Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03.18.2024 Outboard
ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ORANGE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT N0Xr CAROLINA OrangeCounty i URLIC TRANSIT AGENDA ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD Monday March 18, 2023, 6:30 pm 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, NC 27278 OUTBoard meetings are held in person and open to the public. Any member of the general public who wishes to make public comment should email dweaver@orangecountync.gov and the comment will be read to the OUTBoard during the public comment portion of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Consideration of Additions or Changes to Agenda 3. Public Comments 4. Approval of Minutes— February 2024 5. Regular OUTBoard Agenda a. Short Range Transit Plan i. Action: Provide Comments b. US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study i. Action: Recommend Approval 6. Staff Report/Updates a. MPO, RPO, and NCDOT Updates b. OCTS Update 7. Information Items 1. FY25 Annual Work Program 2. Public Involvement Strategies 8. Adjournment -The next meeting—April 15, 2024 It is the policy of Orange County Transportation Services to ensure that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, sex, age, national origin, or disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987. 600 Hwy 86 N - Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Phone (919) 245-2008 - Fax (919) 732-2137 orangecountync.gov/transportation ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD MEETING MINUTES Monday February 19, 2023, 6:30 pm 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, NC 27278 1 Attendance: Members Present 2 3 Jamie Crandell Eno Township 4 Natalie Ziemba Cedar Grove Township 5 Nishith Trivedi Transportation Director 6 Darlene Weaver Transportation Planning Manager 7 Roy Schonberg Chapel Hill Township 8 Erik Legg Cheeks Township 9 Adam McGovern At Large 10 Micheal Hughes At Large 11 Joshua Mayo At Large 12 Amy Cole At Large 13 Sherrl Appel At Large 14 Randy Marshall Bringham Township 15 16 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 17 The meeting was called to order and roll taken 18 19 AGENDA ITEM 2: CONSIDERATIONS OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 20 21 AGENDA ITEM 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 22 23 AGENDA ITEM 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 24 25 AGENDA ITEM S. OUTBoard Agenda 26 27 5.a. 70 Multimodal Corridor Plan Presentation 28 Nish presented the corridor study and answered questions raised. 29 30 Question: Does that involved a widened shoulder? 31 Answer: Study recommends shared use path on the north side and a sidewalk on the south, done in coordination 32 with Hillsboro's connectivity plan and Mebane's recently approved Bike/Ped. Plan. Study does not recommend 33 any changes to locally adopted plans. 34 35 Question: Does that include the sidewalk in subdivision along the corridor? 36 Answer:Yes, areas like Fairview, and others that go through development review will require sidewalks. 37 38 Question: What about the corner of Corbin and 86? I've heard it's a state road, but what I hear you say that 39 Hillsborough has a plan for it? 40 Answer:Yes. It is in the Hillsborough Connectivity plan they recently adopted. 41 42 Question: Does this plan include areas below it? 43 Answer: Hillsborough Connectivity Plan addresses it. 44 45 Question: What's the road in the upper left-hand corner? 46 Answer:That is Fairview, rural Orange County. 47 Question: I see bike improvement and is that the road to Transportation Services? 48 Answer:Yes. There is Fairview Community Center and Park right there. 49 50 Question: Is the transit vision for this corridor a fixed route transit? 51 Answer: Yes, the majority is fixed route with demand response feeding it. As Transit Emphases Corridor or and 52 through Transit Oriented Development, additional fixed route services will increase transit access. Currently we 53 have the Orange-Alamance and in discussion with Mebane for the Mebane circulator. Question: Do we know the 54 ridership along the corridor? 55 Answer: Right now, it is poor and the ridership along Orange-Alamance is more of a deviated service since Covid. 56 It was also advised that since Go triangle just made changes to their ODX route(s). Transit recommendations 57 include new stops and improvements. Once those are all addressed, it shows a need for a widened road and the 58 plan recommends a four-lane divided for the corridor. 59 60 Question: Would that be similar to the typical widened section in NC 54? 61 Answer: NCDOT complete streets will only help pay for improvements such as sidewalks, bike, pedestrian, and 62 transit improvements through highway projects. 63 64 Question: Is there enough right of way to do it? 65 Answer: It's 120 feet of right of way which is already filed for US 70 (not 70 business). The DOT already has it. 66 There are parts of 70 that are only 100 feet. US 70 is also a federal highway. 67 68 There was discussion regarding speed cameras and revenue generation and higher rates of speeding and accidents 69 post Covid.The four-lane divided highway will end at Buckhorn and Mt.Willing Road. It was recommended to look 70 at the Efland access management plan regarding the residential zoning and a four-lane divided highway. Mebane 71 and 70 business are not recommended to be widened at this time. 72 73 Question: How do you put in a divided highway and keep the character of the community & preserve the 74 environment? There are studies that show the effective way to reduce congestion is to narrow the lanes, not 75 widen them, how will this work? 76 Answer: Road diet's such as narrowing lanes or replacing vehicle lanes with bike/ped. Work in urban 77 environments. The practice is challenging in rural areas due to constant increasing in commuting traffic. The 78 Existing Condition analysis showed that more and more people are using US 70 and less are using 1-85. 1-85/1-40 79 is mainly Burlington to Raleigh, not Mebane, Hillsborough to Durham and vice versa. 80 81 Question: Is this work/plan at the point where the MPOs and Towns have agreed? 82 Answer: We're looking for as many comments as possible so they can make any changes that need to be done 83 before it comes back to you in March for your action. Hillsborough and Mebane will take action first,than Orange 84 County. MPO action will defer to local jurisdictions. 85 86 Question: Has this been vetted by the MPOs at this point? 87 Answer: Both MPOs are part of the Core Technical Team and meet monthly on the project. 88 89 Question: When those improvements are done, is it required they make it ADA accessible for the bus stops, etc.? 90 Answer: Yes. When the State does a road improvement, if there is an associated transit component, it is required 91 to be ADA accessible. A comment was made that advised it depends on the scope of the change, for example, if 92 the State tears up the asphalt and puts it back, that will not trigger the need for an ADA improvement. If they 93 were to move the bus stop, then they would have to. There was a discussion of the nuance of when an 94 improvement is required vs. not. 95 Question: How and who determines the priorities, and what is the total dollar amount for all of this?Who is going 96 to make the decision, I assume there is a staging process? 97 Answer: In the Plan itself it tells you who is responsible for what. The total cost will be requested from the 98 consultant. The Plan will be implemented through multiple funding sources SPOT/STIP, SPOT 99 Safety/Mobility/HSIP, SS4A and other resources identified. 100 101 Question: Will the consultant break it down by responsibility? 102 Answer:The table in the Plan itself already does that. Consultant will provide cost estimates. 103 104 Question: Will this plan be effective? 105 Answer:This is a visionary document. Durham,Alamance County, Burlington,and Raleigh already have their plans 106 for their portions of the corridor and are currently implementing them. 107 108 Question: Does the Study include anything on the bus ridership like frequency, hours, and is it sufficient for the 109 routes activity? 110 Answer: For the Mebane side, Burlington has put together plans mainly going west Elon, Alamance Community 111 College, and working with John Ando to address improvements focus more regional connections and to bridge 112 the gaps in coordinated service. 113 114 Action: Provide Comments. Please email any additional comments by March 8, 2024. 115 116 AGENDA ITEM 6: STAFF REPORT/ UPDATES 117 118 6.a. MPO, RPO,& NCDOT Updates- Updates were included in the packet.The County bike/Ped. DCHC MPO funds 119 the plan with County giving the local match and managing the project. It will mirror the scope of work done by 120 Durham County who has already started theirs. 121 122 Question: What will be the scope of work? 123 Answer: I will get you a copy of the scope of work once I get the plan and have a chance to review it.We will make 124 sure it's on the agenda for next month. In the FY26, the MPO may fund the design and engineering for Transit 125 access for around mile of Orange Grove Road around the bus stop. 126 127 OUTBoard requested a strong push for this project. They would like for our County Commissioners and our DOT 128 representatives to have to stand on the side while the buses and cars drive by them just to get a feel what that 129 feels like for all the kids walking across there. Another comment was made regarding the logging trucks that also 130 drive by.And another comment was made that we have several bridges where this is an issue.They would love to 131 get people to do a field visit and experience some of these roads. That would be one main area for the DOT to 132 experience. MPO could assist and try to do this with a congestion management plan with cameras to get video of 133 kids walking that area risking their life. OUTBoard discussed that before the DOT would allow there workers to go 134 on that bridge, they had to do a safety assessment to make sure it was safe for their workers to go there, so they 135 are aware that there is a concern, and secondly, more safety calming measures for the interim, such as using only 136 one lane in construction areas around the school. 137 138 Question: Can the Sherrif's Office do that? 139 Answer:Yes. 140 141 The last update contained in the OUTBoard member's packet, the NCDOT luncheon notes and project sheet. We 142 did get a request for comments that is not in your packet.The NCDOT is looking for environmental/technical and 143 public comments on the widening of 1-85. 144 145 Question:The Morgan Creek Greenway, can you give us a snippet? 146 Member answer:The main thing is that there is no sidewalk and no way to get there from the neighborhoods. 147 148 Question: On the DOT status of projects what's the difference between the two columns? 149 Answer: One is what they are supposed to be, one is where they actually are currently. 150 151 AGENDA ITEM 7: FY25 WORK PROGRAM 152 Staff notified OUTBoard the FY25 Orange County Annual Work Program is out for public comment. 153 154 AGENDA ITEM 8:ADJOURNMENT 155 OUTBoard meeting was adjourned at 7:51 p.m.The next meeting is scheduled for March 18, 2024. � ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENTri ORA E L TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT ,� NoRrH CARQLLNA Ora"g;„8�,�,u„5nt Item 5.a. Subject: Orange County Short Range Transit Plan Attachment: SRTP— Existing Conditions Report SRTP— Media Kit PURPOSE: To provide comments on the Orange County Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). BACKGROUND: October 2023, Orange County contracted Nelson Nygaard to provide Orange County Transportation Services (OCTS) with a SRTP. It is a 12 month planning starting November 2023 to October 2024, following best planning practices. The SRTP is a 5-year plan focused on improving the County's transit services in terms of capital and operational investments. The consultant recently completed the Existing Conditions Report (Attachment 1) and has started first round of public workshops (Attachment 2). OCTS staff requests members and public review the material and provide comments. To Date: • Existing Conditions report revised per comments from technical staff • Media Kit provided by consultant and implemented • First Round Public Workshop (March) Next Steps: • Consultant collect and summarize public comments • Draft recommendations, funding, and final plan • Conduct second Public Workshop (August/September) • Finalize and Approve Plan (October) FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact at this time. SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goals are applicable to this item: • GOAL: FOSTER A COMMUNITY CULTURE THAT REJECTS OPPRESSION AND INEQUITY The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race or color; religious or philosophical beliefs; sex, gender or sexual orientation; national origin or ethnic background; age; military service; disability; and familial, residential or economic status. • GOAL: ENSURE ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY The creation and preservation of infrastructure, policies, programs, and funding necessary for residents to provide shelter,food, clothing and medical care for themselves and their dependents. 600 Hwy 86 N - Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Phone (919) 245-2008 - Fax(919) 732-2137 orangecountync.gov/transportation ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The following Orange County Environmental Goal impact is applicable to this item: • CLEAN OR AVOIDED TRANSPORTATION Implement programs that monitor and improve local and regional air quality by: 1) promoting public transportation options; 2) decreasing dependence on single-occupancy vehicles, and 3) otherwise minimizing the need for travel. RECOMMENDATION(S): Provide comments ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Existing Conditions DRAFT February NNELSON NYGAARD pop- z Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................1-1 2 Review of Past Plans and Projects ..............................................................................2-1 3 Market Analysis ............................................................................................................3-1 TransitDemand............................................................................................................................................3-1 Equityand Transit Need............................................................................................................................3-7 TravelFlows...................................................................................................................................................3-9 ActivityCenters..........................................................................................................................................3-12 4 Existing Service Assessment........................................................................................4-1 SystemOverview..........................................................................................................................................4-1 ServiceProfiles..............................................................................................................................................4-4 5 Transit Funding.............................................................................................................5-1 Expenses and Revenues............................................................................................................................S-1 FundingSources..........................................................................................................................................S-2 6 Opportunities................................................................................................................6-1 Table of Figures Page Figure 1: Transit Supportive Land Use Table..............................................................................................3-1 Figure2: Population Density.............................................................................................................................3-2 Figure 3: Orange County Jobs by Sector......................................................................................................3-3 Figure4: Employment Density.........................................................................................................................3-3 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Figure 5: Population and Employment Densities......................................................................................3-4 Figure 6: Population Density Change, 2020-2030....................................................................................3-5 Figure 7: Employment Density Change, 2020-2030.................................................................................3-6 Figure8: Transit Need .........................................................................................................................................3-7 Figure 9: Environmental Justice Communities of Concern....................................................................3-8 Figure 10: Weekday Trips, All Day...............................................................................................................3-10 Figure 11: Saturday Trips, All Day................................................................................................................3-10 Figure 12: Weekday Trips, AM Peak............................................................................................................3-11 Figure 13: Weekday Trips, Mid-Afternoon...............................................................................................3-11 Figure14: Activity Centers..............................................................................................................................3-12 Figure 15: OCPT Service Span and Frequency...........................................................................................4-2 Figure 16: Annual Unlinked Passenger Trips by Service Type..............................................................4-2 Figure 27 Durham Tech OCC Park-and-Ride Bus Stop...........................................................................4-3 Figure 28 Efland-Cheeks Park & Community Center Bus Stop...........................................................4-3 Figure 15: OCPT and Regional Fixed Route Bus Service........................................................................4-4 Figure 16: Average Daily Boardings by Hour, October...........................................................................4-5 Figure 17: Hillsborough Circulator Boardings............................................................................................4-5 Figure 18: Orange-Alamance Connector Boardings, October 2023..................................................4-6 Figure 19: Demand Response Zones.............................................................................................................4-8 Figure 20: ROAP Trips by Purpose, October 2023....................................................................................4-9 Figure 21: ROAP Average Daily Trips Per Hour, October 2023 ...........................................................4-9 Figure 22: ROAP Demand Response Trips, October 2023..................................................................4-10 Figure 23: All Trips by Hour, October 2023..............................................................................................4-11 Figure 24: Mobility On Demand Destinations, October 2023...........................................................4-11 Figure 29: FY2023 OCPT Expenses..................................................................................................................5-1 Figure 30: FY2023 OCPT Revenues.................................................................................................................5-1 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY 1 INTRODUCTION The Orange County Short Range Transit Plan The focus of this Existing Conditions report is on the areas of (SRTP) guides the improvement of transit Orange County outside of the municipalities of Chapel Hill and Carrboro, which are served by Chapel Hill Transit. The analysis will services in Orange County through 2030. look at Hillsborough, Mebane, and the more rural areas of the Orange County Public Transportation (OCPT) provides fixed-route county, identifying the opportunities and challenges in providing and demand response transit services throughout Orange County, transportation services outside the Chapel Hill area. Analyses will NC. The changing conditions in the county—including new also include up to 10 miles outside of the Orange County borders, developments, rising population and jobs, the COVID-19 which marks the fullest extent of OCPT's service area. pandemic, and limited budgets—present an opportunity for OCPT Key findings for the Existing Conditions include: to refine how transit investments are made. The SRTP will analyze . Orange County is growing and is focused on ensuring existing service performance and markets, evaluate strategies for planning efforts are inclusive of residents throughout the improving transit, and recommend a transit investment program entirety of the county. through Fiscal Year (FY) 2030. The SRTP will also guide future long ■ Potential demand for fixed route transit is limited outside range planning efforts as the region continues to grow. the Hillsborough, Mebane, and Chapel Hill-Carrboro The Existing Conditions report is the first piece of the Orange cores, with low population and employment densities. County SRTP. The report consists of five key chapters: ■ OCPT fixed route bus service is limited, and ridership has ■ A review of previous plans and projects that impact not fully recovered since the COVID-19 pandemic. transportation in Orange County, ■ Eligibility-based demand response service fills a critical ■ An analysis of the underlying market conditions in Orange need in connecting rural residents with medical, County, employment, and shopping opportunities, but general ■ An analysis of the current services provided by OCPT, public microtransit service is underutilized. ■ A review of current and potential funding for OCPT • There are funding opportunities that are not being services, and utilized to their full potential that could be tapped to ■ A synthesis of the gaps and opportunities that can be stabilize OCPT finances. addressed through the SRTP. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 1-1 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY 2 REVIEW OF PAST PLANS AND PROJECTS Past plans establish a baseline understanding Orange County Public Transportation Short of transit projects and programs considered Range Transit Plan (2018) or planned for Orange County and the region. The OCPT Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) analyzes the market for transit within the county, assesses existing transit operations, and Reviewing past plans and projects is a critical first step to guiding provides a set of recommendations for the near future. The plan existing conditions work.The previously published plans and ultimately recommended small improvements to the existing policies reviewed included transit plans, climate plans, funding fixed-route network and focused more on alternatives, such as studies, and more, all of which focused on Orange County and/or demand-response zones and vanpool programs. the surrounding region. The review focused on both specific transit service recommendations and higher-level funding and BGMPO 204S Metropolitan Transportation Plan goals. (2020) This review sets the stage for the existing conditions analysis by The BGMPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan is the providing a baseline and history of projects, changes, and future transportation plan for the Burlington-Graham region, which visions. The following section provides a brief overview of the consists of the cities and towns of Burlington, Graham, Mebane, plans reviewed and the information that is directly relevant to the Elon, Gibsonville, Green Level, Haw River, Whitsett, Alamance; SRTP effort. The full review can be found in Appendix A. Alamance County; and parts of Guilford and Orange Counties. This plan identifies the transportation needs over the next two Orange County Transit Plan (2017) and Update decades and provides recommendations for improvements. (2022) The Orange County Transit Plan from 2017 and its subsequent BGMPO Regional Transit Feasibility Study (2024) update in 2022 provide an overview the county's transportation The BGMPO Regional Transit Feasibility Study is an ongoing goals and funding. It includes information on service project that has recently completed its Operations and Fiscal improvements that are planned to be funded through the Impact Analyses. This report contains recommendations and County's transit tax, as well as other improvements that have opportunities for transit funding at the MPO level and an been planned but not funded. assessment of Orange County's government structure and funding. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 2-1 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Orange County Climate Action Plan (2023) Orange County Transportation Services Title VI The Orange County Climate Action Plan is the guiding document Plan (2022) for county-wide greenhouse gas reduction. This document offers Orange County Transportation Services Title VI Plan overviews the a comprehensive set of strategies that are in line with state Title VI standards and processes that OCTS must abide by. The regulations. Transit-specific strategies revolve around increased document includes transit service standards for OCTS, including on-demand service and converting the existing vehicle fleet to an that all fixed-route services have between 30- and 45-minute all-electric fleet. headways with plans to reduce these to between 15- and 30- minutes. Connect 2050: The Research Triangle Region's Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2022) Orange County Transportation Services ADA Connect 2050 is the long-range transportation plan for the Paratransit Plan (2022) Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and The Orange County Transportation Services ADA Paratransit Plan the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning outlines the standards that OCPT must meet to provide sufficient Organization (DCHC MPO). The transit-related components of this ADA and paratransit services. OCPT currently exceeds the focus on improvement of local and regional transit facilities and required service standards for coverage and abides by all federally services and improving accessibility and ease of use of transit for mandated standards. riders. GoTriangle Short-Range Transit Plan (2023) Orange County's Complete Streets and Vizion GoTriangle's SRTP recommends a series of transit service Zero Policies (2022) improvements for the Triangle region up to FY2028. The Orange County's Complete Streets and Vizion Zero Policies were recommendations included simplification of routes (including the adopted in October 2022. The Vizion Zero Policy states that the 420 and ODX) and expansion of 15-minute all-day service routes. locality will aim to meet the state's safety targets of a 50% reduction of fatalities and serious injuries by 2035, and a 100% Chapel Hill Short-Range Transportation Plan reduction by 2050. The Complete Streets Policy, which was Chapel Hill Transit's SRTP (2020) provides a roadmap for transit adopted in tandem with the Vision Zero plan, strives to improvements in Chapel Hill and Carrboro for the next ten years. encourage the design and construction of safer and more Recommendations include service expansion and demand- equitable streets. response zone additions. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 2-2 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY 3 MARKET ANALYSIS This chapter explores the underlying demand ■ Based on an analysis of travel patterns amongst all modes of transportation, most trips take place within for transit and transportation services in municipalities. There is also moderate travel demand Orange County using the region's geography, along the Mebane-Hillsborough corridor. demographics, and built environment. • Transit needs are greatest within more dense municipalities, though environmental justice communities The Market Analysis consists of four components: of concern are also prominent in the northwestern and ■ Transit Demand: Looking at where people live and work, eastern parts of the county. both currently and as the region grows ■ Equity and Transit Need: Identifying the socioeconomic TRANSIT DEMAND characteristics that influence transit use and where those A main factor in determining the demand for transit is density: characteristics are more common where people live and work, and how those areas are ■ Travel Flows: Mapping how people travel to, from, and concentrated. As shown in Figure 1, population and employment within Orange County density may be used to indicate an appropriate level of transit ■ Activity Centers: Identifying key destinations and trip service. Areas that are higher density may be able to support generators for transit Figure 1: Transit Supportive Land Use Table Key takeaways from the Market Analysis include: ■ Population density and transit demand is greatest in the Residents Jobs Appropriate Frequency P Y Land use Type per Acre per Acre Types of Transit of service Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Hillsborough areas. The rest of AIR AIA 30-60 the county is rural, where demand-response services may Mixed 10-15 5-10 Local Micro- minutes Neighborhoods Bus transit be more suitable than fixed-route transit. e�llefe'h 60mins ■ Most of the employment density is located within towns Low Density z-1a z-5 * or less or Micro- Ritleshare Volunteer On Demand and cities and along major corridors. Service jobs make up transit Driver Pgm the largest share of jobs in the county. I a2 <2 04 On Demand Rural Rideshare Volunteer Driver Pgm Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-1 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSIT TY Figure 2: Population Density more frequent fixed route transit, while areas with lower density may be better suited for demand response services. --- These densities broadly indicate demand across contiguous areas, and act cumulatively to drive demand for transit. Clusters of density throughout an area or along a corridor are strong indicators of demand, while an isolated pocket of high density °•, srora Hd � O alone in a rural area would not produce sufficient demand itself. t no ee Sch! To more accurately represent the distribution of people and jobs, this analysis uses "developed acres" to calculate density, which is defined as the area within a quarter-mile buffer from roadways. L""On Rd SOH W� ; Meb�a ne Where People Live n t o a 79 Hillsharh`ughti As shown in Figure 2, population density in Orange County is „ fl concentrated in the municipalities of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Mebane, and Hillsborough: a Old NC it G O4`�Q� ■ In Hillsborough, denser areas are not clustered together, s �oy¢� ��' °,wd1s but located throughout the municipality with less dense a o`'p9e "B.0(T areas between them. ■ Mebane's population density is mainly concentrated in Alamance County, with some higher density Pockets in ea '� c ra F Q ..vr Orange County. Population density is very low outside of these municipalities, Population Oansity P-plepenc :, h%iE�apel H01 `�'<05 Carrht`oro with fewer than one person per developed acre. Even in the .� 0,5-, higher density pockets, the population density alone is likely not 1-2 oltl�reanshnroRe o6 - U r ■Z 5 4�t6 ._ yf 4 enough to support frequent fixed-route transit service outside of ■5 P ��J 10, - _----- 'E sai Chapel Hill and Carrboro. -- ------ n� 059ocncnroxoeo Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-2 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSIT TY Where People Work Figure4: Employment Density -------------------r The geographic distribution of job density in Orange County (Figure 4) is largely similar to population density, with the highest m density areas in Mebane, Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro: s ■ Employment in Hillsborough is densest in the southeast mr SrOte Rd O area of the town. O $` ■ Pockets of high employment density are located throughout Chapel Hill and Carrboro, mainly near UNC r n 0.a and along the major highways. O ell °c d 5 Q` ■ Mebane employment density is clustered along 1-40, in `eban Rd S` the southern portion of the municipality. There are few neaa�e a jobs outside of these areas. 7 ,�, - °' Pa Hillsharnugh\ � cm9�ti Jobs not only generate demand from the employees that travel fl ,N\\55n4 there to work, but also from the potential customers, clients, and 16` RIG tic IR patients that visit a business. Jobs in the service and retail sectors es n f r� r- tend to generate travel demand at higher rates than industry or n Gt° Q° alfly �.�• office jobs. In 2020, out of 74,721 jobs in Orange County, 59% of "0" ° nrs` a'Rtl jobs were in service and retail sectors (Figure 3). Figure 3: Orange County Jobs by Sector ti v° FuhenS's Rtl .� � � k Industry, 10% /s Este Vti!EmpkoyrnentUenalty ; JapelHlll Jobs per acre Service, Office, 05-t Old Greensh°r°Rd 44% 30% 1 so3 0 n5� m m w s C ■5 10 _ �°ng c ®� r Retail, ■ dt so °ohw -------- 15% ------ oa�so��9�.¢cncnroxozo � a i eni. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-3 NGE TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRANGI TROUNLAN Figure 5: Population and Employment Densities Population and Employment --------- ---- - Density Together m Together, population and employment density give a more complete picture of potential demand for transit. Figure 5 shows the combined population and employment densities by census `°-so eR,, 'r O block group. Blue areas on the map signify areas with high employment density but lower population density, while orange m�Pa sen"�d r represents areas with higher population density and lowerjob density. Darker brown areas have high densities of both O oar employment and population. °ba"o"Rd St�atysgd Mebane $ Areas with both high population and employment density ' a �- include: •f •%ice Hillsbornu gh x ■ Downtown Hillsborough 7 �iLf ilr� I ■ UNC Chapel Hill QIdNCT[l ^n ' B B6 ■ Southwest Mebane eAa y' G 9N,21%y. Areas of high employment and population density do not always "e align, with pockets of high employment density further from the >�a ,i downtown cores and some isolated areas of residential density. - ���rIA Areas with mismatched densities include: ■ Employment density in Hillsborough is concentrated in �; + ;� � many of the pockets of lower population density. Popatatlonand ' _ �,, Employment Densities �,� ,� ,�.Chapel H114,;r i _ t ■ Downtown Mebane has greater population density, while Old Greeashoro Rd Card®® �Y's employment is concentrated along 1-40. <V R0 -r ' �■ �peesfe< �ys �Ca 7 e People Per Acre E :suit r�nu' 0-5ource°.KHCMFDn2C try \ JI 4 — Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-4 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Regional Growth Figure 6: Population Density Change,2020-2030 ---------------------- ------------------------------------ The Triangle Region is growing rapidly, with new housing, mixed- use developments, and job centers being planned and approved O throughout Orange County. Using the Triangle Regional Model's 4 2030 projections, based on the 2020 base year, the Market Analysis can identify areas likely to see significant growth of 'Sore R to C demand for transit within the SRTP timeframe. O O Pa sop/y'�a Population Change ` as a y�c StatysRd Orange County is projected to see an 11% increase in population Leh, pn Rd between 2020 and 2030, growing to just over 150,000 residents. ' o- Mebane As seen in Figure 6, much of the increase is expected in Chapel O 7- Hillsbarough L7 Hill, with some additional growth in southern Hillsborough, Ak downtown Mebane, and between Hillsborough and Durham Ra o a0 along NC-10. The rest of the county is projected to see a 7 O o Grd NC rG population increase of fewer than 0.5 persons per acre. r r a aeGede Q� awalf,s �� t O�� 40 t7s Sinei Ry v ;ya ❑r ELha"KSR'A' } � i a ' cegsteaQ Ra i, Estes 7 O 1 Or Po ulatianChan e Chapel Hilliil O P 9 Carrboro ^ Mill 54 Growth In People per Acre771 Old Greensharo R-0 1-2 F m t 2-5 rye y ca e i oamso—ocncffozaso-soao Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-5 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Employment Change Figure 7: Employment Density Change,2020-2030 ------ Employment is projected to increase at a greater rate than r population, with a 19% increase in jobs in Orange County O between 2020 and 2030 to about 89,000jobs. As seen in Figure 7, most of this growth is likely to be concentrated near the UNC ;r Chapel Hill campus and hospitals, and between Chapel Hill and ar `Store q in v Durham. Southern Mebane is also expected to see an increase in ns ee employment density, while most of Orange County will likely not era° sca`ayPv see a significant increase in employment density. r as 0 ra � m� g4aR Lebanon Rd St r\ s a ; Me be Hillsborough �t Q5 0 O O!d NC ro Ao �waIIISP �. a o`9 9 New O MS Sinai Ry v n EuhanRs R% k FmsteaQRddy��- ��esQrA iF 5y �♦ entChan Cfi`apel H131 Eurp O bYm 9e Carrharo Growth In Jobs per here � * • p Old Greenshvro Rd 9.5-I Pa �A 1_2 4e4vV m 4 r 5+ ti sm rC� oemse�e:ocxc nPvmzo-zoao a i zr,,,K N Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-6 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN EQUITY AND TRANSIT NEED Figure 8: Transit Need ---------- While total population and employment density are crucial to understanding transit demand, the demographics and m O s, socioeconomic characteristics of the population are also a key a a component in identifying the need for transit services. Many a population groups, often those historically and currently Sy°,eRd O marginalized, rely on transit more than the general public. To plan O O scn� transit equitably, transit agencies should focus their investments on areas with high populations of these communities. r bra I/6p�- ^ r �e6enon Rd }v St Vol Transit Needs Index `=nle � - a The Transit Needs Index measures the densityof socioeconomic - C r �k= Hillshoroug N groups that would most benefit from improved transit services for both fixed route and demand response. To calculate the index, 4 census block groups are assigned a score of 1 to 5 for each of the following groups, based on the relative density of that group in o �o < tali! Orange County, and summed for a final composite score: a o�9eG hee+�p er °� �tsina;Rp s°O 3 Zero vehicle households ■ Racial and ethnic minorities eal A ■ People with low incomes (below federal poverty level) ■ Older adults (65+) FsreRo �,� � � F R..4Cha el�Hill ■ People with disabilities � ��:: �.�; P,.�,, Transit Need Carrh'dr�o4 C°mp-ite de..ity of....—hid, r householends,minorities,lawervincepopuiedonme Figure 8 shows areas of high potential transit need, with darker pnplti ,°A—duhs.and and Greenshnr°Rd w colors indicating higher than average densities of multiple target • n ed hl1eedr ------------ populations. 'E _ C populations. Areas with the highest transit need include most of --- -- y hw o•iesa«e.,acssozas-re.[sdma,e• -------------- ©trks Chapel Hill and parts of Carrboro, downtown and southern Hillsborough, and most of Mebane. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-7 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN Environmental Justice Figure 9: Environmental Justice Communities of Concern ---------------- III ------ --------- ------------r - . The DCHC MPO incorporates Environmental Justice (EJ) into all aspects of its planning process, working to ensure the fair x treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of °o- race, color, national origin, or income.' The MPO identifies a V specific Environmental Justice Communities of Concern to target: `rsto.eR q ■ Black Population 3` a s`n e eft Y� ■ Hispanic Population r a� ea ■ Racial and Ethnic Minorities C ebanon Rd ■ People with Low Incomes (below Federal Poverty Level) � N� Mebane � ■ Older Adults (65+) a n +�POOL n y a ■ ■ Zero Vehicle Households Hill!llsbarouh IN Population with Limited-English Proficiency �aVd 7� d+ r The environmental justice analysis identifies Communities of Old ye l-:4-P�—� Concern based on County thresholds for the percentage of certain socioeconomic groups within each area, then identifies o nr s,na ad areas with multiple overlapping Communities of Concern. These thresholds focus on percentage of a population, rather than - 'r c° Eubov,Rd density, highlighting the presence of environmental justicegpv stead Rq communities in the more rural areas of the county. Communities F of Concern are located throughout Orange County, especially in Es7esOYi arq the northwest and east, as well as in the denser municipalities. Errvirenmantal 1 SdtChapel Bill Justice Areas �k Areas of ovariap C arrb'dr o O Overlap .... Old Greenshoro Rd - 10erlap C jS zaverlap � pelf¢ a 30rerlap r.___-W-_ oefass --------------------------� ......... oemograrnresaaysnat M_.,N https://www.dchcmpo.org/work-with-us/environmental-justice-ej Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-8 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TRAVELFLOWS Many of the existing transit services in Orange County, operated by both OCPT and GoTriangle, only operate for parts of the day. Using data from Replica that models average daily traffic patterns As shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13, travel patterns during the of trips on all modes of transportation, the following maps show morning peak and mid-afternoon on weekdays differ only slightly. general flows of travel between census tracts in Spring 2023. During the morning peak, between 7 and 9 AM, travel patterns On an average weekday, the strongest travel flows were typically are mostly similar to the travel flows of the full day, with strong within the municipalities, with weaker flows across longer trip links within Chapel Hill and Hillsborough (Figure 12). Unlike distances (Figure 10). In particular, the strongest flows were: full day travel patterns, there are some stronger long-distance ■ Short trips within Chapel Hill, near UNC connections, including Durham to Chapel Hill and Chatham County to Chapel Hill. Travel flows are slightly lower during the ■ Trips to the center of Hillsborough from surrounding midday period (Figure 13) than in the morning. Mebane to areas Buckthorn continue to see strong travel flows. Trips to and from ■ Thousands of trips occur each day from the communities Durham are concentrated more in the north of Chapel Hill, rather between Mebane and Hillsborough (such as Efland and than to and from UNC. Flows on the US 70 and 1-40 corridor Buckthorn) into Mebane and Hillsborough. between Hillsborough and Mebane remain strong. As shown Figure 11, Saturday travel flows are slightly more locally contained than weekday, and lower overall, but follow similar patterns to the weekday travel flows. Strong travel flows occur between: ■ Mebane and the tracts on the western edge of Orange County, including the communities of Buckthorn and Efland ■ Northeast Orange County and Hillsborough ■ Downtown Hillsborough and surrounding communities ■ Within Chapel Hill, including short trips between areas further from UNC Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-9 NGE SHORT Existing Conditions ORARRANNGE CRANSIT PLAN OUNTY Figure 10:Weekday Trips,All Day Figure 11: Saturday Trips,All Day tsa PERSON tsa PERSON Q oc q°c CASWELL me CASWELL I a' f Re1e@@ M°q@n Ra Hete�@-naq@�Rd �a e 99 O 4e O n �° ��rOFe•R l O y 9cb}' � na Sch r W Bur inpton va Me6 �,U fir o za Mai tHae Graham Hillsborou m Graham Hil lsborov h 00 _ 11 40 0 JI.R.H,A-M 1 es ALAMAN'CE rr ssµ A,LAMAN'CE Q rs® ao ga Ra ORANGE Durham ORANGE C Durham �U. 0° � yC hap Ir-l � �0 reanstl0�O Ch@pal Rlll Rd 40 a°sticra Chapel Nlll Ra Old Greensboro Rd old Gr@enso.ra Rd A Qs T Ca LYsrraR •� LYstr@R Tratre[Patterns a Ma rrisvllle Travel Patterns d Morrisville Wekaays All nay C HIA T H A M saturaays all Dsy C HIA7 H A M Relween Census Tracts eelween Census Tracts 50u-I,Ouu B1 C —5nn-I,Eli O Cary 1,000-2,a0h Sai O WAK.E —I,000-2Aa0 wl ua W6KE 2.000-e,000 111111110 2.000-5,00 S IIII 5.0n0+ e4 Apes M 5,nnn+ A a D Q Census Tracts ❑Census Tracts bows°°�°�m�lre sazs 0 ze ne Gease°mes:pmoca 202Z p 16 6Hllea Z Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-10 NGE Existing Conditions ORARRANNGECROUN� Figure 12:Weekday Trips,AM Peak Figure 13:Weekday Trips, Mid-Afternoon 1GB PERSON ae - PERSON tre a qeo k k M ra` ro.�Rd M i 'oa.Rd CASWELL I e CASWELL I a' f f Helene-nags Hetege-HagB ya �a O Oa 4B O i9 O n a` �ieres a` �iercn 041 r s �Ilyl urlington -��� s`�at�e tF �,urlingto Mebane j Mebane y 7 4 Graham 40so sborou Hillgh Graham 40R0 Hillsborou gh C LLR.H,A.M � Ol1.R.W,A-M C r- r- es 1 A,LAMAN'CE 1 1 6,L6MAN'CE 1 es L ORA,NGE / Qd Durham o GRANGEtd Durham. 4� 4 e,q� s4 Ghapel Hill i y m � �hapel Hill m Greensasro Chapel Nlll etl � 1�" ,4P � � Grsansasro Chapel Nlll etl _ �40 "!r old Gr9easa0ro Rd - £�r 4 E old Gmb—Rd V� �- 11 Qs W� r9e - IF Qs LYsGa Hy � Travel Patterns Ma rrIsvllle` Travel Patterns _ ° Marrlsvitle weekeZAM Peak 17 sal C HIAT H A M Weekdays M[aaay0-7py C HIAT H A M 8etvrean Census Tracts g 8etwean Census Tracts - 50-150 ei 5 50-150 O Cary 150-300 .1 O WAKE 150"300 w1 ud W6KE e�300-50a 300-500 S 500 t „ 500 t Aye Aye Q Census Tracts Census Tracts Gewsee�s�R���e sozd 0 ne oeuseerre::Rmo.2G3] P 16 6Hllea Z Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-11 TYkNSIT Existing Conditions SHORART NRGE GIE CROUNLAN ACTIVITY CENTERS Figure 14:Activity Centers ----------------_-----------------------------______-_________.,____-___________-___________________r___. Some activity centers generate additional demand for transit that are not captured by the previous density analyses.As shown in m '' Figure 14, major activity centers and points of interest in the Orange County service area include: �r a`'Srure R, O ■ Higher Education campuses, including UNC Chapel Hill and Durham Technical Community College in °Ra Gee yea Hillsborough r ■ Government/Civic institutions, such as social services �d departments, town halls, and DMV locations `""'On Rd � sa schat�s Mee no o- i ■ Hospitals, including UNC Hospitals in Chapel Hill and Hillsborough Hillsborough ■ Recreation/Community centers, including parks, stadiums, senior centers, and recreation centers, such as p the Passmore Center °Id"C'° es a o' eS, ■ Shopping destinations, including shopping centers such a Q°r 'walls as Patterson Place and Tanger Outlets, as well as o�9e °° J"S'na+Rd Ro- destinations like Walmart Supercenters ■ Transit facilities, including the Eubanks Park and Ride b ° E°ba° Rd } Q F¢staadR Many of these activity centers are clustered in more densely o populated areas, such as downtown Hillsborough and Chapel Hill, ` ee Es'as a Major Activlty Centers sa or along key travel corridors. However, with the distributed rural 111,1,11....1°n Chapel Hill eoeeremeni!e'me CarrboD G° population of Orange County, residents often need to travel H°=P„�, °Itl Greensh°[o Rd 501 a longer distances from less dense areas to the areas of more Recreetlonl Community P6m y ® concentrated activity to access healthcare, grocery stores, and T o-ren9a yecuuntyPuencrrensrsRoules ---_social services. oem8—� wee9e eenwam Ta,a Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-12 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY 4 EXISTING SERVICE ASSESSMENT The Existing Service Assessment looks at the The Orange-Chapel Hill Connector runs between Hillsborough and Chapel Hill during the middle of the day current state of transportation services when Chapel Hill Transit's Route 420 is not running. There offered by OCPT, identifying trends in service could be opportunities to improve efficiency by ensuring delivery and usage. there is no duplicate service. ■ OCPT's on-demand service is underutilized, possibly due This analysis consists of two key components, a System Overview, to the rider registration process and lack of information which explores OCPT's services as a holistic network, and Service available directly on OCPT's website. Profiles, which delves deeper into each individual service offered by OCPT. SYSTEM OVERVIEW Some key takeaways from the existing service assessment are: ■ OCPT offers service in the form of three fixed routes— Services Available Hillsborough Circulator, Orange-Alamance Connector, and Orange-Chapel Hill Connector—and demand OCPT operates the following services: response. ■ Three fixed routes: Hillsborough Circulator, Orange- ■ Ridership on OCPT's fixed route and demand response Alamance Connector, Orange-Chapel Hill Connector services has not recovered from the decrease due to the ■ Rural Operation Assistance Program (ROAP) Demand COVID-19 pandemic. Response Service ■ The Hillsborough Circulator is OCPT's highest performing 0 Mobility on Demand fixed route. Utilizing only one vehicle, the route runs ■ ADA Complementary Paratransit hourly as that is the time it takes for the vehicle to complete the loop, ultimately resulting in the route Each OCPT route and service has different hours of operation, frequently running late. though all fixed route buses are scheduled to operate hourly throughout their service period. Figure 15 depicts the service span ■ The Orange-Alamance connector is currently partially and frequency for the three fixed route services as well as the two suspended and covered by demand response service. demand response service types. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-1 NGE TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRANGI TROUNLAN Figure 15: OCPT Service Span and Frequency Service Performance Weekday Hillsborough Circulator Ridership on OCPT's demand response services declined Drange-Alamance Connector Drange-Chapel Hill Connector significantly in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and ROAP Demand Response continued to decline in 2021. Fixed route ridership did not see the Mobility On Demand same steep decline in 2020 but decreased in 2018 and again in sect,rosy 2021 (Figure 20). Mobility On Demand The pandemic and resulting changes to commute patterns, paired with vehicle and driver shortage challenges at the agency, have 7(Fridays 7only) led to significant on-the-ground changes to the services being offered in recent years. These changes include route suspensions and service hour changes, often without significant advertisement to the public. These challenges and changes make exact comparisons over time difficult on the level of an individual route or service. Figure 16:Annual Unlinked Passenger Trips by Service Type 60,000 Neighboring Transit Services 50,000 Along with OCPT, three other transit agencies operate bus routes 40,000 in Orange County: PART, GoTriangle, Chapel Hill Transit. 30,000 Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation (PART) operates 20,000 transit service in the counties to the west of Orange and runs one 10,000 route that extends into Orange County. PART Route 4 offers service from UNC Chapel Hill to Mebane Cone Health Park and 0 Ride, and to Graham, Burlington, and Greensboro. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 GoTriangle serves Durham, Orange, and Wake Counties with six tFixed Route tDemand Response all-week and all-day routes, four peak-only routes on weekdays, and 7 regional express routes that run during peak hours all week. Source: FTA NTD Two routes serve similar corridors to OCPT routes: the ODX and Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-2 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN the 420. The ODX is an express route that serves Hillsborough, Figure 17 Durham Tech OCC Park-and-Ride Bus Stop Efland, Mebane, and Durham during mornings and evenings. This E� route runs hourly at peak times, with three trips in the morning ,y1 and three in the afternoon. Route 420 is a peak-only regional i route that runs from UNC Chapel Hill to Hillsborough. Chapel Hill Transit is a fare-free radial transit service based around the UNC Chapel Hill campus. Chapel Hill Transit operates 20 fixed routes, 9 of which operate all week and the other 11 , operate on weekdays only. These routes facilitate local travel within Chapel Hill and Carrboro. Transit Amenities and Facilities - OCPT's bus stop amenities vary based on the size of the bus stop Co 18 Efland-Cheeks Park& .. and nearby amenities. Working with GoTriangle, the two transit Figure Community Center Bus Stop providers have made stop improvements in Orange County and the greater region. GoTriangle actively updates their Stop ` 'r r Improvement Map on their website with completed and in- progress bus stop amenity improvements. 9 Shelters vary in size depending on the location, with larger shelters typically being placed at the end-of-line and park-and- rides and smaller shelters being placed at high volume ridership locations mid-route where space allows. The style of bench can also vary, with larger benches being placed inside of or nearby shelters and smaller seats located on the bus stop pole. _ oS' ,''tr3' ",y"'•s . .. J. .. ki<&''.'�,` F'es: rFr, xa� t-, '-s OCPT serves the Mebane Cone Health Park-and-Ride and the19 ,.��� :. .• -. `° ��`.� � . �a ., Durham Tech OCC Park-and-Ride on the Orange-Alamance 7W Connector, and the Durham Tech OCC Park-and-Ride by the Orange-Chapel Hill Connector. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-3 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN SERVICE PROFILES Figure 19: OCPT and Regional Fixed Route Bus Service Fixed Route F a, 0 OCPT provides both regional and local service with its fixed route o- buses, shown in Figure 19. The Hillsborough Circulator is a local c�lotore Rd route serving key destinations in Hillsborough. Two regional connector routes, the Orange-Alamance Connector and the °Pa sehay�d Orange-Chapel Hill Connector, connect Hillsborough with other T regional destinations and fill a midday gap for peak-only 3 GoTriangle bus routes, with additional local service stops. Lebangn Rd 3 Fares are charged for the two connector routes, at a cost of $2.00 Mebane a for the general public, $1.00 for students between ages 6 and 17, Hillsborough' �+ and free for seniors (older than 60), children (younger than 5), a persons with disabilities (ADA certified from OCPT or anotherIN transit agency). Fares must be paid using UMO Pass or a Old NC,O Passenger ID card. Cash is not an option for fare payment on 9_a r OCPT routes. The Hillsborough Circulator is free to ride. a °9°G`oe N0\" nwe;"sR, o ,o Mc Sinai Rd Analysis focuses on data from October 2019 and October 2023 _ r° to, where available, but technological and operational difficulties ,Ebhe4SRd`, were limiting factors to the robustness of the ridership and trip ` data. On-time performance is only available as an estimate for the o ea Hillsborough Circulator, and there is limited recent ridership data 54 for the Connector routes. Improving data collection would Chapel Hill •ter Car rboro support a more robust analysis in future studies. B"$Routesin ange irulator un�' Old 6reensgoro R Ci Hillsboroughrculator d ° � Orange-Chapel HillConnector 2d _Pa Orange-Alamance Connector ti a Fe ^� GoTriangle Routes Chapel Hill Transit Routes __-___ PART Routes Oates-rea:Orange County Public Tranan, s I� Remlx,Mapbm� Q o i 2nia Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-4 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN Hillsborough Circulator Figure 21: Hillsborough Circulator Boardings Route Description p The Hillsborough Circulator is a one-way loop that serves major destinations in the town of Hillsborough, operating hourly Monday through Friday from 7 am to 5 pm. The route operates �Otif6ieliJs St L@B/�o with one vehicle, taking one hour to complete each loop. No fare t15a° TO � 1a 53 is charged to ride the Hillsborough Circulator. W pi a s� 9a\�t Route Performance Wil rs, y WTr,onSt N Ridership on the circulator has recovered to approximately 78% Hillsborough o of pre-pandemic levels, with 1,042 boardings in October 2023 compared to 1,342 boardings in October 2019. As seen in Figure 20, boardings in 2023 are more evenly distributed throughout the day, with higher activity in the midday, compared to a previous °"fib AM and afternoon peak in 2019. a6 Figure 20:Average Daily Boardings by Hour,October P 85 a 12 oaxeala.u. i n 10 s 8 40 st 6 a HIIIs6omgh CInuWorBo dIn" 4 Omober 2023 gyp' 2 ' � � 'I — Attrvkry Acts y 0 >•trilhbweupCimNeler �ucm,hang.m°my Putscttaieii �sny. 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 °� a AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM ■2019 ■2023 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-5 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Figure 21 shows where boardings are concentrated along the Orange-Alamance Connector Hillsborough Circulator. High ridership areas include: ■ Large apartment complexes, including Gateway Village Route Description and Coachwood apartments on Cheshire Drive and Eno The Orange-Alamance Connector is a fixed-route service that Haven Apartments connected activity centers in Hillsborough, Efland, and Mebane ■ Key shopping destinations, including the Hillsborough during the weekday midday period when the peak-only Walmart and Rebecca Drive Food Lion GoTriangle Orange-Durham Express (ODX) is not operating. Due ■ Triangle Sportsplex and Passmore Center to low ridership, the route is currently operating as a partially There are distributed hoardings along the downtown portions of demand-response service. When in full operation, the Orange- the route, and some limited ridership at other key stops. At key Alamance Connector ran bi-directional hourly service between 10 timepoint stops, 16% of trips arrived more than 5 minutes after AM and 3 PM Monday to Friday. their scheduled times. Figure 22: Orange-Alamance Connector Boardings,October 2023 Opportunities The Hillsborough Circulator connects the denser downtown _ environment, apartment complexes, and major shopping W GRANGE destinations, but operates in a challenging built environment outside of these main destinations. Ensuring the route takes the „.b... ENaed most direct path possible to the key ridership areas is essential in „a,...PaoFgpdp „idshernugh improving reliability and on-time performance. Return trips are Xkllsbereugh made less direct by the nature of a one-way loop, especially when eAe C p ALA„ANCE the route operates only hourly. Exploring options to create a bi- directional route, shortening the time it takes to complete a loop, or increasing frequency would all improve the rider experience. Cmn �w BwMnp. 11 Short hours of operation, including lack of service on weekends ° • and after 5 PM, also limit the potential uses for the route. _ A Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-6 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Route Performance weekday AM peak and the midday period when the peak-only The Orange-Alamance Connector was the lowest performing GoTriangle Route 420 is not operating. The OCH operates along OCPT fixed-route service pre-pandemic, with 45 total hoardings Hwy 86, serving downtown Hillsborough, UNC Hospital in October 2019. In October 2023, operating as a demand Hillsborough Campus and Durham Tech Community College, response service, 16 trips were attributed to the Orange- Eubanks Park and Ride, and key destinations in Chapel Hill, as well Alamance Connector. As shown in Figure 22, all but two of those as additional local stops. The route operates Monday to Friday from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. boardings were at the Efland-Cheeks Community Center. Opportunities Route Performance The Orange-Alamance Connector has limited service hours, Due to data collection complications, accurate recent ridership operating outside of core travel times, with potentially confusing information is not available for the OCH, although some trends differences from the peak-period service offered by the can be observed. In October 2019, there were 728 boardings for GoTriangle ODX. While the route is not operating on the ground, o the route total, 70% of which were on southbound trips. In limited the OCPT website does not show it as suspended or replaced by January 2024 data, 88% of the 130 boardings occurred on demand response. Midday service along this corridor may be southbound trips. better served by demand response or microtransit service, Opportunities integrating the trips into the already existing alternatives and better advertising the service to the public. The Orange-Chapel Hill Connector serves to fill the midday service gap of Route 420 as well as provide service to local stops Mebane is a growing area with strong pockets of density that may during the AM period while the 420 is operating. Given the be supportive of fixed route transit service, but even when the imbalance in northbound and southbound boardings, it is likely Orange-Alamance Connector is fully operational, there is limited that riders are taking the OCH in one direction and the 420 in the bus service available locally. other. Strong coordination between OCPT and GoTriangle is essential in serving those riders, as well as potential riders who Orange-Chapel Hill Connector may not know that is an available option. Identifying if there are unnecessary or duplicative trips between the OCH and 420 would Route Description also streamline service and potentially save money for either The Orange-Chapel Hill Midday Connector (OCH), also known as agency. Improved data collection would support this goal. the "Hill to Hill", connects Hillsborough and Chapel Hill during the Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-7 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Demand Response Figure23: Demand Response Zones ------------------------------------------------------ Along with the paratransit provided within 3/4 mile of fixed route service as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, OCPT 0 0, provides two types of demand response service: eligibility-based 4 demand response service funded through the Rural Operation Assistance Program, and a publicly available microtransit service �`Sr°reRa 9 called Orange County Mobility on Demand. Both service types ne ee ` srh,° operate throughout all of Orange County, and serve key c destinations in Mebane and Durham, as shown in Figure 23. a rya n �r Customers typically use these services round trip. Orange County Lelia° Rd records trips separately for each direction. For mapping purposes, Mebane o- trip origins are defined as residential locations or the starting777 i '' a point of a trip between two non-residential locations. Trip { Hlilsbare°9h destinations are defined as non-residential locations or the end point of a trip between two non-residential locations. 0!C NC 7p a l" a Rural Operation Assistance Program e"9 dew a O Q MS Sinai Rd Service Description EM= Em= Eligibility-based Demand Response service in Orange County ka 7 consists of three categories of funding under the umbrella of a �stee°R° North Carolina's Rural Operation Assistance Program (ROAP): the Esras 0 Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Program (EDTAP), Chapel Nlll the Employment Transportation Assistance Program (EMPL), and Carrboro Old Greensboro Rfl the Department of Social Services Work First Program (DSS). These services are marketed to the public based on eligibility, not Demand Respanse and ocs f�a g Y- Mobility-On-Demand Iso is Service Areas grouped together by funding as they are for the purposes of this oa�5o,�so„9ero -- :�:•r ,N} analysis. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-8 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN ROAP Demand Response service is available Monday through trips, and EMPL funded 11 trips. Due to the nature of eligibility- Friday from 7 AM until 5 PM, and trips must be booked two days based services, each trip's purpose is recorded, and Figure 24 in advance by 5 PM. Trip funding is based on the eligibility of the shows the number of trips taken for each eligible purpose, broken rider and trip purpose. EDTAP-eligible riders include Orange down by funding source. County elderly (60+) or disabled residents travelling for the Figure 24: ROAP Trips by Purpose,October 2023 following eligible trip purposes: 600 553 ■ Job interviews,job fairs,job readiness activities/training, 500 GED classes, transportation to work, Group field trips/ tours to community special events 400 ■ Human Services agency appointments, public hearings, ■EMPL committee meetings 200 14592 ■DSS ■ Medical appointments, pharmacy pick-ups, shopping, 100 - , 4 2 1 ■EDTAP personal care, banking etc. .0 \�4, -0,\ The Employment Transportation Assistance Program (EMPL) and 41, pia �J�c� \ofQa� DSS Work First Program provide trips for the following purposes: 5ec\oc �ccc�PaJ�� `� Q ■ Transport to work or training for DSS clients transitioned off TANF or Work First within 12 months, Workforce Figure 25: ROAP Average Daily Trips Per Hour,October 2023 Development Program participants, "disadvantaged 16 public" and or general public. 14 ■ Job interviews,job fairs,job readiness activities/training, 12 GED classes, transportation to work (scheduled by 10 passenger), 8 ■ Children of working parent transported to child care. 6 4 Service Performance 2 0 In October 2023, OCPT provided 1,502 completed demand 6 AM 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 11 12 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM response trips through the ROAP project categories. EDTAP AM AM PM funded 1,035 of those trips, DSS was the funding source for 456 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-9 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Figure 25 shows the average daily ROAP trips per hour, with clear Figure 26: ROAP Demand Response Trips,October 2023 peaks in demand from 8 to 10 AM and from 3 to 4 PM. Figure 26 ---- ----------------------------`-----------------------------------------------------r--- shows the home and destination locations of all ROAP trips in October 2023, with larger dots indicating more trips to or from that location. Demand Response riders tend to travel from 4 disparate home locations in less dense areas to concentrated • . destinations in the municipalities, in particular. c`'SroreRa _ ■ Carolina Dialysis, in Carrboro and Mebane es 0 ,• .Ln®yP� ■ Hillsborough Recovery Solutions r 4�Qa ■ Passmore Senior Center ■ Downtown Hillsborough l,� Le6anon Rd o . y S`�arys Mebane o- �� • 36% of ROAP trips picked up their passengers within 10 minutes -- s of the scheduled pick-up time. � �. HiFlsborough � • J. `0t a y� m Opportunities old a= • NC rp V ROAP services are fragmented, with multiple funding sources and different flows of customer information. It can be hard, especially a °G` "';'s'po, for new riders, to identify which service they may be eligible for, where each one operates, or how to book a trip. The website, Rider's Guide PDF, and backend data do not all match, and this Eube°"=R° ;•. • could discourage potential users. This also complicates funding o F��Bea and reimbursement, in particular for Medicaid-eligible trips. •• a, Estes • For current users, ROAP services are not consistently on time, and Demand Reponse travel flows October2023 Chapel Hillx Origin Location Cal • * D require significant advance notice, lowering their convenience •DestImLl-L-flonoid�ree°=eeroR-0 compared to traditional fixed-route transit or other transportation TotalRiders per L°°°ti°^ �e g OW options. Improving response time and on-time performance 5 '° 'S '°P s E ° o a _ could attract new users as well as improve the experience of ^a.Suke^9elftlT�- -- --------------- �,� current riders. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-10 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSHORT SIT TY Mobility on Demand Figure 28: Mobility On Demand Destinations, October 2023 Service Description O Orange County MOD (Mobility On Demand) is an on-demand a microtransit service available to the general public within Orange County and with service extending to Mebane and downtown d,seeR d O Durham. MOD service operates Monday to Thursday 8 am — 5 pm, Fridays 8 am —9 pm, and Saturdays from 9 am — 5 pm. Trip fares are $5 per zone travelled through. a �,a try O ra a � Service Performance L'b"On Rd y St„sty Mebane a ; In October 2023, service was available on weekdays only, and 29 r,+ trips were completed with an average of fewer than 2 trips per Hillsborough ji day. Trips were most commonly taken during the AM peak and at noon (Figure 27). 5r Wd NC,a Figure 27:All Trips by Hour,October 2023 Nev o` 4o t1s Sinai Ra 10 rya soi 8 ti Ebb$z Rd k � 6 gstead� o �o 4 EsrB9 54 Ql 2 ' ' Chapel Hill O Mobility-On-Demand Canh o ro co 0 ■ Destinations Oltl Greensboro Re s5i 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM onoherzaza 0.a mD v 41 total aia®rsaerioee<mn coy4z �olu ----------------- ' a oeteseunxs0.ange county wain Tsmit ""--- ¢ o xwa<\._ Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-11 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSIT TY Due to the limited number of home locations, only destinations rider must first register online or via app with a third party to see are shown in the ridership map in (Figure 28). The Seymour the full extent of service offered through MOD, which adds an Center on Homestead Road was the most popular MOD unnecessary barrier to ride. Cost and payment may also pose destination. 52% of MOD trips complete their pick-up within 10 barriers to potential riders compared to the more subsidized minutes of the scheduled pick-up time. ROAP services and the technology requirements for booking and payment. Identifying other barriers to use through public Opportunities engagement will help shape the advertising and service Orange County MOD is significantly underused, given the characteristics of MOD to ensure that the funding is being put to potential demand within the service area. Much of Orange County the best use for Orange County. is not suited to fixed-route transit, and ROAP demand-response service faces eligibility constraints. There is not currently a service area map available on the OCPT website for MOD—a potential Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-12 TYANSIT Existing Conditions SHOR TRAM GE E TROUNLAN 5 TRANSIT FUNDING Funding drives the amount of transit service Figure 29: FY2023 OCPT Expenses and capital projects Orange County can Category Demand Response Fixed Route Total Administrative $319,536 $207,789 $527,325 provide its residents, workers, and visitors. Operating $776,084 $513,389 $1,289,473 This chapter review OCPT's annual expenses and revenues, Capital $0 $192,434 $192,434 including a look at the agency's current federal, state, and local Total Expenses $1,095,620 $913,612 $2,009,232 funding mechanisms. It also begins to explore other potential funding sources for future transit improvements. Key takeaways Figure 30: FY2023 OCPT Revenues include: ■ OCPT's expenses exceed revenues, creating a funding gap Federal that makes it difficult to provide needed transit services. 5307 Urbanized Area Formula $141,102 13.6% ■ OCPT utilizes federal, state, and local funding source, the 5311 CTP Funds $184,580 17.8% largest of which are federal 5307 and 5311 funds, the Federal Total $325,682 31.4% state Rural Operating Assistance Program, and local State government funds, including the Orange County Transit ROAP Funds $211,284 20.4% Plan. ■ There are other federal, state, and local funds that OCPT State Total $211,284 20.4% can utilize to increase its revenues. Local Government Funds $434,000 41.9% EXPENSES AND REVENUES Medicaid Revenue $26,012 2.5% Contract Revenue $11,315 1.1% In FY2023, OCPT spentjust over $2 million on all its expenses, for Fares $27,610 2.7% both fixed route and demand response services (Figure 29). Over half of the funds went towards transit operations, which includes Local Total $498,937 48.2% the wages of drivers and mechanics, fuel, and vehicle Total Revenue 1 035 903 maintenance. Administrative costs were about $500,000 and Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 5-1 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN primarily went towards staff wages. Capital purchases made up used towards up to 80% of capital costs and 50% of operating the smallest proportion of the total expenses. costs. In the same year, OCPT made just over $1 million in revenues, Section 5310 leaving a deficit of close to $1 million. 31% of revenues came from the federal government, with a mix of 5307 and 5311 funds. Section 5310 is formula funding targeted towards transportation 20% came from North Carolina's Rural Operating Assistance needs of older adults and people with disabilities. The federal Program (ROAP). The remaining 48% of revenues came from local share is up to 80% for capital projects and 50% for operating sources, including Orange County government funds (which assistance. Example uses of eligible Section 5310-funded activities includes the Orange County Transit Plan transit tax), Medicaid include the purchase of buses and vans, wheelchair lifts and revenue, contracts, and fares. OCPT's farebox recovery ratio is ramps, mobility management programs, travel training and about 2.7%. transit-related information technology systems, including scheduling, routing, and one-call systems. FUNDING SOURCES Section 5311 OCPT's annual expenses exceed its revenues, and additional Section 5311 is a formula grant program for rural areas, providing investments are needed to fulfill the level of transit need capital, planning, and operating assistance. The federal share is up identified in Orange County. To increase its revenues, OCTP can to 80%for capital projects, 50% for operating assistance and 80% work to fully utilize existing funding sources and tap into new for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) non-fixed route ones. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the funding sources paratransit service. available at the federal, state, and local levels. This list builds upon work completed through the BGMPO Regional Transit Feasibility Section 5339 Study. Section 5339 is FTA's Bus and Bus Facilities Program. This program funds replacement, rehabilitation and purchase of buses Federal Sources and related equipment, and construction of bus-related facilities. The federal share is not to exceed 80 percent of the net project Section 5307 cost. Section 5307 is FTA's Urbanized Area Formula Program. These funds are available for transit agencies that operate within a census-designated urbanized area. Section 5307 funds can be Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 5-2 ORANGE COUNTY Existing Conditions SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Carbon Reduction Program A local match is not required for EDTAP and EMPL, but a The Carbon Reduction Program is a new funding source through minimum 10% local match is required for RGP. ROAP funds can the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Funds are administered through also be used to leverage FTA Section 5310 and 5311 funds. the NCDOT. The program provides funds for projects that reduce State Maintenance Assistance Program carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the transportation sector. The State Maintenance Assistance Program (SMAP) provides state Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds designed to assist urban, small urban, and regional transit The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement service providers with funding the non-federal share of Program is along-standing source of grant funding for operational expenses. Funds are allocated annually through a transportation programs that reduce air pollution and vehicle formula. Funds can be used only for FTA Section 5307-eligible operating costs and cannot exceed the amount of the local fund miles travelled. It is often used by transit agencies for upfront match. capital costs, like the acquisition of on-demand vehicles. Transportation Demand Management State Sources Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs can receive grant funding through NCDOT Integrated Mobility Rural Operating Assistance Program Division. Public organizations responsible for promotion of TDM The Rural Operating Assistance Program (ROAP) is a state-funded activities, which may include providing services such as public transportation program administered by the North carpool/vanpool matching and vehicles for use in vanpooling may Carolina DOT'S Integrated Mobility Division. Formula-based apply. programs that fall under ROAP include: ■ Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Program Local Sources (EDTAP) ■ Employment and Transportation Assistance Program Orange County Transit Plan (EMPL) The Orange County Transit Plan, adopted in 2017, provides for ■ Rural General Public Program (RGP) funding to OCPT, GoTriangle, and Chapel Hill Transit for improvements to transit services. The Plan is funded through a series of Orange County taxes and fees approved by voters: Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 5-3 Existing Conditions ORANGE CGE OUNSIT TY ■ Half-Cent Sales and Use Tax Fares ■ 5%Vehicle Rental Tax OCPT charges a variety of fares for its services. For fixed routes, ■ $3 increase to the GoTriangle Regional Vehicle the Hillsborough Connector is free of charge, while the Orange- Registration Fee Alamance Connector and the Orange-Chapel Hill Connector are ■ $7 County Vehicle Registration Fee $2 for the general public. Demand response services range from fare-free to $12.75, depending on eligibility and type of service. Medicaid Transportation The Mobility on Demand service is $5 one way. Changes to the Non-emergency medical transportation provided by OCPT is fare structure can influence the funding available for transit funded by Orange County's Department of Social Services, which service in Orange County, though fares are a small piece of total gets reimbursed from the state's Medicaid program. North revenue. Carolina expanded access to Medicaid in December 2023, so OCPT may be able to provide more medical trips soon. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 5-4 Existing Conditions ORASHORT NGE CGE OUNSIT TY 6 OPPORTUNITIES OCPT serves essential transportation needs in Hillsborough and Strengthen the Hillsborough Circulator, focusing on on- rural Orange County through a patchwork of fixed route and time performance, travel time, and service hours demand response services, coordinated with multiple transit and Explore New Service Opportunities human services agencies throughout the region. The SRTP will Explore options for low-cost service to grocery stores build upon the identified gaps and opportunities when recommending improvements to transportation in Orange • Increased access to employment opportunities, including County. non-traditional work hours Based upon the findings of the Existing Conditions report, OCPT • Invest in a Mebane circulator in partnership with other can continue to improve transportation and grow alongside the transit providers communities of Orange County by focusing on making it easier to Better Leverage Available Funding ride existing services, making it easier to pay for transportation, ■ Balance available resources to favor more productive and improving the operations of existing services, exploring the needed services development of new services, and better leveraging currently . Ensure Medicaid-eligible trips are being reimbursed to the available funding. Key opportunities under each of these fullest extent possible improvement categories include: Improve Fare Payment Make Services Easier to Use ■ Streamline fare payment methodology across services ■ Communicate with the public about available services, including better advertising MOD service and clarifying • Explore possibility of subsidized passes for MOD the partial suspension of the Orange-Alamance Connector These findings will be supplemented by robust public outreach to ■ Invest in better bus stop amenities understand what current and potential riders want most from • Coordinate services with regional providers, including OCPT, and integrated into proposals for further review at a later GoTriangle, Chapel Hill Transit, and PART stage of the SRTP. Improve Existing Services ■ Invest in Demand Response outside of main towns and corridors Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 6-1 Xor Sti .��j24, i rcl��OR. ,��q- +yy����¢• �.a�j .=ird• '\4A � jj• j � � Y V �� rr� �"����)� � .S f �� .?.hr �r� � � r t E �r �r`�� +. c `'.�`� �'µ1, i ` rw �s G i h"a ,r. -'� .�+ "� _i \�!, � �p v." 'Tr' '��f. t. '"_ �,�rt 1 / t e l�' 1` - nr�F'�;.•. Pill l • •�. ` �.�,' �..1 v VP -/'- ,�- ^.�J-1` DTI �M,-' '•.� r :�,l�Ct�h'�� ��d•'4:.. r��r9't�.1 � '`�] l rd. l� �f yi`�i� �,.^�I�Y, �;�/r a,y c o.. V ;���(F��,h3i:l�nl�'�t ,��� �1' ,:i , 1 c 1•as'- !r •Q + Vj��_ A .�qj..�.. .{��74 �� ���".'L'._.' !-�t�� 7`tJ i •Is:�9,y ~ - /�Y7y' l t y ir? �n �{{ At �"„ rj v �` /f'r •.~ ~] l j t.a a! 4�. �� y •r fi r�� 1 �}°�:R � '��'� -. l: �i!'i''Jf'1 � `f7.1"4/�.`� - � ��_� �lar, t � >• � _ V„S' :.�„r S°'y�kt/�*''. � ��9••.I � 6 � 1; ti "4- r fp. Y e'h. � l - Y - _ ,/ l �C \ .. �l1' 1.. �. � '����`Jt�{,.�. _ •1 ��� -_ rr�' 'r.�� !•a:1��I�i �� .. � i .�/<.<�, tlyrnfta �� •'�`.e""�ar• 1 �,�I"P•7,,, ° ,� tr.'►�-.e i�5y sue`' "'' _ a . - -- _T r„� .t ram'�S`�,•*�ct3'itt Li'�1�, ��[, '"ei f � . 'v.A _ yI s�ra � Y'• _ ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table of Contents 1 Social Media Posts.......................................................................................................... 1-1 2 Transit Poster.................................................................................................................. 2-5 3 Monitor Ad...................................................................................................................... 3-6 4 Email and Newsletter Content......................................................................................4-7 5 Press Release................................................................................................................... S-9 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates i TYANSIT Phase 1 Media Kit ORRT CGE ROUNLANN 1 SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS Facebook/ Instagram Post Week 1 Help us improve transit service! Let us know what improvements that you would like to see in Orange County by 2030. Attend a pop-up event throughout the month of March: Hillsborough Walmart— 501 Hampton Pointe B, Hillsborough, NC March 18th, 2:00 p.m. — 4:00 p.m.* Seymour Center - 2551 Homestead Road, Chapel Hill, NC March 19th, 11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m.* Passmore Center - 103 Meadowlands Drive, Hillsborough, NC March 19th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Durham Tech OC Campus - 525 College Park Road, Hillsborough, NC March 20th, 9:00 p.m. — 11:00 a.m. UNC Hospital Hillsborough- 430 Waterstone Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278 March 20th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Mebane Eggstravaganza — Downtown Mebane, Mebane, NC March 23rd, 11:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. Can't make it out? Learn more and take the survey by March 315t: www.orangecountvsrtp.com *Weather Permitting. Please visit the website for updates. Post Week 2 Reminder: Don't Miss Out on Your Chance to Improve Transit Service in Orange County! Hey Orange County residents! We want to hear from you to shape the future of transit service in our community by 2030. Can't decide what changes you'd like to see? Attend one of our pop-up events for more information. Learn more and take the survey by March 31st: www.orangecountvsrtp.com Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 1-1 ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Your feedback is important to this process! Post Week ;s The Deadline for Comments is March 31, 2024 Don't miss the chance to share your thoughts on what transit improvements you'd like to see in Orange County for 2025 to 2030. For more information and to take the survey, please visit www.orangecountvsrtp.com. X (Twitter) Post Week 1 Help us improve transit service! Let us know what improvements you would like to see in Orange County by 2030. Learn more and take the survey by March 31St at: www.orangecountysrto.com. Post Week 2 Reminder: Help Shape the Future of Transit Service in Orange County! Help us improve transit service in Orange County! Your input is crucial in making improvements by 2030. Attend one of our pop-up events for more information and take the survey by March 31 st. Visit the website at www.orangecountysrtp.com to take the survey see a full list of pop-ups. The Last Chance to Take the Survey! Don't miss the chance to share your thoughts on what transit improvements you'd like to see in Orange County for 2025 to 2030. For more information and to take the survey by March 3111, please visit www.orangecountysrtp.com. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Social Media Graphic Week 1 - 2 ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN HELP US IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE _ AYUDENOS A MEJORAR EL • DE TRANSPORTE POBLIC0 TAKE THE SURVEY BY MARCH 31st To share your thoughts on potential transit service improvements for 2025 to 2030. RESPONDA LA ENCUESTA ANTES DEL 31 DE MARZO Para compartir sus ideas sobre mejoras potenciales al transporte publico entre 2025 y 2030 ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN UPCOMING POP - UP EVENTS HILLSBOROUGH WALMART 501 HAMPTON POINTE B, HILLSBOROUGH, NC 2727 SEYMOUR SENIOR CENTER 2551 HOMESTEAD RD, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516 PASSMORE CENTER 103 MEADOWLANDS DR, HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278 DURHAM TECH OC CAMPUS 525 COLLEGE PARK RD, HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278 ® UNC HOSPITAL HILLSBOROUGH '30 WATERSTONE DR, HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278 ® MEBANEEGGSTRAVAGANZA DOWNTOWN, MEBANE, NC 27302 WWW.0 RANG ECOU • Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 1-3 ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Week 3 ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN LAST CHANCE TO TAKE THE SURVEY BY WWW. ORANGECOUNTYSRTP. COM Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 1-4 ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 2 TRANSIT POSTER ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN IMPROVE HELP US TRANSIT SERVICE RUBLICO • K`AkLTy�'� TAKE THE SURVEY ■ 0 MM BY MARCH 31st io To share your thoughts on potential transit service �■ .`, . improvements for 2025 to 2030 RESPONDA LA ENCUESTA ANTES DEL 31 DE MARZO Para compartir sus ideas sobre mejoras potencial�,-, al transporte publico entre 2025 y 2030 www.orangecountysrtp.com Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 2-5 ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 3 MONITOR AD ORANGE COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN HELP US IMPROVE "k, TRANSIT SERVICE AYUDENOS A MEJORAR • DE TRANSPORTE PUBLICO TAKE THE SURVEY BY MARCH 31st DtiO To share your thoughts on potential transit service •{' :• .� improvements for 2025 to 2030. RESPONDA LA ENCUESTA ANTES DEL 31 DE MARZO Para compartir sus ideas sobre mejoras potenciales al transporte •�' • �� publico entre 2025 y 2030 www.orangecountysrtp.com Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 3-6 Phase 1 Media Kit ORRT CGE ROUNT ANSIT �YN 4 EMAIL AND NEWSLETTER CONTENT Email Week 1 The Orange County Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) will identify opportunities to improve transit services in Orange County, NC and create an implementation plan for 2025 to 2030. An important part of this process is talking with stakeholders, transit riders, and people who live and work in Orange County about what improvements they want to see in Orange County transit over the five years of the plan. Here's how you can get involved: Take the Online Survey Tell us what improvements you'd like to see by March 31st. [ Place holder Survey Button] Attend a Pop-up Event The project team will be conducting pop-up events throughout Orange County. These events will provide transit riders and residents with an opportunity to hear about the project and provide quick input. Hillsborough Walmart — 501 Hampton Pointe B, Hillsborough, NC March 18th, 2:00 p.m. — 4:00 p.m.* Seymour Center - 2551 Homestead Road, Chapel Hill, NC March 19th, 11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m.* Passmore Center - 103 Meadowlands Drive, Hillsborough, NC March 19th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Durham Tech OC Campus - 525 College Park Road, Hillsborough, NC March 20th, 9:00 p.m. — 11:00 a.m. UNC Hospital Hillsborough- 430 Waterstone Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278 March 20th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Mebane Eggstravaganza — Downtown Mebane, Mebane, NC March 23rd, 11 :00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates ORANGE COUNTY Phase 1 Media Kit SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN If you can't make it out or want more details about the project, please visit www.orangecountysrtp.com. *Weather Permitting. Please visit the website for updates. Week 3 Reminder Email Time is running out, and this is your last chance to provide your valuable input. The survey will officially close on March 315t Your feedback is incredibly important to us, and it will help us make informed decisions to improve the transit service in Orange County! We understand that your schedule may be busy but taking a few minutes to complete the survey will make a significant impact on the Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP). To participate, click the button and take the survey now. [Survey Button Link] If you have already completed the survey, we sincerely thank you. We encourage you to share this email with friends, family, and co-workers who use the public transit system in Orange County. If you have any questions or want to learn more visit the project website at www.orangecountVsrtp.com. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 4-8 Phase 1 Media Kit ORRT CGE ROUNT ANSIT -YN 5 PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: [Name] [Role] [Phone Number] [Email Address] Residents Invited to Provide Feedback on Short Range Transit Plan in Orange County [Orange County, North Carolina] — [Date] — Orange County is seeking feedback from community members on transit service improvements. Take the online survey any time through March 31 st The project team will be conducting popup events throughout Orange County during the month of March 2024. These events will provide transit riders and residents with an opportunity to hear about the project and provide input. Hillsborough Walmart — 501 Hampton Pointe B, Hillsborough, NC March 18th, 2:00 p.m. — 4:00 p.m.* Seymour Center - 2551 Homestead Road, Chapel Hill, NC March 19th, 11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m.* Passmore Center - 103 Meadowlands Drive, Hillsborough, NC March 19th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Durham Tech OC Campus - 525 College Park Road, Hillsborough, NC March 20th, 9:00 p.m. — 11:00 a.m. UNC Hospital Hillsborough- 430 Waterstone Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278 March 20th, 3:00 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. Mebane Eggstravaganza — Downtown Mebane, Mebane, NC March 23rd, 11 :00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. For more information about the Short-Range Transit Plan and upcoming engagement opportunities, please visit: www.orangecountvsrtp.com. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates ORANGE TRANSPORTATION COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT COUNTY NoKm CALIQLLNA PUBLIC TRANSIT OrangeCounty Item 5.b. Subject: US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Attachment: Draft US 70 Study PURPOSE: To recommend Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approve US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study. BACKGROUND: In 2019, Board of County Commissioners approved the US 70 as a county priority for consideration in the state's Strategic Prioritization of Transportation (SPOT) process. VHB recently completed the US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study. It presents a comprehensive understanding that safety and congestion issues would be addressed through the state's highway mobility and complete streets process for multimodal accommodations. Key Highlights • US 70 be designated Transit Emphasis Corridor with specific transit improvements. • Multimodal recommendations are bike lanes,sidewalks, multiuse path, and transit access • Reduce speed but widen east of Mebane for all uses, improve safety, and mobility. NCDOT Complete Streets (link) and County Complete Street Policy All highway projects now go through a comprehensive "complete" use assessment. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) is the governing document for the state's new Complete Street Policy and its implementation. Per the new policy, "during the Comprehensive Transportation Planning process, bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and other multimodal usage shall be presumed to exist along and across certain corridors." NCDOT recognizes that an individual user is a pedestrian, bicyclist,transit rider, EV/gas vehicle driver, etc., and often times in the same day. Therefore, the policy dictates "Consideration of multimodal elements will begin at the inception of the transportation planning process and the decisions made will be documented." Orange County BOCC also adopted a Complete Street and Vision Zero policy on October 2022. Local Authorization—UDO and Collector Street Plans The Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) section 2.5.3.(v) and reiterated in section 6.10.A.1.(b), includes the requirements for reserving and dedicating right of way or requiring road construction listed in locally adopted Collector Street Plans or on the CTP. Specific mention is also made to the dedication of right of way based on the concepts shown on the CTP and locally adopted transportation plans, in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 136 66.2 and § 136 66.10. Orange County currently has three locally adopted transportation plans: • Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane and Orange Grove Road Access Management Plans • Eno River Economic Development Access Management Plan • NC 54 Multimodal Corridor Study (East and West) 600 Hwy 86 N - Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Phone (919) 245-2008 - Fax(919) 732-2137 orangecountync.gov/transportation Approval of the US 70 West Multimodal Corridor Study will demonstrate County's commitment to multi-mobility, transit access, and safety of the transportation as an important local priority. It also demonstrates to local, regional and state partners that the County, like NCDOT's Complete Streets, sees the road network as equitable for all travelers, not favoring one over the other, and acknowledges that a traveler throughout the course of their day will walk one place, ride another, drive to and from a third, and bike yet another. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact at this time. Local approval of study allows County opportunity to pursue state and federal funding for transportation improvements along the corridor. It also allows County staff to utilize it in development review process for the dedication of right-of-way for future state funded improvements and the construction of bike/ped facilities through enforcement of County's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goals are applicable to this item: • GOAL: FOSTER A COMMUNITY CULTURE THAT REJECTS OPPRESSION AND INEQUITY The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race or color; religious or philosophical beliefs; sex, gender or sexual orientation; national origin or ethnic background; age; military service; disability; and familial, residential or economic status. • GOAL: ENSURE ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY The creation and preservation of infrastructure, policies, programs, and funding necessary for residents to provide shelter, food, clothing and medical care for themselves and their dependents. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The following Orange County Environmental Goal impact is applicable to this item: • CLEAN OR AVOIDED TRANSPORTATION Implement programs that monitor and improve local and regional air quality by: 1) promoting public transportation options; 2) decreasing dependence on single-occupancy vehicles, and 3) otherwise minimizing the need for travel. RECOMMENDATION(S): Recommend BOCC approve US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study FINAL PLAN US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study PREPARED FOR ORANGE COUNTY NOR III c_,\R.OLINA Orange County 300 West Tryon Street Hillsborough, NC 27278 919.732.8181 PREPARED BY 10 VHB NC, P.C. 940 Main Campus Drive Raleigh, NC 27606 919.829.0328 February 2024 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table of Contents 1 Study Context................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose..........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Context...........................................................................................................................................2 2 The Plan Making Process..............................................................................................................7 2.1 Steering Committee..................................................................................................................7 2.2 Plan Development Overview.................................................................................................7 2.3 Stakeholder Interviews............................................................................................................7 2.4 Community Workshops...........................................................................................................8 2.5 Interactive Map...........................................................................................................................9 2.6 Survey...........................................................................................................................................10 3 Goal-Setting.................................................................................................................................12 3.1 Vision............................................................................................................................................12 3.2 Plan Goals...................................................................................................................................12 4 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues......................................................................................14 4.1 Natural Environment..............................................................................................................14 4.1.1 Protected Areas and Open Space.....................................................................................14 4.1.2 Wildlife.........................................................................................................................................17 4.1.3 Relevant Plans...........................................................................................................................21 4.1.4 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................22 4.2 Built Environment....................................................................................................................22 4.2.1 Places of Interest......................................................................................................................22 4.2.2 Historic Properties...................................................................................................................24 4.2.3 Hazardous Materials...............................................................................................................24 4.2.4 Relevant Plans...........................................................................................................................26 4.2.5 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................27 4.3 Motorized Transportation....................................................................................................27 4.3.1 Roadway Design.......................................................................................................................27 4.3.2 Intersections...............................................................................................................................28 4.3.3 Historic Traffic Volumes........................................................................................................31 4.3.4 Traffic Data.................................................................................................................................32 4.3.5 Traffic Operations and Quality of Service......................................................................38 4.3.6 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans..................................................................42 4.3.7 System Connectivity...............................................................................................................46 4.3.8 Future Conditions....................................................................................................................47 4.3.9 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................48 4.4 Active Transportation.............................................................................................................49 4.4.1 Pedestrian Facilities.................................................................................................................49 4.4.2 Bicycle Facilities........................................................................................................................51 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.4.3 Observed Pedestrian and Bicycle Trips...........................................................................51 4.4.4 Bicycle Levels of Service........................................................................................................52 4.4.5 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans..................................................................52 4.4.6 System Connectivity...............................................................................................................55 4.4.7 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................55 4.5 Public Transportation.............................................................................................................56 4.5.1 Transit Service...........................................................................................................................56 4.5.2 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans..................................................................59 4.5.3 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................62 4.6 Safety............................................................................................................................................63 4.6.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes..........................................................................................66 4.6.2 Large Vehicle Crashes............................................................................................................66 4.6.3 Rail Crossing Crashes.............................................................................................................67 4.6.4 Critical Issues.............................................................................................................................67 4.7 Critical Issues Summary.........................................................................................................69 5 Recommendations.......................................................................................................................70 5.1 Plan Overview............................................................................................................................70 5.1.1 Mobility Plan..............................................................................................................................72 5.1.2 Placemaking Plan.....................................................................................................................78 5.1.3 Safety Plan..................................................................................................................................80 5.1.4 Job Access Plan.........................................................................................................................88 5.1.5 Natural Environment Plan....................................................................................................91 5.1.6 Objectives Summary by Segment.....................................................................................92 5.2 Roadway Improvements.......................................................................................................95 5.2.1 Infrastructure Improvements..............................................................................................95 5.2.2 Traffic Operational Improvements....................................................................................97 5.2.3 Speed Policies...........................................................................................................................99 5.2.4 Additional Policies................................................................................................................102 5.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements.........................................................................103 5.3.1 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements........................................................................................103 5.3.2 Transit-Oriented Development.......................................................................................108 5.3.1 Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements...................................................................109 5.3.2 Policy Measures.....................................................................................................................114 5.4 Public Transit Improvements............................................................................................115 5.4.1 Infrastructure Improvements...........................................................................................115 5.4.2 Service Improvements........................................................................................................121 6 Implementation and Funding ................................................................................................. 125 6.1 Funding Opportunities.......................................................................................................125 6.1.1 NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding............. 125 6.1.2 North Carolina Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Funding........ 127 6.1.3 Federal Grant Funding Opportunities...........................................................................128 6.1.4 Private Development Interests........................................................................................129 6.2 Implementation Priorities..................................................................................................129 6.2.1 Summary of Funding Opportunities.............................................................................130 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study List of Tables Table No. Description Page Table 1 US 70 Corridor Plan Goals..................................................................................................................13 Table 2 Managed Protected Areas in Project Area...................................................................................15 Table 3 Historic Properties in the Project Area...........................................................................................25 Table4 StreetLight AADTs..................................................................................................................................33 Table 5 StreetLight Estimated AADTs.............................................................................................................33 Table 6 2019 Speed Data and Limits..............................................................................................................34 Table7 2019 Truck Percentages.......................................................................................................................36 Table 8 2022 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 Using Two-Lane Highways Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................39 Table 9 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 in Segment A (Mebane) and Segments C-D (Hillsborough)................................................................................................................39 Table 10 2022 Intersections AM and PM Peak Hour LOS Summary....................................................41 Table 11 2050 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 Using Two-Lane Highways Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................47 Table 12 2050 AM and PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary..............................48 Table 13 Corridor Segment Bicycle LOS Summary for US 70................................................................52 Table 14 US 70 Corridor Crash Rates...............................................................................................................63 Table 15 US 70 Business Crash Rates..............................................................................................................63 Table 16 Crash Severity Description.................................................................................................................64 Table 17 Total Crashes per Segment by Severity........................................................................................64 Table 18 Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes (August 2017 -July 2022)..................................................66 Table 19 Critical Issues Summary......................................................................................................................69 Table 20 US 70 Corridor Plan Goals..................................................................................................................71 Table21 Segment A Objectives.........................................................................................................................92 Table22 Segment B Objectives........................................................................................................................92 Table23 Segment C Objectives.........................................................................................................................93 Table24 Segment D Objectives.........................................................................................................................93 Table25 Segment E Objectives........................................................................................................................94 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table26 Segment F Objectives........................................................................................................................94 Table 27 NCDOT Complete Streets Policy(2019) Cost Share Scenarios........................................127 Table 28 Complete Streets Betterment Cost Share.................................................................................127 List of Figures Figure No. Description Page Figure 1 US 70 Study Corridor, Segmented.....................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Snapshot from the Round 1 Interactive Public Input Map....................................................10 Figure 3 Snapshot from the Round 2 Interactive Public Input Map....................................................11 Figure 4 Protected Areas and Open Space....................................................................................................16 Figure 5 Wildlife Resources in Corridor...........................................................................................................18 Figure 6 Major Wildlife Corridors &Critical US 70 Crossing Areas......................................................20 Figure7 Places of Interest....................................................................................................................................23 Figure 8 Project Vicinity and Study Intersections........................................................................................30 Figure 9 Historic Traffic Volume Trends by Study Segment...................................................................32 Figure 10 2019 Seed Data and Statutory Limits.............................................................................................35 Figure 11 2019 StreetLight Total Truck Percentages....................................................................................37 Figure 12 Level of Service Illustration.................................................................................................................38 Figure 13 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70.............................................................................39 Figure 14 Worst Case Intersection Level of Service Summary for US 70.............................................40 Figure 15 2020-2029 NCDOT STIP Projects in Corridor..............................................................................44 Figure 16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations...................................................................................50 Figure 17 Transit Route in Corridor.....................................................................................................................57 Figure18 GoTriangle Route Map.........................................................................................................................58 Figure 19 Run-Off Road Crash Severity& Passing Zones..........................................................................65 Figure 20 US 70 Recommended Roadway Infrastructure Improvements............................................96 Figure 21 US 70 Recommended Traffic Operational Improvements.....................................................98 Figure22 Speed Limit Changes.........................................................................................................................101 Figure 23 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment A..............................................................................104 Figure 24 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment B.............................................................................105 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Figure 25 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments C/D/F...................................................................105 Figure 26 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment E..............................................................................106 Figure 27 US 70 Recommended TOD Improvements...............................................................................109 Figure 28 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments A/B.................110 Figure 29 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments C/D..................111 Figure 30 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment E.........................114 Figure 31 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segements A/13116 Figure 32 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segements C/D118 Figure 33 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segement F......120 Figure 34 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Service Improvements, Segement A/B..............121 Figure 35 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Service Improvements, Segement C/D/F.........122 US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Study Context The following section defines the study area and purpose. 1.1 Purpose The US 70 Corridor Study is an in-depth review of:the 18.9-mile stretch of US 70 between NC 119 in Mebane to the Orange/Durham County line; and the 3-mile stretch of US 70 Business from INC 86 (Churton Street) to US 70. The existing two-lane roadway is a regionally significant east-west corridor with daily traffic volumes ranging from less than 4,000 vehicles/day to 17,000. Peak period congestion is concentrated at locations with more frequent intersections and/or heavy conflicts/turning movements. The route acts as an alternate route for 1-85 and 1-40 while connecting diverse agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses, posing conflicting priorities for roadway design. Much of the western portion of the corridor runs adjacent to the North Carolina Railroad (NCRR) line carrying both passenger and freight rail services. Numerous streams cross this portion of US 70, most notably the Eno River—where the Mountains-to-Sea Trail (MST) is also present. Parks and open space in the study area include the Eno River State Park and Quarry, Historic Occoneechee Speedway and Natural Area, River Park and Riverwalk Trail, Kings Highway Park, Efland-Cheeks Park and Community Center, and Lake Michael Park. Recognizing the need to evaluate this vital roadway, Orange County, the City of Mebane, Town of Hillsborough, NCDOT Division 7, NCDOT Integrated Mobility Division, Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (BGMPO), and the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) united to fund this study. The goal of this study is to develop a long-term vision for US 70, the communities it serves, and the surrounding natural areas.This vision is comprehensive, preserving and enhancing the corridor's character, economic vitality, environmental resources, and multimodal transportation options. While this report will not determine ultimate design details, its analysis and recommendations will guide those decisions by documenting transportation needs, community priorities, and environmental constraints. The project's Study Team reflects the broad interests of the corridor, representing the City of Mebane, the Town of Hillsborough, BGMPO, DCHC MPO, Alamance and Orange Counties, VHB, and Rose &Associates. The Study Team examined existing growth management plans, economic and land use trends, and transportation systems to inform short- and long-term recommendations for region's future prosperity. 1 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 1.2 Context The study corridor spans 18.9 miles of US 70 from NC 119 in Mebane and the Orange/Durham County line (classified as Minor Arterial per federal function classifications), and 3 miles of US 70 Business from NC 86 (Churton Street) in Hillsborough to US 70 (Major Collector/Other Principal Arterial). Historically, this route was designed to link the municipalities of Durham, Hillsborough, and Mebane; while the corridor is still an important commuter route, it now acts as a secondary route for 1-85 and 1-40, and a growing share of its trips begin or end within the corridor in response to increasing residential and commercial development. To address the corridor's diverse traffic demand, land use, topography, and roadway design, this report divides the corridor into shorter segments that share relevant characteristics. Figure 1 identifies seven corridor segments, A— F. Segments A through E comprise the US 70 corridor from west to east, while Segment F is US 70 Business. The average segment is 3.6 miles long, each spanning between three and four miles. Segment A Segment A passes through Downtown Mebane—the most urban part of the corridor—and the Alamance/Orange County line, extending from James Walker Road east to Mace Road. NCRR tracks run along the southern side of this segment, creating delays and safety concerns when trains cross intersecting roadways. Right-of-way constraints and historical sites limit improvement options. Outside of Downtown Mebane, US 70 is predominantly abutted by commercial and light industrial uses. The most recent BGMPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), adopted on May 24, 2022, identifies congestion relief, enhanced mobility, and intersection modernization as key needs for this segment.Additional plans recommend bicycle/pedestrian improvements and a fixed-route bus service in Downtown Mebane. Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with paved 2'-4' shoulders. • There are no bicycle accommodations. • The speed limits drops from 55 mph to 45 mph at the western end of this segment, transitioning down to 25 mph through the Central Business District (CBD), then back up to 45 mph through the eastern half of the segment. • Estimated 2022 average annual daily traffic volumes (AADTs) through the Mebane CBD range from 9,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day(vpd). • The Orange-Alamance Connector and Orange-Durham Express bus routes operate along this segment. Segment B Segment B extends from the Buckhorn Road intersection east to Lloyds Dairy Road. Land use along this segment includes industrial, institutional, commercial, residential, and agricultural development. The latest DCHC MPO CTP (amended March 9, 2022) recommends transit improvements along this segment. 2 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study r Ji r / � rl✓� � I • _tip. , J, I _ r ail'^ J) 1 h 1 � � 1 I � I 2 Mlles Legend Segment A-US 70 from NC 119 to Mace Road Segment A —Segment D ; -;US 70 Corridor Study Buffer -- Railroad Track Segment 8-US 70 from Mace(toad to Lloyds Dairy Road Segment B — Segment E = County Boundary Segment C-US 70 from Lloyds Dairy Road to east of NC 86(Churton Street) Segment D-US 70 from east of NC 86(Churton Street)to US 70 Business Segment C Segment F Municipal Boundary Segment E-US 70 from US 70 Business to the Orange/Durham County Line Segment F-US 70 Business From NC 66(Churton Street)to US 70 Figure 1 US 70 Study Corridor, Segmented 3 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with paved 2'-4' shoulders. • There are no sidewalks or bicycle facilities. • The Orange-Alamance Connector and Orange-Durham Express bus routes operate along this segment. • The speed limit is 45 mph throughout. • Estimated 2022 AADTs range from 5,000 to 7,500 vpd, decreasing as the corridor extends east from Mebane. Segment C Segment C extends eastward from Lloyds Dairy Road to the NC 86/Churton Street intersection. It includes a high-speed interchange with the 1-85 Connector that does not serve eastbound US 70 traffic and incorporates an unorthodox left-lane exit (westbound) and a mainline yield (eastbound). This design presents particular challenges to pedestrians and bicyclists. East of this interchange is a narrow bridge over the Eno River, followed by a significant hill and curve.This river crossing falls within the watershed critical area immediately upstream of the town of Hillsborough's water treatment plant and river outtake. Land use along this segment includes industrial, institutional, commercial, residential, and agricultural. The latest DCHC MPO CTP (amended March 9, 2022) identifies this segment as needing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements, and recommends a park-and-ride lot near Revere Road. The 1-85/US 70 Connector interchange is planned for conversion to a full access connection. Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with paved 2'-4' shoulders, with the exception of the 1-85 Connector interchange, where the eastbound and westbound lanes separate, and an additional lane is added to the entry/exit roadways. • Sidewalks and crosswalks are only at the Revere Road/Faucette Mill Road intersection. • West of the Hillsborough Town Limits, the speed limit is 50 mph, except for a short 55 mph segment though the 1-85 Connector interchange. The speed limit is 45 mph within the Hillsborough Town Limits. • Estimated 2022 AADTs are around 5,000 vpd west of the 1-85 Connector, 12,000 west of the Connector, and 15,000 at NC 86/Churton Street. • The Orange-Alamance Connector and Orange-Durham Express bus routes operate along this segment. Segment D Segment D extends from the NC 86/Churton Street intersection north of downtown to the US 70 Business intersection at Palmers Grove Church Road. US 70 in the vicinity of Orange High School Road is subject to school-related queuing and delays. Intersections at NC 86, St Mary's Road, and Lawrence Road experience peak-period congestion and lack adequate pedestrian crossing treatments.There are significant grades approaching the new bridge across the Eno River,which lacks pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. Land use along this segment includes industrial, institutional, commercial, residential, and recreational. 4 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study The latest DCHC MPO CTP identifies this segment as needing bicycle and pedestrian accommodations west of Lawrence Road. It also recommends bus service improvements west of St Mary's Road, including a park& ride lot near Miller Road. Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with paved 2'-4' shoulders. • Other than a short sidewalk segment on the north side of US 70 east of NC 86, there are no sidewalks or bicycle facilities. • The speed limit is 45 mph west of the Eno River, transitioning to 55 mph to its east. • Estimated 2022 AADTs range from 15,000 vpd west of St Mary's Road to 10,000 vpd east of Lawrence Road. Segment E Segment E extends from the US 70 Business intersection east to NC 751, near the Durham County line. The portion of US 70 east of the 1-85 interchange is designated US 70 Business (US 70 follows 1-85 east though Durham). This segment is part of the NC Colonial Heritage Byway, as designated in the NC Scenic Byway program. Land use along it includes industrial, institutional, commercial, residential, and recreational. The latest DCHC MPO CTP identifies this segment as needing multimodal improvements west of Pleasant Green Road.The unconventional high-speed design (left-side exits and required U-turns) of the 1-85/US 70 interchange and its proximity to the Pleasant Green/Mt Herman Church Road intersection creates congestion and safety problems. This design is especially challenging for bicyclists and pedestrians, as well as emergency vehicles leaving the Eno Fire Department.While previous plans have suggested solutions, there are currently no planned improvements. Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with paved 2'-4' shoulders. • There are no sidewalks or bicycle facilities. • The speed limit is 55 mph, except between University Station Road and Mt Herman Church Road/1-85 where it is 45. • Estimated 2022 AADTs are over 15,000 vpd west of the 1-85 interchange, dropping to 10,000 or less to the east. Segment F Segment F extends from east of the NC 86/Churton Street intersection to the US 70 Business intersection at Palmers Grove Church Road. Like Segment E, this stretch is part of the NC Colonial Heritage Byway. Land use along this segment includes light industrial, institutional, commercial, residential, and recreational. This section contains several local employment centers (about a dozen enterprises), many of which are distribution operations, and is home to a destination recreation facility - Sportsplex -and the Passmore Senior Center. Historical structure pose development constraints. This facility is functionally classified as Other Principal Arterial west of NC 8 and as Major Collector to the east. The latest DCHC MPO CTP identifies this segment as needing bicycle improvements west of Lawrence Road and enhanced bus service west of NC 86. 5 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Key segment attributes: • The prevailing roadway cross-section is two lanes with minimal paved shoulders (e.g., less than 2'). • There are limited sidewalks on the south side of US 70 Business, extending east from NC 86 to the Sportsplex. • There are no bicycle facilities. • The speed limit is 40 mph throughout. • Estimated 2022 AADTs range from approximately 9,000 vpd on the west end, down to approximately 3,000 on the east. 6 Study Context US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study The Plan Making Process The following section outlines how public input informed the US 70 Corridor Study. 2.1 Steering Committee The Steering Committee comprised representatives from the City of Mebane, the Town of Hillsborough, BGMPO, DCHC MPO, Alamance and Orange Counties, VHB, and Rose &Associates. For the duration of the two-year project, the group met monthly to discuss goals, draft recommendations, and review plan elements. 2.2 Plan Development Overview Using research compiled from prior planning efforts, GIS databases, and field observations, the project team assessed the corridor's current condition, analyzing roadway design characteristics, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and environmental and jurisdictional restrictions.After identifying the critical issues revealed by both data analysis and public engagement events, the team evaluated alternative solutions for public feedback and plan development. 2.3 Stakeholder Interviews As part of the Public Involvement Plan, the project team solicited interviews from groups that possessed specialized knowledge of the US 70 corridor. Interviews were conducted over the phone during December 2022. Interview subjects were selected based on their subject matter specialization and ability to complement the study team, as well as existing data sources. These sources included public safety, education, and real estate and development perspectives. Major findings from these discussions are identified below. • US 70 is often used an alternate route to 1-85. • Wildlife crossings are often seen along the corridor and are important to consider in further recommendations. • Vehicle crashes are often seen along the corridor, most notably at West Hill Avenue in Hillsborough and 5t" Street in Mebane. • There is an existing pedestrian use of the US 70 corridor, particularly for hiking and biking activities near Haw River, Downtown Mebane, and Hillsborough's connection to the MST corridor. • Speed limits should be considered for lowering in various areas of the corridor. • There is a safety concern for the corridor, particularly at railroad crossings, including improvements to the 1-85 connector. 7 The Plan Making Process US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 2.4 Community Workshops Community workshops occurred in two rounds with three sessions per round. The sessions were scheduled for locations that balance the geography of the corridor and are intended for—but not limited to—the general public and affected populations.The first round of community workshops was in March 2023.The workshop dates and locations are listed below: • March 7, 2023 — 5:00 PM —7:00 PM o Passmore Center— 103 Meadowlands Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • March 9, 2023 — 5:00 PM —7:00 PM 0 Mebane Arts and Community Center—633 Corregidor Street, Mebane, NC 27302 • March 14, 2023— 5:00 PM - 7:00 PM o Town Hall Annex— 105 E Corbin Street, Hillsborough, NC 27278 These workshops were advertised by each partner agency in their respective communities. Workshop content informed the community about identified deficiencies, and confirmed the Study Team captured the concerns, needs, and vision of the community as the project team proceeded with developing project alternatives and recommendations. Feedback and responses from the first round of public workshops were incorporated into subsequent project deliverables. In total, thirty-six individuals attended across all three events. A total of three written comments were shared, while numerous anecdotal observations were made. Participants were asked to label a study area map with areas of concern, areas they would like to see bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, and places of interest (schools, parks, community centers, etc). Participants were also asked to "vote" on the priorities they had for the corridor. Options included: • Relieving vehicular congestion • Slowing down speeds of cars • Improving intersections • Maintaining the character of the corridor • Providing more bus connections • Providing more pedestrian connections • Providing more bicycle connections. Over the three community meetings, pedestrian connections were most important to participants, followed by relieving vehicular congestion. The least voted for was maintaining the character of the corridor. In addition to the in-person meetings, the project team hosted an online website, showing the study area, that allowed individuals to comment. They could place a comment at a specific location and state any concerns, desire for new multimodal connections, and places of interest.The online map was available for a total of 8 weeks. Fifty-five comments were left by the community.The following are comments that appeared regularly: • Sidewalk additions to various parts of US 70. • Improved crosswalks. • Protected bike lanes. • Improved access and circulation into schools. • Address speeds. 8 The Plan Making Process US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study The second round of community workshops occurred in November and December of 2023.The workshop dates and locations are listed below: • November 19, 2023—2:00 PM —4:00 PM o Mebane City Hall — 106 East Washington Street, Mebane NC 27302 • December 2, 2023—2:00 PM —4:00 PM o Town Hall Annex— 105 E Corbin Street, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • December 9, 2023—2:00 PM -4:00 PM o Whitted Building—300 W Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC 27278 These workshops were advertised by each partner agency in their respective communities. The project team presented a summary of the existing conditions data and findings and presented draft recommendations for each segment of the corridor. Feedback and responses from the second round of public workshops were incorporated into the final recommendations. In total, twenty-five individuals attended across all three events. Participants were encouraged to ask questions during the presentation about the recommendations and offer comments, which were noted by the project team. 2.5 Interactive Map For each round of community workshops, the project team welcomed corridor comments through an interactive map. The interactive map was prominently featured on the project website and promoted through the workshops and Study Team communications to the public. During the first round of workshops, residents, commuters, and other users of corridor were encouraged to contribute to the Study Team's understanding of the corridor by placing "markers"' on assets, issues, opportunities, and quick fixes on locations of interest.This map was open for comment for 8 weeks. Figure 2 below displays the distribution of the 55 interactive submissions by comment category.A plurality of submissions was vehicle-related current issues that addressed safety, visibility, speed, passing, and other operational problems. 9 The Plan Making Process US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study ultt •Corri tudy Ak i as N' •. y rf F @MM Ql�iH� 54 J Figure 2 Snapshot from the Round 1 Interactive Public Input Map The second round of community outreach included an interactive map that provided the draft recommendations for public input. Users of the site were able to add comments on each recommendation, identified by mode of travel, and/or"like" a recommendation to show agreeance. This map was open for comment for 6 weeks. Figure 3 below displays points of recommendations, coded by segment and recommendation type. Four comments were offered and 14 "likes"were given to various recommendations. 2.6 Survey The project team also offered a survey to garner feedback on policy recommendations that applied to the corridor as a whole. The survey was 15 questions and took about 10 minutes to complete.A total of 5 responses were received. The survey was shared on the project website and by the corridor communities. It was open online for 6 weeks. Overall, public sentiment regarding the project was positive. Most individuals liked the recommendations presented and acknowledged the need for improved connectivity and access for multimodal users. 10 The Plan Making Process `70 � • - • • • ro Find address no r McDade - ' .,Pines- +°� j •a Wei G I�, , •�- reen Spri 1 L, ,, J �, �� • esdows harter ieldstream © �I' �.'`�y.• *1 ,. �. ..°1r,�1 • ,a �r'" Meadows id 0 :t ,t gay r Ate' t ' � �f S- ;.,,.�t l c, Just-A-Mere .,�•�, 15j 4 Y Yr.�• ,r{� 7 R '/i,..''�.. -`•; r. •o ` :.. ✓ Landing r :.:a F r /iMi# "�-�.� "I*"r tti �li1C •a,. . s rw rj rI -S Sunset Rid e� ,Jordan0a ` . Pleasant .�. u •,+.. �tiF r•� rr �'• 'TM , ,Wilkerson Green Estates cres crest -y i. �• •.` Esl les r Sri • 'wood ••4, +t; Rose ood bes Ford Willow Ridg � a, �.: •1' F - ` t, Is rough Popla idge ki r Sunshine Acres Jaat ppa Oaks { 1 r? o-- P i•` ,_ Saven Mills - Strayhor Hills �` •;u « NI,• T �_ Farms Un versity i r his �Y - ./ :� ► -� - 00• _ - Windy HIII Pines `!q� _ '�• ,+" ., r at >✓��r University •1 s 7 _ Acre r�y r J'� Z: _, New Hope :!; ► ��� ,1" •'Saga;R u;g�J,. •� `T _ Yin r I I � .•� � `�� � ` /�'� D:a� • , • • • ' • • - ' • • . • US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Goal-Setting The following section overviews the vision that informed the plan's direction. 3.1 Vision This plan is guided by a community-informed vision that addresses the priorities and concerns of the US 70 corridor's residents. Following these workshops, the most consistently shared values were condensed into a cohesive, aspirational vision statement that guided the subsequent policy framework. The US 70 between NC 119 in Mebane to the Orange/Durham County border will be an economically vibrant multimodal corridor, supporting high-capacity transit, free-flowing traffic, efficient freight transport, and bicycle and pedestrian connectivity. Without sacrificing the character and environmental resources of its communities, the corridor's infrastructure and policies will prioritize the safety, mobility, and accessibility of all users traveling on US 70 for work and recreation. 3.2 Plan Goals The vision statement will drive policy decisions that shape future development in the US 70 corridor. It will guide improvement projects that limit motorized congestion and promote transit use while elevating the accessibility and safety needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. Additionally, improvements will be designed to enhance community character, facilitate broader employment opportunities, and protect the natural environment. These community values are captured in the following goals. 12 Goal-Setting US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 1 US 70 Corridor Plan Goals Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and Afreight. A (k Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Mobility Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility. JGoal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. y ;VD Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Placemaking Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 7:Work towards Vision Zero. Safety Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. Goal 9: Improve multimodal access tojobs within the corridor. 1 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. Job Access Goal 11: Improve multimodal access to parks throughout the corridor. I Natural Goal 12: Reduce wildlife-automobile conflicts. Environment 13 Goal-Setting US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Existing Conditions and Critical Issues The following section identifies and evaluates the problems that need addressing to attain the plan's goal. An Existing Conditions Report was completed in July 2023. The following sections summarize that report; a copy of the complete report can be found on the project webpage or can be provided upon request. 4.1 Natural Environment An environmental screening was completed for the project study area utilizing existing GIs resources. This screening analysis indicated areas of possible environmental concern, including streams and wetland areas, community resources, and locations of hazardous waste sites. These data were obtained from a variety of sources and mapped throughout the corridor. Detailed information on the various resources reviewed is included in the Existing Conditions Report. This section focuses on the open space and wildlife resources. 4.1.1 Protected Areas and Open Space The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) is responsible for surveying and designating properties and easements where natural resource conservation is one of the primary management goals, also known as managed areas. This dataset also includes several properties and easements that are not primarily managed for conservation, but that are of conservation interest. This conservation interest ranges from properties and easements which support rare species and intact, high-quality natural communities to those that are open spaces in places where open space is scarce. Managed areas along the project corridor, including two dedicated nature preserves, are shown in Table 2. 14 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 2 Managed Protected Areas in Project Area Site Name Owner Site Type Description Orange County Open Space Orange County Local Managed for multi-use—subject Government to extractive or overhead use NC Division of Mitigation NCDEQ State Easement Managed for biodiversity— Services disturbance events suppressed NC Clean Water NCDNCR State Easement Managed for biodiversity— Management Trust Fund disturbance events suppressed Duke Forest Duke University Private Site Managed for multi-use—subject to extractive or overhead use Eno River Duke Forest Mesic Registered Managed for biodiversity— Slopes Registered Heritage Duke University Heritage Area disturbance events suppressed Area Eno River Association Eno River Private Easement Managed for multi-use—subject Easement to extractive or overhead use Triangle Land Conservancy TLC Private Easement Managed for biodiversity— Easement* disturbance events suppressed Mountains-to-Sea Trail NCDNCR State Park Managed for multi-use—subject to extractive or overhead use Historic Preservation NC Preserve Private Site Managed for multi-use—subject Foundation to extractive or overhead use James M.Johnston Nature Classical American Dedicated Managed for biodiversity— Preserve Homes Preservation Nature Preserve disturbance events proceed or Trust are mimicked Managed for biodiversity— Eno River State Park* NCDNCR State Park disturbance events proceed or are mimicked Dedicated Managed for biodiversity— Eno River Nature Preserve NCDNCR Nature Preserve disturbance events proceed or are mimicked *Contains Land Trust Conservation or Conservation Tax Credit Property Out of these managed areas, the Montrose Gardens, located in the Triangle Land Conservancy Easement, is identified as a Land Trust Conservation Property, and parts of the Eno River State Park are identified as Conservation Tax Credit Property. In addition, three voluntary agriculture district parcels, all owned by Andrew B Lloyd Jr., are in the project area west of Hillsborough at US 70 and the 1-85 connector. All the protected areas and open space in the project corridor are shown in Figure 4. This GIS-level screening also included land and water conservation funded properties, but no features were identified within the project study area. 15 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study vhb -1 57 EBA w x' {� 1 I I _ r+>< ' I -- ;• — Cj {—] n i /. DURHAM :,y. ■i+ jig } r I J 9 0.3 0.6 09 Miles Ir ��� 751 Legend US 7D Corridor Study Suffer Railroad Track ........ Conservati on Tax Credit Property Parks and Open Space Grange County Park _ County Boundary Managed Area VAG 11 17 r,sa P�space Municipal Boundary �Land 7`ru5t CvnservaEon i Property State Owned Land Gar p Figure 4 Protected Areas and Open Space 16 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.1.2 Wildlife 4.1.2.1 Wildlife Resources While it is not expected that this corridor study project would directly impact plant or animal species, best management strategies during construction must be implemented to protect aquatic habitats within and downstream of the project study area. The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) is responsible for identifying occurrences of rare plants and animals, exemplary or unique natural communities, and important animal assemblages (see Figure 5). Collectively, these plants, animals, natural communities, and animal assemblages are referred to as elements of natural diversity, or simply as elements. Some of the NHP resources that have been identified include: • Easements of land managed by several agencies: o NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund (State) o NC Division of Mitigation Services (State) o Triangle Land Conservation Easement (Private) • Orange County Water and Sewer Authority(OWASA) Property (Local) • Orange County Open Space (Local) 0 Six Natural Heritage Natural Areas (Name—Rating—ID) ■ Eno River Mesic Slopes and Floodplain—General— NAID#2197 ■ Eno River Aquatic Habitat—Very High — NAID#980 ■ Poplar Ridge Slopes and Bottom—Very High— NAID#2190 ■ Eno River/Cates Ford Slopes and Uplands—Very High — NAID#1701 ■ Eno River Mountain Spleenwort and Rhododendron Bluff—General— NAID#2359 ■ Middle Eno River Bluffs and Slopes—Very High— NAID #455 0 30 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, which are primarily Natural Communities located west of the Town of Hillsborough. This GIS-level screening also included game lands; however, no features were identified within the study area. 17 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study z jli i ib r r Hlj[�LSBO L•` ti c + 0.1 rrL - ` DURHAM :47 f L t' r r D 03 96 99 Miles Legend _ L!S 70 CoMdar Strdy Buffer Railroad hack NatruaI Heritage Elements Occurences(NHEO) Animal Mumopal Boundary ®Natural Hen taoe Natural Area(NH NA) Natural community County Boundary Plant Figure 5 Wildlife Resources in Corridor 18 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.1.2.2 Animal Crashes Crash data analysis indicates there were 67 animal crashes (8% of total crashes) in the corridor. Segment B and Segment C had the most animal crashes with 26 and 25, respectively, and most of these were concentrated north of Hillsborough. As detailed in the 2019 report,A Landscape Plan for Wildlife Habitat Connectivity in the Eno River and New Hope Creek Watersheds, these crashes represent not only a danger to drivers and passengers.The crashes, along with the barrier created by the roadway itself, are a substantial threat to critical ecosystems and the wildlife they support. The Eno River and New Hope Creek-Jordan Lake watersheds are home to ecologically important habitats supporting a rich diversity of plant and animal species. Development and climate change cause habitat fragmentation and loss. To survive, animal species must be able to move within and between remaining high-priority wildlife habitats. Functional ecosystems require a connected network of habitats and corridors for movement. In addition to sustaining diverse wildlife populations, such connections can benefit water quality, native plants, working farms and forests, and public health and safety. Figure 6 indicates critical wildlife crossing locations in Segments C, D, and E of the US 70 Corridor. The Landscape Plan identifies criteria for barrier roads and potential crossing locations, along with potential actions to preserve and enhance connectivity within and between wildlife habitats. This information will help guide design recommendations for US 70 that will benefit both traffic safety and the environment. 19 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study ma's". Jr Protected areas (NCNHP 2019b) overlaid on habitat corridors (Showing critical crossing areas along US 70 Study Corridor) WC111'. .. r• ' � . � R ' S: �c. � l` _ �fa �R #r • �Wti I Protected Areas - 4- Habitat-Corridor Network MLA _Highest Connectivity Value a Higher Connectivity Value n } f High Connectivity Value 4: -► _ '�I� , � t Local or alternative network Unranked �i Jr PrajectArea County River ,f Lake Major Road Adapted from A Landscape Flan for Wildlife Habitat Connectivity,2019 Figure 6 Major Wildlife Corridors &Critical US 70 Crossing Areas 20 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.1.3 Relevant Plans 4.1.3.1 2014 Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2030 The Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies facilities, parks, and trails for expansion, improvement, and creation across Orange County by 2030. Key recommendations include: • A proposed segment of the MST is planned to cross the study corridor at the confluence of Cane Creek and the Haw River. • The Orange County trail segment is planned to parallel Cane Creek north from the Alamance County line to the Town of Hillsborough where the trail follows the Eno River westward. • The plan recommends that the county and other stakeholders develop a master plan to facilitate the completion of the trail segment and consider the location of a node or way station on county or OWASA land to provide basic hiking services. 4.1.3.2 A Landscape Plan for Wildlife Habitat Connectivity in the Eno River and New Hope Creek Watersheds (2019) Recognizing that the Eno River and New Hope Creek-Jordan Lake watersheds are home to ecologically important habitats supporting a rich diversity of plant and animal species, this plan identifies actions to preserve and enhance connectivity within and between wildlife habitats. Development and climate change cause habitat fragmentation and loss.To survive, animal species must be able to move within and between remaining high-priority wildlife habitats. Functional ecosystems require a connected network of habitats and corridors for movement. In addition to sustaining diverse wildlife populations, such connections can benefit water quality, native plants, working farms and forests, and public health and safety. This plan helps ensure wildlife habitat connectivity throughout the Eno River and New Hope Creek-Jordan Lake watersheds.The objectives most relevant to the US 70 Corridor Study involve guidance for decision- making related to land protection, land-use, and transportation. Three basic principles associated with this effort are: • Protect conservation priorities, including large natural areas and sensitive habitats. • Buffer these areas from suburban and urban development. • Connect these natural areas across the landscape to reduce habitat fragmentation. 4.1.3.3 2019 Eno New Hope Plan The goal of this project is to provide an actionable plan for ensuring wildlife habitat connectivity across the landscape of the Eno River and New Hope Creek-Jordan Lake watersheds through minimizing the impacts from future land uses changes. Recommendations relevant to US 70 include encouraging the redesign of the 1-85/US 70 to incorporate bridge designs that allow wildlife to cross safely under the bridge and that allow pedestrian passage along any existing or planned trail-system connectors. 4.1.3.4 2022 Bringing Eno River State Park to Downtown Hillsborough This project aims to acquire a group of parcels located near downtown between US 70 and 70A as park space. The collection of parcels makes up over 200 acres of preserved open space to be added to the Eno River State 21 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Park. Once added, the Eno River state park will comprise of over 4.7k acres connecting to Durham and other parts of Orange County. 4.1.4 Critical Issues The table below overviews deficiencies in the natural environment that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) Natural areas that are recreational destinations lack connectivity to the multimodal transportation = network. 2, 3 5 11 The corridor experiences a large amount of animal crash incidents. i � I 7 12 4.2 Built Environment The built environment in the study area is primarily rural residential, with agricultural farms scattered in between (Figure 7).There are commercial, retail, and industrial developments at the eastern and western ends of the study area and many natural areas on the east end of the corridor. Overall, the study area is low density. 4.2.1 Places of Interest A review of places of worship in the vicinity of the study area identified 27 places of worship and seven cemeteries. Five public schools and one private school are located within the project study area, with most of the schools being located within either Mebane or Hillsborough municipal limits. In addition, there are seven fire stations that are spread across the corridor(including Mebane, Efland, and Eno Fire and Rescue). The full list of community resources is included as an Appendix item. Other notable places of interest include the three National Register-listed historic districts (Mebane Commercial, Old South Mebane, and Hillsborough Historic) and 14 National-Register-listed historic sites located within those districts. Lastly, the corridor is sprinkled with numerous open spaces, parks, and natural areas, most notably, the Mebane Community Park, Occoneechee Natural Area and Speedway, Eno River State Park and Rock Quarry, and the Duke Forest. 22 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Grp f I 91 ec -FFILT.STi{712C1LX.H ' n •k �tltiB e ' 1 iq ML11A\L. MEBANE HfLCSBQRoUrTr Zcc �� . p+� L' r DURRa 71�du Z 1 ti i - f � + Il?' 751 Legend VS 70 Corridor Study auuffer + Airport .6: pre station A Hazardous Waste Site Brownfield Boundary Historic District © NR _ County Boundary 3 Cemetery T Gas Station h Places of ftrship Historic Points SLOOE _ 41 Nahonal Pegister individual listing Municipal Boundary Publlc Llhrary ■ Underground Storage Tank T Puhllc School © DOE 39 NR and Local Landmark -- Railroad track Private School ■ Determined Eligible-DOE Figure 7 Places of Interest 23 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.2.2 Historic Properties The North Carolina State Historic Properties Office (SHPO) is responsible for surveying and designating structures and districts of historical significance and maintains an online web viewer with more information http:Hgis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. The highest level of preservation is the National Register.The second highest is the State Study List. The third level is Determined Eligible, meaning that the properties are in the process of becoming listed on the Study List. The following historic properties were identified within the project study area, shown in Table 3. 4.2.3 Hazardous Materials 18 gas stations were identified in the project area, each with underground storage tanks that may pose a potential challenge for redevelopment of these parcels: • Tommy's Mini-Mart - 300 West Center Street, Mebane, NC 27302 • Foust Corner Market - 509 East Center Street, Mebane, NC 27302 • Foust Oil Company- 601 East Center Street, Mebane, NC 27302 • The Pop Shoppe - 6300 Buckhorn Road, Mebane, NC 27302 • Mebane BP - 7615 US 70, Mebane, NC 27302 • Efland Supermarket - 3419 US 70, Efland, NC 27243 • Talbert's Mini Mart - 225 Mount Willing Road, Efland, NC 27243 • AZ Shop N Go - 2113 US 70 Business, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Circle K#382 - 1204 US 70 Bypass, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Hillsborough BP#305 - 1811 NC 86, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Hwy 86 Amoco Food Shop - 114 NC 86, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Lloyd's Quickie Mart#2 - 110 NC 86, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Quality Mart#9 - 1414 US 70 Bypass, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Quickie Mart—225 Churton Street, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Breeze Thru #30026—2300 Old Chapel Hill Road, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Carolina Propane—4630 Hillsborough Road, Durham, NC 27705 • La Marqueta—4701 Hillsborough Road, Durham, NC 27705 • Shop &Go Food Mart—4640 Hillsborough Road, Durham, NC 27705 Three other active underground storage tanks, not found on gas station properties, were also identified in the project area servicing locations such as: • Dodson's Service Center—306 West Center Street, Mebane, NC 27302 • Frank Efland —316 Efland-Cedar Grove Road, Efland, NC 27243 • Orange County Asset Management Services—600 NC 86, Hillsborough, NC 27278 One hazardous waste site, the former General Electric Mebane Operations site, now known as ABB (6801 Industrial Drive, Mebane, NC 27302), is located approximately 0.3 miles off the US 70 corridor southwest of Mebane. In addition, one Brownfield site is in the project area—former Redman Industries, now known as Barber& Ross Window Company (200 Redman Crossing Road, Mebane, NC 27302) located approximately 0.2 miles off the US 70 corridor between Miles and Efland. This GIS-level screening also included active and former landfills and dry-cleaning sites, but no features were identified within the project study area. 24 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 3 Historic Properties in the Project Area Site Name Status* Site ID Description Year Listed Durham Hosiery Mill No. 15 NR AM1791 1922 two-story brick and concrete textile 2010 Mill Rigsbee's Rock House NR/LL OR0302 1929 Tudor Revival house 1988 White Furniture Company NR/LL AM0466 1924 furniture factory complex 1982 Occoneechee Speedway NR OR1542 1940s early NASCAR site 2002 Efland Home NR OR2815 1925 one-story hip roof T-shaped frame 2018 African American school Nash Law Office NR OR0012 1801-1807 one-story frame building 1971 Old Orange County Courthouse NR OR0014 1845 Greek Revival two-story brick 1971 courthouse St. Matthews Episcopal Church NR OR0019 1825-1826 Gothic Revival 1971 and Churchyard Heartsease NR OR0009 Late 181"to early mid-191"century two- 1973 story frame house Ruffin-Roulhac House NR OR0017 1820 Federal/Greek Revival 1971 Sans Souci NR OR0020 1813 two-story Federal houses 1971 Eagle Lodge NR OR0007 1820 early Greek Revival Masonic Lodge 1971 Burwell School NR OR0004 1837 two-story frame house and school 1970 Ayr Mount NR OR0002 1814-1816 Georgian/Federal two-story 1971 brick tripartite house Montrose NR OR0050 191"—early 201" century Graham Family 2001 estate Mebane Commercial Historic NRHD AM1698 1905-1960 commercial district 2011 District 181" -20tn century county seat Hillsborough Historic District NRHD OR0077 1973 residential/commercial district Old South Mebane Historic NRHD AM1508 1900-1961 residential district 2011 District Old South Mebane Historic NRHD AM2351 1900-1962 residential district 2013 District Boundary Increase Benjamin Frank Mebane House SL AM0284 1855 Greek Revival 1985 S.C. Forrest House II SL OR1409 1927 house, S.C. Forrest 1995 1952 one-story hip roof frame Ja-Max Motor Lodge SL OR3001 2017 Miscellaneous Modernist building Orange County Courthouse SL OR0054 1953 two-story side gable brick Colonial 2006 Revival courthouse 1910 three-story parapet roof brick Jones Department Store SL AM1507 2000 Romanesque Revival building Bridge No. 670241 DOE OR2222 1922 reinforced concrete t-beam bridge 2005 (DOT 670241) *Status:NR—National Register-listed,LL—Local Landmark;NRHD—National Register-listed Historic District;SL—Study List DOE—Determined Eligible 25 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.2.4 Relevant Plans 4.2.4.1 2008 Orange County Future Land Use Map (amended 2012) The future land use plan balances environmental constraints and community needs by accommodating a particular combination of compatible land uses and relating them to current zoning classifications. There are three basic land use categories (Developed, Transition, and Rural) and several overlays (watershed protection). Properties along the corridor and within the Orange County jurisdiction predominately fall into one of the five following zoning classifications: • Agricultural Residential (AR) - Agricultural activities and associated residential and commercial uses predominate. • Rural Residential (R1) - Identifies rural areas to be developed as low intensity and low density residential. • Public Interest District (PID) -These lands are considered valuable for recreational and research purposes and are afforded special treatment. • Economic Development (EDB, EDE, EDH) - Identifies areas along major transportation corridors that may be in proximity to 10-Year or 20-Year Transition areas of the County which have been specifically targeted for economic development activity consisting of light industrial, distribution, flex space, office, and service/retail uses. • Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node for Office/ Research and Manufacturing (O/RM) - Identifies areas changing from rural to urban in form and density.A full range of commercial and industrial activities would be appropriate and allowed. The amended Future Land Use Map determines the following recommendations for the US 70 corridor: • The majority of the parcels located along the corridor from the ETJ boundary eastbound to Harding Street fall within the 10 Year Transition land use distinction.Where Efland Cedar Grove and US 70 intersect is considered the Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node.After N Lloyds Dairy Road to the end of the ETJ for approximately 2,000 feet is designated as Agricultural Residential. 4.2.4.2 2017 Mebane by Design Comprehensive Land Development Plan The Mebane by Design Comprehensive Land Development Plan is intended to be used by the City of Mebane and County partners to guide land development decisions. It is a long-range guide for public policy decisions concerning the overall growth and development of the Mebane community, and it focuses on the physical growth and development of Mebane and the study area.The plan calls for: • Detailed guidance on the development of the Downtown District, including along and adjacent to Center Street (US 70). • Renewed mix-use land use policies for downtown, including the 'Village Concept'that has been deployed elsewhere in Mebane, and higher densities to encourage active transportation. 4.2.4.3 Hillsborough Comprehensive Sustainability Plan (2023) This plan guides future development and the transition to 100% clean energy, balancing environmental stewardship, resiliency, and racial justice with smart growth that will allow for a thriving economy and a great quality of life for the residents of Hillsborough. 26 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Plan elements focus on community connectivity, future land use, parks and recreation, rail station planning, corridor planning, and climate action. A major priority for the Town is multimodal connections, for which the project team has been evaluating opportunities and feasibility with safety and resiliency at top of mind.The plan elements are listed with in the 8 main chapters: Town Government & Public Services, Land Use & Development, Environment & Natural Systems, Transportation &Connectivity, Social Systems & Public Space, Housing &Affordability, Economic Systems &Tourism, and Climate & Energy. The plan's transportation and connectivity chapter outline and unifies recommendations listed in the Town's other controlling plans, with specific future pedestrian and bike facilities. Other key recommendations include an update of the Town's UDO and Zoning Classifications, as well as an implementation plan for unifying the other controlling plans within the Town. 4.2.5 Critical Issues The table below overviews deficiencies in the built environment that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) US 70 poses a significant barrier to pedestrian connectivity in urban areas despite existing crossings. 2 4, 5 6 US 70 does not have sufficient multimodal facilities to support its growing business. /WwApr 2, 3 9 US 70 detracts from the character of the municipalities it traverses. 3 4.3 Motorized Transportation 4.3.1 Roadway Design US 70 is a basic 2-lane highway, most of which has 4' paved shoulders and 120' ROW. Thirteen intersections along this 18.9-mile segment are signalized. Driveways and intersections are frequent, but visibility is often adequate.The terrain is mildly-to-moderately rolling, with some significant vertical and horizontal curvature, 27 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study though not excessive for the primarily 45 mph speed limit.There are no bicycle facilities and limited pedestrian facilities along the corridor. 4.3.2 Intersections Within the study area, US 70 and US 70 Business intersect approximately 95 public streets, and numerous private roads and driveways. Of these, fifteen signalized intersections and two unsignalized intersections were quantitatively evaluated for existing and future year operations (see Figure 8): Signalized Intersections • US 70 (W. Center Street) at James Walker Road • US 70/ NC 119 (Center Street) at SR 1962 (Third Street) and Washington Street and Norfolk Southern Railway Crossing 735 469V • US 70/ NC 119 (Center Street) at 4th Street and Washington Street and Norfolk Southern Railway Crossing 735 471 • US 70/NC 119 (Center Street) at NC 119 (Fifth Street) and Norfolk Southern Railway Crossing 735 472D • US 70 at SR 1114 (Buckhorn Road) • US 70 at SR 1004 (Efland-Cedar Grove Road) • US 70 (Cornelius Road) at US 70 Business/SR 1328 (Faucette Mill Road - Revere Road) • US 70 at NC 86/US 70 Business/Churton Street • US 70 at SR 1588 (Orange High School Rd) • US 70 at SR 1555 (Miller Road) • US 70 at SR 1002 (St Mary's Road) • US 70 at SR 1561/1709 (Lawrence Road) • US 70 at SR 1567 (Pleasant Green Road) and SR 1713 (Mount Herman Church Road) • US 70 Business at NC 86/SR 1879 (Elizabeth Brady Road) • US 70 Business/NC 86 at SR 1009 (Churton Street) Unsignalized Intersections • US 70/SR 1303 (East Washington Street) at SR 1402 (Mattress Factory Road) • US 70 at US 70 Business/SR 1562 (Palmers Grove Church Road) Recent Roadway Improvements Several signalized and unsignalized intersections have been upgraded through recent projects beyond their original cross-sections to reduce crash potential and/or increase capacity. Such improvements--typically involving additional turn-lanes, acceleration /deceleration lanes, or channelization-are summarized below: James Walker Road • Median crossover, no left turn bay Gib Third Street • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 �7 Fourth Street • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 Fifth Street • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 • Dedicated left turn lanes on Fifth Street 28 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Dedicated eastbound right turn lane on Fifth Street • Traffic queuing safety measures Buckhorn Road • Dedicated southbound left turn lane on US 70 Faucette Mill Road/Revere Road64"i • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 7a 7 • Channelized right turn lanes on Faucette Mill L e.JL , 0 Road / Revere Road • Dedicated westbound left turn lane on Revere Road NC 86/Churton Street • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 : • Channelized right turn lanes on NC 86/Churton Street • Dedicated left turn lanes on NC 86/Churton Street NC 86/Churton Street at US 70,facing north Orange High School Road • Dedicated northbound left turn lane on US 70 • Dedicated northbound right turn lane on US 70 Miller Road • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 St Mary's Road • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 • Dedicated northbound right turn lanes on US 70 • Dedicated left turn lanes on St Mary's Road Lawrence Road • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 Pleasant Green Road/Mount Herman Church Road • Dedicated left turn lanes on US 70 • Dedicated right turn lanes on US 70 • Median crossover, no left turn bay NC 86/Elizabeth Brady Road • Dedicated left turn lanes on NC 86/ Elizabeth Brady Road Old NC 86/Churton Street • Dedicated right and left turn lanes on US 70 Business • Dedicated eastbound left turn lane on Old NC 86/Churton Street 29 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 0 � 1 I „ q• i i v Ra � � �a711 ' 70 Hillsbomugh J -- � ` I _ � �„� pia• _ +r r 'i]urham Ij7 � oy91'Rd ! Oid pilfsDar 751_ 1 US 70 corridor Study Buffer Munlelpal Boundary US 70 Key lnteru4 born-for quantitative analysts L _ county Boundary - Railroad Trail US 70 Key InWrseLton-for qualOtive analysis Figure 8 Project Vicinity and Study Intersections 30 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.3.3 Historic Traffic Volumes NCDOT's count program provides a consistent source of data for assessing traffic volume trends over time. There are multiple count stations on US 70 within the study limits. This study uses data from NCDOT's Traffic Count Database System for the years 2011-2022. AADT estimates derived from Streetlight Insight and traffic counts collected for this study in 2022 were also considered. AADTs on US 70 are highest on the eastern portion of corridor in Hillsborough (14,400 vpd) and by the 1-85 interchange near Durham (17,000 vpd).Volumes are steady through Mebane, then decrease towards the middle of the study corridor, reaching a low of 3,800 vpd in Efland, before increasing through Hillsborough. Due to the effects of COVID-19, however, traffic volumes dropped substantially in 2020, before beginning to recover in 2021, and continuing through 2022 (although complete NCDOT data for 2022 AADTs are not yet available). Overall, available 2022 traffic levels appear similar to those in 2019. However: • Trucks make up a larger share of traffic now than in 2019. This is due in part to increased online shopping and home delivery, and in part because truck traffic was less impacted by COVID than travel by personal automobile. • Traffic volumes recovered somewhat faster in the western portion of the corridor than the eastern. This may be due to the more industrial/commercial nature of employment in the west, resulting in more work-from-home opportunities (thus less travel) to the east. Although traffic growth for the study corridor overall averaged about 2.3% annually between 2011 and 2019, rates varied considerably year-to-year and by. Further analysis of NCDOT count data reveals no substantial, sustained traffic growth trends for US 70 immediately beyond the study limits; in fact, some minor decreases were observed.Traffic volumes for significant roads intersecting US 70 within the study corridor were also assessed. NCDOT AADT records were reviewed, along with other counts and Streetlight estimates, and in general, traffic trends at these locations are consistent with US 70 observations. Figure 9 shows the average historic NCDOT AADT for each segment in the study area from 2011-2022. 31 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 15,000 14,000 - E 13,000 - - - D 12,000 11,000 C �. A 10,000 - .................... Q� 9,000 .. ... - Q 8,000 w,. v ........................... 00 m 7,000 m Q 6,000 - F 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 -A 7,800 7,900 7,900 7,800 7,600 81200 81800 81900 9,400 7,700 81800 10,500 -B 4,700 5,200 4,600 4,S00 4,400 5,200 5,200 5,400 5,600 4,800 4,900 5,800 -C 9,600 9,500 7,900 6,900 8,800 10,400 8,800 10,500 10,000 9,600 9,200 11,100 D 10,800 11,700 10,400 10,400 10,400 12,700 11,000 12,800 13,600 11,300 10,600 12,500 _E 9,100 9.000 81500 8,300 8,100 91800 10,500 12,900 11200 10,000 11,900 13,600 -F 61100 5,800 5,300 5,700 5,100 6,100 6,500 6,200 6,600 5,400 51200 51900 Figure 9 Historic Traffic Volume Trends by Study Segment 4.3.4 Traffic Data VHB collected relevant traffic data at locations along the corridor in September of 2022, primarily at major intersections, both signalized and unsignalized. Data obtained and analyzed included turning movement volumes by time-of-day for all vehicles and for trucks and busses, and bicycles, as well as pedestrian crossing volumes. To capture representative peak conditions, counts were obtained for typical Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays when schools were in session. Streetlight Insight probe data were used to supplement turning movement volumes at additional intersections, and to estimate changes in traffic characteristics observed during the pandemic. Streetlight analysis provided information on changes in daily traffic, time-of-day distributions, truck percentages, travel speeds, trip lengths, and trip origin-destination patterns. 4.3.4.1 Traffic Characteristics 2022 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Volumes StreetLight was used to estimate AADTs and other traffic data, such as peaking characteristics and vehicle classifications, for Monday-Thursdays in 2019 and 2021.Available data for 2022 was also collected; however,these AADTs are an approximation using data from September 2021 through April 2022 to obtain an adequate sample size.Truck AADTs (AADTTs), including medium and heavy trucks, were only available for 2019 and 2021.The locations and respective AADTs are listed in Table 4. 32 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 4 StreetLight AADTs Route Segment Location 2019 2021 2022 E of Woodlawn 8,900 8,300 8,500 A W of Supper Club 8,300 7,500 7,800 W of Buckhorn 7,100 6,700 7,200 E of Frazier 3,800 3,800 4,000 B W of Richmond 3,500 3,200 3,400 W of Efland-Cedar Grove 3,900 3,700 4,000 W of Connector 4,100 4,000 4,400 C W of Eno R West 10,000 9,200 9,700 US 70 W of Lakeshore 8,900 8,900 9,500 W of Constitution 9,400 9,700 10,500 W of Orange High School 12,600 12,000 12,900 W of Miller 12,500 11,600 12,000 D W of Eno R East 11,200 9,900 10,200 W of Lawrence 11,000 9,700 10,000 W of US 70 Bus East 10,100 8,800 9,000 W of University 12,700 10,800 10,700 E W of Pleasant Green 14,000 11,700 11,800 W of NC 751 7,500 7,000 6,600 US 70 Bus F E of Churton 7,600 6,900 6,900 E of Quincy Cottage 4,800 4,700 4,900 Overall, volumes at these locations remained slightly lower in 2021 than in 2019, as people continued working from home through the pandemic. The eastern segments of US 70 experienced a larger drop in volumes (-10%) than the western segments (-5%) and Segment F on US 70 Business near Downtown Hillsborough (6%). This difference may be attributable to socio-economic and employment type differences. Higher- income white-collar work proved more amenable to working from home than did lower-paying industrial, agricultural, and service work. Such variations in demographic data map onto the corridor consistent with the observed changes in traffic volumes.The estimated AADT for each segment is shown in Table 5. Table 5 StreetLight Estimated AADTs Segment 2019 2021 2022 A 8,100 7,500 7,800 B 3,700 3,600 3,800 C 8,100 7,900 8,500 D 11,500 10,400 10,800 E 11,400 9,900 9,700 F 6,200 5,800 5,900 33 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Vehicle Speeds Vehicle speeds were gathered from Streetlight at locations distributed throughout the corridor.The 2019 average and 85th percentile speeds (mph) are shown alongside the speed limit in Table 6 and Figure 10. Locations where the 85th percentile vehicle speed is five mph or higher than the posted speed limit are shown in bold.The locations with vehicle speeds higher than the speed limit are situated in the less urban areas between Mebane and Hillsborough, and Hillsborough and Durham. Table 6 2019 Speed Data and Limits Average 85th Percentile Speed Route Location Speed Speed Limit US 70 E of Woodlawn 35 46 45 US 70 W of Supper Club 34 44 45 US 70 W of Buckhorn 39 49 45 US 70 E of Frazier 37 49 45 US 70 W of Richmond 41 51 45 US 70 W of Efland-Cedar Grove 36 47 45 US 70 W of Connector 43 53 55 US 70 W of Eno R West 49 59 50 US 70 W of Lakeshore 45 54 50 US 70 W of Constitution 36 46 45 US 70 W of Orange High School 34 46 45 US 70 W of Miller 34 47 45 US 70 W of Eno R East 36 48 45 US 70 W of Lawrence 39 50 45 US 70 W of US 70 Bus East 41 52 55 US 70 W of University 46 57 55 US 70 W of Pleasant Green 41 52 45 US 70 W of NC 751 43 54 45 US 70 Bus E of Churton 29 42 40 US 70 Bus E of Quincy Cottage 30 44 40 34 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study `u I1 vh f 1 Mehane Hillsborop li Legend _ — — Observed 2019 Daily Speed Limit 2019 Speeds Volume - -• 8,000 55 mph _- ■ =50 mph '+ _ q Dpp 45 mph 70t 40 mph 60-70 0 �35 mph _ 50-60 �25 mph 70 40.50 Speed Limit 30-40 20-30 Average Speed ia•xn fff" D-10 — — — 85`h Percentile Speed H� Figure 10 2019 Seed Data and Statutory Limits 35 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Truck Volumes/Freight Movement Data is divided into medium trucks, which have two or more axles but no towed trailer, and heavy trucks, which are trucks towing separate trailer units. 2019 average daily traffic data for Monday-Thursday was analyzed using Streetlight data, which were validated against available counts. Truck percentages at multiple locations throughout the corridor are summarized in Table 7. Total Truck Percentages are shown in Figure 11. Table 7 2019 Truck Percentages Route Location Heavy Medium All Trucks US 70 E of Woodlawn 0.6% 2.3% 2.9% US 70 W of Supper Club 0.8% 2.4% 3.2% US 70 W of Buckhorn 1.2% 3.2% 4.4% US 70 E of Frazier 1.7% 5.6% 7.4% US 70 W of Richmond 1.8% 5.0% 6.8% US 70 W of Efland-Cedar Grove 1.5% 3.9% 5.4% US 70 W of Connector 1.1% 3.3% 4.4% US 70 W of Eno R West 3.1% 2.9% 6.0% US 70 W of Lakeshore 3.3% 3.2% 6.5% US 70 W of Constitution 2.9% 2.9% 5.8% US 70 W of Orange High School 2.2% 2.7% 4.9% US 70 W of Miller 2.3% 2.7% 5.1% US 70 W of Eno R East 2.4% 3.3% 5.7% US 70 W of Lawrence 2.5% 3.4% 5.9% US 70 W of US 70 Bus East 2.7% 3.6% 6.3% US 70 W of University 2.2% 4.0% 6.3% US 70 W of Pleasant Green 2.1% 3.9% 6.0% US 70 W of NC 751 0.7% 3.4% 4.1% US 70 Bus E of Churton 0.3% 1.5% 1.7% US 70 Bus E of Quincy Cottage 0.5% 2.9% 3.4% These truck percentages are in the expected range for a Minor Arterial like US 70, given surrounding land uses and connections. The higher share of truck traffic (especially heavy trucks) in Segment C can be explained by the fact that US 70 is the only viable route for trucks using NC 86 and NC 57 to serve Danville, Yanceyville, Rougemont, Roxboro, and other areas to the north of Hillsborough.The lower truck percentages on US 70 Business are also what would be expected entering Downtown Hillsborough.Truck data from traffic counts and Streetlight were used to calculate intersection levels-of-service during peak periods, when trucks typically comprise a smaller share of total traffic. 36 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study �a �e cr �s Q [� CC Y,s �m 411 m 0.6% 1.2% 1.8% 1.5% 1.1% 3.1% r3.39 2.9% 2.2% 2.39 0.8% 'b t~ - 0.3% 0.5% 2.23. 1 0.7% Signalized Interseaion ,Stop-Controlled Approach c Total Truck% 0 1-2% 2-3%6 3 3-4% 0 4-5%6 ❑ 5-6% 0 6-7% 7-896 GrJa Ea 411 )CX%-Heavy Truck% Figure 11 2019 StreetLight Total Truck Percentages 37 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.3.5 Traffic Operations and Quality of Service There are a variety of ways to measure the performance of a transportation facility.Transportation professionals typically rely on guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual, which describes performance from the traveler point of view that is designed to be useful to roadway operators, decisions makers, and member of the community. Individuals may travel along US 70 via personal vehicle, walking, bicycling, or via transit, each of which can be quantitatively measured using standard criteria such as delay, average speed, percent time spent following, or other measures. The dominant form of transportation currently along US 70 is by automobile. As a result, this section covers traffic operations along the corridor on a corridor basis (i.e. distinguishable segments with common roadway characteristics), as well as by individual intersections. Given the low volume of pedestrian and bicycle trips, and the lack of dedicated facilities, providing a meaningful assessment of bicycle level-of-service is difficult; however, deficiencies and opportunities can be identified. The conventional concept of traffic, level-of-service (LOS) can be summarized—at least qualitatively—in Figure 12. More detailed, qualitative tables are presented in subsequent sections. Generally, LOS D is acceptable in most rural and suburban situations. In some highly urbanized settings, or where there are unacceptable environmental/community impacts, excessive costs, or other policy or planning objectives, LOS E can be appropriate. QUALITY OF TRAFFIC FLOW DECREASES—+ Considered an acceptableLOS i • • i • • Light traffic Slightly Approaching - Speeds • Congestion • Road at increased moderate reduced capacity • Free flow • irregular traffic levels congestion speeds • Lane traffic flow Gridlock • Still free flow levels changes with speeds Speeds near restricted frequent free flow due to traffic stops Figure 12 Level of Service Illustration 4.3.5.1 Corridor-Level A corridor-level capacity analysis was completed using Highway Capacity Software Plus (HCS7). Figure 13 graphically represents the worst case (AM or PM peak) directional LOS for the corridor under existing conditions. Table 8 summarizes the results of HCS capacity analysis by segment and direction for the AM and PM peak periods. In general, LOS is slightly lower in the AM peak due to a combination of higher volumes and more pronounced directionality. Suburban/urban roadways with more frequent traffic signals require arterial analysis to account for intersection-related delays. An arterial LOS analysis in Synchro using HCM 2000 methodology was completed for sections in Mebane and Hillsborough due to the number and spacing of signalized intersections through both municipalities and their transition areas. The LOS for both sections are shown in Table 9. 38 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study �a �� 4a 'a a �a h Ui?J EIiS Signalized Intersection I a-a y Lr L LOS'L�A-C ■D ■f-F 'Worst case from AM and PM Peaks 'Z Figure 13 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 Table 8 2022 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 Using Two-Lane Highways Analysis Segment AM Peak PM Peak Segment Segment Location Length (miles) Segment Segment LOS LOS A Supper Club Rd to Mace Rd (EB/WB) 1.7 C/ B B/C B Buckhorn Rd to Efland-Cedar Grove Rd (EB/WB) 3.9 B/A A/ B C East of US 70 Connector to Hillsborough Border (EB/WB) 1.4 D/ B C/ D E US 70 Bus to Pleasant Green Rd (EB/WB) 2.2 B/ E D/ B Table 9 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 in Segment A (Mebane) and Segments C-D (Hillsborough) AM Peak PM Peak Segment Town Segment Location Arterial g g Class Segment Segment LOS LOS A Mebane 3rd St to 5th St (EB/WB) IV/ III D/ D D/ D C-D Hillsborough Faucette Hill Rd to Palmers Grove Rd (EB/WB) II / 1 B/ B B/C 4.3.5.2 Intersections Peak hour LOS measures the adequacy of the intersection geometrics and traffic controls of a particular intersection or approach for the given turning volumes. LOS ranges from A through F, based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles traveling through the intersection during the peak hour. Control delay represents the portion of total delay attributed to traffic control devices (e.g., signals or stop signs).The engineering profession generally accepts LOS D as an acceptable operating condition for signalized intersections in urban areas and LOS C for rural areas. 39 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study At unsignalized intersections, LOS E is generally considered acceptable only if the side street encounters delay. Nevertheless, side streets sometimes function at LOS F during peak traffic periods; however, the traffic volumes often do not warrant a traffic signal to assist side street traffic. Intersection LOS analyses were performed for the typical weekday AM and PM peak hours using Synchro/Sim Traffic Professional Version 77. Figure 14 graphically depicts the worst case (AM or PM peak) LOS for signalized intersections and unsignalized approaches, as well as identifying locations with potential for queuing problems. All signalized intersections analyzed operate acceptable overall LOS during peak hours, and conditions are generally similar overall between both peak hours. Mainline US 70 generally experiences a better LOS than the cross streets at each intersection. Most side streets operate at an acceptable LOS during both peak hours except for a few intersections between Durham and Hillsborough. Mt. Herman Church Road and Pleasant Green Road operate at LOS F during both peak hours. At Lawrence Road, the northbound approach operates at LOS E during the AM peak, and the southbound approach operates at LOSE E during the PM peak hour. Between the Mt. Herman Church Road/Pleasant Green Road and Lawrence Road intersections is the unsignalized US 70 Bus/Palmers Grove Road intersection. The NB US 70 Bus approach operates at LOS F during both peak hours (with worse delay in the PM), and the SB Palmers Grove Road approach operates at the LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour.These LOS deficiencies are due mainly to vehicles waiting to turn onto US 70, although crossing and right-turning vehicles contribute. Combined with heavy peak-hour traffic, high speeds and some visibility constraints create long delays as drivers wait for adequate gaps in traffic. Due to their proximity to at-grade rail crossings, several signals in Mebane (Moore Street, 3rd Street, 4t" Street, and 51" Street) require interconnection with the rail crossing signals and crossing gates to preempt normal traffic signal operation in the presence of a train. This preemption prevents conflicting signal combinations between the relevant traffic control devices. LOS is not calculated for preemptive operation, but such conditions obviously add delay and can create long vehicle queues. Oa ra P c` a 1 OSignalized kntelsection 0 Stop-Controlled Approach fi°r c� Lr L LOS-•A-C •O •E-F Potential Queueing Pmhkems 'Worst case ftm AM and PM peaks Ffom L.aWrence Road❑evolopment TIA From NC 86 Connector Study(2019) Figure 14 Worst Case Intersection Level of Service Summary for US 70 40 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 10 2022 Intersections AM and PM Peak Hour LOS Summary ED Intersection and Approach Traffic Emshn i 2Z1 PP Control AM g FM ID Intersection and Approach Traffic Existing l�.0221 Contrd AM I FM 3'a St&US 70(Center St) B-16.2 U-10.6 Orange High School Rd&US 70 13-16.3 C-21.2 ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... Eastbound E-17.1 B-11.4 Eastbound A-93 A-6.1 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... 8 ......................................................................................................................................... S_ignalized ...................................................... 1 Westbound Signalized E-13.9 A-4.9 Westbound C-21.1 C-26.6 Northbound B 147 E-15.7 Suthbound C-218 C-29.1 ............................................................................................................................................ Suthbc and C-22.5 C-26.7 St.Marya Rd&US 70 C-22.9 C-26.8 ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... 4`h St&US 70{Center SO A-6.7 E-11.9 Eastbound C-203 E-10.4 ........................................................................................................................................ ...................................................... 2 Eastbound A-6.4 E-14.2 9 Westbound Signalized E-15.0 C-28.6 ........................ Signalized ................... ......................................................................................................................................... Westbound A-5-7 A-9.3 Northbound C-30.7 C-28.9 Northbound E-14.4 5-14.9 Suthbound I}41.5 D-513 51h St&US 70{Center SO B-16.6 B-14.7 Lawrence Rd&US 70 D 38.0 DIM.9 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... Eastbound E-14.5 A-3-1 Eastbound D-363 C-22.4 3 Westbound Sign ali d E-17.1 E-15.9 10 Westbound Signalized E-16.1 D-35.6 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... Northbound A-93 E-137 Northbound E-70.2 D-52.6 Suhbound C-26.4 C-27.6 Suthbound D-518 E-62.1 Buckhom Rd&US 70 g,g �,g US 70 EuslFahners Grove Ch Rd&US 70 ......................................................................................................... Two-Wav ...................................................... ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................... 11 Northbound F-83.4 F-225.8 .1 .................................... Eastbound I�42.4 C 31 ....................................................................................................St Control...................................................... 4 ............................................................................................................................................. SsgnAi d ............................................. ......... Southbvund � I�318 E-37.8 Westbound E-15.1 E-11.2 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... Mt Herman Ch Rd/Pleasant Gr Rd&US 70 D-47.7 D410.3 NorthboundE-58.1 D-37.4 ..................................................................................................................................... EEland Cedar Grove Rd&US 70 B-18.2 E-15.2 Eastbound I}435 C-24:4 ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Westbound Signaltzed C-268 D-372 EastboundB-18.6 E-13.7 ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... gn _ ......................................................... Northbound F-107.0 F-87.9 5 Westbound Si ah-cl E-142 E-153 ...................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... ............................................................................................................................................ .................................................. Sauthbound F-$$.1 F 88.1 Northbound A-97 E-18.1 ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................... NC 751&US 70 E-10.7 13-15.4 SuhboundC-21.6 E-102 ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... Eastbound E-128 E-18.4 Revere RdlFaucette Mill Rd&US 70 A-9A E-10.2 13 ......................................................................................................................................... Sigrudi-d ...................................................... ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................... Westbound A-52 5-10.9 EastboundA-82 A-73 ......................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................... Northbound E-16.4 5-19.8 6 Westbound Signalized A-7.7 A-95 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... Northbound E-16.0 E-17.5 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... Suhbound E-16.0 E-15.6 NC 86(S Churton St)&US 70 E 59.1 C34.2 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... Eastbound F-93.1 C-33.8 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... 7 Westbound Signalized D-422 C-33.5 Northbound C-22-6 C-30.9 ............................................................................................................................................. ......................................................... Suhbound E-63.4 D-M.4 4.3.5.3 Queuing Analysis LOS is not the only metric of intersection performance. The length of vehicle queues waiting to enter the intersection-while related to delay-is not explicitly considered in calculating LOS. A separate inspection of observed/estimated queue length is required. Long vehicle queues have the potential to create problems typically by: • Exceeding available storage • Preventing turning vehicles from accessing turn lanes due while stuck in a through lane queue • Increasing rear-end crashes due to unexpected queues especially around curves • Increasing potential for blocked intersections (gridlock), driveways, crosswalks, and railroad tracks Several signalized intersections have potential long queueing issues: • Buckhorn Road NB lane (Both peak hours)-only about 150' (-6 vehicles) from at-grade railroad crossing in PM. • Efland-Cedar Grove Road SB lane (AM peak only) • NC 86 (N. Churton Street) SB through/right-turn lane (AM peak hour) - may block turn lane access. • NC 86 (N. Churton Street) SB left-turn lane (AM peak only)- may exceed available storage. 41 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • NC 86 (N. Churton Street) NB through lanes (Both peak hours) • US 70 WB through lane at NC 86 (Both peak hours)— Significant queueing observed back to Orange High School Road which is more severe than reflected in Synchro analysis.Through lane queueing may block access to turn lanes that is compounding problems at the Orange High School Road intersection. • US 70 WB through lane at Orange High School Road (Both peak hours)—Significant queueing also observed during both peak hours. Right-turning vehicles may be stuck queueing in through lane impacting drop-off/pick-up at the middle school and high school. School-bound vehicles were also observed cutting through a church parking lot. • US 70 WB through lane at St. Mary's Road (PM peak only) - may block turn lane access and increase potential for rear-end crashes around curve. • US 70 EB through/right-turn lane at St. Mary's Road (AM peak only)— may block turn lane access and increase potential for rear-end crashes around curve. • Lawrence Road NB and SB lanes (Both peak hours) • US 70 WB through/right-turn lane at Lawrence Road (PM peak only)- may block turn lane access. • US 70 EB through/right-turn lane at Lawrence Road (AM peak only) - may block turn lane access. • US 70 WB through turn lane at Lawrence Road (PM peak only)— may block turn lane access. • Mt. Hermon Church Road/Pleasant Green Road NB and SB approaches (Both peak hours) • US 70 EB through lane at Mt. Hermon Church Road/Pleasant Green Road (AM peak only)— may block turn lane access and increase potential for rear-end crashes around curve. • NC 751 NB left-turn lane (PM peak only)— may exceed available storage. 4.3.6 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans 4.3.6.1 North Carolina Department of Transportation 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The current NCDOT 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) includes seven roadway projects in the project study area (see Figure 15). Each is summarized below: STIP# U-3109A— NC 119 U-3109A relocates NC 119 from 1-40/ 1-85 to north of SR 1921 (Mebane Rogers Road). The project was recently completed. STIP# RX-2007B— Norfolk Southern Railroad RX-2007B proposes to install active warning devices at Norfolk Southern Railroad crossing 735145T near Efland. Construction is scheduled for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. STIP# U-5845—SR 1009 (South Churton Street) U-5845 proposes to widen SR 1009 (South Churton Street) to multilanes from 1-40 to the Eno River in Hillsborough. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in FY 2029, and construction is currently unfunded. STIP# 1-5984— 1-85 1-5984 proposes to upgrade the 1-85/ NC 86 interchange in Hillsborough. Right of way is scheduled for FY 2024, and construction is scheduled for FY 2026. 42 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study STIP# 1-5959— 1-85 1-5959 proposes pavement rehabilitation on 1-85 from west of SR 1006 (Orange Grove Road) to the Durham County Line. Construction is scheduled for FY 2028. STIP# 1-0305— 1-85 1-0305 proposes to add lanes to 1-85 from west of SR 1006 (Orange Grove Road) in Orange County to west of SR 1400 (Sparger Road) in Durham County. STIP# BR-0091 — Bridge Replacement BR-0091 proposes to replace the existing bridge along US 70 over the Eno River between the 185 connector and West Hill Avenue. 43 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study l hb5'I � i53 {,rt't`11 - _ pill sbG k r 4 ti rt J OurhdNS i 1 tit,,Tm)n+i11e { I r I r + 1 i3l _ US 70 GQ Nor Sh+dp 9Yrm, M1Sw*"l ft%p arY 74 MP Porft wOiin Pmled A,*a -STIP Liam%'nhlrl Nelad 40 C my 0-rwaiy Ra-koM--radr o&w 571u"qem s QtherSnPP"*J d[s Figure 15 2020-2029 NCDOT STIP Projects in Corridor 44 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.3.6.2 2022 Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan addresses the aspirational transportation improvements in the Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (BGMPO) area for the next 25 to 30 years.The noted roadway recommendations within the study area are listed below: • Widen NC 119 to a four-lane, divided facility • Widen Mattress Factory Road to a four-lane, divided facility • Realign Mattress Factory Road to allow for safer railroad crossing and improve mobility; extend on a new location as a four-lane, divided facility to US 70 • Construct new interchange along 1-85/1-40 for Mattress Factory Road to improve mobility, relieve congestion on Arrowhead Blvd and Oakwood St Ext and provide better access to industrial areas 4.3.6.3 2020 Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) This plan identifies the planned transportation improvements in the Burlington-Graham area through the year 2045. The plan identifies US 70 as a major transportation corridor and key to the economic vitality of the region. Roadway recommendations include: • 1-40 and US 70 integrated corridor management. • Advanced signal technology upgrades along US 70. 4.3.6.4 2017 Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan identifies the planned transportation improvements in the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) area through the year 2040. The notable recommendations along the US 70 corridor include: • Widen US 70 to a four-lane, divided facility from the 1-85 connector to US 70 Business. • Improve the existing 1-85 connector/ US 70 interchange to create a full movement interchange. • Widen Churton Street (US 70/ NC 86) to a four-lane facility with a raised median. 4.3.6.5 2018 Mebane 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Mebane's 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) is for the City of Mebane in Alamance and Orange Counties.The plan is multi-modal, covering roadway, public transportation, and bicycle and pedestrian travel. The plan lists the following roadway project associated with the US 70 corridor: • Realign the northern terminal of Mattress Factory Road to improve the existing at grade crossing on Washington Street, as the existing configuration does not accommodate heavy vehicles and limits connectivity to US 70 across the railroad. 4.3.6.6 2018 Mebane NC Railroad Traffic Separation Study The Mebane Traffic Separation Study(TSS) focuses on eight (8) existing at-grade roadway-railroad crossings along a 5-mile span through downtown Mebane to determine the need for improvements and/or elimination of public at-grade crossings to improve safety and mobility for motorists, pedestrians, rail passengers, and train crews. The TSS evaluated the rail line in Mebane that crosses various streets, as well as any planned or 45 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study programmed railroad and roadway improvements within the study area.The plan recommends configuration changes for multiple crossing locations and adjacent intersections. 4.3.6.7 2022 Mebane Fifth St. Improvement Impact Study The City of Mebane analyzed potential traffic impacts of the proposed Fifth Street and Washington Street Intersection Improvement project.Analysis includes volume development, capacity analysis, safety assessment, and multimodal evaluation results due to the planned geometrics modifications and resulting travel pattern changes at the Fifth Street and Washington Street intersection and six other adjacent intersections, including intersections with Center Street (US 70). Notable findings included: • Recommendations include new sidewalk connections, new raised medians, further monitoring for signalization and other crash modifications safety improvements at Fifth/Jackson. • The signalized Fifth Street and Center Street intersection is projected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours, with or without the roadway project, under both the 2025 and 2035 conditions. • The signalized Fourth Street and Center Street intersection is projected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours under the Existing conditions. It is projected to operate at LOS B under both the 2025 No-Build and Build conditions, and at LOS B or C under 2035 No-Build and Build conditions. • Based on travel demand analysis, traffic volumes are expected to continue to increase in the study area (5-10% by 2025, 20-25% by 2035) due to ambient growth and background developments, despite that completion of NC 119 Bypass is expected to result in 9-14%traffic reductions at the Fifth Street and Center Street intersection. 4.3.7 System Connectivity 1-85 supplants much of US 70's role in connecting the Mebane/Burlington area with Hillsborough and Durham.While the proportion of traffic traveling the entire length of the corridor has declined since the completion of 1-85, new development along the corridor and along roads accessed via US 70 has generated additional trips that use parts of the corridor in travelling to jobs, residences, schools, stores, and other services or activities.Although traffic growth for the study corridor overall averaged about 2.3% annually between 2011 and 2019, rates varied considerably year-to-year and by location. Due to the proximity of 1-85 and 1-40 merging just west, and the connection US 70 provides to 1-40 via the Durham Freeway, this route also provides some relief when incidents impact 1-40 between RTP and Mebane. The lack of north-south connectivity along the corridor results in vehicles using portions of US 70 to complete north-south trips. This adds traffic and turning movement conflicts that increase delay, especially at key intersections. Vehicles using NC 86 and NC 57 north of US 70 is an example of this issue. Congestion through downtown Hillsborough discourages automobile trips, and truck traffic is (mostly) routed around downtown. Completion of the new NC 119 connection helped address a similar situation in Mebane.Traffic also uses US 70 to access one of the limited number of north-south routes across or to/from 1-85, such as Lawrence Road. The lack of western access at the 1-85 Connector also represents a lack of connectivity, forcing traffic to use indirect routes on minor roads with at-grade rail crossings through Efland, or to continue eastward on US 70 through Hillsborough. This is a particularly noticeable problem for truck traffic. The proximity of the rail line to US 70 along the western portion of the corridor limits connectivity to the south, while trains at at-grade rail crossings introduce temporary restrictions to connectivity. 46 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.3.8 Future Conditions Future year(2050) evaluations of traffic operations were conducted for both the corridor segments as well as the intersections included in the existing conditions analysis. Future traffic volumes were determined based on growth projections derived from the Triangle Regional Travel Demand Model. Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the 2050 projected operations for the evaluated corridor segments and intersections, respectively; these results assume no additional capacity improvements or multimodal initiatives to the corridor or localized intersections. As shown in the future year analysis results, degradation of both the corridor level and intersection level operations are expected throughout the corridor, indicating a need for improvement. This is due to generalized growth in the area as well as taking into account planned future economic growth drivers such as expected growth detailed in the Efland-euckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan (2019). Table 11 2050 Corridor Level of Service Summary for US 70 Using Two-Lane Highways Analysis Segment AM Peak PM Peak Segment Segment Location Length (miles) Segment Segment LOS LOS A Supper Club Rd to Mace Rd (EB/WB) 1.7 E I E E I F B Buckhorn Rd to Efland-Cedar Grove Rd (EB/WB) 3.9 E I D D I E C East of US 70 Connector to Hillsborough Border (EB/WB) 1.4 E I D E I E E US 70 Bus to Pleasant Green Rd (EB/WB) 2.2 CIE E I C 47 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 12 2050 AM and PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Summary Traffic No-Build(2050) Traffic No-Build(2050) ID Intersection and Approach ID Intersection and Approach Control AM PM Control AM PM 3`d St&US 70(Center St) C-31.8 B-13.8 Orange High School Rd&US 70 D-42.6 E-71.1 Eastbound D-47.4 B-17.3 Eastbound C-20.9 B-14.1 1 Westbound Signalized C-21.4 A-9.3 8 Signalized Westbound F-92.8 F-167.3 Northbound B-14.4 B-15.7 Southbound C-23.6 C-21.4 Southbound C-22.0 C-27.4 St.Marys Rd&US 70 D-37.5 E-56.4 4"St&US 70(Center St) B-17.9 D-45.6 Eastbound C-32.9 B-12.0 2 Eastbound Signalized B-17.0 C-28.7 9 Westbound Signalized B-18.3 E-71.4 Westbound B-19.3 E-61.7 Northbound B-14.0 B-14.2 Northbound D�0.9 -107. 5`h St&US 70(Center St) C-29.8 F-95.9 Lawrence Southbound F-88.1 -126.3 Eastbound A11.4 A-5.5 Lawrence Rd&US 70 E-75.7 F-126.5 3 Westbound Signalized D-39.4 F-149.8 Eastbound E-70.3 C-26.2 Northbound C-29.9 F-113.8 10 Westbound Signalized B-16.5 E-75.6 Southbound E-61.9 E-72.3 Northbound F-114.1 F-342.2 Buckhorn Rd&US 70 B-13.9 C-30.4 ISouthbound F-137.9 I F-141.2 Eastbound B-19.8 B-12.2 US 70 Bus/Pahners Grove Ch Rd&US 70 4 Signalized 11 Northbound Two Way F-717.3 F-4370.3 Westbound A-5.3 D�1.3 Stop Control Northbound B-19.3 I C-24.7 Southbound F- F- EIIand-Cedar Grove Rd&US 70 F-173.9 F-171.5 Mt Herman Ch Rd/Pleasant Gr Rd&US 70 F-130.4 F-109.7 Eastbound F-164.8 F-104.7 Eastbound F-210.4 D-40.8 5 Westbound Signalized F-110.5 F-193.3 12 Westbound Signalized D-35.4 F-155.3 Northbound F-126.4 F-278.3 Northbound E-68.3 E-70.3 Southbound F-260.5 C-30.7 Southbound F-102.8 F-95.2 Revere Rd/Faucette Mill Rd&US 70 F-123.8 C-34.7 NC 751&US 70 B-13.0 C-22.2 Eastbound F-253.2 C-26.9 Eastbound B-14.7 C-20.9 6 Westbound Signalized D-37.3 D-42.8 13 Signalized Westbound A-5.2 B-17.9 Northbound D-35.7 C-29.7 Northbound B-19.5 C-31.0 Southbound D-50.0 D43.7 NC 86(S Churton St)&US 70 F-179.4 F-124.8 Buckhorn Road Proposed Alignment&US 70 F--216. F F-9.1 Eastbound F-267.0 F-206.4 Eastbound F-216.6 F-99.1 7 Westbound Signalized F-110.5 F-127.5 40 Westbound Signalized D45.6 D 41.6 Northbound D-39.7 D-44.3 Northbound F-456.4 F-274.3 Southbound F-219.6 F-115.7 Southbound D-36.8 D-39.8 4.3.9 Critical Issues The table below overviews roadway deficiencies identified during the existing conditions analysis, and supported by future traffic projections and land use goals, that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) Schools in the corridor are significant sources of congestion. 1 Roadway infrastructure in the corridor does not have the capacity for the future projected traffic demand ' 1 9, 10 48 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study High traffic speeds contradict existing and planned residential and commercial development in the corridor. 2 4, 5 6, 7, 8 4.4 Active Transportation 4.4.1 Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks are largely absent from the US corridor(Figure 16). The exception to this is where US 70 travels through the City of Mebane, where there is nearly a mile stretch of sidewalk on the north side of the road between the Mebane Community Park driveway and 91" Street. There are also marked crosswalks, pedestrian signal heads, and ADA - features at the signalized intersections at Third Street and Fourth Street in Mebane. However, not all of these Marked crosswalk and pedestrian signal heads at treatments were constructed in accordance with current best Faucette Mill Road practices. For example, several curb ramps lead into the center of the intersection rather than aligning with the sidewalk/pedestrian access route. There are two short stretches of sidewalk where US 70 travels through the Town of Hillsborough. One stretch of sidewalk (approximately 350') is in front of the Walgreens near the intersection with US 70 (Churton Street), though the sidewalk does not front the road and therefore does not connect to the bus stop.There is also a small segment of sidewalk on the Worn path observed west of US 70 Business north side of US 70 and marked crosswalks, pedestrian signal heads, and ADA features at Faucette Mill Road.The crosswalks at this intersection mainly serve pedestrians traveling north- I= south on Faucette Mill Road/Revere Road. Worn paths along the shoulder of US 70 were also observed in Hillsborough, I suggesting that pedestrians are walking along the roadside, particularly between US 70 (Churton Street) and Faucette Mill Road. IM Sidewalks are absent near Efland Cheeks Elementary School Road (4401 Fuller Rd, Efland); however, no children have been observed walking along US 70. Pedestrian facilities at Fourth Street in Mebane There are also several short stretches of sidewalk present on the US 70 Business corridor. There is sidewalk present on the south side of US 70 Business directly in front of Sport Endeavors.There are also segments of unconnected sidewalk on either side of US 70 Business near the Forest Ridge neighborhood and marked crosswalks at the intersection of Quincy Cottage Road and a midblock crosswalk in front of the Orange County Sportsplex. 49 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 57 �r - - P. _ + an - L.1 - - - - - - - 1 0` fiPurham - 141 I � _ I � _ i - � r � r 0 96 1.j Miles � I� '75 1 ! Legend US 70 Corridor Study Buffer Railroad Track Existing Bike Cane Urban Municipal Boundary -- Existing Shared Use Path NC Bike Route Systern Caurdy _ County Boundary Existing Sidewalk Figure 16 Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations 50 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.4.2 Bicycle Facilities There are no dedicated bicycle facilities on either the US 70 or US 70 Business corridor(Figure 16). There are narrow paved shoulders, generally three or less feet wide, along the two-lane section of roadway, which represents the largest portion of the corridor. These shoulders are not wide enough for cyclists to ride completely out of the travel lane. Neither Share the Road signs nor shared lane markings were found along the corridor to indicate the presence of bicyclists. 4.4.3 Observed Pedestrian and Bicycle Trips Pedestrian counts were collected for this study at the intersections listed above. These counts revealed a total of 192 pedestrians crossing the corridor during the count periods. A total of 131 pedestrians were observed in Mebane at Third Street (100) and Fifth Street (31). In the Hillsborough segment of the corridor, 49 pedestrians were observed at Faucette Mill Road (30), NC 86 (11), St. Mary's Road (7), and Orange High School Road (1). Bicycle counts collected for this study revealed a total of 99 cyclists at nine intersections. Of these, 75 traveled on roads and 24 used sidewalks. Over 40% of the cyclists (46) were observed on the eastern portion of the corridor near Pleasant Green Road (22) and NC 751 (24). All 22 cyclists at the Pleasant Green Road intersection were using the road, and half(11) were traveling on US 70 through the intersection.Two cyclists were turning onto or off US 70, and nine were traveling across US 70 between Pleasant Green Road and Mt. Hermon Church Road. At NC 751, 88% (21) of cyclists were using the road. Eight cyclists were traveling on US 70 through the intersection, and six were turning onto or off US 70.The seven remaining cyclists on the road were observed along the old road alignment between NC 751 and Old NC 10. Five used this pavement section to turn right on NC 751, and the remaining two crossed NC 751 to continue eastbound on US 70 towards Durham. Although the pavement section ends without connecting to Old NC 10, a well-traversed path or maintained strip of grass can be seen, suggesting cyclists may be using this old alignment to avoid the section of US 70 between NC 751 and Old NC 10. Due to large traffic volumes, high travel speeds, and limited accommodations, most cyclists who utilize this corridor are likely experienced and more comfortable operating alongside vehicular traffic. Most cyclists are generally less experienced, and therefore, choose to avoid riding along this corridor. 51 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.4.4 Bicycle Levels of Service The HCS methodology for estimating LOS for travel by bicycle (BLOS) is an empirically derived procedure that assesses a facility's suitability for bicycle travel using a specified set of roadway characteristics, including traffic volume and speed; heavy vehicle percentage; pavement condition; access points on right side; presence of bicycle lane; and bicycle lane, shoulder, and outside travel lane widths. Table 13 summarizes the BLOS for each segment by direction and peak period. Note that BLOS for individual intersections has not been calculated. In its current state, this corridor is generally not well-suited for bicycle travel. Every section analyzed operates at LOS E or LOS F in both directions during both peak hours The most important contributing factors appear to be traffic volumes and speeds; lack of bicycle lanes; limited width of shoulders and outside travel lanes; limited sight distance, and density of access points. Table 13 Corridor Segment Bicycle LOS Summary for US 70 AM Peak PM Peak Segment Segment Location Segment Length (miles) Segment BLOS Segment BLOS BLOS Score BLOS Score A Supper Club Rd to Mace Rd 5.61 / 5.29/ (EB/WB) 1.7 IF IF 5.59 E/E 5.41 Buckhorn Rd to Efland-Cedar 5.58/ 5.29/ B Grove Rd (EB/WB) 3.9 IF/ E 4.56 E/E 5.30 East of US 70 Connector to 6.03 / 5.54/ C Hillsborough Border (EB/WB) 1.4 IF/ IF6.15 IF IF IF5.71 US 70 Bus to Pleasant Green 5.85/ 6.30/ E Rd (EB/WB) 2.2 F/ F 6.07 IF IF 5.56 4.4.5 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans 4.4.5.1 North Carolina Department of Transportation 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The current NCDOT 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) includes one active transportation project in the project study area . STIP#C-5184— Riverwalk Trail C-5184 constructed a paved, off-road trail along the Eno River and a sidewalk to provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to the greenway as part of the Riverwalk Trail. 4.4.5.2 NCDCIT Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, "WalkBike NC" (2013) The State Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation convened stakeholders and community members statewide to review and update the State's bicycling routes (among other objectives). The plan adopted an alternate alignment of the MST that takes the route south of US 70,just east of the study corridor, at Trollingwood Road and back up toward US 70 at Mt.Willing Road. 52 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.4.5.3 Mountains-to-Sea (MST) North Carolina State Trail Master Plan (2015) The vision for the MST is an off-road hiking trail connecting Clingmans Dome on North Carolina's western border to Jockey's Ridge State Park on its eastern Outer Banks. In this master plan, the NC Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) remains focused on moving forward to connect these trail limits. The MST segments 10-12 are included in the US 70 corridor study area. Segment 10, named Haw River Trail, joins the Haw River Trail at the Guilford-Alamance County line and extends south along the Haw River Trail to Cane Creek and follows Cane Creek North into Orange County. Segment 11 runs from the Alamance County line to the Occoneechee Mountain State Natural Area just near the Town of Hillsborough limits. Segment 12 follows the Eno River through the Town of Hillsborough, Occoneechee Speedway, and sections of Eno River State Park to Falls Lake.All these segments are classified as mid-term to long-term in planning priority. 4.4.5.4 2022 Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan addresses the aspirational transportation improvements in the Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (BGMPO) area for the next 25 to 30 years.The noted bicycle and pedestrian recommendations within the study area are listed below: • Modernize US 70 by adding a wider paved shoulder to improve safety and mobility. • Add bike lanes and sidewalk on Mattress Factory Road from Washington Street to Rock Quarry Road. 4.4.5.5 2017 Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan identifies the planned transportation improvements in the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) area through the year 2040. The notable recommendations along the US 70 corridor include: • Construct a dedicated bike lane and sidewalk from the 1-85 connector to US 70 Business. • Construct bike lanes and sidewalks on Churton Street (US 70/NC 86). 4.4.5.6 2018 Mebane 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Mebane's 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) is for the City of Mebane in Alamance and Orange Counties.The plan is multi-modal, covering roadway, public transportation, and bicycle and pedestrian travel. The plan lists the following bike/ped project associated with the US 70 corridor: • Improve safety for pedestrians along Woodlawn and Moore Roads to improve access to the Holt Street Park and crossing of US 70. 4.4.5.7 2015 Mebane Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan This plan is intended to be a guide for future development and implementation of the City of Mebane's bicycle and pedestrian network. Most of the projects outlined and prioritized in the plan are local bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The plan was funded in part by Burlington Graham MPO and the MPO was identified as a potential partner for future bicycle and pedestrian programming with the City of Mebane. Specific to the US 70 corridor, the plan calls for: 53 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Construct sidewalk along the north side of US 70/W. Center Street from N. Charles Street westward to Moore Street. • Construct sidewalk along the north side of US 70/W. Center Street from Ninth Street eastward to Supper Club Road. • Construct shared-use path along the north side of US 70 from Supper Club Road to Ashbury Boulevard. • Construct shared-use path along W. Holt Street from Lake Latham Road to Madison Street • Install intersection improvements, including high visibility crosswalks, upgraded curb ramps, and countdown pedestrian signals at the intersection of South Fifth Street and East Center Street/US 70 Business. • Extend the sidewalk on both sides of South Fifth Street from East Center Street across the railroad tracks. • Stripe bike lanes on North Fifth Street from Stagecoach Road to West Center Street. 4.4.5.8 2017 Mebane by Design Comprehensive Land Development Plan The Mebane by Design Comprehensive Land Development Plan is intended to be used by the City of Mebane and County partners to guide land development decisions. It is a long-range guide for public policy decisions concerning the overall growth and development of the Mebane community, and it focuses on the physical growth and development of Mebane and the study area.The plan calls for: • Improved pedestrian access across major streets, including US 70. • Sidewalk connectivity along and across US 70, public arts, and connecting NC-119 Bypass to US 70 and downtown with bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 4.4.5.9 2018 Mebane Downtown Vision Plan The Mebane Downtown Vision Plan was created to align the community and economic need of Downtown with City officials', local business owners', and residents'visions. The Vision Plan illustrates the potential for nearly 850,000 square feet of new residential and commercial uses in Downtown, and it includes the following recommendations: • An 8' two-way bike path with a curbed buffer on Center Street (US 70), lane reconfiguration, and street trees. • Connecting sidewalks on Clay, Center (US 70), 3rd, and 51" Streets. • Improved pedestrian connectivity from Ruffin to Washington to 2,d Street, in coordination with the development of the Kingsdown property. 4.4.5.10 2018 Mebane NC Railroad Traffic Separation Study The Mebane Traffic Separation Study(TSS) focuses on eight (8) existing at-grade roadway-railroad crossings along a 5-mile span through downtown Mebane to determine the need for improvements and/or elimination of public at-grade crossings to improve safety and mobility for motorists, pedestrians, rail passengers, and train crews. The TSS evaluated the rail line in Mebane that crosses various streets, as well as any planned or programmed railroad and roadway improvements within the study area.The relevant recommendations include: • Improve pedestrian connectivity between US 70 and Washington Street. • Establish median and pedestrian refuge island on 5th Street with new crosswalks at 5th Street and Washington. 54 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Establish new pedestrian crossings at 1st Street and 2nd Street, including overpass and underpass options. 4.4.5.11 2022 Mebane Fifth St. Improvement Impact Study The City of Mebane analyzed potential traffic impacts of the proposed Fifth Street and Washington Street Intersection Improvement project.Analysis includes volume development, capacity analysis, safety assessment, and multimodal evaluation results due to the planned geometrics modifications and resulting travel pattern changes at the Fifth Street and Washington Street intersection and six other adjacent intersections, including intersections with Center Street (US 70). Notable findings included new sidewalk connections at the intersection of Fifth and Jackson. 4.4.5.12 Hillsborough Comprehensive Sustainability Plan (2023) This plan guides future development and the transition to 100% clean energy, balancing environmental stewardship, resiliency, and racial justice with smart growth that will allow for a thriving economy and a great quality of life for the residents of Hillsborough. Plan elements focus on community connectivity, future land use, parks and recreation, rail station planning, corridor planning, and climate action. A major priority for the Town is multimodal connections, for which the project team has been evaluating opportunities and feasibility with safety and resiliency at top of mind.The plan elements are listed with in the 8 main chapters: Town Government & Public Services, Land Use & Development, Environment & Natural Systems, Transportation &Connectivity, Social Systems & Public Space, Housing &Affordability, Economic Systems &Tourism, and Climate & Energy. The plan's transportation and connectivity chapter outlines and unifies recommendations listed in the Town's other controlling plans, with specific future pedestrian and bike facilities. Other key recommendations include an update of the Town's UDO and Zoning Classifications, as well as an implementation plan for unifying the other controlling plans within the Town. Any recommendations made within this study are meant to enhance and compliment those included in this plan. 4.4.6 System Connectivity For pedestrian and bicycle travel, the lack of facilities and continuity in the study corridor is a major obstacle, not only for trips along US 70, but for trips across it. This deficiency also reduces the attractiveness and effectiveness of transit service in the corridor. 4.4.7 Critical Issues The table below overviews active transportation deficiencies identified during the existing conditions analysis that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) Low-income populations have limited access to the multimodal transportation network. 1 1 2, 3 5 9, 10 55 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Inadequate pedestrian connectivity to bus stops reduces transit demand. 2, 3 6, 8 Existing pedestrian facilities do not serve most of the corridor. 2 4, 5 6, 7, 8 No dedicated bicycle facilities exist in the corridor. 1 1 2 6, 7 9 4.5 Public Transportation 4.5.1 Transit Service The US 70 study area is served by several public transportation providers and regional transportation authorities that accommodate regional and local transit trips through Alamance County, Orange County, Durham County and within municipalities. Local and regional transportation systems operate a variety of services including demand response services, local fixed route bus and express bus routes. Figure 17 shows the study area's existing local fixed bus routes, express bus routes, and park-and-ride lots. 56 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study r ! I4f�bulc ��o' 1. — -.. — —— ` �> I ; _ yrt�J i f f 86 � tf Purham 1a7 I r _ f 7l r !L 1 I r I ! 7s1 \ i r i D 0.6 12 Mkles f US 70 Corridor Study Bu%r i Go Triangle Transit Stops PART Transit Stops • Go Durham Transit Stops Osage-Alamance Connector Stops Paratral Coverage Area _! County Boundary -•••• Go Triangle Transit Routes PART Transit Routes —Go Durham Transit Routes Orange-Alamance Connector 0 Orange-Alarnari Connector Municipal Boundary Orange-Chapel Hill Midday Connector 0 Orange-Chapel HIII Midday Connector Hillsbarough Circulator F—]Hillsborough Circulator Figure 17 Transit Route in Corridor 57 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.5.1.1 GoTriangle GoTriangle provides regional transit services between Wake, Durham, Orange, and Alamance Counties. In addition to regional bus operations, GoTriangle provides other commuter resources for the Raleigh-Durham- Chapel Hill area, including paratransit services, ridematching and vanpools, and an emergency ride home program.The following two GoTriangle routes overlap with US 70 study area: Route 420 - Provides weekday peak period express service hourly between Hillsborough and Chapel Hill. The GoTriangle Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) (2018) proposed moving the route to I- '-•e-•� �0.:'� �` sa+-tea° 09••�• 40 between Chapel Hill and — �r�. Hillsborough (instead of NC-86) pok.T—W and to use Churton Street instead 9 of NC 86 and US 70 in QLJ--- - Hillsborough to improve on time ! 13n,....,W. performance and provide more direct service. Orange-Durham Express (ODX) - Provides weekday rush hour - --' -�' -®---- ; i i� --- express service hourly between �o��t- ` J �'©CM WI HIlI TraMlt UMC Efland, Mebane, Hillsborough, Hospa� �V DukeNA Hospitals, and Qu downtown Durham. The Figure 18 GoTriangle Route Map GoTriangle SRTP (2018) proposed increasing the frequency of the route to every 30 minutes and streamlining the service between Mebane Cone Park& Ride, the Durham Tech Orange County Campus, and Durham. ODX route does not operates during the evening or on weekends. The GoTriangle transit fare is typically $2.25 for regional routes and $3.00 per one way trip on Express routes (with discount fares also available);the agency is temporarily operating a fare-free format until June 2023. 4.5.1.2 Orange County Public Transportation (OPT) Orange County Public Transportation (OPT) is Orange County's transportation agency responsible for providing transportation services to residents of Orange County, the Town of Hillsborough, Efland and a part of the City of Mebane. OPT provides community transportation including demand response and circulator bus service, with the following circulators in service: • Hillsborough Circulator:A fare-free route connecting major destinations throughout Hillsborough. The Connector provides hourly service Monday-Friday between 8 PM and 5 PM. The Hillsborough Circulator is a fare-free service. • Orange-Alamance Connector: Connects major destinations in Hillsborough, Efland, and Mebane.The route operates hourly Monday- Friday between 10 AM and 3 PM. 58 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Orange-Chapel Hill Midday Connector (OCH): Connects major destinations in Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, and Cedar Grove. The OCH runs hourly Monday-Friday between 9:45 AM. and 3:50 PM. • Paratransit Services: Orange County offers Medicaid transportation services, complimentary Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) services, and services provided by the Rural Operating Assistance Program (ROAP). Collectively referred to as paratransit, these services are provided within a 3/4 mile of all Orange County fixed route service. Service is offered five days a week from 8 a.m.to 5 p.m. and has no cost. Reservations must be made to use the service. • Mobility-on-Demand (MOD): Option that provides on-demand service in the Hillsborough, NC area; MOD service is available Fridays 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The service is $5 one way. The fare to ride the Orange-Alamance Connector and the Orange-Chapel Hill Connector is $2 (one way) for the general public, $1 for children 6-12, and free to seniors 60+, children under the age of 6, and persons with disabilities. Orange County Transportation has recently shifted to cashless fare collection and accepts UMO smartcard and mobile app for fare payments. 4.5.1.3 Alamance County Transportation Authority (ACTA) The Alamance County Transportation Authority (ACTA) provides transportation for the elderly, disabled, and general public in Alamance County.ACTA uses ADA-accessible vans and buses to assist individuals with special needs. All transportation services are available Monday-Friday from 5:00 AM-5:30 PM and must be scheduled by 11 AM on the previous working day.ACTA provides transportation for general purpose trips, medical trips, and almost any non-emergency trip destination. In addition, special programs and pricing are available to qualified riders based on eligibility requirements. ACTA fares are $5.00 for a one-way trip/or $10 for a round trip. Starting on March 24, 2020 and through the end of January 2022, ACTA has been waiving the fare collection. 4.5.2 Planned Improvements and Relevant Plans 4.5.2.1 North Carolina Department of Transportation 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The current NCDOT 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) includes two active transportation projects in the project study area (see Figure 15). STIP# P-5701A/B— Norfolk Southern Railroad P-5701A proposes to construct a passenger rail station building, site access, utilities, and parking, and P-5701 B proposes to construct a station platform and realign the curve for the Norfolk Southern Railroad H-Line at milepost 41.7 in Hillsborough. Construction for P- 5701A is scheduled to begin in FY 2022, and P-5701 B is scheduled to begin in FY 2023. STIP#TD-5295—GoTriangle TD-5295 proposes to construct a GoTriangle park-and-ride lot in the Town of Hillsborough. Construction is scheduled for FY 2023. 59 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Orange County Transit Plan (2017, amended 2022) The Orange County Transit Plan (2017; amended 2022) was developed by representatives from Orange County, the Towns of Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro, the University of North Carolina (UNC), and GoTriangle to improve transit options throughout Orange County and strengthen regional transit connections.The plan examines ways to improve the transit network through enhanced bus service and facilities. The Orange County Transit Plan has several goals, including improving overall mobility and transportation options while providing geographic equity and positive impacts on air quality. Relevant recommendations include: • New Hillsborough Train Station for intercity (Amtrak) service • New commuter express service between Mebane, Hillsborough, and Durham (implemented) • Improvements to Hillsborough bus stops • Additional deviated fixed-route transit service • Hillsborough transfer center to connect Orange Public Transportation and GoTriangle 4.5.2.2 2018 Mebane 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Mebane's 2040 Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) is for the City of Mebane in Alamance and Orange Counties.The plan is multi-modal, covering roadway, public transportation, and bicycle and pedestrian travel. The plan lists the following transit project associated with the US 70 corridor: • Implement a circulator route to provide service to residents as a method of traveling locally around Mebane. Additionally, the route will provide service to the existing bus stops in an effort to make the regional transit more convenient to all residents and visitors. Stops along the route should include popular destinations such as the Post Office, City Hall, Downtown, Mebane Cone Health, and grocery stores.The conceptual route included in the CTP crosses US 70 at 3rd Street and 511 Street 4.5.2.3 2022 Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan addresses the aspirational transportation improvements in the Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (BGMPO) area for the next 25 to 30 years.The noted transit recommendations within the study area are listed below: • Modernize US 70 by adding a wider paved shoulder to improve safety and mobility, creating a transit corridor from NC 119 to Supper Club Road. • Implement urban bus corridors throughout downtown Mebane and along US 70 and a fixed guideway transit system along US 70 east of Third Street. 4.5.2.4 2020 Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan (CTP) This plan identifies the planned transportation improvements in the Burlington-Graham area through the year 2045. The plan identifies US 70 as a major transportation corridor and key to the economic vitality of the region.Transit recommendations include: • Hillsborough-Mebane Commuter Rail Connector which would include a new commuter rail station in Mebane. 60 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.5.2.5 2022 GoTriangle Mebane Park-and Ride Feasibility Study The GoTriangle Mebane Park-and Ride Feasibility Study was launched in March 2022 to investigate potential new locations for a permanent or leased park and ride facility in Mebane. A pool of potential parcels was identified, evaluated for viability, and narrowed based on their ability to meet the study goals and objectives identified by GoTriangle and key stakeholders.The preferred purchase site is located on Washington Street, across the railroad tracks from US 70 in East Mebane. The plan includes conceptual development at the preferred site including parking facilities, amenities, and a driveway to service the residences.The site currently has access to a water line, but no sewer mains. Orange County is considering expanding utilities north of the interchange. In addition, the parcel was chosen in part because it has no signalized intersections between the proposed site and I-40/85. 61 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.5.3 Critical Issues The table below overviews public transportation deficiencies identified during the existing conditions analysis that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) Low-income populations have limited access to the multimodal transportation network. 2, 3 5 9, 10 Inadequate pedestrian connectivity to bus stops reduces transit demand. 2, 3 6, 8 No bus stop in the corridor meets ADA standards. 3 6 Areas projected to experience significant employment growth, particularly for low-income jobs, are not served by public transit. 1 3 9 Bus service is too infrequent to be a convenient, reliable travel option, especially for those commuting at non-traditional times. 1 3 9, 10 Bus routes do not serve some of the corridor's largest trip producers and attractions. 1 1 3 9, 10 62 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.6 Safety Table 14 US 70 Corridor Crash Rates The Study Team analyzed reported crashes between US 70 Crashes Per Statewide Critical August 2017 through July 2022 along US 70 from SR Rate Crashes 100 MVM Rate' Rate` 1965 (Moore Street) in Alamance County to 25' north Total 828 330.18 263.25 280.30 of US 70 Business/SR 1562 (Palmers Grove Church Fatal 4 1-60 1-32 2.71 Road) in Orange County to provide an overview of Nan-Fatal 239 95.31 73-07 82-15 how the corridor is performing and identify potential Night 210 83.74 57-83 65.93 crash patterns or hotspots. The total crash rate was wet 115 45.BB 43-32 50-36 higher on US 70 than the corresponding critical crash Run-Off Road 240 95.71 45.46 52.66 rate determined by comparing the corridor with Table 15 US 70 Business Crash Rates similar facilities in North Carolina (Table 14). Crash rates along US 70 also exceeded the respective critical Crashes Rate US as Bus Crashes Per Statewide Critical rates for non-fatal injury, night (dark), and run-off hes 1QQ MVM Rate Rate road crashes. The crash rates for fatal crashes and Total 395 339.42 263.25 288-42 crashes occurring under wet conditions did not Fatal 3 2-58 1.32 3-50 Non-Fatal 13 2 58 1 32 3 50 exceed their respective critical crash rates. Crashes Night 101 86.79 57.83 69.86 reported during the same period along US 70 Business Wet 57 48-98 43-32 53.79 from SR 1009 (S Churton Street) to NC 751 were Run-Off Road 77 66.16 45-46 56 17 analyzed as well. Similarly, the total, non-fatal injury, night (dark), and run-off road crashes exceeded their 2017 2021 statewide crash rate for 2-lane undivided urban US respective critical rates, and the fatal and wet crash Routes 2Based on the statewide crash rate(95%level of confidence) rates did not (Table 15). There were 828 recorded crashes in the study corridor during the analysis period. Rear-end collisions accounted for 366 crashes (44% of total crashes). These crashes occurred frequently throughout multiple sections of the study area especially near isolated intersections and areas with transitions between rural and urban conditions.The frequency of rear-end crashes could be attributable to multiple interrelated causes including sections with curves, numerous driveways and intersections including unexpected or isolated traffic signals, high travel speeds, limited turn lanes, rolling terrain, and transitions between rural and urban conditions. The second most common crash type was frontal impact crashes, which includes angle, left-turn, and right- turn crashes and accounted for 189 of the total crashes (23%). Of these, angle crashes were the most prominent with 83 crashes (10% of total crashes). Left-turn and right-turn crashes accounted for about 12% and 1% of the total crashes, respectively. These crashes are concentrated in the urban portions of the corridor, north of Hillsborough and in Mebane, and at isolated intersections such as in Efland. Lane departure crashes accounted for 175 of the total crashes (21%). Of these, fixed object crashes were the most prominent with 86 crashes (10% of total crashes). Run-off road, sideswipe (opposite direction), and head-on crashes accounted for 4%, 2%, and 1% of crashes, respectively. Run-off-road crash locations and severities as well as the passing zones are shown in Figure 19.An explanation of crash severity can be found in Table 16. 63 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 16 Crash Severity Description Severity Description K One or more people are killed at the scene or die within 30 days of the crash due to injuries received from the crash. A One or more people receive incapacitating injuries that prevent the individuals from performing their normal activities for 24 hours or longer. B One or more people receive non-incapacitating injuries that are apparent at the scene and will not prevent the individual from performing their normal activities for more than 24 hours. C One or more people complain of pain or momentary unconsciousness; however, the injuries are not visible or obvious at the scene of the crash. O No one is injured, and only property is damaged. Rear end and frontal impact crashes are the most common crash types. Rear end collisions make up almost half of the crashes along the corridor which suggests drivers may not be anticipating the transitions occurring between more rural and more urban conditions. The high proportion of rear end crashes and frontal impact crashes at isolated intersections along the corridor point to unexpected stops in traffic as a contributing factor possibly due to increased turning volumes and at isolated signalized intersections due to queues at red lights. Other potential contributing factors include curving approaches, limited turn lanes, and intersection skew. Table 17 Total Crashes per Segment by Severity Segment K A B/C O A 0 4 38 123 B 1 4 50 116 C 2 4 74 191 D 1 2 63 155 E 2 5 76 166 F 1 0 32 113 The corridor was also analyzed by segment with more attention paid to prominent crash locations and other areas of concern.This detailed analysis can be found in the Existing Conditions Report. 64 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study V I w 85 A 57 Vhb. x S } n - 5 I 1 ,3 1 1 coo ,r Mehane I �' d ° MW• agccowa°crrr/, • •o og'° ' �pO — 000° • •1i9°�� �•d ��8 1 C/I_ 8 f•� � " Hillsborough ° o r i °pO • y I us I � ° •°9 I f I i Legends\' Passing Direction Severity Railroad Track r Bg Illurham No Passing ° 0 C=1 County Boundary - 1 —Passing in One Direction • B/C Municipal Boundary —Passing in Both Directions • A • K 5 Figure 19 Run-Off Road Crash Severity& Passing Zones 65 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.6.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes Four pedestrian crashes and zero bicycle crashes were reported along the corridor between August 2017 and July 2022, as summarized in Table 18. Many bicycle or pedestrian "near-misses" are not reported and are, therefore, unsubstantiated. Both travelling along US 70 and crossing US 70 are potentially hazardous, given the lack of appropriate accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists. Traffic speeds, rolling terrain, driver expectations, and access locations all contribute to crash potential, and suggest that pedestrian and bicycle travel in this corridor is suppressed due to discomfort and risk. Vehicle safety is typically measured in terms of crash history; given that many bicycle and pedestrian trips are trips are foregone due to the above reasons, crash history is not a reliable indicator of conditions related to bicycle and pedestrian safety. Given the potential amount of latent demand and the scarcity of crash data, bicycle and pedestrian safety are generally assessed differently from vehicular crashes, relying more on physical conditions.A similar approach is applied to railroad safety as well, due to the infrequent—but typically severe--nature of such rail crashes. Table 18 Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes (August 2017 - July 2022) Day of Nearest Road Ambient Date Week Time Location Intersection Severity Surface Light Condition Jul Orange County 10:03 Buckhorn Possible Dark- Not 2021 Thursday PM Rd Injury(C) Dry Lighted Jul 2:44 Hillsborough, Faucette Evident 2021 Sunday PM Orange County Mill Rd Injury(B) Dry Daylight Feb 7:36 Hillsborough, Faucette Evident Dark- 2020 Tuesday PM Orange County Mill Rd Injury(B) Dry Lighted Jan 9:38 Hillsborough, Possible Dark - 2020 Friday PM Orange County NC 86 Injury(C) Dry Lighted 4.6.2 Large Vehicle Crashes Sixty-two crashes involving large vehicles were reported along US 70 between Mebane and NC 751, including one fatal crash and four B-injury crashes as well as multiple C-injury crashes. This crash rate appears to be generally proportionate to the volume of trucks relative to total traffic (i.e., there did not appear to be an outsized number of truck crashes relative to the percentage of truck traffic.) The fatal crash involved a truck rear-ending a vehicle leading to a multicar crash in a construction zone when traffic was stopped by a flagger near W Hill Avenue (SR 1161).The largest cluster of truck crashes occurred in Hillsborough near Churton Street (NC 86) including three school bus crashes.All three school bus crashes were rear ends that occurred in the morning around 7:30 am —8:30 am. Most truck crashes occurred in urban areas along the corridor and about 40% occurred within municipal limits. The truck crashes that occurred in more rural areas along the corridor tended to be rear end and fixed object crashes indicating the possibility of speeding and unexpected stops as attributable factors. Eight crashes involving large vehicles were reported along US 70 Bus from Churton Street (SR 1009) in Downtown Hillsborough to slightly before Palmers Grove Church Road including one A-injury crash and one B-injury crash as well as multiple C-injury crashes. The A-injury crash involved a left-turning passenger vehicle striking another on Churton Street (SR 1009) at US 70 Bus leading to a multicar crash including a bus. The B- injury crash involved a truck running off the road to the left and striking a utility pole then a house near Efland 66 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Street. The largest cluster of truck crashes occurred in Hillsborough near Churton Street (NC 86) including three school bus crashes.All three school bus crashes were rear ends that occurred in the morning around 7:30 am —8:30 am. 4.6.3 Rail Crossing Crashes Although no active rail lines cross US 70 in the study corridor, there are five at-grade crossings in Segment A that are in close proximity to US 70 (less than 50 feet in several instances). There have been two crashes at these locations over the last 10 years: • Third Street 0 March 2021 — Passenger train traveling at 76 mph struck a car stopped on tracks in daylight. No injuries. • Fifth Street 0 December 2014— Passenger train traveling at 79 mph struck a van trapped between gates in daylight. Driver killed. 4.6.4 Critical Issues The table below overviews safety deficiencies identified during the existing conditions analysis that must be addressed to achieve the plan's goals. Problem Relevant Goal(s) Pedestrian crossings across US 70 lack adequate safety features. A /WmAmmy A 2 5 6, 7, 8 High traffic speeds pose a significant threat to non- automobile users. A 2 5 6, 7, 8 No dedicated bicycle facilities exist in the corridor. A 2 6, 7 67 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study The corridor experiences a large amount of animal crash incidents. 7 11 68 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4.7 Critical Issues Summary Table 19 summarizes observed critical issues by the goals that would be achieved by addressing them. Table 19 Critical Issues Summary Goals fA C w u e a Critical Issues c c R o a � W 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 Schools in the corridor are significant sources of x congestion. Roadway infrastructure in the corridor does not have the capacity for the future projected traffic demand. x x x Low-income populations have limited access to the x x x x x multimodal transportation network. Natural areas that are recreational destinations lack connectivity to the multimodal transportation network. x x x x Inadequate pedestrian connectivity to bus stops reduces x x x transit demand. US 70 poses a significant barrier to pedestrian x x x connectivity in urban areas despite existing crossings. High traffic speeds contradict existing and planned x x x x x residential and commercial development in the corridor. Existing pedestrian facilities do not serve most of the x x x x x x corridor. US 70 does not have sufficient multimodal facilities to support its growing business. x x x x No dedicated bicycle facilities exist in the corridor. x x x x US 70 detracts from the character of the municipalities it x traverses. No bus stop in the corridor meets ADA standards. x x Areas projected to experience significant employment growth, particularly for low-income jobs, are not served x x by public transit. Bus service is too infrequent to be a convenient, reliable travel option, especially for those commuting at non- x x x traditional times. Bus routes do not serve some of the corridor's largest x x x trip producers and attractions. The corridor experiences a large amount of animal crash x x incidents. 69 Existing Conditions and Critical Issues US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Recommendations The following section identifies recommended projects and policies that should be implemented to achieve the plan's goals. 5.1 Plan Overview Using the critical issues identified in the existing conditions analyses, each goal was deconstructed into measurable, realistic objectives that when completed would indicate progress towards the US 70 vision. Implementing the recommendations of this plan would result in the achievement of these objectives. Objectives and associated policies often contribute to the success of more than one goal. The strategies outlined in the following sections are coded by an ID number that indicates the applicable segment, objective, and recommendation/policy. For example, 'All 5.1"would indicate a strategy for Segment A and meeting Objective 15 by implementing Recommendation 1 for that objective.Tables 21-26 in Section 5.1.6 provides a concise summary of each objective by segment; Section 5.5 details the specific recommendations/policies needed to meet each of those objectives. 70 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 20 US 70 Corridor Plan Goals Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Mobility Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility. Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. I L/K'&V Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Placemaking Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 7:Work towards Vision Zero. Safety Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 1 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. Job Access Goal 11: Improve multimodal access to parks throughout the corridor. I Natural Goal 12: Reduce wildlife-automobile conflicts. Environment 71 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.1.1 Mobility Plan 5.1.1.1 Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. To achieve Goal 1, improvement projects should: • Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor(Objective A.15/B.1/C.1/D.1/E 1/F.7). o A.15.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road. o B.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road. o C.1.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment C. o C.1.2: Realign Revere Road approach to the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection; reroute Short Street accordingly. o C.1.3: Construct/extend exclusive turn lanes on the west- and northbound approaches to the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection. o CAA Construct exclusive turning lanes at the US 70/NC 86 intersection, including dual eastbound left turn lanes from US 70 onto NC 86 northbound. o D.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment D. o D.1.2: Extend existing south- and westbound right turn lanes at the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection o D.1.3: Upgrade the US 70/N. Scotswood Blvd. intersection to a roundabout. o E.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment E. o E.1.2: Extend turn lanes at the US 70/NC 751 intersection. o F.1.1: Upgrade the US 70 Business/Lawrence Road intersection to a traffic signal. o F.1.2: Convert the US 70 Business/Elizabeth Brady Road intersection to a T-intersection with an adjacent roundabout at NC 86. o F.1.3: Convert the existing traffic signal at the US 70 Business/NC 86 intersection to a roundabout, including pedestrian crossing markings and signage. • Improve access between US 70 and 1 40/1 85 (Objective B.2/F.2). o B.2.1: Construct exclusive left- and right-turn lanes on all approaches at the US 70/Efland Cedar Grove Road intersection. o B.2.2: Redesign the US 70/1 85 Connector interchange to a fully directional at-grade configuration, such as a "dogbone" roundabout. o F.2.1: Implement the US 70 Business realignment proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021), built to complete street standards. 72 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Manage travel demand for future development in the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area (Objective B.3). o B.3.1: Implement and regularly update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan (updated 2019). o B.3.2: Update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan to include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity recommendations. • Manage travel demand resulting from trips to and from schools (Objective D.3). o D.3.1: Conduct NCDOT Municipal School Transportation Assistance (MSTA) school study to address circulation, queuing, and storage needs specific to Orange High and Middle School complex. 5.1.1.2 Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. To achieve Goal 2, improvement projects should: • Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough (Objective A.7/B.4/C.4). o A.1.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Holt Street from Tate Avenue to 1It Street. o A.1.2: Install signage to encourage bicycle use along E.Washington Street and Lebanon Road. o A.1.3: Develop protected bicycle route on Washington Street from Sargents Path to Buckhorn Road. o B.4.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Lebanon Road from Doe Run Road to Old Paths Trail. o B.4.2: Develop protected bicycle route along Richmond Road from Lebanon Road to Efland- Cheeks Park and Community Center; connect the route south across US 70 to shared-use path proposed to run parallel to 140. o C.4.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route along the length of Faucette Mill Road north of the Hillsboro Town border. o C.4.2: Construct an off-road bicycle path that connects Faucette Mill Road with Lebanon Road across the Eno River. • Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects (Objective A.7/B.8/C.9/D.8/E.2/F.7). o A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot sidewalk on north side of US 70 from 9t" Street to Ashbury Blvd. o A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. 73 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US 70 indicating presence of cyclists between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel Road. o B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road realignment to include a 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. o D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.2.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NC 751; in the short term, widen shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road. o F.7.2:Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road to provide a minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. • Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas (Objective A.9/B.I7/C.17/D.70/E.4/F.9) o A.9.1/B.1 1.1/C.1 1.1/D.1 0.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and Orange County for new and existing pedestrian facilities on US 70. o A.9.2/B.1 1.2/C.1 1.2/D.1 0.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, dedicate ROW for future construction, or pay in lieu. • Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane (Objective A.72). o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 91" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. • Manage travel demand for future development in the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area (Objective B.3). o B.3.1: Implement and regularly update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan (updated 2019). o B.3.2: Update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan to include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity recommendations. • Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough (Objective C.74/D.72). o C.14.1: Construct shared-use path along the east side of NC 86 from US 70 to Corbin Street. o C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. 74 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and protected bicycle route on the entirety of Orange High School Road; connect to Caine Street across US 70 along parcel lines. o D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/Lawrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. • Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough (Objective C.76/D.74/F.72). o C.16.1: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Torain Street between Faucette Mill Road and Rainey Avenue. o C.16.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish east-west bike route through Fairview Park from Rainey Avenue to NC 86. o C.16.3: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Hayes and Union Streets from West King Street to Cameron Street. o C.16.4: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Churton Street between Union Street and Margaret Lane. o D.14.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on the length of Crawford Road. o F.12.1: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on the length of Meadowlands Drive. • Connect Eno River State Park to US via bicycle infrastructure (Objective D.75/E.7). o D.15.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Lawrence Road from US 70 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.7.1: Construct protected bike lane on Pleasant Green Road from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.7.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Cole Mill Road from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. 5.1.1.3 Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility. To achieve Goal 3, improvement projects should: • Improve bus service reliability(Objective A.2/B.5/C.5/D.4/F3). o A.2.1/13.5.1/C.5.1: Increase the frequency and service hours of GoTriangle's ODX route. o A.2.2/B.5.2/C.5.2/D.4.1/F.3.1: Increase the frequency and service hours of Orange County's Orange-Alamance Connector and Hillsborough Circulator routes. 75 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o A.2.3: Increase the frequency and service hours of PART's Route 4. • Improve the accessibility of existing bus stops (Objective A.3/B.6/C.6/D.5/F.3). o A.3.1/B.6.1/C.6.1/D.6.1/F.4.1: Update all existing bus stops to accessibility and safety standards, complete with shelters, seating, lighting, visible and audible information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's employment centers (Objective A.4). o A.4.1: Add two accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serve businesses on Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's recreation destinations (Objective A.5). o A.5.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Community Park. o A.5.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Memorial Garden. • Construct accessible bus shelters that service Mebane's residential communities (Objective A.6). o A.6.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves the Supper Club mobile home community. o A.6.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. • Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Alamance County (Objective A.13). o A.13.1: Incorporate planned stops at Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive into the future Mebane Circulator route. o A.13.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses in Alamance County. • Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County (Objective A.74/B.72/C.75/D.73/E.6/F.7 7). o A.14.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Mebane Community Park and Supper Club Road mobile home community stops. o A.14.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses in Orange County. o A.14.3: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to existing Ashbury Boulevard stop. o B.12.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Ashwick Drive, Graham Trailer Park, and Mebane Memorial Garden stops. o B.12.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities around Efland, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o CA 5.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the existing Faucette Mill/Cornelius Street, Hillsborough Police Station, and West Village stops. 76 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o CA 5.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator from Lakeshore Drive to Hill Avenue, and service new stop at Bennetts Mobile Home Park. o C.15.3: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.15.4: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for Fairview,job centers north along NC 86, and West Hillsborough, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o D.13.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Miller Road, Orange High School Road, and Scotswood Boulevard stops. o D.13.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator along Orange High School Road, Miller Road, Woodlawn Drive, and Scotswood Boulevard to service planned stops between the existing US 70/Walgreens and Scotswood/US 70 stops. o D.13.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for communities adjacent to Palmers Grove Church Road, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o E.6.1: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities east of Piney Grove, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o F.11.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Cornerstone Court and Orange Grove Road stops. o F.11.2: Shift partnerships with service providers in Orange County to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021). • Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor(Objective A.76/B.73/C.77/F.73). o A.16.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Supper Club Road mobile home community stop. o B.13.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Ashwick Drive and Graham Trailer Park mobile home community stops. o C.17.1: Extend ODX service to the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street, US 70/Rainey Street, and West Village stops. o F.13.1: Shift regional transit services to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021). • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities (Objective B.7). o B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve communities near Ashwick Drive. o B.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve the Graham Trailer Park. • Introduce and expand park and ride service (Objective C.2/D.2). o C.2.1: Implement the Faucette Mill Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP (updated April 2023). o D.2.1: Implement the Miller Road/Latta Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP(updated April 2023). • Expand regional transit access to Hillsborough's job centers (Objective C.3). 77 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.3.1: Extend PART Route 4 service to existing North Carolina Drivers License and Orange County Courthouse stops. • Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities (Objective C.7). o C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street stop. o C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities (Objective C.8/D.7/F.6). o C.8.1: Replace Lakeshore Drive stop with a stop serving Bennetts Mobile Home Park and surrounding communities. o D.7.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Miller Road. o D.7.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Scotswood Boulevard. o F.6.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near Orange Grove Road and Elfin Boulevard. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers (Objective D.6/F.5). o D.6.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Orange High School Road that serves Orange High School. o F.5.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near NC 86 and Cornerstone Court. co 5.1.2 Placemakin Plan 9 5.1.2.1 Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. To achieve Goal 4, improvement projects should: • Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place (Objective A.71). o A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. o A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth Streets. • Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane (Objective A.72). o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 9t" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. • Establish gateways to Hillsborough (Objective C73/D.77/F.70). 78 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.13.1: Upgrade the US 70/Lakeshore Drive intersection to a roundabout. o D.11.1: Upgrade the intersection of US 70, US 70 Business, and Palmer's Grove Church Road to a roundabout. o F.10.1: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 Business from Tuscarora Drive to US 70 Bypass. • Prepare east Orange County for smart growth (Objective E.5). o E.5.1: Construct reduced conflict intersection configurations from Palmers Grove Church Road to the 185 interchange. o E.5.2: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 south of 185. 5.1.2.2 Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. To achieve Goal 5, improvement projects should: • Modernize existing US 70 pedestrian crossings in downtown Mebane (Objective A.70). o A.10.1: Modernize the US 70/3'd Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.2: Modernize the US 70/41" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.3: Modernize the US 70/51" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. Coordinate with NCDOT and NCRR to refine design of T-550GC as shown in Mebane's 51 Street Improvement Traffic Impact Study(August 2022) to maintain three-lane northbound approach and crosswalk/sidewalk design on the east side, and replicate that design on the west side. • Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place (Objective A.71). o A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. o A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth Streets. • Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane (Objective A.72). o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 9t" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. • Improve the safety of pedestrian facilities in the Fairview Neighborhood (Objective C.72) o C.12.1: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage at the Faucette Mill Road/Torain Street intersection. o C.12.2: Include high-visibility crossings in all future sidewalk construction on Faucette Mill Road, Torain Street, and Rainey Avenue where the pedestrian network would otherwise be interrupted by roadway. 79 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.12.3: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage and pedestrian pads at the Rainey Avenue/Torain Street intersection. • Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough (Objective C 14/D.12). o C.14.1: Construct shared-use path along the east side of NC 86 from US 70 to Corbin Street. o C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and protected bicycle route on the entirety of Orange High School Road; connect to Caine Street across US 70 along parcel lines. o D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/Lawrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. 5.1.3 Safety Plan 5.1.3.1 Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. To achieve Goal 6, improvement projects should: • Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough (Objective A.1/B.4/C.4). o A.1.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Holt Street from Tate Avenue to 1IY Street. o A.1.2: Install signage to encourage bicycle use along E.Washington Street and Lebanon Road. o A.1.3: Develop protected bicycle route on Washington Street from Sargents Path to Buckhorn Road. o B.4.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Lebanon Road from Doe Run Road to Old Paths Trail. o B.4.2: Develop protected bicycle route along Richmond Road from Lebanon Road to Efland- Cheeks Park and Community Center; connect the route south across US 70 to shared-use path proposed to run parallel to 140. o C.4.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route along the length of Faucette Mill Road north of the Hillsboro Town border. o C.4.2: Construct an off-road bicycle path that connects Faucette Mill Road with Lebanon Road across the Eno River. • Improve the accessibility of existing bus stops (Objective A.3/B.6/C.6/D.5/F.3). 80 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o A.3.1/B.6.1/C.6.1/D.6.1/F.4.1: Update all existing bus stops to accessibility and safety standards, complete with shelters, seating, lighting, visible and audible information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's employment centers (Objective A.4). o A.4.1: Add two accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serve businesses on Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's recreation destinations (Objective A.5). o A.5.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Community Park. o A.5.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Memorial Garden. • Construct accessible bus shelters that service Mebane's residential communities (Objective A.6). o A.6.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves the Supper Club mobile home community. o A.6.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. • Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects (Objective A.7/B.8/C.9/D.8/E.2/F.7). o A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot sidewalk on north side of US 70 from 91" Street to Ashbury Blvd. o A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US 70 indicating presence of cyclists between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel Road. o B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road realignment to include a 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. o D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.2.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NC 751; in the short term, widen shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road. 81 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o F.7.2:Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road to provide a minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. • Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor (Objective A.8/B.10/C.10/D.9/E.3/F.8). o A.8.1/B.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and NC 751. o C.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and NC 751. o C.10.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Faucette Mill Road to 35 miles per hour between the Hillsborough Town border and Frank Perry Road. o D.9.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and NC 751. o D.9.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Lawrence Road to 35 miles per hour between US 70 and Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.3.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and NC 751. o E.3.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Pleasant Green Road to 35 miles per hour from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.3.3: Reduce posted speed limit on Cole Mill Road to 35 miles per hour from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. • Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas (Objective A.9/B.11/C.71/D.10/E4/F9). o A.9.1/13.11.1/C.11.1/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and Orange County for new and existing pedestrian facilities on US 70. o A.9.2/13.11.2/C.11.2/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, dedicate ROW for future construction, or pay in lieu. • Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place (Objective A.11). o A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. o A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth Streets. • Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane (Objective A.12). o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 9t" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities (Objective B.7). o B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve communities near Ashwick Drive. o B.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve the Graham Trailer Park. 82 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study • Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities (Objective C.7). o C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street stop. o C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities (Objective C.8/D.7/F.6). o C.8.1: Replace Lakeshore Drive stop with a stop serving Bennetts Mobile Home Park and surrounding communities. o D.7.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Miller Road. o D.7.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Scotswood Boulevard. o F.6.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near Orange Grove Road and Elfin Boulevard. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers (Objective D.6/F.5) o D.6.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Orange High School Road that serves Orange High School. o F.5.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near NC 86 and Cornerstone Court. 5.1.3.2 Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. To achieve Goal 7, improvement projects should: • Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects (Objective A.7/B.8/C.9/D.8/E.2/F.7). o A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot sidewalk on north side of US 70 from 91" Street to Ashbury Blvd. o A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US 70 indicating presence of cyclists between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel Road. o B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road realignment to include a 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. 83 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. o D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.2.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NC 751; in the short term, widen shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road. o F.7.2:Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road to provide a minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. • Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor (Objective A.8/8.70/C.70/D.9/E.3/F.8). o A.8.1/B.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and NC 751. o C.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between MCBane Store Road and NC 751. o C.10.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Faucette Mill Road to 35 miles per hour between the Hillsborough Town border and Frank Perry Road. o D.9.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between MCBane Store Road and NC 751. o D.9.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Lawrence Road to 35 miles per hour between US 70 and Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.3.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between MCBane Store Road and NC 751. o E.3.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Pleasant Green Road to 35 miles per hour from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.3.3: Reduce posted speed limit on Cole Mill Road to 35 miles per hour from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. • Modernize existing US 70 pedestrian crossings in downtown Mebane (Objective A.70). o A.10.1: Modernize the US 70/3'd Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.2: Modernize the US 70/41" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.3: Modernize the US 70/511 Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. Coordinate with NCDOT and NCRR to refine design of T-550GC as shown in Mebane's 51 Street Improvement Traffic Impact Study(August 2022) to maintain 84 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study three-lane northbound approach and crosswalk/sidewalk design on the east side, and replicate that design on the west side. • Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place (Objective A.71). o A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. o A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth Streets. • Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities (Objective C.7). o C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street stop. o C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. • Improve the safety of pedestrian facilities in the Fairview Neighborhood (Objective C.72). o C.12.1: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage at the Faucette Mill Road/Torain Street intersection. o C.12.2: Include high-visibility crossings in all future sidewalk construction on Faucette Mill Road, Torain Street, and Rainey Avenue where the pedestrian network would otherwise be interrupted by roadway. o C.12.3: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage and pedestrian pads at the Rainey Avenue/Torain Street intersection. • Establish gateways to Hillsborough (Objective C.13/D.11/F.70). o C.13.1: Upgrade the US 70/Lakeshore Drive intersection to a roundabout. o D.11.1: Upgrade the intersection of US 70, US 70 Business, and Palmer's Grove Church Road to a roundabout. o F.10.1: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 Business from Tuscarora Drive to US 70 Bypass. • Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough (Objective C.14/D.72). o C.14.1: Construct shared-use path along the east side of NC 86 from US 70 to Corbin Street. o C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and protected bicycle route on the entirety of Orange High School Road; connect to Caine Street across US 70 along parcel lines. 85 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/Lawrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. • Prepare east Orange County for smart growth (Objective E.5). o E.5.1: Construct reduced conflict intersection configurations from Palmers Grove Church Road to the 185 interchange. o E.5.2: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 south of 185. • Designate wildlife crossings where animal strikes are high (Objective E.8). o E.8.1: Develop location for a designated wildlife crossing of US 70 between Seven Springs Road and Linden Road. 5.1.3.3 Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. To achieve Goal 8, improvement projects should: • Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects (Objective A.7/B.8/C.9/D.8/E.2/F.7). o A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot sidewalk on north side of US 70 from 9t" Street to Ashbury Blvd. o A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US 70 indicating presence of cyclists between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel Road. o B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road realignment to include a 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. o D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.2.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NC 751; in the short term,widen shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road. 86 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o F.7.2:Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road to provide a minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. • Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas (Objective A.9/B.11/C.11/D.10/E.4/F.9). o A.9.1/13.11.1/C.11.1/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and Orange County for new and existing pedestrian facilities on US 70. o A.9.2/13.11.2/C.11.2/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, dedicate ROW for future construction, or pay in lieu. • Modernize existing US 70 pedestrian crossings in downtown Mebane (Objective A.70). o A.10.1: Modernize the US 70/3rd Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.2: Modernize the US 70/41" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.3: Modernize the US 70/51" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. Coordinate with NCDOT and NCRR to refine design of T-550GC as shown in Mebane's 51 Street Improvement Traffic Impact Study(August 2022) to maintain three-lane northbound approach and crosswalk/sidewalk design on the east side, and replicate that design on the west side. • Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane (Objective A.72). o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 9t" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. • Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities (Objective C.7). o C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street stop. o C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. • Improve the safety of pedestrian facilities in the Fairview Neighborhood (Objective C.12). o C.12.1: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage at the Faucette Mill Road/Torain Street intersection. o C.12.2: Include high-visibility crossings in all future sidewalk construction on Faucette Mill Road, Torain Street, and Rainey Avenue where the pedestrian network would otherwise be interrupted by roadway. 87 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.12.3: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage and pedestrian pads at the Rainey Avenue/Torain Street intersection. • Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough (Objective C.14/D.12). o C.14.1: Construct shared-use path along the east side of NC 86 from US 70 to Corbin Street. o C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and protected bicycle route on the entirety of Orange High School Road; connect to Caine Street across US 70 along parcel lines. o D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/Lawrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. ID5.1.4 Job Access Plan 5.1.4.1 Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. To achieve Goal 9, improvement projects should: • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's employment centers (Objective A.4). o A.4.1: Add two accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serve businesses on Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's residential communities (Objective A.6). o A.6.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves the Supper Club mobile home community. o A.6.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. • Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Alamance county(Objective A.73). o A.13.1: Incorporate planned stops at Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive into the future Mebane Circulator route. o A.13.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses in Alamance County. • Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County (Objective A.14/8.12/C.15/D.13/E.5/F.11). 88 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o A.14.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Mebane Community Park and Supper Club Road mobile home community stops. o A.14.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses in Orange County. o A.14.3: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to existing Ashbury Boulevard stop. o B.12.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Ashwick Drive, Graham Trailer Park, and Mebane Memorial Garden stops. o B.12.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities around Efland, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o C.15.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the existing Faucette Mill/Cornelius Street, Hillsborough Police Station, and West Village stops. o C.15.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator from Lakeshore Drive to Hill Avenue, and service new stop at Bennetts Mobile Home Park. o C.15.3: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.15.4: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for Fairview,job centers north along NC 86, and West Hillsborough, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o D.13.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Miller Road, Orange High School Road, and Scotswood Boulevard stops. o D.13.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator along Orange High School Road, Miller Road, Woodlawn Drive, and Scotswood Boulevard to service planned stops between the existing US 70/Walgreens and Scotswood/US 70 stops. o D.13.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for communities adjacent to Palmers Grove Church Road, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o E.6.1: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities east of Piney Grove, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o F.11.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Cornerstone Court and Orange Grove Road stops. o F.11.2: Shift partnerships with service providers in Orange County to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021). • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities (Objective B.7). o B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve communities near Ashwick Drive. o B.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve the Graham Trailer Park. • Introduce and expand park and ride service (Objective C.2/D.2). o C.2.1: Implement the Faucette Mill Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP (updated April 2023). 89 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o D.2.1: Implement the Miller Road/Latta Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP(updated April 2023). • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities (Objective C.8/D.7/F.6). o C.8.1: Replace Lakeshore Drive stop with a stop serving Bennetts Mobile Home Park and surrounding communities. o D.7.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Miller Road. o D.7.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Scotswood Boulevard. o F.6.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near Orange Grove Road and Elfin Boulevard. • Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough (Objective C.76/D.74/F.72). o C.16.1: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Torain Street between Faucette Mill Road and Rainey Avenue. o C.16.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish east-west bike route through Fairview Park from Rainey Avenue to NC 86. o C.16.3: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Hayes and Union Streets from West King Street to Cameron Street. o C.16.4: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Churton Street between Union Street and Margaret Lane. • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers (Objective D.6/F.5). o D.6.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Orange High School Road that serves Orange High School. o F.5.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near NC 86 and Cornerstone Court. 5.1.4.2 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to job outside the corridor. To achieve Goal 10, improvement projects should: • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's residential communities (Objective A.6). o A.6.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves the Supper Club mobile home community. o A.6.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. • Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor(Objective A.76/B.73/C.77/F.73). o A.16.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Supper Club Road mobile home community stop. 90 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o B.13.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Ashwick Drive and Graham Trailer Park mobile home community stops. o C.17.1: Extend ODX service to the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street, US 70/Rainey Street, and West Village stops. o F.13.1: Shift regional transit services to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase/1(2021). • Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities (Objective B.7). o B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve communities near Ashwick Drive. o B.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve the Graham Trailer Park. • Introduce and expand park and ride service (Objective C.2). o C.2.1: Implement the Faucette Mill Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP (updated April 2023). o D.2.1: Implement the Miller Road/Latta Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP(updated April 2023). 5.1.5 Natural Environment Plan 5.1.5.1 Goal 11: Improve multimodal access to parks throughout the corridor. To achieve Goal 11, improvement projects should: • Connect Eno River State Park to US via bicycle infrastructure (Objective D.75/E.7). o D.15.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Lawrence Road from US 70 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.7.1: Construct protected bike lane on Pleasant Green Road from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.7.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Cole Mill Road from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. • Further connect the trail system to the urban active transportation network (Objective F.74). o F.14.1: Connect Mountains-to-Sea trail to US Business with a shared-use path via Elizabeth Brady Road. 5.1.5.2 Goal 12: Reduce wildlife-automobile conflicts. To achieve Goal 12, improvement projects should: • Designate wildlife crossings where animal strikes are high (Objective E8). o E.8.1: Develop location for a designated wildlife crossing of US 70 between Seven Springs Road and Linden Road. 91 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.1.6 Objectives Summary by Segment Table 21 Segment A Objectives Objectives A.1: Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough. A.2: Improve bus service reliability. A.3: Improve accessibility of existing bus stops. AA: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's employment centers. A.5: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's recreation destinations. A.6: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's residential communities. A.7:Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. A.8: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. A.9: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. A.10 Modernize existing US 70 pedestrian crossing in downtown Mebane. A.11 Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place. A.12: Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane. A.13: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Alamance County. A.14: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. A.15: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. A.16: Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor. Table 232 Segment B Objectives Segment B Objectives B.1: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. B.2: Improve access between US 70 and 1 40/1 85. B.3: Manage travel demand for future development in the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area. BA: Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough. B.5: Improve bus service reliability. B.6: Improve accessibility of existing bus stops. B.7: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities. B.8:Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. B.10: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. B.11: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. 92 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Segment B Objectives B.12: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. B.13: Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor. Table 243 Segment C Objectives Segment C Objectives CA: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. C.2: Introduce and expand park and ride services. C.3: Expand regional transit access to job centers. CA: Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough. C.S: Improve bus service reliability. C.6: Improve accessibility of existing bus stops. C.7: Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities. C.B: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities. C.9: Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. C.10: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. CA 1: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. C.12: Improve the safety of pedestrian facilities in the Fairview Neighborhood. C.13: Establish gateways to Hillsborough. C.14: Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough. C.15: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. C.16: Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough. C.17: Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor. Table 24 Segment D Objectives Segment D Objectives D.1: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. D.2: Introduce and expand park and ride services. D.3: Manage travel demand resulting from trips to and from schools. DA: Improve bus service reliability. D.5: Improve accessibility of existing bus stops. D.6: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers. 93 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Segment D Objectives D.7: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities. D.8:Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. D.9: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. D.10: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. D.11: Establish gateways to Hillsborough. D.12: Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough. D.13: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. D.14: Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough. D.15: Connect Eno River State Park to US 70 via bicycle infrastructure. Table 255 Segment E Objectives Segment E • . E.1: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. E.2:Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. E.3: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. EA: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. E.5 Prepare east Orange County for smart growth. E.6: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. E.7: Connect Eno River State Park to US 70 via bicycle infrastructure. E.8: Designate wildlife crossings where animal strikes are high. Table 266 Segment F Objectives V so Segment F Objectives BEL F.1: Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to projected traffic demand growth through the corridor. F.2: Improve access between US 70 and 1 40/1 85 F.3: Improve bus service reliability. F.4: Improve accessibility of existing bus stops. F.S: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers. F.6: Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities. F.7: Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. 94 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Segment F Objectives F.B.: Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. F.9: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. F.10: Establish gateways to Hillsborough. F.11: Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. F.12: Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough. F.13: Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor. F.14: Further connect the trail system to the urban active transportation network. 5.2 Roadway Improvements 5.2.1 Infrastructure Improvements 5.2.1.1 Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to project traffic demand growth through the corridor. Population and job growth in the corridor is projected to generate significantly more car trips by 2050 than present conditions.Although US 70 currently experiences a high level of traffic service, the roadway does not have the capacity to absorb these additional trips without significantly increasing corridor congestion. Subsequent delay times would have implications for freight and emergency service travel, as well as everyday commuting and recreation.To offset this, this study proposes the following infrastructure projects, depicted in Figure 20: o A.15.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road. o B.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road. o C.1.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment C. o D.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment D. o E.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment E. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. 95 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study ©Wildlife&—my Road Widening { 57 1 _ 86 MEBANE 70 HILLSBOR 1UGH 70 DURHAM 70 86 5, N Figure 20 US 70 Recommended Roadway Infrastructure Improvements 5.2.1.2 Prepare east Orange County for smart growth. With the populations of Durham and Hillsborough both growing, communities in-between need to be planned such that their unique character and economic opportunities do not suffer from their neighbors' expansion. Reduced conflict intersections (RCI) can prepare the US 70 corridor for smart growth east Orange County. These configurations reduce the number of conflict points at intersections, improving traffic flow and enhancing the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. By implementing this policy now, US 70 will be able to safely accommodate increasing road user densities while managing traffic in configurations more suited for promoting economic activity in the segment. The following policy is depicted in Figure 21: o E.5.1: Construct reduced conflict intersection configurations from Palmers Grove Church Road to the 185 interchange. Relevant Plan Goals: /WwAr Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. 4AGoal 7: Work towards Vision Zero 96 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.2.1.3 Designate wildlife crossings where animal strikes are high. The designated crossing in Figure 20 is located on US 70 between Seven Springs Road and Linden Road, where car accidents involving deer were reported at especially high rates. By erecting physical structures such as fencing, this improvement can guide deer to move in a predictable pattern. Signage on US 70 alerting drivers to the crossing will increase their awareness of possible deer interactions. o E.8.1: Develop location for a designated wildlife crossing of US 70 between Seven Springs Road and Linden Road. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. Goal 12: Reduce wildlife-automobile conflicts. I 5.2.2 Traffic Operational Improvements 5.2.2.1 Reduce automobile congestion delay times in response to project traffic demand growth through the corridor. As stated in Section 5.2.1, US 70 is not equipped to effectively absorb projected future car trips without significantly increasing corridor congestion.The following traffic improvements, depicted in Figure 21, will preempt this problem: o C.1.2: Realign Revere Road approach to the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection; reroute Short Street accordingly. o C.1.3: Construct/extend exclusive turn lanes on the west- and northbound approaches to the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection. o CIA: Construct exclusive turning lanes at the US 70/NC 86 intersection, including dual eastbound left turn lanes from US 70 onto NC 86 northbound. o D.1.2: Extend existing south- and westbound right turn lanes at the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection. o D.1.3: Upgrade the US 70/N. Scotswood Blvd. intersection to a roundabout. o E.1.2: Extend turn lanes at the US 70/NC 751 intersection. o F.1.1: Upgrade the US 70 Business/Lawrence Road intersection to a traffic signal. 97 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o F.1.2: Convert the US 70 Business/Elizabeth Brady Road intersection to a T-intersection with an adjacent roundabout at NC 86. o F.1.3: Convert the existing traffic signal at the US 70 Business/NC 86 intersection to a roundabout, including pedestrian crossing markings and signage. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OI,.e=et�E ImP,oemer 70 • -HILL -ROUGH E J� • 70 • \ a • 86 DURHAM 70 • [I51 N Figure 21 US 70 Recommended Traffic Operational Improvements 5.2.2.2 Improve access between US 70 and 1 40/1 85. As the number of those who live and work in the corridor increase, so too will travel to and from it. Running parallel to US 70, 140/1 85 is the predominant regional connection to the study area.To manage the increasing road user density, the following recommendations, showed in Figure 21, will improve access between US 70 and 1 40/1 85: o B.2.1: Construct exclusive left- and right-turn lanes on all approaches at the US 70/Efland Cedar Grove Road intersection. o B.2.2: Redesign the US 70/1 85 Connector interchange to a fully directional configuration, such as a "dogbone" roundabout. 98 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o F.2.1: Implement the US 70 Business realignment proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021), built to complete street standards. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. 5.2.2.3 Establish gateways to Hillsborough. US 70 lacks features that distinguish its Hillsborough segments, degrading the town's sense of place. Roundabouts offer an opportunity for beautification and placemaking while visually cuing drivers that they are entering an urban environment. Roundabouts also slow traffic and reduce conflict points, benefitting the safety of all users. The following improvements, depicted in Figure 21, will establish these gateways: o C.13.1: Upgrade the US 70/1-akeshore Drive intersection to a roundabout. o DA 1.1: Upgrade the intersection of US 70, US 70 Business, and Palmer's Grove Church Road to a roundabout. Relevant Plan Goals: I ewftAr Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 5.2.3 Speed Policies 5.2.3.1 Slow automobile traffic throughout the corridor. Reducing car speeds improves roadway user safety without increasing congestion. To improve multimodal transportation in the US 70 corridor, lowering the speed limit to 35 in the following locations, indicated in Figure 22, will complement the proposed bike/ped infrastructure: o A.8.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane Store Road and Buckhorn Road. o B.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles throughout Segment B. o C.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour throughout Segment C. o C.10.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Faucette Mill Road to 35 miles per hour between the Hillsborough Town border and Frank Perry Road. o D.9.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour throughout Segment D. 99 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o D.9.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Lawrence Road to 35 miles per hour between US 70 and Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.3.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour throughout Segment E. o E.3.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Pleasant Green Road to 35 miles per hour from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.3.3: Reduce posted speed limit on Cole Mill Road to 35 miles per hour from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. o F.8.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 business to 35 miles per hour between NC 86 and US 70. Relevant Goals: Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 100 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �ram' Speed Limit Change 86 ,79 � 57 35 25 25 35 .. MEBA E 35 70 3"5� 35 , ' HILLSBOROUGH 3`s 3'E5 35 35 T�Jy 3 •70 35 35 s` DURWAM 35 N F1 la Figure 22 Speed Limit Changes 5.2.3.2 Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place. With slower vehicle speeds, businesses along US 70 will experience more pedestrian traffic and more vibrant street life. The safer, quieter environment will enhance the attraction of downtown Mebane for socializing and commerce.This objective can be achieved with the following policy, shown in Figure 23: o A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth Streets. Relevant Goals: /WwAr Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. /WwAyp Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 101 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 5.2.4 Additional Policies 5.2.4.1 Manage travel demand for future development in the Ef land-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area. To effectively manage the rapid growth in the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area, the existing Management Plan must be updated on a regular basis: o B.3.1: Implement and regularly update the Efland-euckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan (updated 2019). Relevant Goals: AkGoal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. 5.2.4.2 Manage travel demand resulting from trips to and from schools. School traffic is a leading cause of queuing in the corridor and is therefore a significant strain on US 70's capacity.A detailed school study will be required to fully evaluate mitigation strategies: o D.3.1: Conduct NCDOT Municipal School Transportation Assistance (MSTA) school study to address circulation, queuing, and storage needs specific to Orange High and Middle School complex. Relevant Goals: Goal 1: Manage increasing vehicular traffic congestion, including auto, EMS, and freight. 102 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 5.3.1 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements 5.3.1.1 Accommodate all transportation modes in roadway improvement projects. o A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot sidewalk on north side of US 70 from 9t" Street to Ashbury Blvd. o A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to accompany the long-term typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short-term. o B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US 70 indicating presence of cyclists between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel Road. o B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road realignment to include a 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. o D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.2.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NC 751; in the short term, widen shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. o F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road. o F.7.2:Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove Church Road to provide a minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. Relevant Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 103 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. �J PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Inlersectior Modernlzalion in Z 6 3' a Dike/Ped Improvement k s a � Fed Improvement S � Bike Improvement EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE Sidewalk 70 119 • Planned sidewalk 6 n Trail Planned Designated Erke Route E�ashin9ton st MEB' NE e 9tph Sr 9 1 �i N K 4/. V 4 H V 0 119 lndnstdai Dr .i s a - A Figure 23 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment A 104 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Ad Lebanon � Bike/Ped Improvement ��`Phe EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE 'Pd — Trail EE � - ir ® � A 7. } 70 f 70 a Ps S b I 4 1 MEBANE Figure 24 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment B F'oP oo� 86 1 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4q, a F71 - Intersection Modernization o EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE 11orbin St E Cor6i St —Shared-Use Path —Sidewalk Cae St z •• Planned sidewalk W Un on St nion Stm _ 70 Trail o •• Planned Protected Bike Facility x � HILLS$OROUGH r o Pla nedoe5igna RikeRnnte z _ Kin Y M Ma aret Ln E r aret L. 0 p 4 V 2 N ^I\ K q a i 7� N n m e pyr 66 Meado 2 N � C5. nv..ldqur - Figure 25 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments C/D/F 105 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS w j Interseclieri Modem-Lion HILLSBOROUGH a ��} EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE Trail e 5 - m s a 70 Q� 1 ' DURHAM n l I �51 N n ns .4rvP: Figure 26 US 70 Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment E 5.3.1.2 Modernize existing US 70 pedestrian crossings in downtown Mebane. o A.10.1: Modernize the US 70/3r, Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.2: Modernize the US 70/41h Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o A.10.3: Modernize the US 70/511 Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. Coordinate with NCDOT and NCRR to refine design of T-550GC as shown in Mebane's 51 Street Improvement Traffic Impact Study(August 2022) to maintain three-lane northbound approach and crosswalk/sidewalk design on the east side, and replicate that design on the west side. Relevant Plan Goals: AWAA&p Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. jiGoal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 106 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.3.1.3 Enhance downtown Mebane's sense of place. o A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. Relevant Goals: /WwAyr Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 5.3.1.4 Complete the sidewalk contiguity in downtown Mebane. o A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on US 70's north side between Mebane Community Park and 9t" Street. o A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb cuts and wide, flush frontages as parcels redevelop. Relevant Goals: /WwApp Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. /WwAyp Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. J& Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. 107 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.3.1.5 Prepare east Orange County for smart growth. o E.5.2: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 south of 185. Relevant Plan Goals: /WAAKp Goal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. J& Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 5.3.2 Transit-Oriented Development 5.3.2.1 Improve the accessibility of existing bus stops. o A.3.1/B.6.1/C.6.1/D.6.1/F.4.1: Update all existing bus stops to accessibility and safety standards, complete with shelters, seating, lighting, visible and audible information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. Relevant Plan Goals: Ak Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 108 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study PROPOSED IMPROVFMFNTS L�Pedestrian Connectivity Priority 119 70 MEBAIVE HILLS BOROUGH �f a * 86 i J N Figure 27 US 70 Recommended TOD Improvements 5.3.1 Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements 5.3.1.1 Establish alternative east-west bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane and Hillsborough. o A.1.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Holt Street from Tate Avenue to 1It Street. o A.1.2: Install signage to encourage bicycle use along E.Washington Street and Lebanon Road. o A.1.3: Develop protected bicycle route on Washington Street from Sargents Path to Buckhorn Road. o B.4.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Lebanon Road from Doe Run Road to Old Paths Trail. o B.4.2: Develop protected bicycle route along Richmond Road from Lebanon Road to Efland- Cheeks Park and Community Center; connect the route south across US 70 to shared-use path proposed to run parallel to 140. o C.4.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route along the length of Faucette Mill Road north of the Hillsboro Town border. o C.4.2: Construct an off-road bicycle path that connects Faucette Mill Road with Lebanon Road across the Eno River. 109 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. PROP05EI]IMPROVFMFNTS M Blke Improvement 1'19 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE —Sidewalk •• Planned sidewalk —Trail •• Planned Protected Bike Facility 1 —Planned Designated Bike Rohe J ■ �f■ ME BANE V � t N � Mllas Figure 28 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments A/B 110 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 111111 Bike/Ped Improvement 57 111111 Bike Improvement EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE Shared-Use Path Sidewalk Planned sidewalk 86 Trail - PI-ned Protected Bike Facility �-- Planned Designated Bike Route 70 n.. HILLSB OUG 1. 66` �.. a N Figure 29 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segments C/D 5.3.1.2 Improve the safety of pedestrian facilities in the Fairview Neighborhood. o C.12.1: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage at the Faucette Mill Road/Torain Street intersection. o C.12.2: Include high-visibility crossings in all future sidewalk construction on Faucette Mill Road, Torain Street, and Rainey Avenue where the pedestrian network would otherwise be interrupted by roadway. o C.12.3: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage and pedestrian pads at the Rainey Avenue/Torain Street intersection. Relevant Plan Goals: 4 ewwAy* Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. 111 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.3.1.3 Improve the permeability of US 70 as a barrier within Hillsborough. o C.14.1: Construct shared-use path along the east side of NC 86 from US 70 to Corbin Street. o C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and protected bicycle route on the entirety of Orange High School Road; connect to Caine Street across US 70 along parcel lines. o D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. o D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/Lawrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high-visibility markings. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Goal 5: Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity within urban areas. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. 5.3.1.4 Improve bicycle connectivity between residential and commercial centers in Hillsborough. o C.16.1: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Torain Street between Faucette Mill Road and Rainey Avenue. o C.16.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish east-west bike route through Fairview Park from Rainey Avenue to NC 86. 112 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.16.3: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Hayes and Union Streets from West King Street to Cameron Street. o C.16.4: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Churton Street between Union Street and Margaret Lane. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. GO Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 5.3.1.5 Connect Eno River State Park to US 70 via bicycle infrastructure. o D.15.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Lawrence Road from US 70 to Palmers Grove Church Road. o E.7.1: Construct protected bike lane on Pleasant Green Road from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. o E.7.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Cole Mill Road from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. Relevant Plan Goals: AkGoal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. Goal 11: Improve multimodal access to parks throughout the corridor. 5.3.1.6 Establish gateways to Hillsborough. o C.13.1: Upgrade the US 70/1-akeshore Drive intersection to a roundabout. o D.11.1: Upgrade the intersection of US 70, US 70 Business, and Palmer's Grove Church Road to a roundabout. o F.10.1: Invest in streetscaping projects on US 70 Business from Tuscarora Drive to US 70 Bypass. Relevant Plan Goals: ewftArGoal 4: Guide transportation investment to protect community character. 113 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 4AGoal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 5.3.1.7 Further connect the trail system to the urban active transportation network. o F.14.1: Connect Mountains-to-Sea trail to US Business with a shared-use path via Elizabeth Brady Road. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 11: Improve multimodal access to parks throughout the corridor. �\ Bike/Ped Improvement `tea M Bike Improvement FH6TII\FG INFRASTRUCTURE T-1 RL m n Ps 1 roi � P L J 70 DURHAM .J ice•- 14P N ] .S Figure 30 Recommended Complementary Bike/Ped Improvements, Segment E 5.3.2 Policy Measures 5.3.2.1 Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth areas. o A.9.1/13.11.1/C.11.1/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and Orange County for new and existing pedestrian facilities on US 70. o A.9.2/13.11.2/C.11.2/D.10.1/E.4.1/F.9.1: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, dedicate ROW for future construction, or pay in lieu. 114 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. 1 Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. 5.3.2.2 Manage travel demand for future development in the Ef land-Buckhorn-Mebane economic development area. o B.3.2: Update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Management Plan to include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connectivity recommendations. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 2: Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian connectivity through the corridor. 5.4 Public Transit Improvements 5.4.1 Infrastructure Improvements 5.4.1.1 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's employment centers. o A.4.1: Add two accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serve businesses on Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive. Relevant Plan Goals: AGoal 3: Improve transit accessibility. IGoal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 115 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. M EBAN E PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS LXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE j Existing Bus Stop u i I 70 119 O V Vndustrial➢r _ l �1 N fs Figure 31 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segements A/B 5.4.1.2 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's recreation destinations. o A.5.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Community Park. o A.5.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves Mebane Memorial Garden. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility 5.4.1.3 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Mebane's residential communities. o A.6.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate pedestrian connectivity that serves the Supper Club mobile home community. o A.6.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. 116 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 1 0 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. 5.4.1.4 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Efland's residential communities. o B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve communities near Ashwick Drive. o B.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters with appropriate pedestrian connectivity either side of US 70 that serve the Graham Trailer Park. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 9: Improve multimodal access tojobs within the corridor. 1 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. 117 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.4.1.5 Introduce and expand park and ride services. o C.2.1: Implement the Faucette Mill Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP (updated April 2023). o D.2.1: Implement the Miller Road/Latta Road park and ride service proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP(updated April 2023). Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. l--❑ I PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Bus Stop Fay 86 5� Pf,@ M%U Rd ®Park and Rlde ElEXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE a � �J Evytirg Bus Stop 0 P 0 l o P j' A l H/ x HILLSBOROUGH n Oa^C 0. GroV Figure 32 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segements C/D 5.4.1.6 Construct paired bus stops across US 70 from existing facilities. o C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. 118 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street stop. o C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. Goal 7: Work towards Vision Zero. 4AGoal 8: Reduce pedestrian-automobile conflicts. 5.4.1.7 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's residential communities. o C.8.1: Replace Lakeshore Drive stop with a stop serving Bennetts Mobile Home Park and surrounding communities. o D.7.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Miller Road. o D.7.2: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Scotswood Boulevard. o F.6.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near Orange Grove Road and Elfin Boulevard. Relevant Plan Goals: AkGoal 3: Improve transit accessibility. AkGoal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 119 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 1 0 Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. HILLSBOROUGH PROPOSE[)IMPROVEMENTS 70 z [ Bus stop EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE _ r% Exkti ng Bus Stop 70 c o L ,6 L QR o� Gt {aage 0 l� r N Figure 33 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Infrastructure Improvements, Segement F 5.4.1.8 Construct accessible bus shelters that serve Hillsborough's employment centers. o D.6.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity on Orange High School Road that serves Orange High School. o F.5.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity near NC 86 and Cornerstone Court. Relevant Plan Goals: . Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility Goal 6: Increase the comfort of non-automobile roadway users. 1 Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 120 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 5.4.2 Service Improvements 5.4.2.1 Improve bus service reliability. o A.2.1/B.5.1/C.5.1: Increase the frequency and service hours of regional transit routes. o A.2.2/B.5.2/C.5.2/D.4.1/F.3.1: Increase the frequency and service hours of Orange County's Orange-Alamance Connector and Hillsborough Circulator routes. o A.2.3: Increase the frequency and service hours of PART's Route 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ■ Bus Route Mobility-on-Demand Service Ared 1 E-twg Bus Route 0 L Fduetie "VI Rd MEBANE N r Figure 34 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Service Improvements, Segement A/B Relevant Plan Goals: AGoal 3: Improve transit accessibility. 121 Recommendations PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Bus Rout? Mobility-on-Demand Service Area Existing Bus Foute 57 a esr yy lr HILLSBOROUGH .- 40 4 J'Q Qrz�9eR 70 - 'W G�J ~ Figure 35 US 70 Recommended Public Transit Service Improvements, Segement C/D/F 5.4.2.2 Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Alamance County. o A.13.1: Incorporate planned stops at Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive into the future Mebane Circulator route. o A.13.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses, in Alamance County. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility. Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 5.4.2.3 Expand transit by partnerships with service providers in Orange County. o A.14.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Mebane Community Park and Supper Club Road mobile home community stops. o A.14.2: Expand transit service offerings, such as on-demand service, for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to align with fixed route buses, in Orange County. o A.14.3: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to existing Ashbury Boulevard stop. 122 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o B.12.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Ashwick Drive, Graham Trailer Park, and Mebane Memorial Garden stops. o B.12.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities around Efland, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o C.15.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the existing Faucette Mill/Cornelius Street, Hillsborough Police Station, and West Village stops. o C.15.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator from Lakeshore Drive to Hill Avenue, and service new stop at Bennetts Mobile Home Park. o C.15.3: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. o C.15.4: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for Fairview,job centers north along NC 86, and West Hillsborough, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o D.13.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Miller Road, Orange High School Road, and Scotswood Boulevard stops. o D.13.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator along Orange High School Road, Miller Road, Woodlawn Drive, and Scotswood Boulevard to service planned stops between the existing US 70/Walgreens and Scotswood/US 70 stops. o D.13.3: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for communities adjacent to Palmers Grove Church Road, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o E.6.1: Introduce and expand on-demand transit services for rural communities east of Piney Grove, specifically to align with fixed route buses. o F.11.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Cornerstone Court and Orange Grove Road stops. o F.11.2: Shift partnerships with providers in Orange County services to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase 11(2021). Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility koo Goal 9: Improve multimodal access to jobs within the corridor. 5.4.2.4 Expand regional transit services to residential centers in the corridor. o A.16.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Supper Club Road mobile home community stop. o B.13.1: Extend ODX service to the planned Ashwick Drive and Graham Trailer Park mobile home community stops. 123 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study o C.17.1: Extend ODX service to the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Street, US 70/Rainey Street, and West Village stops. o F.13.1: Shift regional transit services to the new US 70 Business location proposed in the NC 86 Connector Study, Phase/1(2021). Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility 0 Goal 10: Improve multimodal access to jobs outside the corridor. 5.4.2.5 Expand regional transit access to Hillsborough's job centers. o C.3.1: Extend PART Route 4 service to existing North Carolina Drivers License and Orange County Courthouse stops. Relevant Plan Goals: Goal 3: Improve transit accessibility 124 Recommendations US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Implementation and Funding This section describes the development of priorities for implementation as well as potential funding options needed to achieve the US 70 Multimodal Corridor Plan. Implementation of any project recommendation entails a lengthy process of detailed studies identifying impacts and refining designs. This is especially true of a set of recommendations of this magnitude, which will be implemented over time, by various jurisdictions and agencies, utilizing multiple available funding mechanisms. Adjustments to recommendations may be needed to accommodate unanticipated variations in land use, travel demand, and policy and funding priorities. Final design decisions cannot be finalized until late in project development and sometimes into construction, with the documentation of environmental impacts in the NEPA and SEPA (National and State Environmental Policy Acts) process being a critical point in this regard. However, identifying priority recommendations and associated funding options will help guide jurisdictions, NCDOT, and the MPO to an approach for cohesive implementation, resulting in an improved corridor, specifically for multimodal users, over time. 6.1 Funding Opportunities The recommendations in Chapter 5 are based on an assessment of the current facilities, connectivity needs and opportunities, and an understanding of future growth areas and their land use. Current NCDOT policy does not treat all facilities the same in terms of funding. These differences in funding eligibility are substantial enough that they can determine the viability of a specific facility type or design in jurisdictions dependent on NCDOT or public agency participation to pay for construction and maintenance. In such cases, design compromises may be needed if the project is to have a realistic chance for implementation, especially within a given timeframe. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities may be added along a roadway either as part of a roadway improvement (such as a widening or roadway extension project) or as an independent project. The North Carolina Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) law requires NCDOT to rank highway improvement projects separately from independent bicycle or pedestrian facility projects. NCDOT may work with a local agency to determine and construct bicycle or pedestrian improvements as part of the roadway project. Otherwise, local agencies may apply for federal funding to add bicycle or pedestrian improvements separate from a roadway project. 6.1.1 NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funding NCDOT's State Transportation Improvement Program selects projects to be funded through the State Prioritization Process (SPOT).The process involves scoring all roadway, public 125 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study transportation, bicycle, pedestrian, rail, and aviation projects on several criteria, which are all weighted differently, as follows: • Local Input Points from the MPO and Division Engineers (50%) • Safety (20%) • Connectivity/Accessibility (15%) • Demand / Density(10%) • Cost Effectiveness (5%) If seeking STIP funding, local municipalities, Orange County and DCHCMPO and the NCDOT Division 7 will be key in ensuring the inclusion of specific recommendations within larger roadway projects as applicable (such as the SUP and sidewalk along US 70) or assigning local priority points to specific recommendations (such as a specific intersection upgrades) to gain traction within the statewide prioritization process.The option of increasing local match dollars in this funding pursuit is unlikely to produce a noticeable priority increase for project scoring; rather, focusing on local input points and safety points are more important. Once a project is prioritized and funded through the STIP, NCDOT policy allows the Department to pay for and maintain all improvements within the curb or edge of pavement, including wide shoulders and bicycle lanes. When separated by a curb, swale, or vertical element, the Department may require the local jurisdiction to acquire additional right-of-way, share in the cost of construction, and maintain the separated bicycle or pedestrian facility(such as a sidewalk or shared use path). Despite these costs, incidental bicycle and pedestrian improvements are often less expensive than constructing the same improvements through an independent project. In August 2019, the NCDOT Board of Transportation adopted an updated Complete Streets Policy that requires NCDOT planners and engineers to consider and incorporate multimodal facilities in the design and improvement of all appropriate transportation projects in the state. Under the new policy, pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation projects included in adopted state, regional, or local transportation plans, such as this plan, will be included as part of the proposed roadway project.' For example, when a SUP is included in an adopted plan and the need for the SUP is identified through the NCDOT Complete Streets evaluation process, NCDOT is expected to pay the full cost of the Shared-Use Path (SUP), including right-of-way, as part of a larger roadway improvement project (Table 28). This financial arrangement could prove beneficial to the development of this study's recommended SUP and sidewalk along the majority of the length of the US 70 corridor by being included with the eventual expected widening of US 70, should the facilities be reflected in an adopted plan. In instances where a project is not included in a plan or is considered a betterment, cost share requirements would apply (Table 29). The policy allows exceptions to a project's inclusion, and the policy's newness may lead to updates and clarifications on implementation and what constitutes an adopted plan, among other issues. North Carolina Department of Transportation,Memorandum:Complete Streets Policy Guidance,30 August 2019, https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/CS%20Policy%2OU pdate%2OMemo%2OSecr etary%208.28.19.pdf 126 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Table 277 NCDOT Complete Streets Policy (2019) Cost Share Scenarios Complete Streets Cost Share Facility Type In Plan Not in Plan, but Betterment Need Identified Pedestrian Facility NCDOT pays full Cost Share Local Bicycle Facility NCDOT pays full NCDOT pays full Local Side Path NCDOT pays full Cost Share Local Greenway Crossing NCDOT pays full Cost Share Local Bus Pull Out NCDOT pays full Cost Share Local Bus Stop (pad only) NCDOT pays full Cost Share Local Table 288 Complete Streets Betterment Cost Share Betterment Cost Share Cost Participation Municipal Population NCDOT Local >100,000 80% 20% 50,000 to 100,000 85% 15% 10,000 to 50,000 90% 10% < 10,000 95% 5% 6.1.2 North Carolina Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Funding Funding through the NCDOT HSIP program may be available for certain recommendations such as intersection signal upgrades specific to pedestrian phasing, either submitted as a single project or as separate projects. It is recommended to combine multiple recommendations into a 127 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study single project submittal, however.This funding is meant to provide a continuous and systematic process that identifies, reviews, and addresses specific traffic safety concerns throughout the state.There are multiple submittal timeframes throughout the year when projects can be submitted for review, allowing for more frequent review than the SPOT cycle discussed above. This plan, along with others mentioned in Chapter 3, establish and support the need for the recommended improvements, which is needed for submittal.The local municipality and DCHCMPO would work with the Traffic Safety Unit and the Triad Regional traffic safety engineer to have the project formally submitted for consideration. The project would then "compete" against other projects statewide for funding, also on a rolling cycle basis like the submittal process. If a project does not score well within the HSIS selection process, the Traffic Safety Unit will return feedback that may help future considerations. No resubmittal is needed if the project is not selected; it remains on the list of projects for consideration. Unlike the SPOT process, increased local contributions could make a notable difference in the competitive scoring of HSIP projects. 6.1.3 Federal Grant Funding Opportunities There are several reasons why a local agency may choose to add bicycle and pedestrian improvements in advance of or separate from a roadway improvement.The roadway project may not be scheduled for design and construction for many years after a future need has been identified. This delay may not be acceptable to an agency whose interest is to provide a connected and safe network for cyclists and pedestrians as soon as possible. This is one scenario when pursuit of federal grant awards may be an appropriate funding mechanism to implement the plan recommendations. 6.1.3.1 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grants The RAISE grant program is federal funding allotted for planning and capital investments that support roads, bridges, transit, rail, ports, or other intermodal transportation.This program is intended for projects that will improve safety, environmental sustainability, quality of life, mobility and community connectivity, and economic competitiveness and opportunity. Additional considerations include demonstrated project readiness and cost effectiveness. Over the past 15 cycles of competitive grant awards, RAISE and its predecessors (TIGER and BUILD) has awarded nearly $14.4 billion for national infrastructure investment projects. Currently, the minimum RAISE grant award is $5 million with a maximum of$25 million for projects located in urban areas. While the 2024 RAISE grant application deadline is February 28, 2024, this cycle is relatively predictable and a release for the 2025 applications is expected near the end of 2024 with a February 2025 submittal deadline. Municipalities can use the project prioritization to prepare information that would be needed for a future application submittal. A RAISE Grant is most suitable as a funding source for corridor wide improvements if they can be bundled with other systemic projects to reach the minimum $5M grant award threshold. Approved pre-design tasks completed to support the grant application are reimbursable through this grant program. 128 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 6.1.3.2 Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Grants The SS4A Implementation Grant is federal funding allotted for designing and implementing roadway safety improvements. These projects can include: system-wide, low-cost roadway safety treatments, identifying and correcting common? risks across a network, installing pedestrian safety enhancements, and speed management strategies. A total of$5 billion is available for the five-year SS4A grant program (2022-2026) for regional, local, and Tribal initiatives that prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. To qualify for an SS4A grant, the applicant must have an adopted comprehensive safety action plan such as a Vision Zero plan or Safety Action Plan. At the time of this report, the municipalities within the study area do not have adopted plans to qualify for this grant; however, the Durham- Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO (DCHC), of which the Town of Hillsborough is a member, is in the process of developing a Vision Zero Action Plan in 2024/2025.This US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study should be used to help inform the DCHC Vision Zero Action Plan, and future SS4A grant awards could be a suitable funding mechanism for recommendations in this plan. 6.1.3.3 T P M Bus and Bus Facility Grant Program (TPM) In February 2024, FTA announced the availability of$1.5 billion in Fiscal Year 2024 funding to support state and local efforts to buy or modernize buses, improve bus facilities, and support workforce development for agencies with low/zero emission buses in their fleets. GoTriangle and Orange County Transit both have low/zero emission buses within their fleets;thus this grant option is available to implement bus stop enhancements served by these buses. For the current (2024) iteration of this grant program, project applications must be submitted by April 25, 2024; however, there have been annual awards through this program since 2016. Tracking this grant availability should be a priority for all jurisdictions/agencies affected by the transit recommendations in this plan. 6.1.4 Private Development Interests There are multiple recommendations (ie, A.9.2, B.11.2, C.11.2, etc) that encourage jurisdictions to codify policies that require developers along US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, dedicate ROW for future construction, or pay in lieu as new developments are permitted and constructed. Each jurisdiction should develop a policy that details the level of these requirements tailored to their specific community, but which would result in implementation of the recommendations through private funds. This way, while built in pieces, the outcome is a consistent and connected US 70 corridor within each jurisdiction. 6.2 Implementation Priorities The adoption of this plan is the first step toward ensuring a more accessible and connected US 70 corridor for multimodal users. Additional action is required by each involved municipality, Orange County, and DCHCMPO to fully realize the multimodal corridor vision supported by the plan recommendations. Recommended actions detailed in Chapter 5 are focused around plan goals for the corridor as a whole, with specific actions included for each segment. These specific recommendations should inform and be incorporated into future plans and project priority efforts for each jurisdiction to encourage implementation. These efforts could include Vision Zero or Safety Action Plans, localized pedestrian or bicycle plans, or NCDOT prioritization (SPOT) scoring discussions. As outlined in Section 6.1 above, understanding how to incorporate the plan 129 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study recommendations into larger NCDOT projects or bundling similar improvements, such as bus stop upgrades, pedestrian signal upgrades at multiple intersections, or bicycle lane markings can also improve chances at obtaining funding, which could move a project, or set of recommendations, up in local priority. The summary tables below, specific to each segment, assign a likely funding source, or sources, to each recommendation, whereby grouping sets of improvements into potential bundles. As the individual jurisdictions determine the importance of each "bundle"to their communities, tracking the availability of the noted funding option will drive the prioritization order of implementation, which dictates the schedule of additional planning or conceptual design work that may be needed for each funding option. 6.2.1 Summary of Funding Opportunities The following tables outline the plan recommendations by Segment and Objective; also included is a column indicating potential funding source(s) for each improvement.These funding source notes should be used by localities to help group implementation of recommendations for grant funding applications, or for supporting SPOT funding point allocation to potential NCDOT STIP projects. 6.2.1.1 Segment A ImprovementPotential • . Goals Source A.1.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Holt Street from Tate Avenue to 111 RAISE Grant Mobility, Bike Street.alternative east- Safety A.1.2: Install signage to encourage west • Mobility, � bicycle use along E.Washington RAISE Grant SafetyBike Mebane Street and Lebanon Road.between and Hillsb h. A.1.3: Develop protected bicycle route on Washington Street from Sargents RAISE Grant Mobility,Safety Bike Path to Buckhorn Road. A.2.1: Increase the frequency and Mobility, Job service hours of regional transit TPM Grant Transit routes. Access • A.2.2: Increase the frequency and • service hours of Orange County's TPM Grant Mobility, Job Transit Access Orange-Alamance Connector route. A.2.3: Increase the frequency and TPM Grant Mobility, Job Transit service hours of PART's Route 4. Access 130 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study A.3.1: Update all existing bus stops to • accessibility and safety standards, • complete with shelters, seating, Mobility, lighting, visible and audible TPM Grant Safety Ped, Transit • • information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. ConstructaccessibleA.4.1:Add two accessible, safe bus shelters that serve shelters with appropriate pedestrian Mobility, TPM Grant Safety,Job Ped, Transit • • connectivity that serve businesses on Access employmentOakwood Street and Industrial Drive. A.5.1:Add accessible, safe bus shelters Mobility, either side of US 70 with appropriate Safety, ConstructTPM Grant Ped, Transit accessible bus pedestrian connectivity that serves Natural Mebane Community Park. Environment A.5.2:Add accessible, safe bus shelters recreation either side of US 70 with appropriate Mobility, destinations. TPM Grant pedestrian connectivity that serves Safety Ped, Transit Mebane Memorial Garden. A.6.1:Add accessible, safe bus shelters either side of US 70 with appropriate Mobility, A.6:Construct TPM Grant Safety,Job Ped, Transit accessible bus pedestrian connectivity that serves the Access Supper Club mobile home community.shelters that serve A.6.2:Add an accessible, safe bus residential shelter with appropriate pedestrian Mobility, communities. TPM Grant connectivity across US 70 from the Safety Ped, Transit existing Ashbury Blvd. stop. A.7.1: Construct a minimum 5-foot transportation Mobility,� � � � sidewalk on north side of US 70 from Private, SS4A Ped way 91" Street to Ashbury Blvd Safety improvement 131 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study A.7.2: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from McBane Store Road to Buckhorn NCDOT STIP Mobility, Bike, Ped Road to accompany the long-term Safety typical section widening; install bicycle pattern rumble strips in the short- term. A.8.1: Reduce posted speed limit on throughout the US 70 to 35 miles per hour between n/a Safety Auto McBane Store Road and NC 751. A.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and n/a Mobility, Ped Orange County for new and existing Safety pedestrian facilities on US 70. growthA.9: Extend sidewalk connectivity to anticipated A.9.2: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their n/a Mobility, Ped frontages, dedicate ROW for future Safety construction, or pay in lieu. A.10.1: Modernize the US 70/3rd Street intersection with accessible pedestrian A.10 Modernize signal heads/pedestals on all corners, RAISE, SS4A Placemaking, Intersection existing US 70 leading pedestrian intervals, no right Safety pedestrian turn on red restrictions, and high- crossing in visibility markings. . . Mebane. A.10.2: Modernize the US 70/4' Street RAISE, SS4A Placemaking, Intersection JA intersection with accessible pedestrian Safety 132 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals -A& A Source Type OFsignal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high- visibility markings. A.10.3: Modernize the US 70/5t" Street intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high- visibility markings. Coordinate with NCDOT and NCRR to refine design of Placemaking, T-550GC as shown in Mebane's 5t" RAISE, SS4A Safety Intersection Street Improvement Traffic Impact Study(August 2022) to maintain three-lane northbound approach and crosswalk/sidewalk design on the east side, and replicate that design on the IL west side. A.11.1: Invest in streetscaping projects between Charles and Ninth Streets. Private, Local Placemaking Ped downtown Mebane's sense of A.11.2: Decrease the speed limit to 25 mph between Charles and Ninth n/a Placemaking, Auto Streets. Safety A.12.1: Maintain existing sidewalk on Mobility, CompleteUS 70's north side between Mebane Maintenance Placemaking, Ped sidewalkthe Community Park and 91" Street. Safety conti uity in downtown• A.12.2: Combine and minimize curb • • cuts and wide, flush frontages as Private Placemaking, Ped parcels redevelop. Safety Expand Md A.13.1: Incorporate planned stops at Mobility, Job transit by Oakwood Street and Industrial Drive TPM Grant Access Transit partnerships with into the future Mebane Circulator 133 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals K Source Type service providers route. A.13.2: Expand transit service 7Wm offerings, such as on-demand service, Mobility, Job for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to TPM Grant Access Transit align with fixed route buses in Alamance County. A.14.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Mobility, Job Mebane Community Park and Supper TPM Grant Transit Club Road mobile home community Access stops. A.14.2: Expand transit service partnerships with I offerings, such as on-demand service,service providers Mobility, Job for Mebane's suburbs, specifically to TPM Grant Transit Orangein align with fixed route buses in Orange Access County. A.14.3: Extend Orange-Alamance Mobility, Job Connector service to existing Ashbury TPM Grant Transit Boulevard stop.4 Access automobileIR A.15: Reduce A.15.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane times in response divided facility from McBane Store NCDOT STIP Mobility Auto to projected Road to Buckhorn Road. corridor.traffic demand growth through the ExpandA.16.1: Extend regional transit service regional All to the planned Supper Club Road Mobility, Job services to mobile home community stop. TPM Grant Access Transit in the corridor. 134 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 6.2.1.2 Segment B ImprovementPotential Goals Li: ML Recom me nclation/Pol icy Funding Met Type automobileB.1: Reduce congestionB.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided N • • S times in facility from Buckhorn Road to Lloyds TIP Mobility Auto projected traffic Dairy Road. STIP corridor.demand growth through the B.2.1: Construct exclusive left- and right- NCDOT turn lanes on all approaches at the US STIP Mobility Intersection B.2: Improve access 70/Efland Cedar Grove Road intersection. between US 70 and 1 40/185. B.2.2: Redesign the US 70/1 85 Connector interchange to a fully directional NCDOT Mobility Intersection configuration, such as a "dogbone" STIP roundabout. B.3.1: Implement and regularly update the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access Local Mobility Auto ManageManagement Plan (updated 2019). developmentdemand for future ' ' B.3.2: Update the Efland-Buckhorn- developmentMebane Access Management Plan to Local, Bike, Ped, include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit SS4A Mobility Transit connectivity recommendations. B.4.1: Develop protected bicycle route on Lebanon Road from Doe Run Road to Old RAISE, Mobility, Bike B.4: Establish Paths Trail.bicycle routes to US SS4A Safety alternative east-west B.4.2: Develop protected bicycle route between70 along Richmond Road from Lebanon Road to Efland-Cheeks Park and RAISE, Mobility, Bike • • • Community Center; connect the route SS4A Safety south across US 70 to shared-use path proposed to run parallel to 1-40. 135 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study B.5.1: Increase the frequency and service TPM Grant Mobility Transit hours of regional transit routes. B.5.2: Increase the frequency and service hours of Orange County's Orange- TPM Grant Mobility Transit Alamance Connector route. B.6.1: Update all existing bus stops to B.6: Improve accessibility and safety standards, complete with shelters, seating, lighting, TPM Grant Mobility, visible and audible information, and Safety Ped, Transit appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. B.7.1: Add accessible, safe bus shelters Mobility, with appropriate pedestrian connectivity TPM Grant Safety, B.7: Construct either side of US 70 that serve Job Ped, Transit accessiblecommunities near Ashwick Drive. Access Efland'sB.7.2: Add accessible, safe bus shelters Mobility, communities. with appropriate pedestrian connectivity Safety, either side of US 70 that serve the TPM Grant JobMd Ped, Transit Graham Trailer Park. Access B.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from NCDOT Buckhorn Road to Lloyds Dairy Road to STIPMobility, Bike, Ped accompany the long-term typical section TIP Safety widening; install bicycle pattern rumble B.8:Accommodate strips in the short-term. transportationall B.8.2 Install high visibility signs along US improvement 70 indicating presence of cyclists NCDOT Mobility, between Tinnin Road and Gaines Chapel SS4A Safety Bike Road. B.8.3: Revise the US 70/Buckhorn Road NCDOT Mobility, realignment to include a 5-foot paved STIP Safety Bike shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble 136 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study ObjectivePotential Goals Improvement Source strips. 476 B.10: Slow B.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US automobile traffic 70 to 35 miles per hour between McBane n/a Safety Auto throughout the Store Road and NC 751. B.11.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and Orange n/a Mobility, ped County for new and existing pedestrian Safety facilities on US 70. sidewalk connectivity to anticipated growth B.11.2: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their frontages, n/a Mobility, ped dedicate ROW for future construction, or Safety pay in lieu. B.12.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the planned Ashwick Mobility, TPM Grant Job Transit Drive, Graham Trailer Park, and MebaneB.12: Expand transit Memorial Garden stops. Access by partnerships with service providers in B.12.3: Introduce and expand on-demand Orange County transit services for rural communities Mobility, around Efland, specifically to align with TPM Grant Job Transit fixed route buses. Access Expand B.13.1: Extend regional service to the regional services to planned Ashwick Drive and Graham Mobility, residentialTrailer Park mobile home community TPM Grant Job Transit the corridor. stops. Access 137 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 6.2.1.3 Segment C Potential . Improvement Goals Type Source C.1.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane NCDOT divided facility throughout Segment STIP Mobility Auto C. C.1.2: Realign Revere Road approach to the US 70/Faucette Mill Road NCDOT intersection; reroute Short Street STIPautomobile Mobility Intersection Reduce accordingly. congestion delay I- • • C.1.3: Construct/extend exclusive turn projected traffic lanes on the west- and northbound NCDOT Mobility Intersection • - approaches to the US 70/Faucette STIP through • • Mill Road intersection. C.1.4: Construct exclusive turning lanes at the US 70/NC 86 intersection, NCDOT including dual eastbound left turn STIP Mobility Intersection lanes from US 70 onto NC 86 northbound. C.2: Introduce and C.2.1: Implement the Faucette Mill expand park and Road park and ride service proposed TPM Grant Mobility, Job Auto, Transit ride services. in the DCHCMPO CTP(updated April Access 2023). C.3: Expand regional C.3.1: Extend PART Route 4 service to transit access to • existing North Carolina Drivers TPM Grant Mobility Transit License and Orange County Courthouse stops. C.4.1:Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route along the length SS4A Mobility, Bike Establishof Faucette Mill Road north of the Safety alternative east-west Hillsboro Town border. bicycle routes to US 70 between Mebane C.4.2: Construct an off-road bicycle owpath that connects Faucette Mill Road SS4A Mobility, Bike with Lebanon Road across the Eno Safety River. 138 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals I& Jm Source Type C.4.3: Install signage to encourage S Mobility, Bike bicycle use of Faucette Mill Road. Safety C.5.1: Increase the frequency and service hours of regional transit TPM Grant Mobility Transit routes. . bus • C.5.2: Increase the frequency and service hours of Orange County's TPM Grant Mobility Transit Orange-Alamance Connector and Hillsborough Circulator routes. C.6.1: Update all existing bus stops to C.6: Improve accessibility and safety standards, complete with shelters, seating, Mobility, accessibilityTPM Grant Ped, Transit lighting, visible and audible Safety information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. C.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian connectivity across US 70 from the TPM Grant Mobility,Safety Ped, Transit existing North Carolina Drivers License stop. C.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus C.7:Construct paired• shelter with appropriate pedestrian us stops across US connectivity across US 70 from the TPM Grant Mobility, Ped, Transit 70 from existing existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Safety Street stop. C.7.3:Add an accessible, safe bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian TPM Grant Mobility, connectivity across US 70 from the Safety Ped, Transit existing US 70/Rainey Avenue stop. C.8: Construct C.8.1: Replace Lakeshore Drive stop accessiblewith a stop serving Bennetts Mobile Mobility, Home Park and surrounding TPM Grant Safety, Job Transit - Hillsborough's communities. Access residential 139 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals communities. Source Type . . C.9.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use path on the north side and a 5-foot NCDOT Mobility, Bike, Ped improvement sidewalk on the south side of US 70 STIP Safety from Lloyd's Dairy Road to NC 86. C.10.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between n/a Safety Auto C.10: Slow McBane Store Road and NC 751. automobile throughout corridor. C.10.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Faucette Mill Road to 35 miles per n/a Safety Auto hour between the Hillsborough Town border and Frank Perry Road. C.11.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and n/a Mobility, Ped CA 1: Extend Orange County for new and existing Safety sidewalk pedestrian facilities on US 70. connectivity to C.11.2: Require developers building anticipated growth A on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their n/a Mobility, Ped frontages, dedicate ROW for future Safety construction, or pay in lieu. C.12.1: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage at the SS4A Placemaking, Intersection Faucette Mill Road/Torain Street Safety Improveintersection. safety of pedestrian facilities in the C.12.2: Include high-visibility Fairview crossings in all future sidewalk Neighborhood. construction on Faucette Mill Road, SS4A Placemaking, Ped Torain Street, and Rainey Avenue Safety dAwhere the pedestrian network would otherwise be interrupted by roadway. 140 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study C.12.3: Install high-visibility pedestrian crossing signage and SS4A Placemaking, Intersection pedestrian pads at the Rainey Safety Avenue/Torain Street intersection. C.13.1: Upgrade the US 70/Lakeshore NCDOT Placemaking, • • Intersection Drive intersection to a roundabout. STIP, Local Safety C.14.1: Construct shared-use path NCDOT Mobility, along the east side of NC 86 from US STIP Placemaking, Bike, Ped 70 to Corbin Street. Safety Improve permeability of US i as a barrier C.14.2: Modernize the US 70/Faucette Mill Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on NCDOT Placemaking, all corners, leading pedestrian Intersection intervals, no right turn on red STIP, SS4A Safety restrictions, and high-visibility markings. 141 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals Source Type C.14.3: Modernize the US 70/NC 86 intersection with pedestrian refuge islands, accessible pedestrian signal heads/pedestals on all corners, NCDOT Placemaking, Intersection STIP, SS4A Safety lip leading pedestrian intervals, no right turn on red restrictions, and high- visibility markings. C.15.1: Extend Orange-Alamance Connector service to the existing Faucette Mill/Cornelius Street, TPM Grant Mobility, Job Transit Hillsborough Police Station, and West Access Village stops. C.15.2: Reroute Hillsborough Circulator from Lakeshore Drive to Mobility,Job • • TPM Grant Transit partnerships with Hill Avenue, and service new stop at Access providers in Orange Bennetts Mobile Home Park. County services C.15.3: Extend Hillsborough Circulator within the corridor. g Mobility,Job service to the existing North Carolina TPM Grant Transit Drivers License stop. Access C.15.4: Introduce and expand on- demand transit services for Fairview, Mobility, Job job centers north along NC 86, and TPM Grant Transit West Hillsborough, specifically to Access align with fixed route buses. C.16: Improve C.16.1: Add sharrows and signage to bicycle connectivity establish bike route on Torain Street SS4A Mobility, Job Bike between residential between Faucette Mill Road and Access and commercial Rainey Avenue. Hillsborough.centers in C.16.2: Add sharrows and signage to SS4A Mobility,Job Bike establish east-west bike route Access 142 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study through Fairview Park from Rainey Avenue to NC 86. C.16.3: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Hayes SS4A Mobility,Job Bike and Union Streets from West King Access Street to Cameron Street. C.16.4: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on Churton SS4A Mobility,Job Bike Street between Union Street and Access Margaret Lane. C.17.1: Extend ODX service to the existing Faucette Mill Road/Cornelius Mobility,Job Street, US 70/Rainey Street, and West TPM Grant Access Transit Village stops. 6.2.1.4 Segment D ImprovementPotential • . Goals ASource D.1.1:Widen US 70 to a four-lane divided facility throughout Segment NCDOTSTIP Mobility Auto • D. automobile congestionD.1.2: Extend existing south- and . • westbound right turn lanes at the US NCDOT Mobility Intersection projected traffic 70/Orange High School Road STIP demand growth intersection. thr h the •corridor.• D.1.3: Upgrade the US 70/N. NCDOT Mobility, Scotswood Blvd. intersection to a STIP, Local Safety Intersection roundabout. D.2: Introduce and D.2.1: Implement the Miller expand park and Road/Latta Road park and ride service TPM Grant Mobility,Job Transit ride services. proposed in the DCHCMPO CTP Access (updated April 2023). 143 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals J= Source Type D.3.1: Conduct NCDOT Municipal �I D.3: Manage travel School Transportation Assistance • (MSTA) school study to address NCDOT from 91 circulation, queuing, and storage STIP Mobility Auto from • • needs specific to Orange High and Middle School complex. D.4.1: Increase the frequency and • service hours of Orange County's TPM Grant Mobility Transit reliability.service Orange-Alamance Connector and Hillsborough Circulator routes. D.5.1: Update all existing bus stops to D.S: Improve accessibility and safety standards, accessibility of complete with shelters, seating, Mobility, lighting, visible and audible TPM Grant Safety Ped, Transit information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. 13.6: Construct D.6.1:Add an accessible, safe bus accessible bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian Mobility, shelters that serve connectivity on Orange High School TPM Grant Safety,Job Ped, Transit Road that serves Orange High School. Access employment D.7: Construct D.7.1:Add an accessible, safe bus Mobility, accessible bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian TPM Grant Safety,Job Ped, Transit connectivity on Miller Road. Access D.7.2:Add an accessible, safe bus Mobility, residential —9 shelter with appropriate pedestrian TPM Grant Safety,Job Ped, Transit communities. 9 connectivity on Scotswood Boulevard. Access •.8:Accommodate D.8.1: Include a 10-foot shared-use all ath on he e and a 5-foot • •transportation , ,• ssiidewalkton the south outd NCDOT Mobility, h side of US 70 Bike, Ped , improvement from NC 86 to Palmers Grove Church STIP Safety projects. Road. 144 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study D.9.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 to 35 miles per hour between n/a Safety Auto McBane Store Road and NC 751. • • • D.9.2: Reduce posted speed limit on Lawrence Road to 35 miles per hour between US 70 and Palmers Grove n/a Safety Auto Church Road. D.10.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and n/a Mobility, Ped Orange County for new and existing Safety D.10: Extend pedestrian facilities on US 70. sidewalk connectivity to D.10.2: Require developers building anticipated growth on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their n/a Mobility, Ped frontages, dedicate ROW for future Safety construction, or pay in lieu. D.11.1: Upgrade the intersection of US NCDOT Safety, gateways to 70, US 70 Business, and Palmer's STIP, Local Placemaking Intersection Hillsborough. Grove Church Road to a roundabout. D.12: Improve the D.12.1: Construct sidewalk and permeability of US protected bicycle route on the entirety NCDOT Mobility, 70 as a barrier of Orange High School Road; connect STIP, Local Safety, Bike, Ped within to Caine Street across US 70 along Placemaking Hillsborough. parcel lines. 145 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study D.12.2: Modernize the US 70/Orange High School Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal NCDOT Safety, heads/pedestals on all corners, Intersection leading pedestrian intervals, no right STIR SS4A Placemaking turn on red restrictions, and high- visibility markings. D.12.3: Modernize the US 70/1-awrence Road intersection with accessible pedestrian signal NCDOT Safety, heads/pedestals on all corners, Intersection leading pedestrian intervals, no right STIR SS4A Placemaking turn on red restrictions, and high- visibility markings. D.13.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Miller Road, TPM Grant Mobility, Job Transit Orange High School Road, and Access Scotswood Boulevard stops. D.13.2: Reroute Hillsborough D.13: Expand transit Circulator along Orange High School Road, Miller Road, Woodlawn Drive, • • Mobility, Job • and Scotswood Boulevard to service TP Access M Grant Transit • • • • • County within the planned stops between the existing US 70/Walgreens and Scotswood/US 70 stops. D.13.3: Introduce and expand on- demand transit services for Mobility,Job communities adjacent to Palmers TPM Grant Transit Grove Church Road, specifically to Access align with fixed route buses. • .14: Improve bicycle connectivity D.14.1: Add sharrows and signage to establish a bicycle route on the length SS4A Mobility,Job betweenresidential Access Bike and commercial a of Crawford Road. centersin 146 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals OL Source Type -�l D.15: Connect Eno DA 5.1: Add sharrows and signage to WM Mobility, River State Park to establish bike route on Lawrence Road SS4A Natural Bike US 70 via bicycle from US 70 to Palmers Grove Church Environment Road. 6.2.1.5 Segment E • E.1.1: Widen US 70 to a four-lane NCDOT Mobility LOM • • • divided facility throughout Segment E. STIP E.1.2: Extend turn lanes at the US NCDOT • Mobility Intersection 70/NC 751 intersection. STIP, Local E.2.1: Include a 10 foot shared use E.2: Accommodate path on the north side and a 5-foot all transportation sidewalk on the south side of US 70 from Palmers Grove Church Road to NCDOT Mobility, NC 751; in the short term, widen STIP Safety Bike, Ped shoulders to accommodate minimum 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. E.3: Slow E.3.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US automobile traffic 70 to 35 miles per hour between n/a Safety Auto throughout the McBane Store Road and NC 751. corri r. Mg • • E.3.2: Reduce posted speed limit on n/a SafetyAuto 147 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Pleasant Green Road to 35 miles per hour from US 70 to Cole Mill Road. E.3.3: Reduce posted speed limit on T Cole Mill Road to 35 miles per hour n/a Safety Auto from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno River State Park entrance. E.4.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and n/a Mobility, Ped E.4: Extend Orange County for new and existing Safety sidewalk pedestrian facilities on US 70. connectivity to E.4.2: Require developers building on anticipated growth land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their n/a Mobility, Ped frontages, dedicate ROW for future Safety construction, or pay in lieu. E.5.1: Construct reduced conflict intersection configurations from NCDOT Safety, Auto PreparePalmers Grove Church Road to the 185 STIP Placemaking Orange County for interchange. smart growth. E.5.2: Invest in streetscaping projects Private, on US 70 south of 185. LocalE.6: Expand transit Placemaking Ped E.6.1: Introduce and expand on- by partnerships A demand transit services for ruralwith service TPM Mobility, Job communities east of Piney Grove, Transit • • - • • = specifically to align with fixed route Grant Access County within the buses. E.7.1: Construct protected bike lane on Mobility, Pleasant Green Road from US 70 to SS4A Safety, Bike Connect Cole Mill Road. Natural River State Park to Environment US i via bicycle E.7.2: Add sharrows and signage to establish bike route on Cole Mill Road Mobility, from Pleasant Green Road to the Eno SS4A Natural Bike River State Park entrance. Environment 148 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study E.8.1: Develop location for a designated Safety, wildlife crossing of US 70 between Local Natural Auto Seven Springs Road and Linden Road. Environment 6.2.1.6 Segment F ImprovementPotential • . . . 6 Source F.1.1: Upgrade the US 70 NCDOT Business/Lawrence Road intersection RLoc Mobility, STIR Local Intersection to a traffic signal. al Safety Reduce F.1.2: Convert the US 70 automobile Business/Elizabeth Brady Road NCDOT Mobility,congestion delay Intersection intersection to a T-intersection with STIRLocal Safety times in response to an adjacent roundabout at NC 86. projected traffic demand growth F.1.3: Convert the existing traffic throu h the corridor. signal at the US 70 Business/NC 86 NCDOT Mobility, intersection to a roundabout, STIR Local Safety Intersection including pedestrian crossing markings and signage. F.2: Improve access F.2.1: Implement the US 70 Business between US 70 and I realignment proposed in the NC 86 NCDOT Mobility, Intersection 40/185. Connector Study, Phase//(2021), built STIP, Local Safety to complete street standards. F.3: Improve bus F.3.1: Increase the frequency and TPM Grant Mobility Transit service hours of Orange County's 149 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study Potential • . Goals I& Source Type service reliability.miOrange-Alamance Connector and ' Hillsborough Circulator routes. F.4.1: Update all existing bus stops to F.4: Improve accessibility and safety standards, accessibility of complete with shelters, seating, Mobility, stops.existing bus lighting, visible and audible TPM Grant Safety Ped, Transit information, and appropriate pedestrian and ADA connectivity. F.S: Construct F.5.1: Add an accessible, safe bus accessible bus shelter with appropriate pedestrian Mobility, shelters that serve connectivity near NC 86 and TPM Grant Safety, Job Ped, Transit Cornerstone Court. Access employment ConstructaccessibleF.6.1: Add an accessible, safe bus shelters that serve shelter with appropriate pedestrian Mobility, • • connectivity near Orange Grove Road TPM Grant Safety, Job Ped, Transit Access residentialand Elfin Boulevard F.7.1: Construct 5-foot sidewalks on the north and south sides of US 70 NCDOT Mobility, Ped Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove STIP Safety Accommodate Church Road. transportationall roadwaymodes in improvement F.7.2: Widen the shoulders on US 70 Business from NC 86 to Palmer Grove NCDOT Mobility, Church Road to provide a minimum STIP SafetyBike 5-foot paved shoulder with bicycle pattern rumble strips. F.8.1: Reduce posted speed limit on US 70 business to 35 miles per hour n/a Safety Auto throughout the between NC 86 and US 70. Ad 150 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study F.9.1: Establish a maintenance agreement between NCDOT and n/a Mobility, Ped Orange County for new and existing Safety pedestrian facilities on US 70. F.9.2: Require developers building on land parcels fronting US 70 to either construct sidewalk along their n/a Mobility, Ped frontages, dedicate ROW for future Safety construction, or pay in lieu. F.10: Establish F.10.1: Invest in streetscaping gateways to projects on US 70 Business from Private Placemaking Ped Hillsborough. Tuscarora Drive to US 70 Bypass. F.11.1: Extend Hillsborough Circulator service to the planned Cornerstone TPM Grant Mobility,Job Transit Access F.1 1: Expand transit Court and Orange Grove Road stops. by partnerships with F.11.2: Shift partnerships with service service providers in providers in Orange County to the Orange County. Mobility, Job new US 70 Business location TPM Grant Transit proposed in the NC 86 Connector Access Study, Phase 11(2021). F.12: Improve bicycle connectivity between F.12.1:Add sharrows and signage to residentialestablish a bicycle route on the SS4A Mobility,Job Bike commercial centers length of Meadowlands Drive. Access in Hillsborough. F.13: Expand F.13.1: Shift regional transit services regional transit to the new US 70 Business location Mobility, Job services to proposed in the NC 86 Connector TPM Grant Access Transit residential centers in Study, Phase 11(2021). the corridor. 151 Implementation and Funding US 70 Multimodal Corridor Study 1W Mobility, • F.14.1: Connect Mountains-to-Sea Safety, • • trail to US Business with a shared-use SS4A Natural Bike, Ped • • path via Elizabeth Brady Road. Environment 152 Implementation and Funding DURHAM PROJECT LIST 5-YEAR PROGRAM FEBRUARY 2024 Project ID Description R/W Acq. Let Date Project Manager Name ROW$ UTIL$ CON $ COMMENTS Begins U-6021 SR 1118 (FAYETTEVILLE ROAD),FROM WOODCROFT PARKWAY TO BARBEE 10/15/2032 1/1/2040 BETH A. QUINN $4,158,000 $379,000 $15,200,000 Project is funded for engineering only in 2024 STIP and ROAD IN DURHAM. WIDEN TO 4-LANE DIVIDED FACILITY WITH BICYCLE/ remains suspended. PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS. U-5516 AT US 501 (ROXBORO ROAD)TO SR 1448 (LATTA ROAD)/SR 1639(INFINITY 10/18/2028 10/15/2030 JOHN W. BRAXTON JR $9,290,500 $2,075,000 $12,400,000 Project is funded for engineering only in 2024 STIP and ROAD) INTERSECTION IN DURHAM. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. remains suspended. BP5-R117 BRIDGE 110 OVER LITTLE CREEK ON SR 1110(FARRINGTON ROAD) 8/14/2030 LISA B. GILCHRIST, El $150,000 $3,709,612 BP5-R142 PIPE TO BRIDGE ON (SR 1800) HEREFORD ROAD 7/11/2029 LISA B. GILCHRIST, El $75,000 $1,500,000 I-6000 1-540- DURHAM/WAKE COUNTIES FROM I-40 IN DURHAM TO US 1 INRALEIGH. 11/21/2028 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON $7,610,000 BRIDGE PRESERVATION/REHABILITATION. COORDINATE WITH 1-5998& I-5999. U-5717 US 15/US 501 DURHAM CHAPEL-HILL BOULEVARD AND SR 1116 (GARRETT 4/23/2019 10/20/2026 JOHN W. BRAXTON JR $20,413,786 $53,300,000 ROW acquisition ongoing. ROAD)CONVERTING THE AT-GRADE INTERSECTION TO AN INTERCHANGE 80105 Riddle Road Widening Expansion of The Building Center- Econ Dev 3/25/2026 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON SM-6105H SM-6105H- Durham- NC 54(Miami Boulevard)at SR 1978(Hopson Road). 3/3/2025 3/11/2026 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON Construct a southbound right turn lane on NC 54. HS-2005N NC 98 AT SR 1919(LYNN ROAD). TURN LANE CONSTRUCTION. 2/19/2025 2/25/2026 MARK S. GALLO $500,000 $1,785,000 Planning and engineering activities underway. I-5995 1-40-DURHAM/WAKE COUNTIES FROM EAST OF NC 147 TO SR 1728 (WADE 1/20/2026 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON $53,500,000 Estimate updated in February. AVENUE). PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. INCLUDE I-5996. I-5998 1-540- DURHAM/WAKE COUNTIES FROM 1-40 IN DURHAM TO US 70 IN 12/16/2025 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON $24,500,000 Estimate updated in February. RALEIGH. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. COORDINATE WITH I-5999&1-6000. HS-2405M US 501 BUS. (ROXBORO ROAD)AT MAYNARD AVENUE. INSTALL TRAFFIC 4/25/2025 9/24/2025 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $25,000 $177,000 SIGNAL WITH PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS AND CONNECT TO THE DURHAM SIGNAL SYSTEM. SM-6105G SM-6105G- Durham- NC 147 southbound off ramp at SR 1321 (Hillandale Road/ 2/26/2025 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON Planning and engineering activities underway. Fulton Street). Widen the NC 147 southbound off ramp to dual right and revise the traffic signal. HS-2005S NC 98 NC 98 AT SR 1815(MINERAL SPRINGS ROAD). CONSTRUCT RIGHT 1/29/2024 2/12/2025 STEPHEN REID DAVIDSON $700,000 65% plans. Engineering continuing. TURN LANES AND SIDEWALK. HE-0007B SR 1794 (TEKNIKA PARKWAY), FROM SR 1632 (RED MILL ROAD) CONSTRUCT 2/23/2024 1/22/2025 MARK S. GALLO $95,000 $815,000 Funding is insufficient for a roundabout. Project team will TURN LANES AND SIGNALIZE INTERSECTION. evaluate costs for turn lane. HS-24051 SR 1110 (BARBEE CHAPEL ROAD)AT DOWNING CREEK 4/19/2024 10/23/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $2,000 $2,000 $120,000 PARKWAY/HALESWOOD ROAD. INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL WITH PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS. Page 1 of 2 DURHAM PROJECT LIST 5-YEAR PROGRAM FEBRUARY 2024 Project ID Description R/W Acq. Let Date Project Manager Name ROW$ UTIL$ CON $ COMMENTS Begins HS-2005L SR 1327 (GREGSON STREET)AT KNOX STREET. INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 6/26/2024 ASHLEY LOWERY $110,000 HS-2005D SR 1303 (PICKETT ROAD)AT SR 1116 (GARRETT ROAD)/(LUNA LANE). INSTALL 10/17/2022 4/24/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $2,000 $40,000 ALL WAY STOP. HS-2405B NC 157(GUESS ROAD) FROM DURHAM MUNICIPAL LIMITS TO ORANGE 4/24/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $223,000 COUNTY LINE. INSTALL LONG LIFE PAVEMENT MARKINGS. HS-2005E US 15-501 BUSINESS AT NC 751 (DURHAM -CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD). 4/10/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $175,000 INSTALLI GUARDRAIL. HS-2005H SR 1973 (PAGE ROAD)AT CHURCHILL HALL/Aat Churchill HALLI/ARBY'S 4/10/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $20,000 /MCDONALDS DRIVEWAY. INSTLL DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER. HS-2005C NC 54 AT NC 55 3/27/2024 KAYLA NOELLE GALES $75,000 HS-2005M NC 55(ALSTON AVENUE)AT SR 1670 (GEER STREET). REVISE TRAFFIC 3/27/2024 ASHLEY LOWERY $62,000 SIGNAL AND INSTALL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEADS. HE-0007A SR 1004 (OLD OXFORD ROAD) FROM FIRST AVE (MERCK DRVEWAY). 2/29/2024 JOHN EDWARD SANDOR $165,000 ROW and utility coordination ongoing. CONSTRUCT RIGHT TURN LANE. 1-5941 1-85 FROM ORANGE COUNTY LINE TO US 15/US 501 IN DURHAM PAVEMENT 2/20/2024 MARK S. GALLO $26,600,000 Construction contract unable to be awarded in February REHABILITATION letting. Project will readvertise in spring. Page 2 of 2 NCDOT DIV 7 PROJECTS LOCATED /N DCHCMPO - UNDER DEVELOPMENT TIP/WBS# Description LET/Start Completion Cost Status Project Lead Date Date U-4726DF Bicycle detection at signalized intersections in Carrboro 3/28/2024 FY2026 $36,000 Plans at 90%completion- Plan review Town of comments returned back to the Town of Carrboro/Stephen Carrboro for revisions Robinson EB-5721 Upgrade existing off-road path and construct new section of TBD FY2025 $2,400,000 Bids opened 7/17/23-Bids rejected. Town of Chapel path of Bicycle Route#1 from Cleland Drive to Willow Drive Project on Hold. Chapel Hill to seek Hill/Stephen Robinson in Chapel Hill additional funding and relet at a future BL-0044 NC 54 from Westbrook Drive in Carrboro to west of US 9/1/2024 10/31/2024 $1,311,000 Construction funding to be requested Chad Reimakoski 49998.1.1 15/501/NC 86(South Columbia Street)interchange in once municipal agreements are executed. Chapel Hill. Construct sidewalk and install pedestrian Chapel Hill MA executed, Carrboro MA signals, crosswalks, and refuge islands at selected has also been executed. Letting date set locations. tentatively September 2024. P-5701 Construct Platform, Passenger Rail Station Building at 7/1/2024 FY2025 $7,200,000 PE funding scheduled 7/1/2020. Planning Matthew Simmons 46395.1.1 Milepost 41.7 Norfolk Southern H-line in Hillsborough and deisgn activities underway 46395.3.1 SS-6207A NC 54 Pedestrian improvements between SR 1902 4/30/2024 10/31/2024 $171,000 Planning and design activities underway. Dawn McPherson 50337 (Manning Drive)and SR 1937(Old Fayetteville Road)in Waiting on materials to arrive. Chapel Hill and Carrboro. Improvements will include refuge islands, crosswalks and pedestrian signals. Improvements to be completed by state forces. 51130 Eliminate slip ramp on SR 1120 (Mt. Willing Road)at SR 5/31/2024 Summer 2024 $75,000 Funding approved by BOT. Maintenance Matthey Whitley 1117 (Oak Grove Church Road) to begin after Traffic Services revision complete. EL-4828A Construct Morgan Creek Greenway Phase 1 in Carrboro 5/24/2024 FY2026 $372,000 Review comments provided to Carrboro in Town of June 2023 for revisions and resubmittal. Carrboro/Stephen Robinson HL-0045 Repair Bridge#241 on Exchange Park Lane over Eno River 9/26/2024 FY2027 $153,800 Agreement executed, Hillsborough to Town of from South Churton Street to Faribult Lane in Hillsborough prepare environmental documents and Hillsborough/Stephen plans. Robinson C-5181 Jones Creek Greenway Project- Fill Gap between the 6/21/2024 FY2026 $654,000 Environmental document approved Town of Carrboro Upper Bolin Trail and Twin Creeks Greenway and 8/14/23. NCDOT to review plans once Carrboro/Stephen also implement program to support on-vehicle trips to Morris Carrboro develops and submits. Robinson Grove Elementary School DCHCMPO Mar 2024 Page 1 NCDOT DIV 7 PROJECTS LOCATED /N DCHCMPO - UNDER DEVELOPMENT TIP/WBS# Description LET/Start Completion Cost Status Project Lead Date Date SS-6207T Portions of Twenty-One(21)Routes. Curve Warning Sign 9/20/23 9/30/24 $200,000 Project approved by BOT and assigned. Dawn McPherson 51112 Installation. Planning and design activities underway. C-5650 Construct sidewalk on one side of SR 1919(Smith Level 12/4/2025 FY2028 $1,718,000 Carrboro approved to incorporate water Town of Road/S. Greensboro St.)from Public Works Drive to the line work into design. Env doc returned w Carrboro/Stephen northern end of Old Pittsboro Road in Carrboro comments on 12/10/21. Document to be Robinson updated to include additional limits for resurfacing. NCDOT waiting on revised plans to be submitted for review. Util Plans under review. HS-2007J Install a new crosswalk with Rapid Rectangular Flashing 11/21/2024 6/30/2025 $300,000 Planning and deisgn activities underway Chris Smitherman Beacons (RRFB), raised center island, pedestrian signage, and approximately 125 linear feet of sidewalk on NC 86 at Critz Drive in Chapel Hill B-6037 Replace Bridge#49 over Norfolk Southern Railway on NC 7/15/2025 FY2029 $2,500,000 Planning and design activities underway Chris Smitherman 86 BR-0092 Replace Bridge#37 on NC 86 over New Hope Creek 8/19/2025 IFY2028 $4,100,000 Planning and design activities underway Alexander Foster EB-5880 Construct sidewalk on the north side of SR 1005(Jones 9/30/2027 FY2029 $441,000 Municipal agreement needs to be Town of Ferry Road)from Davie Road to SR 1010(West Main St.)in requested and executed to begin work. Carrboro/Stephen Carrboro Robinson EB-5890 Construct sidewalk on Barnes Street from King Street to SR 9/30/2027 FY2029 $230,000 Municipal agreement needs to be Town of 1005 (Jones Ferry Road)in Carrboro requested and executed to begin work. Carrboro/Stephen Rnhincnn EB-5886B Construct sidewalk/MUP/bike lanes on Estes Drive from 10/2/2025 FY2027 $3,104,000 Municipal agreement executed and Town of Chapel south of Norfolk Southern Railroad to NC 86 (MLK Jr. Blvd.) project development underway. Hill/Stephen Robinson in Chapel Hill 1-3306AC 1-40 at NC 86-Upgrade to superstreet from Northwood 10/21/2025 FY2028 $4,350,000 Planning and design activities underway Radha Attaluri Drive to Ramp C/D at 1-40 interchange DCHCMPO Mar 2024 Page 2 NCDOT DIV 7 PROJECTS LOCATED /N DCHCMPO - UNDER DEVELOPMENT TIP/WBS# Description LET/Start Completion Cost Status Project Lead Date Date HO-0013 Chapel Hill from Franklin Street and Rosemary Street, and 6/4/2026 FY28 $2,100,000 Project approved by BOT and assigned. Stephen Robinson 51177.1.1 the streets in between from Merritt Mill Road to Henderson 51177.2.1 Street in downtown Chapel Hill. Install new mast arm and 51177.2.2 51177.3.1 curb and sidewalk improvements. BP7-R009 Replace Bridge#11 on SR 1336 (Halls Mill Road) 9/17/2026 FY2029 $1,100,000 Planning and design activities underway Vacant Plans at 65% BP7-R013 Replace Bridge#90 on SR 1940 (Damascus Church Road) 9/16/2027 FY2030 $800,000 Planning and design activities underway Vacant Plans at 25% EB-5998 Construct MUP on US 15/501 from Willow Drive to SR 9/30/2026 FY2028 $2,044,000 Municipal agreement needs to be Town of Chapel 1741/SR 1838 (Old Durham Chapel Hill Road)in Chapel Hill requested and executed to begin work. Hill/Stephen Robinson EB-5886A Construct sidewalk/MUP/bike lanes on Estes Drive from SR 9/17/2026 FY2029 $848,000 Municipal agreement needs to be Town of 1772 (North Greensboro Street)to south of Norfolk requested and executed to begin work. Carrboro/Stephen Southern Railroad Tracks in the Town of Carrboro Robinson 1-5958 Pavement Rehabilitation on 1-40/1-85 from West of SR 1114 11/17/2026 FY2028 $8,690,000 Planning and design activities pending Chris Smitherman 45910.1.1 (Buckhorn Road)to West of SR 1006(Orange Grove Road) 45910.3.1 BR-0247 Replace Bridge#29 on US 70 Business/NC 86 over Cates 11/16/2027 FY2029 Pending Preliminary activities pending Bryan Key Creek R-5821A Construct operational improvements including 6/17/2031 FY2033 $7,000,000 PE funding approved 10/10/17, design Chris Smitherman 47093.1.2 Bicycle/Pedestrian accommodations on NC 54 from SR activities currently suspended, 47093.2.2 1006 (Orange Grove Road)to SR 1107/SR 1937(Old Coordinating with NC54 West Corridor 47093.3.2 Fayetteville Road). Study BP7-R007 Replace Bridge#63 on Pleasant Green Road 9/5/2030 FY2033 $2,500,000 Planning and design activities underway Vacant DCHCMPO Mar 2024 Page 3 NCDOT DIV 7 PROJECTS LOCATED /N DCHCMPO - UNDER DEVELOPMENT TIP/WBS# Description LET/Start Completion Cost Status Project Lead Date Date BP7-R015 Replace Bridge#86 on SR 1942 (Jones Ferry Road) 9/6/2029 FY2031 $1,700,000 Planning and design activities underway Vacant BR-0091 Replace Bridge#32 on US 70 over the Eno River 10/17/2028 FY2032 $4,000,000 Planning and design activities underway Jon Gaillard U-5845 Widen SR 1009 (South Churton Street)to multi-lanes from 1-7/16/2030 FY2033 $49,238,000 PE funding approved 5/14/15, Planning Radha Attaluri 50235.1.1 40 to Eno River in Hillsborough and Design activities underway, 50235.2.1 Coordinate with 1-0305B which was 50235.3.1 formerly 1-5967. 1-0305(A) Widening of 1-85 from west of SR1006 (Orange Grove 1/20/2032 FY2036 $132,000,000 PE funding approved 6/5/18, Planning Colin Mellor 34142.1.2 Road)in Orange Co. to west of SR 1400 (Sparger Road)in and design activities underway, Project 34142.2.2 Orange Co. reinstated per 2020-2029 STIP (funded 34142.3.2 project)and delete project 1-5983 1-0305B Interchange improvements at 1-85 and SR 1009 (South 10/15/2030 FY2033 $16,900,000 PE funding approved 9/8/17, Planning Colin Mellor 34142.1.5 Churton Street)in Hillsborough and Design activities underway, 34142.3.3 Coordinate with 1-0305 and U-5845. (I- 34142.3.4 0305B was formerly 1-5967) 34142.2.4 1-0305C Interchange improvements at 1-85 and NC 86 in 11/16/2032 FY2035 $20,900,000 PE funding approved 10/10/17, Planning Colin Mellor 34142.1.6 Hillsborough and Design activities underway, 1-0305C was formerly 1-5984. B-5733 Replace Bridge#39 over Booker Creek in Chapel Hill on SR 1/16/2029 FY2031 $5,100,000 Planning and design activities pending Jennifer Hernandez 1010 (E. Franklin St.) BR-0195 Replace Bridge#31 on SR 1010 (Franklin Street)over Bolin 2/15/2029 FY2031 Pending Planning and design activities underway. Jennifer Hernandez Creek in Chapel Hill Bridge recently rehabbed. Project on hold. DCHCMPO Mar 2024 Page 4 North Carolina Department of Transportation 3/6/2024 Active Projects Under Construction -Orange Co. Contract TIP Location Description Contractor Name Resident Contract Bid Availability Completion Work Start Estimated Progress Completion Number Number Engineer Amount Date Date Date Completion Schedule Percent Date Percent C204632 1-3306A WIDENING 1-40 FROM 1-85 IN ORANGE COUNTY TO THE DURHAM THE LANE Cvijetic,PE, $236,457,869.00 9/27/2021 9/1/2025 10/28/2021 9/1/2025 59 35.6 COUNTY LINE AND 1-40 WESTBOUND IN DURHAM COUNTY NEAR US- CONSTRUCTION Bojan 15/501. CORPORATION C204806 RESURFACING 27 SECTIONS OF SECONDARY ROADS CAROLINA SUNROCK Howell,Bobby J $4,512,658.45 3/15/2023 9/15/2024 5/22/2023 9/15/2024 17 20.35 LLC DG00589 HS-2007C INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TRP CONSTRUCTION Cvijetic,PE, $1,494,249.58 3/15/2023 11/7/2023 9/13/2023 2/20/2024 100 100 VARIOUS SECONDARY ROUTES THROUGHOUT DIVISION 7 GROUP LLC Bojan DG00596 R-57871 INSTALLATION OF ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMPS AT VARIOUS CAROLINA GROUP Howell,Bobby J $312,070.00 10/12/2022 2/28/2024 11/9/2022 10/14/2022 100 100 ROUTES PROPERTIES LLC DBA CAROLINA GROUP CONTRACTING Page 1 of 1 Chatham County- DCHC MPO - Upcoming Projects- Planning& Design, R/W, or not started - Division 8--March 2024 Contract#or Completion Funds Route Description Let Date Contractor Project Admin. Notes WBS# or TIP# Date Needed U-6192 US 1S-S01 Convert to reduced conflict intersections S/20/2031 TBD TBD Greg Davis $117,700,000 Right of Way 8/2027 from US 64 to SR 1919 (Smith Level Rd) (910) 773-8022