Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 04-04-2023; 5-b - Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment – Parcel Located at 3026 White Cross Road, Chapel Hill, in Bingham Township 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: April 4, 2023 Action Agenda Item No. 5-b SUBJECT: Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment — Parcel Located at 3026 White Cross Road, Chapel Hill, in Bingham Township DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. Application, including Site Plan and Taylor Perschau, Current Planning & Zoning Supplemental Materials Supervisor, (919) 245-2597 2. Staff Report Cy Stober, Planning Director, (919) 245-2592 3. Notification Materials and Certification 4. Notes from Neighborhood Information Meeting 5. Project Correspondence and Staff Comment(s) 6. Excerpt of Draft March 8, 2023 Planning Board Minutes 7. Statement of Consistency 8. Draft Ordinance, Including Proposed Conditions PURPOSE: To hold a public hearing, receive the Planning Board/staff recommendation and public comment, close the public hearing, and consider action on an applicant-initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone a 4.83+/- acre parcel (PIN: 9749-40-2351) located at 3026 White Cross Road, Chapel Hill within the Bingham Township of Orange County. The proposed rezoning is: FROM: AR (Agricultural Residential), & NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) TO: NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District) BACKGROUND: On November 17, 2022 a Conditional Zoning Atlas Amendment application (Attachment 1) was received proposing to rezone 4.83 acres of property at 3026 White Cross Road, Chapel Hill, within the Bingham Township. The Staff Report in Attachment 2 contains additional information, maps, and analysis. 2 Basic Review Process: A conditional district rezoning application requires submission of a site plan and other documents, in accordance with Section 2.9.1(C) of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The typical cadence for the review is as follows: • FIRST ACTION — Applicant holds a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). STAFF COMMENT: The Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on February 22, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Public Library. • SECOND ACTION — The Planning Board reviews the application at a regular meeting and makes a recommendation to the BOCC. STAFF COMMENT. The Planning Board reviewed this application at its regular meeting on March 8, 2023. • THIRD ACTION — The BOCC receives the Planning Board and staff recommendations at an advertised public hearing and makes a decision on the application. STAFF COMMENT: The public hearing is scheduled for April 4, 2023. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part of this process if they address: a. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, b. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways, and access points, parking areas and driveways, pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, the timing of development, street and right-of-way improvements, storm water drainage, the provision of open space, etc.), and/or c. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose. A formal site plan is required as part of a conditional rezoning application and has been submitted (Attachment 1). Approval of a site-specific plan is part of the conditional district rezoning process, and the site plan and any agreed-upon conditions are binding to the development footprint permitted for the zoning district. Staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as included in the Ordinance in Attachment 8. The following conditions have been been proposed and agreed to by the applicant: 1. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet; 2. Off-Street Parking Requirements: Relief from providing the 54 parking spaces required, conditional on provision of 34 parking spaces; 3. Driveway Access: Responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments, right turn lane shall be provided at the White Cross Road driveway; 4. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School the north elevation towards NC Hwy 54 shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; 5. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received within 30 days of site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within 60 days of agreement; 6. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28-3016. 3 Public Notification: In accordance with Section 2.8.7 of the LIDO, notices of the Public Hearing were mailed via first class mail to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject parcel. These notices were mailed on February 21, 2023, 14 days before the meeting. Staff also posted the subject parcel with a signs on February 21, 2023, 14 days before the meeting. See Attachment 3 for the notification materials. Planning Board Recommendation: The Planning Board reviewed the zoning atlas amendment at its March 8, 2023 regular meeting. At this meeting the Board voted 9 to 3 to recommend denial of the application based on its finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Excerpts of the minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment 6. Agenda materials from the meeting can be viewed at: https://www.co.orange.nc.us/AgendaCenter/Planning-Board-26 Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the: 1. Statement of Consistency indicating the zoning atlas amendment(s) are reasonable and in the public interest as contained in Attachment 7. 2. Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas, as well as imposing development conditions, for the identified parcel as contained in Attachment 8. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including the public hearing notice and mailings, are covered by the application fee. SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goal is applicable to this item: • GOAL: ESTABLISH SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE LAND-USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of people of all races, cultures, incomes and educational levels with respect to the development and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, policies, and decisions. Fair treatment means that no group of people should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, governmental and commercial operations or policies. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no Orange County Environmental Responsibility Goal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board: 1. Conduct the public hearing and receive the Planning Board and staff recommendations and public comments; 2. Close the public hearing; and 3. Vote to Approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) and Zoning Atlas Amendments (Attachment 8). OR Vote to Deny the Zoning Atlas Amendments along with either the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 7) or a stated rationale of inconsistency with the County's adopted plans. 4 t Attachment 1 Orange County Planning & Inspections Department 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 200, Hillsborough, NC 27278 CAROLINA 919-245-2575 or plan ningapps orangecountync.gov NORrHZoning Atlas Amendment— Rezoning Application Please check all applicable boxes and complete the required documentation.Additional information and submittal requirements are contained in Sections 2.8 and 2.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or blue ink. Date: Rezoning Request: ® Conventional District D Conditionaf District � �'EIC� jE?����'3 "�' '"""�"��`�.3 �"'��^ ��`� err � .r^•a r,�,,�';r ,. -c'-, �r� ,.;..a ,^ -s.;:n..� :.a. r, Property Owner(s): Vernon P. Davis Mailing Address: 2401 NC Hwy 54 West Chapel Hill, NC 27516 l E Phone: Email: Applicant (if different than property owner): Glartdon Forest„Eguit.„...,,-y, LLC Mauling Address: 3825 Barrett Drive, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: 919-459-2601 Email: gbarnes@vanguardpg.com Parcel ID Number (PIN): 9749-40-2351 Total Acreage: 4.83 Address: White Cross Road Orange County, NC Future Land Use Map Classification: Current Zoning Designation: NC2 and AR Requested Zoning Designation: _NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District) If applicant/owner are different people, include a signed, notarized, statement indicating that the owner has authorized the applicant to submit the request. In cases where there are multiple property owners, E please attach an additional document containing their signatures authorizing the submission of the application or other legal documentation establishing the applicants' right to file on their behalf, Conventional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.8.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): 0 A map, at a legible scale, showing the property(s) subject to the request. A map may be procured at the Planning Department for a fee in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. 3 El A legal description of the property(s) proposed for rezoning. 0 A list showing the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners within 1000-feet of the subject property. f A detailed narrative denoting the following: i. The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request. E E Page 1 of 2t E f 5 Attachment 1 ii. The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. iii. How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of the adopted Orange County Comprehensive Plan, or part thereof. ® The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule. Conditional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.9.2 (C) of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): El A site plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.5 of the UDO. Applications for a Master Plan Development (MPD) Conditional District (CD) shall adhere to the site plan preparation requirements outlined in Section 6.7 of the UDO. . 0 All CD applications, regardless of type, shall include a detailed landscape plan showing the location of on-site significant trees; proposed screening, buffers, and landscaping; and any proposed treatment of any existing natural features. 0 A detailed description of the proposed use of property including an outline of the proposed development. This will include a detailed summary of proposed utility services. The utility service plan for applications for a Home Park (HP) CD shall specify if the proposed services are temporary or permanent connections. ® A detailed traffic survey, regardless of estimated daily trips, prepared in accordance with North Carolina Department of Transportation requirements and Section 6.17 of the UDO. 0 The appropriate environmental document(s) prepared in accordance with Section 6.16 of the UDO. 0 A schedule of construction of all elements of the proposal. Other information identified during the pre-application conference deemed essential to demonstrate the project's compliance with these regulations. IE The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule mac- "y �" -:�. ^'. �- � �r-�,,.»-x '�"z-` ti� �,n :� - �.i�.:�. ry^,� _a— ✓. s `� .^ ",: � �,.,��- y l (we), the undersigned, have been made aware of the process for the review and action associated with a UDO Zoning Atlas Amendment application and understand only completed applications, containing all information required by the Orange County UDO, shall be reviewed and acted upon by the County. Further I (we) understand that any assistance I (we) may receive from County staff in preparing this application in no way guarantees a favorable recommendation by staff on the merits of this pr posal nor does it guarantee an approval of the proposagsendment by the County. r Owner Signature(s) ApplicarA ignature (if different from owner) /z, Date Date ```,1```,�� �►��ST Urprr'��+�,� o '4'9�,',,,, IV NOTAp Y 4 pllBL��' UZ 'Z.t;CE C O�r; ``��` ru�trrrnstk►tu�►� Page 2 of 2 6 I. wlxRElE MaauTlnc aRB/4ttwuN-s[ttLNL vlmT a,z VICINITYMAP xcR PAIEET aROL SITS-SEEcma9as- 1 DESIGN AE FER fFDlf _�V 2 SEW3.EYPAN90N PND ta]RDL JpN15-EEE OETNm 3. i P­EN OMAN AS PER GEOIECNNI REPORT SPEWNTIONsSEE - (M ETANDAL III PANNENT V -1 11I PAVEMENT NC 5y Hwyµ, ®AmN.I IA-SEE o rPN 0.1zo'PI>euc N,W �. I.A. —1111 -E55 DEINL�aT a.x I DNIIS OF G fANCREII Da1 MUE E IA-ATFwux s[u uL 9fEET ts.x fa smEwAixs RaaxD DISTURBANCE em.AO e. 6'0'm urour-SEEEEL ST spm Ds.s NMTE OR ! L1 nEI V 9. 6'0'LWG DaCF£R NHm stop.NNNm TO PAVFM[Ni-(HOT DEED). O g51DRRANLt SIZE D.PO,: a Ha IuxD R SEPARATE PFRAIG OF v\ II,r WE PA..smrt_-rmow(TIP) MKREN x DI¢AP MW-MftlM SLOP F 1:12(ELSA)(PER ADA SE ` w:)ANv Meuxs LEss ixa I�u—i slime sTsmeq 1 ——— SETBACK C 3 VORINGS AND CamnslNG mai. -. I ASEAARISGAPE AREA cv+uMENT u 14._FFS 75 eros m i 15.MEw GR AND a1TEN-SEE OETAL SHEET III(NGT ISREA _ _ ]5' PE F BUFFER11 a DIT.&TEre I 1E PA_ wrs usEaoETN¢LcslaT 8$S g �PRWOSfD'Ml1_ANON M'AGEMENT / �! Ul"A' - C62 m PEND I 1 T.M Ta-.I Ea:k.APPe PER LOCAL 1.11 d g z NEw.x91 DEm) m g a E DFlsuml ooa Axcss °G IT s a IANC 1 FILMS ST�PoNNG 4WE $ m D.A—A,_ N -(—SEE) O 71L10DELIVERYDOORAGOESS I PIA, 21057..Przasl I I I I I x.is. x9Dl wt HwY 5r w ©I I s Iw_ y9 I I I�Im-O 11 SIGN LEGEND fz I I IW 120FxD Ott. Q I I I Tim Z I� I yl� is MIN.16'X16' o f I I I y 1 �p® I Lu O 'ate'I LOADING AREA d I I ts'Rf.P Z I 1 rvv 55e.z6 cl) - MIN.18'%18' I I J a� DUMPSTER AREA ___ i J I q R AN11 NI O 5 IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE a5o ♦ \ I I 11ST ND ANGLE - 1 OF(tp Ac) U �. aE) 1.0 OF AIIA - — -_ �` n 2o.NT sf sa AwE(s) 100 TYPEzF BUFFER I 2.5x1 ff o.W AmF( SA 11 AREA 9 —_ _— — -- — —011 APIA 5¢.ne s 4. — RrN/aFE 77,599 s. E..Aa¢c s - ! A.1" 1'x70'SIGHT STANCE TRIANGLE PRELIMINARY uuirs 0, I I DO NOT DisTURBANce LINE TABLE r I j LINE LENGTH BEARINGS USE FOR CONSTRUCTION EN a, n Ir E SEPT I ' o221T 1 20'SETBACF _—__———-1 ARE) CURVESTABLEN 2V11"E Lt CURVE RADIUS IENGTN BEARIN6CHORD 11 m AS 12 192oP s nG'as'w Ifl.n' Cx xRN'P E 4t].n' V I 100'TYPE F BUFFER E8 I ® PLINaSTATUS I I STOP za �fo Know whal s below. NP 0A c DESc PnaN Call before you dig. a NLL N DRAvm cNxD L___ 20'SET ACK I M I IAi SCALE 1-, n GRAPHIC SCALE ON No.220117 Pm.9]a¢-A9-9¢99 DATE SEPT 30,2022 x s9't1'2S w 7J1.xM TLE No. (aF¢5T) SxFLT C3.O Goa N..�. w.ma,>a Nw�n va.Puxs-a-.NoaxY�..mP�wm«v o«'.��w�.1a,aam.n.w.v9-v1.ew 7 r Proposed VICINITY MAF General Retail MTE O White Cross Rd m Orange County, NC ¢ 9 Y n gm DEVELOPER Glandon Forest Equity,LLC 3825 Barrett Drive DEVELOPMENT DATA Suite 100 ILI" STIEET I, Raleigh,NC 27609 o T'11�D,nFlG^^° (919)459-2602 W " 16 374 (919) 459-2604 FAX cr) - gbarnes@vanguardpg.com ° 0 III A- 11— U i a oM,x� xo ;a VANGUARD "�'s�a r�g� A�E. , " PROPERTY GROUP fPONf SERMN: IT MEW E SRR: Waal. aN W M I-- I. CIVIL ENGINEER PRELIMINARY Bowman North Carolina,Ltd. DO NOT 4006 Barrett Drive T'°" H snee`Lest TET TI CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE krn NUMBER s,eeT Tn� N,I-n) Suite 104 "^" �.P...�e� PYPiW IN ILEe lane uHH emrwry Raleigh,NC 27609 n 'B xDEMEq 9 372 Stip Nelai Plaza�aOk SK °ip003K IN I] it i. �AGx�s, 111.-A (919)553-6570 roae'.E"�x/mow�na'aAq.'I 8382 x a MEq C'q+Y1Ey xadlses xelre pef..W Wm Swede V-1-11 v t--TWA,LC-:umecrn[n Ii91 SF ACAEIs) 0.5]x OF MEA aupwG&WHAM KM' ixeAEAsr'H�WPNCMMSEAPEA Me]s gcBEls mlowder@bowman.com ,sM epe,Mn.aewe mer imee,ee;aM.in�>,JK>d Ple pe,�mM.,. cs. H I.—0 FIRM#F-1445 Table ESa Exovm"i w"1.°�"'N LHVeWR£elYke SYmmi PEAN S—S aN Pauk H"a2 PY Peak Mdfn �'" si(eMwnnx Cnndl!Inn - Z�A L4S{Ovla'I LQ5 DelCURRENT PROPERTY k iMin(10�1 Tnfli.: ' ts'LI. .1 a+OWNERS NDt, ,a Dl , //yyyy��aorxKmuna uma,rr3e ® 'NEIL-Biii]! WSL-k13.11SCg1E �: DdVISVerrIOnP a91kl aL.102MC HRk rm E:(i1.11 vrl EId9J1 O U L... IAI - _ STOP , L- C, 2401 NC HWY 54 W Nl�KCer pri- 11EI1l l"(Qee Cha el Hill,NC 27516 9Wld eEM MITrame Ee A19 1 Ell Alla}I Knowwhat'sbelow. p JBL-A T3T +SE-h 7.e callbefore you Ill. 8 ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES(CONT.) LEGEND Ax.1 FlCAA DAR"ND W ERE OF K xTRl Loss.1111 r T cM.ALL ABABNG UTDas SMWn-CWPEST ADS IISAFNATI A TV G INC.D[f5 NOr WAPAxIF£ME NONACTION CP WOERCAUND UPL1iE5 5.TURN NEPEOx�CONMALiOR TORE RERW§BHE OR AFELO Hi.MNON CWIRACTW SHALL Cwffully ExwlxE ME$IZE AND MAKE ALL xSFECPWs NE456wY M ORDER TO DERAUINE TIE FOUL EMNr[F ME E%ISTING DESCRIPTION PROPOSED Ke MF LWAPON OF ANO PROTEcnxc NL ExISRND unNnm.INWIAGNc MOSS HOT EAM OR MO WH x-111 W TRD PLANS.ANv K REOURED r0 NNE M PACPOSFD WORK CGNFCRM TO Mf DA-AND SPERM.F D.ME CWTRACTOS SEAL i�nsY HMBELF AS TO SANG UIMRES.SHALL BE CONTRm W A UPU PASNII TO ME SA1fiAC11.OF ME AFPMPRAA WVEANMG AGENCY ANO ME M NATURE NO LUCAROM CE ME WOR,,CGI GERM AND COURAMAPCW AND DCXGRW OF ENISIING GROUND SURFACE ANO M[HARACRR U, PROPERTY LINE 'Al A W T w GNADE x GWNEAOF0IWE IMPACTED UHBItt AT ME CW1AACiGR'S EXRHSE. M pWPTANUExT AND FAcxnEB xEmm MEA N AxD WAINC FxmunW IE ME WALK.ME CWMAcrae sx-NATTRY xws¢FAI TO ME AGAUCENT LE OUAxnTY ANO Oupurc ff 4JRFACE AND MBsuRGCE upRRALs OR OBSTAGES r0 BE.ENCWNRFAG ANY A.AT, ES W -- ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE ---- AO;x G W(RApxG 2. ALL MARRMI AM WUU MANMF RAIL BE IN CONEARMwff NN 1K URST ITANDAR05 AID RECE-1 PON ME APPROPRUM ASCAEPANNONNS BENNMN E D HE OCRIA""OR AD BE TT CA CES HAT SO a"TO MSE OvxEKS ATIENT01 Ix HOER TO CLNIFY ME ENACT ----- LOi LINE ----- ADDANC ANE�cC1x rvAPGNAL siAmNES MSDNRUL LONED I.E. AGENCY.M CWMACIOR HALL NAME IN HIS POSSESSION AT ME JCB SER AT ALL DMFS MF NPRGWIAR CREATING M[NCYT x E i n WAR TILE c,ANDIANDS "A'"A' Aro ONE(1)COWED DOPY Of ME PUNS As APPEONED BY ME APARGARIATE _---_---_ pT OF WA ______ SPACE PURE, L', s WRITTEN APPRO FRW ME APPRoxAATE CONER A AGENCY FOR ANY RARANCE TO AC WLL N RIF FOR MY IMAGE 10 ME ENSnxc ROMs AND UNTES WIIW OCCURS Al A RESAT OF ME PROJECT "E.CGNSIWMD,X44 CR CONIIW C1 TO ME E.DO AHT1-MPA. RcwIERUNEY -_-___- u IT ROOD PLAIN - - - - D CANOE ACEAwSxxL CRIAH.AT HIS ON FEATURE ALL APPUCA9F GWES EREN i.STANDARDS,SPECffICAPONS.PER"IA,,BONDS..ETC..WATCH SMEEI WT ANO P CN WONK Ix R10uC RGNi-6-WAr WEWRM FOR LPLTER INSTALLABOU SHALL BE PERACRMED IN STRICT AT AA PSNH Y TO PERFORM ME PROPOSED WOR(. NE DUTY,CWxrc,prvo%aa AFPaWRATE GOVERN TS AGENCY STANDARDS AMC SPEARTATENi IN, 0 CAD-ECRCN. -Yew AMERICAN WATER-11 ISCOAipx _ ALL N NO M.ME NPPoVAL 6 MI5 PLAN CALL IN XO WAY MUNI PEFM11 FW THE CONTAACIOR TO TRESPASS ON WF-91F PkOPmPE2 LlMlie OF DISTURBANCE u IsUIE.A MANNUALLffRSNO G AHOLES ADD MAT LIMPLY WIN�IANRDWME MNS. IA AUIRNENix5NN1 RAFFLE CONRNUOu5L9VTwD0.N0i m'MIT.-T." u,ME APPROVAL(i MESE PLANS SHALL Ix ED WAY CRUS ME WNTRAPPOR OF LWPLYNI WM OMER APPUGME LOCAL$FATE,AMC AEIXRAL - - - - SN N /STREAM FLOWI.NE - - - - BW 9AAWxEUMT FAL xafaN WD a gDUTAEUENM. OVERFLOW RELIES PATH -^� .1. E-ANECTS APIwOUID RwBE 5 Fq2 ANY ElfuExT OF ME gA0Pr0 NOP RSED Np N ETS �oFRr PALO fNGAIINNDEERWU PNY PROBLEM WNFCPoINTHEAND G r0 PE ALUs uNx 10 RF➢R[swrAmlx As r0 THE wnWRFACE caDlnGNs 10 TRE PRFSNCE u'wesuRFACE wArtR d ME NOR FCq " FENCE LINE Arn¢5 SUBSURFACE OaI MAGE FRONTIER. ------ A' U.S.- PR TAM YHFSpm Haug YFAM E UP EAmIENT BLIP I IA. ALII WAHm �% uFNI�e LLvfL a THE caxTRACIOR vlaLL REPMB ANY navgnrnsGR PAmAExr FNmsfs GwMn BY xRllaR LGNSMucirorv. n.ME cWMAc1GR Is RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANm1G ALL NEassARY INSPATENCY ----------------- EDGE OF PAVEMENTNO M CONNSTRACATTIR SHAAIL IF MANMP MOL UP AND MMWAY DE9Gx ANDLCDONNPIII F kL ANDARDSSOF TM MPRPAAR cCNEwEM NCAA H#NC NL W N/TAAxPUCAWE MAR A r TEL FAEAGENLY NERIINE ACCESS SHALL BE MNx1NW:0 WRxG ell PHASES OF CWSTAUCPOx. ----------- "' WERRGAL CURB AND GUi1FN NG 51ATx1H x/iAN, K.ALL HNI91N CR N NG OR PANNG 91NL BE OpNE IN sUCN A THINNER 10 PRECWOF ME PkYANG OF WATER. --- ----_--_-__- MOUNTABLE CURB AND CU1TfR BW OF WALL ° HATFlm AT NIST NS HOLDS N wYRNCEiOF.1ST=¢DONATES ANO Al,IN ME ENH1CMAi ANY FlRE HYDRANTS AAE - - CONCRETE SOEWALL( - .1.MUS x w B or SD E REBACERR ALLGNOr HANIE CONMI0.ONR OR CHARGE OF AND MALL HOT RD REmW96iE FAR CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS, O VA Nina SCALE OFPAA1Mm1 MALL BE TECTECLOO OUENCfS DA PAOCEWAES ON FOR SARETY PAmMnWS AND PROGRAMS N COx 1.WAN ME Waw IN-OH BE PLANS. GOHTFR WAAECTON W TS ro BE lO&ONARAY A[MTWD FACN SERNCE M CWMwrCR SHALL Nm BE AESPW54E iW GAONE Ar LEAST M HWA6 4. ------------------------------------------ - a RWGT COrFIOFNr xOPCF 6 ANY xEm TO MU1 DOWN ANY P1NTON ff THE MSTIHG WAIFR SK1W AID FOU WSERVA1Cx5 AND/Ot WSPECPOxS REaUAm. - ___ ---_ ASPHALT 9DEWAIN. - Raz TE1EN SOF MEERCONTRACWTOP SUAONNWACTN OR TNFlAAACRES ORYEIPLOIFES OF ANY OTHER PERSONS C W a CEATER ME ENMmA SHALL NOT BE HawW 11 OUT 11 BAN,THE ENGINEER 11 AT cATv Cull ANC WTHN 9. M WNTaperaR MALL PAWDE ALL MUS,BARRCALES,FV.Gwx,CLONUS OR OMP pENt6 NECESSARY FOR ROUE MAFTC Wx1R0.IN R-MONS&E F[H ALTS OR WI59W5 O8G cplCH BASIN WT.RDEONpuETfR ACWaDANCE WM ME WRRNi TRITON OF M DAWN W NNFWu MWEC CWM0.DENCDS AND PS NMFFD AY THE COLWADO RRfOMING PONTIGNS W ME WORK. HANDICAP PARKINGN TICCED, aR pP 10 ME Muim,A TRNFIC OONTAW PLAN SIAL.BE SUBMITTED M AND NPPoNED BY ME APPMPWAR GCNERNINO AGENCY PWIUR ICnON ON THE PxGFCT.IF cWnl APON O//xUNC TO THE IINCE OF ANY CCNSTAUCTICH PERMIT FON X'OPx WMIN ME PogIT-OF-WAY. AIE CH COVERED As A 1E 1 OF FINDINGS NOTIFY OMI AEPREENTAIl IMIDENTELY SECANT TRIANGLE �OT CLEC I FOR W fi 1HRox5PoRi WT D TDBPxaS 10.NO OW7RANCNiOfl SE�ADLLNTNC MONI UINUOUITNDNO1hFlCAUON cMNim M COLONMA AIN AANY MFECR5 DT LT11 CCWLEAST PAWIA9Af5,DAtt PRIOR i0 IRON SYSTEMS SHALL CONFORM AD ME PROWSONS OF OSHA CONSMUCPON STANDARD H CFA PORT AOU-PART rTER(REVERT.£NOR) � 52Rx ALES P Gp Fl 1 UNCONEAD-,I 61 a P OB ORFS wM ON ME FROM AT&LLCHNICAL�NEI FN(MEFA NMC WAN ME'PANENmI �AIT LOCAnONs WERE ME ANAL 9MFACE COURSE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT s M BE FGMfRED INTO ME CASTING 5uWACE cWRGETIE 9GN(S) Cx 0. MCH(WNERSS OEOGN ISP RY.ME CWTRMNR MUST K"PIES ® PARKING COUNT NOCATOR ® 1mMNEARR IRE NATYREt M CWTRACTW E AEWwm TC wDE As-c Tm vFAW FWugnW NCLUpx THE LocAnOxs `MOON SIC RFANW WD JLNI E TO US SCABBIEO i0 A MNNUN➢FPM W 1'AN i FR Ot M i1NN PAYING TO XWIS A €@ NENCLES FEAT DAY INDICATOR ,¢ aP RG METERS 2 a AALLS-BULi OGYOIUufx1SND SERNLf£WATER HNFiM.OIUCc 2RNCFS ANl OMfR UNrc LNFS AND YANGfA IQ THE ENGIDRGAD PREPARATCH ATL RELDVE A TACK WAr FAON 10 PLACEMFNr CP ANV OVEISnNG ASPHALT CWRE. g W X g yE TEST Ri xp� CNmUGARDs EI ID2. NEAEDGEED 6M EWINGMEEUT 51.ANY HOW PAWSNr ORT'mroWAiiCM ¢ v MONITORING WELL Yp uNeA R.CnW PAR EICUD W t OPLL BE PFR APRAPAUR GOVERNING AGENCY. WAr SEHNL BE DFUWATm WM RWw UPY sTANAc Nc er ME WNMrW.GFErY mxClx .ALL C-TO BE V'THICK CONCRETE UNLESS OMmWff MOWN W ME PLW. 1. ---350--- MAJDA GOIRW R 350 P. PONT W METRAYFVMSE O.AVANRE i ER PAVEMmi NE EAsmc PANEMMT CRATE BE sqw CUT N A uANNM N 56_ALL OEWMPCN SHALL BE Pm DEMON N sMICT CCURTMAS WAN ME APPAPRAA GWEPNwD AMNCY. -----35D----- MINOR CONTOUR 350 FiFFCTA SMOOTH 9MMWL-CUT EDGE ASPHALT PATCH SHALL B].ALL APFLEABLL EROS AMCGINEXLCWRW MFAWR ALLRDINANLfD PAICR fO WMENCING OFNWTW. <WHERE E SNESCI,5 REWIPm uERR EArnNG APATCH ai C AC PIN MPAWRAR GOMERNING AGENCY STANDARDS CW M1D Es 91 Q GRADE BREAK - - TU RffR TO FlNAL RECCMm FLAT FOH N.CNN LOT TRACT,PARCEL AND GSENmi LOCAPCxS AMC OE9WAMWS. 5&MASS iR ISE INTO BBE RELOOCATED S AALLLiLUS IAMff Y IrtuSDWMMET SSTTATERR BBY COUNS CTCR LIRL CCN RINE n5 THEY CAN BE PLACED IN z RIOGELLAE cUWC YARD CNH%ME LBLx�LDPLltt E59HFxNr ESPOLLSMEEINY THE HGMACYAL ANDGN nNDLAATMmUCRW STANDARDS WGICAppgrFDR GNONFM HG AGMCY ALL w WxSMIMPW. W ,.5A�� ,15236 TSL SPOT ELEVAMN f52 ,15236 ITT CY P PO"N A, 6u mt[USFCRRI"P i EARRING Al WAIXMAN9IIP gHA TRA r A A OVAL 6R RELOCAnW Al ALL USING Urom(AWND AND OK6xGD FI£CWWA4 Tp£pIGW:w0 CABLE 1 0" N.ONr pTVEATI[N rAlWfxtt WCHI TIT 58 WEI AND 11-L 6-11 PpFS,PF 111 AND 11111GRUEAS WM 111E W"PAN AND WM DExf1OFEA PRION TO DEUWIPON W CA TEE GEE MHS.UPS -E RP RAP m-,DME vNNTTY PONT a vFRTICN IIEv�RSE nNNt T FEDERAL ftECUAPCNs. "E¢ssAxY(a ApmNc a[)I SUMP E ME SON CR AND SxAu COMPLY WM u1 L AL DATE TAMP IAN GOHAi'E"C")i0 HATCH Mf FlN fs OF THE/AAAGS EFT'ECRO BY srRueTIOx (MwxaE TRAMPS AND cONCNs,vAt Q PIPE D(eh) uWMi ON AWGF(RW"ARI t TIE CWMIT-TNTOTNNEP MAD EROSION IN IA-AS OF WATER AS A W51 PRENNTATI 1x NOT BE PAI A MEA,IN TO ME START OF CODITALIMAN.AT LEAST..(1) Q P:1 C�BGP INLET O v WAT R NE1 R ❑ATERr a R ARA v,D T xWUDm 0 M NI NATER L. ■ ■ ® KEPT AT 11 1111 E CONDI PAT U CONMAtTON ON SGL ACCINDLAnWS EEYWD ME PAWERTY UNITS WE r0.-I Oft EROSW MNL BE REPAIRm IMMEDIATELY BY ME 6ILL®HANOICAPP NAMES-BE_,�Ul W lll MIT 61x ME MOST CUPAENr.'TO' DLP x Ci MF APPACPPoAIE CUVERHING AGENCY srwDNCS, z SACTOT n1 Bx TROT SFAIDARA,AND ABRRFNT ADATRECID UP A W O WATER REDUCER Y IN MC70N REPASS ON MUD TRACKING IN ME PLBEIC RIRT-OF-WAY REYAWPNG FROM INNS DEVELCMEENT BNTMBEDHAVOOYED MUMAAT¢Y 63.ME sipM ORNN,sMPonwARR MANAGEMENT AID WATER IT—FACUPES MINT BE uuxruxED BY ME COOPER CRR uHPI Sup+PINE As O Q J y} NATER I.E. - J L�- • 4xEDIARLY Rx Nr EKCxvnnW Av N AI 0 r A M TAE NOi ONLY T WA(OUPLER.Bui Nb Mai T WS W MF ORUNME AREA 10 F4Cn iAfurc W FFAUANExRY ErASu2m.CED AND U ARE HYDRANT Y ITS G 2O.SHALL PAOPOEY BMmCELOfnHERU9rzBUNEL ALBANY LBAN UP ON WPAx IS WMRETE WLLW DOES TNOTACONn¢uL sTA•RT TON I TERITERMMSAOF E ECTIR MMNNNAN OF NTRY FnE STRAW DRAH.TALL.1NUM.ER MAiaGMENTmrt AND a x SANITARY LINE W ANO _ SWa S AM NAN"CCURWA- 2T,rt If CW MAC OA's A SEDiY TG GRADE STREET ACCESS RATE-OF-NAY RMPLARTA AND LOTS ACTSMNG TG gAOxG CCWPIERLY�gfAX NA RMT FROM AN CONSTIdUCPW RELATER SEpAExr ORw0EON5ITED�R R � F C. MSWTAUCNws NEI M1EspLu N SANITARY MANHOLE N DQ DR. 1,CRGNW,INCA GONNA 1tlR Is AES W9RE 11 WRNG MAT ALL ANA AM' u110.11 M1B[M yAKI9ND[MEAT'T A ExC'Em SR LW'.'"LAY ANO 1 O EANILARY CLEANOUT Mc/FASi 22.START CGNTWRS MEM AT PROPOSED STAMET LWAROA ICPRESDrt FNI91m C IDE ELJCMRCN N TOP GF MPH COMMAND 5 OPE,STAPPY AT ATAF Nett'PAREN RACES AN R ANG M MANELWWNG aFAVAN¢ m Z w STORM BILE PIPE R LAOA➢ IT IS A.DATANCES(HALL NINESANUAGNAN SLOPE OF 2A m � N/w n Row RICANS w WAY 23 COMPACT OMPNAA TEOTELL YATEAIAL SHALL BE WNPACRD ICTNEING TO TIE AMSOMMATE GOAL 111 AGENCY REWHATWNS AND ME RECOUNfNDAPWs ® slpw SEVER NANxIME o0 W ® Wm DR saR OF MHCAL ExaNLFR. Oxxm TR ORCH No RMPGR.wY CGNNEcnONS TO FIRE HYDRANTS MAY■MADE WMOUT ME UNLESS AUMOH2AJEN of TIE UTILITY Q i g OO ® STORM SOWER INI£r g 0 ® INIPAT INET Sµ 24.TOFRANCE SPIN GSMIH3 raERANCE SHALL AT N/-UI FEET U) W ® SIORu SEWER MREO ENO sEGRON ® TO AUERIY Exr WE 3BWL4X IAIE IS TMWATERP E CONMACNA'S AERW9Wurc ro YUS SURE ALL aPPROPRAR PFRMHM FOR SMM WATER OSCHOAGE9 ASSWARD WTx H Q p sroRM sEwDt nEaowALL p CE RD Lena+AGRARY HANE BEEN REFUNED FRNW TO ERMWi.GONMACTOR MILL W RESPONSES PON ME INSTALLAT W OF ALL TEMPORARY p x -N F-EAT URLLn -a xl.- _=NCGNMAGFCANMCTaR HS ESSIGNNs MA EROSION Al'A THE MA aL a OF s C CET,M NFIICANNCUT CECT ONS`�c�'AID ARL TMivfwDMExr Z O .� uxoEACRouxD EIECMHc PROTECTONNPECESSANY"HAS BEEN ccunERD. AN AI "M' GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES ae OVERHEAD ELECMIG a._ FUi ACTON .[NSE tt ro GAIN M MOST WCRmi -af-WAY 0 AwRCPRIAR GWOxING AGMLY Ams A NU-I Inns ADAMUC u I x MF FLOWNfs AI0 D H M APPRONED A-IIFECTI 1. THE CONRDAGI'at M�MMDVE ALL SmWENT,MVD Rs MAT MAYPAGWC MULVIE SAD REMOVN.WALL eE SLID m N IANU UPLLTY A. s LOA AGE OF CONCESTE 26.OPEAAnONs�CTRCN/PLWWNGAREACTUAAL MNS AND WGRDMAR SNE WM ME AR PLAN.PPCA N BEGINNING CONSIRUCnON ATMELr MAAMm. BY STREET LLCAUi G RUM x MO�TTRACTOR MARL PREVENT SENMEHT,DEBRIS AMP ALL OTHER POLLUTANTS AN ENTERED ME STOM SUMP SYSTEM DURING ILL Z SE 2rA. .WHEN DURING ME CW ASE OF CWSTMCTCN,ANv OPDCI OF AN WuSAL NATURE K ENALLATHED,M CONTRACTOR SHALL CEASE NON IN AND CGNSwHrnCx.CFERARGH,MAT AIS A PART OF MI5 PROJECT,THE CONTRACTOR MALL RD HELD RESPCNSIBIf FON RULMARCH LLI -v.�v.- CARIE NSPRUCE -m�v.� DFNWS E PNxGF EPA ANCA AND IMMEDIATELY NOT Y ME OVNER APPROPRIATE COKMnNG AGENCY,AND/OR ME ANDETECT/TNpNEES, 2 OF ANv ADVANCE IYPACM TO-Aff WAILANAYS,WETLANDS ETC,AENTLPNG ANNI IMd DONE As A PART AF THIS FROJECTCBS' MUM 2 �F TELECOM EERNCE . . ENEDIGL 11""'r � �x� TIE EWSMUG U EDERAROLCND UNTIE0S MEOW nERENA�E BASIN NUPON NAVALACE E OMATIW,M TRACTOR SMALL BE ASTNISSIBEE FOR ALL Glsnsan-',.NIT 6P xmAo-uUtam w/iAfxtNU A AFTER HxN CUAOE Is m'ACIeO AN ANY PORTION OF TRE OTE NDi GMERWSE TIC STANCE S x A F Y fE YxI A FERNNENET AAWUZm.SI FlRFA 0 -n m- L CEx3 28.OF FAEISFA�INEgATMpER9HE UTLITIA 6 WflxG CCNSMUCPON RlRAlIDNS ME CONTRAMW SxpHD GAACIJ TDi UPUPES OMEALTHw NARRALPcgs I-SE GRu saf AWUEx, ,xE THAM.WMFDARLY xonlr ME MENESER AND OUR NFTES11Y All PAW,1RP,TD PROJECT THE NO COMA TOM OTA LL AONME THAT:TAY.1111 AT GNNNI"ND FULL M TER'a L IMPGRRN 10 ON EXPORTED mW INS sR MALL RD INGFUar PRELIMINARY w xrN Wwry cGRRDrn sY swlnE r.WD MANAGnT�A; %CM ME coxnxugna a CAN NCE u H -P- . {� O E c 2D-ALL SA A WM MAF£ON MORE RISERS SHALL II HAND 1M 1,PER LNIL CODE TO 1eW 7IDEAS IDEA STE AN ES A STEEL ASSOC POSTS N STAKE AN sMAx CR PAT BALES OR TO SUPPORT CLT RNN Usm As w DO NOT TREE NIT-.I AC'ne's 11 PAnr Acm'THI USE W LONA APPROVED WLWED MPAialNG BHA ON REBAR OR FENCE OSIS usf0 WM USE FOR a am noI HEMENT THE caRIWMI OF-'NO'DID m PROPOSED CURB AND WATER AND/M ANSPosER ECAE W 6 ALL R uGMING OAS .I RONS ON F FAAE DID TRAM ANDlaR RDE roNDNG a All WATER IN M AOADwgr.IEMONE AND RFCG+smucr CONSTRUCTION .,........:......_...._.. TREE uxE NWAnm THM AN., EArnxc PANEMmT CURB AS GCT RD BY FlBD ccxonw5 m INONDL Poll l TE x¢i TE PO Ts TEM WMIx TAD FEET OF A DRAINAGE DDUPWAL SOMENT CONMWs WAN As TURCRART MILE ON TRT REAS wsx Roan T M aµN/INE A TAA A SCALL BE=AN) EGUIREo ' y" •M WEIVNOS 11 CARPAL CARTAY I FMmT TO FAIII N T ANALL 1111MIAM11LL BE/S��£DOE�RRE a'I'ITtI F oATEO WM P`1MRU T m Y,oA ME WLLxG ff SEa-I CMNO-I uMAUENI R I--SHALL BE MANTNNm AND KEPT IN ROOD-AIA AS ME WRARCH ,nRAR MTBE IW�DATIW PPOSECIT, MINIMUM.ME CONTRACTORS OR US AGENT MNL mRmT ALL BOPS WEEKLY AND AFTER 9aEGANT PREDPNInON aR RWi-0E-WAY DEOICATN FOR PUBLIC USE 9IALL BE CLEAN AND UNENWMBENN. EM NA NECESSARYY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SNALENF CWPALERD IN TNELY MADDEN.AAMIgDLAATED SEDMNT AND DESATS MALL BE PLANIN roPT P WALL US Tnw KRE1 MAY RECOUNT OA GfBWs Al FEET PER SECOND 32 ANL AR WALM PIXMIT SHALL RE DETANED E REWIND. ADVFASRYTIYPETAHCM M NNCPM ffTIE BUP.A BUILDUP oFEEAESSIN,SEgMEwI OCWMBWG x'MT AREAS,BFMMA STRAIN BALES,w0 1A,NOEISE A,MTGR OF fEtt CES WILL BE HUSKED PRWPTLY.DSmcA20 sMAW BALES AND CWLAPSAD ON RRA BUY FENCES WILL RD IMMEGATELY FOOT W FELT GNRNG SHOWN HEREON W AS RECFIm BY ME CLIENT AID IS PALUDED FOR NFCAMAnW PURPOSES LN�AS WRECTED BY ME ONO RDPAWEOL WGAS Ap,N/W MBUC AGENCY RACT ARIENTS.ED—CONSULTING GAWP.LN.HAS NOT PERFORMED ME LOADING OL ANO MRDORE DOES NO B ME Enrol TM OF-1 TOCK CEUNEMV CHJRS MNL N-x A BEDEWED CCNTNxMExi ARG ME OSWARGE OF WATER CONTAINING W ANr AND Is NOT RESPCNSM£ACR TIE DEGREE AND/OR MEWACV UP ILWMWAPOx ON MIs PRONECT.G WA SEWER SAFu Is PRODE ROD. SEA ATKARC I.,INOUR INLET 21 "WNONL"1 N BUSPNC ITN ACMA13 WITH Mf TOARRNIRTOT1IAIE CAN4RNWG Aff11CYRREg�R IB E PRaPmtt...C.v rm(1C)SAYS AT m ANY 4. ARGON RATES-R PLACED SEAN T MNMF WTI ANY ROW RETURN,FICAND at UNLER BALES ANES TO ff MMI WEN t'M 2' AR CARy LL x 5 W3COAN SNALS ON IID PW NATO .TNA PUN STATUS V AGIAL sNvfY E PSRHITFO*MIN IS OF FABRNU mum A.ON SMDCNRCS-NO TO BE E%IExOm 25'B€YWD PROPOSm I ION CWM0.MEASURES ARE TO BE RwWED.ANY SECT,SOD 30NFXT CFPWItt SHILL BE Rw014D AND UDI-N u swucTUREsNaxDlnox nARuxrNTURF EKRNCWs. eENLr Ix Lxx aAEei EreasH""`AL AND18 1111 1W111 IMERAM AN RUM, 3r.ALL RDTNWNG WALLS<'IN NFl[Nr AID ONA(4EAWAm FRW eprrtxR ON FOOTER r0 TOP Oi WPLL)AEWPS A SEPAaAR BUDGING Ppnxr. U2.BEST Al-ENT FRACn¢s(BNP)-A SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AAF C.--OMI.-ST As NECESSARY TO FIT FIELD CONaTLWs. BUNDIDORF TB NPAWAL AF MIs PLAN DWS HOT CONmMR APPROVAL v NNEI WNx. I PONARY SFDIYFNI BASUN9 MALL BE USED DURING WN6MUCPON M WNTMN All RUNCAT FFOM THE SITE F TRENCH CEWARING OR GROUND PAN'AR HAND PAT , SOL ALL xAUND CAPPED 5 ACES SHALL HANE AN ABOVE GRME IDENTFIC TION SRN MEETNG APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AMNCY STANDARDS. UWATER PEAARWS FkIpEDME SEDIMENT FWD OR ORDER AIFRWSD MEANS SHALL BE USED r0 DETNN ALL WATER W4AE0 BY MSETHERTK NSF,ME ARxALi SXu1 AT HEADY SAWW T Ta OPLL DmM Onm MTASM I FCOF CO ID LCROEIMAYING AND ON ON SEMDNIANDSCA MNTU MMPPoiPoARUc NPR 20HIM&FHCWE NLMBERH MLL ITT IRMWnRxWE, INSTNLATIW OF ME PIPF7A FRA-PIPESRADWAY 9HALLSBE PATOIfDN ALCO20wCE WM M APPR[PPoAR WNANING A(CNLY STANDARDi H A MilCr 0 Hx A CYPRIORro RAINFALL AAGTEI�EENMCAPCN W' BATER HE GCOMNING ANY COATRRUCTIONO CONTACT LEGEND NOTES E �LxiW IEvgnW HS FRmW c6uTacLAUWRES TD IE caDROxARn WRD LWsiaucnw MANAGu. oe No.22011/xxx 1 THIS N A STANDARD SHEET,THE EARl SOME AB@ E'AAPONS MAY APPEAR ON MIS 9TEET AND xN WARS. NE U6.EA04PV AND SIDUFxT CCNM0.SHALL BE INSTwEO Ix ACNMw¢WM PEWLAnCNs OF M IPPRCPaAR CONaHIUG AGENCY. DATE SEPT 30,2022 NOT BE USED ON THE PROJECT. VAL LE N. 2, AN TMANN LE SHAS AND NOTES MAY BE FOUND ON OTHER SHEETS ASSOCLATER MEN MIS RAN. IRR IAR6AnOn HF I CdAR MESE LESIONS AMC NOTES NO TO BE REFERENCED IN ADOIRCN TO M5 STANDARD SHEET. TRKNO HATC, IEEi wa me mm� aM-wquvtl Pwe v-P2R-N-.nmWx reeg vq.mn5 pa..w..w.+:n dw+ve,b TRI-324x5.dq INT OF _R 9 L�- — NC 54 MST,W DEMOLRION LEGEND - -_ 0,120 P�A—_ Em Exlsnrw Ta AEaax ---- Fill EMISTNG TD HE gEMCUSHED/AEMOVED ETA E,.TNG N BE ASANEMD IN PLACE ' EEIRLk,� fNSPNG TO BE RELOCATED NCCS MONUMENT"LL-I $k V F 1 WC TREE,0 BE AEMOMED LI X NvsM]nT' \ ��.—L— LlMnsa asnraea+cE \ EAYSPN G CDAR.T/CCNCREIE/GRAKL i0 BE ❑E F9V\\ � WMCUSHEO/1VEM01£D \ F .1ING RUT—ON IMUC,URE !ury --- —�I-- TO BE DEMCBSPED/HEMOKD I luf OR ANRM MR SWRDwA M ENSlING CURB ANC GLTIFA N BE RENOVEO ZYN M SEEM MAN E%ISIING U1111,1 i0 BE REM014C fNAL-1 TLE ALFREYER MOM YERTY1 p,PHYACALLY LOCA,FO THE UNOEFGRWNA UPLI,[5. Olut[0 ff ELIV'[R MF REVEYCR NAS FEE CAL GARY NOIF.aL ELsnNG UNOFAIAOU nF5 SHOv.N ON AnOlm a $C RINEFLE MENAGPCN S SPECULATTME M NFRY`AAT OR R MI SNV I AND WOl.—T AS NOl'E CO SIRLED m L ME uEN AS ML MENTS MAY ALIO BE OtER ENRING LAREARROPM)11—FOR IF eDERVI ICI INNER nn is��az� DP.a ME RNmnclEl -DAADv"ao,° °i t_ LINE TABLE ME SLAB Y I L n . g 210B7] F IL LINE 1 LENcm BEARING zm,NG H. u W o BG, BERN 114 1 z.0 a IBX CURVE TABLE>~ ALL BE CURVE RADIUS. LEN G7N BEARING CHORD MZAN ER BRONY"GRED PRON PC START m=lllnw. \ <9Rr/ UND Y MID ITORCPREAVRioxe xF uro \ _ S RRVE�roEMY R M Y ON THE ARE 11 MI o smEAN/,wD ON wEtTum rtAMgfs a mCPDs¢D 1— INV ARu Z 3 NRCP DFMu,RIN NDTtR ME FRO ENTY IS Ell S V.55x16' t Ma SHALL DNB MERRY AND LOCALS ALL SIO NG UNITES ON ME PRION M LM! NAPS sUed[171NFAIAT By 1- 2. DENC.N..` - Y Z 2 ME CO PER SHALL FEI6oRNNFN—ACPwnEE AS NOTER AND SHOWN ON MEY 0 Q PLANS All AS 0.SCTED BY ME OYNFR. T— EE Rcs1. N WNL RE ME ecuMAcmas REs¢wsBUTr To 1111 All PERNIS AND PAY III J Z Nv.ssGze ME"'T"IRM fm i[ uu"�iuuNr a�amw.AwMIN ART ERIAs MTS As LU EE ME DENLIME rouN 15INTENOM To DIRCRT�[ER L REMENna Arm uttlTY wanK.,IT VICINITY MAP � J a SHPLL,=.A.WM THE ONNER A.MEROPRIATE Mu,Y-,AY l ,0 NDAK.S EE U 6. UCNTRACTCR OM COMPLETELY,NCN UFMW W AND NSPOSE R DRUM N A I-M NANNAN AAOLN L ME PANOPERTINV NLWGM—All ALL WO R NOT LN EO TO—M)S,ARM YEAS Sum Ca+gnOxlxc Uwls.AOxs,ONINB,S—S,ELECTRIC MISTERS,FROI la� OAS RD &MMEIN u oTpotED LAL WMINE ANROCxNKs,AAroGrlWIN rrsAN, 3 D. AEo�IID RIO[R G EEll—um,nFS 9JgH AS SAN ITMYY SEMFRR�WATER,GAs ELEONY, C CO4PuaY M CMI At RFMwu OF ALL YNNMS 10METOETERMINiINO TOaio°iPl Apo uMN,ROAMBF Gf-.11 PRIG.TO CCMM.—-A. 6 e PRELIMINARY MY ME WTM oort�UC ui FEE BIC n,nOR a ITR¢T 11.1 ON NNNI As fi�m�r AR DO NOT OTTvt € ro BE REMOVER,NYT OR PCORET,xTo MR D�'ETwC'Ns THE 970 OF SEAr�¢PIPNG � USE FOR CONSTRUCTION U� t ICTO ¢FOR REEFING a CURB ME,VALVE SOKES AND cATANO AR \ w e un`"LIn"aMP°�ARM.�I�Mm'na a<UMfFAD N,¢MI All Ipla.,K,Hf vPgUPgIA,f s x*oR6J•w nR.pr IS — ALL ENNION AND FRIM T U Mo UFMGFS AND TREE RD GnU PRION,o & 11 ANE OMPRoIS RFAONSIRE FDR ME PADTECTON 9 ALL UPLIPES TO REMAIN N LACE 11 ME CPNMAOCC�SPALL TAKE ALL= LINES N' ✓'- MR H WL A TO BE R N)YED R DE-M AMD NEDD EN;D B"`-ToLONO G RESTORI IC SAIBN AT NPLEACEW PAVEMENT A CURE TO RENAN %MRN EllS,NG PAMENENT. IIigAAL-Em�mOnsmxMAL TOBRAIIrxioWCHMEAT LSm"RD IN Oi°NisH[RUCoxT°NSNAURL A ® � _ PLAN STATUS 1 SFANCxI FAPL EI CCC11 AND U , FZp1ING HG_,I SED BY ME .10 S N[GEO BW rRVEW r° o x BY r, STOP �B°E'P,>x PM °Y µw "" Ate. aCIN=LTA'ABrE OAT; DESCRIPnON NBA,:B. 11 m DN NG f��WCGARFGnY GN Fl MSn G Plnrvc UR UMLR C11"BF Know whGlts below. N RECTLT NM R N r,AMLY FU DIRGnU B Rs Rf Ra mI LEN NO LnM xvR�x MIS AREA. Call before you dig. . Mu rnLL SIS O R IPLAMUWS MA INAL IF MWD ON SDE SNALL BE REMOVED BY A UCENSED 5 GN CRALM1N CHKD xAugows DSCALE " t9,ME PROPENTY ER—PUMP WT N—ML GREAR MAPS,AND WASTE RL GRAPHIC SCA 106 uo.220117 DIS BE All ARE EIWIjM)ID ARM FNEL TO I MATTERS)NONEAL AREA 81 GWXIAC,ORN SWIti Al-AllMM DAlE SEPT 30,2022 CpRRAONt SNALI PROPERLv AS LFCULY DI9 OSF 6 PLL DfMWPW DFBAS.OfF ai (El R¢ET) IN-1-xB-JDID11 1411,P1 11 ME s, coe w.nmma W wpuva pve.rry gouP\LT-4-LNMx\maeer:ip angn+em9 tle^L Luen�Lln azmmis w✓'u9-WOap 10 SCCII SA As u3 uG =�I LINE TABLE Ptl' 4 LINE 1 ENG,I 1BEARING Ia FAG`BV k xM M0L gcnnn somlx DIxE wcFFlux Bsr mNRA erlmwxG�aurr ll¢rulm a IN IS I Ax5 E IN(R.ANS IA VE AT N AN /xicDlmauNETE,uE—. FDRM MAY IUI:T wrmdTRI-R TII BE 11 APipG�VED. °F TINE Fkm RN.A TINE FIS USIRR x -`TE PmrmAMr x A PEWIns mx,PxD AcasslME S1 HWyW a z,.a' s1sYa' DNAS Msrccnaa OUTI IF (Ex III.AN, I'll x IIAUS w 2 to mxua xm1G RALERN IE9aW aFrla aFaF.wv LuiD Bsmm�ncE aiuRs CURVE TABLE a wrlWTIR SNAIL CRIME IRA r ML TacEnnTrr PEWITS x BBEN PETEIVED Ala MAT Tao CURVE RADIUS LENChi BEARING CHORD .,,..a B­(A-S..1 AMALAB LIMIT P--I-..Mm .11T.0 AT sT ae xWla RF—ME ACNPLsrnRr \ I,AY Q CasWUCMM..C4wi.CT wmfOM$PETRUCnCTM. 1 El ifIT, 1 - S. xW"RELY TOCTDR A OIGGNG DCT CAROLINA NE­AND M.MATES I—R A OPECrm AT THE FRE-ISBETATITrcR NEEn1C,AIED U11LIrE$AT LEAST 73 v UMrs aF ❑(nE) TB'RCP US v.:54].4]' Rr Ca9MUC ENTRANCES AT EAa POINT 9F ACCESS 70 SIN ME MN:R$I FR090N CalAm MASMF9 sHA1L EF INSrALI£0 PRIa 10 EfNOUnON AND m 1 M A TU N M¢REYOvnt GPFRATroxs \ AS NECESSARY i0 M AIN \ (- PffilnK OR GE 10 f0V\ PNAS[AND CS waTAAND f204a1 MEA41AE5 MAI RE M9rAMm IN A DANDE WN FLANS 4(I Eft BA9N SET FEN F RESxlnaBL�BaARkM WBP INaUDIN6 9L1 FENCE INLET PRGIEGMN,SxIMMER aA51R DINRBIa DILGHFS,MISS O 1 \ PROTE ,aEXRING 1LT As"IMSSARY mR THE INsiPLLAnON OF—1EA-1 \ ss1BAU W SIBREACTIR MALL INUY A RUN ITS CAum AND EOC BOOn mxruxlxG lM xSPECRM AEmA05 iCR lK 75'T>ff E M']rIX — G I EXTEND IYER BE 1 IwER BA9N AND rtMPoR N1.1.1 Sing FARM 9LRM5 AS WELL AS 11AT$LOPES k _ I NATURA g2PLE CY CL qlt FROEION CW1Am MATING IN IEMPORMY N\1A51(NS PAICF i0 BEpNNING MA55(AADINO of lHE FABD i 011 iY C 9Te I / — W ca �INP9aT�M N D D Yka IMNmIAmY TO AN APPRONO LMIMTLL a REur10 EABMTY / mVEPs Ira rD BE / r YS I —{ EROSION CONTROL LEGEND mE TA[u AR�r EMIWEN eaASIF�ii M�TnlwINusrlCAMwn eurvw PTaxn INNi gnvrAi AAS \\ / ///AC���C...iiiC..AR�rOING r0 SiABIUZAA I /�� �) \ g'TFR ro DETAR siEfl rW WxslRUctlOx REWIMMFNIS T cs I..MST rs $,meg [ 2 TIMEFRAME REVUIREMENIS� I I FORWORAT,US MfP I N�ENLDUN7SIE S ARMI P#LP ATEA DT'US ME PENSPG4D SiOAI OR'.2 tt \\ I 9(IMM:R BA I I I I I ' CE NBI�FANENII TfpllRuisNUP rco mnfo AAS ALAN upm MM AEIL PAT[wv�TCFNm vWstxiA NINEolnmTF � m w E z i;a I SPI Y NACTUR TO USE PARIaNG AREA$ITONAT TO n£HISSU ED BILIRNG La LAY-o0x./STAWa z ¢n a NnIMO,�]SFBx AFFI£( ) IN. UtYI ' NUM"S I INMFO �OhLR,G�Y IHfr FAS-MuxINH MEY A#o5 50 THAI SEOIUExI IADN RuIOiF WLL BE DIVERTED TO ERG9°N CMN0. A Al N I 1 I AS INS n Y • INA CET IxsYFdSBLaIAa NEASIMES MLASEITLY AND uSi BAT III M11 ARNUII ENUNHiANmAlIXn09FFAVNFN HGEiAna 6CES D MIT E ® �W 9Li, a1.DAY S_y TOS / \ FUNP TAMT9Im f y BLIEP BA6 °� WP BAP AF:� `RIMIER ULUM aaGE E\FRVIYWNTCAUIDM DAYS AND wM.RN HWRB m ENR.R S EeEN!mwaGTFA MaIIAST °g I I — — FaRnRr 9Lr F[xCE MEASLPES v BE MITTAN ARS RNED ASFSPE%iffo THE UNSTRMUUCIN DETALS IN ITS­AS I. NMNED.AIL ESC J 1 DE PRUTEST.FENCE AN. Q 1 s5 m I RP-1.ON I.AND INSTALL ALL IBAOSON mNTRLt u 1-EETI THEEFR CR Uva ULBN or INN.ANm rtC MAr BE RIWIR BY M Sq j I I s PECNWNOAna OFANOCEO INS CIASS FRRE NxR AS mNDIRaS WAIRM'i. SCT SSB - AT I llAIL NSTIRELD AI M5 SRmr.AREAS NATT TAN GRSMD ANSE URa BY ME CanUtnH ALCIEDING N ME CHART Z Q 5� 9(aXALNff RaAgN i ofTSV RCP BMP LEGEND 11 ITAa'PSNux 11 As AREAS ARTBRIT—UP 1 xxlsxED III Q R N_ss4 rtow umRDW BE SE,m/MIUBN DD amwAN.I,READNEDUS mr AFTERPma a` TwNa N wog SaAmavo nATE IHM F 2CY CIA B RIP- P AT DUN¢rRULRa CE - [C OIiL fN1RµB rN \\ \ I ENTRANCE ❑ CWA GMCRFIE WAOHWT AREA WTMA WEAL OF 1IIE0 MESIMM A9NUSE IT II III EwAxOTaaaaM$PCBNO Ci Z vL I \ I\ I iNV hGF SSA LB STMELSED STANK-1 AND 0 NRS IW 0 rCNESEOEPON SRUNERNET B/SW REIwO p IRS E LL BE NARTEO xr0 III O - Y. .:556.38' PERNMENT SIMMIAIEP MAnASEMar FAPMtt TEND PRY PIP I \ I O MILT PROTECRON DUNNs DE wA NG IENF is NATER STATI BE IT.-Ixm AN DAFFEMES FlLNR.O DEN¢RAN V � `LT SOT AT OB`NG DISaAflfE r0 AEUS IN W N27 Skr FENCE 14.�u ev xATATE wM mTEmAvmauvuaF NI ES AB TN E).-TEMPaARY ER mXTROL LEASNES m Q y.A I_i I O STOCI(PIU: I SMEN__pANILI&MAIISD LauNlu rvcWTu.s[ERPiAOfAiGIiN3A,AW4iA°;E° O CONCRETE VTC NTT IL iRACXING-- IDN W \ WASR ATEA f PRDEcr Is LaPTITE.ME PErmBTEES—I.—muu TD mosE Dur M1 Ease nYE sGs \\ wAw TOE �Im� Loo Uu aF[—SAMNCE aTFNR SIIR.II-11x1 PERMTTEE M ME PNDk°r—WL NA xSNEUNUN RFPGRa MF FFRMITRE ORARY D1VFA I k NN OX IEMPfRM SHALL mMaa MimWn"ogoy/ryrA.GI 1n SUBRI AN EULTAaII NoD a TFAMMATIN(4-xOr).A slm AnrvUnL UNI15 OIrLH/z si LCLAn u9 P MR TEE WIL SE aMCED M1nL ThE sum nAs efa RMED Wr DIGNRBANLE As NECESSARI TO MAMTAM I iso POPE OPNN Po 11. NAGE m IRIN BAS. SOB SEDWENT BASIN BID DIANNEL u HC snD 1.)RAo A.uulcmxc °110) 40°EI� H w PRELIMINARY TD.B LFs a.4x 1.r DON OT ——— w———— DIVERS Ta TC BENvE.UN mXE TM N n r R. M IEr xn USE FOR sTAAwzm wM Dors pTP y 1 1 SP Ix9xG CONSTRUCTION ACCaBNC TO STAOU I R ® RS RCCK SOIX w W w C Rl1EPRANE REGMFEMFNA.WN NETNns ' C $ ISIT, 1B' B:21:1 DESS ]ve s$ 2. I 3 rxTE P A STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME N SITE SC AREA STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME APNDvm iW mDrtcx s'ulnF mDlra 1 DESCRIPTION ExCEPTIONS NTST x apxna ITEIAPORARY Y x yy, MIIXO `Li fFXCE NAS OTA m � IMufOIA BUTTAL r B� LIT1 'll \ SM[A gILMSAW 7 SA IRNE IN,-,TEG ni 'S 1 TEMPORARY DIVERSIONDITOHDATABLOCK l Ate'WA(//PYI]fR ]DAYSEFT. ILM PIN:1711M I— / I \ (Foo,161fS' - ATUI C \ \ S7r8[M 7 OAYB IN 1ENITx I4 OA OI:DET -_y NCTEO BW AEVEN' e ARS 10 ON LLg b 2 STEMEY AIM 1: AN E PC G]4 L —®—— — —— —— E A(A)RA DAVE TNIgAN.MIT IN sOttsMGREAtfft �® , �/ 1DATE OEGCMPnON ,R 76 PS 171 A9-9899 HOW IDMSENTS MLL MLL MILL WDrr a w Know whaft below. DE9I. DRA S'. Call beforeroudlg. STALE g: AxGF MAirCAx BEAOFAEIA.m BY VEQ1AlIN CONK a o`ER AI=TT OB No.22011] EB%cnNM...NN a smucNREx GRAPHIC SCALE WLL AmG,.I. MwIBBEpE1 IN DATE SEPT 30,2022 DB ae PBGG 1ID pENCEa,IwaP s1RUCNNN I IFmPEfIN iDBREITAAR EF09aN�PP UNRE ra LE NoEll . PIx.B]4e-as-35TG IED Fa NL DJ TINBBEEDBAAABBfAAS ADSRDMG TG MFSFGLLOYANG NDS_IN I'NEUINNEENT. (p NBBT) HEFT C2.1 coe P.nmma ro wpuve poKrry gouP]19-4-"NMm\maeer:ie alW+am9 tluA"uen,�In azmmis w4-v9-L5.a.9 v 11 CC �,INM 5AB 0 M LINE TABLE $w I Os f�°=� WNE LENGhI FEARING 1..ADAM w.q Ma 11,111 T A IB'wC�uu SE1�wERA 11ir rl¢rulm L, SE',"AND LINO GSGrURBWG E 0.".. L2 BB.NO I'aY[ ML BEELLEDrm ELETO—RGM DNCE TMININ PVNUP INTIEBT I PLANS)FOPM 4u5i�jEpiFN°APPROVEOCCD,. [a TMF—P Nli.Fnl°AE X NC Sw H W 15Yw'[ AN A x -¢PEPEN-1IN A PEPMIrs B Ano Ac.SSIEE W OU°FxG INSPECTIMS l9 x153' x s:PV w .—A-.11 FEIRE 2 DmrAGI mFO PALE.—AL ORI. ANY LAND S 0°"ET rcx��"'g1Ca NCURVE TABLE _ CURVE RADIUS LENGhi BEARING CHORD aER BTAMAFoim SUADLLi II—NAr�N cEysSA�ar�Ing xANE DEEM KNEIUED ANO BA„IwSE A SLl FENCE ]BMxY xaz]60'E a,>,N Tm.A x A P C OTM MEMG AT LEAST H IPAI BEUTE ME ACMALSTART ' .CMSMUC'NM..CMiWACT wWmNSPECiM. xMAGT 11A ME CNL AND All ENwTES HA BURIED UnLITE$AT LEAS,)] 1 AMLt(TIE)TS OF GGG aUP PRIM TO LL G OAwEC1E gS111ABANCE OI_FUF -N TO BE 5 OAT Mf PNE-CM5IRUC,nwmNG Mf , e'RCF ON GONTA.MASAm SHAEL EF INSTALI£0 PRIM TD MEN ON AND STABILISED NTTNIN Oats v�54].n]1 ALL TENIgNRr DONSIRUCMM FN,RdN.S Ai FAC"POIN,.AGMEN i0 SRPADE D gALLI 1 ACCOROINO i ZATION \ ANEECG�MUG,EN AREAS, 1 TEOUIRFMENTS "°VN°PEflA" A r -RAP APR.xw TO` F°N\ MA.smMNr AND m04M MFASUAm$XALL e[IxStALLF➢IN aCCmDANOE MM BANS \ I _ D ` NInaNL11,EANO MWElIA INCLUDING AICA ECNCE INLET ENE 1 N,.INNER gASIIY DxEA91M DILOHFS.TREE O ONS TS SET FEN \ PTOTE .ENING MLr Al xECESSARr EUR ME INsiAWnON m AnESE uEASwTs 5Y18ACH WIR 'W — \ I AA[ mR.SPALL INCLUSE A ftNN Cnu.0x0 LOC BOOn CMiuXING lxE x�ECAM AEWmS PON lK CON IT SK Bt A 1 FD Ull£T NNIROL G ` / STALE SNMNER BASIN AND TEMPORARY gYWm-STANINtf FARM 1,-1 Al.WELL As aaAN SI Tll k SIR CLARE /1 I NrEALL N.N CW1ROl NAAIWD IN IEMPORMY ONES IPA..iU MONNO MASS gUOINO OF THE GE / q�BEN«„G=IIGITUNE ws�UD sxOMucx MNm.mr D.#3 ST LOCAnax i To u+APPwoW°LANonu aR Rfurz°Eacun AS NOTES Y i0 M NTNOX / II ggq���fffAAAaaAqqqAaaFFFUUU + EROSION CONTRSLUE END PAD.w0 ME 111 1EAs'.1 AAE mown g p / 51(INAEA BASINET PER PFUIIRF4fxr5 ANE LEN 111 WAS"1ION'11 TH"fEm"uBi�"A ITITEMsm F s $,meg 2 / J RER N LURaPgVANRYRSpMMEP BAMN AY �02F Il nE 1 AMf ANO SiAM17FD MM COHCRf1E�°E \\ I SHINIER BA I I I l/ I .TAN 91 CE Amro NTII PETEENNPWURPN15 UP UM mno AASAIN THEN M1"tEA ETL i cuv�iµm� a T u=o¢RYAllEwGES U -s tel'^Y RoncnM mAAr T s IxsrAu sv F.cE AxwxB u D A E v� IB A ( IN n E I '� pmsEsx..a1� NUITE'Ll wLE wumacio"NT N BEEBa�ASEOU NU a a0ffo Bu�u¢11 DOPNEE O 000 ESSION cwmmL E s a '( e Ewz I'kwau w al-aaP ax RE 1 PGx aT i' ENE.DAM AwT LL w�.xnv AND GaN11=1m IT G'a EAOSM GMm.DFxcxs AND � $ eI _ G^ u \ro DET`oR s.Wucn° TT 9LL f= � ®FENCE a11ET wMP ARY J / N IREMENTS I 'iLLRR BAG ® AL APPICANTI EES CONTROL MEASURES MOST BE uuNTANED UNTIL PEJMAA I AGETAi10N 6 SILT FENCE \ J DE PLPFG1^q ESTANLIBEEI AT STOR A \ I ,M1 —® RM RM / AMMum UEWE ONCE EMFRYESEWN1. FELF-MOTEENTENI TOAIENFA A GAYS AND MTxWON UPPONAN 11 MN Nql S.ENR"Ru NT OFPGAG o MAN UNPIMPT AT t III REE mEI PT—E.AxRIART SET a T PDETAIL M 11 MEET C6.0 NEASLMES SH ECPEO EE W ME LONSPAUCnWx LET.ON TINE RAN. J FOA CO ULMRON J 5 — �1mPORARY p14RAM DnN I RPR M COMM.uGEmuRES vHFRN M."M"OR UPM Z j N\ 4Ar.REaR BYM LL NRR REMNSNO Anm N L EPO INDPEGnPE =mM AS NDInMG ED BAHT. q TpK.OE 55 B MR-RAP aB J I ALL�g sNsnaT ANEAS SxML 1ANE gmux0 STAauOAnEx BY ME-TRACTOR A—NG TO ME CNANT AREA CN IN .TD y 15'RCP I2 sTAwOs ATE Al ARMs AIT BITITAT UP M Flx Afm U A g ml q(WME ASIN _ r 55LE BMP LEGEND 11 1111CMPLFTIM OF ME s n .D M CMM.DENS ETN°11,SNEETR R I 1 �S ROW ARRROW REMOVED ANO p�POSEO Of EA.YGIION 41ALL BE U C MUCnO EON�WOVGCFMmtlmNA1FLY qx ON T IRUGNM�iA(E°uFASmf EOmO NAR WM O F \ RE EMENT$ I OW41ROCnON ANCE CWA N.P.COWASNfXR AREA BE m GA M C S. Ir EE MAN. INI I.M.,w AAN NFD.AE BI AND KPOAxc 0 j / I TEE,Y IN!£T I J I 15.:556.39'FITSSA. BTPBWZFA STAgNG MEA ANAu°M1NFni 5"TmNwATENIrl- NEUA AG&E r.ABAAN kMENADL LIME DALL BE CMHRiEI N,0 nE ""� O Z o D U PmARr ) Nv IP NIEr PRarzCnax PUNxs DE wA xG mfNAnUNs wA ,D Ax APPTDvm RLRR xs DBw.PmDA ro i SILT @I 5xT/ ` I L AL crc0 x MPmARr ER o uNAR.,o�mw+c MnEi Z a I\ O -1 FENCE 'ONwu E ATEo E wM NTTEmavmMDV SHED. TE 090N OONTR.LEAEURES � 4 P RAP MRI �, E TRAP DETNL ON EE EE / I I CIF FOR O SiO.PILE IMEN 1CMM EASA ME CMSMUt,m N ACCmWN.MM N.G.EROSM 650 \ I SIM k smxcnox s Alms'"a Punwlx AND¢vM 1,R Na,Aw STATEcr E,E I A IENENIB VTC "NO.iRACNING WNIROL LU \ WASH A A �Ipp� Loo t1YIT51T gSNRBAN. I" NIFH"EEMT 1-1.1 PUNUOT 11 �EREATrtF MF ULE FkW MT�IE �s \III I n PLS o+ xoASEsxce Nmr _ .rsnu Nm nA GRTFME Frau E NNI15 \ \ I A,RV PROTECTION TSD TEMPORARY SLOPE ORAIN PERMIT ILL BE TO SOB T M(.NGT)A w,W ANNUAL pBNRBANCE P MA PEE MLL BE MAR.O UNTL ME o- B BEEN RILED IT k LLT r \\\ IPRO,E mPr DEgNFNiPLAIN qAM w ._EP NO M� © a,E aRxl �-rc 1, 0 SEEDING ANT NInaINc � Y PRELIMINARY A.MM NET NAG < prw'ii Az sP ins DO NOT e DD DIVETmcN DINE 'E4PmANr USE FOR L— ——————— 566——— \ I ® as Aacx wa k 'c xEz E a c' Ds,50 Mand nA CO STRUCTION O P N � wM ,B.BD D,N ,.B BY z1 �IB MANW uTExv AME . STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME ' ,aP a mGN Tw or m ;)I ars of SITE AREA STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME MA_T. N B'Nlry Cm KIEL III § 1 DESCRIPTION ExCEPT10N5 Noims"w ePmPRovED �TEMPORnxr M q W B SlLi ffHCE EW AL.Am" LIT 1 II SwNESP'2YES Aw )DAYS T TEMPORARY DIVERSION ORCH DATA BLOCK AB'PLENTY ]E,TPc ni 'YPO`s IYEfR I OEtuL sMET FUR TEMPORMr Z PLIA21 ,IN BSD-wSO9 v I \ I MOM1 zaMs i DAYS • ATUS \ nc[P[w N�ARE At uA�iO InRExO ng PNC.O sw AMW m PY \�� J � )°AYE-N I )OAYs raR n C 1 ♦O x , " ---- — -- --� STOP ® G )(ALAR DAYS NOmN �MM AtEA DATE OESCRIPnON HM s,.B 'Bess aw roM Know whBPs below. Mu Ma N x Herr a w \ Call before you dig. DEBI DRA D gND srnEP AEnPE4.rs. scALE " AN igxAT 1.EE 11MSSwm Bx1E¢AT n\M 1.77 NE`TP GRAPHIC SCALE JOB No.220117 I EM..`N`.OEM'Es m BwNONRFc IN MLL Aa.O N',MM.FOLtomM DATE SEPT 30,2022 DB SaSMP�G Jg0 pEN.NSgImPsLNUCNOR s AFRO IN NKITBAIAx"EROSau�PSTAM CONES. FOR LE No. PIx.RTxe-as-3s,GT BE Nm FOR ALL 0SFENEEEDEAANSEAASN AOSRDWG TG MFNET.III— EFauoMrw L r,"avx 7 tt v e ° SHEET X2.2 coe N..am. ro.mw>a POP�M1 w,P\fa-O-mMm\�w.eme�w�mv tl«':moun,�u,eow�1:wHvs-esa.M1 12 DW WaND FORraTMSTSAT—ORTAPARD.FPWIWmw,RWMIDURE— DMWWWDLNBEAnE BENMwTMmD�WWaxDT BENSS,BW U[USED IN ME TVSLAM r u1O PwuAwr sEm1c scxEWlEs FA PRDMNxO CROWD THE xW oDMO�U wTAnar Cama MA.-WI NESE 'a,AEF 1,m1s,nx ne.mnswclN��lxxl1 me,�,ea m comgMe n*,"1 nn zl11 LOHIT RA ro .BETARLINE O�EVfLFAANB�iT�A av¢LRExr W vMIT AY55 PDA.tONx DF WAPU xLL LEC BE ' FOR S,AM W TR D SCxMUS fRal Aa R SMA CWSWUttIW ACntP,ES GE EARL FE =m' ML a0p)1a mage(COI'll unser Ne xCWI W W;enaWelbn csM M. m s�ccAT uW+s ALL WE&A,,[ .M.oF_li T'I ALiiac�,EDLP Mme' " I L « �s(WIN QRST) a.1�in�na ronr�i�an�"�aw�a.ieM�<i1��w.,..vw�PSA Cl.e1 MR rKYAIh'N0 9 ES IN ASO RSICE cRUN HEE,PLANS BOUNFUNI ONaLY A NE mFFORM A,HIM I"alMHOT R=111 WDcru�slxcrs raTOTH M[aAm�camaL DETu s Ax �a+a'�'z9�"�maw 9 FISUN R_ MADUSA�AY'TOF EpN iroAT o.TMAmlRmuwi ON NS.DIWRSIW OTWES.Aro ULWRTS 4DPE.Aws.PIP-RAP AN M1�u UFYIR`N SaM- ON BES.BASED 10 OAR m ANN. STERN iATTMWR.MTM cACW PEVA SH INsrnu£O UNESAMLY ALT'SL1rFPAFANPER NiEr I"«I�uS,ul£o,IIWkFi� APRONS ONp oAon CpVma NFA-,, N"i�e.anxl N�Fmm.a cac rw�.NmoWiala to yw rIIMn m,m Eus�ess W.wWs WAu az sMAO,MLWFD AND AcxrlmnNwfO AD I.ww - ITsnxo BWxDAmm TANF Wr 1 W- EusnxG N,UWFI x Ls rO M Bun..T By nE 1,SOM,BEL"nm f�.;i n..ne,"`w.aIx m �M <mi ie vti DEMUR°si m» ienx"a Ye WATER MAT—JOSIMI£0 WBE THE- ro DASA.WE PTIBAD HE R. mW A ENSTND THRIONs"wA(EY.ML ""N Allf", Ns,ALLATW EF uGSUES yT.IXSITALLAR.OF PIT OUTTENRG'NRi MEIN BE PEE—NE)ensE MBNE wlu ETHER BE PLACED r� IB.o M(R eM uK NCWI RATI rzve4a Not Pre itllornv ewumntutlm to ML m nk FINE AllAREAS W«BE ORMSEAS aµo DEO.MMOYE A«INUIT PROMMON Mu ®MNY M TO azar. Iwc ML Ww HE mMlErm. a. sEc,az uxoscAPE Pux FOR LAAnpxs A PR➢POMn RAnncs AT 1INM srelMunW. m:'"tee` Pam i EDN a e.aenm. CW Wa MEASURES TO az NSrU1m PAIW TO WE BEGIXMXG OF DEMUITW R WE REMOVAL NALBE�aRuwn,CER PDRID EMBITURE MG£UPSTREAM ARDS NI BEEN STAIu:m BBURM E uv pwSRSON DITCHES AND BERMS SHALL HE NUNTAINED AS,HE LTE IS BROUGHT TO P M1e Is W eon LROPEOR nuNUL,ABD, CLEsWNFNT).ALL LMDSGAINC M<BE COMPLETED.THE W--stow=N=N TAADRARr FFxT AD 9WwAOlLUMATRED —H 91Etlllwr UMCFS S1MALL MY OF�az PENOKD ADI. m<cvA<ete a PFrmnl C[AUNG ro ME GROUND s,AluiAgW RFWIREUExR W M4RL IN CONTRAM. CLOSE I-IFTT''RES OCA1xIN OF AY OFF-5TE BIXwOW SOURCE OA Ofi-ms12 wASII N�TFRAL NSPOSAL A,E.qt-9II N y11 rf�ITM 111 US ING iTHALP�wo wSWix�M�ct:NANo uxu�I ITITUI MA LEAnal LOYMBOCnw.IRT PmppC IXSKCIIONS SAN Bf Pms[PMO Ar APPAWAIAt[siAGES OE T Cn A.wo/OTMA=AMLn AtWONMAxOra RE AAiEEAxcoO MAI wr WIInt0.uF EM `wgES p NRTDFO ro,RTP ADI srOgNwA�q BE I P GAWEWMENPXRAMS A S SHEEM MD M GRANT AND MANNABE RA FOR OTHER NOTES INE�SCDIMMTIAIN POLLUAON F.—All.1 AMENDED w m05E10 tSW12 THAT PERSONS EPFAuaiTD FaR IWS PmJELT LEAS BEEN xEWIFlm t0 t✓CWDE TE9BELRO TMA2 WE STgINWATEP azPAE I NARU.Inxc PH USED OAMIACE RAN,UTMN Pun,—1.PVN AO OWER PLA PULS O—NO ME-..'A'.OF TT""N_IDA EFFmT OC,WER 1,EMB 111'I LIS E1.11NP1 III.11lAND1E1lN1.TA1'11T.1N1.1ll III� D .OV11 H LANDER" ID Ill IKtE NCDE�IO P�NSOL IxSPETTOR THAT lK U11IIT AREAS ARE TO PREVENT PULUrAILADEN MORN-1 RWUF FAIN R4WNG TO ADJACENT PROPERTES WFfi �ETNIEDNOESBN INmA .A PtlYANEHT ATE APPUATWACES SIONN W MI5 O SIBE1 f TEMBORMI PERM((yy Sl fl ED AA SOMHNFO FFORM ETHE ESMUNA R�WMTR PERMIT ISO SCAN5IRUTCLIIFROM WO ACnBE [nSW U'arA01 xOTC. - JACExl�f THE iFMPAMV FFNCEEIM S,NE'BUTS OF NSNABACE.TH IffYTPESRAAE I'M IN, S a MOUE SE1PGIxPECOWNiEPATHIXIS WTMINS�ALWa o AND UTMn1ENAPEUCTMSESi0UN�0 Ip TDTM AFEAADNNFBED-Z Ul A— 1 THE THAT MAY BE ATNEOUPNL STAIN Aro PAY FOR Au WSRLUNS tmUILAnDK EWiLe-NL,E1G FOR ILLuSWATVE PUPPOSFS Wlr. Af 1FER N ONVOL PHAYMUS 11[PPO aFB TR'NAo coxnxufD unra MANnIrrvT FAWXD CEDED TMAL SITE 1 mMurwLom.WE roRu cnx BE AccEATED AT T' 11,/11TALllmwg OPcncRnartxOFlax R SUL TIRE =G MKING SANDY LOAM AND WNOAE IRE SADY LOATHE O lf�Yl o N0 sn1WABE OR MTWN ANSY AEOMED UL WIS UraF�O=.UO,ED OP 2. HIM OWERwSE IxgCATEO ML'h oIARAl4 AUD SWJCNRAL EAE 4Aro SE➢u SCMWMm SAB ET,WASMM.FlT,NG,ERG.MAr MAI eE AEOUfdO FOA A arxRErt eNO W[MpNG AK WFSTMMIS OA CANOi ACCESS TIF FNN,PLUS SA.M=APWc1BLECaNR MUgJAL woazMAcrza WALL xo x Tule A.W xoT W :( )(FAYCE.THE s O ua RAW)IMu s a z AE ABOAD A Ni n�0 EMUS ulo Sou[rvi W mm xnxOBTMOaK NM s 1 I TT DF rRNIM,nano XG,NOT NOT LIMS ro DU51 FM DE BUTERNA, ( -AH sA i)(M+sroN selEM.On n1 DGR)(MOOR asst Gs) AND THE ENGMFm DI OWE nR N WE CONST UETRIN MEMS AND MFTHWS wAST D SPMAI uILO xAlAFWMS uA.- IN ( -aE00). T,C PITA SHAll RRIAL,AND--.IN WROUW Wi WE PROULT CWSITUCTW ALL ASSaYpOJ:O A5 3T FW N THESE PUNS I AFWTmAIDD ITHAIINIABOI CONTROL MAKR6FS£M J CONTROLµo U%EIMSRON1caIWm IN'�aun`AnDASIN AcmmANCE wW APwcABLE NAW 81 .1 AEN cAUwu+c cw BERN SALT s n BRIT-1 F V"" CHAR A w a A N AN As UJIL Ol�I DRQ 11 TO EEA E EAKT LTWATiu-nm1 z NUR ow.r As PEW m r0 wsruL ERrcP - W.PA URSIT.XMEEL N. CWSWUCTW MSM WNL BE Ix NMUANCE MW NEWLATWE OF WE NATWM POWTANr OR FIA.ELT MWCAW Y U PtE WASWnALCLIfTTEA TO ME OrNw. PINK 1S p NEER EC€SSARYw1MWRW WSWTEALL PMHIANSES SIR SONSTRUE-, CRAU IMDFMxl rnEFL wSSMS I ALL WEES Aro SHRUBS W A m n 'z DISAAa SUMINABW MTII(NPDES)sT]RN ENSUED BEIERN.PFAYIT 5. 1qF5 fRW WFv UBGimNs A AAMIGS AF OEFNENO CESSAW BY ME 1 R B W CSL MNA50NEWFSTO E ETAULD ANALL HEX.OIi SLUM WOTR�ry0ffFEO FMEW uEMXmIMxT BASN SLOPES USNO OIAFRSW SnxG SEDIMENT CONWa MEMURES ME TO BE RACM PRIOR TO CLEARING AND/OR LAIDFROM THE-TRACT OOLNNwR 91All az MADE MW WiCINUENES to AMD REDDEST-REBA UtLx6 AND lO SAVE ML OTTA EDI SAO WRWS ABA ImS�WE COXIRA OISNRBAGANF . THE FIS PERMISSW U WE Ov.Nm SLOPES.UTAINS 70 UMBRE STORM WATSON RUNOFF DOES NOT—1 FE FAT U FINAL AAfs, MOST PRUNING S NEBESSMY,Wi POOR CLEARLY USING A SKS TRENCNw AND IMMENATLY CDAER ALL PWT CUT SURFACES LUMBER THAN WHO IXWES M CHUMETER WW,AEE WOUND DRSSNG. G. ONCWE SIR Al UPY UP 11 ALL TIMEDMES ENO Stm smluwT cW Wa PLAN AT PBaB W A«eE MuxTANmITS 1MESYKEES R WYEFS A H5 MFRO ALL SPERM PE 051E 1B AptWW1PLASE EAACAPAtt WLEI AroLWTIO WAS,wAFAFT BMASm¢WGPFNIT[OIIHiER I50l1ENDIiazWSFNTOWPRSOMMna1. VY PLYWOW FORMS MRN WBE RCD1 IRE AWAUNT TO PROPOSED WIDE h BUTTER W ADEwALu. riM NON&PIR 1ER1111 Z. WE CUNPNF A SHPLL DIIGENTIY AT CWINUOUSLY MAIN-ALL FROSON LUMBO.DEMISES AND RwOKD wW ME PROECL ST W A DULY BASIS LAND DISNRBIXLG�ACTNtt DER—ON, IN WF WU PADTFCTW SORE RIFE BARRICADES mf0 EAOSIW CCN%INSTLTA W WAT PE=IN`10CU.TS LA Rf CWPFWUMID'Al 1 Rff VAn SOF TI EP%WM ID SKIM sF'NER AT="'WO PAUEMEnt AAas AND NS,O NNSTAu£D BEFORE ANY DEMW TER.(FARING A CWBTAUCnW EEGNS ANO NOT MUM— UNTL ON INSECT., APPROVAL NAM ST1 OF*uH BHO LA AUIMOBSATW 10 AIDE ADJACENT PRCfEATIfS N ORTUDYL 1I.UA OISwNmIxG,ACNATMS SNHAllaxDT CSN­ONMAD�M Am"ROYAWL`L ED SO BEEN PMPTROOVET SIPPLENFIT MW 1 2 x��Es OF NUlbl 9Y1 AND RICA MFR UNDISn SRA ANG TPUISSW MUST BE 0M FROM THE APREGTO Fl¢0 wOSON NID SEDIMENT CW Wa AAMVGS OWMO CWISnAICTW WmAnUK'. -NO CRUSUND WTHIN TIME III pMAE-SEED MSH SASS WLY N OISMazO/AaUO REAS. PR ttSPONNEAPRS A AEM ED PL NN—.1 LISIT IMF—4 F az SUBMDIEO Nm BY RIVE IxG CAlES.MUro RBE INTTNLED LEn AE ANY TWronWW aVRINO.CFANNG OA COuSTRUCTW � LWTADT MUM wDNMR AT PROJECT UNDSU1 10 aNmM mxWAMPR WML COYPLr WW ALL STAT AT LAN UmINA[ES WAt APPLY. W ST-D.NRAD.S.io ExsA�E ADInWu moslan cox WOL AAwgm ARE wsTALLm PRIOR TO N PERMIT 111 .-1-MRME worm,WE eENxs um Is xo sR P N P `M'NS.ALL US SENTmfD WE PERMIT WIT. B. BE PROMOTION TNBE Is To BE LOSATD I FEET Pw WE DIAETR NW AMY FROM WE WEE. p z 11.1ENA.wan OR N caw/wcNO LAND psNPBxO AcnwnEs IN UeSs aMm THAN ISTATD W WEE AS(INCLWNG W T NOT 1MRD TO CAF-SIR LWAOW A wAIB REAS STASNG 0A STURAGE mtl r E.SW LOI—PROLUSEB TM BE INSTALLED Aro MAINTAINED 10 MruN EOuwT J Q r THE'coHOWALTA.AML PREPAAE Ao sueurt A w�P1Eu�Ar EPDSIW cpxTmL PUDE MrwN WS eWImAFs A WF sT. NEDEPSrA swut PA�AL�Emnc V ATNO WE u[wOLD 11MMIL ME—B WE .1 IN MEA.A A s.S Ba.11 ro BE PUFFn ISRSH ANI STALL PROwOE WE ovxw ANO Ile wcxmA A mPv N. DWECTD BY 1Nf PPOtCi wM+me Sxp/OA LOCAL,uAlsgcRWM MSPELMA. � 2 EO IAm E wNl l.M A NEAESSAr M'OR AES F AND SENNEN7 CAWa MEASURES SHALL BE 1UNTARED CW WUOURY,AELOCATO MIEN 21.FW U AT AS,RMARDMULLE.TAY,ANG AML HE BE ENTERED Fwnuzm AEUEFDAEnLL s SOUL BECaz9 EDTM RRIU.AL J mCn011MAE RP050N CWTNL LAK AD sAWuznnW O Z TO STAN A FENff STAR GF AAss - AD Macxm as xEmw.xr 23,ALL AND ER EN CW Wa MEASURED IALLAM INRRACE:II TO wMMENNwc U - 111111AIST 1111_ _PER _ Z .11 ARE ITT AW ST�ABIS➢A FBBUND LOAM 6,AIENED. WMTRUCTA ENWMU PMS I-L BEOTHEMARDS MAN LET, S O S WM THESNCUO SEDIMENTNT COURWa FFWLA4:,O P RENT SmOIXG ADI SASS INSTALLED WACTA AT WxB11 ACCESS POINTE PRIOR rO SENO NSNABANCE. E:TAuauwr Is aWIAm PPIA To moJEa cWu,wx AND Ac«PrAra, miN`AFAs�.Iw11­1 ruae m uaIRE A�,°N c.s IS O.B.mOmx IN AcwRDAxcE a 12.1I i TO IN SDIL OYNNCWs,MIOn. �xU xO�AEENBECOVEDIllf➢IWTwI A 0 PMSOf SONE 25.WNSWUCnw 1MI15NALL NOT BF ExaEan IN1HWi THF AWAOV,LL OF NUIFO IXSPECTW. W U FRIM TO MAT U WF WIFNNAL MRI[AT W_11 11111Y 1APEL OWMALIILNEDOMn AT ALL COxSWUCTOn MIT WUGTW NAU55 LDGTWs NTD.NW-PAVED CUA.Sx INWm U 11 11 BRAIMS RNUBM 1I HE PAUTH AT.OF I Y PEPIAUD AD M MIfT G&Am.BIILT USNMG N ITT A,AALCEPT% Mf WA A 11.SELIKENT CIFAING DIKES,SFUNwi B%SEW ANO OWER MEASUN S IN- TO WAR ME CRO.A5 A TORS,STP Ix AN r I.wO-NSnMNNG MnAttt AND SHALL BES—FWCTWALEBEFORE A-SLOPE LAT OSNMAXCE TAKR PLAT. Rem AREAS MG E TO DRANeTO wAnowlx�s APPROVED aNliiraPlLiFNxiTuai AFwlei si IN. PRELIMINARY G CpIPI£TEO D O DO NOT 17 DURNME E-wso1EA¢ro aaAw NTE WUL az PURRED INTO A APPROVED FLUND DE1a USE FOR PmA Tow ,. CONSTRUCTION PLAN T1s SO EaE"sw DATE DESORIPTOH DELL DELL DELL EN DRA ry CHKD BS LE N 00 No.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 ILE No. SHFFT CZ3 _'\S s_'YNMMNr.N..aP<NwmMP Xa"=,Mu.Nu,__M,wa EEFMT 13 V N ww wasA T_ L.LJ F_ 0 'V Z Lu CL Or Lu 0 z Lu 0 NCGOI GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING NCG01 SELF-INSPECTION,REOORDKEEPING AND REPORTING DRMiK oaNVis z 0 < cc: I- 07 z C.D. (D PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION www _'2 M;R� =n Tw Tal V,I%= PLAN lec-L :A�_ SILT BAG INLET PROTECTION 1 R NT D EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS RECP) LL DAIS DESCRIPTDN 106 No.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 ISE No. SHUT C2.4 14 sorts. I. wlxRElE ManaN,ac aR¢/4ttwuN-s[ttTUL 91EET a,z VICINITY MAP NRNEIE PAIENEx DTROL REPORT SEE 0l waxs- 1 DESwN AB rtR fFDlf STEE V 2 SxEFi W3.EYPAN90N PND CGNIROL JRN1E-EEE OEiN15 3. i PAS FM EMSA As PER ODIDT­REPORT SPECPIC TMSSEE - C M ETPNDAL III PANNENT V -1111 PANEMEM Nc 5y Hwy w ®PmN.I I-SEE o rPN —1111 t`"'p'De NN aD AD-EED NL�a�¢ N —I E J.1 ROLE TAPE DNIIE OF Ewu%-siE uI.L EIEEI tsR ITT slDEwuxs...T TI$TLRBRNCE BNIIOINO nr,GE M(N DIT'Ll.1 . x. DDUPE,Ex ITIT-NEE 1-1 SHEET 11,1iE, NMTE a Dd , -o'LONG DMCFER NNE¢ i0 PAVFM E1oP,PINNED [Ni-(HOT USED). O gE1NRBANtE ID.",MT "" 0� rav II,r w PA�e dart PAI-'E""rel 10 — I CDluniu N Rav RA LEM10LF �'YIBACx WARxINGO PNS C[NTRAS'ING LOLM.Yfw� xAME eeD ————— _ I I>.xFw GRAEEnAwsrePF ArtA I14.MIORMPND QI11EA-SE DETAIL vl¢1 ce.2(1101 us¢G.) ] LnxDa OR—ER Is.STOP sml-xc—11 SNFET 111 �PROPOYD NEIL LOCAPCN OR ANAGENENT \ /^ / IIE.PANIFFNT uAANN6-YE DELL—I C62 m rI PMD 'P[ CUi M TW EM.I Ell PER 1.11 a k.PPPRAAW LOLL u f f Ncs.(NDI DEED) *1NOL T_,DIT AC(Ess c�N¢1 EIIwE6 $ ]D. —stF fx RFNCE-(H]I I-) sp]e1-1G I ) I OELMERYDWflACCESS "NNE»AE.PrzE, I x.is � e I s � sFDI xc xwrGsa I 5° I I �Q I j I T.b ES-1 _ Q 1 HE TElIRa 0..1". .W.. SIGN LEGEND s 8 e Is V I 1 W Lard Lka rauE,.F¢I ad Praa Maur PM F'IraN Naalr Dtt. z Q3 a o f o .O, R I 1 S71 SW Retld Pita a iDl SFI It,lpd SF I:% 43 ® QQ U RRinrvL r�SpncLlu Ywnin I I wryw.vee.Tent ER.P wl.aurucx J F MIN.16'Xw 16' I III I—im RfTIWa Jy ealww.m A9 in dAe Aand PM p.1 o II LOADING AREA �b D I I I I 1 ,s'RCP I— z MIN. ) 1 rvv ss<.ifi TWEb Es.2 CIE,DUMPSTER18AREA'%16' ___ a I I 1 LawawTSaM LQS S12;a J uwTs ,a1N PWakow HPadA Haw -RA ANCS �aA D Dada PL Q3'ONa -IED nT Au APPROVED was,E N`l.'L AN' 6 I I R P NCS{-W 6kr CF,m Wald(IL.Amidur61 i '� ♦ \ I 10'x Q' l BICi55sz' Eaw�ml lPx+Flrnlde "'H I l tiH 11111 FF V a I DIST NCE TRIANGLE elf F1 11 NkL IY(:il,ll Ha lji W IN240'Harr. NR-L N3.a7 Nh-Edaw 31 FTN_ HmIW�a113WF1 TRup11e G,10,9p Wm AIR Whu c—Raaf-sk ftim."{17s1pWd1 I ld'x70SIGHT R.,Id II.t 212+1 TRu1T.R ER AN.a1 GN AVIU 31 I � N8L-A 79 Y81-A'.Sr DISTANCE TRIANGLE PRELIMINARY L.T,DT I I DO NOT RAR13— El I USE FOR IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE CONSTRUCTION II SEPT. I I 40y 1-L— =Y11-El'(01 AI) -1ARE) 8 RdA D010 R L-------------- 1 I I / Rid I—ENT 23.m]S Nes) 111,xOi— ITT53 ACR�F 5' mTaLIUPERxDusAREA s a,:EREE ki m WEEx/axx SPACE 4sF I W ACRTE s eru¢Ss w nzsl I �I� ; CaD ACRE(E) � s1 11E F.aER LINE TABLE ® gE­LL s Ans LINE LENGTH BEARINGIS,Is L2 MW SA]5'ar EE-"-NOD I zsrIl'I Know whD1s below.,evwCall before you dig. x zDTL CURVE TABLE SCALEr,; IePPPSAni CURVE RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD GRAPHIC SCALE aT No.220117 Pm.s]ae-Ss-sass4171TATE SEPT 30,2022 x�'a140'x IJI.ffi ILE No. (aF¢ET) eon IE SNFET C3.0 Goa a..�. w.�,>N xw�n va.Pu2s-a-INo�xr�.�NP.wm«v oma.�o^w�.la,aam.n.w.vs-vl.ew 15 usxns LOS. FOR L.B.- AS'ECANDED CIECAN OP"AIL.L.ANC MO-A'"I-OR"A"" ME ElTNCl 071.OF TI NORM-..A DERARTNERI NFINANSFORIATON M(NOT) ro OR ��:=�BEAAN MIST BE NOTRED AT LEAST 24 IDLEAS FRION TO­LACTION. FRANCIANAT. —1 TD ME-1.ON DID _XNT .—(....A 1A.11 EDVAOR,FOR DETAIE OF—NO I—I ITANDANDS -A-''--ALCT--Y A­` I NENCES A. I TIN. _ONCE T,...T 2 ME-.A—WALL 1-1 ALL NORMENTS 1.FERS AND PERPERTY .1 N I ME NOACT'TANDIC,NO 'Y'A4.1 'ONNOT,CLEM,COFITIPA)" ..ES OR TR.C ARE TO BE OPEN...THE ICLERS OF E:BO AV TO—AN A. AwAcmT I..TO s.0,11 A MINIMUM 7 ONE 12-ENET LANE WALL BE MAINFAMOD AT I Im,1117=Ell"IT., MIT 11. ON .US,.CSI.M...ME A_TES"CLEITY CADNEI AL_ROADWAY SIGNS WON ARE TO BE REMOVED CLIG­MLICIM ARE TO BE RODESTALLNED I ­DMATE ALL�AND STREET RR­11 ITERRIONE INN NOPECTIF1 "E"NOR A'""IS S TID BE PAFKCD AO CLOSE TO ME FRIFT OF 5 " I E P—S,REDA - WAY UNE AS=B-ON BE PROFFENLY BARRICADED I ORDER TO FRESEN ANY 0..1 A .,—.y-='T"�=Z—Dl VOLIElt DESIAKNON­N Ml TRAVEL-1. RIM I.OM,"'ANINER,I MANUTALIC,'m N_­ -I—ACTON,—1 AOIIR IN STATS APT OF ANY FEE TO—A ISPY OR I ALL 11 1 EACED 111'A'1.1.OB IM& NNEIE IA.01.1 JOB S. ,AN.MILESS CMIYBS,%ALL FRIYNN...SONS I NET ME OLTED, .1—0.". YORDN PERSONNE.ANDECIN ECUPNENT ARE ATTIN P AN ONER CONTRACTOR SNALL OLLSE ME OPEN TRI.LARE ADJ T�NMEN'ZIL MIA INNIAG =COLE CONCINKINS.FRALES,CONTONFRI URJTB AND OTHER EASING REFFORELATE__ANDS.ALAN,A.M_IM M.A SLIEY IYETARED.Nl..D—.­ IROME.BY EARIDER I CIARCRAI I ALL A 1AL"IlRlrl.D'= "T"'To! TRE ZDA OF.CAN�.A CRY_T TRAN:OR AT.ET. LO CONTRA SHALL NOT�SMULTANEA ON DEAN SIDES OR AN OPEN TRAVEL 1PETICATAll 11 11 AND 11DAR LICTRY11ON'11 ARN11—IRANCE 1111 ME CARE LOCCAMAW ON A TAD-LARE,­lY MAN. TDADRT�OCIS ANY ONSAANCE&ME CANIBITION SNALL SFE CARIENT ME IIAKMUN LENDTH OF A LANE CLIMME BN ME PRIST­BE CRE MILE, ED—OR ME STATE AND LOCI CODES,ORDNANCES.StACESED SFEOFC.TCN UBAYVABC MAI ME BEIANNING OR TNE LIERGE­TO THE BAD OF TRUE LANE AND STANDARD_ALS ON.1111 SIB 11 REFETEDS WRING OD TER CINTRACTI WALL NA­AT 6:1 EASSIS RA-EN'.ARE.ACIACENT 9E LIE TO,ZA DOOR AND�ADDR OF —D E I.E.—NAS A I ME OONTFWS­SNAL.W ALL )MEN­IN TNE FIELD RON TO ME MRSE-1 OF—MAN 1. START OF MAO� ILLY AND iIRAMSU'l"—WALL BE NESINOBLE FOR ALL AND'CTLAL TOLD MEG ANY 111:11�'EEE=TA 1-El IS REQUIRED 11 Al I Al NO EARENSE TD I DINER. ,ORNOR ON ON IMENATI, N.L.ON..1-­11.EDENT TO NA MN MO LIPOINUM BEFTERENCE K ELEVA­SETBEEN OPEN LANE Of TRAIC SNALL BE 2', DHEN LANE CLOSAIRES ARE NOT 11 FRECT.CHATINNETLINE DEACCE I­ ALL DYCE MN�E��F7 11 ME CONTRAOTOR­LL'A�T­SWOO' BE I CED NO GREATED MAN �P—)TEND T jo�ON-CCENTER IN BERATICS TO E_F� REC A�_=YWORS—PROPOSED Of RA s Cl.AND­BE EST 3 CAR THE ECCE OR AN OPEN TRA­ a I ME ORNMACTOR ONAL.DEAL ME ECROE OF E-MG ASPHALT PANE—fflM CARING INSTALLATION,P­TRAPIC CONTROL TIVECES.S­.ETt BE NSTALRED TO 8 'A 'OF OR CO.IN ACCORDANCE M.1 ADEM CADCAMA 011­ F iR F CARD—110-1..1...ERT­EAST. ENSURE IBL C ETANB=ORCl.UECW'TN TRE'l—CARCMLE DEPARTLEAT OR ,A-- ANORCA ff AN 'A, 2 PREAS D, REPEAL FRA­RECONSTRUCT O�I—ANY ALL.QSTLISNED AREAS ARE 10 K III REA­TO ICDOT I—ROINLAY SGBmwNO_'M ON By THE.—T.ME _QLARY ME_OR S.PFIDES AT NO ACEITANNI CDST TO ME CMER, MATERALS AND Y(FINARSHIP SFALL CONFORM TO ME ICOOT NORDANY STANDARDS AND ­ ALL PINFRENLCI ALL SA7 PRIOR TO P4ANR TO MONDE A BNIFLAAANNS(D—ST,mln,N. ALFABILL AN,I"'L'll EIIBE �CNTRA�CTON SH.ALLCRRE��T.0 ARCH TECTNRA_FLANE PON EXACT­ONS AND _ I BIT—IDEAALAR PREASO ELYMNI D-F.S,AND EAACY MILDN'L.,ENWANEf mcnoxs. I5 �,L FRA'NYCSlRRNY.PAVIRT MARKNEC.AND SONACS SIAL­DID ME " ON IN..TRATE1 I—Ell.'ON Al C.I..SPECIFIED. 1, PEORIENTY URB ANY MATLT­OF­INMENTS SHALL III I DSTINED BY ALL RUSCRENCEN�I., C Sl AN05 ARE TAKEN FRSN ME'NANJIL ON ANEFNARI CONSIFELICTON.IF DSTDBEEE.TREY SPALL BE RESET T) ANSIAL TRAFRO CON CE�ENSP ROOM AND InCCIONCANCE ALL NEV 1.1 CHIP BE NOUNTM ON CALIANDIED PAL S AT"—ACTOREC—AL BYEA­D LAND IM.— .1 5TATE A.—1 RLIP"ONS z 2 PROOF NOLL ELLDIS AND ALL PARKING AREAS.NOTY­Of ANY 11 NACCE, I S—lDlAAl'NllIL.111.lLNA�F_l PER LOCAL 111CPALTY A. U AKAs ADA'ANDAN ALL OR A. NO_T.B AS RECARED u) , Blll�LENBCAR-1 1.1AILL111 11111"OE I ARE NOR R Uj Il.THIS CAN A—I RESTON11.1 TO,ME—1.AND M0...ALL. D__ 'LY CONTEACTOR _EI A_r EARETING I DES­NN CONSTRIACTEDIN AT LEAST 4A.1 1.TO.1 ILANI 1.E.IT ALILDINS DMENSIONS. R.A.STENCTLEAL BE_ A&P —CNAOKI OR ON.Ll ON ACIPATY ME CON. CIA WALL NO_ 0 DR,IELI"ul. P.—T,FDA MGPM.IDWRNEAnON OF CASDNR 4. ALL SITE DMENAMEi ARE AFFERIED TO ME NAI T CURN CIA INCE OF P­ ;z ­T SITE. UNLESD CTNERBEC NCMEI LL o 11 FILE FELL III ART ALL PACKING "N"MINFA/AALAR I'll 1� WINALKI.11 AND ITTER.ITRETTL RANONS.CAUND—=TY ME IN OF ANY MA�6TANNEF AREAS. OAIES,"A""''_"_"OTED.—TIRE ME NCMlC­AY SLAILL TO ALL MUNCRAL ANN/OR A— cn 19.ME­CIR­IRLEACE AS-EMJ RETORDS OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ANC MICLUCING NAMEONDUAD JTLPEC AND STCII CRAINACE)To CMI/tOLLAR SENCRAP READ.CONPLET.6_TALACTOR D ALL COSTLRA.CE MIURRED TO ANY AIMME PODREATT DDE 10 CISTIATBN CL. ON DEA NORSE SHALL BE BEI MORED TO ME­CONINTION ON DETTOR,AND `C TNE SAT—ON OF CITY ON STATE ALMD-. STRIPING LEGENG SURFAYES SHILD BE YCLEAN,DRY AND E­OLDENG AND­N- `EAL'..ANS"A'S%N' ,ANRNA LOT _ EI A P ALRYOAMELYF— SLIIA- s CLEAN ON I.IM.-..NO LOi CWT CHEMANN IDIOMS-MO TRAFEC MANIMB PA 1MAN suRFAWs WON D BE I—L.1 TOP 1AND—STIRRING-PARARNS LOTCOST ADS MAER C..T:�C` �C. PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN­TUR KVEo sty DATE DEscaPnaN 106 NO 220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 ILE No SHEET C3.11 I—SELS, 16 SfN 55,, 11, SA3.D6 1NDa / I=_ 'B �¢r0 1NF SNE PUN 1.RFU1L0 N-1, I.. A LIHWN IGRADE Of p 31.5p F IxIAINm REFS CN ALL UNIE55 OTHERWISE u01Fp. W l 3nN�'0.4 =]5' ALL COBTIT.A.SPor FU_CNS AE 1 iINSTED GRADES 2 PIPE 1FROUNS uW—11 wOICAIf➢ON mE FlANE A.APPFOpM .1 ,1 Al EILVAIWNS ARE IATINN FFPFREN�TO THE NxT ME 4AAK,MD m15 MUST 9E VERINED BY THE Iry LINES GALL OD INSiN¢p w AODOApM[E 1m ME FaLOMNG SIMpMpS IN NC 5a HWY HW �RUN,roxmAACCTON S"'i�F�Arttr REPDRI ro o'AMER.1 ADDmax i0 milfA,wn¢nelc wrtalA pSNAEPMCR:s'UN B CTIN INM ODD TF ENRAtm M OPE ED AT ONE TIME NC OmAoFlGNDInDNS AND GGN O DDNNa S Mm a L BAR TDR wS R GnON R _ a 5 rylGry 4 E GNTRACIOR a 9E RESS SOEE FOR L NG AND PRDsrnr1 EKN G ITLITE9.AND s.WNI A.'C�®9 °M:EW NA TONS 5 SAL REPAR NL DAMAGE TO EMS UTLITES NAT OCCUR NPoNG CCNSIAUCnaI 3O. CO.'.. 0 IN P90EA TO - c1 DMI15. ^ l E CTNTRACTTR SH.&END NEW EARTNWOAK RAVE MPROKICK T EA AND FlLL 3.[ g EtroG�n ASI 11 gtE�ABI�ON,1TMU.�11/ a m vmrwv to mArsnau RACK to Ewsnwc ceArE. VCE ERmw IN 9nwwr ITA CH uwts of ` ccs - aTPE uI III roul`?,oa"o>xceTH TRAINT RED REEiAA."Nis"c 11111. xF. Ace"PPuwmeAssrElr AENunaxs slAu a cpuvuFn 1m. 1 11 11 RECTIMENTS 1 11 msnxBANCE� \(nE(� la'xcP / DEBASES ANRE I BASE c II.S.g ETU IMEs IT RE cauim D fires IASUSH I. cT RUFFENCE no FACUOW G STAA"rvpnDRO BETuus� '�"01V5P°RTAnpn suxDMo mnwxcs. rzsI ¢EVAnONSTHE SDM P RE ON mE NORM OMOu r— ,RAG ENSURE POxnAE DR F 1 N M OAiOx RAS O3 NE'All,NT xNT PG GTN THE TQM NT EAS,D NEW OR INLETS a O N� OAO ¢ET x TO A FINE mE of mOGnoN M�Ow N mE sF-t ROPE incur Ax Im9am a0s0x cNmN PUH s wnafcr is eBB.U.21SO P"Ec"cw a PREGID DAnmAs smucmRE M N F 0 58.9(15) —_— — (AIER.-�. 1 YS S-yJ15 ixryfONMOFUDN MFS"MD F9LGA LLYMWAEX rNNE D]NS11NCn0Y R oER ACNRArt NETHOM E GN sTR AucNNERAm ulT EVEx GRATES ustxc A RAPE USER qt 558]5(TS) BE AS FOLLOW IN¢SS 01HERMEE N01Fo / 5&25(N) 9n:H TI R L los SEEpm D LMDECAPm 1 I51A OF DOMPI TIN OFro TYPE 1 RCP cuss I PER ASTA C-WITH FtEAKE RAS.nc ECTMFN GSNEC AT ANTS. 'C#'CA / / / MND MEAS ME TO eF SEFDFD wixxmio DAls,m 1 ca R 11" Sss w) ENsnxG GRALEs CcwTNTb NnLTES AND OTHER EMMIND FEA—I m Tref z BN Da9TY vNrcN E 9PE N—) AA las NFE s NUI 1 INV 56.5 I — / a fl¢p RUN SIRLEY TYPE s MT w]9]mE s sMTTm x TN/Nu PDFIRE SHAI BE a1TRAo wNa H io THE��NTRAGNIT ME P�Gi ns DEow HEE CONTHE TRACT PRICE MY CdwAiEA NE NECESSARY r0 Z wnTEn 1 D uALIUFACN S III�TNIAnONI IDISGGUDDN S tt ..AND NTT. o � LL RK NCHt i T wA F weDG ACOS 9 N N N R wT r¢ $ [[ J MD(FS) — NIF MarPTON Of 1L SrU E ND N0 8 v ED S o 5%9(15) 559,]5(15) ( ON,RED oRnwHtsMiLxOc L ' Ax s1aR mw m wcEp cNwFTE TPF — Nr ¢St oma15E NOIEO ssR,zs(ml I —I 7 ) U oma acxEa Aclxats xD ss9axspmr iDN info vcx"(s1 Ia HrsrAu sup las S. snxc�o�uxns smucmREs TO RE xs°Ec1Ep AMC s9uAm AS NEEDED Aro Ewsnxc wPEsPIN 4711- TC F a 55&(1S) X1P) I I \ /I' t NS TOP 9IANL RFrtAEIasmE Ma rtGNRM BANS faR ExACi LOCAM N,ELEVAnN,AND BE CU NI ID RaDVE STT AW CB A F E SILT-n}Yil WE xAm xAT 55I.(GTI t' ICII CNE OF FwI pOtA5 AANPS NLgNG p1aSCN5 Mp ErACI aUID ND UnOtt FNmMCE NSU"I SmUCRRN.ES N AEuun ME ANAND N wG CMs1RU1 T I-BE d{ WATER Pati) II t 1. F1Y rN IT REMTLRGwC SrNUICn9NESR5NALL m rzwNrERmE EKrnxs sTRurnRE M xEasMv 8 6D.S9x t t IEAMs 9tALL K 0 ro PETIRN T TO ElbiwG c01IDTM5 CA BEDFR. Tax C[NPIFI¢t'PM VMFTOMmau wMRAN 1SiIETBiMxc t BE CANTED TU—RE NxNEANN AT SINUCIIRE 5a.3(TP) I 1 . IS MANNOT, / 9,9n5> um) `5 i O D EfMNMNWR BD<NNLLED AHO"NNPACIFD AASBRENNEO By WO G°NERE�E N¢ it PRE ST T AREAACTORSAR HATT OPIBFONAE 5 SN LL a e E TTTEH AN 1MUA­11 NMa I I I Al E b_ u111 1 a ccCI sAu�Ax x uxP HE E FM sl sHADL BE kl ORF 1T DUCCESS S A'R. OR p' LOS I sTRU mrc TTORLEIEVANTNSpWN 1I xFMx 11 M ax MAtE cNmActtN 11L MAIST ASx�ApE. 11 w Ru t m mP v PERMIT DR�MwAhR USCH SSUCAso WIN CD macs Tax CTITD 1 nEu w xEsassMY % 5¢s(cR) ss9IXn) sse.zs(mj ss�9.zs( I t I FIT ATRr�ADlCOHNNNUOMS ADXST D ARACE Ano/DR cur EKlsnxc PANawr M xEassMY ro MwRE A supprx ¢EVAnpxs Al xoim ME rC 11c Nr¢R¢marc d z LDit03 559.9(15) \ I I t 0 wM-s .tb) T.e(Tp — _ j 15'RCP a AcrcN exA¢ENaRE PrsnLE oGxAa AWAY Nau Bumxcs FTR ALL xATIRu ANT PAu,O LINE TABLE C7 O b / � 65,7 \ � 69 G I I NV-65A.P5 ANREMiAMS � - I / /I I mNm�MT SNA¢EAS 1.1.1nn9TN RION ITAN T Au amEs M Iv N SRAFPEN TOPSUL LINE IG141 BEARING z U 41 E 559.M1P \ I FDS 5 1 [rob TON 91ALL CCMLY 1m ALL ARDICMIE GOVER11NG CODES AID BE CONSTRUCTED N 55.](TP �\ 5586(c) D ssa.o( '�I '.� °Na zs.sAs�a U2n' x p O rvl0 1 I I 557.5 5'RLP 43 Z / / 50v(1P µ0.11E1 MOPE T L4 S NA5N0 w ( TER1 T( I� Nv-ssD.rze' � CURVE ATABLEs 9s A.E � J SERE( NADIUS lENG1H BEARING CHg2D Z 2 — — t J i 55e 9(ro ssEx>P ssas -"' c scat s'aTAss NE.I / 5369 ) SHOULDER r 41r�P 4 TYPE I / /. TCJ VICINITY MAP SSB 4(Gi) (WATER WA5'HI • (WATER�jICHi) W _y.-`'�+ 9€ �"" - I \ \ Np"ryX PoM-95fi. 4U�5"N PE a p� INV-559.3 ++WATER>r.l�pli�� '- \ \ NNI- 'x.5.5\ (11 t6"OtA53 IY ROP L LIN Itt \ \ \ 5158,OWN / (WATER-nDHT) .— / DTsnmeM+c PINY w i ws9x INV-55.5 yIX�c.� `oanw v� 3 R SEP I rte. I N1m Nrs w.R VAN.INHN2�No�NasF PRELIMINARY T1NFtw N ao-no,Na Nl»N,N.HKnmw: p DO NOT " USE FOR I �I cl' uNHrs,w Nm.rAo®wNS Fm PUMP w;,R �. CONSTRUCTION I "T"M""`om rzemnAAa �,�,G ]90'5] 111291' I \ TIN w sie*wlaveo¢RAuwua ¢P n1F PMUHCT N�ve�limwe4 \ NN TtiPE T rl CHANNEL DRAIN"SYSTEM aA u r \ TD"MANAm�r WAIT T HHETMNSS THE DPW'Y1 THE H"srCR�WA s 09 1 I ai PAGTESsI AL m P ns t'm Bo t WNTRI:OT�Op of THE STOAN FN Rld PLAN.STATUS FCR " SNUOTON ro Wlre rrvtlwHts ® vu." L� 0 2FAT 1­1NUA A:umO09ANDDDSF"DDIMENTAT01ONTRUPfi1TSHALBE I\ � W+IA PporeEGrade STOP9D Y pk M srARt a CkbmuCTN. ` NSU t r CR Ttf WxsWUC➢m C�nDDHF GTM BrMARATON OF � A�— a�_ 'I C:BNI ALLY"""'NO NURx pMvq D.DOW C xALO�aAn U \ CONTALnN6 9' r00A Nln.9 r 1—PFdMN Sv. x0 M BTT LONDON PE BOOM NORM CANOUNA,LID. We T DAIS DESCPoPTON Know what's below. 1- TWL TO,D, Nce Ate" sIRAEroR;° xwn w n.eAeBoNNURTIM CDII before you dig. Mu MLL Mu .w OF MA ���o"�" Ew/Mp \ m xRAvm cIKD 81YN N sE0.1 DT OR...FEATURES 1aewA:m ng«�e ort DGRAPHIC SCALE H. 22Dtt] w� FEE DCA NSRDUF DETAIL C_ GATE SEPT�C4O _YAAD NIST FEENA MATED BfGn 9a] NENHUN 1, _ ,rS 4N¢Ctt1 PIPHCH, S P oLL SIR CID,APRUW Nro] uAPsmCHARDORSN N 1 0 - ULE Ne 6 NOET 17 --- A ,AX WM .wx: a nwvu.mW®r. I/wirt�m'xrw rpT cassAu Aj AAallxs stxnv anw Pm.ruw NC SM Nwy 750 UYNS OF DI$ndtBANCE Wan«�WnrmWRrzs DMrS C, NWS MONUNENi'LLOYDS'. O gS1URBANLE� nEI,� A swNx ummm avmm ttsv wim lx wbxc mf wrzamm wm LI RvnAFD a4xrtow Mxxrta nsslflr Is UNOERGRWND ELECTRIC/IELEPHIWE SERNCE A rATlml CCNiRACTLR 10 COORDINATE r —— SEANCE CU1RJI CON — _ APPROPRIATE UnLItt LOYPANY 11 C ov u'mizrtmlwuj FPH BACNFLOWPREVENTEP '}11 YIBAfN a B x0 SICRNWAIER I INWwwLu' —_— ANASANwi I � ri'nPF F B9FG /TI'PVC NWIi POND BAc AVE]'toxo BUFCEp ��COUPACiADLE V�CJ I mE RUCIA UU 11IYCAST mWAv rash r WW Amdu OVER scLRulm w 8�, r Io az nAER uc ua0a Wuu sEWEs sEoaAED cDAEfl \ —PRrorASED Wl1 LWanW �Ir_ _ W x5"11. —11 TAPER IHREID PLUS PxA u ^� i VEA xfL00R WIN C.DIINIER SINK HEAD Ca rvxw Au reE m.�t=i g z 0 RU H WIN mu w xi W RIC III I I j FLOOR UNE FLANGE rTm n$ I jl III e]w-w-rzxsl KIYE NNE LFNCnI DD SUIT a river aa.oaw nN I I � I rxmu ecru 21`5]]S.F I rsxc Wsr I ` RGW XPx N I 8 I G,ol XC I. W WE WATER I I I I \Ij 2 2-WAY ClEANDUI DETAILw � A CL TSN—"DETAIL grencE I I, g I I a Z I 1 U—NUKE fW wmTCCnn rts-. J U CL 11T ARE ARIES AND THE INK NOT RUE1—M E DON JII I Z-WAY 5.5.CLEANOUT I I I I n'C 1 "III uTu,r Lrcanxs'RNus ApPLLR ru 6P[WS Cn0AA9JRNC roR PRCA RNBERALNOEAflWMENrs VE lE 11—C2ff[OGPNR BAYD W NWEO PIroAOVED ROWµWNI _ RIN35B1 I I 3 I -I PUBLIC RIVERS DFPARW FNIW B NOLAS PRIOR IO UIDllLBDiL INV=sss.s .� I O S"vVc CaxWrt FDR n I I S 1 IK s a.zB wNu T[E n ED aIARA ux x Ww¢EnOUND uns sWxE e[SAIiRAIi m IIIE TILE mE O ArtD A.usacE FOR ma v Z WI COMA I1. 111CSFRVICE 1 I I I CON —TO WE STARI OF CWSI-DR u 2 SERVICE CONN UE CO WITH I i I I I I UMUS LgiSmUD� rs A SHAUI BE IN ro Nn1FAlALt AroW WN[E WITH Mf UgI1Y OFPMiMFNiS k APPAOPRMiC COMPANY 1 f1\ I �J 1 DISNA AIDE xFAL JILII SERNCE NOTES a NURAN WAIN ' A'PVC SAMTAAY N" DER IS mWA ES VAnlff ARDS Cut caPLnxc NO INETAUATIW Of IMTE WAIFR D SARTAAY CaxmACTW PWaNu Ax0 NS,Ait A'wATEN ffRN ule U 1-NSENSER SIR,ERICI 6 xv-5.5..., Wx ACIax u1Au Dum ATC WTx aLL unun WNRAN Es iW N,AUA,Nx Iw leu rs ]&YIN.$LLPE j I OPOSEN WLL ro BUUxxc PER uWItlPN.WIf£I-NN a. ANO SPE61CAnONS.0 A PRE-[WS,RUCPW NF£nHC Wnl nlE VARIWS UNIT,1..PAN.B CONTACT RRA-CRu TY CREWW ENI4 I- x �--___ � Wuumn PRlw,o TxE START of AxY eaxs,meDW ArnN,+. IL,Bxe«E Nls-z,s-z.,e0 _ _— I s. Wx,A FOR ffA xmwY,rE D,R„Y Aa,xWlnEs xffEG,W]z ROUND A_mx EW FWfRR _ EIECINCSFRNR YI _ r0 NVYCp61NG NIE 'PDXFR CO PINCE UNOERGRWWI IYO`YOBA PNAA 4RNVU 1 ICa'IYPC WSW C. iH AATW BALL CCAX9lranuax[vtm Pam a Uunln sCRNc sHA1I.A . OI CutWlr w/P.uu wK r0 s.s.clAaxart ♦ 9 urc x. D F E EaNx ,mwxWE -Wz-eve PNdYDA I HWAANOnR ro TRE Unutt CWPANY Auo INE OMlfx STAID GinFFGr (REFER CE S NQa1 1xv=sss.B I \ >' CONWACAA.NNYY UK ARIED LA INS RED Y UNAREFEO,riUTU S BE ENS uxiEAED,TR —CRE sERNCE�o�E E B.S.cJ= .5 I I 1n WE wAlm MNn E n ETI..IONXI AxxnAE�u AO 1An PI DUN UU 1/ PRELIMINARY uulrs W sss.e I sEWnc rAxx E RE...AsWwureEeE REDwRmmsmlxm foR EAaI Au A a DIA Pro can ux w/wu OISNRBANC£ g CHAXI IF 7QEPx PANEL BOARD TO UnLltt COMPANY Pgnr OF WNNECAW.vex[ DO NOT RcursLW¢WCARAII W TME USE FOR NOUDE�x0w ICI woman:esmxccs ELECIac sANUABI Sfax.-A—um Au x A CONSTRUCTION I ! r 10 CIV— WAA.Alm 5WmD1E aU P Dmu SEPT o TxE TRAGmx SIAR SAW WI,RSmA¢AND REPuOv AmnuT PAVWENT AS.xmmSANY DE—' max¢I aF Wlmwc(NN.Ix SAuI,M mYE IOU CENW [W STAlI a RN Ef O iO INWsrxNL UNgAEAWND EIECIPoC REAxDNE SEWER;AHD vunR, xavE)CON-1 ]5N(,mlut)NExiAl nFum NEED L_-----%---------� I I 1 THE TRURD— / WNINACANVM MEANSTPRON M BECURIK ANY E Cn M.NES'LINS n9uLL BE RUG ASrt W 919-29F236DY FN nT All.UDCA q E KSEt4 CRUDE MAIG U—S,AND WNE W TAL Aro NA—L GAs xo COvmACrOR SXau GENERAi LWCroW�AC i0 LWAuxAR WM xAMtAi GAS unun FOA SERN[E m aF Axr urvfaREs¢En ccxFums a,Ww EXIIII AK s BYn¢v w nzel I �Y RKP SEDLUNJXSxSO THAT Ax APRIORRIATE NWxCAIN NAY BE MACE, mmxWE. r REWIRED 3 "'IRA,Au unutt cou""""I"""I xEUM FNiCSrAlm RDS FOR MA="AHDI="NUTfnxWi uaE9vD5¶AENE,.,NF OCCNTxx DOR SN LL OWt PR pER COORO W E EC wE U Ltt LGNPANY. �I ttPE F B1rFFR TRE CONIRACTo 9".CW DA.—M BE PFWCRYEO BY INE v� 1 UWUtt PLAN STATUS dl I IIZANIIWS AND DENUTAON FEES FOR OWxECUWS DISCONIODKI,REL-KIS, , 4Ht--ILt I TD 5'IRW off BAURG FACE.AE r0 M IMG 14.Al EABRK WAWAFDR AVEMENT NGS�EJIU P�11 TOIVrAxm BALL BE SAW WT ANDSTOPrECUREH WrAHEcNANDS CINtt DPARMENOSDRWTN RDLINADTPRAE RLI Know whales below. r...1WNNUNID'-R x�I:W,AtffPARAnWB w W-SIASxI,RY�WRD Call before ou— ----- 0WMESnGW IY SEKR G.PoPSSBIE wnEREwa,Fn PlPlxc MU¢r Cfl055 'CAL,L__ VFA SANTARY SEWER PPINO.MAINTWN A NNWUN I¢VERACAL AEP—ON.WEE SCALE oI z SANTARY SEVER NVNR MUST aO55 oALfl WRIER PIPING,uunTAN A uININU12Y VENBCAL lA-,PPUAAS SEPABAnW AND PRONDE YIx.a _CONUEn ExCASWgr W r Wxnxuaus can GRAPHIC SCALE ae K.220117 NON RPF SIEEVE Rx WAIFA PIPNG FOA A W 1-P EACH SIDE RF ME SAN. Pm a]a0 SB I ffWR CAOSST'G WEA B LUQ xIWWW OR WAifR D saxxARY SEWER GATE SEPT 30,2022 AND gPlNc PucEUFHI x W'a1]e'w 2JI.2K Well CORKY WIN IL RNNG CODES AND —RONS ILE No. (aF¢ET) eoN_No YL SHEET C5.0 coA tl..mn. w.ma,>X Wwwn va.Pr=zs-a-aw+�xv�..�P�wm«v oma.��w.AE,aam.,l.w.vs-Dl..av 18 �a,MEx.x.9xxEa�xa�,s �axxa�,.,�n xµ,<xx�E ARA, w A®a w[trva �� u[4�E pAOMt Ot W wx uew i w —�yn, y _Y� xr wxa rwa uo xuwue mm fiSdtf➢KYFN `�iwtm wm 1 r �x �s�iiw.xaw nBWs 2TEMPOW1RY 01VFA510N DRCH nv.� vw w°c rcww v� �w� 4Nv sswvr m*a� O R —uw�I n Lm SILTGILT FE1N1 mm x P S e snucntx svtuxunw � �8 v P3 m PT RW w„ w,vo-ra.ww�ww.w.wwwvww�.vwova•. �...�;S���' mP�"�,�°mss« aw ,e,.va w.,s nE.»n�vv�bnff� J rySKIMMEPBAGIN ry r uom w wa xm wem uxr mem mr w ° Lu Z mav,xarwxwwne�w mrswwweuvmmsurorrxmrwwwwmmrcxmwav rus�x ume.aww,moxce.u,.mazw wm rw waxw.wn en nam.mrmr. UNG°YCnONS.�� - � Q L ¢ x n`a G7or°"iw;a.�",a°.a'a "ckw"s54`ioSe" 'P �za m.ma g aas xw(sa samr my us�aE�x° sNn ena<w L. Q ED �msmx as IT.1-1 slaxi R [�•*•, rrmme cvrr § xaay.w xorw lwvwn,°.uv`"n1 b•sms a va mm„`i iv`rlwxw PRELIMINARY DO NOT SILT FENCE : acu u ^ USE FOR r1 CIX MUCT10N ENTRANCE 5 x°�i,°5u[ o� ^RSESHOE INLET PROTECTIONoa wuamuumcew� _ CoNSTRUCTIDN t°swf xoi ro Stu£ nuwJ$ w" :..m }Yy,."1� Yo xwwrm vmm�ma��'s,nr .ravcnw ireu. ..wwmnu uanna ma.�wi ea ���� � — — Pix STATUS a� a.x ° j T— NOTE: a MA/N7£NANCE. .... ij� aev p DAIS DFSCRIPnaN MLL mucawacs ann w.sas r`tt°PRiaX �'i �i� mea °90. arc. �xr maw xam ar _ x m� paw d x,�"'al a":.i°.