Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMInutes 02-06-2024 - Business Meeting 1 APPROVED 3119/24 MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BUSINESS MEETING February 6, 2024 7:00 p.m. The Orange County Board of Commissioners met for a Business Meeting on Tuesday, February 6, 2024, at 7:00 p.m. at the Whitted Human Services Center in Hillsborough, NC. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Jamezetta Bedford, Vice-Chair Sally Greene and Commissioners Amy Fowler, Jean Hamilton, Earl McKee, Phyllis Portie-Ascott, and Anna Richards COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: John Roberts COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Bonnie Hammersley, Deputy County Manager Travis Myren, and Clerk to the Board Laura Jensen. (All other staff members will be identified appropriately below) Chair Bedford called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. All commissioners were present. 1. Additions or Changes to the Agenda Chair Bedford dispensed with reading the public charge. 2. Public Comments (Limited to One Hour) a. Matters not on the Printed Agenda Terri Buckner said in the information item from Orange County Planning staff, Chapel Hill's zoning and stormwater regulations as urban, and the County's as rural. She said that observation fails to recognize that the area under concern for WASMPBA extension is neither urban nor rural. She said there are both farms and suburban neighborhoods and it is a transition area without infrastructure and community services to support high density development. She said building out that infrastructure will not fall to Chapel Hill alone and Orange County and Carrboro will be forced to support that growth in one way or another. She said cost estimates to the county cannot be done until there is a plan in place so why open the area to sewer without the plan. She said bringing in water and sewer and opening the area to high density development without a plan is the antithesis of sustainable development. She said it conflicts with the county's own Climate Action Plan among other plans. She reminded the Board that the county has already had to buy out three homes in Heritage Hills due to nuisance flooding, which arises from past planning decisions that did not anticipate climate change by allowing construction in watersheds and floodplains. She said that further destruction of currently functional watershed, which is less than 10% impervious surface, will exacerbate the effects of the nuisance flooding events. She said two homes in Heritage Hills have experienced flooding within the past 30 days, forecasting the probability that more homes will need to be condemned down the line. She said a recent report from a group of UNC researchers claims that new housing construction in flood prone areas has contributed to increased risks across NC despite community and government efforts to reduce flood damage. She said the report further claims that due to climate change and development within watersheds and floodplains, the technical BMPs are not working. She said Chapel Hill has stated that WASMPBA must be changed before they can put zoning in place, OWASA said the zoning must be in place before they can accurately estimate the cost and design of the new sewer lines, and Orange County staff claims that University Lake won't be affected, 2 but residents are completely helpless to protect their homes and safety without the BOCC's resistance. Catherine Vaughan thanked the Commissioners for their responses to an email she sent earlier in the week. She said she applauds the decision to have a crisis diversion facility in the community and reflects humanity and pragmatism. She said she is concerned that her neighborhood is being enclosed by development. She asked the Board to consider helping to preserve the residential character of the Waterstone at Harmony community by minimizing intrusion from development around the neighborhood. She said she would like for there to be sufficient setback, a substantial wooded buffer so that lights will not come into residential windows at night and would also like to see perimeter fencing. b. Matters on the Printed Agenda (These matters will be considered when the Board addresses that item on the agenda below.) 3. Announcements, Petitions and Comments by Board Members Commissioner McKee petitioned the Board to instruct staff or the Broadband Task Force to identify solutions that would extend broadband to the areas that have been identified and would not otherwise receive service in Lumos's current plans. Commissioner Hamilton said she attended the Central Pines Regional Council Open House and board meeting. She said this council is an important regional governmental body that encourages collaboration between participating counties and helps tax dollars go further. She said Central Pines recently won a $3.9 million grant to study EV charging stations and help create a national standard to enhance reliability. She said she also attended an Alliance Health board meeting and encouraged residents to apply for vacancies on the board. Lastly, she said she attended the Durham Technical Community College Board of Trustees meeting and update and the Go Triangle Special Tax Board meeting. Vice-Chair Greene said she attended the Orange County Democratic Party meeting at Carol Woods last Sunday which recognized Chapel Hill Town Council Member Theodore Nollert's efforts to organize the student vote for the fall election. She said she appreciates Commissioner McKee's petition and joined him and Commissioner Portie-Ascott at the Caldwell Community Center for another Lumos community presentation. She said on Saturday, she and Commissioner Richards represented the Board at the Orange County Extension and Community Association, which dates to the home demonstration groups of the early 20th century. She said the Association is a group of women who used to do canning and quilting, and they now raise money and give goods and services to nonprofits in the community. She shared that one member has been part of the group for 65 years. Commissioner Fowler petitioned staff to bring forward an Ordinance that would preclude tobacco, vape, and hemp shops within 1000 feet of schools and parks. She said she would also like the county to serve as a resource to municipalities so they may adopt similar ordinances, which is vital for them to have any real impact. She said she has reached out to elected officials in Hillsborough, Carrboro, and Chapel Hill with this request. She said County Attorney John Roberts anticipated this issue and has been delineating a course of action. Further, she said this topic has been discussed by Health Director Quintana Stewart and the Board of Health Equity Committee, who agree it is worthwhile. She said surrounding counties and municipalities in Wake, Alamance, Durham, and Chatham have already or are looking into adopting similar ordinances. She shared some statistics regarding tobacco use and vaping, including that usage among NC high school students has increased over 1000% since 2011 and that NC has the second highest rate of youth vaping in the country. She shared that 4 local Orange County youth met with Senator Tillis to discuss substance use prevention. She said there are things that will have to be addressed by the state, but a county ordinance is something that can be done on a local level. Commissioner 3 Fowler also shared that she attended a DCHC MPO orientation, the Durham Tech Board of Trustees meeting, and the Board of Health and its Equity subcommittee meeting. Commissioner Richards said in addition to Black History Month, February is also "Love Your Heart" month. She recognized the graduates of Phoenix Academy who held a graduation on January 26t". She also attended the Burlington-Graham MPO meeting, Partnership for Young Children meeting, and the ABC Board meeting. She encouraged residents to attend a Comprehensive Land Use Plan input session. Commissioner Portie-Ascott said she attended the opening reception for First Fridays at the Eno Arts Mill. She said she was amazed by the number of people in attendance, especially young people. She said there were two artists that she was very impressed with and shared details of their work. She also mentioned that the Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness completed the Point-In-Time Count on January 31st, which allows them to submit data to HUD about people experiencing homelessness in Orange County. Finally, she said she attended the JCPC meeting, and the number of school-based complaints has decreased by more than 50% since May. Chair Bedford said she represented the Board at the Eno River Association special meeting where they were doing some strategic planning and getting input from members on ideas to protect the Eno River. She said that every month there is a fifth Wednesday, there is a joint meeting with Wake County's MPO and they are already beginning the work for the MTP 2055. Chair Bedford said the Piedmont Food Processing Center Board met last Friday and it was a good meeting. She said she also attended an informal meeting with Senator Meyer about plans for the UNC coal plant should the railroad become available for another purpose in the future. Finally, she said she attended the Behavioral Health Task Force meeting on Monday, and they are working on trying to illustrate time saving and financial saving from the planned Crisis Diversion Facility. 4. Proclamations/ Resolutions/Special Presentations a. Presentation of Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for FYE 6/30/2023 The Board received the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report(ACFR)for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. BACKGROUND: The ACFR reports on all financial activity of the County for the fiscal year July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC, a firm of Certified Public Accountants, audited the financial statements. The financial statements and audit are required by Chapter 159- 34 of the North Carolina General Statutes. The County prepares an Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) that meets the standards set by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). The ACFR is submitted to the GFOA in order to be awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The financial report for the Orange County Sportsplex, as required under the management contract, is included in the County's ACFR. The County received an unmodified (clean) audit opinion on the financial statements received from the audit. The financial audit results indicate compliance with County financial policies. The Chief Financial Officer and representatives of Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC will cover highlights of the Report and answer any questions. Gary Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer, introduced Tim Lyons and Chad Jackson from Mauldin and Jenkins, LLC. In general, he said that the county continues to have very strong financial results. 