The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - 04-29-2002 - 4b pff xm:,>7,an?ab OPC & System Reform APri1200 OPC Moves Forward In Planning For System Reform Reform of the public mental health system UPCOMING EVENTS as outlined in Carmen Hooker Odom's State Plan 2001:Blueprint for Change is moving .MenMl Health Association in orange County forward across North Carolina. Orange, Hosts Public Meeting Person. and Chatham counties have converted a local steering committee Apri115,ROOT 7:00 pm comprised of County Commissioners, County Southern Human Services complex Managers,the OPC Area Director and Board 35ot Homeslea i rswa Chapel N01 Chair, as well as a representative from the Consumer& Family Advisory Committee. Speaker:rim Wlalems,MSW The Steering Committee, which has had two Director at Mensal H""/Substance Abuse meetings, will provide oversight and servleae management&the local reform process. OPC Area program The Consumer &Family Advisory Committee, which has also met Mice, is changed with the The Manel Heats Associalon la hosting an responsibility Of Obtaining Consumer and information session on Me rim State Plan being family input, as well as advising and reporting proposed. rim Williams will facilitate Me meeting, to the State on the local planning process, which will ME open mall friends of MHAKIC. The Local Management Entity(LME) Work Group has developed a strategic planning . Mental Health Asimclagpn in Orange County Process(see pages 2 and 3),and identified Hosts Legislative Breakfast responsible parties for the multiple tasks. The work group has also started to compile Saturday Apol 30,2002 Mllam-10:00am and analyze service provision data of the CM1Umh of Reconciliation existing system (see inserts), as well as 110 N.EIOon Roed Chapel Hill developed a preliminary list of stakeholders in the local community. Members of the work leynow speaker: Dr.Beth Mekhir group have started meeting with OPC staff to Director of Government Beastmns discuss the requirements of the Stale Plan Material Alliance for Me Mentally 111 and elicit feedback for the planning process. each year,shortly Were Me Legislature mesb, the Mental Health AssOdagon hosts a Legisimnis Brealass,In which community members,mental NOTHING IN D EE roar HapErr5.Y0a EEIEE To HAVE health consumers and amexafts,and Blotted 'HE SfAMINATO MEE'rTHE 0341ALCUSIrND officials exchange areas on the unmet mental OVERCOME THEA1 health needs in the community. -GOEDAMEIR OPC&System Reform April 2002 Orange, Person, & Chatham Counties Strategic Planning Process (Response to State Plan 200h Blaeprfntfor Change) _ STEPS THE FRAMES FOR PE6PoNSBLE COmPLEIION _ PEM1WNS • Organic LIFE shot process Ianmry Sits Tam MonaN,Are • Educate Cook E cUp a Area hoard regarding the Slane Plan Dimcmr • Develop lemons outline whh OPC Am Dowd • Obui,Baor CUP, voI fimmnml,T dcm of holds Ne¢d m development&Mplemematlw of local immes plan • Fro itate the development of a consumer&parody ndvimry m1mmry 2002 mom" • 1'a line the establishment of a local steams onaon" Pebwuy2002 rvmp6ed of Co"S Commissioners&Comity Mang OPC Arta Dim1m,and IRmd chair well as Commandant from me Cmrmmer&Family Advisory Commmm • Compile&amilyre son ICU Fm on Ron of eda'mg system Amil tons prehirst LME Wink GRam Cumin srvees Emotional mods Service mix'by dimmostic smso Chem Iwo year history of serene provision dameaphice • Gaectwenee&eEicleocy of son ice",in-former...y Diagwsm &service cost electronic • Penenauon most I Mapping of • unmet need: services Gldissi Ofinpan"t""i'm Fula value of Indict over rory m, 'm^t°s system re,ow dam May 2002-• • Outcomes Ali other service Pro,mm dew of exis • Identify major sekehoWets aM implemm omlufu&ed Febnary,No outer Consumer& u mmummmon plan FamlFamily• btdivid�sl&gmupmeehig5 FeGUVy�November Advimry Public6rvou SPremMrit Committee' NaJa&6np msessmenw November Sieving • Newsletter Mmch- May Commune' Febmarr� DUE Wok Cm Caner aervia'e pmvlekn4y dlmbiliry and age in do fallowing rismat i¢; by diaQners&GAD eouniy or ewn With ne ompmryi'a aftem 111,CRI,be•ri ng elpaimel,COCO oednotm ml cR JU involvement, tler(o):swvioo lac npeyor,T Wiflarymvtnws:ing ^Ievv.m,iro thoddyl Room rnmeGroup;TOm Maywd.Tim WWium,Ceb Fertirwb .0.waPNh .IWYFroIeq Prt Far In. Kevinm en& and lady I Consumer&Femlly Advent imy Cummins; t&e ancys crest dm Caring:imrs,&ison-Kar O'Nxl mmi CommilyA Cmnty c=Coioners&oams, Mawgrs;OPCAm Dirtcn&FOW Chen, Conwnv&family AtivifoO Commltltt rtpteuorenva Strategic Plming N,,,, OPC&Synem Reirnrisi s April 2002 STEPS TENLE FRAMES FOR RESPONSIBLE COMPLETION PERSONS > Cuspids Strummed uwlysis Apd12002 LMEWork Gawp I ti a n xs&we ssc.,swu0a oproMryaies&thedu Lr ytm, Rneazeh how to me d beget popma0w HMIs - ReseareM1 ,nd,mnsoliinfloa oemommies > Cnmpilc in6mwlipn for Ml drzA of ml bermes LefE Work Gawp plmao mGWe • how LME will manage cmcvmiav&wvisc Iure2002 Consumer&Firmly prcvislon t,amgetpppulediom AdvimryCUmmillec ahe design fora • emprehen 1001 wk $mein-Commmec 1,111m,Mr laei mweg si send ID01 wdVWIiy • I deoig.6rmvlu mustering&eriluader, hlay2002 wcll av acompgr ive Sutliry ,mmmene prow.. y3Po2 • IsySlcm ft,mfatonGOn wish insurability tWnen Iunc2002 • the dsipp fwnenifom wwl ofx«es ➢ Summit pechminmy fe,mol plw w Rviswn July 1002 Lp¢WOrk Grmp Sian GmmiRS D Cnmple&awl&e 0zi dmROf kwO bminm Augurs 2002 LM Wmk Group gust 10 a11iM1kcholde D R irc Ilse dmft"lawl busdues plus end review stoodd c2W2 L46 Work Gawp with key sukehoddem Suing Commixes C mwwr&Family Ad,ismyConsamace > Ewh county submits howl inert widening (NMAx 00E County Cnmm'vVwM MS of Lh@ ➢ Submit must draft of kcal businec Flmm Cwnry November 1,2002 LIdE Work Gmp Commiaalnnm m,di..emm.mn,.M ublm > war[of heal business plan SubtlmW w She January 1.203 saeGl,Igco,nmMee Di,inion consensus me following d....ms: • 5mItigiv pm,for system reform Lh6 WOrh Cmm,p • Provider mmo,kd,wimmmt Service mMg&owoiVs Evaluuionn Cnlleb..mmn ➢ Plmell aflo[alominessplmi svhmimtl satM1e April Stbr Ssedngcomm"M Dinspn WMaining ceveiems in me tie r,dommr aM meduslveof three a61itional element: Lhff Work Group Smvimmmugemem • Financialmuagemen[@uaounmdEry Aa Sumgic Marring PO[ett ORC&whom Return Apra 2001 Report From The Convivial& Each member present introduced themselves to Family Advisory Committee the group and briefly described their connection to the committee. The committee men discussed ways to mumaze the committee. The pros and February Me-an iniful meeting was held at the cons of dividing into disability Monte were OPC Administrative Offices in Carr Mill Mall discussed It was decided that for sub-commMee About 25 consumers and family members heard a work in the future,the groups va uM spilt up into presentation about the State Plan by Tom groups representing developmentally disabled, Maynard, milowed by a quest'a i and answer mentally ill, and substance abuse. They would! "salon and discussion about the committee's then would come beck to the larger group where mle they could have a stronger voice. The deaf embers expressed a need to not be overdosed March 2V-Sandra Hening, interim chair, by me community. It was generally agreed that it opened Me meeting of the OPC Consumer& is important the committee be representative of all Family Advisory Committee at Carr Mill Mall, groups and that a continued afford be made to be Twenty-five attended. Karen O'Neal, staff liaison inclusive. The committee asked Karen and On to me committee,gave a brief update on the to provide more information to me committee State budget effe is on On and oWNed her about demographics,waiting lists, Medicaid rates, supportive role as a rwncomnimee member. OPC updates, atM aftemativea model programs. Sandra passed along Information updates from The next meeting was scheduled far April 2Td. Me On State Plan Steering Committee and provided other information about the State Plan. OPC BUSINESS PLAN: STATE PLAN 2001 Geographic Distribution of Clients Served in Calendar Years 2000 and 2001 wnwnm y�ownwnmarcbcamnemn•.o wsoo-a„z.v. 113227 Alm Tome ¢my,q:oaw AAmr ny wp,an or Cmhm..nc�cwnw. TTW 27A WA �70 21 m 21 n A 123 216 17 4a 11 15 26 m wwwunmmm BT ?moon: OPC BUSINESS PLAN: STATE PLAN 2001 Volume of Services Provided in Calendar Years 2000 and 2001 Units of Service and OPC Service Charge Sum Standard Estimated Calendar Year Units(Hours) Service Value 2000 1,031,959 $21,173,780 2001 1,231,886 $23,898,702 Calendar Year 2000 Calendar Year 2001 Sum Sum Standard Estimated Standard Estimated Type of Service Units(Hours) Service Value Type of Service Units(Hours) Service Value ACT TEAM 5,600 $195,256 ACT TEAM 9,220 $368,701 ADMINISTRATIVE 38 $254,460 ADMINISTRATIVE 548 $2,262 CASE MANAGEMENT 12,086 $2,569,864 CASE MANAGEMENT 40,420 $3,125,929 COMMUNITY SUPPORT 29,511 $2,103,252 COMMUNITY SUPPORT 153,301 $3,344,410 COURT RELATED SERVICES 238 $19,644 COURT RELATED SERVICES 471 $37,273 CRISIS SERVICES 1,277 $110,671 DAY SERVICES 91,781 $1,082,193 DAY SERVICES 24,431 $117,317 DETOX 3,680 $65,320 DETOX 11,568 $205,332 DWI SERVICES 3,027 $118,542 DWI SERVICES 1,230 $112,922 EVALUATION 1,961 $191,957 EVALUATION 119 $10,229 GROUP TREATMENT 18,067 $769,025 GROUP TREATMENT 21,969 $661,763 INDIVIDUAL THERAPY 23,395 $2,332,567 INDIVIDUAL THERAPY 21,503 $1,945,284 INTAKE 763 $211,622 INTAKE 631 $222,564 MEDICAL SERVICES 6,567 $631,302 MEDICAL SERVICES 6,140 $559,177 PREVENTION t5 $1,131 PREVENTION 0 $10 PSYCHOSOCIAL REHAB 76,953 $769,530 PSYCHOSOCIAL REHAB 13,921 $520,047 RESIDENTIAL 578,369 $7,145,667 RESIDENTIAL 813,666 $10,180,379 RESPITE 11,197 $50,579 RESPITE 6,438 $128,959 SPECIAL THERAPIES 5,978 $542,590 SPECIAL THERAPIES 1,334 $166,221 SUPPLIES $148,727 SUPPLIES $186,845 TRAVEL 5,548 $216284 TRAVEL 1,841 $81,372 VOCATIONAL SERVICES 202,609 $2,743,090 VOCATIONAL SERVICES 58,420 $812,213 Total 1,231,888 $23,898,702 Total 1,031,959 $21,173,780 OPC BUSINESS PLAN: STATE PLAN 2001 Demographic Characteristics of Clients Served in Calendar Years 2000 and 2001 Sex of Clients Receiving Services SEX F M Total Services In calendar 2830 3251 6081 year 2000 46.6% 53.5% 100.0% Services in calendar 2725 3287 6012 year 2001 46.3% 54.7% 100.0% Census 2000 52.0% 48.0% 10010% Age of Clients Receiving Services AGE 65 years and Missing or Birth-2 years 3-5 years 6-17 years 18-64 years older unknown Total Services in calendar 167 213 1265 4210 210 16 6081 year 2000 2.7% 3.5% 20.8% 69.2% 3.5% .3% 100.0% Service§in calendar 219 195 1214 4200 181 3 6012 year 2001 3.6% 3.2% 20.2% 69.9% 3.0% .0% 100.0% i 3/18/2002 Age of Clients Receiving Services by(Census Age Categories) AGE 17 years and 65 years and Missing or under 18.64 years older unknown Total Services in calendar 1645 4210 210 16 6081 year 2000 27.1% 69.2% 3.5% .3% 100.0% Services in calendar 1628 4200 181 3 6012 year 2001 27.1% 69.9% 3.0% .0% 100.0% Race of Clients Receiving Services RACE Native Asian/Pacific Amedcan/Alaskan Missing or White Black Hispanic Islander Native Other unknown Total Services in calendar year 2000 3788 1985 130 26 17 104 31 6081 62.3% 32.6% 2.1% .4% .3% 1.7% .5% 100.0°k Services in calendar year 2001 3757 1969 83 44 23 121 15 6012 62.5% 32.8% 1.4% .7% .4% 2.0% .20/9 100.0% 16.4% _-- 5-2% 5-0% 0-4% 1 4% Hispanic Ethnic Distribution of Clients Receiving Services ETHNIC Mexican Hispanic other American Not Hispanic Puerto Rican Unknown Total Services In CY 2000 59 23 5957 4 38 6081 1.0% 4°k 98.0% .1% .6% 100.0% Services in CY 2001 66 41 5598 6 301 6012 1.1% .7% 93.1% .1% 5.0°k 100.0% r.onC11Q 2QQQ 1.5% 3.8°/ 44 7% Z$ 100.0%.. Note: The number of Hispanic nic clients in the Race table does not exactly match the number in the Hispanic Ethnic table.i P The information comes from two separate questions and there may be nconsistencies in the way people answer and/or record the answers. 3/18/2002 CONSUMER VIEWPOINTS A lot of people got tired of the way mental health services in North Carolina were, and complained to their lawmakers enough that a reform law was passed. The goal of this reform law is to create a whole new system of care that is fair, uniform throughout the state, easier to access, aimed at those who need help most and available regardless of People's ability to pay. It is still in the planning stages and it is called the State Plan. Part of the law states that consumers will have a big part in planning and overseeing the whole system, both at the state level and in their own communities. Consumers will have real power because it is built into the new law. The law states that mental health officials must seek our input and opinions and prove they are listening to us in every step of building the new system. That's why it really does matter that you speak up and say your opinion about the services you get and the way want them to be in the future. You can go to the local committee meetings, call yourArea Program Office, or call orwrhe to the State Division of Health and Human Services. They are listening because they have tol You can visit www came state nc memhddsas for information. Laura Eaateding Most of the broad outlines of what the new State Plan comprises have and will be defined, descnbel, or delineated in Raleigh. However, each Local Management Entity(WE) has responsibility for creating a local business plan. The group creating this local business plan has a strong desire to hear comments, complaints, and the occasional compliment before it sends Its proposed plan to Raleigh. They'd rather hear it now than later. Thus,the Consumer and Family Advisory Group was born, people who are interested themselves and who also are interested in getting input from other people who don't happen to be in the room at the time.' The group has met twice so far and elected a set of officers. The group intends to assemble comments regarding the process of making a local business plan, the proposed plan, and later the plan as it impacts the public. It may not do anything, but hopefully it will point out what we think should be done. At least from a couple dozen points of view. - Stephen Haabig