�."` DscnLe m -- — a"No.220111 �i ux nffMa ar wu soav w. °„Q;""�'". —o°:e. �, °e 'u'R59.etl.mA — mx,°-- �wx e`axs w>6 N.,x,�x,x�a.wvea�ixsruun°x nu azul scMWx ,as ros a w•,�,�w• rte, '. '^^,V. _ a� oa wmITccs1a—rsm 11TIaF PITI'l APPAN x°mvP Nsn°Ix SLOPETRAGWNG DETAIL �vW n Minn OAiE SEPT 30,2022 /1 CIXJCRETE WASH ARE4 ^°------- xxdwv ►'.:�MSCa°x a,m o .ta+lma a°r'¢o u+o a+xsx uE x lJ xar To scply w,w,a ry n TEMPoRARV INLET PROTECTION �o uar BE xs oorn xoT ro ung seavc w wn,wuwm sx¢r Cis. coe n..�. ro.mwva rwwM1 w°v\ea-O-.nMn\wa�.an�e aww�me tlw�:coun,wu,eoww.wi:wHvs-esa.e 19 swxc arse.rrrr' w s wx,�a�.nwR�w,�m It xoi ropscuG u[vuion n1Q,".. .i,v.. 'ux u'w °� i�.av ars.xn xa � Exwr wnrw.wvuuuv O a brixaX°�ossPioK s— sorar war nff ww ra. rirza 72(x�NE05D�M q\ew-..x� �r� ra. sw xm n<xA oxsarxLwu � � S F 12 ms nus/ax¢u _ amucnoxs v.wxc w.exE m �w 1 z _ m� �vhixwxo wrt��..�ae9�x�ia�nwr iw an cmeme � ¢6 n$ i�-.use w://.moo—ice mcrww mxay.ixces o®. n a/�.s-a•..s.e.xam p a m.. w��uomr xw�w -sal -,m amna r• ��-w s�vwro• sw�.u�. X r rsarram. masa ravmvuo metun of-wi a4emx xw� h m% is mra/emx mrsasl J mae oma.s®xs x.rt caww. uKxm nsrxur wu�sw nr sus eas W Z rz TEMPORARY SEEDING orxw euwe voaie omm�¢rzvaw va a vesm on. �"vv it H 1dEX1 cc O¢ 13 Z O z U - O O a x � U W PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PLIN ns g,"' SCALE Oe N..220117 DATE SEPT 30.2022 ISE No. SHE£i C6•' coe ne nmma ro wpuva poprry gout/\sa-4-.xMe\ma.er:ie atW+am9 tle^.swwxus azmmis w✓v9-t5.e.g 20 .xwar � m�mxa wn,xxx w w�m n�.wm� ::Nw � Ixwx�mxe. aw mx�xWxe -L E - xxxW.,rWwwur ,Wxw. WaWaW.WMAaam��l�x�Awmrlm�axW.AWWwWma�Wo — wWWxea�waWw rxrF. � w,om.mx,Awaxaw NWANr x�xxr.MN wlxAme x,MWx x�xamxo.W w..«WAxr�Lwx,w .::g P/�'I W� xr ,e�A .�ax w © W�WwW xuWxTxWWw vW Ma W �m ww �N�ww w �m w Waw ���-�� wamAwno we ouW ; mw w<xaw u nCONCRETE JOINTS °�,. a c<imeL m nc<sieL m swwwwm.exrzn wv. U xor rD kAW El..1 ro sum § a RESERVED RESERVED NCDOT PAVEMENT SECTION PARKING r PARKING axm„w Axw.w�L O AesMui Smmu xUR`aWERAL WNWW REWWEMEnR AWD uAY WCAEA9E mM vuxcus spl WNWWMS�GEOAEPe.'gAE e erW , iPAr W1111I PwAPI.-Ii T NNu�EmxosWxrn�A�11—IIAIII AVEliaDI2. EtEL�ASHI. aLOmNG DETAILS ARE CDNIAAGTDA LD +weu - AEDAA IKA£9ffs O ' W1DI ffP M p➢a1SD"'Er Wff n NDuEDPnNO RfPP1AGE�w1UH CW WxntiFD 5¢E414A1EWN rYg ACrNAFR.M y.' i w . K AW —E 1 51—DIM Br ME GEDIELHN CAL R�r CW DwAR cmER 7 B' aE stE¢ nFoaP AnxioRxmdn?imE euLL az mal Al—Br DDLW+cEwaL R HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL u uw xcvw xnuumx. _ Q S o vola ►J ND un WHEEL STOP vty r$V €m IIW LIG OTS)xra+ x ex r Jgwls.Rmm rD Aq rm DEs1N.wD—11% x0i Nle L y �o r - '�f..x� h wm- N ts —1 A Ixam� +� � a z wor n.0 1A1'� —T 'RP n CURB EDGE CONCRETE SIDEWALK W A.w,mAwww wwNaW Rue a Z = mx°Arno we awe �xUA':1 _ a�N�.,. rA,�N ~ O LD EE HANDICAP PARKING,ACCESS °wa"oasl�.n:twna m¢s my V Z I,1 RAMPANDACCESS AISLE DETAILS - L reEAmo ra mixxW vwT ALE m wx rax um weAmx W c s2 aw.wr xax.n.ww.xs wx wz.ww wR .i„ ',II Ascme swe m�Wa war anwr°Awox °Aam xmume vmrz. m W O U - — .mrAmm.soesAn MAsr IwA)vAtiws�xm��mW sun mc�c wxuuma. xa w - - ac Wr Weanmlm eor'�r°Amx mAWx ur xor xss rvui WC Nuw.Nw roe va wWx�r.. I.. smN mimAnmm wW •wowWww�xoeoAaaassvw�x:�rAx'"xw�s.e"`xr..s"Aw w�xm rtaW�/eminlm sa aysnxo xxvavc ��Ac®smu wwsr WxwawD"'" 510'cWALK DETAIL PAVEMENT MARKINGS o.,wxrnrxn�°au:: m`woal<°a�'Am o .uu x l'J x .1°wuwnl �' 1ne`xmEi�reM,ii°`r"`"r °x»�o WAo6�W..vNw��woxWs.w.�.w�Wa,A,e xo.W�rw aaxWvwm,.,w PRELIMINARY �$° °�a a mw.zuNm x..m mwuW ° DO NOT USE FOR •fOflN "x"a ywuwo a-v ww ur Aewe CONSTRUCTION IF mu°.rno ae wW � ua W.mav"I"i"Qo�rcnEik:su�aw \ - _ �u NT ASA �wA a A u � Po x a _ owro/lreiiwm�rwiA�aroE PDAao�ii�le®° ° �umw�-��xNwv sAc,wTrwlmwG.axw.r�W»suru we LEMDETARS M �.- u.A ♦ 12 CURGIGUITER DETAIL ND -N STATUS ° mamx. mW a x.oc u a x � mxoNW -- CfE0 9m °wW xuu Nue ma. � r1 TYPICAL@OUARD DETAIL r_ I I�I Y NDi TP SCUE III-�I zr DAIS DESCWPWDN ♦•1 HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL q MLL MLL MLL xoT To scuE rax n-v xa ESICN VRAvm CHKD DSCALE OB No.220111 n STOP SIGN DETAIL DATE SEPT 30,2022 ILE xw. SHEET X6'2 coe ne nmma ro wpuva prywry moue\TAa-4-�xMw\maeer:,e wW+w�9 tle^.cuen�rn azmmis w✓v9-sx.aq 21 r ,.xmm�n 0 12 m F 1 z a S $ N J nano wm<w�rtlrt,w. xnK pwirtnu ¢ Z Lu 0 Z U O — 0 U z H i Cl) O a a mm.u< U x U r. n rzam � rocvoxc rvx PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PLIN mw TD= MN LL uzmnz m u¢z art wz� SCALE9F�61O1 HKD Oe N..220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 DOUBLE DUMPSTER DETAILS IIE No. �E xoT ro� SHHCT C6.3 22 SEEDBED PREPARAT ON T S rORMWATE R MANAGEMENT NOTES: _2 _,A,TIN _,U.C_ 9 —­NNPRI!. MIX= IL _A�APING`N`O'TIE�S —.,=nT­ ,.,,=z, PROFILE OF STORMWATER WETLAND DETENTION SYSTEM =z= OF—. N. 2 g LANDSCAPING NOTES: F. A I F N __0= =4— ME4- HAM OUTILETCONTROL.STRUCTURE INCRE TALWEIR PVC OMN OUTLET N­ TRASHRACKDETAIL Lu J-1 wPr�eeMPir9 („T' P..111 < GSW- r STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STORMWATER WETLAND < 0 z STAGE/STORAGE —I iV31) LLl < UIT .'M -M.. ID, 11 A. A- -7 P M%" ­NNC 0 M SIRO F— TI I C/) 14.1 POREIG,­ F... I.. BMP POND DE-WATERING IN I'm A- 11. TYPICAL SHALLOW WATER PLANTING SCHEDULE 'I' 1 MWAIMAIIADNI.11 1 PRELIMINARY ux ._.0 WE COMMON CARE PLAGTING ZONE QUANTITY NEUGHT C_._ NURXV DO NOT CIXNTARIFA TYPE SPACING PLAGN­N T'C_—OL I C G, USE FOR 9 5,U,RESER 0 OF 1X11 SHEET ly OUTLET PIK REFER CONSTRUCTION 10 111P I FRINI. sSxroNAun \\ POOL AREA FOR. OF FOREGA EGICI MEA G., 0%4 G, TYPICAL TEMPORARY INUNDATION ZONE PLANTING SCHEDULE RIP-RAP APRON IE I AT k UME AT SCIENCRE WE COMMON WE PLANTING NNE QUANTITY NEGNT CONTAIN O SPACWG PI.—IEA- NTAINIR IEGG IF-IONARY I NRG r—G.I.1.TG.1..,.1 'M TOTAL PLAN INGS AT 2 OC]REFER �/�n TO CHART ON ZS SNGET FOR PLARTNO "I SENE T.. 2020 IF SHALLOW ZONE PLIN STATUS 1.,,._Gy PLAGTNGS[50 PLANTINGS PER NO 71 1 12 OF-1. NOR ACM ZOGE 1 07 TA PLANTINGS AT 2 OCI REFER R_I, ............ ..RT TPUS SHEET FOR PLANTIOS LET PLANTINGS / \ G 105 IF N-FOREPAY DATE DESCRIPTION RIP-RAP — MLL OUL Es M CHCD UP PoO AREA GRAPHIC SCALE 106 N..22011] INIET MR aND IF I HI F GATE SEPT 3C 2022 �VIEWL 11 rear) 1 STOMATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DETAILS W L "111 , L TIH.'T' C _:6.4 23 N 1-54W oabs°sce ssx—ss, Imo, i NCs4�A, aPe NC HIGH 4 uMlTs �� a 1 DISNRB Cf LI(nE) 1-17 1 \ � _ O I � snena — _ I \� 211 a I si POST-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE a AREA=1.09 AC _ -I I Lua 5% �I 0 `z Q J I � t I I I ' I NCE 0 ¢O CL. Z •S INV.:5s6.2x' 0 _ uj J - I W a ro'rvttEe -- - f— U %< Cn — d ws ui SEPTI I PRELIMINARY DO NOT L_ __ ¢lana___—a————- € USE FOR a CONSTRUCTION I i d s anoass•w nz.ar ffi P vTi1 -c Pc nz PLAN e-as-awe I �% I ns �aI�n+rPssz-esss �a� OE I e s z P — MRo eMNw 374 L L SCALE x asvhn'w z HKD GRAPHIC SCALE / Ox No.220117 _ -E SEPT 30,2022 LIT I 79 a F¢ ) x.N1-w-- — ,m°"_w " SHEET C6.5 24 IONGRETE Mwexr (IN) MASTER PLANT LIST JTWE SYMANEY OUANnTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SYMBOL CALIPER HEIGHT SPREAD ROOT SPACING OTHER QW­ LAND,wEES NO 54 HWY W (Ex.NzpOPW�RANAuu 79 Lu¢enborna LmNP - e'IN, EMIL As WDWN NC HIGHWAY 54 11 —awl : I OIL DIRECT YARO wwUBS 42Actio.N.00dlnwo w ® - W i W W LEMPLD MIH Al A.1 E GD B ID D�INA fB R ARa ND ANNG O IAS" a ¢N¢M wr wDE �D ". ww mx P AxxG wi nAxD$ , w m A—NOT swEwMD FDA"�= 1 P — � �1 A4(���� 1ANwNGs W NMLW M,AIE�smpm _ LG IBL 1 s,Aa —— / w1 A1W iM,Y D1 w1 c¢NwAG,¢A ro miA�lEx A N1ewY STAND W¢xAEE GN ALL AmAfaNIAIM Dxs AND�RMIr1LD wwwr wN,w,APP ap A.AWa wD BY wf wE 75TYPEER�A — QED EA WM I uN —— ' IN i FOS"THAT PLANING DDS AND MULCH ORE AEW RED I[C041RADIN SNAEL NSTNL owm5"NEE w IasFAL ABEYN. I ° LL f x�RK TD a w• GRDABwa N w Wo °"wp f�Ra m Mu R 8 o Q G,r 4 AU MG sxaoxs O N:u EM E DEIm x ro DTw GALS ND DB NNm RDM A wEL DMMxm ANA D E a T M ND,wN " $ EwSTWC VE.T M,N !.a.®®�® -. / su 1REAs WNW NAY II NARMFUI ro ETAxT.— rz'Pmx M21 1 sCNwEAWn AND Er¢ r ^ m 0 REMNN +I.— N O M Y uPS,SmNfS tt PIAxrS,Iwt AI.-WDSIANas' X N D.wfrER1AN S @ASS COVERAGE i0 UTENO NNIN P OPERtt 1.111 IF-90EWANHS AIDA.CIWBS �u 8 P L DEBANSCIXWitulx"RAI NGRFASiw'NA OACANC HITTER BYEAwEMETwxD IxGAW�fRAIMOfSW11WANL 0 NAmu 51 c sxGu srtM L I I ENCU PLONrs w L > o G slN\BE AE'AN E FGR wAmxxs OND rw uuxlxAxa:W ALL IAHpSGOP MI BE TUE FGRu.uAuuuu 5 TO 5 muxNs,lAlw MlMulw a FEEr rA�.w A `m�+ dd m a F n + EATkk o AR E uwR GF,(o)NRTY Iw)DAw I—ND roE PLAIING OF ME GPAss Aro PANDA i0 eA«nww PNUN/n W"'AE easar oust s cur Awnr AND Rnmm MOM Aaor snu s a sroRuwArfH \ o MalrEle)w1¢Art txAi DatAR rtxEAu¢PONS FDA BUMx1ss w wE Pleur. oxn Nc Pu NOME.-1/s W 1x1 w1-MOM uAxwafu ,/ k* Ac z i°eine zaaN sq I V IN-1 R Is ro aux. I-GF Au ca+smucnaN Dmas Aw AA¢Au GRAVE sat ro Ma1 c AMM AND ADD 1SL eA�Nmso1.LIL AIiDABE AME Dw��1—to a DLwsmc s 11. 1 H�j O W ]. M�"Gs, i N.MNIxc ux s<ANOAADs FW m[[s. w�II Hwr s.w ® C OMDE IANESCAPE PUNS TO DaiAR GEAEAAL AND As REDU ED BY LOCAL wuBINUEN w TxE 1w r BE PuwwD wnERE IERE ARE DVERxEAp uSTRESO A GR B, uxpPR POx¢ ss WDwxs,ETG W u xorslxwR W wv9c MANAI a Ix o 3 w 1mE wm wE MaswTY W DGIUR ax uxEI� spcaxEucrwlH FOYER uxEs W slclrs,CALL uxeuN FWEssR ro f I f%ISrND\£QTATIyy . J O I & [#NERAL SIGNAGE N wAIa+S w AroID UxpERGROWD OnunES 1ANT t5'11.ALL TO REMAIN 1� & I --------- __ . y* ED '¢-""I"Y R ro VfflFY wAxIRS PRIOR TO"'0"1xC wCRx N LNDONDRIOmRTu11E5(VEMRµ0x01fSTC9N WMA PBAD,LINE R dtOTKA COxNLw&TIXW ) STREET Y O 7 WEN AMENS WIMN PLANING Rm5 91ALL BE MULCHED. NFIFF ** 1 N —N.NEW TREES i \ � 7 i ED D LU III I ** kkk -- J1 o�w www m� UQ z M ON R) o ® vwn smzs"H mw1�„e J 'D Ix , fYwrwwv wo w•mE1wEnR — —•_` .. — _� ' O Tn�a"xww x.VN.TaA�.W..w,. F �wrvN uuux AN 1. - ~`.;�" OO T rvrT wA�w AooT a,.mtaxM rvw xw< n<n TREE(M) * ..N X10 �rwrs wo,uuu wnvWwe¢ rvor uvl ax'mu,x,wN ----- �� AN @ MULN AROUND u - O I a � PRELIMINARY —, I� DO NOT USE FOR \_ SEPTI I ^Ux ,IEMAL " TWW) curt.v,s CONSTRUCTION __——_--- ---_.: AR TYPICAL EPLANTIT TAIL (FOR 6-I.VTREE HEIGNGS AT PLANTING) OF TO EXISTING VEGETATION z ®®*k*®®®®NB®® .WMR M M1ER Y`k W, J ®pl TO ION., Ng o ®®®®® ®®AB®® ®B, ED BA PLAN aTUS s ® LINE TABLE NcrcD sw Rvew W5 'W1'N4S HNE LENGTH BEARING ®qvI /1I +,E STOP n� 44 E Go(& I\ �+ 2 ,vw Know what's below. �L DAre OEBCNPIDN PURNa`ri o'DAwsD p� L+ +asr xz Call before you dig. Mu Mu Gnu t c B., f� CURVE TABLE URAMry cx"D MPD ED o 0 0 0 ND®® CURVE ' AR MS LENGTH BEARING CHORD >r o a o 0 0 oxo 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rGRAPHIC SCALE all uo.220117 8841 to W UI.ffi 731 B'O'E 411 20hT E F MI_ DATE SEPT 30,2022 10 EMERDAVEN TREES PER t00PT=11 TREES ILC No. 20 EV ED.UNDERSTORY IOOfr=42 TREES 03 SNRUD..PER ODFY=I>2 4NRUf15 Inv 6 FBNO )u. VFANtlaN P� C7•0 SHEET roe N.noma w wpuvA pryvry awp\r29-4-rvIMx\maeer:ie aW+am9 tlons rvuen.xMn azmmis wN-'u9-LW.aq 25 PESPROCTOR ENVIRONMENTAL `) SERVICES, INC. Corporate Licensure No.C-520 5113 Yachtsman Court Raleigh,North Carolina 27615 919-630-0721 December 16, 2022 Mr. Brian S. Collie, Planner II Orange County Planning & Inspections Department 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 201 P.O. Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 4.82+-ACRE PROPOSED GENERAL MERCHANDISE USE 3026 WHITE CROSS ROAD CHAPEL HILL, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Dear Mr. Collie, On behalf of Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, the "applicant," please find enclosed a completed Environmental Assessment application for the above-referenced proposed Dollar General development project. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (919) 630-0721 . Best Regards, PROCTOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 74P�r------ Thomas A. Proctor, P.G., RSM President Cc: Ms. Ashley Davis, Glandon Forest Equities, LLC i 26 I Orange County Plannlo & Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY 131 W. Margaret lane, Su to 200,Hillsborough,NC 27278 NORTH CAROLINA 999-245-2575 or planni a s Oran ecount nc. ov Environmental Assessme'it Please check all applicable boxes and complete the recit Ired documentation. Additional Information Is contained in Section 2.25 of the Unified Dvelopment Ordinance(UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or b ue ink. An EnvironmentalAssessment(EA)shall be required foreach individual parcel proposed for develojment consistent with applicable criterial as detailed within the UDO. Date: 1-r �,(3orati��it�fQ�i�a�ioh `,�,�, 1, �� ! �•. 1 _ 1 .5 Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: q0I L 11L 2 576 Phone: Email; Applicant(if different than property owner): 'ibd t g"� Mailing Address: 302 z r I I p0. RA!Li 16 v Phone: �_�el — Email: lR 01 1 Vee01 III 1A Q 011rdt q. ea 77 Property lrtfQrmaion a Parcel ID Number(PIN): Address: POO Acreage: __ r �3 'Township: Zoning District: 111 Watershed Overlay: Other Overlay: `ll C3e'r>e > 1(o (if fn by k. z stiS• F ;' ;v' t ' -, v., t41 11 A Adjacent Pioperty Zoning North: South: East: West: Land Use North: Z ercid l;-iP South: t fi t. I7 4 L-- East: d West; w. a �f> t1f Gd ft B.Topography' . ■ Highest Elevation: 6U ■ Lowest Elevation: ar ■ General direction of slope: V Page 1 of 5 i I 27 i ■ Estimated % of property with: 0—5% slope: 5—15% slope; 00 15—25% slope: More than 25% slope: C. Water Features and Drainage The following water features are located on the props : ❑ Streams ❑ Wetlands ❑ Ponds ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Special Flood Hazard Area Describe N AV (attach additional sheets if ne'ded) D Does the property contain any of the following inventory ofatura!or Cultural Resources? As identified in the "Inventory of Sites of Cultural, Historical, Recreational, Biological, and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated Portions of Orange County" or tf3 "Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, North Carolina". 1. Cemeteries ❑ Yes I ! No 2. Archaeological sites ❑ Yes I No 3. Historic sites ❑ Yes �' No 4. Areas of geological significance ❑ Yes No 5. Designated natural areas ❑ Yes I2 No 6. Designated habitat ❑ Yes ® No For each yes answer above, please indicate the location on the site Aan and complete Attachment A. I L ct Qescnption f A: Describeproposed use of property: I PVI L DCJII B, Numberof lots; C. Number of streictures: Page 2 of 5 i 28 E D Estimated square footage:of area to be.graded for develojo ent pf attached,residential units (excluding roads;but including parking areas) E. Estimated square footage of areato be:graded.for non-rest ential use (excluding roads) U j q 37D _ aC,Y I F. Estimated area to be graded for roads ■ Road type: ❑ Public ❑ Private ❑ Class A ❑ Class B ■ Total road length: �,illi5tata'IR erriniti.`Requlr'ed A Does the project involvethe mining of earth products? ❑ Yes No ■ If yes, how many cubic feet of material are expected to bo excavated? ■ Has an application for a Mining Permit been submitted to NCDRCD? ❑ Yes No Please attach map indicating expected extent of proposed activity B Does the projeet Involve generation or storage.of haaardous or toxic wastes, as,identified by the Enviroriment I Protection i4gency? 1 ❑ Yes CPNo ■ Describe the wastes to be generated: ■ How much material is expected to be generated per mont ? ■ Will any material be treated onsite? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, i; dicate volume: Will any material be stored onsite? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate volume: ■ Where will disposal of the material take place? ■ How will materials be transported to the disposal site? ■ What measures are proposed to protect water quality and'air quality in case of spills? Page 3of6 29 C :11Vall the.^project involve a;land a llcation s. stem.for:#reat, ,`ent of WMA!tewater? ■ ❑ Yes No- If yes, describe ■ Has an application for a non-discharge permit been sub itted to the NC Department of Environmental .fiagement or Orange C unty Department of Environmental Health? p. Is a septic tanir ayste�m prgp❑ Yes No oseci vvl��ch has.n designapc ty.of amore than_ 1 3,000 gallons er ❑ Yes No- If yes, describe # Does the:activity Involve audge' isposal? - l . . d ❑ Yes No I ■ If yes, where is the source of the sludge? ## f i ■ Describe where and how the sludge Is being disposed } Has a NPDE3 permit from the NC Division of Environme .tal Quality been issued? ❑ Yes ❑ No t i F Water Usage _ . . f ■ Estimated number of employees: x 25 gallons per Jay(gpd) _ p — �9-Pd' ■ Estimated water use for climate control = /00 gpd ■ Process Water — lid r 1 ?,I CA`?LC % Consumed % Discharged to septic system• i Discharged to surface (including storm 4wers) -Describe: • Evaporated % Reclaimed/reused % Other I = 100% ■ Water used for cooling, heating, etc., In association with reduction or manufacturing j % Reused /�'���IC.� % Consumed _% Discharged - Describe: = 100% gpd Total Water Usage ■ Describe source of water: G iS ,; �'r✓ Q moi=i� - Page 4ofS i 1 30 E E f f y, ,.,y LT�J�► A To be completed only if inventory sites are ic entified m LD. (attach additional sheets if necess Ary) 1a im ac#.on�Re p source from Propose�d�De�eloPmen't i Proposed Mitigation 2:a:Impact on Resource from Proposed Developp anent I 2.b Proposed Mitigation 'Certffrcation anti Signature$ - Stat � , a },; ement by A cant- certify that the information presented be in this f r the best of my n e Y s application �s accurate to 'nformation, and belief. 2Y 2-3 Applicant Date Page 5 of 5 Traffic Impact Analysis White Cross Retail Orange County, NC Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Kim1ey>)) Horn © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.2022 32 Traffic Impact Analysis for White Cross Retail Orange County,North Carolina Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Raleigh,NC Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. NC License#F-0102 300 Morris Street, Suite 200 Durham,North Carolina 27701 (919) 682-3583 �,��yyl If lfrf# +' �kiCkQ , ` SEAL � �iXW 'FJAi'Y: w VU 'IF 4f �yd LeW #`111irralitt'%`► 11/15/2022 November 2022 014405000 33 This document,together with the concepts and designs presented herein,as an instrument of service,is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 34 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC Executive Summary Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 — White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. As currently envisioned, the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet (SF) of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing traffic condition as well as the projected(2024)background and build-out traffic conditions. As shown in Table ES-1, the proposed development has the potential to generate 31 new trips in the AM peak hour and 83 new trips in the PM peak hour on a typical weekday. Table ES-1 ITE Traffic Generation Vehicles Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Code In Out In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k SF) 11,000 SF 18 13 41 42 Capacity analyses were performed using Synchro Version 11 software. Table ES-2 summarizes the operation of the study intersections in the AM and PM peak hours. Table ES-2 Level-of-Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Dela LOS Dela NC 54—White Cross Road (Unsignalized) Existing(2022)Traffic NB—D(34.2) NB—D(31.6) WBL—B 10.6 WBL—A 8.2 Background(2024) Traffic NB—E(37.2) NB—D (34.1) WBL—B 10.7 WBL—A 8.3 Build-out(2024)Traffic NB—E(43.4) NB—E (48.3) WBL—B 10.9 WBL—A 8.4 White Cross Road—Site Driveway(Unsignalized) Build-out(2024)Traffic EB—A(9.6) EB—A(10.3) NBL—A(7.5) NBL—A(7.6) ES-1 35 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC The following improvements are recommended as part of the proposed White Cross Retail development: White Cross Road at Site Driveway • Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress and one egress lane • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. With the recommended improvements in place, the proposed Site Driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at White Cross Road in both peak hours at project build-out. Figure ES-1 shows the recommended roadway laneage. ES-2 36 NOT TO SCALE I NC 54 150' S � TE 0 0 SITE DRIVEWAY � O n o � cn = 0 LEGEND �- EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH EXISTING STOP SIGN RECOMMENDED LANE RECOMMENDED STOP SIGN WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC RECOMMENDED ROADWAY LANEAGE ES-1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFlC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY WIALEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 37 Kimley>>>Horn White Cross Retail— Orange County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 INVENTORY...............................................................................................................2 2.1 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................2 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................2 3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION...........................................................................................5 4.0 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION...............................................................................6 5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES.........................................................................8 5.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC.............................................................................................. 8 5.2 AMBIENT GROWTH TRAFFIC................................................................................ 8 5.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC....................................................................................... 8 5.4 SITE TRAFFIC...................................................................................................... 8 5.5 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC........................................................................................... 8 6.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS............................................................................................12 6.1 NC 54—WHITE CROSS ROAD............................................................................. 13 6.2 WHITE CROSS ROAD-SITE DRIVEWAY............................................................... 14 7.0 SEGMENTAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS...................................................................15 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................16 APPENDICES A. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING B. TRAFFIC COUNT DATA C. TRIP GENERATION D. INTERSECTION SPREADSHEETS E. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.EXISTING F. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.BACKGROUND (2024) G. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.BUILD-OUT(2024) H. FLORIDA 2013 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK EXCERPTS i 38 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Paye No. Table 3.1 ITE Traffic Generation(Vehicles)..........................................................................5 Table 6.0 Level-of-Service Control Delay Thresholds.........................................................12 Table 6.1 Level of Service:NC 54-White Cross Road.......................................................13 Table 6.2 Level of Service: White Cross Road- Site Driveway...........................................14 Table 7.1 Daily Traffic Volume Summary...........................................................................15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page No. Figure2.1 Site Location...........................................................................................................3 Figure 2.2 Existing Roadway Laneage.....................................................................................4 Figure 4.1 Site Traffic Distribution and Percent Assignment..................................................7 Figure 5.1 Existing and Background(2024)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................9 Figure 5.2 Projected(2024)Build-out AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................10 Figure 5.3 Projected(2024)Build-out PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................I I Figure 8.1 Recommended Roadway Laneage........................................................................17 ii 39 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 1.0 Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 — White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. As currently envisioned, the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet (SF) of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing traffic condition as well as the projected(2024)background and build-out traffic conditions. Orange County and NCDOT staff were consulted regarding the elements to be covered in this analysis. The approved Memorandum of Understanding is included in the Appendix. 1 40 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 2.0 Inventory 2.1 Study Area The study area includes the following intersections: • NC 54—White Cross Road • White Cross Road—Site Driveway(proposed) Figure 2.1 shows the site location. 2.2 Existing Conditions The proposed White Cross Retail development is located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 —White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. Significant roadways in the study area include NC 54 and White Cross Road. Figure 2.2 shows the existing roadway laneage. NC 54 is a two-lane undivided road with a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour in the vicinity of the site. NCDOT reports that the 2018 average daily traffic (ADT)volume was approximately 11,500 vehicles per day(vpd)west of White Cross Road. White Cross Road is a two-lane undivided road with an assumed speed limit of 50 miles per hour south of NC 54. The 2015 NCDOT ADT volume was approximately 1,100 vpd south of NC 54. 2 41 IM"t f Ior �• x A4 Ir io Y71 :I�,r sir/' l '�. p^y'.'•' �� IFTi.' , k4i moi+ 1 y3 r w 1 [M 1 a „ 4• . , :�Mj,� i I�, trt r y � _'r \ WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC SITE LOCATION 2.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFlC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 42 NOT TO SCALE SPEED 1- LIMIT NC 54 150' 55 18 SPEED LIMIT 50 n o * cn = c/1) � � m 0 LEGEND EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH . EXISTING STOP SIGN 'EE' POSTED SPEED LIMIT Er 35 WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC EXISTING ROADWAY LANEAGE 2.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFlC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY WMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 43 Kimley>))Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 3.0 Traffic Generation The White Cross Retail development proposes to construct approximately 11,000 square feet of retail space. The traffic generation potential of the development was calculated using the data published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition, 2021). Table 3.1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation potential of the proposed White Cross Retail development. Table 3.1 ITE Traffic Generation Vehicles Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Code In Out In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k SF) 11,000 SF 18 13 41 42 As shown in Table 3.1,the proposed development has the potential to generate 31 new trips in the AM peak hour and 83 new trips in the PM peak hour on a typical weekday. 5 44 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 4.0 Site Traffic Distribution The proposed generated trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network based on the following distribution: • 55%to/from the east via NC 54 • 35%to/from the west via NC 54 • 10%to/from the south via White Cross Road Figure 4.1 shows the site traffic distribution and percent assignment for the proposed project. 6 45 NOT TO SCALE 55% 35% NQ 54 55% 35% � I w � cn cn 0 olq T TE 0 0 SITE 'J DRIVEWAY (10%) 0 OA n o � cn _ cf) � � m 0 10� LEGEND XX% INBOUND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT (XX%) OUTBOUND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT XX% OVERALL DISTRIBUTION WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Kim ey >)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT 4.1 THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFlC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY WIALEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 46 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 5.0 Projected Traffic Volumes 5.1 Existing Traffic Weekday AM (7:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 — 6:00 PM) peak hour turning movement counts were collected at the following intersection: • NC 54—White Cross Road November 2, 2022 The turning movement count data is included in the Appendix. Figure 5.1 shows the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. 5.2 Ambient Growth Traffic Ambient growth traffic is the increase in traffic due to non-specific growth throughout the area. Based on an analysis of historic growth rates, a 1.25% annual growth rate was applied to all existing volumes up to the 2024 future study year. Ambient growth calculations are detailed on intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix. 5.3 Background Traffic Background traffic volumes include existing and historic growth traffic. Figure 5.1 shows the projected (2024) background peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. 5.4 Site Traffic The proposed site traffic was generated and assigned to the roadway network according to the distribution discussed in Section 4.0. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the projected peak hour site traffic volumes at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. 5.5 Build-Out Traffic To obtain the projected (2024) build-out traffic volumes, the projected site traffic was added to the projected (2024) background traffic volumes. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the projected (2024) build-out peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Volume development calculations are detailed on intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix. 8 47 AM PEAK HOUR NOT TO SCALE 256 (6) [262] NQ 54 r 23 (1) [24] [850] (21) 829 Ir [65] (2) 63 W J rn -.1 N W �I u u n O � rn C3 PM PHOUR 773 (19) [792] NQ 54 88 (2) [90] [298] (7) 291 11 h [52] (1) 51 0 CA C71 w u .I n LEGEND O ::E (n _ XX EXISTING TRAFFIC c/) (XX) BACKGROUND GROWTH CD � rn [XX] TOTAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL EXISTING AND PROJECTED (2024) FIGURE Kimleylfflorn ORANGE COUNTY, NC BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR 5.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT.TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN.AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE.IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 48 NOT TO SCALE 1 262 (0) [262] NQ 54 24 (10) [34] [850] (0) 850 11 4� [71] (6) 65 w � � co rn 0 uu 1 S TE j00 0) .co' - 0 0') _ 00 0 00 SITE DRIVEWAY .1 I [1] (1) 0 N � ^ 0 N u r� u n O U) _ LEGEND m XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (XX) SITE TRAFFIC [XX] BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL PROJECTED (2024) BUILD-OUT FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC AM PEAK HOUR 5.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIRC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY MMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 49 NOT TO SCALE �— 792 (0) [792] NQ 54 90 (23) [1 13] [298] (0) 298 11 4� r [66] (14) 52 cn w LID cn N �I UT u u S T E1 CA N Ju u C4 u O N SITE DRIVEWAY .1 I [38] (38) 0 [4] (4) 0 o v o u � u lTJ N 0'nn �T VV,n// 1 / LEGEND m XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (XX) SITE TRAFFIC [XX] BUILD—OUT TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL PROJECTED (2024) FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC BUILD—OUT PM PEAK HOUR 5.3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIRC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY MMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 50 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 6.0 Capacity Analysis Capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can pass over a particular road segment or through a particular intersection within a set time duration. Capacity is combined with Level-of-Service (LOS) to describe operating characteristics of a road segment or intersection. LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions and motorist perceptions within a traffic stream. The Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, LOS A through LOS F, with A representing the shortest average delays and F representing the longest average delays. LOS D is the typically accepted standard for signalized intersections in urbanized areas. For signalized intersections, LOS is defined for the overall intersection operation. For unsignalized intersections, only the movements that must yield right-of-way experience control delay. Therefore, LOS criteria for the overall intersection is not reported by Synchro/SimTraffic Version 11 or computable using methodology published in the Highway Capacity Manual. It is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Table 6.0 lists the LOS control delay thresholds published in the Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections, and all capacity analyses are included in the Appendix and are briefly summarized in the following sub-sections. Table 6.0 Level-of-Service Control Delay Thresholds Level-of- Signalized Intersections— Unsignalized Intersections—Average Service Control Delay Per Vehicle Control Delay [sec/veh] & Qualitative [sec/veh] Operational Description A < 10 < 10 B > 10-20 > 10— 15 Short Delays C >20-35 > 15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35—50 Moderate Delays F >80 >50 Long Delays Existing peak hour factors (PHF's) were used where current conditions exceed the default value of 0.90, which was also used at new intersections. Existing heavy vehicle percentages were used where current conditions exceed the default value of 2%. 12 51 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 6.1 NC 54— White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. Therefore,no improvements are recommended at this intersection. Table 6.1 summarizes the operation of the intersection for the existing and projected (2024) background and build-out traffic conditions. Table 6.1 Level-of-Service NC 54—White Cross Road (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Dela LOS Dela Existing(2022) Traffic NB—D(34.2) NB—D (31.6) WBL—B 10.6 WBL—A 8.2 Background(2024)Traffic NB—E(37.2) NB—D (34.1) WBL—B 10.7 WBL—A 8.3 Build-out(2024)Traffic NB—E(43.4) NB—E(48.3) WBL—B 10.9 WBL—A(8.4) 13 52 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 6.2 White Cross Road— Site Driveway The White Cross Retail development proposes to construct a full movement site driveway on White Cross Road approximately 330 feet south of NC 54. The following additional improvement is recommended along with the site driveway: • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the site driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at project build-out with the proposed improvement in place. Therefore, no additional improvements are recommended at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 6.2 summarizes the operation of the intersection for the existing and projected (2024) background and build-out traffic conditions. Table 6.2 Level-of-Service White Cross Road—Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Build-out(2024)Traffic EB—A(8.9) EB—A(9.6) NBL—A(7.5) NBL—A(7.5) 14 53 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 7.0 Segment Capacity Analysis The Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires an analysis of average weekday traffic volumes. 24-hour volume counts were performed at the following locations: • NC 54 west of White Cross Road November 2,2022 • NC 54 east of White Cross Road November 2,2022 • White Cross Road south of NC 54 November 2,2022 Consistent with the peak hour capacity analysis performed above, these existing volumes were grown at a 1.25%annual rate up to 2024 and were then added to the projected site traffic volumes to obtain projected(2024)build-out traffic volumes at each location. The projected (2024) build-out traffic volumes were compared to the thresholds for transitioning areas published in 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook published by the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT). Table 7.1 below summarizes this comparison. Table 7.1 Daily Traffic Volume Summary (vehicles per day) Projected (2024) FDOT Segment Roadway Conditions Build-out QLOS D Daily Volume Threshold NC 54 west of Interrupted Flow Facilities White Cross Road Class I State Signalized Arterials 11,516 16,200 Two-lane Undivided NC 54 east of Interrupted Flow Facilities White Cross Road Class I State Signalized Arterials 11,803 16,200 Two-lane Undivided White Cross Road Interrupted Flow Facilities south of NC 54 Class I Non-State Signalized Road 2,671 14,580 Two-lane Undivided As shown in Table 7.1, the projected (2024) build-out daily traffic volumes are expected to fall below the FDOT LOS D thresholds on all three segments. Note that the Level of Service D Standards for Systems Level Planning report published by NCDOT's Transportation Planning Branch in October 2011 was considered as a possible source for segmental capacity LOS thresholds. However, the road characteristics included in the FDOT methodology were judged to better match the road characteristics of the study area. Daily volume development calculations are detailed in the Appendix. 15 54 Kimley>Morn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 8.0 Recommendations The following improvements are recommended as part of the proposed White Cross Retail development: White Cross Road at Site Driveway • Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress and one egress lane • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. With the recommended improvements in place, the proposed Site Driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at White Cross Road in both peak hours at project build-out. Figure 8.1 shows the recommended roadway laneage. 16 55 NOT TO SCALE 1 r NC 54 150' S � TE 0 0 SITE DRIVEWAY 40 n o :�E cn = U) � m 0 LEGEND �- EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH EXISTING STOP SIGN -' RECOMMENDED LANE 0 RECOMMENDED STOP SIGN WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC RECOMMENDED ROADWAY LANEAGE 8.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER PATH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE FOR LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 56 Appendix 57 Appendix A: Memorandum of Understanding 58 Kimley>>> Horn MEMORANDUM To: Check Edwards, P.E., NCDOT District Office Nish Trivedi, Orange County Transportation From: Earl Lewellyn, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: October 27, 2022 Subject: White Cross Retail -Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum of Agreement The following assumptions will be incorporated into the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development. The site is located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 — White Cross intersection in Orange County, NC.As currently envisioned,the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet of general retail space.The site is proposed to be accessed via one driveway along White Cross Road. Build-out is anticipated in 2024. STUDY AREA Based on initial discussions, the following intersections are assumed to be included in the analysis: ■ NC 54—White Cross Road ■ White Cross Road—Site Driveway (proposed) ANALYSIS SCENARIOS We will analyze the weekday AM peak hour(7:00 to 9:00 AM)and PM peak hour(4:00 to 6:00 PM) of the above intersections under the following traffic conditions: ■ Existing Traffic ■ Projected (2024) No-Build Traffic ■ Projected (2024) Build-Out Traffic ■ Projected (2024) Build-out Traffic with Improvements (if necessary) ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Actual peak hour factors will be used at intersections where current conditions exceed the default 0.90 value. Right turns on red will be allowed in all scenarios where currently permitted in the field. Signal timings will be optimized in each traffic condition. BASELINE TRAFFIC New AM peak hour (7:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour (4:00 — 6:00 PM) turning movement counts will be collected at the existing intersections listed above when Orange County schools are in session. APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS No approved/pending developments will be specifically included in the analysis as background traffic. 00 Morris Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • .: 59 Ki m ey>>> H o r n Page BACKGROUND GROWTH Based on prior discussions and an analysis of historic growth rates (attached), existing volumes will be grown at a 1.25% annual rate up to the 2024 future study year. PUBLIC ROADWAY PROJECTS There are no known public roadway projects within the study area. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation for the project will be calculated using the equations presented in the 111h edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 ITE Trip Generation (Vehicles) Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Daily Code Total In Out Total In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 SF 694 31 18 13 83 41 42 (< 40k SF) Passby Trips will be calculated per ITE standards and distributed onto the network in proportion with current traffic volumes. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Based on a review of existing traffic counts and origins and destinations within the area, primary site traffic will be distributed to the roadway network as summarized below: • 55% to/from the east via NC 54 • 35% to/from the west via NC 54 • 10% to/from the south via White Cross Road 60 Appendix B: Traffic Count Data 61 Ty e of eak hour being re orted:Intersection Peak Method for determining eak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: White Cross Rd-- NC 54 QC JOB#: 15991301 CITY/STATE: Cha el Hill, NC DATE:Wed, Nov 2 2022 0 0 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM--8:15 AM 0 0 + * Peak 15-Min:7:45 AM--8:00 AM + + 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓ + ✓ + r 292 +- 0 t t 0 279 1.4 w 0 1 t 0 + 1.8 829+ 16D] w 256 3.4+ . 1.2 892* 63 1 C 23 r 906 33 + 1.6 1 C 8.7 + 3.6 36 0 77 a: 86 113 lJaL ity Counts 3.5 5.3 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 * t 0 1 * � o 0 1 r 0 a 0 0 0 N/A L N/A+ ■ +E N/AN/A+ +•N/A � � i C + N/A � � � ^ N/A r 15-Min Count White Cross Rd White Cross Rd NC 54 NC 54 Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7:00 AM 5 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 8 0 1 40 0 0 252 7:15 AM 10 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 15 0 6 68 0 0 323 7:30 AM 8 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 13 0 2 58 0 0 328 7:45 AM 1 11 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 17 0 6 77 0 0 357 1260 8:00 AM 7 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 18 0 9 53 0 0 276 1284 8:15 AM 8 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 19 0 9 55 0 0 266 1227 8:30 AM 16 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 19 0 10 60 0 0 238 1137 8:45 AM 10 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 8 0 5 57 0 0 215 995 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 44 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 68 0 24 308 0 0 1428 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 4 0 36 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Re ort generated on 11/8/2022 11:31 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(htt ://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 62 Ty e of eak hour being re orted:Intersection Peak Method for determining eak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: White Cross Rd-- NC 54 CIC JOB#: 15991302 CITY/STATE: Cha el Hill, NC DATE:Wed, Nov 2 2022 0 0 Peak-Hour:4:30 PM--5:30 PM o 0 + + Peak 15-Min:4:45 PM--5:00 PM + 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 4 ✓ + r 831 * 0 t t 0 861 1.9 « 0 1 t o w 1.9 291+ 097 4. 773 3.8 1.8 342* 51 r 88 325 3.8+ 39 1 r 2.3 + 4 �a 0 �� �3 .4 0 5.9 739 92 uaLity Counts pts 2.9 4.3 VATA TRt4TDRAVESCOMMUNMES 0 0 0411111111111111� -1 L r + � 0 � I � 01 t0 0 0 7 C 0 0 a 0 0 0 J N+A y L N/A y N/A+ N/A N/A+ w N/A + N/A � � � ^ N/A r 15-Min Count White Cross Rd White Cross Rd NC 54 NC 54 Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 9 0 20 146 0 0 258 4:15 PM 13 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 17 0 22 179 0 0 313 4:30 PM 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 14 0 15 188 0 0 307 4:45 PM 14 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 12 0 30 210 0 0 335 1213 5:00 PM 19 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 11 0 14 199 0 0 326 1281 5:15 PM 14 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 14 0 29 176 0 0 327 1295 5:30 PM 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 15 0 24 177 0 0 301 1289 5:45 PM 11 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 20 0 17 167 0 0 282 1236 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 56 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 248 48 0 120 840 0 0 1340 Heavy Trucks 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 12 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Re ort generated on 11/8/2022 11:31 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(htt ://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 63 Appendix C: Trip Generation 64 White Cross Retail Table 1 -Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza(<40k s.f.) 11,000 s.f. 694 347 347 31 18 13 83 41 42 \\kimley-horn.com\SE_DUR\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\[White Cross Retail-TIA Data Sheet.xls]Trip Gen 11/15/22 65 Appendix D: Intersection Spreadsheets 66 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: White Cross Retail Net New Trips: 18 13 41 42 Location: Orange County,NC Pass-By Trips: 0 0 0 1 0 Ct.Date November 2,2022 Ct.Peaks AM:7:15-8:15;PM:4:30-5:30 N/S Street: White Cross Road Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 E/W Street: NC 54 Growth Factor: 0.025 Buildout Year: 2024 AM PEAK HOUR AM PHF= 0.9 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 829 63 23 256 0 36 0 77 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 829 63 23 256 0 36 0 77 0 0 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 21 2 1 6 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 850 65 24 262 0 37 0 79 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 35% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 55% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 6 10 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 2024 Buildout Total0 850 71 1 34 262 0 41 0 86 r 0 0 0 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) 0.7% 1 3.6% 9.7% IL #DN/01 Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 2.0% PM PEAK HOUR PM PHF= 0.97 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Throud Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 291 51 88 773 0 58 0 34 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 291 51 88 773 0 58 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 7 1 2 19 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 298 52 90 792 0 59 0 35 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 35% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 14 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 55% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 23 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 14 23 0 0 15 0 23 0 0 0 2024 Buildout Total 0 298 66 113 792 0 74 0 58 0 0 0 Approach Percent Impact vs.Existing) 4.1% 2.7% 41.3% lu >FDN/0! Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 5.4% IWmley-haro.comise durldur Idevlwhite cross retailIN-analysisl[white cross retail-tia data sheet.xlslint.#1-oc 54Qwhite cross 11/15/22 67 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: White Cross Retail Net New Trips: 18 13 41 42 Location: Orange County,NC Pass-By Trips: 0 0 0 1 0 Scenario: Study Scenario Ct.Date Ct.Peaks AM:xx-xx;PM:xx-xx N/S Street: White Cross Road Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 E/W Street: lSite Driveway GrowthFactor:1 0.025 Buildout Year: 2024 AM PEAK HOUR AM PHF= Site Driveway - White Cross Road White Cross Road Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Rieht Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 86 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 86 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 88 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 Percent Assignment Outbound 90% 0% 10% O% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 11 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 2024 Buildout Total11 0 1 ;Q 0 0 2 116 0 0 88 16 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) #DIV/01 #DIV/O! 1.8% 78.6 Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 12.8% PM PEAK HOUR PM PHF= Site Driveway - White Cross Road White Cross Road Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 139 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 139 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 142 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound. 0% 0% 0% 0% O% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 37 Percent Assignment Outbound 90% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 38 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 38 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 37 2024 Buildout Total38 0 4 0 0 0 4 94 0 0 142 37 Approach Percent Impact vs.Existing) #DN/01 911 Wint 4.3% 26.6 Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 26.0% IWmley-harn.camise_durldur Idevlwhite cross retailW-analysisl[white cross retail-on data sheet.x1v7int.#2-site drwy 11/75/22 68 Appendix E: Synchro Output: Existing 69 White Cross Retail Existing AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 829 63 23 256 36 77 Future Volume(vph) 829 63 23 256 36 77 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 991 0 26 284 126 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchrol1 -Existing AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 70 White Cross Retail Existing AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ t Traffic Vol, veh/h 829 63 23 256 36 77 Future Vol,veh/h 829 63 23 256 36 77 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 921 70 26 284 40 86 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 991 0 1292 956 Stage 1 - - - - 956 Stage 2 - - - 336 - Critical Hdwy = - 4.19 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 671 179 306 Stage 1 - 372 - Stage 2 - 722 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 671 172 306 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 172 - Stage 1 372 Stage 2 694 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.9 34.2 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 245 671 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.512 0.038 HCM Control Delay(s) 34.2 10.6 HCM Lane LOS D B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchr0 -Existing AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 71 White Cross Retail Existing PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 291 51 88 773 58 34 Future Volume(vph) 291 51 88 773 58 34 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1790 0 1770 1863 1680 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow(perm) � 1790 0 1770 1863 1680 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 353 0 91 797 95 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol2-Existing PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 72 White Cross Retail Existing PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR i Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 291 51 88 773 58 34 Future Vol,veh/h 291 51 88 773 58 34 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 300 53 91 797 60 35 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 353 0 1306 327 Stage 1 - - - - 327 - Stage 2 - - - - 979 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 - 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1206 - 176 705 Stage 1 - - - - 728 - Stage 2 - - - - 363 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1206 - 163 705 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 163 - Stage 1 - - - - 728 - Stage 2 - - - - 336 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 31.6 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 228 - - 1206 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.416 - - 0.075 - HCM Control Delay(s) 31.6 - - 8.2 - HCM Lane LOS D - - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.9 - - 0.2 - K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchrol2-Existing PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 73 Appendix F: Synchro Output: Background (2024) 74 White Cross Retail Background AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 850 65 24 262 37 79 Future Volume(vph) 850 65 24 262 37 79 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 1016 0 27 291 129 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Anal ysis\Synchro\3-Background AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 75 White Cross Retail Background AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR i Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 850 65 24 262 37 79 JWL Future Vol,veh/h 850 65 24 262 37 79 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 944 72 27 291 41 88 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1016 0 1325 980 Stage 1 - - - - 980 - Stage 2 - - - - 345 - Critical Hdwy - 4.19 - 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.281 - 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 656 - 171 297 Stage 1 - - - - 362 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 656 - 164 297 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 164 - Stage 1 - - - - 362 - Stage 2 - - - - 686 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.9 37.2 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 236 - - 656 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.546 - - 0.041 - HCM Control Delay(s) 37.2 - - 10.7 - HCM Lane LOS E - - B - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3 - - 0.1 - K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Anal ysis\Synchro\3-Background AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 76 White Cross Retail Background PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 298 52 90 792 59 35 Future Volume(vph) 298 52 90 792 59 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1790 0 1770 1863 1682 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow(perm) � 1790 0 1770 1863 1682 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 361 0 93 816 97 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Anal ysis\Synchro\4-Background PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 77 White Cross Retail Background PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 298 52 90 792 59 35 JWL Future Vol,veh/h 298 52 90 792 59 35 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 307 54 93 816 61 36 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 361 0 1336 334 Stage 1 - - - - 334 - Stage 2 - - - - 1002 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 - 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1198 - 168 699 Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 354 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1198 - 155 699 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 155 - Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 326 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 34.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 218 - - 1198 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.445 - - 0.077 - HCM Control Delay(s) 34.1 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS D - - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.1 - - 0.3 - K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Anal ysis\Synchro\4-Background PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 78 Appendix G: Synchro Output - Build-out (2024) 79 White Cross Retail Build AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 850 71 34 262 41 86 Future Volume(vph) 850 71 34 262 41 86 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1828 0 1656 1863 1608 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1828 0 1656 1863 1608 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 1023 0 38 291 142 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 80 White Cross Retail Build AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� '� t Traffic Vol, veh/h 850 71 34 262 41 86 Future Vol,veh/h 850 71 34 262 41 86 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 944 79 38 291 46 96 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1023 0 1351 984 Stage 1 - - - - 984 Stage 2 - - - 367 - Critical Hdwy = - 4.19 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 652 165 295 Stage 1 - 361 - Stage 2 - 699 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 652 155 295 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 155 - Stage 1 361 Stage 2 658 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 43.4 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 228 652 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.619 0.058 HCM Control Delay(s) 43.4 10.9 HCM Lane LOS E B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.6 0.2 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 81 White Cross Retail Build AM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway II 1111012022 t t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Volume(vph) 11 4 4 116 88 16 Future Volume(vph) 11 4 4 116 88 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1735 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.998 Satd. Flow(perm) 1735 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Link Speed(mph) 15 50 50 Link Distance(ft) 255 1122 322 Travel Time(s) 11.6 15.3 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 16 0 0 133 98 18 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 82 White Cross Retail Build AM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 4 4 116 88 16 Future Vol,veh/h 11 4 4 116 88 16 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 - 100 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 4 4 129 98 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 235 98 116 0 0 Stage 1 98 - - - Stage 2 137 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 753 958 1473 Stage 1 926 - - - - - Stage 2 890 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 751 958 1473 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 751 - - - - - Stage 1 923 - - Stage 2 890 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1473 797 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.021 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.5 0 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 83 White Cross Retail Build PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 1111012022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 298 66 113 792 74 58 Future Volume(vph) 298 66 113 792 74 58 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1781 0 1770 1863 1666 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.973 Satd. Flow(perm) � 1781 0 1770 1863 1666 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.94 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 376 0 119 816 140 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 84 White Cross Retail Build PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR i Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 298 66 113 792 74 58 Future Vol,veh/h 298 66 113 792 74 58 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 95 95 97 95 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 307 69 119 816 78 62 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 376 0 1396 342 Stage 1 - - - - 342 - Stage 2 - - - - 1054 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 - 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 155 692 Stage 1 - - - - 717 - Stage 2 - - - - 334 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1182 - 139 692 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 139 - Stage 1 - - - - 717 - Stage 2 - - - - 300 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.1 48.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 215 - - 1182 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.649 - - 0.101 - HCM Control Delay(s) 48.3 - - 8.4 - HCM Lane LOS E - - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.9 - - 0.3 - K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 85 White Cross Retail Build PM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway II 1111012022 t t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Volume(vph) 38 4 4 94 142 37 Future Volume(vph) 38 4 4 94 142 37 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1759 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.956 0.998 Satd. Flow(perm) 1759 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Link Speed(mph) 15 50 50 Link Distance(ft) 255 1122 322 Travel Time(s) 11.6 15.3 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 46 0 0 108 158 41 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 86 White Cross Retail Build PM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR i Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 4 4 94 142 37 Future Vol,veh/h 38 4 4 94 142 37 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 - 100 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 4 4 104 158 41 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 270 158 199 0 0 Stage 1 158 - - - - Stage 2 112 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 719 887 1373 - Stage 1 871 - - - Stage 2 913 - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 717 887 1373 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 717 - - - Stage 1 868 - - - - Stage 2 913 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 10.3 0.3 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1373 - 730 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.064 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.6 0 10.3 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 87 Appendix H : Florida 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook Excerpts 88 LEVEL OF SERVIC ° HANDBOOK Md 'Li��TOF TFtPN�eo O O Vit► i STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2013 For NC 54 89 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's TABLE 2 Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas' 12/18/12 INTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES UNINTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Lanes B C D E Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) 4 44,100 57,600 68,900 71,700 Lanes Median B C D E 6 65,100 85,600 102,200 111,000 2 Undivided * 14,400 16,200 ** g 85,100 113,700 135,200 150,000 4 Divided * 34,000 35,500 ** 10 106,200 141,700 168,800 189,000 6 Divided * 52,100 53,500 ** Class H(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Lanes Ramp 2 Undivided * 6,500 13,300 14,200 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided * 9,900 28,800 31,600 +20,000 +5% 6 Divided * 16,000 44,900 47,600 Non-State Signalized Roadway AdjustmentsAdjustment (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) for White Non-State Signalized Roadways -10% Cross Road Median&Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 9,200 17,300 24,400 33,300 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 35,300 49,600 62,900 69,600 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 52,800 74,500 94,300 104,500 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE 'Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for generalplanning directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for volumes.) more specific planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should Paved not be used for corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual and Shoulder/Bicycle the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number 0-49% * 2,600 6,100 19,500 ofmotorized vehicles,not number ofbicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 50-84% 1,900 5,500 18,400 >19,500 85-100% 7'500 19500 >19,500 ** 3Buses perhourshownare only for thepeakhour inthe single directionofthehigher ttaffic , ,e e flow. PEDESTRIAN MODE * Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service **Not applicable for that level service letter grade.For the automobile mode, volumes.) volumes greater than level ofservice ice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter grade(including F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. 0-49%p * * 2,800 9,400 50-84%p * 1,600 8,600 15,600 85-100% 3,800 10,500 17,100 >19,500 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Source: Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Florida Department of Transportation 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 Systems Planning Office 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sm/los/default.shtm 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES 90 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's TABLE 2 Transitioning and (continued) Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas 12/18/12 Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(t,uo) t t t t t t t t t Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n n n Median(n,nr,r) n r n y n y r r Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 60 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 8 5 5 1.8 2 2 2 2 2 Number of basic segments 4 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.555 0.550 0.550 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.565 0.570 0.570 Peak hour factor(PHF) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate (pcphpl) 1,700 2,100 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Local adjustment factor 0.85 0.97 0.95 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %o right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 4 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 150 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) n n Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus Level Two-Lane Multilane Class I Class II Servicea Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph >17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 >18 mph >13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 1 <35 1 >15 mph I >10 mph 1 <5.00 <5.00 1 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES 91 ype of report: ube Count-Volume Data LOCA ION: NC 54 west of White Cross Rd QC JOB#: 15991303 SPECIFIC LOCA ION: DIREC ION: EB,WB Cl Y/S A E: Orange, NC DA E: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Mon ue Wed hu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start ime 2 Nov 22 Hourly raffic Hourly raffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 57 57 57 [I 01:00 AM 30 30 30 [I 02:00 AM 19 19 19 03:00 AM 18 18 18 [ 04:00 AM 45 45 45 05:00 AM 210 210 210 06:00 AM 603 603 603 07:00 AM 1108 1108 1108 08:00 AM 829 829 829 09:00 AM 548 548 548 10:00 AM 497 497 497 1 11:00 AM 456 456 456 12:00 PM 529 529 529 1 01:00 PM 537 537 537 02:00 PM 619 619 619 03:00 PM 780 780 780 04:00 PM 1040 1040 1040 05:00 PM 1057 1057 1057 06:00 PM 817 817 817 07:00 PM 471 471 471 08:00 PM 273 273 273 09:00 PM 223 223 223 CI 10:00 PM 150 150 150 11:00 PM 81 81 81 Day otal 10997 10997 10997 Weekday 100% Average Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 1108 1108 1108 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 1057 1057 1057 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 92 ype of report: ube Count-Volume Data LOCA ION: NC 54 east of White Cross Rd QC JOB#: 15991304 SPECIFIC LOCA ION: DIREC ION: EB,WB Cl Y/S A E: Orange, NC DA E: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Mon ue Wed hu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start ime 2 Nov 22 Hourly raffic Hourly raffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 56 56 56 E 01:00 AM 31 31 31 [I 02:00 AM 19 19 19 Fj 03:00 AM 19 19 19 j] 04:00 AM 46 46 46 1-1 05:00 AM 224 224 224 06:00 AM 626 626 626 07:00 AM 1158 1158 1158 08:00 AM 857 857 857 09:00 AM 564 564 564 10:00 AM 485 485 485 11:00 AM 473 473 473 12:00 PM 546 546 546 01:00 PM 547 547 547 02:00 PM 633 633 633 03:00 PM 785 785 785 04:00 PM 1024 1024 1024 05:00 PM 1037 1037 1037 06:00 PM 826 826 826 07:00 PM 472 472 472 08:00 PM 264 264 264 09:00 PM 225 225 225 10:00 PM 145 145 145 11:00 PM 79 79 79 1 Day otal 11141 11141 11141 Weekday 100% Average Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 1158 1158 1158 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 1037 1037 1037 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 93 ype of report: ube Count-Volume Data LOCA ION:White Cross Rd south of NC 54 QC JOB#: 15991305 SPECIFIC LOCA ION: DIREC ION: NB,SB Cl Y/S A E: Orange, NC DA E: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Mon ue Wed hu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start ime 2 Nov 22 Hourly raffic Hourly raffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 14 14 14 LI 01:00 AM 3 3 3 02:00 AM 3 3 3 II 03:00 AM 1 1 1 04:00 AM 4 4 4 [ 05:00 AM 32 32 32 0 06:00 AM 110 110 110 07:00 AM 186 186 186 08:00 AM 207 207 207 1 09:00 AM 121 121 121 10:00 AM 129 129 129 11:00 AM 129 129 129 12:00 PM 181 181 181 01:00 PM 131 131 131 02:00 PM 162 162 162 03:00 PM 186 186 186 04:00 PM 223 223 223 05:00 PM 234 234 234 06:00 PM 189 189 189 j 07:00 PM 129 129 129 08:00 PM 68 68 68 09:00 PM 58 58 58 10:00 PM 27 27 27 11:00 PM 10 10 10 Day otal 2537 2537 2537 Weekday 100% Average Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 207 207 207 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 234 234 234 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 94 Project: White Cross Retail Daily In Daily Out Location: Orange County,NC Net New Trips: 347 347 Ct.Date November 2,2022 Pass-By Trips: 0 0 N/S Street: White Cross Road E/W Street: NC 54 Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 Growth Factor: 0.025 Buildout Year: 2024 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road West of White Cross Road East of White Cross Road South of NC 54 2022 Traffic Count 10,997 11,141 2,537 Count Balancing 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 10,997 11,141 2,537 Growth Factor(per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 277 280 64 2024 Background Traffic 11,274 11,421 2,601 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 35% 55% 10% Inbound Project Traffic 121 191 35 Percent Assignment Outbound 35% 55% 10% Outbound Project Traffic 121 191 35 Pass-By Capture Reduction 0 0 0 Pass-By Capture Assignment 0 0 0 Total Pass-By Traffic 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 242 382 70 2024 Buildout Total 11516 11803 2671 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) 2.2% 3.4% 2.8% 95 96 FT Baa P.�Nre aa���a s��b Bay,EPEE¢a>sE b o ■ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION .aMs v LZ e:ve�.rb• ] H �s E` € V—I x a LEFT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION fi 8 QD 6 o ti U � Q z � O P"' w O O O � RSI I I a - I I J � II i7 9 ._.._._._...._....._.._..._._.._.._............................_.1 A-2 ` FLOOR PLAN scn�:iia..�o• OF 44. rF /d a, Y _ 44418 98 115 MPH D• - • Internally Illuminated-LED DGEN-DF•4X8.115MON DESIGN INTENT ONLY Engineering Required to 8'-01/2"cabinet Determine Actual Production 7'-81/2"vo 1'-31/2"+/- 8,Installation Requirements T-7 an area 10 112" 7'-4 5/8 5/8"shroud 10 1/4" LG:E' 3"Ventner LLAR 2"FExtrusionEMS 10"DIF Sign Extrusion NERAL° .177"Clear Polycarbonate w/ `T 2nd Surface Paint 8 Vinyl Graphics a Disconnect3witch_-- DOLLAR GENERAL .080"Alum.Shroud - Temayable t.Access Plates in 36.17 Scl Ft Scale:1/2"=1'-0" Scale:1/2"=1'-0" Scale:3/8"=1'-0" 3M 7725-12 Black Faces: .177"Clear Polycarbonate w/2nd Surface Paint&Vinyl Graphics Paint toMatch a Cabinet: EMS 10"Alum.Sign Frame Cabinet w/F-Retainers. Pantone PMS 109 C Exterior Painted Black(Semi Gloss),Interior Painted White Paint n PMS Match Gray 5 C Ilium: White LEDs as Required by Manufacturer,Remote Power Supplies Pantone Cool Black(Semi Gloss) Electrical: Actual#of Circuits to be Determined by Licensed Electrical Contractor (1)20 AMP Circuit,120 Volts All paint finishes to be Satin unless otherwisee ss/p�ecif/iee Qu�[ann�ttity; (1)ONE U — CamuLbawgM ARIOU�SINROTHSNEAITNPLICABLEBEOLDCA AF CODENINA.THTSAINCLUDEESROLEODE CONNECTIONS Ic", opydght 02021 Allen Industries,Inc. Client: Date. Pane#. # Date Description Initial Client Review Statushis is an original,unp,bli,h,d dowingcreated by Allen.usS,s,In,.This drawing is sLbmRted m you In conndenoa Dollar General 12/10/212of 21 1 01118122 Signage UpdatesBComecBons ECW Allen Industries, Inc. requires that an approved ryouruse sDlelyin wnnec[ionwi[htheproject being plannetl # File Name: 02102122 Update to 115 mph ECW dawing be obtained from the client prior to any YOUR BRAND AT ITS BESTT. m you by Allen Intlustries,Inc. and is nostelo be shown to 3 02122122 U date to 5000k Modules ECW roduction release or roduction release revision. 1-800-967 25��53gone outada your organaation,nor u d,repro.,..., P P Pd or e.n�mted m an fashion whtsoever.The desi DG Monument Si ns304opie y gns Address: — g — 4 12115122 Update Sign Specs ECWown on the drawing(exoept for y registered trad.marks Client SignatureApproval Date: at may belong to a client ofAllen Industries,Incl re main the SlDesi n: PM: 5 - rrogeny ofAllen mdusmes,Inc. House ECW 8 - 99 115 MPH Dollar LED Illuminated/Raceway Mounted DGEN-LTR-18-RWY115 DESIGN INTENT ONLY Engineering Required to Determine Actual Production B Installation Requirements FIELD SURVEY REQUIRED 18'-8 1/8" Prior to Release to Production 8'-0 7/8" V 1/1 9'-6 3/16" 5"4 /2" Raceway Sea - 3M Vinyl Applied 1st Surface 1"Trim Cap r4 41/2"x4112"Fabricated i "Shoebox'Raceway 8'-10 5/8' #2037 Yellow Acrylic (raceway) (raceway) 28.01 Sq Ft Scale:3/8"=1'-0" Scale:3/8"=1'-0" DOLLAR GENERAL Scale:1/4"=1'-0" � Face: .177"2037 Yellow Acrylic w/1"Trim Cap-Black 7125-12Returns: 5"x.040"Alum.Coil Stock-Pre-Finished Black(Gloss) Backs: 3mm ACM-Pre-Finished White Raceway: Fabricated"Shoebox"Alum.Raceway-Painted to Match Fascia IM Black Trim Cap Ilium: White LEDs as Required by Manufacturer; #2037 Yellow Acrylic Power Supplies Located in Raceway O Electrical: Actual#of Circuits to be Determined by Licensed Electrical Contractor (1)20 AMP Circuit,120 Volts Wall Type: TBD Raceway Color:TBD Install: Raceway to be installed using min.3/8"all thread fasteners(or approved equivalent)and wood blocking as required All paint finishes to be Satin unless otherwise //specified Quantity: (1)ONE Electric�O a—atnE�/ l�S ComuL68wgh RIOU�ROTHENDING AR APPLICAONDINGBLE OF THE CODES.THTSAINELECTRICAL S SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EODE CONNECTIONS Copyright 82021 Allen Industries,Inc. Client: IS Data Pape N. # Date Description Initial- Client Review Status - This is as anginal,unp,bli,h,d drawing,created by Allen MII al s,lac.Thisdrawingissubmittedtoyomnconndenoe Dollar General 72/01/21 2of13 1 01118122 Signage Updates&Corrections ECW Allen Industries, Inc. requires that an approved foryourusesolelyin wnnection with the project being planned 2 02101122 Update to 115 MPH ECW drawing be obtained from the client prior to an YOUR BRAND AT ITS BESTT. far you by Allen mdustdet,Inc. and I,not to be shown he File Name: 9 P Y ,,yens outside your o,ganaab,r,nor used,reproduced, DG Channel Letter Racewa 304 3 02122122 Update to 5000k Modules ECW production release or production release revision. 1-800-967-2553 ' copied or exhibi ad in any fashion whatsoever.The designs Address: — y- 4 12112122 Update Sign Specs ECW shown on the drawing la,cept far any registered trsdemarhs Sales: Design: PM: 5 - Client Signature Approval Date r that may belong to a client of Allen Industries,Inc.)remain the property ofAllen Ind-n.a.Inc. House ECW 6 100 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lumens/Lamp LLF Lum. Watts Description D 5 G Single 5346.7 0.950 39.8284 LEDS-WP4053 Wall Pack {]] 4 HB Single 20784 0.950 148.978 LEDS- AL1211 -TS-SL0715-15OW-H3-40K Numeric Summary Luminaire Location Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min LumNo Label Z Site Illuminance Fc 0.23 22.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. 1 HB 16.5 Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 1.58 15.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. 2 HB 16.5 3 HB 16.5 4 HB 16.5 Notes: 5 G 12 Plan Notes: 6 G 12 7 G 12 Calculations at Ground Level (10' x 10' Grid Spacing). Refer to luminaire location summary 8 G 12 for mounting heights of each fixture. Pole mounted fixtures include a 2ft concrete base. g G 12 Mounting heights indicated on luminaire location summary is a total A.F.G. height. General Notes: Due to changing lighting ordinances it is the contractors resposibility to submit the site photometrics & luminaire specs to the local inspector before ordering to ensure this plan complies with local lighting ordinances. This lighting design is based on information supplied by others. Changes in electrical supply, area geometry & objects within the lighted area may produce illumination values different from the predicted results shown on this layout. This layout is based on .IES files that were lab tested or computer generated, actual results may vary. Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 L°J L E C I S Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 1 of 9 101 -� -1 I I i LSI - - - - I I I I Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1Lp� LED's Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 2 of 9 102 92 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 ��� LEOS Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 3 of 9 103 i Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 LL�J LEGS Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 4 of 9 104 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1UL J� L E 13 Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 5 of 9 105 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1UL J� L E 13 Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 6 of 9 106 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 �L�J� L E 13 Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 7 of 9 107 i i 13.1 2.5 1.3 • 0 Illuminance Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1UL J� L E 13 Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 8 of 9 108 i i 13.8 1 13.1 2.5 1.9 f� 1.3 0. • 0 Illuminance Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 L� LED's Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 9 of 9 109 --- II � 1 E I U a Revisions J l IL O 0 a �� N U U U In Notes: (p Plan Notes: Calculations at Ground Level(10'x 10'Grid Spacing). Refer to luminaire location summary N for mounting heights of each fixture. Pole mounted fixtures include a 2ft concrete base. (� Mounting heights indicated on luminaire location summary is a total A.P.G.height. Z General Notes: C: Due to changing lighting ordinances it is the contractors resposibility to submit the site �� 0 _ photometrics&luminaire specs to the local inspector before ordering to ensure this plan N complies with local lighting ordinances.This lighting design is based on information supplied fa f1 by others. Changes in electrical supply,area geometry&objects within the lighted area may O CO produce illumination values different from the predicted results shown on this layout.This Q 11 V layout is based on.IES files that were lab tested or computer generated,actual results may vary. Page 1 of 1 110 ORANGE COUNTY DEED OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT NORTH CAROLINA (Water Source) THIS DEED OF EASEMENT and AGREEMENT, made this day of February, 2023, by and between Patricia w. Cecil, 2505 Wildcat Creek Road, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27518 ("Grantor"), and (the "Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property located on Wildcat Creek Road in Bingham Township, consisting of approximately 31.84 acres of land more particularly described in a deed recorded at Dee4d Book 416, page 1 in the Orange County Registry, on which there is currently an approximately 3.0 acre pond and identified as Orange County PIN 9748-28-3016 (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantee plans to develop and build a commercial structure on a nearby approximately 4.83 parcel located at having Orange County PIN 9749-40-2351 ("Grantee's Property"), and requires a source of water for fire protection purposes with respect to structures to be built on Grantee's Property; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns an easement to draw water from the pond on the Property as a source of water for firefighting purposes, only, for the benefit of Grantee's Property and for no other property or purpose. 111 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged by Grantor and Grantee, the Grantor does hereby give, grant, quitclaim, and convey unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right and privilege and perpetual easement over, upon and through the Property for the sole purpose of drawing water from the pond on the Property for fire protection purposes for the benefit of the Grantee's Property. By this easement, Grantor conveys to Grantee, and to local fire departments and fire department personnel responding to any fire at Grantee's premises, the right to go on the Property using the least intrusive or disruptive means possible under the circumstance, to draw water from the pond as may be necessary to extinguish a fire at Grantee's property. Grantor covenants with Grantee that Grantor is seized of the Property in fee simple, has the right to convey the rights, privileges and easements which are granted herein, that title is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances which may affect the said rights, privileges and easements conveyed herein, and Grantor will warrant and defend the title to said easements against the claims of all persons or parties whomsoever. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK; CONTINUE NEXT PAGE] 2 112 FURTHERMORE, it is agreed by Grantor and by Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, that Grantee shall indemnify Grantor, its successors and assigns, from all claims for damages to property made against Grantor arising from the use of the pond on Grantor's property as a source of water for fire suppression services on Grantee's Property. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have hereunto set their hands the year and day first above written. PATRICIA W. CECIL, Grantor , Grantee BY; (Name, Title) Orange County,North Carolina I, , a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that Patricia W. Cecil, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this the day of 12023. (Official Seal) Notary Public My commission expires: 3 Attachment 2 -Aft.- Staff Report Zoning Atlas Amendment — Conditional District ORANGECOUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Basic Information Vicinity Map for RezoningApplication 3026 White Cross Road,PiN97494�=3s, Parcel Address Chapel Hill, NC 27516 k� Parcel Identification N9749-40-2351 umberPIN Chapel (PIN) Tow` Ch°e,H„' G Glandon Forest Equity, LLC „ _ ro Lgel Applicant Name ra "r3825 Barrett Drive, and Address Suite 100 Haw2 a Raleigh, NC, 27609 h «o Property Owner Vernon P. Davis °ke .jam Name and Address 2401 NC Hwy 54 W �HChapel Hill, NC, 27516 tl k (if different from a R Applicant) �._t,al",S,ou,h—ham= l tP�" A Agent(s), if N/A applicable Parcel Size 4.83 acres Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 9749402351 De icted Future Land Use Rural Community Activity Node Map (FLUM) Designation FLUM Overlay(s) Resource Protection Area (for historic structure located on north side of Highway 54) Growth Management Rural 9 System Designation Definition of FLUM Land designated in the Designation Comprehensive Plan that is focused on designated road Haw River Watershed (from Article 10 of intersections which serve as a `" UDO) nodal crossroads for the surrounding rural community and is an appropriate location for any of the following: church, fire station, small post office, school, or other similar institutional uses 'R`�m�ProleceeA.ea® &"o- Future Lena use Ce,,rles and one or more commercial uses. I, 1 Attachment 2 Rezoning RpplicationtoNR°cL)for PIN 9��94oz35, AR (Agricultural Residential) — 3.67 acres Current Zoning District \� � NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) — 1.16 acres NR-CD (Non-Residential Requested Zoning Conditional District) -- District Requested Zoning ` District Consistent SMSW2�5, with Appendix F of Yes 2030 Haw River Watershed Comprehensive Plan l Existing Zoning Haw River Unprotected Overlay Districts Watershed s,rea _"nn �Aaq3 LC1 �' r Amendments u Naz Proposed for R, No Overlay Districts (Y/N) 2 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Attachment 2 Aerial Image with Parcel 9749402351 Outlined North Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) HVAC business; Local Commercial (LC-1) shop in the historic school building; Rural Residential ` (R-1) residential home. South Agricultural Residential (AR) residential homes. East Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) gas station; and Rural Residential (R-1) vacant. - - West Agricultural Residential (AR) residential homes. Existing Roads North NC Highway 54 West South Kristie Lane approximately 200 feet to the south East White Cross Road West None Existing Conditions/Physical Features The parcel currently has a stick built structure that is proposed to be demolished. The topography is relatively flat. Other than a small clump of trees near the center of the parcel, the parcel has been cleared of vegetation (other than grass that's kept mowed) for many years. Public Water and Sewer Private well and septic systems are used in this area. The Water and Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement (WASMPBA) does not designate this area as a Primary Service Area for water and sewer services. Proposed Project Proposed Development A conditional zoning district with "Retail Use" being the sole specific permitted use, and the layout specified provided in the submitted site-specific plan, as detailed and defined within the Unified Development Ordinance and as authorized by NCGS 160D-703. The Applicant, Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, seeks to rezone an approximately 4.83 acre parcel of land located on the southwest corner of White Cross Road and NC Highway 54 West from its current zoning of NC-2 and AR, to the Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) in order to develop on the property an approximately 10,640 square foot general merchandise store stating: "The Property is located in a commercial node, as indicated on the application. There are existing commercial and retail businesses to the east, across White Cross Road, and to the north, across NC 3 Attachment 2 Highway 54. The area is undergoing development generally consistent with the rural character of the area, and is underserved by the type of general merchandise store use proposed by the Applicant. Currently, the property is "split zoned", with the northeast corner being zoned NC 2, and the balance of the Property, in an "L" shape surrounding the NC 2 portion, being zoned Agricultural Residential (AR). The current split zoning of the Property makes it difficult to develop for economically beneficial use. NC Highway 54 is a primary corridor between Carrboro and Chapel Hill to the east, and Alamance County to the west. There is considerable development activity in and along the corridor. The existing and anticipated future growth in the southwest portion of Orange County makes the Property an ideal location for the addition of a general merchandise store use of the type the Applicant proposes. The proposed store would serve the existing community and anticipated future growth. Moreover, as shown in the more detailed plans for the Property which accompany the Application, the proposed store is designed to fit in with the character of the area. The site has been designed to address concerns regarding traffic patterns on both White Cross Road and NC Highway 54, and there will be no adverse impact on existing traffic in the area. In fact, the proposed development will significantly benefit the surrounding community by providing a closer to home shopping opportunity for household essentials. This will thereby reduce household fuel costs, the length of vehicle trips, which in turn will lessen traffic and strain along NC 54 and surrounding thoroughfares. Furthermore, the site has been designed to comply with all applicable stormwater management requirements so that neighboring and nearby properties will not be negatively affected by stormwater post-development. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the future land use map for the area and with the Orange County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The design and scale of the proposed general merchandise store are intended to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area, and not to dwarf the existing neighboring uses. The mass of the proposed structure is intentionally small, and the fagade is likewise intended to blend in with the existing environment. The proposed site development has been designed with the existing built and natural environment of the Area." The property is currently owned by Vernon Davis, who has authorized this application. A formal site plan is required as part of a conditional rezoning application and has been submitted. Approval of a site-specific plan is part of the conditional district rezoning process, and the site plan and any agreed- upon conditions are binding to the development footprint permitted for the zoning district. Staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as included in the Ordinance. 4 117 Attachment 2 Site Plan E_ i~�-�__'�t uxwrq'---- - __._—"`_—�_____�-- _ ..®.� - � cru �4•'� S I � i t- a° M I[at I I. I SII ulx leXla - ' � I _ UJXYi7EP+Ril `i � ,✓,' ,,. IMP:R51�L5 SLkh`dAY-ABL II `� - i nsrM[F nEr.XCIF ` F gyf'FiR - IV INYI 101-571 e I I�uwa _ 11 I V usi>na la,„u� PrsEuuludr.� udE-ABLE Uf FN UX[ L. B1RXG GR61��, I I JS IL461F HPRIC [tltld Xu�X sl `Ij SSP G hogs'' 1 Xl� _ �Ns e w Gall gefare you dlg. � --——— J I 'V GAPPfllC SCRLB �Ib.iMP V 3vi xl,]An �W4xv uVm y �n �Iro-o-lw C3.0 5 Attachment 2 Proposed Access and Transportation Network Improvements The Project is proposing access from White Cross Road only. The following access improvements, as recommended in the submitted Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), have been proposed: • White Cross Road at Site Driveway o Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress lane and one egress lane o Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper on White Cross Road Summary of Transportation Information Existing Roadway Characteristics Affected Roadway White Cross Road NC 54 Type of Roadway Two-lane undivided local Two-lane undivided with without turn lanes turn lanes Current Roadway White Cross at Site NC 54 at White Cross Capacity Driveway— LOS A unchanged LOS —A to E Latest Traffic Volume 1,200 (2021 AADT) 9,600 (2021 AADT) Traffic Generation Number of Trips Expected to be Generated by 694 Total Daily Proposed Project 31 Total AM Peak 83 Total PM Peak LOS (Level of Service) Descriptions (source: 'orth Carolina Department of Transport ) LOS A: Describes free-flow operations. Free Flow Speed (FFS) prevails and vehicles are almost completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. The effects of incidents or point breakdowns are easily absorbed. LOS B: Represents reasonably free-flow operations, and Free Flow Speed (FFS) is maintained. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and the general level of physical and psychological comfort provided to drivers is still high. The effects of minor incidents and point breakdowns are still easily absorbed. LOS C: Provides for flow with speeds near the FFS. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted, and lane changes require more care and vigilance on the part of the driver. Minor incidents may still be absorbed, but the local deterioration in service quality will be significant. Queues may be expected to form behind any significant blockages. LOS D: The level at which speeds begin to decline with increasing flows, with density increasing more quickly. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is seriously limited and drivers experience reduced physical and psychological comfort levels. Even minor incidents can be expected to create queuing, because the traffic stream has little space to absorb disruptions. LOS E: Describes operation at capacity. Operations at this level are highly volatile because there are virtually no usable gaps within the traffic stream, leaving little room to maneuver within the traffic stream. 6 Attachment 2 Proposed Utilities The property is not in an area served by public water/sewer. Water and wastewater services will be provided via a private well and septic system that meet Orange County Environmental Health standards. Erosion Control/Stormwater Regulations The applicant has indicated the project will conform to existing stormwater management (Section 6.14) and erosion and sedimentation control (Section 6.15) regulations of the LIDO. See attached memo (Subject: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management). Land Use Buffers/Setbacks North 75' Type F Buffer/ 50' Setback South 100' Type F Buffer/ 20' Setback East 30' Type B Buffer/ 50' Setback West 100' Type F Buffer/20' Setback Environmental Assessment (EA) The applicant has provided an Environmental Assessment (EA) application and supporting materials as required in Section 6.16 of the UDO with their submittal. These materials will be shared with various State agencies via the NC Department of Administration's State Clearinghouse. Planning and DEAPR Staff have jointly reviewed the materials and agree with a determination of "Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)" as required in Section 2.25.1 (B) (5) of the UDO. This determination eliminates a requirement from the applicant to provide a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process as outlined in Sections 2.25.2 and 6.16.4 of the UDO. Solid Waste The applicant has indicated development within the project will conform to the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance, Proposed Conditions Per NCGS 160D-703, imposed conditions and site-specific standards are limited to those that address conformance of the development and use of the site to local government ordinances and adopted plans or the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development or use of the site. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part this process only if they address: 1. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, 2. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking, pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, etc.) and/or 3. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose. 7 120 Attachment 2 The following voluntary conditions are being offered by the applicant: 1. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet. Applications to rezone property to a Conditional District shall be processed in accordance with the procedures in UDO Section 2.9; 2. Off-Street Parking Requirements: No more than 34 off-street parking spaces shall be required rather than the required amount from UDO Table 6.9.7, one space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area for retail uses, which would total 54 spaces for this development; 3. Driveway Access: Shall adhere to the recommendations from the Traffic Impact Analysis in Attachment 1 (5), shall be responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments in Attachment 5 (6), and to the Orange County Transportation Services Department comments in Attachment 5 (4); 4. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School, the north elevation of the building, towards NC Hwy 54, shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; 5. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received within 30 days of site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within 60 days of agreement; 6. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28- 3016. UDO Section 1.1.4 (B)(3) Review Milestones Application Submittal Date November 17, 2022 Development Advisory Committee December 1, 2022 (DAC) Review Neighborhood Information Meeting February 22, 2023 (NIM) Note: the DAC is a staff/agency committee, established in Section 1.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Courtesy Review Jurisdiction Date Sent Comments Received (Y/N) None Required Analysis 8 12 Attachment 2 71 Staff Analysis As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director shall cause an analysis to be made of the application. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: 1. The application is complete in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.9.1 (C) of the UDO; 2. The proposal is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, furthering the following goals: a. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. b. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. c. Land Use Goal 6: A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. 3. The requested zoning district, NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District), is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix F, Relationships Between Land Use Classifications and Zoning Districts. 4. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix G, Land Use Classification and Overlay Locational Criteria, identifies Rural Community Activity Nodes as areas characterized by a cross-road that serves as a focal area for the surrounding rural and farm population and contains three or more commercial or institutional land uses; and serves the surrounding low-density rural and agricultural population, generally 1,000-5,000 persons. 5. The applicant has provided a basic environmental assessment as part of this submittal. Staff has reviewed and determined no significant environmental impact is expected from this project based on existing conditions. The proposed development is consistent with existing/anticipated development within the area and the land use associated with the project is compatible with various 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals detailed above. 9 122 Attachment 3 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov I 131W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I, Taylor Perschau, Current Planning & Zoning Supervisor with Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance I have mailed, or have caused to be mailed, a Notice of the Public Hearing to be held regarding a rezoning application proposing to rezone a parcel of property located at 3026 White Cross Road, Chapel Hill (PIN 9749-40- 2351) on March 21, 2023. The owners were identified according to the Tax Records, as required by Section 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. The mailed notices specified the date, time, place and subject of the Public Hearing. WITNESS my hand, this 21st day of March 2023. J,f ft�e�� Taylor Perschau Current Planning & Zoning Supervisor 123 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director 1 cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 272781919.245.2575 March 21, 2023 NOTICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONER MEETING Dear Property Owner: This notice is to inform you of the April 4, 2023, Board of County Commissioners meeting, at which an application to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel (PIN: 9749-40-2351) located at the southwest corner of NC Highway 54 and White Cross Road will be reviewed. The parcel's address is 3026 White Cross Rd., Chapel Hill, 27516,within Bingham Township. This notification is occurring in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). You are receiving this notice because you own property located within 1,000-feet of parcel requested for rezoning. YOUR PROPERTY IS NOT PROPOSED FOR REZONING. Property Information Parcel ID Number (PIN) 9749-40-2351 Owner Vernon Davis Applicant Glandon Forest Equity, LLC Location 3026 White Cross Rd., at the corner of NC Hwy 54 &White Cross Rd. Acreage +/-4.83-acre parcel Current Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR) &Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) Proposed Zoning Non-Residential, Conditional District (NR-CD) Watershed Designation Haw River Unprotected What is being proposed? The property requested for rezoning is currently split zoned with two districts: NC-2: Neighborhood Commercial, (1.16 acres) and AR: Agricultural Residential (3.67 acres). The applicant has requested the 4.83 acre parcel to be rezoned to NR—CD (Non-Residential Conditional District). The applicant has provided a site-specific plan with the use of the property limited to a"retail use", as defined by the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. As defined and detailed by the Orange County UDO, should the application be approved, these conditions will be binding for the property, with any significant change, including principal use, requiring subsequent zoning map amendment. 124 What is this meeting for? The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing on the proposed rezoning. Interested persons are invited to address the County Commissioners with their comments regarding the rezoning application. The Orange County Planning Board, an advisory board comprised of appointed volunteers, reviewed this application at its March 8, 2023 regular meeting and voted not to recommend approval of the rezoning request. Board of County Commissioner Meeting Information Date April 4th Time 7:00 p.m. Place Whitted Meeting Facility Address 300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC Taylor Perschau, Current Planning &Zoning Assigned Planner Supervisor Email: tperschau(cDorangecountync.gov Phone: 919 245-2597 If you cannot attend the Public Hearing and the website does not answer your questions about the requested rezoning, you may call (919) 245-2575 during regular business hours and you will be directed to a staff person who can assist you. You may also submit written comments via email to ocbocc@orangecountync.gov (emails sent to this address are considered public records and are subject to public disclosure). Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning& Inspections Director Additional information is available on the Orange County Planning Department's website: https://www.oran ec�ountync.gov/3038/Active-Development-Projects or scan below: ■ ■ ®■ ■ ■ ■��■ ■ i ■ ■■r rr ■ ■ o ■ ■ � ■_ E C O U N T Y , N C Rezoning Application PIN 9749402351 Notification Maps LESLIE DR h OAK'HO``OW RD l W W 1 9749402351 GF O,y O,Q KRIST\E04 s 1,000 Foot Notification Area Zoning D AR �P��� 'P° - EC5 LC 1 N r in=400 feet J NRA GE 0 NC2 COUNTY 0 400 Planning and Inspections Department(BC) R1 1/25/2023 u.�ui.vui isspace\Projects\Zoningrtiezoning\PIN 9749402351 to NC2 and LC1\PIN 9749402351 to NC2 and LCi.aprx\Rezoning Application PIN 9749402351 126 PIN OWNERl_LAST OWNER].—FIRST OWNER2_LAST OWNER2_FIRST ADDRESSI ADDRESS2 CITY STATE ZIPCODE 9749402351 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748396909 TILLEY GREGORY T 3600 HYW 54 W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748491572 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748494626 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748396243 CECIL DOVIE JO 2904 WHITE CROSS RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275165892 9748592925 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748493910 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748594995 LIETH ARMIN F P 0 BOX 4752 CHAPEL HILL NC 27515 9748383719 HARRIS MARY CECIL HARRIS KEITH N 2726 WILDCAT CREEK RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748399899 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748485886 JAIMES TOMAS E <Null> <Null> 3713 OLD GREENSBORO RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748499852 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748590109 VILLALPANDO RODRIGO MARTINEZ CAMARENA ROSA LILIA PEREZ 1311 HATCH RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749300495 CLANTON ROBERT PAUL <Null> <Null> 3536 HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749306411 TILLEY GREGORY T 3600 HWY 54W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749404659 BPS[ INC 3403 HWY 54 W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749412275 WHISNANT PHILLIPS PTNS DBA WHITE CROSS PARTNERSHIP 116 E MAIN ST CARRBORO NC 27510 9749500067 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749501789 SARKARIA PROPERTIES INC <Null> <Null> <Null> 514 GRAVEL BROOK CT <Null> CARY NC 27519 9749504904 HOLTZ PERDITA H AVERETT EDWARD M 9903 OAK HOLLOW RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749310328 CAROLINA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST INC <Null> <Null> PO BOX 44270 <Null> CHARLOTTE NC 28215 9749405354 HARIDEV LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 300 W MAIN ST <Null> CARRBORO NC 27510 9749415111 GUERRERO ZURIBEL P HERNANDEZ <Null> <Null> 532 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749511086 PRATER LARRY R JOHNSON PRATER HELEN M 3225 NC HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749208153 TILLEY GREGORY T <Null> <Null> 3600 HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749308334 CHAPPELL LEON <Null> <Null> 3510 NC 54 W STE A&B CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749402837 BIG SHOW PROPERTIES LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 100 FLORAL DR <Null> Chapel Hill NC 27516 9749408985 BLACKWOOD WILLIAM KELLY 320 DAIRYLAND RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749413288 GRIFFIN AMANDAJOHNSON GRIFFIN JOHN TERENCE 546 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749419462 DAVIDSON ROBERT P DAVIDSON FLORA F 3261 HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749422010 RIGSBEE CAROLYN <Null> <Null> 1922 ORANGE CHAPEL-CLOVER GARDEN CH RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749500194 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749500366 J&I BRAVO LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 3300 NC 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749512250 NALLY HEATHER DEANS NALLY ERICJ 9901 OAK HOLLOW RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748398598 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748492381 CECIL PATRICIA W <Null> <Null> 2505 WILDCAT CREEK RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748496921 HARIDEV LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 300 W MAIN ST <Null> CARRBORO NC 27510 9748591637 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749405914 LEWIS STAN HOWARD 3445 HWY 54 WEST CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749414263 FERGUSON MICHAEL P KEYES ALEX M 528 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 127 Attachment 4 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING NOTES MA22-0005 Meeting Date: February 22, 2023 Time: 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. Location: Orange County Public Library Main Meeting Room 137 West Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Attendance: 43 Residents on sign-up sheet 1. Mary Kraft 23. Michelle Wood 2. Janet Domont 24. Rebecca Teer 3. Mariloe Metigue 25. Pat Cecil 4. Susan Walser 26. Michele Meloy 5. Steve O'Daniel 27. Mark Mason 6. Keith Harris 28. Craig Burch 7. Carol Rigsbee 29. Mareah Steketee 8. Virginia Ferguson 30. Sadie Rapp 9. Rob Jamison 31. Greg Buehler 10.Bob Horn ick 32. Rene Rogers 11.Brent Purdum 33. Joe Rogers 12.Preston Mason 34. Tony Blake 13.Lucy Piner 35. Bob Davidson 14.Bev Bell 36. Ellen Young 15.Larry Prater 37. Leslie Dilorenzo 16.Vernon Davis 38. Paul Collins 17.Larry Sturbin 39. Jesuso Bravo 18.Amanda Griffin 40. Lisa Dumain 19.Jessica Ostrowski 41. Paul Plummer 20.John T. Cecil 42. John Schaub 21.Bryan Wood 43. John Kingsley 22.Erika Nissman 128 Applicant: Bob Hornick, and Brent Purdum County Employees: Cy Stober, and Brian Collie Discussion Summary: The majority of residents that attended the Neighborhood Information Meeting spoke against this rezoning to allow a retail use to be located on this property. The main sentiment being that the proposed development would take away from the rural character of the community and hurt local business owners. However, there was a handful of residents that vocalized acceptance towards the proposed development. Topics of Discussion: - Discussion about the outdoor lighting plan and how it could potentially affect surrounding properties. - The type of stormwater control measure that will be built. - Clarification of the existing building "condition". - How parking for commercial retail is calculated and why they were requesting to have less parking than the UDO requires. - How there are already enough Dollar Generals in the surrounding area and how they are poorly managed and maintained. - The need of a stoplight at the corner of White Cross Rd. & Hwy 54 W. - The President of the White Cross Volunteer Fire Department questioned the water source that would be used for fire suppression needs. - Discussion concerning the type, size, and location of signs. - The Hwy 54 W traffic widening plan. - Land owner rights - The traffic impact assessment study and why a left turn lane into the property off White Cross Rd. is not proposed. - Had Glandon Forest Equity (Applicant) conducted any market studies for the property. - Had a study been conducted on the past use(`s) of the property, and if soil test had been conducted to check for possible contamination. - Had the Planning Department or Economic Development conducted any studies pertaining to the effects on surrounding property value if a Dollar General was built on the proposed property. - Why a rezoning request for this property was allowed to be brought back before the Planning Board before the required year wait. _ [Attachment 5 129�""�� ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1 919 245.2575 February 24, 2023 White Cross Rezoning Application Case #: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 3026 White Cross Rd. Re: Development Advisory Committee Report (UDO, Article 1, Section 1.9.5) On December 1, 2023, the Orange County Development Advisory Committee met for a final review and discussion of the conditional rezoning application from Glandon Forest Equity for PIN 9749402351 (Case #: MA22-0005). The Orange County Development Advisory Committee has no objections to the approval of the zoning atlas amendment so long as the items in the attached departmental memos are addressed. The application package features an abstract and staff report that provide the foundations for my recommendation regarding this application and request. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning & Inspections Director Orange County Government I www.orangecountync.gov 1919732.8181 Attachment 5 130 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov I 131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 MEMORANDUM TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Christopher Sandt, PE — County Engineer; and Steve Kaltenbach — Erosion Control and Stormwater Supervisor CC: Patrick Mallett— Deputy Director Development Services DATE: February 9, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 WATERSHED: Haw River Unprotected (Cape Fear River Basin) PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District(NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management This memo summarizes the findings of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management assessment by the Orange County Development Services Division (hereafter, the "Division") of the submitted application for a NR-CD Conditional District, submitted as the "General Retail" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 4.83 acres of property at the southwest intersection of NC HWY 54 West and White Cross Road. The request proposes mixed-use development consisting of: ■ One Commercial Retail Building (Dollar General) The Staff comments contained herein are based upon the submittal of a required Site Plan, dated September 30, 2022. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Upon zoning approval, the proposed development would then be required to submit a Land Disturbing Permit (LDP) which would formally review and approve development activity consistent with these conceptual plans and calculations. Page 1 of 2 131 Erosion and Sedimentation Control: According to current Orange County GIS imagery of the project parcel, there are no mapped stream features or other water features within the project parcel boundaries. Orange County enforces stream buffers along streams, rivers, water bodies, and other water features (e.g. wetlands) as outlined in Section 6.13 of the Orange County UDO. Based on the submitted materials for the proposed development, the project could meet the basic Erosion and Sedimentation Control requirements as outlined in Section 6.15 of the Orange County UDO and could be developed as generally proposed. Stormwater Management: The project parcel is located in the Haw River Unprotected Watershed Overlay District, and is therefore subject to compliance with the Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Strategy. There are no known Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) located on the project parcel. Based on the submitted materials for the proposed development, the project could meet the basic Stormwater Management requirements as outlined in Section 6.14 of the Orange County UDO. The project proposes the installation of one (1) permanent primary Stormwater Control Measure (SCM) to meet water quantity requirements (i.e. post-development stormwater runoff attenuation). There are no water quality requirements (i.e. post-development nutrient attenuation) currently associated with the Watershed Overlay District within which the project parcel is located. The primary SCM is currently identified as an engineered Stormwater Wetland. The Site Plan, while preliminary at this stage of Orange County review, meets applicable stormwater management requirements as outlined in Section 6.14 of the Orange County UDO and is in general conformance with the North Carolina Stormwater Design Manual (i.e. Minimum Design Criteria). Conclusion: The Division has No Objections to the approval of the rezoning request so long as a complete LDP application and supporting plans and calculations are submitted to Orange County for review, processing and approval prior to commencement of on-site Land- Disturbing Activity. As the project progresses with engineering design, additional field observations, and/or permitting by others (e.g. US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Environmental Quality, NC Department of Transportation, etc.), additional buffers, setbacks, and/or additional Orange County review and permitting may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with this rezoning request. /yam 02./09 /2023 Christopher Sandt, PE Date - /C;�'/20 z3 Steve Kaltenbach Date Page 2 of 2 132 ORANGE COUNTY A. - V Department of Environment, Agriculture,Parks&Recreation MEMORANDUM To: Brian Collie,Planner II, Planning and Inspections Department From: Peter Sandbeck, DEAPR Cultural Resources Coordinator Christian Himi,DEAPR Land Conservation Manager Date: February 14,2023 Re: White Cross and Hwy 54 Map Amendment-Conditional District Rezoning Application Thank you the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed White Cross and Hwy 54 Map Amendment-Conditional District Rezoning Application. The development would be the construction of a retail store located in the southeast corner of NC Highway 54 and White Cross Road(Haw River Unprotected Watershed) The subject property is compiled of one parcel(PIN 9749402351). The property is located within an Orange County recognized Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School,a designated Orange County Historic Landmark. There are no streams or additionally recognized natural resource areas on the property. DEAPR comments on development projects are generally intended to a)address any concerns with respect to potential impacts on important natural or cultural resources, and b)identify any areas that might be desirable for possible dedication to the County for public recreation/open space pursuant to Section 7.11.