no significant environmental impact is expected from this project based on existing conditions. The proposed development is consistent with existing/anticipated development within the area and the land use associated with the project is compatible with various 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals. 9 55 Attachment 3 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1 131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 May 19, 2025 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Dear Property Owner: This notice is to inform you of the June 3, 2025, Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) meeting, at which an application to rezone a +/-11.22 acres (PIN: 0910-24-6642) will be reviewed. The parcel's address is 9900 NC 57, Rougemont, within the Little River Township. This notification is occurring in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). You are receiving this notice because you own property located within 1,000-feet of the parcels requested for rezoning. YOUR PROPERTY IS NOT PROPOSED FOR REZONING. Property Information Parcel ID Number(PIN) 0910-24-6642 Owner Justin Chandler Applicant Justin Chandler Location 9900 NC 57, Rougemont Acreage +/- 11.22 acres Current Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR) Proposed Zoning NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District REDA-CD-1 Watershed Designation Flat River Protected What is being proposed? The applicant is requesting to rezone the parcel for future storage of goods land use to locate a self- storage business on this site. What is this meeting for? The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing on the proposed rezoning. Interested persons are invited to address the County Commissioners with their comments regarding the rezoning application. The Orange County Planning Board, an advisory board comprised of appointed volunteers, reviewed this application at its April 9, 2025 regular meeting and voted to recommend approval of the rezoning request. 56 This amendment request will be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners during a public hearing scheduled at 7:00 p.m., June 3, 2025, at the Whitted Meeting Facility(300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC —see attached map).All interested persons are invited to address the Board with their comments regarding the application. The Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is the decision-making body regarding land use and zoning matters. The Board may take one of the following four actions at their meeting, 1) Approval, 2) Denial, 3) Approval, but with specified changes, or 4) that the Board be given extended time to consider the matter. BOCC Meeting Information Date June 3, 2025 Time 7:00 p.m. Place Whitted Meeting Facility Address 300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC Ashley Moncado, Planner III Assigned Planner Email: amoncado@orangecountync.gov Phone: 919-245-2589 If you cannot attend the public hearing and the website does not answer your questions about the applications, you may call (919) 245-2575 during regular business hours and you will be directed to a staff person who can assist you. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning & Inspectio'' Direc or Additional information is available on the Orange County Planning Department's website: https://www.oran-gecountync.gov/3038/Active-Development-Protects or scan below: [Nil f.0 16. ■ ■ ` ■f _ ■ ■ Whitted Building (300 W. Tryon St. ) - Meeting Location if r Y !x„ i 1 + �} 1• 1W 1 ``. Whitted .•, j Building - _ W TRQN ST 10 = iii •+,: P. Wr 14 -r �4; -•�� •� ai h. a• 1 in=100 feel 0 50 MEMNIMMFeet ��(,/ - � �• Orange County Planning and Inspections Brian Carson(5/8/2015) s 58 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov I iii W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I, Ashley Moncado, Planner III with Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance I have mailed, or have caused to be mailed, a Notice of the Public Hearing to be held regarding a rezoning application proposing to rezone one parcel located at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont (PIN 0910-24-6642) on May 19, 2025. The owners were identified according to the Tax Records, as required by Section 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. The mailed notices specified the date,time, place and subject of the Public Hearing. WITNESS my hand,this 19th day of May 2025. OA ff7 Ashley Moncado,AICP Planner III Orange County Planning 59 PIN OWNERI_LAST OWNERI_FIRST OWNER2_LAST OWNER2_FIRST ADDRESSI ADDRESS2 CITY STATE ZIPCODE 091024664:CHANDLER JUSTIN M HURDLE KRISTEN D 9900 NC 57 <Null> ROUGEMONT NC 27572 091013806:AMMONS MICHAEL R 9806 NC HWY 57 ROUGEMONT NC 27572 091023715!ROUGEMONT STORAGE CENTER LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 8927 MIKE BRANCH RD <Null> Rougemont NC 27572 091005434!RICHARDSON ELEANOR <Null> <Null> 8320 BACON RD <Null> TIMBERLAKE NC 27583 091015330:FILZEN MELISSA S FILZEN MATTHEW P 1190 ROGERS FARM RD <Null> WAKE FOREST NC 27587 091032840!HARRIS DARRELL RAY 13107 HWY 501N ROUGEMONT NC 27572 091035867!PORTILLO IDALIA AYALA SINDY 601 FOX LAIR TRAIL <Null> SEMORA NC 27434 091013090;TUCKER DOUGLAS TUCKER ANGELA 5031 OAK GROVE CHURCH RD <Null> MEBANE NC 27302 091022046!WALLACE KENNETH F WALLACE NANCY W 9761 NC 57 <Null> Rougemont NC 27572 091022310E MUCKLER DOUGLAS <Null> <Null> 2524 WASHINGTON AVE <Null> CREEDMOOR NC 27522 091022845:DAVIS MICHAEL N DAVIS LUCINDA 1 8426 DOUGHTON DR BAHAMA NC 27503 091032117!HANSON AGGREGATES SOUTHEAST INC <Null> <Null> 3520 PIEDMONT RD STE 410 C/O MARVIN F POER&COMPANY SPS RE ATLANTA GA 30305 091043173(HARRIS W R <Null> <Null> 1526 BACON RD <Null> ROUGEMONT NC 27572 091045476:BORI IBRAHIM D BORI MAIRO 604 W KNOX ST <Null> DURHAM NC 27701 091002519!ORANGE COUNTY SPEEDWAY REAL ESTATE LLC 9740 NC 57 ROUGEMONT NC 27572 09101368b TUCKER DOUGLAS TUCKER ANGELA 5031 OAK GROVE CHURCH RD <Null> MEBANE NC 27302 091032290!ARGOS USA LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 3015 WINDWARD PLZ STE 300 ALPHARETTA GA 30005 091034817E CHANDLER DARRELL W <Null> <Null> 9925 NC HWY 57 <Null> Rougemont NC 27572 091045212:RUSSICK JOHN C RUSSICK PATRICIA A 9985 NC 57 <Null> ROUGEMONT NC 27572 PIN OWNER—NAME OWNER_ADDR OWCITY OWSTA OWZIPA 0910-34-81 CHANDLER DARRELL W 9925 NC HWY 57 ROUGEMONT NC 27572 0910-43-80 HARRIS W R 1526 BACON RD ROUGEMONT NC 27572 0910-44-69 RUSSICK JOHN C RUSSICK PATRICIA A 9985 NC 57 ROUGEMONT NC 27572 Primary Ow Secondary Owner Postal Address Postal City Postal State Postal Zip PIN(use Tax Map&Parcel) BLALOCK W BLALOCK DONNA NEVILLE 868 HILLSBOROUi TIMBERLAKE NC 27583 0910-01-36-5442.000 BLALOCK W BLALOCK DONNA NEVILLE 868 HILLSBOROUi TIMBERLAKE NC 27583 0910-01-36-7251.000 ANDREWS P ANDREWS LACEY 864 HILLSBOROUi TIMBERLAKE NC 27583-8917 0910-01-36-5652.000 BLANKS MCKINNON Y 206 N CHARLES S"ROXBORO NC 27573 0910-01-26-3915.000 RICHARDSON ELEANOR ELIZABETH 8320 BACON RD TIMBERLAKE NC 27583 0910-01-06-7993.000 NC LAND INVESTMENTS LLC 314 W MILLBROC RALEIGH NC 27609 0910-01-38-5491.000 60 Attachment 4 11/25/2024 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) Conditional Rezoning: MA24-0006,Bully Self-Storage To Whom It May Concern: We (the applicant) have submitted a conditional rezoning application proposing to develop property located at the intersection of Property Address (PIN 0910-24-6642) for REDA-CD. Per Section 2.9 Conditional Districts of the Unified Development Ordinance, you are receiving this letter because property you own is within 1,000 ft. of this parcel. The parcel is further described below: Property Information Parcel ID Numbers (PIN) 0910246642 Owner Justin Chandler Applicant Justin Chandler Location 9900 NC 57 Acreage 80.52 Zoning Agricultural Residential Watershed Designation Flat River What is being proposed? Bully Self Storage What is this meeting for? This Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)will allow you and other nearby property owners to meet with the applicant and discuss the proposal. When and where is the meeting? Meeting Information Date 12/30/2024 Time 10:00 a.m Place Orange County Public Library Address 137 W Margaret Ln, Hillsborough, NC 27278 Ashley Moncado, Planner III Assigned Planner 919-245-2589 amoncado oran ecount nc. ov After the NIM, this proposal will go on to the Planning Board for review and recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners will then hold a public 61 hearing to make a final decision on the application. You will also receive a letter regarding when those meetings will take place and at what time. If you have any question regarding this project, feel free to reach out to us, my contact information is listed below. Best Regards, Justin Chandler Enclosures: Overall Site Plan 62 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 4 Neighborhood Information Meeting Sign-In Sheet Project/Plan: Bully Self Storage Date &Time: Dec 30th 202410:00 A.M Name Address Telephone Number Email Address Justin Chandler 9900 NC 57 Rougemont, NC 336-583-9674 Justinmchandler@gmail.com 63 Neighborhood Information Meeting Report Form REPORT OF INFORMATION MEETING REQUIRED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE To: Ashley Moncado, Planner III Project Name: Bully Self Storage Approximate Location (or Address): 9900 NC 57 Rougemont, NC Proposed Number Lots: 1 Residential (Y/N): N The undersigned hereby certifies that the required sign(s) was posted on the property proposed for project, on each road frontage of said project on (date) December 12' 2024 A photo of the sign posted is recommended to be attached to this form. The meeting was held at the following time and place: December 30 at 10 am - Orange County Main Library, 137 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough The persons in attendance at the meeting: See attached Attendance sheet The following issues were discussed at the meeting (Attach additional sheet(s) if needed): Bully Self Storage project As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the project proposal (Attach additional sheet(s) if needed): N/A Date: 12/31/24 Applicant: Justin Chandler By: Justin Chandler Please submit this Report to the Orange County Planning Department located at 131 W. Margaret Ln or mail it to 131 W. Margaret Ln. Hillsborough NC, 27278. If you have any questions, please contact the assigned staff planner. 64 Attachment 5 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director cstober@orangecountync.gov I 131W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 February 26, 2025 Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning Application Conditional District (Chandler) Case #: MA24-0006 PIN: 0910-24-6642 9900 NC 57, Rougemont Re: Development Advisory Committee Report (UDO, Article 1, Section 1.9.5) On December 5, 2024, the Orange County Development Advisory Committee met for a final review and discussion of the conditional rezoning application from Justin Chandler for PIN 0910- 24-6642 (Case #: MA24-0006). The Orange County Development Advisory Committee has no objections to the approval of the zoning atlas amendment so long as the items in the attached departmental memos are addressed. The application package features an abstract and staff report that provide the foundations for my recommendation regarding this application and request. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning and Inspections Director Orange County Government I www.orangecountync.gov 1 919.732.8181 65 Application 1. Application will need to be revised to include correct Future Land Use Map Classification as AR, Agricultural Residential, not REDA. CORRECTED 2. Revise application materials to clarify proposed use as "Storage of Goods" per Section 5. 2 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). CORRECTED 3. Legal description of the property (i. e. deed). CORRECT ADDED 4. Confirm with staff if conditions are being proposed or not. If yes, please provide to staff for review. CONFIRMED 5. Confirm with staff if a vesting period is or is not being requested. DUE TO THE ZONING AND CONDITIONAL NATURE THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE 6. Recommend adding additional information to the narrative for clarity including: a. The request is to rezone the parcel from AR, Agricultural Residential to NC Highway 57 Speedway Rural Economic Development Area (REDA-CD-1). b. The existing parcel is part of the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Small Area Plan. c. Acreage proposed for rezoning d. Proposed total number of buildings and units. e. Total square footage of development f. Phases and timing of phases and/or construction g. Construction schedule for project h. Proposed utility services, including water and wastewater. CORRECTED 7. A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is required for the conditional rezoning application based on Section 2. 9. 1(D) of the UDO. COMPLETED Site Plan 1. Revise site plan labels, shading, and line widths to be more reader friendly. Recommend removing contour line labels overlaying with proposed development area. REVISED 2. The boundary of the lot(s) to be developed labeled with bearings and distances. 66 S1 13 .01 " 1 1 .094 / � r TR BUFFER� 1 BUFFER 91 FT 0 FFSErg7 c9� Q 1 .1 1 1 3. Provide adjacent parcel information including zoning, existing land uses, legal information (i. e. owner, PIN number, Deed/Plat references, etc. ). CORRECTED 67 =ATIM IS ESTABLISHED, �\ GTIONAND FINAL APPROVAL. I� LIMIT v, ❑ s wr aL E FLO D-CTION 1 OFT[INTERVAL R5,1OFT INTERVAL 4. Add state road number for NC Highway 57. CORRECTED r C 04 � �U oG0 O@Oy�G OO 5. Under General Notes, Note #2 shall be deleted. Please note, staff will not draft Declarations of Restrictions. CORRECTED 6. General Notes 17-20 are repeats of 9, 10, 12, and 13. CORRECTED 7. The proposed zoning shall be revised to REDA-CD-1, not REDA-CZ-1. DONE REDO IN NARRATIVE AND DOCUMENTS 8. Provide a development summary including total acres, proposed use, total building square footage, required and proposed parking spaces. PARKING COMMENT 17&18 SITE SUMMARY ON C-100 C-101 C-102 68 SITE INFORMATION PIN: 0910-24-6642 JURISDICTION: ORANGE COUNTY TOWNSHIP LITTLE RIVER COUNTY: ORANGE STATE: NORTH CAROLINA WATERSHEAD: FLAT RIVER (PROTECTED) RIVER HASIN NEUSE REFERENCE, DB 6710 PG 828 TOTAL NET AREA. 3,507,451.2 SF (80.52 AC) LOT EXISTING TOTAL NET AREA: 434,728.8 SF (9.98 AC) PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT PROPOSED USE: SELF STORAGE ZONING REDA-CD-1 ADJACENT: AR & REDA-CD-1 TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FT: 150,550 SQ FT FRONT SETBACKS 40FT SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS 3OFT 9. Identify and label utilities with accompanying easements and storm drainage facilities/easements including septic tanks and wastewater disposal fields, wells, fire hydrants, and irrigation. SEE E-100 FOR EASEMENTS AND UTILITY INFORATION SEE GENERAL NOTE 19 FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY INFORMATION 10. Add note stating "Open burning of trees, limbs, stumps, and/or construction debris associated with the permitted activity is expressly prohibited" . ADDED, SEE GENERAL NOTE 20 11. Provide total allowable impervious, total existing impervious, and total proposed impervious surface calculations for the +/- 10- acre tract. This can be added to the development summary. If total impervious exceeds the allocated threshold, applicant will need to explore an impervious surface transfer with remnant lot. SEE C-1. 5 IMPERVIOUS SUFACE TRANSFER WILL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN PROPOSED AND REMAINING LOT. 69 lq. ausroxAG1— 02 1c Off- ONSt ✓ 1t1. +�NTY `f/fes✓// J f/9ssr/ f F oR�5D'� '�� T % � - I I l LAND COVER zola rosy ARfA f1fl ARG.I�l ARFApp AVAW _, �` F------� lNYpSFiMdFl1NW11S![MISfRVAFN)N ARFA 11fQ41f �9 1A81,R8 RAB '1 ff r�`�'� AppFAHD CONCMFeFONM£1%FN}AJ eA$ 7310 1.87 MW AN 6 Y� t� \� owccu.rasc+vervuoNarat 42=2 AM Wzam x.rr 11l}i ��`�� \� CfF55{GRlYfl BRNfWAYaFFAS 1],BW dfr r,ose7 3JJ r 0376 1-0 dap�d96 IS9 �r rain:nasAarnrsuar.wAcvRovroL"ersrvaenrxrAND aarwuLAND asrvaewnreMer �� 1 �� ou Er[xrrwrvee nssacureom rr¢cxvA:c yr urro car�aerwaasesarsToanFxearR If WGVunpMf PRE-DEVELOPMENT(2010)PLAN scare r=mn• 12. Add note stating standards contained in Section 6. 4, Performance Standards shall be met. SEE NOTE 21 13. The landscape plan shall meet standards contained in Section 6. 8. 9. 14. Identify primary and secondary tree protection areas as contained in Section 6. 8. 4 of the UDO. SEE C-100 C-101 C-102 15. Identify plantings or add note stating Section 6. 8. 6(F) Street Trees will be met. 16. Identify plantings or add note stating 6. 8. 6(H) Between Lot Plantings will be met. 70 17. Identify plantings or add note stating 6. 8. 6(I) Foundation Plantings will be met. 18. Identify plantings or add note stating 6. 8. 6(J) Landscaping of Vehicular Use Areas will be met. 19. Identify any proposed screening and note Section 6. 8. 8 shall be met. CORRECTED 20. The proposed REDA-CD-1 district does not require minimum land use buffers per Section 6. 8. 6. D. However, staff recommends the applicant consider providing the following land use buffers. These would be required for the proposed storage of good use if developed in a general use zoning district: - Type B Buffer - 30 ft. in width along the public right of way - Type E or F Buffer - 75 to 100 ft. in width along adjacent property lines abutting AR zoned property. SEE SHEETS C-100 C-101 C-102 FOR PROPOSED SETBACKS THE PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOT IS TIED TO THE REMAINING LOT BY MEANS OF IMPERVIOUS SUFACE RESTRICTIONS. EXISITING LOT WILL HAVE A EASMENT AROUND THE PERMITER OF THE LOT TO ENSURE NO DEVELOPMENT WILL TAKE PLACE. BUT WILL STILL MEET THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN COMMENT 21. r n .Q. 21. The proposed REDA-CD-1 district does not require minimum setbacks. However, staff recommends the applicant consider providing setbacks which are consistent with other REDA-CD-1 zoned parcels and shall meet section 6. 2. 8 of the UDO: - Front: 40 ft. - Side: 30 ft. - Rear: 30 ft. 71 REQUIREMENT MET SEE ABOVE COMMENT 22. Add minimum and proposed front, rear, and side setbacks to the development summary. SEE C-100 C-101 C-102 SITE INFORMATION PIN: 0910-24-6642 JURISDICTION: ORANGE COUNTY TOWNSHIP LITTLE RIVER COUNTY: ORANGE STATE: NORTH CAROLINA WATERSHEAD: FLAT RIVER (PROTECTED) RIVER BASIN: NEUSE REFERENCE: DB 6710 PG 828 TOTAL NET AREA: 3,5071451.2 SF (80.52 AC) LOT EXISTING TOTAL NET AREA: 434,728.8 SF (9.98 AC) PROPOSED SUBDIVIDED LOI PROPOSED USE: SELL- STORAGE ZONING REDA-CD-1 ADJACENT: AR & REDA-CD-1 TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FT: 150,550 SO FT FRONT SETBACKS 40FT SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS 30FT 23. Provide proposed height and finished floor elevations for all structures. SEE C-102 FOR ALL STRUCTURE FLOOR ELEVATIONS X04� h 4� qQ �4$ o V F ernm Zt 649 � N wN .� M S` C x. a sc 1 ? m 24. The proposed "storage of goods" land use does not require use standards in the REDA CD-1 district. However, staff recommends the applicant consider the standards for this use contained in Section 5. 6. 11 of the UDO, which apply to general zoning districts. 72 OKAY 25. Add sight triangles per Section 6. 2. 10 of the UDO. SEE C-100 C-101 C-102 Y� ~L 4' r, �N 41 1 1 V 26. Include the AM peak, PM peak, and total trips per day on the site plan. SEE SITE SUMMARY 27. Clarify areas of existing asphalt and areas of proposed asphalt on site. SEE LEGEND ON E-100 C-100 C-101 C-102 CLEAN #57 STONE EXISTING ASPHALT STOCKPILE LOCATION 73 S } al Y J 4P7 n rI � O _ 28. Parking standards for storage of goods include one space per employee, plus one space for every 10 individual storage areas. Parking calculations need to be provided and General Note #12 shall be revised. DUE TO THE LARGE LAYOUT OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY EACH UNIT SHALL HAVE PARKING DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE UNIT. PER STANDARDS IT IS REQUIRED 1 PER 10 UNITS HOWEVER EACH UNIT ISLE WILL HAVE ITS OWN PARKING AREA. ADDITIONALLY THERE WILL BE 4 SPACES AT THE FRONT OF THE FACILITY FOR 74 PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS AND FOR THE EMPLOYEE VEHICLE. SEE GENERAL NOTE 17 & 18 29. Parking design shall meet standards contained in Section 6. 9. 10 and be provided on the site plan. PARKING STANDARD IN COMPLIANCE WITH 6. 9. 10 SEE C-100 C-101 C-102 PER 9FT MIN WIDTH AND 180 SQ FT 30. All parking spaces and maneuvering space shall be surfaced with an all-weather paving material, such as asphalt or concrete, and maintained in a safe, sanitary and neat condition. Gravel parking areas may be permitted with the approval of the DAC. ENTRANCE VIA NC-57 TO BE PAVED TO GATE. REMAINDER OF LOT REQUESTED TO BE GRAVEL. TO BE ARRANGED IN AN IDENTICAL MANNER TO ROUGEMONT SELF STORAGE 31. Any proposed outdoor lighting shall comply with Section 6. 11. If no lighting is proposed, please add a note stating any proposed outdoor lighting shall meet Section 6. 11 of the UDO. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING TO MEET 6. 11 OF THE UDO. ONLY LIGHTING SHALL BE DOWNWARD FACING BUILDING MOUNTED SECUIRTY LIGHTING 32. Identify and label stream and required 80 ft. stream buffer. SEE C-100 C-101 C-102 FOR STREAM BUFFER FFSFTFFE CBul- ,^ 1 9T OFETT -9T `ly\ 1 75 33. Add stormwater and erosion control land disturbance thresholds for the Flat River Protected Watershed. SEE ESC PLANS FOR LAND DISTURBANCE THRESHOLDS 34. Identify and label stormwater control measures on the site plan. SEE UPDATED SITE PLAN FOR STORM WATER CONTROL MEASURE CONTOURS AND LABELS 76 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 i 919.24S 2S7S Development Advisory Committee (DAC) Comments DAC review comments and recommendations do not constitute plan or permit approval for this application and/or replace any other plans and permits that may be required by other County departments and State agencies. Project: MA24-0006 (Chandler) Conditional Rezoning Location/PIN: 0910246642 Applicant: Justin Chandler Staff Planner: Ashley Moncado DAC Meeting Date: 12-5-24 Addressing and Britney Pendleton Land Records Date: 12.2.24 Staff: brpendleton(a)_orangecountync.gov 919-245-2576 1. No comments from the Addressing team. - BP James Bryan Attorney's Office Date: Staff: 0bryan@orangecountync.gov 919-245-2319 No comments received. Building Michael Rettie Inspections Date: 12/2/2024 Staff: mrettie()_orangecountync.gov 919-245-2604 1. Any construction regulated by the NC State Building codes will require Permits. Chris Hirni DEAPR Date: Staff: chirni orangecountync.gov 919-245-2514 No comments received. Environmental Victoria Hudson 7 Health Date: 12/02/24 Staff: vhudson(a)orangecountync.gov 919-245-2365 1. The Department has records for 9900 NC 57. No public health concerns. Erosion Tyler Sliger Control Date: 12/3/24 Staff: Tsliger orangecountync.gov 919-245-2582 1. Based on the materials provided for the 12/5 DAC meeting, there are (4) mapped stream features or other surface water features (e.g. ponds and/or wetlands) within the project's parcel boundaries. Regulated streams (if any) must comply with Section 6.13 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). If applicable, the applicant must 77 also comply with Section 2.20 of the UDO and submit a Buffer Use Authorization Certificate (BAC) application for disturbances inside the regulated stream buffer. 2. Based on the submitted materials, the project isn't proposing a stream crossing. If the project proposes a crossing and/or is disturbing the stream channel a Pre-Authorization Construction Notification (PCN) application will need to be submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the scope of work and a USACE Jurisdictional Determination (JD) must be forwarded to Orange County staff. 