HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.5.22 Training and ORC Notes Approved 12.7.22
1 SUMMARY NOTES
2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
3 OCTOBER 5,2022
4 TRAINING SESSION AND ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE
5
6 NOTE: A quorum is not required for Planning Board Training Sessions and Ordinance Review Committee
7 meetings.
8
9 MEMBERS PRESENT: Whitney Watson, At-Large Representative; Beth Bronson, At-Large Representative;
10 Steve Kaufmann, Bingham Township Representative; Lamar Proctor(Vice-Chair), Cheeks Township
11 Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township Representative;
12
13 STAFF PRESENT: Perdita Holtz, Special Projects& GIS Supervisor; Tyler Sliger, Planner II; Pat Mallett,
14 Interim Current Planning Supervisor and Erosion Control, Stormwater& Engineering Supervisor; Carlos
15 Sanchez, Planning Technician: Tina Love, Administrative Support;
16
17 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER
18
19 AGENDA ITEM 2: PLANNING BOARD TRAINING SESSION — Staff will lead training designed for recently
20 appointed Planning Board members on basic aspects of land use regulation in Orange
21 County.
22 PRESENTER: Perdita Holtz, Special Projects & GIS Supervisor
23
24 Perdita Holtz conducted a training session on motions and voting and on the basic processes of amending
25 the LIDO and Comprehensive Plan.
26
27 AGENDA ITEM 3: ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE — UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT
28 AMENDMENTS — FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT SIGNATURE BLOCKS — To review proposed
29 amendments to the UDO that would remove the school district signature block on final
30 subdivision plats.
31 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner II
32
33 Tyler Sliger presented the proposed text amendments to the UDO regarding the removal of a school district
34 signature block on subdivision plats.
35
36 Lamar Proctor expressed serious reservations on removing the school district from being required to sign
37 all subdivision plats.
38
39 AGENDA ITEM 4: ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE — UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT
40 AMENDMENTS — EFFICIENCY UNITS — To review proposed amendments to the LIDO
41 pertaining to efficiency apartments (also known as "accessory dwelling units" or
42 ADLIs).
43 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner II
44
45 Tyler Sliger presented the proposed text amendments to the UDO regarding efficiency units or ADUs.
46
47 Adam Beeman expressed objections to allowing mobile homes and disagrees that it is any more affordable
48 than a stick built residence but depreciates faster, has worse building design and is not a good addition to a
49 property or neighborhoods.
50
1
Approved 12.7.22
51 Delores Bailey stated that she is doesn't like ADUs but doesn't think it is fair to be prejudiced against
52 mobile homes.
53
54 Adam Beeman thinks ADUs should be allowed.
55
56 Lamar Proctor agreed that mobile homes are not desirable.
57
58 Beth Bronson requested the item come back to ORC prior to going to the regular meeting.
2