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Cultural Resources Review Comments: The site of this development is located directly opposite the historic White Cross School(3501 NC 54 West). This historic structure, along with the front half of its parcel,was designated as an Orange County Local Historic Landmark by ordinance passed by the Board of County Commissioners on May 5,2015. Its designation was based on its historic, architectural and cultural significance to the County. The original building, constructed in 1933 and enlarged in 1948,retains a high degree of architectural integrity,with most of its original historic exterior and interior features still preserved. The building is an important and rare example of a rural school built according to the plans promoted by the State Department of Public Instruction in the 1920s and 1930s. This new facility provided modern,well-lit and sanitary facilities for the area students. The White Cross School played a pivotal role in the social and cultural life of the White Cross community and lower Bingham Township until it was closed in 1961, and as such,was for decades the center and focal point of the community. Any proposed project that has a potential to adversely affect a designated historic landmark is subject to a higher level of review with the goal of working with property developers to find ways to reduce or eliminate any potential negative visual or physical impact on a landmark property. Due to the proximity of the proposed new development to this important community landmark,there is an additional responsibility on the project developer to provide design and landscaping that provide an appropriate level of respect for this historic landmark and its context. In our review of the planning documents,it appears the north end elevation(Sheet A-2: right side elevation) of the proposed building presents a blank steel-clad wall toward NC 54, and thus the proposed new building completely ignores and turns its back toward the historic school and as well as toward the many motorists that will pass the 133 site each day. This is not an acceptable treatment in such close proximity to this significant landmark that has been recognized by the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission. As a mitigation strategy,we recommend that the design treatment for the front elevation as shown on Sheet A-2,be continued around the corner and applied also to the north elevation. This should consist of the same treatment of cement fiber lap siding,trim, crown, frieze and applied simulated windows. This modification to the building design will provide a significant visual improvement to the elevation facing NC 54 and the historic school building. The proposed landscaping and planting plan appears to provide an acceptable level of visual screening that will help to reduce the visual impact of the proposed new building once the plantings reach maturity. The proposed project appears to involve the demolition of the existing old community store building now standing on the corner of the proposed site. This is believed to have been built in the early 20th century. This property(site number OR 0922),was first recognized as a historic site in 1992,when it was documented as part of Orange County's first historic resource inventory project. Since that time it has been altered and remodeled multiple times. While this loss of architectural integrity will make it more difficult to justify its continued preservation, it appears to possess adequate structural integrity to permit it to be moved to a nearby site and preserved in the event that there is community or developer interest in such a project. Natural Resources Review Comments: Overall,the plan appears consistent with the County's desire to minimize adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of floodplains,wetlands,natural areas and wildlife habitat. There are no additional natural resource areas of significance(e.g.,natural heritage sites,proposed wildlife corridors, threatened or endangered species)located on this property that would warrant further potential DEAPR recommendations for open space or environmental comment. If you have questions please contact Christian at x-2514 or Peter at x-2517. 134 ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Chuck Edwards, NCDOT Earl Lewellyn, Kimley-Horn CC: Cy Stober, Planning Director Brian Collie, Planner II Benjamin Clark, Transportation Administrator FROM: Nishith Trivedi, Transportation Director DATE: November 30, 2022 SUBJECT: TIA Review — White Cross at NC 54 The following memo summarizes Orange County Transportation Services (OCTS) review of White Cross at NC 54 — Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report. Staff assessed the TIA Report based on to the approved Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Study Area: Accurate as reported, no comment. Analysis Scenarios: Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) 6.17.5.c.2 and d.1 request average daily and average weekday respectively, not just peak hour traffic. • Sufficient — included in table 1 and Appendix Analysis Conditions: As previously requested - left turn lane on White Cross Rd into site driveway be considered. • Insufficient — results in increased delays for northbound as indicated in tables ES-2 and 6.1 o Level of Service (LOS) from D (31.6) in 2022 to LOS E (48.3) in 2024 build-out • Increasing traffic may impact adjacent property (Whitecross Mart) • Increasing freight - including delivery - in area will negatively impact safety as shown below: Figure 1:Northbound Whitecross at NC-54 135 Baseline Traffic: Include average daily (24 hour) traffic count in TIA per Orange County UDO • Sufficient — provided in Table I and Appendix Approved Developments: Accurate as reported, no comment. Background Growth: Accurate as reported, no comment. Trip Generation: Accurate as reported, accounts for average and weekday daily, no comment. Trip Distribution: Accurate as reported, accounts for full 100%, no comment. Recommendations: Insufficient, • Reiterate northbound left turn lane into site driveway o Previously requested on October 25, 2022. o Necessary to alleviate increase delay by returning LOS from E (proposed) to D (existing). o Providing this will address County Vision Zero policy. • Request bicycle and pedestrian use be addressed in accordance with County Complete Street Policy Upon receiving revised TIA addressing the above requested information, OCTS staff may recommend approval of the TIA. Thank you. 136 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Improving health. Inspiring change. MEMORANDUM TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Victoria Hudson — Orange County Environmental Health Division CC: Patrick Mallett— Deputy Director Development Services DATE: February 16, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749402351 WATERSHED: Haw River Unprotected (Cape Fear River Basin) PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Summary of Plan Review by Orange County Environmental Health Division This memo summarizes the findings of an Orange County Environmental Health plan review of the application for a NR-CD Conditional District, submitted as the "General Retail" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 4.83 acres of property at the southwest intersection of NC HWY 54 West and White Cross Road. The request proposes mixed-use development consisting of: ■ One Commercial Retail Building (Dollar General) The Staff comments contained herein are based upon the submittal of a required Site Plan, dated September 30, 2022. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Soil and site evaluations have not been conducted by the Orange County Health Department, 919 245 2360 > 131 West Margaret Lane, Suite 100 1 Hillsborough, NC 27278 r orangecountync.gov 137 Environmental Health Division. The Health Department's role in the Amendment is one involving preliminary determination of soil suitability for septic systems. Environmental Health Conditions At this time, no Well Permit application has been received. Application(s) and X fees required. Improvement Permit(s) shall only be issued upon presentation of the exact structure to be constructed. Permit(s) must be issued by the Orange County Health Department prior to any alteration of the lot(s). X Permit conditions may apply. X Existing EH records are attached. Existing well and/or septic systems will be impacted. X Contact Public Water Supply for on-site water supply. X Other: This onsite system has been permitted as an Engineered Option which also serves as the Construction Authorization. Conclusion: EH has no objections to the approval of the zoning request so long as a the above list is addressed to the Orange County Health Department for processing, and issuance of Permits. This designation is not an Improvement Permit or Well Permit and not approval for a septic system or on-site water supply. Additional field observations and/or permitting by others may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with this request. Please direct any questions or requests for Laws, Rules, and policy to ehapplications(a)_orangecountync.gov. 02-16-2023 Victoria Hudson, MPA, REHS Date Or designee 138 STATf o tion ROY COOPER• Governor NC DEPARTMENT OF KODY H. KINSLEY• Secretary A HEALTH AND y� Y 4z HUMAN SERVICES HELEN WOLSTENHOLME• Interim Deputy Secretary for Health V,�QUA�V1�RR MARK T. BENTON •Assistant Secretary for Public Health Division of Public Health COMMON FORM FOR ENGINEERED OPTION PERMIT See Instructions for Use in Appendix A Except for"Date received",this Section to be completed by the Professional Engineer licensed in accordance with G.S.89C LHD USE ONLY: Initial submittal of this NOI received: 12/13/2022 by kgh Date Initials PART 1: Notice of Intent to Construct(NOI)-Please check all that apply ❑X Single System or ❑ Multiple Systems AND ❑X New ❑ Expansion ❑ Relocation of all or part of the Existing System ❑ Relocation of Repair Area ❑ Repair—LHD Permit Number ❑ Repair—EOP/LSS COVID 19/AOWE Permit Number 1. Facility Owner's name: (Owner, Company Name, Utility, Partnership, Individual,etc.): VERNON DAVIS Mailing address: 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST City: CHAPEL HILL State: NC Zip: 27516 Telephone number: 919-459-2603 E-mail Address: ADAVIS@VANGUARDPG.COM 2. Professional Engineer(PE) name: ATHAN M PARKER, PE License number: 43250 Mailing address: PO BOX 4580 City: EMERALD ISLE State: NC Zip: 28594 Telephone number: 919-795-9594 E-mail Address: ATHAN.PARKER@AMPDENGINEERING.COM 3. Licensed Soil Scientist(LSS) name: HAYWOOD PITTMAN, LSS License number: 1262 Mailing address: 1073-1 GREGORY FORK RD City: RICHLANDS State: NC Zip: 28574 Telephone number: 910-324-2892 E-mail Address: PITTMANSOIL@YAHOO.COM 4. Licensed Geologist(LG) (if applicable) name: License number: Mailing address: City: State: Zip: Telephone number: E-mail Address: 5. On-Site Wastewater Contractor name: HAYWOOD PITTMAN, LSS License number: 3825 Mailing address: 1073-1 GREGORY FORK RD City: RICHLANDS State: NC Zip:28574 Telephone number: 910-324-2892 E-mail Address: PITTMANSOIL@YAHOO.COM 6. Proof of Errors and Omissions or other appropriate liability insurance for the following persons is attached that includes the name of the insurer, name of the insured and the effective dates of coverage: ❑X PE ❑X LSS ❑ LG X❑ On-site Wastewater Contractor NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LOCATION:5605 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC 27609 MAILING ADDRESS:1642 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1642 www.ncdhhs.gov • TEL:919-707-5874 • FAX:919-845-3972 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 139 CAEOP22-0013 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: 7. Property location (physical address,tax parcel identification number or subdivision lot, block number of the property to be permitted): 3026 WHITE CROSS RD; PIN: 9749402351 County Name: ORANGE 8. Type of facility: ❑ Place of residence No. Bedrooms: No. Occupants: X❑ Place of business Basis for flow calculation: DOLLAR GENERAL STORE ❑ Place of public assembly Basis for flow calculation: 9. Factors that would affect the wastewater load: NO KNOWN FACTORS TO AFFECT LOADING 10. Type and location of proposed wastewater system: 4-60 ' CONVENTIONAL LINES, TYPE II, 12-18" TB; LOCATED 129' FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND 53' FROM THE EAST PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF PROPOSED STORE) 11. Design wastewater flow: 200 gpd(For flow>3,000 gpd and industrial process,duplicate plans shall be sent to the State.) Design wastewater strength: ❑X domestic ❑ high strength ❑ industrial process 12. A plat as defined in G.S. 130A-334(7a) is attached: ❑X Yes ❑ No 13. Location of proposed or existing wells(drinking water, irrigation,geothermal,groundwater monitoring, sampling,etc.)and any potable and non-potable water conveyance lines is indicated on attached plans and complies with 15A NCAC 18A.1950: ❑X Yes ❑ No This is a saprolite system. ❑Yes ❑ No 14. Evaluation(s)of soil conditions and site features in accordance with G.S. 130A-335(a1)signed and sealed by a LSS is attached: X❑Yes ❑ No 15. Evaluation of geologic and hydrogeologic conditions signed and sealed by a LG is attached ❑Yes X❑ NA 16. Proposed landscape,site, drainage,or soil modifications are attached: ❑Yesx❑ NA Attestation by Professional Engineer licensed in North Carolina pursuant to G.S.89C I, ATHAN M PARKER, PE hereby attest that the information required to be included with Registered Professional Engineer(Print Name) this Notice of Intent to Construct is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and that the proposed system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules,and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336-.1(e)(6). ,,+t'"'""'f0f e xo,IlloaRKER4F.PEc-us EKING L*�.�"\,tr1 .AI S\r,`'. U RKR AMSOE EER a 0 �tiSS1p �y o� / Signature of Licensed Professional Engineer Date SEAL 43250 = �+f��i4�pir�t5ti DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 2 of 6 i i Jul 19 22 09;41 p Vernon Davis 919-869-7687 p,1 140 CAEOP22-0013 State of NC EOP LHO Reference: this section Is far Owner use to either designate PE as their legal representative or to self-submit the NOL Designation of Registered Professional Engineer as legal representative of owner for this Notice of Intent. I, hereby designate ATHAN M PARKER PE Print Name of Owner Print Nome of Aeglstered Professional Engineer as I al representative for pur ose of this Notice of Intent pursuant to G.S. 130A-336.1. Signature of owner Date Owner self submittal of NOI., i, hereby submit this NOI prepared by Print Name of Owner Print Name of Lkmed PE pursuant to G.S.13OA-335.1. slgnature of Owner Date NOTES: LIABILITY; The Department,the Department's authorized agents or local health departments shall have no liablirty for wastewater systems designed,constructed and installed pursuant to on Engineered option Permit.[(NC General Statute 13OA-336.1(f)] RIGHT OF ENTRY.• The submittal of this Notice of intent to Construct grants right of entry to the Local Health Department and the State to the referenced property. ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: Once the LHD deems that the Notice of Intent to Construct is complete via signature in the section above,the owner may apply to the local permitting agency for a permit for electrical, plumbing,heating,air conditioning or other construction,location or relocation activity uhder any provision of general or special law pursuant to G.S.130A-338. Page 3 of 6 Vi.tH5/EH5/05WP8—COMMON FORM Effective lune 1,2018 CAEOP22-0013 141 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: This section for Local Health Department use only. PART 2: LHD Completeness Review of the Notice of Intent to Construct "(c)Completeness Review for Notice of Intent to Construct.—The local health department shall determine whether a notice of intent to construct,as required pursuant subsection(b)of this section,is complete within 15 business days after the local health department receives the notice of intent to construct. A determination of completeness means that the notice of intent to construct includes all of the required components. If the local health department determines that the notice of intent to construct is incomplete, the department shall notify the owner or the professional engineer of the components needed to complete the notice. The owner or professional engineer may submit additional information to the department to cure the deficiencies in the notice. The local health department shall make a final determination as to whether the notice of intent to construct is complete within 10 business days after the department receives the additional information from the owner or professional engineer. If the department fails to act within anytime period set out in this subsection,the owner or professional engineer may treat the failure to act as a determination of completeness." The review for completeness of this Notice of Intent was conducted in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(c). This NO1 is determined to be: ❑ INCOMPLETE(If box is checked, Information in this section is required.) Based upon review of information submitted in Part 1,the following items are missing: Copies of this form listing missing items were sent to the design PE and the Owner on Date via with directions to re-submit missing items using Page 5 of this form. Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Print Name of Authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of Authorized Agent of the LHD Date VCOMPLETE(If box is checked, information in this section is required.) Based upon review of information submitted in Part 1 of this form,this NOI is deemed COMPLETE. Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on 12/28/2022 via EMAIL Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered A copy of this NO1 and tracking information was sent to the State on 12/28/2022 via EMAIL Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Kathryn Hobby,REHS 1835 12/28/2022 Print Name of Authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of Authorized Agent of the LHD Date DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 4 of 6 142 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: Re-submittal of NOI with missing items included This Section is for use by the owner or PE to submit items noted as missing during LHD Completeness Review above. Resubmittals must be accompanied by a cover letter from the PE. LHD USE ONLY: This NOI resubmittal received: by Date Initials Item#from initial NOI Resubmittal description Attestation by Professional Engineer licensed in North Carolina pursuant to G.S.89C I, hereby attest that the information re-submitted for this Notice of Licensed Professional Engineer(Print Name) Intent to Construct is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and that the proposed system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336- A(e)(6). Signature of Licensed Professional Engineer Date The section below is for Local Health Department use after submittal of items noted as missing above. LHD Follow-up Completeness Review of Notice of Intent to Construct This follow-up review for completeness of this Notice and Intent was conducted in accordance with G.S. 130A- 336.1(c). This NOI is determined to be: ❑ INCOMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the RESUBMITTAL above,this Notice of Intent remains INCOMPETE because the following items from Part 1 of this form remain missing: Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ❑ COMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the RESUBMITTAL above in addition to information provided in Part 1 of this form,this NOI is deemed complete. Copies of this signed form were sent to the PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered A complete copy of this form with tracking information was sent to the State: via Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 5 of 6 143 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: PART 3: Authorization to Operate(ATO) Except for date received,the Section below is to be completed by the Owner or the PE. LHD USE ONLY: Initial submittal of request for ATO received: by Date Initials Date of Post-construction Conference: Post-construction Conference waived in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(j): he following items are included in this submittal for an Authorization to Operate under an EOP: 1. Signed and sealed copy of the Engineer's report that includes the information in G.S. 130A-336.1(k)(1)and 15A NCAC 18A.1971(f) ❑Yes ❑ No 2. Operation and management program and ORC contract, if applicable ❑Yes ❑ No 3. Fee (as applicable) ❑Yes ❑ No 4. Notarized letter documenting Owner's acceptance of the system from the PE ❑Yes ❑ No 5. Owner meets requirements of ownership or control of the system per 15A NCAC 18A.1938(j) ❑Yes ❑ No 6. Easement, right of way, or encroachment agreement required per 15A NCAC 18A.1938(j) ❑Yes ❑ No 7. Multi-party agreements required, as applicable, pursuant to 15A NCAC 18A. .1937(h) ❑Yes ❑ No If yes,agreements filed in County Register of Deeds in Deed Book Page Attestation by the Owner or the PE for Authorization to Operate I, hereby attest that all items indicated above have been provided to the Print name of Owner or Professional Engineer County LHD and the system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336-.1(e)(6). Signature of Owner or Professional Engineer Date This section for LHD Use Only. LHD Review of required information for the ATO ❑ INCOMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the Section above,the following items are missing from the information required for an Authorization to Operate for an EOP: Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ❑ COMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the Section above,this Authorization to Operate is hereby issued in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(m). A copy of this complete NOI/ATO with tracking information was sent to the State on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Once the LHD determines completeness based upon the ATO submission,the owner may apply to the local permitting agency for permanent electrical service to a residence,place of business or place of public assembly pursuant to G.S.130A-339. DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 6 of 6 Owner: DOLLAR GENERAL 144 Address: CORNER HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD . PITTMAN SOIL CONSULTING PO BOX 1387 Location: CARRBORO, NC RICHLANDS,NC 28574 PROPERTY INFORMATION OBTAINED VIA NEWCOMB 910-330-2784 LAND SURVEYORS, PLLC, DATED JUNE 8, 2022. pittmansoilnayahoo.com tttt lt111ly+r+F .. Z/ = SCALE I"=100' SEAL _ ® POE EER��-43250 _ z.6 7 � Q4� I� o I J PPROVED PRESSURE MANIFOLD 000 GALLON P nq + PUMTANK_ I 500 GALLON ' _ + SEPTIC TANK J I ' CIJ r L „�, sc J I ' TYPICAL SOIL BORE INITIAL 0-12 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 4/3 DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD ` 12-24 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 6/4 LTAR.33 ^� 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES ? f���eg 24-30 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, IOYR 5/8 12-18"TB ��- F� 30-48 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, IOYR 5/8,2.5Y 6/1,7.5YR 5/8 >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER ��, .� � SOIL WETNESS 30" SYSTEM AND T BEYOND SYSTEM A. �is``` � � LTAR 0.33 GPD/SQFT REPAIR AREA DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD LTAR.33 af° f 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES f'fj 76 12-18"TB NOOAk � >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SYSTEM AND 5'BEYOND SYSTEM Owner: DOLLAR GENERAL 145 Address: CORNER HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD . PITTMAN SOIL CONSULTING PO BOX 1387 Location: CARRBORO, NC RICHLANDS,NC 28574 910-330-2784 PROPERTY INFORMATION OBTAINED VIA NEWCOMB LAND SURVEYORS, PLLC, DATED JUNE 8, 2022. pittmansoilna yahoo.com %y��410tp11pl, ` jNA CAJ,©��.,, SCALE 1"=60' C? QSSIp !j. 1 Qv - HAN;—ERIE,—S,-AMPoSEALENGINE- _ _ 12 t° oE oN��EERN254 D-._ s4 +e.ouPzas+moo ��� Am 129' I 1 Q``P ryy p ILI Q"ig°`O� 1 0 I APPROVED IPRESSURE MANI a j \1000 GALLON PUMP TANK 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK Vol— r - - I m TYPICAL SOIL BORE INITIAL 0-12 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 4/3 DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD ` 12-24 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 6/4 LTAR.33 ^� 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES 24-30 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, IOYR 5/8 12-18"TB 0..; >611 F� 30-48 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, IOYR 5/8,2.5Y 6/1,7.5YR 5/8 >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER ��,,_: .� Ak SOIL WETNESS 30 SYSTEM AND T BEYOND SYSTEM is``` � � LTAR 0.33 GPD/SQFT REPAIR AREA DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD LTAR.33 af° f 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES 12-18"TB N00k >611 SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SYSTEM AND 5'BEYOND SYSTEM 146 g m'rral 11,617 1003 Gregory Fork Road Richlands, NC 28574 Phone (910)330-2784 pittmansoil@yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 2,2022 Ref: Dollar General site located on NC HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD, CARRBORO, NC A soil evaluation was conducted on the above referenced tract to determine the sites suitability for septic repair. The current laws and rules of NC was used as guide for this evaluation. This evaluation was conducted for a 200 gpd Dollar General. Hand Auger borings on the site were used to characterize the soil texture, and depth to the soil wetness condition. The attached plot plan shows the location of the septic system in the most ideal location on the site. The soil wetness condition was found to be 30" from the surface with a clay loam texture. I have assigned an LTAR of 0.33 gpd/sqft for a 200 gpd Dollar General. This will require the installation of 4-60'conventional lines that shall be installed in accordance with the current rules and on contour. The depth to soil wetness of 30" would constitute a 12-18"trench bottom. The system will require 6" of Group II or III soil cover that shall extend 5'from the edge of the system. The system will require a 1500 gallon septic tank and a 1000 gallon pump tank. The repair will require 4-60'conventional lines installed at 12-18" from the surface. After installation the site should be landscaped to shed surface water. Any alterations to the site may impact soil conditions. This does not constitute a warranty or guarantee of system performance or functionality. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 910-330-2784. Thank You. Sincerely, �p 50LL 5��N,S, f�aoo°_ - oo�,Oc� A�as sl9E �, R. Haywood Pittman II NC Licensed Soil Scientist 147 r'"ejo-ei a T" Civil Engineer— Consulting Engineer— Land Development PO Box 4580 Emerald Isle, NC 28594 (252) 777-0141 + athan.parker@ampdengineering.com Firm License Number P-1532 Ref: AMP'D Engineering, PLLC Septic Standards To Whom It May Concern, Due to unforeseen negligence by previous owners and contractors regarding the Engineered Option Permit ("EOP") process and installation, the following standards have been adopted by AMP'D Engineering, PLLC and are to be strictly followed. If these standards are not followed, AMP'D Engineering, PLLC has the right to void all warranties related to engineering work involved with these EOPs. • Engineer shall approve septic installer prior to installation. • Engineer shall be notified at a minimum of 48 hours prior to septic installation. • No vehicles, equipment, structures, debris, or any other items that may compact the soils or damage the septic lines allowed on the septic location before or after installation. Equipment only allowed over the septic area by a certified septic installer to backfill and grade the septic area after installation. • All systems are to have a minimum of 6" cover over the system and five feet beyond the system. Only approved soil to be used as cover. • After installation, the area should be graded to shed water. All drainage should be diverted away from septic area and tanks. • All drip systems to have a minimum of 12" cover over the system and five feet beyond the system. Only group I soil allowed over system with a cap of topsoil to promote growth of groundcover. • Groundcover is to be established over every system within 14 days after installation. • Orange safety fencing with T-Posts to be used to surround the system after installation to prevent any unqualified individuals from entering septic area. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call (252) 777-0141 or email me (athan.parker@ampd en gineering.com). Sincerely, �( :''+4�� CARO -_IMEER.oE. s.o_AMPo OssiQ %, o„e,ozz12S1WE=gAMM o=oo �. SEAL Athan M Parker, PE = 43250 = President AMP'd Engineering, PLLC Firm License No. P-1532 Page 1 of 1 D M/DD/YYYY) A�" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 02/17/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Kira Gibson,AINS,SBCS NAME: The Sewell Insurance Agency PHONE Ext): (910)326 5754 FA Na: (910)326 6310 785-1 W Corbett Ave E-MAIL kira@thesewellagency.com ADDRESS: PO Box 835 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Swansboro NC 28584 INSURER A: Bankers Insurance Group 33162 INSURED INSURER B: Progressive Southeastern 38784 AMP'D Engineering PLLC INSURER C: NorGUARD Insurance Company 31470 PO Box 4580 INSURER D: Berkshire Hathaway GUARD Insurance Company INSURER E, Emerald Isle NC 28594 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL2221703839 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS TYPE OF INSURANCE (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 JAMAUE 1U HEN I E7-CLAIMS-MADE � OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 A 32 0040007108 0 02 03/02/2022 03/02/2023 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY ❑ PRO- ❑ LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 JECT OTHER: Add'I for policy minimum $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 00MBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ B OWNEDX SCHEDULED 01335494 11/05/2021 11/05/2022 BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X PER STATUTE EORH AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N 500,000 C ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE N/A AMWC357500 03/01/2022 03/01/2023 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yes,describe under 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ Professional Liability D AMPL339476 03/01/2022 03/01/2023 Per Claim $1,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN AMP'D Engineering PLLC ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. PO Box 4580 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Emerald Isle NC 28594 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ACS CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DA 07/27/202 IIII THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: N.C. Farm Bureau Ins.Agency PHONE FAX (AtC.No.Ext): (A/C,No): I 5301 Glenwood Avenue (27612) E-MAIL I ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 27427 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC N I Raleigh NC 27611 INSURERA: Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation I INSURED I INSURERB: Ronald H.Pittman,II DBA INSURER C: I Pittman Soil Consulting INSURER D: I 1003 Gregory Fork Rd INSURER E: I Richlands NC 28574 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL2272123407 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TOALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, 3SUERLIMITS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSO WVD POLICY NUMBER (MMIDO/YYYN1 MMIDD/WYYI COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence $ 50,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 A X Professional Liability EV20182381-05 07/19/2022 07/19/2023 PERSONALBADVINJURY $ 1,000,000 I LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY JECOT- LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER Professional OcciAgg $ 1M/2M I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ _ (Ea accident) ANYAUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNESCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS D ONLY AUTOS HIRED HNON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ ' AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident $ ' UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ I EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED I I RETENTION$ $ I WORKERS COMPENSATION PER I 1OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN STATUTE _ ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEI OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? NIA E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ I If yes,desaibe under I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ Contractors Pollution Liability- Each Incident $1,000,000 A Occurence Form EV20182381-05 07/19/2022 07/19/2023 Aggregate Limit $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA NC 28540 01 2015 A O ORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registe marks - A D -- 150 Orange County Emergency Services EM 510 Meadowlands Drive Hillsborough,NC 27278 919.245.6100 Fire&Life Safety Division TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Elizabeth Farnan —Fire Marshal, Orange County CC: Patrick Mallett— Director Development Services Date: February 24, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Site Plan Review Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Emergency Apparatus Access and Water Availability for Required Fire Flow This memo is to show that the Fire Marshal Division has No Objections to the approval of the rezoning request. All requirements have been met for emergency apparatus access to the site and water to meet fire flow requirements. 02/24/2023 Elizabeth Farnan, FM Date A Prepared, Coordinated, and Integrated Emergency Semices System Twitter @ocncemergency 151 From: ]ones.DeAnoelo J To: Brian Collie; Nishith Trivedi Cc: Cy Stober;Chuck Edwards Contact Subject: [EXTERNAL MAIL]White Cross Retail TIA Review Date: Friday,February 3,2023 2:15:48 PM Attachments: image001.pno Hello Brian, District Staff have reviewed the TIA. Here are the findings: Traffic Impact Study Review • General Overview o The proposed White Cross Retail development is located in the southwest quadrant of NC Hwy 54 and White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, NC. The project will include approximately 11,000 square feet of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. • Required Improvements o White Cross Road at Site Driveway ■ Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress lane and one egress lane ■ Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taped on White Cross Road The Department concurs with the findings in the TIA. We are in receipt of the revised plans. Comments from the District office review are forthcoming. Thanks DeAngelo J. Jones Senior Assistant District Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways Division 7, District 1 336 570 6833 diiones1&ncdot.gov 115 East Crescent Square Drive P. O. Box 766 Graham, NC 27253 152 2� - y` Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. DRAFT Attachment 6 153 1 Excerpt of Draft Minutes MEETING MINUTES 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 3 MARCH 8,2023 4 REGULAR MEETING 5 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Adam Beeman (Chair), Cedar Grove Township Representative; Lamar Proctor(Vice-Chair), 7 Cheeks Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Melissa Poole, Little River 8 Township Representative; Beth Bronson, At-Large Representative; Randy Marshall,At-Large Representative; Charity 9 Kirk,At-Large Representative; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township 10 Representative; Whitney Watson,At-Large Representative; Delores Bailey, At-Large Representative; Steve Kaufmann, 11 Bingham Township Representative; 12 13 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director—Long Range Planning and 14 Administration; Patrick Mallett, Deputy Director; Development Services Division Taylor Perschau, Current Planning and 15 Zoning Supervisor; Brian Collie, Planner II; Tina Love, Administrative Support 16 17 OTHERS PRESENT: George Barnes,Applicant; Bob Hornik,Attorney for Applicant; Brent Purdum, Engineer/Architect; 18 Vernon Davis, Property Owner; Preston Mason, Rob Jamison, John Cecil, Pat Cecil, Susan Walser, Marilee McTigue, 19 Steve 0'Daniel, Carol Rigsbee, Deanna Smith, Greg Tilley, Sally Jo Slushen, Chris McCord, Diantha Rau, Jessica 20 Ostrowski, Sadie Rapp, Isa Cheren, Elly Schopler,Amanda Griffin, John Griffin, Peter Moyers, Katie Engel, Tony Blake, 21 Jayne Jackson, Robert Pollock,Jake Bialos, Rev, Cory Oliver, Tammre Lindsey, Rebecca Teer, Chris Hagenberger, 22 Jesus Bravo, Lisa Dumain, Eric Dumain, Dr.Anndal Narayanan, Kevin Reese, Clare Steech-Julich, 23 24 25 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 26 Chair Adam Beeman called the meeting to order 27 28 29 ********r************rt******************** 30 31 32 AGENDA ITEM 9: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(CONDITIONAL DISTRICT)-To review and make a recommendation to the 33 BOCC on an applicant-initiated zoning atlas amendment to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel from AR 34 (Agricultural Residential) (3.67 acres) &NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) (1.16 acres)to NR-CD 35 (Non-Residential Conditional District). 36 37 The parcel's address is 3026 White Cross Road in the Bingham Township(PIN 9749-40-2351). This 38 item is scheduled for BOCC Public Hearing on April 4, 2023. 39 PRESENTER: Brian Collie, Planner II 40 41 Taylor Perschau and Brian Collie reviewed the proposed amendment and gave a PowerPoint Presentation. 42 43 Applicant representative, Bob Hornik, reviewed the project and provided additional information. 44 45 Lamar Proctor: Can you talk more about why it is a Resource Protection Area? 46 47 Bob Hornik: Because of the proximity to the White Cross School across the street. That's why you see the green circle 48 on the map. 49 50 Brian Collie:That is correct,that green area that sprawls over across onto this property is for the White Cross School. 51 52 Lamar Proctor: It's for the school then it goes off in a line and that follows a stream... 53 54 Brian Collie:Yes, stream buffers 55 154 DRAFT 56 Lamar Proctor:And so, does the stream go on the school property? I'm just trying to figure it out. 57 58 Brian Collie: I'm not sure if it goes onto the school property or not. 59 60 Charity Kirk: It's two separate things. 61 62 Lamar Proctor: Okay. 63 64 Statler Gilfillen: I believe that this issue came before this board a few months ago and a decision was made. It has only 65 been a few months, can you clarify for me,why this is brought up before us again tonight?What is the justification of 66 change? 67 68 Bob Hornik: I can give you what I, as the applicant,think it is.The application previously was for a general use district 69 which would have allowed 110+different uses.We had no specific site plan, no specific detail about the plan.That 70 Planning Board meeting was back in July or August of 2022 and after that meeting,we regrouped and said "here are 71 what the concerns were, it seemed to be that it was a Dollar General store and many people were concerned that with a 72 general use zoning, it could be almost anything.We thought that the best way that we could try to give some assurance 73 to the County and the residents of the area about what was going to go there,would be to step back, rethink it and to do 74 some of the engineering and to present a site-specific development plan and a conditional district rezoning. The non- 75 residential district is the district that's available and suitable,for this kind of use. So, after some discussion with the 76 planning staff, they felt it was a different enough application, and we do too, in quality and in kind,that it wasn't subject to 77 the one year waiting period. No one that I know of challenged that. 78 79 Steve Kaufmann: I remember distinctly talk of a Dollar General going in there.And that was one of the reasons, in my 80 opinion why the board wasn't interested. It didn't quite fit in with that community setting,with the residential and business 81 district in general.They were all against having a Dollar General store there.The discussion was about Dollar General 82 as I remember it. 83 84 Bob Hornik: I don't doubt that for a second. however, I don't think you can make a recommendation, under zoning, based 85 on who the user is. I would think that's an abuse of the zoning power. 