3. Based on the information provided and for the proposed/assumed limits of disturbance, the project will need a Land Disturbance Permit (LDP). If this project requires a LDP the applicant must adhere to Sections 2.18, 2.19, and 6.15 of the UDO. If the project does not require an LDP an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Waiver will be needed for adherence to Section 6.15.6(C) of the UDO. Orange County strongly advises the applicant to submit an LDP upfront that accounts for the total projects including the roads and lots. Fire and Life Chris Pendergrass Safety Date: Staff: cpendergrass _orangecountync.gov 919-245-6125 Storage Facility notes: - Surface must support at least 75,OOOlbs - Gate shall be no less than 20 foot in width and be equipped with Knox gate switch if electric - Drive width to be no less than 20 foot in width not including width of any parking spots - If units are over 62,000 gross building area, a second access will be required - Grade shall not be greater than 10 percent - Overhead clearance to be no less than 13 '/2 feet - Turnarounds and turning radiuses to meet 120 foot hammerhead or 120 foot acceptable hammerhead as shown in Appendix D - Fire extinguishers to be mounted with no more than 75 foot travel distance apart David Genwright NCDOT Date: 12/3/24 Staff: digenwright(a)ncdot.gov 336-570-6833 Permitting: • Prior to performing work in NCDOT R/W, the applicant will need to obtain the following: o Approved NCDOT Driveway Permit for proposed connection to NC Highway 57. ■ $50 Driveway fee per every access • Trip Gen: o This development is expected to have a low traffic generation. No roadway improvements are expected from NCDOT Plans: o Prior to issuance of the above permit documents, the applicant will need to satisfactorily address the following comments: ■ The left driveway detail on page D-100 with the 30' radii is the detail closest to matching our standard. That detail will need to be the driveway entrance constructed. ■ 10X70 sight distance triangles will need to be drawn on the site and landscaping plans • Those triangles will need to be clear of vegetation and anything that may obstruct sight. o The applicant will need to further evaluate and verify that roadway geometry and proposed access location provides adequate sight distance per NCDOT and AASHTO requirements. 78 Ashley Moncado Planning Date: 11/11/24 Staff: 919-245-2589 amoncado(a)orangecountync.gov Application 1. Application will need to be revised to include correct Future Land Use Map Classification as AR, Agricultural Residential, not REDA. 2. Revise application materials to clarify proposed use as "Storage of Goods" per Section 5.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). 3. Legal description of the property (i.e. deed). 4. Confirm with staff if conditions are being proposed or not. If yes, please provide to staff for review. 5. Confirm with staff if a vesting period is or is not being requested. 6. Recommend adding additional information to the narrative for clarity including: a. The request is to rezone the parcel from AR, Agricultural Residential to NC Highway 57 Speedway Rural Economic Development Area (REDA-CD-1). b. The existing parcel is part of the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Small Area Plan. c. Acreage proposed for rezoning d. Proposed total number of buildings and units. e. Total square footage of development f. Phases and timing of phases and/or construction g. Construction schedule for project h. Proposed utility services, including water and wastewater. 7. A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is required for the conditional rezoning application based on Section 2.9.1(D) of the LIDO. Site Plan 1. Revise site plan labels, shading, and line widths to be more reader friendly. Recommend removing contour line labels overlaying with proposed development area. 2. The boundary of the lot(s) to be developed labeled with bearings and distances. 3. Provide adjacent parcel information including zoning, existing land uses, legal information (i.e. owner, PIN number, Deed/Plat references, etc.). 4. Add state road number for NC Highway 57. 5. Under General Notes, Note #2 shall be deleted. Please note, staff will not draft Declarations of Restrictions. 6. General Notes 17-20 are repeats of 9, 10, 12, and 13. 7. The proposed zoning shall be revised to REDA-CD-1, not REDA-CZ-1. 8. Provide a development summary including total acres, proposed use, total building square footage, required and proposed parking spaces. 9. Identify and label utilities with accompanying easements and storm drainage facilities/easements including septic tanks and wastewater disposal fields, wells, fire hydrants, and irrigation. 10. Add note stating "Open burning of trees, limbs, stumps, and/or construction debris associated with the permitted activity is expressly prohibited". 11. Provide total allowable impervious, total existing impervious, and total proposed impervious surface calculations for the +/- 10-acre tract. This can be added to the development summary. If total impervious exceeds the allocated threshold, applicant will need to explore an impervious surface transfer with remnant lot. 12. Add note stating standards contained in Section 6.4, Performance Standards shall be met. 13. The landscape plan shall meet standards contained in Section 6.8.9. 14. Identify primary and secondary tree protection areas as contained in Section 6.8.4 of the UDO. 15. Identify plantings or add note stating Section 6.8.6(F) Street Trees will be met. 16. Identify plantings or add note stating 6.8.6(H) Between Lot Plantings will be met. 79 17. Identify plantings or add note stating 6.8.6(1) Foundation Plantings will be met. 18. Identify plantings or add note stating 6.8.6(J) Landscaping of Vehicular Use Areas will be met. 19. Identify any proposed screening and note Section 6.8.8 shall be met. 20. The proposed REDA-CD-1 district does not require minimum land use buffers per Section 6.8.6.D. However, staff recommends the applicant consider providing the following land use buffers. These would be required for the proposed storage of good use if developed in a general use zoning district: — Type B Buffer— 30 ft. in width along the public right of way — Type E or F Buffer— 75 to 100 ft. in width along adjacent property lines abutting AR zoned property. 21. The proposed REDA-CD-1 district does not require minimum setbacks. However, staff recommends the applicant consider providing setbacks which are consistent with other REDA-CD-1 zoned parcels and shall meet section 6.2.8 of the UDO: — Front: 40 ft. — Side: 30 ft. — Rear: 30 ft. 22. Add minimum and proposed front, rear, and side setbacks to the development summary. 23. Provide proposed height and finished floor elevations for all structures. 24. The proposed "storage of goods" land use does not require use standards in the REDA- CD-1 district. However, staff recommends the applicant consider the standards for this use contained in Section 5.6.11 of the UDO, which apply to general zoning districts. 25. Add sight triangles per Section 6.2.10 of the UDO. 26. Include the AM peak, PM peak, and total trips per day on the site plan. 27. Clarify areas of existing asphalt and areas of proposed asphalt on site. 28. Parking standards for storage of goods include one space per employee, plus one space for every 10 individual storage areas. Parking calculations need to be provided and General Note #12 shall be revised. 29. Parking design shall meet standards contained in Section 6.9.10 and be provided on the site plan. 30. All parking spaces and maneuvering space shall be surfaced with an all-weather paving material, such as asphalt or concrete, and maintained in a safe, sanitary and neat condition. Gravel parking areas may be permitted with the approval of the DAC. 31. Any proposed outdoor lighting shall comply with Section 6.11. If no lighting is proposed, please add a note stating any proposed outdoor lighting shall meet Section 6.11 of the UDO. 32. Identify and label stream and required 80 ft. stream buffer. 33. Add stormwater and erosion control land disturbance thresholds for the Flat River Protected Watershed. 34. Identify and label stormwater control measures on the site plan. Matt Taylor Solid Waste Date: Staff: mtaylor(a)_orangecountync.gov 919-918-4905 No comments received. Stormwater Christopher Sandt Management Date: 12/4/24 Staff: csandt(a)orangeco untync.gov 919-245-2583 The project is located in the Flat River Protected Watershed Overlay District. The submittal of a Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) is required if the proposed Land- Disturbing Activity exceeds 12,000 square feet. Land disturbance thresholds are cumulative to parent tract and will carry over to any/all subdivided lots. 80 Transportation Darlene Weaver Services Date: 12/3/24 Staff: dweaver(c_orangecountync.gov 919-245-2002 1. No comment 81 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1 131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 MEMORANDUM TO: Patrick Mallett, Deputy Director, Development Services FROM: Christopher Sandt, PE — County Engineer, Planning & Inspections; and Steve Kaltenbach — Erosion Control and Stormwater Manager DATE: January 7, 2025 CASE: MA24-0006 — Zoning Atlas Amendment PIN: 0910-24-6642 WATERSHED: Flat River Protected (Neuse River Basin) PROJECT: Bully Self Storage SUBJECT: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion & Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management This memo summarizes the Development Services Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Division's (hereafter, the "Division's) assessment of the submitted application for a Zoning Atlas Amendment (MA24-0006), submitted as the "Bully Self Storage" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 80.52 acres of property at 9900 NC 57 in the Little River township of Orange County, North Carolina. The request proposes rezoning 9.98 acres from AR to REDA-CD-1, NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District. The project proposes the construction of 40 commercial storage buildings within the rezoned footprint. The staff comments contained herein are based upon the submitted Rezoning Application and Site Plan dated April 5, 2024, and October 3, 2024, respectively. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Upon zoning approval, the proposed subsequent development would then be required to submit a Land Disturbing Permit (LDP) and/or a Stormwater Permit (SWP) which would formally review and approve development activity consistent with the Rezoning Application. Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC): According to current Orange County GIS imagery of the project parcel, there are three mapped jurisdictional stream features within the parcel. Orange County enforces stream buffers along streams, rivers, water bodies, and other water features (e.g., wetlands) as outlined in Section 6.13 of the Orange County UDO. Based on the submitted materials, Page 1 of 2 Orange County Government I www.orangecountync.gov 1 919.732.8181 82 the project could meet the basic Erosion and Sedimentation Control requirements as required by Orange County UDO Section 6.15 and could be developed as generally proposed. Stormwater Management: According to current Orange County GIS imagery, there are no mapped Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) located on the project parcel. There were no formal stormwater management plans or calculations included in the submitted Rezoning Application; however, the submitted materials suggest that a "Low Impact Development (LID)", or "Runoff Volume Match" approach will be pursued for Stormwater Management compliance. The submitted materials indicate a level of development that meet current UDO requirements specific to stormwater management. The project will need to meet applicable stormwater management requirements as outlined in Section 6.14 of the Orange County UDO and must be in general conformance with the North Carolina Stormwater Design Manual (i.e., Minimum Design Criteria). Conclusion: The Division has No Objections to the approval of the Rezoning Application so long as a complete LDP and/or SWP application and supporting plans with one separate hard copy of both ECP and SWP and calculations are submitted for review, processing, and approval prior to commencement of any on-site Land-Disturbing Activity. As the project progresses, additional field observations, additional permitting by others, and/or additional Orange County review and permitting may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with the Rezoning Application. P.E. Digitally signed by Christopher J.Sandt,P.E. Christopher J. Sandt EDN:cn=Christopher J.Sandt,P.E.,o–Orange County,North Carolina, —Engineering Division,email=csandt@orangecountync.gov,-US Date:2025.01.07 11:21:34-05'00' Christopher J. Sandt, PE Date January 2, 2025 Steve Kaltenbach Date Page 2 of 2 83 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Improving health. Inspiring change. MEMORANDUM TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Victoria Hudson — Orange County Environmental Health Division CC: Patrick Mallett— Deputy Director Development Services DATE: January 07, 2025 CASE: MA24-0006 PIN: 0910246642 WATERSHED: Flat River Protected PROJECT: Proposed development a 10.1 acre subdivision will to be rezoned into the zoning in accordance with Orange County's UDO. SUBJECT: Summary of Plan Review by Orange County Environmental Health Division This memo summarizes the summarizes the findings of an Orange County Environmental Health plan review of the application for a REDA-CD-1 amendment, submitted as the "Bully Self Storage" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 80.52 acres of property at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont. The request proposes development consisting of: • A request for a 10.1 acre subdivision will be requested to be rezoned into the REDA-CD-1 zoning in accordance with Orange County's LIDO. The REDA district is designed to foster economic development, and Bully Self Storage is ideally positioned to capitalize on this vision. The Staff comments contained herein are based upon the submittal of a required Site Plan, dated April 01, 2024 and made available November 6, 2024. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Soil and site evaluations have not been conducted by the Orange County Health Department, Environmental Health Division. The Health Department's role in the Amendment is compliance to the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. 84 Environmental Health Conditions At this time, no application(s) have been received. Application(s) and fees required. Improvement Permit(s) shall only be issued upon presentation of the exact structure to be constructed. Permit(s) must be issued by the Orange County Health Department prior to any alteration of the lot(s). Permit conditions may apply. Existing EH records are attached. Existing well and/or septic systems will be impacted. Contact Public Water Supply for on-site water supply. X No public health concerns. X Other: Permits required for office, shop, or residential unit in the future. Conclusion: EH has no objections to the approval of the zoning request so long as at the above list is addressed to the Orange County Health Department for processing, and issuance of Permits. This designation is not an Improvement Permit or Well Permit and not approval for a septic system or on-site water supply. Additional field observations and/or permitting by others may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with this request. Please direct any questions or requests for Laws, Rules, and policy to ehapplications(c�orangecountync.gov. 01-07-2025 Victoria Hudson, MPA, REHS Date Or designee 85 MEMORANDUM TO: DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: MATT TAYLOR,ORANGE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR MA24-0006 DATE: 12/17/2024 Orange County Solid Waste has no comments on this rezoning proposal. 86 AC*DOA Department of Administration Roy Cooper Pamela B. Cashwell Governor Secretary December 12, 2024 Ashley Moncado Orange County Planning& Inspections 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 201 Hillsborough, NC 27278- Re: SCH File#25-E-4300-0093 Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres(PIN 0910246642)of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR) zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District(REDA-CD-1)for storage Dear Ashley Moncado: The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. The appropriate document should be forwarded to the State Clearinghouse for compliance with State Environmental Policy Act. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (984) 236-0000. Sincerely, KADISHA MOLYNEAUX State Environmental Review Clearinghouse Attachments Mailing r, Location 1301 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1301 325 N. Salisbury St. I Raleigh, NC 27603 .4`::':: ?''✓ 984-236-0000 ncadmin.nc.gov oF�E STATE,. 87 ROY COOPER Governor MARY PENNY KELLEY ` Secretary *fEf QUAM W JAMIE RAGAN NORTH CAROLINA Director Environmental Quality To: Kadisha Molyneaux State Clearinghouse NC Department of Administration From: Lyn Biles Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service NC Department of Environmental Quality Re: 25-0093 Scoping - Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR) zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1) for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). Orange County Date: December 10, 2024 The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Several of our agencies have identified potential permits that may be required and have provided recommendations to help minimize negative impacts in and around the project site. I have attached the comments for the applicant's consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to respond. Attachments RE Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service le:!5—of217 West Jones Street 1 1639 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1639 NORTH CAROLINA Department of Emiramemal Quality /`� 877.623.6748 88 0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Cameron Ingram, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Lyn Biles,Environmental Assistance and SEPA Coordinator NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Services FROM: Olivia Munzer'Western Piedmont Coordinator — Habitat Conservation DATE: 10 December 2024 SUBJECT: Scoping for a Rezoning Application and Environmental Assessment for Bully Self Storage Facility at 9900 NC Highway 57, Rougemont, Orange County,North Carolina. DEQ No. 25-0093. Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission(NCWRC)have reviewed the subject document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-13 1 et seq.). Justin Chandler has submitted a Rezoning Application and an Environmental Assessment for the development of Bully Self Storage located at 9900 NC Highway 57,Rougemont, Orange County,North Carolina. Of the 80.52-acre site, 9.66 acres will be developed into 40 commercial storage buildings; a map does not delineate the entire property boundary clearly. The property contains a single pond on the northeast side of the property and three streams;however,none of the maps depicts all the streams and the pond. The site is surrounded by a concrete plant,racetrack, solar plant,rock quarry, and wooded lands. The Applicant indicates the storage will replace the racetrack,yet the site plans show the storage facility built adjacent to the racetrack. According to the documents provided,three unnamed tributaries to South Flat River in the Neuse River Basin flow through the site, one of which occurs near the development zone. The property contains a single pond on the northeast side of the property outside of the development zone.We have no known records for state or federally listed rare,threatened or endangered species within or adjacent to the site. However,the proposed federal endangered and state endangered tricolored bat(Perimyotis subflavus)is known to occur in Orange County. The lack of records from the site does not imply or confirm the absence of federal or state-listed species.An on-site survey is the only means to determine if the proposed project may impact federal or state rare,threatened, or endangered species. We have some concerns with the Project.We prefer the storage facility replace the racetrack rather than be built adjacent to the racetrack and the mature forest is felled for the facility. The project footprint Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh,NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028 89 10 December 2024 Page 2 NCWRC Comments Bully Self Storage Orange County should be surveyed for wetlands and streams to ensure there are no impacts to surface waters. Furthermore,we offer the following preliminary recommendations with the intent to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources: 1. In the Section Vegetated Buffers(Page 6),the Applicant states they chose native plants species for their vegetated buffers.However,Ilex cornuta (Dwarf Burford Holly),Ligustrum sinense (Variegated ligustrum),Prunus laurocerasus(Schipka Luarel),Ilex crenata(Heller Holly), and Thuja standishii(Green Giant Arborvitae) are non-native and/or invasive species.Avoid using invasive,non-native plants in seed mixtures or landscaping plants (http://www.ncwildflower.org/plant_galleries/invasives_list). Also, do not use non-native and/or invasive species such as Sudangrass, Kobe lespedeza, lespedeza,tall fescue,or other non-native species for temporary or permanent seeding. Alternatively,use grains, such as oats,wheat,or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. A list of alternatives to non-native species has been attached. We recommend planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the project boundary as well as planting native trees and shrubs in landscaping.Native trees and shrubs can be found at native plant nurseries throughout NC, and lists of native plants can be found https://ncwildflower.org/ and https://nc.audubon.org/birdfriendlynativeplantslists. 2. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed,native,forested buffer along perennial streams, and a minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands.Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources,water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area. Also,wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater. 3. We recommend minimizing clearing of living, dying, or dead mature trees,particularly if they are hardwoods, and avoid tree clearing activities during the activity period for tricolored bats (April 1 —November 14), a state endangered and federally proposed endangered species.Any existing culverts greater than 3 feet wide and bridges within or adjacent to the project should be surveyed for bats within 15 days of construction. Surveys should be conducted in accordance with the National White-nose Syndrome Decontamination Protocol and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Range-wide Indiana Bat&Northern Long-Eared Bat Survey Guidelines. 4. During heavy rains,the stormwater will still run off the roofs and compacted roads. We recommend installing rain gardens or other bioretention structures to reduce water runoff and soil erosion. Also, additional information on LID can be found at the NC State University LID guide: https://www.uni-groousa.orjz/PDF/NC LID_Guidebook.pd£ NCWRC's Green Growth Toolbox provides information on nature-friendly planning (http://www.ncwildlife.org/Conserving/Programs/GreenGrowthToolbox.aspx). 5. Consider using wildlife friendly outdoor lighting since light pollution can impact the circadian rhythms of animals, disrupt behavior, cause injury, or death. Lights should only be on when needed;use lights only where necessary; lights should have wavelength greater than 560 nm emissions(i.e.,narrow-spectrum LEDs or low-pressure sodium);mount the fixture as low as possible;use the lowest wattage necessary; and lights should be fully shielded. 6. Erosion control matting made of plastic mesh or twine should not be used within the project area because it can injure or kill wildlife. Based upon the information provided, it is unlikely the project will adversely impact state protected species or critical habitats. If I can be of additional assistance,please call(336)269-0074 or email olivia.munzer(kncwildlife.org. 90 RECOMMENDED NATIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR NON-NATIVE GRASSES IN NORTH CAROLINA* (Species are appropriate for all geographic regions unless otherwise indicated) NON-NATIVE SPECIES NATIVE SPECIES Big bluestem Andropogon gerardii Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans Crownvetch Switchgrass Panicum virgatum Centipede Beaked panicgrass Panicum anceps Bermuda Purpletop Tridens flavus Roundheaded bushclover Lespedeza capitata Deer tongue Dicanthelium clandestinum Sensitive partridge pea Chamaecrista nictitans Partridge pea Chamaecrista asciculata Big bluestem Andropogon gerardii Little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium Indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans Switchgrass Panicum virgatum Kentucky bluegrass Beaked panicgrass Panicum anceps Tall fescue Purpletop Tridens flavus Sudangrass Broomsedge Andropogon virginicus Deer tongue Dicanthelium clandestinum Canadian wildrye Elymus canadensis Virginia wildrye Elymus virginicus Sensitive partridge pea Chamaecrista nictitans Partridge pea Chamaecrista asciculata Switchgrass Panicum virgatum Splitbeard bluestem Andropogon ternarius Sericea lespedeza Beggarlice Desmodium spp. Kobe lespedeza Deer tongue Dicanthelium clandestinum Sensitive partridge pea Chamaecrista nictitans Partridge pea Chamaecrista asciculata 91 NC Native Plant Recommendations **A recommended revegetation/stabilization mix would ideally include a combination of the species listed in this table. In addition, please note that additional consideration may be needed in areas that are (highly) erodible and/or have sloped terrain. The following species could be included in all regions for additional stabilization and wildlife benefit: Black-eyed susan: Rudbeckia hirta Plains coreopsis: Coreopsis tinctoria Lance-leaved coreopsis: Coreopsis lanceolata Narrow-leaved sunflower: Helianthus angustifolius Created October 2018 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 92 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS Reviewing Regional Office: Raleigh Project Number: 25-0093 Due Date:12/10/2024 County: Orange After review of this project,it has been determined that the DEQ permit(s)and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.All applications,information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office. Normal Process PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time (Statutory time limit) Permit to construct&operate wastewater Application 90 days before begins construction or award of treatment facilities,non-standard sewer system 30 days 171treatment &sewer systems that do not construction contracts.On-site inspection may be required.Post- (90 days) discharge into state surface waters. application technical conference usual. Permit to construct&operate,sewer extensions involving gravity sewers,pump Fast-Track Permitting program consists of the submittal of an 30 days ❑ stations and force mains discharging into a application and an engineer's certification that the project meets all (N/A) sewer collection applicable State rules and Division Minimum Design Criteria. system NPDES-permit to discharge into surface water Application 180 days before begins activity.On-site inspection.Pre- ❑ and/or permit to operate and construct application conference usual.Additionally,obtain permit to construct 90-120 days wastewater facilities discharging into state wastewater treatment facility granted after NPDES.Reply time,30 days (N/A) surface waters. after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later. ❑ Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary. 30 days (N/A) Complete application must be received,and permit issued prior to the ❑ Well Construction Permit installation of a groundwater monitoring well located on property not 7 days owned by the applicant,and for a large capacity(>100,000 gallons per (15 days) ) day)water supply well. Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property ❑ Dredge and Fill Permit owner.On-site inspection.Pre-application conference usual.Filling may 55 days require Easement to Fill from N.C.Department of Administration and (90 days) Federal Dredge and Fill Permit. Permit to construct&operate Air Pollution Application must be submitted,and permit received prior to construction and operation of the source. If a permit is required ❑ Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources as in an area without local zoning,then there are additional 90 days per 15 A NCAC(2Q.0100 thru 2Q.0300) requirements and timelines(2Q.0113). Any open burning associated with subject ® proposal must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC N/A 60 days (90 days) 2D.1900 Demolition or renovations of structures Please Note-The Health Hazards Control Unit(HHCU)of the N.C. containing asbestos material must be in Department of Health and Human Services,must be notified of plans to ❑ compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1110(a)(1) demolish a building,including residences for commercial or industrial 60 days which requires notification and removal prior to expansion,even if no asbestos is present in the building. (90 days) demolition.Contact Asbestos Control Group 919-707-5950 The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity.An erosion& sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed.Plan must be filed with and approved 20 days ❑ by applicable Regional Office(Land Quality Section)at least 30 days before beginning activity. A NPDES Construction (30 days) Stormwater permit(NCG010000)is also usually issued should design features meet minimum requirements. A fee of $100 for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option is available with additional fees. Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular (30 days) ❑ attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable Stormwater conveyances and outlets. Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with Orange Co.Local Government's approved Based on Local ® program. Particular attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping Program devices as well as stable Stormwater conveyances and outlets. ❑ Compliance with 15A NCAC 04B.0125—Buffers Zones for Trout Waters shall have an undisturbed buffer zone 25 feet wide or of sufficient width to confine visible siltation within the twenty-five percent(25%)of the buffer zone nearest the land-disturbing activity,whichever is greater. ® Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0126-NPDES Stormwater Program which regulates three types of activities:Industrial, 30-60 days Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System&Construction activities that disturb>_1 acre. (90 days) Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000-State Stormwater Permitting Programs regulate site development and post- 45 days ® construction stormwater runoff control. Areas subject to these permit programs include all 20 coastal counties,and (90 days) various other counties and watersheds throughout the state. DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 1 of 3 April 4,2022/lbh State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 93 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS Reviewing Regional Office: Raleigh Project Number: 25-0093 Due Date:12/10/2024 County: Orange Normal Process PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS Time (Statutory time limit) On-site inspection usual.Surety bond filed with DEQ Bond amount varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land.Affected 30 days F] Mining Permit area greater than one acre must be permitted.The appropriate bond (60 days) must be received before the permit can be issued. If permit required,application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant must hire N.C.qualified engineer to prepare plans,inspect construction,and certify construction is according to DEQ approved ❑ Dam Safety Permit plans.May also require a permit under mosquito control program.And 30 days a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers.An inspection of site is necessary (60 days) to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of$200.00 must accompany the application.An additional processing fee based on a percentage,or the total project cost will be required upon completion. ❑ Oil Refining Facilities N/A 90-120 days (N/A) File surety bond of$5,000 with DEQ running to State of NC conditional 10 days ❑ Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well that any well opened by drill operator shall,upon abandonment,be N/A plugged according to DEQ rules and regulations. ❑ Application filed with DEC,at least 10 days prior to issue of permit. 10 days Geophysical Exploration Permit Application by letter.No standard application forms. N/A Application fee based on structure size is charged.Must include 15-20 days ❑ State Lakes Construction Permit descriptions&drawings of structure&proof of ownership of riparian N/A property Compliance with the T15A 02H.0500 Certifications are required 60 days ® 401 Water Quality Certification whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a (130 days) discharge into navigable water as described in 33 CFR part 323. Compliance with Catawba,Goose Creek,Jordan Lake,Randleman,Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules is required.Buffer requirements: ® http://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/401-wetlands-buffer-permits/401-riparian- buffer-protection-program Nutrient Offset:Loading requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River basins,and in the Jordan and Falls Lake ® watersheds,as part of the nutrient-management strategies in these areas. DWR nutrient offset information: http://deg.nc.gov/a bout/divisions/water-resources/pla nning/nonpoint-source-management/nutrient-offset-information ❑ CAMA Permit for MAJOR development $250.00 75 days$475.00 fee must accompany application (150 days) ❑ CAMA Permit for MINOR development $100.00 fee must accompany application 22 days(25 days) ❑ Abandonment of any wells,if required must be in accordance with Title 15A.Subchapter 2C.0100. ® Notification of the proper regional office is requested if"orphan"underground storage tanks(USTS)are discovered during any excavation operation. Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction ® as per 15A NCAC 18C.0300 et.seq.,Plans and specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh, 30 days North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply with state and federal drinking water monitoring requirements.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,(919)707-9100. If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction,plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to ® the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699- 30 days 1634.For more information,contact the Public Water Supply Section,(919)707-9100. Plans and specifications for the construction,expansion,or alteration of the water system must be approved through the delegated ❑ plan approval authority. Please contact them at for further information. DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 2 of 3 April 4,2022/lbh State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 94 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS Reviewing Regional Office: Raleigh Project Number: 25-0093 Due Date:12/10/2024 County: Orange Other Comments(attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to comment authority) Division Initials No Comments Date comment Review DAQ DLP ❑ See checked box. 11/15/2024 DWR-WQROS ❑ &See check boxes above.Three mapped features are depicted 11/18/2024 (Aquifer&Surface) &KM within/near the project area that may be subject to riparian buffer rules. Any impacts to the riparian buffer will need a buffer determination/authorization from the local program. If any impacts to surface water are anticipated,401/404 approval may be required. DWR-PWS TP ❑ See checked boxes. 11/14/2024 DEMLR(LQ&SW) WHD ❑ See checked boxes. 11/26/2024 DWM—UST MRP ❑ See checked box above. 12/5/2024 Other Comments ❑ / / REGIONAL OFFICES Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below. ❑ Asheville Regional Office ❑ Fayetteville Regional Office ❑ Mooresville Regional Office 2090 U.S.70 Highway 225 Green Street,Suite 714, 610 East Center Avenue,Suite 301, Swannanoa,NC 28778-8211 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone:828-296-4500 Phone:910-433-3300 Phone:704-663-1699 Fax:828-299-7043 Fax:910-486-0707 Fax:704-663-6040 ® Raleigh Regional Office ❑ Washington Regional Office ❑ Wilmington Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive, 943 Washington Square Mall, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Raleigh,NC 27609 Washington, NC 27889 Wilmington,NC 28405 Phone:919-791-4200 Phone:252-946-6481 Phone:910-796-7215 Fax:919-571-4718 Fax:252-975-3716 Fax:910-350-2004 ❑ Winston-Salem Regional Office 450 Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300, Winston-Salem,NC 27105 Phone:336-776-9800 Fax:336-776-9797 DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form Page 3 of 3 April 4,2022/lbh ,a,SrnrE 95 ROY COOPERi/� R ' Governor y {Q MARY PENNY KELLEY Secretary �`Q MICHAEL SCOTT NORTH CAROLINA Director Environmental Quality DATE: November 21, 2024 TO: Michael Scott, Division Director through Sharon Brinkley FROM: Charles Gerstell, Solid Waste Section Field Operations Branch RE: NEPA Project 25-0093, Orange County, NC Orange County Planning - Application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR) zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District(REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the scoping request in reference to an application to rezone approximately 10 acres(PIN 0910246642)of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR) zoning districtto NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units) in Orange County, North Carolina. The review has been completed and has found no adverse impact on the surrounding community and likewise knows of no situations in the community, which would affect this project from a non-hazardous solid waste perspective. During the project, every feasible effort should be made to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle materials for which viable markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in the development of this project where suitable. Any waste generated by this project that cannot be beneficially reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste management facility approved to manage the respective waste type. The Section strongly recommends that any contractors are required to provide proof of proper disposal for all waste generated as part of the project. A list of permitted solid waste management facilities is available on the Solid Waste Section portal site at: Solid Waste Facility List. Please contact Chuck Kirchner, Environmental Senior Specialist, for any questions regarding solid waste management for this project. Mr. Kirchner can be reached at (336) 776-9633 or by email at chuck.kirchner@deq.nc.gov. Ec: Chuck Kirchner, Environmental Senior Specialist North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Waste Management Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue,Suite 301 1 Mooresville,North Carolina 28115 hNCRTH cnnaurvn '� Dw.i_M.1 E'_..m ju�.�u r 704.235.2100 ,a,SrnrE 96 ROY COOPER Governor y {Q MARY PENNY KELLEY Secretary �`Q MICHAEL SCOTT NORTH CAROLINA Director Environmental Quality Date: November 25, 2024 To: Michael Scott, Director Division of Waste Management Through: Janet Macdonald Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch From: Katie C Tatum Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Subject: SEPA Project# 25- 0093 Orange County Planning, Orange County, North Carolina The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of sites under its jurisdiction to the Orange County Planning site. Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR) zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1) for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). No (0) Superfund Section sites and no (0) Brownfields Program Sites were identified within one mile of the project as shown on the attached report.The Superfund Section recommends that site files be reviewed to ensure that appropriate precautions are incorporated into any construction activities that encounter potentially contaminated soil or groundwater. Superfund Section files can be viewed at: http://deg.nc.gov/waste-management-laserfiche. Please contact Janet Macdonald at 919.707.8349 if you have any questions concerning the Superfund Section review portion of this SEPA/NEPA inquiry. DNorth Carolina department of Environmental Quality I Division of Waste Management E Q�� 217 West Jones Street 1 1646 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1646 aePnn,emQity 919.707.$200 97 PaD"'. Superfund & Brownfield Sites SEPA/NEPA Review Report Area of Interest (AOI) Information Orange County SEPA project 25-0093 Area : 2,359.81 acres Nov 25 2024 11:48:00 Eastern Standard Time „ �yah mt Timberlake LOP \ m s PERSON _ ORANGE __- -–––- PFRSON –_ �]nRHAhA _–––––– – d� � z o� `Rougemont l.r ,ta - wlma - +nR Slpn Rd %11 Rbg S 0 > ` ilo = I 1 7'L.'L I i i r a km Sale c!N011hCa rnl,.COT,Esri.HERE,G—h.INCR9NEM P, USGS,MEiIlNASA,NGA,EPA,USDA Superfund and Brownfield Sites 98 Orange County SEPA project 25-0093 Summary Name Count Area(acres) Length(mi) Certified DSCA Sites 0 N/A N/A Federal Remediation Branch Sites 0 N/A N/A Inactive Hazardous Sites 0 N/A N/A Pre-Regulatory Landfill Sites 0 N/A N/A Brownfields Program Sites 0 N/A N/A 99 Department of Environmental Quality Project Review Project Number: 25-0093 County: Orange Due Date Received: 11-12-2024 Date: 12-10-2024 Scoping- Orange County Planning Department received an application to Project Description: rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential(AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District(REDA-CD-1) for storage of goods(i.e. self-storage units). This Project is being reviewed as indicated below: Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review Asheville a Air E]Air Quality El Coastal Management Fayetteville a DWR Waste Mgmt Marine Fisheries FlMooresville Fv—,f] DWR-Public Water Water Resources Mgmt (Public CC&PS Div. of Water,Planning&Water Emergency Mgmt Wf Raleigh Fv_-�I DEMLR(LQ&SW) Quality Program) DMF-Shellfish Sanitation Washington a DWM DWR-Transportation Unit �✓ Wildlife Gabriela Wilmington Wildlife/DOT F] Winston Salem Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency: Response(check all applicable) No objection to project as proposed. No Comment Insufficient information to complete review Other(specify or attach comments) 100 Department of Environmental Quality Project Review Project Number: 25-0093 County: Orange Due Date Received: 11-12-2024 Date: 12-10-2024 Scoping- Orange County Planning Department received an application to Project Description: rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential(AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District(REDA-CD-1) for storage of goods(i.e. self-storage units). This Project is being reviewed as indicated below: Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review Asheville a Air E]Air Quality El Coastal Management Fayetteville a DWR Waste Mgmt Marine Fisheries FlMooresville Fv—,f] DWR-Public Water Water Resources Mgmt (Public CC&PS Div. of Water,Planning&Water Emergency Mgmt Wf Raleigh Fv_-�I DEMLR(LQ&SW) Quality Program) DMF-Shellfish Sanitation Washington a DWM DWR-Transportation Unit �✓ Wildlife Gabriela Wilmington Wildlife/DOT F] Winston Salem Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency: 12/3/24 Melodi Deaver,DWM Hazardous Waste Response(check all applicable) No objection to project as proposed. X No Comment Insufficient information to complete review Other(specify or attach comments) 101 Mev m.njt. • qu K Q�l/1M V� North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History Secretary D.Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary,Darin J.Waters,Ph.D. December 12, 2024 Justin Chandler jchandler(a,aggies.ncat.edu 9900 NC Highway 57 Rougemont,NC 27572 Re: Construct Bully Self Storage, 9900 NC Highway 57, Rougemont, Orange County, 25-E-4300-0093 GS 24-2707 Dear Mr. Chandler: Thank you for your email of November 12, 2024, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the submission and offer the following comments. We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed. These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive Order XVI. If you have questions regarding them, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or environmental.reviewgdncr.nc.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above-referenced tracking number. Sincerely, Ramona Bartos, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: Kadisha Molyneaux,N.C.S.C.H. state.clearin_hg ouse(kdoa.nc._og_v Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fait:(919)814-6570/814-6898 102 as sT�rrno,N STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER J.R."JOEY"HOPKINs GOVERNOR SECRETARY DATE: December 3,2024 TO: North Carolina State Clearinghouse Department of Administration Intergovernmental Review FROM: Julie E. Bogle,P.E. 4h NCDOT-Transportation Planning Division SUBJECT: 25-E-4300-0093—Proposed project is to rezone approximately 10 acres of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential(AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District for storage of goods(i.e. self-storage units). Located in Orange County. Thank you for allowing the Transportation Planning Division to review the project proposal. In reviewing the information,below are some comments. The 2013 Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) recommends an off-road pedestrian facility along NC 57. See CTP website for more detail: connect.ncdot.goy/projects/planning/Pages/CTP-Details.aspx?study id=Orange County. Please continue to coordinate and consult with the Central Pines Rural Planning Organization (CPRPO), and NCDOT on your project as you move forward. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to email meat jebo�.lekncdot.gov or call meat 919-707-0945. Mailing Address: Telephone:(919)707-0900 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax:(919)733-9794 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON ST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH,NC 27601 1554 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH,NC 27699-1554 Website:www.ncdot.gov ■ TP D TRANSPORTATION PIAXNIN6 61 VI SI6N 103 Control No.: 25-E-4300-0093 Date Received: 11/12/2024 County.: ORANGE Agency Response: 12/12/2024 Review Closed: 12/12/2024 DIANNE FARRIER CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Project Information Type: State Environmental Policy Act ping Applicant: Orange County Planning & Inspections Project Desc.: Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). As a result of this review the following is submitted: ❑No Comment [-]Comments Below ❑Documents Attached Reviewed By: DIANNE FARRIER Date: 11/21/2024 104 Control No.: 25-E-4300-0093 Date Received: 11/12/2024 County.: ORANGE Agency Response: 12/12/2024 Review Closed: 12/12/2024 LYN BILES CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Project Information Type: State Environmental Policy Act ping Applicant: Orange County Planning & Inspections Project Desc.: Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). As a result of this review the following is submitted: El No Comment ❑Comments Below ❑✓ Documents Attached Reviewed By: LYN BILES Date: 12/10/2024 105 Control No.: 25-E-4300-0093 Date Received: 11/12/2024 County.: ORANGE Agency Response: 12/12/2024 Review Closed: 12/12/2024 JINTAO WEN CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Project Information Type: State Environmental Policy Act ping Applicant: Orange County Planning & Inspections Project Desc.: Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). As a result of this review the following is submitted: ❑No Comment [-]Comments Below ❑Documents Attached Reviewed By: JINTAO WEN Date: 12/9/2024 106 Control No.: 25-E-4300-0093 Date Received: 11/12/2024 County.: ORANGE Agency Response: 12/12/2024 Review Closed: 12/12/2024 DEVON BORGARDT CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DEPT OF NATURAL& CULTURAL RESOURCE Project Information Type: State Environmental Policy Act ping Applicant: Orange County Planning & Inspections Project Desc.: Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642)of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District(REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). As a result of this review the following is submitted: F-1 No Comment F-1 Comments Below ❑✓ Documents Attached Reviewed By: DEVON BORGARDT Date: 12/12/2024 107 Control No.: 25-E-4300-0093 Date Received: 11/12/2024 County.: ORANGE Agency Response: 12/12/2024 Review Closed: 12/12/2024 JESSICA MOSLEY CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Project Information Type: State Environmental Policy Act ping Applicant: Orange County Planning & Inspections Project Desc.: Orange County Planning Department received an application to rezone approximately 10 acres (PIN 0910246642) of an 80.52-acre tract from the Agricultural Residential (AR)zoning district to NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1)for storage of goods (i.e. self-storage units). As a result of this review the following is submitted: El No Comment ❑Comments Below ❑✓ Documents Attached Reviewed By: JESSICA MOSLEY Date: 12/11/2024 108 GRANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.24S 2S7S February 26, 2025 Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Zoning Atlas Amendment Application (Chandler) MA24-0006 PIN: 0910-24-6642 A complete Environmental Assessment (EA) application for the Chandler Zoning Atlas Amendment Application, for the property located at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont with PIN 0910- 24-6642 (hereafter, the 'Project'), has been received and reviewed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. The EA application, rezoning application, and site plan were sent to local, state, and federal agencies for review. On November 7, 2024, the applicant submitted an Environmental Assessment application as required within Section 6.16 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. Staff did not identify any element of the Project requiring the completion/submittal of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). In addition, an EIS was not recommended by any local, state, or federal agency. Based on the information contained within the EA application, rezoning application, and site plan, Orange County Planning staff review, and comments received from local, state, and federal agencies, staff makes a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Project. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning and Inspections Director 109 Attachment 6 1 MEETING MINUTES 2 Excerpt of Minutes ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 3 APRIL 9,2025 4 REGULAR MEETING 5 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamar Proctor(Chair) Cheeks Township, Chris Johnston (Vice-Chair) Hillsborough Township, 7 Meg Millard, Little River Township Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township Representative; 8 Beth Bronson,At-Large Representative; Charity Kirk,At-Large Representative;Whitney Watson, 9 At-Large Representative; Steve Kaufmann, Bingham Township Representative; Liz Kalies, Chapel 10 Hill Township Representative;Venkat Yendapalli, Cedar Grove Township Representative;Jonah 11 Garson,At-Large Representative. 12 13 MEMBERS ABSENT: Delores Bailey,At-Large Representative. 14 15 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director—Long Range Planning 16 &Administration; Patrick Mallett, Deputy Director—Development Services;Taylor Perschau, 17 Manager—Current Planning;Ashley Moncado, Planner III; Lauren Honeycutt, Planner Il; Jack 18 Moran, Planning Technician. 19 20 OTHERS PRESENT: Adam Beeman, Patrick Florence, Keith Brown, Ken Redfoot, Dan Jewell, Justin Chandler, M. 21 Coulter, Betsi Snipes, Dan Snipes. 22 23 ****** 24 25 AGENDA ITEM 8: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(CONDITIONAL DISTRICT)-To review and make a recommendation to 26 the BOCC on applicant-initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone+/- 11.22 acres(PIN: 0910- 27 24-6642) located at 9900 NC 57, Rougemont,within the Little River Township of Orange County. 28 The proposed rezoning is from AR(Agricultural Residential)to REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 29 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District). The anticipated BOCC 30 public hearing date is June 3,2025. 31 32 Lamar Proctor: Now we're moving to Agenda Item 8,which is a Zoning Atlas Amendment to review and make a 33 recommendation to the BOCC on an applicant initiated zoning atlas amendment to rezone PIN 34 number 0910-26-6642 from agricultural residential to rural economic development area conditional 35 district. 36 37 Ashley Moncado: Thank you. I'm just going to hop right into it. The 80.52-acre parcel that is related to this request 38 is located northwest of NC-57 in the Little River Township. The applicant has requested 39 amendment to the zoning atlas to rezone approximately 11.22 acres of the 80-acre tract to REDA- 40 CD-1. Following BOCC approval,the applicant shall proceed with a subdivision to divide the 11- 41 acre parcel from the existing 80-acre tract. This request is to allow for storage of goods land use 42 to locate a self-storage business on this site. This use is permitted in the REDA-CD-1 District. 43 Adjacent parcels to the north,south, and west are zoned as AR and EC-5,which is existing 44 commercial, and contain rural residential and non-residential uses including warehousing. Parcels 45 to the east of the site were rezoned to REDA-CD-1 in 2012 and 2021 and contain an existing self- 46 storage business. Parcels which are located north of the site in Person County are zoned as 47 residential. This parcel is also located in the Agricultural Residential future land use classification. 48 No amendments are proposed. In addition to a signed application, conditional zoning applications 49 require a site plan, environmental assessment, narrative, and landscape plan. Again, all these 50 items are contained in the application package in Attachment 1. The applicant has provided a 51 site-specific plan illustrating three development phases and a total of 41 storage buildings. The 52 first development phase shall include three storage buildings, including an office. This is probably 53 hard to see, but this building and then these two buildings are Phase 1. Upon approval of the 54 zoning request,the existing go-kart use,which is located north of the proposed 11.22-acre site will 55 be terminated,eliminating concerns related to noise, light, pollution, traffic and trash. The site 110 56 plan also identifies landscaping, parking,water and wastewater utilities which are in conformance 57 with the UDO. In addition,the applicant is proposed an off-site easement,which will be located 58 along the perimeter of the 11.22-acre tract. This is to provide additional landscape buffering to 59 adjacent parcels. Access is provided via two paved driveways or entryways connecting to NC-57 60 meeting NCDOT design guidelines and North Carolina Fire Code regulations. The one main 61 access is located here,which is clear to see, and the second access actually goes off site north to 62 connect to NC-57 north. There is another page to your site plan that identifies that access point. 63 Mutually agreed upon conditions can be proposed as part of the conditional rezoning process and 64 are binding to the development permitted for the zoning district. As part of the process, the 65 applicant proposed 20 total conditions. These conditions were reviewed by staff and revisions 66 were recommended in order to provide clarity and consistency with the UDO. The applicant 67 accepted the revisions and these are what are contained in your packets,specifically 68 Attachments 6 and 8. Again,following the applicant's presentation,we can go through these and 69 if you have any questions, staff or the applicant answer to them.At this time I am going to go 70 ahead and hand it over to the applicant, to allow him to introduce himself. 71 72 Justin Chandler: Hey there. My name is Justin Chandler. I have been a resident of Orange County now for about 73 20 years. I'm the landowner and I guess driving force with the development here. Back in 2007, 74 this small area task force was structured to kind of address some of the ongoing concerns with the 75 large speedway, rock quarry, asphalt plant, concrete plant, and go-kart track. At that time, I didn't 76 own the property, and to keep it short and sweet, I think Ashley covered most of the stuff here, but 77 the four main concerns were ongoing traffic, noise, odors, and then the additional non-residential 78 use to the land. All of this was taken into consideration. I've been a member of the community, as 79 1 said,for about 20 years. I know the neighbors pretty intimately and have spoken with them 80 throughout this project, and as of now it's going on about 3 years in this whole development 81 process, and took in a lot of consideration with what they said and not only have I had no 82 opposition, I have actually had support for it, and taking down some of these structures that have 83 been causing an eye sore and have been dilapidated, and well pending you guys'approval and 84 recommendation, I'd like to complete it and kind of get rid of the eye sore up there. 85 86 Lamar Proctor: Any questions? Okay. We'll start down here and move this way. 87 88 Meg Millard: I have a few questions. 89 90 Justin Chandler: Yes, ma'am. 91 92 Meg Millard: So, I'm curious why you chose to put the storage units on the 11 acres that's currently wooded as 93 opposed to where the,the go-kart track was, is? 94 95 Justin Chandler: It's due to the ease of grading. That patch of vegetation is relatively new. If you actually look 96 back in the aerial GIS data, the vegetation there is relatively young. It's probably under about 97 15 years old at this point, and it's for constructability purposes mainly. 98 99 Meg Millard: Okay. Just provide a buffer for the neighbors on the other side as opposed to a very narrow 100 buffer. That's what I was wondering about. 101 102 Justin Chandler: Yes, ma'am. 103 104 Meg Millard: And then the other questions I had,the wildlife resources commission had some suggestions, and 105 1 didn't see that addressed that you were accepting them. It said for the vegetative buffers that 106 you said you were going to use native species, but the ones you listed were not native, and then 107 they gave some suggestions. Had you considered switching to native species? 108 109 Justin Chandler: In regard to the grasses, yes. That is consistent, or that would be an issue in terms of the actual 110 buffers themselves. Just, again,for being able to maintain it, and the heartiness of the soil there, 111 111 or the lack of heartiness of the soil, it is next to impossible to. I mean it grows brooms hedge and 112 junk pretty good, but anything else is relatively difficult to maintain. 113 114 Meg Millard: But not, not for the larger trees and things. 115 116 Justin Chandler: Yeah,just isn't feasible unless you, I mean you'd have to transplant quite a bit of soil to maintain 117 that. As you can see the buffers there, I mean they're pretty long. The north, if you're looking at it, 118 1 guess northwest buffer is almost 900 feet as it is, and then the other sides are about 500, 600 119 feet. So, in each of those settings it would be a pretty big economic feat to bring in that much 120 topsoil in there to address that. 121 122 Meg Millard: Well, the native species should do better in the native soil than other things, but they also had the 123 question why would you cut down threes when there's open space right next to it.And then they 124 did have a concern about the lighting and whether or not you had made any accommodations for 125 the possibility of tri-colored bats being there, and not cutting down trees during their breeding 126 season. 127 128 Justin Chandler: the lighting is in compliance as far at the LIDO goes. I went a step further and am only putting 129 security lighting downward facing attached to the building,which the UDO actually allows poles 130 and structures set to a timer. I don't want to cause any light pollution. I only have what's 131 necessary,and they're going to be on during business hours and off afterwards. So, it will be 132 completely isolated unless there is movement within the facility per the security guidelines and 133 what not with the LIDO. 134 135 Meg Millard: Okay,thank you. 136 137 Beth Bronson: You said you're a new property owner? Or you were before? 138 139 Justin Chandler: I purchased the property in March of 2021. 140 141 Beth Bronson: Okay, and that's the full 80 acres that happens to include the inactive go-kart track existing? 142 143 Justin Chandler: Yes, ma'am. 144 145 Beth Bronson: And when you're talking about one of the conditions for approval for the Bully Storage,this is the 146 only Bully's, like this is the only storage facility that exists? Is it like a one off,or is it part of a 147 franchise? 148 149 Justin Chandler: Yes, it'll be the only, it's not a franchise. 150 151 Beth Bronson: A one off. Okay, and one of the conditions, number 2 for the existing go-kart use and track 152 contained on the existing 80 acres shall be terminated and no longer operate on site. I wanted to 153 clarify that it is not actively being used, correct? 154 155 Justin Chandler: Not at this time. 156 157 Beth Bronson: Okay, and so does this condition include that it would be removed or that it just wouldn't be 158 reactivated? 159 160 Justin Chandler: It will no longer operate. It shall no longer operate on site. My plan is to completely rid all of the 161 structures related to it, or all of the infrastructure there. As of now, some of the buildings have 162 actually been removed as it stands. But,yes, in its entirety it will be removed. 163 164 Beth Bronson: You're talking about the track itself. The asphalt will be removed? 165 112 166 Justin Chandler: Yes. 167 168 Beth Bronson: So that land is already going to be disturbed? 169 170 Justin Chandler: Yes. 171 172 Beth Bronson: Okay. And then as far as the elevation change it didn't look super significant. Is there a place in 173 the report where you were talking about like the ease of grading? 174 175 Justin Chandler: No, not in the report. Directly to the northeast of that parcel there, or actually on the 80-acre 176 parcel there's a house,too. So, the more you move it over the more it's sitting right in front of the 177 house. So,that's a factor of why it's placement to it as well. 178 179 Beth Bronson: You're saying that the house is closer to the go-kart? 180 181 Justin Chandler: Correct. Yeah. 182 183 Ashley Moncado: You've gone too far down. I don't think we have an aerial, unfortunately. 184 185 Beth Bronson: You can put it on Google Maps. It's no problem. 186 187 Ashley Moncado: I think the house,you're probably going to say is about here? 188 189 Justin Chandler: Yeah, a little to the south, right there. 190 191 Beth Bronson: Yeah, so your problem is that it's in the dead middle of what, 80 acres? It's like in the almost the 192 middle? 193 194 Justin Chandler: Approximately, yeah. 195 196 Beth Bronson: Okay. And then the 11 acres, being south, right,and then northeast you're saying that it'll be too 197 close to the residence. 198 199 Justin Chandler: Correct. 200 201 Beth Bronson: Now, is this going to be a completely separated parcel? 202 203 Justin Chandler: Correct. 204 205 Beth Bronson: By the time this, pending approval, it would be its own parcel, but not just rezoned within the 80 206 acres? 207 208 Justin Chandler: Correct. 209 210 Beth Bronson: Okay. 211 212 Whitney Watson: I didn't think you understood the question. So,the parcel is going remain as a single parcel, 213 portion of it's going to be rezoned. Correct? 214 215 Justin Chandler: Correct. It's a subdivision of the 80 acres. So, it will be 11.22 and then the remainder. 216 217 Beth Bronson: I think that for condition Number 10,the property owner shall record a final plot dividing the 11.22- 218 acre parcel from the existing 80-acre park tract within 120 days of the commissioner's approval of 219 the rezoning application. So,that said,the facilities that would be on that property and used for 220 that property, utilities for that parcel would be completely separate from the other 80 acres? 113 221 222 Meg Millard: The wells are outside of that 11 acres. 223 224 Ashley Moncado: I believe there's also a condition to record off-site easements for wastewater utilities. 225 226 Beth Bronson: Okay. So, it's not like its own well, or septic. 227 228 Ashley Moncado: And that could be for just the applicant, but yes, and then as part of the subdivision process, most 229 likely we're going to have a conversation with Environmental Health, because they will also require 230 easements for those utilities, and whether that will be through the subdivision process or a 231 separate plat that the applicant has to get those easements for the well and for the septic system. 232 233 Beth Bronson: If he's required. 234 235 Ashley Moncado: He will be required. They will possibly require new permits to be issued, I believe due to the new 236 parcel line splitting the utilities. 237 238 Beth Bronson: Now, has there been a survey of that land where there's any abandoned wells or septic, or is it 239 just not at that point? 240 241 Ashley Moncado: 1, again, if the applicant wants to answer, but this did go through DAC. At that time is usually 242 when we receive comments from Environmental Health. This was presented to them. At that time, 243 1 think it was more of a 10 acres parcel when it went through DAC. I don't believe that we 244 received any comments from them. Again,that would be a process that the applicant would have 245 to follow through whether it's through the subdivision, prior to the subdivision approval, or 246 immediately following the subdivision approval. Environmental Health will work with him. 247 248 Justin Chandler: So,we have the GIS pulled up here.And you can kind of get a little bit better picture of it. Of the 249 location.And the offset, and the purpose for the offset. 250 251 Beth Bronson: The offset of? 252 253 Justin Chandler: Of where the proposed 11-acre subdivision will be. 254 255 Beth Bronson: So, like the offset from the cleared area is what you're saying? 256 257 Justin Chandler: Exactly. 258 259 Beth Bronson: That makes sense. Because that 11 acres is towards the bottom. Correct? 260 261 Justin Chandler: Yes, it's in this area. Right here. Probably half of it, or roughly half of it is already cleared. 262 263 Beth Bronson: You're saying it slopes down to the west? 264 265 Justin Chandler: Yeah, in the center of the track. So,the way it was, the way the track was graded, you would 266 think it's flat.The center of the track is significantly sloped down, and it's got a drainage pipe that 267 runs through the center, right here.And comes out on the pond side. So, it actually travels about 268 100-foot underground. So,filling that in would obviously disrupt a lot of the drainage. 269 270 Beth Bronson: That makes a lot of sense.And then, eventually, the 11 acres will be completely separated from 271 the go-kart track parcel? Like the parcel that it'd be located on,the go-kart track will be completely 272 separate from the 11 acres? 273 274 Ashley Moncado: That will remain as AR,yes. 275 114 276 Beth Bronson: Okay. 277 278 Ashley Moncado: The single-family home and then the track will remain separate and zoned as AR. 279 280 Beth Bronson: I guess that was my confusion, I think. Thank you. No more questions right now. 281 282 Whitney Watson: Sure. It's great that you have this GIS aerial pulled up. It looks like there's a road that runs 283 through the property to a structure off to the north. What is the structure to the north of the 284 property line, and will that road be continued,will they have continued easement through there? 285 286 Justin Chandler: In regard to this structure that you're mentioning?These are old houses. I mean they've probably 287 been there from the 1800's. Most of them are dilapidated and falling down, but they cut hay in 288 that. They'll continue to have access to it, as it stands, and that road will stay in place because 289 there's, again that is the same access to the single-family residence there. 290 291 Whitney Watson: So, does that access for cutting hay or agricultural purposes, does that need to be somehow put 292 into the conditions for this change? 293 294 Ashley Moncado: That part of the property is not part of this rezoning request. I might have to refer to either Cy or 295 Pat, but it's not part of it,we're focusing on the 11.22 acres that's going through the rezoning. 296 297 Whitney Watson: That's just the storage facility area, right? 298 299 Ashley Moncado: Yes. 300 301 Whitney Watson: Okay. So, the balance will then remain zoned as AR? 302 303 Ashley Moncado: Correct. 304 305 Whitney Watson: Okay. 306 307 Ashley Moncado: And whether there are recorded documents or recorded easements or plats that have the access 308 documented, again,when he comes to the subdivision review process, the surveyor putting the 309 plat together would have those items highlighted and documented on the plat to make sure that 310 the easement and the access is still legally there for them. 311 312 Whitney Watson: Okay. 313 314 Cy Stober: I just want to be clear that, I hope I'm not muddying the waters, but what the board is being asked 315 to review is enabling split-zoning on a single property. There is a proposed subdivision of the 316 property, but that is not part of the discussion tonight, but the split zoning would distinctly separate 317 the storage use from the pre-existing residential and as Justin mentioned some kind of light 318 agricultural uses in that area. 319 320 Beth Bronson: Any future use for the other one? 321 322 Cy Stober: Yeah,there is no action being taken on the larger portion of the property,just that 11 acres. 323 324 Lamar Proctor: Just following up with that. Split zoning can exist within the same parcel. 325 326 Cy Stober: Yes. 327 328 Lamar Proctor: It doesn't require a separate plat. 329 330 Cy Stober: Correct. 115 331 332 Lamar Proctor: Okay. 333 334 Meg Millard: The one connection is the impervious surface transfer? 335 336 Cy Stober: Yes, but that's a civil matter between property owners, and we do administer that, and we provide 337 it as an option, but ultimately it does need to be recorded as an obligation between two property 338 owners in this case, or between properties and that, essentially it would function similar to a 339 conservation easement that that area would be dedicated for non-development because it is 340 serving as the impervious transfer. 341 342 Whitney Watson: I also found that there were some places where the paving for the storage facility wasn't clear. 343 There are some places where it says it all needs to be asphalt, and some in your application, talk 344 about number, Size 57 washed stone. So, I'm wondering if that's just an oversight in a 345 documentation. 346 347 Ashley Moncado: The UDO requires parking to be paved, but the applicant has issued a condition to allow for that 348 not to be the situation, and that's where the 57 stone has been proposed. As a condition,we will 349 require the access ways connecting to NC-57 to be paved. 350 351 Whitney Watson: Right. 352 353 Whitney Watson: Okay. And last question has to do with the sizing for the septic system. I think you proposed 354 perhaps as many as 20 people working there part time. 355 356 Justin Chandler: No, it will be a single employee. 357 358 Whitney Watson: Okay,you might want to look at the application, because it clearly says you expect as many as 20 359 people there. For when they did the environmental health calculations it was based on 20. 360 361 Justin Chandler: I think that that's in regard to a minimum. So, in the site plan in the notes, I don't have it right in 362 front of me, but in the note section on general notes, it speaks to the employee and in regard to 363 the parking situation,specifically, and it's one employee.And then what five additional parking 364 spaces, or four additional parking spaces for a total of five. I think for environmental health 365 concerns, or environmental health calculations, it's kind of similar to traffic where there's a 366 minimum required proposed. Even if the anecdotal side of it,there's,five people going in and out 367 a day, there's a minimum per building and what not. I think it's along those lines for that. So,the 368 existing septic on the facility has been approved for over 400 people.400 spectators for that 369 facility. 370 371 Beth Bronson: The existing one? 372 373 Justin Chandler: The existing one. 374 375 Whitney Watson: Okay. 376 377 Beth Bronson: It is not currently on the parcel under review, but you would potentially use. 378 379 Justin Chandler: Correct. 380 381 Beth Bronson: If it wasn't irreparable? 382 383 Justin Chandler: Correct. That portion of it has been maintained around that track. 384 385 Beth Bronson: It's technically already there. 116 386 387 Justin Chandler: Yeah. It's been upkept and maintained. So, there shouldn't be any issue with that, but obviously, 388 we would have to get Environmental Health to come out. 389 390 Beth Bronson: And I guess that goes back to that question that I had if there is an existing well and septic close 391 enough. 392 393 Justin Chandler: Correct. 394 395 Beth Bronson: But you're not using the residential well and septic? 396 397 Justin Chandler: Yeah, exactly. 398 399 Beth Bronson: Because there's a separate one, but not being incorporated into the 11 acres? 400 401 Justin Chandler: No, it will not be encompassed in the parcel boundaries. 402 403 Beth Bronson: And I'm just trying to understand why you wouldn't do that because it's being used for it. You'd 404 rather do the easement than include it into the parcel. 405 406 Justin Chandler: Correct. 407 408 Statler Gilfillen: Okay. So, practical matter then,they go across the street to the existing toilets if they need to use 409 the toilet for this facility? And it is a storage facility. Is that what you're saying? 410 411 Justin Chandler: The toilets would be obviously located on site,within the storage buildings,they wouldn't be 412 leaving off site to access that. This would be something that is connected by way of an easement. 413 414 Whitney Watson: All right. I, 1 think you should just go back and look in the packet, it's Page 127. 415 416 Ashley Moncado: It says in the ground water assessment that 20 is being the maximum. For the total number of 417 employees. 418 419 Justin Chandler: Okay. 420 421 Whitney Watson: If it's going to be made that certainly seems like a lot of folks for a storage facility. 422 423 Justin Chandler: Yeah. 424 425 Whitney Watson: But if you're only anticipating two or three,then perhaps Environmental Health should know that 426 so they can adjust their calculations. 427 428 Ashley Moncado: When this comes back approved,the next step in the process would be to come back through and 429 to review as a site plan. It would come through the non-residential zoning compliance permit 430 process. At that point is where all these permits and everything kind of come more into play. 431 Environmental Health would be having these conversations with them. They would need to know 432 the employee counts and be going out there to do site visits. 433 434 Whitney Watson: Okay. That's all. 435 436 Statler Gilfillen: I have several technical questions. How many individual different units do you plan on having. I'm 437 just looking at the plan. I can't tell any square footages or spaces. How many units are in here? 438 439 Justin Chandler: I believe the proposed building dividers are actually being quoted and finalized now. The current 440 configuration, I believe, is 226. 117 441 442 Statler Gilfillen: Okay. And are some of these insulated? Some of them not insulated. 443 444 Justin Chandler: Non-insulated. 445 446 Statler Gilfillen: Basically, metal building storage facilities we're used to seeing. 447 448 Justin Chandler: Correct. 449 450 Statler Gilfillen: Okay. Have you discussed this with the Fire Marshall? 451 452 Justin Chandler: The Fire Marshall, in the initial DAC review,was asked for comment. I actually spoke with him 453 outside, or post the comment phase about the drive access, and asked him were there any 454 additional concerns that he had, at which point I addressed the secondary drive access. 455 456 Statler Gilfillen: All right. My background, in the 1980's, I did well over$20 million with the design for major 457 storage facilities just like this. This is not about my work or any conflict here, but I have some 458 experience dealing with this.And your question somewhat avoids one of the major issues that 1 459 ran up against. When you have these many facilities, and they are individual citizens putting their 460 items in storage, many of those items can be flammable. It's very hard to control whether 461 somebody puts 20 cans of paint or even gasoline in some of these facilities. So,therefore fire can 462 be a serious issue. Therefore,the ability of fire trucks to come on and quickly maneuver around 463 the property, as well as having enough outlets for the hoses for the fire trucks to connect into are 464 major issues. I'm looking at this plan, and I'm concerned that the safety, and a Fire Marshall, 465 locally, if he's not dealt with this before, may not raise that question. I'm concerned,from a public 466 safety standpoint, and the safety of innocent individuals that could lose their life's possessions, 467 what protection you have given in this facility to that. 468 469 Justin Chandler: Yeah, absolutely. I guess give full encompass to the background. If you look at the GIS and you 470 look across the street,there's another storage facility there. I took a part in that. That's my 471 family's. That was the process that she was talking about in 2012 and 2021. We received 472 comment from the Fire Marshall with those. They are very happy with us, and we have put items 473 in the leasing contract that specifically forbid the storage of anything flammable, explosive,and 474 you can't store any dangerous items on there that would void the lease. I understand people may 475 or may not listen to that, and I completely, a hundred percent acknowledge that. They asked us to 476 increase our aisle size and turn radii,which we have done and incorporated in both facilities. In 477 this one and the other one. I've also included, if you look at the very back of the site plan that's up 478 there now, it's a spot for a hammerhead turn section, so fire trucks can come in and easily 479 maneuver back and forth. It followed the 30-foot radii and 210-foot in length,to address these 480 concerns for any first responders. 481 482 Statler Gilfillen: Thank you. Good luck. 483 484 Lamar Proctor: Justin, so you said your family owns the ones across the street. 485 486 Justin Chandler: That's correct. 487 488 Lamar Proctor: Do you foresee enough business to go through all the phases and complete this project? 489 490 Justin Chandler: I hope so. 491 492 Lamar Proctor: I guess my question is, did you see an increasing need that this community and the population 493 around it need more storage areas, and is that why you chose to do this? 494 495 Justin Chandler: That is correct. 118 496 497 Lamar Proctor: Back to Meg's question about the non-native species. I'm just trying to understand. There's listed 498 specific non-native species in their recommendations like crown veg, centipede and Bermuda. 1 499 assume those are grasses.Are those ones that you plan to plant, or can you tell me about how 500 that works. Like in terms of choosing plants for buffer zones and setbacks and things? 501 502 Justin Chandler: Yes,that's correct. It's going to be on the out, if you see the site plan here, kind of where these 503 buffer areas,the landscaping buffers there for the buildings. It would be in kind of that white space 504 around that,encompassing that. Again,to go back to the 2012, 2021,we got recommendations in 505 regard to those as well. We tried to put some of those in and it did not take. It's the same soil 506 across the road. We ended up chasing our thumb, and tried to implement those, and then 507 basically had to talk and get something else in there that would take off and take root a little bit 508 better. 509 510 Lamar Proctor: Okay. And does Planning have anything to do with the choice of species? 511 512 Ashley Moncado: There is a condition related to landscaping I think might help answer some of this question.The 513 final landscape plan will be reviewed and will be approved as part of the zoning compliance 514 process. We do have a recommended plant list, or recommended plantings.We list,when it 515 comes to like street trees,this is what's recommended, and when it comes to landscape buffers, 516 this is what's recommended. We do have a list, and we work with applicants as we're going 517 through that process to get their landscape plan finalized. Also,with the existing vegetation out 518 there,that's why we also have these conditions, as he moves through the subdivision, he'll be 519 working with staff to determine what's out there,what is needed. If things are not meeting our 520 standards or not meeting the planting schedule requirements,then we would be working with the 521 applicant based on that plantings list. 522 523 Lamar Proctor: Okay. So, Planning works with the applicant and developers to get native species or non-invasive 524 species planted? 525 526 Ashley Moncado: Pat put the list together and I actually think Charity had something to do with it, and those are 527 going to be native. We're not going to want non-native plants. 528 529 Lamar Proctor: I think Meg's concern, I know it's my concern on my property. There are all sorts of invasive 530 species, and it just becomes a problem that starts, but it, as long as it's being addressed. 531 532 Ashley Moncado: There's condition number 15,which is specifically calling out that their final landscape plan would 533 be during the zoning compliance process, and then there's also a condition that if it's determined 534 that the plantings do not meet LIDO standards, additional plantings may be required. 535 536 Lamar Proctor: Great, thank you. Chris? 537 538 Chris Johnston: I don't really have any questions. I think it looks fine,and I appreciate the time and effort you've 539 put into this. I also just wanted to call out, I haven't seen many Neighborhood Information Meeting 540 sign-in sheets that have no one sign up. That was pretty impressive. Although it does look like it 541 was December 30th at 10:00 a.m. So, maybe everyone was just out of town.Thank you for your 542 time. 543 544 Charity Kirk: Can you clarify where the amendments are? 545 546 Ashley Moncado: The conditions? 547 548 Charity Kirk: Yes,the conditions? 549 550 Ashley Moncado: It's in the attachment to the staff report. 119 551 552 Charity Kirk: What page. 553 554 Ashley Moncado: Page 145. 555 556 Charity Kirk: 145. Thank you.You have a lot of language in your, purpose and intent of leaving a sustainable 557 footprint, and eco-friendly practices,and I'm a little concerned about the non-native invasive plants 558 that you seem so intent on doing,which is not sustainable really. There's nice language and then 559 there's reality. So, I feel like I need to check a few things. Where are your photovoltaics that you 560 say you're going to have? Where are your photovoltaic systems? Are they on all the buildings? 561 562 Justin Chandler: We're going to incorporate that with some of the drive aisle lighting. It's going to be the security 563 lighting system that will be on during the wintertime after, let's say 5:30,depending on the time of 564 year and time change. They will be attached there, and act as access lights for lockers during 565 those times. Again,they're low lumen outputs. You can barely see them from 200 yards away. 1 566 mean if you're on the other side of the property, it would be virtually impossible to see it. It's not 567 like a flashlight. Like a 500, 600, 700, 800 lumen flashlight that you can see. Those will be 568 attached to the buildings themselves and in the office as well. 569 570 Charity Kirk: The photovoltaics are just associated with the lighting? 571 572 Justin Chandler: Correct. 573 574 Charity Kirk: Okay. And the eco-friendly materials you're going to design the units with,what are those 575 materials? 576 577 Justin Chandler: In regard to that, obviously this is a protected watershed in that whole area there. A lot of that 578 verbiage speaks to the non-permeable stone. However, using 57 stone and some of the studies 579 that have come out with it, that talks about the permeability being,for the land to be able to soak it 580 back up. Although in Orange County it is not considered it, it helps mitigate some of the runoff. 581 Again, I just want to go back and harp on the fact that it was a racetrack. It still can be a 582 racetrack. It's still there. The infrastructure's there to do it. It has oils, gases, loud noises, giant 583 lights on them that run until 10:00. It's permitted to run until 10:00 or 11:00 at night. We don't 584 want any of that. 585 586 Charity Kirk: You're comparing yourself as more sustainable than a racetrack? 587 588 Justin Chandler: Significantly,yes. 589 590 Charity Kirk: Okay, but you use a lot of sustainable language here to impress, I think, and I'm wondering where 591 that is. 592 593 Justin Chandler: When we do the erosion control measures, as you can see in the northwest side, all of the roll 594 outs, netting, are biodegradable. They're not plastic. They're not nylon. They will degrade over 595 time. We plan on using straw and grass coverings from the area to go back there to prevent more 596 non-invasive species coming in there and overtaking it. During this whole process, a lot of the 597 runoff with nylon, now seems to be,that's what gets in the rivers systems, and obviously the 598 netting stuff is a huge concern, not only in our river systems, but our oceans in general,which by 599 way of, go down to the coast of North Carolina. None of this will be a factor with the materials that 600 I'm using for erosion control. So that more of what I'm pointing towards when I'm saying 601 sustainable and eco-friendly practices. 602 603 Charity Kirk: So, you're sentence, the storage units are designed with eco-friendly materials, you've pointed at 604 gravel.And you've pointed at the water runoff, but I have yet to hear storage units are designed 605 with eco-friendly materials. That is your language. What does that mean? 120 606 607 Justin Chandler: It's more the construction process. I was speaking to the construction process as a whole. 1 608 wasn't trying to inherently say that like steel was inherently eco-friendly. 609 610 Charity Kirk: Okay. 611 612 Statler GiIfillen: You're using basically metal building construction, right? 613 614 Justin Chandler: Correct. 615 616 Statler GiIfillen: Standard framing. 617 618 Justin Chandler: Correct. 619 620 Beth Bronson: And there's no solar plans for the lighting system? 621 622 Justin Chandler: It's basic solar lighting that you can get from any type of supply store. 623 624 Charity Kirk: And your green building materials? That would just be the gravel. 625 626 Justin Chandler: That's part of the erosion control process as well. That's part of the construction process, and 627 that's, again,what I was pointing to. 628 629 Charity Kirk: Okay. That's landscaping. I would consider that more landscaping than building. 630 631 Justin Chandler: Yes, ma'am. 632 633 Charity Kirk: And how are you a benchmark for sustainable and environmentally conscious storage facilities? 634 Just the use of pervious pavement. 635 636 Justin Chandler: Generally speaking,when you see a lot of these storage facilities go up,they're vertical storage. 637 They're multiple level. They include a significant amount more infrastructure compared to these 638 single level storage units. They use weight-rated I-beams, all sorts of fire suppression systems 639 that have harmful chemicals in them. Some obviously have various systems in it that are not 640 great. Basically,what I'm getting at is there is so much more because of multi-level development 641 with these storage units. There's a lot more material. There's a lot more waste. All of these kits 642 that I buy,they have no waste. When you go out there on the job site afterwards,you can load up 643 the trash from the construction in a small 10 by 20,or 8 1/2 by 20 dumpster,for this entire facility. 644 If you go to somewhere like off of Guess Road, Public Storage just built their unit. You go look at 645 their dumpsters. They're hauling off five,six,seven, eight loads of trash to go into the landfill. 646 What I'm doing right now is retaining almost 70 acres of land that I will own in perpetuity with this 647 and intend to not develop it and keep it completely as it is to promote wildlife. Obviously have low 648 lighting to not disturb any type of nocturnal animals. I'm not doing anything that would have 649 significant run off type inferences with this, and I guess that's what I'm pointing to. 650 651 Charity Kirk: And how are you going to serve as an inspiration for other businesses to adopt sustainable 652 practices? 653 654 Chris Johnston: Just to confirm, I want to make sure that we're not necessarily digging in at anyone's writing style 655 or anything along those lines. I want to make sure we're focused. 656 657 Charity Kirk: I'm wanting to sort of go towards the,you know, there's non-native plants and invasive plants 658 even, and there is a hesitation to do much more, to amend the soil,to do sort of sustainability stuff 659 to be an inspiration of pollinators and rainwater and all of that.And how can we, as a Planning 660 Board say that we can add to this? That we want certain practices that are being stated as they're 121 661 going to happen. Can we make sure that the stormwater stays on site and there's retention ponds 662 and a rainwater garden and more sustainable practices than what I'm seeing as actually 663 implemented.What can we do? 664 665 Cy Stober: Just a reminder, and Ashley covered this in her initial slides that conditional zoning is, any 666 conditions that are imposed upon the property and any approval are those that are mutually 667 agreed upon by the applicant and the County ultimately. This is a negotiation, and between 668 Mr. Chandler and the Planning Board on behalf of the County and eventually the Commissioners. 669 This is an active discussion and dialog, and any concerns that the Board may have would be 670 appropriate to bring up as a point of negotiation and discussion. I think the other thing is if there is 671 a condition that any Board member feels is fundamental to the nature of the project, if it is a 672 reasonable land use consideration it could be grounds for a recommendation of denial, or a 673 recommendation to continue the matter. 674 675 Chris Johnston: I'm not here to make excuses or anything for Mr. Chandler. I just want to make sure that 1 676 understand,you're experience across the street where your family has a lot that did this self- 677 storage thing and you attempted to follow the statute and attempted to do the non-invasive 678 grasses or whatever the case may be, and that didn't work out and eventually you had to fall back 679 to something else. Is that how I understood your take on this previously and your hesitation? 680 681 Justin Chandler: The grass is not an issue. 682 683 Chris Johnston: Not an issue. Okay. 684 685 Justin Chandler: Yeah,that's not an issue at all. Some of the plantings, again,fall within the schedule of the UDO 686 and what has been provided.And we've made those picks based on that. 687 688 Chris Johnston: And again, that comes from your experience in the area next door. 689 690 Justin Chandler: Correct. 691 692 Chris Johnston: I'm just making sure I understand,from your point of view where this is coming from, because on 693 this Board, the non-invasive species thing is very important,and I want to make sure that we're 694 answering that and go from there. I'm going to defer because I started talking over your spot, and 695 I'm so sorry. 696 697 Charity Kirk: It's okay. So, I mean,the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, in their letter talking 698 about bio retention structures and rain gardens,what do you feel about, I mean you have pervious 699 gravel, but what is your vision of the landscaping? Can you clarify that again? It sounds like you 700 want really easy landscaping that you don't have to take care of that just you set it and forget it 701 and it kind of spreads a little bit on its own. 702 703 Justin Chandler: Again, the facility across the road has been in for 13 years now. We have not had any issue with 704 non-invasive spreading. The entire site is visible from Mile Branch Road and Highway 57. It's 705 been compared to what was there before. We maintain a high standard of cleanliness. You can 706 drive through the parking lot. There's not a bit of trash. Once a week we go out there and clean 707 up the trash, anything that's left behind from any renters. We also have done the adopt a highway 708 program and clean up that area from the Person County line all the way down to the big 709 Speedway,which during racing season has quite bit of trash, and just from commercial traffic 710 comes out of the back of trucks off 18 wheelers,what have you,wherever it comes from. We go 711 out there and we clean it up to, obviously to be a pillar for the community here of sustainable 712 practices. This is something that we live around the area, and we're from the community, and we 713 plan on keeping it nice, and I don't want to put anything out there just because it's easy per se. 1 714 know that that may be how it came across. That's not it at all. I just don't want it to die. 715 122 716 Meg Millard: What are the trees that you have planted at the other storage unit? Across the street. 717 718 Justin Chandler: I can't speak to the scientific name. 719 720 Meg Millard: You don't need the scientific. 721 722 Justin Chandler: I would have to refer to my site plan. I'm sorry about that. 723 724 Meg Millard: Are they dogwoods? 725 726 Charity Kirk: Can we recommend with a condition that like the plantings be non-invasive at least? 727 728 Cy Stober: That is a standard in the LIDO, landscaping, and we do have a planting guide. Mr. Chandler 729 would have to indicate whether he's agreeable to that condition or not. The Planning Board could 730 still make the recommendation if he's not agreeable, and we would just reflect that in the abstract 731 to the Commissioners. 732 733 Charity Kirk: I mean I'd like a minimum to be non-invasive species, preferably native species, but I understand 734 the difficulties. 735 736 Patrick Mallett: I would discourage any condition that would specifically states like these three species. 