The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAbstract for Joint Meeting – Board of County Commissioners, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board of Education and Orange County Schools Board of Education 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: September 26, 2023 Action Agenda Item No. 1 & 2 SUBJECT: Joint Meeting — Board of County Commissioners, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board of Education and Orange County Schools Board of Education DEPARTMENT: County Manager/Financial and Administrative Services ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Woolpert Presentation - Long-Range Bonnie Hammersley, 919-245-2300 Optimization Plan - Options Planning Travis Myren, 919-245-2308 Dr. Nyah Hamlett, 919-967-8211 Dr. James Merrill, 919-732-8126 Gary Donaldson, 919-245-2453 Steven Arndt, 919-245-2658 Kelly Guadalupe, 919-245-2156 PURPOSE: To discuss the various School related issues that are of interest to the Board of County Commissioners, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Board of Education and Orange County Schools (OCS) Board of Education. BACKGROUND: The County/Schools Collaboration Work Group established the agenda items for this Joint Meeting. Welcome, Call to Order, and Agenda Overview — BOCC Chair Jamezetta Bedford 1. Presentation from Woolpert on Public School Capital Needs Assessment As a strategy to improve the quality and efficiency of operational services, Orange County Government, Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) and Orange County Schools (OCS) collaborated on the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a design firm to provide a: • Comprehensive Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) • Optimization Plan of Existing Space Utilization; and • Examination of Prioritization Models, Benchmarking Best Practices and Scenarios for both school districts that recognize the distinct structure of the County allocating funds to the two school districts. The products of this study will help County and School professionals and elected officials better plan, manage and fund new construction and maintenance of the thirty-one (31) school campuses and administrative offices for the two school districts. 2 At the Board of County Commissioners' March 21, 2023 Business Meeting, the Board approved a contract with Woolpert, Inc. totaling $984,561 to perform this work. Woolpert will provide a presentation on the current status of the Public Schools Capital Needs Assessment. 2. Budget Concerns/Impacts Related to State Funding/Potential Federal Shutdown/Inflation Both School systems will provide updates on the County, State and Federal funding for their districts this fiscal year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact tied directly to the discussion at this Joint Meeting. SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goal is applicable to these discussion items: • GOAL: ENABLE FULL CIVIC PARTICIPATION Ensure that Orange County residents are able to engage government through voting and volunteering by eliminating disparities in participation and barriers to participation. • GOAL: FOSTER A COMMUNITY CULTURE THAT REJECTS OPPRESSION AND INEQUITY The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race or color; religious or philosophical beliefs; sex, gender or sexual orientation; national origin or ethnic background; age; military service; disability; and familial, residential or economic status. • GOAL: ENSURE ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY The creation and preservation of infrastructure, policies, programs and funding necessary for residents to provide shelter, food, clothing and medical care for themselves and their dependents. • GOAL: CREATE A SAFE COMMUNITY The reduction of risks from vehicle/traffic accidents, childhood and senior injuries, gang activity, substance abuse and domestic violence. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There are no Orange County Environmental Responsibility Goal impacts associated with these discussion items. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Boards discuss the issues noted and provide direction to staff, as appropriate. 3 ORANGE COUNTY 2023 NORTH CAROLINA LONG- RANGE OPTIMIZATION } •, Orange HAl'>LL HILL- / School 5chovls A�ORO CITY SCHOOLS A AGENDA • Project Overview • Condition Assessmen• Educational Adequacy --------------- J SO• Capacity , ,yr • Survey Results • Options ', � ,:y,`.• ;��A�' ..��_ ��. � •^dam , � �.� ' �+ `v►tom,. � ••�.�`�Yv~t�`��;YET:r�C� ��.�[.,r �� > is rli' ' �..:I:,. 1a•''" `` ';= I � ... � : • �t'j To-- - , PROJECT OVERVIEW 156 A' LIFE CYCLE REPAIRCOST 4p 10-YEAR NEED ' ASSESSMENT RANGE PLAN _ - : � - 00 EDUCATIONAL �• -� - - •ti.'...��.. I :::-:-&.:�:�:.y..fro f � - 6 CURRENT DEFICIENCY • Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Priority 1 —Critical • Priority 2 — Roofing $80 Priority 2— Essential 0 • East Chapel Hill High $70 Priority 3— Necessary • McDougle Middle/Elementary $60 Priority 4— Suggested • Carrboro High $50 PriorityS— Improvements • Culbreth Middle $40 • Orange County Schools $30 • Priority 5 — Interior Finishes $20 • Terrazzo flooring (Orange Middle & High) $10 • Ceiling Tiles & Grid (Orange Middle) $- Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 • Vinyl flooring (Cedar Ridge HS) ■ Orange County Schools ■ Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools # V 7 FIVEYEAR LIFE CYCLE PROJECTION • Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools • Mechanical • Year 4 — Ductwork/Controls/Lighting/Chiller V) $200 c ■Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools ■Orange County Schools • East Chapel Hill High Schools $1$16 0 0 • Carrboro High school $140 5 Yr-$235 M • Orange County Schools $120 $100 • Interior $80 • Year 4 — Roofing $60 • Orange High School $40 $20 • River Park Elementary $- ■ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 • Pathways Elementary ►. 8 FIVE YEAR FA I LITY CO N D ITI 0 N I N D EX (FC I FCI RATING SCALE • Ratio to compare dissimilar facilities BEST <10% • Indicator of facility health GOOD 10-20% • Higher the FCI the greater the need AVERAGE 21-30% • FCI is only one factor in decision making BELOW 31-50% AVERAGE FIVE-YEAR FCI POOR 51-65% *0 10 REPLACEMENT Great COMBINED TOTAL FIVE-YEAR CANDIDATE than 65% FIVE-YEAR REPLACEMENT FCI NEED COST X■ r Vr 9 PORTFOLIO FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI 5-Year FCI 10-Year FCI 9 ■ CHCCS ■ OCS 8 ■ CHCCS L OCS 8 7 } 7 6 7 u° 6 u° 5 5 0) 0)4 E- 4 0 3 =3 m 2 m 2 0 Q Q 0 ■■ ■ ■ °°t �e i►f 10 ED U CATI 0 NAL AD EQ UACY Evaluates: Space Types, Space Size & Learning Tools CHCCS:Present but Undersized OCS: Present but Undersized (spaces below 90%min size set by NCDPI when or Woolpert Standards when N/A) (spaces below 90%min size set by NCDPI when or Woolpert Standards when N/A) Academic Support Academic Support Admin Spaces Admin Spaces Controlled Entry Controlled Entry Core Academics Core Academics Career Technical Education Career Technical Education PreK PreK Exterior Canopies Exterior Canopies Gym/PE/Fitness Gym/PE/Fitness Kitchen/Cafeteria Kitchen/Cafeteria !� Library Media Center Library Media Center � Exceptional Children Exceptional Children STEM STEM Visual &Performing Arts Visual&Performing Arts 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% s0% 40% s0% 60% 70% a0% 90% 100% ■ HS ■ MS ■ ES ■ HS ■MS ■ES �l# 11 CAPACITY CHCCS • NCDPI - students per room type • Chapel Hill -Carrboro City Schools E • Elementary some surplus capacity z .. • Middle & High at or above capacity ES MS HS ■Capacity ■Enrollment • Orange County Schools 005 • Elementary some surplus capacity v • Middle some surplus capacity o • High at capacity z ES MS HS ■Capacity ■Enrollment 12 FCI V UTILIZATION ocs 601/1 Total 5-Year Need - $201.4 Million Total 10-Year Need - $389.4 Million Replacement Value - $743 Million Average 5-Year FCI - 27% oms LL Average 10-Year FCI - 50% � Overall 80% Utilization Districtwide: range from <65%to >100% 50%, 25% & 20% of ES, MS & HS classrooms are undersized "% ` 13 FCI V UTILIZATION CHCCS Total 5-Year Need - $297.2 Million Total 10-Year Need - $5WCO Millionx D -0 1) 0 -S� 40% 0 0 Replacement Value - $1 Billion Average 5-Year FCI - 28% • 20% 'bo OHS Average 10-Year FCI - 51% LL 0 Overall 87% Utilization Districtwide: range `% from <60%to >100% 40%, 60% & 20% of ES, MS & HS classrooms `'' are undersized Utilization AL 14 SURVEY R Key Takeaways • 3,960 responses (1/3 from OCS) • Top 3 Safety and Security _-_ - • Upgrade and Add Cameras • Controlled Entries • Add electronic door access security for perimeter doors y • Top 5 Facility Investments • Technology Infrastructure i -- • Small Group/Pull-out • Reduce/Eliminate Portables • Upgrade HE , • Covered areas (canopies) for bus pick up and drop off and walkways • 88% likely to support increased funding 15 OPTIONS DEVELOPMENT _- - , 39.2e a • Utilization --- FCl • Portables • Site constraints • Educational Adequacy • S u rvey - -- • What investments are best for students and best value in the long -term ? CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS 17 ELEMENTARY SCHOOI (CHCr,,S) - CURRFNT TATF School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types> %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Carrboro ES 1957 78,012 $ 3,650,822 10% 61, 52% 48% 543 485 89% Ephesus ES 1972 73,952 $ 11,152,211 34% 72% 36% 50% 578 353 61% Estes Hills ES 1958 63,001 $ 11,990,522 42°� 67% 47% 51% 528 331 63% Frank Porter Graham ES 1960 72,300 $ 15,420,956 47% 87% 54% 64% 589 512 87% Glenwood ES 1952 67,300 $ 6,608,290 22% 76% 54% 57% 407 432 106% Morris Grove ES 2009 90,221 $ 12,027,060 30% 77% 73% 69% 547 426 78% Northside ES 2013 109,100 $ 6,080,804 12% 95% 87% 5% 583 377 65% Rashkis ES 2003 115,562 $ 20,514,681 39% 79% 67% 68% 532 423 80% Scroggs ES 1999 93,580 $ 11,431,422 27% 92% 65% 73% 521 377 72% ° Seawell ES 1969 66,198 $ 4,870,839 16/ 66% 33% 48% 378 464 123% McDougle ES 1996 249,092 $ 23,297,836 21% 82% 69% 69% 589 477 81% 1981 1,078,318 $ 127,045,442 26% 77% 58% 1 62% 5,795 4,657 80% 33 14 • $127 million in • Utilization ranges About 60% of deficiencies O from 61%-123% M Educational 16 • 2 schools > 40% FCI N • Average is —80% � Adequacy — requirements U Q • Smaller spaces 18 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition CHCCS_ES Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Total Option Resulting Resulting years) Investment Capacity Utilization Option A Priority Maintenance $109,461,641 5,795 80% Option B Minor Renovations to Improve Educational Adequacy $125,348,379 5,795 80% Option C Major and Minor Renovations to Improve Condition&Adequacy 5,795 4,657 26% 80% $127,045,442 $220,990,781 5,319 88% Option D Create a K-8 School for Estes Hills ES& Phillips MS $225,796,319 4,790 97% 19 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS A B C D Priority Maintenance & Consolidate into Priority Maintenance Partial Renovation Major Renovation Partial Renovation Major Renovation Adequacy Renovations New School Carrboro ES Carrboro ES Estes Hills ES Carrboro ES Frank Porter Graf Carrboro ES Estes Hills ES Ephesus ES Ephesus ES Frank Porter Gral Ephesus ES Morris Grove ES Ephesus ES Estes Hills ES Estes Hills ES Morris Grove ES Glenwood ES Northside ES Glenwood ES Frank Porter Graham ES Frank Porter Graham ES Northside ES Seawell ES Rashkis ES Seawell ES Glenwood ES Glenwood ES Rashkis ES Scroggs ES Morris Grove ES Morris Grove ES Scroggs ES McDougle ES Northside ES Northside ES McDougle ES Rashkis ES Rashkis ES Scroggs ES Scroggs ES Seawell ES Seawell ES McDougle ES McDougle ES 20 MIDDLE SCHOOL (CHCCS) - CURRENT STATE School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types > %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present McDougle MS 1994 85% 54% 73% 707 753 106% Culbreth MS 1969 115,462 $ 19,067,027 35% 81% 50% 68% 775 660 85% Phillips MS 1962 109,498 $ 15,392,752 30% 93% 37% 72% 702 610 87% Smith MS 2001 134,180 $ 25,457,155 40% 91% 59% 78% 679 771 114% 1982 359,140 $ 59,916,934 35% 87% 50% 73% 2,864 2,794 98% flop $60 million in Utilization ranges < 75% of Educational o deficiencies o from 87%-114% U Adequacy 16}' Smith MS has • Average is —100% � requirements highest FCI at 40% N • 3/4 score 85%+ Ed 0 Q Ad space types 21 MIDDLE SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition Total Option Resulting Resulting CHCCS_MS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $61,122,639 2,745 92% Priority Maintenance and Minor Renovations to Improve Option B $75,065,134 2,745 92% Educational Adequacy 2,745 2,518 35% 92% $83,214,770 Priority Maintenance and Renovations to Improve Condition & Option C $177,339,114 2,776 91% Adequacy Rebuild Phillips MS& Estes Hills ES as a K-8 School, Priority Option D $202,694,826 3,210 78% Maintenance and Renovations to Remaining Facilities 22 MIDDLE SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS A B C D Priority Priority Maintenance & Maintenance & Priority Maintenance & Priority Maintenance Major Renovation Major Renovation Adequacy Renovations Adequacy Adequacy Renovations Renovations McDougle MS McDougle MS McDougle MS Culbreth MS McDougle MS Culbreth MS Culbreth MS Culbreth MS Smith MS Phillips MS Smith MS Phillips MS Phillips MS Smith MS Smith MS Rebuild On-Site Phillips MS 23 HIGH H L (CHCCS) - CURRENT STATIF School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types > %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Carrboro HS 2007 152,823 $ 33,983,248 45% 82% 35% 71% 851 853 100% Chapel Hill HS 2020 320,328 $ 20,672,972 13% 83% 69% 79% 1535 1578 103% E. Chapel Hill HS 1996 279,992 $ 45,376,687 33% 84% 66% 77% 1275 1425 112% 2008 753,143 $ 100,032,907 27% 83% 57% 76% 3,661 3,856 105% • $100 million in C Utilization avg 3/3 80%+ space O deficiencies O 105% U types +� }, � Yp • 27% avg FCI with N 3 schools > 100% C Highest FCI has 0 45% highest -0 lowest Ed Ad U � Q • Small spaces 24 HIGH SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition CHCCS_HS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Total Option Resulting Resulting Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $84,933,236 3,661 105% Priority Maintenance and Renovations to Improve Educational Option B $90,103,422 3,661 105/0 Adequacy 3,661 3,856 27% 105% $100,032,907 Addition &Adequacy Renovations at Carrboro HS to Increase Option C $117,288,515 3,946 98% Capacity and Improve Condition &Adequacy Option D N/A 25 HIGH SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS A B C Priority Maintenance Priority Priority Maintenance Maintenance Carrboro HS Chapel Hill HS Chapel Hill HS Chapel Hill HS E. Chapel Hill HS E. Chapel Hill HS E. Chapel Hill HS Partial Renovation Partial Renovation & addition Carrboro HS Carrboro HS 26 ALT HIGH H L (CHCCS) - - CURRENT TATE School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types> %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Phoenix Academy 2009 15,182 $ 2,188,595 29% 8% 4% 5% 83 28 34% 2009 15,182 $ 2,188,595 29% 8% 4% 5% 83 28 34% FCI is 29% Low utilization >. • Low Educational 55 open seats � Adequacy 5 N Cr 0 }' Q 27 ALT HI SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition CHCCS_ALTHS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Total Option Resulting Resulting Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $1,726,291 83 34% Option B Renovation to Improve Condition&Adequacy $5,711,468 62 45% 83 28 29% 34% $2,188,595 Option C N/A Option D N/A 28 ALT HI SCHOOL (CHCCS) - OPTIONS A B Priority Maintenance Partial Renovation Phoenix Academy Phoenix Academy %ALit 29 ORANGE COSCHOOLS "I'" �p Alga 'elm ik �� dim �L --w 74k,1. t 30 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - CURRENT STATE School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types> %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Central ES 1957 62,102 $ 11,146,471 40% 76% 56% 63% 447 295 66% Efland-Cheeks ES 1952 65,084 $ 5,804,603 20% 81% 55% 65% 538 551 102% Grady Brown ES 1974 78,016 $ 6,740,826 19% 86% 78% 74% 504 410 81% Hillsborough ES 1952 65,332 $ 9,577,258 33% 75% 54% 63% 568 430 76% New Hope ES 1991 102,086 $ 17,047,159 37% 77% 46% 67% 618 549 89% Pathways ES 2000 85,282 $ 8,535,605 22% 86% 78% 73% 534 359 67% River Park ES 1956 146,024 $ 14,706,427 22% 79% 49% 63% 580 557 96% 1969 603,926 $ 73,558,348 27% 80% 59% 67% 3,787 3,151 83% • $73.5 million in r • 4/7 < 85% > 4/7 < 65% Ed Ad O deficiencies o +, }, utilization (0 requirements • 1/7 > 400/ FCI N C Small space types p • 4/7 < 22% FCI U Q 31 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition OCS_ES Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Total Option Resulting Resulting Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $57,187,657 3,787 83% Priority Maintenance and Minor Renovations to Improve Option B $70,058,579 3,787 83% Educational Adequacy Priority Maintenance and Renovations to Improve Educational Option C Adequacy. Rebuild Central and Hillsborough at Central as One 3,787 3,151 27% 83% $73,558,348 $116,364,082 3,483 90% School Priority Maintenance and Renovations to Improve Educational Option D Adequacy. Rebuild Central and Hillsborough at Central as One $145,451,810 4,019 78% School. Build a New Elementary on Western Border. IL Ai 32 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - OPTIONS A B C D Priority Maintenance & Priority Priority Maintenance & PriorityMaintenance Priority Priority Maintenance Maintenance Adequacy Maintenance Adequacy Renovations Renovations Central ES Grady Brown ES Efland-Cheeks ES Grady Brown ES Efland-Cheeks ES Grady Brown ES Pathways ES New Hope ES Pathways ES New Hope ES Efland-Cheeks ES Pathways ES Grady Brown ES Hillsborough ES New Hope ES Priority Maintenance & Major Renovation Rebuild On-Site Consolidate into ajor Renovation Rebuild On-Site Pathways ES Adequacy Renovations New School River Park ES River Park ES Central ES Central ES River Park ES Central ES Hillsborough ES Efland-Cheeks ES Hillsborough ES Consolidate into New Construction New Hope ES New School River Park ES Hillsborough ES New ES Option 33 MIDDLE SCHOOL - CURRENT STAI School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types > %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present A.L. Stanback MS 1995 136,758 $ 27,859,070 43% 75% 48% 61% 813 642 79% Gravelly Hill MS 2006 122,793 $ 17,963,598 31% 71% 45% 59% 663 428 65% Orange MS 1968 130,400 $ 21,435,075 35% 82% 55% 68% 791 525 66% 1990 389,951 $ 67,257,742 36% 76% 49% 63% 2,267 1,595 70% 11 • $67+ million in 70% avg utilization Meets about 60% deficiencies 2/3 < 70% of Ed Ad 1 FCI range 31% - N utilization C requirements U 43% - Small space types Q 34 MIDDLE SCHOOL - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition Total Option Resulting Resulting OCS_MS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $50,351,395 2,267 70% Partial Renovation at all Middle Schools to Improve Condition and Option B $117,246,147 1,927 83/ Adequacy Major Renovation at all Middle Schools to Improve Condition and 2,267 1,595 36% 70% $67,257,742 Option C $151,561,835 1,700 L94% Adequacy Rebuild Orange MS and Major Renovations at Stanback&Gravelly Option D $166,654,314 1,973 E Hill MS to Improve Condition and Adequacy ■l� 35 MIDDLE SCHOOL - OPTIONS A B C D Priority Maintenance Partial Renovation Major Renovation Major Renovation Rebuild On-Site A.L. Stanback MS A.L. Stanback MS Gravelly Hill MS A.L. Stanback MS A.L. Stanback MS Orange MS Gravelly Hill MS Gravelly Hill MS Gravelly Hill MS Orange MS Orange MS Orange MS 36 HIGH H L - CURRENT STATE School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types > %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Cedar Ridge HS 2002 270,229 $ 12,164,747 9% 79, 71% 72% 1,328 1,108 83% Orange HS 1962 236,337 $ 35,707,628 31% 79% 61% 71% 1,310 1,340 102% 1982 506,566 $ 47,872,375 19% 79% 66% 71% 2,638 2,448 93% $48m deficiencies Highest N80% space types O FCI - 9% and 31% o utilization/enrollm M and 71% N ent (102%) _ C requirements 0 highest FCI (31%) Q 37 HIGH SCHOOL - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition OCS_HS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Total Option Resulting Resulting Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $36,024,603 2,638 93% Priority Maintenance at Cedar Ridge and a Partial Renovation at Option B Orange to Improve Condition and Adequacy $40,854,233 2,638 93% 2,638 2,448 19% 93% $47,872,375 Priority Maintenance at Cedar Ridge and Major Renovation at Option C $90,637,961 2,555 96% Orange to Improve Condition and Adequacy Option D Priority Maintenance at Cedar Ridge and Rebuild Orange $143,912,286 2,899 84 1 ♦ALI --TT` 38 HIGH SCHOOL - OPTIONS A B C D Priority Priority Maintenance & Priority Priority Maintenance Priority Maintenance Partial Renovation Rebuild On-Site Maintenance Adequacy Renovations Maintenance Cedar Ridge HS Cedar Ridge HS Orange HS Cedar Ridge HS Orange HS Cedar Ridge HS Orange HS Orange HS 39 ALT HIGH H L (OCS) CURRFNEr STATI School Name Year Built Total Square Feet Deficiency Total FCI %Space Types %Space Types > %Teaching/ Capacity 2022-23 2022-23 Present min size Learning Tools Enrollment Utilization Present Partnership Academy 2006 6,600 $ 602,788 19% 2% 0% 0% 116 34 0 2006 6,600 $ 602,788 19% 2% 0% 0% 116 34 29% FCI is 19% Low utilization >. • Low Educational 82 open seats M Adequacy 6 N Cr 0 Q 40 ALT HI SCHOOL - OPTIONS Planning Area Current Option Impact Condition Total Option Resulting Resulting OCS_ALTHS Option Description Capacity Enrollment FCI Utilization Needs(0-5 Investment Capacity Utilization years) Option A Priority Maintenance $568,541 116 29% Priority Maintenance and Renovations to Existing Building. Option B $3,028,541 149 23% Classroom (4)Addition with Commons and Kitchen 116 34 19% 29% $602,788 Option C NA $568,541 Option D NA $568,541 41 ALT HI SCHOOL - OPTIONS A B Priority Maintenance Priority Maintenance + addition Partnership Academy Partnership Academy ■ QUESTIONS IkAl WOOLPEPT ARCHITECTURE I ENGINEERING I GEOSPATIAL