86 87 Beth Bronson:To his point, I think it had more to do with the character of the area than what the actual development 88 was. 89 90 Bob Hornick: Regarding the character of the area,you've got 2 or 3 steel buildings across the street. In my view,the 91 facade that's going to be on this Dollar General store,will be a significant improvement over what's in the area. 92 93 Cy Stober:What you have laid out before you is documented in emails from staff and Mr. Hornik, is the rationale for why 94 1 supported the application proceeding and didn't halt it.The ordinance does require that we get a dissimilar application 95 before us and what you see here,the zoning request for single use, proposed the difference in acreage, and then the 96 site specific commitments, and then furthermore,the lack of an impact to the commercial balance for development in that 97 activity node, are all the rationale for why I made the determination on behalf of the County that this application could 98 proceed. So,what you have before you, is my rationale and why I made that decision.That was before we saw a site 99 plan or anything, that was just the general nature of the request, and that it would be a single use with a site-specific 100 plan. Regarding the use,the use before you tonight is for a retail store.That is the only use that we as planners or you 101 as planning board can consider. There's federal matter of due process and equal protection under the law,that has to 102 be considered.You cannot consider this with regard to the specific tenant that would occupy the building.There are 103 certain carve outs say, adult uses,that do consider specific uses to be exceptionally different from other commercial 104 uses or entertainment uses, but in the case of general retail store,we can't consider whether it be a locally owned and 105 operated store, it would be a nationally owned and operated store, the franchise that would be locally owned and 106 operated but speak to a higher corporate power,we don't take any of that into consideration.We have to consider a 107 general retail store use, that is our responsibility, and that's the responsibility before you tonight as well. 108 155 DRAFT 109 Charity Kirk:We wouldn't be setting a precedent in denying dollar stores. Other areas in the country have limited chain 110 stores. How could we do that as a community?You're saying that isn't the Planning Board's charge, so who can say that 111 we don't want dollar stores? 112 113 Cy Stober: In North Carolina, it's been determined by the General Assembly,that we shall consider uses and not specific 114 tenants. Unless they change the law to allow us to regulate them differently,we don't have that enabling legislation or 115 power in North Carolina. 116 117 Charity Kirk:Would it need to be a state mandate to allow communities to limit the chain stores and types of stores? 118 119 Cy Stober:Yes, in North Carolina as our State law is constructed.That's my understanding of 160-D,that the zoning 120 laws broadly limit us to consider categories of uses rather than specific uses such as a dollar store unless explicitly 121 otherwise stated. 122 123 Melissa Poole-On page 114 of our packet on the map of where the site is proposed,where is the school in relation to 124 the site? 125 126 Cy Stober- I believe it's not the corner parcel, it's the one just to the west of the stream.The stream defines the school's 127 eastern property boundary.That stream is on the property, as well as the school. 128 129 Melissa Poole-What sort of school is this? 130 131 Cy Stober- It's a historic unoccupied school. It's not used as a school. 132 133 Beth Bronson- It's not used as a school but it's a historic landmark. 134 135 Melissa Poole-There's an HVAC business and then another building to the right, across the road? 136 137 Discussion about the maps provided in the packet by several Board members. 138 139 Cy Stober-Can you repeat the question Ms. Poole? 140 141 Melissa Poole- If you make a right on White Cross Rd.,what is that? 142 143 Cy Stober- I don't know. I'm sure some of the folks from the community who are here, could tell you. 144 145 Voices from the crowd can be heard, explaining what the other buildings on the map are. 146 147 Adam Beeman- It's commercial.You've got HVAC,woodworking, etc. 148 149 Melissa Poole-The reason I'm asking is not whether or not it is zoned, but I am curious to what the businesses are to 150 determine how many people are coming in and out. 151 152 Beth Bronson-To my knowledge,there are 2 gas stations at that intersection. There is also a restaurant and a market. 153 154 Melissa Poole-When you look on page 114 of the packet at the site, the section that comes down White Cross Road 155 when you've turned off of 54,what is the smaller rectangle there going to be? Is that going to be a parking lot? 156 157 Adam Beeman-No, they are going to fill it in with plantings to block the view from the homeowner. 158 159 Delores Bailey- Impervious surface-What's our requirement and what are they using and how much are they using of it? 160 161 Brian Collie-This is located in an unprotected watershed and there aren't impervious maximums in that watershed. 162 156 DRAFT 163 Delores Bailey- If the red building is not moved by someone, can it be repurposed with any of the parts salvaged as 164 opposed to just throwing them away? 165 166 Bob Hornik-Not by us and it looks like it's in pretty rough shape on the outside for sure.There are planks falling off and it 167 is in rough shape. 168 169 Charity Kirk-There is something in the packet about it being a historic building that has been remodeled many times. 170 171 Delores Bailey-The one with the red top? 172 173 Charity Kirk-The one that's on the property. It's been remodeled so many times that it's lost its character, but it could still 174 potentially be refurbished. 175 176 Bob Hornik- It has historic origins but has been changed over time. 177 178 Statler-Are there photographs of that building available tonight to see? 179 180 Bob Hornik-No, not that I have. 181 182 Adam Beeman- If you pull Google Maps up, you can probably see a street view. It's a pretty nondescript building. 183 184 Statler- I turned my phone off, so I can't see. 185 186 Delores Bailey- I think the last time we talked about this area maybe being a food desert. Is there any nutritional value 187 coming through this store? 188 189 Bob Hornik-Just like in other Dollar General stores, there will be food stuffs sold there. 190 191 Statler-When a large chain store like a Wal Mart comes into a community, often it makes a major impact and puts many 192 businesses out of business. Competition is good, price is important,we all know that.This is a discussion about a 193 national company who wants to come into a small community where there are a series of small stores and the possibility 194 that the Mexican market that now sells milk, may not be competitive long-term.The question is, has an impact study 195 been done on what this could mean for the community? 196 197 Bob Hornik- I don't have the answer to that question. I do know that Dollar General has done a study and found that 198 there is a market for them in this location. 199 200 Statler-Even with the other Dollar General stores you have that are close in the area? 201 202 Bob Hornik-Yes, sir. 203 204 Vernon Davis, property owner-A little history of the building. It was built in 1929 as a branch of the Junior Order of 205 America. They used the bottom as a grocery store and the top floor as a meeting hall. I purchased the property in 1974. 206 Prior to that,the state had acquired the right of way on Highway 54 and moved the building back.The property was 207 moved over an existing road drain and also set it down directly on the ground. The building has served several purposes. 208 It has restricted parking due to the existing property lines and right of way that comes within 6 feet of the building.There 209 is no room there for parking with the existing building. There has been some interest in salvaging the building. I'm not 210 going to trash the building. My daughter wants to move the front part, if we get permission to move it, and whoever wants 211 the tall part is welcome to it.There are windows,flooring, siding, and all that will be repurposed. I live just a mile down 212 the road on a 5-generation farm. I'm 80 years old and I just want to get rid of this property so I can spend my last years 213 on the farm.Anybody that has an interest in that is welcome to it. I am a building contractor and I have built 2 other 214 businesses, one being a market and one being a service station. They did very well. I am a long-time resident of the 215 community and I want to see the community do good. I am not here to just put something that will not serve the 216 community in it.The reason the property hasn't been sold before is because of the restrictions that have been imposed 217 on it by the County. Dollar General was the only person that could meet all the requirements to purchase this property if 157 DRAFT 218 it's approved. I would like to urge the Board to consider approval. I am an Orange County resident, have been and will 219 continue to be. I hope that you will consider this request and I will try to answer questions if you have any. 220 221 Whitney Watson- I appreciate that you included the renderings of the lighting, but could you speak further about it being 222 dark sky compliant? 223 224 Bob Hornik- I do know that the lighting is all downward shielded and is confined to the storefront area. I don't think there 225 are any free-standing light poles in the parking lot. 226 227 Whitney Watson- My other question has to do with the location of the wells. I read in the packet that a permit has not yet 228 been applied for. I wondered if you could indicate on the plan, approximately where you are going to have someone start 229 looking for water. 230 231 Adam Beeman- I think it's on there. I believe it's off to the side on the top left half corner of the building where the 54 232 frontage is. 233 234 Brent Purdum-(Indicating a location on the map)That's where we are proposing the well to go. Up there, close to the 235 corner where the woods are. So it would be behind the building, close to the 54-buffer line. 236 237 Beth Bronson-Can you speak to how many locations were tested before that was the one, they came up with? 238 239 Brent Purdum-We haven't done a well test. 240 241 Beth Bronson-Okay, so no well tests have been done? 242 243 Brent Purdum-No, ma'am,we are just proposing it because we have to meet certain distances. 244 245 Beth Bronson- If there is no well test, there is no alternative means to bring water out to that area, correct? 246 247 Brent Purdum-As far as we know, correct. 248 249 Adam Beeman-Do they do well tests here in Orange County? 250 251 Beth Bronson-You have to test to be able to perc. 252 253 Adam Beeman-Percing is different... 254 255 Brent Purdum-That's the septic system. 256 257 Beth Bronson- I apologize,yes, sorry. 258 259 Brent Purdum-We've done the testing for the septic tank. We do have the perc test.That's going to be between the 260 parking and the newly landscaped southern border. 261 262 Beth Bronson-So that top left corner that you're speaking to is for the septic? 263 264 Brent Purdum-No, that's for the well.The well is on the north side, septic is on the south side. 265 266 Randy Marshall-We keep talking about the rezoning, and we don't talk about what's going in there, on the other hand, 267 half the questions are about what's going in there. I'm not even sure what's appropriate to be questioned. 268 269 Bob Hornik-Because this is a conditional rezoning,we're not only allowed to talk about specifics, as compared to a 270 general use rezoning,with a conditional rezoning, a conditional district,we've got to talk about the specifics. We're only 271 going to be allowed to do what is specifically approved. 272 158 DRAFT 273 Randy Marshall- Is this the last time that this comes before the planning board or if the rezoning takes place,then staff 274 handles the building approval process? 275 276 Cy Stober-The latter. Should this be approved, by the Commissioners, at next month's public hearing,this will be a site 277 specific plan.The ordinance does allow us to make minor modifications,that accommodate field realities, but we cannot 278 deviate significantly from this site plan that is before you tonight.The use would be limited to a retail use. Say a library 279 wanted to go in there, or a health clinic,the entire project, even if it was the same footprint,would have to come back 280 before the planning board and the Commissioners for approval for any other use to occupy that space. But yes, all 281 building permits, all site plans for construction,would then be permitted by right, provided it was consistent with the site 282 plan before you and limited to the retail use. 283 284 Randy Marshall-Just to be clear then,the approval that the County Commissioners would eventually rule on would be 285 the last time there would be review or any point to comment on this project? 286 287 Cy Stober-That's correct unless there is a significant deviation from both the use or the site plan. 288 289 Randy Marshall-Okay, then I have another question since we can talk about the business itself. One of the things that's 290 striking to me is that you haven't justified this business in terms of what kind of sales tax impact it might have to the 291 citizens of Orange County. Is it going to make money? How much money do you think it's going to make? Clearly you 292 think it's going to make money, or you wouldn't be putting it there. Do you presume that most of the clientele is going to 293 be people who drive back and forth to Alamance County and stop there,therefore we are getting out of county 294 contributions to our tax base, or do you presume that in the case that was stated before,there's not enough population 295 or business within the local community to support the business? I'm just interested in a bit of the economic thinking about 296 putting this business there. 297 298 Bob Hornik-Certainly we hope and expect that we are going to be drawing traffic to and from Alamance County and from 299 the area.We hope and expect that we will make money. 300 301 Randy Marshall-There are no projections,formal or informal that you folks have done on this? 302 303 Bob Hornik-Not that I'm aware of. The Dollar General folks may have done some of that. It's really not a zoning 304 question. 305 306 Randy Marshall- I understand but I was told that we could ask business questions so that's what I'm doing. I'm trying to 307 get some sort of a feeling for how much of a commercial generator this is going to be for Orange County. Not just for that 308 community, but for Orange County. In other words, if it brings in tens of thousands of dollars in sales tax revenue,that 309 impacts every Orange County resident in terms of what we have to pay in potentially raised property taxes. If it doesn't 310 generate that much sales revenue, then it's a wash, I don't know why we would consider it in terms of the economic 311 impact. I think that information is critical for us to consider. It's also curious that that would be a main selling point for you 312 folks in wanting to put this business there,to say it's going to be a a commercial tax generator for the county and to help 313 you folks to spread your tax burden out, not just for residential taxes but for commercially generated taxes as well. So, 314 I'm curious that it hasn't been sold at all on that. I read all 30 of the letters that were sent to the planning board, nobody 315 spoke on that part of the topic, and I think it's an important one. 316 317 Bob Hornik-Right, everyone's been focusing on the land use aspects of it, not the economic impacts of it. 318 319 Randy Marshall- I think you missed an opportunity. 320 321 Bob Hornik-Yes, I understand what you are saying. 322 323 Whitney Watson- If I could follow up on Randy and actually ask Brian a question,that is designated as an Economic 324 Activity Node, correct? 325 326 Brian Collie- It's a Rural Community Activity Node. 327 159 DRAFT 328 Whitney Watson- Is there any history of that type of retail store drawing additional commercial activities around them to 329 enhance that node? 330 331 Brian Collie-As far as that question goes, I don't know if I can answer that,we don't have the studies that lead to that. 332 333 Whitney Watson-What about suppressing additional development in that area because of the competition? 334 335 Brian Collie- I can't answer that either. 336 337 Beth Bronson-There are studies out there if you start poking, but they are usually for more urban areas, not rural areas. 338 339 Cy Stober- If you look at the language in the comprehensive plan, it simply makes recommendations about what the 340 future land use should be in that area. It doesn't really speak to competition between nonresidential uses, so we are 341 bound and limited by the guidance provided by the comprehensive plan. 342 343 Beth Bronson-Can you clarify to that point that the comprehensive plan does not necessarily specify NR-CD or the NC- 344 2, but they do specify to local commercial? 345 346 Cy Stober-No, commercial.This was in the slide that Brian already had up. If you look at the last clause, "an appropriate 347 location for any of the following uses,the institutional uses then the final clauses, one or more commercial uses"that is 348 the guidance that is provided to us by our comprehensive plan. Imperfect as it may be,that is the guidance that staff has 349 in making its findings and I have in making my recommendation to you all. 350 351 Beth Bronson- I absolutely agree with you. Because this application falls under"one or more commercial uses", I do want 352 to highlight the emphasis on "institutional uses", in that sense of this rural community activity node,juxtaposed with the 353 existing commercial uses that are already in play, in that intersection, in that activity node. Not to say that there's any 354 question to that, but the fact that the NC-2 is designated for the rural community activity node... 355 356 Cy Stober- It was neighborhood commercial versus LC-1 which is local commercial, so they are applied appropriately 357 based upon their description,the buffers and what is in the ordinance about how they may be consistently integrated and 358 introduced into an activity node or an area of the county but yes.There's no prescription in that NC-2 can only be in 359 these activity nodes or LC-1 can only be in these that's not how that works. 360 361 Beth Bronson-So they overlap? 362 363 Cy Stober-Yes. 364 365 Beth Bronson-Agreed.We saw this at the last presentation for the rezoning too. It's coming within this time frame 366 because it's dissimilar. I think it's important that the board and the community also know that the zoning application is 367 different which makes it dissimilar which may have already been stated. But I think it's worth underscoring that there's no 368 longer a local commercial aspect to it. It is a neighborhood commercial ask like a conditional zoning request. 369 370 Cy Stober-Well,there was that question that was significant at the Planning Board meeting in August, regarding 371 consumption of the... there's an allocation of X number of acreage in each activity node and conditional zoning does not 372 impact that allocation,so there's still available NC-2 and LC-1 acreage,that could be considered for future rezonings. 373 374 Beth Bronson-Thank you for that clarification. 375 376 Lamar Proctor-What is that allocation,for rural community activity node, do you know? 377 378 Cy Stober- I don't know. 379 380 Lamar Proctor-But there's a limitation? 381 382 Cy Stober- There is, yes sir. 160 DRAFT 383 384 Lamar Proctor-Why? 385 386 Cy Stober-Some of it's been consumed by the existing businesses that are there, but there is available acreage. 387 388 Perdita Holtz- It's 10 acres for LC-1 and 10 acres for NC-2, so 20 acres combined. 389 390 Lamar Proctor-20 acres combined for that rural activity node. 391 392 Cy Stober-Some of that has been consumed by the existing businesses that are there,which is why the split-zoning 393 request came before you before. 394 395 Lamar Proctor-That's to preserve the rural character of that area, right? 396 397 Perdita Holtz- It is, but you may recall that we also spoke to the fact that we require a greater area to be rezoned for 398 commercial use than was previously required. For instance, now we require the septic areas and the well area all be 399 zoned commercial because it is serving the commercial use. One of the things that needs to be looked at is whether 10 400 acres is an appropriate amount given that one use can potentially take all the 10 acres. 401 402 Lamar Proctor-Right, also because conditional districts like this are exempted from the limitations on the rural 403 community activity nodes,what you could see happen is you could see multiple conditional districts being approved in a 404 rural area, thereby bypassing that limitation, thereby destroying the rural character of that particular community. 405 406 Cy Stober-You could have multiple non-residential conditional requests in an activity node. 407 408 Lamar Proctor- Right, so that's tricky and that's something we should definitely be looking at in the separate issue of the 409 comprehensive land use plan and the UDO. What you're going to see is exactly this,that developers will just apply for a 410 conditional district, and you'll end up with 10-20 conditional districts bypassing what the comprehensive land use plan 411 had envisioned in terms of preserving the rural character of a particular community. 412 413 Cy Stober- I think it deserves further exploration,yes. 414 415 Charity Kirk-That's a very good point,thank you. 416 417 Statler Gilfillen- I assume that in this packet, the images of what they are proposing the building will be is consistent with 418 what is planned to be built. Buried in the back of the packet,there is a letter from Peter Sandbeck who is in charge of the 419 historic commission on behalf of Orange County. I am a past member, I am a licensed architect, I have some expertise in 420 preservation. I think his letter was very well written. In that letter, I would like to comment if I could and maybe get a 421 comment back on this because we are talking about a small community and the fabric of the community. The building 422 itself and the store may service more people passing through than the people that live there.As such, it may have a 423 negative impact on the community if you follow what Peter Sandbeck is saying. I'd like some comment on this. Quoting, 424 "Any proposed project that has a potential to adversely affect a designated historic landmark is subject to a higher level 425 of review with the goal of working with the property developers to find ways to reduce or eliminate any potential negative 426 visual or physical impact on a landmark property." He goes on to say in the next paragraph"the proposed new building 427 completely ignores and turns its back toward the historic school as well as toward many motorists that will pass the site 428 each day. This is not an acceptable treatment in such close proximity to this significant landmark that has been 429 recognized by Orange County Historic Preservation Commission."That tells me, as an architect involved in preservation, 430 the impact of this building as an architectural statement and I appreciate the amount of work,time, and money that they 431 have spent in providing this proposal. But the impact of this design within this small community at this crossroads may be 432 very negative. Could somebody respond to that? 433 434 Taylor Perschau-This is how one of the conditions came about. "Number 4 Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that 435 the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School,the north elevation of 436 the building towards NC Highway 54, shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding,trim, crown,frieze, 437 simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application;" 161 DRAFT 438 That condition was added after Peter Sandbeck was allowed the opportunity to comment, so that was in response. 439 440 Charity Kirk-So did he comment on the addition? 441 442 Taylor Perschau- I don't believe that we were able to get those materials back to him for further comment after the memo 443 was provided. 444 445 Statler Gilfillen-What you've described there, I don't know that that's compatible with what he's described, could be the 446 issue here. I just want to raise the question tonight. 447 448 Cy Stober-On that letter,which is on page 205...on page 206,the first paragraph, Mr. Sandbeck states"As a mitigation 449 strategy we recommend that the design treatment for the front elevation as shown on the sheet A2, be continued around 450 the corner, and applied also to the north elevation. This should consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, 451 trim, crown,frieze, simulated windows. This modification to the building design will provide a significant visual 452 improvement to the elevation facing NC 54 and the historic school building." I believe that condition was directly in 453 response and almost a pull quote from Mr. Sandbeck's language. 454 455 Bob Hornik-After seeing that,we did extend the fagade along the north side of the building in direct response to Mr. 456 Sandbeck's comment. 457 458 Charity Kirk-Could you touch on the size of the other retail establishments and the sizes of the parking lots in the area 459 and how this store compares to the sizes of the others? 460 461 Bob Hornik- I'm not sure about the size of the parking lots, I know that across Hwy 54, 1 think the Artisan's Building that 462 we were just talking about is 8,000 square feet give or take. There's the other building that's almost directly across Hwy 463 54 from this property where you have the pole barn building,which is significantly less aesthetically pleasing to the 464 historic school than our site would be but that pole barn is about 7,700 square feet,the building itself. 465 466 Charity Kirk- Is that a retail establishment? 467 468 Bob Hornik- It's just what's across the street, I didn't know you were talking about just retail establishments. 469 470 Charity Kirk- I was asking about retail establishments. 471 472 Bob Hornik- I know the gas station across White Cross Road is, I want to say, 1,500 square feet roughly. I looked at all 473 those this afternoon and the Bravo Market is about double that, I think. It's 2,500 or something like that. 474 475 Charity Kirk-So a 10,000 square feet retail building would match some other buildings in the area but not necessarily 476 other retail stores? 477 478 Bob Hornik- I think that's an accurate statement,yes. 479 480 Beth Bronson- I have a question for the applicant. Is anyone here from Kimley Horn? 481 482 Bob Hornik-The traffic engineer?There's nobody here from there tonight. 483 484 Beth Bronson- Is anybody here to speak to the traffic impact analysis that was performed on that intersection? 485 486 Bob Hornik- I'll do the best I can with it, I've reviewed it. 487 488 Beth Bronson-My question is about the traffic impact analysis that was performed on that intersection, specifically for the 489 conditional zoning application. With that conditional zoning application,they performed a traffic impact analysis that 490 observed both the intersection of Hwy 54 going both east and west, and then White Cross coming north and turning east 491 or west. From White Cross,that's the right towards Carrboro or the left towards Graham and Alamance County.White 492 Cross is considered a minor road, it's rural, however, there are few roads that come off of the Greensboro highway to 162 DRAFT 493 Hwy 54.White Cross is therefore a main artery from the Greensboro highway to Hwy 54. My question is that the level of 494 service was rated an A, but it was unclear what the projected traffic was going to look like in 2024. 495 496 Bob Hornik- For which section of road? 497 498 Beth Bronson-One for the parcel itself, so one for the business itself...the numbers that they generated for the projected 499 traffic. 500 501 Bob Hornik- I know there was a trip generation which I want to say was 31 in the AM peak hour and 83 in the PM peak 502 hour. 503 504 Beth Bronson- It looked like the existing characteristics were listed as a level of service A. If you actually look at the level 505 of service A, it describes free-flowing operations. 506 507 Bob Hornik-Like in school, an A is pretty good. 508 509 Beth Bronson-So there is no need for any kind of consideration because there's no stopping of traffic.When I'm looking 510 at the existing traffic in that area, actually turning left or right off that road onto Hwy 54 or turning left off of 54 onto that 511 road is not necessarily represented in this traffic impact analysis so I wanted to know if anyone could speak to the 512 conditions under which they did the observation? I know that there is an algorithm in their appendix but it's very 513 confusing so I didn't know if anyone could describe that? 514 515 Bob Hornik- I can't really speak to that. I know that the TIA was scoped before it was done, it was reviewed by NCDOT, 516 and DeAngelo reviewed it and said it was satisfactory to NCDOT. We made the plan modification that NCDOT asked us 517 to make with the right turn lane. 518 519 Beth Bronson-So, the right turn lane off of 54 onto White Cross,was not part of the plan. The site plan of the applicant 520 specifies 100 feet, right turn lane, off of... 521 522 Bob Hornik-White Cross into the parking lot. 523 524 Beth Bronson-The easement, of the highway, so that 100 feet would include some of what the DOT's easement exists 525 already. 526 527 Bob Hornik- I think it's probably all the NC DOT right of way. If it's not all, then it's a good part of it is, the right turn lane. 528 529 Beth Bronson- Would that business also have a right of way because it was zoned originally as a business? 530 531 Bob Hornik- I'm confused by that question. 532 533 Beth Bronson- It's probably not significant. I think my question has to do with the fact that what the traffic analysis has 534 recommended is a 100 foot, right turn lane off of White Cross. However,there's and maybe this is just my perception of 535 measurement, but there's not even 100 feet of a right turn lane off at 54 into White Cross. So,what you're asking is that 536 people coming down 54, eastbound are going to have to, if they,this projected 31 AM, and 83 PM peak... 537 538 Bob Hornik-They would have to make a right and then make a right. 539 540 Beth Bronson-Yes, they would have to make a right and then make a right,or they have to make a left and then make a 541 left.To me it seems like those numbers are combined. It looks like total daily. 542 543 Bob Hornik- I can't answer what I understand your question to be. I wish I could. 544 545 Beth Bronson-Yeah, I think my question is that,was this impact analysis done using 2021 numbers? If so,then they 546 were not necessarily an accurate description of how many commuters during AM and PM peak hours were actually 163 DRAFT 547 occurring, so my concern is that it's not actually representative of the impact on the neighborhood traffic that it's going to 548 have. 549 550 Bob Hornik-All I can tell you is that the professionals who did the study and the professionals who reviewed the study, 551 said it was good. 552 553 Beth Bronson- I appreciate that input. 554 555 Brent Purdum-DOT reviewed the traffic analysis study. When they did the traffic analysis study off the 2021 numbers, 556 they submitted it, then DOT,takes those numbers and does their research.Then the DOT were the ones that said, "Yes, 557 you know traffic analysis study still meets today's numbers. What we need to do is put one right turn lane on White Cross 558 Road leading to the site and that was it. 559 560 Beth Bronson-You don't have an ingress on 54, correct? 561 562 Brent Purdum-Correct. 563 564 Beth Bronson-Part of the traffic analysis was that you could not have an ingress on 54 because that would impact the 565 traffic, correct? 566 567 Brent Purdum-All of that was researched, all of that was included in their study. 568 569 Beth Bronson- I absolutely agree with that assessment, that you couldn't have a right-hand turn lane on 54. I'm not 570 questioning their professionalism or their aptitude, not at all. I am not an expert, I'm just a resident who has been in this 571 area for a very long time. I've seen that intersection and I've seen what happens to people trying to turn left to White 572 Cross going westbound. I've seen how traffic accordions for eastbound traffic that is coming down 54. During peak 573 hours,there can be an issue there.The fact that no one actually went out to this spot to do this impact analysis.They 574 just used existing numbers, correct? 575 576 Bob Hornik- I can't tell you whether Kimley Horn went out there and sat there and did a traffic count. I assume that they 577 did. 578 579 Brent Purdum-They go out to that intersection,they sit out there, and they have car counters. It's not just that 580 intersection they'll look down the roads,they will look all over. They are not just looking at a chart.They are going to that 581 site, that intersection to collect all their data.That's part of their data collection is physically being at the site. 582 583 Beth Bronson- I was trying to find, in the report, what days they were there.All I can see is that they are basing it on 584 2021 numbers,which would indicate that they were using an average that was already aggregated from a previous 585 report that was similar enough. 586 587 Brent Purdum-During the time that we went from the regular rezoning to this conditional rezoning, that's when they were 588 onsite. 589 590 Beth Bronson-Thank you, I appreciate that. 591 592 Adam Beeman-Any other questions or can we open it up to public comment? 593 594 David Blankfard-What does staff think about the reduction in the number of parking spaces? Do you think that's 595 adequate? 596 597 Brian Collie-Towards that question referring to the trip generation numbers,we feel that 54 spaces there per the UDO is 598 overkill.We feel that any paved surface that's not needed there is better. 599 600 Diantha Rau- I just want to speak to the character of our rural community which was mentioned by several folks here. 601 Facades and aesthetically pleasing buildings are one thing, but the character of our community is its people and our 164 DRAFT 602 small businesses that we have there.We have Mom and Pop businesses which will be impacted, I believe, very 603 negatively by a national chain coming in and setting up shop on that corner.We have a local market that uses local 604 meats and local dairy products. We have a restaurant; the Fiesta Grill and we have artisans and woodworkers in the 605 community. We also have our gas stations which are also convenience marts.A Dollar General store would be an affront 606 to the character of our community I believe. I strongly encourage your denial of this applicant in terms of 607 recommendations. 608 609 Charity Kirk-Can I touch on something? It's become clear to me that we are not supposed to be disallowing a Dollar 610 General,we are supposed to be disallowing a retail establishment here. So, the community, I'm very clear that you don't 611 want a Dollar General but to help me, I would be very interested why you don't want a retail establishment of this size on 612 that corner. We've been told that we cannot disallow a Dollar General because that's discriminatory and the North 613 Carolina's statutes don't allow that. So, if you could speak in a broader sense about the size of the establishment, or 614 something else,that would be helpful to me to help make my decision. 615 616 Diantha Rau-Sure,well, any type of a retail store, particularly a national one, I don't know what other ones would be on 617 the table, a Walgreens or anything like that, interferes with the Mom and Pop businesses that we have in the area. We 618 rely on them, they rely on our business,and they could be put out of business by a retail store coming in there.That's my 619 concern. 620 621 Sadie Rapp- I'm here on behalf of preserve Rural Orange. Based on the applicant's presentation, at the neighborhood 622 information meeting, I believe that they seem to have misunderstood our core concerns. They characterize the 623 communities protest as being largely about the aesthetics of the building, the using up of limited commercial zoning, and 624 the vagueness of the proposal. I would like to recognize their effort to assuage these concerns, but it doesn't change the 625 basic nature of the project. Preserving your own character, not just about aesthetics, but it's also about values. The 626 purpose of conditional zoning is to allow an exception to existing zoning to meet a distinct need of the community.To pull 627 from the language of the County's unified development ordinance;The exception comes with a high standard to ensure 628 compatibility and harmony with the surrounding areas and take applicable regulations to an equivalent or higher degree 629 when it comes to things like improved level of amenities, creative design, and a better environment.These standards 630 and expectations are lofty,we have data from the Institute for local self-reliance, as well as Consumer Reports,that 631 shows that dollar store proliferation is associated with a hollowing out of the local business economy. They use their 632 purchasing power to put any competitor out of business, including those that currently provide significant jobs, carry local 633 products, meaningfully contribute to the economic well-being of the area, and also serve our needs in a dynamic and 634 responsive way.A dollar store which siphons profits from our neighborhood and out-of-state has none of these qualities. 635 It's important to say that we are not opposed to economic development in general, but we deserve better than this 636 project. I simply cannot see how the term"Good civic design"could suit this project that is so grossly redundant,with the 637 many dollar stores in an 8-mile radius, and also create such conflict with the businesses in its orbit. On the basis of the 638 guidelines set forth in the UDO, I believe that the Board has a responsibility to vote against approving conditional zoning 639 as it is in direct conflict with the requirement that development be, as the UDO states, compatible and harmonious with 640 White Cross, thank you. 641 642 Amanda Griffin-There were a lot of questions around what businesses exist and the size of the buildings that are there 643 right now. This is my neighborhood, and I can speak very clearly to any of those questions that I heard some of you have 644 earlier. I sent an email, I don't know if you have access to that right now, but I emailed the planning board with a map 645 that has descriptions of all the local businesses and their sizes. Bravos Market is 2,700 square feet and that's our largest 646 retailer right now. Between that and the two convenience stores,White Cross Mart which is directly across from the 647 proposed lot is 1,680 square feet and the 76 Gas Station is 2,700 square feet with a tire repair shop, so this proposal of 648 a 10,640 square foot retailer is grossly disproportionate to the retail size that we have right now, and I think it's totally 649 unnecessary. I feel like our retail needs are already met with what we have in the community. There have also been 650 some rude comments about the buildings directly across the street, about the HVAC service,that they are big ugly metal 651 buildings, but I think that as another resident said earlier, aesthetic concerns are part of it but what's inside is what really 652 matters, and that HVAC company has been here for 30 years or something.They are locally owned and run by a family, 653 they keep their money local. No one is complaining about those buildings.Also,the size of them,the largest building is a 654 warehouse which is 4,200 square feet, they have an office which is 2,500 square feet, so nowhere near the parking 655 requirements that a retailer would bring.The historic White Cross school that was mentioned is 7,000 square feet and it 656 is a local artist's studio space with 4-6 commercial tenants. It's not retail, it's not open to the public, it doesn't have a 165 DRAFT 657 huge footprint on our community, but it does bring in culture and art and local businesses and it's a huge boon to our 658 area.The largest building in the area is 8,800 square feet and that's the local artist's cooperative which has 12 local 659 artists operating in it. It's also not a retail building, it doesn't have a ton of parking, it's low impact on the neighborhood 660 but again it's also bringing jobs and high-quality workers to our area. It really serves the White Cross community 661 aesthetic of a thriving, cultural crossroads. I also wanted to speak briefly to the comprehensive plan since we can't speak 662 directly about the type of retail...(timer went off) I'll let others speak to that. Thank you for your time. 663 664 John Griffin-Good evening. For centuries, rural Orange County, NC has maintained an economy of home local trade and 665 agricultural self-reliance, while state and nationwide economic forces lured neighboring counties to invest in major 666 commercial and industrial infrastructures, generations of Orange County residents kept corporate land development out 667 of their forests,watersheds, and county crossroads. Today, rural Orange County is a sanctuary from the industrial and 668 suburban sprawl of the Triangle and Triad. The preservation of home and land is unique here.That's the social and 669 economic character of Orange County. I believe these ideals are enshrined in the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 670 The Board voted down an application almost identical to this one last fall.The County has rejected other rural dollar 671 stores. In fact, there are no dollar stores within the rural boundary of Orange County that I'm aware of.This would be the 672 first.While the neighboring counties are saturated with dollar stores at their rural crossroads and boundaries.Approval 673 sets a sad precedent for economic development under the comprehensive plan. Southern Orange County at White 674 Cross, like other economic development nodes is well served by locally owned retailers.A dollar store would seek to 675 disrupt and outcompete and ultimately shutter them and preclude future local businesses from operating there.A ton of 676 journalism and legislation all over the US has examined and responded to the sprawling social and economic costs of 677 corporate box retail like Dollar General to families and local governments. Bottom pay, understaffing, non-nutritious 678 foods, increased opportunity for armed robbery, and an overall deterioration of local economic and social well-being. 1 679 implore Orange County to again deny this application in the spirit of Rural Orange Preservation and the values for 680 commercial development set forth in the comprehensive plan.Vote again against predatory low quality, and low paying 681 chain retail in Orange County,thank you. 682 683 Jesus Bravo-Thank you, my name is Jesus Bravo and I own Fiestas Grill and Bravo's Market. I think when I started the 684 Bravo's Market, started thinking that community needs. It's been over 3 years since we started. I think definitely it's going 685 to have a bad impact on my business and not only on my business, but on the community, and also on the traffic. The 686 Fiesta Grill,too of course.We have a hard time making a left turn into Fiesta Grill already. Everybody else already talked 687 about the bad impact this is going to have in our community, and of course, it's going to have a bad impact on Bravo's 688 Market.Thank you very much. 689 690 Dr.Anndal Narayanan-Members of the board,thank you for this opportunity for input tonight. My name is Andal 691 Narayanan and I'm here on behalf of 5 neighbors in White Cross,who were not able to be here tonight, but all of whom 692 share my opinion on this matter. I live in White Cross, 8 minutes from the parcel in question. I'm here to also ask you to 693 refuse Glandon Forest Equity's rezoning request.A big box retail establishment of this size will lower property values for 694 surrounding homeowners, it will increase traffic, it will disrupt the calm and quiet that we all value in the area.And, as 695 you as you just heard it will hurt the small businesses that are part of what make White Cross such a special place to 696 live. It's not needed in White Cross,this type of establishment.White Cross is not a food desert by any means. I rely on 697 Bravo's market, as part of my weekly shopping. It offers high quality dry goods, dairy, meat, and fresh produce.A lot of 698 this is, locally produced, and I really value that. I value keeping my dollars in the area.There are also several big box 699 dollar stores and grocery stores within a few miles driving distance in either direction. Finally, I think this is also 700 unnecessary, because if we if we really need to buy cheap stuff that's made in China from a predatory company, we can, 701 and already do that,from Amazon.Thank you for your attention to the overwhelming community opposition to this 702 rezoning request. 703 704 Tony Blake- I didn't originally plan to speak, but I heard some stuff in here that kind of bothered me and I wanted to 705 approach it from a little bit of a different tact. I'm sort of conservative property rights guy and I'm all for diversifying the tax 706 base. But what I'm hearing here as pointed out, 160 D holds the planning boards to the comprehensive plan not the UDO 707 and when I read the comprehensive plan,there's no mention of conditional zoning. In fact, if you look at Appendix D, 708 which is the 1981 Appendix,Appendix 5.4 and 6.8 they're the only mentions of White Cross at all and they have a zoning 709 category BH2,which doesn't appear in the UDO anymore. I strongly urge you to wait on this until you get a 710 comprehensive plan that covers this kind of conditional zoning, and really makes a definition of what this node, should 166 DRAFT 711 be. I'm all over, trying to participate in that discussion, but I think this is just kind of an ad hoc proposal here that really is 712 a basis for rejection, even though I as I said, I support property rights and I support tax diversification. Thank you. 713 714 George Barnes-Thank you for allowing me a couple of minutes to speak. I'm George Barnes with Glandon Forest 715 Equity. I'm sure I'm the least popular person in this room, but I wanted to speak to Mister Marshall,one question you 716 had, and then also just address a couple of the other points. There's been a lot of comment on the proposed use node 717 consideration on the proposed use being given to the local community and I do appreciate and respect all of the 718 community members concerns, I do. I will say that a lot of study and market analysis did go into this. Not by me, because 719 I'm not privy to that, but by the intended user and they have the means to track where their dollars and their customer 720 dollars are being spent and where it's coming from and where are the people that own those cards live. The reason they 721 wanted to be here, is because in their mind, it better serves the needs of the community and their customer base. I've 722 also heard comments on"Why does it need to be here,there's one 5 miles down the road to the east, there's one 7 miles 723 down to the road to the West,"that might be true, but we can't assume that those stores will stay there, and we don't 724 know what the intended users' plans are for those stores. I don't want to get hung up on how a certain store might look in 725 a certain area, because this is a different store. It is going to be 10,640 square feet, but it will have a lot of coolers for 726 fresh foods in there, and it's a little something different than what I've been involved with before with this intended user. 727 728 Beth Bronson-Were you involved with employing the traffic impact analysis? 729 730 George Barnes- Indirectly. 731 732 Beth Bronson- I just wanted to clarify that, since the author of the report is not here to speak on it, and the 733 recommendations that were made were kind of generic,that there was only one day that the author of the report was 734 actually onsite to get the average. In doing so, do you know the company that you employed, do they do traffic analysis 735 in the county, do they normally do it in a rural area? 736 737 George Barnes-That's a really good question and I appreciate it.We did employ them, and it was a requirement and we 738 have employed them throughout the state with other projects. This is the standard way of doing traffic impact analysis. 739 The firm's name was on the County's list of firms that we could work with, it's a very reputable firm. They take historic 740 data, current data, date from being on the site into consideration in coming up with that report. Then they share that with 741 the county and also NCDOT. 742 743 Beth Bronson-So you are aware that the projected traffic means that it would be to the point at which it would be prudent 744 for the Department of Transportation to assess for a traffic light or assess for some kind of intervention to help alleviate 745 the traffic that's being created and that's within one year of right now. I'm trying to find any kind of discussion that was 746 had with the developers about any kind of proactive measures or anticipation of.... 747 748 Charity Kirk-Can I clarify?You feel like the dollar store going in is going to affect traffic so much so that the DOT is going 749 to have to do something and that it was not addressed in the study? 750 751 Beth Bronson-The traffic is going to continue to increase regardless of whether or not there is a retail space there. Does 752 this report sufficiently reflect that? I think that is to be determined because there's only one day of analysis of data 753 collection that was performed. But there is an expected projection of already increasing traffic and so, by adding the 754 retail center,you are creating additional safety concerns that are outlined in the County's assessment. I just wondered if 755 there was any kind of response that you guys had for the county to specifically address that? 756 757 George Barnes-We addressed all the concerns that came our way. I can say that the intent is to provide a closer to 758 home shopping option for the customer base and again, they know where their customers are, to offer general 759 merchandise,American made, consumable items.As it relates to DOT,they had their report and reviewed it, and we are 760 accustomed to doing what DOT requires us to do. If they said we needed to install a turn lane or a stoplight,we'd have to 761 do that.All that was required of us was to...I know you brought up the idea of the right turn lane a couple of times, it's not 762 on 54, 1 just wanted to be clear, it's on White Cross Rd.,for the stacking, so the cars don't stack up into the highway. 763 764 Beth Bronson-To be clear, there's already a right-hand turn lane on 54 to get into White Cross... 167 DRAFT 765 766 George Barnes- Right. 767 768 Beth Bronson-So you would be going from one right hand turn lane to a right-hand turn lane to get into the 769 establishment? 770 771 George Barnes-Yes. 772 773 Beth Bronson- I think I'm clarifying that the right-hand turn lane that exists already on 54 is not even 100 feet. So, the 774 one that's being required for the retail space that needs 34 parking spots versus the highway that services over 2,000 775 cars at peak, only has a 50-foot right hand turn lane. 776 777 Charity Kirk-What would you suggest? Do you have a suggestion? 778 779 Beth Bronson-To the point of the previous public comment of understanding better what our comprehensive plan is 780 going to be for how 54 is going to be developed. How the intersection for a rural activity node is going to be developed. 1 781 have issues with the existing assessment of what is necessary and what the requirements are I think,Yeah. does that 782 make sense? 783 784 Charity Kirk-You're suggesting to table this, until 54 is reviewed or are you suggesting they add a stoplight? 785 786 Delores Bailey- Point of order, did we finish the public comments? 787 Overlapping conversations 788 789 Adam Beeman-He was the last person to speak. 790 791 Overlapping conversations-loud murmurs from the audience. 792 793 Beth Bronson- I apologize, I wanted to make sure that I was asking the applicant a question... 794 795 Overlapping conversations 796 797 John Cecil- I have been a resident of White Cross for 52 years. I grew up there, it's my home, I'm not against 798 development, I feel like the retail establishment that is being planned there is going to service a totally different 799 demographic of our community than what is existing and being served by Bravo's Market. I shop at Bravo's Market, I will 800 continue to shop at Bravo's Market for those fresh goods. I haven't been in a retail establishment like the one that's 801 being planned for there, that sells those types of retail goods. Will it take some away from some of the convenience 802 stores? I'm certain it will. From the local establishment such as Bravo's Market, it's two totally different demographics 803 that it's going to serve. 804 805 Charity Kirk-So are you for it or against it? 806 807 John Cecil- I am for rezoning for a retail establishment. 808 809 Susan Walser- Hi I'm Susan Walser and I too have concerns about the traffic. I use the stoplight at Dodson's Crossroads 810 on 54 all the time and it's an uncomfortable situation. I don't go into that intersection even though I have a green light, 811 because people disobey the red light on 54. Twice, people have blown through the red light when I've gotten partially into 812 that intersection. So, 54 is not a safe road and with the increased traffic,that's coming from between Chapel Hill and 813 Alamance County all the time, it's a concern. I'm concerned if I go to Fiesta Grill and turn left to go back home if it's 814 during rush hour. It can take an awful long time to get out of there with people coming and going and if people are going 815 to turn left out of White Cross to go back west when through with their shopping at a retail establishment, I can't imagine 816 the backup of traffic that can happen. If they don't have a reasonable way to turn, I think there needs to be a stop light at 817 White Cross. If a retail establishment is going to get approved there is going to be one needed, otherwise, I think it's 818 going to be dangerous.There are still traffic accidents at Dodson's Crossroads even with a light there because of the 819 traffic flow. The other concerns that I have, if we're going to get a national retailer in that space, is that national retailer 168 DRAFT 820 going to help the community and pay a living wage? It seems like if we're going to have that, a living wage is going to be 821 needed.Another question is, is the County, giving the retailer any kind of tax incentives to be there. I think this would be 822 a concern.And we know that you don't want to hear this, but over the course of the past few weeks when people hear 823 about the dollar store,they complain about what's happening in Carrboro with the dollar store. They can't keep their store 824 open. They don't pay their employees enough to keep the doors open.The doors are always locked,They can't keep the 825 doors open when they stock their shelves. If you look at next door neighbor, there's complaints about locking the doors 826 of that store, all the time. I have a friend who, several times, a month, she goes through dumpsters of the several dollar 827 stores in the county and she finds totally intact containers of goods that they throw away because they don't have 828 enough space or whatever on their shelves and she pulls them and she gives it to women with children and she gives 829 them to churches and she also sells them in her garage sales too. Do we want something in our community that can't 830 handle their inventory, so they add it to our landfill? 831 832 Deanna Smith- Hi everyone, I'm Deanna Smith. I live off of White Cross road. I appreciate your questions and insights. 833 so far that you all have asked in regard to this matter. From what I've heard tonight, it's kind of opened my eyes to the 834 whole process of this and overall, I can say that I'm mixed. I feel like Mr. Davis has the right as a taxpayer and a 835 landowner to do what he wants with his property, and I support his right to do what he feels is best for his own needs.At 836 the same time, I have a piece of property on White Cross Road that eventually, I would like to rezone and have a healing 837 center on, and if I ever make it that far in the process of planning and developing, I hope that I have some grace and 838 consideration from the community like y'all are giving him at this time. But I do have concerns for the impact on the 839 community and especially to Bravo's Market. Some of the things that haven't,fully been said is their canned goods and 840 household staples, in addition to the local foods,they talked about,would take an impact from a retail store going in next 841 to them and competing with them.And they are a local member of the community.Another concern that I have that was 842 raised just because of Mr. Davis's comment that others have tried to purchase that property, but they haven't been able 843 to meet the regulations and the guidelines. What are the hindrances to small businesses and other local people trying to 844 get that piece of property?What can we do as a community to try to help that out, and what can we do as a board that 845 might be able to help influence us to be able to get those other people that we do want in the community there instead of 846 a national chain store? Finally,to piggyback on some of, I believe it was Miss Knapp's comments about the guidelines of 847 being compatible and harmonious with the community, there were some comments made basically knocking the look of 848 the surrounding buildings and steel buildings.That are the businesses of local hard-working members of the community 849 and in the vicinity of the place that they're trying to get in that area and so to me, that doesn't sound very harmonious to 850 the existing members of the community,they're trying to work with.You know at the end of the day, it's a Dollar General 851 that they're trying to put in, not a Tiffany's, so I don't care what facade they put on it.The comments making it sound like 852 they are better than what's already there in the community, are offensive and not very appreciated, so as a community 853 member, I would ask that you vote no for the rezoning of the property at this time. 854 855 Statler Gilfillen-Can I see a show of hands, how many people are against this project?Could you raise your hands? How 856 many are undecided? How many are in favor? 857 858 Kevin Reese- I am a 20 year resident of White Cross, born in Orange County. My son went to the Our House Preschool 859 that was located in the historic White Cross School.The economic heart of the community is Fiesta Grill and Bravo's 860 Market.A lot of us think of Mr. Bravo as the Mayor of White Cross. Whatever retail establishment that goes in there, is 861 going to harm those businesses whether it's upscale or not.We don't want it and we don't need it. 862 863 Beth Bronson- I would like to ask Mr. Davis a question before the public hearing closes. Mr. Davis,when you purchased 864 the property in 1975,you were not subject to any kind of zoning conditions, because they did not exist? 865 866 Vernon Davis-The zoning has changed several times since that time. It's all for the good. Used to, it was more lenient. 867 It's a little stricter now but it's gotten so strict that it's hard to meet all the regulations. I had been approached about 868 people buying but they couldn't meet all the criteria. This person was able to meet all the rules and regulations that the 869 county imposed on them. 870 871 Beth Bronson-They had the facilities and the resources to meet all those. 872 873 Vernon Davis-When I first got the property, it was just on a quarter of an acre, and it had no bathroom. When they 874 moved the building back,they took the privy, and it was done away with. I could never get septic for the building, so I 169 DRAFT 875 had to go across the street. I was able to purchase more property and get a permit for a septic system.There was an 876 antique store there,they sold mattresses there at one time. I didn't realize when I purchased the property from the 877 Masonic Lodge,that it was going to create this many problems. 878 879 Beth Bronson- How could you know?The zoning did not exist at the time you made that purchase. Thank you very much 880 for clarifying. 881 882 Taylor Perschau-This is open for further planning board deliberation, of course, but I did want to close out the 883 presentation portion to highlight what staff analysis determined with the application, how the site-specific plan and the 884 conditions attached to this application align with the comprehensive plan, and as a reminder,this is from the planning 885 staff.This is also in coordination with all of our interagency review partners that have looked at this, so the determination 886 is that the proposal is consistent with the allowed zoning districts for the comprehensive plans' rural community activity 887 node. You've seen this definition before, but I think it's worth repeating that the rural community activity node is defined 888 as land designated in the comprehensive plan that's focused on designated road intersections,which serve as a notable 889 crossroads first surrounding rural community and is an appropriate location for any of the following: church,fire stations, 890 small post office, school, or other similar institutional uses, and one or more commercial uses. So,we'll bring it back to 891 y'all now.You've had the opportunity to hear from the applicant, staff, and the public.You know it's still open for review 892 and discussion amongst the board and then when you feel ready, it's time for a recommendation. 893 894 Randy Marshall-These commercial activity nodes were placed on the map in Orange County to try to help generate 895 taxable income other than residential property taxes. Orange County has done a particularly poor job of actually 896 attracting and continuing to hold on to commercial activities. For those of you who are too young to remember,there was 897 a very thriving Lowes store where Whole Foods is now.They wanted to expand, and Chapel Hill wouldn't let them 898 expand, so they went across the bridge, and they've got a nice Lowes that generates lots of tax money for Durham 899 County. Mayor Ellie Kinnaird of Carrboro worked very hard to try to get Walmart to put a store in the Carrboro Plaza 900 Shopping Center. She was unsuccessful.Wal Mart went across the line into Chatham County,where Walmart is making 901 a lot of money for Chatham County. We continue to miss opportunities, and this may not be one, but we continue to miss 902 opportunities where we could help relieve some of the pressure on property taxes. It's not just property taxes, the houses 903 are too expensive. People who can't live here have to drive out to Chatham County, out to Alamance County, that's why 904 the roads are so busy.All of these people can't afford to live here. They can't afford to pay rent here and a dollar store 905 might be attractive to them because those are the places that these people, these commuters can shop. I don't think this 906 business is designed or put into place in White Cross to serve the community.As such, regardless of what they say, 1 907 think it's put there to try to capture commuter traffic going back and forth. The commuters are people who patronize 908 these stores because they have prices that they can afford and we're never going to get any relief from property taxes or 909 the cost of housing if we keep turning down commercial activities.You have to start somewhere, and we should have 910 started 50 years ago. You know it's just troubling to me that even long term people who live in Chapel Hill and Carrboro, 911 especially can't afford to live there anymore because the taxes go up because there's no other source of income that's 912 substantial that can support the Orange County schools, other activities that we have in Orange County from just 913 property taxes, the only way you could improve that is to raise property taxes. I'm not saying that this is going to 914 generate much in terms of the tax base, but at some point, you've got to start somewhere. I won't be on the board in the 915 future but all of the projects,whether it's Bucky's or one of the other places that we've talked about that could have 916 generated lots of tax income for Orange County to relieve their property tax burden on our citizens are always turned 917 down because the people don't want it next to them, and I can't blame them.That's natural,who wants a business,or 918 industrial complex next to you. But if you don't start somewhere, in these areas,which the commissioners in Orange 919 County have designated for these purposes,we're never going to get the diversified tax base that we need to try to hold 920 these other costs accountable. 921 922 Lamar Proctor-With all due respect, I would somewhat disagree in that I think that Chapel Hill and Carrboro are growing 923 phenomenally fast and are having a renaissance of commercial activity.As one of the speakers said, one of the most 924 appealing parts of Orange County is that it has been able to preserve its rural county character and its natural 925 surroundings by effectively preventing urban sprawl, box stores, and impervious surface that seem to crawl across other 926 counties and destroy the rural character and the bucolic and peaceful nature of it. My biggest concern with this is in 927 hearing from the residents is that changing the zoning from AR in an NC2 to a Non residential conditional district within 928 the rural community activity node of White Cross is inconsistent with the comprehensive land use plan because you are 929 essentially bypassing commercial space limitations and this project proposes having an over 10,000 square foot retail 170 DRAFT 930 space that's magnitudes larger than the other commercial establishments that have existed there for a long time. So, 1 931 think that this is inconsistent with the comprehensive land use plan because of that reason, I'm concerned that it 932 bypasses and subverts the limitations on commercial uses in the rural activity node,that it's also inconsistent with the 933 resource protection area of the White Cross School and that,as Ms. Bronson pointed out, that it appears that the traffic 934 impact study may be insufficient, given the level of traffic that may be anticipated and the timing of that study that was 935 done during the pandemic when we know that a lot of vehicular traffic was limited. 936 1 would move to not recommend that this zoning change be approved to the Orange County Commissioners based on 937 those reasons. 938 939 Randy Marshall-Don't we have to have a motion to approve and then vote it up or down? 940 941 Delores Bailey- I have a comment before we vote. 942 943 Bob Hornik-Had a correction concerning the traffic study. He said the study was done in November 2022, not during the 944 pandemic. 945 946 David Blankfard-The study said that if they didn't do anything it would be just as bad as if they did do something. 947 948 Beth Bronson-Correct. 949 950 David Blankfard-So it's not as if because we're building this, it's going to get worse, it's going to get worse naturally 951 because people are moving more and driving more between Alamance and Carrboro. 952 953 Lamar Proctor- I withdraw the statement on traffic. My concerns about its inconsistency with the comprehensive land use 954 plan and the rural community activity node are the same. 955 956 Randy Marshall- I'm happy to make a motion and then people can vote the way they want to. I don't think you can make 957 the motion in the negative.You have to make the motion and then vote it down if you don't agree with it. 958 959 Delores Bailey-There are a couple of pieces that I heard in the public comment about this project, specifically the words 960 that hit me were;for conditional zoning that we're looking for,for the change of this to meet a distinct need of the 961 community, a good civic design and compatible, and harmonious with what we are trying to do for this area. While 1 962 agree that we do need more commercial projects,when I listen to the person from the public describe the sizes of the 963 other commercial properties that are out there in this area,this seems tremendously out of scale with what we've got 964 there. The value of rural preservation is important to me and so I in my zoning purview as the applicant kept reminding 965 us that this is about a zoning piece, zoning does require us to look at this as it meets a distinct need of the community 966 and good civic design, and I have some concerns about that. 967 968 David Blankfard-We can add conditions to the project beyond the 6 that the applicant has stated, and I wanted to know 969 if anybody else on the board had any additional conditions that they would say, if we did this,we would change our vote. 970 971 Beth Bronson- I have one condition that I was thinking of. I would like to put forth the idea of a condition that the right- 972 hand turn lane on 54 going south towards White Cross be extended an additional 100 feet. 973 974 Charity Kirk-Would you approve the project if it was? 975 976 Beth Bronson-Yes. 977 978 Taylor Perchau- I want to remind you that any condition does have to be agreed upon.Also, if we are talking about a 979 condition that is an NCDOT right of way,we are bringing in a 3rd party that can't offer their statement on that tonight. 980 981 Beth Bronson-That would be my suggestion. I am open to any other conditional requests. 982 983 Adam Beeson- Does anyone want to vote on Beth's suggestion, up or down? 984 171 DRAFT 985 David Blankfard- I make a motion that we ask the applicant to extend or respond... 986 987 Bob Hornik-We are willing to do it if NCDOT says okay because ultimately it is a DOT highway. If NCDOT says it is all 988 right to do that or wants us to do that,we are willing to do it. 989 990 Beth Bronson-You are willing to fund the construction? 991 992 Bob Hornik-Yes, ultimately our contractor probably does the work... 993 994 Beth Bronson-So if the DOT says of course, you can do it, that would be sufficient for you to make that change. 995 996 Bob Hornik- If they approve the design for the 100-foot additional turning lane,we will build it. 997 998 Beth Bronson-Would that require resubmission of a site plan? 999 1000 Bob Hornik- If you made it a condition and then we'd have to amend the site plan, the staff could probably approve that 1001 to show compliance with the condition. 1002 1003 Cy Stober-That condition at this point would be pending DOT approval. It would be a note on the site plan, turn lane to 1004 be extended 100 feet, pending DOT approval. 1005 1006 Beth Bronson-So the approval would not actually make a difference if the DOT said no? 1007 1008 Cy Stober-Yes, correct. Ultimately its their land. 1009 1010 Adam Beeman-Any other questions or concerns? 1011 1012 Statler Gilfillen- I have 4 points here. I've tried to capsulize what I've been hearing all evening. I see this and it's the 1013 same thing when they came before us before.This is a small scale, local community, there are businesses there, like the 1014 market that sells the local produce,that could be put out of business.That affects the local community. Item 2, this 1015 proposal as I see it, does not prove that it meets the immediate community needs. Same issue before,today I haven't 1016 seen any change in that actually presented to me. The 3rd issue, I see an incompatibility with the historic architecture, 1017 which has since come out in the proposal for the scale of local buildings to what they're trying to add into the community. 1018 It affects the urban fabric of the community and as such, I appreciate what the engineers and everybody has done 1019 because there's a substantial cost. I know how much these costs are as an architect that this proposal does substantially 1020 improve the details it expands on many things, answers,the building questions of how you would get it construction, but 1021 it does nothing to change,why we voted on this several months ago? I'm not seeing anything, I'm hearing a community 1022 that this is an incompatible project being thrust in their community, and it's basically the same thing they brought to us 1023 before. 1024 1025 Adam Beeman-One was conventional, this one's conditional,that's 2 different things. 1026 1027 Overlapping conversation 1028 1029 Statler Gilfillen- ...The question is, I'm not sure the issues from the first time, how it affects the community itself, that 1030 there was objection to,were really answered.All I saw was the engineering and the architectural information, all of the 1031 traffic information, yes, that was provided to us tonight, that's good. It would have been nice to see the first time, but I'm 1032 not sure as a member of this board, I've seen anything presented tonight that would change the justification of what our 1033 vote was before. 1034 1035 Randy- If there are no other comments, I'm prepared to make a motion. 1036 1037 MOTION BY Randy Marshall to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency indicating the amendment is 1038 reasonable and in the public interest and the proposed zoning atlas amendment ordinance. 1039 172 DRAFT 1040 Randy Marshall pulled the motion. 1041 1042 1043 MOTION BY David Blankfard to add the condition proposed increasing the 100 ft. right lane to 200 ft. pending NCDOT 1044 approval. Seconded by Beth Bronson. 1045 MOTION FAILED 2. 10(BEEMAN, POOLE,WATSON,PROCTOR,KIRK,HUNTER,BAILEY,GILFILLEN,KAUFMANN, MARSHALL) 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 MOTION BY Randy Marshall to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency indicating the amendment is 1051 reasonable and in the public interest and the proposed zoning atlas amendment ordinance. Seconded by David Blankfard. 1052 MOTION FAILED 3. 9(POOLE,WATSON,PROCTOR, BRONSON, KIRK, HUNTER, BAILEY,GILFILLEN, KAUFMANN) 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor that the no votes be based on a finding that the proposed zoning change is not consistent 1058 with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that it bypasses and subverts the limitations on commercial uses in rural 1059 activity nodes and is not consistent with the rural activity node as it applies to White Cross and that it is not consistent 1060 with the resource protection area of White Cross School. Seconded by Melissa Poole. 1061 MOTION PASSED 9—3(BEEMAN,BLANKFARD,MARSHALL) 1062 1063 ***************************************** 1064 Attachment 7 173 STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An applicant-initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to rezone a parcel as follows: Parcel Identification Township Owner of Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Number Record (PIN) • AR (Agricultural Residential, 3.67 NR-CD (Non- acres) and NC-2 Residential (Neighborhood Conditional 9749-40- Bingham Vernon Commercial, 1.16 District); 2351 Davis acres); Haw River • Haw River Unprotected Unprotected Watershed Overlay Watershed Overlay District. District. The Board of County Commissioners hereby finds: a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the UDO have been deemed complete; and, b. Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 Statement of Intent - Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance with Adopted Plans of the UDO and to Section 160D-604(d) Planning Board review and comment — Plan Consistency and 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement — Plan Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. c.The amendment is consistent with applicable plans because it supports the following: • Land Use Goal 3 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan —A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. • Land Use Goal 5.6 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. • Land Use Goal 6: A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. 174 The amendment is consistent with these goals because the proposed development is consistent with existing/anticipated development within the area and the land use associated with the project is compatible with various 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals detailed above. d. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because it furthers the goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is located in an area designated on the Future Land Use Map as "Rural Community Activity Node." Such Nodes have been identified as appropriate areas for one or more commercial uses (reference pages 5-16 and F-2 of the Comprehensive Plan and page 10-39 of the UDO). The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this Statement of Consistency and the findings expressed herein. Jamezetta Bedford, Chair Date Attachment 8 175 Ordinance#.--ORD-2023-016 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition submitted by Glandon Forest Equity, LLC (hereafter `the Applicant') seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, This petition seeks to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel of property (PIN 9749-40-2351) from AR (Agricultural Residential, 3.67 acres) and NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial, 1.16 acres) to NR — CD (Non-Residential Conditional District)for the purposes of a retail business, hereafter `the Property'; and WHEREAS, The Applicant has voluntarily chosen to establish development and land use limitations on the Project to address potential conflicts with surrounding properties; and WHEREAS, The petition has been submitted with a site plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9.1 (C) of the UDO; and WHEREAS, The requirements of Section 2.8 and 2.9 of the UDO have been deemed complete; and WHEREAS, The Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reasonable and in the public interest. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to rezone the aforementioned 4.83 acre parcel to NR — CD (Non-Residential Conditional District), as detailed within the submitted application. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT in accordance with Section 2.9.1 (F) of the UDO the approval of this Conditional Zoning application is subject to the following mutually agreed to conditions: A. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet; B. Off-Street Parking Requirements: Relief from providing the 54 parking spaces required, conditional on provision of 34 parking spaces; C. Driveway Access: Responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments, right turn lane shall be provided at the White Cross Rd. driveway; D. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School the north elevation towards NC Hwy 54 shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; E. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received within 30 days of site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within 60 days of agreement; t 176 F. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28- 3016. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2023. I, Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2023 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of , 2023. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners