Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3.8.23 PB Agenda Packet
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 131 W. MARGARET LANE, SUITE 201 HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 CJ` s� An AGENDA ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD WHITTED MEETING FACILITY 300 WEST TRYON STREET, SECOND FLOOR HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 Wednesday, March 8, 2023 Regular Meeting — 7:00 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR FOR 2023 2. 4 a. Term Expiration Dates and Reappointment Eligibility, by Member 3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 5-6 a. Planning Calendar for March and April b. Planning Board Members Scheduled to Transition off the Board on March 31 — thank you for your service: • Dave Blankfard — 2 full terms • Randy Marshall — 2 full terms • Susan Hunter— 1 partial term + 1 full term c. Tina Love, Administrative Support, is retiring; her last day in the office will be March 17 d. Verbal Update from Staff on RFP (Request for Proposals) for Comprehensive Land Use Plan 7-8 e. Memo Regarding Planning Board's Request for Information About Notification Boundaries for Neighborhood Information Meetings APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. 9 — 18 December 7, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes 19 — 20 January 4, 2023 Training Notes 5. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 6. PUBLIC CHARGE • •' Agenda Item Introduction to the Public Charge The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, appoints the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB)to uphold the written land development laws of the County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and harmonious development. OCPB shall do so in a manner which considers the present and future needs of its residents and businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to and promotes the health,safety, and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every effort to uphold a vision of responsive governance and quality public services during our deliberations,decisions, and recommendations. Public Charge The Planning Board pledges its respect to all present. The Board asks those attending this meeting to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner toward each other, County staff, and Board members. At any time should a member of the Board or the public fail to observe this charge, the Chair will take steps to restore order and decorum. Should it become impossible to restore order and continue the meeting, the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. The Planning Board asks that all electronic devices such as cell phones, pagers, and computers should please be turned off or set to silent/vibrate. Please be kind to everyone. 7. CHAIR COMMENTS $ 21 - 72 PROPOSED AMENDMENT (ADDITION) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY — CHAPEL HILL — CARRBORO JOINT PLANNING LAND USE PLAN (JPLUP), THE ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM), AND THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS - To review and make a recommendation to the BOCC on an applicant-initiated amendment to the JPLUP, FLUM, and Zoning Atlas to apply a Land Use classification and Zoning District to a portion of a parcel that was annexed into Orange County from Chatham County in 2021. The annexed portion is 4.66 acres in size; the full parcel is 8.14 acres. The requested Land Use classification is Rural Buffer and the requested Zoning district is RB (Rural Buffer). The parcel's address is 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road in the Chapel Hill Township (PIN 9796-29-3144). A joint public hearing will be scheduled for this item, date is to be determined. Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director — Long Range Planning and Administration 9. 73 — 229 ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT (CONDITIONAL DISTRICT) - To review and make a recommendation to the BOCC on an applicant-initiated zoning atlas amendment to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel from AR (Agricultural Residential) (3.67 acres) & NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) (1.16 acres) to NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District). The parcel's address is 3026 White Cross Road in the Bingham Township (PIN 9749-40-2351). This item is scheduled for BOCC public hearing on April 4, 2023. Presenter: Brian Collie, Planner II 10. ADJOURNMENT Written Comments Interested persons who cannot attend the meeting in-person are invited to submit written comments on agenda items to the Planning Board via email at planningboard()orangecountync.gov no later than 3:00 p.m. on the afternoon of the meeting. Please include in the Subject line of the email the title of the agenda item your comment pertains to. Emails sent to this address are viewable on Google Groups: https:l/groups.google.com/g/ocplanningboard Written comments can also be dropped off at the Planning Department's offices at 131 W. Margaret Lane, 2nd floor, Hillsborough, NC during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday). Written comments will be scanned and sent by staff to the email address indicated above. Review Process The Planning Board is an appointed volunteer advisory board which makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners (the elected officials). The Board of County Commissioners holds a formal public hearing and makes decisions. Section 2.8 of the County's Unified Development Ordinance contains a flowchart depicting the review process for rezoning and text amendment applications. 4 Orange County Planning Board Membership and Term Information Name Term End Date Eligible for Date First March 31 Reappointment? Appointed Randy Marshall 2023 N 3/7/17 Susan Hunter 2023 Y but will 4/16/19 transition off Board Delores Bailey 2023 Y 2/17/22 David Blankfard 2023 N 3/7/17 Steven Kaufmann 2024 Y 5/24/22 Lamar Proctor 2024 Y 4/1/21 Melissa Poole 2024 Y 4/16/19 Charity Kirk 2024 Y 2/16/21 Adam Beeman 2025 N 12/12/17 WhitneyWatson 2025 Y 2/16/21 Statler Gilfillen 2025 Y 5/18/21 Beth Bronson 2025 Y 4/5/22 5 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 Notes:*Planning Board Member Attendance Required Planning Board meetings are held in room 230 on the second floor of the Whitted Building located at 300 W.Tryon St., Hillsborough, NC 27278 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 **NEW DATE** BOCC BOCC Meeting Business Planning Board with Schools Meeting Meeting 7.00 pm 7:00 pm 7:00 pm* Whitted Whitted Bldg. Whitted Building Building 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 BOCC Work Session 7:00 pm Whitted Building 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BOCC Business Meeting 7:00 pm Whitted Building 26 27 28 29 30 31 6 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Notes: *Planning Board Member Attendance Required Planning Board meetings are held in room 230 on the second floor of the Whitted Building located at 300 W.Tryon St., Hillsborough, NC 27278 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BOCC Planning Board Business Meeting Meeting 7:00 pm* 7:00 pm Whitted Bldg. Whitted Bldg. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 BOCC Budget Board of Work Session Adjustment 7:00 pm 7:00 pm Whitted Bldg. Whitted Bldg. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 BOCC Business Meeting 7:00 pm Whitted Bldg. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOCC Work Session 7:00 pm 30 Whitted Bldg. Notes: *Planning Board Member Attendance Required 7 �1 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 919.24S.2S75 MEMORANDUM Date: March 1, 2023 To: Orange County Planning Board From: Cy Stober, AICP, Planning Director Perdita Holtz, AICP, Deputy Director for Long-Range Planning and Administration Subject: Planning Board Request for Information Regarding Notification Distances for Neighborhood Information Meetings At the December 7, 2022 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested information on notification distances for Neighborhood Information Meetings (NIMs). Staff has gathered information from peer counties and compiled the information into the table below. In summary, Orange County currently administers the most robust notifications, in terms of both the types of actions for which a NIM is required to be held and the mailed notification distance. In addition to mailed notifications, the property is posted with a sign that informs interested passerby that an action is proposed on the property. This allows people who may not own property within the 1,000-foot mailed notification boundary to seek out more information if they desire. The Planning Department also coordinates with the County's Community Relations Department to send out information to an e-mail newsletter list and/or post on the County's social media accounts. Interested persons can sign up for various "sunshine"/newsletter lists at: https://www.orangecountVnc.gov/1561/Electronic- Newsletters. The County's Facebook and Twitter names are OCNCGov. 8 Comparison of County Notification Requirements Any Deviation in NIM Required? Mailed Notice Regulations or Mail Notices for Planning Board Public Hearing Mailed County (if yes,for what types of Distance(NIM/ Practice? Meetings? Notification Distance actions?) Planning Board/Public Hearing)? Regulations requires only"abutting" Buncombe N N/A Y notifications. Practice is 1,000' N notifications, based on a BOCC vote to direct staff to use 1,000'. Y for Major Subdivisions. Planning Chatham Y for Rezonings, Special Use Regulations Board meeting for rezonings is after For rezonings and SUPS: abutting only. N Permits, Major Subdivisions the public hearing, so no additional For major subdivisions:400-feet notices are mailed. Y for Comprehensive Plan amendments, rezonings, Durham conservation subdivisions Regulations Y 600-feet N (not regular subdivisions), and statutory development agreements N Encouraged only and staff Practice, if Note: mailed notice will ask applicant to meet for the public hearing Wake with neighbors, depending staff asks due N N/A to dynamics is 1,000' as a policy on the dynamics. (not in regulations) Y for Conditional Districts, Special Use Permits, Minor Orange Subdivisions Utilizing the Regulations Y 1,000-feet N Flexible Development Option, Major Subdivisions Zoning:Affected parcel(s)+abutting parcels(touching or across a right-of- Statutory way). Requirement NCGS 160D- None Not Required SUPS: abutting parcels. 602; 106D- 406; 160D- Subdivisions: no requirement for 803 administrative or legislative actions; follow SUP requirements for quasi- judicial actions. 9 DRAFT 1 MEETING MINUTES 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 3 DECEMBER 7,2022 4 REGULAR MEETING 5 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Adam Beeman (Chair), Cedar Grove Township Representative; Lamar Proctor(Vice-Chair), 7 Cheeks Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Melissa Poole, Little River 8 Township Representative; Beth Bronson,At-Large Representative; Randy Marshall,At-Large Representative; Charity 9 Kirk,At-Large Representative; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township 10 Representative; 11 12 13 MEMBERS ABSENT: Whitney Watson,At-Large Representative; Delores Bailey,At-Large Representative; Steve 14 Kaufmann, Bingham Township Representative; 15 16 17 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Special Projects&GIS Supervisor; Pat 18 Mallet, Erosion Control, Stormwater&Engineering Supervisor;Taylor Perschau, Current Planning and Zoning 19 Supervisor; Brian Collie, Planner II;Tyler Sliger, Planner II; Carlos Sanchez, Planning Technician; Tina Love, 20 Administrative Support 21 22 23 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 24 Chair Adam Beeman called the meeting to order 25 26 27 AGENDA ITEM 2: INFORMATION ITEMS 28 a. Planning Calendar for December and January 29 30 31 AGENDA ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 32 October 5, 2022 Training and Ordinance Review Committee Notes 33 October 5, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes 34 November 2, 2022 Training Notes 35 36 MOTION BY Randy Marshall to approve the September 7, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Lamar Proctor. 37 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 38 39 40 AGENDA ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA. 41 There were none 42 43 44 AGENDA ITEM 5: PUBLIC CHARGE 45 46 INTRODUCTION TO THE PUBLIC CHARGE 47 The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, appoints 48 the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB)to uphold the written land development law of the County. 49 The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and harmonious development. 50 OCPB shall do so in a manner, which considers the present and future needs of its citizens and 51 businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to and promotes the health,safety, 52 and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every effort to uphold a vision of responsive 53 governance and quality public services during our deliberations, decisions, and recommendations. 54 55 10 DRAFT 56 PUBLIC CHARGE 57 The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its citizens to 58 conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with fellow citizens. At 59 any time,should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this public charge,the Chair will 60 ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual regains personal control. Should 61 decorum fail to be restored,the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment 62 to this public charge is observed. 63 64 65 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 66 There were none 67 68 69 AGENDA ITEM 7: PLANNING BOARD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN-To review and approve the annual input form 70 which informs the BOCC of the part year's activities of advisory boards/commissions and assists in 71 overall County work planning. 72 PRESENTER: Perdita Holtz, Special Projects&GIS Supervisor and Cy Stober, Planning Director 73 74 Perdita Holtz reviewed the Planning Board Annual Report and Work Plan form. 75 76 During the discussion of the Annual Report and Work Plan the Planning Board members discussed the following topics: 77 78 • Collaboration between Planning Board and other Advisory Boards within the County. 79 • The Comprehensive Plan update focusing on Land Use 80 • Utility Security and the role that Planning and Zoning plays, including concerns of security measures for public 81 utilities and discussion of potential land use regulations to implement. 82 • The focus of downtown Hillsborough in the space study and County owned properties and the redevelopment of 83 downtown Hillsborough. 84 • How the Board can be proactive and craft policy 85 • Affordable Housing and Policy 86 • County Broadband 87 • The condition of school buildings 88 • Growth of Mebane and Western Orange County 89 • Acreage limits of Activity Nodes 90 • Residential acreage thresholds 91 • Water and sewer disposal issues 92 93 MOTION BY Melissa Poole to approve the Annual Report and Work Plan form. Seconded by Beth Bronson. 94 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 95 96 97 AGENDA ITEM 8: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT—NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETINGS 98 -To make a recommendation to the BOCC on proposed amendments to the LIDO pertaining to 99 Neighborhood Information Meetings. This item was introduced at the August 3, 2022 ORC meeting 100 and reviewed at the October 5, 2022 Planning Board meeting where it was continued to the next 101 meeting. It is scheduled for a BOCC Public Hearing in January. 102 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner II 103 104 Tyler Sliger reviewed the proposed UDO text amendment for Neighborhood Information Meetings(NIMs) 105 106 David Blankfard: I thought we had recommended that staff be a witness at all NIMs 107 108 Cy Stober: As with all text amendments and zoning amendments,these are reviewed by the County Attorney's Office 109 and the legal counsel wants to leave the matter of verification open but required so that attendance at the meeting could 11 DRAFT 110 be one form of verification but to allow for other forms of verification, streaming video,video recording to provide 111 evidence because it doesn't rely on individual testimony should anything be taken to the Court of Appeals. 112 113 Charity Kirk: How do you know that they have posted the signs? 114 115 Tyler Sliger: In the written report we can make it a requirement that they send a picture of the posting.That is something 116 that I do with mine when I have a NIM, I take a picture of where I put it on the property and attach it. I have it in my 117 report that they have to fill out. 118 119 Charity Kirk: I think our problem is we want proof that citizens that are in the area are invited, are allowed to participate in 120 the meeting and the meeting actually happened. Without someone there how do we do that? 121 122 Beth Bronson: There is a checklist, is that included in the Planning Board's agenda package? 123 124 Tyler Sliger: Absolutely,that is something that Chatham County does with their NIMs they have a report that the 125 applicant fills out and it's something that we would review 14 days prior to the meeting and if something is missing then 126 it's not complete. 127 128 Randy Marshall: I was struck by Lamar's comments and 1,000 feet in some instances seems to be too short of a 129 distance for NIM notifications. Based on the size of the project, perhaps we should scale the size of the notification area 130 for NIMs. For future consideration,that might be something to think about. 131 132 Charity Kirk: Or density of the area, if it is a low density area. 133 134 Statler Gilfillen: What you're saying makes a great deal of sense, the larger a development is the more likely it is a major 135 corporate type of development and will have a different impact than something smaller. 136 137 Lamar Proctor: I have 2 concerns, I looked at google maps and looked at distances and 1,000 ft. in the County is 138 woefully inadequate. Looking at West Ten Rd.,that doesn't even get you from Medline to the soccer fields and one 139 clearly effects the other. The other thing is I think most people who attend these meeting are pretty intelligent and they 140 know what everyone's role is, so I understand that it should be the applicant running the show but I do think it is 141 important to have a member of Planning there to answer questions and clarify things or to correct misstatements by a 142 developer. It makes sense that Planning shouldn't be running these things but to completely be absent seems a recipe 143 for disaster. 144 145 Randy Marshall: If it is a contentious meeting,there is some value in having staff there who can clarify issues. 146 147 Tyler Sliger: There are always people that are not going to be happy about any development no matter the size. This 148 year we had 2 or 3 and all of them were blaming Planning on why we were allowing it. It's one of those things if we are 149 not there,we are not the problem and it's on the applicant or the developer to educate. On our website we are directing 150 people to the planner for the project and the letters have the planner assigned to it as well. It's always an option to call 151 or come in to discuss. 152 153 Elizabeth Bronson: So even though you put it on the applicant you are still including the Planning Department's staff 154 contact information so that anybody from the public can follow up with planning staff and not the applicant on the details 155 of the project. 156 157 Tyler Sliger: Correct, email,direct phone line, all that is provided. 158 159 Randy Marshall: I see the role of a planner at these meetings as a referee to clarify what is allowed and not allowed so 160 that it doesn't get into an argument between applicant and neighborhood. 161 162 Elizabeth Bronson: I think that is stress on staff that is unrealistic expectation of staff. I don't see requiring staff to 163 attend. If a Planning Board member wanted to attend they would have that option. 164 12 DRAFT 165 Lamar Proctor: My concern is that a developer speaking to a poor or more rural or less educated, socioeconomically 166 depressed area that a developer can take extreme advantage and either directly or indirectly misinform the public. 167 There is just so much information that most people don't understand about this process that a developer who is looking 168 to make money and profit does not have a vested interest in properly informing the public about these things. 169 170 Beth Bronson: We would have a recording of that at a public hearing. 171 172 Lamar Proctor: Having a recording of a bunch of people being misinformed doesn't do anything. 173 174 Charity Kirk: The debate is down to whether we require staff to be there or not. Should we vote for it the way it is or is 175 there discussion about something else? 176 177 Melissa Poole: Is there a balance for any of these scenarios that have been brought forth? 178 179 Cy Stober: I appreciate the concern being expressed. The intention which is not explicit in the text and we can make 180 explicit, is that the submittal 14 days prior to the deadline for notification,whether it is the Planning Board meeting or the 181 staff administrative approval, is to allow staff to reject the NIM if we find evidence of misinformation. That is the intention. 182 If we need to make that explicit that can be done. Staff reserves the right to determine whether the NIM accurately 183 represented the project or not. That is another approach we can take. 184 185 Melissa Poole: So yes there is a checks and balance to that then my preference would be to explicitly state it. I think 186 you would agree that you would want it to be explicitly stated. You want them to state that staff can reject on any sort of 187 misinformation or misleading anyone. 188 189 David Blankfard: This can cut both ways, the people attending can say they were told the wrong thing off the record so 1 190 think if we had a staff witness but not necessarily participate, it will keep the developer in line and keep the citizens in 191 line. I think there should be a recording but I think that staff should be required or recommended to attend. 192 193 MOTION BY Randy Marshall that a planning staff member attend NIM meetings, not to run them but to be there to clarify 194 or answer questions. Seconded by Lamar Proctor 195 196 Adam Beeman: Just so we're clear,you are requiring them to attend the NIMs. 197 198 Randy Marshall: A planning staff member be in attendance at a NIMs meeting. 199 200 David Blankfard: Along with all the other requirements of being recorded and being 14 days and etc. 201 202 Randy Marshall: That's the only thing I am proposing to add. 203 204 Overlapping conversations 205 206 Beth Bronson: It's a motion to see who all on this Board is interested in having this go back. 207 208 Adam Beeman: Requiring them to go to the meeting. That's what we are after right now are we going to approve a motion 209 to require a staff member to attend the NIM. Is that about what you are saying? You have Lamar's second. 210 211 Statler Gilfillen: This is asking for more time for your staff to do something in particular, do you have a comment about 212 that? 213 214 Cy Stober: The Planning Board is here to advise the staff on land use and development concerns. You are appointed to 215 advise us on land use and development concerns so if in your opinion we should attend the meetings, we will attend the 216 meeting. We will find the resources. 217 218 Adam Beeman: Everybody satisfied? 219 13 DRAFT 220 Beth Bronson: They did explain how they had gone to add that text amendment and they were told by the legal not to so 221 even though we are making this motion, I'm not really sure what could happen. 222 223 Charity Kirk: Were you told be legal not to? 224 225 Cy Stober: We were advised by counsel not to have that be the sole method of representation of the meeting. 226 227 Lamar Proctor: So it doesn't fall upon staff to verify the meeting in any way. Their role would be very limited and it seems 228 to me that these LIDO amendments greatly reduce the current workload on staff in terms of NIMs. 229 230 MOTION BY Randy Marshall that a planning staff member attend NIM meetings, not to run them but to be there to clarify 231 or answer questions. Seconded by Lamar Proctor 232 MOTION PASSED 7—2(BEEMAN,KIRK) 233 234 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to expand the notice distance from 1,000 feet to 2,500 feet. 235 236 Lamar Proctor: Since staff is not having to do it, it is up to the applicant to do it. I move to expand because given the 237 rural nature of the much of Orange County that the vast expanse of spaces that I think the notice requirement, I would 238 move to amend the notice distance from 1,000 feet to 2,500 feet. 239 240 Charity Kirk: Is that appropriate in this? 241 242 Cy Stober: It will need to be reviewed by legal counsel. There are statutory requirements about public notification within 243 160D and about consistency and how we notify but as Tyler presented, NIMs are voluntary and are not governed by 244 statute in nearly the same way a public hearing or Planning Board meeting is. That will need to be run by them but we 245 can communicate and if we need to come back to the Planning Board with that with further commentary we will. 246 Otherwise it would be added to the Planning Board's recommendation and presented to the BOCC as such. 247 248 Randy Marshall: I think we need a broader discussion of that and not just have that here. Again, I would like to have a 249 scale and not a flat square footage area. 250 251 Cy Stober: If I may, I do have a concern about having different public notification requirement for Neighborhood 252 Information Meetings versus Public Hearings and Planning Board meetings and essentially the different threshold being 253 applied for public notification but really the only qualitative difference is whether its governed by statute or not. It does 254 give me pause, I do have concerns about the legal review and I think it is deeper water than it may first seem. I am 255 happy if directed by the Planning Board this evening to discuss it with legal, to pursue the amendment further and have 256 the staff opinion for presentation to the Planning Board if that is the wish of the Board. 257 258 Adam Beeman: I think it needs discussed further at a different meeting because I'd like to discuss the costs that you are 259 going to put on the applicant now by more than doubling his area that he has to reach out to. 260 261 Charity Kirk: Can we separate it out from this? 262 263 Cy Stober: It already is—Mr. Proctor's amendment is separate from the text amendment. 264 265 Charity Kirk: Are we ready to approve this and then can we ask for you to review Mr. Proctor's amendment. 266 267 Cy Stober: He has made a motion, if there is a second or if the motion dies. 268 269 Charity Kirk: But that's separate from this? 270 271 Cy Stober: Yes. 272 273 Lamar Proctor: I did make the motion so I can either withdraw it or no one can second it. 274 14 DRAFT 275 Charity Kirk I would make a motion to discuss at a future date to increase the mailing radius. 276 277 Lamar Proctor: I stand by my proposition that 1,000 feet is woefully inadequate. I did not consider Cy's statement that it 278 would create a incongruence between statutory, mandated notice requirements and voluntary notice requirements and 1 279 do think that is going to give somebody a headache. I do think that this is an issue so my concern is that anything that 280 we discuss that isn't a change to the LIDO at this point is going to be months, maybe years before the opportunity comes 281 to modify the LIDO. 282 283 Cy Stober: If you give us a deadline,we would have to report back to you by a certain date. I would ask that it not be 284 over the holidays or for the January meeting but we would come back to you at a future Planning Board date after we 285 have discussed it with the County Attorney's Office and have a brief information discussion item perhaps on an agenda 286 without a lot of other particularly public hearing matters or that we have enough time to discuss it in depth. 287 288 Randy Marshall: I propose that we take advantage of your offer and that you bring it back to us when you are ready. 289 290 Lamar Proctor: I withdraw the motion but I would make a motion to ask Planning staff to investigate potential expansion 291 of NIM notification and report back to the Planning Board in 120 days. 292 293 Randy Marshall: I second 294 295 Beth Bronson: Is it just the NIM? 296 297 Lamar Proctor: I don't think you can mess with notification requirements for other things that are mandated by statute. 298 Since the NIM is voluntary, my thinking is that people in the County don't know something is happening until the ground 299 is breaking and they want to know why it is in their backyard and by that point it is way too late. I am trying to serve the 300 citizens of Orange County to get a little bit greater increase in notice so that the word spreads. 301 302 Overlapping conversations 303 304 Adam Beeman: The motion is for the planning staff to come back within 120 days to discuss the potential expansion of 305 the notification range on the NIMs? 306 307 Lamar Proctor: Yes 308 309 Charity Kirk: Notification range in general if possible. 310 311 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to ask Planning staff to investigate potential expansion of NIM notification and report back to 312 the Planning Board in 120 days. Seconded by Randy Marshall. 313 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 314 315 Adam Beeman: So now I need a motion to approve. 316 317 Overlapping conversations 318 319 MOTION BY Charity Kirk to approve the LIDO text amendment for the Neighborhood Information Meetings with the 320 approved amendment and the Statement of Consistency. Seconded by Beth Bronson. 321 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 322 323 324 AGENDA ITEM 9: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT—FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT SIGNATURE 325 BLOCKS-To make a recommendation to the BOCC on proposed amendments to the LIDO that would 326 remove the school district signature block on the final subdivision plats. This item was introduced at 327 the October 5, 2022 ORC meeting and is scheduled for a BOCC public hearing in January. 328 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner 11 329 15 DRAFT 330 Perdita Holtz presented a PowerPoint presentation and reviewed the School Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance 331 (SAPFO). 332 333 Statler Gilfillen: Without the need for new schools, my experience as an architect, maintenance has been severely 334 limited. Is there any consideration of maintenance upgrades? 335 336 Perdita Holtz: I can't speak as to the exact budgets but there are maintenance needs that are addressed in the school 337 budgets every year. 338 339 Lamar Proctor: I looked into this and the issue for me is that Mebane is not part of the MOU, all this development in 340 Western Orange County, if you remove the signature block then the school board doesn't have any advance notice,the 341 elected body of the school board, has no advance notice of these developments that are going to be Mebane town 342 developments within Western Orange County that contribute to the school systems until the kids hit the schools. The 343 MOU does a fabulous job of covering this information for the schools in the MOU but for Mebane, I think in terms of 344 planning that this does provide a helpful mechanism to notice them. It serves an effective notice mechanism to the 345 school board of subdivision development in Western Orange County by Mebane that is covered and at the phase one of 346 SAPFO. 347 348 Perdita Holtz: School staff keeps their school board informed of the work that we're doing and they're invited to attend 349 Technical Review Committee(TRC) meetings for Mebane. They receive those agendas and can attend and provide 350 comments. School staff tracks development that is happening. Planning tracks it as well in Orange County's Planning 351 Department. It's not the only way the school board receives notification of development that's happening and our 352 development that receive CAPS aren't necessarily subdivisions;there is other development that is subject to CAPS not 353 just subdivisions. The school signature block is a time burden on school staff and planning staff. We are the only local 354 government that is part of SAPFO that requires it, the towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough do not. It was added 355 to the subdivision regulations well after the other SAPFO provision were put in there. It was part of a large subdivision 356 regulation package and wasn't really spoken to on why it was added. 357 358 Lamar Proctor: I think the underlying issue is Mebane not being part of the MOU for SAPFO and CAPS and our local 359 government doesn't get notice of those kids until they hit the schools that you are telling me that staff does pay some 360 attention to but those things have to get approved by Mebane. 361 362 Tyler Sliger presented a PowerPoint presentation and gave an overview of the proposed text amendment. 363 364 MOTION BY Randy Marshall to approve Attachment 2, Statement of Approval and Consistency of the proposed UDO 365 text amendments with adopted Orange County plans. The Board recommends approval of the proposed text 366 amendment and issues this Statement of Consistency requirement of UDO Section 2.8 has been met. The amendment 367 is consistent with the 2030 Orange County Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is consistent the applicable plan 368 because it supports the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goal 6, A land use planning process that is transparent,fair, 369 open and responsive. 370 MOTION PASSED 8—1 (PROCTOR) 371 372 Lamar Proctor: My concerns about notice requirements to the school board for the aggressive growth of Mebane and 373 Western Orange County and not being part of the MOU. 374 375 376 AGENDA ITEM 10: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT—EFFICIENCY UNITS-To make a 377 recommendation to the BOCC on proposed amendments to the UDO pertaining to efficiency 378 apartments (also known as"accessory dwelling units"or ADUs). This item was introduced at the 379 October 5, 2022 ORC meeting and is scheduled for a BOCC public hearing in January. 380 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner II 381 382 Tyler Sliger presented a PowerPoint presentation and reviewed the proposed UDO amendment for efficiency units. 383 16 DRAFT 384 Adam Beeman: I don't see it there but is it in the text about requirements for septic system that it can't go if the septic 385 system is not capable. 386 387 Tyler Sliger: That is the basic building permit. If Environmental Health is not going to sign off on it then you don't get a 388 building permit. 389 390 Adam Beeman: The only other big thing that I have is we specifically didn't allow mobile homes so why the change? I'm 391 not a fan of those. 392 393 Tyler Sliger: A lot of people are requesting mobile homes,they can't afford stick built homes and I talked to a developer 394 today that they don't make modular 1,000 sq.Units so people can't get affordable homes. 395 396 Adam Beeman: The smallest trailer I found was$40.000 and it goes up to$150,000. 1 don't really see those as 397 affordable either. I find it interesting that we are going essentially put a car out in the yard and let it rot. The 398 manufactured home meets federal standards and not local regulations and guidelines. They get to supersede everybody 399 because it the federal. I don't see why we want to allow it. It's not going to be beneficial for the landlord or the tenant in 400 the long run. It's an immediate fix but long-term it is not the path that we should be going down in Orange County. 401 402 Beth Bronson: Is there a year build requirement? 403 404 Tyler Sliger: No. 405 406 Beth Bronson: So a mobile home from 1975 could be placed on a residence and considered an accessory dwelling the 407 same as a mobile home build in 2020? 408 409 Tyler Sliger: Correct but no matter what the building permit has to be issued so if it doesn't meet the specs, it doesn't 410 meet the specs, and a permit would not be issued. 411 412 Randy Marshall: I can drive up and down Orange County roads and there are abandoned mobile homes with vines 413 growing in it and at one time there was a nuisance ordinance that was enforced to pull those off and people had to get 414 rid of them but apparently it's no longer used or is no longer enforced. My concern here is not what is stated here but 415 what do you do because old mobile homes deteriorate more rapidly than more permanently built structures. Is there 416 anywhere in the ordinance that is being enforced that when these become no longer livable or serviceable that they have 417 to be removed? 418 419 Cy Stober: The Nuisance Code does speak to odor, vermin,creating any sort of noxious environment and respond to 420 complaints. If a complaint is given to the Planning Department,we have to make a determination whether it falls under 421 the County Ordinance or the Development Ordinance and qualify as a nuisance that we can enforce as staff or we must 422 direct it to the Sheriffs Office. They would enforce through that route or through minimum housing code which is a 423 combination of, depending on the situation, the Housing Department or the Inspection Department but we will process a 424 complaint. 425 426 Charity Kirk: And then what happens with the processing? 427 428 Cy Stober: We do have an abatement avenue we can pursue. It's a civil matter so we notify the property owner a 429 minimum of 42 days and allow for 21 days of compliance followed by another 21 days of warning and then if it falls under 430 our ordinance then we can proceed to civil penalties and following a period of inaction we can remedy the issue and 431 abate the property, basically put a lien on it. For absentee landlords, especially those in other states,that approach is 432 minimally effective. The amendment was forged through discussion with Current Planning and myself and we included 433 mobile homes as an allowance and affordability and equity and accessibility to both tenants but also for first time home 434 owners in the County where we have an acknowledged affordability concern. I hear your concerns and I'm not 435 completely surprised but we were trying to offer as many options and flexibility to the residents of the County. 436 437 Melissa Poole: Personally, I don't have an issue with it. I certainly know people,those of us who have extensive 438 amounts of property that are blessed with that. I know people who have brought in trailers for elderly parents rather than 17 DRAFT 439 putting them in a home to live separate but being able to be cared for. We are talking about this as if it's only renting or 440 renters and affordable housing but it's also a support for folks with aging parents and family members. 441 442 Adam Beeman: I understand it, I just feel like you are putting those people in the hole to begin with it's like forcing them 443 to go buy a car with 40% interest. I need the car so I'm going to do what I got to do and you're putting them in a house 444 and they are already behind the 8-ball as far as being efficient and a long-term solution. I understand there is a short- 445 term solution, I am completely in agreement with you. If they are building a home, park it temporarily and get it off when 446 done building the home. Long-term, I just don't see why you would want to let that in the door so that these 447 underprivileged or low-income people just have to pay exorbitant heating and air-conditioning costs because the thing is 448 not efficient. They are built to federal standards and not state and local regulation. I find it hard to believe that these 449 people are manufacturing something that is going to be of value to the low-income. 450 451 Beth Bronson: This opens up a market for secondary mobile home purchases. To Melissa's point, and staffs, in adding 452 it you are expanding your options for the community to have access to affordable housing. Or giving access to families to 453 incorporate the needs of their parents or children. For reasons that are none of our business, as to why they might need 454 an accessory dwelling unit that might need to be a mobile home that wouldn't be up to your standards personally but that 455 are federal standards that are already set and that information is available going into bringing that mobile home onto 456 their property. 457 458 Adam Beeman: It starts at$40,000 up to$150,000 and I don't see$150,000 for a trailer when you could build the same 459 stick built thing for an equivalent price and have something that is appreciating in value. 460 461 Charity Kirk: That's not up to us to give people that value judgement. 462 463 Statler Gilfillen: Forget about homes,we have a lot of existing old antique farm houses without building on there that are 464 no longer functioning as farms in Orange County. The option, the existing house may have an updated septic system 465 more than adequate for the house the question becomes the conversion of the outbuildings into what might be an 800 466 sq.ft, less than 1,000 sq.ft. unit that follows the historic configuration of that site. Under this ordinance,you are only 467 allowed 1 unit on your site. 468 469 Tyler Sliger: Yes. 470 471 Statler Gilfillen: You have the right to appeal for the possibility for a second one and I raise the question on this 472 financially, as an architect, if someone owns an existing house and a shedthat are in exceptionally good condition, or 473 were historically there,to rebuild them on that site is visually a positive thing and for the owner,where it is tied together 474 as one system,you've got a landlord sitting right there on the site to control how it is rented. That can be a very positive 475 social aspect of this type of law. To allow more than one unit on a site. The construction standards typically with tiny 476 houses not with the trailers that are bought from the cheapest vendor. 477 478 Tyler Sliger: Anything that is proposed is going to have to be passed by building inspections. 479 480 Statler Gilfillen: Is it possible to put a second unit on a site like that within an appeal. 481 482 Tyler Sliger: Possibly,that would be up to the Board of Adjustment. 483 484 Lamar Proctor: I do have concerns that as soon as you allow this everyone in the County could conceivably pop a 485 mobile home on their property,get approval and start and become landlords. 486 487 Tyler Sliger: They can do that right now. 488 489 Melissa Poole: You are focusing on the mobile home when there are a lot of people. 490 491 Adam Beeman: I understand that we need affordable housing but I think the County could go ahead and come up with 492 some generic blueprints for a home equal to the size of the trailer and that people would know the County has already 18 DRAFT 493 approved it so this is roughly what it would cost me to do that so let me go that route versus the other route but they are 494 not armed with that information and the trailer is just faster and we are in the world of I need it immediately. 495 496 Charity Kirk: Do you want to make a proposal to disallow mobile homes to be efficiencies to remove that. 497 498 Adam Beeman: I would but I don't think it would get very far. 499 500 Lamar Proctor: I spent part of my childhood in a trailer and I don't have anything against trailers but I do see the point of 501 allowing a depreciating asset to stand as real estate is a financially economically losing proposition in the long run. 502 503 MOTION BY Adam Beeman to remove mobile homes from the amendment so that they are not allowed at all and 504 everything else stands. Seconded by Lamar Proctor. 505 MOTION FAILED 7—2(PROCTOR,BEEMAN) 506 507 MOTION BY Charity Kirk to approve the Statement of Approval and Consistency in the proposed text amendment with 508 adopted Orange County plans in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2. Seconded by Randy Marshall. 509 MOTION PASSED 6—3(PROCTOR,BEEMAN,GILFILLEN) 510 511 512 Cy Stober introduced Taylor Perschau, Current Planning and Zoning Supervisor, to the Planning Board. 513 514 515 AGENDA ITEM 11: ADJOURNMENT 516 Meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. 517 518 519 Adam Beeman, Chair 19 DRAFT 1 SUMMARY NOTES 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 3 JANUARY 4,2023 4 TRAINING SESSION 5 (This training session meeting was held virtually. 6 Members of the Planning Board, staff and public participated remotely) 7 8 NOTE: A quorum is not required for Planning Board Training Sessions. 9 10 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamar Proctor(Vice-Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough 11 Township Representative; Beth Bronson, At-Large Representative; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township 12 Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township Representative; Steve Kaufmann, Bingham Township 13 Representative; Whitney Watson, At-Large Representative; Charity Kirk, At-Large Representative; Delores Bailey, 14 At-Large Representative; 15 16 17 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director— Long-Range Planning 18 &Administration; Taylor Perschau, Current Planning &Zoning Supervisor 19 20 21 AGENDA ITEM 1: PLANNING BOARD TRAINING SESSION — Staff will lead training on basic aspects of land use 22 regulation in Orange County. The topic is Basic Site Planning for Single Family Homes 23 PRESENTER: Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director— Long-Range Planning &Administration 24 25 Perdita Holtz conducted a training session on Basic Site Planning for Single Family Homes. 26 1 20 21 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: March 8, 2023 Action Agenda Item No. 8 SUBJECT: Application for Amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan, Future Land Use Map, and Zoning Atlas — 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road within the Chapel Hill Township DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. Application Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director— Long-Range 2. Staff Report Planning & Administration, (919) 245-2578 Cy Stober, Director, (919) 245-2592 3. Notification Materials and Certification 4. Draft Resolution to Amend the Joint Planning Land Use Plan 5. Statement of Consistency 6. Draft Ordinance to Amend the Orange County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Atlas PURPOSE: To review and make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) on applicant-initiated amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan, Future Land Use Map, and Zoning Atlas to apply the Rural Buffer (RB) Land Use designation and Zoning district to a portion of a parcel (4.66 acres of an 8.14 acre parcel) that was annexed into Orange County from Chatham County in 2021. The parcel is located at 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road (PIN: 9796-29-3144), within the Chapel Hill Township of Orange County. BACKGROUND: In January 2023, an application (Attachment 1) was received proposing to amend the plans described above and the Zoning Atlas. In 2021, Session Law 2021-67 (contained in Attachment 1) annexed 4.66 acres of an 8.14 acre parcel of property into Orange County, from Chatham County. The county line had previously split the parcel, and that area already in Orange County is zoned RB and designated as Rural Buffer land use by the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Future Land Use Map. The Staff Report in Attachment 2 contains additional information, maps, and analysis. Because this parcel is located within an area of the county subject to the Orange County — Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan, all three local governments must review and approve amendments to the plan and a joint public hearing of all three elected boards must be held. Basic Review Process: The cadence for review of this multi-part application is: • FIRST ACTION — Submission of an application with required supporting documents by the property owner. 22 STAFF COMMENT: The applicant submitted an application and documents on January 12, 2023 and clarifying information was submitted on January 30. • SECOND ACTION — The Planning Board reviews the application at a regular meeting and makes a recommendation to the BOCC. STAFF COMMENT. The Planning Board will begin its review on March 8, 2023. The Town Planning Boards will also review the application, following each Town's regular review process. Dates of expected review are included in the Staff Report in Attachment 2. • THIRD ACTION — The 3 elected boards (BOCC and 2 Town Councils) receive the available Planning Board recommendations, and hold an advertised joint public hearing. (The Town of Carrboro's Planning Board makes a recommendation after the public hearing). STAFF COMMENT. A joint public hearing is expected to be held in late April or in May. The date is to be determined. • FOURTH ACTION — The 3 elected boards (BOCC and 2 Town Councils) take action on the application at a regularly scheduled meeting of the elected board subsequent to the joint public hearing. As a technicality, the Towns' actions are on the amendment to the Joint Land Use Plan only (i.e., the Towns do not act on the amendments to the County's Future Land Use Map or Zoning Atlas). STAFF COMMENT: Dates for actions are to be determined. Conventional District Rezoning: Zoning promotes development of land uses that can co-exist in proximity to one another consistent with the promotion of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Regulations establish opportunities/constraints associated with land development in an attempt to ensure one person's `reasonable use' of property does not impact another person's ability to make reasonable use of their property. The RB (Rural Buffer) zoning district is a "conventional district". As such, the County is unable to impose conditions and the applicant is not required to define what type of development (i.e. land use) is anticipated. If approved, all land uses permitted within the RB district could be developed on the property, consistent with applicable regulations. Conventional district rezoning applications are processed in a legislative manner (i.e., does not require sworn testimony or evidence) and decisions are based on the BOCC's determination the request is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. A formal site plan, reviewed and approved by staff in accordance with Section 2.5 of the UDO, must be submitted and approved prior to any new development activity on the parcel. The property's current land use would not introduce any non-conformities to the county. Public Notifications: In accordance with Section 2.8.7 of the UDO, notices of the Planning Board meeting were mailed via first class mail to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the subject parcel. These notices were mailed on February 21, 15 days before the meeting. Staff also posted the subject parcel with a sign on February 24, 12 days before the meeting. See Attachment 3 for the notification materials. Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the: 23 1. Resolution to Amend the Joint Planning Land Use Plan (Attachment 4). 2. Statement of Consistency (Attachment 5) indicating the zoning atlas amendment is reasonable and in the public interest. 3. Ordinance amending the Orange County Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas, as contained in Attachment 6. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments which have determined that the approval of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including meeting and public hearing notice and mailings, are covered by the application fee. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Director recommends the Board: 1. Receive the multi-part application, 2. Deliberate on the proposal as desired, 3. Consider the Planning Director's recommendation, and 4. Make a recommendation to the BOCC on the Resolution to Amend the Joint Land Use Plan (Attachment 4), Statement of Consistency (Attachment 5), and the proposed Ordinance (Attachment 6). 24 BROWN & BUNCH,PLLC CHARLES GORDON BROWN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW gbrown@brownandbunch.com 101 North Columbia Street, Suite 100 WILLIAM W.BUNCH,III Chapel Hill,North Carolina 27514 bbunch@brownandbunch.net (919)968-1111 LEANN NEASE BROWN Facsimile: (919)968-1444 Inease@brownandbunch.com January 30, 2023 via e-mail: pholtzna,oran eg coon nc.gov Perdita Holtz,AICP Deputy Director, Long-Range Planning and Administration Orange County Planning&Inspections 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 201 P. O. Box 8181 Hillsborough,NC 27278 RE: Clarifications of Future Land Use and Zoning Designations Sought by Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill,North Carolina#MA23-0001. Dear Perdita Holtz: Thank you for correspondence of January 18. It helped me understand the errors made on the Future Land Use Map Amendment and Zoning Atlas Amendment Applications. Ironically,I initially inserted"Rural Buffer"or"RB"in both applications before over thinking the answer to the question. On the Future Land Use Map Amendment Application,I respectfully amend the Application as follows: Land Use Plan Category Designation(s)Requested: Rural Buffer. On the Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment, I respectfully amend the Application as follows: Future Land Use Designation for Property: Rural Buffer. Requested Zoning Designation: Rural Buffer(RB). The Orange County Planning Department is authorized to endorse these corrections directly on the original applications. As corrected in accordance with the above,on behalf of the Applicant I ratify these changes. 25 January 30,2023 Page 2 I look forward to working with you. Very truly yours, BROWN &PUNCH, PLLC / 0 ftgpoCn- Charles Gordon Brown CGB/cf cc: Taylor Perschau(via e-mail: terschau@orangecountync.gov) Cy Stober(via e-mail: cstober@orangecountync.gov) Patrick R. Mallett(via e-mail: pmallett@orangecountync.gov) 12902\07\L\005Perdita Holtz- Orange County Planning and Inspections 26 BROWN & BUNCH,PLLC CHARLES GORDON BROWN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW gbrown@brownandbunch.com 101 North Columbia Street, Suite 100 WILLIAM W.BUNCH,III Chapel Hill,North Carolina 27514 bbunch@brownandbunch.net (919)968-1111 LEANN NEASE BROWN Facsimile: (919)968-1444 Inease@brownandbunch.com January 11, 2023 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Orange County Planning and Inspections Department 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 201 Hillsborough,NC 27278 ATTN: Cy Stober,Director RE: Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill,North Carolina Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment (General Use Zoning Request) and Future Land Use Map Amendment. Dear Mr. Stober: Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill,North Carolina(the"Church") owns unzoned land adjacent to its principal worship facilities at 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road. The land in question became unzoned when the Orange-Chatham boundary was changed in 2021. Mount Carmel is a bona fide Cooperative Baptist Fellowship Congregation. It has served its faith community since 1803. Until 2021, the property of the Church which supported and furthered its programs of worship, education,ministry and mission straddled the Orange-Chatham line. 4.6623 acres were in Chatham and 3.4730 acres, Orange. On June 30, 2021, Session Law 2021-67 went into effect. That Act annexed the Chatham County portion of the Church's property into Orange County. A copy of the Act is attached. To transition tax administration,the Act provided"Beginning January 1,2022,all property in the area described in Section 1 of this Act [the former Chatham acreage] which is subject to ad valorem taxation shall be listed, assessed, and taxed by Orange County in the same manner as is prescribed by law for all other property located in Orange County." Accordingly, Orange County recognized the annexed property as being recombined into the original 3.4730 Orange County tract and added it to PIN #9796-29-3144. On December 28, 2021, the Church registered a plat which showed the recombination into one parcel of 8.1353 acres. See Orange County Plat Book 124, Page 74 (copy attached). This is as far as the Act went. Both the Orange and Chatham portions had long been recognized as exempt from real and personal property taxation,but to ensure continuity of exempt 27 January 11, 2023 Page 2 status, the Church duly applied for exemption under G.S. §105.278.3 and .5 on December 29, 2021. The former Church grounds in Chatham had been historically used for Church gatherings, exercise, recreation, outdoor classes and the like. These uses had been recognized by Chatham County as qualifying for exemption before the annexation. After receiving the Church's Application,the entirety of the 8.1353 acre tract was accepted as exempt. While the single tax parcel and the exemption were taken care of, there was still some unfinished business. In July 2022, Orange County Planning contacted the Church to advise additional steps had to be taken before all regulatory requirements were satisfied. More specifically, the Act did not transition zoning. This resulted in 4.6623 acres of the recombined 8.1353 acre tract being unzoned. Objective The Church seeks to comply with Orange County requirements in two ways: 1. Obtain a Zoning Atlas amendment to establish the same General Zoning Classification for 4.6623 acre newly annexed portion of the Church's property as currently applies to its original Orange County 3,4730 acre portion. 2. Obtain a FLUM designation for the 4.6623 acre portion of the Church's parcel the same as the existing Orange County 3.4730 portion. Factors Supporting Application a. Alleged Error in Zoning Atlas To Be Corrected. Technically, there is no error, nor is this a rezoning. It is an initial zoning of land not heretofore situated in Orange County. In most cases, an application for rezoning anticipates a change in use. Here there will be no change in use. The activities carried on within the boundaries of the Church's full 8.1353 footprint will be continued as before. Should the Church subsequently add or eliminate improvements to further its purposes, it will follow the permitting requirements otherwise applicable to Places of Worship elsewhere in the County. b. Consistency With Intent and Purpose of Adopted Comprehensive Plan. The 4.6623 acres annexed into Orange County have been utilized historically by the Church to further its religious mission and purpose. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan anticipates the area around the original Church acreage in Orange County will continue to be RB, in which a Place of Worship is a permitted use. The uses currently made of the unzoned acreage qualify under the Place of Worship category and accessory uses attendant thereto. 28 January 11,2023 Page 3 C. Changing Conditions Which Make Amendment Reasonably Necessar. This criterion does not anticipate a change in a county boundary may create a need to zone property which slides from one jurisdiction to another. However,that is what occurred here. As a courtesy, the delivery of this package to your office will be followed by an email containing electronic copies of the following in Word format: 1. Legal description of the 4.6623 acres annexed into Orange County from Chatham County as it appears in the 2021 Act. 2. Legal description of the recombined 8.1353 acre tract depicted in the plat recorded in the Orange County Registry at Plat Book 124, Page 74 and assigned PIN#9796- 29-3144. 3. Adjacent Parcel Identification for notice purposes (Owners of record, addresses, PIN or Parcel Nos.). Fees per the Orange County Fee Schedule are enclosed. The fees have been calculated on the 4.6623 acre area which needs to be zoned. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BROWN & RUNCH, PLLC Charles Gordon Brown CGB/cf Enclosures cc: John Eberhard (via e-mail: j.eberhard@icloud.com) W. P. Whichard (via e-mail: wwhichard@tillmanfirm.com) Barrett Freeman, Pastor (via e-mail: barrett@mcbcl803.org) 12902\07\L\002Orange County Planning and Inspections 29 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 131 W.MARGARET LN.,SUITE 201,P.O.BOX 8181 HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 aaPl. e ° o ba ep li 1 {°an ea°a°a FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION All persons requesting an amendment to the Land Use Plan of Orange County are required to complete the following application as completely as possible: OFFICE USE ONLY REQUEST #CP- - DATE RECEIVED: STAFF PERSON(S)RESPONSIBLE: GENERAL DATA Property Owner(s)Name: Mamt Camel. Baptist Gikch of Gia* Hill, North CaroLim Mailing Address: 2016 Mt. Qm-el Gimch Road, Chapel Hill, North CaroL m Telephone: (Home) N/A (Work) 919.933.8565 Agent(s)Name: Charles Gordon Brava Mailing Address: a:u n& Bx&j RIL, 101 N. Cohnbia Street, Suite 100, Ghapel Telephone: 919.%8.1111 SPECIFIC DATA Tax Reference: Xommeb* 97%-29-3144 Public/Private Road Name: 2016 Mt. Camel GIrch Road (NCSR #1008). Lot Size: Acreage: 4.6623 Square Footage 203,091 Lot Frontage 521.41' Lot Depth 383.65' (N) 384.37' (S) Current Plan Category Designation(s): General Currently uvL i seeUrg gerntal use na-residEntial. Activity Node N/A Watershed 'Jordan Lake Prot--ted Joint Planning Area Yes 30 SPECIFIC DATA(continued) Request#CP- - Describe Land Uses in the General Area: Residential with s nall n rude near intersection Mt. Carmel Gxxcb Road On Adjacent Parcels of Land: Place of 1 rsl i with accessory uses (Clnxch property originally in Orange County 3.4730 acres); adjoiners on east, sou D5 t are all residential all in Chadm County. REQUEST Land Use Plan Category Designation(s) Requested: Place of Gbrship (T 0 79) Type of Amendment: Primary Secondary x This application should be submitted with the following materials: survey x Fully dimensionedxWomap on which is highlighted the parcel, or portion thereof, in question. x Legal description of the parcel, or portion thereof. x Letter of request to include: • the tax reference, general location and owner of the parcel • the current and requested land use plan category designation(s) • a narrative stating the manner in which the proposed amendment will carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted comprehensive plan or part thereof • a statement of any other circumstances, factors and reasons which the applicant offers in support of the proposed amendment • statement of the changed or changing conditions in the area, or in the County generally, which make the proposed amendment reasonable necessary. x Application Fee. I (We),the undersigned, certify that all statements furnished in this application are true and to the best of my(our)knowledge and that the application as su fitted is com t . Ma nt Carmel Baptist axdi of Chapel. Hill, North Carolina /�� NAME OF APPLICANT SIGNATUXE OF APPLICANT(S) Jaru 11, 2023 DATE 31 .. Orange County Planning and Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR NORTH CAROLINA ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT GENERAL USE REZONING REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION: Date: January 11, 2023 Mant Camel Baptist Qwerh of Applicant: Chapel Hill, North Carolina Phone: 919.933.8565 Address: 2016 Mt. Carmel Gixch Rcaad Cell Phone: N/A Chapel. Hill, NC 27517 E-mail: frrbc1803.org PROPERTY SUBJECT TO REQUEST: Parcel Identification Number(PIN): 9796-29-3144 Address of property: 2016 Mt. Camel Qxmh Road Owner of property: Mount Carnet. Baptist QiLrh of Chapel Hill, North Carolina Future Land Use Designation for Property: dal Use - Nonresidential Current Zoning Designation: N/A. Urged. Requested Zoning Designation: C wal Use - Nonresirtential ** If Applicant/Owner are different people, include a signed, notarized, statement indicating that the owner has authorized the applicant to submit the request. In cases where there are multiple property owners, please attach an additional document containing their signatures authorizing the submission of the application or other legal documentation establishing the applicants right to file on their behalf. ** Signed, notaHzed authorization attached. SUBMITTAL INFORMATION -Section 2.8.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) 1)A Map, at a legible scale, showing the property(s) subject to the request. A map may be procured at the Planning Department for a fee in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule 2)A legal description of the property(s) proposed for rezoning 3)A list showing the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners within 1000'feet of the subject property. 4)A detailed narrative denoting the following: a. The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request. b. The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. c. How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of, the Orange County Comprehensive Plan, 32 5) The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule in affect as of the date of the application. I (we), the undersigned, have been made aware of the process for the review and action associated with a UDO Zoning Atlas Amendment application and understand only completed applications, containing all information required by the Orange County LIDO shall be reviewed and acted upon by the County. Further I (we) understand that any assistance I (we) may receive from County staff in preparing this application in no way guarantees a favorable recommendation by staff on the merits of this pro osal nor do J it guarantee an approval of the proposed atlas amendment by the County. Gty Jai-k y 112 2023 Charles Brmn for M�mt Carnal Applicant Baptistof Chapel Hill, North Carolina Date: Applicant Date: 33 Orange County Planning and Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY Zoning Atlas Amendment NORTH CAROLINA Application Checklist The purpose of the Zoning Atlas Amendment checklist is to provide direction to the general public on 'what' is necessary to submit a complete application package for review and processing by the Orange County Planning Department (hereafter `Staff") consistent with the procedural requirements embodied within the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), which can be accessed utilizing the following link: https://www.co.orange.nc.us/DocumentCenterNiew/8305/Unified-Development-Ordinance-PDF. Questions on required submittal elements can be handled by calling (919)245-2575 PART 1: SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: SUBMIT TO: Orange County Planning and Inspections 131 West Margaret Lane—Suite 201 PO Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 EMAIL TO: Ulannin a s oran ecoun nc. oy SUBMITTAL: Applications for Zoning Atlas Amendments are accepted during normal business hours. PLAN SUFFICIENCY REVIEW: Per Section 2.2.6 of the UDO, staff has 5 business days to determine if an application complies with all submittal requirements. Staff shall notify the applicant, in writing (i.e. e-mail or formal letter), of any deficiencies and invite the applicant to revise the application package, correcting identified deficiencies. Incomplete or deficient applications shall not be processed until identified issues are addressed. If and/or when the atlas amendment application complies with all submittal requirements as detailed within the LIDO, Staff shall formally accept the application and notify the applicant of its acceptance. REQUIREMENTS: As detailed within the Zoning Atlas Amendment application package, and Section 2.8 of the UDO, submittals are required to contain: 1. A completed/signed Zoning Atlas Amendment application; 2. A map, at a legible scale, showing the land proposed for rezoning; 3. A detailed narrative denoting the following: a The existing zoning of the subject property and the requested zoning as defined in Article 3 of the UDO; b. The current land use designation of the subject property consistent with the Orange County Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map (FLUM), which can be accessed utilizing the following link: o The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request; d The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; e, How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of, the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. 4. Plan review fees consistent with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. 34 PART 2: SUBMITAL CHECKLIST— GENERAL ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS: REQUIREMENT: INCLUDED: NOT APPLICABLE: 1. Map of the subject property including the boundary of the lot(s)subject to the atlas request. x 2. The name, address, and phone number of the: a. Applicant and the property owner(if different); b. Surveyor responsible for completing/sealing the site plan. x 3. Contact information for utility providers (i.e. power company, gas company, telecommunications, etc.) anticipated serving the project. x PLEASE NOTE: This is required so County staff can coordinate review/approval of proposed utility line locations. 4. Adjacent right-of-way widths with road names and numbers. x 5. Adjacent parcel information (i.e. Zoning of adjacent property, Existing land uses, Legal information on adjacent property (i.e. owner, PIN number, Deed/Plat references), etc.) PLEASE NOTE: Most of this information can be obtained from the County's on- x line GIS Mapping System, which can be accessed utilizing the following link: https://gis.orangecountync.gov:8443/orangeNCGIS/default.htm 35 General Zoning Atlas Amendments Part 2: Requirement 1 Map of Subject Property \ 36 �O JAPANCE SCW IE)AT NOTES 0-7 �gN.WJY 1 Of/RHAY {BE nrovelrsrow Nttw Ir xeeer ro 4{rAsaons G•rtiiaa�Arrrcna rresuc�, � 1 cmNrr ',� T$ n An rmE scAwl xAs avr POVIH�er nu rN4 ararc 1E wuax a nrs soon: 0�� 1 x an.arrinae Das Anr mrrsr ro Ile rxanents m I.w-Asslura a-ANr r2r�vo f�f,q eery vrx.os m Q� I � � AN)'R6DASA(£rrAluas mAriurmrur,rorarmmvvrm na slt c�,F� A Alx ao{uKrs'snnwa APE M]OIOVTAL us swrFrrur snzro rctyam,rs IAussAnlm As Nc pv r�rs "� I � _ � �y, a AVA[e]wweD runo r,E m>srLAr6aenAu 7£ --- ' \ r ar�ee.iaa n ar p��'in;at�O1 rb,,,.ui�fo;;N.�t•v�an.w Hesse rax Ne a.��r a..m NaA o s..ou.h+f er 7 ndr-aD rt 4y riow+K.y+fa.e,.+am d+n eroa»;erruy MAore p(. � .p1 \ a..�r m�tirow.+ma%.a ao•µar<Ny,r e/br.+am,r a 4onf.��UM P+�+e rI211 er.or.ram urU m.omavy 4 me... S O' CNA INA4 �A\ x /Dee.7' `Y. cocwry SHO RT Lcc \ DA 2JS'{rc JeMCOU !ea'ADaIE P.a eR,PR I10 •Sb y VICflMT drAP fN r ro scup ELPO 11 are E E Pa r/µ Pa IJS 16Aeo' L SHORT, ac BELPERAIN y{! aaLt�Pr r9zJJ' N e45Jle E— ` $y�4{y as u44 Pa ro/ L rrAlE,I SYM,[F]IIF1'ALI111R FUT 1fAS aP.11l'/ Ra 1&S'L FC.17J N OSYB S2'W R N eJ41'15'E- �^t P.a lei,pa II9 fAVXR 4r.RATRiF90'r N,Mwn µ ACNAL SIR1E]'/lA[L' 1 u:rB 4Y 3LfGPHSrm(YYID OE'�NYlr REGKIO.YD Nk J7.32'TOTAL� Ltr, m P.a lle,PG IJ5 Kaa BQYr ASD{PAQ J6 OL4Cr S wvoO p0'E- I e7.(A' 9 AFD BOOT'125f CE JS( Y O®6V(IY 62s1, JTD aw 1 46Y inrs ,�. S ee21'.K'E- HArBO(W 104 (�IJ aOr ew BOOK Ira PA(wkA"pIJai a[4 iB /A`ID BOOK 1-4 PAW�N 6I ttA -.- -- 1 s�N � IPEMT O x HAr SASE 2RN-KI CiR l I Y ji TursrA>E spur- cox 1 Z rkrs anx.arr rNAr TIE 6Kcrnwct RnrsNlFlm nAEOy�.r2ar'Arm �r � ac m�'tlE1arorurr AS LiP.11Yr w r Na'a,A,.U'/riXfA N BGYN�flNaffA PAGE 1 AfX2RA YAS rNLGLU IFDRI ,61-i!N/Hr�T 1AS 1 p N+NFrNtla fnwaml NA A2 .NY£wOr Gr IT-JO Ar MIX/NT CARMELG- E{w{,, p,,�w O dL$WAW(1)(1(1(Pm r i)i ONW, j r r or(c;c,i r BAPTST CHURCH OF `�� us sw�eYrrrr mAr w rxclsAL NANW iq'1 CHAPEL HILL, NORTH '9 i1 &1J5J ACRES _ s4mu/E SIsm,�ivs wAr ram roHRrzwrA CAROLINA, lNC arar.,mer '�JMSWA�a i A,INS STNIEy fiYL011M7 MWWIXW fYAs pp aba o/y. A as 091'Pa J64 K'ar OMHwa HrfrA»e,A y<Ot0'AT AiI'CdikMKE/EIEI. m4CT2 r lxsWR a/PR Hlwis d umney NOr s7J0)w I IJPI o/dfr5/fda paNva M'»B//NPC �� XG lw0 aC1M'AR' Lbrn o/y pD-la-2]1� N/n n(N U Bep.,yTPoor NAD as/.rolrJ �C _ � N- Nxlxar rrrAr,vl Rd.MM/fbi0-nnbW v,r N'X5^'BASE'SM&W 7A4{'fro LY.WN E.r oc{4xn f rivtaJ us sumrrsi LYaV� 2O/a s¢r/4[A rormn.d DNa r«er�kr«enpk GDD22mre mri�cA mn�vi ru^ew ea ml� WSANS SM,/ahL•�'•N.DI,IIJ E r a Ixaal nmee,-Nl Iw 9 ChAe aS sERItY Fair fpI ........ Ba69• 'ffi'4A 6fAIY /aso I H ° a ce —S 0972W W g wBESP o DAY OF SKla BM lAXJCSE i =12'R/rAL �f � OIS YJRO DAY f1•'{�GFxtBEIL AOy 2pzNI�Aw'�`' � rof0o, ePiase•r raa�wra� W Iii�I1Rl��,i, as PG I25 ca I slaESBt I f-,rosaw S p avOWA kEADOM ft /'1'r�', """"� j(4 $EI«�I• � Ima Anr,r � `� Na��'f xITSO AWES-131,20.5 uttVAREfE£T i �� cOGrrr C '- 1,L-3/66 r �• _ L�rNe Q� aN� rcwum oxnW r,� rouor m»,,,n sru-aewcr m N.ro� c mwry t [.fNor saw N N7e'ar e•-- au»wl awrr ut 3 N�?Ij cif B w.F ImLLI Marts{.xu-ounuDm N 26�SYue9E- B "^'' 'r/1 JJq�Fy" !`C?ca rorow Ar6rN ASc! 04 NA,�Rrr\���NNrra N w caaGP9Je sGE aAM Na2v mav/D neq 46625 AO6-2"og,swARE rr rW20 E-NS41 Mxpuo r/. Q "w - mo r'J wo N dCO E 1AR IUItc0K-U0 mal ilAiOaNfxa Sf N1IE N rwrlA•NW RsFWD A'9IA V /wYlw wurvuF I4D N(NIT) srAltl+iD 79DS• �µ NaOISW l.�laalV.In e-raa{rnn E+•wozanN l�As srmarlu-r us.cmcrmT NERIZ 7 RDEL m GOR IM Pa M I AR l897, a6z ; MO(/NT CAR,4IEL BAPTIST C7/URCH I r{mo OF CHAPEL HILL, NOR7H CAROL/NA, INC p i-SOH 5Y ( as 1.NI,M W4-TRACT I NP S f11A in-WUy Q.wer.Ymyonf I LD AR"54 Pa U4 oa y 4 emU.p MnV fM De.,�wf -- `p rr, as 62M,Pr JO EYR Ya 0-M l(I/2'h✓Arr WnNrJ K 1`I PU oB toz PAGE fJ aA Ar6O-N.yNrb N+I Lf .�i l HAT 9IXK 1I4 PAW/x1 CtN Cta/PG-iMlabet//bp, A� Fd-Abf ad Zt A AA 454 Pa 451 rov Z D.a w4,PR 76s Tar HArStza62 -05 aR CAROLINA MEADOWS/Na aA-a.,a wnVROD`M m-Mmm�f AAnlraAr I RAT r,A1 2Wr-J&T CGr 3 a3 I77,Pa a A;rw ftht a ry cm FN-Iba�NmG)lmrbv,Nntl,r Lm - I p % /PS1 et a 'asi a "Wars&UIWBES NOT STMNN a J7,Pa p hKsf-NM h ir.T'ee`vYrPwe 0 Fa e9,Pa JJ-R4Asr/NP Nxt-IA+dY ame a«aw w»r ROCKY Ps se-2ae HrAsa•J Ox WCAMPBELL aar-aaw A4Jyolbn sor.rw,sl.r.n ab,+Nr..w,xoreo KIMBERLETGH 1 N%N-Abm L1rMre ad-Om Inu 2 WB a:(mrU-AVIN AN9.I:VI raw INtl(,FAA a•AGr/rBp,>) McCAMPBEII g {y� sErsnv uw 2o:,_ar Ww N-AMM Al A1'.W{WMAC pAw lr� Ait 1384 pa 652 U ,4 M E SU 2Ja US1K-ffvTd Sbfw W AtarRv Amr WW W f inrs A$91-r69 N CDT I I µ ACr ro A'NFA'W frf C"ry r rM CaMrn pR'n,r rib mil'(!b) ILV^ pG r1Um Ct;NrY.I)IDN �CLnV aw.a..y(f ) I F INS ACT BEL HAu4rE r.R.M.E'JQ 102r. Sbn,N rM mWo m r Av OlrtF.C[Y,102r. I rASL£A (ars+6 16) 1 c�sav rrxrxrAN w�av�rA� IEercmwrN,vEs learcuaa>KArEs Ac m�roN,w Na am maNes CARLY/NA Nao u(Nr0 rup u!NrU mAxrc mGwry 1 x.,aaNx 4.rpa{W MEADOIY$ lNC _ Ga.AIIIEI'Nr/ aS 3U1lY/!FT as/6JR Pa 252 RfFr ^S ee1k4}XI W tl4.INAl, GWNry P,4 9/-w LOT2 arll.2iD JJAJY LKrnll' NC aba Ql lYl.IJr CAROU)VA MEADOW$ INC WD ry q& ,A. rranur A` Nauru mnnulin� /,N{xute �w Oee No: MJMm3 h{a{ISW as rat PYJ.237 ux 3Vr1EY RST RKMed:iNtaa0110x1S03 PM �• I I aS S,fln/rrr P.S 95-21E.+ _ FaArtt f31.OJ Psp TRACT awa�+N Nam cardYu � Ps 2019�96 m4CrJ m 124 tR,N-14(1) Bx1TA IbTA•TA(1) CAROUNA -r-* MEADOWS INC FINAL PLAT OF A PAR77AL RESURVEY OF THE P,pa t-m 9/'m Lori CHATHAM — ORANGE COUNTY LINE i CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA I� WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA +T Smith & Smith, a)T;�LM M.— "r Para= 2021—¢17 * " '4 A Surveyors, P.A. S�Am l,.60, RECORDED IN PLAT SL/DE CHA 7HAM COUNTY RMSMYA Haan)CABR'NA N1? 20/a 4T.GfRIIa f2AANa/Jw r mica,�-v m aR n 44 M 2Ts(1 P.O.BOX Or BENLWN a SierN H/P M xdA aarm.0 m APB N.a BT308 Pr(Of TJCENSE Ho.C-0155 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK PAGE ORANGE COUNTY RE s7RY. ,}/P)qt H)III Dour m (°JDl'Y8B-r!u PRGVd'LT ND, p 2 i Book 124 37 General Zoning Atlas Amendments Part 2: Requirement 2 a. Applicant: Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2016 Mt. Carmel Church Road Chapel Hill, NC 27517 919.933.8565 Authorized Agent for Applicant: Charles Gordon Brown c/o Brown & Bunch, PLLC 101 N. Columbia Street, Suite 100 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 919.968.1111 b. Surveyor: Smith & Smith Surveyors, P.A. P. O. Box 457 Apex, NC 27502 919.352.7111 38 General Zoning Atlas Amendments Part 2: Requirement 3 Utility Provider Contacts. N/A. 39 General Zoning Atlas Amendments Part 2: Requirement 4 Adjacent right-of-way width, road names and numbers. Mount Carmel Church Road S.R. 1008 Variable width 40 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 SESSION LAW 2021-67 HOUSE BILL 236 i AN ACT TO ANNEX TO ORANGE COUNTY CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED IN CHATHAM COUNTY. Whereas, Mount Carmel Baptist Church (hereinafter "Church") is primarily located in Orange County, but approximately 4 acres of the Church's property is located in Chatham County; and Whereas,the Church is preparing to implement a master plan that will likely involve multiple construction projects that will require approval from both Orange and Chatham County governments;and Whereas, the Church believes it can complete the construction programs more efficiently if it is required to seek approval only from Orange County,where the majority of its property is located; and Whereas, the board of commissioners of Orange County and Chatham County adopted resolutions on February 2, 2021, and February 15, 2021, respectively, expressing their support for the annexation of the Church's property by Orange County; and Whereas, the establishment of a county boundary line is, pursuant to Section 1 of Article VII of the North Carolina Constitution,the responsibility of the General Assembly;Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: SECTION 1. The boundary line between Chatham County and Orange County is hereby changed and relocated so as to divest Chatham County of the territory described below, which territory shall vest in and become part of Orange County: Lying and being in Williams Township, Chatham County, North Carolina, and described more fully as follows to wit: BEGINNING at an iron pipe set,a new corner for Chatham—Orange County,in the western property line of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book 477, Page 8 Chatham County Registry)bearing NAD'83 (2011)N.C.Grid Coordinate values of North 768,963.87 U.S.survey feet,East 1,992,521.14 U.S.survey feet;thence with Carolina Meadows,Inc.,South 0 1"52,01" East,532.37 feet to an existing concrete monument with a broken top,a new corner for Chatham —Orange County, also being a corner of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book 706, Page 237 Chatham County Registry);thence with Carolina Meadows,Inc.,South 88°08'00"West,384.37 feet to a disturbed existing iron pipe(reset), a new corner for Chatham—Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt.Carmel Church Road(NCSR 1008);thence North 01' 51' 57" West, 524.41 feet to an iron pipe set, a new comer for Chatham— Orange County,on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt.Carmel Church Road(NCSR 1008);thence with the former county line North 87'40'20"East,0.80 feet to former county line monument # 3 as shown on Plat Slide 2004-425, Chatham County Registry (PID AB2055); thence continuing with the former county line North 86' 56' 43" East, 383.65 feet to the BEGINNING, containing 4.6623 acres more or less(203,091 square feet more or less)as shown i IIlNIIIIIIlIlIIIIl�lIIIIIIIII IIIIII� + H 2 3 6 V - 3 +t 41 on a map prepared by Smith&Smith, Surveyors,P.A. entitled"Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham—Orange County Line,"dated September 16,2020. The above-described parcel is a portion of that certain parcel described in Deed Book 469, Page 451,Chatham County Registry. SECTION 2.(a) On and after the date this act becomes law, all papers,documents, and instruments required or permitted to be filed or registered involving property in the area described in Section 1 of this act, which previously would have been recorded in Chatham County,shall be recorded in Orange County. SECTION 2.(b) All public records related to property in the area described in Section 1 of this act, which were filed or recorded prior to the date this act becomes law in Chatham County, shall remain in Chatham County where filed or recorded, and such records shall be valid public records as to the property involved even though they are recorded in Chatham County, a county where the property is no longer located. SECTION 2.(c) Any unpaid taxes or tax liens for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, or for prior fiscal years on property subject to taxation in the area described in Section 1 of this act shall continue to be valid and enforceable by Chatham County, including the foreclosure remedies and the remedies of attachment and garnishment provided for by law. SECTION 2.(d) On and after July 1,2021,all real and personal property in the area described in Section 1 of this act which was subject to ad valorem taxation in that area on January 1,2021,shall be subject to ad valorem taxes in Orange County for the fiscal year beginning July 1,2021,to the same extent as it would have been had it been located in Orange County on January 1, 2021. On July 1, 2021, the Chatham County Tax Administrator shall transfer to the Orange County Tax Assessor the ad valorem tax listings and valuations for all real and personal property subject to ad valorem taxation in the area described in Section 1 of this act. Beginning January 1,2022, all property in the area described in Section 1 of this act which is subject to ad valorem taxation shall be listed,assessed,and taxed by Orange County in the same manner as is prescribed by law for all other property located in Orange County. SECTION 3. No cause of action, including criminal actions, involving persons or property in the area described in Section 1 of this act which is pending on the date this act becomes law shall be abated by virtue of this act, and such actions shall continue in the same county unless changed under some other provision of law. SECTION 4. This act becomes effective June 30, 2021. In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 2"d day of July, 2021. i sl Carl Ford Presiding Officer of the Senate s/ Matthew Winslow Presiding Officer of the House of Representatives j I Page 2 Session Law 2021-67 House Bill 236 I 42 Legal Description of 4.6623 Acres Annexed into Orange County Formerly lying and being in Williams Township, Chatham County,North Carolina, and now lying and being in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County,North Carolina, and described more fully as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, in the western property line of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book 477, Page 8 Chatham County Registry) bearing NAD 83 (2011)N.C. Grid Coordinate values of North 768,963.87 U.S. survey feet, East 1,992,521.14 U.S. survey feet; thence with Carolina Meadows, Inc., South 01' 52' 01" East, 532.37 feet to an existing concrete monument with a broken top, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, also being a corner of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book, 706, Page 237 Chatham County Registry);thence with Carolina Meadows, Inc. South 88' 08' 00" West, 384.37 feet to a disturbed existing iron pipe (reset), a new corner for Chatham— Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road (NCSR 1008); thence North 01' 51' 57" West, 524.41 feet to an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road(NCSR 1008); thence with the former county line North 87' 40' 20" East, 0.80 feet to former county line monument 43 as shown on Plat Slide 2004-425, Chatham County Registry (PID AB2055);thence continuing with the former county line North 86' 56' 43" East, 383.65 feet to the BEGINNING, containing 4.6623 acres more or less (203,091 square feet more or less) as shown on a map prepared by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, P.A. entitled "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham—Orange County Line,"dated September 16, 2020. The above-described was annexed into Orange County by Act of the North Carolina General Assembly, Session Law 2021-67 effective June 30,2021 and recombined with that certain 3.4730 acre parcel of land as shown on that certain "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham-Orange County Line"dated September 16,2020 prepared by Smith&Smith, Surveyors, P.A., and recorded in the Orange County Registry in Plat Book 124, Page 74. 12902\07\M\005Legal Description(4.6623 Acres) 43 Legal Description of 8.1353 Recombined Acres Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill,North Carolina Orange County PIN #9796-29-3144 Lying and being in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County,North Carolina, and described more fully as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, in the western property line of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book 477, Page 8 Chatham County Registry) bearing NAD 83 (2011) N.C. Grid Coordinate values of North 768,963.87 U.S. survey feet, East 1,992,521.14 U.S. survey feet; Thence with the common boundary of Carolina Meadows, Inc., South 01° 52' 01" East, 532.37 feet to an existing concrete monument with a broken top, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, also being a corner of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book, 706, Page 237 Chatham County Registry); Thence with the common boundary of Carolina Meadows, Inc. South 88' 08' 00" West, 384.37 feet to a disturbed existing iron pipe (reset), a new corner for Chatham— Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road (NCSR 1008); Thence along the eastern right-of-way of line of Mt. Carmel Church Road North 01° 51' 57" West, 524.41 feet to an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham—Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road(NCSR 1008); Thence along the eastern right-of-way of line of Mt. Carmel Church Road N 01° 51' 57" W 90.54 feet to a magnetic nail set on top of a stone wall at an existing concrete monument on the eastern right-of-way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road, Thence along the eastern right-of-way of line of Mt. Carmel Church Road N 05' 26' 14" W along a chord 225.15 feet in length with a radius of 1,692.23 feet a distance of 225.32 feet to a magnetic nail set in the eastern right-of-way of Mt. Carmel Church Road, Thence S 88' 00' 20"E 6.67 feet to a magnetic nail set in an indention in the eastern right-of-way of Mt. Carmel Church Road, Thence along the eastern right-of-way of line of Mt. Carmel Church Road N 05' 18' 32" W 19.20 feet along with the eastern right-of-way of Mt. Carmel Church Road to an iron pipe set above broken concrete monument 1.5' deep, Thence leaving the right-of-way of Mt. Carmel Church Road N 83' 31' 55" E 102.35 feet along the common boundary with L. Short, LLC to an existing concrete monument, 44 Thence continuing along the common boundary with L. Short, LLC N 84' 53' 48" E 164.80 feet to an existing iron stake in an L. Short, LLC corner, Thence continuing with L. Short, LLC's line N 06' 45' 19" W 24.68 feet to an existing iron stake in a Mount Carmel Baptist Church corner with L. Short, LLC, Thence continuing along the common boundary with L. Short, LLC N 84' 56' 40" E 108.53 feet to another Mount Carmel Baptist Church corner with L. Short, LLC, Thence continuing from said corner S 05' 39' 5 1" E along the common boundary with L. Short, LLC 91.12 feet to an existing concrete monument, another corner with L. Short, LLC, Thence continuing with L. Short, LLC S 88' 21' 36"E 87.14 feet to an existing iron set in another Mount Carmel Baptist Church corner with L. Short, LLC. Thence continuing with the common boundary with L. Short, LLC S 05' 41' 03 E 206.17 feet to an existing iron set in the line of Carolina Meadows,Inc. (the southwest corner of L. Short, LLC and southeast corner of Mount Carmel Baptist Church), Thence from said common corner along the common boundary with Carolina Meadows, Inc. S 890 12' 12" W 86.69 feet to an existing concrete monument (broken top, 0.8' below ground), Thence along the common boundary with Carolina Meadows, Inc. S 01° 52' 01" E 73.81 feet to the new iron pipe set making the new corner of the Chatham—Orange County Line, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 8.1353 acres more or less (354,376 square feet more or less) as shown on a map prepared by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, P.A. entitled "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham—Orange County Line," dated September 16, 2020. The above-described includes 4.6623 acres annexed into Orange County by Act of the North Carolina General Assembly, Session Law 2021-67 effective June 30, 2021 and recombined with that certain 3.4730 acre parcel of land as shown on that certain "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham-Orange County Line" dated September 16, 2020 prepared by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, P.A., and recorded in the Orange County Registry in Plat Book 124, Page 74. 12902\07\M\007Legal Description(8.1353 acres) -2- L` ^ VAj",4 i�� ► r+.c.-�li�� gr/„'t ! �� ,<.� �e .erg,_. "�, �► �. ♦'>i�- la., Mr-1, F err.. P� �� ... � i�i; ". e�; `: �(u► 1 rpm _ {�� ,fil. ... Slow �� 1,. . ` '��i�ii`C'. e..Ir !r J.►r''F�� ` ) « Ns-c' I yr i • �o V Y►'/��r�:.�l�,C�Ca��'j��ll'jrr4,�rr�✓y.,1�1J■"�'+��r'v_, ei'`� LE ' 24 "all IOWA rft t' °teaOr �i� ". �.),F� �►�►v y '.'rre �i , i'�� I "�'1 1�f�.E F R NO o . ; ISM�i►" ��!"4ErT/ ,1 L.efl t�}''- `'1`r'f!4,• r �r��'rJ►t a / / `►:, �.�'1 r /D' �6�4 ) ♦ '�.4.'S� `�v�. \r ��� � L'1'{ i. '.. Li�■�_� pA� L 4 ■,�yJ_ 'f•i��'• w1s..r`/w i. •• �91 ti�� ��► �i��i > v: 4 " ! .R_i ty E1fa1 �� � u ` pp�+�f'e \ y���r•""`Ji .r.Ir J� i�f�l � Y1ME e 1• IM 1 •%�,• r ►57. fw 1 •°i fiw il�{ � 7�iia ' r►r I,�, r s%, �' j i� \� Gi �d il��" lip,_4V `r ,: •,j�'S �rF•�"..�°,'�ry .c,, y � irN yU r ♦ ► J lYJ. ti 7 w,y�.� pull gos.G1 ��L ! �r a ; r , �Ve���' i/� �w"p ���SE�ii� art. � r J01 �r ot, L f itS i/► _' .�y�, I (1 :�a'• ^�" J �l��v'��`�Uj +F'�JC . n ■ty}:�,. y 11�' �•t+ `Y �r rf �6'!ia��11 }' L r '41 L�� 3f 1 'ro.�� �,,yr i •���Y. r �- yJ���n��✓S� •1, '�.I�"f'P�►r�G�U ��' , Pc T•, v y Y a/ f K.L.7\it i i �} ■ o ��t�F �/ t ilI > �.,,, �• r.Nhi i_ faa 0 �f� � w I {I i �•�t Z y�r��;•i ► " ,�_ „�n �"�,�r�' •. �,y� • di i 'Fog., eIA\�iTo r. ! t\+�1 L ii r �' ��• ''�, .il"SS, ji pp ��l i't`51`' r*v`,• rl � �� iJ � Irr�� / '. i[ � - ���in�:. t`�_ IF 41, Jim QI� tom• •D „� _ � � 1 y R3. tv e,p IIjp df �. t ■ " Y �IfN � �i17,'t'1;%W, A,� IFS •. �,: .- . MA tAl"31 FF r.�E,�►� y y N p'QtTO s MR N I �rty�,'- qq ,++� NICK u�aia� �`� i9"�.a U'?l1L_,s�(-..�1.1■_i Y��j�G-1' •I '� •. Sultylii!"'i A!'y� { rr�/I ra rrullp�y oJs'� i 7_�f.- • . /�rl � Jh .�►[ r R� 't •tt hrd:�,,. 1•."a+*'l t"u G 46 01 Chapter 5: Land Use Element e d j s Aa ew Ho ur Mi Ru al B er ` --�� ` Rural Buffer _ Eu n� s rrbor Chapel Hil nsiti II Transition ep aMe tee rl t ham rbcq �j o t nI � O � � s i ural B ffer ar ns� C i J ►T� prsity ke C� 1 atershedgs '` " ti Rd >� .t t$ U IF @ p +CO H 8r , �U a JQ h /k7gl �_. Tr n Chapel Hill Planning Areas Orange County,Chapel Hill,Carrboro I I Chapel Hill City Limits,Jan.,2004 Chapel Hill ETJ Joint Planning Agreement(JPA) (� ' 0 Chapel Hill Urban Services Area 0 Carrboro Transition Areal Rural Buffer,Orange County moo®o r.. Carrboro Planning Areas Carrboro Transition Area 2 Joint Courtesy Review Area Map prepared by Carrboro City Limits,Feb.,2004 0 Chapel Hill Transition Area University Lake Watershed Chapel Hill Planning ® Carrboro ETJ February 27.2004 MAP S-2:JOINT LAND USE PLANNING AREAS ora*tge,CottAty Co-Y tVreRe4 e.,Pla.w Page 5-4 Orange County Zoning Map 47 ti a 1 November 14, 2022 1:12,000 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 mi ITT i I i . I I I 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km Attachment 2 AA fi- Staff Report ORANGE Zoning Atlas Amendment — Conventional District COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Parcel Information v'a"'ty Map forAmendmert Area for P1N9796293144 Parcel Address 2016 Mt. Carmel Church Rd. ��j t : , - _ -�- / Chapel Hill 27517 Parcel Identification z 9796-29-3144 7 T Number (PIN) Cpape����rov�sr,tp , ,. �.. Mt. Carmel Baptist Church of —TT Applicant Name pp Chapel Hill, NC _— and Address 2016 Mt. Carmel Church Rd. B'naha°' °�'"p f� - Chapel Hill, NC 27517 `"^\ Protected -. t - { ke.Protectetl Property Owner I `fa e H. I Name and Address (if different from Same as Applicant a l Applicant) l rtl, k P°'e"ed Charles Gordon Brown P tested *PIIJ:9/9�931�J H"'�0V1"'"° Sed ` ` -�` Agent(s), if Brown & Bunch, PI_I_C H^=h s L Cl"'�,a;°r n��ams A h-torts ::,Yr�r9r°PNt+ rsh s 101 N. Columbia St., applicable Suite 100 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Parcel Size 4.6623 acres—affected area Adopted Future Lard Use Map with Parcel 9796293144 Depicted 8.1353 acres—total parcel � Future Land Use None— newly annexed land from -L� Map (FLUM) Chatham County.na Designation �� � g Portion of parcel that has always J o r:'.' ake Protectetl� been within Orange County is designated Rural Buffer a� FLUM Overlay(s) Resource Protection Area 979B299144 (on northern portion of parcel not ___ ----------------`-'- included in proposed action) Growth Management Rural System Designation Definition of FLUM No existing designation for subject Designation area. (from Article 10 of Rural Buffer definition: UD O) -- Pru W setl G'rar'tlrn3rrl Area Designated lands in the s—I,`' spot.YoslareM1atla Com rehensive Plan that are s,ream, p �N'erer a°d s adjacent to an urban or transition �Poefi1i`a'a° 1etl6 Rewui_n Pi°W'llvi Aiae> area that is rural in character and F "°"d 6°rr which should remain rural and not require urban services. 1 AQ None— newly annexed land Zoning Amendment for PIN 9796293144 from Chatham County. Current Zoning [Land was zoned "Residential District District 1" (R-1) (Chatham County regulations) prior to Jorda ��� being annexed into Orange County.] Requested Zoning RB (Rural Buffer) 9796293144 county District Orange- _ f cnecham County Requested Zoning District Consistent with Appendix F of 2030 Yes Comprehensive Plan Existing Zoning Pra�sa°r.ref°"'"` Overlay Districts None — newly annexed land oP'"'g'd® ` from Chatham County. --- A`aa —5,raams M,h'elar and ae ���'.h'elei Spaly YJeU nhedx E Amendments Proposed for Yes— area will be within the Overlay Districts Jordan Lake Protected (Y/N) Watershed Overlay District 2 Rn Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Aerial Image with Amendment Area Outlined North Church building is located on the northern portion of the parcel. A single-family residence on a 1.73 acre parcel is located to the north of the Church's parcel. ` All are zoned RB (Rural Buffer). South Multi-story attached residences associated with Carolina Meadows Retirement Community. Chatham County R-1 zoning. East Attached residences (quadplexes) associated with Carolina Meadows Retirement Community. Chatham County R-1 zoning. West Single-family residences on lots ranging from 1 to 4 acres in size. Chatham County R-1 zoning. Existing Roads Q PIN 9]98293,4 North None South None East None West Mt. Carmel Church Rd. Existing Conditions/Physical Features The affected portion of the parcel currently supports a large, flat, grassed field that appears to be used for field sports such as soccer; a gravel parking area; a fenced community garden; and a fenced children's playground. These uses occupy most of the affected area. Public Water and Sewer The Water and Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement (WASMPBA) does not designate this area as a Primary Service Area for water and sewer services. As such, private well and septic systems are used in this area. 3 Review Milestones Application Submittal Date January 11, 2023, with clarifying information received January 30, 2023 Orange County Development February 16, 2023 Advisory Committee (DAC) Review Note: the DAC is a staff/agency committee, established in Section 1.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Joint Planning Review The subject parcel is located in a portion of the county included in the Orange-County— 1;haael Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan. All three jurisdictions must approve amendments to the Land Use Map, following a joint public hearing by all three governing bodies. The date for the joint public hearing is still to be determined but is expected to be on either April 20, May 4, or May 30. Jurisdiction Anticipated Planning Board Anticipated Governing Review Date Board Decision Date Orange County March 8, 2023 After Joint Public Hearing Town of Chapel Hill March 21, 2023 After Joint Public Hearing Town of Carrboro After Joint Public Hearing After Joint Public Hearing Analysis Staff Analysis As required under Section 2.8.5 of the LIDO, the Planning Director shall cause an analysis to be made of the application. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: 1. The application is complete in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.8.3 of the UDO; 2. The proposal appears consistent with the various goals outlined within the Orange County Comprehensive Plan concerning development, including: a. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. b. Objective LU-2.1: Maintain the rural, low-density land surrounding Chapel Hill and Carrboro Transition Areas as Rural Buffer land, as designated on the Future Land Use Map. Future consideration should be given to designating Rural Buffer areas around other municipalities where such interest exists. The proposal is consistent with this goal and objective because it will assign a Zoning district for the first time to property that was annexed into Orange County. The proposed RB (Rural Buffer) Zoning district is consistent with adjacent and nearby properties. IL_ 4 3. The proposal appears consistent with the Orange County— Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan. Specifically, the Land Use Plan amendment will apply the "Rural Buffer" land use classification to a portion of a parcel that was annexed into Orange County, from Chatham County, in 2021. The Rural Buffer classification is consistent with adjoining and nearby lands in Orange County. 5 53 �1 Attachment 3 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I, Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director, Long-Range Planning & Administration, with Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that in accordance with the provisions of Sections 2.3.5 and and 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance I have mailed, or have caused to be mailed, a Notice of the Planning Board Meeting to be held regarding Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas amendments proposing to apply a Land Use classification and Zoning district for the first time to a portion of a parcel of property located at 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road, within the Chapel Hill Township of Orange County (PIN 9796-29-3144). The owners were identified according to the Tax Records, as required by Sections 2.3.5 and 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. The mailed notices specified the date, time, place and subject of the Planning Board Meeting. WITNESS my hand, this 21st day of February 2023. Perdita Holtz, AICP Deputy Director, Long-Range Planning & Administration 54 �1 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 272781919•245•2575 February 21, 2023 NOTICE OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING Dear Property Owner: This notice is to inform you of the March 8, 2023, Planning Board meeting, at which an application to amend three regulatory documents will be reviewed. The review is in connection to applications to apply an Orange County Land Use classification and Zoning district for the first time to property that was annexed into Orange County from Chatham County. The subject property is 4.66 acres of an 8.14 acre parcel at 2106 Mount Carmel Church Road, Chapel Hill (PIN: 9796-29-3144). This notification is occurring in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). You are receiving this notice because you own property located within 1,000-feet of the affected parcel. YOUR PROPERTY IS NOT PROPOSED FOR REZONING. The regulatory documents proposed for amendment are: 1. The Orange County— Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan 2. The Orange County Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use Map 3. The Orange County Zoning Atlas Property Information Parcel ID Number(PIN) 9796-29-3144 Owner/Applicant Mount Carmel Baptist Church of Chapel Hill, North Carolina Agent Charles Gordon Brown of Brown & Bunch, PLLC Location 2106 Mount Carmel Church Rd., Chapel Hill, NC 27517 Acreage +/-4.66 acres of an +/-8.14 acre parcel Current Land Use None for the 4.66 annexed acres; the remainder of the parcel is Designation designated Rural Buffer Current Zoning None for the 4.66 annexed acres; the remainder of the parcel is zoned RB (Rural Buffer) Watershed Designation None for the 4.66 annexed acres, but located in the Jordan Lake Protected Watershed The requested designations for the Joint Land Use Plan and Orange County Future Land Use Map is "Rural Buffer." The requested Zoning district is RB (Rural Buffer). Additionally, the Jordan Lake Protected Watershed zoning overlay district will be applied due to the property's location within the protected watershed. Additional information is available on the Orange County Planning Department's website: https://www.orangecountync.gov/3038/Active-Development-Projects 55 These amendment requests will be reviewed by the Orange County Planning Board at a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., March 8, 2023, at the Whitted Meeting Facility(300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC). All interested persons are invited to address the Planning Board with their comments regarding the applications. The Planning Board is an advisory board comprised of appointed volunteers that makes recommendations to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners regarding land use and zoning matters. A formal joint public hearing on the proposed amendments will be held by the Board of County Commissioners, and Town Councils of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. The date of the joint public hearing has not yet been determined; you will receive another written notice about the public hearing at a later date. If you cannot attend the Planning Board meeting and the website does not answer your questions about the applications, you may call (919) 245-2575 during regular business hours and you will be directed to a staff person who can assist you. Sincerely, 51N Cy Sto r Planning & Inspections Director Enclosures (3 maps and Aerial Image of Meeting Location) 56 Whitted Building (300 W. Tryon St.) - Meeting Location f P. • i r- r Parking - ' ,• ,• J q ti' S W Am Z 1 ' � ■ Ir i Whitted BuildingTaft 4 INA �1 - ■pA�u��u�i��n3� _ ,� r F W TRYON ST Wit ,. f 17,. r �+�Parking Uj it j r`"+'' �� �:�• h 1 in=100 feet Feet t - Orange County Planning and Inspections ! ' '� + �,• Brian Carson(5/8/2015) t AL V,%,V , ' bf Orange County-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Joint Planning Area Proposed Land Use Plan and Joint Review Area Amendments �O P� �Q MT cgRMEI CHURCH RD IVII I C7 Rural Buffer ,P�c 1NOMNS DR C H J DA 9796293144 — — — 0 0 u 0 u o Q PIN: 9796293144 j Proposed Amendment Area Rural Buffer N 1 in=500 feet ORANGE Feet rn Orange County Boundary COUNTY. o 500 Pla ni nng and Inspections Department(BC) Parcels 2/7/2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Mt Carmel Baptist Church\Mt Carmel Baptist Church.aprx\Orange County-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Joint Planning Area Proposed Amendment N T Y , N C bb Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 9796293144 Depicted MT CgRME`CHURCH R p -MANGUM_CT Jordan Lake Protected �pV SH�MAS pR 9796293144 Z Z Q PIN: 9796293144 Proposed Amendment Area County Boundary Water Supply Watersheds Streams - Water Bodies - Public Interest Areas Resource Protection Areas N i in=500 feet ORANGE Feet Future Land Use Categories COUNTY 0 500 Planning and Inspections Department(BC) Rural Buffer 2i6i2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Mt Carmel Baptist Church\Mt Carmel Baptist Church.aprx\Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 9796293144 Depicted O R A N G E Zonin.&_Amendment for PIN 9796293144 �Q MT CgRMEI CHURCH Rp -MANGUM_CT Jordan Lake Pr ,PV SHoMPs pR 9796293144 Orange County l�M� Chatham County 0 PIN: 9796293144 Proposed Amendment Area Streams - Water Bodies r_ County Boundary ram! Water Supply Watersheds Zoning N 1 in=500 feet '�` ORANGE Feet - EC5 couNTr 500 No Planning and Inspections Department(BC) RB 2/6/2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Mt Carmel Baptist Church\Mt Carmel Baptist Church.aprx\Zoning Amendment for PIN 9796293144 O RAN G E COU NTY bu PIN 9796293144 Notification Map SPARROW RUN LN i I T CAR MEl-CHU-- � RCy BD MANGUM-CS i i i i i JAY �NpMAS-DR orange County Chatham County 0 ® PIN: 9796293144 r- County Boundary 1,000 Foot Notification Area p �\ N 1 in=700 feet F Chatham County Notification Parcels EEEI ORANGE j Feet 0 Orange County Notification Parcels �® COUNTY 0 J00 C Planning and Inspections Department(BC) Parcels 1/17/2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Zoning\Rezoning\PIN 9796293144\PIN 9796293144.aprx\PIN 9796293144 Notification Map 61 PIN OWNERI_FIRST OWNERI_LAST OWNER2_FIRST OWNER2_LAST ADDRESSI CITY STATE ZIPCODE 9796196140 CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA INC MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH OF 2016 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9797203235 SAVANNAH L LABO CHRISTOPHER T LABO 1916 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9797207475 THERESA C ARICO 2001 MANGUM CT CHAPEL HILL NC 275149234 9796098770 CAROL P TRUSTEE ET AL WILLIAMS CLARA R TRUSTEE ROSS 109 W FRANKLIN ST SUITE 1 ROCKINGHAM NC 28379 9796194308<Null> MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH <Null> <Null> 2016 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9796290405 CHAPEL HILL INC INC MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH OF <Null> <Null> 2016 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9796293144 CHAPEL HILL INC INC MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CH OF <Null> <Null> 2016 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9796290637 FREDERICK RAY HUBBARD KAREN SUMMERVILLE HUBBARD 1937 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9796291368 CHAPEL HILL INC INC MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH OF <Null> <Null> 2016 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9796292414<Null> L SHORT LLC <Null> <Null> P 0 BOX 150 CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9797107003 CHARLES C III DANIEL MYRA DANIEL 222 ROBERTSON RD ROXBORO NC 275748510 9797207103 LARRY T SHORT 2002 MT CARMEL CH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9797208593 THERESA C ARICO 2001 MANGUM CT CHAPEL HILL NC 275149234 9796199911 NORMAN JAMES HORTON 1923 MT CARMEL CH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9796281089 WILLIAM D GOODRICH 1175 MT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9796383969 MEADOWS CAROLINA 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HILL NC 275178505 9796396529<Null> L SHORT LLC <Null> <Null> P 0 BOX 150 CHAPEL HILL NC 27514 9797205340 PEDRO RAMIREZ ET AL BARTOLO <Null> <Null> 1931 MANGUM CT CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 9797401314<Null> BUCKNER FAMIY FARM TRUST <Null> <Null> 109 W FRANKLIN STSUITE 1 ROCKINGHAM NC 283793543 62 Full_AKPAF OwnerNamel OwnerName2 OwnerAddre OwnerAdd OwnerCity OwnerStat OwnerZip 19387 CORVERA NERIZ FIDEL 1145 MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH RD CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8031 19408 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MDWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-850' 19409 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MDWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-850' 19410 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MDWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-850' 19413 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 20039 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 64734 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MDWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-850' 72756 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 76273 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 73471 CSP COMMUNITY OWNER LP PO BOX 27329 HOUSTON TX 77227 77726 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PO BOX 14 MONCURE NC 27559-014, 20042 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-850! 64812 MCCAMPBELL ROCKY MCCAMPBELL KIMBERLEIGH 11310 GOVERNORS DR CHAPEL HII NC 27517 20041 CHEEK BEN FORD 1130 MADISON WOMBLE WAY CHAPEL HII NC 27514 93487 SPARROW CAROL C 204 GRADUATE CT DURHAM NC 27713-6021. 20037 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 93488 CHEEK BEN FORD 1130 MADISON WOMBLE WAY CHAPEL HII NC 27514 19423 SPARROW CAROL C 204 GRADUATE CT DURHAM NC 27713-6021. 20040 TCG SINGER ENTERPRISES FUND 1 LP 9073 NEMO ST WEST HOLI CA 90069-551 60693 CARLYLE GROUP INC THE 9073 NEMO ST LOS ANGEL CA 90069 20048 CHEEK BEN FORD 1130 MADISON WOMBLE WAY CHAPEL HII NC 27514 63618 CARLYLE GROUP INC THE 9073 NEMO ST LOS ANGEL CA 90069 20033 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 74450 CAROLINA MEADOWS INC 100 CAROLINA MEADOWS CHAPEL HII NC 27517-8501. 63 Pictures of Posted Notification Sign (posted February 24, 2023) 1'i�ur.i.i. _�I:FF.V�MEEYrHG 0.0 IK le �J�!jM�J�5�1k11@aJF�R.�Lu_ -f s.� r, 64 Attachment 4 Resolution#: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY— CHAPEL HILL — CARRBORO JOINT PLANNING LAND USE PLAN TO ADD 4.66 ACRES TO THE RURAL BUFFER WHEREAS, Orange County, the Town of Chapel Hill, and the Town of Carrboro have engaged in a cooperative planning effort detailed within the Orange County — Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan (hereafter `Joint Planning Land Use Plan'), adopted October 13, 1986, and amended from time to time, and WHEREAS, on June 30, 2021, North Carolina Session Law 2021-67 annexed 4.66 acres of land from Chatham County into Orange County, and WHEREAS, a Land Use classification and a Zoning district must be applied to the annexed property by Orange County, and WHEREAS, the property owner has filed applications to amend the Orange County Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Atlas to affix the "Rural Buffer" Land use classification and RB (Rural Buffer) zoning district to the property, and WHEREAS, the annexed property is part of a parcel of land subject to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and staff has determined that it should be added to said Plan for continuity and regulatory purposes, and WHEREAS, Section 2.6.A of the Joint Planning Agreement, which is part of the Joint Planning Land Use Plan, requires that amendments to the Joint Planning Area Land Use Map must be adopted by all parties to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan, and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing regarding the proposed Joint Planning Land Use Plan amendment was held on xxxx, 2023 [date to be filled in after hearing occurs], in accordance with the requirements of the Joint Planning Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County hereby resolves that the Joint Planning Land Use Plan be amended as shown on the attached page. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the amendment to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan shall become effective upon adoption by the governing bodies of Orange County, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro. Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 12023. 65 I, Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2023 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2023. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners 66 Orange County-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Joint Planning Area Proposed Land Use Plan and Joint Review Area Amendments �O P� �Q MT cgRMEI CHURCH RD IVII I C7 Rural Buffer ,P�c 1NOMNS DR C H J DA 9796293144 — — — 0 0 u 0 u o Q PIN: 9796293144 j Proposed Amendment Area Rural Buffer N 1 in=500 feet ORANGE Feet rn Orange County Boundary COUNTY. o 500 Pla ni nng and Inspections Department(BC) Parcels 2/7/2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Mt Carmel Baptist Church\Mt Carmel Baptist Church.aprx\Orange County-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Joint Planning Area Proposed Amendment 67 Attachment 5 STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An applicant-initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to rezone a parcel as follows: Parcel Identification Township Owner of Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Number Record (PIN) 9796-29- None 3144 Mount Carmel (property was • RB (Rural Buffer) Chapel Baptist Church annexed into • Jordan Lake (4.66 acres Hill of Chapel Hill, Orange County Protected Watershed of 8.14 acre North Carolina from Chatham Overlay District parcel) County) The Planning Board hereby finds: a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the LIDO have been deemed complete; and, b. Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 Statement of Intent - Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance with Adopted Plans of the LIDO and to Section 160D-604(d) Planning Board review and comment— Plan Consistency and 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement — Plan Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. c. The amendment is consistent with applicable plans because it supports the following: • Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. • Objective LU-2.1: Maintain the rural, low-density land surrounding Chapel Hill and Carrboro Transition Areas as Rural Buffer land, as designated on the Future Land Use Map. Future consideration should be given to designating Rural Buffer areas around other municipalities where such interest exists. The amendment is consistent with this goal and objective because it will assign a Zoning district for the first time to property that was annexed into Orange County. The proposed RB (Rural Buffer) Zoning district is consistent with adjacent and nearby properties. 68 d. The amendment is also consistent with the adopted Orange County — Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan which established the area in which the property is located as "Rural Buffer". e. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because it assigns a Zoning district for the first time to property that was annexed into Orange County; the proposed Zoning district is consistent with adjacent and nearby properties. The Planning Board hereby adopts this Statement of Consistency and the findings expressed herein and recommends the Board of County Commissioners consider adoption of the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment. Adam Beeman, Chair Date 69 Ordinance Attachment 6 #: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed applications seeking to amend the Orange County Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map and the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Sections 1.7 and 1.2, respectively, of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, these applications seek to establish an Orange County Land Use classification and Zoning district for the first time on property annexed into Orange County on June 30, 2021, via North Carolina Session Law 2021-67, and WHEREAS, the annexed piece of property is 4.66 acres of an 8.14 acre parcel of property with Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9796-29-3144, and WHEREAS, the annexed piece of property is described as: Formerly lying and being in Williams Township, Chatham County, North Carolina, and now lying and being in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, and described more fully as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, in the western property line of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book 477, Page 8 Chatham County Registry) bearing NAD 83 (2011) N.C. Grid Coordinate values of North 768,963.87 U.S. survey feet, East 1,992,521.14 U.S. survey feet; thence with Carolina Meadows, Inc., South 010 52' 01" East, 532.37 feet to an existing concrete monument with a broken top, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, also being a corner of Carolina Meadows, Inc., (Deed Book, 706, Page 237 Chatham County Registry); thence with Carolina Meadows, Inc. South 880 08' 00" West, 384.37 feet to a disturbed existing iron pipe (reset), a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road (NCSR 1008); thence North 010 51' 57" West, 524.41 feet to an iron pipe set, a new corner for Chatham — Orange County, on or near the eastern maintenance right of way line of Mt. Carmel Church Road (NCSR 1008); thence with the former county line North 870 40' 20" East, 0.80 feet to former county line monument #3 as shown on Plat Slide 2004-425, Chatham County Registry (PID AB2055); thence continuing with the former county line North 860 56' 43" East, 383.65 feet to the BEGINNING, containing 4.6623 acres more or less (203,091 square feet more or less) as shown on a map prepared by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, P.A. entitled "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham — Orange County Line," dated September 16, 2020. The above-described was annexed into Orange County by Act of the North Carolina General Assembly, Session Law 2021-67 effective June 30, 2021 and recombined with that certain 3.4730 acre parcel of land as shown on that certain "Final Plat of a Partial Resurvey of the Chatham-Orange County Line" dated September 16, 2020 prepared by Smith & Smith, Surveyors, P.A., and recorded in the Orange County Registry in Plat Book 124, Page 74. 1 70 WHEREAS, the requirements of Sections 2.3 and 2.8 of the UDO have been deemed complete, and WHEREAS, the proposals have been found to be internally consistent with the 2030 Orange County Comprehensive Plan or part thereof including, but not limited to, the following: • Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. • Objective LU-2.1: Maintain the rural, low-density land surrounding Chapel Hill and Carrboro Transition Areas as Rural Buffer land, as designated on the Future Land Use Map. Future consideration should be given to designating Rural Buffer areas around other municipalities where such interest exists. and WHEREAS, the proposals have been found to be consistent with the Orange County — Chapel Hill — Carrboro Joint Planning Land Use Plan. Specifically, the accompanying Joint Land Use Plan amendment will apply the "Rural Buffer" land use classification to a portion of a parcel that was annexed into Orange County, from Chatham County, in 2021. The Rural Buffer classification is consistent with adjoining and nearby lands in Orange County, and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed Land Use classification of "Rural Buffer" and Zoning district of RB (Rural Buffer) to be reasonable and in the public interest, and WHEREAS, the property lies within the Jordan Lake Protected Watershed delineated by the NC Department of Environmental Quality Water Supply Watershed program and is thereby consistent with that same zoning overlay district, as established in Section 4.2 of the UDO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map and the Orange County Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to apply the Land Use classification of "Rural Buffer," the Zoning District of RB (Rural Buffer), and the Zoning Overlay District of Jordan Lake Protected Watershed to the aforementioned piece of property. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2023. I, Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2023 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. 71 WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of , 2023. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners 72 73 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: March 8, 2023 Action Agenda Item No. 9 SUBJECT: Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment — Parcel located at 3026 White Cross Rd., Chapel Hill, in Bingham Township DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. Application, including Site Plan and Brian Collie, Planner II, (919)-245-2599 Supplemental Materials Cy Stober, Planning Director, (919)-245-2592 2. Staff Report 3. Notification Materials and Certification 4. Notes from Neighborhood Information Meeting 5. Project Correspondence and Development Advisory Committee Comment(s) 6. Statement of Consistency 7. Draft Ordinance, Including Proposed Conditions PURPOSE: To review and make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) on an applicant-initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone a +/- 4.83 acre parcel (PIN: 9749-40-2351) located at 3026 White Cross Rd., Chapel Hill within the Bingham Township of Orange County. The proposed rezoning is: FROM: AR (Agricultural Residential), & NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) TO: NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District) BACKGROUND: On November 17, 2022 a Conditional Zoning Atlas Amendment application (Attachment 1) was received proposing to rezone 4.83 acres of property at 3026 White Cross Rd., Chapel Hill, within the Bingham Township. The Staff Report in Attachment 2 contains additional information, maps, and analysis. Basic Review Process: A conditional district rezoning application requires submission of a site plan and other documents, in accordance with Section 2.9.1(C) of the UDO. The typical cadence for the review is as follows: • FIRST ACTION — Applicant holds a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). STAFF COMMENT: The Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on February 22, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Public Library. 74 • SECOND ACTION — The Planning Board reviews the application at a regular meeting and makes a recommendation to the BOCC. STAFF COMMENT. The Planning Board will review this application at its regular meeting on March 8, 2023. • THIRD ACTION — The BOCC receives the Planning Board and staff recommendations at an advertised public hearing and makes a decision on the application. STAFF COMMENT. The public hearing is anticipated to be held on April 4, 2023. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part of this process if they address: a. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, b. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways, and access points, parking areas and driveways, pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, the timing of development, street and right-of-way improvements, storm water drainage, the provision of open space, etc.), and/or c. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose. A formal site plan is required as part of a conditional rezoning application and has been submitted (Attachment 1). Approval of a site-specific plan is part of the conditional district rezoning process, and the site plan and any agreed-upon conditions are binding to the development footprint permitted for the zoning district. Staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as included in the Ordinance in Attachment 7. The following conditions have been requested by the applicant: 1. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet; 2. Off-Street Parking Requirements: Relief from providing the 54 parking spaces required, conditional on provision of 34 parking spaces; 3. Driveway Access: Responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments, right turn lane shall be provided at the White Cross Rd. driveway; 4. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School the north elevation towards NC Hwy 54 shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; 5. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received soon after site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within a timeframe that will not impede development of the proposed project; 6. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28-3016. Public Notification: In accordance with Section 2.8.7 of the UDO, notices of the Planning Board meeting were mailed via first class mail to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the subject parcel. These notices were mailed on February 21, 2023, 15 days before the meeting. Staff also 75 posted the subject parcel with a signs on February 23, 2023, 13 days before the meeting. See Attachment 3 for the notification materials. Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the Statement of Consistency, indicating the amendments are reasonable and in the public interest, contained in Attachment 6 and the proposed zoning atlas amendment ordinance contained in Attachment 7. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including the public hearing notice and mailings, are covered by the application fee. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Director recommends the Board: 1. Receive the rezoning application, 2. Deliberate on the proposal as desired, 3. Consider the Planning Director's recommendation, and 4. Make a recommendation to the BOCC on the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 6) and the proposed ordinance (Attachment 7) in time for the April 4, 2023 BOCC meeting. 76 t Attachment 1 Orange County Planning & Inspections Department 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 200. Hillsborough, NC 27278 �� ��INA 91 9-245-2575 or plan ningapps orangecountync.gov NORrHZoning Atlas Amendment— Rezoning Application Please check all applicable boxes and complete the required documentation.Additional information and submittal requirements are contained in Sections 2.8 and 2.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or blue ink. Date: Rezoning Request: ® Conventional District 0 Conditionaf District ':;rv- ��.�� wr� _ .*, � ��- ',w '"'� -�-.,v�-Ji��� �.`f''..N,-''.�^•�a`r „����'',�'n�",��v,".:,a�"�-�"".:,''.,,r "'+y3`""��.�.���,"✓.zr'%������.-�.✓�"".rv.-..-..�"�''^;`:� i 1 .:-�"' - .✓--� ,..., s 'r-i ;;"cx., ;�- �' y.3 �`..?, �.-�"3a? :,,,_.��`� ��_� > r��""�z':'�"�':,.:.r""r'✓����� � _�'�N,��.�P Property Owner(s): Vernon P. Davis Mailing Address: 2401 NC Hwy 54 West Chapel Hill, NC 27516 E Phone: Email: Applicant (if different than property owner): Glandon Forest„Equity, I_LC Mailing Address: 3825 Barrett Drive, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: 919-459-2601 Email: gbarnes@vanguardpg.com �'.. ��� w" .;.,,; - '.'.`�, "`"qr� "'.`-'�,.`� �" �-',;G"��'l,�'.�""� ate' ;•�""«'- -� :g� ..�;-` �.�. �.,,.w"�'a, Parcel ID Number (PIN): 9749-40-2351 Total Acreage: 4.83 Address: White Cross Road Orange County, NC Future Land Use Map Classification: Current Zoning Designation: NC2 and AR Requested Zoning Designation: _NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District) If applicant/owner are different people, include a signed, notarized, statement indicating that the owner has authorized the applicant to submit the request. In cases where there are multiple property owners, E please attach an additional document containing their signatures authorizing the submission of the application or other legal documentation establishing the applicants' right to file on their behalf, Conventional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.8.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): 0 A map, at a legible scale, showing the property(s) subject to the request. A map may be procured at the Planning Department for a fee in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. 3 El A legal description of the property(s) proposed for rezoning. 0 A list showing the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners within 1000-feet of the subject property. 0 A detailed narrative denoting the following: i. The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request. E E Page 1 of 2 E i f 77 Attachment 1 ii. The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health safety, and general welfare. iii. How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of the adopted Orange County Comprehensive Plan, or part thereof. ® The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule. Conditional District Rezoning Application Based on Section 2.9.2 (C) of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): El A site plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.5 of the UDO. Applications for a Master Plan Development (MPD) Conditional District (CD) shall adhere to the site plan preparation requirements outlined in Section 6.7 of the UDO. . El All CD applications, regardless of type, shall include a detailed landscape plan showing the location of on-site significant trees; proposed screening, buffers, and landscaping; and any proposed treatment of any existing natural features. 0 A detailed description of the proposed use of property including an outline of the proposed development. This will include a detailed summary of proposed utility services. The utility service plan for applications for a Home Park (HP) CD shall specify if the proposed services are temporary or permanent connections. ® A detailed traffic survey, regardless of estimated daily trips, prepared in accordance with North Carolina Department of Transportation requirements and Section 6.17 of the UDO. 0 The appropriate environmental document(s) prepared in accordance with Section 6.16 of the UDO. 0 A schedule of construction of all elements of the proposal. Other information identified during the pre-application conference deemed essential to demonstrate the projects compliance with these regulations. IE The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule mac- "y �" -:�. ^'. �- � �r-�,,.»-x '�"z-` ti� �,n :� - �.i�:,�. ry^,� _a— ✓. s `� .^ ",: � �,.,��- y l (we), the undersigned, have been made aware of the process for the review and action associated with a UDO Zoning Atlas Amendment application and understand only completed applications, containing all information required by the Orange County UDO, shall be reviewed and acted upon by the County. Further I (we) understand that any assistance I (we) may receive from County staff in preparing this application in no way guarantees a favorable recommendation by staff on the merits of this pr posal nor does it guarantee an approval of the propos agsendment by the County. r Owner Signature(s) ApplicarA ignature (if different from owner) /z, Date Date ```,1```,�� �►��ST Urrpr���ii�� o '4'9�,',,,, v NOTAp Y 4 pllBL��' UZ 'Z.t;CE C O�r; ``��` ru�trrrnstk►tu�►� Page 2 of 2 78 1 carvcreEn:MaxaTxlc wrec/soEwuX-S[E-,,I=u.s VICINITY MAP c x CONCRETE PEET S.E1 At OI rfo ID—01 SEE M111 M I BITS-SEE 0— ECIFlfanoxs- ® E SUNOAAD Duiv P w1ENi clNlcu REPoRi SPEaFlCantNS- PANEMENI NC 54 Hwy W a naxol®nsa G T W—,T MET.ES'cc z ryx'' k -- --- OEx. S. D RE,Dnio WLXra .z g g BMITS OF EwATS-ME N—.11,—Em sDEwAixs AxwxD DISTURBANCE AR— Is & DUMPSIER UYWi-SEE DETAIL MET C6.3s g5111RIXANCETS 6 LI(PE) H 9. 6-p:03NCTSn xHEEt-P.PINNED 10 PAVEMENT-(NOT USES, SITE O D.p Dx sIc roxD R�p RA f�q G DM\ 1I.4 IXDE PAXMNDCIP STNPE 1..PryNTED M.N W OPTO La f I IF .wxlxvs u1 0 & L(&33x)(Pfa no.n NMIMOxJMExi ILL-17 M.NENEUNTE SETBACK w D)CMITRASTN CtlSR SEE DETPL SHEEP 7 4 ( RAESA.AM-1— m G n.NEW c a.s(NOT Msm) s 75' PE F BUFFER ( 11.-1 SON-sE SETA&sREE1 Lc.z �° ¢ MTMORNWaTMER I <.roxCAflE Cum ax0 btTrtR SEE OfTAx 9IRT r a= G�PRDPagS xEu EDCAncx A�aaxo a ic,pavEUExr uARNIxa-ME rcTUL slcET CO2 ¢ Q y W a A€ �( F 17.�SCUM-MI Ewmxc ESP a awxww PER LmAL EMES n 1 ®� UST--ENO,ass aG Do € a 7—, I 9.�rvCRE DMExD a E m D.M wD D x FENCE-(NOT DSER1 +I I I) 1 OEMVER 4US,Al � 1 x2i0.as-�a-f35i / I I I ITO SIGN LEGEND I F z 1 0 I I SEE p I 5 QI I a mll MIN.16'X16' LOADING AREA d , is°Rro � Z of I 1 I Irvv.:ssa.2s' � J CUM MIN.18,X18' ME ESTER AREA O J oIM R axcE wa s„RCP IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE i • I 1 1'x 0'El TRIANGLE EST - =n4an ss I—ACJ U IST VICE TRIANGLE ACRf((�I'_J'j —4-- fi- — wi �4saa sf AwE(5) — --_ —1 AR E) 100'1YPE�F BUFFER — t_ aqq ATIIS) 11R, OF • IN I RPT-SF AONE(s) 1'x70'SIGHT uMlrs of I I STANCE TRIANGLE PRELIMINARY DIs1BRBANCL I I DO NOT LINE TABLE USE FOR LNE LENGTH GEARING mR 1. x ." CONSTRUCTION :q SEP I I se.XD 7s'ar E 20'SETBACK __——_ ARE I Q/ u� s zsru'E _ I £ u n z39o'w L'——— I CURVE TABLE 2 CURVE I RADIUS T1ENG1H BEARING CHORD $ s 41Q35"W 191.71 s R7nNs3 w nz.m N I _may/ 3 � ae'v E axn o I 100'TYPE F BUFFER PLAN QE ZA TATUS LOT OPKnow what's below.Call before you dig. MLLL---- 20'SETBACK — scALE VEReDNEPW°a37s G GRAPHIC SCALE OB No.220117 O Pix 9Ta6 NO17SSES99 DaiE SEPT 30,2022 x 03 VERT w -SE NU SPEE,(dPeETJ C3.0 cee n..°m p,DDhwp.va popery vo'+p z9-ae-snoMal vriteeme mv.eemv pans anscvt'm aowmene whzu-si.aq 79 c M Proposed General RetailI- VII White Cross Rd " Orange County, NC a aE DEVELOPER Glandon Forest Equity,LLC 3825 Barrett Drive DEVELOPMENT DATA Suite 100 Raleigh,NC 27609 aGPmTMF.TPIaTGN KPINIE LU ;_ (919)459-2602 w DM M"'"" ""' (919) 459-2604 FAX C SNSTNI-IN, gbarnes@vanguardpg.com ¢_ LLI cc 2 0 SITE- rasa sr(,.a3 AG, 0 I UNITS, NI) .6INUNB U. pa-Tg asa 1 x�r�a.xE. VANGUARD V U MIT4005E PROPERTY GROUP �120=1. RARKING Isaanexrxs CIVIL ENGINEER PRELIMINARY Bowman North Carolina,Ltd. DO NOT Sheet Llst Table USE FOR 4006 Barrett Drive Tahle�s-1 CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE ITS TralHc Gene lion Vehicles NUMBER SHEET IIIIL aT"G) Suite 104 Land AN Peak Reur PM Psak Npur aT®RE�S wz mD LL�x° Use Land use Inleztslly - Raleigh,NC 27609 `°°° '" °°' n °"' - u°n sr v Acxgs) g Strip Retail Plaza(�40k SF) 11,000 SF Ik 13 41 42 - aa�T "'SF °"`�S' (919)553 6570 ,�SE reEal/re[ry S. �" n6Jss s a Ac_1 Capacity analyses was perfbneed using Synch.Version I I S°Bware.Table ES2 summarizes .11 �Aae]53 A-S) mlowtler@bowman.eom the operation ofth,curdy intersection,in do AM and PM peak hours. - EaaDIxGe&MAINAM Rla ys) FIRM#F-1445 TaCie ES-2 cez mco0s S.TE.DETA`S Levebf.5ervlce Summer Condition AN Peak Mour PM Peak 110- '� sTaflnwnlESN NANAGENUNI DETAI-5 __ S01. PLAN TATUS L0.5 D°la LOS IDI CURRENT PROPERTY NC54-WWI.C'o Road(Omi°elted VH-D(341) NB-D(31..2 EzlYing(2022)Tra� \YBL-B 10.6 WBL-A 8.2 oAIE °Escre °N OWNERS NB-E(371) NB-D(34.1) /// � MLL MLL Pn MLL Bactgrouhd 12a247 itaT7c ® oS.. °RAary cxxo WBL-B 10.7 W:-D(8.1 • 'CALL x Davis Vernon P FRI(2024 TraB)e NB E(9341 NB-E(4&3) WBL-B 10.9 WBL-A8 .4 STOP pe No.220111 2401 NC HWY 54 W White Crns,Ruad—site D,`eway(un,igIndind) DATE SEPT 30,2022 Chapel Hill,NC 27516 Bnll (2024)TYefft ER-A19..' EB—A o.3) Know what'ore .9 NBL-A 7. NBL-A 7.a Cal before udi. LEE] cee a..am P,axhwp.va popery vap tz9-a,-aw��ii erreem,mv.eemv pans wnsc�un aowmene w,-to-man., 80 ABBREVIATNNJS GENERAL NOTES CODA. LEGEND TAM RES. srAM P.n GENERAL NOTES K. r ME US Lou amlaaT ' HE EXISTING DESCRIPTION PROPOSED Umnm.IxNKLIGIDENG NG 1 EN of sxfno UP salxcoavECTLY any TIE vwui.mwr IN ME C RECIN 0 To MIKECMEE RA"NDOM IWRI COIE nfwu TOMME wunnGS C10 EPEGGGAY—ORDERANI 11 I TIMC wflul9roinuxsAnsr xMfmF 4 TO FAME PROPNtt LINE -� nT IN UNADE F.H.OFIxG w auOxG O'WEA OF ME IMPACTED MUtt Ai THE CaTAAUP FFUNA EXPENSE N m ME SAnSFA.CIION OF ME APPROPRIATE WtERNNG A¢NCv Np THE µD OUAuh OF -Aro wBSUU UP ME M.,HAILUTUDS.AID RnCE unOTERUM ORIMMALGIN AND�OGBCTAaM mGITION OF IBExWux AfD.Axr INACWAACfS°a ANYq x OF NO FWIECPXG ILL IXISRXOUx xCRN UNI pAMAax TO EUCIINGnaIITil6 91ALL BE gfP'I IN A NM¢Y FASHIO iME AND QUAG[W�uEO pN oTM NON LINE -- 2. All MATERIALS AND MO TIMANSIIP SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE FOP THE LATEST STANDARDS AND SPECINCAnONS FOR ME APPROPRIATE FICURAANNO- ITUNE OF ESSUBE�EN THE DRAMNGS ND SFECIFICATCNS MUST m BOUGHT TO ME OMNEHS ATTENRON IN(ROW TO CLARIFY ME'EDGE AN'-- CENLOigLINEgtt RIGHT OF MY —_—— w9 AL STAMamS NSnNrt IT MILE POW E ALL APPEARNED CONTRACTOR$HALL OITanADwAITTEnMnPvUS aEM(0)u4f AC UP OF PLAxInG AGfnCT FOR ANY vaAP"SI TIE F N m BE PaFaMm PMaA TO ME WMMNcaaT OF��NUM.NN ununFs wnla OCCuas as a gfSULT Fs mF PftaJFn —___—_— —_—_—_— x EUS LGAIMI i spats PBUSE DIS OOINNIS Vu A2 CaSMUCRa TMHINaCONnWW510 TH IXISIIXGRIGPARE HT-OD M_NM G ROOD PLAN — — — — N LEND ARE NECESSARY TO UNTAN,u ME pIPOEO�OSE.ALL APPUCABE CUTEST GGENSES,STANDAADS,SPECFCAnONS.PERUHS.SOIDS.ETC,.1. YR Ott=IT AM �Ntt CRT 'g Mal IN PUMC H—PROF-WAY AECUTAED Fa PLITES IXSTAIIAnON SHALL BE FERFURum IN STRICT ACCOIDANCE nsM AND/OR APPROPFIAGE AN RNING AGENCY STNDARDS Aro APEOSICAnaS. ON LNIiS OF DISTURBANCE nxxu w wartR MRxS ASSOOATpx CxFEWxPoLGEM SxwL APPLY LOxnxuOU'L, I NOi N uuITED ro H.THE APPRIR OVAL DF THESE PIL.R,Sxaa xOxOAMY RFUETf MERE WrvFTRACr01tOroWuµPLmG wM OMEROMPUUp£GTE LMa m5fA1E,Ax0 FEGAAL SNPlE/SNEN ROWJNE — — — xGTMU xOAxIxG x0IR5 Axp COST COMPLY mM OsnA REWunOxS. aEOwFEMENDS. D M -"-� MPIN1WN PLUG,FOR ANY ELEMENT Of THE NDWEED IUPRONUENLS HPIR 0 ITS gwslRLCna. Y PROBLEM WNFCFMING m l,E c„As TO ME 9JBSNRFACE IXYIDmOxs wD lxE FRL4llcE ff 9lesuRFACE FRIER a1 T,IE x®Fai VERfLDW RELIEF PAI THRUM PLAIN MINE NO HS' PENCE ONE Aantfs wBSUAFAOE NxrvAOE FACLl ___________ eu BEST uµa¢xsn1R uM MILES PFA xOUR YEA:YA Ut§L ------- EImBNT aP ILA OuauTrl IuiS B. EE CONMACNR SHALL REPUre Nr ExcavanONs pre PAtExENT FawREs crUxO By xIs/nfre COxsmucnOrv. n.THE cWMACNR Is RMPW4ELF FOR ARRANRxG ALL NELT.SSMY IGNECTONS --------------------- EDGE OF PAVEMENTrc x//A xNPu/rvalx uARRIaS an0 wtlNMAx9IlP 9GALL x¢1 ME rorowar DE9Gx AND COxSmuCnW sTAxDNroS OF TnE APPR[PRIAR GOVEg I,AGBGCr AD EIERG£xcv WHIa£ACCESS SHALL BE MunrulfD DURING ALL PHASES OF CAnSRNCnON. -- ----— VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER Mf STAFN MOUNTABI£CORE AND CUTTER BOTra OF waL x/F a9.ALL xN14Gm PtADIxG,sFFpxG.SUOOMG OR PANNG 4GNL BE CONE IN SUM A MANNER N PRECLUDE THE POnpNG OF FRIER. B. ROSECAMEREI. ANDMEM GREGIIA1URFIANII- .PC IGNEREIE SD— WMICAL OMW xM R A Nor m mu[ AD FGHTIREL --_--- ---— xORCE OF wr NEED TO Slur DOxry ANY P[aTla OF ME EUSnxG wArta CttrtM Ax0 Fa WffRVATxInS wSPECnOns�CTURTEL E ASPHALT SIDEWAM µTDT 40 TO ME ENANNEEN STAFF NFL BE RESSINGREP IN THE ME WnTRACirOR wECaMICroRCNOR MFAA111OnGN15TEND E0A EmROVF£S ORNOFT"SUGY OMEEAPERS[xs ESE ns. ,IaGWS ButPoGfEs�,FLLMN�LI HTws`A o�RaOENaCEi�NECmEssuEY FOR suE mA4ICWCONmR IX PEgFOFMING PORTIONS OF ME W]AN. 11 MANft COLORADO HANDICAP PARKINGE`ON KB BY ME APPaOFAIIrt COVEANNL AGENCY NIM AD VRABTO TRANSPORTATION M/x m THE 1591NCF OF wY CONSTRUCTION PNNIi FOR YDPot WIN ME AIaT-OF-WAY. AID 11 DISCOVERER AS A Rf9JLl OF TEST HOLE FlNGINcs,NNEY—.A NEPPffiGTAIRE INMERATELY.FOR ME NAAMS IF LEFT 1—.1.M REARNMING OF ANY ucnCN ON THE Fli01ECT.IF CaGRI SIGHT TRIANGLE ® MY W G. ai OxO SP ar OVEauD TDLPxaE ' COxsMUCTa.MF anMACTON SILL CWAOINArt xi ION-U'nOry ACnNTIFSAD IA Axr ARFECrtO Unutt CaPlrvr, S OAtt PRIW ro UP=mnaPORT SrC1FM SHUL mnFaM TO ME NOmSat Vi OaI CaSMUCnOx SINM B 2M OR PNtt,DAM SUBPAPT P,OR Wa) na MREP,E POPE) p PERIMETER a , GUITIONATTESPAUG OB ENGINEER INC wM ME PAtfNai sGn(s) ,„Lcxxss of9cry mParT ME mn,RAD,Dft MUST xlrE cows OF SaME a ME 9rt AT ALL HussEGIFNG COD D I.wIE k g e ® ® ¢BALTO ' sgwcE M.ONES ANp REre" Aro AND R uxEs wD DNMI O M ME NGNDre Fa PR.CAIO C —ON,ERR R.D.J°TUT SURFACEBE wADBLER ro A MlxluuH pEPM a ARM A TACK cNT APaIm rNla m FINAL PANNc, A g Q Epp VEHICLES PER DAY p TO PPSnOE A xaoSOx*AL 5q Am W.PAHumT OPENER ro TRAFFIC snau aE¢GVE A TACK FORT NIOA m PLACEMENT CF ANr OKALnxG A9'nuT[OurtSE '^ w Y EST PIT Gp a WRB rc u-auaT OocuMaTs `n 8 w MONITORING FELL UI Ix ' MPLL BE C.APFRGPAMM WNRNING AGENCY. FAY—BE BEDNEATEO NUM TNP IRTYP STUGINc BY Ta wxTRAcrat,SAFETY FNax ALL SOFMUNS N BE A NICK CONCRETE UNLESS OMFRwsE SHOMPH ON NE PLAN. —350——— NAJOR CAx10UR 35000NMELP ALL DNOTna—BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COUPUNCE wM ME APPROPRIATE ORWRNNG AGENCY. -----3ED----- MINOR CONTOUR ,I E CavANRE ' EFFECT A SMWM IS STA"'T CUREST UNDER NGF FASPHAL NG APAT NT OR SHALL BECRETS PW AP qWx^TxGOEEHIG VERN NO AGFNCYxr µAA."S.CUT IN A xaxxN m 51 ALL APNCABLE FImLON AND SEDIMENT CWTAUL MEASURES SILL BE InST ULDE PAIN TO COMMENCING DNOUDN. OR CAURT GRADE BREAK — — t5.POEM M MAL RECORDED PUT FOR ACNU ml,TRACT,PARCEL,ND EASEMaT mGPWS AMI DBaARNS. ME 0.0 THEY CAN BE PufID z MDR x. DODGECONTRUNCE URCUUMTa 9a1 V(INIX THECF HENS wM ME GHR II,PRIa ro_STIWCTN. Z lT ON �52 ii �5236 F� SPOT El£VAnCN �52 �523fi cr BEEM rxap proH.P.UP I— IAPUH Uj ' uATmlus AxD wadMIxSHW SHALL MEET ME RO. DESGNMIT AND mx IUCHa CHANDums OF HIE ARPRtvRurt DOvaxGNO AIDGCAl v. MI KCAL LFLEI i0 E 11 CABLE I 0 DIMa Ax x 9m(9m ME ERa9oxTH pcarvMa RPuxl.Me mmqumx uNIS Aro"NONAL OF unutt TIM W=l ArvD TRAnEFNUERS mM unutt muPUGIES ArvD vnM DEv¢ O W RIP RN F pwc H.P.a ufRTGcn RVERSE aRME HE xEasNr PralaxFuuMEJ m cpuNIY TO ETEx PoxsTRucna AND 4GALL caN wM ALL LWAL.HATE AxC R sxADL rouREma4ME oa ADasMMNM AND/GR REFOxsmucnpx�apML unoittvcoro�R(.wxaE FRAMES AND roNns,vuxE J O Lam) waxr of ftaaF(flan RAM FEDaU REWunas xax muas Erc)TD uATON THE ONwm aADM OF ME NEAs EFFECTED Br ME 111MALrnox_ o ® NSA ER NE ER o w® CONCRETE PI a 4 ftA aT,AN NCNDm IN IN ME BY W GF ME WDRK BIGN IN aEa DBf DF WAMR B A WBT P NTAn f sHwL NOT Bf PAD WT a ME PRDND P N,.wM REN4DN,.M BE NPT a-,IM AT ALL RMM TG ME ART a La Po LnW.AT LE ONE(„ a D . TO NA1N VALVE D . ® E NORUaxx 19. ANT SA ra OR SOL ACCIMUunONTS BE1MG ME PROPERTY LINE DUE m GRADNG OR EROAN GHALL BE REP.RM NMmuTELT ST ME FOOT �ftwPS Exu E w A ITUG Xq CUN BNC M ME MOST W RREM WInON a ME APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AGE41 STANDARDS, Z NICER REDUCER ANTS INO NgRNT ADA RmUIRNENTSE w O JO J J L+ NITER FIIRNCS — J J + 1 PM.11 COISTRATCYPON DBMS UP IUD TRACKING 11 ME WOOD MORIEU-NAT"'0"AMNENT fAMISILWfS CAUSED BY Mf OEVELCPIExT IrvD TER WwM1 FAaunM MUST 0 EACH FAU BY I I TRAC ITASL EM,TINE MD a5 � Q SHALL PAWEILT BNRICADf ME 41E UNTIL CLLN UP UP REPAIR IS UBV& Q U NNE HIDRANi Y ITS tt FAauDM STALL BE NNm mER m ME T.A 2 SANITARY LINE s RGUILY m GRADE ITRET FORM,IIIIIF-war TEMPLATES,AND Lens ACcaOING m ARIED CONPLETRY CLEM AND FROE FROM ANT axsTRUCna PRATED A.TINT OR DENS. W ¢ PICTURS DoCOM NO uSE SHALL BE A MAXIUUM » SANI. U.NWT SANITARY NUMMULD » DFABnxGAGST Ra OrtcTwx aRia 22 ISTREET CONTWI05 SHOMNPATrvxroPOaD STREET LOCADCNS REPRESENT NNISxm—HEVARON TO TOP OF ANHAT AT fITERIa aM NDERS'-'SHALL xxtf A uanxuu SLOPE OF NSUMA. WxoZ uGo TCIG`%"Eu."aEwYANap m Z m RAN x Row elc1TT OF war COMPACTED MOM—TO TIE APPgWPoATE SONEGING AtrNcr REcuunas AND ME AELOMMENGITIOry m _ ® _ O w CF MF CEOrtaNICIL ENGINEER OwGN BTRUCIIa.NO IENPawY CONXmnaS N CORE NrilAw15 MAY m MADE WMOUT ME EXFFfSS NMWI2ANa OF ME MUtt Q. EEG 11 g ICI S STORM SEWER ANC g 0 0 wrtTML 21 TCHEANCE FOUM GRADING.TDRRANCE SHALL N a/-0.1 FEET. W G, s u sE'wt EARED BIDsECn Dx ® EGL ar DUE uxE ACTOR'S a SPM—To THE SIRE ALL APPROPRITE PERM M FN STERN NITER DwHAAGES ASSWAMID mM H ¢ 1 TO Nl ® mgSTORM SEVER xEApWALL 0RKAGON a 40x/CCxMb.DEMCFS ANDHART BEEN UEA05W�'M_L DEENLECE OF BIDDAB DS I PROPECWG OUT ME RCWSTIUCnaMlwnlExw M�Pfw UP, Z U a a ovFNHEAn unutt a =� MOD E17ANCE PGOTmTEcnw xmOMADY xas eEEN caONSU ME Man xAx EN n x UxL AN GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES UNONCRDIND FIECTRIC 2. GFROTER-TIN J wv OVERHEAD ELECTRIC —a. ENT 5 CU/FTECMICUA PET /Ruu9rvG/SMNCTugIL Fury AnD CamlxArt SATE win ERE 9Tf PLANEGA /PAILA TO mGlamG mrvGIAUCna A nMRx MNxm. E AwRaRUM cOVSNIxc Nacv As A RNTLT OF ME casmucnOx PROJECT.suD RNavAL MALL R coxOucTmcc URLITY POLE % WERAnONS p STREET FONT At xTIE COURSECONSTRUCTURN. ORIECTALL CEASE YARN IN RNmu Z LLUTATIS iRONCNIFRING THE STOPox SFNFR SYSRM OURIN6 PLL GONE ELD TOW AL NATURE IS ENFOaTFAfD,ME CaMACTOR Sx Lu OTIFN Po aPAR IN STALL ro HDD RMPaGSIBLE FOR W .,� REPLACED �T ORMuGxaE 2B MAT ARM MD 4MEGATE LY NOTFY ME GAMPER,NPROFMATEaGOVERNIxG AGENCY,AND/OR THE ARaITECTOPPEN. OF Nv ADVEFff wPACM TO NeACaT wATFRwAvs,KY STREET ETMC 9AESULnxG FROM vnH aNE AS A PRAT OF MIC PROTECT. CD r . TELECCN YRNCf . rATG IF 1111MULa KNER ARTS FINAL GRADE Is MARGIN a ANY Poana OF ME 41 NOT OMERMSE —� �— —� �— ENDL CORE sramry 5/x x AGw[xT 2x OR�PRESERVE MECEANOERCENUND UnUnES'I'F OUAINC�xCONSMUCRON GPWATDNS ME CONTRACTOR SHWN aCOUNRfl UIPMESxOTHERFMN PFRMNNRv STABu2m. m w/TAr; o NITUML.1 SfRVICf a NODFY ME ENGINEER INC TUGS x[aS'AND PROPER-PC TO 11—ME OR1ED PM THIS ME SHALL ro PRCPE- aNROwNTAL GIAMY cpawpa F.wWr ANp usURE ME CONNNpwwx a I.M. COVERED m",LWs HE ME MATERIAL HUMID TNAxsvDRT ON PMFUI PoasDF-MY PRELIMINARY TREE O E r s NE rwD sr BaINs T�EW SE VREEI STEEL STAKES,OR STEEL ONCE POSTS TO STANE 001 STRII OR IM BIB;OR TO SUPPROT 9LT FENCE USED AS AN zs.ALL STEPS wM THREE oR Mars RISERS aau HAVE NAND Rxu,PER Law GmE_ ERO4ON cpxTRa uFwWRM Is xpr AamTABLE of oaA NPreDED w.WER wAgrvlxc CAPS N RmAR a FENCE Posh usEn RIM DO NOT USE FOR ALL BE MAINTAIxm MGM ME mGMPoTx ND/a PRaD.xD ma a CONSTRUCTION �..... TREE uxE xmx wopRGH NTUALM FMrnxG PAVEMENT Am„o/ox I%As DCTArtD G nm TIERI woI ws ro moNOE Paslnrc Bganam a uF-Ix-Pane. B gfcasmun I IF STNANIIIES ARE"ALL BE RmuIHEp. FOB mMx Too EERY of A DRanaa war,ADDmaIL smufnT amgas wen As rtuPcftlAr Dmfs a 9Lr PENCE AN MEnRNDs EMrnxG PAVEMENT To WTUx rDalRm DfPm.SHALL ei nssuum BY THE caxMura. TED WM PANuar wERur,are ME MILEIxc vB I TO DURATION FULIGAMAN TO, "ME TO' TGP M FEE ICATED PUBLIC K CHAD.BE ACTIN OF s rcrc TM TOP Of OR TA WIYER 31 N xR CH UTY PERMMIrsnu ABaTINEDDIFF RmUIREM cLfAR ArvC unNWMmRm. AD A E„cfs WLL BE REMOVED PHPMWP.asLGD&I sMAw BI I PUB cGLLAPsm a TaN mT fExcfs HIGHmLL m IMMEDIATELY AND BE NOT a R[i AN MBHTING WAR HEREON IS AS SPEAMED BY THE CLIENT AT Is INCLUDED FOR INFORMATION PURP0.Y5 COLT.AS DIREUTER BY ME GMNER WHEAIRCD. nPAR IL 3a NDD///OR PUBLIC AGNCY RESU RNMENTS.ENNAN CONSULTING GAWP.M.HAS XOi PNNNFD THF UNNNG DGERGE AND MNRORE DOES NOT a LEAN G UR CE FNT TA a DEuvER C TES 5 aWR PRmEx ER CaT ENT M.ME aScxAmE OF Ta caT G w ANT ND IS NOT R FOR THE DEGREE AND/OR AOEWALY a IUUMINAnOx a MS PAOELT ISLEV TONNE BTORI SE¢a MTEM I PRMIBIrtDxU` IN A n AINM a M ANN VA CHARD ML UP MUGO "ATE wLn F Busnxc Ix A.ccDADANa MIM ME APR RESIURID OPRIATE GDMAxwc aENl"MGNR Mwii E RGPERTT BWNDANY MN(m(BAYS PRIOR TB ANY x 3 waa STATES a PAp Pa BALE T WNW PULL NOT Row BErAEEN.ARaxC OR UNmR PALES.RUES ro N ANLHogm wM 2 x Gv c+.M Vuu um a Cu wPvtt SMUCNRFS IF tGl'EO CANNS wpNANi NNAE F EAGMS utt ON.ON STRICTURES.GRASNNG TO BE ENmxDED 25 EGRMD PROPOSED G DTEMPROMPY SEDIMENT ME ENNLv DG EVN AREAS ION CONTRUL MEASURES NE TO BE RNOMED.ANY III AND SEME T DEPOSITS SHALL BF RNOHD w4DE .H;0 PLAN STATUS GRADENPREU RELIC uxF L PAAwnG�A¢ OR TINE ADpaOVU v ftlMI5 PLAD DOM NOT mxsnNMUME AmRovADa NRaOTER K FOP LF wui)IEWBf A YPARITE BamlxG pERMT '2 USE MANAGEMENT aACna3(BURP)OETxlS SHOEN a PME PLANS ARE CaaPNU ONLY.ADJUST As NEOEAART TO FIT FIELD CaCITWu NNUM I VAN USED STURING GO CTION TO kL ,p AN PUN`HAND RIL ,N U 39.Au xeNOICAPPm SPAas SnuL nAK N AIWVE aKK DExnmGnW SIGH MEETING APPRGPRIAm GOVEgnIxG IaTGCr srwBAR05. OPNAnONS usNAEGUIREO.ME 5 DIEITT Pao OR OTHER UAI4RGVID MWENSxSnnLLxBE USER TO DETax TULFw C'Ur BT M SE NO HT xuOwATmALL IxSTuuTIOx OF Mf PIPE.MEAWOwIYRXAL BE PAMNmxImORDN¢ ixM APPROPRIATImNAxSTNDAADC. x "'I'LA&G MU EAMIW N SEDNEI PROBLEM TO MEMp THEATE GXII IGENCr PRIMro MESH LLvnna ExnFlCInOx w/u a ERG wM G5 EA IS NA09a WxlRtt uFASURM TO N mOROINAIfD RIM CaSMutna MAxALa. SfALE V •- LEGEND NOTES M„M Ana oB DATE SEPT3 ,. PRE SOME AMNENATIONS MAY APPEN Ox THIS SHEET ANY wV MOM vUVE GB.No4a No smwfnT WxMa snaLL BE INSTALLED IN AWagCNa mM IEWunas a ME ADpRwNATE cOwa+wc AwGcr. PATE EPT 30,2022 NOT BE USED M ME PROJECT.Nm RR UPI'D Ed 2 ADDITONAL LEGENDS AND NOTES MAT BE FOUND ON OPEN SHEETS ASSOCIATED wM MIS PLAN. USmx nn ft THESE LEGENDS Aro NOES NE M BE REFERENCED IN ADDITION TO MIS STANDND SHEET. tee me Ham wx —,—P P B-P,-1},AFOB ag—,Noce—UP,e—ERG-xzB-Rlsey 81 INv.:50.iOB' ®N ONlRlDL- MC 54 HWY A, DEMOLITION LEGEND m (Ex 1zD' Em BSTNC TO REMMN R/VD E1D EYOSTNB TO BE DEMBUSHFD/REMOVm ETA E]xS,NB TO BE ABANDC4ED IN RACE E1RL E%IBTNB TO BE RELCCAIEp BIDS MONUMENT FLLODEV Eq-NO TREE TO BE RE.-D L1(TIE) tR4 47 54I4 �w•�r� LINOS 6 DSNRBANCE ASPHALT/GMC IEL NETE/BAA TO BE pE PDv ■ DENcu NOsnm/REM— N F ® 1 11 D RCUTHE/E STRUCTURE U O _ ro sE oDABus1m/RENowD EVISTING CURB AND BUTTER TO BE REMOVED ,FF NO AUTBOTC, TBE NOT PnrneALU mcATED THE UNPEBc«AND UTLTI ETD I EXISTING UTTTY TO BE REMOLD DIUIm sf BVFrER / CE1 rTIE wRaCATFR rat nns I / PIPE CwT[xARx xolF. o @@ D LINE TABLE wE srAPT Br All ARo Au coxnRMcnw. ar PRE I.--Paoli TO A LOT w a € LINE LENGTH BEARING g a g n x e'o'w u Rmwxm ar xmm PRIR TD START OF mxsmucU. CURVE STABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGM BEARING CHDRD ALL BE SVB>LO_C B].nY 29'V f 6iB].N ND LAND wFI PaaA BY.NEwRMB EAND EAN/IND R..NO iEAIR6 Q Cx DO PRDPRED PAPCEL ZZQ 15'RLP DEvcuacN xI., J INV.:554.18' d Q ]109MBA-RATENEnOtfuBe�R 1 ax EIRL 1 BEMOUT[N. R SXALL FIRD HR6Y ANB LOCATE Au EpBnnO UnunFS R 9rt PRIR r0 2OI].RAPS SUBED1 ro F&A Z = 2 ACRNn6 AS NOTED AND§1owN IN MESE O 2 PLANS AxD AS SE4EL'Im Bx T1E OMNFR o 15'RCP 3 TRACCDRS RESPCN��U�DTO RT�PR All�PERITS AND x FEES J 2 INV:555.1F, REWIRE)FOR BEMOLR AnD 111 M IA Es Au 0 A REWAED RE.TO IN,¢Mua1L..I of-NUFFpl.Ao]I1IIs IPPrcPRAIE PfAu6 AS w J VICINITYMAP Q SHALL COBRDNATE wrx THE INNER AND APPROPRIATE OTUTY mMPANr PRIOR TO tNAx U 6 uwEOL�N ONNAND CONBITCNIxL ONrS,ARB,NABB,4DEwurcSNIE�EL eC LErERs,f ON4 ETC.AN SFURs,wuLS,FBUNDA 1,caN.11 NA',DEBRIS AND RuxBISB RENG11 R21ovu FROR TBE—AREA Ix A11 APPROVED 3 uxR L K e ANDW RLDEB- A.GPS 6ECTML. AnL ANr� 9 ANT FELLEN TUARN 11 FALT ITITED AND FOR PRELIMINARY s vERncu LOCAnINS of ununES PRIOR To CONREAUND-N MCPRlniaulnm,�Banxsnxv DO NOT p TO m Rmovm,cuF DR Pmcrm. BIDDING Ta DETERMINE THE ExrtNo of sElma aPxc USE FOR o OB� a� a x.IxF mxm Ili CONSTRUCTION 10 FIRE unurr NCR,u1.w nw IF 1—EAU UTunfs AND FULi ES—me APPPRrexurz sBE B Blm'BY w 1]2s1 = r ENT ORNTRO.DEMCLs AND Tax PROTECTION PR¢R To RE. & ND 1 PLACE. ACION 1REEPRSIaE FOR IRE PROIECDON R ALL.UDLINES TOREMAN IN ALI Tl— LINES OF JUNTS VTICH WILL PERNIT A NEAT SURFACE WHER RESTORED. TERENCE OF NT DID�x-RR ;4 REsmRED TO NIs B UNu NFULN A,TMfPRRE D soIE . Br TIE NTRAcroR�mr. ® 'I—BE QDA !E-R STATUS mTx DNLYDCCATION R aPR EATAS aFBRARxBPRNCE H�Box RBNDm. B BNB LLR-EPPO"I - c NaRIfp,=`I' DIIrEBDBNSDIRE Know what's below. "N.9T4B-BB-SBBB xBB4I w ePR«aDINGFBRIHERwTIAUNI1NUSAREA Call before you dig. MLLxo1 muxD OR DIE,STALL BE RERDAT BY A ULENsm xuRDws uATRIu mxlwcraR. scALF 1RE ID—OIL GRAPHIC SCALE DO No.220117 I'S(IF u r SELLER EENDUDU o7 AND NE ORE Fuc�cTTOO IAI N�APPg-SUR Inc—caw Li uIxBTYx DATE SEPT 30,2022 RERNOLNOI ENTS REFUND aETNu AND ES'79 20 FIRE r RSTATE SHALL FROPERLY ANTI EIRLI DmasEN OF ILLS BEMeuncx DEBRIS OFF OF f d wee2 7 FILL DDUR-,B-5ID INEOBE. ,IMn-BD K C2.0 Bee n..am P,DOhwp.va popery gwp xn-ae-aapsal erreeme mv.eemv pans ansNn'm aowmene wl-2u-wO.a.e 82 S,j _u' �� —� soe'���Ixv_ � LINE TABLE its / ® S+e LINE LENGTH BEARING Ra pr(msci Pfmn uNBm as cntfBEf mTERucy(au wpsr°R mrur[D ,( x a5�u'E t1 ONLY BE IM.DUE ON"[xr(<-.Avis rw"AS SAN 'R vfox�n r nE NG 54 NW,W Dz4Y s DIYa4'E ONRNG msPEcn 1 E PUN uusr BF.11 Gx-S,,P—A-N A"IIITSGEUwv,W G END, IaE ED CE (BX Im,I..R N DID,No I CONTAIN NEED RALSOE RNER1.DTIR BEFORE ANY LAND OSNNEANCE OCCURS to CURVE TABLE fi HATE BEEN RmBUEO ANO THAT THOR CURVE RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD AEw1AE0 TO a BImuYEO an-sTE ARE AVAIEm LIMITS Ci 4tP]5'w 9E.NY EEnxc AT 1FAST as III eEFOtE 11 Af.'1uu siAm \ SILT DE GG ,z]Y RED'P[ R Dx51RGCnCN._ACT xCOm xSPfV M ALL MLIRfs AT LUST] 1 OMITS OF xw"PRIG TO Dlccwc aR As PUT AT I PRE-cwI_ MRnUF xc. \ BE Ll(,IS) RCP 1 HT ADJUST M IDRN B \ ERR R[M_OPmALUM,LIL fBON GCNh¢MEASURf9 sH AT NL BE IxIT STALIEO PRIOR i0 RNOSD unON AN0 1 (— AS NECESS,F i0 M ED FOV \ 1 _ PoSITVOR GCE 1N Es O SILT FEN \ T PDtEcnON CLAA ,Etc, ING ONLY R xm¢sAnY mR NNE IDUUATIN DF THESE 111D HIS OU Sh CONTRACTOR PEACE IN¢UOE A RNN GVCE ANO LOG eBGN CONTAINING THE INSPECTION RECOA05 FOR THE \ >5'CYPE F a'AFFR G 1 Np Ew INER IPE 1 FRGSIOH cWlAa unm CRiN lFMvoRIPr DIgV4CNs PAICR ro aFgINMc unss WADIxc OF lHE I N a RA PRIDE L S \ / FABP W FBI SINE ONCE NIS AGE SEEDMACT ITT DEMBU a DmNI 111ATO NO T°AN 111-D wNDnLLL ON BE,m FAGutr II CORNING IT TO BE / ATS I / / EROSION CONTROL LEGEND p --� ps ummro � 11 \ ACCORDING T� ETAR SxFfT FOR tlw REWIREIGNfi m r¢ e @€\ I nuETRAME REpu1REMwrs /I lAMID CNAf"E T"WEET e[[MOumHI IT ro[AWF TO END CAN Asraaa µIRI`TO D�Ea ITT SKIMMER BA I\ I 1 0 O GE CONSTRUCTION ONCE tI[AISA 15 UP to RAD�sstAewu XNH'MM PAt[YmT OR GEaTAUTUM MNmuntY e m o �_ \ �E RT¢�D I SPI T TOPPARNINGAREASADAIDENT11 THE PRAN INOPOSED Bu1ED1na FOREGE -°DA�Bxxpa+ \ Is N210.5]]SF]5 A FFE( ) OEVYI E ' PRDrErn°rvISSIHOU MFa pROTIRM1ECipN ARY NET uEASINEs IxsTAu BUT rtxa AxvuxD uY ooNm/sAcxc.wu As 4NDvm TOE a \ Et 140E x I 1 I1BM REARY Ll, CHECK DAM STALL COUT DUC UM AND WNPxLWEUY MNITAIx AD EROSION CONTROL BEIGES AND $ I 1 I I L se ®HNa au s1RUCA Po w 1 FILTER BAD ® RUMP ESTA1AISHEO. EADS CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE NUNTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT MESETAnM Is I ® RIP R INUEN aI¢ - 4T uEAsuEs BEAU BE.1 ENm As SVEUEN IN THE cOxsNDcn�N D`CN-ON AS PUN Esc J 55 Q BBEEN OB GB¢N IU IL REW WIMPED ESNGUNAG�1-GRIND RSTAANI-TON THE LCAmAGION ADGMMMNG PC NE ONAA z IP AT 2C CH ENTR RCE i0 I I ^yl N2 sXA u1a 4hTAs AREAS ANE BRIGHT UP m HNlsxm DUDE Z O 5I yP 4(IMM A4N i ,RI I I E, NNV:SS AI RCP BMP LEGEND N GWPLE"S OF ME ms AUATOx AND.l roPROGENABLEVA CF BIDED A¢ERGBON EIRG Q Q d MAN ROW FARROW TN�mMo4ox caxma�x> 1 R�Tn�u�vu I wDs1WC1UONF£.OOA A¢ESBB ON s AW 011141E IN J F 2CY CIA B RIP- P AT I WN¢¢NNgqUCNON ANCE °F IDAINNI 0 2 iD l I ENTRANCE ❑ CWA CONCRETE WASHWi AREA O y1 pl MMER B N I I I 15'RCP SSA STAISIO]ED STAGNG AREA IAIN APPECIAL OF IGDEO,THE SINA IN IHALL BE BE GLh E CON.RO INTO THE R FUR NE x Z J NV:5562G' O P PRT RPRY PI I --(� ?mot TOP INLET Pfl01ECTI0N G,.,-.E-..AANNARR MANAGEMENT WDT�IN-B[YPuuamNlxTO AN BAwDVED HLiwlxc DEIO PRIOR V � SI 555 A NG�I OB[HAAR TO RRINN6 WnET. Z SIT FENCE NPDRARY EARN.o]A1DL AGEOUR O Q 2 -cAPILE US SAIL BE REMDVED LAIS.1¢SIGN NANND NCWiiURS-D OF AGRTICUIS N Alf siATEk �w MGSV 6 B E O R ONGfRUGTE 1Iry ACCO,IANCE W CONCRETE I vre uwlclE mAa1Ne coxma LU 18.MENDBE P IS COMPLETE BE PEIaIT,EES SLAEL COMTAa DEM N ro CLOSE IT BE Ease PLAN. Y5 WASH AREA RAI G ICE m� L00 ONIIs OF pSNRBANLE E PEFNITIEE O 1H PROdCi¢OY OUT,wA INRECn REP FERNITIEE ONI15 pTCH/D ORAND �R iD10CAn I k PL I OX IEMPOtARY,LOPE GRAIN RNERu PERMIT SLIDE-! BE iON0 SURBp IT UTL.1IROXI i NOA TOP Thrum.1(rXOla1A M W ANNUAL SEA DISTURBANCE AS NECESSAR TO MAINTAIN TSD L ux x o-x Iw n POSITIVE C IMAGE TO SNMM BASIN I S,B ® SOB SEDIMENT BASN DRON CHANNEL Ux1D o E� sM SEEDNG AND MULCHING °(10) H 4uPg8 PRELIMINARY NED DO NOT pIEERSIo ITn BE I I� E oo p1vERslax PIKE piO1 n T s. TM N USE FOR SAC SEA.EDED MTH DAYS lam\ pIWPPDRANI AcCONGING TO STABO `3 ® as RGCK Spa a CONSTRUCTION T EFRAME REOUIREMEN I tFF BA R TM SAN I c g mN�AAY t, NET Brow]' N 3 D: w W STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME SITE AREA TIMETRAME �,�/ I F wF 4s STABILIZATION AP�DVED B'M1x FREBBAm ' DESCRRIIPT ON EXCEPTIONS x wpnnEt uNlxc 4 ITG,DAIRY eatw k ZaYGRaRrIINI BLT fEXCf 41AONLL R As LOT \\I I 's 2MTAISSAw DAYS EPRI UA o EAPc an I SG t TEMPORARY OIVER510N DITCH DATA BLOCK BEF ED AS PIA.9i4ED-]9-CAN ° Nrotl SAYS IF STRALES ANY 11 UP LESS 7 DAYSTO DEt Tw PLAIN STATUS U 4E� E°swl2vPw Q.tFEPPLA3la � � CNN�µ�Gm�� STOP DEsc Ory PIN 9TN8-A-9899 IGIRR NOTE pw ZOKS RPn MLL Know what's below. RAIN cxAD Call before you dig. SCALE AN AT 1.El VTA�V.DAUTAITIZ OR WAh- OB No.220117 RE. GRAPHIC SCALE ELAIDGES PUTW L AG;CRD NG TO THE IN LOwnc CHANT.BE PNANhOP ply DATE SEPT 30,2022 BEEN.A—S ON1. Se I_PC 33D OF MPs111UCNOOSS SGFFR PDT R�STIUX ABOUT PAC S FOR FIX.9,48-49-�,8 ,N E'&NT J C2.1 Gee n..am P,1--.aa popery qo p CC9-N TApsal xgleuGS mvN++m9 Mons ansxn'm Nownxne wN-zu-fsa.e 83 us ul �CC SAC�C��Ixv.: oe LINE TABLE Sy j s'S'6 UNE LENGTH BEARING I I" wO y. qa R"'I SlIN OmEata uABEf SOIRACETANSEr(COLI ILITA.A CfiTNIEO �u EH.µSffCNM Ai a gneROVE0 CC01.R i xE NC.54 11,W LB 22.4Y s IS—E DANI UFac INSPEcnpxs F Auw III IF HEAD W-ITF,PNRUNA N A AEaIISGENmv,W 1 aWss'IAE —I ODTI£T TEN.lm'Pum1D R " CURVE STABLEN x WNTACD NmED Rona REMIND OF NICE LEEWE Axr LAND DSTUNIANCE WG CURVE RAMS LENGTH BEARING CHORD REWIRED ro a DISPUTED W-srt AAE IrIlIE. S HAD[RFBN 1m 1 AND THAT THOA to LIMITS Emxc AT FAIT ae xWRs eEFDRE DHE Af.'mu sDAm \ (f WIST2BCIIW..DWTACiN slLl FENCE mm xSFEC1CA�M MLIRfG AT LMS<] 1 UMITS OF xWRs ARIOt TD Clccwc HER As DIHECDO AT NE ARE-cwN_ Mmnxc. \ Bs 014ER90N plC i0 BE LI(IT) it RCP \ 11F.I.E.WIIHINH GAYS V.:Sd].4] \ AGARDING TO ZATON TRm RmOvu OAmAnI S O30N CWIN ME INfs SHALL BE IxITALIES PRIOR DO¢NCUPCN AN"O REQUIREMENTS FOV\ \ \ _ -RAP RW TO YI CHENCDIAADLILTLETASH AD, I ITS Es IN 0 IS SIILi FEN \ pD1FIT.,DID,CIF/alxc.1.Ls xm¢vnr mR THE IIaDAUAnox OF P¢E uuvIFI O DIN Ci 9( ER I SIA 101t MALL Ix0-UOE n PAIN DUCE ADD LW BOar CONTAINING 71E IxSID 1lOn RECORDS FBI FIE 75'B1PE INSIDER —— — OSED UILfT NNma G j —_ ERowsMry eWAslma a DE gAgr Opafs- w M u A Ix a I _ sm cnRE I Arnxa Ix TEMPOR.wr DIuw9Ws PRIw ro Ef9INNc MAss w"Dlxo GF TxE TEMONII PD DIrEASIDX i = S ALL I.DunDN CEBN'I,x,NN AN A�P�ADNED TH ON A"_EACLNr NED SEES AR Si LOCAPDX ''j As x pas s<IN�Nxmx A TRE m l 1. EROSION CONTRETFORP ND DANNINc TO71 (I I ETNL 91FEi RP Wx WAEWIAWEn6E.N.NxDNNNUsroAMwAIERRUNV A�AmmTMEBA9p.ADJUBICE S Ero \ I ( I EEER ro sm PAAx°6 er 11 µ Dw wn gAxoTxTMfA c.w of B a plj nNCI1- 8 i g SKINIER BA —I I I 1 D GE WCEDHD TIEEA-Is UProN�CxAOESSDAe I.—I'MMITE.TV'.T,DWTMECCCAnWTIMumu-1,� 9]!&Aa-Y A ( ) PD1Emp1Ix�a pRCRCnON "ARM TDI i uusCxEs IxsTAu sHT rtxa AxvuxD ur D TxE c AREA As glDvm i0 ER�OxxCW q a m N210.5]]SF]S p�yT E -UIm/III R� D_CTER S i 240I x RI-RAP AOX RE IEMPOgngr�T, CN-DAM LL NBCENRT AND, NICIAT uaxiAlx Au ERCSIOx CW iqa DEWCfG ADD Ti _ TO DETAIL S EETCn O se ®fENCE OUBEE SmUCNRES ART o I TOx R N IREMENTS I ®ELTER BAO ® POMP fW5 CW iAa uGSUPES MUST BE uunTAINED III PERINDENT SECEIATW IS ASILT(410E 5 I •\ ESTABLISHED T STOR A —® PIP RM A➢AAONw 9XMum CExCE 'SPIN SALPIDAN EADIS AID ITHI I NOARS BF FARE III EIEIT OF GREATER THAN I 0 p REFE —Z°.oTEOnL.N7 PDETAIL ON HEET C6.0 '' 5 1 1SLRES SH-EE MAIxiuNED AS SPECNm IN DHE CWBIWCnW OEDA DS W THIS PLAN J FOR CO YLPONDDITCH R U EN19 IALI A, SONTA. NNERE.1-1 IS ' - pnEfR OR UPW Z OBOUN ON IEL AS IEMP Ou>Kx i I _ U ' PETS%RAPWEASNSHNL N�ncRWDR STTAABUZATW ACVI ONES CONTRACTOR-WINDING N THE 6NAA Q �N E W FI S s BE CH EN R RAP is NV R� Z ¢ AREA yo I 9cIMM 4N I 'I I I BMP IEGEND iz.snawa sTE As.wEAs erx evDualT uA ro nmsxm aIADE Wms n O RSrvBER fR I � A ROW A.R. CWI En ANN OISPoSEPAa Ix AN ADD ACUSNABIE MAxIEANCOFAtRI ALL ACIIW SX U 'N O OIINIF wlH C DRUCPO nlEDm ON CW1Ra NID C> IORS10LR11OVAL P IXOSIDNCC.I.u INNIIA O F I'llN REp EMEN15 I NQiNUCTON ANCE CWA WNCRETE ANSHWi AREA a ([ ¢ NPUNCE :� O I I I R P O SSA STABW}ED STAEMXG AREA I LIE E EN ANDAO INTO HE N Z Z Y INLET INV.:556.26' PfquexfIT 6TERINI MAIUGEUEnTEFN AID EACwtt-wfT OERxiION PONDALT O J 11,EER 56 ` ) I O INLET PRO1FCnON OISWAA2 TO NICE E NNDNN WT£T. APR IIAR HF POuxm IxI AN A PI11D NLPRwc CEUCE PNDA V EE MRCNgS O SILT FENcf ISAU NI—'ER..WNma uEAWR Q R E RA10 CI DETAIL ON Ya4 C6C FOR O O SIOLY(PI£ ' sxALL eE AmOVEOPWiND NlO¢SGN NPN ISORDINIE NDNCWDNIFUDUAS¢ROF AGRC x.C.EAOSOn 0 U SURED ULNNIL AD STATEN R INELIENTS VTC VEHICLE TRACKING COXTRa snxOADs. LLI II WCSH AfTE O LINIDs HE pSNRBANCE I % CW PERIDIEE aWI�RC E T CLOSE OR VA N9'ECn�WmT L E EERNITRE PAO CIS THE ys k pl 6 GE II HORSESHOE INLET LOD CENERu POINT OFF�rn✓eF DOCCEEBOITNnL.1'.O NAs PEEn A IMNAWPON(INE0,A THE W ANNUAL OISNR15 C N211NX TECT W TSD TEMPORARY SLOPE BRAIN L u L BNA IPROTE (TYP) ® SB SE£NNGTANMULCHID MT,;X LBANN¢uNID S6'o pIID) A=,, f� O Tx NET N. PRELIMINARY vial IT r R' DO NOT L_ __a x--____———— ssr € DD DIRSRBSR DIKE I.r USE FOR s66 I I ® Rs R.A soot TW R Tn NOT N. CONSTRUCTION w ID T cis o.stt l.a Da Br 2:I �s I t $ DIEA�ww s BrvBSrw nz. I TreEFDT a '� STABILIZATION TIMEERAME a SITE AREA S STABILIZATION I RAIE Lxo9W ,p, H 6'MIx FHEEeao�ulmG ¢ ' DESCRIPTION EACEP110NS rMioim ervgpvfD PRIIFRAD NINEITEMPoRARY Zt7YCwaR 1 P SLT FENCE ILW'pRrtSY EWALW AAS FM INES \\ III swNES gmxS'Aw Ax E T TEMPORARY GIVER CO101,HDR 1G I 1bII.BLOCK 0 EDPG a i �- q� TO OEiuL DETAIL NO"Plx.P]4B-]91, 1 I e protl FtlrT L/'II PLAN STATUS 5l¢!Yw _ SHOR A B AREIAOD� • __ON ® TB EFL�„ \ FSE AD STOP ��D N DAs D;,�;PGTM Knowwhatsbelow. DATEPIN9 pw ZOKS MLL Call before you dig. DEs SCALE IF ANCLE I MI ON ANNUE AsaA1EDIE GRAPHIC SCALE ae No.22011Z LOT I roW L AG;CRD NG TO THE FO LOwN DATE SEAT 30,2f11 ANY E111-1 LEFT 11 E1. PA_IN IN IF CNORISS NHF ILIONT T AE S PIX.P7IPL-W1a \ L�Ixx PVT)n C22 tee n..am P,OOhwp.va popery qwp 2n-ae-aapsAl xriteeme mvNeemv pans ansun'm aowmene whzu-fsa.e 84 6E Wm M TRE DE ELOPMREr W n5 N E ,N1 UP mf—SE—FOR LGN a Mf�� D REM MmDL MAn� DIMENrk ANE M WNmENEb 6.� Doro�flax g sroNGnW maW P�Mr D ro one 5 bmll ee ele�mle AND P�ANMT EELONG,MaD�FGA PRDNDING WMD D aDFnT RE NITR��ADAD,TD�DF MAPa HILL W pop,°ror oGDe,.e WhA THf EW mf EfM EPMm, roR G,GRM wAmR DI M R�F GM RGE AND 6M LL RE6Ta"DO"ITORES GEX 1KRIM M rr =x� Na E. Mx�� aLMx cl. �m....a wal ENE B�N NEED= s m _;� mIWI.rR�W D LNLmA NE�DAAIX AIP-Aro ■Y �s��Tm�A�AI>a",�"� E ��I�aD���f o�;s� a E�W ,RD�s X� °"`II A�:N.F�A.REALLRAG°1"1°° AVRGNSADDOTHEREMS101EMTR MA coma e.m LNSF...WGYw��•a a Pil.NI., 6. � SENIOR BASIN...EASED ON I OAK M GINN, STORM SEWER M1EN C�N N011 BE NSTALLFD.INMENATELr AFTER AN NET IS INSI.4IEEX INLEiAK 5¢Dm,EMLMED ArvD ANexOMDNxm ANo RNxm uPM1111 A' FLY eaxOmON,SURVEY.Z fnrnxe IIxEC TOAND ROD n[In"2[EETANER E 1.aRx e,a9IRD Gx n N,Fms .N.111 trio Ge INS,.be EDT t.me o MLA SUN.—Cmtal uxr WATER�ISNN,MAY"�vR BEER BALD CN¢THE 9 5 Bp UCNLL U*xP OffGR1SE�INE Slrt PI➢EYLL xA n r ^ 9 Insr^wnW a MEAsuEii 91E.INSIALLAIiW K CURB.WO W,R MLL mEXUBE PEAFNE ONME0.BASE STONE 1 TEN BE PLACED WnmACTGR. MN(.)..e me NDWI pelmn reyu'rz Ed me ANl.Wlx9 eo<.mmt.tfm be Mt m file SEE- ALL s AND E D.STANIUunRE. xmE m[WTRAGrdt Rm BE QX'I,EUN A SEE THE LANDSCAPE PUN FOR LCCAnaNs M PROP�D PJNnHc m ony opp.ree eerotim.LOO(ffMWE T DIVERSION DIMIES ANO BERMS 6NALL NE NuxTANm AS THE AGE Is G-11 ro NeeCCC,m.`rt M nnfwWM EROSION CMTAM YEAWH,,O ff INATu m Pm.R'TO ME BEGINNING Of OfMMTM k TREE REUMAL MfxTJ 1OANUP, ISTEREMANE. .ring be prim— A.p. N SED MEETADD 0" """rs M"Oi TMM.rEX. Pp.�. BEGG RE 1. AEG OR FEE M THE SEEcm v nME BETx[ix Ixlnu vMI D gsuRBANCE ANo FlxA1 tEc[TnnOx sTANuunRE WxsmucnM. 0 ME CFAOING AND ORAMAGE RAN rote O'ER NOTES ,0 FEWIro RAT PEA,REB "o%avETEcie Awuna Axora��iehx o�DMauulffTno 9rz Dmn.Lg sFMENP� ON REGARDwc GRADwc AcnunEs. GREGF.LTN, N.- NOUN sENIPERMIT PER PRO xs�x TURNAFFIGNEEN- sPFcroR TEAT THE OEv-snF AAus ARF Eu ,o PREVENT POLLurnxr-LroEN sralawATER RuxaFE FRa aGMrS wro AnaACEN PRaERnEs lABILLS PRISON STRIKE IMII m R DETUIED Dfsox mFORMAnax M vmuANMT PLANATE AvwRTENANCEs sxoxry M mIs RELES DEruuxc TEE DxuuMTAnRE M THEff Ixslwcncxs TOM ENTCT OCTWER I.xlc.LOXED WNwEo urvDER AcnLE AVPLIUAEY RIE NWFc cERMITE MEERES T. ANDD_G _I.. ONERAMANAUE FRAN O US PONT ME—ALEGAILAN ASIATTEN, m AGUM NT,FOR ILLDsmARVE REP I, TE ON a RE,GAHCE.mfuxc,TEES Als EDDIED - 1 l AIn Aro PAT Em Aa IHIPfcnaxs annRCAnoN-1-Nr,ITS. IS THAT MAr REGwBEo. BE AREA ACRESI mTANUMEn.mf FOreu ax BE AxFsfo AT. RETR mcm xman o i enxifxasa SOL TEE- APRIMO savor LOAN.AND WNCAREE ENE SANDY DAu "WOR THE 1 M TERE smlmANCE ER IT HI nr�DUIRED BIFFEA 111M U�RE NOTED aR 11 111 T-U.—IN CANNOT MILES THE FaM6,PLEng arvu uM sTANDARE5 SYSTEM_ ET.TRANNTRE.RTnxG.ErG THAT unv Bf 12rouFAD FOA A LLUPIErt AND wMpxG I TANTS.INauoMG WT NOT IMITED TO DUST comma,UE-NTEPoNG, (MASN 11 cR"W a a�1(�(nox-sAILM..iTB-Tn-OW D))(uo"WoaEsuvi ma-55i 55e) GE.AM AND'PECIEgnMS CE mFWNCDEO EAO,IMmAND FY01EEN,WNIRSE ANDEGGE ANDTMOA CIIGN MFANS AND MEMWS SMN wAsrt OISroSAL AND nA]NAlOU,unrfPoALS. nLIE.0]e-996- A ¢ m (ASUEIX 1RE - ). COGATRICE01 ALL ASWCIATED ME E PROECT AS ffT FORTH IN THEE FVNS CARWxA EROSM AND SEGMENT CMma.REaLATOXS wAOAxcF TRTx APwcANE nMmETNTTEEHI AN WILY SET OF DRANNES TO— xEER ua LECATIN Fox 1 aTAPoxc AN.cxuNlwc CAN eEax MLr uTEx Aa DoxNsmEAN uEAsulEs NAVE BEEN IxsrANm. TEFL PRomcnM NOTES. e y w a I msMARa LLlulx"nM scow IA CII IEroI"IN RE 11 WATER cErvERu PERMS. TONAL PamrAnr av THf PROTECT Mm A MPr M TRf TAANsxITrAL OTTER ro TRE ovNFN. I u xEassARr mRausxouT ALL Px"sEs M WrvsmucnM.I SIR TO GRAOF.IMnF�xr YNm wnslEs 1 TEDREOE A- CU Tc a ISNALEDsoNrANADDROONN6 z ERA 5. IF BEETARTURES FACENI THE SHECIFICARDES RE DEARNIS AGE DENIED N—BY THE Ik GINERT SEEN IARRG RUNOFF GET THE FACE T TIE SELIENIT GANDI RUPPON LUNG D-101 uFNT CMmOL MEASURES ME To BE PLACED END To CLEARING Aro/ore I.w6 M THf cMTRAcr OOtxufrvON sxul Bf uAEE unmoor TD SAVE uL mxm ExlNxc TELLS AND SURuaR xxwE PO�Ba. AMI SLOPEI REN E1 DOE NOT TEND 111) GN RE UGY 111 SITE AT ATI GGED sled ME smIEExT caXTRaL RAN AND MENIT RGI BE MMNTAINm 11 THE MR IONTRASTUR PE MMITI aF II ENTI E 1PREMIS1 NATE AearoMI snsro I etwANTEEAREA G rows,AEAY ma SOUS M THE OIVFF,ION DIPIA- ro P' GE off PLrwmD mxus wNEx TEFL FIT AGE 2&NT TD va elM�n alE A ATUN O ON sRD-1. 7. THE CWTAAGIOA SHALL DIUGENTLr AND WNEENUOUAr MARTIN All EAMION CMTRM DEMLES ANO RE4pVED FROM THE PRgEtT ATE W A DAILY OASIS M N Aa xN1 AOgnMAL CAPAaT TRAIROIIClION IINI TRENAL E BIMPAIM11 TEED mmwmn caima IxZnoR m TEAT FTav TEAT SHALL FC NN,CAN aE a� R n TH` I ETEAGAnays of mF PRmosm SEDAN sExn+mrtuS 6.REFER TO THE GRATIN6 ADD ED AGE FOR FINAL SEE°No PArEMEn,wAOEs exo UNLET OR ENTALLER DEFOR IT RNu Ixsrccnox. ""`DEawnorl,mwlxc DR cwsmurnW REaxs,AND xoi REuovED RICENED UNDITU ED M"uinwG aulmaTuusT a[oeiuxmTF mM nIEF�FTECT[o E� I ERUMON AND SELIMENT CWTRY.gUMNGS DURING WNSIRUCPW roEBATONS. TEE APPre0VE0 I suPttRnfxi xIM I-4 1IIP Of xULM.AE-SEED vnnl GAass MTx Ix OIS11NBm/GRAEm AREAS. T OR AND 70 DID IN,GENERAL WNTRACTOA SGUALE cLNRT wm AIL,TAIL AND LOCAL OREDIANDA TXAT APPLY. eLEE AND Is xoT To BE REMoum uxnL AEra MxsmucnM.CLEARING,GRANNG OR WNSIRU— W OFT-9m MADIXG.R TO ENWIrt AOgnONAL EROSION COxI WL NFASUAFS AAE INSTALLED PRIOR i0 I ALL Eo Pux PRORRtt uMlTi A,71 LL RE calSloER TxE 1.1T Duns. OTNFRMSF NO., F 6, TEFL PROTECTION RNCf IS ro BE LOCATED I FO]i PER nl¢OIAMf,fA NOT AwAT fRCM ME IRfE O a Z OA TO CMMFXCIXG LAND N,WRUNG ACnnnE,Ix ApEAS OTHER 'Ax I"TED M PRESS Z RANI(IAUUJUING WT NOT LIMITED TO IT ATE R;M RE WASTE ARFIS STAGING OR STORAGE uu,T ff In,rALLED AID MAIMAMm,0 AETun SEOIu[N, ol f"AS).TO THE E'ON E'101 CroA SHUL PAfPWAAE AxO,uBMIT A WPPIfuFN,ANr EAO,IOn WxnnlL PLAN MmIN INS BWNwRI6 OF mF 91E J Q ES AT NO ALTDR SvuL PA aAc,at AND/OR U NAa PRDNDE THE MANEn AND,HE MaNEER A WPT IF,lE AMMaD PERMIT. DIKI BT,XL PRDELT MaNLER:�`DmAA�c"NIgRA�roo u xsPfDEcr�oA5H0WN F x ANDiD1 M. wAEA��'cRNN MD—N AND,TANUZAnM z o ,D EBTAN EN Dfn,f MI Gf OAR,,. D.RXnIaER,RE-EEaD AND MULIFIG A,NEa�Rr ETED AREAS IHAUJUL BEslur Bf AEDDIAED,�PER LOCAL D I AL LA O Z G�REµpo�A z "ANCE MEN TIE moo AF HAL miENT CONTROL—UW T`a"v" uG ANo TEAS, IHE,ALIEo fir THE SOGGGA are AT WxsmurnM A RE CGEss POINTS PPoDre To LAND wsRUM1RDa+GE ISTARS"ENT Is REGGRED PGOR TO ERNEST ccuPlEnRE ARD ACOEPTANGE. 11 ALL SNM RI EA PDT PUTS PRIM ro AcavrAxcf cwssm TD CREma ENDNDX IN AcaM<UANCE SELL x TRAfFl41H"Sn�RW2�EiPfIDm'AInWiIn bMSU,TREE 9S WNSIINCnM LIMITS SNALL NOT BE ERaEa➢MTHWTTHE MPAOVN.OF NGDE W. W O IxSPEC1 U Al MDEDARPEY RE ANG THE CLEANING DEM,,smNEN BA'EARRRImS AND OU' uEASMEs IT S SHALL BESMADE FUNCIIONALLBEFME m-BTAG LWE LAIDsaSNTmANa—1 PLACE.RNNG AGnvtt ANo l PRELIMINARY 6.cWREIED m SGM GG AenwTs AND WRING NTR DEVUOPMFNT'E',FIX."ANU.T.IS DO NOT USE FOR 11.EGSRIDE ro DIIATER NI SWANrE ro RRAIA W,IEr ro PwPm Irvro AN AamOMm aTERlxc DEMCE CONSTRUCTION —N STATUS E�aNw BATE MLL MLL ILL BESIf]J BRANN BHNB SCALE BB No.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 FUE C2.3 Ge.n..am P,OOhwp.wa popery vap,z9-a9-eRwmlll wgleeM19 mp.mw9 pans ansAwt'm aowmene wh,u-tsa.9 85 2 ...... --- -------- ....... I P-- ev.--an 0 we zv— k w Lu F- 0 Lu =Wr CL Lu z 0 Lu NGG01 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING mm NGG01 SELF4NSPECTION,REOORDKEEPING AND REPORTING cn oc/mns 0 < cr) IS (D PRELIMINARY DO NOT zr USE FOR CONSTRUCTION Aw. I siiwi � —TUSI.IUT�GAG INLETPIITEITION nE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS RECP)To SCALE � W N..220111 — SEPT 30,2022 N. 86 IcarvcreEn:Maxalxlc wreB/sDEwuK-xE N:iNL sIECi u.2 VICINITY MAP c x SEE X IE PSREET I DE9)x AS PERND OSORD01 I RE -9PECIFl ."'US - 111 MS.E111901 SPEET 1 :RP1MEN1MDENAN AS PER ® o SFAIIDAAD Duiv P wsENi clrllcu REPORT SPEaFlCAnCNS- PANEMENI NC 54 Hwy w A nnxol®nsa G s Ws[r ocruasnrcr ce z 7— w' k -_------ ft..,zD•PIreNC xAyry S. GDRETE U RT POFE BASES .2 T UMIT5 OF U Aax-SE DETAT.111�x fa slDE 1DISTURBANCE RUR_NCGS MNJUMENT'LLOYDS' BDUMPSIER`_TDETAIL SHEF )ETURIBANCE 6 LI(RE) \ 9. e'-p WIG OMOSn wIER TTGP.PIXNN N PAVEMFNi-LXOi DYD), BBE O MDxMMaT 6xk roam 6EPAR„E REa.n Ov\ .MDE PARXING SWPE Pryx,L9 "S"m l NI'MIP-N.„.MM GLGPE I 12(a330,PER ADA « FN x'RETAIL xA R G E A9,"GGN� L9xEEro-7 __ 1-M-1 AREA 6 u•ORE,r aurEX — — %' I 14 roxCRETE cuRR AND airtx SEE BETAI SPEED II �PRmagD xEu LacAncx STROO VATIIR � Is.vvEUExr uAA xrs^I SEE rcTu slwET c6.z a.z(xGT usm) A N SEE E a A�PaxD �( I 17. CCUG-MI EwsnxG EaP a AwRww PER LmnL CODES k A m 1 ®� G NPUTSER,POP,-1112 7-, I A, NoE.11NE NANG WG I o i I ) I fl.M-N xREEx FREE-(NOT T-) i s'w-L-2 OELNERT Al n210.5]IIF.551 I , I 1 x I s I_ r Tr Ric GenarM�un Vwhlclew SIGN LEGEND z I D I I ) Lantl AN Peak M Peak Hour Gn C I C de Vnd use Iskensity In Zrout In Oet e z JO 0 ( 822 Slnp Relal Plane(<4pk SF) 11,000 SF IB 13 41 A_' Z Q Cdpaclly mwlyss wcrt Pcrfamal usm8 Syncbm Vcrsion 11 sMOa-urc.Tablc ES2 swvewis.s CL J F yll MIN.16'X16' b R I I I I c nc,opmtion ofLhc Rudy inlxeaaiors in drc AM end PM peak hours. W Z LOADING AREALEE MIN.18'%18• , I Irv'.�SSa.26' Table PS-2 tN DUMP IN AREA ___ I I I- LavaoLseMO.Summa J ell 2*1 5 ��6AT I\ I I I J olsnR aNCE Con0ltlon A OSeaDksMaour PNOPeak�our wuPE)AT AN APPRDUD MAI.O NSPosu ulA O I I 5"RCP NC 54-W\Be Cross RDaO(Uerlplsll'20) 2 I +a 10x 0•D(,:{$75.28' Exbtu�(2022)TmBic NB-D(342) NB-D(31.6) U I _ DIST VICE TRIANGLE WBL-B f 727) -D4 WB 82 Backgmwd(2024)TreFlc NB-E(372) NB -A(91) - WBL-B 10. WBL-A 3 I — — --- I Buildaet(M )Traffic NS-E(U.4) NS-E(48.3) Imo`— '-}-_- _ WBL-B 10.9 WBL-A BA w _ white Clan Rwd-SI DrMxq(UoclgeaBaed) Build—,(2024)Tm6Ec EB-A(9b) EB-A(10.3) 1'x70'SIGHT NBL- A 7.5 NBL-A 17.61 STANCE TRIANGLE PRELIMINARY I'll OF DO NOT DIENRBAWE g I USE FOR � IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY TABLE CONSTRUCTION SEP I I ' BI.N. - ss(A.e TALI ON_ am xof AREA zu sElena ARE I I L——————————————�I I I € PAtfY uPExNDus Ax a,SZI s ACNg ACRE(57 1).93%Gr NEA ACRE(EJ I/ $ faE�EH/DFF11 SPACE ACRE(S) I OF AREA s 67nNs3 w In.m I —ray 3 � el rmE I 011 SF AREA () rwlaR ACRr{s PLAN IIILOT STATUS LINE�TABLE 6 A ® - - Gsw LINE LENGTH BEARING L S STOP_ J 690 I Know what's below. D" RPnD �z5ao. Call before you dig. M MLLMLL DESIGN DRANK CXKD u61 CURVE TABLE SCALE x: CUflVE RADIUS LENGIH BEARING CHORD y' VERNON P DAa O ——— ———— r pax•w n' GRAPHIC SCALE OB No.220117 SIR 9TaE-J9-9B99 E Ix3Y a2x6'V[ A9xi1 DATE SEPT 30,2022 N 89Y12N w xTI.z6 (Ix sees 7 11 RE C3.0 Gee n..am P,axhwp.va popery vo'+p a-ae-avaMl vriteeme mv.eemv pans wnscvun aowmene whzu-si.aq 87 DNDN NX NALL EM A.ALL N .Rro K D� ON IN G Hi aE'aI:aNNT;:for"'amFi°�IL":N"omE�oAam rNAva:,A DPMTwEr'i F A next D mAx�DrnnN Mcgop OF TRMSPoRTATN.REFER TO TIE MANUAL M UNIFpM ERMUO CQNTAOL oust N Mll XO T LEASr Ya nWRS PAICB r0 COnsTlu[TN. OBI DETAILS OF AND BBEEIAGES 7,LATEST EomN.FORNxNFNN,IRax wxs AT PreDINT�r� EMTox a mE nmoT rnrouas AID sPECIFlCD INDICT)Axo wm NE gIEET TO BE GRn'Mo0lx4 DYAGENT aLL nuE. m I Pu_A MINIMUM D DALE Tz-mor IME NAU BE MNxruNEO Ai ED 'I GI REARGI NEURCULASULD AR GLEN AG—I. a. CODgxAIE Au TcuMRS IAEo smEEr D 5 ADES In IxrFRSEcnO 'A,IM xSPEcroA F E. AGN DID RIVERS,RRIGATUM SISTERS. LE RAY DUE AG FLEGUBLE AND BE PRCRERLY BARRICAL)BE STM I . TURI _ ECURIENT IN ORDER rO PRwn MY PA G LNUESS FA¢OF r,srRucNA T ,MG I UNGGN,AXE EYEADRED TO 1KSF BANS ON CONTRACTIOR MFO.pBD vTE SIDE 7. G�RMM rW UDnLmTE AND OXwTEER ENSINB ULTINIEF1T1I1OUTRA UXITss ACEN Ix NAr.wEA Is EANXE Eau A E TER'P N UE'HAFT OF�'ALS Axo a WTmxw 1 EB SN[RLoII a D1A TYRfuNE 11.1 XOAT.RS AN OPEN TRAVEL O ILL BE ONE III ANSmUCDN OF mE IN FIRE FIRE DSITE FOR AETERENCE DURING TOn 4EASURO FRCM TIE BEGINNING OF TIRE MERGE TAPE PfOC1HENEND OF NE LANE 0.WJRE [ENT TO AN DENED FR N INS "IT VHAG AAICU Of I-C.INICNI AND YEED AN s wxE CAom XlsreaEWIXEO,U SAME CE AT XC[u[NSE m THI CRUDE. 11 WALK N1IUCNA ENE WM FOA INSmuCTN FRIOR r0 EDFfDIxG THE W—UM EIFlEAENCE IN ELEYAIIN BETRED OPEN LANES D TRAFFlC SHALL BEY. F$ N.GUAI IT U IF 11ARCED NO GREATER THAN.11"' ON ' FFANPIS N ENIBTNG FFANAES AS NECESSARY. 5 E[u PRDP�D N RADII.AND SHALL BE Yi]OE TO NN D M DE IRA�SroC ro aTlfAr ro'N m y w u m IN PATERET N STANDARD SPECIFIfAnDUS WIDE NEW PAVEMENT AIRS EXISTING EN gOPUgHD s STAIIDALms AND'CEGIFlCATNs CA a RFACE AEcaSTRICTI UFFLUNISH ANY ——ARErD BERYll RESIDED rD Nmor MUN RDABwA. SLECONTRAcrD20 D SAPPLIES Arlin aAnDNlaAL COST TO THE EEOwD A mIERAN AND 1�Ns*NSHIP S ALL CONFORM TO TIE Nmor RDADWAY ST.woARDE AND IMNI RIS U'RABLE AND NIORN RUNT oms,R IsRPI .Aua,vR�CETegT1°�Dxcorvs AND OIME9MS AID iNNAci BFULDI of In ENTRANCE USCATIDN. TACIND.PAVEMENT MMKINGS,AND SNAGS NALL CONFORM To THE ° E111 OR AS mxERusE SPICI D.x EED SUEu mane D,ARE o __ NRAFRC REXTAO SGN UES"ALL ARE IGNS 'L ME'MANUAL ON NI I CONSTRUG. REN LVMIYm LaunDOOFaxs AT mE wxmSURLDING ANDAcrDs rnws BY A RasIEXEO ux0 sumEwX PDsrs AND IN AGDDmMCE Mm STATE AND LDUL XEuunoxs ? LOCAL 1A. ALL PARKING AREAS,NonY oRNEN D ANY 11,ABA nMD. AT Au ONLE Ala MJILIRrvG LOCATBxs AS REHIRED. urvACLEPTARE AREAS. Fr a W U t DEMOUT011 GIUTEINOMD OCNSIRUCnN ADC M nWN1RONCIp OR D SHALL X I PLANS fD ENACT PUILIANG T MNSUI rnE ARCNIRCNRu AND STRUCTURAL O F FOROF ECE TO M[BAN D OIAB OR DOE Of PANro Z 2 unMEs wmx NE PROJECT SALE. UNLESS OrnERMBE Norm. W Z I. NINN ATWwS NOTTY GANEA/U,M cEEAE 11 CUTTER.sNET PART DID CUTS DR"Ay D ANY INAPIDiABTE AAEIS AP RAC ETC,CONSTRICTED OU@OE 7XE PROPERTY LINE IN J 11 BX¢pc WOERORO NO UNNTLITm SALID'TTDu�RAAD7ALL TOCo S CST LD SPEMCATOxS AND SUIT CZ B7S Ew T ALL MUNICIPAL ANO/fR SNOTS J YENEAL FWD TO GUMPIETN D CCNSTRIcnDI. OR I 'FORR"TORED TO ON D BETTER,AND Q TO THE SA YEFACTOI OF mE CITY D STATE wIHORITY. 2 U STRIPING LEGENG SURFACTICE SICULD BE CLEAN.DRY AND FOO FOUR HANDICAP STRIPING-PAscwG LOT -FF-I ASKING FRUIT PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION FFTM STATUS gEPaNw DA -R 1EN MLL MLL MLL DESIED DRAwry CHND SCALE JOB No.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 IN C3.1 eee n..am p,NOhwp.va ww+y WaP Yn-ae-eXwDNI Nrrneeme mv.eeme pans anscn'm aowmene whYu-sT.aq 88 `� D 551 BIB 952 t—— Nv:54106' C ;P Spg '�I RETm lO mE SIZE PUN mR RLLATED NOTES. 1. A ulnlxuu GAA1C OF O.m R 91AL m MAW,uxm W Au PPfS Vx1E55 OIMRWSE x01E0. �W S(x 9q ALL CLURCURF AND SPoI FLEVA,IOns RENECI FINISHED CRAIW.S L PIPE Lmcros A.ITT" IN=C ON mE PUNS ARE APPRavMArz ONLY uz "sa.1az _ — — A .AND ms Nu9I DE I".BY TE Lm w AmomANce WT mE FLLLLWNG S,AN-. IBE NC 54 HI p'�a ^w NC HIGH „ o,TE a I'DNF AND CUNBTNUCnON DOmA.P AND SEAL w N fore WF W CnON µour DDIN m oTER A FALL'ml wIA MINN.TAT FEES BC. EFFLUENT FROM DEWATIRINI ITERATONS III BE TPERED EN 1, AN TTI 4 MAIL REPA R AL DAMAGE TD EIALL-BE INU UNLINES IN TAT OCCVR AND DURING(ONSTRUCNLN. ISROYCEING El BE PROPERLr mMPAG,ED IN RIMER IS LIMITS 6. mf mx1RACTOR SxAL BIEND xFw FAR,xMRu 9IOO,rEY 10 TRAM Y' BACu 10 fxlSnxG CRATE \ Y 31 A[OMPusxm IX ACCamANCE Wm nE[Aural AND SmIYmT \ DO ASm UPOM TE APPR.I.INATE III Nll 11 OF, V2%1L11E Benin RECVunOMS EIHALL m COMPUEI.11 \ uNl�rs"oE f a YLPE Duls LR LTm NNARMC Yn11 IN. I fGUAnoIrs \ DISN L1(IE) 18"RCP ASII MOM'CS FRAMEp FRATESS,,-91 ,EST \ �51111AND R 11 LOTSOF Cl REFERE CE mE FCLLO G III i 0 m OET LS 1RINSPCNTAnON SIAnOMD CRAWNGs. \ mBBAY OR AmRECALE BAY cmNY EIEMAnONS TO BE"LLD IN LIMNER mIs CONIRACI. N WN AN A AI Ow �N=ATOP BASH B D.DA URAME.IRA>6,AND PULP Tx CA LP AC U NEw PA M NT AREA6 D x w DR p nNG DRRNAGz IxLETB oR 6HEET ON RR=D BACE IT ANT G%DIENF. THE UNITS OF AS TO A III „ O a Dac wTU E Aro W mm mLS D U NP w�a mm A`„IEc P Is s fl �,Bo-PRE ART MAN ITro ENDw ::I u-IF_ore Ru smUcBUR' BER. BEST OF ER — I 6 C5'T1PE f BbRF —— (SIPS-"HI) I smuwT Aucxumm AND Evsx cw0m uaxc A PPE usm OR PR x0 n 5fl9(� —— ——f15.3R S=5$15.5 YOUm¢IWWIas I ON DENUDED AREAS AND ESPECIALLY WHEN TE COMSIINCnON 6 STO Y PIPE MALLMBE AS FOLLOW UNLESS OTERWY NOIEU 55&)5(1S) 55).9(C) . \ COl109 55&25(TP) 55).4(1J \ / - l / ILAC N1IPISf TOMEDEASEAR°E BeEU"sfio[o WT TP lxx UD n GP COMPLEPEN OF mE A MR.cuss III Pm As,M c-]6.I TH MIKE FusnC anuFN GAINIII AT.glxs. xv N5e \ I - - ssEs ) 11 fxlsnxs sBAnfz eCNImR6 ununfs AND omm fNsnns 1TArules FRau Na0 Rux sumlr. _ mx°�eEER(IORjORA"xuu'�N'EnroRWEl Aax PLL ON UP'T TIE P SHAI PLLEFT As s„.a I THE wE TIM Axv DEvuTERINc rvECEssNr TO w,Au a wArtIN PF IFA ON 71Eiml�s w uunoxcCIPERMcc°YPE Dann AND FITINIC p r� \ 1 559.0(15) - I I FETr04HAx FmmLLSNELTx4 pCKNI. E KTC FDA.SHAUL BE—Iu reaxfCArEL ca1mETE nPE a 8 z 55x.915 _ SCE,- \ ssazsIX(m) I - I x Cmcx mDxEER Ac®,s xL reE�CxsRluTr mre TE'o s`C«isi Ta°Ns,Au NNL nfus. '"E DNass DTERvnsE NL,m. AM Rm.uRm As NLLDm.AM msnNG PIPE T III 974S \ u6.(T) (*i) I I E„IT LOCM9.ALL RAMPS.mILD.IMEN,IINS AND T BDmING DnD EN R CE BE CLL Nm a T TU RS L E SET AND UE�=D Gm D R G ONG W CnON,S BE,E \ I (w I`x_naTj x4a N sn. SSAY (cT) \ .-ONE eA HAMS FLR muT Laa,LN,ELEM na,AN µl/ IWPIAY TE misnNc=,RDG,NNE As NE.IIE �R 5 I TEE ILD TERIALS BMALL ED"OWP NENENT''AAM ITUTl STRUC IRES,,OPORL, 1 TO RETURN rt TO EASING CINDI ICIS OR BE TTER 50.2(1P) I s5 z0Y BFEOW THE s,Ruc,uRE. MO4m FROM WININ THE BEARING ALE STORM PIP ENTERING SIRUCNRES III BE GRa1TED TO ASSURE mxNECNCN AT SHRUCNRE RR fl9ns) a.sn P) LD Dm ALL eNDURREL REPRNSN". PH PRECIT smDCT RES 11IS DSm AT CENTRACTERS CTnw. s (>P) BACNDILLC AND CCMPACTD AF REQUIRED BY IT LLDTECNNIC,L PFPRrsENr.nME. R ' _ IN FRINED DLL IF NPAMEC AREAF SUALL Y 6 Aanl PINK ORNM u9 m ALL CUT OR Fu YORE=SHALL BE S,1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTERWSE NOTED OR DEPICTED. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED ELLMAnUN%1L IS P RE A LxIMA E Ca A�F AI DA AF z D E°PmMN F�C,ORM.ATER OGCPARGE mIA.Wm CONGmODIEW ACnHnm. NEa RY IT-ADIII' TUNED IN TE SERA ssa s(cR) s59.IX>s) sse ss15jmj sse.zs() I I I ANL/LR ar RISING PAIMENT AS NETFEARl ro AcwRE A Sum,P 14,RW ECISTOxs As Nmm ME Ta TE DEFIER FLOM LINE. d z DT ANL CCNnNDOVs R m. I'xv ssasL°a ARfws FIAT 111E PC ITI DRAINACE All FIRM BamwcF PIN ALL NATURAL AND PAYC LINE TABLE CP3 "•' LINE 1 LENGTH BEARING ¢ U nil yN ssfila(m \ _ µJ FFs'Ss H I ALL mN,NAGTIN FPAI APPIY FTABIII.ON FM ,C ALL SLCPm IAMN .uH.,v UP I,mPIN TOPsaL 6a](iP• ) I FIRS-55°( C) I/ SAME TON STALL COMPI W AIAH m ALL PPCBE CO.IRNWG CODES AND m Ca1SITIC ED TO 5fi4Y E Q F sze(c j ' Ya ce ALL u°' p q'a s I I I 5sa5 �15"RCP +a r SSflB S) 556.(m 5 10.EER'HOPE .55fi.10' � (WATER- Hr) I I CURVE TABLE zsfiL w � ys SOM.x 55&IX I CBlYo1 - _ CURVE RADIUS LENCIH BEARING CHGRD z S 550.](1P 55&xiP M 5sB41 - fi'GRASS I• 01' 0 I 556.1 ) SUCULDER � v BBPa.aY N]BY Q R m',reE FBUF a9(IF) '-- r VICINITY MAP CD 6sfl4(cT) HINT S HOPE BINS, (WATER GHl) CE1 BMIX TR N-55R N . 555 I5513 I(WATER LIMITS ME— 'tl5q�(999 (WA I'CLHITJ AIS III RCP DISNRRANC RIPE INI£r a0.59R INSO SE PRELIMINARY _—————- I IF, �PMHm N�mnm.a.m N.a<Hwus m DO NOT L— ------ ,,, ® g o USEFOR I9 Wrs a W W--.e IF 1 wE CONSTRUCTION Tm'Br w nz91' I I "' a W ff 2R,sa.MM.RAIL .,WFPLAY 'I xi s I _ TdMY aI"x,I WEP o°A MN.FAma. - EFES IN AL BETA I SrtE INECUIL'I FULLY \�) I ,a rom m rrpmACTrn NANAt£NIT PEAMIT IEWRES TEIN PIPFEIRON.TO DDWWpeN v.e-B¢EEE TT I � I°iiR wrA�:«°mMF,`T saIEM rax•��m NCI STATUS IS N;DP1 WEDS caxsmucnsx cERnxunox re.erg mI�N. ® Lxxc FOR SUBLITAL TO mroED PRRIOR FO NE CERPROME OF Wz"Nx.Hmxm • mEa swimW IN' mxsmucnoN aF WROM AID TL PIePARE A LEGEND' AN FOx CmTa NLas mAre 11 I I�IESCOnsmOCnON cmI'T TE ———— EALL mNTACNXG IGnOx Br a Pia bbA Cra6e n1s Gu A 0Y xmEOID FwILR,L B,AR,DF mNBmDCnax. - - STOP , m NO= B I' LOCK I.ODR Nin.gape BATE R o -BOIANNORTCARamALro Know whaPs below. °ESL °" m..........I,�PZINE LAND1RMEY-m"11NEWCOMBIII Call before you dig. MLL MLLRPWMLL TOP OFI DNO ESIGN DRANK CHND II.........—AI^ALL ONRTx[PNLPLsm PARCEL EW/AND GR MEMNL YANRES � x a9nxe W I mlwMrRB01WPN.COM ipeferetof_L"Plan) SCALE � _ATE ALL n.n ANNN.NOIE. GRAPHIC SCALE NEB NO.220117 cn1 ED, DGN'NSPDUT DETAILZI OR DATE SEPT 30,III _.....YARD IXI£T FE xO,I.YAPS slazCT m CxAN¢BY FEUA IC / pAfcnOM A PIN.9740-19-10 \ 1 mch P�BD)PL C4.0 Gee n..am P,OOhwp.va popery ynv PINE-av-M�wmBl erreemv.vaeemv pops xxv-aamv 89 �Imx�ABN4r 1,4 66m£4� ® �ANo, o�..: 4ro�TwLNp NC SIP Hwy W Naovx -'----_ ft..p•MLc Fax xwNm Nwran R� pax mNx�.I ,xm aaP EMITS OF DISIURDANCE W ;� vravL W UNITS OF` NCGS MgJUMENT'LLOYDS' - rxru u u u u O gEIUPBANCE \ . L1(ME) A � •pxom cu,nm NAv 11111-11 Ell—mm xm UNDERGROUND ELECTRIDIRDR TO CO SEANCE �— C D,11 qt rD COORDINATE Q pOV\ APPAOP"A.UPLUY COLIPANY vt n RPZ BACMFLOW PREVENTER ♦LrrA4 wr roam E IT MAARNA ARA I 6 )s'IipE F sorry / t('PK XOIIIi AGFuano �' I I u _ TA H OrFER /�WMPACTPBLE AVTLf EDIA CAST OffE) ISE PD COVE LE SCCRAIED_ 351AYPo6SE0.RED COVEfl pwr o I / / 0 RFDU SIR ACLS SURROUNDING BOITHR OR IMONZE TAPER IHREAD PLUG e vNK HERE) agogxl Wlaw FUNT YA1H 8FLOOR un EFINELLNGTXTO DW0HN w ®I wc t MA. I2 2-WAYCLEANOUT DETAIL nCLEANOUI DETAILwur ffRNPE I' I I Q E I�1 I I I 1 rvoss O I I 1 Z I 1 unL1q DAr PAOlrrn U yll I 2-NAY S.S.CIFAXORT I I I I I _ , INc 111E PREPAID)BULGING ALL NOT HAVE A HE IPRNKLER SYSTEM d 2 INV35PS n I 1 1NV R(P R IS 2UGN BAffG W NroEO APPROVES AOw W WXi 2 2'PVC LONWR FOR "'I I SSa.26' DS caxOE rAAPT1.P,ortgxAT[ I I I WN,RACTRUR PRIGR ro FINE START Gr wxsxUCTI unfs III nuL BE ACRIDEo or ME TO TARTAN CcxEreAE oEwm ISAII Exrs ? J SEANCE CO-WiN UMITS IAIS SHALL BE IN ACE M OADAIEf A THE unutt DEPAREENTS E ell MPPOMI4IC CO4PAN! i I I I J OIDNA 0.NCE r TOR I.EN A GRADS ro uAIFAIuS An0 INSTAAEAnw Dr ME wAIFR ARD SAnITAAY MLItt ffAN[E NOTES Q If 4'PVC SANITARY I I Imo"RCP 2 SEXEfl YRNCE® I I 556.28' SERF"' ED wfLL A.INETTRALL A I-wATw SEEN UNE U 7A MIN.SLOPE I I pro"SnCEIC P�Dxs cOAmxAOUx51RUL�nOUWEnn mM III l MfO IWS unutt WMPARIES5 AR.ENIAL IT-.EOEPI i —� PRI R,G rnE BPRE RAFT GF ANY GGN91NPnW APR11 MAR �ry�EP� ro NO �w��TM I�P� ET S NGHA UNEFET TINE unutt AUTxwmEs INSFEOI rf 11Es e[TUE NOTECnNG IECTNC SEANCE EPID ER CO"10 PIRDIDE UNDERGROUND 120/208/I PHASE SEANCE C{NERN _ DI CCNWIr w/Nu ME TO S.S CLGNWr ♦ OTHOULD A""'nOn¢ro FEE Unutt COUPANY AND ME ONxfR, sERNu sxAiL 6E uv[x �Ta 1 s66-iv2-aAA5 SiOPMNAIEP PIPES NV-SBSiA HHUTRES 1EFEREna ff1E R PIPE)' I \ GDN,RAGTDR S,ALL cwTACT THE I I IAMEGIATELr FDR NREGRwS ED.THE uMlrs E)F ss RIu3fi0b I SE 1TANN AEWnswAn ass IN THE I NDI ON TU EECEms w Ps SEE EACH PANfL AOAAO ro unutt mMPemv Pgxr a coxxina.WE PRELIMINARY DISNRBANCE 8 INV=553.9 I Bf REOOIREO W Mf OWE9IIC AIEALI E9 FOR DO NOT MEr11uiI EUL/NwBNCAPLAxswE w N RELEP"ONE USE FOR Rorn SAAN `F0 Ara:7 STR1P EIECTAT.SANITARY FEARS TUIuwG FAMOUS AND CONSTRUCTION ' Ecr ro exAxDE TA ISUAi A 1. NINTE, ARR ENT ON zG sErena _——— SARE I ro IXBTPL UNgRrROUNO EIECTmt ryIT�xo i,"�E ,E X NRUTE PAVEMExT As xE�.wr ZE)sm� � w�PREAL) w""TNU'Il m owr� L———————__ _, I I x 11.FIRE CONTA—SHALL MSIT THE SITE AND MAEFY THE EL vu TELEPCONTxwE 919 z,b-zsw / PrererffG ununEN m THAT AN APpmpreuTE MEDwunw', RE u.LCE Nc ArvG cEN OPO sfD WI "Ah mrx"AILAu GAs unutt NA ssANx aME TE MEN NATTRAT AN TM aryxaE. NOT REWIRED el tmE F NNERAFRO S AT RE �I I SSTOPn%D sxu�P r� S FOR CaxrEC7- IN RUN�dS<n XTan,RFOUiOfnna;HE E11E111 Am STATUS qA µGCRGAN E A N PA WENT AEPNA ED IA 4E ro D nE w NDE�Mxtt ® ' QDA- DE-R LDING USE Ti ITUTGreAANa LOT NR WINGING GwNEmDNI SUPPLY AND INSTALLRD PEE AGAPHEER TO A9 NEgGSARY. STO PHEAL,HDEPARTMENTSANDNDNHEARWNADEPARWENTOF,RANSPORTAnGN. Know whats below.Call before you dig. ALLxxD L—————sv— ———— J OVER AP K MAAONTM MUST RI vn NI Y le'DOTE SUPARKRONP MI�� SCALE 1e ELOTPPc0An PIPINO�AM-11 A MINIMUM 24'AERWALVER V. MIN c ,o'-v rww um�sio¢AaE su1. GRAPHIC SCALE DB No.22011] E PR, 9ra6-J9-9B99 IF ANO nnxc PuOEM DATE SEPT 30,2U22 N 89YI 28 N 211.26 SHALL WMINY min ALL GOVERN.O 1.2 AND AEfuunONi (a PEEre 7 L Ixon-xG K CS.� eeo n..am p,axhwp.xa popery 9np z9-ae-aapsal xuAieeme rgnexn9 pans anscn'm aowmene wV-ru-Om.aA 90 ro.M wID 1. —.NwpI... /1! NT wr E � mM �pxar�w,r .wwwaE.� ° ��I DIU, xN �ur 1pra x \11 ax.xwr 1° ; nTEMPORARY DIVERSION ORCH svuin� >00� nE .N �iw far „ r ro-vE mivu' 'r�°w wee rmruwrs3 ry SILTFENCEOUTLETx m ¢ @@ m � a A..,rwrexo..mx�.�rmx�r � e ,�AE�AMr��a.���..x.TMew�orsa��m�xxm,exwerwr..� J ^SKIMMERBASIN .me.r<w,w.n�mrxr..n..m a,w.r •,o vrmimuv ouormnn russwrm u..wnu m.ummmum.x",r r NI w Z ll ewrsnx,rwmmrxwn msa wrwoxrzur..wwrwu m,ma+xmr.xwnw.e uma.swwr Axoxwx,"mem.m wwuxxo.rzwmsrxua.mwv. N 0 Q K E [) U L � F W. xwo,owmu,UEA. my r. o:®%a'p,�� e � u..ar nw we tge mToxsw sa uaq NOTE SR¢A.w(A r� O 2 ITAN I'm w ay _ " '�\\\W NAT.A —E o wmxa aau i erxg,v.ow Na rxe rai IXrm wus ry s, wa Prrs xm w ¢L vn¢ xrxemuh wxA wmE vrsv�o. \_— esarz o- ._ NiP-Nro III_ U Q w m E77, !- L---q11, E r. ? V nsrnsme cvuc �x rw.,no rww ¶sad m" .,.A e,..off RY �.au." �.wmwrg w.=ru __ PRELIMINA DO NOT SILT FENCE USE FOR I.1 CONSTRUCTIONEMRANCE 0 names �� n HORSESHOE INLET PROTECTION mrn<Nemu�ruw.rwsurmuxmwEm� CONSTRUCTION uNDT D INME TATUS 4SI e fSl nr` wm dx NM N_;: IQ— !— �_ { MIMM — %a S. NOTE: MA/NIFNANCE. �({I f{ '� —, • "m o� rz.i nur u¢ana,nmaxn,° MLLlE, _ tt ND40 rurxxvNwu�D MSKS lH[Mff O=m o'numt°u 8 vwm.ury w.� is� : xrss a u mw —odN.�...„ ,..^9§d0U�:9•e,.,rop^�ae, m rx e x CENVI ax �DATESEPT 0117 EOMExr ix uN v. ns r%sr. ...tee.. amreNNw xE a�NE:era r'nEas.Ea.unLE ti. ¢gym xrmr n RIP-RAP APRONI. 30,2022 YY SLOPETR� n C0NCRETEWASHARE4 �oo-.�roo- ^•�'o-,.muo ^� E0a6Bd1 AxaxA 1.. coma ap wm.wD�usx ii0 ►"J xar rD rN. 9I TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION u NDr ro SALE x C6.0 cee n.,°m p,axhwp.ra popery gwp Az9-ae-aw��ii erAieeme rgnwme pans ansN�t'm aowmene whzu-fsa.e 91 c 11 no„DRse AD�m �. er..�n. «"n eee eixw arzn as i vuv vfl ax�prex n"'�a�t ��� O �ro'ms� - Dxs/taEw meyaR .. ,wm�xwes ww wv..mw�s � �8 z� C aa—ttr � r v asnccmw v..w ssna ¢ N W?' o -_ �."�.�" ms`1'srz�0ex�^rnue..o srm�aux.rz owmer,w waM � a nm/� - .nee xuoxar wrwr mmema it.wr a./d.o.i� ivemo roam a.ixws o®. a sagaswa xroa. 'n`a/j�sea.�nrsa.npe. wxmr on asmo-.rim aun ""g01O1Rrwm nl -r. el aajs •�-:m as -aan xrob• smr"`aA aao waxara ooaae,.a&m xnxwa memraw wrwn p�-wi u%"°'^,. xba. saoiW P,aWr� onr sasJ J W o-„gyp F- LU `z o ol s "mw_ ,am¢wan orxwer, J Q �ruumx�w w,xsoW O U n TEMPORAFYSEEDING mws w�xc.onmxff.r®exnrawnm we nw 1YH1OEX1 F H 2 Z O z U O O a oC W U PRELIMINARY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN STATUS 4—!- MLLRALNJ CHND SCALE � JOB No.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 C6.1 cee n.,.n,p,aohwp.va popery vap�z9-ae-ssoMiu arreeme mv,eewe pans ansmwt'm aowmene whzu-fsa.e 92 �nmx�rmA,..wper����wm�rxml-11 - xm�a,rsoro�u. o �ow aLamm�wM.mLww®1�x�xam�,Mma�mmm.m�ww�,E�DDxD — �wxrar.mgx Em � q�ow.wxpxaw mr<Mrs•r mE wMxL xD w�x.ucE MxM,. m© w 1.2Nrt xm aEx, rzmw,r-21 pxw .EMgpm — EA ,g aI . ow�,,.ar�wx6.wxe�� rww r wMvmiw we m-m .n..p nLm nCONCRETE JDINTS nm Acis ieL a A ccissieL aErR wL,w..wm wm. U rv0T r0 sc+W sc,u_xOT TO snL RESERVED RESERVED NCDCT PAVEMENT SECTION PARKING r PARKING m�E mmmm,wwo qE Mx MUM DOLLAR o.Rmvs P-11T xEwmumrs xcv��EOOAnpsm xEccuumOAnas III TO NE Osm ,xr rauomxc OrTA�s AB - M..naE AmE MErs9w1 m M 11 nxO xmucEO w,n caxpAc,EO smEcr MA,ENu �. � T - s r "U.FE 11 ww.�m�s caxv cso vNox ro vucE�cxr a e.sE MArminL u�vn 1 I I ❑ M"a - �I I=1I I=1' FFE1. �PAVBENT.1N0 s,ANDNiO OUtt c q�EIEIP NEMEnr As MECOMNENDm By 1HE LEO1ExcAL xERtt,Ox H 9 OEUAa crRrxu uuuuusl SxAri eE srr�rmxmacEO. IxWBPFwrR,,E sxAL eE PBaR AVPaoMO All—O cmmnL rl 'DAUE ,,,. wwm prt"DAmx. L,LI H A w 2 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN DETAIL WNEEL SIGP rr €€ RE—FELS,TD ALA 5iw(forior of mx DEvw.,wxs 11 M R1 G 8 z C LOTD)EFO NOTL. i0� A .xq x�r pm� �rtmr rn AR, ro r w APPAO rml -^I iq mus .� C� xevlmx xo mnM -II - = J Q rwDr sas, p ryE— plaWRI, Q Z nor i-n.w moaa ry�'� n CURB EDGE CONCRETE SIOEIWALK w O e o..P,c,w,p.Pa,rz xnE lJ xo p ¢ W T TO scut R.`i i�.Girvr"idol n�u n s'rar Lnrt w _ O 2 vmr m[oL mEAxrraz vw.v. r-r lmx�wrv-wq smF mE V 2 HANDICAP PARKING,ACCESS - I1 RAMP AND ACCESS AISIE DETAILS OT ar ¢ 1vE r�mr�aii a rwr ,aumO wr muw wrem Z W W .. rvme�ounm mnwinnmuwrs = n,r uanm m m�n� O 5 Aaw Pa mxart . uxiu a u"riau.w.mr rmrnw wwmart wx ran run wumx miurww rwiw wnxn rro e,rs M4� wwsv ra srvrs.,a xown 9 V U vra;1m r me,wm A--1 z 1wN nurv�.wx wx wssmu"n[�ooracucc nc v�ue�rzT xemm,aarHs wm ovan¢.e'� rtauu�u¢. un.m ,�a¢ _ ur pnrrwir a61Ern'h Hirt. ma mE mr m Ear rM n1,�T�E.,pma mmc mr xrn,Ew,„q oc x mvmeM m w..w.mwsaa<. arME �„�.M[�asiaE�rEsplW,°�°aiµa«prua��Ka�am r�wE�o,sm,im av rsssr,xD sx�rwxc -� „_�� ��_, rnwnm rww mm,rr Rq;m.1 SIDEWALK DETAIL rl PAVEMENT MAAKINGS «c oaxxmr.ertsrro. 1'<r ,mm w«•P'� 01 l'J n .wwwsxo Notes PRELIMINARY $ r rz xc Luv gmaw rm.p o.Rwwr mw.rmTmmmx DO NOT US 4=2m,"r°-oa E FOR ,mp m.,g Rom:"m [n[r,awE = CONSTRUCTION ie•ua rmr.nm ae mw _ e waxormxm�„w � rm mrriw worm scnrz xwirc - � T. 6JP1 PAVEMEM DETAILS wrw m rgar wwrrxirr nrmm rm.ppi wx aaaw<xrs mwm r O ewxa � ��v mus¢rc. xor,O svaic .m xw sarc.,.�m o, Q , "O Y"x - xx..s aarsp. � w ,r,wuL u["wxs I-1 CUR&'GUTTER DETAIL u D m����=s.T� O a oLR0u.w0 DETAIL R L = =III= DATEIN 4 HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL —III MLL MLLRPAOMLL D'R HRANN CHND x0,,O SCALE DB No.220117 n STOP SIGN DETAIL DATE SEPT 30,2022 u xD LE Li6d cee n.cam p,aohwp.va popery vap rm-ae-sxoMai errneeme mvcwma pans wnscn'm aowmene whru-s,.aq 93 c rxwmr�� 0 m�pE M Q4=P e � w � J Q r.o puw irrx vvwra u Q W Z wn as wr oun�wuEN Lu JO ^^ Z U 0 F H 2 U z H i U U ¢ �..xc U x U epxem e.. � roewoinc prx PRELIMINARY s�s�wnurex pns Pr.s,c1 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION —N STATUS T�Y7' oArE ocsc IT ary u MLL MLLR MLL DESIGN ORALMJ CHND anus m uu arz wsr SCALE - si'mi OD No.220111 DATE SEPT 30,2022 I�OOUBIE OUMPSTER DETAILS ILE N. u NDT LT E SHEET C6.3 cee n..am p,aohwp.va popery vap�z9-ae-av��ii vrA�eeme mv.eeme pans anscvt'm aowmene whzu-svaq 94 '—SEEDBED PREPARATION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: lag— 11 —Z 17=1L N --AN IA 1= 7 LANOSCAPING NOTES IL xwsun IN. 1XV,. m—E, ry 6°ubn MumvnM. bn coop n�ir erbmpuR ca wvww vm xat ez wvaonrnz was mzmmnr2 zwws nrun sys.a/mr¢urn�eu --ram�r__ 'A A. .1 OR IR x—mm I MO. PROFILE OF STORMWATER WETLAND DETENTION SYSTEM RF IM S E LANDSCAPING NOTES R------ nu: -jrUw, c/) MR LOU un.ene.,u�.I sa �,""en>daa• A TALWEIR PVC DRAIN OUTLET TRASH RACK DETAIL LOU 0 Lu ¢rmauw 'STORMYVATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN STORMWATER WETLAND, ¢ 0 z STAGE/STORAGE TABLE Lu 1—T I..N— < Ua I I -7 7— I MEOLMOOE—1—1-- 0 p" f =Ulwl "IN I I C/) OF I-- I—IN -N ".MN EMP POND DEWATERING INOAR N, IN.1. iT-1 INA_M1 TYPICAL SHALLOW WATER PLANTING SCHEDULE PRELIMINARYMIENTHIC NAME HOMMON NNE PLANTNG NNE QUANTITY HEIGHT IDEAL DEPTH NNTU"E" SPACNG PUNTN.I..H DO NOT L,OE.EE INER TYEE NET 1T OUTLET PIPE REFER USE FOR �1 MPNS EEi R TO . CONSTRUCTION NON RE SIEFAY DEEP TO MMINO PUN W1 285 T PERESAY ETEV EMEAN11,85.5 1T AREA LDW TYPICAL TEMPORARY INUNDATION ZONE PLANTING SCHEDULE 20N E L RIP-RAP APRON "!ATER I AT FOOM, SCIENTES NAME COMMON NAME NENO ZONE NANTTY NESHT SPACING PLANTING SEASON 0\ TAINER TWO 9 TEMPMARY HONDA,IN SEN SRIPR AT PLANEENGS[NO P—NNS PER NO E] ia -0]REFER 4 AT 2 SO T -N TO M TOTAL ART OPtAN NM AT TOE]REFER N THIS SHEET MR PLANANG H— 11... NN OF SHALLOW WATER NINE PLAN STATUS TNTH�'TEMMFOORY PLANTNGS[50 PLANINSS PER NO 7] INUNDATION ZONE 507 TAL PEANEWS AT 2 OC)REFER '-'-22 PLANTINGS TO MART EN THIS SHEET FOR PTANEING SMEELLE 211 Sl"l-MRElA'11 DALE PO HL AREA EA EESM I— MLL 4E S.. H GRAPHIC SCALE 340 SF Kf�� INIZ Ep R I AREA SO HE.220117 DATE SEPT 30,2022 KL�AEW 1 STORMWATERMANAGEMENT SYSTEM DETAILS p I— 95 sse ss3SST —— s a0,a>>ixv.:suas• uz NC 54 HWY W ren IZP R NC HIGH 4 cz c DISNPPANLL LT(TE) To'Rep P 1 \ 1 O I x xr nPE I _ I SUI I —f'I I Q PIPE 8 � e e E N W g € H I � aal x I I sq I POST-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE p I AREA z 1.09 AC i w L z I ¢ - �o RCP Z Q �I 11:55 M U "I 0 NCE o 0 \ I INV RCP d 2 hn+ :555.28' 0 J _ W J m'irx Eeu I _ W F i I M U CL sc5 DI5 u"�µ� SEPT I I - x PRELIMINARY sE —_— DO NOT — L— --_ ---—� -- p USE FOR s � CONSTRUCTION I I T PE i x"f PLAN I l" TATUS gAD'I'- 56-EPPG J19 arvMN.9l1x-39-9899 RIPP MLLWRANN CHND E T GRAPHIC SCALE ae rvo.220117 DAiE SEPT 3p,2022 DI Pe 330 tl N. / d eee 7 PIN:9],x-,x-3910 Mn- D K ISPETT C6.5 tee n..am P,axhwp.va popery ywp xn-ae-aapsal eriteeme mv.eeme pans anscn'm aowmene wl-xu-Lw.a.e 96 CONCRETE s z.rr(reM) MASTER PLANT LIST TYPE SYM/KEY OUANPTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SYMBOL CALPER HEIGHT SPREAD ROOT SPACING OTHER IT I—, ESES AS SUPAD NC 54 NW,Mr „m r, I.v.LID' ALL>R FFE (c �e B q wi NC HIGHWAY 5¢ wM STREET YARD SIRIBS 41 1,NENO, - AS SUPAN I IT. AS SUPAN —— _ Bf —NI FOR IXf ENT11 O __ ❑ \ OG R DR WALL ODNPLT wANO�.LLN ITANTEI GD o D D.OEE RE DIXG L D NnG AREAS NOT PONE.-.X HARE-1, ELT I—RE PAN i o� o D ESE amz PMR LOT IEL.N°zIl,.nnnNGs, XOLo,zIALL BE sEE°EO ——— 50'gfgA �% UP THE LABIRS Js'TAI F EA,N, — — 1� 6 j T S :EF elu,T OE rEE—TRAGTm m EnAaIXI A HFAimY sTADO UP ORAEE ON ALL RETeESNTAmc ONs ARE wtunTm WTnwT xln IN 11 fRl[DLAxD PfPROVEO BY ME ME Owens REPRES[XTATRE mlaR TO IHSIALunON. OVERfq I Eucx FAPOL MEET EIaMt uIN—AN NEw uHTFN TIE"i'TO FREUNi WEFT mm'Ix. O MVLCRI EFTS ANT SHALL RE SEPANAEET FROM HVRF LAASS IRN'D UBS WALL ME PWI1E0 IX m e m® > pSUSEAT LL RRDXDE NA R mp SL Ar IB DERIDE,FRIADLL..W T M mRE Df NET , ¢ FTI°a5 ENNX _+ / o.Nµ aF xT vMFu�m P_I ao m".°""''l°"AI°i ff IT mxMY FCOXirti 5. GRn4 GDVFAAT e.GE iD EM,Ero FRDM PRDPERtt LINES iD BAM OF ffiT 9TEWAInS ° h�H��n.ITS,PI.Na TR MN�EIBOTAN� TR NR E IN ETERTAI Na SHA D/DR aaRB � �8=� � ° M O°NTAIn AT M.Ex ORGANIC MATTER BY WFIar AND HAM`A PH RAXGF D D D ro J D. MIETFORM N wR -) A NOT PUX s a _'+ TKIL O L DF:(a)�in Rtt(SDE DA nxD PaITENI ALLTREPA Em ERAocnwxs 2 nN[i WRE PASMEr uu5i�NCuisawnr�AxD RF AN NOHO IRON ROOT BALL q a m mT MANAGEMENT • /•� *M O INRIES,VOR(1)nIS LATE Mn DOLLM n Ru OPS S FOR BUSIESS ro THE PUBuf. µD c PIT.REwt[Tre t/3 TF IxE aIRUP mTN ROST EUL PDND `�a �E� mACTaq Is TO LLEan NINE snE IF Al casTRucnOx TETPos AxT Rux ALL mAss E�EM D AMFAN TxE ST IB Of Ep51NG y r z TOP ILL rN w `\ ® O ILL m MHEETTN�wmL/bl wnxs�ultiBSTNAN gl90OL N PANIPIEDT III ui-EASE AIL COnSm CTIOx DEERS: ,.i - CE. s�am1�m BY Lace JURNEP SON Ta THE °�� 13 Tlac EEPT FDR�+Fss,sxRUBsp Em.sx.Lwi XorBIXTFRFFRE IN TxF ngBXITT aF oaLrR REmLrE EON PI.NTxG. O°'FLlcT w,H PD�MR LD I OR scnzR cui°RCµ°SEE ro Y o I Ns ro DaiAA cExERAL ANT A xAY r BE PunTED WnFRF mFRE AR LAN >E E%IITNG RESSUAPCN I o I C£NERAL 91GNACi TLITEPS PUNT,S fRtu ALL TO flEMMN +I. O T I0.ECNTRACmR ro YFNRY BLANTTES PRIOR TO SOMENCIXG RUNx. T UxttRGRDUNP UTILTES(SEA AND STORK DRNNMT GAS UWATER.PHONE,AND ELECTRICAL LINES) STREET TPR O° , II NEED AREAS WITHIN PUNTXG Bw5 SHALL BE MULCHFO I"" PLADRI NEW IRFES NOTLY OWnER v ANY III BRALY LIRE,OR OFFER cONFUcrs BEFORE _- J * O Q ° I qZ z ol �4\Y}+ 1AE. I ��oo L U — Lu —`"" "rt( q6�• H m p . ,F aBR,X .N,� CL < o ID ",.o"°Wr=IAT'„"R'p" Z EwN OB wI a R) D Mf �IaX:Ifxwr� mn°„IH o TE 7— ar TYPE F EITHER --��'��".�-- p B �A ,o:AN I a=:w.�. —•`•�T\` 7' _ux Tn s/.auvw wen anL muelw.SEA.wsPo MULSN AROUND I MIe_TI£E(TW) PRELIMINARY rt DO NOT kLS USE FOR CONSTRUCTION ST I I� AnMLs sr� la wl ram.a,: a„ .wao..Y,r avers ao:wA..i' I wTx6Poo :nE�.� TYPICAL TREE PUNTINGSTAIONG DETAIL YD n FaRe'-12'TREE HEIGHTGAT PUNTING) s eYre'sYw IJ2s,' ®®W`y* •®®*® —I ly UxOTroscuE EXIST IS VEOETATON ® ®®B®®®®® wMR FlMRA•Y I—J TO REMAIN ®® PLAN ®® DTI I �=� ® LINE TABLE °XE JLE 39 s9� a sW LINE IENGIH BEARING � N,SRRu•E STOP ED E ® X� I zIIE Know what's below. °A °ES` °" N.EJ { E "'E Call before you dig. MLL MLLRPTMLL s°X-F,PPci"i tl1s"1' L'kSJ") c, CURVE TABLE DESIGN HRAxn cHxD fs JFGI O O O O O O O O O ®®® CARVE RADIUS LENGTH BEARING CHORD SCALE - 0 0 0 0 oxo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r ss• n' GRAPHIC SCALE JOB NO.220117 X941ss w 231.ffi ��Y QZRB'p E 4�IJP 20JR 4E F M3fFER DATE SEPT 30,2022 10 EVERSISEN TREES RE' 10 EVERGREEN UNOFRSTORT I°T-_42 TREES E3 SHRUB TEES PER 10a _112 SUBLES L men-s0 K YENP,cee n..em p,DDhwsp.va popery voop rz9-ae-avw�al wgieeme vWAewNR pans an0".eAAm w4--PAR. 97 PESPROCTOR ENVIRONMENTAL `) SERVICES, INC. Corporate Licensure No.C-520 5113 Yachtsman Court Raleigh,North Carolina 27615 919-630-0721 December 16, 2022 Mr. Brian S. Collie, Planner II Orange County Planning & Inspections Department 131 W. Margaret Lane, Suite 201 P.O. Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 4.82+-ACRE PROPOSED GENERAL MERCHANDISE USE 3026 WHITE CROSS ROAD CHAPEL HILL, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Dear Mr. Collie, On behalf of Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, the "applicant," please find enclosed a completed Environmental Assessment application for the above-referenced proposed Dollar General development project. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (919) 630-0721 . Best Regards, PROCTOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 711 P,40�61t-� Thomas A. Proctor, P.G., RSM President Cc: Ms. Ashley Davis, Glandon Forest Equities, LLC i 98 I Orange County Plannlo & Inspections Department ORANGE COUNTY 131 W. Margaret lane, Su to 200,Hillsborough,NC 27278 NORTH CAHOLNA 919-245-2575 or planni a s Oran ecount nc. ov Environmental Assessme'it Please check all applicable boxes and complete the recit Ired documentation. Additional Information Is contained in Section 2.25 of the Unified D velopment Ordinance(UDO). If completing by hand, please use black or ti ue ink. An EnvironmentalAssessment(EA)shall be required foreach Individual parcel proposed for develojment consistent with applicable criterial as detailed within the UDO. Date: 1-r - �'. Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: q0I L /`L 576 Phone: Email; Applicant(if different than property owner): 'ibd t g"� Mailing Address: g82z rI" p �( v Phone: �_�el — Email: Vee III 1A Q 011rdt q. ea 77 Property lrtfQrmaion a Parcel ID Number(PIN): Address: POO Acreage: __ r �3 'Township: Zoning District: 111 Watershed Overlay: Other Overlay: `ll C3e'r>e > 1(o nfairr�Iatlo�n v., t s H y 1 1 4 A Adjacent Pt,"operty Zoning North: LC M South: East: AVWest: Land Use North: Z erC i A l;4 m South: I fi t. 17 4 L-- West; B.Topography' . ■ Highest Elevation: 6U ■ Lowest Elevation: ar ■ General direction of slope: V Page 1 of 5 i I 99 i ■ Estimated % of property with: 0—5% slope: 5—15% slope; 00 15—25% slope: More than 25% slope: C. Water Features and Drainage The following water features are located on the props : ❑ Streams ❑ Wetlands ❑ Ponds ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Special Flood Hazard Area Describe N AV (attach additional sheets if ne'ded) D. Does the property contain any of#he.following inventory of atural or Cultura! Resources? As identified in the "Inventory of Sites of Cultural, Historical, Recreational, Biological, and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated Portions of Orange County" or tf3 "Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, North Carolina". 1. Cemeteries ❑ Yes L9 No 2. Archaeological sites ❑ Yes I No 3. Historic sites ❑ Yes �' No 4. Areas of geological significance ❑ Yes No 5. Designated natural areas ❑ Yes I2 No 6. Designated habitat ❑ Yes ® No For each yes answer above, please indicate the location on the site Ian and complete Attachment A. I L n f A: Describeproposed use of property: I—PVIA L DCJII B, Numberof lots:' C. Number of structures: Page 2 of 5 i 100 E D Estimated square.footage.of area to be.graded for develojo ent of attached,residential units exc uding roads,but including.parking areas) E. Estimated square footage of area to be:graded.for non-rest ential use (excluding roads) U j D _ QiPiY F..Estimated area to be graded for roads ■ Road type: ❑ Public ❑ Private ❑ Class A ❑ Class B ■ Total road length: �Ili 5#ata Perrinits`Requlr'ed A Does the projec#involve the mming of earth products? ❑ Yes No ■ If yes, how many cubic feet of material are expected to bo excavated? ■ Has an application for a Mining Permit been submitted to NCDRCD? ❑ Yes WNo Please attach map indicating expected extent of proposed activity B Dbes the projeet Involve generation or storage..of haaardous or toxic wastes, as,iden#ified by the Environment I Protection i.gency? 1 ❑ Yes CPNo ■ Describe the wastes to be generated: ■ How much material is expected to be generated per mon# ? ■ Will any material be treated onsite? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, i; dicate volume: Will any material be stored onsite? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate volume: ■ Where will disposal of the material take place? ■ How will materials be transported to the disposal site? ■ What measures are proposed to protect water quality and'air quality in case of spills? Page 3of5 101 C :11Vall the.^project involve a;land a llcation s. stem.for:#reat, ,`ent of WMA!tewater? ■ ❑ Yes No- If yes, describe ■ Has an application for a non-discharge permit been sub itted to the NC Department of Environmental .fiagement or Orange C unty Department of Environmental Health? ❑ Yes No p. Is a septic tapir system prgposeci vvl��ch has.a designapc ty.of more than_ I 3,000 gallons er ❑ Yes No- If yes, describe # Does the:activity Involve audge' isposal? - l . . d ❑ Yes No I ■ If yes, where is the source of the sludge? ## f i ■ Describe where and how the sludge Is being disposed } Has a NPDE3 permit from the NC Division of Environme .tal Quality been issued? ❑ Yes ❑ No t i ■ Estimated number of employees: x 25 gallons per i Jay(gpd) _ p gpd. ■ Estimated water use for climate control = /00 gpd ■ Process Water — lid r 1 ?,I Cep-J?L9 % Consumed % Discharged to septic system• i Discharged to surface (including storm +ers) -Describe: • Evaporated % Reclaimed/reused % Other I = 100% ■ Water used for cooling, heating, etc., In association with reduction or manufacturing j % Reused /�'���IC.� % Consumed _% Discharged - Describe: = 100% gpd Total Water Usage ■ Describe source of water: iS ,; �'r✓ Q � GL - Page 4ofS i 102 E E f `V?'e �i y"" -! y E `... 'i ,Atta�h1�� -'4- -t- E r `� F. .• Ta be complet ed only if inventory sites are ic entified in I.D. (attach additional sheets if necessary) J 'J a 'iMOIR on'Resource from Proposed De��lopmen't 1.b:Proposed Mitigation 2.a..Impact on.Resource from Proposed Develop rent I 2.b Proposed Mitigation FCertffrcation anti Signature$ Statement by A cant- certify that the"information presented`b, me in this ,.. � the best of my n e Y s application �s accurate to 'nformation, and belief. 2Y 2-3 Applicant Date Page 5 of 5 103 Traffic Impact Analysis White Cross Retail Orange County, NC Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Kimley))) Horn ©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.2022 105 Traffic Impact Analysis for White Cross Retail Orange County,North Carolina Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Raleigh,NC Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. NC License#F-0102 300 Morris Street, Suite 200 Durham,North Carolina 27701 (919) 682-3583 ? S EAL , '+°+ FY 451 PIP �y •* #�iRa I I'Llk 11/15/2022 November 2022 014405000 106 This document,together with the concepts and designs presented herein,as an instrument of service,is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 107 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC Executive Summary Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 — White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. As currently envisioned, the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet (SF) of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing traffic condition as well as the projected(2024)background and build-out traffic conditions. As shown in Table ES-1, the proposed development has the potential to generate 31 new trips in the AM peak hour and 83 new trips in the PM peak hour on a typical weekday. Table ES-1 ITE Traffic Generation Vehicles Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Cff227 de In Out In Out Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k SF) 11,000 SF 18 13 41 42 Capacity analyses were performed using Synchro Version 11 software. Table ES-2 summarizes the operation of the study intersections in the AM and PM peak hours. Table ES-2 Level-of-Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Dela LOS (Delay) NC 54—White Cross Road (Unsignalized) Existing(2022)Traffic NB—D(34.2) NB—D (31.6) WBL—B 10.6 WBL—A 8.2 Background(2024) Traffic NB—E(37.2) NB—D (34.1) WBL—B 10.7 WBL—A 8.3 Build-out(2024)Traffic NB—E(43.4) NB—E (48.3) WBL—B 10.9 WBL—A 8.4 White Cross Road—Site Driveway(Unsignalized) Build-out(2024)Traffic EB—A(9.6) EB—A(10.3) NBL—A(7.5) NBL—A(7.6) ES-1 108 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail Orange County, NC The following improvements are recommended as part of the proposed White Cross Retail development: White Cross Road at Site Driveway • Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress and one egress lane • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. With the recommended improvements in place, the proposed Site Driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at White Cross Road in both peak hours at project build-out. Figure ES-1 shows the recommended roadway laneage. ES-2 109 NOT TO SCALE 1 NC 54 150' STE CD SITE � 1 DRIVEWAY 40 c� o ::E cn = cf) � �:om 0 LEGEND EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH EXISTING STOP SIGN <. RECOMMENDED LANE O RECOMMENDED STOP SIGN WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC RECOMMENDED ROADWAY LANEAGE ES-1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECInC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER REUANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY IOMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 110 Kimley>))Horn White Cross Retail— Orange County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 INVENTORY...............................................................................................................2 2.1 STUDYAREA....................................................................................................... 2 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................ 2 3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION...........................................................................................5 4.0 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION...............................................................................6 5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES.........................................................................8 5.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC.............................................................................................. 8 5.2 AMBIENT GROWTH TRAFFIC................................................................................ 8 5.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC....................................................................................... 8 5.4 SITE TRAFFIC...................................................................................................... 8 5.5 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC........................................................................................... 8 6.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS............................................................................................12 6.1 NC 54—WHITE CROSS ROAD............................................................................. 13 6.2 WHITE CROSS ROAD—SITE DRIVEWAY............................................................... 14 7.0 SEGMENTAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS...................................................................15 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................16 APPENDICES A. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING B. TRAFFIC COUNT DATA C. TRIP GENERATION D. INTERSECTION SPREADSHEETS E. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.EXISTING F. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.BACKGROUND (2024) G. SYNCHRO OUTPUT.BUILD-OUT(2024) H. FLORIDA 2013 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK EXCERPTS i 111 Kimley)>)Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page No. Table 3.1 ITE Traffic Generation(Vehicles)..........................................................................5 Table 6.0 Level-of-Service Control Delay Thresholds.........................................................12 Table 6.1 Level of Service:NC 54-White Cross Road.......................................................13 Table 6.2 Level of Service: White Cross Road- Site Driveway...........................................14 Table 7.1 Daily Traffic Volume Summary...........................................................................15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page No. Figure2.1 Site Location...........................................................................................................3 Figure 2.2 Existing Roadway Laneage.....................................................................................4 Figure 4.1 Site Traffic Distribution and Percent Assignment..................................................7 Figure 5.1 Existing and Background(2024)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................9 Figure 5.2 Projected(2024)Build-out AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................10 Figure 5.3 Projected(2024)Build-out PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...............................11 Figure 8.1 Recommended Roadway Laneage........................................................................17 ii 112 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 1.0 Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 — White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. As currently envisioned, the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet (SF) of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing traffic condition as well as the projected(2024)background and build-out traffic conditions. Orange County and NCDOT staff were consulted regarding the elements to be covered in this analysis. The approved Memorandum of Understanding is included in the Appendix. 1 113 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 2.0 Inventory 2.1 Study Area The study area includes the following intersections: • NC 54—White Cross Road • White Cross Road—Site Driveway(proposed) Figure 2.1 shows the site location. 2.2 Existing Conditions The proposed White Cross Retail development is located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 —White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, North Carolina. Significant roadways in the study area include NC 54 and White Cross Road. Figure 2.2 shows the existing roadway laneage. NC 54 is a two-lane undivided road with a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour in the vicinity of the site. NCDOT reports that the 2018 average daily traffic (ADT) volume was approximately 11,500 vehicles per day(vpd)west of White Cross Road. White Cross Road is a two-lane undivided road with an assumed speed limit of 50 miles per hour south of NC 54. The 2015 NCDOT ADT volume was approximately 1,100 vpd south of NC 54. 2 114 A% �rF �,�� lq rr •� NOT TO SCALE all all 411� r. ~ •A • �I 1 \. • ' 7. r.'. �- r _.a �I r _. "-- r ,E III ' got ALI ■ '��+�Ir I y R 11 Wl' � •�'`' �-Yr ! � .�3'^�`I' - .en, .y�, �'4�f� ref WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley-�>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, INC SITE LOCATION 2.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFlC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 115 NOT TO SCALE F55 D T NC 54 150' —7� • F c� o ::E cn = c/) � � m 0 LEGEND -+— EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH • EXISTING STOP SIGN 3s POSTED SPEED LIMIT WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>»Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC EXISTING ROADWAY LANEAGE 2.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECInC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER REUANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY IOMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WTHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 116 Kimley>))Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 3.0 Traffic Generation The White Cross Retail development proposes to construct approximately 11,000 square feet of retail space. The traffic generation potential of the development was calculated using the data published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1 Ith Edition, 2021). Table 3.1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation potential of the proposed White Cross Retail development. Table 3.1 ITE Traffic Generation Vehicles Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Cde In Out In Out ff�22:: Strip Retail Plaza (< 40k SF) 11,000 SF 18 13 41 42 As shown in Table 3.1,the proposed development has the potential to generate 31 new trips in the AM peak hour and 83 new trips in the PM peak hour on a typical weekday. 5 117 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 4.0 Site Traffic Distribution The proposed generated trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network based on the following distribution: • 5 5%to/from the east via NC 54 • 35%to/from the west via NC 54 • 10%to/from the south via White Cross Road Figure 4.1 shows the site traffic distribution and percent assignment for the proposed project. 6 118 NOT TO SCALE r 55% 35% N C 54 55% 35% 4 w v F— STE (o O\� SITE 'J DRIVEWAY (10%) 0-1 c� o ::E Cn = C/) � � m 0 10� LEGEND XX% INBOUND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT (XX%) OUTBOUND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT XX% OVERALL DISTRIBUTION WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Kim ey » ORANGE COUNTY, NC Horn TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND PERCENT ASSIGNMENT 4.1 THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERNCE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECInC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER REUANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY IOMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WTHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 119 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 5.0 Projected Traffic Volumes 5.1 Existing Traffic Weekday AM (7:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 — 6:00 PM) peak hour turning movement counts were collected at the following intersection: • NC 54—White Cross Road November 2, 2022 The turning movement count data is included in the Appendix. Figure 5.1 shows the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. 5.2 Ambient Growth Traffic Ambient growth traffic is the increase in traffic due to non-specific growth throughout the area. Based on an analysis of historic growth rates, a 1.25% annual growth rate was applied to all existing volumes up to the 2024 future study year. Ambient growth calculations are detailed on intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix. 5.3 Background Traffic Background traffic volumes include existing and historic growth traffic. Figure 5.1 shows the projected (2024) background peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours. 5.4 Site Traffic The proposed site traffic was generated and assigned to the roadway network according to the distribution discussed in Section 4.0. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the projected peak hour site traffic volumes at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. 5.5 Build-Out Traffic To obtain the projected (2024) build-out traffic volumes, the projected site traffic was added to the projected (2024) background traffic volumes. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the projected (2024) build-out peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Volume development calculations are detailed on intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix. 8 120 AM PEAK HOUR NOT TO SCALE 4 256 (6) [262] N C 54 r 23 (1) [24] [850] (21) 829 h r [65] (2) 63 A J rn -.A N C 4 �I u u n O � U rn 0 PM PEAK HOUR 773 (19) [792] N C 54 r 88 (2) [90] [298] (7) 291 I r [52] (1) 51 CTI 00 � CTI b4 CuD u n LEGEND O ::E (/) _ XX EXISTING TRAFFIC (XX) BACKGROUND GROWTH CD � rn [XX] TOTAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL EXISTING AND PROJECTED (2024) FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR 5.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT.TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN.AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERACE.IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 121 NOT TO SCALE 262 (0) [262] NC 54 24 (10) [34] [850] (0) 850 [71] (6) 65 w � 00 uu DTE mcoj - 0 0) �. 00 0c SITE + DRIVEWAY .1 I [1] (1) 0 N � N 11� u� u n 0 LEGEND m XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (XX) SITE TRAFFIC [XX] BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL PROJECTED (2024) BUILD-OUT FIGURE Kimley>»Horn ORANGE COUNTY, INC AM PEAK HOUR 5.2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECInC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER REUANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY IMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WTHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 122 NOT TO SCALE 4 792 (0) [792] N C 54 90 (23) [1 13] [298] (0) 298 [66] (14) 52 cyl CA ccn N UT W �I CJI u Ou0 DTE W N Ju u ^ CA � J O NI- DRIVEWAY SITE *) .1 41 �. O 11^ Y 1 u � u n 0 LEGEND m XX BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (XX) SITE TRAFFIC [XX] BUILD—OUT TRAFFIC WHITE CROSS RETAIL PROJECTED (2024) FIGURE Kimley>»Horn ORANGE COUNTY, INC BUILD—OUT PM PEAK HOUR 5.3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES THIS DOCUMENT,TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE,IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECInC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER REUANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY IMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC.SHALL BE WTHOUT UABIUTY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 123 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail-Orange County, NC 6.0 Capacity Analysis Capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can pass over a particular road segment or through a particular intersection within a set time duration. Capacity is combined with Level-of-Service (LOS) to describe operating characteristics of a road segment or intersection. LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions and motorist perceptions within a traffic stream. The Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, LOS A through LOS F, with A representing the shortest average delays and F representing the longest average delays. LOS D is the typically accepted standard for signalized intersections in urbanized areas. For signalized intersections, LOS is defined for the overall intersection operation. For unsignalized intersections, only the movements that must yield right-of-way experience control delay. Therefore, LOS criteria for the overall intersection is not reported by Synchro/SimTraffic Version 11 or computable using methodology published in the Highway Capacity Manual. It is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Table 6.0 lists the LOS control delay thresholds published in the Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections, and all capacity analyses are included in the Appendix and are briefly summarized in the following sub-sections. Table 6.0 Level-of-Service Control Delay Thresholds Level-of- Signalized Intersections- Unsignalized Intersections-Average Service Control Delay Per Vehicle Control Delay [sec/veh] & Qualitative [sec/veh] Operational Description A < 10 < 10 B > 10-20 > 10- 15 Short Delays C >20-35 > 15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35-50 Moderate Delays F >80 >50 Long Delays Existing peak hour factors (PHF's) were used where current conditions exceed the default value of 0.90, which was also used at new intersections. Existing heavy vehicle percentages were used where current conditions exceed the default value of 2%. 12 124 Kimley)>)Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 6.1 NC 54— White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. Therefore,no improvements are recommended at this intersection. Table 6.1 summarizes the operation of the intersection for the existing and projected (2024) background and build-out traffic conditions. Table 6.1 Level-of-Service NC 54—White Cross Road (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Existing(2022) Traffic NB—D(34.2) NB—D (31.6) WBL—B 10.6 WBL—A 8.2 Background(2024)Traffic NB—E(37.2) NB—D (34.1) WBL—B 10.7 WBL—A 8.3 Build-out(2024)Traffic NB—E(43.4) NB—E(48.3) WBL—B 10.9 WBL—A 8.4 13 125 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 6.2 White Cross Road— Site Driveway The White Cross Retail development proposes to construct a full movement site driveway on White Cross Road approximately 330 feet south of NC 54. The following additional improvement is recommended along with the site driveway: • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the site driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at project build-out with the proposed improvement in place. Therefore, no additional improvements are recommended at this intersection to accommodate site traffic. Table 6.2 summarizes the operation of the intersection for the existing and projected (2024) background and build-out traffic conditions. Table 6.2 Level-of-Service White Cross Road — Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Build-out(2024)Traffic EB—A(8.9) EB—A(9.6) NBL—A 7.5) NBL—A 7.5 14 126 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 7.0 Segment Capacity Analysis The Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires an analysis of average weekday traffic volumes. 24-hour volume counts were performed at the following locations: • NC 54 west of White Cross Road November 2, 2022 • NC 54 east of White Cross Road November 2,2022 • White Cross Road south of NC 54 November 2, 2022 Consistent with the peak hour capacity analysis performed above, these existing volumes were grown at a 1.25%annual rate up to 2024 and were then added to the projected site traffic volumes to obtain projected(2024)build-out traffic volumes at each location. The projected (2024) build-out traffic volumes were compared to the thresholds for transitioning areas published in 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook published by the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT). Table 7.1 below summarizes this comparison. Table 7.1 Daily Traffic Volume Summary (vehicles per day) Projected (2024) FDOT Segment Roadway Conditions Build-out QLOS D Daily Volume Threshold NC 54 west of Interrupted Flow Facilities White Cross Road Class I State Signalized Arterials 11,516 16,200 Two-lane Undivided NC 54 east of Interrupted Flow Facilities White Cross Road Class I State Signalized Arterials 11,803 16,200 Two-lane Undivided White Cross Road Interrupted Flow Facilities south of NC 54 Class I Non-State Signalized Road 2,671 14,580 Two-lane Undivided As shown in Table 7.1, the projected (2024) build-out daily traffic volumes are expected to fall below the FDOT LOS D thresholds on all three segments. Note that the Level of Service D Standards for Systems Level Planning report published by NCDOT's Transportation Planning Branch in October 2011 was considered as a possible source for segmental capacity LOS thresholds. However, the road characteristics included in the FDOT methodology were judged to better match the road characteristics of the study area. Daily volume development calculations are detailed in the Appendix. 15 127 Kimley)>>Horn White Cross Retail—Orange County, NC 8.0 Recommendations The following improvements are recommended as part of the proposed White Cross Retail development: White Cross Road at Site Driveway • Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress and one egress lane • Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage on White Cross Road Analyses indicate that the unsignalized NC 54—White Cross Road intersection currently operates with moderate delays on the minor street approach (White Cross Road) in both peak hours. The minor street approach is projected to continue operating with moderate delays in both peak hours in 2024 with or without the proposed project in place. However, it is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Furthermore, Synchro indicates that minor street queues are projected to be less than 100 feet in the peak hours and that the addition of site traffic is expected to result only in a minor increase in delays and queues. With the recommended improvements in place, the proposed Site Driveway is projected to operate with short delays and queues at White Cross Road in both peak hours at project build-out. Figure 8.1 shows the recommended roadway laneage. 16 128 NOT TO SCALE r 150' NC 54 F S TE 0 0 SITE �V 1 DRIVEWAY 40 c� o ::E cn = cf) � ;:urn 0 LEGEND EXISTING LANE XX' STORAGE LENGTH EXISTING STOP SIGN <. RECOMMENDED LANE 0 RECOMMENDED STOP SIGN WHITE CROSS RETAIL FIGURE Kimley>>)Horn ORANGE COUNTY, NC RECOMMENDED ROADWAY LANEAGE 8.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THIS DOCUMENT.TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN.AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERACE.IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.INC.SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 129 Appendix 130 Appendix A: Memorandum of Understanding 131 Kimley>>> Horn MEMORANDUM To: Check Edwards, P.E., NCDOT District Office Nish Trivedi, Orange County Transportation From: Earl Lewellyn, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: October 27, 2022 Subject: White Cross Retail -Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum of Agreement The following assumptions will be incorporated into the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed White Cross Retail development. The site is located in the southwest quadrant of the NC 54 —White Cross intersection in Orange County, NC.As currently envisioned,the project will include approximately 11,000 square feet of general retail space.The site is proposed to be accessed via one driveway along White Cross Road. Build-out is anticipated in 2024. STUDY AREA Based on initial discussions, the following intersections are assumed to be included in the analysis: ■ NC 54—White Cross Road ■ White Cross Road—Site Driveway (proposed) ANALYSIS SCENARIOS We will analyze the weekday AM peak hour(7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour(4:00 to 6:00 PM) of the above intersections under the following traffic conditions: ■ Existing Traffic ■ Projected (2024) No-Build Traffic ■ Projected (2024) Build-Out Traffic ■ Projected (2024) Build-out Traffic with Improvements (if necessary) ANALYSIS CONDITIONS Actual peak hour factors will be used at intersections where current conditions exceed the default 0.90 value. Right turns on red will be allowed in all scenarios where currently permitted in the field. Signal timings will be optimized in each traffic condition. BASELINE TRAFFIC New AM peak hour (7:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour (4:00 — 6:00 PM) turning movement counts will be collected at the existing intersections listed above when Orange County schools are in session. APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS No approved/pending developments will be specifically included in the analysis as background traffic. 00 Morris Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701 • .: 132 Ki m ey>>> H o r n Page 2 BACKGROUND GROWTH Based on prior discussions and an analysis of historic growth rates (attached), existing volumes will be grown at a 1.25% annual rate up to the 2024 future study year. PUBLIC ROADWAY PROJECTS There are no known public roadway projects within the study area. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation for the project will be calculated using the equations presented in the 111"edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 ITE Trip Generation (Vehicles) Land AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Land Use Intensity Daily Code Total In Out Total In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza 11,000 SF 694 31 18 13 83 41 42 (<40k SF) Passby Trips will be calculated per ITE standards and distributed onto the network in proportion with current traffic volumes. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Based on a review of existing traffic counts and origins and destinations within the area, primary site traffic will be distributed to the roadway network as summarized below: • 55%to/from the east via NC 54 • 35% to/from the west via NC 54 • 10%to/from the south via White Cross Road 133 Appendix B: Traffic Count Data 134 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: White Cross Rd-- NC 54 QC JOB#: 15991301 CITY/STATE: Chapel Hill, NC DATE:Wed, Nov 2 2022 0 0 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM--8:15 AM o 0 + * Peak 15-Min:7:45 AM--8:00 AM + 0 0 0 0 0 0 + ✓ + r 292 r- 0 ! t 0 279 1.4 r- 0 ! 4 0 � 1.8 829+ 10910 256 3A+ 1.2 892 r 63 1 r 23 r 906 33 + 1.6 i r 8.7 + 3.6 36 0 77 a: 86 113 uAlty Counts 3.5 5.3 VATA TtMT DRMS COhihi{JKME5 0 0 0 J r + � 0 i 0 0 !� 10 1 + (� 0 r n 0 i r 0 * r o 0 0 +A L N/A N/A�+ • N/A N/A+ N/A + N/A * � � ^ N/A r 15-Min Count White Cross Rd White Cross Rd NC 54 NC 54 Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 7:00 AM 5 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 8 0 1 40 0 0 252 7:15 AM 10 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 15 0 6 68 0 0 323 7:30 AM 8 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 13 0 2 58 0 0 328 7:45 AM 11 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 17 0 6 77 0 0 357 1260 8:00 AM 7 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 18 0 9 53 0 0 276 1284 8:15 AM 8 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 19 0 9 55 0 0 266 1227 8:30 AM 16 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 19 0 10 60 0 0 238 1137 8:45 AM 10 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 8 0 5 57 0 0 215 995 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 44 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 68 0 24 308 0 0 1428 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 4 0 36 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 11/8/2022 11:31 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 135 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: White Cross Rd-- NC 54 QC JOB#: 15991302 CITY/STATE: Chapel Hill, NC DATE:Wed, Nov 2 2022 0 0 Peak-Hour:4:30 PM--5:30 PM 0 0 + * Peak 15-Min:4:45 PM--5:00 PM + 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 4 ✓ + r 831 « 0 > c 0 4. 861 1.9 « 0 j c 0 « 1.9 291+ [617 4. 773 3.8+ 1.8 342+ 51 1 r 88 + 325 3.8+ 3.9 i r 2.3 + 4 �58 0 *� � 3.4 0 5.9 739 92 uAlty Counts Fo}s 2.9 4.3 VATA THAT DRMS COhihi{JKME5 a o 0 J r + � 0 i 0 0 !� 10 o r ( , 0 r n 0 i 0 * r o 0 0 +A v L v +A v N/A�+ • N/A N/A N/A + N/A * � � ^ N/A r 15-Min Count White Cross Rd White Cross Rd NC 54 NC 54 Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 9 0 20 146 0 0 258 4:15 PM 13 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 17 0 22 179 0 0 313 4:30 PM 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 14 0 15 188 0 0 307 4:45 PM 14 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 12 0 30 210 0 0 335 1213 5:00 PM 19 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 11 0 14 199 0 0 326 1281 5:15 PM 14 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 14 0 29 176 0 0 327 1295 5:30 PM 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 15 0 24 177 0 0 301 1289 5:45 PM 11 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 20 0 17 167 0 0 282 1236 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 56 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 248 48 0 120 840 0 0 1340 Heavy Trucks 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 12 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 11/8/2022 11:31 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 136 Appendix C: Trip Generation 137 White Cross Retail Table 1 -Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out 822 Strip Retail Plaza(<40k s.f.) 11,000 s.f. 694 347 347 31 18 13 83 41 42 \\kimley-horn.com\SE_DUR\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\[White Cross Retail-TIA Data Sheet.xls]Trip Gen 11/15/22 138 Appendix D: Intersection Spreadsheets 139 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: White Cross Retail Net New Trips:1 18 13 41 42 Location: Orange County,NC Pass-By Trips: 0 0 0 1 0 Ct.Date November 2,2022 Ct.Peaks AM:7:15-8:15;PM:4:30-5:30 N/S Street: White Cross Road Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 E/W Street: NC 54 GrowthFactor:1 0.025 Buildout Year:1 2024 AM PEAK HOUR AM PHF= 0.9 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 829 63 23 256 0 36 0 77 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 829 63 23 256 0 36 0 77 0 0 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 21 2 1 6 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 850 65 24 262 0 37 0 79 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 35% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 55% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 6 10 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 2024 Buildout Total 0 850 71 34 262 0 41 0 86 0 0 0 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) 1 0.7% 3.6% 9.7% Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 2.0% PM PEAK HOUR PM PHF= 0.97 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 291 51 88 773 0 58 0 34 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 291 51 88 773 0 58 0 34 0 0 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 7 1 2 19 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 298 52 90 792 0 59 0 35 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 35% 55% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 14 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 55% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 23 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 14 23 0 0 15 0 23 0 0 0 2024 Buildout Total 0 298 66 113 792 0 74 0 58 0 0 0 Approach Percent Impact vs.Existing) 4.1% 2.7% 41.3% Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 5.4% IVa'mley-hora.comise_durldur ldMwhite cross retailIN-analysisl[white cross retail-fia data sheervIslint.#1-nc 54@white cross 11115122 140 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: White Cross Retail Net New Trips:1 18 13 41 42 Location: Orange County,NC Pass-By Trips: 0 0 0 1 0 Scenario: Study Scenario Cf.Date Cf.Peaks AM:xx-xx;PM:xx-xx N/S Street: White Cross Road Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 E/W Street: lSite Driveway GrowthFactor:1 0.025 BuildoutYear:1 2024 AM PEAK HOUR AM PHF= Site Driveway - White Cross Road White Cross Road Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 86 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 86 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 88 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 Percent Assignment Outbound 90% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 11 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 11 0 l 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 2024 Buildout Total II 0 1 0 0 0 2 116 0 0 88 16 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) #DIV/01 #DIV/01 1.8% 18.6% Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 12.8% PM PEAK HOUR PM PHF= Site Driveway - White Cross Road White Cross Road Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 2022 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 139 0 2022 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 139 0 Growth Factor(0.0125 per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 2024 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 142 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 37 Percent Assignment Outbound 90% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 38 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 38 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 37 2024 Buildout Total 38 0 4 0 0 0 j 4 94 0 0 142 37 Approach Percent Impact vs.Existing) #DIV/01 4.3% 26.6% Overall Percent Impact(vs.Buildout) 26.0% Uonley-haro.comise_durldur ldevl white cross retatllt4-analysisl[white cross retail-tia data sheet.xls]int.#2-site dray 11115122 141 Appendix E: Synchro Output: Existing 142 White Cross Retail Existing AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 829 63 23 256 36 77 Future Volume(vph) 829 63 23 256 36 77 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 991 0 26 284 126 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchrol1 -Existing AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 143 White Cross Retail Existing AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 829 63 23 256 36 77 Future Vol,veh/h 829 63 23 256 36 77 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 921 70 26 284 40 86 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 991 0 1292 956 Stage 1 - - - - 956 - Stage 2 - 336 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 671 179 306 Stage 1 - 372 - Stage 2 - 722 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 671 172 306 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 172 - Stage 1 372 Stage 2 694 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.9 34.2 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 245 671 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.512 0.038 HCM Control Delay(s) 34.2 10.6 HCM Lane LOS D B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol1 -Existing AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 144 White Cross Retail Existing PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 291 51 88 773 58 34 Future Volume(vph) 291 51 88 773 58 34 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1790 0 1770 1863 1680 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow(perm) 1790 0 1770 1863 1680 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 353 0 91 797 95 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol2-Existing PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 145 White Cross Retail Existing PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 291 51 88 773 58 34 Future Vol,veh/h 291 51 88 773 58 34 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 300 53 91 797 60 35 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 353 0 1306 327 Stage 1 - - - - 327 - Stage 2 - 979 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1206 176 705 Stage 1 - 728 - Stage 2 - 363 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1206 163 705 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 163 - Stage 1 728 Stage 2 336 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 31.6 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 228 1206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.416 0.075 HCM Control Delay(s) 31.6 8.2 HCM Lane LOS D A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.2 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol2-Existing PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 146 Appendix F: Synchro Output: Background (2024) 147 White Cross Retail Background AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 850 65 24 262 37 79 Future Volume(vph) 850 65 24 262 37 79 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1827 0 1656 1863 1606 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 1016 0 27 291 129 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchro\3-Background AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 148 White Cross Retail Background AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 850 65 24 262 37 79 Future Vol,veh/h 850 65 24 262 37 79 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 944 72 27 291 41 88 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1016 0 1325 980 Stage 1 - - - - 980 - Stage 2 - 345 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 656 171 297 Stage 1 - 362 - Stage 2 - 715 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 656 164 297 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 164 - Stage 1 362 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.9 37.2 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 236 656 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.546 0.041 HCM Control Delay(s) 37.2 10.7 - HCM Lane LOS E B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3 - 0.1 - K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchro\3-Background AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 149 White Cross Retail Background PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 298 52 90 792 59 35 Future Volume(vph) 298 52 90 792 59 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1790 0 1770 1863 1682 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow(perm) 1790 0 1770 1863 1682 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 361 0 93 816 97 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchro\4-Background PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 150 White Cross Retail Background PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 298 52 90 792 59 35 Future Vol,veh/h 298 52 90 792 59 35 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 307 54 93 816 61 36 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 361 0 1336 334 Stage 1 - - - - 334 - Stage 2 - 1002 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1198 168 699 Stage 1 - 723 - Stage 2 - 354 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1198 155 699 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 155 - Stage 1 723 Stage 2 326 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 34.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 218 1198 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.445 0.077 HCM Control Delay(s) 34.1 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS D A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.1 - - 0.3 - K:\DUR_LDEV\White Cross Retail\T4-Analysis\Synchro\4-Background PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 151 Appendix G: Synchro Output - Build-out (2024) 152 White Cross Retail Build AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 850 71 34 262 41 86 Future Volume(vph) 850 71 34 262 41 86 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1828 0 1656 1863 1608 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.984 Satd. Flow(perm) 1828 0 1656 1863 1608 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Confl. Bikes(#Ihr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 2% 9% 2% 3% 7% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 1023 0 38 291 142 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 153 White Cross Retail Build AM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 850 71 34 262 41 86 Future Vol,veh/h 850 71 34 262 41 86 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 2 9 2 3 7 Mvmt Flow 944 79 38 291 46 96 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1023 0 1351 984 Stage 1 - - - - 984 - Stage 2 - 367 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 6.43 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 3.527 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 652 165 295 Stage 1 - 361 - Stage 2 - 699 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 652 155 295 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 155 - Stage 1 361 Stage 2 658 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 43.4 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 228 652 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.619 0.058 HCM Control Delay(s) 43.4 10.9 HCM Lane LOS E B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.6 0.2 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 154 White Cross Retail Build AM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway II 11/10/2022 t t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Volume(vph) 11 4 4 116 88 16 Future Volume(vph) 11 4 4 116 88 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1735 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.998 Satd. Flow(perm) 1735 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Link Speed(mph) 15 50 50 Link Distance(ft) 255 1122 322 Travel Time(s) 11.6 15.3 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 16 0 0 133 98 18 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 155 White Cross Retail Build AM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 4 4 116 88 16 Future Vol,veh/h 11 4 4 116 88 16 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 - 100 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 4 4 129 98 18 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 235 98 116 0 0 Stage 1 98 - - - - Stage 2 137 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 753 958 1473 Stage 1 926 - - Stage 2 890 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 751 958 1473 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 751 - - Stage 1 923 Stage 2 890 Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1473 797 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.021 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.5 0 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol5-Build AM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 156 White Cross Retail Build PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Volume(vph) 298 66 113 792 74 58 Future Volume(vph) 298 66 113 792 74 58 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 150 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length(ft) 215 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1781 0 1770 1863 1666 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.973 Satd. Flow(perm) 1781 0 1770 1863 1666 0 Link Speed(mph) 55 55 50 Link Distance(ft) 2773 3259 322 Travel Time(s) 34.4 40.4 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.94 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 6% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 376 0 119 816 140 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 157 White Cross Retail Build PM 1: White Cross Road & NC 54 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Traffic Vol,veh/h 298 66 113 792 74 58 Future Vol,veh/h 298 66 113 792 74 58 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 95 95 97 95 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 2 2 3 6 Mvmt Flow 307 69 119 816 78 62 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 376 0 1396 342 Stage 1 - - - - 342 - Stage 2 - 1054 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.43 6.26 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.43 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.527 3.354 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 155 692 Stage 1 - 717 - Stage 2 - 334 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 139 692 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 139 - Stage 1 - - 717 - Stage 2 - 300 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.1 48.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 215 1182 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.649 0.101 HCM Control Delay(s) 48.3 8.4 HCM Lane LOS E A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.9 0.3 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 158 White Cross Retail Build PM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway II 11/10/2022 t t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Volume(vph) 38 4 4 94 142 37 Future Volume(vph) 38 4 4 94 142 37 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow(prot) 1759 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.956 0.998 Satd. Flow(perm) 1759 0 0 1859 1863 1583 Link Speed(mph) 15 50 50 Link Distance(ft) 255 1122 322 Travel Time(s) 11.6 15.3 4.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 46 0 0 108 158 41 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 159 White Cross Retail Build PM 2: White Cross Road & Site Driveway 11/10/2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 4 t r* Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 4 4 94 142 37 Future Vol,veh/h 38 4 4 94 142 37 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 - 100 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 4 4 104 158 41 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 270 158 199 0 0 Stage 1 158 - - - - Stage 2 112 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 719 887 1373 Stage 1 871 - - Stage 2 913 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 717 887 1373 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 717 - - Stage 1 868 Stage 2 913 Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 10.3 0.3 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1373 730 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.064 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.6 0 10.3 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - - K:1DUR_LDEV1White Cross Retail\T4-AnalysislSynchrol6-Build PM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report 160 Appendix H : Florida 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook Excerpts UALITY ��P(�OFF OR/6 Q / LEVEL OF SERVIC ° HANDBOOK OF TB PN"QO O O STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2013 162 For NC 54 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's TABLE 2 Transitioning Areas and Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas' 12/18i12 ro INTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES 7 bNINTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIES I STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes B C D E 4 44,100 57,600 68,900 71,700 Lanes Median B C D E 6 65,100 85,600 102,200 111,000 2 Undivided * 14,400 16,200 ** g 85,100 113,700 135,200 150,000 4 Divided * 34,000 35,500 ** 10 6 Divided 52,100 53,500 106,200 141,700 168,800 189,000 * ** Class H(35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Freeway Adjustments Lanes Median B C D E Auxiliary Lanes Ramp 2 Undivided * 6,500 13,300 14,200 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided * 9,900 28,800 31,600 +20,000 +5% 6 Divided * 16,000 44,900 47,600 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments JkAdjustmen't (Alter corresponding state volumesby the indicated percent.) or White Non-State Signalized Roadways - 10% oss Road Median &Turn Lane Adjustments UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided 9,200 17,300 24,400 33,300 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 35,300 49,600 62,900 69,600 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 52,800 74,500 94,300 104,500 Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +5% Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facility Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-directional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE 'Values shown are presented as two-way annual average daily volumes for levels of (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated.This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service applications.The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for volumes.) more specific planning applications.The table and deriving computer models should Paved not be used for corridor or intersection design,where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual and Shoulder/Bicycle the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Lane Coverage B C D E 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number 0-49% * 2,600 6,100 19,500 oftnotorized vehicles,not number ofbicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 50-84% 1,900 5,500 18,400 >19,500 , o 85-100% 7,500 19,500 >19,500 ** nsesper hourshown are only for thepeakhour n the single directionofthe higher traffic fl PEDESTRIAN MODE * Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service **Not applicable for that level service letter Fade.For the automobile mode, volumes.) volumes greater than level of service ice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached.For the bicycle mode,the level of service letter Fade(including F)is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input Sidewalk Coverage B C D E value defaults. 0-49% * * 2,800 9,400 50-84% * 1,600 8,600 15,600 85-100% 3,800 10,500 17,100 >19,500 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Source: Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Florida Department of Transportation 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 Systems Planning office 85-100% >4 >3 >2 > 1 www.dot.state.fLus/nlanning/systems/snV]os/default.shtm 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES 163 Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's TABLE 2 Transitioning and (continued) Areas Over 5,000 Not In Urbanized Areas 12/18/12 Interrupted Flow Facilities INPUT VALUE Uninterrupted Flow Facilities State Arterials Class I ASSUMPTIONS Freeways Highways Class I Class II Bicycle Pedestrian ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Area type(t,uo) t t t t t t t t t Number of through lanes(both dir.) 4-10 2 4-6 2 4-6 2 4-6 4 4 Posted speed(mph) 70 50 50 45 50 30 30 45 45 Free flow speed(mph) 75 55 55 50 55 35 35 50 50 Auxiliary lanes(n,y) n n n Median(n,nr,r) n r n y n y r r Terrain(l,r) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 %no passing zone 60 Exclusive left turn lane impact(n,y) [n] y y y y y y y Exclusive right turn lanes(n,y) n n n n n n Facility length(mi) 8 5 5 1.8 2 2 2 2 2 Number of basic segments 4 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Planning analysis hour factor(K) 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Directional distribution factor(D) 0.555 0.550 0.550 0.550 0.570 0.570 0.565 0.570 0.570 Peak hour factor(PHF) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Base saturation flow rate (pcphpl) 1,700 2,100 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Heavy vehicle percent 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Local adjustment factor 0.85 0.97 0.95 %left turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 %right turns 12 12 12 12 12 12 CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Number of signals 5 4 10 10 4 6 Arrival type(1-6) 4 3 4 4 4 4 Signal type(a,c,p) c c c c c c Cycle length(C) 120 150 120 150 120 120 Effective green ratio(g/C) 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.44 0.44 MULTIMODAL CHARACTERISTICS Paved shoulder/bicycle lane(n,y) n,50%,y n Outside lane width(n,t,w) t t Pavement condition(d,t,u) t On-street parking(n,y) n n Sidewalk(n,y) n,50%,y Sidewalk/roadway separation(a,t,w) t Sidewalk protective barrier(n,y) n LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Freeways Highways Arterials Bicycle Ped Bus Level of Two-Lane Multilane Class I Class II Service Density Score Score Buses/hr. %ffs Density ats ats B <17 >83.3 <17 >31 mph >22 mph <2.75 <2.75 <6 C <24 >75.0 <24 >23 mph >17 mph <3.50 <3.50 <4 D <31 >66.7 <31 >18 mph >13 mph <4.25 <4.25 <3 E <39 1 >58.3 1 <35 1 >15 mph I >10 mph 1 <5.00 1 <5.00 1 <2 %ffs=Percent free flow speed ats=Average travel speed 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES 164 Type of report:Tube Count-Volume Data LOCATION: NC 54 west of White Cross Rd QC JOB#: 15991303 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB,WB CITY/STATE: Orange, NC DATE: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Average Week Profile 2 Nov 22 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 57 57 57 ❑ 01:00 AM 30 30 30 02:00 AM 19 19 19 0 03:00 AM 18 18 18 04:00 AM 45 45 45 0 05:00 AM 210 210 210 0 06:00 AM 603 603 603 07:00 AM 1108 1108 1108 08:00 AM 829 829 829 09:00 AM 548 548 548 10:00 AM 497 497 497 11:00 AM 456 456 456 12:00 PM 529 529 529 01:00 PM 537 537 537 02:00 PM 619 619 619 03:00 PM 780 780 780 04:00 PM 1040 1040 1040 05:00 PM 1057 1057 1057 06:00 PM 817 817 817 07:00 PM 471 471 471 08:00 PM 273 273 273 09:00 PM 223 223 223 10:00 PM 150 150 150 11:00 PM 81 81 81 Day Total 10997 10997 10997 %Weekday 100% Average %Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 1108 1108 1108 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 1057 1057 1057 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 165 Type of report:Tube Count-Volume Data LOCATION: NC 54 east of White Cross Rd QC JOB#: 15991304 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB,WB CITY/STATE: Orange, NC DATE: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Average Week Profile 2 Nov 22 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 01:00 AM 31 31 31 02:00 AM 19 19 19 0 03:00 AM 19 19 19 0 04:00 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 05:00 AM 224 224 224 0 06:00 AM 626 626 626 0 07:00 AM 1158 1158 1158 08:00 AM 857 857 857 09:00 AM 564 564 564 0 10:00 AM 485 485 485 0 11:00 AM 473 473 473 0 12:00 PM 546 546 546 0 01:00 PM 547 547 547 0 02:00 PM 633 633 633 0 03:00 PM 785 785 785 04:00 PM 1024 1024 1024 05:00 PM 1037 1037 1037 06:00 PM 826 826 826 07:00 PM 472 472 472 0 08:00 PM 264 264 264 0 09:00 PM 225 225 225 0 10:00 PM 145 145 145 11:00 PM 79 79 79 ❑ Day Total 11141 11141 11141 %Weekday 100% Average %Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 1158 1158 1158 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 1037 1037 1037 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 166 Type of report:Tube Count-Volume Data LOCATION:White Cross Rd south of NC 54 QC JOB#: 15991305 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB,SB CITY/STATE: Orange, NC DATE: Nov 2 2022-Nov 2 2022 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Average Week Profile 2 Nov 22 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 14 14 14 [ 01:00 AM 3 3 3 02:00 AM 3 3 3 03:00 AM 1 1 1 04:00 AM 4 4 4 0 05:00 AM 32 32 32 0 06:00 AM 110 110 110 07:00 AM 186 186 186 08:00 AM 207 207 207 09:00 AM 121 121 121 10:00 AM 129 129 129 11:00 AM 129 129 129 12:00 PM 181 181 181 01:00 PM 131 131 131 02:00 PM 162 162 162 03:00 PM 186 186 186 04:00 PM 223 223 223 05:00 PM 234 234 234 06:00 PM 189 189 189 07:00 PM 129 129 129 08:00 PM 68 68 68 09:00 PM 58 58 58 10:00 PM 27 27 27 11:00 PM 10 10 10 V Day Total 2537 2537 2537 %Weekday 100% Average %Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 207 207 207 PM Peak 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:00 PM Volume 234 234 234 Comments: Report generated on 11/11/2022 12:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) 167 Project: White Cross Retail Daily In Daily Out Location: Orange County,NC Net New Trips: 347 347 Ct.Date November 2,2022 Pass-By Trips: 0 0 N/S Street: White Cross Road E/W Street: NC 54 Annual Growth Rate: 1.25% Existing Year: 2022 Growth Factor: 0.025 Buildout Year: 2024 NC 54 NC 54 White Cross Road West of White Cross Road East of White Cross Road South of NC 54 2022 Traffic Count 10,997 11,141 2,537 Count Balancing 0 0 0 2022 Existing Traffic 10,997 11,141 2,537 Growth Factor(per year) 0.025 0.025 0.025 2024 Background Growth 277 280 64 2024 Background Traffic 11,274 11,421 2,601 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 35% 55% 10% Inbound Project Traffic 121 191 35 Percent Assignment Outbound 35% 55% 10% Outbound Project Traffic 121 191 35 Pass-By Capture Reduction 0 0 0 Pass-By Capture Assignment 0 0 0 Total Pass-By Traffic 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 242 382 70 2024 Buildout Total 11516 11803 2671 Approach Percent Impact(vs.Existing) 2.2% 3.4% 2.8% 168 169 4 IN , a a : Emg I m ME]EIK 0 § : EIET o MOM o RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION � a soaF,pie=I-o souE:ve°=Io• � � � F a� .m wr.LL r,�K �nwri+eo«rnc uwn � �a u j 4 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION sG�:ve•,rb• x.�.va.i o x x a � Q o a � a Q z q O � O W O O O O a I I = I I LJ II c � ..EE.rv�weE. s A-2 FLOOR PLAN scn�:ve•.vo' or 5 1 Y i, :,'�`ram. k � S♦i♦�;r 444E 1 1 WIN 171 115MPH D• i • Internally Illuminated-LED DGEN-DF4X8-115MON DESIGN INTENT ONLY Engineering Required to 8'-01/2"cabinet Determine Actual Production 7'-81/2'vo 1'_3 1/2"+/- &Installation Requirements T-7 3/8" area 1 7'4 5/8"(shroud) 10 1/4" 3"Vent 2"F-Retainer 1 A R EMS 10"D/F Sign Extrusionm to 4 -- .177"Clear Polycarbonate w/ GENERAL 2nd Surtace Paint 8 Vinyl Graphics Disconnect SwiI �� q DOLLAR 1' A ca GENERAL .080"Alum.Shroud 'Removable to Access Plates 36.17 Sq Ft Scale:1/2"=V-0" Scale:1/2"=V-0" Scale:3/8"=V-0" 11,�-12.la! Faces: .177"Clear Polycarbonate w/2nd Surface Paint&Vinyl Graphics OPaint to Match Cabinet: EMS 10"Alum.Sign Frame Cabinet w/F-Retainers. Pantone PMS 109 C Exterior Painted Black(Semi Gloss),Interior Painted White Paint n PMS Cool Gray 5 C Match Pantone Ilium: White LEDs as Required by Manufacturer,Remote Power Supplies Black(Semi Gloss) Electrical: Actual#of Circuits to be Determined by Licensed Electrical Contractor (1)20 AMP Circuit,120 Volts All paint finishes to be Satin unless otherwise specified I Quantity: (1)ONE ANW/I1�-- Lam° Electric Sign RE UIGN IS INTENDED ARTICLE E INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITHTHE GROUNDED /C/I//OK1,!/CS M\[JTl Com lies with REQUIREMENTS OF ARTIOLE 600 OFT HE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CONIEVEC�IOrvS Qn R /OR OTHER CABLE LOCAL CODES.TH IS INCLUDES PROPER IIlAB GROUNDING AND BONDING OFTHE SIGN. Copyright®2021 Allan Industries,Inc. Client: Date: Page#: # Date Description Initial Client Review Status Tnis is an original,unpuh'i.h.d I. su drawing,cmatetl by Allen Dollar General 12/10/21 2 of 21 1 01118122 Si na e Updates&Corrections ECW Zr St IndustNee,mp.This erawmg is submined to you in confidence 9 9 P Allen Industries, Inc. requires that an approved for your usesclelyin mnn.cti.nwiththep.j-b.ing PIann`d # File Name: 2 02/02/22 Update to 115 mph ECW drawing be obtained from the client prior to any YOUR BRAND AT ITS BESTT. foran you by Alanoutside Indyour oiga Inc. andor usis te,be shown d 3 02/22/22 Update to S000k Modules ECW production release or production release revision. gone tside your omaniza6on, d, pmduoed, DG Monument Si ns 304 ' ' copied or exhibited in any fashion whafscever.The designs Address: — 9 — 4 12115122 Update Sign Specs ECW -967-2553 snewn on me arawmg(except for any registered va,amarks Sales: Design: PM: g - Client Signature: Approval Date: r that may belong to a client of Allen Industries,Inc.)remain the propertyorAllenlndustnes,Ino. House ECW 8 - 172 115 MPHDollar LED Illuminated/Raceway Mounted DGEN-LTR-I8-RWY115 DESIGN INTENT ONLY Engineering Required to Determine Actual Production &Installation Requirements FIELD SURVEY REQUIRED 16'-8 1/8" Prior to Release to Production 8'-47/8" 1/1 9'-63/16" 5"41/2" Raceway Se 3M Vinyl Applied 1st Surface B 1"Trim Cap — <q a a 41/2"x41/20 Fabricated-- "Shoebox"Raceway 8'-105/8" #2037 Yellow Acrylic (raceway) (raceway) 28.01 Sq Ft Scale:3/8"=1'-O" Scale:3/8"=V-0" DOLLAR GENERAL Scale:1/4"=1'-0" � Face: .177"2037 Yellow Acrylic w/1"Trim Cap-Black 7121-12.1a.kReturns: 5"x.040"Alum.Coil Stock-Pre-Finished Black(Gloss) Baeks: 3mm ACM-Pre-Finished White Raceway: Fabricated"Shoebox'Alum.Raceway-Painted to Match Fascia _ Black Trim Cap Ilium: White LEDs as Required by Manufacturer; Power Supplies Located in Raceway O#2037 Yellow Acrylic Electrical: Actual#of Circuits to be Determined by Licensed Electrical Contractor (1)20 AMP Circuit,120 Volts Wall Type: TBD ORaceway Color:TBD Install: Raceway to be installed using min.318"all thread fasteners(or approved equivalent)and wood blocking as required All paint finishes to be Satin unless Otherwise specified Quantity: (1)ONE /--,-1�-- Electric Sign THISSIGN IS INTENDEDTOBE INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE GROUNDED REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ELECTRICAL Complies with /OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES.THIS INCLUDES PROPER CONNECTIONS F]FlLF UlAB GROUNDING AN DING OF TH E SIGN. Fri.is Allan Industries,Inc. Client: Issue Date: Page#: # Date Description Initial Client Review Status This is an original,unpublished drewing,createtl by Allen Dollar General 12/01/21 2 of 13 1 01118122 Si na e Updates&Corrections ECW lndusu.s,lac.This drawing is submined to you in confidence 9 9 P Allen Industries, Inc. requires that an approved for your usesclelyin mM.oti0n withthep.jectb.ingplanned 2 02/01/22 Update to 115 MPH ECW drawing be obtained from the client prior to an YOUR BRAND AT ITS BESTT. for you by Allan IMJT,Ies,mo. and Is not to be shown to File Name: 9 P Y anyone outside your omani�agon,nor used,reproduced, DIG Channel Letter Raceway 304 3 02/22/22 Update to 5000k Modules ECW production release or production release revision. ' f -967-2553 copied or exhibited in any fashion wlu,s er.The designs Address: — y— 4 12/12/22 Update Sign Specs ECW anown on the drawing(except for any registered vadamarks Sales: Design: PM: g - Client Signature: Approval Date: r that may belong to a client of Allen Industries,Inc.)remain the prepertyorAllentndustdes,lnc. House ECW 6 - 173 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lumens/Lamp LLF Lum. Watts Description [� 5 G Single 5346.7 0.950 39.8284 LEDS- WP4053 Wall Pack {]] 4 HB Single 20784 0.950 148.978 LEDS-AL1211 -TS-SL0715-15OW-H3-40K Numeric Summary Luminaire Location Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min LumNo Label Z Site Illuminance Fc 0.23 22.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. 1 HB 16.5 Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 1.58 15.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. 2 HB 16.5 3 HB 16.5 4 HB 16.5 Notes: 5 G 12 Plan Notes: 6 G 12 7 G 12 Calculations at Ground Level (10' x 10' Grid Spacing). Refer to luminaire location summary 8 G 12 for mounting heights of each fixture. Pole mounted fixtures include a 2ft concrete base. g G 12 Mounting heights indicated on luminaire location summary is a total A.F.G. height. General Notes: Due to changing lighting ordinances it is the contractors resposibility to submit the site photometrics & luminaire specs to the local inspector before ordering to ensure this plan complies with local lighting ordinances. This lighting design is based on information supplied by others. Changes in electrical supply, area geometry & objects within the lighted area may produce illumination values different from the predicted results shown on this layout. This layout is based on .IES files that were lab tested or computer generated, actual results may vary. Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 �� LE13S Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 1 of 9 174 ........................................................ 77--- ........................................ 00 00 00 00 .............................. a a I aaa � � � 00 �a as .............................. ............................ , , a, a aaa aIa aaaaaaaoo as l ...................... as I ............................................................ .......... aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa . ..................................... ........................ aaaaaaaaa aaaaa ............ ............ aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa ...................................................................... 4M Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 L.r,EDPrepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, Wl 54952 ?iLLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 2 of 9 175 01, \, \ \ ° s a� Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLCM Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 �� LED Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 3 of 9 176 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 Lsvi LE13S Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 4 of 9 177 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC -� Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 � LEOS Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 5 of 9 178 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC -� Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 � LEOS Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 6 of 9 179 Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC 93 Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 � LFm0 Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 7 of 9 180 13.8 13.1 12.5 4.4 11.9 11.3 10.63 0 Illuminance Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 �- LE13S Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 8 of 9 181 4.4 13.8 13.1 12.5 1.9 1.3 . 0 Illuminance Project name: Dollar General LEDS - LLC 13 Chapel Hill NC 24465 Lighting Layout N8874 Fire Lane 1 L LE13S Prepared for: Vanguard Property Group Menasha, WI 54952 LLC PH 920-840-6054 / FAX 920-840-6424 Prepared by: Brent M. Finley, LC www.leds-llc.com Date:12/12/2022 Page 9 of 9 182 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L�J L E D S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LLC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0�'0- 0�.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �10T�o-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HI j��7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 ov a�e.o_ 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 d 1oV.0 �o.o�. o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a-0-0.n_.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o�.t'- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0000.0=.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.II6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 e-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.m 0.0 0.ro o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.l o.l o.l o.l o.l o.l o.l o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0-0�D_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0\0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 B--O_o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o=.o 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o\o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 11 0-2-�.3 0� 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. \0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0--. -5-_0. 0.3 0=0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.9 3.5 2.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0\.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0�p.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1. .s .2 0 1.9 4.s 3.9 3.9 3.0 1.8 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 \Q.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Io.O 0.0 lo.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 4. 1.2 .z 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G G 10. 7.6 3.5 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 .o 0.0 0.0 0.\.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 l .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 20. 11.3 4.1 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0l0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. HB 21 3 11.5 4.0 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 -0-.1'-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 k 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 14.7 1 .9 9.4 3.4 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 C_O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 219.4 9.9 9.7 2.9 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 d.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HO.o 6.5 7.4 2.4 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0I1.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2.10.4 5.7 2.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 .1 0.1 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0. 9.9 8.3 4.7 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 13 9 9.0 4.2 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 �-0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0I0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 .8 10.4 3.9 1.2 0.4 0.2 0 1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 �- b- o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5IE 9 1 .s 9.1 3.2 0.9 0.3 0,2 o. 0:1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 lo.o 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.� I I I !0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 s.3 7.6 2.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� 0.0 0.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 15.7 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' o.o;0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 I cn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.q o.0 0.q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.4 .7 9.2 2.6 6 5 HB17. 12.3 4.9 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0l0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I o.o o.of 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0. 8 5.27 s.6 3.7 .0 7.4 7.9 9.7 6.8 3.2 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 Olo 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0 5 1.2 !z.3 z.8 3.0 9.1 3.9 3.0 5.4 7.3 5.7 3.9 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 .1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0. .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 -.--a-----4_50.9 l.11 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.2 3.6 3.3 2.3 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 v 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0.0 0.0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_1 0.1 3 0. 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.s 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.z 0.2 0.3 0.4 4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0. .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0. 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Io.0 0.0 Io.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.o 0.0 b. b. d.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o I o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0�� � Revisions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.O .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 �. I 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0I.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0l0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.'0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0�.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 o.lo 0.0 1 0 0.o 0.0 ___n-_0� 0-0-a-0�.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0l0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Luminaire Location Summary 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.Ib 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ql.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LumNo Label Z 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.¢ 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o-n ^ ^.&- . ��0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.010.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o Ip.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 1 HB 16.5 II I 2 HB 16.5 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lo.o 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 o.o 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 3 HB 16.5 J 4 HB 16.5 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 G 12 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 �.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 G 12 7 G 12 IF � 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.o d.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 8 G 12 LL 9 G 12 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lo.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o C• o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.lo 0.0 olo 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lo.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o G o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� 0.0 0.� o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.olo.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.ol 0.0 0.0�0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 � M W 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 � '^ Luminaire Schedule Calculation Summary Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description LLF Luminaire Luminaire Total Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Lumens Watts Watts Site Illuminance Fc 0.23 22.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. [} 5 G Single LEDS-WP4053 Wall Pack 0.950 5359 39.8284 199.142 Parking Lot Illuminance Fc 1.58 15.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. 4 HB Single LEDS-AL1211 -TS- 0.950 20788 148.978 595.912 SL0715-15OW-H3-40K ' n V / Notes: CD Plan Notes: 411- Calculations at Ground Level (10' x 10' Grid Spacing). Refer to luminaire location summary N for mounting heights of each fixture. Pole mounted fixtures include a 2ft concrete base. 3.1 13.1Cz C.) Mounting heights indicated on luminaire location summary is a total A.F.G. height. 2.5 1 2.5 z General Notes: 1.9 _ _ - _ Due to changing lighting ordinances it is the contractors res osibilit to submit the site �'��` rr, g g g g p Y (� photometrics & luminaire specs to the local inspector before ordering to ensure this plan63 - complies with local lighting ordinances. This lighting design is based on information supplied Cz by others. Changes in electrical supply, area geometry & objects within the lighted area may = Cz produce illumination values different from the predicted results shown on this layout. This 0 layout is based on . IES files that were lab tested or computer generated, actual results may vary. 0 U Page 1 of 1 183 ORANGE COUNTY DEED OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT NORTH CAROLINA (Water Source) THIS DEED OF EASEMENT and AGREEMENT, made this day of February, 2023, by and between Patricia w. Cecil, 2505 Wildcat Creek Road, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27518 ("Grantor"), and (the "Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property located on Wildcat Creek Road in Bingham Township, consisting of approximately 31.84 acres of land more particularly described in a deed recorded at Dee4d Book 416, page 1 in the Orange County Registry, on which there is currently an approximately 3.0 acre pond and identified as Orange County PIN 9748-28-3016 (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantee plans to develop and build a commercial structure on a nearby approximately 4.83 parcel located at having Orange County PIN 9749-40-2351 ("Grantee's Property"), and requires a source of water for fire protection purposes with respect to structures to be built on Grantee's Property; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns an easement to draw water from the pond on the Property as a source of water for firefighting purposes, only, for the benefit of Grantee's Property and for no other property or purpose. 184 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged by Grantor and Grantee, the Grantor does hereby give, grant, quitclaim, and convey unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right and privilege and perpetual easement over, upon and through the Property for the sole purpose of drawing water from the pond on the Property for fire protection purposes for the benefit of the Grantee's Property. By this easement, Grantor conveys to Grantee, and to local fire departments and fire department personnel responding to any fire at Grantee's premises, the right to go on the Property using the least intrusive or disruptive means possible under the circumstance, to draw water from the pond as may be necessary to extinguish a fire at Grantee's property. Grantor covenants with Grantee that Grantor is seized of the Property in fee simple, has the right to convey the rights, privileges and easements which are granted herein, that title is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances which may affect the said rights, privileges and easements conveyed herein, and Grantor will warrant and defend the title to said easements against the claims of all persons or parties whomsoever. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK; CONTINUE NEXT PAGE] 2 185 FURTHERMORE, it is agreed by Grantor and by Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, that Grantee shall indemnify Grantor, its successors and assigns, from all claims for damages to property made against Grantor arising from the use of the pond on Grantor's property as a source of water for fire suppression services on Grantee's Property. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have hereunto set their hands the year and day first above written. PATRICIA W. CECIL, Grantor , Grantee BY; (Name, Title) Orange County,North Carolina I, , a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that Patricia W. Cecil, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this the day of , 2023. (Official Seal) Notary Public My commission expires: 3 1 Sir. Attachment 2 Staff Report Zoning Atlas Amendment — Conditional District ORANGECOUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Basic Information 3026 White Cross Road, Vicinity Map for Rezoning-X plicaticn PIN 97494O2351 Parcel Address P� Ik Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Parcel Identification 9749-40-2351 ET °h Chapel Number (PIN) / s ° Town: - Glandon Forest Equity, peI HIIT hp G Applicant Name LLC A� w Cane Cra k Au :I 3825 Barrett Drive ��t and Address Suite 100 R-wR Raleigh, NC, 27609 Property Owner Vernon P. Davis / u • Name and Address 2401 NC Hwy 54 W � ke, �tPSN9�02351 "°'g"�° t° ty Chapel Hill NC 27516 (if different from > t ci i Ets ` H R Applicant) 1a°9h-T-,hi, Pro<a«ed —Mxjo5l earns � - �..,vx�,s Pp th�s 7P A Agent(s), if applicable N/A Parcel Size 4.83 acres Adopted Future Land Use Map with Parcel 9749402351 De icted Future Land Use Rural Community Activity Node Map (FLUM) Designation FLUM Overlay(s) Resource Protection Area (for historic structure located on north side of Highway 54) Growth Management Rural s System Designation Definition of FLUM Land designated in the Designation Comprehensive Plan that is focused on designated road Haw River Watemhetl (from Article 10 of intersections which serve as a ° UDO) nodal crossroads for the surrounding rural community and is an appropriate location for any of the following: church, fire station, small post office, school, or other similar institutional uses �Rem�Prof °nAr°°, and one or more commercial uses. °A° F.Wre—d J-C-9,d` gy m R-1 comma°uv 1 1517 Attachment 2 �o Rezoning Application to NR-CD for PIN 974 AR (Agricultural Residential) —94oz35� 3.67 acres Current Zoning District NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial) — 1.16 acres 1 ` NR-CD (Non-Residential 1 f --- Requested Zoning Conditional District) District � 1 J r Requested Zoning IJ J [7] =�r l District Consistent 9"9'°z'S' with Appendix F of j 2030 Yes Haw River Watershed Comprehensive s"` J Plan Existing Zoning Haw River Unprotected —� Overlay Districts Watershed zonin AR g ��11 Amendments Proposed for �R' Overlay Districts No (Y/N) 2 Attachment 2 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Aerial Image with Parcel 9749g02351 Outlined North Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) HVAC • business; Local Commercial (LC-1) shop in the historic school building; Rural Residential (R-1) residential home. South Agricultural Residential (AR) residential homes. r' `' East Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) gas 3 station; and Rural Residential (R-1) vacant. West Agricultural Residential (AR) residential 9 148 4 0 23 51 homes. Existing Roads North NC Highway 54 West South Kristie Lane approximately 200 feet to the south 3 3 r East White Cross Road West None ""�✓ 1 �,. Existing Conditions/Physical Features The parcel currently has a stick built structure that is proposed to be demolished. The topography is relatively flat. Other than a small clump of trees near the center of the parcel, the parcel has been cleared of vegetation (other than grass that's kept mowed) for many years. Public Water and Sewer Private well and septic systems are used in this area. The Water and Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement (WASMPBA) does not designate this area as a Primary Service Area for water and sewer services. Proposed Project Proposed Development A conditional zoning district with "Retail Use" being the sole specific permitted use, and the layout specified provided in the submitted site-specific plan, as detailed and defined within the Unified Development Ordinance and as authorized by NCGS 160D-703. The Applicant, Glandon Forest Equity, LLC, seeks to rezone an approximately 4.83 acre parcel of land located on the southwest corner of White Cross Road and NC Highway 54 West from its current zoning of NC-2 and AR, to the Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) in order to develop on the property an approximately 10,640 square foot general merchandise store stating: "The Property is located in a commercial node, as indicated on the application. There are existing commercial and retail businesses to the east, across White Cross Road, and to the north, across NC 3 Attachment 2 Highway 54. The area is undergoing development generally consistent with the rural character of the area, and is underserved by the type of general merchandise store use proposed by the Applicant. Currently, the property is "split zoned", with the northeast corner being zoned NC 2, and the balance of the Property, in an "L" shape surrounding the NC 2 portion, being zoned Agricultural Residential (AR). The current split zoning of the Property makes it difficult to develop for economically beneficial use. NC Highway 54 is a primary corridor between Carrboro and Chapel Hill to the east, and Alamance County to the west. There is considerable development activity in and along the corridor. The existing and anticipated future growth in the southwest portion of Orange County makes the Property an ideal location for the addition of a general merchandise store use of the type the Applicant proposes. The proposed store would serve the existing community and anticipated future growth. Moreover, as shown in the more detailed plans for the Property which accompany the Application, the proposed store is designed to fit in with the character of the area. The site has been designed to address concerns regarding traffic patterns on both White Cross Road and NC Highway 54, and there will be no adverse impact on existing traffic in the area. In fact, the proposed development will significantly benefit the surrounding community by providing a closer to home shopping opportunity for household essentials. This will thereby reduce household fuel costs, the length of vehicle trips, which in turn will lessen traffic and strain along NC 54 and surrounding thoroughfares. Furthermore, the site has been designed to comply with all applicable stormwater management requirements so that neighboring and nearby properties will not be negatively affected by stormwater post-development. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the future land use map for the area and with the Orange County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The design and scale of the proposed general merchandise store are intended to be consistent with the character of the surrounding area, and not to dwarf the existing neighboring uses. The mass of the proposed structure is intentionally small, and the fagade is likewise intended to blend in with the existing environment. The proposed site development has been designed with the existing built and natural environment of the Area." The property is currently owned by Vernon Davis, who has authorized this application. A formal site plan is required as part of a conditional rezoning application and has been submitted. Approval of a site-specific plan is part of the conditional district rezoning process, and the site plan and any agreed- upon conditions are binding to the development footprint permitted for the zoning district. Staff has recommended the imposition of conditions, as included in the Ordinance. 4 Attachment 2 Site Plan --- -- --- ----------------- ------ .. 1. xAz Sr Nlarnv+r.� r�tixY © F rq1 II.xY.l wtltG Suf MTLwG1 RY1 I UXEJ HP v � II. � � ' � � �' •1- 1 fl� r, I� f mr®,,.��,�-oo,�.m u:ioearmmA:^Es acv rxcxxn �, cmxcarEA I II oauP;nn s7m Ara ¢ aRa IMEFRNOl15 SLMMhAY-ABLE � � tlSIrTfE 1PoAIGIC tm'I`PE F sj I tlsl Rla Ila- PRELIVIMIF.Y rsuwa � ` i II.eI u.�iv L1RE'ABlf a�ro Ufi fDa J- uas L]!GM aNs ram' J III •l i ,� � �� 0.FM WpJS IEV6M EEaxaw [tl[Rl mo me umR I � K�, h��a 6x Gall tafore you dig. -----six-t------J I 4xm + � GAPPAIC SCRLA �Xa ZAI1l C3,0 5 J 101 Attachment 2 Proposed Access and Transportation Network Improvements The Project is proposing access from White Cross Road only. The following access improvements, as recommended in the submitted Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), have been proposed: • White Cross Road at Site Driveway o Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress lane and one egress lane o Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taper on White Cross Road Summary of Transportation Information Existing Roadway Characteristics Affected Roadway White Cross Road NC 54 Type of Roadway Two-lane undivided local Two-lane undivided with without turn lanes turn lanes Current Roadway White Cross at Site NC 54 at White Cross Capacity Driveway— LOS A unchanged LOS —A to E Latest Traffic Volume 1,200 (2021 AADT) 9,600 (2021 AADT) Traffic Generation Number of Trips Expected to be Generated by 694 Total Daily Proposed Project 31 Total AM Peak 83 Total PM Peak LOS (Level of Service) Descriptions (source: orth Carolina Department of Transportation) LOS A: Describes free-flow operations. Free Flow Speed (FFS) prevails and vehicles are almost completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. The effects of incidents or point breakdowns are easily absorbed. LOS B: Represents reasonably free-flow operations, and Free Flow Speed (FFS) is maintained. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and the general level of physical and psychological comfort provided to drivers is still high. The effects of minor incidents and point breakdowns are still easily absorbed. LOS C: Provides for flow with speeds near the FFS. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted, and lane changes require more care and vigilance on the part of the driver. Minor incidents may still be absorbed, but the local deterioration in service quality will be significant. Queues may be expected to form behind any significant blockages. LOS D: The level at which speeds begin to decline with increasing flows, with density increasing more quickly. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is seriously limited and drivers experience reduced physical and psychological comfort levels. Even minor incidents can be expected to create queuing, because the traffic stream has little space to absorb disruptions. LOS E: Describes operation at capacity. Operations at this level are highly volatile because there are virtually no usable gaps within the traffic stream, leaving little room to maneuver within the traffic stream. 6 109 Attachment 2 Proposed Utilities The property is not in an area served by public water/sewer. Water and wastewater services will be provided via a private well and septic system that meet Orange County Environmental Health standards. Erosion Control/Stormwater Regulations The applicant has indicated the project will conform to existing stormwater management (Section 6.14) and erosion and sedimentation control (Section 6.15) regulations of the UDO. See attached memo (Subject: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management). Land Use Buffers/Setbacks North 75' Type F Buffer/ 50' Setback South 100' Type F Buffer/ 20' Setback East 30' Type B Buffer/ 50' Setback West 100' Type F Buffer/ 20' Setback Environmental Assessment (EA) The applicant has provided an Environmental Assessment (EA) application and supporting materials as required in Section 6.16 of the UDO with their submittal. These materials will be shared with various State agencies via the NC Department of Administration's State Clearinghouse. Planning and DEAPR Staff have jointly reviewed the materials and agree with a determination of "Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)" as required in Section 2.25.1 (B) (5) of the UDO. This determination eliminates a requirement from the applicant to provide a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process as outlined in Sections 2.25.2 and 6.16.4 of the UDO. Solid Waste The applicant has indicated development within the project will conform to the Orange County Solid Waste Management Ordinance, Proposed Conditions Per NCGS 160D-703, imposed conditions and site-specific standards are limited to those that address conformance of the development and use of the site to local government ordinances and adopted plans or the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development or use of the site. Per Section 2.9.1 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part this process only if they address: 1. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, 2. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking, pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, etc.) and/or 3. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose. 7 Attachment 2 The following voluntary conditions are being offered by the applicant: 1. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet. Applications to rezone property to a Conditional District shall be processed in accordance with the procedures in UDO Section 2.9; 2. Off-Street Parking Requirements: No more than 34 off-street parking spaces shall be required rather than the required amount from UDO Table 6.9.7, one space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area for retail uses, which would total 54 spaces for this development; 3. Driveway Access: Shall adhere to the recommendations from the Traffic Impact Analysis in Attachment 1 (5), shall be responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments in Attachment 5 (6), and to the Orange County Transportation Services Department comments in Attachment 5 (4); 4. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School, the north elevation of the building, towards NC Hwy 54, shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; 5. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received soon after site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within a timeframe that will not impede development of the proposed project; 6. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28- 3016. UDO Section 1.1.4 (B)(3) Review Milestones Application Submittal Date November 17, 2022 Development Advisory Committee December 1, 2022 (DAC) Review Neighborhood Information Meeting February 22, 2023 (NIM) Note: the DAC is a staff/agency committee, established in Section 1.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Courtesy Review Jurisdiction Date Sent Comments Received (Y/N) None Required 8 1 CIA Attachment 2 Analysis Staff AnalV.19 As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director shall cause an analysis to be made of the application. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: 1. The application is complete in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.9.1 (C) of the UDO; 2. The proposal is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, furthering the following goals: a. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. b. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. c. Land Use Goal 6: A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. 3. The requested zoning district, NR-CD (Non-Residential Conditional District), is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix F, Relationships Between Land Use Classifications and Zoning Districts. 4. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Appendix G, Land Use Classification and Overlay Locational Criteria, identifies Rural Community Activity Nodes as areas characterized by a cross-road that serves as a focal area for the surrounding rural and farm population and contains three or more commercial or institutional land uses; and serves the surrounding low-density rural and agricultural population, generally 1,000-5,000 persons. 5. The applicant has provided a basic environmental assessment as part of this submittal. Staff has reviewed and determined no significant environmental impact is expected from this project based on existing conditions. The proposed development is consistent with existing/anticipated development within the area and the land use associated with the project is compatible with various 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals detailed above. 9 195 �1 Attachment 3 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245.2575 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I, Brian Collie, Planner II with Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that in accordance with the provisions of Sections 2.3.5 and and 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance I have mailed, or have caused to be mailed, a Notice of the Planning Board Meeting to be held regarding a rezoning application proposing to rezone a parcel of property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of White Cross Road and NC Hwy 54 West in Chapel Hill (PIN 9749-40-2351) February 22, 2023. The owners were identified according to the Tax Records, as required by Sections 2.3.5 and 2.8.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. The mailed notices specified the date, time, place and subject of the Planning Board Meeting. WITNESS my hand, this 22nd day of February 2023. Brian Collie Planner II 196 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278I 919.24S•2S7S February 21, 2023 Notice of PLANNING BOARD MEETING Dear Property Owner: This notice is to inform you of the March 8, 2023, Planning Board meeting, at which an application to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel (PIN: 9749-40-23 5 1) located at the southwest corner of NC Highway 54 and White Cross Road will be reviewed. The parcel's address is 3026 White Cross Rd., Chapel Hill, 27516, within Bingham Township. This notification is occurring in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). You are receiving this notice because you own property located within 1,000-feet of parcel requested for rezoning. YOUR PROPERTY IS NOT PROPOSED FOR REZONING. Property Information Parcel ID Number(PIN) 9749-40-2351 Owner Vernon Davis Applicant Glandon Forest Equity, LLC Location 3026 White Cross Rd., at the corner of NC Hwy 54 &White Cross Rd. Acreage +/-4.83-acre parcel Current Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR) &Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) Proposed Zoning Non-Residential, Conditional District(NR-CD) Watershed Designation Haw River Unprotected The property requested for rezoning is currently split zoned with two districts: NC-2, Neighborhood Commercial, (1.16 acres) and AR, Agricultural Residential (3.67 acres). The applicant has requested the 4.83 acre parcel to be rezoned to NR—CD (Non-Residential Conditional District). The applicant has provided a site-specific plan with a use for the property limited to a"retail use", as defined by the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance. As defined and detailed by the Orange County UDO, should the application be approved these conditions will be binding for the property, with any significant changes, including principal use, requiring subsequent zoning map amendments. 197 Additional information is available on the Orange County Planning Department's website: https://www.orangecountync.gov/3038/Active-Development-Projects The rezoning request will be reviewed by the Orange County Planning Board at a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., March 8, 2023, at the Whitted Meeting Facility (300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough,NC). All interested persons are invited to address the Planning Board with their comments regarding the applications. The Planning Board is an advisory board comprised of appointed volunteers that makes recommendations to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners regarding land use and zoning matters. A formal public hearing on the proposed amendments will be held by the Board of County Commissioners. At this time, the anticipated date for the public hearing has not yet been determined; you will receive another written notice about the public hearing at a later date. If you cannot attend the Planning Board meeting and the website does not answer your questions about the requested rezoning, you may call (919) 245-2575 during regular business hours and you will be directed to a staff person who can assist you. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning& Inspections Director O RAN G E C O U N T Y , N C Rezoning Application PIN 9749402351 Notification Map LESLIE DR v k HO��OW R� \ OAK. L W W W 974940 351 G� O,y KRIST�E�N i 1,000 Foot Notification Area Zoning �° °„ AR - EC5 0 LC 1 N iin=400feet ORANGE Feet 0 NC2 COUNTY 4 a o0 ' Planning and Inspections Department(BC) R 1 1/25/2023 O:\GIS Workspace\Projects\Zoning\Rezoning\PIN 9749402351 to NC2 and LC1\PIN 9749402351 to NC2 and LC1.aprx\Rezoning Application PIN 9749402351 199 PIN OWNERI_LAST OWNERl_FIRST OWNER2_LAST OWNER2_FIRST ADDRESSI ADDRESS2 CITY STATE ZIPCODE 9749402351 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748396909 TILLEY GREGORYT 3600 HYW 54 W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748491572 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748494626 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748396243 CECIL DOVIE JO 2904 WHITE CROSS RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275165892 9748592925 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748493910 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748594995 LIETH ARMIN F P 0 BOX 4752 CHAPEL HILL NC 27515 9748383719 HARRIS MARY CECIL HARRIS KEITH N 2726 WILDCAT CREEK RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748399899 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748485886 JAIMES TOMAS E <Null> <Null> 3713 OLD GREENSBORO RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748499852 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748590109 VILLALPANDO RODRIGO MARTINEZ CAMARENA ROSA LILIA PEREZ 1311 HATCH RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749300495 CLANTON ROBERT PAUL <Null> <Null> 3536 HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749306411 TILLEY GREGORYT 3600 HWY 54W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749404659 BPSI INC 3403 HWY 54 W CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749412275 WHISNANT PHILLIPS PTNS DBA WHITE CROSS PARTNERSHIP 116 E MAIN ST CARRBORO NC 27510 9749500067 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749501789 SARKARIA PROPERTIES INC <Null> <Null> <Null> 514 GRAVEL BROOK CT <Null> CARY NC 27519 9749504904 HOLTZ PERDITA H AVERETT EDWARD M 9903 OAK HOLLOW RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749310328 CAROLINA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST INC <Null> <Null> PO BOX 44270 <Null> CHARLOTTE NC 28215 9749405354 HARIDEV LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 300 W MAIN ST <Null> CARRBORO NC 27510 9749415111 GUERRERO ZURIBEL P HERNANDEZ <Null> <Null> 532 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749511086 PRATER LARRY R JOHNSON PRATER HELEN M 3225 NC HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749208153 TILLEY GREGORYT <Null> <Null> 3600 HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749308334 CHAPPELL LEON <Null> <Null> 3510 NC 54 W STE A&B CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749402837 BIG SHOW PROPERTIES LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 100 FLORAL DR <Null> Chapel Hill NC 27516 9749408985 BLACKWOOD WILLIAM KELLY 320 DAIRYLAND RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749413288 GRIFFIN AMANDAJOHNSON GRIFFIN JOHN TERENCE 546 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749419462 DAVIDSON ROBERT P DAVIDSON FLORA F 3261 HWY 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749422010 RIGSBEE CAROLYN <Null> <Null> 1922 ORANGE CHAPEL-CLOVER GARDEN CH RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749500194 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749500366 J&I BRAVO LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 3300 NC 54 W <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749512250 NALLY HEATHER DEANS NALLY ERIC J 9901 OAK HOLLOW RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748398598 DAVIS VERNON P <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748492381 CECIL PATRICIA W <Null> <Null> 2505 WILDCAT CREEK RD <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9748496921 HARIDEV LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 300 W MAIN ST <Null> CARRBORO NC 27510 9748591637 TIMBERIDGE RENTALS LLC <Null> <Null> <Null> 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749405914 LEWIS STAN HOWARD 3445 HWY 54 WEST CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 9749414263 FERGUSON MICHAEL P KEYES ALEX M 528 EVERETT LN <Null> CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 200 Attachment 4 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING NOTES MA22-0005 Meeting Date: February 22, 2023 Time: 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. Location: Orange County Public Library Main Meeting Room 137 West Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Attendance: 43 Residents on sign-up sheet 1. Mary Kraft 23. Michelle Wood 2. Janet Domont 24. Rebecca Teer 3. Mariloe Metigue 25. Pat Cecil 4. Susan Walser 26. Michele Meloy 5. Steve O'Daniel 27. Mark Mason 6. Keith Harris 28. Craig Burch 7. Carol Rigsbee 29. Mareah Steketee 8. Virginia Ferguson 30. Sadie Rapp 9. Rob Jamison 31. Greg Buehler 10.Bob Hornick 32. Rene Rogers 11.Brent Purdum 33. Joe Rogers 12.Preston Mason 34. Tony Blake 13.Lucy Piner 35. Bob Davidson 14.Bev Bell 36. Ellen Young 15.Larry Prater 37. Leslie Dilorenzo 16.Vernon Davis 38. Paul Collins 17.Larry Sturbin 39. Jesuso Bravo 18.Amanda Griffin 40. Lisa Dumain 19.Jessica Ostrowski 41. Paul Plummer 20.John T. Cecil 42. John Schaub 21.Bryan Wood 43. John Kingsley 22.Erika Nissman 201 Applicant: Bob Hornick, and Brent Purdum County Employees: Cy Stober, and Brian Collie Discussion Summary: The majority of residents that attended the Neighborhood Information Meeting spoke against this rezoning to allow a retail use to be located on this property. The main sentiment being that the proposed development would take away from the rural character of the community and hurt local business owners. However, there was a handful of residents that vocalized acceptance towards the proposed development. Topics of Discussion: - Discussion about the outdoor lighting plan and how it could potentially affect surrounding properties. - The type of stormwater control measure that will be built. - Clarification of the existing building "condition". - How parking for commercial retail is calculated and why they were requesting to have less parking than the UDO requires. - How there are already enough Dollar Generals in the surrounding area and how they are poorly managed and maintained. - The need of a stoplight at the corner of White Cross Rd. & Hwy 54 W. - The President of the White Cross Volunteer Fire Department questioned the water source that would be used for fire suppression needs. - Discussion concerning the type, size, and location of signs. - The Hwy 54 W traffic widening plan. - Land owner rights - The traffic impact assessment study and why a left turn lane into the property off White Cross Rd. is not proposed. - Had Glandon Forest Equity (Applicant) conducted any market studies for the property. - Had a study been conducted on the past use(`s) of the property, and if soil test had been conducted to check for possible contamination. - Had the Planning Department or Economic Development conducted any studies pertaining to the effects on surrounding property value if a Dollar General was built on the proposed property. - Why a rezoning request for this property was allowed to be brought back before the Planning Board before the required year wait. 202 [Attachment 5 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245•2575 February 24, 2023 White Cross Rezoning Application Case #: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 3026 White Cross Rd. Re: Development Advisory Committee Report (UDO, Article 1, Section 1.9.5) On December 1, 2023, the Orange County Development Advisory Committee met for a final review and discussion of the conditional rezoning application from Glandon Forest Equity for PIN 9749402351 (Case #: MA22-0005). The Orange County Development Advisory Committee has no objections to the approval of the zoning atlas amendment so long as the items in the attached departmental memos are addressed. The application package features an abstract and staff report that provide the foundations for my recommendation regarding this application and request. Sincerely, Cy Stober Planning & Inspections Director Orange County Government I www.orangecountync.gov 1 919.732.8181 Attachment 5 203 ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING and INSPECTIONS Cy Stober,AICP,Director I cstober@orangecountync.gov 1131 W.Margaret Lane,Hillsborough,NC 27278 1919.245•2575 MEMORANDUM TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Christopher Sandt, PE — County Engineer; and Steve Kaltenbach — Erosion Control and Stormwater Supervisor CC: Patrick Mallett— Deputy Director Development Services DATE: February 9, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 WATERSHED: Haw River Unprotected (Cape Fear River Basin) PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District(NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Summary of Findings Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management This memo summarizes the findings of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management assessment by the Orange County Development Services Division (hereafter, the "Division") of the submitted application for a NR-CD Conditional District, submitted as the "General Retail" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 4.83 acres of property at the southwest intersection of NC HWY 54 West and White Cross Road. The request proposes mixed-use development consisting of: ■ One Commercial Retail Building (Dollar General) The Staff comments contained herein are based upon the submittal of a required Site Plan, dated September 30, 2022. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Upon zoning approval, the proposed development would then be required to submit a Land Disturbing Permit (LDP) which would formally review and approve development activity consistent with these conceptual plans and calculations. Page 1 of 2 204 Erosion and Sedimentation Control: According to current Orange County GIS imagery of the project parcel, there are no mapped stream features or other water features within the project parcel boundaries. Orange County enforces stream buffers along streams, rivers, water bodies, and other water features (e.g. wetlands) as outlined in Section 6.13 of the Orange County UDO. Based on the submitted materials for the proposed development, the project could meet the basic Erosion and Sedimentation Control requirements as outlined in Section 6.15 of the Orange County UDO and could be developed as generally proposed. Stormwater Management: The project parcel is located in the Haw River Unprotected Watershed Overlay District, and is therefore subject to compliance with the Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Strategy. There are no known Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) located on the project parcel. Based on the submitted materials for the proposed development, the project could meet the basic Stormwater Management requirements as outlined in Section 6.14 of the Orange County UDO. The project proposes the installation of one (1) permanent primary Stormwater Control Measure (SCM) to meet water quantity requirements (i.e. post-development stormwater runoff attenuation). There are no water quality requirements (i.e. post-development nutrient attenuation) currently associated with the Watershed Overlay District within which the project parcel is located. The primary SCM is currently identified as an engineered Stormwater Wetland. The Site Plan, while preliminary at this stage of Orange County review, meets applicable stormwater management requirements as outlined in Section 6.14 of the Orange County UDO and is in general conformance with the North Carolina Stormwater Design Manual (i.e. Minimum Design Criteria). Conclusion: The Division has No Objections to the approval of the rezoning request so long as a complete LDP application and supporting plans and calculations are submitted to Orange County for review, processing and approval prior to commencement of on-site Land- Disturbing Activity. As the project progresses with engineering design, additional field observations, and/or permitting by others (e.g. US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Department of Environmental Quality, NC Department of Transportation, etc.), additional buffers, setbacks, and/or additional Orange County review and permitting may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with this rezoning request. /_< 02,49 /2023 Christopher Sandt, PE Date 'Z'2- _ � Z / C�'/20Z3 Steve Kaltenbach Date Page 2 of 2 205 ORANGE COUNTY Department of Environment, Agriculture,Parks&Recreation MEMORANDUM To: Brian Collie,Planner II, Planning and Inspections Department From: Peter Sandbeck, DEAPR Cultural Resources Coordinator Christian Himi,DEAPR Land Conservation Manager Date: February 14,2023 Re: White Cross and Hwy 54 Map Amendment-Conditional District Rezoning Application Thank you the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed White Cross and Hwy 54 Map Amendment-Conditional District Rezoning Application. The development would be the construction of a retail store located in the southeast corner of NC Highway 54 and White Cross Road(Haw River Unprotected Watershed) The subject property is compiled of one parcel(PIN 9749402351). The property is located within an Orange County recognized Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School,a designated Orange County Historic Landmark. There are no streams or additionally recognized natural resource areas on the property. DEAPR comments on development projects are generally intended to a)address any concerns with respect to potential impacts on important natural or cultural resources, and b)identify any areas that might be desirable for possible dedication to the County for public recreation/open space pursuant to Section 7.11.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Cultural Resources Review Comments: The site of this development is located directly opposite the historic White Cross School(3501 NC 54 West). This historic structure, along with the front half of its parcel,was designated as an Orange County Local Historic Landmark by ordinance passed by the Board of County Commissioners on May 5,2015. Its designation was based on its historic, architectural and cultural significance to the County. The original building, constructed in 1933 and enlarged in 1948,retains a high degree of architectural integrity,with most of its original historic exterior and interior features still preserved. The building is an important and rare example of a rural school built according to the plans promoted by the State Department of Public Instruction in the 1920s and 1930s. This new facility provided modern,well-lit and sanitary facilities for the area students. The White Cross School played a pivotal role in the social and cultural life of the White Cross community and lower Bingham Township until it was closed in 1961, and as such,was for decades the center and focal point of the community.Any proposed project that has a potential to adversely affect a designated historic landmark is subject to a higher level of review with the goal of working with property developers to find ways to reduce or eliminate any potential negative visual or physical impact on a landmark property. Due to the proximity of the proposed new development to this important community landmark,there is an additional responsibility on the project developer to provide design and landscaping that provide an appropriate level of respect for this historic landmark and its context. In our review of the planning documents,it appears the north end elevation(Sheet A-2: right side elevation) of the proposed building presents a blank steel-clad wall toward NC 54, and thus the proposed new building completely ignores and turns its back toward the historic school and as well as toward the many motorists that will pass the 206 site each day. This is not an acceptable treatment in such close proximity to this significant landmark that has been recognized by the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission. As a mitigation strategy,we recommend that the design treatment for the front elevation as shown on Sheet A-2,be continued around the corner and applied also to the north elevation. This should consist of the same treatment of cement fiber lap siding,trim,crown, frieze and applied simulated windows. This modification to the building design will provide a significant visual improvement to the elevation facing NC 54 and the historic school building. The proposed landscaping and planting plan appears to provide an acceptable level of visual screening that will help to reduce the visual impact of the proposed new building once the plantings reach maturity. The proposed project appears to involve the demolition of the existing old community store building now standing on the corner of the proposed site. This is believed to have been built in the early 20th century. This property(site number OR 0922),was first recognized as a historic site in 1992,when it was documented as part of Orange County's first historic resource inventory project. Since that time it has been altered and remodeled multiple times. While this loss of architectural integrity will make it more difficult to justify its continued preservation, it appears to possess adequate structural integrity to permit it to be moved to a nearby site and preserved in the event that there is community or developer interest in such a project. Natural Resources Review Comments: Overall,the plan appears consistent with the County's desire to minimize adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of floodplains,wetlands,natural areas and wildlife habitat. There are no additional natural resource areas of significance(e.g.,natural heritage sites,proposed wildlife corridors, threatened or endangered species)located on this property that would warrant further potential DEAPR recommendations for open space or environmental comment. If you have questions please contact Christian at x-2514 or Peter at x-2517. 207 ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Chuck Edwards, NCDOT Earl Lewellyn, Kimley-Horn CC: Cy Stober, Planning Director Brian Collie, Planner II Benjamin Clark, Transportation Administrator FROM: Nishith Trivedi, Transportation Director DATE: November 30, 2022 SUBJECT: TIA Review — White Cross at NC 54 The following memo summarizes Orange County Transportation Services (OCTS) review of White Cross at NC 54 — Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Report. Staff assessed the TIA Report based on to the approved Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Study Area: Accurate as reported, no comment. Analysis Scenarios: Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) 6.17.5.c.2 and d.1 request average daily and average weekday respectively, not just peak hour traffic. • Sufficient — included in table 1 and Appendix Analysis Conditions: As previously requested - left turn lane on White Cross Rd into site driveway be considered. • Insufficient — results in increased delays for northbound as indicated in tables ES-2 and 6.1 o Level of Service (LOS) from D (31.6) in 2022 to LOS E (48.3) in 2024 build-out • Increasing traffic may impact adjacent property (Whitecross Mart) • Increasing freight - including delivery - in area will negatively impact safety as shown below: Figure 1:Northbound Whitecross at NC-54 208 Baseline Traffic: Include average daily (24 hour) traffic count in TIA per Orange County UDO • Sufficient — provided in Table I and Appendix Approved Developments: Accurate as reported, no comment. Background Growth: Accurate as reported, no comment. Trip Generation: Accurate as reported, accounts for average and weekday daily, no comment. Trip Distribution: Accurate as reported, accounts for full 100%, no comment. Recommendations: Insufficient, • Reiterate northbound left turn lane into site driveway o Previously requested on October 25, 2022. o Necessary to alleviate increase delay by returning LOS from E (proposed) to D (existing). o Providing this will address County Vision Zero policy. • Request bicycle and pedestrian use be addressed in accordance with County Complete Street Policy Upon receiving revised TIA addressing the above requested information, OCTS staff may recommend approval of the TIA. Thank you. 209 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Improving health. Inspiring change. MEMORANDUM TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Victoria Hudson — Orange County Environmental Health Division CC: Patrick Mallett— Deputy Director Development Services DATE: February 16, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749402351 WATERSHED: Haw River Unprotected (Cape Fear River Basin) PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Summary of Plan Review by Orange County Environmental Health Division This memo summarizes the findings of an Orange County Environmental Health plan review of the application for a NR-CD Conditional District, submitted as the "General Retail" project (hereafter, the "project"). The project is located within 4.83 acres of property at the southwest intersection of NC HWY 54 West and White Cross Road. The request proposes mixed-use development consisting of: ■ One Commercial Retail Building (Dollar General) The Staff comments contained herein are based upon the submittal of a required Site Plan, dated September 30, 2022. These findings should not be interpreted as the Division's final analysis/approval of the proposed development. Soil and site evaluations have not been conducted by the Orange County Health Department, 919 245 2360 > 131 West Margaret Lane, Suite 100 )► Hillsborough, NC 27278 1 orangecountync.gov 210 Environmental Health Division. The Health Department's role in the Amendment is one involving preliminary determination of soil suitability for septic systems. Environmental Health Conditions At this time, no Well Permit application has been received. Application(s) and X fees required. Improvement Permit(s) shall only be issued upon presentation of the exact structure to be constructed. Permit(s) must be issued by the Orange County Health Department prior to any alteration of the lot(s). X Permit conditions may apply. X Existing EH records are attached. Existing well and/or septic systems will be impacted. X Contact Public Water Supply for on-site water supply. X Other: This onsite system has been permitted as an Engineered Option which also serves as the Construction Authorization. Conclusion: EH has no objections to the approval of the zoning request so long as a the above list is addressed to the Orange County Health Department for processing, and issuance of Permits. This designation is not an Improvement Permit or Well Permit and not approval for a septic system or on-site water supply. Additional field observations and/or permitting by others may apply beyond the proposed development as shown with this request. Please direct any questions or requests for Laws, Rules, and policy to ehapplications(a)_orangecountync.gov. 02-16-2023 Victoria Hudson, MPA, REHS Date Or designee 211 0,c sTnrf o of ROY COOPER• Governor � NC DEPARTMENT OF KODYH. KINSLEY• Secretary '�� HEALTH AND y 1 HUMAN SERVICES HELEN WOLSTENHOLME • Interim Deputy Secretary for Health � ' _ a ♦,�QUAH N�ERY MARK T. BENTON •Assistant Secretary for Public Health Division of Public Health COMMON FORM FOR ENGINEERED OPTION PERMIT See Instructions for Use in Appendix A Except for"Date received",this Section to be completed by the Professional Engineer licensed in accordance with G.S.89C LHD USE ONLY: Initial submittal of this NOI received: 12/13/2022 by kgh Date Initials PART 1:Notice of Intent to Construct(NOI)-Please check all that apply ❑X Single System or ❑ Multiple Systems AND ❑X New ❑ Expansion ❑ Relocation of all or part of the Existing System ❑ Relocation of Repair Area ❑ Repair—LHD Permit Number ❑ Repair—EOP/LSS COVID 19/AOWE Permit Number 1. Facility Owner's name: (Owner, Company Name, Utility, Partnership, Individual, etc.): VERNON DAVIS Mailingaddress: 2401 NC HWY 54 WEST City: CHAPEL HILL State: NC Zip: 27516 Telephone number: 919-459-2603 E-mail Address: ADAVIS@VANGUARDPG.COM 2. Professional Engineer(PE) name: ATHAN M PARKER, PE License number: 43250 Mailingaddress: PO BOX 4580 City: EMERALD ISLE State: NC Zip: 28594 Telephone number: 919-795-9594 E-mail Address: ATHAN.PARKER@ AMP DENGINEERING.COM 3. Licensed Soil Scientist(LSS) name: HAYWOOD PITTMAN, LSS License number: 1262 Mailingaddress: 1073-1 GREGORY FORK RD City: RICHLANDS State: NC Zip: 28574 Telephone number: 910-324-2892 E-mail Address: PITTMANSOIL@YAHOO.COM 4. Licensed Geologist(LG) (if applicable) name: License number: Mailing address: City: State: Zip: Telephone number: E-mail Address: 5. On-Site Wastewater Contractor name: HAYWOOD PITTMAN, LSS License number: 3825 Mailingaddress: 1073-1 GREGORY FORK RD City: RICHLANDS State: NC Zip:28574 Telephone number: 910-324-2892 E-mail Address: PITTMANSOIL@YAHOO.COM 6. Proof of Errors and Omissions or other appropriate liability insurance for the following persons is attached that includes the name of the insurer, name of the insured and the effective dates of coverage: ❑X PE ❑X LSS ❑ LG X❑ On-site Wastewater Contractor NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LOCATION:5605 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, INC 27609 MAILING ADDRESS:1642 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1642 www.ncdhhs.gov • TEL:919-707-5874 • FAx:919-845-3972 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 212 CAEOP22-0013 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: 7. Property location (physical address,tax parcel identification number or subdivision lot, block number of the property to be permitted): 3026 WHITE CROSS RD; PIN: 9749402351 County Name: ORANGE 8. Type of facility: ❑ Place of residence No. Bedrooms: No. Occupants: X❑ Place of business Basis for flow calculation: DOLLAR GENERAL STORE ❑ Place of public assembly Basis for flow calculation: 9. Factors that would affect the wastewater load: NO KNOWN FACTORS TO AFFECT LOADING 10. Type and location of proposed wastewater system: 4-60 ' CONVENTIONAL LINES, TYPE II, 12-18" TB; LOCATED 129' FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND 53' FROM THE EAST PROPERTY BOUNDARY (LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF PROPOSED STORE) 11. Design wastewater flow: 200 gpd(Forflow>3,000 gpd and industrial process,duplicate plans shall be sent to the State.) Design wastewater strength: ❑domestic ❑ high strength ❑ industrial process 12. A plat as defined in G.S. 130A-334(7a) is attached: ❑X Yes ❑ No 13. Location of proposed or existing wells (drinking water, irrigation,geothermal,groundwater monitoring, sampling,etc.)and any potable and non-potable water conveyance lines is indicated on attached plans and complies with 15A NCAC 18A.1950: ❑X Yes ❑ No This is a saprolite system. ❑Yes ❑X No 14. Evaluation(s)of soil conditions and site features in accordance with G.S. 130A-335(al)signed and sealed by a LSS is attached: X❑Yes ❑ No 15. Evaluation of geologic and hydrogeologic conditions signed and sealed by a LG is attached ❑Yes x❑ NA 16. Proposed landscape,site, drainage,or soil modifications are attached: ❑Yes ❑ NA Attestation by Professional Engineer licensed in North Carolina pursuant to G.S.89C I, ATHAN M PARKER, PE hereby attest that the information required to be included with Registered Professional Engineer(Print Name) this Notice of Intent to Construct is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and that the proposed system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules,and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336-.1(e)(6). KER�AMSOE����EERNG�aN `Q�SS/p���y9'. Signature of Licensed Professional Engineer Date :'Q� l SEAL 43250 DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 2 of 6 i i Jul 19 22 09:41 p Vernon Davis 919-869-7687 P.1 213 CAEOP22-0013 State of NC EOP LHO Reference: this section Is for Owner use to either designate PE as thePr legal representative or to self-submit the 11101. Designation of Registered Professional Engineer as legal representative of owner for this Notice of Intent. I, hereby designate ATHAN M PARKER PE Print Name of Owner Print Nome of Aeglstered Professional Engineer as I al representative for pur ose of this Notice of Intent pursuant to G.S. 130A-336.1. Signature of owner Date Owner self submittal of NOI., i, hereby submit this NOI prepared by Print Name of Owner Print Name of Licensed PE pursuant to G.S.13OA-335.1. Signature of Owner Date NOTES: LIABILITY; The Department,the Department's authorized agents or local health departments shall have no!lablirty for wastewater systems designed,constructed and installed pursuant to on Engineered option Permit.[(NC General Statute 13OA-336.1(f)] RIGHT OF ENTRY.• The submittal of this Notice of intent to Construct grants right of entry to the Local Health Department and the State to the referenced property. ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: Once the LHD deems that the Notice of Intent to Construct is complete via signature in the section above,the owner may apply to the local permitting agency for a permit for electrical, plumbing,heating,air conditioning or other construction,location or relocation activity uhder any provision of general or special law pursuant to G.S.130A-338. Page 3 of 6 VftH5/EH5/05WP8-COMMON FORM Effectivelune 1,2018 214 CAEOP22-0013 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: This section for Local Health Department use only. PART 2: LHD Completeness Review of the Notice of Intent to Construct "(c)Completeness Review for Notice of Intent to Construct.—The local health department shall determine whether a notice of intent to construct,as required pursuant subsection(b)of this section,is complete within 15 business days after the local health department receives the notice of intent to construct. A determination of completeness means that the notice of intent to construct includes all of the required components. If the local health department determines that the notice of intent to construct is incomplete, the department shall notify the owner or the professional engineer of the components needed to complete the notice. The owner or professional engineer may submit additional information to the department to cure the deficiencies in the notice. The local health department shall make a final determination as to whether the notice of intent to construct is complete within 10 business days after the department receives the additional information from the owner or professional engineer. If the department fails to act within any time period set out in this subsection,the owner or professional engineer may treat the failure to act as a determination of completeness." The review for completeness of this Notice of Intent was conducted in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(c). This NO1 is determined to be: ❑ INCOMPLETE(If box is checked, Information in this section is required.) Based upon review of information submitted in Part 1,the following items are missing: Copies of this form listing missing items were sent to the design PE and the Owner on Date via with directions to re-submit missing items using Page 5 of this form. Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Print Name of Authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of Authorized Agent of the LHD Date VCOMPLETE(If box is checked, information in this section is required.) Based upon review of information submitted in Part 1 of this form,this NOI is deemed COMPLETE. Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on 12/28/2022 via EMAIL Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered A copy of this NO1 and tracking information was sent to the State on 12/28/2022 via EMAIL Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Kathryn Hobby,REHS 1835 �_ �� 12/28/2022 Print Name of Authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of Authorized Agent of the LHD Date DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 4 of 6 215 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: Re-submittal of NOI with missing items included This Section is for use by the owner or PE to submit items noted as missing during LHD Completeness Review above. Resubmittals must be accompanied by a cover letter from the PE. LHD USE ONLY: This NOI resubmittal received: by Date Initials Item#from initial NOI Resubmittal description Attestation by Professional Engineer licensed in North Carolina pursuant to G.S.89C I, hereby attest that the information re-submitted for this Notice of Licensed Professional Engineer(Print Name) Intent to Construct is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and that the proposed system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336- 1(e)(6). Signature of Licensed Professional Engineer Date The section below is for Local Health Department use after submittal of items noted as missing above. LHD Follow-up Completeness Review of Notice of Intent to Construct This follow-up review for completeness of this Notice and Intent was conducted in accordance with G.S. 130A- 336.1(c). This NOI is determined to be: ❑ INCOMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the RESUBMITTAL above,this Notice of Intent remains INCOMPETE because the following items from Part 1 of this form remain missing: Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ❑ COMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the RESUBMITTAL above in addition to information provided in Part 1 of this form,this NOI is deemed complete. Copies of this signed form were sent to the PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered A complete copy of this form with tracking information was sent to the State: via Date Email,FAX,USPS,hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 5 of 6 216 Engineer Option Permit Common Form LHD Reference: PART 3: Authorization to Operate(ATO) Except for date received,the Section below is to be completed by the Owner or the PE. LHD USE ONLY: Initial submittal of request for ATO received: by Date Initials Date of Post-construction Conference: Post-construction Conference waived in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(j): he following items are included in this submittal for an Authorization to Operate under an EOP: 1. Signed and sealed copy of the Engineer's report that includes the information in G.S. 130A-336.1(k)(1)and 15A NCAC 18A.1971(f) ❑Yes ❑ No 2. Operation and management program and ORC contract, if applicable ❑Yes ❑ No 3. Fee (as applicable) ❑Yes ❑ No 4. Notarized letter documenting Owner's acceptance of the system from the PE ❑Yes ❑ No 5. Owner meets requirements of ownership or control of the system per 15A NCAC 18A.1938(j) ❑Yes ❑ No 6. Easement, right of way, or encroachment agreement required per 15A NCAC 18A.1938(j) ❑Yes ❑ No 7. Multi-party agreements required, as applicable, pursuant to 15A NCAC 18A. .1937(h) ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, agreements filed in County Register of Deeds in Deed Book Page Attestation by the Owner or the PE for Authorization to Operate I, hereby attest that all items indicated above have been provided to the Print name of Owner or Professional Engineer County LHD and the system shall meet applicable federal,State,and local laws, regulations, rules and ordinances in accordance with G.S. 130A-336-.1(e)(6). Signature of Owner or Professional Engineer Date This section for LHD Use Only. LHD Review of required information for the ATO ❑ INCOMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the Section above,the following items are missing from the information required for an Authorization to Operate for an EOP: Copies of this signed form were sent to the design PE and the Owner on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ❑ COMPLETE Based upon review of information submitted in the Section above,this Authorization to Operate is hereby issued in accordance with G.S. 130A-336.1(m). A copy of this complete NOI/ATO with tracking information was sent to the State on via Date Email,FAX,USPS,Hand-delivered Print name of authorized Agent of the LHD Signature of authorized Agent of the LHD Date ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Once the LHD determines completeness based upon the ATO submission,the owner may apply to the local permitting agency for permanent electrical service to a residence,place of business or place of public assembly pursuant to G.S.130A-339. DHHS/EHS/OSWP—EOP COMMON FORM Updated April 2022 Page 6 of 6 217 Owner: DOLLAR GENERAL PITTMAN SOIL CONSULTING Address: CORNER HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD . PO BOX 1387 Location: CARRBORO, NC RICHLANDS,NC 28574 PROPERTY INFORMATION OBTAINED VIA NEWCOMB 910-330-2784 LAND SURVEYORS, PLLC, DATED JUNE 8, 2022. pittmansoil�),yahooxom 'Sti,yl11/f 11f!/ ,,,• �A GARQ f•./,,, 0 . .FESSIp' �f SCALE 1"=100' SEAL _ —4325O .'3',,��••, ...IVGINres ell f'f ll+I M++It+ -29 ` � 1 a - � R PPROVED I ` PRESSURE MANIFOLD 1 GALLON PUUMM P TANK_ 111 soo GALLON SEPTIC TANK f r ' tu L---- - -- --- I TYPICAL SOIL BORE INITIAL 0-12 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 4/3 DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD -_• 12-24 SL GR VFR NEXP 2.5Y 6/4 LTAR.33 24-30 CL SBK FI SS SP IOYR 5/8 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES All :, rG�!:t 12-18"TB , %:' 30-48 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, lOYR 5/8,2.SY 6/1,7.SYR 5/8 >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SOIL WETNESS 30 SYSTEM AND 5'BEYOND SYSTEM ' p e LTAR 0.33 GPD/SQFT REPAIR AREA DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD �. - LTAR.33 „ 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES l'4T 262 12-18"TB N0RTvkC;' >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SYSTEM AND 5'BEYOND SYSTEM 218 Owner: DOLLAR GENERAL PITTMAN SOIL CONSULTING Address: CORNER HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD . PO BOX 1387 Location: CARRBORO, NC RICHLANDS,NC 28574 910-330-2784 PROPERTY INFORMATION OBTAINED VIA NEWCOMB pittmansoil�yahoo.com LAND SURVEYORS, PLLC, DATED DUNE 8, 2022. ',ti,{ll llflflr, SCALE 111=60' f HAS PA KER�E—S.-A-D SEAL NGINEERING.WLCo. SoSS P ooENSNEERN43250 :.ouo: � rif ljllllY11114�` 129' / rr 0.-77��r I � _ M o Qti6o � 1 + 4q M h G Y O APPROVED PRESSURE MANI a j \1000 GALLON Lr PUMP TANK — --- � TtP�f B'.IFFfR 5 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL SOIL BORE INITIAL 0-12 SL,GR,VFR,NEXP,2.5Y 4/3 DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD -_• 12-24 SL GR VFR NEXP 2.5Y 6/4 LTAR.33 24-30 CL SBK FI SS SP IOYR 5/8 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES G�!:t f 12-18"TB %:' 30-48 CL,SBK,FI,SS,SP, IOYR 5/8,2.5Y 6/1,7.5YR 5/8 >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SOIL WETNESS 30 SYSTEM AND 5'BEYOND SYSTEM ' p e LTAR 0.33 GPD/SQFT REPAIR AREA DOLLAR GENERAL 200 GPD �. - LTAR.33 „ 4-60'CONVENTIONAL LINES l'4T �C2 12-18"TB NOR"M� >6"SOIL COVER REQUIRED OVER SYSTEM AND Y BEYOND SYSTEM 219 gwj).YI26m ofa 1003 Gregory Fork Road Richlands, NC 28574 Phone (910)330-2784 pittmansoil@yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 2,2022 Ref: Dollar General site located on NC HWY 54 WHITE CROSS RD, CARRBORO,NC A soil evaluation was conducted on the above referenced tract to determine the sites suitability for septic repair. The current laws and rules of NC was used as guide for this evaluation. This evaluation was conducted for a 200 gpd Dollar General. Hand Auger borings on the site were used to characterize the soil texture, and depth to the soil wetness condition. The attached plot plan shows the location of the septic system in the most ideal location on the site. The soil wetness condition was found to be 30" from the surface with a clay loam texture. I have assigned an LTAR of 0.33 gpolsgft for a 200 gpd Dollar General. This will require the installation of 4-60'conventional lines that shall be installed in accordance with the current rules and on contour. The depth to soil wetness of 30" would constitute a 12-18"trench bottom. The system will require 6" of Group II or III soil cover that shall extend 5'from the edge of the system. The system will require a 1500 gallon septic tank and a 1000 gallon pump tank. The repair will require 4-60'conventional lines installed at 12-18" from the surface. After installation the site should be landscaped to shed surface water. Any alterations to the site may impact soil conditions. This does not constitute a warranty or guarantee of system performance or functionality. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 910-330-2784. Thank You. Sincerely, 4�00Z�' PC� zA�as R. Haywood Pittman II NC Licensed Soil Scientist 220 Civil Engineer- Consulting Engineer- Land Development PO Box 4580 Emerald Isle, NC 28594 (252) 777-0141 + athan.parker@ampdengineering.com Firm License Number P-1532 Ref: AMP'D Engineering, PLLC Septic Standards To Whom It May Concern, Due to unforeseen negligence by previous owners and contractors regarding the Engineered Option Permit ("EOP") process and installation, the following standards have been adopted by AMP'D Engineering, PLLC and are to be strictly followed. If these standards are not followed, AMP'D Engineering, PLLC has the right to void all warranties related to engineering work involved with these EOPs. • Engineer shall approve septic installer prior to installation. • Engineer shall be notified at a minimum of 48 hours prior to septic installation. • No vehicles, equipment, structures, debris, or any other items that may compact the soils or damage the septic lines allowed on the septic location before or after installation. Equipment only allowed over the septic area by a certified septic installer to backfill and grade the septic area after installation. • All systems are to have a minimum of 6" cover over the system and five feet beyond the system. Only approved soil to be used as cover. • After installation, the area should be graded to shed water. All drainage should be diverted away from septic area and tanks. • All drip systems to have a minimum of 12" cover over the system and five feet beyond the system. Only group I soil allowed over system with a cap of topsoil to promote growth of groundcover. • Groundcover is to be established over every system within 14 days after installation. • Orange safety fencing with T-Posts to be used to surround the system after installation to prevent any unqualified individuals from entering septic area. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call (252) 777-0141 or email me (athan.parker@ampdengineering.com). Sincerely, KER.PE,-S.-AMPo :p�C F SS R��/ �MPOE EER ory 9 000 _ •Q � SEAL Athan M Parker, PE = 43250 = President = AMP'd Engineering, PLLC Firm License No. P-1532 'y;QN M. pI gt Page 1 of 1 001 DATE A�" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE E(MM/DD/YYYY) 02/17/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Kira Gibson,AINS,SBCS NAME: The Sewell Insurance Agency A/CNNo Ext: (910)326 5754 a/c No): (910)326 6310 785-1 W Corbett Ave E-MAIL kira@thesewellagency.com ADDRESS: PO Box 835 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Swansboro NC 28584 INSURER A: Bankers Insurance Group 33162 INSURED INSURER B: Progressive Southeastern 38784 AMP'D Engineering PLLC INSURER C: NorGUARD Insurance Company 31470 PO Box 4580 INSURER D: Berkshire Hathaway GUARD Insurance Company INSURER E: Emerald Isle NC 28594 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL2221703839 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR AIJUL bUIJH POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE � OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 A 32 0040007108 0 02 03/02/2022 03/02/2023 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY ❑ PRO- ❑ LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 JECT OTHER: Add'I for policy minimum $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY GOMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ B OWNED ;./ SCHEDULED 01335494 11/05/2021 11/05/2022 BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY P AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X STATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N SOO,000 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ C OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A AMWC357500 03/01/2022 03/01/2023 (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yes,describe under 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ Professional Liability D AMPL339476 03/01/2022 03/01/2023 Per Claim $1,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN AMP'D Engineering PLLC ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. PO Box 4580 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Emerald Isle NC 28594 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 999 AC40 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE7/27/2022 V) 111 07/27/2022 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: N.C. Farm Bureau Ins.Agency PHONE FAX (AK:.No.Extl: (A/C,No): I 5301 Glenwood Avenue (27612) E-MAIL I ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 27427 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC N I Raleigh NC 27611 INSURERA: Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation I INSURED I INSURER B Ronald H.Pittman,II DBA INSURERC: I Pittman Soil Consulting INSURER D: I 1003 Gregory Fork Rd INSURER E: I Richlands NC 28574 INSURERF: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL2272123407 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TOALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 3 SUER LIMITS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSo WVD POLICY NUMBER (MMIDD/YYYN1 MMIDD/YYWI COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE �OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence $ 50,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 I A X Professional Liability EV20182381-05 07/19/2022 07/19/2023 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 I LAGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 I POLICY JECOT- LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER ProfessionalOcc/Agg $ 1M/2M I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ _ (Ea accidenU ANYAUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED HNON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ ' AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident $ ' UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ I EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DIED I I RETENTION$ $ I WORKERS COMPENSATION I STATUTE I I EORH AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E. I OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? NIA .L.EACH ACCIDENT $(Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ I If yes,desaibe under I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ Contractors Pollution Liability- Each Incident $1,000,000 A Occurence Form EV20182381-05 07/19/2022 07/19/2023 Aggregate Limit $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached It more space Is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA NC 28540 01 2015 A O ORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registe marks - A D - - - 223 Orange County Emergency Services EM 510 Meadowlands Drive Hillsborough,NC 27278 919.245.6100 Fire&Life Safety Division TO: Cy Stober, AICP — Director, Planning & Inspections Department FROM: Elizabeth Farnan— Fire Marshal, Orange County CC: Patrick Mallett— Director Development Services Date: February 24, 2023 CASE: MA22-0005 PIN: 9749-40-2351 PROJECT: General Retail Non-Residential Conditional District (NR-CD) Zoning Atlas Amendment SUBJECT: Site Plan Review Regarding Conformance with Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for Emergency Apparatus Access and Water Availability for Required Fire Flow This memo is to show that the Fire Marshal Division has No Objections to the approval of the rezoning request. All requirements have been met for emergency apparatus access to the site and water to meet fire flow requirements. 02/24/2023 Elizabeth Farnan, FM Date A Prepared, Coordinated, and Integrated Emergency Services System Twitter @ocncemergency 224 From: ]ones.DeAnoelo] To: Brian Collie; Nishith Trivedi Cc: Cy Stober;Chuck Edwards Contact Subject: [EXTERNAL MAIL]White Cross Retail TIA Review Date: Friday,February 3,2023 2:15:48 PM Attachments: imaae001.Dna Hello Brian, District Staff have reviewed the TIA. Here are the findings: Traffic Impact Study Review • General Overview o The proposed White Cross Retail development is located in the southwest quadrant of NC Hwy 54 and White Cross Road intersection in Orange County, NC. The project will include approximately 11,000 square feet of retail space. Site access will be provided via one full-movement driveway on White Cross Road. Project build-out is anticipated in 2024. • Required Improvements o White Cross Road at Site Driveway ■ Construct a full-movement site driveway with one ingress lane and one egress lane ■ Construct a southbound right-turn lane with 100 feet of storage and appropriate taped on White Cross Road The Department concurs with the findings in the TIA. We are in receipt of the revised plans. Comments from the District office review are forthcoming. Thanks DeAngelo J. Jones Senior Assistant District Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways Division 7, District 1 336 570 6833 diiones1&ncdot.gov 115 East Crescent Square Drive P. O. Box 766 Graham, NC 27253 225 r . Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 226 Attachment 6 STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An applicant-initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to rezone a parcel as follows: Parcel Identification Township Owner of Current Zoning Proposed Zoning Number Record (PIN) • AR (Agricultural Residential, 3.67 • NR-CD (Non- acres) and NC-2 Residential (Neighborhood Conditional 9749-40- Bingham Vernon Commercial, 1.16 District); 2351 Davis acres); • Haw River • Haw River Unprotected Unprotected Watershed Overlay Watershed Overlay District. District. The Planning Board hereby finds: a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the LIDO have been deemed complete; and, b. Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 Statement of Intent - Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance with Adopted Plans of the UDO and to Section 160D-604(d) Planning Board review and comment — Plan Consistency and 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement — Plan Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. c.The amendment is consistent with applicable plans because it supports the following: • Land Use Goal 3 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan —A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. • Land Use Goal 5.6 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. Land Use Goal 6: Aland use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. 227 The amendment is consistent with these goals because the proposed development is consistent with existing/anticipated development within the area and the land use associated with the project is compatible with various 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals detailed above. d. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because it furthers the goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is located in an area designated on the Future Land Use Map as "Rural Community Activity Node." Such Nodes have been identified as appropriate areas for one or more commercial uses (reference pages 5-16 and F-2 of the Comprehensive Plan and page 10-39 of the UDO). The Planning Board hereby adopts this Statement of Consistency and the findings expressed herein and recommends the Board of County Commissioners consider adoption of the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment. Adam Beeman, Chair Date 228 Attachment 7 Ordinance#: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition submitted by Glandon Forest Equity, LLC (hereafter `the Applicant') seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, This petition seeks to rezone a 4.83 acre parcel of property (PIN 9749-40-2351) from AR (Agricultural Residential, 3.67 acres) and NC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial, 1.16 acres) to NR— CD (Non-Residential Conditional District) for the purposes of a retail business, hereafter `the Property'; and WHEREAS, The Applicant has voluntarily chosen to establish development and land use limitations on the Project to address potential conflicts with surrounding properties; and WHEREAS, The petition has been submitted with a site plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9.1 (C) of the UDO; and WHEREAS, The requirements of Section 2.8 and 2.9 of the UDO have been deemed complete; and WHEREAS, The Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan and reasonable and in the public interest. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to rezone the aforementioned 4.83 acre parcel to NR — CD (Non-Residential Conditional District), as detailed within the submitted application. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT in accordance with Section 2.9.1 (F) of the UDO the approval of this Conditional Zoning application is subject to the following mutually agreed to conditions: A. Application: Project shall be completed as presented in approved site plan/application packet; B. Off-Street Parking Requirements: Relief from providing the 54 parking spaces required, conditional on provision of 34 parking spaces; C. Driveway Access: Responsive to NC Department of Transportation comments, right turn lane shall be provided at the White Cross Rd. driveway; D. Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School the north elevation towards NC Hwy 54 shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown, frieze, simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application; E. Existing Building: Applicant will accept an offer from the community to remove the existing structure at no cost/liability to the applicant if a written and qualified offer is received within 30 days of site plan approval and the existing structure is removed within 60 days of agreement; 1 229 F. Fire Safety: Fire suppression needs shall be met by securing a deed of easement and agreement for use of the water source (3 acre pond) identified on Orange County PIN 9748-28- 3016. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2023. I, Laura Jensen, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2023 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2023. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners