Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 12-06-21; 6-b - Approval of an Allocation Framework for the FY2020-21 Financial Results 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: December 6, 2021 Action Agenda Item No. 6-b SUBJECT: Approval of an Allocation Framework for the FY2020-21 Financial Results DEPARTMENT: County Manager ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Update on FY2020-21 Year End Financial Results Travis Myren, 919-245-2308 Gary Donaldson, 919-245-2453 Rebecca Crawford, 919-245-2152 PURPOSE: To approve an allocation framework for the FY2020-21 financial results which resulted in a total net positive financial positon of approximately $12 million, with the approved framework to be codified in a budget amendment for consideration at a future meeting. BACKGROUND: This abstract provides a high level summary of the attached Update on FY2020-21 Year End Financial Results report which provides a more detailed discussion of the sources and proposed uses of the County's positive net financial positon ending on June 30, 2021. The results of the FY2020-21 financial audit will show positive results in two areas. On an operating basis, the audit will show a surplus of approximately $8.9 million before transfers. Of that amount, approximately $8 million is available for a mid-year budget adjustment. In addition, the fund balance reconciliation contained in the audit will show $4 million in available one time resources resulting from a decrease in the fund balance appropriation used to balance the FY2020-21 Budget compared to the smaller amount appropriated to balance the FY2021-22 Budget. The positive operating results relied on revenue collections that exceeded budgeted expectations and intentional expenditure restrictions that limited expenditures to below budgeted amounts. Some of these variances are expected to be recurring or ongoing while others are non-recurring or one time occurrences. 2 Source Amount Recurring vs. Non-Recurring Property Tax Collection Rate $1,600,000 Recurring • 98.7% Budgeted • 99.27% Actual Motor Vehicle Tax Collection Rate $ 400,000 Recurring • 99.4% Budgeted • 103.8% Actual (exceeds 100% due to payment of delinquent bills) Sales Tax Collections (Articles 39, 40 and $4,000,000 Recurring 42) • Budgeted to decrease by 4.5% • Actual Collections exceed Budget by 17.4% Medicaid Hold Harmless $2,000,000 Non-Recurring • Budgeted at $1.75 million • Actual Payment - $3.75 million No Use of Fund Balance to Balance $4,000,000 Non-Recurring Budget • $8,200,000 Budgeted • $1,900,000 Assigned to FY2021-22 Budget • $2,300,000 Allocated to maintain 16% Unassigned Fund Balance • $4,000,000 Available for Allocation TOTAL 000 000 Based on the recurring and non-recurring nature of the variances outlined above, the following table proposes specific uses for those funds. A more detailed description of the proposed allocations is contained in the attached Update on FY2020-21 Year End Financial Results report. Proposed Employee Wage Adjustment $ (1,883,875) Recurring • Three percent wage increase retroactive to July 1, 2021 Schools Opportunity Gap & Mental $ (1,500,000) Recurring Health Fund • Allocated by average daily membership • Schools to provide spending plan • Track progress on key indicators 3 FEMA Back Stop $ (407,543) Non-Recurring • Reserved for unreimbursed COVID- 19 emergency expenditures • May be repurposed if reimbursement occurs Ineligible Federal Expenses $ (2,228,629) Non-Recurring • Sportsplex Deficit • Visitors Bureau Deficit • Information Technology Expenses for County use • Expenses not eligible under evolving federal regulations Outside Agencies $ (1,729,953) Non-Recurring • Substitute general fund resources for proposed ARPA funding due to rigorous reporting requirements for sub recipients Crisis Diversion Facility Design $ (250,000) Non-Recurring • Conceptual design funding for potential new facility Transfer to Capital Reserve $ (4,000,000) Non-Recurring • Reserved to fund existing debt financed projects or increase capital funding for priority projects • A decision on how to allocate this funding could be made at a later date TOTALGRAND 000,000) FINANCIAL IMPACT: The County ended FY2020-21 with a total net positive financial positon of approximately$12 million. This framework allocates those funds to a variety of recurring and non- recurring expenditures. SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goals are applicable to this item: • GOAL: FOSTER A COMMUNITY CULTURE THAT REJECTS OPPRESSION AND INEQUITY The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race or color; religious or philosophical beliefs; sex, gender or sexual orientation; national origin or ethnic background; age; military service; disability; and familial, residential or economic status. 4 • GOAL: ENSURE ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY The creation and preservation of infrastructure, policies, programs and funding necessary for residents to provide shelter, food, clothing and medical care for themselves and their dependents. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is no Orange County Environmental Responsibility Goal impact associated with adopting an allocation framework. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve an allocation framework totaling $12 million. A budget amendment will be presented to codify this framework at a future meeting. 5 Update on FY2020-21 Year End Financial Results Commissioners, The County's auditors are finalizing the FY2020-21 Financial Audit. The results of this audit will show positive results in two areas. On an operating basis, the audit will show a surplus of approximately $8.9 million before transfers. Of that amount, approximately $8 million is available for a mid-year budget adjustment. In addition, the fund balance reconciliation contained in the audit will show $4 million in available one time resources resulting from a decrease in the fund balance appropriation used to balance the FY2020-21 Budget compared to the smaller amount appropriated to balance the FY2021-22 Budget. This memorandum will summarize the primary contributors to this positive financial outcome, outline a framework for the investment of those funds through a mid-year budget adjustment, and propose a timeline for the Board's consideration. A more detailed table of budgeted versus actual expenditures and revenues is attached. FY2020-21 Budget Results The FY2020-21 Budget was presented to the Board of Commissioners in May of 2020. At that time, the State was entering its sixth week of the Governor's Stay at Home order. Unemployment rates in the County were beginning to increase, and the County's otherwise resilient local economy was suffering. Under these circumstances,the County Manager's recommended budget included conservative revenue projections and austere expenditure measures designed to protect the County's financial well-being. Fortunately, the federal government asserted a variety of economic stimulus initiatives to individuals, private businesses, and the public sector to avoid widespread economic distress. Those stimulus measures manifested in positive impacts to the County's primary revenue sources. Property Tax and Motor Vehicle Collections The collection rates for property taxes and motor vehicle collections were adjusted down in the FY2020- 21 Budget in anticipation of residents struggling to pay those obligations. Property tax collection rates were decreased from 99.2% in FY2019-20 to 98.7%in FY2020-21. However,the actual collection rate did not decrease. Rather, it stayed consistent with the FY2019-20 rate at 99.27% resulting in a positive property tax revenue variance of over$1.6 million. The collection rate for Motor Vehicles also performed in excess of expectations. That rate was budgeted to decrease by 0.5%. However,the actual collection rate exceeded 100% at 103.8% as both current year and delinquent tax bills were paid. This positive variance amounted to over $400,000 in surplus collections compared to the budgeted amount. Both of these positive variances are expected to be recurring, so the funds could be used to support ongoing operating expenses. Sales Taxes Sales taxes were budgeted to decrease by 4.5%from the FY2019-20 budgeted amount. Actual sales tax collections, however, exceeded FY2019-20 collections. This unexpected performance resulted in actual collections exceeding the FY2020-21 budgeted amount by over $4 million. Although the Department of Revenue will not disclose the amount of sales tax collected from online sources, online purchases during and after the stay at home order likely fueled some of this growth, and direct federal stimulus payments 1 6 to individuals and families helped to enhance retail sales. Those direct stimulus payments were distributed in April of 2020, December of 2020, and March of 2021. Due to the three month lag in sales tax reporting from the Department of Revenue, the impact of the December 2020 stimulus was not known until April of 2021, and the impact from the March stimulus payments were not known until June 2021. The following chart illustrates how those stimulus payments amplified the seasonal variations in sales tax collections compared to FY2019 and FY2020. Sales Tax Collections by Month $3,000,000.00 3rd Stimulus-March 2021 2nd Stimulus-December 2020 $2,500,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 1st Stimulus-April 2020 $1,000,000.00 $500,000.00 $ Large Refund & et et et t to n ,�o`P tc0 �C'0 p� Q�e ece >a� �eo \� $(500,000.00) 5e 2019 2020 2021 Medicaid Hold Harmless In April of 2020, the Office of the State Treasurer warned counties that, "Based on our expectations, we urge counties to be very conservative about budgeting how much revenue they budget for the MHH [Medicaid Hold Harmless] payments in their 2021 budgets." Hold harmless payment are made from the state to counties because counties exchanged a portion of their local sales and use tax revenue for the state's agreement to assume responsibility for certain non-administrative Medicaid costs several years ago. The FY2020-21 Budget estimated the County would receive a Medicaid Hold Harmless payment of$1.75 million. Since sales tax revenues Statewide did not suffer the expected losses,the County's Medicaid Hold Harmless payment exceeded the budgeted amount by over$2 million. The audit will reflect this payment in the sales tax category. Since this revenue is not in the County's control and, therefore, not as predictable, it should be considered non-recurring revenue available for one time expenditure. 2 7 Unassigned Fund Balance The FY2020-21 Budget implemented a number of expenditure austerity measures intended to maintain fiscal flexibility. The Budget included a hiring freeze, did not provide a wage adjustment for employees, suspended employee performance rewards, and suspended all conference,training, and travel expenses. These intentional austerity measures, along with other restrained spending in departments, resulted in actual expenditures that were under the budgeted amounts. This means that the $8.2 million fund balance appropriation used to balance the FY2020-21 budget was not required. Of that $8.2 million appropriation,$1.9 million was used to balance the FY2021-22 Budget,$2.3 million was applied to achieve the sixteen percent unassigned fund balance target based on increased budgeted expenditures, and the remaining$4 million is available for one time expenditure. Framework for Investments Based on the factors cited above,this proposed framework for investment includes a total of$3.38 million in recurring expenses and $8.61 million in non-recurring expenses. o Opportunity Gap Reduction and Student Mental Health Support Fund -$1.5 million Both school districts highlighted two priorities in their expansion budget requests for FY2021-22, closing the racial and ethnic opportunity gap and addressing the mental health of students. In response to that request, this proposal creates an Opportunity Gap Reduction and Mental Health Support fund that would be exclusively dedicated to those priorities. The resources contained in this fund would be allocated, as required, by average daily membership. Based on the FY2021-22 allocations, Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools would receive $905,400, and Orange County Schools would receive$594,600. This fund would exist outside of the districts'current expense budgets to emphasize this investment as it relates to the Board's goal of promoting equity and social justice in the community. The fund is anticipated to be a recurring expense. As proposed, each District would propose a spending plan each year which could not supplant current spending. The districts would have the flexibility to determine the amount of funds used to address each priority area. The outcomes associated with this investment would also be tracked. The opportunity gap will be measured by end of grade scores in math and reading. The County will seek input from the districts about how to best measure the results of mental health support component of the fund. The County Manager is discussing this proposal with the Superintendents on December 1. o Employee Wage Adjustment-$1.9 million Orange County employees have not received an across the board wage adjustment for two years. Employees did receive a one-time pandemic relief payment of$900 per employee, but this payment was not applied to base wages. Employees in surrounding jurisdictions received wage increases between two percent (2%) to five percent (5%) this fiscal year. The second proposed recurring investment is in Orange County employees with a 3.0% wage adjustment that will be retroactive to July 1, 2021. o Outside Agency Base Budget Funding-$1.7 million The FY2021-22 Budget recommended funding the entire Outside Agency budget using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. However,the new reporting requirements associated with the use of ARPA funds would require outside agencies of all sizes to track expenses and submit reports on a level 3 8 that they have not been required to do before and many may not have the administrative capacity to complete. If one of these sub-recipients were to fail to produce the required documentation,the County's overall compliance could be jeopardized. Therefore, this plan replaces ARPA funds with general fund resources. The ARPA funds that were designated for this purpose will be available for other community needs. • Ineligible American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Expenditures-$2.2 million As the interim spending rules on ARPA funds continue to evolve, some of the proposed expenditures contained in the first recommended County allocation are clearly eligible expenditures. For example, the FY2021-22 Budget applied ARPA funds to deficits in the Visitors Bureau and Sportsplex Funds. Given the federal eligibility framework that was in place at the time, covering revenue shortfalls appeared to be an eligible use of funds. However, as the guidance has evolved, the measurement that is being used to determine a revenue shortfall is on an organization wide basis, not an individual fund basis. As a result, $1.35 million proposed to cover the deficits in the Visitors Bureau and Sportsplex funds are ineligible uses. Likewise, prior federal guidance on information technology related expenditures cast a wide net of eligible uses. However, the ARPA guidance restricts the use of funds for technology to those related to the direct COVID-19 response or supporting residents negatively impacted by the pandemic, not to other organizational expenses related to transitioning to remote work. As a result, $878,629 in information technology software and equipment that would have been eligible under prior federal COVID-19 programs is not eligible under the ARPA rules. • Federal Emergency Management Agency Reimbursement Backstop-$407,543 The County expended a total of approximately$2,840,015 on non-congregate housing for individuals experiencing homelessness during the height of the pandemic. To date,the County has only received $638,956 in reimbursements for that housing,despite the many assurances provided by the State that reimbursement was certain. As the County continues its reimbursement claim for the balance of funds, this proposal recommends setting aside $407,543 in an Emergency Recovery Fund for the purposes of offsetting unrealized reimbursements. In the event that reimbursement is received, these funds would be available for repurposing. • Crisis Diversion Facility Design Funds-$250,000 The Behavioral Health Task Force has outlined the business case for a Crisis Diversion Facility that would offer a therapeutic alternative to either the Detention Center or the Emergency Room for residents experiencing a behavioral health crisis. The team has defined programming needs through a variety of stakeholder engagements and will be in a position to proceed with conceptual design in 2022. This proposal recommends allocating$250,000 to support that conceptual design.Any funding remaining from the conceptual design phase could be applied to architectural work later in the project if it proceeds or could be repurposed for other capital needs if it does not proceed. • Transfer Funds to Capital Reserve-$4 million Finally, this proposal recommends transferring the one-time unassigned fund balance surplus to a capital reserve fund for uses to be determined at a later date. For example,these funds could be used to substitute cash for future borrowing thereby reducing pressure on the County's debt service costs. If all $4 million were applied to next year's Capital Budget in this way, it would eliminate the need for 4 9 a projected tax increase until 2024. Alternatively, the Board could authorize additional, one-time capital spending for school or County capital needs without incurring additional debt service expense in the future. • Summary Table of Proposed Uses of Funds Recurring Employee Wage Adjustment $ (1,883,875) Schools Opportunity Gap& Mental Health Fund $ (1,500,000) TOTAL Recurring $ (3,383,875) Non- Recurring FEMA Backstop $ (407,543) Ineligible Federal Expenses-S-Plex, VB, IT $ (2,228,629) Outside Agencies $ (1,729,953) Crisis Diversion Facility Design $ (250,000) Transfer to Capital Reserve $ (4,000,000) TOTAL Non-Recurring $ (8,616,125) GRAND TOTAL $ (12,000,000) Next Steps and Timeline for Consideration The financial audit must be submitted to the Local Government Commission by December 1,2021. When that occurs,the audit officially becomes a public document. County management is prepared to present these preliminary spending recommendations on December 6. Following the Board's deliberation on these recommendations, a final budget amendment reflecting the Board's action on December 6 would be prepared for the December 14 meeting. This amendment will include an action to change the salary schedule since the Board adopts this schedule as part of the budget ordinance. The change would reflect the amount approved by the Board. 5 10 DRAFT-FY 2020-21 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY RESULTS Both the Income Statement and Balance Sheet provided the$12 million to fund the Budget Amendment as illustrated below. INCOME STATEMENT The bolded column below represents the net income impact REVENUES Revised Budget Actual Amounts Variance NOTES Positive variance due primarily to higher tax collection rate than budgeted;budgeted 98.7%for real and personal and actual collection rate was 99.3%. Motor Vehicle collections had additional Property taxes $ 167,234,047 $ 169,609,395 $ 2,375,348 $403,268. Federal Stimulus offset management's forecast of projected lower revenues due to pandemic Sales tax $ 25,577,353 $ 32,101,942 $ 6,524,589 closures. Intergovernmental $ 28,795,396 $ 25,670,181 $ (3,125,215) Timing of Grant Reimbursements. Primarily due to necessary public health restrictions impacting Detention Center Federal Bed Charges for Services $ 12,444,279 $ 11,549,397 $ (894,882) Utilization; Budgeted$1.6 million and Actual is$803,671. Investment earnings $ 530,000 $ 17,708 $ (512,292) Lower interest rate environment eroded yield opportunities. License and permits $ 288,250 $ 281,024 $ (7,226) Comprised of Franchise Tax and Privilige License. Miscellaneous $ 1,003,000 $ 865,501 $ (137,499) Comprised of Lease Rentals and Donations Total revenues $ 235,872,325 $ 240,095,148 $ 4,222,823 Positive variance attributed to property and sales tax collections EXPENDITURES Community service $ 11,436,885 $ 9,962,876 $ (1,474,009) Manager Cost Containment measures and Personnel Attrition. General government $ 14,733,484 $ 13,549,081 $ (1,184,403) Same comment as above. Public Safety $ 29,051,056 $ 27,428,024 $ (1,623,032) Same comment as above. Human services $ 46,160,781 $ 41,797,621 $ (4,363,160) Same comment as above. Education $ 93,809,052 $ 92,671,015 $ (1,138,037) Same comment as above. Support services $ 12,787,530 $ 11,970,772 $ (816,758) Same comment as above. Debt service $ 33,910,651 $ 33,764,216 $ (146,435) $ 241,889,439 $ 231,143,605 $(10,745,834) Manager Cost Containment measures and Personnel Attrition. Revenues over(under) expenditures $ 8,951,543 Basis for Mid-Year Budget Adjustment NOTE All transactions indicated above the line exclude transfers in and out