737 738 Charity Kirk: No. I don't want to list species. 739 740 Patrick Mallett: I would point towards the recommended plant list that we spent a lot of time working on. It has a 741 large variety of native drought tolerant, non-invasive species. If you're going to point to 742 something, I'm not saying that's where they're headed, but use that as your plant list, because it is 743 easy to maintain. I could also say across the street, a lot of those materials are not on that list. 1 744 would not use the same plantings. 745 746 Charity Kirk: Is that amenable to you,to do some other plantings? 747 748 Justin Chandler: Absolutely. 749 750 Charity Kirk: Okay.And trying to be an inspiration to your community,which you list as a value,would you be 751 willing to consider trying to move away from lawns and grass and toward rain gardens or sort of 752 landscaping that is more inspirational? 753 754 Justin Chandler: We are implementing what's not included in this packet but is under review with the County now. 755 We have an entire erosion control packet that I'm happy to provide to you to refer that is signed 756 and sealed by a licensed civil engineer that has worked with the county with countless projects. 1 757 think Pat and Ashley both have experience with him. He has recommended all of the erosion 758 control measures that keep in mind some of these eco-friendly practices. 759 760 Lamar Proctor: What would the condition that you're looking for look like?The applicant is committed to using 761 non-invasive, native species as from the recommended Planning department list? 762 763 Charity Kirk: Most native species aren't invasive. So, it would we either allow non-native species that are not 764 invasive, or we encourage just native species. One is a bit more rigid than the other one. 765 766 Lamar Proctor: The native is more invasive. 767 768 Charity Kirk: A little more rigid. 769 123 770 Statler Gilfillen: Let me ask this question. Would it make sense,with what I think you're talking about,with the 771 exception,from the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission,their letter here, outlines some 772 pretty specific things, including, I think a lot of details of the plants. Perhaps the only exception of 773 what we're talking about here is they have suggested it should be back across the street. That's a 774 separate issue, but I think they outline pretty closely what plants should be used and I'm 775 wondering if we can commit that. 776 777 Charity Kirk: I don't want to specify plants though. 778 779 Statler Gilfillen: That doesn't specifically say it has to be this, but it will give them some say in following those 780 guidelines of what I think you're talking about. 781 782 Charity Kirk: Are you willing to try just native plants? Or plants from the recommended plant list for Orange 783 County? 784 785 Cy Stober: What's on our website is called the Orange County preferred plant list for the record. 786 787 Justin Chandler: Absolutely. That's where the landscaping plan comes from as it stands right now. The species 788 that are chosen come from that list. 789 790 Lamar Proctor: Do we need to do that as a separate condition that the applicant would agree to plantings from the 791 Orange County preferred plant list? Or does that automatically happen because of the UDO? 792 793 Cy Stober: No. It's not a standard so we would need a condition to that effect. 794 795 Lamar Proctor: Okay. Is that something you're willing to do? 796 797 Cy Stober: And staff to enforce. 798 799 Chris Johnston: But just to confirm,that's already what this list is? 800 801 Cy Stober: Correct. 802 803 Chris Johnston: Okay. I believe what the applicant is saying is that they've worked with county on their plan and 804 that this list of plantings is from the list of county-approved plants. 805 806 Lamar Proctor: The Orange County preferred plant list? 807 808 Chris Johnston: Thank you.Yes, that one. 809 810 Lamar Proctor: So, it's already in there? 811 812 Chris Johnston: Well, it's not a stipulation. 813 814 Patrick Mallett: Now splitting hairs here, but I'm pointing to the Orange County plant list, our plant list,which was 815 specific to Orange County and what we felt had the best,depending on what you're using it for, 816 the best selection of native, non-invasive, drought-tolerant materials. They're pointing to a 817 different list. I would prefer to use our list. 818 819 Meg Millard: Can't we just put that in number 15? Just add it? Final landscape plan will include plants from the 820 Orange County list? 821 822 Lamar Proctor: Which condition are you looking at? 823 824 Chris Johnston: 15 on Page 145. 124 825 826 Charity Kirk: Do you already feel, Patrick and Ashley, do you already feel that that's already done. 827 828 Ashley Moncado: As I stated before. When he would come through the zoning compliance process,that's when the 829 final landscape plan would be reviewed,working with him, and we would be referring to that list. 830 831 Charity Kirk: Is it helpful if we make it a condition? 832 833 Ashley Moncado: I don't know if I can answer that, again, it's between the Board and the applicant. 834 835 Beth Bronson: It's your preference. That's, why you're on the Board though. Like,we can. 836 837 Charity Kirk: Okay. I would like to make that a condition. 838 839 Lamar Proctor: How would you phrase that? 840 841 Charity Kirk: All landscaping needs to be selected from the Orange County preferred plant list. 842 843 Lamar Proctor: Okay. As an amendment to Condition 15,essentially? 844 845 Charity Kirk: Yes. 846 847 Chris Johnston: But this is helpful to know that our plant list, if an applicant is adhering to it, may still run afoul. 848 They may have more specific requirements than we list out. 849 850 Lamar Proctor: Who, the Wildlife Commission? 851 852 Chris Johnston: Yeah,the Wildlife Commission. 853 854 Patrick Mallett: Well, because, they just have a different list. There is so many lists. This is why we spend a lot of 855 time methodically thinking about as it applies to Orange County and North Carolina. 856 857 Charity Kirk: I don't believe the lespedeza is on the list. Like you said, I mean I'm looking at what the Wildlife 858 Commission is saying. I haven't actually seen the plants you've selected because it's too small. 859 860 Patrick Mallett: My point is,we spent a lot of time and effort developing a list and it did give thought to not every 861 tree is appropriate in every situation. Some are not well suited for vehicular areas, and so on and 862 so forth. So, all I would add is that if you're going to do a condition,we have a recommended 863 plant list, and there's nothing in the ordinance that would obligate any applicant to rigidly adhere to 864 that plant list for selection of their materials. It's a recommended plant list. When they came in 865 with a landscape plan,without any condition we would point to that say and we,we really prefer 866 you use these materials. Or something from this list. 867 868 Statler Gilfillen: Can we put that proposal to require it though for this approval? 869 870 Lamar Proctor: Well, if Justin agrees to it. 871 872 Patrick Mallett: It's not for me to say, it's for the Board to discuss with the applicant. 873 874 Justin Chandler: With consideration with my landscape plan, I'd use the list as my reference for what I put on the 875 property. I'm happy to adhere to it. I'm happy to put it in my site plan notes. I'm happy to put it as 876 a condition. Whatever you guys want. 877 878 Charity Kirk: I don't have a list. I haven't seen it. Okay. I can continue poking, but I think I've spent enough 879 time. I'm ready to move on. 125 880 881 Venkat Yendapalli: I just have one quick question.About the impervious surface. Did you get chance to work with the 882 Planning team and also the Environmental Health team to see the amount of impervious surface 883 you're creating with all the structures? Is it permitted with 11 point something acres you are asking 884 for rezoning or you're using the overall parcel to get the impervious surface limit? 885 886 Justin Chandler: Correct. And we're going to borrow from the other existing parcel, and that will be recorded in the 887 deed, or recorded once the subdivision is recorded as well. 888 889 Venkat Yendapalli: Okay. Good deal. Thank you. 890 891 Ashley Moncado: Just to add, the impervious surface transfer, I think you'll be working with our erosion control 892 stormwater and county engineer. They'll be working with the erosion control plan,storm water 893 plan, and then impervious surface transfer is something that staff would be reviewing before it's 894 recorded. 895 896 Venkat Yendapalli: Okay. Thank you. 897 898 Lamar Proctor: Mr. Chandler, thank you for your time. 899 900 Justin Chandler: Thank you. 901 902 Beth Bronson: You got two more. 903 904 Steve Kaufmann: I don't have any questions. But I've been listening, and it sounds like, sounds like a worthwhile 905 project. Sounds like you're very integrated into the community so I wish you luck with it. 906 907 Justin Chandler: Thank you,sir. 908 909 Elizabeth Kalies: Same, no comments. 910 911 Justin Chandler: Thank you. 912 913 Lamar Proctor: All right,any discussion? And there's no public comments signed up for this, right? No? All right. 914 Any discussion? 915 916 Beth Bronson: Just to clarify the impervious surface, because it's going to be an easement into the existing 80 917 acres, because this gets back to that original discussion of the 11 acres is going to be completely 918 subdivided off of the 80 acres. 919 920 Ashley Moncado: Correct. He will be subdividing and following that action is where the applicant will be coming back 921 and under impervious surfaces, it's a form that's on our website. You fill out,and like I said, staff 922 reviews it,works with them. Since he will be having erosion control and stormwater plans, making 923 sure everything goes together and everything checks out,our county engineer works with 924 applicants through that process, and then it's a document that's recorded with the impervious 925 surface transfer between these two parcels. It's a recorded document. 926 927 Beth Bronson: And this is all to say that it has already been calculated that there is enough land available. 928 929 Ashley Moncado: I would imagine yes.The erosion control plans, and storm water plans have been submitted and 930 these calculations have been completed by the applicant and are under review. The erosion 931 control plans are a separate review process that is not part of the conditional rezoning application. 932 933 Beth Bronson: So,theoretically the size of this project could change? If it doesn't meet the impervious surface? 934 126 935 Ashley Moncado: He's providing a condition, because we know there is enough impervious for the 11.22-acre 936 parcel. 937 938 Beth Bronson: Okay. 939 940 Ashley Moncado: Acknowledging that the impervious will be addressed with the impervious surface transfer. 941 Separately there's other erosion control and stormwater plans that are going on as well that are 942 not part of the conditional rezoning application. Those are just a separate process that they follow 943 through for the zoning compliance permit. 944 945 Beth Bronson: Okay. Thank you for answering all the questions. 946 947 Justin Chandler: Yeah, absolutely. And again,to reiterate exactly what she said, basically we've already submitted 948 the erosion control and stormwater plans and they're being currently reviewed by the county. And 949 again it's 11.22 acres, not all of that's impervious. 950 951 Beth Bronson: Nine of it is. 952 953 Justin Chandler: A lot of it is,yes. 954 955 Beth Bronson: 9.25, acres of impervious surface. On an 11-acre parcel. 956 957 Justin Chandler: But it's enough within the 80-acre parcel, between the entirety of the 80.52 acres. 958 959 Beth Bronson: That is understandable. But in that sense why would it be subdivided then. And that's just a 960 completely philosophical question. 961 962 Justin Chandler: Oh, okay. 963 964 Beth Bronson: Yeah, it has nothing to do with this. And that's understandable. And again,there was another 965 one, a case sometime last year or the year before where there was an impervious surface 966 easement and there was some kind of development. The acreage that is over by Waterstone, 967 they wanted to develop it into multi-use and there was some agreement that was 20 years old that 968 said that they weren't going to develop on that land, and I think that's why I'm having questions 969 about it, is because now in 20 years if you say, okay,well I'm actually ready to make townhomes 970 or something like that, how are we going to know that that impervious surface is tied, or that 971 pervious surface is,you know,tied to the 11 acres. 972 973 Ashley Moncado: That's why it's a recorded document. With anything, it's our go to look at the Register of Deeds. 974 975 Beth Bronson: Exactly. 976 977 Chris Johnston: I believe Charity has an amendment. 978 979 Charity Kirk: Yeah, I would like to amend Condition 15 to clearly state that all landscaping needs to come from 980 the Orange County preferred plant list. 981 982 Lamar Proctor: You cool with that? 983 984 Justin Chandler: Absolutely. 985 986 Lamar Proctor: All right. Do I have a motion with Charity's amendment to approve the Statement of Consistency 987 with the amendment to Condition 15? 988 989 Whitney Watson: So moved. 127 990 991 Statler Gilfillen: I'll second. 992 993 Lamar Proctor: All right. All in favor. 994 995 MOTION BY Whitney Watson to approve the Statement of Consistency with the amendment to Condition 15. Seconded 996 by Statler Gilfillen 997 998 MOTION PASSED 10-1: Jonah Garson Opposed. 999 1000 Lamar Proctor: One in opposition, remainder of the Board is approving, so it's approved to the Board of County 1001 Commissioners. 1002 1003 Justin Chandler: Thank you. 1004 ****** °6 Attachment -- CONSISTENCY' . - ENT OF - . , STATEM _ OF-A PROPOSED Z''ONING ZONING-ATLASAMENDMENT = s•; WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHIENSNE PLAN An applicant-initiated=amendme.nt`to"the-Zoning Atlas has been reviewed torrezona+/- 11.22 acres of a +/- 80:52-acre parcel as follows ; it y, 77 Parcel i r N dentifiea ani .°Township . ' �Gt rrer�ttZonmg $� Propos d Zor tng 'Number(PIN) Record ^'�#, '`.:.�., _ �'., r +saw_"s,G.. ". �c as. f *. t w •, ': - RE'DA Cb-1 (NC Highway='S7 Speedway gnculturaL,;Residenti I Area Rural Economic --0910724m6642 Little River.: Justin (AR) Development Area Chandler Flat River,.'Protected Conditional Distnct) VVate`rshed Flat River Protected., Watershed _ . ThePlanning`Board herebyfinds. a , The requirements of Section 2 8 ;Zoning Atlas and Unified DeveloPment`;Ordinance f Amendments'and 2:9.1 Conditional Districts of.,the-UDO-have-'Been:reviewed and:the following;.standards conditions have been deemed acceptable r. 1: -The -property shall" be developed '.consistent with-:.the reviewed site: plan and application_as acted upon by the Orange,County Board of Commissioners on June 3; 2'026- 'a' 025 _ 2 The existm ':=Go Kart use'and tract contained onahe existing 80 52-acre tract shall be terminated°and shall nol`onger operate on:_site 3. :Retail-sales-from-, e proposedrental office shall be limited_to packing,supplies (i e. e ' boxes, tape; packing materials; etc.),and shall='not involve the sale of general,retail 'items suc- food-;'drinks,.,or other similar. items not.consistent with the use of the' property as"a--self.-storage facility- ' _ 4 .No-ancillary commercial;or residential use of"individual 'storage facilities shall be permitted This includes-the-use of storage facilities for automotive repair-or retail sales. F 5 No hazardous matenals1shall}be stored on the property: 6.- The:applicant shall contract with a private- olid:waste contactor toTemove trash from the site•cor sistent�witKthe ubinitted site plan`,and in aecordancejwith:the Orange County Solid-.Waste-Management�Ordinance 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirernents of the State of~North"-Carolina Buildng'Code N- - 8.` The sforage:facility's hours.of operation shall not be before 6:0O:arn rior after 9:00 prn = 9: -Outdoor lighting fxtures.shahl--not exceed-25-feet`in height.from,ground level.'-: All IigfSting shall be downward to-minimize light trespass,and obtrusive. lighting 10:The property_ownershall record a final plat-dividing the+/= 11.2`2-acre`parcet from the :'existing +/-80 52-acre tract-within_1-20=days.of'BOCC-approval of_the:'rezoning application': - 11:Qffsite.easements for.water;-wastewafer, utilities; and access shall be.recorded witt'in 12.0 days_after;approval of.,the_rezon n.g application. : 12_Offsite landscape of easement:shall-be recorded-within 120.days after - approval:of the=rezoning application" 13; Impervious surface transfer shall be_recorded within 120-days after approval of.the rezoning;application 14.The project.shallmaintain the existing vegetation.on th 'north, south, and west.sides Of,the and incorporate an-,offsite:;easerment'area of`approximately 12&,acres :along-the-northern,,southern-and western-parcel lines in lieu.of'standards contained, - in Section-6'8, Landscaping; Buffers;=and.-.Tree.Protectioh, Street°Trees; Between Lot Plantings; FoLindationPlantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and`_Screening of Ahe Unifed Development Ordinance: 15.The;final.landscape plan will-be reviewed-as;part of the Zoning_Compliance Permit 4 _ process.: f existing vegetation containedonsite orwithin thesecorded-landscape preservation-:easement area does not meet UDO.standards, additional'plantings shall } be required. All required landscaping pIantingsahall-be selected:_fromrthe,Orange County, Preferred:Plant List.. _ = 16.Al requ red landscaping-shalkbe installed-„prior to i e.issuance of;e Certificate,;of Occupancy allowing for-the units to pe rented/occupied _ y 17:The_applicant shall be_required to maintain all-requlted,land use buffers- including ” chose of�p�eserved vegetation,-,in accordance:with the requirements of Orange = County Unifed Qevelopment:QrdinanceSection.6,8, Landscaping,.Buffers, and,Tree Protection 18 Proposed driveway connections with NC=57 shall be:paved with asphalt.:, 19The'parking-iand,drive_aisles'shall.be surfaced with-Type-57 washed stone - 20..The Planning_Director shall.have the authority.fI review and-approve minor changes; - h r J6-1M approved plan,,:perSection 2.9 1(I);,Alterations to an Approved-Conditional District of the Orange Count Unified Development,0rdinance;,446ific to-the location and arrangement-of=development-With In.the limits of disturbance,and tho proposed . "activity area" The "activity area shall be defined' s the edge of gravel-as shown on- the provided,conditional.zoning plan set 1.5Statement.oftenb : Pursuant to Sections_1: mnd-1.1.7 Conformance ,,, w►th:Adoptedt`Plans of-the UDO'and to Section 1�60D-604(d)'Planning,B64rd�review and ; comment'= Pla,n.:Consistency and 160D=605(x) Governing Board Statement..= Plan Consistencyof'the North Carolina General Statutes;,fhe Board-finds sufficient documentation within the record-denoting that_the amendmenf is consistent with�_the . adopted 2030'Comprehensive Plan = ' , c: The�amendment.is consistent with:applicable plans because it,supports.the following " -130 ,:... Planning Principle=1..Efficent and:Fscally Responsible Provision_of Public facilities and Services:- Orange County's public facilities and services should be'-delivered-in a ,manner that efficiently uses existing,capacity:.Expansions of°facilities and services - - should.be made only after-careful consideration of the costs and benefits of expansion. ` Staff Comment:. Not.applicable il Planning Principle-2. Sustainable--Growth and_Develop.ment:,-Growth arid-development within--the county-.should.occur--in a pattern, location;,and density(hat is sustainable over.°the long-term: Staff-Comment: Per.Section,18-ofthe Orange County,Unified Development Ordinance; the REDA-CD 1 district shall'be-:located consistent with-the-parcels r designated;as "Rural Economic:Development Area"'withirrthe NC Highway Speedway_.Area,Small Area Plan:.-The:existin� .parcel'is.located-within the-:Rural,' ' Economic Development, .of the NC.Highway 57:SmaII Area Plan, allowing.for the, rezoning.to be considered ,:-The parcel-has:been.designated-_for._rural.economic development-within the NC Highway Speedway Ar.-ea'rSmall Area:Plan-and=the proposed land,.use is_consistent with the recommendations detailed within theNC Highway 57 Small Area_Plan study' approved by. the County inr2007 The proposed project will remain-limited to the property::The proposed`:Storage of_Goods use is permitted in the'REDA-CD 1;'zoning district, complies with the.U_D,O.standards:,-and meets-the-standaeds of evaluations as-: reviewed bythe Planning'Board and.Board.of County-Commissioners -.Planning-Prince ie 3A. Encoura ement of Energy-Efficiency';-Lower_ Ener p 9 :9Y Consumption; and the-Use ofNon:P.olluting,,Renewable.Energy Resource: -Dec,roasing the use of-hon-renewable,-,resources and lowering energy consumption are,encouraged.i.both.public-and,prwate'activities The county's,transportation system should be'enhanced to pr-o note_more energy_efficient modes of travel-and improve air_quality. Staff Comment: The project proposes-the.use of a-solar photovoltaic system and energy-efficient lighting,and.appliances to reduce energy consumption;as detailed in,. the.applicant's,narrative-(Attachment-A)".The`conditions of:approval,also require the<. extinguishment of theaand use,rights for the adjacent go=kart track, which is a site. with uses tii-at often produce-higher,levels of carbon--emissions,.as-well As having- otherimpacts to.the local3area. Planning Principle;4'.-Natural Area Resource Protection -Protection of the.County's natural areas,-including forests;-wildlife.habitat, and-other important open-spaces should be,a�priority.-The County should;work;with-regional and local organizations, 4 .` the (owns, and private=landowners to promote and achieve.preservation.of the -131 County,s mportant_natural resources. Staff Comment ,The applicant provided an Envir-onrr-entalAsse' ment as pa`rt:of.the application-package: Staff.has-reviewed and.determined`no`significant`environmentaI impact is expected from this:project based:on existing-conditions Required landscape bu-ffers"are provided_onsite. In addition, the.applicant is proposing-, na .offsite easement area.around the perimeter of the real ized.1;1,22-acre parcelto-protect-existing natural vegetation-off-site-and enhance landscaping and--screeriing.of the proposed used-. The`proposed project is.located outside of the regulated;80-foot stream buffer-'area: Planning Principle 5..Preservationof-Rural-Land Use-Patterm,The Count Ys.:rural : areas are a=cherished component of the County's:character.,Future development -should preserve and enhance the-.county's rural landscape: Staff Comment.2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix-G;�Land Use Classification and Overlay LocationalCriteria,defnesAgricultural,Residential:as,agricultural activities, = and associ`ated-resideritial and'commercial=uses_predominate -Th'e"storage of goods" land use.as.consistent with the_rural:residential;and.non-rdsidohtial-.uses:aocatiad in the immediate-area.,The proposed landscape`buffer_a reas,:and�offsite.easement shall provide to buffering and screening to adjacent parcels and minimize impacts: In,.addition;-the,project will strive to protect_existing vegetation and pastureland adjacent-;to the project-area ;The:proposal will not disrupt the:existing character of this area of the County ■ =PlanningPrinciple:6 UVater Res ourcesPreservation: ThejCounty_has finite water resources_to provide to future;pop"ulations: The protection.-and n anagement ofahe _ County's water resources.should be aFhigh°priority:;- T Staff Comments The:proposed project:will:utilize an existing well=and septic system to- serve:the future`land use, as permitfed'by-the_Orange:County Division of Environmental.Health. ,ont-5). Per Section 3.8 of:the'UDO; the:applicant has completed a Groundwater Assessment'(Attachment 1).demonstrating-compliance _ with.standards-limiting:- undwab r.withdrawals for-this area. In addition,-the- = applicant is-proposing the use-of#57 stone on all drive aisles,and parking areas to, allow'for improved water infiltration and reduced°stormwater runoff.-(Nater saving measures.are also:proposed including-low flow faucets-and Wate-r efficient landscaping..practices " Planning Principle 7. Promotion-of Economic;Prosperity and:Diversity--Development: : of a:diversity of new businesses and xezparfsion of existing businesses:should�:occur n Orange County:. :Staff Comment l"he applicanf is proposinga self-storagebusiness-:on-this site. The .. =-rural setting will appropriately--allow-forthe.use.to-operate with:minimal impacts to;the ;area :while serving-the Orange County community. The site-has been identified for . . -::_:rural_economic-development in they NC Highway,57-Small Area-Plan Study. The 132 proposal expands economic development prospects within the County, while continuing to protect adjacent and nearby land uses, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the adopted Small Area Plan for the area. • Planning Principle 8. Preservation of Community Character: Future growth and development should occur in a manner that preserves and enhances the existing character of the County, its townships, and rural crossroads communities. Staff Comment: The project proposes development which is consistent with existing land uses in the area including storage of goods and warehousing. Immediately east of this parcel, an existing self-storage business was approved and rezoned to REDA- CZ-1 by the BOCC in 2012 and expanded in 2021.In addition, an existing quarry and solar array are located in the area. As a condition of approval, this rezoning will also extinguish the land use rights of the adjacent go-kart track, which has produced noise, fumes, and periods of high traffic that can disrupt and negatively affect the local area. The proposed low intensity land use will not create a conflict with the adjacent rural residential uses and undeveloped properties. • Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. Staff Comment: The location and character of the proposed use, developed according to the pian submitted, will be consistent with the rural land uses of the area in which it is to be located. The use, as proposed and limited by the application and site plan, is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan's stated goals. The proposed land use is consistent with existing land uses adjacent to this parcel including an existing self- storage and warehousing use. The project will remain compatible with minimal negative impacts to the immediate area. • Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features, and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. Staff Comment: The proposed use will meet UDO standards for buffering and screening, as well as the applicable erosion control and stormwater regulations. The project includes a proposal to allow for an offsite easement area to preserve existing vegetation along the permitter of the project area. In addition, the project is located outside of the regulated stream buffer area. • Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. Staff Comment: The subject parcel is included in the NC 57 Small Area Plan, which 133 identifies parcels for redevelopment and compatible, non-residential development. The proposed use is consistent with existing non-residential development in the area including storage of goods and warehouses. Standards contained in the UDO, including landscaping and setbacks, will allow the use to be buffered from neighbors and prevent negative impacts. The activity and impact of this use will be limited to the property, generating low volumes of traffic and minimal lighting and noise. The site will be developed with all applicable development standards from the Orange County UDO to protect neighboring residential properties and minimize land use conflicts. In addition, the termination of the existing go-kart use as a condition of approval will address offsite impacts related to noise, lighting, pollution, and traffic. Land Use Goal 6: A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. Staff Comment: The Orange County staff has noticed the public regarding this application, as required by Sections 2.8.7, 2.9.1(D), and 2.9.2 of the UDO, including a required Neighborhood Information Meeting, mailings to neighboring property owners, posting of the property, and advertisement in the local newspapers. Additionally, staff have provided all application documents on the Active Development Projects webpage. d. NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan Study Staff Comment: The proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment is consistent with the goals of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan study. The Small Area Plan called for expanding economic development opportunities in the Little River Township along NC Highway 57 and Mile Branch Road near the existing Orange County Speedway. In addition, the rezoning request has met the Review Procedure standards of the Small Area Plan. e. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because it furthers the goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is located in an area designated on the Future Land Use Map as "Agricultural Residential". The Planning Board hereby adopts this Statement of Consistency and the findings expressed herein and recommends the Board of County Commissioners consider adoption of the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment. Vote: � For, Against 130 -2 Lam Pro or, Chair Date 134 Attachment 7 STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An applicant-initiated amendment (MA24-0006) to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to rezone +/- 11.22 acres of a +/- 80.52-acre parcel as follows: Parcel Owner of Identification Township Record Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Number (PIN) ■ REDA-CD-1 (NC Agricultural Residential Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic 0910-24-6642 Little River Justin (AR) Development Area Chandler Flat River Protected Conditional District) ■ Watershed Flat River Protected Watershed The Board of County Commissioners hereby finds: a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments and 2.9.1 Conditional Districts of the LIDO have been reviewed and the following standards conditions have been deemed acceptable: 1. The property shall be developed consistent with the reviewed site plan and application as acted upon by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 3, 2025. 2. The existing Go Kart use and tract contained on the existing 80.52-acre tract shall be terminated and shall no longer operate on site. 3. Retail sales from the proposed rental office shall be limited to packing supplies (i.e. boxes, tape, packing materials, etc.) and shall not involve the sale of general retail items such as food, drinks, or other similar items not consistent with the use of the property as a self-storage facility. 4. No ancillary commercial or residential use of individual storage facilities shall be permitted. This includes the use of storage facilities for automotive repair or retail sales. 5. No hazardous materials shall be stored on the property. 6. The applicant shall contract with a private solid waste contractor to remove trash from the site consistent with the submitted site plan and in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirements of the State of North Carolina Building Code. 8. The storage facility's hours of operation shall not be before 6:00 am nor after 9:00 pm. 135 9. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 25-feet in height from ground level. All lighting shall be downward to minimize light trespass and obtrusive lighting. 10.The property owner shall record a final plat dividing the +/- 11.22-acre parcel from the existing +/- 80.52-acre tract within 120 days of BOCC approval of the rezoning application. 11.Offsite easements for water, wastewater, utilities, and access shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 12.Offsite landscape preservation easement shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 13.Impervious surface transfer shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 14.The project shall maintain the existing vegetation on the north, south, and west sides of the site and incorporate an offsite easement area of approximately 1.28 acres along the northern, southern, and western parcel lines in lieu of standards contained in Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection: Street Trees, Between Lot Plantings, Foundation Plantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance. 15.The final landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the Zoning Compliance Permit process. If existing vegetation contained onsite or within the recorded landscape preservation easement area does not meet UDO standards, additional plantings shall be required. All required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 16.All required landscaping for Phase 1 shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for Phase 1 allowing for the units to be rented/occupied. Required landscaping shall be installed per phase. 17.The applicant shall be required to maintain all required land use buffers, including those of preserved vegetation, in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection. 18.Proposed driveway connections with NC-57 shall be paved with asphalt. 19.The parking and drive aisles shall be surfaced with Type 57 washed stone. 20.The Planning Director shall have the authority to review and approve minor changes to the approved plan, per Section 2.9.1(1), Alterations to an Approved Conditional District of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, specific to the location and arrangement of development within the limits of disturbance and the proposed "activity area". The "activity area" shall be defined as the edge of gravel as shown on the provided conditional zoning plan set. b. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because it furthers the goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, is consistent with the description of the "Agricultural Residential" future land use, and, more specifically, the Orange County-adopted "Highway 57 Small Area Plan". The latter document seeks, among other goals and principles, to 1) preserve and protect the rural character and nature of the area; 2) minimize negative impacts to natural systems/environmentally sensitive areas; 3) restrict growth and development so that it complements the rural character and lifestyles; and 4) to bring existing non-residential, non-conforming land uses into conforming uses of property 136 through amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment proposes to do just that and thereby reduce impacts from the go-kart track in favor of a use that will support the surrounding community without creating the noise, fumes, traffic, and other associated characteristics historically present on this property. As detailed in the site-specific plan and the applicant's submitted conditions, "Bully Storage." the mini-storage warehouse, will serve area residents' needs and minimize impacts to the environment through alternative stormwater treatment methods. The applicant is also proposing conditions to ensure that this use will not impact their quality of life after normal business hours, and to commit to landscaping reflecting Orange County priorities to ensure that this area is the "gateway community" envisioned in the small area plan. c. Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 Statement of Intent -Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance with Adopted Plans of the LIDO and to Section 160D-604(d) Planning Board review and comment— Plan Consistency and 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement— Plan Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix G, Land Use Classification and Overlay Locational Criteria, defines Agricultural Residential as agricultural activities and associated residential and commercial uses predominate. The "storage of goods" land use is consistent with the rural residential and non-residential uses located in the immediate area and is less intensive than the existing quarry and solar array uses located in the area. The project proposes a use consistent with existing land uses in the area, including an existing self-storage business that was approved and rezoned to REDA-CZ-1 by the BOCC in 2012 and expanded in 2021. The proposed low intensity land use will not create a conflict with the adjacent rural residential uses and undeveloped properties. The applicant has committed to conditions and a site plan that will ensure that this non-residential use will not disrupt the existing character of this area of the County, buffering and screening adjacent parcels to minimize impacts to any surrounding residences. As a condition of approval, this rezoning will extinguish the land use rights of the adjacent go-kart track, which has produced noise, fumes, and periods of high traffic that can disrupt and negatively affect the local area. The subject property has been designated for rural economic development within the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Small Area Plan (SAP), approved by the County in 2007, and the proposed land use is consistent with the study's recommendations. The SAP called for expanding economic development opportunities in the Little River Township along NC Highway 57 and Mile Branch Road near the existing Orange County Speedway. Per Section 3.8 of the Orange County UDO, the REDA-CD-1 district shall be located consistent with the parcels designated as "Rural Economic Development Area" within the NC Highway Speedway Area SAP. The existing parcel is located within the Rural 137 Economic Development Area of the NC Highway 57 SAP, allowing for the rezoning to be considered, and the proposed Storage of Goods use is permitted in the REDA-CD-1 zoning district, complies with the UDO standards, and meets the standards of evaluations as reviewed by the Planning Board and Board of County Commissioners. The conditions of approval require the extinguishment of the land use rights for the adjacent go-kart track, which is a site with uses that often produce higher levels of carbon emissions, as identified in the SAP, as well as having other impacts to the local area. The applicant provided an Environmental Assessment as part of the application package. Staff has reviewed and determined no significant environmental impact is expected from this project based on existing conditions. To the extent that a fairly conventional mini- storage warehouse is able to be environmentally sustainable, the applicant has sought the opportunities to do so, as reflected on the site plan and the proposed conditions. The project proposes the use of a solar photovoltaic system and energy-efficient lighting and appliances to reduce energy consumption, as detailed in the applicant's narrative. Water saving measures are also proposed including low flow faucets and water efficient landscaping practices. The applicant also has committed to the Orange County Recommended Plant Guide for landscaping species selections, which will ensure that all plantings are drought-tolerant, non-invasive species. The project is located outside of the regulated 80-foot stream buffer area. In addition, the applicant is proposing the use of permeable materials (#57 stone) on all drive aisles and parking areas to allow for improved water infiltration and reduced stormwater runoff. The applicant is also permanently preserving an offsite easement on adjacent property as part of an "impervious surface transfer" and to protect existing natural vegetation off-site and enhance landscaping and screening of the proposed use. The proposed project will utilize an existing well and septic system to serve the future land use, as permitted by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health As such, MA24-0006 provides Orange County with certainty on the form and design, ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses and consistency with both the SAP and the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan because it supports the following: Planning Principle 2. Sustainable Growth and Development: Growth and development within the county should occur in a pattern, location, and density that is sustainable over the long-term. Planning Principle 3A. Encouragement of Energy Efficiency, Lower Energy Consumption, and the Use of Non-Polluting Renewable Energy Resource: Decreasing the use of non-renewable resources and lowering energy consumption are encouraged in both public and private activities. The county's transportation system should be enhanced to promote more energy efficient modes of travel and improve air quality. Planning Principle 4. Natural Area Resource Protection: Protection of the County's natural areas, including forests, wildlife habitat, and other important open spaces should 138 be a priority. The County should work with regional and local organizations, the towns, and private landowners to promote and achieve preservation of the County's important natural resources. Planning Principle 5. Preservation of Rural Land Use Pattern: The County's rural areas are a cherished component of the County's character. Future development should preserve and enhance the county's rural landscape. Planning Principle 6. Water Resources Preservation: The County has finite water resources to provide to future populations. The protection and management of the County's water resources should be a high priority. Planning Principle 7. Promotion of Economic Prosperity and Diversity: Development of a diversity of new businesses and expansion of existing businesses should occur in Orange County. Planning Principle 8. Preservation of Community Character: Future growth and development should occur in a manner that preserves and enhances the existing character of the County, its townships, and rural crossroads communities. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features, and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. Land Use Goal 6: A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. The Zoning Map Amendment MA24-0006 also is consistent with the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Small Area Plan because it supports the following principles and goals: Principle 1: Preservation and protection of the rural character and nature of the area. Principle 2: Minimization of negative impacts to natural systems/environmentally sensitive areas. Principle 3: Restrict growth and development so that it complements the rural character and lifestyles. 139 Goal 1: The Study Area is located in a rural portion of the County where local residents have chosen to reside in an effort to escape the congestion and hectic pace of urban areas. Any additional development within the area shall augment or enhance, rather than detract from, the rural character and nature of the area. Goal 2: The Study Area represents a `gateway'into the County that establishes an entry corridor where travelers form opinions as to the quality of life within the area as a whole. To that end, steps should be taken to address design elements within the Study Area to aesthetically enhance this entranceway into Orange County. Goal 3: The lack of reliable, consistent potable water supplies and poor soil conditions for septic drain fields limit development opportunities within the Study Area. Future development proposals should not adversely impact existing groundwater supplies and should be reviewed and approved with this factor in mind. Goal 4: Stormwater runoff shall be maintained on site in conformity with existing standards and policies regardless of the age or approval date of the project. Goal 5: Air quality issues shall be an intricate part of any future permit reviewed within the Study Area. Goal 6: Existing non-residential, non-conforming land uses should be made into conforming uses of property through amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan and should then be brought into compliance with existing, or proposed, development criteria to address off-site impacts. The Board of County Commissioners adopts this Statement of Consistency and the findings expressed herein. Vote: For, Against Jamezetta Bedford, Chair Date 140 Attachment 8 STATEMENT OF INCONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An applicant-initiated amendment (MA24-0006) to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to rezone +/- 11.22 acres of a +/- 80.52-acre parcel as follows: Parcel Owner of Identification Township Record Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Number (PIN) ■ REDA-CD-1 (NC Agricultural Residential Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic 0910-24-6642 Little River Justin (AR) Development Area Chandler Flat River Protected Conditional District) ■ Watershed Flat River Protected Watershed The Board of County Commissioners hereby finds: a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments and 2.9.1 Conditional Districts of the LIDO have been reviewed and that many of the twenty (20) conditions proposed for Zoning Map Amendment application MA24-0006 reflect a lack of conformance with the Orange County LIDO and are not a reasonable amendment to the adopted Zoning Atlas due to due to the potential impacts upon the quality of life and incompatibility of land uses to surrounding properties, as required by Sections 2.5 of the Orange County UDO. Specifically, the conditions do not conform with the standards of the adopted LIDO, which were drafted "...to accomplish compatible development of the land within Orange County in a manner which will best promote the health, safety, and general welfare," (Orange County UDO, Section 1.1.4): b. Pursuant to Sections 1 .1 .5 Statement of Intent - Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance with Adopted Plans of the UDO and to Section 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement — Plan Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is inconsistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The amendment, the twenty proposed conditions, and the associated site plan all challenge Orange County interests in focusing Economic Development in strategic areas, minimizing environmental impacts from non-residential uses, and promoting the rural character of most of the county. This use will create a new non-residential use in a largely rural area and, as an economic development project, does not realize new employment opportunities for Orange County. Though the go-kart track use is proposed to be extinguished as a vested right, the 141 proposed "storage of goods" use will continue to present a non-residential use that is incompatible with the rural character of the area and does not present the "gateway" to Orange County that is identified as a priority in the NC Highway 57 Area Small Area Plan. This use is more appropriate to a semi-urban environment where it can serve a larger population and potential customer base, rather than introduce new impervious surfaces to the Flat River Protected Watershed. This use is a likely anchor for an activity node where one is not proposed on the County's adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. Furthermore, the go-kart track is not being demolished or, preferably, redeveloped but will remain as a deteriorating impervious surface adjacent to a new non-residential use in this rural area, creating a larger development footprint than already exists on the property. The stormwater from the new development is not being managed onsite but is instead being offset by a permanent easement elsewhere on the property, providing no treatment function to the new development. Depending on what materials are stored on-site and the level of traffic use to the site, treatment of runoff could be a relevant land use concern. As presented, MA24-0006 is both non-conforming with the Orange County UDO and inconsistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, particularly the following principles, goals, and objectives: Planning Principle 2. Sustainable Growth and Development: Growth and development within the county should occur in a pattern, location, and density that is sustainable over the long-term. Planning Principle 4. Natural Area Resource Protection: Protection of the County's natural areas, including forests, wildlife habitat, and other important open spaces should be a priority. The County should work with regional and local organizations, the towns, and private landowners to promote and achieve preservation of the County's important natural resources. Planning Principle 5. Preservation of Rural Land Use Pattern: The County's rural areas are a cherished component of the County's character. Future development should preserve and enhance the county's rural landscape. Planning Principle 8. Preservation of Community Character: Future growth and development should occur in a manner that preserves and enhances the existing character of the County, its townships, and rural crossroads communities. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. Land Use Goal 1: Fiscally and environmentally responsible, sustainable growth, consistent with the provision of adequate services and facilities and a high quality of life. 142 Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features, and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. Objective LU-3.1: Discourage urban sprawl, encourage a separation of urban and rural land uses, and direct new development into areas where necessary community facilities and services exist through periodic updates to the Land Use Plan. Objective LU-3.7: Ensure that new development patterns in non-residential nodes encourage a clustered, walkable development pattern and discourage strip development. c. As presented, MA24-0006 is inconsistent with the stated principles and goals of the NC Highway 57 Area Small Area Plan, including: Principle 1: Preservation and protection of the rural character and nature of the area. Principle 2: Restrict growth and development so that it complements the rural character and lifestyles. Goal 1: The Study Area is located in a rural portion of the County where local residents have chosen to reside in an effort to escape the congestion and hectic pace of urban areas. Any additional development within the area shall augment or enhance, rather than detract from, the rural character and nature of the area. Goal 2: The Study Area represents a `gateway' into the County that establishes an entry corridor where travelers form opinions as to the quality of life within the area as a whole. To that end, steps should be taken to address design elements within the Study Area to aesthetically enhance this entranceway into Orange County. Goal 3: Stormwater runoff shall be maintained on site in conformity with existing standards and policies regardless of the age or approval date of the project. The Board of County Commissioners adopts this Statement of Inconsistency and the findings expressed herein. Vote: For, Against Jamezetta Bedford, Chair Date 143 Attachment 9 Ordinance#: ORD-2025-018 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition submitted by Justin Chandler (hereafter `the Applicant') seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, this petition seeks to rezone +/- 11.22 acres (PIN: 0910-24-6642) from AR (Agricultural Residential) to REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District) for the purpose of Storage of Goods; and WHEREAS, the petition has been submitted with a site plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9.1 (C) of the UDO; and WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 2.8 and 2.9 of the UDO have been deemed complete; and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reasonable and in the public interest. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to rezone the aforementioned parcel to REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District), as detailed within the submitted application. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT in accordance with Section 2.9.1 (F) of the UDO the approval of this Conditional Zoning application is subject to the following mutually agreed to conditions: 1. The property shall be developed consistent with the reviewed site plan and application as acted upon by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 3, 2025. 2. The existing Go Kart use and tract contained on the existing 80.52-acre tract shall be terminated and shall no longer operate on site. 3. Retail sales from the proposed rental office shall be limited to packing supplies (i.e. boxes, tape, packing materials, etc.) and shall not involve the sale of general retail items such as food, drinks, or other similar items not consistent with the use of the property as a self-storage facility. 4. No ancillary commercial or residential use of individual storage facilities shall be permitted. This includes the use of storage facilities for automotive repair or retail sales. 5. No hazardous materials shall be stored on the property. 6. The applicant shall contract with a private solid waste contractor to remove trash from the site consistent with the submitted site plan and in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirements of the State of North Carolina Building Code. 8. The storage facility's hours of operation shall not be before 6:00 am nor after 9:00 pm. 9. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 25-feet in height from ground level. All lighting shall be downward to minimize light trespass and obtrusive lighting. 10. The property owner shall record a final plat dividing the +/- 11.22-acre parcel from the existing +/- 80.52-acre tract within 120 days of BOCC approval of the rezoning application. 11. Offsite easements for water, wastewater, utilities, and access shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 12. Offsite landscape preservation easement shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 144 13. Impervious surface transfer shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 14. The project shall maintain the existing vegetation on the north, south, and west sides of the site and incorporate an offsite easement area of approximately 1.28 acres along the northern, southern, and western parcel lines in lieu of standards contained in Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection: Street Trees, Between Lot Plantings, Foundation Plantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance. 15. The final landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the Zoning Compliance Permit process. If existing vegetation contained onsite or within the recorded landscape preservation easement area does not meet LIDO standards, additional plantings shall be required. All required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 16. All required landscaping for Phase 1 shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for Phase 1 allowing for the units to be rented/occupied. Required landscaping shall be installed per phase. 17. The applicant shall be required to maintain all required land use buffers, including those of preserved vegetation, in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection. 18. Proposed driveway connections with NC-57 shall be paved with asphalt. 19. The parking and drive aisles shall be surfaced with Type 57 washed stone. 20. The Planning Director shall have the authority to review and approve minor changes to the approved plan, per Section 2.9.1(1), Alterations to an Approved Conditional District of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, specific to the location and arrangement of development within the limits of disturbance and the proposed "activity area". The "activity area" shall be defined as the edge of gravel as shown on the provided conditional zoning plan set. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of 2025. 1, Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2025 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2025. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners 145 OR- -A-NGE COUNTY NORTH CAR(3LINA Board of County Commissioners Meeting June 3, 2025 7:00 p. m . 146 OR- -A-NGE COUNTY NORTH CAR(3LINA Item 5b: Zoning Atlas Amendment (Conditional District) AR Zoning to REDA-CD- I Zoning Location: 9900 NC 57 PIN: 0910-24-6642 Applicant: Justin Chandler Case#: MA24-0006 Zoning Atlas Amendment - MA24-0006 (Chandler) 147 9900 NC 57 Overview: Address 9900 NC 57 Vicinity Map for Rezoning Application-PIN 0910246642 �¢South H¢ co H �I f Er Y ,i .. _ .� uanry goo Creek 1 RO 1° yrs i ♦ Fla River Protected h r Protected 0910-24-6642 � - 1 „exp ll. RD rawssroaEK viP � I 5]**� NCKEEF9 � i HWN�ciks� 't' aurvRo IE °., ►E _ Little River tnt�F aivra i♦ �Mazvr eo Township- - Township Little River n E edar Grove Township Little y River Protected P Watershed Flat River Protected v�KENIeMFD— Nws a ��. Upper Eno Protected. w"sKe a rn�Rv n Hillsborough Township Rio ;I 1 Eno Township ka pYe Pirc ogio246642 ❑ttie River Township si`^P eggy r „ LED Tnwnshi ps —Major Streams ✓? Lower City Limits t Water Supply Watersheds - Eno i • • Justin Chandler LA� ETIs Protected Zoning Atlas Amendment - MA24-0006 (Chandler) 148 9900 NC 57 LOverview (continued): Rezoning Application to REDA-CD Yor PIN 09102662 Current Zoning ■ Agricultural Residential (AR) - Requested Zoning ■ REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway i Area Rural Economic Development Area J 5 i Conditional District) Flat River Protected ■ Use - Storage of Goods — �- 0910246642 i Surrounding Zoning ■ REDA-CD-1 (NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional District) ■ Agricultural Residential (AR) ■ Existing Commercial (EC-5) Q PIN 0919246642 Streams rr! ■ R: Residential (Person County) -VYater Bodies r, C—ty B—dan. Little River Protected i Z_I Fater SuppRy VU:item4eds Zoning AR -ECF Y. � mown REDA-CD-I Zoning Atlas Amendment - MA24-0006 (Chandler) 149 9900 NC 57 • (continued): Aerial Image with Parcel 0910246642 Outlined Existing Zoning .._ _ Person County Person Count� �.K. ,� � Y Orange Coun '"""•—''Ji Orange County -- —"- pr; $7 i _ 09102A6642 YI 0910246642 i i ✓` Durham County I I Y a Durham county I gAcon gp�oN Ho PIN.0910240642(80 acres) i Proposed Parcel(11.22 acres) r county Boundary Zoning county Boundary _ - �AR Q .... m,::.. ortgrucy 1 mr.a PIN',0910246642(80 acres) EC5 couur /fir suo. 0 fj Proposed Parcel(11 22 acres) RECA-C[-1 amp o Fa mem leq — s s Zoning Atlas Amendment - MA24-0006 (Chandler) 150 9900 NC 57 • (continued): A Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 0910246642 Depicted Future Land Use Map Designation Agricultural Residential i • Agricultural activities and associated residential and 5' commercial uses predominate. 0910246642 • No proposed amendment • i Flat River Protected i i 0 i i /'_tiV // BnCON RD `V Q PIN.0910246 42 — Water Supply Watersheds ----- County Boundary Little River Protected !` —Streams —Water Bodes Resource Pmtectlon Areas --- - � m.. Future Land Use Categories Ag-ullural Residential Zoning Atlas Amendment - MA24-0006 (Chandler) 151 9900 NC 57 • (continued): A d Rezoning Application to REDA-CD for PIN 0910246642 Conditional District Application Requirements ■ Site Specific Plan ■ Environmental Assessment ■ Landscape Plan 5 ■ Additional Information as Identified by Flat River Protected 0910246642 Reviewing Agencies ~� ' Q PIN.0910246642 —�je,Ncaa rte Water aBodies Water -i County Boundary Little River me ted :I Water SuPPPy Watersheds Zoning 0 AR Ant —EC5 A ol=. s REDA-CD-I - , Site-Specific Plan 152 COdSTRUMONSEQ=CINGNOTES _� r 4 g SITE L,.F[)EL�__I0_N r am +. em}erwrc>�.wrrrrwnr.�e rsvnlNq rwwxerr Ywoixanwsa,rermr�. ❑ ) II , le ry n E .r. E I. r tale exa°mr msce5w 9TH 1E lE rr ....,. w.uu uerum}Mx va�iwee L E E - a» ��'''S55 rte.�hea¢w fiEFE E. �vvv rwx I�m� axs,reKfwwa�be"`tY¢�H cru E. E FLF i _E - E n II.E.L 1BsaN)1 ew, uvgj-° 7�edarwec A ac Gaa` .EttByNEFM7ema 1¢¢ \\ T i-L L -�R R E L I':14 . xw au 1¢ 1 'rrx} 1. xne .xex¢to YMta�ne .� ry F R 1 I E ¢e[ea irm� xi�axm. art [u4nw� �R�EgK ,_•[. T-FFl E-1 El r i L�ILi r 1 \ EI TI I E 1 F E-I eitln cea su wwa..es nxo.�1n� Cxn: v•::: - 'a g erste �\ E I I F anmtrus rlxaamvex extrr rexR�evsm uxe ave Avuaae. a'Px}� _ TErI I E{ L_a T T-L E 1.11 -L T -E-E- - ereg moe}waillm�ales¢saaew[aWatra Hata aM Sma.�1 arrc AAucaYloY��Ind1tAM + d I a\ - -T E E T-L IL-I L i E-E- a E.L.EE- xc recG+werolmerzwea .er®mex en,m,efcw clpmlaVlxw a1r1FM-0ar E ams em¢vu oermrvc a ia.°arurmvz sxEaen > •,' a. Stt+ T�..1 dvNn cevsrrrtc mia d '- fi �2d _ - 2 O mx-a.,.� a,nea,e uenasnceu^s a M�txwwmagA.vR k a� l'. - t = {�{' I GER'ERAL`v On S srcwsc,�a,>.a[,a.um 1:11 rietYA619! 1+114` wel.w.c xr. aux I. rr,e� eRmcnwt,aro aaearexarrs rwe aiuct.�.e... i *�.- ' �,y�}'�, 1 - aa,=e�.�.,.o,r..,,��e.�x,�xea,; �/ ea}eua ourle. ++ '•y _ -` _- �`5'"`y\ =1_1 11 tit � A � t� _N.Lr G-102 153 Applicant Presentation ORANGE COUNTY 154 Public Notification ■ Notices were mailed via first class mail to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the subject parcel on May 19, 2025. ■ Signs posted the subject parcel on May 19, 2025. ■ Legal Ad published on May 21, 2025 and May 28, 2025. ■ Application information has also been posted on the Planning Department's "Active Development" webpage. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 155 Proposed Conditions Per NCGS 160D-703, imposed conditions and site-specific standards are limited to those that address conformance of the development and use of the site to local government ordinances and adopted plans or the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development or use of the site. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part of this process if they address: a. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, b. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways, and access points, screening and buffer areas, the timing of development, etc.), and/or c. All other matters the County may find reasonable and appropriate or the petitioner may propose. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 156 Proposed Conditions (Attachment 9 Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, the following conditions are being proposed: 1. The property shall be developed consistent with the reviewed site plan and application as acted upon by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 3, 2025. 2. The existing Go Kart use and tract contained on the existing 80.52-acre tract shall be terminated and shall no longer operate on site. 3. Retail sales from the proposed rental office shall be limited to packing supplies (i.e. boxes, tape, packing materials, etc.) and shall not involve the sale of general retail items such as food, drinks, or other similar items not consistent with the use of the property as a self-storage facility. 4. No ancillary commercial or residential use of individual storage facilities shall be permitted. This includes the use of storage facilities for automotive repair or retail sales. 5. No hazardous materials shall be stored on the property. 6. The applicant shall contract with a private solid waste contractor to remove trash from the site consistent with the submitted site plan and in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. 7. The facility shall meet all applicable requirements of the State of North Carolina Building Code. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 157 Proposed Conditions (Attachment 9 Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, the following conditions are being proposed: 8. The storage facility's hours of operation shall not be before 6:00 am nor after 9:00 pm. 9. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not exceed 25-feet in height from ground level. All lighting shall be downward to minimize light trespass and obtrusive lighting. 10. The property owner shall record a final plat dividing the +/- 11.22-acre parcel from the existing +/- 80.52-acre tract within 120 days of BOCC approval of the rezoning application. 11. Offsite easements for water, wastewater, utilities, and access shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 12. Offsite landscape preservation easement shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 13. Impervious surface transfer shall be recorded within 120 days after approval of the rezoning application. 14. The project shall maintain the existing vegetation on the north, south, and west sides of the site and incorporate an offsite easement area of approximately 1.28 acres along the northern, southern, and western parcel lines in lieu of standards contained in Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection: Street Trees, Between Lot Plantings, Foundation Plantings, Landscaping of Vehicular Areas, and Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 158 Proposed Conditions (Attachment 9 Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, the following conditions are being proposed: 15. The final landscape plan will be reviewed as part of the Zoning Compliance Permit process. If existing vegetation contained onsite or within the recorded landscape preservation easement area does not meet UDO standards, additional plantings shall be required. All required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List. 16. All required landscaping for Phase 1 shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for Phase 1 allowing for the units to be rented/occupied. Required landscaping shall be installed per phase. 17. The applicant shall be required to maintain all required land use buffers, including those of preserved vegetation, in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance Section 6.8, Landscaping, Buffers, and Tree Protection. 18. Proposed driveway connections with NC-57 shall be paved with asphalt. 19. The parking and drive aisles shall be surfaced with Type 57 washed stone. 20. The Planning Director shall have the authority to review and approve minor changes to the approved plan, per Section 2.9.1(1), Alterations to an Approved Conditional District of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, specific to the location and arrangement of development within the limits of disturbance and the proposed "activity area". The "activity area" shall be defined as the edge of gravel as shown on the provided conditional zoning plan set. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 159 Staff Analysis 1. The application is complete in accordance with Section 2.8 and Section 2.9 of the UDO. 2. Staff review of the application included considerations for how the request relates to the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 3. Per Section 3.8 of the UDO, the purpose of the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-CD-1) is to encourage additional, compatible, and unique non-residential development opportunities in a predefined area of the County as identified within the adopted 2007 NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan. 4. The REDA-CD-1 district shall be located consistent with the parcels designated as "Rural Economic Development Area" within the aforementioned Small Area Plan. The subject parcel is located within the Rural Economic Development Area of the NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan allowing for rezoning to the REDA-CD-1 to be considered. 5. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies Agricultural Residential as land designated in the Comprehensive Plan as land for agricultural activities and associated residential and commercial uses. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 160 Zoning and Land Use Review This district shat be located consistent welh the parcels designated as "Rural Economic Development Area'within the aforementioned Small Area Plan, a map of which is provided herein for illustratwe purposes only: HIGHWAY 57 SPEEDWAY NC HI AREA RURAL ECONOMIC EVELOPMENT AREA PUFt dd' -* R+L1M 6rNnT. F,r I-e purpose of the NC Highway 57 Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area Conditional Zoning District (REDA-ICD-f) is to encourage additional, compatible, and unique non-residengal }" development opportunities in a predefined area of the County as dentified within the adopted NC Highway 57 Small Area Plan. rurther,this district is intended to provide existing non-conforming land ises an opportunity to become cunfamming through a development review process so that properly owners can upgrade their existing Business to address changing needs while recognizing, and being ego consistent with, local land use regulations. ` .Imww ^Ir.figrnyi-"'x}wl-n Few -. "+3Vh"rr.,- ,lam" C+avrv_ .repre,ri A+s. f Unified Development Ordinance — Section 3.8 Conditional Districts ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA TABLE OF PERMITTED USES •=PERMITTED USE d=SUBJECT TD USE STANDARbS S=3PEClAL U SE CONVENTIONAL 2(7NIN0 DISYRICT5 ECONUMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS CONCITIONAL DI9TRtlCT9 161 Zoning and Land Use Review Article 5: Uses SecbDn 5.2 Table of Pemnitted Uses. U5E TT PE RB AR R7 R2 R3 R4 RS RS RT7 LC7 NC2 CC3 GC4 ECS D1 RM AS EFAIMMAIID COiE}- ED6- CDE- EOE- CDH- CDH- CDH- EO#1- EOH- ASC- MPO- HP- REOA- R CO YR- 7 2 T 2 1 2 3 4 5 CD CO CD CD-1 C0 Petroleum Product DistFibulmn .® Sexmily Businesses• • A A .............■.. .® Taxidermy ■®■■■■■■■ A 11 11 .■■■ A ■■..........�..-.� Unified Development • • Section Tableof • Uses ORANGE* , COUNTY 162 Planning Director Recommendation The Planning Director recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Consider the matter for action; 2. Acknowledge that legally-sufficient public notice was given for the application and this meeting, in accordance with State law and the Orange County UDO; 3. Review the staff report (Attachment 2), featuring analyses of UDO compliance , impact of the use to the surrounding area, safety and efficiency of land use, and consistency of the application with Orange County's adopted plans; 4. Allow for the applicant's presentation of materials; 5. Conduct the public hearing, receive public comments, and consider the Planning Board recommendation; 6. Close the public hearing; and 7. Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and Zoning Atlas Amendment Ordinance (Attachment 9) OR Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendments, including a statement as to why the application is not reasonable and/or not in the public interest, as detailed in the Statement of Inconsistency (Attachment 8). ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 163 Planning Board Recommendation Planning Board reviewed the rezoning application at its April 9, 2025 meeting Voted 10- 1 to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency LAttachment7 and the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment (Attachment 9), as presented, with the exception of revising Condition #15 to include all required landscaping plantings shall be selected from the Orange County Preferred Plant List ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 164 Recommendation The Manager recommends the Board: 1. Conduct the public hearing and receive the Planning Board and staff recommendations and public comments; 2. Close the public hearing; and 3. Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and Zoning Atlas Amendments (Attachment 9). OR Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendments, including a statement as to why the application is not reasonable and/or not in the public interest, as detailed in the Statement of Inconsistency, (Attachment 8). ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA