HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-18-2002 - 9o ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 18, 2002
Action Agenda
Item Ng. r�-Q
SUBJECT: Tuscan Ridge Subdivision—Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN)
ATTACHMENT(&): INFORMATION CONTACT:
1)Developer Enhancements to Subdivision Pg.4
2) Resolution of Approval Pg. 5 Eddie Kil Planner II
3)Application Pg. B Extension 2582
4)Vicinity Map Pg. 10 TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
5)Agency Comments Pg. 14 Hillsborough 732.8181
6)Floral Impact Analysis Pg. 19 Chapel Hill 9684501
7)June 6, 2002 Draft Planning Bd. Minutes Pg. 35 Durham 688-7331
8)Preliminary Plan Mebane (336)227-2031
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Tuscany Ridge.
BACKGROUND:
Resident- Prell Plan
Applicant: Red Zin Development. Ti 7.12..1A & 27 PIN: 9851-97-1387 &9851-85-9887
Subdivision follows the Conventional Option of Development.
Minimum lot size is 2 acres.
• Total deal Is 55.61 acres including right-of-way.
Lots Average Lot She %Open Space Acres Open
_ Gress- S ace
Conventional 22 2.31 1175 (IT ACOntrolt 600
Location
North side of Arthur Minnis Road approximately 800 fast west of Rocky Ridge Road in Chapel Hill
Township.
Existing and Proposed Conditions
Existing:
• Zoning: Rural Buffer IRS) ( min. density= 2 acres/dwelling)
The property is not in a designated protected watershed.
Physical Features:
• There are no USGS designated streams on the tract
• The site is mostly wooded with a mixture of pines and hardwoods.
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the east and west are undeveloped.
• Properties to the north are divided into large acreage tracts.
• Predominate larding pattern for this general area is 5+acre tracts.
Proposed:
Roads:
• Access is from Arthur Minnis Read (SR 1115), an existing unpaved public mad.
• The main major collector mad extends through the property to the east property line;a second
2
• All roads are to be constroated to NCDOT attendants.
• Arthur Minnis Road is listed as k 8 on the pnonty,paving list and scheduled to be paved in
2002. A condition of Concept Plan Approval was to require, as a Preliminary Plan approval
consul that this section of Arthur Minnis Road be brought up to State Standards if the
road was not paved by Preliminary submittal.
The stub outs to the seat and west property lines will provide for future IntemonnectivIty.
Open Space/Buffers:
• 6.00 ease (11%)of HOA owned common area open apace
3.6 acres (6.6%) of HOA regulated easements for Type A roadside buffer with trails
MTAR is 1.02; 0.04 acres of in-lot open space
• MTADR is 2.31(less RAN); density for entire tract is i unit per 2.5 acres.
Homeowners Association will maintain open space, roadside buffers and trail system.
WaterSawer:
• Individual wells.
Individual septic systems.
Recreation:
• Chapel HIII District Park
• No dedication is warranted because no county recreation or resource area has been
identified at this time. The payment-In-Ilau option is viable.
Anency Comments;
Comments attached from NCDOT, Environmental Health and Emergency Management.
Development P S hedule and Act on
Planning Board:
First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board March 6, 2002 with the
following conditions:
1. The intersection and road alignments on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT collector
standards.
2. Homeowners Association documents that provide for maintenance ofthe Open Space .
shall be submitted w ith the preliminary plan.
3. Lot 1 shall have a joint driveway with the William Bird property,all other lots shall have joint
driveways.
4, Show proposed dedication of an additional 5 feet of right-of-way, or 35 feet from C L of
existing RIW whichever is greater along Arthur Minnie Road on the Preliminary Plan.
5. If this section of Arthur Minnis Road is unpaved at the time Preliminary Plat is submitted a
condition to bring the road up to paved state standards will be recommended by staff.
6. Show five-foot utility easements along both sides of all rights-of-way. All rightaf-ways to
be 50'with five foot utility easements shown on each side.
Preliminary Plan addresses conditions of approval of the Concept Plan.
• Second Acton: Planning Board on June 6, 2002 unanimously recommended approval.
1. Board added a condition requiring signs (34 sq.1t) at the terminus of each road that
indicate the streets are subject to future extension.
2. Board added a condition, agreed to by the developer, that if a lighting plan is to be
Implemented within the subdivision, the plans will be reviewed by Planning Staff prior 0 or
at the same time as the submittal for final plat approval.
• Third Action:
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amountof time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall have one
(1)year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request a one-year extension from the
3
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Adminlatretion Approval, In accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval,
Planning Board Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
Plannina Staff Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution
of Approval.
4
DEVELOPER ENHANCEMENTS TO SUBDIVISION
RURAL BUFFER ZONING DISTRICT
Ordinance Ratiuirements Developer Proposal
OPEN SPACE (ACRES) 0 S acres
FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP
OPEN SPACE (PERCENTAGE) 0 11%
FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP
(Open apace is central and
connected by a rail system)
TYPE A(30'WIDE) ROAD SIDE Yes Yes
BUFFERS
EASEMENT TO 8, Not Required Yesi
MAINTENANCE BY HOA
TOTAL ACRES UNDER HOA 0 9.6 acres
CONTROL
PERCENTAGE ACRES 0 17.6%
UNDER HOA CONTROL
WALKING TRAILS Not Required Yes
JOINT DRIVEWAYS Not Requited Yes'
CURVILINEAR STREET LAYOUT Not Required Yes
OPEN SPACE CONNECTIVITY Yes Yes
(Interconnectivily of a public abets
network)
r Placing the roadside buffers under HOA administration is an additional control that ensures
the buffers are not complement.
2 Joint driveways will reduce the'cutdng out'of the roadside buffer by one halt.
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Dale: June 18, 2002
Name of Subdivision; Tuscany Ridge
Owner/Applicant; Red Z'n Development
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Tuscany Ridge subdivision
preliminary plat,dated March 27, 2002 and revised June], 2002 and containing 22
lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
Tuscany Dave and Front Street shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and
constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The
approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept
for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of
Tuscany Dave and Front Street. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication
to the general public of Tuscany Drive and Front Street shall be without maintenance
responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the ownerlapplicant call such time
as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Camlim Department of
Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Tuscany
Ridge can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
t. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal,
and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of
Environmental Health.
2. The septic system location may restact the size and location of
improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document
describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the
FInal Plat The document shall also disclose that information regarding
the tentative location of septic systems Is available from the Orange
County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health.
S. Roads and Access
1. Tuscany Dave and Front Street shall be constructed to standards of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation,within a 50-toot rightdf-way
with 5-foot utility easements on each side, and the construction shall be
Inspected and approved by NCDOT.The pavement width shall be a
minimum of 20 feet.
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement,or bond shall be submitted to secure
construction of Tuscany Drive and Front Street to the standards of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the
construction cost must be prepared by a certifiedllicensed engineer or
grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections
Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate
and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restricticns to be recorded with the
Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until
the mad construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads. No
tldveweye shall be permitted within 50'of a street intersection. Lot 1 shall
have a joint driveway with the William Bile property, all other lots shall
implement combined driveways not to exceed 30 feet in width.
3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by
the applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review
and approval prior to any land disturbing activity on the site.
4. Approved street name signs shall be erected at all Intersections prior to
Planning Department signatures on me final plat.
5. Prior to any construction or alteration of any existing access within the
right-of-way of Arthur Minnis Road,the developer/owner shall secure a
driveway permit from the NCDOT District Office. Submit a copy of the
NCDOT- approved permit and letter to the Planning Department at the
same time as the request for Planning Department signatures on the Final
Plat.
6. Sight tdanglas (10'x70) shall be shown on the Final Plat at each
intersection.
Z The section of Arthur Minnis Road from Rocky Ridge Road to the western
property line of this subdivision shall be constructed and paved to NCDOT
standards prior to Planning Department signatures on the Final Plat.
8. Dedicate, in fee simple,five (5)feet of addltlonel right-of-way, or 35 feet
from the centerline of the so ialing right-of-way, whichever Is greater, along
the frontage of Arthur Minnis Road. Said dedication shall meet major
collector road right-of-way standards as identified in the Comprehensive
Plan and required in Section IV-13-3-c-0 of the Subdivision Regulations.
9, Temporary twenty(20)feel in width construction easements shall be
shown on the final plat along lots 9, 10, 18 and 19.
10. Signs (between 3 and 4 square feet)shall be placed at the termini of
Tuscany Drive and Front Street indicating that each street is subject to
ful extension.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1, Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan (operi space and pathways plan), and shall be displaced
and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department prior to
signatures on final plat. No pad of the landscaping shell encroach into the
10' x 70' sight triangles at intersections,
OR
Guaranteed financially thrl a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or
bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and
preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings
and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall
reflect 110 percent of the estimate and be issued by an accredbed
financial institution licensed to do business In North Carolina.
Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved
landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. No clear curing on individual
lots per section IV-13-8-c of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations is
permitted.
2. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Tuscany Drive and
along Frent Street as shown on the Preliminary Plan. The buffer shall be
30 feet in width along Tuscany Drive and Front Street and shall be
composed of deciduous and/or evergreen vegetation, farming sami-
opaque imannMent visual obstructions from the ground to a height of at
least thirty(30)feet Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and
described in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat. Thirty-(30)foot buffer easements along both streets
shall be conveyed to the Homeowners Association for enforcement and
maintenance.
D. Drainage
1. Locate drainage easements on the final plat as required following review
and approval of the Erosion Control Plan.
2. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and a
North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer,
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of$10,01D.00 shall be paid to Orange County as
payment in lieu of parkland dedication prior to recordation of the final plat.
2. The second paragraph of Section IV-6-T-b of the Orange County
Subdivision Regulations references the required minimum recreation
space ratio in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance,Article 5.1.1,which
requires 0.02B square feet of recreation space per land area dedicated to
residential use [0.026 '55.61 = 1.56 acres or 67,826 square feet[. In
those cases where the required minimum recreation space results in a
larger amount than the public recreation space requirement of 1/57 acre
per lot, the difference shall be established as private recreation space for
the use of the residents of the development(67,826— 16,813 = 51,013
square feet (1.1] acres). The developer has planned 6.0 acres of open
space (H%)to be owned and maintained by the Homeowners
Association,which will meet the County's requirement for private
recreation use.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shell contain a title block and vicinity map in ao_vNance
with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision
Regulations.
2. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by D.1. above.
3. The open space shell be conveyed Into the Homeowners Association.
4. A 30-foot pedestrian access easement across lot five(5)shall be shown
on the final plat connecting the open space b the William Find property.
5. Prior to installation of lighting within the subdivision a lighting plan shall be
submitted to the planning office for review and approval.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Su rvey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land
Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in
Section V-DE-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by
the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included
in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall ci that the
platted portion of both Tuscany Drive and Front Street have been entirely
constructed to Stale standards or that construction plans have been
approved plot to Planning Department signatures on final plat.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and
Inspections Department.
7b
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Orange County
Commissioners that the Preliminary Plan for Tuscany Ridge Subdivision is approved in
accordance with the above mentioned conditions and attached Preliminary Plat dated
March 27, 2002.
Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner
the foregoing resolution was adopted this the day of
2002.
I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clark to the Board of Commissioners for the County of
Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a ime copy of ac
much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on 2002 as
relates in any way W the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are
recorded in Minute Book No._of the minutes of said Board,
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this_day of
2002.
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
_ e
APPLICATION FOR PRE�ARY PLAN APPROVAL
MASOR 6UBDIVLSION 4/9.,
ORANOECOUNTY '
DATRM_MW
' ]GF.fiBE'RREORPRWTPNR PYLI)
sueDmsTOxNU.�: Tuscswly K`rr�r-
LOCATION: W AsIIR1 M wp ! =0 Oslo'WEST F Se 1113
OWNCP/DE OPCR: :RM 2 1. Ve/e meL
AnnRBSS:T'i.r>_8e+< nte34- TPLEpBOxeNO.:C9wS319-7119
WiaW.h me 211D9
AGHNTKONTALT: WlLUaw9tDD TflHPxoxB xo.:(9191399-^IIl9
A ' . sunDdazzYlxTO]imnnoN: .
Ocenge Ca®ry Tmm '-(( Block l2 Lags) /A27. TOwashlPC/ 0fd. flll�,�@M[•(.�11<.A
Took rills aP Tfu laATFea. ��"
Td<INVmberaeLoo: 22(AV¢cge laSize: Mloimvm U[Siae: A'� -C.
Lb,errF ta5ve3929.% 1Si � (pro Paas) 22
OPm Pm:�59 AC
wwm saPplr u.. PubBc faem ) No cammmnr __ma:.;m�at
school erlT:ryaul: LPUhPo(spemfy) NO Commm m&vdoe]
Sc6wl Dico-icC D Pv<DvtriR (RA1 �
C®enl l.ovd Law bArm: ' SiDLRTA6
Crlticel A�ns:
"WA diveecify) N A hWwcsiesnss
wnnshed(specify) N b hiawriceism
-) olhw(wP1em1
le mepol<atymbambdividedawmflymdc"fimose ralvetawtlm'"! Yn _ No Y, V')'u:'pleue
mvtttme gevSe CeuvbT*e 0fficx Subdiviaiw oftbepoparyvuy rryvhepymm[afdeRmedmzu mdv
"Pmvuu wlm ruetim"
'.H. All plee mmtbe s[bmi¢edayshcttvo®eBnmev ow wch e¢uotr two-buodndeeaz(1"-200')®duo lergartln
ova ivcheryelctweorykn(1" 20')md mvn coemw mo YWbgivgiveu'motim:
✓ memWe M&oiaedudurm em e o fowutt(s) apavadyugofeNnmldueaajbmymvasWPmoPvV ed.iw
vame&MCrm afmbtlWldet cr piullotmyout
(ifemmmm ew¢w7 ✓ WmdmmtlwNmofem
ZEE v em<ofaucv<yar,<ogiva<51evd+cvPe . pmpmedw®eu¢(dnkealaame,utllitlm,.
mchhenwerrL'mct,adhws, made,emJ
gis)P Hn &seal ✓ eaisdug udiogdaudedjooawszeg
(dde)Relimkery Play -oSwryivcludiugdimmvme and men
wl9'northvsrosv nemmmdSSme Rued eumbere. Lbsw
lose a(plmprepYeda¢and setviooa Penolroedttntrlivea mdappmzimcb
mA'vahip.pzmepfilaY-IOSn(em¢c<s saaegeofven's dgkerof uy
y/ tWwbomciadpW m'"vouk ✓ mslm¢®d PmPOeol utilitiq wclwGng
1� deW book and Page%oPPmPetp'm be . typ5 ciam.6Ymmn•'relva,mWseles
mladug mdpmpaudeurbb gutlen and
✓
✓ uy beuptl dmcsibedwkhbeeauvtl De avlvem,lvvludv�gs¢m and gmdm
ahenmm ✓ bmeo¢mawram peau<yc aWe.eo�.
✓ mmlmmege prmeraa[ma.mwge of bk<l<¢w,¢,mil m¢�.mabasnapa
- bq mcludbsgaed rscivdmgveawRhiv � rypimisxet Fwe-emaomavd
ri�of--wry mtuaecdm details mcludNS tlmi�md
g
. ✓ p,waa.amtiuv,wivammaime ✓ narlm .
✓ bt&biocknumbm vml eli�ms mnemline redim,
Phazmg.We(a) .: ®�dmud curve tlemovmpmpmetl
mPOgmPhYptmn(10)feot blervaLa
ZEN pemimeet femme;such u boimm
watmbotli¢.q ameam;Vooaways and / eme0xie;hjamrie lanamyya �'
✓ flootlPieive ✓ egicbivglotlayoutmmeavfadj lobg
sme®buHem p Onvam. Ifmbclvklci
loaatlon mod aim vfpercam ddicamlfor aubaivinm plet namS Plat book A.page
pob4c me,mmmiMtI me or raaeovedm emmba,evdpe'ime[erm[nmvhers.
N�A ammacwlu cmdataaea lamlmana siuofiadandmrtiyy
impemi0waurmaaam(ifimmdm awempmmtPaenmi mavPNdmnm
wahrmppm Amms ga ��( Plmregerawg name
� Wehabmap ahawiv¢¢®emllo-adov or =C4
' mbdivuim with meets mW coeds mamwmudetmrbe mNmremem
lamdfied by SOON:Roadaaaber aW name dtamamodinurbetl amm fmN¢Iwda
✓ �bee�[dWmteawwaem mPP1Y
✓ tc N 1pivgmabn mt:extia mmrs
towuehy,eapaareevamvrcnvoriel ✓ comdLetivwml areas mtl waddle
PlannlnBl'yiadiadoo liveawhlU Croaathe omdors
WoPVh
C. CT SIiByGq'rALUQMFN03Nf5
1. ]Weary five(25J wplaoffhe Pmliminvy Plat
2. Omfullaim cow&M Orm¢e Camty Tai maP(with tez leWVQh involved eleady mwmQ.
3. Woery comae PM m'OWASA umer u oa aVmlabk a copy of ob,prt'
Homkommt alemovaVamul fm each lot ehwn thmoe. Lm�y Pmt ioaiaadog Heaven
4. =Lpr=tool upropoxd,a"mee,ememout by 0appGCantmh4kcaulhodmdrerymemadve
Na iaaidnmdamur.pone rasa(sees.einnrv-ea-a.V of the oange eomay sumviona
5. Au4lierydecmaeat;ind mry fvm.pmpareabaz "ttmouwbh Setion V atIm Ordmmce which assure
cemPmImo and/or mainteomce Ofmapmvemeotsmgairod by Nis canlms ee. Suaba Co copm yimwdae
bmnot be l®ited b,a wiivma rmuL rEmoce apeememaod mL'aVa of ma teetticam
ao^oanm Pa�Nmmgm abmvrowmaesmeiedon. 't*...tiv =a mayberegw@ ummmmymevidwme
Nu the mtlbmae requu'mmm are be'vi¢mtt
6. Fee-Vl70p]wW.00 pmbt(one rue fw Prelbome .mtl Fmn pL4
>. HNeaubtlivuim mmaim 101ob o-mort,Ne foOOwmg iv(mmaamgnap leeubmimed wifB Neapplication:
e. Mmbgofyemato multloet
<. N�mhmofhoumamhbu0t tlnaNg easy YVUOVtli huildM
Avem¢epdceofnomm lnelutlivg cop[or math YevbbuJdout
I.Ne appticevt herebYavtlfy thmihefornamg aPPlignouia<empkRevdxmtye.
CAM'S SIGNA Aa OW[ 5 GNAT
/t OA 3UAl
iE
FEES: Amum,t 6ia.a wmpaii u-9. o- RmeiPt¢ 2s t6d YJ5 "5-
10
1T. 5
.2
22
7.11..%DH ! L7.1 �yi fi..26 7 .9
9
6.12..6
7. 2. A
7.12..:
.12..1A
i
6.12..66 4 7. ..2
7.12..1
.121.24 _ _
.12..IQA 12�..H
6.12..23 5 .12..2$9 7.12..26A Z12..26A
112..24 .2 A
.�. .�. .12..2
n
�� TM
em Vaumrwo�o•w.�..
III
y -
TUSCANY — a'
p c.�
RIDGE cuM
`uit
I�
12
zij
AK
9
19
- .r, t. llalEhoi
e
Egg! I
FE NR
u !liE�sssl��i
t2�`i3 EilE ��INaC E i! a
i
_ s 3
NX
, ®�
NTYI
s� r
lip -
8a 7 '� r
Alf
o l
zz
oil 0 i
k
f �e
i ! s
e a tl y ?
yry
° 519w \_ f�
g z Et
n
14
tSStl M: Eddie Kirk
FROM: S. D. Dixon
RATE: April 16, 2W2
Per your request, a review of the above mentioned subject has been conpletad by the
mn
NM0T Grah District.neelow fox ym¢ file is a list of our secas mdatiore and caments i
the subject:
1. Prior to my construmion of any new access or alteration of any existing access within
the right of Way, the developer/owner is required to secure a permit with this office.
It is the responsibility of the ownaz/developer to obtain a pm¢i.t.
2. All utilities located within the right of way mall require an me deemsent agreement.
All services shall be flush with finished grade. Any utility main, service conneetim
or lateral located within the dedicated right of way shall be maintained by the appropr:
utility authority.
15
Orange County Health Department /.[
z�nno.cwu Rascnar L.Summers,MPH.DrPH
omac..omma,/xwn Health Director m 4An.da
.�.�xaanwnme
1401am,�.NC
=79 tl,° O[ . . Pbm 191flzisvM PA5 ro19)r,
�' PdmlelmtlrcPweo 19r9196W�p1 IR91�a]lli 1a�93:
April 5.2002
SMSITE Evaluation Summary f
Tuscany Ridge Subdivision
ChapHip TOwzWip Map t2lo[ IA sad 2l ,
Map Date RevisOCI April 5,2002
Lot% DESIGN FLOW ,SYSTEM TYPE
1 600 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional
2 600 gpd conventional
3 600 gpd Ulha Shallow Conventional w/pwnp
4 600 Wd Conventional w/pump
5 600 gpd ShallowT hConventioml
6 600 gpd cowmaousl
7 600 gpd Conventional
g 600 gpd Shallow Trench Cwvmtiooal w/pump
9 600 Wd Shallow Trench Convmaonal w/pump
10 360 Wd Shallow Trench Convmaanalw/pump
11 600 Wd Ulna Shallow Convectional w/pump
12 600 gpd shallow Trench Caavattiotal w/pump
13 600 gpd Shahaw Tr Ia Caavmaovlw/pump.
14 600 gpd Cmv®aonal
15 600 Vd Shallow Trench Conventional w/pomp
16
16 600 Bpd Shallow Trench Conventional
17 600 gird Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
18 600 gird Uteri Shallow Conventional w/Immp
19 600 gird Conventional w/pump
20 600 tad Shallow Trench Convmticme w/pump
21 600 Wd - Shallow Trench Canventionai w/pump
-22 600 gird Shallow'h hConventicnel
NOTES:
The design flow is based upanthe number ofbedmams applied forby the property owner or developer. Thedcsil
flow for abedroom is 120 gallmu/day(gpd). (e g. 600 gpd m 5 belmmms)
Proposeshouselacatiomarepmvidcdbytiespmpertyowm¢mdcvelop mmquvedby15ANCACIBA.1900-
.1969(TheI ws and Rules for Sewage Tmahn®t and Disposal Systems).
The design flow,type system,and pump regmrmaent are subject to change based upon the application end site pla
plat submitted for the Wastewater Construction Authorization.
The blocked areas on the accompanying plat ave the Emus of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the
Orange County Health DepaHm ort.
It should be noted[hat all lots having a cavventionel-type drain field with pump are reviewed at a minimum of ens(
five yens by the health department as msuiroi by ISA NCAC ISA.1961 (M.:"r......ce of Sewage System).
Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Syetene tree placed in anars with 26 inches or more of provisionally suitable
millshe charactmiatice and a 6-10"soil cap is placed over the munhw.
Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed m evens with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable soil/Sit
characteristics.
Com'evtioral Trench Syat®s are placed in ems with 36"inches or more ofpravisimnlly suitable soil/Site
chamdaistics.
Imevative Trench Systems can be need m areas with 2A-36'bfprovisionally suitable sm/site characteristics.
The rd d sepdc areas should be kept free of vehicular firsuffic,Itunfluz sonjump.and compacting activit
It is the responsibility of me property owner or developer to maintain the integrity of the septic areas priorm sysh
conattuction and installation. No parking,started of filling shall be allowed In u mound the drain field mesa.
Drainage ways sod easements should be Ytllized to convey,storm water mn-off to the storm water remotion areas.
These conveyances should not be located through designated septic&am field areas.
This report is fm Plsoo bP�Pnses ody and does mt COMEbAe any approval. LotapPswalisgmo bytheb
dTp ant only in the form of m G Mvcmmt Permit
IB
O=9e County Emesdency Management
P.O.Box 8181
Hillsborough
North CmImm
27278
9-1-I CO®uoicutiom EmggevryMedical9evicea
14 aI9o`WamiDO P9iv[ M az
9194324161 .933, mu zaol p mmaciEa
20.11=Pst 9134303 0- 96&E0
50
91"6]-9026
♦. • �;
Ad®ehntiw Pax MacSme
919-968 4066
TO: MOM KRUC,PLAT NOiG DEPARTMENT ��/
FROM: MIICE TAPP,DEPDTY DIItECTOR/S]RE MARSHAL Ip
RE: TGSCAN MGE—PREL41Ni ARYPLAN
DATE: APRII,24.2002
We have reviewed the prelimfi ry plan ofTuscanyRidge submit the following commeuta:
1. Secondary meaty ofingresslegress has been identified wiW the right-ofway easement
shownontheplaue. .
2. As the mml auras make assuausition to residential subdivisions,additional powO and
population may vactwe additional stedmg m order W effectively provide public safety
services. WLite dtislaoJect maY not dvagYimPaot 9-I-1 and msmgevcY xespe"
agencies,camWatively,additioual development in the County wig result m[he need m
incrsase emetgenry response emH.
3. We have hem iu contact with Ontap Gmve One Chief to waist with identification of
available water aupplies f firer VeoCou. AdNuats water for firs Mtectim is available
oa Dahyland Road.
If you need additioual informalion,Please contact U.
Ia
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR TUSCANY RIDGE
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
June, 2002
PROJECTDESCRTPTION
Tuscany Ridge subdivision contains 22 buildable lots and Is located in Chapel Hill
Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will intersect with Arthur Mlnnis
Road. The current zoning is RE — Rural Buffer. The average lot size Is approximately 231
acres Including open space. Las will be served by individual wells and individual septic
systems.
project buildrout Is estimated at four years. Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 2002, with completion of the project scheduled for 2005. Units will consist of
detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price ro be
$500,000.including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal Impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues
associated with residential and non residential growth In the jurisdiction in which the growth
is taking place. Fiscal impact analysts considers only direct impart in that it projects only the
primary costs that will be incurred and the Immediate revalues that will be generated. It
calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering
the current costs and revenues such a development would generate If It were completed and
occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It
is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis Is the Service Standard
Approach. While any gross expenditures by saMce category are dented from the Per Capita
Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees
by service function that will be regulred as a result of growth. This method employs average
county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to
population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category
and school district The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the
average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital peals) per employee.
These average costs are then weighed against per capita and par pupil revenues to project
the rota1 net fiscal Impact of the development.
zp
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROTECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1- Project Date
Project Name,Township, SchnDl District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
- Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2- Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
For Cap'Ita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School Depict Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Populadon
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3- Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4- Projected Not Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5- Projected Na Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6-Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Addldpnal Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School Dlstra Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
21
Section 7-Summary of projected Public School Capacity Impacts
22
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 - PROTECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not
all, of the Information is supplied by the applicant Data inputs Include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township:Township in which the project is located.
School District:School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied..
Ending Year. The last year In which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The
template Is set to calculate Racal impacts for a ten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation late is entered, the template will calculate fiscal Impacts
based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance
Department must be contacted for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit)
based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per household for me
school district In which the project is located. The most recent studies include A Study of
Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N.C. (1995) and
Technical Report: Calculation of Pmpodlonate Share Impact Fees for Financing Public
School Capttal Needs, Orange County, N.C. (1996).
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household
(dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students par household for the sdwol
district in which the project is located. The most recent study Is A Study of Housing
Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N.C. (1995).
% Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled who meet certain Income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the
project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will
automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be cent ucted in the project in each
Mr.
23
Average Sales Price: The average sales Once of all dwelling units based on the number
and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed In each year.
SECTION 2- LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Laval government data includes information regarding expenditures required to
provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County
budget for the fiscal year in which the project is coruidered for approval. Al Information
derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year(July-June) and
Is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information Is compiled on a per capita
(per person) basis. Per capita figures are demred by dividing the hotel expenditures for a
pamcular service function or revenue source by the entrusted population of Orange County
for the year In which the project is considered for approval. . Populations estimates are
prepared by the Planning Department.
Data Inputs include the following:
Budget Year:The current fiscal year; i.e., 1996-97.
Per Capita Revenues:The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes - Other Than Property: Revenues from oboes other than Property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, In the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance progams.
Service Charges: Service(or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to
those who voluntarily receive governmental service or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include Interest comings on investments, proceeds
from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follow:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative,finardal, and legal
functions of government.
Public Safety: law enforcement services and emergency medical servlcee
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
24
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
reveatlon-related services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and
the Chapel Hill-Camboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the
designated school system for Rziurring Capital Items. Recurring Capital funs are used for
general maintenance, purchase of new equipment(furmshings and vehide maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside
the formal structure of county government Other expenditures include equipment
replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this
category, It has been induced as an operating expendiWre. It will be included in Seddon 4,
'Total Annual County Expenditure" These expenditures Will be calculated on a per capita
basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year In which the project 6 wnsiderad for approval. All information
derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year(luly-lune)and
is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure Informaoon Is compiled on a per student basis for County Government CLment
6pense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense
funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services.
Federal revenues and expenditure; an other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not
been included since they are not already growth related. Per student figures are derived by
dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the
estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in
which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the
approved school system budgets.
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student
appropriation Is de i nnlned by the State Board of Education.
School District: &pendltures In this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Canboro school
system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a
supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of
Education.
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenciltures per employee based on
County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school distrait
employees.
2s
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees In a particular service
category per 1000 population
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capllal expenses per
employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes
personnel,operaing and capital costs.
ze
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate:The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since
the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an
amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary.tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel
Hill-Canboro school system.
Assessment Ratio: The haul of market (sales) value tO assessed value based on
information supplied by the Tax.Office.The assessment ratio is used to convert market value
to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and older)
or disabled Intlivitluals whose annual Income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000 tax
exemption Is used In proJeating the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a
specific school district
SECTION 3 • DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school
children anticipated In Orange County resulting from project development. Projections also
provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district
as a msut of the new development.
Total Housing Units:The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project
development
Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying
the number of homes to be constructed by the number Of Persors per household (see
Section 1),
School Population: The focal number of school children added each year by a project
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructetl by the number of children per
household (see Secton 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service
category based on project development.
Total:Total of all additional county employees required based on projed development.
P]
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per
school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4- PROJECTED NET-.FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the inamme In assessed property value expected each
year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $I,000's and are derived
from a formula which Incudei the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment
ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-eldedy units and eldedy exemption are also
used
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which mulaplles the per capita revenues
(Section 2) times the pmjec ed population (Section 3). The exception to this is the properly
tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditure; are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure(S5cdon 2)times the number of addidonal employees (Section 3).
Net Fiscal ImpacD The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to
provide servi M a project than It receives in revenues. A positive net balance Indicates that
more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances In one
project may thus be used W offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 5 PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution Is derived by transfernng education expenditures by
County government(Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by
multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derivetl by
multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total pmjttted number of school
children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiples each per student
expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and
adding the results. -
Net Fiscal ImpacC The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
pojeced revenues. A negative net balance Indicates that it crisis the school system more M
provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues. A positive
net balance indicates that mare revenues are recelved than It casts to serve a project
Positive net balances In one project may thus be used M offset negative balances in another.
SECTION S- SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
SECTION 7-SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
28
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Modified 8/22/01-Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION I-PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
FR0.1ECTO" .1,. � , Y. ' 4keb,�i� t sT s3YFiAC ,.,
TOWNSHIP: Chapel Hill
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
,Beet ONnd SRar ....a .k -JS.aav,ulua'...,.°49" .n.vur.a - J fih, . ,:.2002
Ending Year: 2006
a;kPa'7. m '" W t* xTaPa,s 2'.k%
CHARACTERISTICS Of HOUSEHOLDS:
Rv nvns/t{a. Ay ENi39;i;'y E$IOEiyP LICP @LE @0 ; : Tj210T9ESOWy++,t,%_ AEI ' y5
CHIldren/House: ENTER V' BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.52
� apn-Elde'l;'S'm , -sC„x '?;,Rey .e;x,�n"ar,, y.M' Sga�s °'= c > „ .;f "0b
HOME SALES DATA: _
.Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes Odl Wye ar
,2001 :v �tt;8c @;�.'�„ � . W$ .st3oG.004 .w:�.1Gi` Prrhd —”
2003 �t 5 500,000 22.73%
2T27Ig
2005 6 500,000 27.27%
0, ";'n` +s.rsala np4'%
2007 D o 0.00%,
,l,a,dm
2009 0 - 0 0.00%
r07 Ta " � r� .SI0 �„i " 1 %M.-i'Rir4 T:rh' X q%
2011 -
0 0 OG"
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER-1- INC BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT ISTO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: Schaal Attendance:
' orange Gouty. 4r sn.tjI. a. uii�w++t ':au...,i
I N+'`nE{#�tS4 I�Eh$q}a1.r'¢`�,kt .,. .s ..;,,SX%
Middle School 247
�Cba'p'erfifth rboro h
Note. All calculations below are based upon the developers projected buildout. The developer has the right to built
than the amount granted.
29
SECTION 2-LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
SUDG�ETYUA "�
ic,,i ciitTF 20011
COUNTY POPULATION: -1.
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPU IF- 1182
LATION: c� 'c;i � cOV
17777`cF
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
IV,PUT a,{Uoremmarl, c % TF�-r,
Public Safety
P I I 1 11 1 IF I I ,Ftc 17T50 0.002
f cc
c`.,....0;00(c"IF I
Z-FUJ pi ?
Human Sei
Ldcathn•I57ci Dill 7c*;T 314,34 O.=
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS PERSTUDEN
'lotff - un
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($ REVENUES PER CAPITA;ti % 0�
Tai4ca0ther T ii 22jppAj5c,R,,�c,„ ;;lass u.
Intergovernmental I - -1. -1- 1c
I-SeaRli'll"'Arai 13123958 111.0
PC
Miscellaneous 5857788 49.5
UU,1111111-11mi-AmIALAMENUITURES EXPENDITURE! PER CAPITA
Public Safety
10419788 88.1
T-PubliciPti jR;Tf1x`/PF cc' uIci
ni Wr
_TY7
Human Ser,ril L V.'ci v
jducat, 26368802 223.0
�Fci "t
Non Departments]
23494376 198.7
COUNTYPER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE! PER EMPLOYEE
MHO
10419788 03.0
H Se 26368802 83886.2
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT E%PENDITURES §): EXPENDITURE! PERSTUDENT
EXPENDITURE! PEREMPLOYEE
11U,- xFx,
cc c : 2 9 1
I A 1 a4 41EF
Sol District F c� 0 OGN
,TAX DATA ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT FLOPTIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION
F$) 1 7 - - I
aTRal F c- , '%',, ",9,8050, , 'P
School 011 Tax Rate ($) Pm
00000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
T. ilCom
Eltlerly I Ic
Exemption I FORD I Where Ap I plina his I
30
SECTION 3- DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR ;A 1- 6
2 02 2003r-, 2004' 2005 2006
"u,
HOUSING UNITS
22 -H 22
POPULATION 26 htl� 56 '96
w
4-Tv
SCHOOLCHILDREN
EElementary 3 6 l"B Xed ,A
Middle I
3 4ZA
IT
High School 1 3
TOTAL 5 21
COUNTYGOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
J.u/
Genenal Government 0.03W%
Public Safety Q) 004 COW
Public Works 001 2 0 03y wpi �
. N
Human Services 007 0.15
TOTAL q 0`n 015 zN 0,33
SCHOOL DISTRICT 007 iA 91>2j 0.16 r
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES v u,
YEAR 7 'T` n2 do' 2010
HOUSING UNITS
POPULATION & 56 '
k
I T111
S
I N
SCHOOL CHILDREN v
Elementary 5
MIddle 3 3 1
High School 3 't 3 r, Ii
TOTAL 11 M,
lell
COUNTYGOVERNME14T q;r q
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES k,' q
General Government
. . . X03 0.07:
Public Safety OJOS 'g, 008, l�O.0
Pubflc Works 0.03 LI OD3 lto.'0
Human Services 015' .
015 b 1
TOTAL 033,
A
0.331,
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.16 Out: 16 0.3
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
.......... ........ ......
SECTION 4- PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT
YFAR 1: o 200,2 13 l
T'P201i 2005 1 20
Al
TAX BASE($1000)
'2500 5070
4
REVENUES IS)
Property Tax AM r,'
.,,-�012SP 40814 F 1�
92107
q�
Other Taxes ,,r C 1 24161 1155
r 4968 Axqrgo G 7
I L 11 lk
Intergovernmental F 11 2910 6765 6c
Sero[ca Charges
1204 2799
63-
Miscellaneous Ar, AN
1299 1 3020
TOTAL(S)
51194 L3 86` 118241 594!
General Government
EXPENDITURES IS) 41 zU
F§{�it0" d11191 V, 2301
Public Safety I 1�1 I
111� L 231D i
Public Works .,r
"l, 903 21s
Human Services kll ,tl 2098 C
5847 13593
education L 14W5 33"3 bry 34'5. E
Non Departmental -r I... ..
5209 41 12111 bt fL124
TOTAL(S)
30955 7196a,
INET FISCAL IMPACTS) 1,101 Bi 202Q tM1kvY 16BV, 41974 r
TEAR c44�20uj 20081, 2010�
r*4�,nvV 41n IIRM4 224,"'1,
TAX BASE($1000) 11430 '0°n 12778, 13186 lv
nj
REVENUES IS)
Property Tax
1WO63 r ,
105745 o
Other Taxes qrl, i2`lt
12548 3 Pi awl I 63
la9c 13261 r'dil
Intergovernmental
Service Changes 5 7767 798
3040 31 3213
F
Miscellaneous 3280 3467 ;�Z�56
TOTAIL(IO 126291 G 2 I33452 x137}13
EXPENDITURES(S)
M
General Government r .......
5812 U 6142 6
Public Safety
pl 5 Is
�IPSE/b T 11 5W I
Public Works r 6167 3
221 2zw A, 34 2409
Human Services � I
14>6] r 1814 15606 y- ,r16014
Education r, 35py 36332 fi 73494
38395
Non Departmental 112
13157 139"
TOTALS) 7 78183 110372' 82622
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) 48098
5 50830 5225
32
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR } 240211 2003 2004 2005 2006
4L s2
REVENUES($) } 91881 18686 r QB5n 42428 1 1,. 43616
2 Ix P. ii M3(6 Y +�
EXPENDITURES(§) k t y.Hy ( 6 13513 � y 29729
s4 y``y uYp 2 T29
NET FISCAL IMPACT(;) n X2632 5172 # ;•' '8139j 126991 t 1CIA 13Y691�•
YEAR 6 03Y 2009 u4k( 2010�4'Y F r s
Oil
REVENUES
REVENUES 48710 46093 l9 3(§) !
ft w � n '
�i
EXPENDITURES IS) Y N 291E 29)29 W 9 }}� 297294
NET FISCAL IMPACT(§) aT + lae'I 16363 �,'5. 1/69Y4� 18981 E� s+�2a
SECTION 6+SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
Inn YEAR i 20021 2003 {' 2004' 2005 1 2005
HOUSING UNITS au 1 1l$`� 22 rt 2t
POPULATION In w 1 26 t `; 56 F 69
SCHOOLCHILDREN
Elementary ' 3 p /6 fi p� V
Middle 1 ; '
High School SJj 1 .111, 3F
1" �^lL
NTP IR
TOTAL ^ 6 • 8 11 V § {+COUNTY EMPLOYEES AD 015 033 9 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES g 5a0A 00 016f
TAX BASE(§1000) d! ih�2500+ 5010 �° l 11442 1116?
COUNTY BUDGET(§)
Revenues 'a5iT�$$.. 51194 �Ft}31 ,FI 115241 t�' 119496
Expenditures 15�5G��5pp5' 30965 "6t5091� 71961 ¢ i/ 13982
BALANCE 20240 I32Q66; 44214 d "45514
SCHOOL Revenues OISTRICT 6U0GET(§) h te"f g18'''8"'MMMMMMAIIIIII 18686 k* 34361:; 42428 43616
Expenditures 2 ' '6JSJ`I 13513 ^`216211 29129 29129
BALANCE 3Zj 5112 8739'. 12699 ` 13881
33
YEAR ^ 2007, 2008 20p4'.� 2010 -'20;
HOUSING UNITE 1 . 22xa 22 in 1 22
POPULATION 56, 56 564 56
SCHOOLCHILDREN Ik HJr'L `f4J r`t4 £q
Elementary 6
tlk k:, 6
M'tltlle 4 'F9r 3 A
H 3 E t F . 'High Schaal J rr��11
TOTAL M
lyh qe 3� 11 �14T � 31yi
COUNTY EMPLOYEES A #03 p33P 0 033 '4'48
d
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES Y� 016' 0164 n 01 8�
TAX BASE($1000) - 1 v k 92! 12430
t1 " gy3PTT 13136 3+ 135(
COUNTY BUDGET($) r ➢ }
Revenues 4
IY2B61 126281 133652 2}jtf
Upana'lmree r.. Aw6Dr63 ''�3,@' '
r 78183 U 803 2'.. 82622 849
BALANCE �yyrvv'' 48098 50830 �$tr522�
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET $) '"`"J� N £N" t-.3
Revenues pF vitt 46093 k'�� 48710 c�} gR ' p)
Expenditures III {297^t9 29729 k d9M29 29729 h sv' H 54
BALANCE .N= +j.15308 16. S7S54 18983 :?"��SU31
SECTION 7-SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District School AHendance:
.-OranBF, o niY.atS Li`:}'f'Y 4! ! YESs, °a y £ „^� t?So snt
MiddleSchool p4
Cliepel M�Ca rhor * NO, I Mir,
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 201
SCHOOLCHILDREN 11' 1 " It EY
Elementary I x 3 6
Middle � Z•� l 1 � 3 r� '
High School
TOTAL S lit. �aZa4 11 Mrati.>8. „a27ni
YEAR 2007 2009 2009 2010 20'
SCHOOLCHILDREN p t
Elementary # 6
MMtlle k 3 $g,��� �Y¢ rM, 3 uuu5* t
High TOTAL School s t 71 11
SCHOOL CAPACITIES-ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT-ALL SCHOOLS
Elyse:}ary - a _ ..e ., e a4011 Ele einhil
H ' 311
ighs Scho ol u 1569 Mltltlle 144'
IHfi 1594 ' IHigh School -. 158,
TOTAL
71741TOTAL 6
34
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT bk
Elementary 3120 3122 �.� 3123q 3125 < 6125
Middle 4 �t�fio� taoo '` -^a4s%'! 1a52 1i ' 1462
High School y1681� 158131x"'158'[ 1583 ''k .i.,d563.
TOTAL ,6151' 6153 ` ' '4fi16fi4 6160 '.'9160
YEAR 200 2008 2009 2010 2011
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT y? '-:w
Elementary 3125 'J13I25 3125 < 25c
Middle Mitltlle 1452 1452 ,142"' 1452 P ,Oy.4kGk$i
High School Y�«£ 5583 1533 75$8 1583Y
TOTAL 6160 160N 6160
35
DRAFT
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNU,iG BOARD
JUNK 6,2002
]30 p.m
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Bryan, Craufurd Goodwin,Sam Lasts, Barry Eatz,HOwWtl
McAdams,Jr.,Rachel Preston,Revee Price,Hunter Schofield,More Todd,With Theodore
Trebel
MEAMERti ABSENT: Lynn Holtkamp and Nicole Gooding-Ray
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Craig Benedict,Robert Davis,Cathuine LaSpaluto,and
TMmas Tempia
AGENDA FIRM 41:DINT ERIM FETING IPFPH BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
RmAgenda prepared by Bany Jacobs,Board of County Commissioners.
AGENDA ITEM#2:CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Vice-Cl o r Hwlu Schofield ca11N the meeting to order.
AGENDA ITEM N3;INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Jane Calendar
Next Meeting Scheduled for Weduoeday,July 3,2002
Benedict said that there u a Board nfCounty Commissioners meeting on Juue 15, 2002 where
specific Plarming itmu come forward. He thinks Hatband should Steil Worthing on a sbuctum
fm meetings with the Bound of County Commissioners. Ifihe Planning Board chooses ro have
another ambag m late June,2002 that would be fine_ He also said tbat we could find another
daze forte fulymeefiug since it is the day before ahohday
It was suggcated that if there are not any items with time wnstraints on the July agenda than the
harm g Based watt until August to meet
MOTION: Posronmovedm changcthc Julymeeting m July 10,2002. Secondxlbylams.
VOTE: Ayes,$No, 1 (McA rthn)
3fi
document that would offer a Used of options that local government could use to direct gmw[h to
the appropriate places. no that step is the formation ofthls entrained
'ItwwaskedwhatwouldhappenaR ,hecompletiono£themrmnittw. Benedict said that there
would be a vwiety of options or gowth management tools that could be used TTemosandcons
of all ofihesa tools avd ieeoes will M1e discussed.
Ordinance Review Committee—no meeting
AGENDATTEM41D: PRELIMINARY PLAN -
Tuscany Badge—Chapel Hip Township 221ota
Presenter: Robert Davis
Davis explained Nc sibdivision process br dsenew Planning Bowd mmnberc.
Benedict explained that residential development does not my for itself in Orange County. The
break-even point is ahome that cosec over$200,000.
PURPOSE:Consideration ofthe Preliminary Plan for Tuscany Ridge,
BACKGROUND:
Request—P I' Man,
Applicann 7.12-1A 7 PIN: 9851-97-1387&9851-85-9887
Subdivision follows the Cnnventirwl Option aPDevdopmenl.
Minimum lot size Is 2=as.
Total a reage is 55.61
Lan arms icluin e t-of
A agLow6a n e.
%Opan Space Acres Oora spa,,ad
wM
22 I —Li 11 J 6.00
Location
North side of Arthur Minna Road apprrximately,800 feet west of Rocky Ridge Read in Chapel
Hill Township
Existing d Proposed C diti
Existing:
Zoning: Rural Bnffer(RB)(mmu density-2 acres/dwelling)
The property is not in adesignatcd protected watershed.
Physical Features:
• Thereazcm USGS desi a the
• TTesile is moeDywoodd wid)a contains of pines a nd hardwoods
Adjacent Land Use:
• Properties to the cast and west are redeveloped
Properties m the north are for this large acreage tracts.
Pcedomiute lotlivg pattern for Nis general area is S+core nods.
Proposed:
Roads:
Access is ilnm ANiw Minn's Read(SRI 115),an existing unpaved public Goad.
3]
• The main major-collector road extends Corona the property N the east property lim;a
end collector extends to the wan property len.
• An cords me to be wnshoged to NCDOT Standards
•
Arthur Minnis Roatl is listed as 0 S on the priority paving list and scheduled to be paved
in 2002.A condition of Concept Plan Approval was to require,as aPrelimim[y Plan
approval conditlon fiat this section of Arthur Minnie Road be brought up In Stara
Standards if the Toad was not paved by Preliminary submittal.
The sorb outs to the east and west property lines will provide for furore N comenv cG.ity-
Open Space/Buffers:
• 6.p0 aues(11%)af canvmv rocs open space proposed
• p4 acres oPimlol open spode.MTAR is 1.02.
• MTADwnees t(lecs R/W).
• Heaver: ers ASSOCiatiw will be formed to maimain open space and buR s.
Warr-Sewer:
• Individual wells
tioure amt septic srvema.
RareaCha:
• Chepal Hill Di is warranted Pmk -
Nodedicaatt is warranted because m county ion is is or resource area has bam
idmmme at this time. The payment-m-Geu option is viable.
Agency Comma Catnmmm:
Comments t more NCDOT, memal Health m a Emergency Mmayement
Development Pre uas.Schedule.and Action
Planning Boa
Find bons: Concept Plan approves by Cow Pluming Board March 6,2002 with Na mllowivg
conditions:
1.standards.
intersection end mad on the Ptelimwary Plen shall meat NCDOT collector
2, Homs.
2. Homenwners Association documents that provide fmmain[mmce ofthe Open Space sM1Sll
ba ImtIttedwith Ncpint dri ewaywi
3. Lo[ IShall have ejoint driveway wifi tho Witham Bird property. AU ONer bts shell have
4.Shrivewars.
4. Show proposed dedication of an edditimA 5 fat ofngm-of-way,or]i feet fimn C/L of
xisting R/lN whichever is greeter alovgAMm Mirmis Roadm Ne PrelimietaryPlm.
Ifihis smtion ofn tho road up t hard is unpaved corm Ne be recommended nde is a staff.al a
5. Show bring the mad up m paved state staM:es will be raconmtmded by staff.
b Shaw h five foot utility easame m along both sides of all Tights-of-way. All right-of-ways to
be Second five Pout utility easemmis shown on each seder-
Secovtl Action 1. Ifthe lainin Boom!regularly sact wted Ylae spe B ed time meetings or extend n Wttmh
2.to Cwith Planning Board minces withNfiespecified timeperiod,application Potions. d
to B(7)CC with Planning bond minute and Plamdng Steffrecovwmdaripns and conditions.
Pre[imlunry Plan addresses conditions ofapproval of the Concept Plan
FINANCIAL IMPACT:Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an atlechment.
A
38
R CONAfENDATION(S): StaffRCCOmmevda0on
Approval,in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Katz askedhowwide themad was and Davis wid20 feenwide. Itisamajorlocalmad. A
minodaaa vi ad would carrier 18 feet wide.
Preston is concerned about the slab out andwhere it would go later. Davis said that the County
does not,on it own,extend roads through other properties. Theamhoulnowgoesto
undeveloped property on both etc east and west
Pmsbn would like to have a map in the borne of the hands se that she can wee better Alias the
owes go.
Pmswn pointed out that the property fags wldtintwo townships—Chapel Hill andBinglom-
and she asked about the futs service. It was answered that it does not have any impact on the fine
service.
Bill Bird,We developer for fins project, said that Hawes Road is aprivate road dust Us 12 lots an
it,which is the madman.allowed. There is no logical way to connect with this road. The most
likely outcome,if any of the wljacen[properties were to be developed,would be to lave the mad
re-wrmect with Arthur Miners Rowl.
Preston asked how much traffic the roads would be subjected to if the five and to ii lots were
developed. Davis said drat it is safer in the uniformed take the extra two feet ofpavemeat for
the roads. The Fire Marshall is pretty adamant shoo[at least planning for another access.
Preswn asked about the HOmcovmdr's Association documents. She would like to see these
documents.
Davis said that the documents were afternoon with the application,and we under review by too
County Attorney.
Rill Bud said Nat the covenants were submitted. He will be living Or this subdivision. He said
that the covenants have very strong language to say that the homeowner's association Can put
Gros on property ifthe dues we not paid or woor requirements era not followed..
Benedict asked Mr.Bird about the Gutting plan that was mentioned. Mr.Bud said that there
wasno specific Gghtingplanot buthen low emission lighbng for wafaypurposes. Benediets®d
that ifihere is ligber ,it should not have any sky glow. Any light plan should be submitted to
the Planning Department to make sure that there.is an light Pollution.
Davis continued with the presentation and said that the developer has offered to wnstmct a
walking royal rat a our of his Proposal.
Ttiabel asked about the reasoning behind the open space between lots five and win. Davis said
the one ofthe plmming aspeal is that, as you are coming w an intersection,you ne not hooking
straight into someone's house. The audit sp reejusl worked out in this particular place.
39
Preston made reference to page 41 and asked about the fiscal impel. Derelict said that the
majority of the elements are based on the most rent budget ofthe County and the tan rate at the
times Pradesh questioned that five houses in this subdivision would body generate 13 panels.
Benedict said that the generation rate was 2.55 people per household
Preston asked about page 45 and why the pmjected emodment for the Orange Cowry School
systemwasodyinerems byninefiom2002to2011. Benedictsaidthatth estatisficslsmdies
for Orange County show that the average amount of children generated for a single-&roily house
is.33 for the Orange County school dismict and.38 far the Chapel Hill-Carrbom school district.
Pension veifiest that the increase of nine students is just for this subdivision. This eobdivtvon is
split between the we school districts.
Bryon aquatow that the developer post a sign at dl times that the mad is subject b future
expositor Benedict agreed that this should bean additional confident ofapproval.
Bother asked about the protection of trees above a certain sae. Davis said that cloth tuning was
not allowed w clan with Thee we some specific requirements in the code with regard w the
preservation oflrees.
Tadd asked if there would he a difference in property values since file subdivision is split into
two different towrtedp. Tadd said that the Jilt ce would be more then$5,000 pe acre. She
gave an exmnple of her property,which is in Orange County and is wiling for$20.000 per acre
and The Woodlands,which is m Chapel Hill and u selling for$100,000 an acre. Davies said that
The Weodlanda was more offer developed community.
There was discussion that the subdivision would not be in two separate school districts,only twro
aspirate townships. The entire subdivision is in rte Orange County school crashes
lasru asked ifthis subdivision could become a gated community and Davis said not with politic
reads.
Davis added condition#10 under"Roads and Access'in the Residences of Approved as follows'.
"Signs shall be placed at the and of Tuscany Drive and Front Street,indicating that oath street is
subject to future extension"
A second addW coudlfion was made w the motion-page 18 offl a agenda abstract,Ramp,45 as
follows 'Ifpmposed,a lightning plan for the entire subdivision shall be submitted prior to or
simultaneously with the final plat for approval by Planning staff."
The bond discussed me sire of the signs. The board decided that the sips would be between
three and four squire feet.
MOTION: McAdams moved to accept Item lo,the preliminary Plan,widt the addition of
condition#10 under"Roads and Access"as stated and amended above;and F,#5 as stated above
on any proposed lighting plan. Seconded by louses.
6
40
pr coon said that this is a good plan,but she would have Iiked to see somerhmg a little mom like
cu affordable housing sumplsment. However,she knows that fis would have been difficult.
AGENDA ITEM Nll: CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP PARKAND EDUCAIIONAL
(ADDITIONAL ITP.M) CAMPUS MASTER PLAN WORK GROUP
Benedict said Oat Orange County has purchased a 19 3_acre parcel at the comer of Eubanks Road
and Old NC 86 at the southeast turner. The purpose of the purchase is for open space
preservation ofthe farm onsite and the possibility Oda passive park. Thee arc also possibilities
for a school site. The Board of County Commissioners has f rmOd this work group with
representatives from Carrboro,Chapel Hill,Ormrgc County,rarmtioa departments,and school
representatives t0 look 9 m master plan. the charge of the work group is to discuss the uses of
thesite. The Board of county Commissioners is looking for ampresenmfive Ram the plsmtiag
Bound to serve on the work group. The work group will probably meet over the next year with
about%-10 meetings. Thereisalsomoneyfiumtbc Novembe 2] lbondmfermdumtofund
improvements on this land.
Price volunteered to be on the work group. Bryan will be the altercate.
AGENDA ITEM 012: Pl, TSNG BOARD ISSUES
(ADDITIONAL IT EM)
Goodwin said that the Pleating Board should experiment with diR t devices to see if the
boaad canbe come effective. to particular,the board might delegate to subsets of the
membership responsibility to becomewell li foarrvcd on certain topics and perhaps lead the
dismission. He has certain Uusuationwith addressing big topics led by the staff. Hemm it
wouldbe holpfl to develop experts on water,traffic,ordinance review,etc in order N have
wnvasatims about the real Issues. He is interestad he me issues of groundwater.
Benedict drought that this was an excellent idea He hopes to work on this at the meeting on July
10,2002,to see what this structure would look like. Ile suggested mating at 6:00 p.m.
Tedd would like to support Goodwin on the Issues Ofgrovndwalec
scats said that before the next meeting,the board should come Up with a list of topics that it
needs to learn about.
Bryan would like in see avarso m cudim of the steps ofhow to get amendments through the
process from Benedict.
Benedict said that the three things he sees for the most meeting are the process,the topic soma or
subcommittees,and concern within those topic areas.
The Planm ing Board agreed to meet at 6:00 p m.coldly 10, 2002. There was discussion about
whether the meeting should be in a restaurant or in to Food Lab,