4 Tim Lyons made the following presentation: Slide #1 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA AT Presentation of Audit Results June 30, 2023 Slide #2 >4+ Orange County,Narth Carolina Agenda Engagement Team Overview of: • AuditOpinlon a FfnanclalTrends • Compllance Report Required Communlcatlons Accounting Recommendations and Related Matters Answer Questions AudhW-s Dlsm-=A rr&AneiysJs(ADM Going Further, June X 2023 5 Slide#3 >H— 1111 ++ y + + ■ i Orange II North Carorirra 1\151Dl: � ifffff f 300+ E E - SINGLE AUDITS PERFORMED LAST Fl�lylt� } f YEAR C90ERING OVER$5.3 MILLION OF FEDERAL MAWS rONSISTENTLY RANKED AS A TOP A6[DUNTING EIAY IN THE US. TEAM MEMBERS 6EDICATM 140+ T4SERVINGTHE 1 100+ year GOWERNMEEITAL INDUSTRY , + - R - HOURS ANNUALLY HISTORY PROVIDEDTO OF QUALITY SERVICE `s •**'""�., r GOVERNMENTA,LELIENTS e - [ILIRRENT 1LI1I!0M WAROEh Serve Y e 700+ IV]%VLW tikl7,y = E f 5+ THE GF4A FERTIFICAYE 9F GOVERIIAEENT[WITS EXCELLENCE GOVERNMENTAL 6 14 All( PARTNERS wlalot STATES OFRCES Ennanement Team Leaders Tim Lyon:,Engagement Partner I Brian Nicholson, ❑unity Review Partner I Chad Jackson,Sr_Asanclate Au[fW's Dlscu.TNm 8 Arlosds M9A) June X 2023 Slide #4 Orange County, North Carob+rra Audit Opinion Our Responsibility un der AuditingStandaI Generally Accepted in the United States of America(GARS) We cow dered the Imemal control sir—acre for the purpose of expressing our opinlon on Oran�i€anrnly.Narth Calntine'i (the-Cau n*q basic firnanclal statemenTs.not for The purpose or pro4lding an 6P...on the efte:ZNeheS:of i"mal comrols. our audit was performed In xcofdahoe with GA"L and sovernnre Hie duurgsrunGatds. our objective is Ta Pro"reasonable—WI absolure—assurance that The basic finanoial sraiernenis are free of maierlal misscawmern. The basic financial stawmerim are The responslblllEy of The counWs management. we did not audit the Manual sTatemenis of the Orange touncyABC Board.The nnaneal sTatemenis of the ABC Board were audited by other auditors whose report was furnished w us,along vaihceriatnoTher regwredcommunieaclons.Ouropman on theCaumy'sfinancial sraTemenTsIs based solelyon the report of The oTheraudlmrs who performed The audn of the ABC Board.The financial stwemeaTsof the ABC Board were not audited In accordance wah Garennnre+rrAr oluuEg5Wndords. Report on$asic Financial Statements a Unmodified ftlean'yapinon on basic financial statements, a Presented Fairly in accordance with accounting principles generOyacceptedin the United States ofAmerica. Cour responsibiitydoes not extend begondfinancial intormationcontained in our report. Au6W's 8lsausslDn&Anaysk ADM June n 2023 6 Slide#5 y1f Orange County, North Carnfrfra Compliance Report and AuditScoges&Procedures Government Auditing Standards("YeHow[Book") Report The 9nanclaI report package comalns a report on our tests of the Cauntys Internal controls and compllance With laws.regulatlons ex. The repo-r[Is not Intended to proYIde ar,Opin,00 Or,internal cwrols nor Is It Intended to provide a Iegal determinatlon an the Countys compl lance wixh applicdblt laws and regulations. This report and the procedures performed are required by Govemmera Amfting Smndords_ Compliance Reports We were required to perform SingleAudit procedures on six tG)major programs[d Federal and 2 State of North Carolina program$ We Issued a report on the Countys federal programs In accordance with the U nlform Guidance.That report contal ned an unmodlfled opinlon on compliance. We issued a report on the Countys state programs in accordance with the State of North Carolina Single Audit Im plememation Act. That report contained an unmodified opinion on compliance. AuAor's alscusskDn$Anefys�s to K Jane X 2023 Slide #6 Orange Courtly, North CoNffrra Financial Trends—Cornpositionof Fund Balance Trends from 20n to 2023, Fund Balance Categories-Genera I Fund 0 2022 Fund Balance:$32,31M 50,00,1Ma o 2023 Fund Balance.$80.41M 45,000,006 40,000.000 0 Increase to unassigned fund balance of approximately as,00o,000 $4.4 million—mostly related 30,000,006 to the decrease in assigned 25,000,aon lappropriated in subsequent 20,000,00o period). 15,000,000 10�00�a o Increase to restricted fund In of approximately ', $1AM. 2021 2022 20-23 o Unassigned fund balance as of June 30,2023,is 27,2%of ■Nonspendablc ■Restricted ■Committed ■.assigned ■unassigned General Fund-Debt Svc. Fund expenditures. Audh'dsr's blacusslnn S AMarys�s(A08A) JAM&X 2023 Slide#7 Orange County, No:,M[oraiirw Financial Trends=General Fund Revenue Other 1.5% Charges ror 9mbsq,5.2% InNrgmmrnrnwe+.7_% Saks rafs, 1614 Prop"Trmrss. 69.9% 2623 MIN [Nff Prapagr Tmes 108.249.667 161,453.366 &796,201 soles Taffies d3.396.7B0 37,996 979 5,WAD1 Irtergoserttmental 1aRI115 20,673.198 0.210,00 Charges Tor serVees 14,P35,Tr2 13,75 Hg 2r9,913 Other 4.195.050 2,719.878 1.475.174 2M 2a0 2P4 256,498.078 12741.600 Autl,Ws Dkwu&&M 9 Aealysls(ADM ,lane 30.2023 Tim Lyons said the decrease in Intergovernmental revenue category can be attributed to "COVID-funding" expiring. Slide #8 Orange County, NorM[oratino Financial Trends—General Fund Expenditures 2= 2022 Diff %age Gomm unity Samos 14,595,312 13,206,403 1,389.909 6% General gwomment 13003Z9 10,770.606 2,332,693 5% Public safety 33,434,999 27,822,848 6,612.161 13% Human SaNces 38,758538 39,736,328 (977,790) 15% Education 97.969.758 94,916,033 3,063.725 39% Suppalt serAces 11.805.338 12-461.128 (666.790) 5% Debt smke ') 41,750,825 43,304,765 (1,563,940) 17% 251.419059 242-217.111 9,200,9% 100% t Debt semce expenditures in[fudes apprarinwrefy S21-7 mifffan of prfn[fpoi and interest pt?ymenr5 an s[tr4afielated debt for the Pica year rndrdjurte 30,2023, HNren the defence Rf rtr4Fe payments rs added fR nRn ear SefYl[e, wal expenditures for educarion rota;approxlmRtefy S419,7 milllart Rr 4a%of wal Genera)Fund+Aebt Service Fvnd expertdrtvres. AUdW's Drsarss�m 9 Analysis(ANA) LAM&X 2023 8 Slide#9 YTj_ Orange[aunty, NartH CnroUM Financial Trends-Proprietary-Funds Solid Waste Enterprise Fund Change Operating reAmues $ 11,001,798 S 11,337,901 $ (336,103) Operating expenses 9.430,416 10,019,577 (589,161) Operating income 1.571.382 1.318.324 253,058 Unrestdcted net position 9,696,271 7,645,33E 2,050,935 Operating cash low 1.277.803 4,206,250 (2,931,447) Overall cash low �W2.538) 2,166.292 (2,871.929) $"nsMex Enterprise Fund 2023 2022 Change Operating revenue% S. 4.769,551 S 3,835,429 3 933,922 Operating expenses 4.117,559 3,897,155 220,404 Operating income 651,792 (61,7213) 713,518 Unresldcled net pwillon 647,735 344.385 3WI351 Operaling cash low 1.116.328 977,972 138.354 Inlerfund lransfers - 790,000 VW.000) Overall Cash Irnv 374,180 1,160,7e8 (788,579) Au Uw's dHscuS6m&An06s(AD$A) Going Further. June 3a 2023 Slide #10 Orange County, Nornh Carolina Required Communications Significant Accounting Policies Management is responsible for the selection and use efappropriate accounting policies. The significant accoundng pollcles used by the County are descrlbed In Note 1 to the baslc Ilnarxlal statements. Dud rig the current year,the County implemented Governmentail Aocourting5tandards Boa rd�G B)Statement Na-9b.S%rhsc pLran-Based i4 rmatrwr TrKJw"gyArrovemeras- The pollcles used by the County are In accordance&Ith generally accepted accoundng principles. In corksldering the quslltative aspects of Its polldes,the County Is rwt Involved In arvy conuaverslal or emerging Issues for which guldance Is not avallable. • Management judgmentlAtcounting Estimates Accounring estimates are an nxegrai part otxne rinanoai statements prepared ay management and are cased on managements knowlegge and expenence abo-ut past and current events and assumptions about Future events. The County uses various estimates as part of its financial reporting process-including actuarial assumptions. Aunfao,r's Nwuss�m&Analysts(AD&A) June 30.2023 9 Slide#11 Orange County, Narfh CAru(fiT{7 Required CommunicationsfContinuedl • Relationship with Management we recelved full cooperation from the Coungs rnanagemenc and staff. There were m disagreements wlih managemen(on accounting Issues or Anarxlal reportln maaers. Management Representation we requested,and re€elved.wrltcen representatlons from management relacing to the accuracy of Informaclon Included In the llnanclal scacemencs and the completeness and accuracy of varlous Informailun requested by us. Consultation with Other Accountants To the bestof our knowledge,management has not consulted with,orobtained opinions from,other independent accountants during the year,nor did we face any issues requiring outside consultation. • Significant Issues Discussed with Management There were no significant issues discussed with management related to business oonditions,plans,or strategies that may have affected the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Arn&W'.s AnaiysJ&(A.DBA) Jane 3Q 2023 Slide #12 Orange Cawrrty, North Cara(+rra Required Communications(Continued) • Audit Adjustments several adjustments were required during the conduct of the audlt;these adjustments have been provided to management and they have provided us with representations that the adjustments have been pasted to the Counys general ledger. we did not have any passed audit adjustments, Financial Statement Disclosures The footnote disclosures to the financial statements are also an integral part of the financial statements and the process used by management to accumulate the information included in the disclosures was the same process used In a€cbmbia(Ing the statements. The overall neucrallty. consistency, and clarity of the disclosures was considered as par(of our dual(. Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements Our responsibility for other information in documents containing the Counys basic financial statements and our report thereon does not extend beyond the information identified in our report. If you intend to publish or otherwise reproduce the financial statements and make reference to our firm,we must be provided with printers' proof for our review and approval before printing. Tau must also provide us with a copy of the final reproduced material for our approval before it is distributed. • Auditor Independence In accordance with AICPA professional standards,M&J is independent with regard to the County,its component unit,and its respective financial reporting processes. And,YVor''s tNscuss�m&Anefys�s rAM) Jane n 2023 10 Slide#13 Orange Coufrty, North Caraifr'fra Audit Findinrf • 2023-DUI Reporting of Ern piayee Costs to NCDHHS In our testing of employee costs charged to the Medicaid and SNAP prograims,we noted four 141 total instances tthrcee t3)out of forty�40)for Medicaid and one(1)out of forty(40)For SNAP]where the employee's day sheet twheretime is tracked by servicecode in 6-minute increments)included more time than the employeesapproved timesheet for the week. No questioned casts noted. Management Points(Recommendations) Capitalization Thresholds for Right-to•Vse Assets - over the last two(4 fiscal perlods,the County was required to Implement the provlslons of two 12)Hero accounting standards 1GASB statement No.97.teoSeS and Casa statement No.96,5065crpdon-basedJx40MOt10r1 Techrlaggy Arrorlgemenrs) that have slgnlflcondy changed the way local governments account for leasing acdvliles and Information technology ffl contracts. These new standards have created a new class of asset that Is recorded In the Countys statement of net poslilon known as a'rlghrto-use"asset. similar to capltal assets,these rlghrto-use assets are capltallxed and amortlnd aver the Ilfe of the underlying agreementl&]or underlying asset`&usefui life lwhlchever Is shortel. We recommend the Coumy adapt a capltallzadon threshold far recording rlghrto-use assets In the same way that the County has a caplullzadon threshold for recording tangible capltal assets. Establishing a threshold will make It easlef for the County to more effioendy evaluate agreements that could give rise to the recording of right-to-use assets and ellminate what could be tlme spent on Items that are Imrnmerlal ro the coumys fmnclal statements. Aurdbr'3 Nswssko it AnatySfS fAD June 30,2023 Slide #14 Orange County, North Carafinn Management Polnts(Recommendations) County Reimbursement for Sales Taxes Paid During our testng of the amounts recelved by the county from the North Carollne Department of Revenue tNCDoft]during the f]scal year ended]une 30..Zu23�we noted the county did not re€elve a relenbursement of sales taxes p revlou&ly palo. Based an ou r dlscu&slon with management of the county,the NCDOR submittal Is normally a part of year-end processing that has been delayed such that the County has not eecelved tnew funds from NCDOR yet. Management Is In the process of pfeparing the applIcatlon for relmbursement that is requlred to be sent to NCDOR before the funds are released. Addldonally,we have noted that management has implemented addlilortal Internal controls to ensure ihls Is not overlooked during the annual closeout process in future rascal years. Accounting for Special Revenue Funds During our review of the Countys financial statements,we noted the DSS Payee Fund did not have any revenue or expenditure activity for the fiscal year under audit. Based on our review of the general ledger activity,it appears the County is still accouming for this Fund as if it was still a custodial fund of the County where all amounts are received as cash and offset with a corresponding liability. With the change in accounting standard that was brought about by GASB Statement No.94,RdudaryActitdties,this fund was reclassified to a special revenue Fund in previous years and should be reflecting the inflows it receives during the fiscal year as revenues and conversely,the outflows as expenditures. Due to the fact that the activity for the fiscal year ended June 30,2021 was not material,an audit adjustment to reclassify the activity was not required. However,we recommend County staff implement additional internal controls or additional annual closeout procedures to the ensure the amounts are properly recorded in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles(GAAP). Au&W'S Dkscussthm 9 Antifysfs WU) JWna 3a 2023 11 Slide#15 Orange County, North Caro(rrra New Accounting Pronouncements Nev1r6ASB Pronouncements for Future Years Statement No.101,[atrperrsated A6senres was issued in June 2022 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15.2023,which means the Countys Fiscal year ended June 30.2025- Current f Pandlrig Ma]ar GASB Projects Re-Ekarn11natl0n Of the FYeanCkal RepnrttrkS PAO"L GA58 has added this prcje€t to as technical agenda to make rmpro,rements to the existing Flnaw al repor ang mauet(established vla GASB Issued statement No.34). Improvements are meant to enhance the effecweness of the model In providing information For uecwon-making and assessing a governmenrs accouncatrity. • Rrwsnur and Expatir RooWitien Is another long-term project where the GaSS is working to develop a camprehenslve appllcauan wbo-M for recognroan of reveries and expenses from n wexchange,exchange,and exchange-like trartsacdons. • Ggirtg Corwin Unue"minpos and svvwv rinmmiai Strgw IS major project Where the goal Is to address issve5 related to drsdosrrres regarding going concern uncertainties and severe financial stress.Thistechrical topic is being examined by theG.ASB dwty a wide diversity in practice regarding retired presentation on the fate of the financial statements.disdosures,et€. tlimieitwri Itriated to CapitalAaflrts Is a project the GASS,added to its agenda this year as a result of the new class of assets ;'r�ho-to use'assets)rrom the flew standards(LASS 87.911 and 96). The exposure draft Proposes hew guidance regarding the dadky-fe of certain Items related to capital assets. Auclkw's N&W mtm$Analysis(A 9A) Jana X 2023 Slide #16 >4f Orange Cown(y, Nor#h CPrGIPITO Govt.C lie rnts-Free 0uarterly Continuing Education Since March of 2009 - For Over 1Z Years H : Mauldin&jeokim provide-Free mmrterfuoontintin cdwation for all of our governmental clients. Topics are tailored W be oFinterest to governmental entities. In an effort to accommodate cur entire governmental client base,we offer the sessions several times per quarter at a variety of client prc4ided locations resddng in greater newnrlong and knowledge sharing amvmg our gaveromental dents.Wa normally see approximately 180 people per quarter. Examples of subjects addressed in the past few quarters include: Accoundng for Deb[Issuar6ces GASBPrajecrs&Updates(ongoing&several sesslons • Achieving Excel leneein Financial Reporting Human Capital Management BesiBudgednS I' cdces,Pollcles and Processes Graw 4ccou nil ng ProcessesanACorivols • Budget Preparation Internal Controls Over Accounts Payable Payml I and ACFR Preparadorh(im(2]day hands-on course] CashDlsbursemerxs • Capital Asset Aecounting Processes and Controls Internal Controls Over Receivables&the Revenue Cycle Col laterallzatlanofDeposlisandInvestments IRS issues.PrlmarlyPayrollManers • ComponemUnits Legal Considerationsfor Debt lssuancesiLDisclosures Cydersecurlry Rlskhlartagement Pollclesdnd ProceduresManuals • Evaluating FinancialandNon-Financial Health ofaGovt. Segregation of Duties FlnandalFteportCard-Where Does You rGoyuSwod? 5ingleAudlts for Audkees • Financial Reporti ng Model I mprovements. Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax SPLt7ST) GA59 Nos.74&75.OPEBSwndofds AccounilriS Depordng&Compllance • GASB No.77,Tax Abatement Disclosures Uniform Grant Reporting Requirements and the New GA5B No,84.FlduclaryAaMiles 51ngleAudlt AucgW's DWUssko 8 Analysis(ADBAJ Jana 3a 2023 12 Slide#17 Orange county, North Carof+rra Governmental Advisory Services Core Offerings 0.duq iin J��nvti il. Emurcs@nlnrss Prm[= All..wi—rueu..lul Eraui....ew[vme +tnu eNSWr�.;wls aM -d—d.lh— d`Whnlr�trt�urrerc nuWunres rr No-tlu[Irq p ry.cllur P id.d 1..m.nr.r state lhedrJ ml tle;rrd awns m&ntSng1 rpetodjwls uxawr.nI w me r mu +Iory TmrrlrRY C.C.M.rsna r€hY{tW'atV^tN ir.r Eryrl rarocalY.dCbm .pys.w.4 wr.ar'.sa �rasm r.rr....r. Onw.werr h.vra.rsa re...� rn.ws .sW ra.pNtrtn s.�.r r psra 5,.+br +Ir�xra�tllM1ry N.lWarauWlT1 •PrnN'rl6wr�iN4rl r Cwwrrr!•,%rk4M+.SiIM {rnn Yrr� n S4YY+s+I ]hilv.fa.n.rxl. .SrrMc MrmrFmrfR •wlwa�lar�rr-wilrnib •°`�^'^te *rn. *rv.srr orm .I—,C-0144a Vbw =LMrnrl.ry 4airlFh.Y� ,T.1—P WL,p +yrrin uawa �'^�• renanti Talrnrorr L—r1W Pnl}+➢rzri..Ji.urxA P,*,.tbry.r�r. n—,m s,wavwr.tr sr�rr *���r .�M�sn0.f45b ikrliPidv+NMM +gwnonolvwn •xs.�..cvomv.rnnw�.t� Aud W'.T rlllsorrssbn 8 Analysis(AD8A) Jena n 2023 Slide #18 Questions & Comments ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA AT Thank You for the Opportunity to Serve 13 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked what the consequence is for the audit finding. Tim Lyons said NCDHHS may come to investigate the issue further, but as far as the audit is concerned, it does not rise to the level of a material weakness and would just continue to be a single audit finding if remained unchanged in the future. Commissioner Fowler asked if money given to Sportsplex is being paid back to the county. Bonnie Hammersley said yes and indicated that will be reflected in the current budget year. Commissioner Hamilton asked about the unrestricted net position in the Solid Waste enterprise fund. Tim Lyons said in enterprise funds there are assets, liabilities, and net positions. He said the net positions are what is leftover. In proprietary funds there are multiple classes of net position, and the one that is not shown there is net investment and capital assets, which is what is left over after deducting liabilities from assets, but some of what's left is tied up in capital assets and is not available for spending. He said unrestricted net position is what is left after considering those types of costs, so essentially current assets available to be spent on the operation. Commissioner Hamilton said that is helpful to point out because there looks to be a negative cash flow in 2023, but in fact there is a higher unrestricted net position meaning there is capacity to deal with those changes and flows. Tim Lyons explained that the negative cashflow has to do with change in pension and OPEB liabilities. Chair Bedford asked about the $5,000 capitalization limit. She said it seems like a small dollar amount. Tim Lyons said in a county Orange County's size, $5,000 does seem low for a tangible asset. He said it would be okay to leave it at that level, for tangible assets, but would recommend the threshold for leases and SBITAs to be higher because otherwise immaterial leases and SBITAs will have to be tracked and that is not helpful or useful information in the financial statements. Chair Bedford thanked the auditors and the Finance Department for their work. 5. Public Hearings None. 6. Regular Agenda a. Approval of a Professional Services Contract with Thomas & Hutton Engineering to Provide Civil Design Services for a Greene Tract Master Plan and Approval of Budget Amendment#5-A The Board received a historical perspective on activities related to the development of the Greene Tract; discussed and considered approving a new design services proposal to create a development Master Plan for the Greene Tract; and considered approving Budget Amendment #5-A to provide for the total cost of the project. BACKGROUND: The Greene Tract is located east of the Rogers Road community within the Town of Chapel Hill's extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Of the 164-acre parcel, 104 acres is jointly owned by Orange County/Chapel Hill/Carrboro and 60 acres is owned by Orange County (Headwaters Preserve). Over the last 20+ years, the three jurisdictions have invested significant resources to identify and support the goals for the Greene Tract as a resource for the Rogers Road community and the residents of the two towns and Orange County, all of which can be found on the County's dedicated Greene Tract project page and dynamic StoryMap, but featuring the following: 14 - In 2006, the Town of Chapel Hill initiated and led a Rogers Road Small Area Plan Task Force with the Greene Tract partners, resulting in a final report in March 2009; - In 2012, the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood Task Force led its own small area planning efforts, resulting in a final report in September 2013; - In July 2015, the Jackson Center co-led the Mapping Our Community's Future Report with the Historic Rogers Road Community, which was completed in May 2016; In June 2016, Orange County purchased 60 acres for preservation from the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund ("Headwaters Preserve"); At the 2016 Assembly of Governments (AOG) Meeting, a suggestion was raised to ask the elected officials of the three jurisdictions to participate in discussions on the Greene Tract; - In 2017, staff examined a potential reconfiguration of the jointly-owned tract and the County-owned tract for the purposes of environmental preservation, potential affordable housing development, and a possible school site; - Between 2018 and 2019, the three jurisdictions considered multiple iterations of a joint resolution for the development of the Greene Tract and accompanying Conceptual Plan; - Between 2019 and 2020, the three jurisdictions discussed and approved the Greene Tract Resolution for a Path Forward and Interlocal Agreement, identifying land use acreages for the Greene Tract, initiating staff to seek professional services to conduct an environmental assessment, and initiating the drafting of an Interlocal Agreement between the three jurisdictions to provide a decision-making process for the three jurisdictions moving forward; - In April 2020, Orange County contracted with SynTerra to complete the Greene Tract Environmental Assessment, to be delivered in July 2020; - In 2021, the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between Orange County and the Towns of Carrboro and Chapel Hill Regarding the Current and Future Use of the Jointly Owned Greene Tract was executed by all three parties. Among other commitments, it directed staff from all three jurisdictions to work in good faith to "develop a work plan that includes, among other things, a decision point timeline regarding development"of the Greene Tract; In November 2021, the three local governments adopted a resolution approving a conceptual plan, which identified land uses and acreages to be used as schematic for future planning purposes, including the development of a Master Plan. The 45 acres with frontage on Purefoy Drive and Lizzie Lane were identified for "Development" and the 16 acres with frontage on Merin Road were identified as "Public School and Recreational Site"; and At its November 14, 2023 meeting, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners approved a contract for Gensler and VHB to provide community engagement services to support and realize the Greene Tract Master Plan, with the understanding that a second firm would partner with these consultants and the Greene Tract owners to provide the civil design services for this project. In January 2023, a staff work group operating at the direction of the ILA identified the need to separate the master planning needs for the Greene Tract into professional design services and community engagement services, allowing trained professionals to focus on the respective deliverables and allowing the planning staffs to coordinate their efforts. This would allow the community engagement efforts to focus on a shared vision and mission for the design professionals to utilize in the delivery of a master plan that recommends development footprints, designs, and intensities for this acreage, as directed by the 2021 Greene Tract ILA. 15 Request For Qualifications (RFQ) Process of Evaluation In July 2023, Orange County issued a RFQ to identify a qualified consultant to provide Design Services for the Greene Tract Master Plan on behalf of Orange County and the two Towns. Six Statements of Qualifications were received and evaluated by the proposal review committee composed of Orange County, Town of Chapel Hill, and Town of Carrboro Planning staff. The committee evaluation was based on the following criteria: 1. Past performance of the lead consulting firm on similar planning projects of similar size and scope 2. Adequate and experienced staff and proposed team for the project 3. Current workload and firm capacity 4. Strategy for providing required services 5. Understanding of the area where the project is located and scope of services. Based on the evaluation process, the review committee requested proposals from and interviewed two of the firms, and unanimously recommends Thomas & Hutton Engineering Co. (T&H), for contract award. T&H is a respected and established multidisciplinary firm in the southeast, with 15 locations in Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, and North Carolina, including the office in Research Triangle Park that houses the primary staff for this project. T&H merged with Coulter Jewell Thomas in 2022, bringing all principal staff featured in the proposal to T&H. The principal management staff for this project has done work in Orange County, the Town of Chapel Hill, and the Town of Carrboro, including the 2009 Rogers Road Small Area Plan for the Town of Chapel Hill, designing the Homestead Road Residential Community, and leading the engineering and design for the Morgan Creek Greenway Master Plan and Implementation Plans. Summary of Project Scope and Approach Orange County Planning staff negotiated the scope of services and budget with T&H, as reflected in the Letter Agreement of Services (Attachment 1). The T&H proposal is intended to assist Orange County, the Town of Carrboro, and the Town of Chapel Hill with civil design services to create a Greene Tract Master Plan. The intention of both the Greene Tract owners and T&H is to deliver a conceptual plan that can be utilized to define and directly inform a site plan for entitlement with the Town of Chapel Hill to develop the Greene Tract consistent with the terms established by the 2021 Interlocal Agreement including commitments to Public Engagement, Affordable and Mixed Income Housing and other uses, a School Site with Public Recreation, Connectivity, and a Development Agreement; and the 2021 Resolution that affirmed land use needs and goals to promote mixed-income housing opportunities; preserve environmental features; protect historical and cultural resources; promote cost-effective infrastructure; incorporate school and recreation sites; and earmark development areas for mixed income housing and mixed use potential. The design services project features four primary services: 1) Project Coordination and Management, including all data collection and collaboration with the Community Engagement consultant, Gensler; 2) Master Planning — Housing, Recreation and Community support/service center, including the preparation of an executive summary and two (2) "Conceptual Master Plans" for presentation and feedback, that shall feature: a. Residential uses (focus on affordable housing and mixed income housing); b. Non-residential uses (focus on low intensity commercial and services uses); 16 c. Community support uses; d. Open space and recreation; e. Landscaping and buffering; and f. Utilities; 3) Master Planning — School and Recreation Site, including an executive summary and an elementary/flex school site feasibility and suitability assessment for use by the Chapel Hill- Carrboro City Schools; and 4) Connectivity Framework, including an assessment of Prepare a transportation connectivity exhibit, a professional opinion of probable construction costs, and an estimation of likely impacts to the existing transportation network. Both Gensler/VHB and T&H are obligated to work cooperatively on this project, and, while contracted to Orange County, understand that the commitment is to provide a Greene Tract Master Plan that is agreeable to the Town of Carrboro and the Town of Chapel Hill as well. Project Presentation: The consultant will be required to provide biweekly updates to Orange County, participation at up to four meetings/workshops, and presentation at a joint meeting of the three owners and governing bodies, as well as other meetings Orange County directs it to attend. Other community stakeholders represented in both the 2021 Greene Tract ILA and on the Steering Committee may be invited to participate and comment at such meetings, at the discretion of the property owners. T&H requested modifications to the standard allocation of risks within the contract. Planning & Inspections Director Cy Stober negotiated terms deemed acceptable, but the contract now utilizes the American Institute of Architects' professional standards for both ensuring expediency of services rendered and standards of care, specifies what products may be used by the County beyond the project's scope, and alters Orange County's indemnification protections. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and authorized for the contract to move forward for Board consideration as proposed. Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director, made the following presentation: Slide #1 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Greene Tract Design Services Proposal Board of Commissioners February 6, 2024 17 Slide #2 Purpose • Provide details regarding a recommended professional services proposal that will produce a master plan for the development areas of the Greene Tract. ORANGE COUNTY 2 NC7RtrH C;ARC3"NA Slide #3 Greene Tract Design Services Proposal • Thomas &Hutton proposal recommended by multijurisdictional staff team - Years of experlence In all three]urlsdictions,especially under the Coulter,Thomas,Jewell corporate name • Will work cooperatively with the Community Engagement consultant, Gensler, but both are separately contracted with Orange County and accountable to the Greene Tract owners ORANGE COUNTY 3 NC}RTH C:ARC311NA 18 Slide #4 The Greene Tract; Restoring Community & Connections THE GREEN TRACT: Our Experience I...I....r.N....r.r s..r><..rsMxw�..o StorieEfHlitnries ..lam......... and amngs.E—Road area hacamc lhapraparty fdryad hlacllR s:LaNrr n.I.Fp.R4a A.rvn—.dn6—0- elter lhr€ml War. . me RWrs Ra small Area Plan r•Iwr:.a�ru� Anumhrr oFiamilieshave Fiwr{d vrominentl0nthr hnlorvgr a.qc.Eo.e are..a.lp.•...1..m ro.. rh•ne ghb-h—l-the Nosily the Joney nc.Rgge,,Ih.+loans, rM1F Wallka ,and 1ha Wunns. - �.lvallnaod Xn:h.mmmunitp camp bath tram whhaot ann wAhin,At carious limes,there_mi-It.m a sawmill,and --- wNnelghborhnnd tale,or mIlh—d eggs. I - Vegela4re 8e16n.1,{awe,and 6h:rEe,u pr-i&lend 10,rn5ldvnrc,and tfi—,plows were soared. .icy kcoomma.ded Ma plan for d.town u1 V- - iJpm SaaGe - t .M...; 7' THt]MEA5 F Slide#5 90 The Greene Tract: Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real local solutions that our Team has designed over the years Community Based Master PLanning: The American Legion Property - Chapel HiLI .... •I - Ir r i 11Ap+Ma ��4 J t� #. =rmr�l u I v H IEERI{AN LEaIXX rRa'f.':. EONC1r TVAL MAdTIN PLAN {11 PIL NI1L R a.rGX i{.1411 u a • i 1.uR � �-• - .-'�'ilr THOMAS Program Element Cost Compari ans Community Oesigm Worluhops Master Plan H U T TQ N Cy Stober said there were 6 proposals and out of them all, Thomas & Hutton is the preferred vendor. 19 Slide #6 PPO The Greene Tract: Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real local solutions that our Team has designed over the years Cfc4ornmunity Based Master Planning: Homestead Gardens- Chapel Hill . _ - .. _—_-AEV Sri 1 u�• _ + REWLT F D COLMiLnitt�µ _ - Yrt�n live L G`AAENS - -LAII l9 Vi[I ��LS '-GREENW71W - TOMYIhfk�CS�~ s HhFID TWENT5 AcrsHa�rm+y - S�4F4ENC\ _ - J09-0a MARKET - LEHKAE'6NTR4NL6 ' _r'TINGlE - .. -~ ENTfdRMCE ! THOMAS H U T T O N Slide #7 The Greene Tract: Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real local solutions that our Team has designed over the years Community Based Master Planning: Morgan Creek Green way - Chapel HILL and Carrboro IWI � _ fWAG1F'GA6LKGRE6Nu'AY JJ _ wx.?..N rn6f.�r nN6Eh1NL}. 4 I�'• I - HHU TTQN 20 Slide #8 PPO The Greene Tract; Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real Locat solutions that our Team#ias designed over the years C11clommunity Based Master Planning: The Eubanks Road Property - Carrboro �r I � THOMAS HHUTTON Slide #9 PpsO The Greene Tract: Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real tocaL solutions that our Team has designed over the years Schools: Creek ride Elementaryschavl Sandy RidgeElementary SF,EIOOI WGPearsonElementarySchool T THOMAS FfUT 70N Lucas Middle School Stott KIM Road plaster Plan 21 Slide #10 PPO The Greene Tract: Restoring Community & Connections RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Examples of real local solutions that our Team has designed over the years CfAffordable Housing: 1 E, Z 00. Maynard ROOid Cary THOMAS —a— Farrington Road MUTTON Slide #11 Project Proposal Elements ORANGE COUNTY 11 W4DR:Fk3 CIAIZC31AIIJ-A 22 Slide #12 Project Proposal Elements Project Coordination and Management - Coordinate with local g,,rtstaffon biweekly schedule • Arterrdnieetingsprescrlhedhy0rargeCountp Collect and present relevant datato master pFan developmeru Re viewexistir3gplans,studies,amessments,arid agendaitems Collahmate wrGensler on u p to four{4l open FwuseVpu bllc workshops Assist w/presentarlom tokolnr meedngnf owners ORANGE COUNTY 12 INC}�H C;ARC3"NA Slide #13 Project Proposal Elements Project Coordination and Management Master Plan for Development Area Coordinate with local gov't staff on biweekly schedule - As infarmed bycvmmunity engagement efforts, 4ttertdnzeetingsprescrlhedhy OraneCountp interlocal agreements and resolutions • Collect and present relevantdatatomaster plan development — will feature,as relevant' • Review existi%plans,studies,a asessments,and agenda items Affordable Housing Collaborate wlGensleronupto four(41 open MuseVpu bllc workshops Nonresidential Uses - Asslstw/presentatlomto)olntmeecingofowners Community Support Uses • Open SpaoeR Recreation • Required fandstaping&Buffering • Requ lred UdlJdes,In€luding5tormwater ORANGE COUNTY 13 NC]R11-13 C A ZC]LINA Cy Stober said they will not have a pre-engineered stormwater pond, but the areas will be included. 23 Slide #14 Project Proposal Elements • Project Coordination and Management Master Plan for Development Area Coordinate with local g,,rtstaffon biweekly schedule — As Informed by community engagement efform • A.rtendnwemingsprescrlbedhyOfargeCountp interlocal agreements and resolutions • Collect and present relevemdamtomaster plandevelopmeru _ Will feature,as relevant: • Raviawexistir3gvlans,studies,amessments,andagenfaitems Affordablelmuslrrg Collahmate wrGensler on u p to four{4l open houseVpu hilt workshops Nonresidential Uses A Isc w/presentatlom tokolnr meetingnf owners Communky Support Uses • open 5pace8 Retreatian • Requlredlandscaping&Buffering • RequlredUrllkles,Inclvding5tormwater • Master Plan for School&Recreation Area Feasibility and Suitability Assessment for a future elementary school or"flex"facility — Will include connectivity and recreational needs ORANGE COUNTY 14 NCJRt H C ARC3"NA;A Cy Stober said that the Chapel Hill- Carrboro City Schools is a key stakeholder and there will be a master plan for school and recreation areas. Slide #15 Project Proposal Elements • Project Coordination and Management Master Plan for Development Area — Coordinate with Inca lgov'tstaffon biweekly schedule — Aslnformedbycommunity engagement efforts, • Anertdmeetingsprescrlhedhy0rarkgeCounty interlocal agreements and resolutions Collect and present re levant damto master plan developmem — Will feature,as relevant' Review existir38 plans,studies,assessments,and agenda items Affordable lmuslrrg Collahmate wlGensler on upto four{4l open houseVpu hilt workshops Nonresidential Uses • A Isc w/presentatlom tokol nt meed Space ngnf owners Com Support Uses • open Space Retreatian • Connectivity Framework Requlred Landscaping&Bufdering y Requ lred Urllkles,Incly dingStorm„,a re. Coordinate with Chapel Hill on identifying street, sidewalk and trail design criterla. Master Plan for School&Recreation Area Feasibility of the existing network being able to — feasibility and Suitability Assessment for a future accommodate the a nticl pated traffic and examine elementary school or'71 ex"facility alternate access routes. — Will include connectivity and recreational needs Prepare a transportation connectivity exhibit Prepare an opinIon of probable constructlon costs ORANGE COUNTY 15 NCJItrH C;ARC313NA 24 Slide #16 Project Proposal Elements �trThe Greene Tract: Restoring Community&Connections o!LJR APPROACH 1)1 Project Kick-Off Scope Community Engagement3 Data Collection& �2 &Development Coordination MbppingvAgency Qutreach Hold Praject(Lick-Ott meeting to Coerdirate with CommunRy GIS Tppo.FLoOid,vegritirui,road dismiss project,potential Engagement Specialist. Early mA��rk.utililics.boundary Iwv& challenges,and stalccheltlers. Community Workshops easements,ownership,egring cgnstraints 5tnwM&/ Jetlands y 04 Site AnaLyms 05 Land Planning 06 Stakehotder Check-In U p Assemble data and mcLminq into p, weconce twlde i graphic whibits io inform d gn doop Present inp t was i COrPiW Beta soluligr�s to address identified antl nau�input was incorpareteu Conceptual Design,Summery challenges and❑pportunitias. .rip the work report of opportunities and Exptg Land use possibilities constraints Present Findings& 07 Master Plan (}� lConnectivlty Plan RatWYrmelldatiant to Stakeholders Prepare consensus Master glare Prepare and present summary or Master Plan, THOf.1AS Carnectivity Ran sump ry of Connectivity and Implementation Flan W -g- findings along with Implementationntl h Cemm.nily a EL,cOod 07Gials HUTTO N 5[ra[egy Slide #18 Proposed future Land Use Map", Background November 2021 — Resolution Approving a Conceptual plan I wolrrn 66 acres of Jolnt development • 22 acres of joint Greene Tract Preserve rim • 15 acres for School use I 6Uacres of County owned H eadwaters Pres me {r, April 2023 &, — Recombination Plat realigned properties and placed "Headwaters Preserve"solely in County ownership Cw�T-r[x PtiaMa lf�^��Ua'4 Li]r.� w P�e`e&rod va Rrvaaw lw l�'rl fi�Ki _ ..... 1 S �rw.e.,rarr an.+e morn.awr+i 1a.4 c�.ap mo r� �o�J� p�f.�cncntmene.n.rrr�.e - � Cy Stober said the black lines are the old property lines and that the Headwaters Preserve is now fully in the county. 25 Slide #19 Prior Greene Tract Planning Activities 2006—Rogers Road Small Area Plan—Town of Chapel Hill and Greene Tract partners 2012—Rogers Road Small Area Plan Rogers Road Task Force 2015—Mapping Our Community's Future-Rogers Road Community facilitated by Jackson Center Focused on development in the Rogers Road Neighborhood — "...this effort would help guide future conversations about land use planning and development approvals,especially in the Greene Tract..." — Did rot includeaffordable housing or school stakeholders — Nearly 10 years old and does not reflect recent developments in area,school capacity needs,and/or transportation concerns(e.g. Eubanks Road Park In Ride lot) ORANGE COUNTY 19 NORTH CAROLINA Cy Stober said that previous planning has been regional. Slide #20 Background Recommendations Development Do's and Don'ts Retain families - lived - for - - fmmiinnv[Ommn['gl.l m{pp 3d 5hCC4 _i.iii..�rrJ in rein dP[[q[]phK ••��•• enerations Ex hxhefs hopa,F Lrly suppl k; n— sur romm.1[ui.®g n+:norcas ISw++Mnrrrl Allurdahh H—as:waO—,ohashuas,tarty wmr and ns iur.Ex Timh]riim b-W&an hsiq m nrsa.Afnm Wrly de4.ed al w ra^axe»hn—E b7e rw tlrl rn my..wd-virrarw arc Wm 0.0p % Corinect us with cach other and the larger law Pa/a—&Wrk,ar-d so Ly�x•'�x`e•W+�aw.'N.vr. bi"RWX#+ 4Chides. 6e.e community ks"em 1hK "d!s deviWK +eoi 0 moos MW omo-,na d pehpk i—auc]eo-0 ue hi+F•Flr W h-0yf �rq Ori•hoy""'* VF'O w summrdNrr Md.ddim—h haWq. . tl w L so the xrleslr of housnp 1ha[ Y¢h Rh. • •� • + i � wane tlreaeyhhWhb odrrmd. {atlhenneaP]er�halyhrr ponedaxax 5rck-4mik ahk rot aRomhhk rnuxna Respectthe physical/natural neighborhaod ORANGE COUNTY 20 NORTH C:AROLINA 26 Slide #21 Project Proposal Elements • Master Plan Process Design Workshop One—Vision Launch Hold interactive exercises to explore key areas of opportunity and challenge Produce Design Criteria&Evaluation Measures Will reflect foundation established by Mapping Our Community's Future(2015) ORANGE COUNTY NCJR:I'H C;ARC"NA Slide #22 Project Proposal Elements Master Plan Process — Design Workshop One—Vision Launch Hold interactive exercises to explore key areas of opportunity andchallenge • Produce Design Criteria&Evaluation Measures - Will reflect foundation established by Mapping Our Community's Future(Z415) — Design Workshop Two—Vision Alignment • Genslerand Thomas&Huttenwill provide initial focus areas,guiding principles,potential design priorities Develop design criterla and evaluation measures to inform Master Plan and Its policy goals ORANGE COUNTY 22 NL7Rt R-H C;ARC31JNA 27 Slide #23 Project Proposal Elements Master Plan Process Design Workshop One—Vision Launch Hold interactive exercises to explore key areas of opportunity and challenge • Produce Design Criteria&Evaluation Measures - Will reflect foundatron establrshed by Mapprna Our Communrty's Future(2015) — Design Workshop Two—Vision Alignment • Gensler and Thomas&Hutton will provide initial focus areas,guiding principles,potential design priorities Develop design criteria and evaluation measures to inform Master Plan and Its policy goals — Final Open House • Master Plan presentation to the public Final Recommendations Report&Master Plan Report del ivered to the owners and the BOCC ORANGE COUNTY NCD1R71'H c:A1tC3LJNA Slide #24 Recommended Scope & Cost • Recommend Design Services Scope-$155,000 ORANGE COUNTY ?4 NL]RrH CIAR£]LINA 28 Slide #25 Recommended Scope & Cost Recommend Design Services Scope-$155,000 Project Coordlnatlon&Management A.rrendanoe at Design WorkshopsJOpen houses Presentation to the Greene Tr.sV Owners BiweeklyMeetingswithStaff CaordI In with Gem Ier 1C month Profea Tkmellne - MasterPlan-Development Area Master Plan-Schaal&Recreation Site Connectivity Framework ORANGE COUNTY 2� NCJRtrH C;ARC3"NA Slide #26 Recommended Scope & Cost • Recommend Design Services Scope-$155,000 Cost Allocation Project Coordlnatlon&Management - Orange County(43%) $66,650 Artendanoe at Design Workshops(Open Houses — Tmn of Cha pel+1111(43%) $66,650 • PresentationWthw Greene TrctOwners — Town of Can-b-or4(14%) $21,704 • Biweekly Meetings with Staff Coordl natlon with Gensler 16month Projea Timeline Master Plan-Development Area - Master Plan-School&Recreation Site Connectivity Framework ORANGE COUNTY 26 NL3RrH C A ZC3LINA 29 Slide #27 Recommended Scope & Cost Recommend Design Services Scope-$155,000 Cost Allocation Project Coordlnatlon&Management - Orange County(43%) $66,650 A.rrendanoeat Design WorkshopsJOpenRouses — Town of Cha pel+1111(43%) $66,650 Presentation to the Greene Tract Owners — Town of Carrboro(24%) $21,700 Biweekly MeetingswfthStaff Coordl nation with Gensler 1C monthProfe€tTkmellne FY24 Greene Tract Budget: $367,000 - Master Plan-Development Area Greene Tract Total Contract Services: $399,800 - Gensler/VHB: $244,800 Master Plan-School&Recreation Site - Thomas&Hutton: $155,000 Connectivity Framework ORANGE COUNTY NCJRtrH C;ARC3"NA Slide #28 Recommended Scope & Cost • Recommend Design Services Scope-$155,000 Cost Allocation Project Coordlnatlon&Management - Orange County(43%) $66,650 Attendance at Design Workshops(Open Houses — Town of Chapel+1111(43%) $66,650 • PresentationWthw Greene TrctOwners — Town of Carrboro(14%) $21,700 • Biweekly Meetings with Staff Coordl natlon with Gensler 16monthProjeaTlmeline • FY24 Greene Tract Budget: $367,Ob0 Master Plan-Development Area • Greene Tract Total Contract Services: $399,800 - GensItr/VH5; $244,800 - Master Plan-School&Recreation Site - Thomas&Hutton: $155,000 Connectivity Framework • Budget Amendment 5A:$32,800 - Orange County(43%) $14,104 - Town of Chapel HI11(43%) $14,104 - Town of Carrboro(14%) $4,592 ORANGE COUNTY 28 NL3Rr1-1 C A ZC3LINA 30 Slide #29 Recommendation 1. Authorize the expenditure of up to $155,000 for professional services to provide Design Services for the Greene Tract Master Plan; 2. Approve Budget Amendment#5-A; and 3. Approve and authorize the County Manager to execute and sign the contract(Attachment 3 to provide for the scope of services as detailed in Attachment 1. zg ORA�N ECOUNT Y Slide #30 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Questions? Cy stoker Planning & Inspections Director sa Commissioner Richards asked if this is a regular step in a development process or if this is something that is taking a different direction. She asked about the need for this step. Cy Stober said this is a required step for a concept plan for a development in Orange County. He said there is a question to be answered by the owners about the preferred path forward. He said that detail has not been defined, but this is a critical step to get to the next level. 31 Commissioner Hamilton asked what the timeline is for finishing this work. Cy Stober says this will take 10 months. Chair Bedford said we are a little behind but cautioned not to schedule things in July. Vice-Chair Greene said she appreciates this proposal and that over the years there have been discussions about the potential for small scale commercial development in this area. She asked if this master plan leaves room for this to be revisited. Chair Bedford asked what a pattern book is. Dan Jewell said it is a collection of design elements and details that would be seen as aspirational for the community. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Reverend Robert Campbell said it is important for Thomas and Hutton to come on board. He said more conversation focused on what is actually possible to fit on the land is important. He said he has worked with consultants before, and some things can be implemented, and some cannot. He said they can look at other recent developments for guidance and ideas. He said there is another community engagement meeting this week on this topic. Chair Bedford said she thinks the connectivity part is critical and fits in with what Reverend Campbell said. She said they need to address how to create a feeling of community in what is developed there. A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to authorize the expenditure of up to $155,000 for professional services to provide Design Services for the Greene Tract Master Plan; approve Budget Amendment#5-A; and approve and authorize the County Manager to execute and sign the contract (Attachment 3) to provide for the Letter Agreement of Services as detailed in Attachment 1. Commissioner Fowler said she is glad to be moving forward on this. She asked if entrances and exits to a potential future school are being looked at as part of this. Cy Stober said yes, as well as whether it will be interconnected with the development acreage. VOTE: UNANIMOUS 7. Reports a. Presentation of the Draft Solid Waste Master Plan The Board received a presentation on the Draft Solid Waste Master Plan, consider the recommendations in the Plan, and provide direction to staff regarding which scenario presented in the Plan should be pursued. BACKGROUND: Orange County issued a Request for Proposals on April 9, 2021 for development of a Solid Waste Master Plan that moves the County to "Zero Waste" by 2045. As approved by the Solid Waste Advisory Group, the overarching goals for the Solid Waste Master Plan and its development have been as follows: Goal 1. Develop a comprehensive and easily understandable Solid Waste Master Plan, with identifiable action items and a plan summary; Goal 2. Develop a comprehensive strategy that by 2045 will lead to "Zero Waste," as defined by the County; 32 Goal 3. Integrate the Plan's efforts with the ongoing climate action plans of the County, the Municipalities, the University and the University Health Care system.; Goal 4. Select a sustainable business model that incorporates the financial, social and environmental; including carbon footprint reduction impacts on our community; Goal 5. Identify future programs, initiatives, facilities, and infrastructure to achieve the "Zero Waste"goal, as defined by the County, while ensuring the long-term financial stability of the County's solid waste and recycling program; Goal 6. Identify strategies to increase public education and participation in waste reduction and waste diversion programs through awareness of reduction, reuse, recycling and composting; while addressing ordinance and enforcement requirements; Goal 7. Develop and include an equitable comprehensive public engagement process that effectively includes input by the general public, including groups that historically have been marginalized, and key interest groups, including the municipal and university partners, and keeps the public informed and updated on the process; and Goal 8. Ensure all proposed programs and policies are in regulatory compliance with local, state and federal requirements. Six (6) firms responded to the request for proposals, and upon recommendation of staff, the Board awarded the contract to develop the plan to Gershman, Brickner& Bratton, Inc. (GBB). GBB presented the draft plan to the Solid Waste Advisory Group (SWAG) in November 2023. SWAG recommended the County pursue Scenario Three set forth in the plan. Robert Williams, Solid Waste Management Director, introduced Jennifer Porter and Chris Lund of Gershman, Brickner, and Bratton. Jennifer Porter made the following presentation: Slide #1 •• a • aaNGE • • � � �. � •OIIN 1' 33 Slide#2 � 3 Perspective: How to get to Zero Waste -Community Input& Engagemeri Current as. K Programs Road to ZeroWaste Scenarios In Closing Slide #3 Orange's County Definition of Zero Waste The reduction of solid waste to nothing,or as close to nothing as possible,by minimizing excess consumption by means of responsihle production,consumption,and reuse and maximizing ` the recovery of solid wastes through recycling and composting. 3kq 1,.e Zero Waste by 2045. Slide #4 Project Goals (1-8) GOAL 7-Develop a comprehensive GOAL 3-Integrate the Plan's efforts and easily understandable Solid Waste with the ongoing climate action plans Master Plan,with identifiable action of the County,its Towns(Hillsborough, ,4 items and a plan summary. Chapel Hill&Carrboro),the University, and the University Health Care system. `" GOAL 2- Develop a comprehensive strategy by 2G45 that will lead to"Zero GOAL 4-Select a sustainable business Waste",as defined by the County. model that incorporates financial, social,and environmental aspects, including carbon footprint reduction impacts on our community. Continued.., 34 Slide #5 Project Goals (1-8) GOAL 5-Identify future programs,initiatives, GOAL 7-Develop and include an equitable facilities,and infrastructure to achieve the Zero comprehensive public engagement process that waste goal,as defined by the county,while effectively includes input by the general public, ensuring the long-term financial stability of the including groups that historically have been County's solid waste and recycling program, marginalized,and key interestgroups,including municipal and university partners,and keeps the GOAL 6-Identify strategies to increase public public informed and updated on the process. education and participation in waste reduction and waste diversion programs through GOAL 8-Ensure all proposed programs and awareness of reduction,reuse,recycling,and policies are in regulatory compliance with local, composting;while addressing ordinance and state,and federal requirements. enforcement requirements. Slide #6 GBB Perspective: ,t How to Get to Zero Waste ARoad to,zero waste Plan is guided by the following questions: KEY PILLARS OF ZEIRO WASTE INCLUDE: How to prevent,reduce,reuse? what to recycle 1 divert? 0 How to collect and process? ► what to do with what is left? scraps.mattresses.EIE&Onir%paint How to finance? Slide #7 Sustainable P—�,Rethink Redesign Materials Reduce,conserve,M i r i mize Management ;� N� Hierarchy ireSiuNre�l'ns[�1uE'nbi�l,wew"dwlwvin f�ix'rbem a,d The SMM Hierarchy tool helps establish preferred x�na«.wre management practices for `f, ;�yimmn.rNi.—n,nm-, waste materials to prevent waste a:oral�aLn.ee n,nv n�m generation in the first place. hdtlmx LNfl�non.mm ratmegrc mry may.pau.uneg,uim",xeex�x.wuu��oK�y uyx"oum a"erk.oi .nf ree o.raened araxn 35 Slide #8 Advance the Circular �o Economy (CE) CE goals:design out waste and pollution,keep produrts `w�0esn and materials in use and regenerate natural systems. r Using Si Hierarchy and the CE Model serves the Road to Zero Waste. .. •Local example:Circular Triangle.An organization in the Triangle region of North Carolina that accelerates a just transition to a circular ecanomY,whose initiatives include a Textile . Incubaterto encourage keeping clothing in local use.Learn more ali the incubator at w_w6f_cirCUI2IICian4le ogre_ Slide#9 Zero Waste Plan Must Reflect Community Input Orange County Public Engagement Activities in 2022 Solid Waste AdvisoryGroup A PublicMeetings Free r Paid Ads(print) Coverageand TV Online survey(English,Spanish, Farmers Market BlitzQ Mandarin,Burmese) Slide#10 Engaging Traditionally Marginalized Community Members PUBLIC SURVEY IN 4 LANGUAGES: SIGNAGE&INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS English,Spanish,Burmese, To reach communities with limited internet access or Mandarin. exposure to news networks in places residents gather or access resources. r 4 COMMUNITY LISTENING SESSIONS ADVERTISING SURVEY&PUBLIC MEETINGS 3 in-person sessions[I hybrid]. Local media outlets:newspapers,community based 1 virtual session;interpreters radio,area newsletters and Iistservs. available. 36 Slide #11 Public Feedback Summary -current system working well but want County to he on forefront of solid ►� Overwhelming support for increased efforts f� for load waste management. waste innovation. Desire systemic change with maximum Increased outreach and education efforts effort on preve nti ng waste. needed;consistency in drop-off materials. I Invest in state-of-the-art facilities to handle Robust recycling and food waste waste within County or regionally. t management within K-12 systems. Slide #12 Current Programs [Miardaus mj, pallwazle UrbanCurbside{waekW b QWAllonof11WInIgpred5dlld Cnw"lingEdurahon: r lilradMSWmllenionrorsdkt llydpull kasniYns wndrei the town Inds of Wazie Management facility at +Composting Mienrauons8 goti'PmnHA halldirg5anAkAx6i PdlidurrarCy[IlrgflrppaFl5tt3 IIIIIsherough,CirhOro4C4dprl Nlm1i45goadwhl(hrnnwins WWSshco 0unsafled}induk�Rm&Ae Hill iir*Wkj&portionxithin 11wConsuualonand *Co°''pslmlbnit sdx prugram llurlladl Cduhlp)In singlrinmlh DffpAtiGn I.andlill -Cdnpdsl Bins for Salt w 4o dPL61i($AP at5 Mmesadupem qualify for W�ggR ,xllpm ��' weel�lycur4vAk rtcpoingcGle[Am Aeg�a�d Matsiali:ttyding 3laAedWRC5} -$kpIhe5trau Rural[ur4sidclrsxryopxr+SccW - MdRranO[ompasiSales � Shred CcnLcr -Skq,qhe$tuff 10G'kuFCleunln[urporAredartu� Asbesro-xprogram -1e[oWasrehgyplruuaveour * ialvagrShe�l olOrarte[aunty freryding Slam Pngram w Consmu[t1pn30emnl1llnnwalp Muld-LnnHo�srg ► fond Wale Clrap-af5ire fdecytling[artsiles m znuhi;sne MJSIAg CC+14)"dl DM OM. Chrpel Hill&HillsbomugK available wi: Aenos24RV5iogt-siream regtir)g mllaclion Canmercul lregsfy[ardhoard, foodwxw) 37 Slide #13 Ivey Factors for a Zero taste Future in Orange County ► CHANGE-We can't achieve zero waste without it. ► CONTROL-The County currently does not control all aspects of solid waste collection. ► POPULATION GROWTH-Is projected to increase 184b between 2020 to 2040. •14154Y is currently only collected from WRCs(drop-off sites)and from sawt government buildings and schools. ► TRIANGLE J CONSORTIUM-The County is collaborating •Food Waste Collection sites are partiallyde pen dent upon with Triangle]on solid waste Issues. the Farmers Markets remaining open in their current locations,otherwise they may have to move,which ► RECYCLING COLLECTION-Thee County takes over would have a negative Impact to program usage. urban recycling collection in July 2024, •The County Gan build upon the success of its current food waste collection at restaurants and bars. ► C&D LANDFILL-Has 20+years of life remaining at current fill rate. ► EUBANKS ROAD DISPOSAL FACILITY-Has •Divertingmore recyclablesfrom C&D material will extend the significant limitations at present as well as life of the landfill, adjacent Community concerns. Future facility investment is critical far County control of materials i ncluding l[i Slide #14 Current Solid Waste Collection KEY POINTS: in Orange County (Baseline) 1.9asedanpopulationwage generwion estlrnate5,there 5hoM be more msw awibutabte to Orange County a+d the Towns than i Captured and processedbyi+w Tans Now Tons Now 7MalTansHow presently lwcause AA5w collection Is Uanagedby Managed by Managed by Juradled by the!nunlcipall[Iesawlicr DrangeCounty therossms OrangeCouMy&the Towns undergnvatpwastecalietionand disposal- M5W 61816 , 16,ODG The impact of the •Recagnr2iarg the presen[ilmi[ed Road to zero Waste collation of M5W,tht CaunE has Relydi r 'ri.510 Pton Focuses on tte imostcontrolovrr Ina easing Yard&Feed Waste 8,101 5,216a � i creasing recycling andtrackutg Etredhuersioranf retydables and yardgwd waste. plus diversion of yard and food waste 2-County populawn growth is projected to he 19%from 2020 76.322 tonnages. to 204,,this wig increase waste mak afsand disposal in the reglon. 3.if the RWdtD2erowaste actions are not undertaken,tise2US 2era Waste goal will not he Xhlewable, 38 Slide #15 Road to Zero Waste Scenarios For Orange County No current facility changes; Includes all of Scenario 1 Includes all of Scenario 1& current program adjustments; recommendations plus some Scenario 2 recommendations no new programs. current facility changes;current plus Sustainable Materials ► t.OWeSt Cvst. program adjustments and new Management(SMM)campus; programs. current program adjustments ► i4Tedium Cost. and new programs. ► Highest Cost. Slide#16 V s y'2 1 • . Additional 4 FIE employees. In addition to the 4 FTE,$200,000 estimated to cover materials and fees. LOW@5#cost,Ief15t11i�pflCt �3 k i 39 Slide #17 SCENARIO 1 uu.:I.u� LQiLV 1.'fucL 4r.uui y�Ktii Iilwnlr ul uu u.,..H IIr Pau,hen ttnnnnn•ndellm "KIPPul hlacr+ IPE.Or+r V'a'er s4nbJtlr l+.e.n8'e I.r.Lun' p:su.n,••$ 91s h:ms IR['llyl.�mra.-rL;Olen Time Irx PPJM l4eskkrs[Psr n— ,Jrrd--d•rhsnrlapp; edusahan S.r- —du: L Mrketnp E,PaM aPP:GPPie rate np a•rv[lu mul.q r.>•Srd None .a.� HIP � Oukk von 41nllaly Vet y antl a[[ttslhce. yninl Focus anM Ynp,,, Incrr°xtl elFortsarc nretlea, 2 Maeka[Y,♦C sptLttrsn trn Marc M1r4l°r[an[h.sa as MtaL'. Hih Jkk Mn rnuW, Irry.Pratl +n Halo-l.c[/li ..ir. ma Lo.vsnlma,t Gaiatl!E"- 4a'I' MHiiunsl lS000 u" AtlStlons18tiA0P W.eoearyaN[s � 'rrvenl,Pn aM wrX Prnrmmn. '°rls Iowa rJ p•r.enbn8 Nuur Mesh Hyh mV u-k x.n n nuaiV n�rxnru :, Adreealk ar man rnAerill 1 slrr rorcd—aI tun some 4 arI'rr hw.yemlrr.+.r she,ylid in l.aspLd.aml noon Emn Ir.lm dnnuu Lvasx P�dnance schx6 C rruN CCunrylcxl Ma]a[r+Q[Pmmr�nal Ji Exr.[.IrSJTwi. Iycusrs cn _ vlu cuJ .Yhdr 5 Poky [inm 01 and maM1ilamJ� ma i IamlVJtcsxlink is a itya Na- h. w Law —ium :lot nmt M. M1arv:lsr r.rl.lind l..k. pwhsal[ed ante la�aux,w IrrP-ed: ui b� 4,911 WCOY a,eltled aN[urmn[s,eakm woan R h�lnervipP•InuP.allpn Ml.rnhgl.:iM1 rthul dnfanfse hr.i i>r nr M-Ls rli� � Ih�png ....A, Yn !auvaknl In]Onn09 carstalsu Ph K iud UNOand lApC heashvAzlem. Prsl.PntoF rwtelnnmgh•nN MV unry pna+esvlg lc.•n f 'haste I'0 Poantued waste P's Ventm clr .s t, 1 hr.PnhPn Preur nand 1bwe Pl Plhcrau lrhlrs Nene 1{!A Hlih my XSdt ❑ne hme t,.sinrl. rodL wssul. k1Pst Impartxn pues[kvi: §3 G8 'hsv sMUIJ�xiu W Ylx,p Cpa:idrr bwami�,uilM. Nr aBTi ln[ruuc ower[wrr� • ete.enti°n rcze mxErtolam rcusedrd redY+d°. nr rIs ����� oP.dvI dnrianr 5�n1r�W Slide#18 r.rnre:5renririo 2 assumes all recarnmendorions frorn Scenario 7 are implemented. JIB Indudes New Recommendations Additional 2 FTF employees. x: ' Additional 5500,000 estimated to cover materials and fees. Medium cast, biggerimpact. 3 40 Slide #19 SCENARIO �'Mtw' E9uhyls t Irm d'1, llf[�yr d sell V F—sA— Papmmentlatbn PubkN t Mlxent ec.9nr OmNe k bXy aeP ➢mdln-[M rryxt 4Fnnrcr, r-9uNFsrusew Tirr a Tiensue'lasw. CPnskaerrc'/xroso-hems CPnslwerd xhetlaw sadess, B Farikit —pwd x HrW I,u[h p.....aw scr kaslaccrsst lFnerey: Mr. Ple n dnr tine Y. rcepbbn d nHWI addtuul miles IrasMsd Edpt«r*nnt at WHCs{xllh Necrxa —ej ryipsnk�oe ileeal l Elk— tlumPlnE$onxv drhPlr Mltlpo W cs[ltuM b.aEd Pn ERk ]0 stall angnx senlnry r�[[aminarian w}h_P Nnnr Mrn, Mi.Snn� rr hnn 6no.[irir Adtlkiovl}I,[IOO wnsdrre]xlln{ �"e�afl foaa tr.r�m.loot r,rm.lr�.el rviil uial 1fi16OO rryx or ordari: rnlndallgT[Pmmeraalrmulli n.r m.lnnr r��mrdal�al riTCfC a[oesaltk tlrup olf tamiyrttrUirdt isamorytlM ce ra:il[n, .r"i(M taw rot wl par[�rs ales'-ed by boor MPPI nm r n air.eirie asr"k muhdamly hmldlny rr d.nls. The VA.1g Imp P.Ictl. i] pii�yieiiif Qr -livoe—.4tM h1�he'ary H hen 9"ri:r. Pf Cr...l.�ne�IN r"d""` w� Edhlnakn[[P 21,7 ra tr roes all xhoab rm metal. food wade tdlerlipnal Ple .72,E ihr mad 13 rmgrams Paf.r.daslic,dlar�rnrxl s[haak lsamnne thr mpl n Mrmt IA. r tk,.n aw.eiro laem efatk.Mt. rebls lrxrrar"f w+n4k and malr Impkment dmwsburte Pwartxe C3Pd—,— 517BA la Waste Prdnanec ul[da[es�fxllly angrQiPp3wash Nnn" M— Plc Inr� a. 11, V. {wr+J"r.r 1a%"[ orr p�aw��re:e endaxrnallwS&I]rrncEne pre•,err'uru�rerdrpwn r r���r rni SN aryee. dale. wanted. Slide #20 SCENARIO Summary of Materials Accepted at all Orange County WRCs ateriak Type3 WRC Name XiE y ar"i % m gt E E o 8 s e District Eubanks Road Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y V Y Y Y Y Y Y 1J N 18 7 +NalnutGroveChurch Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y k Y Y I Y Y Y Y N N. 18 2 Road Bradshaw Quarry Road Y Y N N Y N N Y ?d Y Y N Y Y Y Y V Y N 12 E Ferguwn Road V Y Y N Y N N Y fd Y Y N Y Y Y Y V Y N N 13 ] High Ruck Road V Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y V Y Y Y H N 16 4 41 Slide#21 Note:Srenorio 3 ossames all recommendations from ScenorOs T &2 are implemenred, j * includes New Rerarnmendations ►Estimated$175,D00 master plan fees. ► Estimated 57M-512M for the Single-Stream Recycling(SSR)facility assuming no need to purchase properly& a: $250,000 for equipment;plus 5 FTE employees. ' ► Organics program development$1.41M. ► Highest cost,hrggestimp"t rl Slide #22 SCENARIO 3 ImP.d on E9ulry I.W. Lies w- Impnt:al It F—J'ca Rrsrnmend:oon PAk hpur Adleoent ;RE.Qir i\.ik[r FlydhR ty Eotcrap Tirclnr.' LhP[ Pf Busk-15 5plerm ieu se finmcroikl liner area Ilir Pti*l Rer leree's4 TransppnWo PNsr,d l�las'c�Plsn lar Mcars.rf Esr6a"w Ad Wdmin'X]rfi�Y.-]I ��4Tnl ylr4l7 T111'rNnl rwdy: ,,,plrmevel'ra" e 15 IWIHes {cmc¢angMr Jorrneac Imtatrn wd ada[ent pobrtul :r alhrrurtre sire LaR oulrry hkdlum ''^hmr Yes bpvti$ �[ } cnlmunhvr As. raid lunin _vl Lab rxlvatrhasea an EPA mi4a1r 6d mddcn.liltLYl1"xsrlrrrFLny Aadq'n"ivLMW5pfaEa-[ Hgh csUnnwa based an EPA: ,u:Jhiw�J 17pOrTloscol ricTcEr� o rns LpaLiu"WUKl irynEp4Rriui A"'_w db.{94lprsal ordvrlo Constlldatlnn of 55a hamkv the Puhle mPt5a c s5wrrah[noLl.-ndwl arprrirs Lfi FxIider 'suslilmhemmerQP. I.f:l:lWI Etri'ini MH"'. F,r'i'& :1'n liner rvl FA4N r�,rmrp�. _ f:mnly 77.!�7 9rgrtirt prr�r3�n 8.nn.helring suPPun for hnm rarMni sNldp t7 gym' dere"nE i"['e°'�FOPd YZ Prpnns hnn 6,rrinp Ili aunty . nn—R enteRlft lani�l 7.IOm$fik.7fi CumL+atNer7.a'7t+F.2R In[rcnv nwr mrrc.¢ii.Lyw. Commissioner Fowler said she felt like several members of SWAG landed on Scenario 2 rather than Scenario 3. 42 Robert Williams said there were discussions and SWAG raised their hand in support of 3 if some of the new fees were offset with new revenues. Commissioner Fowler said it becomes more expensive as you move through the scenarios. Slide #23 Key Impacts of Road to Zero taste Scenarios SINGLE,STREAM RECYCLING ®®®Road to Zero Waste Ian includes impacts ®®® on diversion tonnages as described les to the right. k tab Ad dithin al Tonnage:Curnulait�ve 1 # : l Note:Financial impacts are modeled at2596 for residential only. Net-rip - 111 YIY Y 1 Slide #24 SCENARIORECOMMENDATION Eubanks Road DiSpoSal Facility Possible Concept for the Future Need to improve the Material Recovery Facility now located at Eubanks Road. 1 Anew covered facility to address transfer/ 4 processing of 55R and incorporate other material streams that are nuwseparatedin the iocatian. 1 5taffing efficiencies could be gained by co-located material recovery operatic%to a single locatloa '~+ 1 Master plan needed to look at relocating maintenance facility and yard to make room for expanded processing capability. Reflecting adjacent€ommurrr'ty concerns an alternate site should also be considered. ....::.... ........ : I' Closing43 Slide #25 In The three scenarios presented herein require varying degfees of infrastructure,funding, and programming;the evaluation of which has considered public input and financial, environmental, equity, and lifecycle impacts. The Raad#o Zera Waste project team is now recommending Scenario 3 as tF�e chosen path forward for finalising the Road to Zera 1Nasfe PIQn. Myriad stakehoEders, paired with the Solid V�laste Advisory Group{SWAG), will help to implerr►gnt the Rood to Zero Waste Plan movi ng forward, and there is a great foundation within Orange County to build up its Materials hrlanagement Program. However,the Caunty's hero Waste goal by 20451s not ach ieva6le without change. Camnruai#y buyan and support are vi#al#a success. Slide#26 fi `f'�J �r-�{ J/L�� �I(��� �f�J Ih�IlT��fJ ��'•-{y J��} T �' �y� LJ � ■f it Y �.J E �L� � I 1 1 1 r� 7 ■�7 5� f � -� PR{PARES 9Y: �V� ZERO 111I �TE FUTURE IS HERE! , xw�� � - v #LIB Wjl3f• Commissioner McKee sa • the fee is an extreme concernfor because predicated on • offset 44 Commissioner McKee asked if this increase is in addition to the improvements at waste and recycling centers. Robert Williams said the waste and recycling centers would have environmental improvements to allow additional uses at the facilities. He said the infrastructure as part of Scenario 3 could allow them to take MSW, so they do not have to be transferred outside of the county by the towns. Commissioner McKee said that given the fact that they are already looking at costs for other competing needs, he does not see it getting to $10 million. Commissioner Richards said there have been challenges with the community engagement piece. She asked what would be done differently to move forward on what has occurred previously. Jennifer Porter said the idea is not additional new sites but reimagining how current sites are being used. She said that Scenario 3 is a phased master plan of Eubanks Rd. or an alternate site. She said that Eubanks is great because there is flexibility there for organics processing and MSW. Commissioner Richards said that would still require community engagement for that process in an area where the county's legacy is not stellar. She asked how they envision meeting this challenge. Jennifer Porter said they have this as a center question during the whole project. She said they will continue to meet with stakeholders. Commissioner Richards asked where the waste is being taken and if it was being taken to a lower wealth county in the eastern part of the state. Robert Williams said the waste is transported to Randolph County. Chair Bedford said that Randolph County is not a minority low-wealth county. Commissioner Richards said it is lower income than Orange County. Commissioner Fowler said if the waste is being transferred that is not taking it to zero. She asked if any of the efforts to take it to zero would reduce the amount that is being used or if it would impact the need for a transfer station. Chris Lund said the transfer of the waste will be needed for the growth over time and if they are going to increase diversion, they will need a facility to do that. He said that if it does not go to the landfill, it must go to other useful locations. Commissioner Fowler asked if there is a place where the BOCC can have an impact on prevention. Jennifer Porter said Scenario 1 has the direction for waste prevention policies and policy changes would be provided in the direction. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Susan Walser said currently there is disparity between the Town services and County services. She said that Option 3 has an increase of over$40 per household. She said many rural residents do their own composting and their own yard pick up. She said they do not use vendor services for trash pickup or county recycling, and they go directly to the convenience centers. She said that the fee would increase but they would not get the services they need. She said they should review private trash hauling in the rural county if they want to decrease vehicle miles. She said it would be good to look at rural services and in-town services and the appropriate fee structure. She said it would also be good to look at household fees in surrounding counties areas. She said Wake County has a $20 fee and they are looking at $200. Marilee McTigue said she is pleased to see a Solid Waste plan. She said that recommendation 16 of Scenario 3 talks about two waste transfer stations. She said this is the costliest and contains little detail. She said that this has been highly controversial in the past. She said that she believes that the Centroid of waste production should be where waste is handled 45 and it should not be hauled off into the rural communities. She asked that they consider a fair fee structure and the rural community concerns related to the waste transfer stations. Vice-Chair Greene said her understanding is that the Board should provide feedback on their preference of the plans that have been presented. Jennifer Porter said they have brought the SWAG recommendation to the commissioners for them to discuss. Bonnie Hammersley said that the recommendation was for the commissioners to provide direction to staff, not to approve one of the scenarios. Vice-Chair Greene said she would like to hear public comment on Scenario 3. She said she is in favor of this option. She said that, in her own experience, this has been about getting Orange County as close as possible to zero waste and it has been a discussion for over 20 years. She said that Orange County will not have a landfill. She said she was impressed by the summary of public feedback. She read from Cradle to Cradle and said it is made of recyclable plastic. She read about the Styrofoam trash problem in China. She said she is excited to think about how close they can be to zero waste. Commissioner Fowler said SWAG members were convinced to go to Scenario 3 with cost mitigation (like LHA program) and they started with scenario 2. She said that they thought of things like long-term homeowners' tax fund issue. She said this brings out the issue of who is using it and can the fee structure be written in a way that is more equitable. She asked if it can be done in such a way that people receiving the benefits are the ones paying for it rather than those out in the county. Robert Williams said towns charge for the collection of waste and the use of waste and recycling centers are available to anyone in the county. He said if a rural customer does not want to bring that, they pay a private collector. He said that if volume increases in the county of the use of private collection, it will decrease the costs because it is by volume. Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if everyone will experience the increase of 44%. Jennifer Porter said that would be the range if everyone paid it. She said there is an assistance program now that people have access to. Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if everyone paid that, would that be the $7-10 million dollars. Jennifer Porter said yes. Robert Williams said this is a 20-year process with staggered increases. Chair Bedford directed the commissioners to Appendix C. She said she does not support Scenario 3 at this time. She said she thinks every neighborhood that is the site of a suggested transfer station will oppose it. She said the increase in the expenses for every household to pay is not worth that change. She said she prefers to start with number 1 and then work in number 2 to see how it is going. She said prevention is important. Commissioner Hamilton asked how many responses they got from people who were non- English speakers. Jennifer Porter said less than 100. Commissioner Hamilton said the report talked about the Eubanks Road disposal facility limitations and asked about those. Chris Lund said the limitations include the plastics area is sitting on top of the expansion area and has to be moved and relocated. He said that it tightens space at that location and there is less space to do that consolidation. He said that some will have to be moved to make room for the site to handle the future need of new materials. Commissioner Hamilton asked if that is already in the plans to do some of that work. Robert Williams said currently they relocate recyclable materials and if they do not make a change, they will not be able to use that. He said that metals, and bringing in MSW from the towns, help generate revenues and they have shifted the services over from where they are. 46 Commissioner Hamilton said that part of what makes this difficult is understanding how it works and asked if this change something that they have to do anyway. Robert Williams said they have to do something, and they have received information that 40% of Orange County waste is organic materials. He said that if that is able to come out of the waste system they won't have to go to a landfill. Commissioner Hamilton said so much needs to be done with clarity on recycling and zero waste. She said that she would rather see Scenario 2 done first because the county needs to do more for education around preventing waste. She said she needs more information on Scenario 3, but she is leaning towards Scenario 2. Commissioner McKee said he has seen trash collection change over his lifetime in Orange County. He said he has private trash service, and the proposed increase is more than he pays for his service. He said it is a concern for him that people living in less expensive homes are paying their fees as a high percentage of their property taxes. He said from his perspective, he thinks the county can only afford Scenario 1, and possibly Scenario 2. He said he does not think it is possible to be zero waste by 2045. Commissioner Richards asked if Eubanks has to be changed regardless of any scenario. Robert Williams said yes. Commissioner Richards said she is not able to support relying on Eubanks Rd. for the future. She said that the community and the county's legacy there is enough. She said Scenario 1 goes well with the Climate Action Plan, and parts of Scenario 2 are doable. She said there are 5-10 years needed of community engagement needed. Vice-Chair Greene said Orange County is growing and what Commissioner Richards is saying is very true, but someday another site will be needed in Orange County. She said she would rather go ahead and get this information into the community and get input on where another site could go. Commissioner Fowler said she agrees that they are never getting to zero with a transfer station, but asked if the county can ever get any of the efficiencies. Jennifer Porter said there definitely are success stories across the country with strong organics programs. Chris Lund said there are communities that have taken on the separation themselves and they decide how it is handled. Commissioner Fowler asked if the facilities are covered but the fee or by the capital fee. Bonnie Hammersley said any Solid Waste capital is paid for by the enterprise fund. Commissioner Fowler said it seems there will be a need for a new facility and she thinks a master plan seems helpful. She said that she is not sure about organics because if waste was prevented, it would not have to be transported across town. Commissioner Portie-Ascott said that Scenario 3 bothers her because of the impact on the Rogers Rd. community. She said that this would be too much to ask them to bear. She said even if there is community engagement with Rogers Road, historically communities of color do not always send constant emails or show up at meetings to express their opinions. She said that can give a false sense that everyone is ok with the idea. She said that to expect people to pay additional money is a lot. She said she likes the idea of starting with Scenario 1 and moving to Scenario 2, when possible. Commissioner McKee said the county is morally bound to figure out how to handle its own waste and not ship it out to other places. Vice-Chair Greene said she agrees with Commissioner Portie-Ascott's comments and would consider taking Eubanks off the table at this point. She said that zero waste is impossible but is aspirational. Chair Bedford asked if any scenario tried to decrease the usage and delay the need for additional facilities. Jennifer Porter says it starts in Scenario 1 but is in all three. 47 Bonnie Hammersley said as she reviewed the report, she sees Scenario 1 and 2 as standard operating procedures and does not see anything that requires Board approval. She said the constraints at Eubanks are design constraints. She said the question is, do you want to move forward with Scenario 3 and, if so, at what pace. She said as an operation, they do options 1 and 2 as standard operating procedures, but the question is what to do as the population grows and how to be more effective and efficient. Chair Bedford summarized where board members landed. Commissioner Fowler asked what is done with the C and D. Robert Williams said some is reused for rocks, building roads, grind stumps for mulch, metals are recycled, and others like sheetrock and shingles goes into the landfill. Commissioner Fowler asked about what Dollywood does to capture their waste and CO2. Jennifer Porter said it is very expensive, but it could be reviewed at a later date. Robert Williams said they have reduced waste, and it was reused as fuel but there is still research and things that have to happen. Chair Bedford said a regional group was formed to look at a regional facility. Robert Williams said he would like to revisit the consortium. 8. Consent Agenda • Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda • Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda • Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to approve the consent agenda. VOTE: UNANIMOUS a. Minutes The Board approved the draft minutes from the December 4, 2023 and December 12, 2023 BOCC Meetings as amended. b. Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds The Board adopted a resolution to release motor vehicle property tax values for two (2)taxpayers with a total of two (2) bills that will result in a reduction of revenue. c. Property Tax Releases/Refunds The Board adopted a resolution to release property tax values for six (6) taxpayers with a total of seven (7) bills that will result in a reduction of revenue. d. Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion The Board approved eight (8) untimely applications for exemption/exclusion from ad valorem taxation for eight (8) bills for the 2023 tax year. e. Orange County FY 2024 Annual Work Program Amendment #1 — FAST 2 Study Commitment The Board approved Amendment #1 to the Orange County Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Work Program regarding the County's contribution to the NCDOT FAST (Freeway, Arterial, Street and Tactical) 2 Study. f. Enhanced Voluntary and Voluntary Agricultural District Designation — Multiple Farms The Board considered applications from two (2) landowners/farms to certify qualifying farmland within the Caldwell and High Rock/Efland Agricultural District Regions; and enroll the lands in the Orange County Farmland Preservation Program's Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District or Voluntary Agricultural District program. 48 9. County Manager's Report Bonnie Hammersley reviewed the agenda for the February 15' work session. 10. County Attorney's Report John Roberts did not have a report for the Board. 11. *Appointments None. 12. Information Items • January 16, 2024 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List • Tax Collector's Report— Numerical Analysis • Tax Collector's Report— Measure of Enforced Collections • Tax Assessor's Report— Releases/Refunds under$100 • Memorandum —Water Supply Watershed and Stormwater Concerns Related to the Proposed Orange County Water And Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement (WASMPBA) Amendment 13. Closed Session A motion was made by Chair Bedford, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, to enter in to closed session pursuant to North Carolina General Statute§ 143-318.11(a)(4)"to discuss matters relating to the location or expansion of industries or other businesses in the area served by the public body," and North Carolina General Statute § 143-318.11(a)(3) "to consult with an attorney retained by the Board in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege between the attorney and the Board including discussion of MDL No. 2804, Opiate Litigation," and to approve closed session minutes. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Reconvene into Regular Session A motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Hamilton, to reconvene into regular session at 10:21 p.m. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Adjournment A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adjourn the meeting at 10:22 p.m. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Jamezetta Bedford, Chair Recorded by Tara May, Deputy Clerk to the Board Submitted for approval by Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board