HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04-01-2025-Business Meeting 1
APPROVED 5120/25
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
BUSINESS MEETING
April 1, 2025
7:00 p.m.
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met for a Business Meeting on Tuesday, April 1,
2025, at 7:00 p.m. at the Whitted Human Services Center in Hillsborough, NC.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Jamezetta Bedford, Vice-Chair Jean Hamilton
and Commissioners Marilyn Carter, Amy Fowler, Earl McKee, and Phyllis Portie-Ascott
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Sally Greene
COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: John Roberts
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Travis Myren, Deputy County Manager Caitlin
Fenhagen, and Clerk to the Board Laura Jensen. (All other staff members will be identified
appropriately below)
Chair Bedford called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. All commissioners were present
except Commissioner Greene.
1. Additions or Changes to the Agenda
Chair Bedford read the public charge.
Chair Bedford said that OWASA asked for the Board to approve letters of support for
federal funding. She suggested adding it to the agenda between items 4-c and 4-d.
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Carter, to
add approval of letters of support for OWASA to the agenda.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Travis Myren introduced the new Animal Services Director, Elizabeth Overcash, and the
new Community Relations Director, Wil Glenn.
2. Public Comments (Limited to One Hour)
a. Matters not on the Printed Agenda
Cindy Talisman asked the Board questions about how the appeal process works. She
asked if someone would actually go to the property and visually inspect it. She asked why
Orange County does not have tax relief for senior citizens like Durham County. She said that a
lot of senior citizens are on fixed incomes and the increases in taxes are very hard for them.
She asked why the tax rate was not set before the tax valuation. She asked if building more
homes and revenue is not enough for them that they have to also tax their residents more.
Chair Bedford asked the County Manager to explain how the appeal process works.
Travis Myren said they will compile those questions and put out a FAQ on the website.
Chair Bedford asked Wil Glenn to put this information on the website.
Ashley Parker spoke to the Board about the revaluation process. She asked the Board
to make choices that reign in the spending. She said that Orange County has the highest
average tax rate for all 100 counties in the state. She said that there are landowners who live on
land that is immensely valuable land if sold but it is becoming harder to make a living as a
farmer. She said so many residents like her do not want to sell their property. She provided an
2
example of the price of a bushel of wheat staying the same as in 1974 but the cost to produce
the wheat has gone up and farmers make less and less. She said when she drives her kids
home from school, they go past a piece of land that used to belong to her great-grandfather.
She said he had seven children, and each one received land to farm. She said there are oaks
still standing that she used to sit under and do homework while her dad planted but now there
are homes, and it is zoned for low density residential. She said they rent land to farm. She said
many farmers are grateful for the PUV benefit that allows them to keep making a living from
production. She said that property that backs up to her farm hit the market last year at $25,000
an acre. She said that due to urban sprawl and subdivisions taking agricultural land out of
production her dad has lost lease after lease of farmable land. She said she understands that
everyone wants their own little slice of heaven but at this rate of development, the appeal and
charm, not to mention the productivity, will soon be gone. She said that her property increased
in assessed value by 177% and she asked the Board to take all of these things into
consideration when determining tax rates and values.
Steve Mahaley thanked the Board for their service and commitment to the community.
He asked the Board to consider the people in the community who do not come from wealth. He
said that people in the community who perform service work and deserve their consideration.
He said some of these people are often the undocumented. He said the Migration Policy
Institute has published data that says that Orange County has over one million foreign born
residents and half of those are undocumented. He said that when taxes go up on property, rents
go up, often disproportionately. He said he is also talking about teachers, mechanics, farmers,
CNAs and construction workers that live in Alamance, Chatham, or Durham County because
they cannot afford to live where they work. He said that he taught in the Chapel Hill Carrboro
City School system in the 1990's, but lived in Chatham County due to cost. He said he moved
to Hillsborough and owns an old house in the Historic District. He said he recently retired and
lives on a fixed income. He said his house valuation tripled with the reassessment. He said his
house is paid off, but he is still required to pay taxes and insurance and that in taxes alone, he
may be paying $1,000 a month on a home he already owns outright. He said that $1,000 a
month was not in the budget for living expenses and he is not at all against paying taxes. He
said he feels it is his patriotic duty to financially support the systems in this community. He
asked the Board to consider those that will face a burden when making decisions related to tax.
Allison Mahaley thanked the Board for their service and said she appreciates the
balancing act they are charged with. She said that while she is the most progressive of
progressives, she discussed the aspect of President Trump unleashing Elon Musk to slash and
burn of government expenses and noted that while it is dangerous and wasteful, it is not entirely
stupid or unwarranted. She said that many are willing to go with the slash and burn tactics
because they are so fed up with the government processes. She asked the Board to prioritize
common sense and efficiency. She asked them not to raise taxes. She asked the Board to say
enough is enough when it comes to expanding government. drive them out of Orange County or
block the door that keeps them out. She said to stop trying to take over the tasks that the federal
government and state government will not do because it is impossible to do at the county level.
She said when heavy tax burdens are placed on low to middle-income people that do not qualify
for generous help, but also do not come from wealth, it drives them out of Orange County. She
said she wants to trust they will make decisions that prioritize preserving and maybe even
increasing the socioeconomic diversity of the county. She said that she does not want to live in
a county that is made up of people that look like her or think like her. She said that diversity is
our strength. She said there are a lot of smart people in the county who have thought about this
and studied it for years. She asked them to think about how to be efficient and use the tax
dollars that we already have.
Earl Gurganus, a Navy veteran, asked the Board if considering the less fortunate was
part of the revaluation process. He said as a third-generation property owner in the county, he is
3
seeing financial mismanagement, problems with the schools, and tax evaluations that reflect
those issues. He said his questions are about where the money was spent, how it was spent,
and why there is a disparate impact on those with fewer means. He said that he owns property
with a dilapidated barn that had no value 4 years ago but now has a value of$51,000. He said
that does not make sense. He said it is unfair to those who cannot pay the tax bill.
Ashley Campbell said she wanted to point out a better way to communicate the
reassessment to the people. She said that a tax neutral amount is likely never going to happen.
She said that it goes to show how far the revaluation increased the values. She said that
research shows the disproportionate effect on land. She said businesses had a smaller
increase than people who lived out in the county. She said that communication for how the
revaluation was performed could be better. She said she wished the area of neighborhoods that
people's homes were compared to were larger. She said she will have to increase rent on
property she owns elsewhere in the county to cover the cost of the taxes.
Gerald Scarlett said he has been in Orange County for almost 70 years and his family
for 200. He said that about 50 years ago, he had local, state, and federal officials visit him to tell
him that they were taking his property to build Interstate 40. He said that he was assured his tax
rate would not go up because of all the development it would bring to the county. He said he
was promised that all of the development would either lower taxes or at least keep them the
same, but it has not happened. He said in 2019 the Board passed a '/4 cent increase in taxes to
fight climate change. He said that two years later, the RTLP project was approved right across
the street from him with three million square feet of warehouse and 400 loading docks, for 400
diesel spewing trucks. He said that this seems disingenuous at best and hypocritical at the
worst. He challenged the Board to not perpetuate the lie that taxes will not go up. He asked the
Board to adjust the tax rate so that rates do not go up a single penny. He said there has been
$100 million or more dollars in the county. He said they cannot afford to keep doing this. He said
his property value has doubled and there is no way he could buy it now on a fixed income. He
said he cannot afford increased property taxes. He asked the Board to make adjustments so
his payments will not go up and so that he will not be run out of the county by increased and
unaffordable taxes.
b. Matters on the Printed Agenda
(These matters will be considered when the Board addresses that item on the agenda below.)
3. Announcements, Petitions and Comments by Board Members
Commissioner McKee petitioned staff to bring to the next Board meeting the revenue
neutral rate, and information on any delays, reductions, or cuts necessary to achieve the
revenue neutral rate. He also asked that the Board discuss a commitment to achieve no more
than the revenue neutral rate this year.
Commissioner Fowler said she went to a Habitat for Humanity ribbon cutting. She said
the average property value increase in value was 52%, but it was lower for commercial property.
She said that people should appeal if they do not agree with the value. She said the budget is
not set based on valuations but is set on budgetary needs and what the departments provide to
the community. She said the Board will be mindful of those paying tax bills while balancing the
needs of the most vulnerable.
Commissioner Portie-Ascott thanked those in attendance for their remarks. She said that
House Bill 412 was written to address a staffing shortage issue in childcare centers. She shared
two data points: people that have two children in childcare are spending $23,000 - $40,000 a
year on childcare and that childcare centers were at 59% capacity in Orange County. She said
that House Bill 412 would make it so that one teacher can cover two classrooms, which
concerns the Partnership for Children because they believe this is a safety issue. She said that
4
she shared the concern to the advocacy team, and they were grateful to get those comments
and present them to the legislators.
Vice-Chair Hamilton thanked everyone for sharing concerns about the revaluation. She
said they will look at the revenue neutral rate and the needs of the county. She said that they
are in an economic situation where people do not have a lot. She said they need to
communicate clearly what money is being spent upon. She said that as a Board, they do not
determine when or how a revaluation is performed. She said that the state sets the process.
She said that homes in her neighborhood have sold at much higher prices, and that is affecting
the value of her home. She encouraged everyone to review the county website and contact the
Tax Office to get a better understanding of the valuation. She thanked everyone for their
comments, because the Board will use these comments as they balance the budget.
Commissioner Carter thanked everyone for their comments. She said she is looking
forward to her first budget cycle as a commissioner. She said they had a good conversation
with the Town of Carrboro for areas of collaboration, and she said that is one example of
innovation as the county manages lower revenues and state and federal support.
Chair Bedford listed the upcoming revaluation information sessions that the Tax Office is
hosting. She said those are great opportunities for residents to get their questions answered.
4. Proclamations/ Resolutions/ Special Presentations
a. Volunteer Week Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation declaring April 20-26, 2025, as "Volunteer Week" in Orange
County.
BACKGROUND: National Volunteer Week was enacted in 1974 by President Richard Nixon to
celebrate the spirit of volunteerism and is recognized by states and local governments across
the country. This special week encourages all Americans to seek opportunities to provide
service to their community.
Orange County has hundreds of volunteers that support the missions of County Departments,
including over 250 residents serving on volunteer boards and commissions.
More information on volunteering with Orange County can be found at
https:Horangecountync.gov/3348/Volunteer-for-Orange-County.
Tara May, Deputy Clerk to the Board, introduced the item.
The Board of Commissioners read the proclamation in turn:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PROCLAMATION
VOLUNTEER WEEK
April 20-26, 2025
WHEREAS, National Volunteer Week is an opportunity to recognize and honor the impact of
volunteer service and come together to tackle community needs and foster a culture of civic
engagement; and
WHEREAS, experience teaches us that government by itself cannot solve all of our nation's
problems; and
5
WHEREAS, volunteering one's time, talents, and resources has been an integral part of our
heritage since the early days of our nation; and
WHEREAS, Orange County has a strong history of improving lives, strengthening communities,
and making our County a better place through volunteerism; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that we continue this tradition of giving and sharing to preserve and
improve the quality of life for all members of our community; and
WHEREAS, volunteer service is needed more than ever as communities work to support and
uphold their ideals on a local level;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners
encourages all community members to celebrate Volunteer Week by promoting volunteerism in
our families and communities and being all in for Orange County;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners hereby
proclaims April 20-26, 2025, as "Volunteer Week" in Orange County.
This the 1 st day of April, 2025.
Jamezetta Bedford, Chair
Orange County Board of
Commissioners
ATTEST:
Laura Jensen
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
approve the proclamation.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
b. Proclamation Recognizing 25th Anniversary of Community Resource Court
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 29, 2025, as "Community Resource Court
Day" in recognition of the 25th anniversary of Community Resource Court in Orange County.
BACKGROUND: Community Resource Court (CRC) was started twenty-five (25) years ago in
Orange County by the District Court Judge's Office and court and behavioral health
stakeholders to support individuals in the criminal justice system with mental health needs. This
innovative specialty court was the first of its kind in North Carolina. Individuals who voluntarily
enter CRC are diverted from the regular court process and provided therapeutic support and
interventions by a multi-disciplinary team with the goal of providing rehabilitation, stability,
accountability and an ongoing connection to services.
The Court meets monthly and participants have individualized clinical plans depending on their
behavioral health needs. The session starts with a confidential team staffing of all the
participants and then during the closed court session, each participant appears before the
6
presiding judge to discuss their progress, any challenges and next steps. Participation in CRC is
typically six to nine months and upon successful completion, there is a beneficial legal outcome
that could involve the charges being dismissed or probation terminating.
Many graduates of CRC return to the Court sessions to share their insights with new
participants. Over the last 25 years, there have been more than 1,000 individuals that have
participated in the Court. These participants and the Court's longevity are a testament to the
success of this innovative program, which could not occur without a dedicated team of
stakeholders who ensure its successful operation. This team includes the coordinator, two
clinicians from UNC`s Center for Excellence in Community Mental Health, a judge, defense
attorneys, a prosecutor and community advocates. The team, while serving in different roles, all
share the mission of ensuring the well-being of the participants and the success of the Court.
In honor of the 25th anniversary of CRC, a celebration is planned at the United Church of
Chapel Hill on April 29, 2025 from 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm. The public is invited to join this event to
recognize the importance of this Court to the community and Judicial District 18.
Deputy County Manager Caitlin Fenhagen introduced the item and those in attendance
who have played a role in the development and success of Community Resource Court.
Judge Todd Roper greeted the Board and spoke about the program. He described the
process for a person going through Community Resource Court and how it differs from other
parts of the criminal justice system.
The Board of Commissioners read the proclamation in turn:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PROCLAMATION
RECOGNIZING THE 25T"ANNIVERSARY OF
COMMUNITY RESOURCE COURT
WHEREAS, for 25 years, the Orange County Community Resource Court has served as a
pioneering initiative to address the unique needs of individuals with mental health conditions
and other challenges who come into contact with the justice system; and
WHEREAS, this innovative diversionary court program was established to promote
rehabilitation, stability, and accountability by providing support and access to vital mental health
services, substance use treatment, and community resources rather than relying on traditional
court processes and punitive measures; and
WHEREAS, Community Resource Court has fostered partnerships between judges, attorneys,
mental health professionals, law enforcement, advocates, service providers, and community
partners, all of whom work together as a team to support participants in achieving positive
outcomes; and
WHEREAS, Community Resource Court has played a crucial role in reducing recidivism,
enhancing public safety, saving money, and promoting healthier, more stable lives for
participants; and
WHEREAS, Community Resource Court has been a model specialty court that many other
jurisdictions have sought to adopt and replicate; and
WHEREAS, the success and longevity of Community Resource Court exemplify Orange
County's ongoing commitment to compassionate justice, community well-being, the de-
stigmatization of mental health conditions and the Stepping Up Initiative; and
WHEREAS, Caroline Ginley and James White have served as Clinical Managers for
Community Resource Court for more than twenty years with integrity, empathy, unwavering
commitment and have provided invaluable resourcefulness and expertise;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of County
Commissioners formally recognizes the 25' Anniversary of Community Resource Court,
honoring its more than 1,000 participants and team stakeholders and its significant impact on
the lives of individuals and the community with a celebration at United Church of Chapel Hill on
April 29, 2025, from 3:00 to 5:00 pm; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that April 29, 2025, is hereby proclaimed as "Community
Resource Court Day" in Orange County, encouraging all residents to support and recognize this
invaluable program and the dedicated professionals who have contributed to its success over
the past 25 years.
This the 1 st day of April, 2025.
Jamezetta Bedford, Chair
Orange County Board of Commissioners
A motion was made by Commissioner Carter, seconded by Commissioner McKee, to
approve the proclamation.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
c. County Government Month Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 2025 as County Government Month in
Orange County.
BACKGROUND: The National Association of Counties (NACo) celebrates National County
Government Month each April to educate the public about county government.A proclamation to
acknowledge April 2025 as County Government Month in Orange County is attached.
In a change from past years, there is no specific theme associated with the 2025 celebration.
NACo has encouraged counties to actively promote county roles and responsibilities in serving
residents.
To highlight County Government Month, the Community Relations Department will coordinate a
social media campaign to highlight the various programs and services offered by the County.
Wil Glenn, Community Relations Director, introduced the item.
The Board of Commissioners read the proclamation in turn:
8
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PROCLAMATION
COUNTY GOVERNMENT MONTH —APRIL 2025
WHEREAS,the nation's 3,069 counties serving more than 330 million Americans provide
essential services to create healthy, safe and vibrant communities; and
WHEREAS, counties fulfill a vast range of responsibilities and deliver services that touch nearly
every aspect of our residents' lives; and
WHEREAS, counties as intergovernmental partners enact local, state and federal programs to
address the needs of all residents; and
WHEREAS, Orange County and all counties take pride in our responsibility to protect and
enhance the health, well-being and safety of our residents in efficient and cost-effective ways;
and
WHEREAS, Orange County is guided by the objective that "Our Residents Come First" and with
the charge to treat all residents and all County employees with fairness, respect, and
understanding; and
WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners has made tremendous investments in
public education, affordable housing, human services, economic development and public safety to
enhance the quality of life for all County residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT we, the Orange County Board of
Commissioners, do hereby proclaim April 2025 as County Government Month and express our
appreciation to the County employees who make our community such a special place to live,
work, play and raise a family.
This the 1st day of April, 2025.
Jamezetta Bedford, Chair
Orange County Board of Commissioners
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
approve the proclamation.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Additional item for consideration:
Request from OWASA for Letters of Support for Federal Funding
Chair Bedford introduced the item. She said the Board had two letters for consideration
to send to Thom Tillis and Valerie Foushee regarding support of federal funding for projects
regarding PFAS and clear wells.
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
approve the letters be sent.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
9
Vice-Chair Hamilton clarified that the Chair Bedford would sign the letters on behalf of
the Board.
Chair Bedford said those letters will be part of the minutes and the public record. She
said that letters are usually part of the agenda packet, but this came along and is due by
Thursday. She said that Hillsborough was able to get funding a few years ago so there is some
hope.
d. Presentation of Manager's Recommended FY 2025-35 Capital Investment Plan (CIP)
The Board received the Manager's Recommended FY 2025-35 Capital Investment Plan.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the County produces a Capital Investment Plan (CIP) that
establishes a budget planning guide related to capital needs for the County and Schools. The
10-Year CIP is evaluated annually to include year-to-year changes in priorities, needs, and
available resources. Approval of the CIP commits the County to the first-year funding only of
the capital projects; all other years are used as a planning tool and serves as a financial plan.
Capital Investment Plan — Overview
The FY 2025-35 CIP includes County Projects, School Projects, and Proprietary Projects. The
School Projects include Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, Orange County Schools, and
Durham Technical Community College — Orange County Campus projects. The Proprietary
Projects include Water and Sewer, Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, and Sportsplex projects.
The CIP has been prepared anticipating moderate economic growth of approximately 2% in
property tax growth and 4% in sales tax growth annually over the next ten years. All tax increase
estimates in the CIP are based on the anticipated FY 2025-26 valuation following the 2025
revaluation, not the County's current FY 2024-25 valuation. The CIP will rely substantially on
debt financing to fund the projects and these required debt amounts are fully integrated into the
County's Long-Term Debt Model.
Travis Myren made the following presentation:
Slide #1
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Introduction of the Capital Investment
Plan for FY2025-35
Board of Commissioners Business Meeting
April 1, 2025
10
Slide #2
Purpose
• Purpose of the Capital Investment Plan
— Board Approves Year 1 of the Plan as the FY2025-26 Capital Budget
Ten Year Planning Horizon(FY2025-35)
• Imposes Planning Discipline
• No Surprises
Debt Service Requirements
• Amount of Funds Required in the Operating Budget
• Measures Debt Capacity—Debt Service Compared to Expected General Fund Revenue
• Predicts Potential Tax Increases Required to Pay Debt Service
ORANGE COUNTY
2 N(]KI'H CAR(]LINA
Slide #3
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Plan Alignment
— Countywide Strategic Plan—Priorities — Responsive Projects
• Environmental Protection and Climate Action Climate Action Plan Projects
• Healthy Community Behavioral Health Crisis Diversion
Housing for All Affordable Housing
• Multi-modal Transportation Mountains to Sea Trail
• Public EducationlLearning Community School Pay-go for Planning and Design
Diverse and Vibrant Economy Mebane Water Line Partnership
3 ORAoN HE ACOUNATY
11
Slide #4
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Education Projects— 10 Year Plan
— School Capital Funding Policy
• Adopted January 2161 by BOCC
• School submissions align with Board project-based allocation
• $300 million School Bond
— Allocated by specific project over 6-year window.
— Each District starting design on elementary school in FY2025-26
— Staff adjusted sequencing of district submissions to ensure both were receiving funds at equal rates
• $100 million Pay-As-You-Go(not borrowed)
— Two-year phase in of Pay-Gc
• FY2025-26 $6.4 million
• FY 2026-27 $10 million
— Additional Funding to be added in years 6-10 to achieve$100 Mover 10 years.
— Provides Flexibility&No interest
— Reduces Impact of Borrowing on Debt Service to General Fund Revenue Measure
— Enduring Source of Maintenance Funds After Bond is Exhausted ��
ORANGE COUNTY
4 NC>W1'H C:AROLINA
Slide #5
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Education Projects—FY 2025-26
— Major Projects-$12.4 million
Design of Garrboro Elementary
OCS Elementary Schcol Design
Project Management Funds
— High Priority Needs—Allocated to specific projects in both districts-$6.3 M
— Other Capital Uses—Allocated by Category-$6.4 M
— Last Tranche of Supplemental Deferred Maintenance
•
Previously Authorized $26,631,000 $24,369,000
FY2025-26 $9,000,000
TOTAL $35,631,000 $24,369,000 ORANGES COUNTY
5 NORTH CAROLINA
Commissioner McKee asked what the unacceptable negative impact would be if the high
priority needs projects were delayed.
Travis Myren said those funds would be borrowed. He said these would be HVAC or
electrical system replacement projects. He said it would be a system that would impact the way
a facility would operate or be able to open.
Commissioner McKee said he did not see that it was borrowed funds and that even
though an immediate expenditure would not be required, the debt would still have to be paid
down and that has a tax impact.
12
Chair Bedford asked if it would be helpful to see what they do currently versus what is
new.
Travis Myren said this is money that the county would otherwise borrow for school
projects and combined with the lottery proceeds. He said the new element is the pay-go portion
and would result in a tax rate increase.
Commissioner McKee said he would not want to get confused between the two.
Travis Myren said the pay-as-you-go is where the immediate tax impact is.
Commissioner Fowler asked for clarification on slide #4 on the amount of pay-go for
FY26-27.
Travis Myren said a new $3.6 million for a total of $10 million. He said there would have
to be additions in years 6-10 to maintain the $100 million dollar commitment.
Slide #6
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Plan Alignment
— County Long Range Facilities Plan County Long Range Facility Plan Projects
• Sil million in Total Project Costs Recommended in FY2025-35
Seven Major Projects Year of Construction Project County cost
FY2027-28 Cedar Grove Conditioned Storage $2,635,200
FY2(127.28 Emergency Services Headquarters $33,571,484
— Refinements FY2020-28 510 Meadowlands Admin Facility $3.641.385
Justice System Space Needs FY2028-M justice System Space Needs $16,914.576
• Emergency Services Headquarters Sub-Station FY202S m Recreation Facility $21.630,703
• Southern Human Services Medicaid M031-32 Deconstruct Old P4acreation Facility $1,095,784
Maximization Revenue FY2031-32 Southern Human Services 59,628,672
TOTAL $89,117,804
ORANGE COUNTY
6 1V0RTH CAROLINA
Travis Myren said the Southern Human Services project is net of Medicaid maximation
revenue and the total cost is about $10 million.
Vice-Chair Hamilton asked if the Medicaid revenue is guaranteed.
Travis Myren said it is there today, and they earn every year, and it can only be spent in
areas where it is earned so that it would be mostly in the medical and dental clinics.
Chair Bedford said it is for a very specific and narrow use.
Commissioner Carter asked for clarification on what Medicaid maximation revenue is.
Travis Myren said it is funds from the Health Department for services they provide.
13
Slide#7
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Plan Alignment Sustainabillity Projects '
• Year(s)of Recommended Project County Cost
Construction
— Climate Action Plan FY 2025-26 Electric Vehicle&Infrastructure $100,000
Study
• Five Major Projects FY2025-26-FY203435 EV Charging for County Vehicles $4,155,060
— Sustainable Building Policy FY2026-27-FY203435 Public EV Charging Stations $250,000
• Directs County departments when FY2026-27-FY203334 Solar Photovoltaic Installations $1,800,326
designing,constructing,and operating
County buildings in a manner aligned FY203031-FY203435 Community Resilience Hubs $1,060,000
with stated Climate Action Plan goals TOTAL 57,365,386
— Other Sustainability Related Investments
• Community Climate Change Mitigation Grant Program-$2,931,788 over Ten Years
• Premium Associated with Purchasing Sixteen(16)Electric Vehicles
�1
7 ORAN GE COUNTY
Slide #8
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Year 1 - Other Major County Projects
— Behavioral Health Crisis Diversion Facility
• $22.7 million Construction in FY2025-26
• $1.8 million Revenue Applied from Cardinal Innovations One Time Transition Funds
— Evidence Storage Building
• $3.7 million County Cost
• Move Evidence from old Jail to new Detention Center location
ORANGE COUNTY
8 N0 R"I'H C:AROL.INA
Travis Myren said that the $3.7 million for the evidence storage is a new CIP cost.
Commissioner McKee asked why evidence storage was in the basement rather than a
specific area with no air quality issues. He also asked why there would be funds to construct a
building for evidence when they are not sure when the jail will be deconstructed and what will be
done with the facility.
14
Travis Myren said that the building cannot be used for anything else and is deteriorating.
Commissioner McKee said he thought that there would be space in another county
building that could be outfitted for preserving evidence.
Chair Bedford said that it could be added to the list of questions that will be addressed
later.
Slide #9
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Capital Investment Plan by the Numbers
— Total Recommended FY2025-26 Capital Expenditures-$76.4 million
• County Capital $38.5 million
• Proprietary Funds $3.7 million
• School Capital $34.1 million
— Total Ten Year Plan—$895.8 million
• Decrease of$2 M from FY 2024-34 CIP
�1
9 ORAR HE,A COUNTY
Chair Bedford asked if a project is pushed out 1 or 2 years, if there is any impact on the
tax rate.
Travis Myren said it would have to be a big amount to make an impact.
Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if the Link Building was still being considered for a
new justice facility.
Travis Myren said yes.
Chair Bedford provided context for the safety needs of the judicial system. She said
there is a working group that is reviewing different options.
Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if the old jail is vacant.
Travis Myren said yes.
Commissioner McKee noted that the total ten-year plan figure would be close to $1
billion. He said payments on the plan would extend 30 years. He said that the $895.8 million
does not include interest. He said they would need to see the impact on the tax rate.
Chair Bedford noted that debt will roll off each year as well and that part of the impact is
the school bond.
Commissioner McKee said that anyone with 100% or over increase, would have a very
large increase this year just from the revaluation. He said if anything else comes up that they
have to do, they might have to raise the rate. He said that in the 1980s, there were multiple
years of major increases, and he does not want to get back in that because the escalation of
values is not going to change. He said the trailing effect of valuation will not change. He said he
wants to be very careful when he looks at this because the kids and grandkids will have to pay
for this. He said that he accepts responsibility for his past votes that led to tax increases. He
15
said he does not want to make it where people cannot afford to live in their homes due to tax
rates. He said he does not want to be a part of that.
Commissioner Carter asked if the total spending is represented in the recommended
capital investment plan slide.
Travis Myren said yes.
Vice-Chair Hamilton said that the capital investment plan is an investment. She said the
dollar amount does not concern her as much as what they are investing in. She said it is
important to be clear on the investment principle.
Slide #10
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
FY2025-35 Recommended Expenditures by Year
180,000,000
$161,975,514 $164,454,929
10,000,000
$148,073,840
140,000,000
120,000,ODD
100,000,O0D ■School Bond Projects
$85,154,859 ■School Capital
w,W0,00o $76,379,922 ■Proprietary Funds
$ssa7a,3ss 965,467,782
■County Capital
60,000,000
7
$42,109,162 $47,829,38
40,000,000 $35,579,104
20,000,0a0
a
FY 2D25-26 FV 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 FY 2030-31 FY 2031-32 FV 2032-33 FV 203}34 FY 203J-35
10 ORANGE
Cq COUNTY
16
Slide #11
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Debt Service Schedule through 2025-35
$9o,aa0,0oo
Ss0.w2,74s
$90,000,D00 5�0,636,345
$75,417,770
$700W Ga0 567,291,643 $6$8G2,899
664,838.447
$60,000,000 557,182,C19
$50,00D,000 $45,a84.4
939,920,629
$40,000,000
$32,460.177 Bp'pyM
$30,000,OW f7Frt Bond
Rv*b
$20,o00,a00
i10,w0,o0E
S-
FY2025-26 FY2026-27 FY2027-28 MD28-29 FY202948 FY2D30-31 FY2031-32 FY2o32-33 Fy2o33-34 1Y1—31
�1
ORANGE G ECOUNTY
Slide #12
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Annual Debt Service Payments on Existing and Proposed CIP Debt
69D,DOO,Doo
WDO0,0oo
570,DOO,OOE
5 0,D00,0o0
no,DOO,OW
sno.DOO.000
530,DO0,0oo
520,D00,00a
$10,DOO,DoO
S
.exisunq oml 9—, .—p—d CIP D-S,—
ORANGE COUNTY
12 NORTH CAROLINA
Commissioner McKee noted that this only accounts for what is currently known.
Commissioner Fowler said if projects take longer, the county will not borrow until it is
necessary.
Travis Myren said it could delay the impact of borrowing.
17
Slide #13
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Distribution of Debt Service
$90,000,o00
$80,632,745 $78636,345
$BD,000,OW
$79,417,710
$70,0w,000 $64,838,dd) $67,291,643 $68,862,899
S60,0001000 9
$SC,OW,000 $45,8&1,493
$39,92C,629
$40,000,000
$32,460,117
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$-
FY2C25-26 FY2026-27 FY2027-29 FY202&29 FY2029-30 FY2030-31 FY2031-32 FY2032-33 FY2033-34 FY2034 35
■STh-1 Oeht Service ■Cnu V[ htS,WM ■CTCC TOTAL
�1
s ORAN4DN GE�COUNTY
Slide #14
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Debt Service to General Fund Revenue Policy Compliance FY2025-35
22%
20%
19-13%
16.63%
16.13%
18%
16.43%
16%
1404
ld%
2296%
12%
11.19%
10%
FY202S.26 FY2026-27 FY2027.28 FY2026-29 FY2029-30 Fr2030.31 FY2031.32 FY2032-33 FY2033-34 FY2034-3$
y—PdE,YT.19H —Pr J—d
�1
ORANGE COUNTY
14 NORTH CAROLINA
Travis Myren said they have a policy of 15% and they are currently below but at FY 28-
29 it goes above that amount and stays above through the 10-year window.
Commissioner Carter asked what the impact is practically if they go above the 15%
policy.
18
Travis Myren said it reduced some flexibility. He said if they are generating more
revenue than it compensates for that. He said from a practical perspective, it is important to
know what the number is and work to get back to the target. He said there will be times when
the policy is exceeded, but there should be a plan to get the percentage down.
Commissioner McKee said that property tax increases are borne by residential
homeowners more than commercial because of decisions made by previous Boards of
Commissioners.
Vice-Chair Hamilton said that they previously had extensive conversations about the
levels of debt service as they went through the school bond referendum and decisions. She said
that she feels comfortable with this given the conversations that they had and what they know.
She said they look at if they are making an investment that ultimately helps and saves residents
in the long-term. She said that should be the key question. She said they can always make
changes, but the policy makes them use the resources in a way that makes sense.
Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if lower collection rates would affect the debt service
percentage.
Travis Myren said that the collection rate has historically been consistent.
Commissioner Portie-Ascott said that it could be a different environment this year.
Slide #15
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
Funding the Plan
• Pay-Go—1.98 cent tax increase in FY 26, estimated 1.09 cent in FY 27.
• Debt—No tax increase required in FY 26.
• County has options for how to fund future debt increases:
Fiscal Year Incremental Tax Upfront Tax Tranche
2026
2027 1.78 7.68 4.00
2028 1.77
2029 2.91
2030 1.59 4.00
2031 0.19
2032
2033 1.04 1.40
2034 0.73
Total 10.01 7.68 9.401
ORANGE COUNTY
15 NORTH CAROLINA
Commissioner McKee clarified that the increases in slide #15 are only related to capital.
He said that these numbers assume that the county will not do anything else related to
operating. He said he could not support an upfront tax of 7.68 cents.
Chair Bedford asked if the upfront tax used to be lower in previous presentations.
Travis Myren said the value of a penny increased.
Vice-Chair Hamilton said that things can change, and they have to pay close attention to
things that go in or out of their favor. She said that she prefers incremental increases in taxes
because it is easier for households to absorb.
19
Slide #16
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Significant Long-Range Projects
— Affordable Housing
• Three Five(5)million installments throughout FY2025-35
— Community Center Space Needs
• Rogers Road Expansion-$2.9 million in FY2027-FY2029
• Chapel Hill and Carrboro Contributions-$1.7 million
• County Share-$1.2 million
— Emergency Radio System Buildout
• Four New Towers+Equipment Enhancements on Five Existing-$32 million in FY2026-28
• Town Public Safety Agencies-$8 million
• County Share-$24 million
�1
6 ORANGE GE COUNRrHATY
Slide #17
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Significant Long-Range Projects
— Justice System Space Needs
• Work Group Request for Consolidated Facility
• Cost Will Vastly Exceed Current Amount of$16.9 million Budgeted in FY2028-29
— Emergency Services Substations
• Joint Project with Chapel Hill FY2026-27-$3.6 million in FY2026-27
• Hub Station in Southern Orange County-$4.4 million in FY2029-30
Lake Orange Phase 2
• Replace Emergency Spillway and Spillway Channel-$3.8 million in FY2029-30
Parks
• Soccer.com Expansion-$4 million in FY2027-28
• Millhouse Road Park Development-$3.4 million in FY2029-30
ORANGE COUNTY
17 NORTH CAROLINA
20
Slide #18
FY2025-35 Recommended Capital Investment Plan
• Schedule for Consideration
— Introduction of the Capital Investment Plan April 1
Work Session on Capital Investment Plan April 22
Further Consideration through Budget Work Sessions May-June
— Approval of the Operating and Capital Budget June 17
a ORAN GE �COUN�TY
Commissioner Fowler asked how the pay-go numbers were arrived at and what the
impact would be on planning if they are reduced.
Travis Myren said that one district has $5.3 million in planning, and one has $6 million in
planning. He said if those funds were taken away, they would either not be able to plan or the
county would have to borrow those funds, which reduces the amount available for future school
borrowing.
Commissioner Fowler clarified that they would not be able to plan, and they have
communicated a need for those planning funds. She was asking if it was based on a specific
type of planning is what it was budgeted on.
Chair Bedford referred to slide #10. She said she thought the county would borrow
funds in three different tranches, which appears to have changed. She asked if borrowing did
not happen in FY 2027-28, how would that affect the county's debt capacity.
Travis Myren said now the county knows what the schools project plans cost and when
they want to do them.
Chair Bedford asked how it would look to space the numbers out more across the ten
years or if it does not matter.
Commissioner Fowler asked if the schools understand how long projects take.
Travis Myren said that for example, the Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools requested two
elementary schools in one year and that he does not know the capacity for them to do that, but
it was in their request.
Chair Bedford referred to the Animal Services project, and asked about requirements
from the USDA, what is part of the county studies, and then the balance. She said that would
show what is optional and could be deferred.
Chair Bedford asked other commissioners to send questions to Travis Myren so staff can
prepare.
Commissioner Fowler asked if it is feasible to acquire so many electric vehicles since
there has been a backlog.
21
Travis Myren said that due to changing circumstances in the auto industry, he will take
another look at that.
5. Public Hearings
None.
6. Regular Agenda
a. Orange County Transportation Priority List for SPOT 8 / FY 2027-2036 STIP
The Board approved the resolution for Orange County Transportation Priorities for Strategic
Prioritization of Transportation version 8 (SPOT 8) and the subsequent State Transportation
Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2027 — 2036 (STIP).
BACKGROUND: Every two years, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
initiates the Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation (SPOT) process to develop the State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the next ten (10) years. This process,
conducted in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 136 Article 14B, follows a data-
driven approach to allocating the State's limited financial resources across three (3) funding
categories. These funds are distributed among North Carolina's seven (7) regions, which
encompass fourteen (14) divisions and 100 counties.
Projects submitted for state funding are evaluated based on a structured scoring methodology
that incorporates both quantitative data and local input points:
• Statewide Impact— 100% data-driven
• Regional Mobility — 70% data, 15% Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)/Rural
Planning Organization (RPO) points, 15% NCDOT division points
• Division Needs — 50% data, 25% MPO/RPO points, 25% NCDOT division points
Orange County submits the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)-approved priorities to the
relevant regional TPO/MPOs and RPOs for those boards' consideration (Attachments 1 — 3).
Each MPO and RPO, based on population size and centerline miles, submits a limited number
of projects per transportation mode to NCDOT for scoring.
Key Updates:
• Project list are the same as SPOT 7 with some independent bicycle and pedestrian projects
removed, as they are restricted to local and federal funding sources.
• Highway projects have been consolidated into multimodal initiatives, ensuring alignment
with state and County Complete Streets policy.
Orange County Transportation Services will provide a brief presentation on this round of
multimodal priorities for the BOCC's consideration. Orange County Transportation Advisory
Services and the Orange Unified Transportation Board (OUTBoard) have reviewed the
department's proposal and offer the following recommendations:
Transportation Advisory Services — March 13, 2025
Recommended BOCC approval of Orange County Priorities for SPOT 8
Orange Unified Transportation Board — March 18, 2025
• Recommended BOCC approval of Orange County Priorities for SPOT 8 with changes:
o US 70 improvements - change - modernize with intersection improvements and
complete street considerations
22
o NC 54 improvements- remove
o NC 86 improvements- remove but pursue multimodal corridor study
Nishith Trivedi, Transportation Director, made the following presentation:
Slide #1
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Orange County
Transportation Priorities for
SPOT 8.0
April 1, 2025
Board of County Commissioners
Slide #2
Outline
• Process Summary
• Local Priorities
- CPRPO
- TWTPO
- BGMPO
• Action
23
Slide #3
Background - Transportation
North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) 136-Transportation
NCDOT, MPO, RPO, DEQ, County, Municipality, etc.
Comprehensive State required for MPOs and RPOs
Transportation Plan only;multimodal vision
2o+Year MPO Federally required for MPOs only;
CMP -Metropolitan TRM - must be fiscally constrained
r nsportation Plan
CV: EJ NCDOT Prioritization-SPOT 49TIP
-a year process
to-Year State
Transportation
Improvement Funded projects;includes NIPO's TIPS
Program(5TIP] plus rural projects
[First 5 years-committed, -Federal Approval of first 4 years
Latter 5 years-developmental]
All modes in all processes
3
Slide #4
How Roads Get Built 1 Improved —
SPOT/STIP
• Strategic Prioritization of Transportation (SPOT)
— N.C.G.S 136 (DOT)—Article 14B
— Orange County-Region D
• Division 7-Alarnance,Caswell,Crawie, Guilford and Rockingham
• Not Durham,Wake,Person(Division 5)or Chatham (Division$)
Orange County and member
Werdremst Pdn-.ent pMolmnrMad Xerr-Tar
�r R m�rr Iwo rceor > O jurisdictions submitting
��"�' �rw•,� projects through DCHC MPO,
anrw N" &eensbora V BGMf O and TARPO
FarsyrhM MPO I'NM�a m compete against:
GW"v aur"re4 l7 - Piedmont Triad RPO
Graham Cha 1HN1
MPO ca tiara town - Greensboro MPO
Aec - NW Piedmont RPO
MPo
�ww �� wrrMPc Winston-Salem MPO
-E Cabarrus-
+tocwrn - High Point MPO
s . Cabarrus-Rowan MPO
ma4rwe� 70 Not DCHC MPO or CAMPO
4
24
Slide #5
Process Summary
Determined by
local Jurisdictions
CPRPO
BG "0
Orange
County 3 other
M--hane counties
towns —d
TWTPO
Orange
County
CPRPO-23Jmade +Durham City
TWTPO- 18/mode BGMPO-Top prelim '
BGMPO- 17Jmode
M POI
RPD
-• . RPO
Limited#of Projects Pubik review period
(&public hearing)
NCDOT Districts also submit
x#of projects 5
Slide #6
How Roads Get Built 1 Improved -
SPQTISTIP
Draft P8 Schedule October B.2024
0 Fisted Oates 2024 2025 2026 2027
■ DartnerinpsJt ON D J F M A M J J A50N D J F M A M J J A50ND J F M
Jun:DOT Approves P8 Methodology
D[t Workgreup Kt E07f
Jul SPOT On I ine C�-1 ve
I I MIL O t-Mar:Data lametyand xo�ng
Id-xp Project Subminah wndow
Feb Partner Data naaew End of Apr:quantitative 5coies&
5t.L—de Mob hi Programmed
P,,,,Released
Apr:Program Stat—de Mvhdny
I I I End of Au.:Peli Impact
May—Jul:Regional hi tncali rout Point lvgnmer, Total Scores&Programmed
rug:Pregr.m rteg�e Ilmpae arvJects ReieaJed
I F I
Sep•li Gv�slGn Ive.ds Ll IOpyt Ppnt AJSIVmtnt
I I
Dec l.n Program ITmsivn Needs
I
Willer 2027:Draft 2.28-2037 SDP
EJe�eased at sOT rneet,ng(final
STIP approval in Summer 2027)
8
25
Slide #7
How Roads Get Built 1 Improved -
SPOT/STIP
Highway Criteria Weights
Historic Default Criteria Weights
Regional Impact
Regional Impact P3.0 Pd.0 P5.0 P6.01P7.0 P&OIP7.0
(Out of 70 Pita) Mobility Modernization
Congestion 30% 20% 20% 20% 5%
Benefit/Cost 30% 20% 20% 20%
Safety 10% 10% 10% 10% 25%
Aecessiconnectivdy 10% 10% 10%
Freight 10% 10% 10% 10%
Multirnodal
Lane Width 10%
Shoulder Width 10%
Pavement Condition 10%
7
Slide #8
Background - CPRPG
• Old Greensboro-(SR-1005)Road Improvement Modernization
• Orange Grove Road-(SR-1006)Improvement Modernization
• Dairyland Road-(5R-1177)Improvement Modernization
Dodson Crossroad-(SR-1102)Improvement Modernization
• Mebane Oaks Road-(SR-1007)Improvement Modernization
• Old NC-86-(SR-1009)Improvement Modernization
• NC-86 Improvement Mobility wlCS OUTBoard—Remove and Study
• NC-54 Improvement Mobility with CS OUTBoard-Remove
(limited to RPO area)
Background - BGMPO
• US-70 Improvements Mob4itywlCS OUTBoard-Modernize w/CS
• Mattress Factory Road Interchange Mobility
• Mattress Factory Road Extension Mobility
• Buckhorn Road(SR 1114)Widening MobilitywlCS
• Lebanon Road(SR-1306)Improvements-Modernization
8
26
Slide #9
Background - TWTPO
• US-70 Improvements Modernize w/CS
+ NC 86 Improvements North of Hillsborough Remove Remove and study
Eno Mountain Road/Mayo Street at Orange Grove Rd. Mobility w/CS
• U.S.70 East/1-85/I-40 Connector Mobility w/CS
• Old Greensboro(SR-1005)Road Improvement Modernization
Dairyland Road(SR-1177)Improvement Modernization
Dodson Crossroad(SR-1102)Improvement Modernization
• Orange Grove Road(SR-1006)Improvement Modernization
Lebanon Road Modernization
• Old NC-86(SR-1009)Improvement Modernization
• Dimmocks Mill Trestle Improvements Rail
• Exchange Park Lane Rail Trestle Improvements Rail
• Orange Grove Rd.Widening with Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility w/CS
• Calvander Roundabout Mobility
• Orange County Public Transportation Circulator II Vehicles Transit
Orange High School Road/Harold Latta Road Sidewalk Mobility w/CS
• 1-85 Pedestrian Bridge* BikelPed
• NC-10Improvements Modernization
Regional Multimodal Hub Rail&Transit
9
Nishith Trivedi said "w/CS" means "with Complete Streets," relating to the Complete
Streets initiative. He said Complete Streets only applies to highway projects.
Commissioner Fowler asked what they mean by "modernize."
Nishith Trivedi said it means bringing roads to current design standards, such as land
width and shoulder width.
Commissioner Fowler asked if the current STIP US 70 Improvement project does not
modernize.
Nishith Trivedi said Transportation Advisory Services (TAS) and staff are recommending
that the US 70 project be submitted as it was before, which includes widening and multi-modal
accommodations. He said the OUTBoard is not recommending the widening but to submit it as
modernization.
Commissioner Fowler asked what the difference is between widening and
modernization.
Nishith Trivedi said it means to bring it up to current standards such as add more
pavement and add more shoulder.
Chair Bedford asked if the county just had a two-year consultant study for US 70.
Nishith Trivedi said yes, and he said he could submit that study as is if the Board wanted
him to.
Commissioner Carter asked why the OUTBoard recommended removing the NC 54
project.
Nishith Trivedi said it was the widening, which could lead to increased demand and more
cars on the road.
Commissioner Carter asked if the final recommendation is to remove those.
Nishith Trivedi said TAS is submitting them as they were approved.
27
Slide #10
Requested Action
• The Manager recommends that the Board approve the resolution for
Orange County Transportation Priorities for SPOT 8 and STIP FY 2027
—2036(Attachment 4).
io
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Chair Bedford, to approve
the resolution for Orange County Transportation Priorities for SPOT 8 and STIP FY 2027 —
2036.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Chair Bedford said it is unlikely that there will be funding for these projects given the
repairs needed to roads and bridges in western North Carolina.
Commissioner McKee agreed and that state transportation funds have already been
allocated for needs in western North Carolina.
Chair Bedford noted that projects are submitted whole, but that they get broken up when
implemented.
7. Reports
None.
8. Consent Agenda
• Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda
• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda
• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
approve the consent agenda.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
a. Minutes
None.
b. Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
The Board adopted a resolution to release motor vehicle property tax values for thirteen (13)
taxpayers with a total of thirteen (13) bills that will result in a reduction of revenue.
28
c. Property Tax Releases/Refunds
The Board adopted a resolution to release property tax values for eighteen (18) taxpayers with a
total of twenty (20) bills that will result in a reduction of revenue.
d. Resolution to Rescind a County Review Officer Appointment
The Board approved a resolution to rescind one (1) County Review Officer appointment as that
individual is no longer employed by the County.
e. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Historic Courthouse Square
Building and Grounds Improvements
The Board:
1) Approved the County entering into a professional services agreement with Joseph K.
Oppermann —Architect, P.A., for the Historic Courthouse Square Building and Grounds
Improvements; and
2) Authorized the County Manager to execute the Agreement, subject to final review by
the County Attorney, and any subsequent amendments for contingent and unforeseen
requirements up to the approved budget amount on behalf of the Board of County
Commissioners.
f. Efland EMS Station Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Plan Agreement with
Orange County (3800 US 70 West, Efland)
The Board:
1) Approved a Stormwater Operation and Maintenance Agreement with Orange County for
the Efland Emergency Services Station Stormwater Control Measures; and
2) Authorized the County Manager to sign the necessary paperwork upon final County
Attorney review.
g. Black Maternal Health Week Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 11-17, 2025, as Black Maternal Health
Week in Orange County.
h. Native Plant Month Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 2025 as "Native Plant Month" in Orange
County.
i. Fair Housing Month Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 2025 as Fair Housing Month in Orange
County.
j. Purchase of an Enterprise Licensing Agreement for Geographic Information System
(GIS) Software from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)
The Board approved and authorized the Manager to sign contract documents with
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) to expand the County's existing GIS software
agreement to a county-wide enterprise license agreement.
k. VIPER Migration Implementation Assistance Extension
The Board:
1) Approved the County entering into a general Services Agreement with Federal
Engineering, Inc., for the VIPER Implementation Support; and
2) Authorized the County Manager to execute the Agreement, subject to final review by
the County Attorney, and any subsequent amendments for contingent and unforeseen
requirements up to the approved budget amount on behalf of the Board of County
Commissioners.
9. County Manager's Report
Travis Myren reminded the Board of the work session on April 8, 2025.
10. County Attorney's Report
John Roberts had no report for the Board.
29
11. Appointments
a. Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment
The Board approved appointments to the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment.
BACKGROUND: The Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment is authorized to hear variance cases
regarding the provisions of the Chapel Hill Land Use Management Ordinance and appeal cases
regarding decisions made by Town of Chapel Hill staff.
The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) appoints one (1) member representing the
Chapel Hill Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), one (1) member representing the Chapel Hill ETJ
or the Joint Planning Area (JPA), and one (1) alternate member representing the Chapel Hill
ETJ or JPA.
Per North Carolina General Statute § 160D-307 and the Joint Planning Agreement, the Chapel
Hill Town Council is able to make appointments to these seats if the BOCC does not do so
within ninety (90) days of receiving a request from the Town of Chapel Hill. In January, Clerk's
Office staff received a request from the Town of Chapel Hill to make appointments by April 6,
2025.
Since the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment is not an Orange County-created board or
commission, it does not submit an Annual Work Plan.
The Town of Chapel Hill does not make recommendations for appointments to this board.
The following individual and positions are presented for Board consideration:
NAME POSITION TYPE OF EXPIRATION
DESCRIPTION APPOINTMENT DATE
TERM
Benjamin (BJ) Chapel Hill ETJ First Full Term 06/30/2028
Warshaw (reappointment)
BOCC Chapel Hill ETJ or First Full Term 06/30/2027
Appointee JPA
If the positions listed above are filled, the following vacancy remains:
POSITION EXPIRATION VACANCY INFORMATION
DESIGNATION DATE
Chapel Hill ETJ or 06/30/2026 Vacant since 06/30/2023
JPA-Alternate
Tara May, Deputy Clerk to the Board, introduced the item.
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
appoint BJ Warshaw for a first full term to the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
30
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
appoint Emilio Garza for the Chapel Hill ETJ or JPA position on the Chapel Hill Board of
Adjustment.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
b. Chapel Hill Planning Commission
The Board approved appointments to the Chapel Hill Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND: The Chapel Hill Planning Commission develops a comprehensive plan for the
orderly growth and development of Chapel Hill. It reviews all plans for buildings, projects and
facilities to be located within the Town's jurisdiction. It also formulates and recommends the
adoption and amendment of ordinances.
The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) appoints one (1) resident representing the Chapel
Hill Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, as well as one (1) resident representing the Chapel Hill
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction or the Joint Planning Area.
Per North Carolina General Statute § 160D-307 and the Joint Planning Agreement, the Chapel
Hill Town Council is able to make appointments to these seats if the BOCC does not do so
within ninety (90) days of receiving a request from the Town of Chapel Hill. In January, Clerk's
Office staff received a request from the Town of Chapel Hill to make appointments by April 6,
2025.
Since the Chapel Hill Planning Commission is not an Orange County-created board or
commission, it does not submit an Annual Work Plan.
The Town of Chapel Hill does not make recommendations for appointments to this board.
The following individual and positions are presented for Board consideration:
NAME POSITION TYPE OF EXPIRATION
DESCRIPTION APPOINTMENT DATE
TERM
Libby J. Thomas Chapel Hill First Full Term 06/30/2028
ETJ or JPA (reappointment)
BOCC Chapel Hill ETJ First Full Term 06/30/2028
Appointee
If the positions listed above are filled, no vacancies remain.
Tara May, Deputy Clerk to the Board, introduced the item.
A motion was made by Commissioner Fowler, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
appoint Libby Thomas to the Chapel Hill ETJ or JPA for a first full term on the Chapel Hill
Planning Commission.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
31
A motion was made by Commissioner Carter, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to
appoint Mike Zibaie for a first full term on the Chapel Hill Planning Commission.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
12. Information Items
• March 18, 2025 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
• Tax Collector's Report— Numerical Analysis
• Tax Collector's Report— Measure of Enforced Collections
• Tax Collector's Report— Foreclosure Chart
• Tax Assessor's Report— Releases/Refunds under$100
13. Closed Session
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to
enter in to closed session at 9:14 p.m. pursuant to North Carolina General Statute § 143
318.11.(a)(3) "to consult with an attorney retained by the Board in order to preserve the
attorney-client privilege between the attorney and the Board," and for the approval of Closed
Session Minutes.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Reconvene into Regular Session
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner McKee, to
reconvene into regular session at 10:07 p.m.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Adjournment
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Vice-Chair Hamilton, to
adjourn the meeting at 10:07 p.m.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Jamezetta Bedford, Chair
Recorded by Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board
Submitted for approval by Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board