HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-11-2001-9gORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: December 11, 2001
Action A9gggQQgda
Item No. y-q
SUBJECT: Fox Hill Fenn Centrel-Preliminary Plan J
DEPARTMENT: Planning antl Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (VIN) L~
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
i) Reaolu[ipn of Approval (pp.4) Etltlie Klrk, Planner lL Extension 2582
2) Diagram of Roadside Landscaping (pp. 9a and 96)
3) Application (pp. 9c)
4) Vicinity Map (pp. 13) TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
5)Agency Comments (pp. i6) Hillsborough 7328181
6j Fiscallmpac[Analysis (pp. 23) Chapel HIII 968-0501
]) 10-3-91 Draft Planning Boats Minutes (pp. 39) Durham tl33$33t
S)Latter from Applicant's Engineer (pp. 42) Mebane (336)327-2037
9j BOCC Draft Minulea fmm 11/19101 (pp. 43)
10) Preliminary Plan
ITEM TABLED ON NOVEMBER 19, 2001 for etldltlonel IMOrmation on [he bllowing Items:
i) Build a center left taro lane on New Sharon Church Road with Phase 3-Developer has
egraetl antl condition has bean placetl in Resolu0on of Approval.(See B 8 in Resolution of
Approval on page 5).
2) Build Fox Hill Farm Drive through to Baldwin Road with Phase 3-Oevebper has agreed
and rantlNOn has bean placatl In Resolution of Approval. (See B 9 in Resolutlpn pf Approval on
page 6)
3) Fire control access to the pond shall be provided with Phase 3-Developer has agreed and
condition has bean placed in Resolution oFApproval. (See F.3 in Resolution of Approval on
page ])
9) To ne9otiale a right taro leper on Baldwin roatl al southam anlrence- NCDOT will not allow
right turn tapers without full storage and taper lanes (minimum standards for NCDOT turn lanes
re 100 atarega lane antl a 220-foot taper).
Atlministration recommentle that the original request (i.e. 30-foot radius antl a 50-foot transition
taper) from the BoaN of County Commissioners be fowarded to NCDOT to permit an
acceptable right taro lane, different than the typical standard, e[the southern Baldwin
Road entrance. (See 6.11 in Resolution of Approval on page 6)
5) Rewortl the language brthe required 30-foot typeA roatlsitle buRerm-WONing has been
revised in the Resolution of Approval. (See C 2 and attached tliagram on pages 9a and 9b)
8) Installation of recycling facility-In summery the response is to rmservaeloca[ion fora
recycling center [o be used for [he[ purpose 9fie owneq HOA antl [he County can later agree
to locate a recycling center on the reserved land. Developer does not agree al this time W
convey property to the Homeowners Association (HOA) tp be matle available tp the HOA for a
recycling center for the Fox Hill Farms community. Atlminis[rebon rewmmends that an area be
reserved and shown on a portion of the open space area Icceletl atljecenl to antl south of Lot
15] on the north aide of Fox Hill Farm Drive for a recycling facility. A recycling facility may be
establishetl on this property tlagreemenf is reached to tlc so among the owner, the HOA antl
nra~~a c„~~ne, ~~n~mtPnnwnm n.~,,,.e r,.~~„v~ c~un mmere ~~e.arm~ ~,.n.me a e.e.,s,.,,
z
center is localetl in the reserved area, the foal plat will describe [he area, the recycling center
property will be conveyed to the HOA. or Orange County, and the declaration of covenants will
be revised [o provide for the recycling center and its mairrtenance. (See F.] in Resolution on
page 8)
PURPOSE: Gpnsidera[ion of the Preliminary Plan for FOx Hill Farm Central.
BACKGROUND:
Reouest-Prel m nary Plan
AppllcanY: Bob Zumwalt, agent for Rantlolph O. FOx
L~
Between Baltlwin Roatl antl New Sharon Church Roatl in Eno Township.
Subdivision follows the Conservation-Clualer Option of Flexible Development.
~,,, Lole Average Lot Erse Yo OPen Space. Acres Open
(Gross) _ S ace
'. Flex ble li 91 :. 33] ' 33 191.4] '
Ex'st'nR antl Probosetl Contlltlona
Existing:
• Total acreage is 30].43 acres.
• The entire subtllvlslon is localetl in the Neuse River Basin.
• A portion (approximately 50%) of the property ie in the Lower Eno protected watershed.
• Current zoning la Agricultural Resitlential (AR)(min.density=40,000 eq.flldwelling)
• Minimum lot size is 40,0110 square feet
• The property is currently under farm use value taxation.
Physical Features:
• There are several designatetl streams on the [racL
• The site is mostly wooded with a miMUre of pines antl haNwaods.
Atljacent Lantl Use:
• Propetlies to the east antl wee[ ere subtlivitletl.
• Properties to the north antl south are undevelopetl.
Proposed
Roads:
• Access is from Baldwin antl New Sharon Church Road
• The subtliviaion road loops through the property with culCe-sacs extending from Chia road.
• All roads are m ba rnnstmcted b NCOOT stantlaMS with 5' utilBy easements on each sitle.
• Estimatetl [rips per tlay ie 952, (a.m. peak = ]3; p.m. peak = 911).
• All access intersections are expected to operate at level of service B or better under
anticipated traffic demands.
• Phasing as proposetl will result in 331ots being placetl on a culEe-sac at the antl of Phase
II. Connection through to Baldwin Rosd is atlvisable for accessibility forflre antl paremetlic
emergency vehiGea ae noted in Administration recommendation.
Open Space/Buffers:
• 101 4] acres (33 % j of Homeowners Association (HOA) maintained open space proposed
Lirile Creek, (gray on the map), is a USGS blue line stream (i.e, perennial) will be a part
of the HOA open space
The two intermittent blue line, unnamed Mbutaries are also within the tlesignated HOA
Opel space
...__....,i....,.....a........m...nn..A enm. the .cmamtlomffhn H(1A noon soars.
• Roadsitle buffering antl setbacks providetl along 8altlwin antl New Sharon Church Roads
• gverage of 1.18 acres of in-lot open space per Ict.
• Minimum to actual density mdo (MTADR)=3.6].
• 100 foot building setback along perimeter required under flexible development is provided
• Homeowners Association documents eletl for maintenance of open space antl buffer
WatarSewer:
• Intlividual wells.
• Indivitlual septic systems.
Recreation:
• Northam District Park (91 lots X $455 = $61 405).
• No tledication is wanantetl because no county recreation or rewume area has been
itlanlifletl at [his time. The payment-in-lieu option Is viable.
Aaencv Comments:
• Comments aXachetl from NGDOT, Environmental Health and Emergency Management.
Development Proeess. SeM1edule and Aclign
Planning Board:
• Flrst Acton: Concept Plen approved by the Planning Boartl April 4, 2001 with the
following contlltions:
1. The intersection and road alignments on the Preliminary Plan shell meet NCDOT
stantlaMS.
2. Homeowners Association documents shall be submitted with the preliminary
plan that provitle for maintenance of the Open Space.
3. A note shall be placed on the plan stating that the proposetl northern by-pass.
which la part of [he atloptetl Hillsborough Thoroughfare Plan, may be located
near the nddhern properly line of this development. The precise alignment has
not bean detenninetl prior to review of this plat.
Preliminary Plan atltlresses conditions of approval of the Concept Plan. The subtlivision tlesign
has not changed from the Concept Plan.
• Second ACtlon:
1. The Planning Boartl in a unanimous vote recommendetl approval October 3,
zogt.
• Third Action; Board of County Commissioners, on November 19, 2901, tabletl [Ile
subdivision and direcmtl staff and tlevelaper to atltlress the siz issues on page 1 IN
[M1is abstract.
• Foukh Action: 8000 to make decision
Optons'.
1. The Boartl shall consider [he application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. Dudng deliberations antl consitleration of the application Ne Boartl may tlefer
consideration at any point to pursue atltlitional analysis antl review.
3. If Preliminary Plan ie approved by the County Commissioners the apphcan[ shall
have one (i) year to prepare antl fJe a Final Plat or to request eons-year
eMension from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis inclutletl as an attachment.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Administration Approval of the Preliminary Plan in accortlance with
the atlachetl Resolution of Approval.
Planning Board Approval, in accortlance with the adached Resolution
of Approval.
Planning Staff Aopmvel. in accortlance with the attached Resolution
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Doh: Ueumber 11, 2001
Name of SubNvisivv: Pox hill Fatm-Cenrcal
OwnerlApplicmh Bob Znmwdt, agent for Randolph D. Fox
The BvaN of COUVry Commissioners hereby approves Fnx Hill Farm-Cenral subdivision
preliminary plaq dated Sepmmher 20, 2001 evd comaiving 911ots, subject [o the fultillmevt of
regviremenm specified herein.
Parm Gate Drive. Windllower PUce, Lee Fox lave, Fox Hill Farm Dave, Cedar Seine Way,
Still Meatlow Lme. Sta[fve Place and gpringfeld Place fiaU be irtevocably dctlicated m the
general public and be eonstrar:red ~o smvdards of the Nnnh Carolina Deparwevt of
Trwsportafion. The approval of this readmion aumorizw end dhecrs the Change County
Menages to aaept far Ormge County and on behalf of the public generally, Ne offer of
dalicazlon of Fmm OaU Drive, Winddowu Plain, ]ee Pox Isve, Fox Hill Farm Drive. Cedar
Stout Way, Still Meadow Lme, gmrtrc Place avtl Sprivgfieltl Place. This acceptance by
Orange Covnly of me dedication m the genuat publle of Farm Gem Drive, Wirdflower Place,
Lee Fox Lave, Fox Hill Farm Drive, Cedar gross Way, Still Meadow Lane, Starfue Place and
Springfield Place shall be wimom maintenance rwponelbiliry- These roads shay he malmained
by the ownvlapplican[ oval inch time as they are accepted for mamtenv~ce by We North
Carolina Depertmeet of 4av6portvtion or some oNer govemmrnW body. Befo¢ the Final
Plat of Pnx Hill Farm-CevvW tin ba recaNL+l:
A. Sewage Dupo681
1. Each residential lot shell covmin av adequate area for septic disposal, and repair
arcs, approval ny the Ormge County Division of Dmiromvcvml Health.
2. The septic syatem location may roslnR the size evd location of improvements.
This disdosam shall be imluded w a documcm describing development
resrcidione ro be recorded wncurtendy with the Fwal Plat Thu document shall
olso disclose that infornatiov regartlmg the tentative Iwafion of eeptic systems
vailable fiom the Orange County Health Depatm~evq Division of
4a
Bvvvmmev[al Healh_
B. Roads and Access
1. Farm Gate Drive, W indFlOwa Place, Lee Fnx Lane, Fox Hill Parts Drive.
CNur Stave Way. Still Meadow Lave, StaRVe Place and Springfield Place shall
be covstmcmd ~o stardards of the North Caroliw Depattmevt of Transportafion,
wiNin a 50 foot [fight-of-way with 5 foot utility emmnent ov each side, and the
urmwuiov shall be impecmd and approved by NCDOT
OR
A Inner of aWi[, escrow agrcemon4 or bond shall be submive4 w secure
covstrvctiov of Farm G re Drive, WitNflowm Place, Lee Fox Lane, Fox Hill
Farm Drive, Ceda Smne Wey, Still Meadow Law, Smrfrc Place aW
Sprivgfeld Plain w the swrWuNs of the Nocth Caroline Departmem of
Trampovatlea An cstimaN of the eoaatruction mat must be preparN by u
cmifed/liwvsed mgiveer or grading corvractor and submitted ro the Planning
and Impectlons Deparonwt. The financial gvaamee mml reflect 110% ofrha[
esf ate avtl be isspetl by an acaedired financial insYiNtiov licensed [o do
buslvess In Notth Cazoliva.
TM1e document describing development restrictions to be recorder with Ne Finel
Plaz shall arse [hanhe f cisl guaamec wdl voY ba released until the road
usasvuctinn has M1een inapeued and approved by NCDOT.
2. All Iota ahall receive acma from tM1e internal svbtlivisiov roads. No driveways
shell be perminetl within 50' cf a meet iv¢rseaion. Lms 126-128 and lots 142-
145 shall implemmt unnbined driveways. Anon-vehicular access easement
shell be recorded along Fox Hill Farm Drive ham the Asldww Road
mmmecnon a Ne wemem lot Ilvea o[ lot 194 and 195 witM1 tM1e exception of 50'
Pot a driveway ov lol l5/ arW a 34fvot mtmvee for a poYmtial recyolivg
fuiliry.
3. An mosi® covnol play int mvfllruCtiov of We mods shall be xubmined by Ne
applievvr tc the Orange Covvty Emsiov Covnol Division (or review aM
approval prior N my distmbmce ov Ne sire.
4. Approved snm mine eigm shall be ueued et sA wo:rsccdave prier m
recordarivv of the fiml plat.
5. Prior ro any mmrmuiov or ahemtiov of my exietwg auces wiNm the righYOf-
way of New Shaun Church Rmd ur Baldwin Ruvl, the developer/nwrnr aM1ell
e a driveway permit hum fie NCDOT Distrin Offce. Submit a umy of
We NCDOT- approvN pnrmir end Icvm to We Plemlvg Depazlrnmt ar the same
tune as Ne reyueal fur Ivmning Deparvnent sigmYUres' on [M1e Pinal Plat.
6. Sight triangles (10' x 70') shall be shown uv Ne kiml Ylat at each inwrseuiov.
]. A mm shall be placed on the final plat which indiuma the proposed nnrtM1em
Ay-pass, which is pats of the adolmd Hdlsborovgh Thomvghfere Plm, may be
located mar the mrNCm property Iwe of nos dcvelopnwv[. The precise
alignmem was not demrminW as of the rewNing of this plat.
8. A cvmor left tom lane nn New Sharon CM1UrcM1 RoW az the Parm Gare Drive
Inmrsecriov shall be wnswcae to NCDOT stavdartls prior to Pleming
Depattmev[ sigvatmes on Ne Fiml Plat lirr Phase 3.
9. Fox Hill Farm Drive tram Farm Gate Drive tv Baldwin Road shall be s
w¢struc[W to NCDOT sNOdard9 prior to Plemting Department signamrcs ov
the Fwal Plar for Phase 3.
10. Dedicate 5' adtlitional right-of-way along New Sbarnn Gbarch Road and
Baldwin Aoed to mmt collecror road right-of-way standards as idcvrified m the
Comprehensive Plav aM regn'ved in Heuion N-R-3-c-I of the Svhdivision
Regvlatiom.
11. Hulld or boM a right mrn lane azcepmble m NCDOT, based on NCDOT answer
to the 8000 request (30' mdlue and W-fvv[ taper) regaNing Haltlwiv Roetl Nrn
lave, at the vmlhem Fox HN Farm Drivc NVance prior m rewrdetion of Phase
3 ^rul plat. If bonding Is the option chosen by Ne developer. We mrn lane mast
be complemd prior m issuance of occupancy permits for any structure. in Phase
3.
C. Laud Use BuRers evtl Levtlsrapmg
landscaping shall be wslalled or preserved as mdicet~ on the appnrvcd
landscape Plan, and must be inspernrl and approval by We Plarmmg evtl
In pecliovs Department. IaMwaping shall be p1acN behind the night criaugles
et mtersectiens.
OR
Gvaravteed financially Wrongh a rasa of ue41t escrow agraam®t or bond
submittN to secure regvis~ IaMscape insNllativn and preservation. An
estimate of the cast for required prce nation, plantings and their im[allation
must be providetl. The financial guarantee shall re8ec[ I10 percem of Ne
estimate end be issued by m acuedited f moiel institution licens d m do
husivesa w Nonh Carolina.
Pevvisiom (or pmlectlov of existing neea m shown ov the approved landscape
play shall be inolvded in a dnenmeN desaibwg developvseN ree¢ic[ions and
cequvemenN m he prepaetl by Plamivg RNB and recorded mnemmNly wiN
Ne Final Plas. No clear coning o¢ individual lots per s«tion IV-B-Rc of the
Orange County Subdivision Regulatinm.
A Type A Land Use Buffer shall M1e pmvlded along New Sharon Church Rnad
within the Homeowaere Aseociafiov open vpa¢ and along Haldwin Road as
showy ov Ne heliminary Plan. The buffer shall be 30 felt iv witl[h tin New
9harov Church Road alW eovmio at lead 509E evwgteev vegemlion, forming
mi-opaque inlermineN vuusl obstmuions from the gmurtl m e height of ar
Ica4 tlluty (30) fat. Ov Baldwin Road the bnHer shall M1e a mlvlmum 30 fee[ in
wid[M1 aM shalt be wmpoaed of deciduous and/or evugreev vegetation, forming
semiopaque in[ennitmm visual obswctiovs from the ground m a height of yr
least thirty (30) Icel. Said buffer shell be so noted ov the plat, and desalbed w a
documeN desQibmgdevelopmenvesrzidiovs evtl requimmevts to be prepared
by Planning Stiff evtl recorded concurrently with Ne Final Plat The buffers
vhall he main[awed bf the Homeowners Association.
D. Daaivage
1. Louvre dcWnage eazemevts on the final plat as requhea following review and
approval of We Erosion Comrol Plan.
2. DreNage culverts shall be sizmt and lowtcrl us mquiml by NCDOP and a Norrh
Carolina IittnsW Pm[rssloml EugWC¢.
3. Impervious surface dam, as pursuam to AniWC 623 3a I of the Zoning
Ordinance shag be ircloded N a documen[ tlesaibmg tlevelopmen[ restrictiorrs
and requirements to be prepmed by PlamWg Staff and recoNN covcurtevtly
wiN fie FNaI Plar The impmviws sorbet limimlions for such lot shall indicme
whetM1er Ne impervious surface incloaes o[ excludes otm-half (1R) of Ne [oad
widN iv the calculafions.
E. Parklsn0
L Cash in the amwnt of $41,405.00 shall be psis to Omvge Cowty es payment in
lieu of pvkhma tleaicadnn prior to reaNatigv of Ne final plat.
2. The second paragraph of SttGOn IV-B-]-b of the Orange Couvry Subaivisiov
Regulations mferrncn Ne requirrrl minimum rerrealion space m[io iv Ne
Otmrgc Comty ZoWrlg OrdWmce, ArtlGe 5.1.1, which requires 0 028 squad
far of remeadnn.vpue per lance area dediearea m reaiaandal nae lo.uxs
29].93 = 8.34 acres or 363,349 square fee[F. In (hose cases where the rryuirW
creazinn span resWU In a larger amount Nan Ne public recreelion
space regvhemmt of 1/5] acre per Ivt, the difference shall be established as
private recreation space for Nc use of Uu msidevts of Ne aevelopmeW (363,3]9
-69,543 = 293,836 sgna¢ fea (6 ]4 acres)-'fM1e developer has planed 101 4]
sores of opw space (33%) [o be malvtaiv~ by the Homaowuws Aseocietiov,
which vdisfies Ne County requdemenu fo[ pdva[e [euearion sae.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The FNW Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance wicfi
Snaion V-0-2 aryl V-D-3 of Ne Orwgv Conroy Subdivision RegWadons.
2. DreNage easements shall be provided az reyuired by D.I . aMwe.
3. A dry hydrant shall be insmllwl in the ponJ Ixaled in Pkaw 4. The pond ehWl
nlem Ne specific requircmmm as rcquhca by Emsgency Marugemrnt. This
would itlevd[y a unable water source for fire suppression- The dry M1yNant
shall be cevswcted dining Ne wnswuion of Phase 3 wiN av ah weather
smGtt provitlea m Ne pond anvil Fox Hill Farm Drive and Starfne Plaw are
conswcted.
6. The open space shall he conveyed inn the Homwwner's AsnmiWion a. each
phase of Ne svbdivlsion la rewrdetl-
5. A 100.foot building se[back dull be provided around Ne pedmemr of Ne
subliviainn. A 150-foot butldmg setback easetnem on lots Iba,165, and Ifi6 a
shall be Provided slang Baldww Roed az ivdica¢d ov the Prelimirary Plan.
6. A 20.foot wide pedasaian access cotenant shall be loeatetl iv lot 191 along the
vosthem proprrry line next to lot 190 from the open space area m Fox Hi0 Farm
Drive.
Z A recycling facility may bo established ov IIGS property if an agreement ie reached
ng the ovmcr, the HOA and Omnxe Cowty cosvsiatent with Orange County's
Solid Wute operaing policies. The open epee urea, IvcatW seusfi of and adjacent
m Lot l5] and north ofFOx HlI Farm Drive iv Phue 3, shall bereserv' N on the
foal plat and designx[duapotemial [ccycpng fecihty. [f an ageemem is
reached, the reserved ¢ree shall be moneyed m the HOA or Orange County.
Maintenance of any pmpedy conveyed to the HOA or Omnge County for a Fax
Hill Farm mmmuniry regeivx cantor will ba the respovaibility of[ba HOA ar
Orange Cowty u agreed to by Dranxe County and the HOA. The declaration of
covevan[s shall be revised b provide foe the recycling canter end its maiulenanca
c. canmaauoass
1. A Cenifiwte of Survey and A¢wacy signed by a P[ofessioval Laud Surveyor
shall be nosarvzd ov Ne face of she Fiwl Plm.
2. A Certificate of Dedara[iov avtl Maintenance in the form providetl N Section V-
D-b-b of she Orange Covvry Subdivuwn Regvla[ions signed by Nc laudowm[ I
developm shall be ov the face of Ne plat and Ivelpded m e document describing
development res[ric[ivva [o be recorded concurrently with do Fwal Plat.
3. The North Caroline DepaHmevt of Transpottedov sbaU certify the[ Ferm Cate
Urine, WirtlFlOwrr Place, Lee Fox Lave, Fox Hill Farm Drive, Cedar gtonc
Way, Still Meadow Lavq Slarfite Place and gptlvgfield Piece have bew
mvswcted m grate srawlazds or that mnstraaion plays have bmv approved
print b PlavWng Department si%nawres on Mal plat.
a. A Cettifirerc of Approval sigu~ by the Otavge County Flaming sad
Ivspcdeas Iseparunevt.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Boe[tl of Ornge Counr
Commissioners Wa[ We Preliminary Plan for Fox HW Farm Cenrcal Subdivision u approved m
arcordance with the above mendoned mMitiovs end attached PreWnivary Plat dated
Scprcmbm 20, 2W 1.
Upon motion of Conunissinntt ecovded by Corrmissioner _
the foregoige, [caolvsiav was adopted [hie the _ day of_, 2001.
I, Beve[ly A. Blythe, Clark m the Bomd of Commissioners fo[ the County o[ O[evge,
Nenh Carolina, DO HEREBY CEATIFY dot [he foregoing is a [me copy of m moth of the
9
proceetlings of saitl Board a[ a meeting heltl nn , 4W I as ¢lates iv any way
to the adOptiov of the foregumg and thw said pmrcedings are rewrded iv M'vwte Book No.
of [he minutes of said evazd.
W ITNE53 vls hand and We scal o[ said Comry, tltis day of , 2001_
Ulerk to the Board of Coromisaionere
75 TYPE'A' SUFFER (1,i50 LF)
(gLONG BALDWW FiD. BE+9VD LOTS 165 +166)
scats r-sa
~\10/V \tlYl/g.
s o o ~
\IIIOp \.~\ItllCy a o $ WVI/yp~WYI/ x
S_ $£ p ~ ~
g
1 „
xao'
30' TYPE 'A' BUFFER (1,650 LF)
(ALONG BALDWIN FmJ
scree r<Yn
muuw, r\wuuw
~ p ~
0
\IIIW~.\.~\IIIWy~ p o ~WYI//y~WVII 4 e
~J
o - °
11
aao'
~' TYPE 'A' BUFFER (1,000 LF)
(ALONG NEW SHARON CFIVRCH ~
scaes rao•
The majority of the Twe A Buffers are locatetl in the Homeowners
i
F
ff
s
1 f1CC FYV al IfTIO ~ ~' NA 96
_~q`~~p, CGYLN Ma~E Y.CV
y/~~y THC~Mago GB
Eealam Petl CeEeY JV
~^W~Ma Sack PFa fT
6 p 5 9cukt Oek aC`
\'`~/j NarwY Mepb MQAFC£'if~)
\~// Airer¢a~BseGl Po( eML TPff)
O K~eaaan CTrry (9 (®JALL l111EE11
Vlbar Oak OP dA5C21YEE1
OclopeY Gory PeE Mega Afi
Bock Om IB
o a ~»,.» ~
APPLICATION POR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVgL 9r
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
ORANGE COUNTY
Dme: 3w. a. zoo
.Lmsn..=oxmm.a[ne ..1
SIIBOINSION NAME. pm Xill FUm-Qnml
LOCATION: BIW paNwip Ra,g New Aemn Cbaeh Ptl souN
Ovm'ERDEVELOPER. RentlWeh O. FOa
ADDftEEfi. 3536 Lrossaaik P.. SU#103 TELEPXONE RO.: )p.56S1
QeM1VR NC 35'IOS
aGENTMONTgCT'. BaEiumvak NJ. TELEPHONENO.: 361-SOW
TLe)dm M[AaviuC Ine.
SUMMIRY INPORMATION:
~ Om3•CawyTn My 5.1] Bbek lnfU 1a To+nNb Fa
2onin301me¢ nR
Tagil NUmbvofpov. )0)6)
T"W NUmbno(Lae 91 preny lus3ia: SOBAVU Min LO19M: 56.3155E
numanrtree oeswLn,N::te.amg3 la #,n,,..... rn,epo:m)
Limon Fen in SM[4: 13,WOIF A4n in Open 3pn: Io1 qAW
w.msoppy: v#IM Iwe<Ih) ^eemnn# ®mm•iauel
worc.Nern¢po,el: ^ mow. kv~ihl ^eo~e.~rnia ®maimml
susol oi:.a: ol.wee"~rv Fin Divan: CamIOMu
GemRI LOM VU in Alva: _ReiNgasl/AnkWO,n
CmieJ ASUS: Yo aneymlaMpapfwsre Yes 1lxa Amu peas
1^`e'E°o Rirn w+lnshnitra[+61 Nou nixlmk:aa
omerfuplml:
1sa~cPmPeulnbz aowreaea eennhuMn"r.A,.m.aEnn.eam^3 vn^ No O. R°re,plo~e
u u=gmgeeauery i.. qF.e. sumi.uion olroe Plopnl5'mry=equ#P`ynNpselaeRnmmes
uMn"eimralu vuim^
L An olanmen#:.ems#am enenb[.nlwum oeem#egml: rve nuMrm Rn O^-3W'a na"o
ivtttaun mevrzh`9ubswwylen(P'-]OTenamuRpsvm Ne NROwing~Po~muion.
~~ ~Mliv6un nnm ~/~ bW aortage of1Ae ma aN avenge M
~_^ =meg aeanno/omu(s) ': F" ~''"`IWMgMa[lu0"S Vn vMM
®~"mmeg ameu er rvbaiNan OI MU ~-.~yW[
nme~ol
~~ I n"veya.. aE^~mla6. ~acob5~mgaM WamnPpPxnn.~.eee
IW+rype uAiurl x.reLiien. WGea, ® OuI3liN sn4rL uiwv H
~amnJ.an eeu Wan "m
ONel mmvmsp PW ~Q '~ lode bn eM~~ or euving ma
.nk.nenn ne. gq #Ilon
W~wn FVhnF~aM YEeen.W ~ a (aRina
IMnLYnlen ~~-.. )
Aw wmonl:e. eproPUxdNWM)onm$~SM1V-
~ P...I iaeonnwae x otlwey mn#bg ehmniewe ""a vn
aw 6mL VA p.yeerP,omnyma masWERMannnhm. Lnw
eenm.iaea ': rm a,am [me,l.,e, maepwma#
~S a~ ae aw whn 4wmge ma ~.p _ e.neegeeroe.~em. nFln,arwey
inHg na P~eWSea WlLies,
ixlW~ rype, s¢ey ryynsnµ relnf.
!' ivNpln
fvbne ovnpkn urene.ie.)
vkgwpmpona.mbc, gwm.ea
alw,bq meM1lmos s;msNa eman
laeaaan ua wieA a(alleys, Aaewelke,
' '
~ bike lmq Paullry
and bus swp
~ ~
ppiml Wn W
" bon 4mi6 intlWmB assign mtl
wWA b(bawlvq ma.brlMn
®p p~.pnma lxlim..ialalm.n..,m
~_ Im wm bl«v.wmMn
® pMJ[y IMp)
nPoglpSy u ren I I0j foot ~nlmely
® w.,n bW'n ,vmm nnnamrc ma
~
l~
~' sm
an
b~mm
®^ I«,M. ma sn. o~pW a aedwl.a
mr vlmnb bm -mml ...
mmw in enmmon. wlm pwpm
~e
~Q - imperviw: :IVnee a.u 4r Iwmd 'm
' wwrwpplrmMmeaa
~~ +iciniry my sACwxg genml Iznim
of subMNe c¢ ud m
.
~amialeg e~sl~
aom .m.bm ma
~~ wmeepmgmabwxn.mmirm~wlm
G (1TpCR 6V6MIRAL RFQUpLLMEN6$
nonmma xugmrwnt amnlini mains,
. W gnml [we ave m JI R4pmsa
pelmareel I®MCS rueM1 az buiyiry4
ms. pifwJ
®'..:[}';~, xmM1N. mRMYi sM en[e.uri~tnal
'.'
`' ! vM1.bang p.baknro n.n wnim mm
.. phi ww•ro
~~
' alomme lm lanm ~m.nnmvmalg
I pmpnq om~m v:ubervla<a,
.. .w.. ^ n pia nm~ pw boa:.,a
unM1n ua pemm~o Id
[
n
inehrt
~- muabn ma [im or lxs a,nbiiua
.. '. x.anmm powMl ma vvmion on
. V
eKWiMLne
~-. ~n
.. a",...... Num mnmion
~
ma ImmamMa rm
mnhnm, vmpom[ rrlm.ne'n mn.
'
' upplr wau1w11
~~ imMme o 1 mm Na wileuk
em:tlxs
I. Tvmlyfin(8]Jiopina(art Pnlimvmypm.
z. arc wl:ixmpynr enquge eumry TU mep(w~mmlmme4 Nwirea clorrymmbml.
]. wbnamwaipnnowAS.sm..ni..m„wixbla •iwr ogan p.limiemv Pm icaiam,e xmu
ommmmm wpo•.vamw w,ennmmown ammo..
WM1VeepHmroM i.pybwl.awivmxmm~wl by A.appleml b.M1iuW WlMnmampeamxmive
wbimnn rmmm=iwmgcmoo rmo mi..m.ue tm. Mnlx~rva]a-I ormiam.gi cowry
SuMin rtegulargni}
]. 4uxiliery puumubq'n anfl fwm.pnyu[ap eubNVe.im sm[iw vl olmrs OMlvanei M¢M1 uawc
cbmpWimxelmmeniensu orlmprowrmu.yevxatymii 0iaku[e. ]ucb ao[uaenb mfy
.mx.Nnnm MlimlW m..p,iwm m.am.mmbam.mim.m~.w..eim or:.npnmfiiwroa
rewae pnuinug ry a lmlrowens nine iuinn. 14ere Jxumeve mry p saqune] u
rmf uy y <r iami qy yi osyww.e rtauimm~ee m Mme mrt
6. Fee~MIDplx bS 00pn M(pm ke lq pRllmlmy Na Flnil Plx}
]. Ilpw subaiersim ewhNS IO kuo.nwn,MrolkwineolMOiYMNYl bisubminee wimmc yplicNOn:
b rmbM.oanaro Mnmm.
b. VumbnofbmnroMN111elbbg eubYm wM baitlum,
e. nwu.win nrMmn ww.glw me®mrom~o ewaox.
I, me tM1 brc IEa fineeoN6 opplieui ~'JJwrglea ub /~ u. ~~~~/~~j
~LLCA..rO ( -fry//tNOi
IGHANRE ' aiwNgft'b ~QNANRE
dm
(J>E DATE
FEES: A~ngm~ /s S~ O.mpaia F'I3-OI 8eeeipi 2P98S
jvlm.iompkm n.nii sua
c%nre ::79
~ Tf~ JOHN R McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
poly 31,2W1
Fox Rill Farm
Site Plop Approval-Major Subdivision
Respomea to Item N] (OSha Required Irmis) from APPlicasipn
]. V she subdivision mmains 10 lots m more, the following infomnarion shall be
submined wiW Ne epptiutiw:
a. Numbtt ofyemsto build-om.
Rmpovae: 2 Yomv (ePProx.2pg3)
b. Nmvber ofhousea so be built during each year unsil buildpus.
Rapovae: 45 -46 hovxNyesr
c. Avaege pace of hovaea including lolafw each yam so builtlour.
Reepamc 5325~0g0
cw.. a ..n
rvmneenme - n .. ~ eua.cwr.~
PJ dY 11Wfi . PaxMi2119b Puk iW 0]]m • 191b ]6~~E9W a 10151am~aa®
vwnvLa~mmma~nimn
Traffic Impact Analysis
Fox Hill Farm -Central
Hillsborough, NC
Prepared for:
Randolph D. Fox
Fox Hill Farm, LLC
September, 2001
~~
€ NCAR9 "rv '
'T ,aoao ~°
'~sRV.,,.,,
- -_
1.0 Executive Summary
A
* The pmpnsed Fox Hill FarmLemral develapmmt is locazed near Hillsborough, North
* Carolina between Baldwin Rvad and New Sharon Chmch Road. The proposed
* develapmmt will cortsist of an additional 91 single-family dwelling mtita. The site will
A be accessetl vie two driveways mro Baldwin Roed and one onm New Sharon Chmch
* Road. Completion (full build-out) W antiripered is yeaz 2003.
A
A The si¢ is esdmared m generate m additioral 951 mtsl trips doily, with ]3 and 98
umng during the AM and PM peek hour, aspectively. It shoWd be noted that these
~ vips generation estimates me a mtW pf both entering and exiting vehicles. N addition ro
~ a dvee percent amuol gow[h rme, snfFc gemratiov fox the previously approved 49
• Single-family dwelling wdt; was also included In the malysis.
A This Study hm hem performed to derermwe rtre Porure mffic impacts oEthe development
on the surtowding street network. Based on this mmlysis, the adjacent street network
will operate az a good overall Icrcl-of-service. lnmaecriomin the mea will opeam at
level-of-service (LOS) B or bens. Average daily tmtt5c covets on Baldwin Road and
~ new Sharon Chmch Road ate not expected to exceed 3000 vehicles per day. Based on
anticipated rnE(c volumes end NCDOT standards, neither left tum laves mr right rum
~ Imes aze required et site dmeways. A &eld mvesrigadon has confvmed that adequate
sight distance is presem at all site driveways.
e
e
e
e
e
e
a
e
e
e
A
k;~pea
SR
V i~lltll l Y 1Y2C1r
~~~ '
16
p
jJ~ ~
it ~ ~ ~~ ° ~ ~ 1
I ~.? a~nl '.!
li
~I
~i~ ~~'~~
~ 't
1
~~
~P
ES
a
'
. _
i~
,
=-
_
,~ -
j f
i=, r,
~
~~,i~ ~ --- ;r
I
~
' i
____
______
-____~, u
,Ir;
W
1
v~^ lu ~i I ~ I9
~ ~~ ~~ i
~~
l
-- ~~ ~i------ti
_!~ ~~ ~ ¢~\.! Ilia
•:~
~~ 3
-iE~l~~l ~~ ~~..
-_ ,:~A.
'* t 1,-~ i ~ IL F ~}
.~~ .- Rid u
®®~ e 5 7 g I~ I
nl?F,ifl~~~i~h i! ~3¢j~E ~i0~l l~ i.1 nil ~~~. -- ~ '~~yii'
4i u~i Ef 6 {iii ~ "~ ~ j ~i t'i _ ~~:~~i
ir'i .,s
~,'
LU"o B 19W
n, 6 Owl. N di^:99GRSaRON
WaF~i hs:svvaK
Ril~g6`P 1 SPauwnl
AEQIiEST FOR AGENCY REVIEW:
-ATE: August 8, 2001
FROM: ORANGE COIIMI"Y PLANNING AND INSPECTIOrvE DEPARTMENT
TO: Derek Duw, NOM Casvlina-epamnrnt vfTransporle~on
We have reeeivetl the attached patlplan for coveidenavv:
Project vame: Fox Hill Faem Cmeal Subdivision
Applicant Rm~dy Fox
Types Concept NLOW1Inib Prvpvsed: 91
Tuwvship: Eno Tax Map: 13 Block: Lots: 16
Locvlion: East ode ofNew Sharon Church Road and wesl aide of Baldwiv Road.
Project Summery: Proposedpublic roads
Pavvag Deparemevt Comment:
I6
Please submit any eammevb la [he Panning Depeslmeat by: Aegurt 31, 2001
Ityou have my queafiova, please cavtact Eddie Kuk
at 688-'1331, ntevalav: 2582
M1B~O ID: Q1Be gial<
EAM 5. 0. Onn
O7g: O}]etd
R yu¢ ssp®[~_ a nviea of de eLVre natlavl sn}st toes iza: am+l~l Ty u,c Pmt 4tdsn rnsrsJec.
wt..., f~ }¢¢ fate ie a list of a¢ LFtameWliaa ad mma:t for tle smjat:
1. Pcia m eF msmutim of an rea ~ s elt~a: of edntltC,_ _e vddvn do rigc of ref
Ne ~relo[s/ara is xRtical m ssae a ~c with Hds afflre. IC ss de caln®:tility of tYe
pxrr/3vxlc~x W aMein a I~dt.
2. All uali.[i.® kceta'.udun dx ¢~[ of 9v11 xeldm s a¢m~(viait~~s~~ All aevirg
doll Iz fhda wiN EfNSh~ gam. A!y ry uatn, sen"^° rauadm Q lat®l lreavai xltldn
de d3tiratel siQu of va:'ttell lx ~nt~e15' da=. mFegriate uNity a:duity.
ll
Orange County Health Department
' o.ya.~c~wus~M,ap~aa~:em Rose ery L. Summere,YBF7, DrPH se eo~winm [~~~~
Health Dlre~ar w.a /m.nn
no.a v.a.a co. xme..r. w.en. n...,e .: ~s~r~w-veo ,v: ~u~geu.
.... o.vie~ e a
a~~so.o. .c anre e.,i~a~.~~u e..w.aeue u..n.. .vane
r~~cn.on xni
v+vw vn."-nc nri~aryil~N etlmwvmurc.ruuuva OI&oevnun pV196FW1 pl9)6HiOll1 pl9)SS9-
Novembarl3,2001
SOIL/SITE Eralwnon Summery (or.
FOX HILL FARIVI CENTRAL
Eno Township Map 13 Lot 14
Mep Dese September20, 2001
Lot# DESIGN Eluw
I I3 480 gpd
u4 4xu ~a
t15 480 gpd
116 480 ppd
t^ 46f1 ~tl
118 480 gpd
119 480 gpd
120 480 gpd
121 400 apd
122 480 ~d
us aso apa
Iza aso gpa
I?d 480 gpd
136 480 pd
12' 480 ~d
SYSTEM TYPE
S]Wlow Trench Cenveutio~tal
Shallow'Ikanoh Ccnvantlortal w/pump
Shallow Trench Convrnnonal
Convrn[ional
Conventional w/pump
Shallow IIench Ccnventional w/pump
Comevlional
Convenional
^Itm 9nellow Trench Cowmdowl w/pomp
Shallow Trench Convmhonal
snanow rmnen coevantiunal
convantimval
Shallow Trench C~nventioval
Shallow Trench Comrenrional w/pump
Conventional
19
128 480 gpd Cawmtioval
129 480 gpd Convmtionel
130 480 gpd Shvllowhmch CvnvenNveal
131 480 gpd Conventonal
132 48o gpd Cowmtioaal
133 480 gpd Shallow Tcewh CovvmtionN
l34 480 gpd Shallow T[m<h COnvmdmal
135 480 gpd Ulrca Shnllvw Trench COnvmticvel w/pwvp
136 480 gpd Shellaw Trevch Convmtieml w/pump
13'1 480 gpd Shallow TCevch Cavvmtioovl
t38 480 gpd Sltallow Tvemh Convntional
139 4g0 gpd Cmventlonal
140 480 gpd Cvnvm[iaval
141 480 gpd Shallow Tcmch Com'mticval
142 480 gpd Conventional
143 480 gpd Shellaw Trench Convm[ional
1d4 480 gpd CvnvnOanal
145 480 gpd Slulbw irmch Cvmmtimal w~pump
t46 480 gpd Olm Shallow Trench Canvwtiovel w/pump
147 460 gpd Cavven6onalw/pump
148 '480 gpd Shallow Tlmch Cvmentioral w/pump
149 460 gpd Covvevtioval
I50 -080 gpd Shallow T.mch COVVmGOVaI
151 480 gpd Shellaw Trench Conventional
19
152 480 gpd Shallow french Conventenal
153 480 gpd Com'uvlic~l wipump
Ii4 480 gpd Com'evlional wipump
Ii5 480 gpd Shalow Trmch Conventional w~pnmp
156 360 gpd Oltre Shallow Treneh Conventional w/pump
IS] 460 gpd Convendonal w/pump
158 460 gpd SM1Nlow 4aurA Couvenlfoual w/pump
159 480 gpd - Shallow 4rwch Canvcnlional w~pwnp
160 480 ~d Shapow ]'retch Covvmtional w,~pvmp
161 480 gpd Shallow IImch Covvmfioval w/pomp
162 480 gpd Shallow ICench Conventional w/pump
163 480 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional
1ti4 a80 gpd Convevdovel wrypmp
165 a80 gpd Shallow Trewh Conventlonal
166 aso ypd snaunw Treneh eouvemional
16~ aso ppa snauow Tabw convevrnaal
168 180 gpd Comrnticnet
169 a80 gpd Conventinnal
190 480 gpd Conventional
1]1 480 gpd Covvmfiovol
U2 480 gpd Convmtianal w/pump
U3 480 gyd Shallow IIench Conventional w/puuw
U4 080 gpd Shallow IeeucL Conventonal
ll5 480 ypd Conventonal
zo
t]6 480 god Ul[m Shallow "l'ravoh Cpvvmtio~ml
1]] 480 god Conventional
VS 480 god Shallow Trench Conventional
L]9 480 god Shallow Trench Conventional
180 480 god Shallow Tmnch Conventional -
1St a80 god Shellvw Trench Conventional
182 480 god Shellaw Trench Convmrionnl
183 480 god - CawpNional w/pump
184 480 god Conventional
18i 480 god Shallow T[emh Cmven[i0val w/pump
186 480 god Conventional wlpwvp
18] 480 god Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional w/ptwp
188 480 god Shallow Trcnch Cavvendonel w/pump
189 480 god Shallow Trench CawenrionW w/pump
190 a80 epd Shallow'Itmch Commtional wipump
191 480 god Shellaw Trench Conveutloval
192 480 god Shaltaw Tremh Comevticvet
19J 480 god CovvmtiovW
Iva asa god Shallow ranch Con. entio¢al
195 480 god Ulo-a Shallow Trench Convmtivvl
196 480 god Shallow Trench Convmtioval
197 480 god Shallow Trench Covvmdonel
198 480 god Shallow Trench Conventional
199 480 god Shallow Trench Cv¢venioval
u
zoo a8o gpa snmmw Trmch cnnvmhonal
zol ago gpd canvmhnnW
202 480 gpd Shallow ltmch Convmticnal w/pwnp
203 R80 gpd Conventioanl
NOT[S'
The design flow is based upon Ne number of bedrooms applied fnrhy the propetly owner or developer. the desi,
flaw for a betlroom Is 120 gallc~/dey (g~d)_ (Eg 680 gpd=4 bedmoms)
Thepmperty owner or developer u required by ISA NCAC 18A.1900 -.1969 (The Lews and Rules 1'or Sewage
Treatment and Disposal Systems provides proposed house locations).
TM1e design Flow, type system, and pump requirement are snbjecl to ehavw based upon Iha epplica[ivn and site pie
plat submitted for Ne Wastewater Cons[rvctivn Authoricmion.
TM1e hlvcked areas vn the xcampanying plat me the limim ofthe provraiovnlly suitabl<soils as evalumetl by the
Ormge County Health Deparhnent.
It should be rated dtat all tatshaving a convemional-type drain field with pomp aze reviewer at amwmum of ev
five years by iha health depaz[mmt as required by 15A NCAC 18 A .19d1 (NLtimevmw oPSawaga Systmu}
Ulve Shallow Trenoh Com'evtiovel Systems are placed in areas with 21 mchea or more ofprovisiorally suitable
seiVSite chazachrisfics avd a 6-30" soil cap is placed over Ne vmehes.
Shallaw'1'reneh Conventional Systems are plmed in areas with JD inches or mme vfprovisionelly svimble so1VSV'
charuclanstlcs.
Cowentienel Trench Sye[ems are pieced N areas with 36' inches or more ofprovisior~Wly sutable soillsite
charxtenstics.
Th d h Idb k [f f M l t R 1 d ~ d<o H C'I
It is the maponsibility of the propttty own or developu to meintwrtthemtepityof Ne septic arena prior to sysh
mnstmdivn and installation. No parking,ecuttivg or Lllwg shall be allowed W or moved the drain field seas.
DrAivage ways and eeaementa shoud be utilized to convey storm waterrva-ofi[o the storm wamr relmliev areas.
These conveyances should not he loaned through designetW septic drain f eld areas,
This report isforplarming purposes only and dues not constitute any site approval. Lot approval is grantal by thi
heWtb depamvmtoWYwthe fonv ofan Lnpmvemmt Permit. ,
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box A181
tEUaboenngn
North Carolina
202J8
9-1-I cewie.mw Snla'aewry Memcel9ervicea
2C HOw Wammg POiw O Fire Marshal
91?J)]-d 161 .933-26pp Oifvs@e Reryarve
30.no~n Fu Mechwe ILVU~w Marewa
9t9-96]-9046 9t9-6aad0]0. 96A-2050
AdmwiSVUdveFU MecWu
919-9fi8-0066
T0: EDD~KHtK, PLANNING DEPARTMEM
FROM: MII{E TAPP, DEPUTY DIltECTOR/FIXE MARS}IAL hA~
RE: FOX Fm,L FARM CENTRAL BUBDMSION, PRFZIIVIINARY PLAN
DATE: AUGUST 13, 2001
We havc reviewed the preliminary plan of Fox FEII Cevtral8ubdivision submit dm following
cammm~:
1. Adtlitional slafTing Pot 9-1-t and emmBeneY resPO¢se agencies will need a be idenlifi d.
As Ne oval areas make the [mnainon to residential wbdivieiove, addidoeal growth and
pvpulaHov mayrcquire edditioml etvfEvg in order to effativalyprovitlepublic saftty
services.
2. Tide site plan tloes not aaaras wets supplies fort protection. The developer should
provide some type afpropomt £ r yr identify usable water sovrcce [a &e supprasiov end
lifesaferyconsidemfione -
Ifyou veM additional iNbmratioq Please contact us.
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
Vorth Caroliva
2929R
31-1 Commwiaanone PrmernaY Nntical9cawxc
EO HOw Wama~g POw[ Fuc MUaLW
91B-]RA161~9132600 - D6azta FaeP^^ae
Nazartlom Ne¢nale
EI-Naar lax Machive 919-64JJOJOa 968-2050
9IY-Yfi~-9026
ANmniseaaive Far MacM1ire
919A6AA066
TO: EDDY KRK, PLA1`NING DEPARTMENT
FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY llIRECTOR/FBtF MARSHAL
RE: FOX HBS, FARM CENTRAL S06DMSION
DATE: NOVBIVIDEA I5, pA01
'ova
This memoraMOm sores m pmvide m uplatc [0 0c Aagnst L2,?001 memorandum whm we
pmWded wnwen[s on water far fire pmt«tivv and stefiing. Since IM1uI vime, m axistiag poud
rile bas bcm identified as a water source end a dry hydrm[ will be ieulalled m the existing
pond for inepro[mfion Purposes.
Secondly, po[mfiel staffing needs wore no[ rv[mded m be JireclW m This panimlar pmjeat
bn[ the[ cumulatively, developmcn[ in [Ile Counrywip result m mcrcaud slafting ne tls far
9-1-1 and emagmcy sepoelee agencies.
ifyuu need additional infonne[ioq plmse contazt us.
as 6
ORANGE COUNTY
ENVIRONMENT ANO RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
T0: Eddie Kirk, Orange County Olanner
From: Rich Shaw, Land ConservaGOn Managers C
Date: November 8, 2001
Re: Proposed Subdivision -Fox Hill Farm Central
Thank you the opportunity to review antl comment on the proposed subdivision
referenced above. My comments are generally intendetl to a) atldress any concerns
that ERCD may have wah respect to potential impacts on important natural and
culNral resources, and b) identify any areas that could be desirable far possible
dedlcalicn ro the County far public recreatlon/open space pursuant to Section IV-B-
]-b of the Orange County Subtlivision OMinance.
The preliminary plat fqr Fax Hill Farm Central shows over 101 acres (33%) are tc be
set aside as permanent open space and deeded tc a homeowners' association. Most
of the open space will be along flue riparian carritlors, which extend across the tract.
One of those corritlors contains a perennial stream (Little Creek) antl its 100-year
Flootlplain. Little Creek Flows souN through the southeast cornerto the Eno River.
From the 1998 orthopho[o it appears mat the riparian corridors are forested with
mature hardwoods, antl those areas would be protected by scream buffers of
varying widths affortletl by the Lower Eno Protected Watershed overlay district antl
the Neuse Buffer Rules. Most areas to be tleveloped as home sites were dearetl
previously far agdcul[oral use. It appears, however, that approximately 101ots
along the proposed Farm Gate Drive and another 101ois along [he proposed Fox HIII
Farm Drive woultl require at least portal clearing oP mature hartlwootls ItlentiFletl as
prime forest wildlife habitat in the 1999 Landsrape wkh Wildlife report (Wiley et al. ).
There are no requirements In Ne ortlinance to protect those areas. The site
includes np proposetl wildlife corridors itlentifetl in the Comprehensive Plan.
The prppasetl subdNislon tlpes a fair jab of provitling open space and protec[Ing
riparian roMtlors located throughout the property. The preliminary plan appears
consistent with the County's tlesire m minimize adverse environmental impacts with
respeQ t0 me protection of streams and Flpptlplains. Mare coultl be tlone to pmtett
prime foresrywildlife habitat antl prime farmland, but [here are no County
requirements [o that effe0. In conclusion, I do not recommend that anY land
ba ronsidered for possible dedication for public recreation/open space.
Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further
a. DaviO Standl
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FOX HILL FARM CENTRAL
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Departrnent
September, 2001
pROJER DESCRIPTION
Fox HIII Fann Central subtlivision contains 91 buildable lots and is loceted in Em
Township. The lots are aaecsetl by new public roads which will iMerseR with New Sharon
Church Roatl antl 8aldwln Road. The Curtest inning Is AR - PgdcuRUral Resitlential. The
average lot s¢e is approximately 2.08 acres. Ints will be served by wells antl indNitlual
septic systems.
Pro]eC[ build-out is estimated at two years. Housing units will be wnstructetl,
beginning In 2002, with completion of the project schetluletl Por 2003. Units will consls[ of
tletached single-famlN homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be
$325,000 Indutling the lot.
METHODOLOGY
FiSCaI impaR analysis is a projection of the direct, torten[, public costs antl revenues
awociatetl with resitlential antl non resitlendal growth in Ne ]pdstllNOn In which the growth
is taking place. RSCaI impact analysis considers only direR impaQ in that It projects only the
primary costs [hat will be incurtetl antl the Immetlla[e revenues Nat will be generated. It
ralcUlates the financial effect of a Banned development or new subdlvislod by consldedrg
[he curtest costs antl revenues such a tlerelopment wnultl geirera[e if k were completed antl
o¢upietl totlay. Fiscal Impact anaNds tlces not cpnsitler the private costs of public aNan. If
is concerned only with public (gwernmentaq vests and revenues.
The methotl usetl in preparing the fiscel impact analyss 's the Service Sbntlartl
Approach. While only gross expentliNres by servire category are tlerivetl from the Per Capita
Method, the Service Sbntlartl method determines the total number of additional employees
by service function that will be requiretl as a result of growtlt. This meNOtl employs avenge
county government vests per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee [o
population redo, and avenge operating expenses per employee far each service category
antl school tlistriR The number of new employees are pmjec[M aM muldp0etl 0mes Ne
average operating expenses (intlutles personnel, gpe2dng and capital costs) per employee.
These average costs are then weighed against per wpi[a antl per pupil revenues to proje¢
the total net flSCdl Impact of Ne tlevebpmenL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARDAPPROACN
PRW ECf FISGL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1-Project Data
Proje¢ Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Vear, InFladan
Charactetlstla of Households
ConstrvRion Bdletlule/COSt Data
Section 2 -Laval GovemmeM and SNOOI DlstrlR Data
Buffet Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School DistriR Per Employee Expendtures
Employees Per 1000 Populaton
Cwnry Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Canstanta
School DisVlct Data
Section 3 - Oemogrophlc Projectlons Based On Project Data
Tpbl Housing
Tobl Population '
School Children
Atltlltlpnal County Employees
Total
Spool District Pdtlidonal Employees
Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Flsal Impart
Section 5 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School Dlsbict
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Flscal Impact
Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impams
Atltlltland HOV51ng '
AdtllUOnal Population
Adtlitlonal5chool Giltlren
Tax Base
County Government Baance
School Distrlc[ Balance
Total Net FlSCallmpaR
SeNon 7 - Summary of Projected Public Schaal Gpatity Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1- PRO]ECT DATA
Project data includes inmrmation about the specifk development project. Much, if not
all, of the information is wpplied b'J Ne applicant. Data Inputs Intlutle: '
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township In which the projea Is looted.
School District: School di#nR In which the project is locatetl.
eeginning Year: The first year pf the project in which dwelling units are comple[etl and
oo:upied.
Ending Year. The last year in which dwelling units are completetl and o¢vpied. The
template is set tc ralalate fsal impacts far a [en-}2ar pedotl.
IMiation Rate: Unless an Inflatlon 2te Is entered, the template will calculate fsral Impacts
basetl on constant dollars. Since the Inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance
department must be contacted far the mo# recent figure.
Persons/Household: The a#imabad average number of persons/householtl (dwelling unit)
baeed on 1990 Census tlata antl #utlles of the number of s[utlen[s per household for the
school tllsbict in which the project Is lamtetl. The mast recent swtlies include A SYUtly of
Housing Charocfsrisrks and Student Genemtmn Rates kr Orange County. N.C. (1995) antl
Technical ftepod: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees /or Finentlng Public
Scholl Capital Neetls, Oronga County, N.C. (1996).
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/hcuseholtl
(dwelling unit) based on s[utlles of the number of students per household far the school
di#dR in which the projea k lomted. The most ecem study Is A SNtly of Housing
Characteristics antl SYUdent Generation Rates for Orange County, N.0. (1995).
Nan-Elderly: N.C. Gene21 Statutes permit an 511,000 exemptlon to the elderly and
d'~sabletl who meet cerlaln Income criteria. [n the event that eltledy units are part of Me
project, the percentage of eligible noneldedy units is enteretl. The tax base will
automatically be atljustetl to reflect the exemptlon.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units [o be cons[mdetl In the project in each
year.
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units basetl on the number
antl sales price of tlwelling and types to be <onsbvRed In each year.
gECRON 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND gCN00L D[giRlCf DATA
Loral ga+xnmer¢ data inclutles infonnadon rcgaNing expentliNres requiretl to
provide County seMCes antl reenues received besetl on the approved Orange County
budget far the fiscal year In which the project is mnsitleretl far approval. All information
tlerived From the approved budget remains censtaM Nroughout a fixal year puh-lune) and
is charged Dory with the approval of a new butlget
Loral govemmeM revenue antl expenditure information's comptletl on a per capita
(per person) basis. Per capita fgures are tledvetl by tlNitling the total eepentlltures for a
particular service function or revenue source by me estimated population pf Orange County
for the year in whidt the protect Is consitleretl for approval. Populations esimates are
preparetlby the Planning Depar[meM.
Dafa inputs indutle the Pollowirg:
eutlget Year: The cuneM fiscal year; i.e., 199692
Per CapNa Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes - Other.Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property tams include
those from sales antl use lazes, f2nchlse taxes, antl animal tines.
IntergovemmeMal Aitl: Revenues from this source, in the Pone of ategprical aid or
sharetl-tax revenues, are provided through Stale antl fetle2l assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions antl are drarged to
chase who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental fatllities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues Include interest earnings an investments, proceeds
from lirense aM permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expentlilures: Expenditures try major w[egory are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administradve, finamial, and legal
funNOrts of goverment.
Public Safety: taw enforcement services and emergenry metlicel sernces.
Public Works: Efforts related to Me maintenance of Cnuntyrowned property aM rite
prpvlsbn of sanpadon (solid waste tlisposal) servkes.
Numan Services: Departments responsible for Ne provision of healN, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports hvo xhaol units, Ne Orange County school rys[em and
Ne Chapel HIII-Canboro xhool system. This Category indutles appmpriations made to Ne
designated schml system for Recumng Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for
general maintenance, purdiase pP new equipmenVfurni5hingsontl vehiUe maintenance.
Non-Departmental: ComAbutlons to agencies providing cultural antl serial services putsitle
Ne formal stmcture of munty government ONer eepenctitures include equipment
replacement antl mntingenry funds. Although Nere are no employees generated by Nls
ategory, k has been inducted as an operating expenditure. It will be Included In Sedfon 9,
'Total Mnual County ExperMiture." These expenditures will be alculated on a per capita
basis as apposed N a per empbyee basis.
Per Student Expendlturea: Informabpn regarding expenctlWres required to provicte
etlumtional servces antl revenues remivect are bazetl on Ne approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year in whirl: Ne pro7ea Is cpnsldered for approval. All Infortnatlon
tlemietl from the approved budgets remains mrtsbnt Nroughout a fscll year putt'-]une) aM
is changed only with Ne approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Govemment Current
Expense, School DistdR antl Sbte appropriations. Courxy Govemment Cunent Expense
functs are used for general operation puposes including Inshuction and Support Services.
Fetleal revenues antl expentliNras antl other local revenues such as Funtl Balano=_ have not
been included since Ney are cwt ctirectly growN relatect. Per sudent fgures are tledvetl by
dividing Ne total approptlatlon for edumdona purposes from a pamcular murce by Ne
es[Imatetl number of s[utlerrcs N be enrolled In Ne appllmble xhool rystem for the year in
which Ne project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from Ne
approved school system budgets.
Comtty Govemment: ExpentliNres in Nis category are based on approprlatlons to Ne
school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student
appropriation i5 determined by Ne State Board oP Edumtgn.
Schaal District ExpentliWres In this category are unique N the Chapel Hill-Carrboro sctwol
system and are based on Ne level of expenditures possible Nrough as5e55meM of a
supplementary school fax.
State: ExpentliWres in Nis rategdry are based on appropriations from the State Board of
Edumtlon.
Schaal District Por Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee 6asetl on
County, School DisNR and Stale approprlatons, and Ne total number of school district
employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a DartlcuWr service
rategory per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per
employee in a parGwlar serWw category. Total expenses In each category in<lutle5
personnel, operating and ragtal costs.
Other Data
County Govemmem Tax Rate: The Coumy tae mte per $100 of assessed valuation. Since
Ne per cepita method focuses only on ope2tfng expendlWres, me tae ate is reducetl by an
amqum equal to the deb[ service payments from property taxes for apical projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessetl on behalf of the Gapel
HIII{arrtoro school system.
Assessment Ratlo: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value besetl on
information supplied by Ne Tax OfOCe. The assessment ratio is usetl to Wnvert market value
to assessetl value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Motlel Constants
Elderly Exemptlon: Far projects tlevelopetl partially ar exdusiveN far elderry (66 antl older)
or disabled Intllvitluals whose annual Incrme tloes not ezceetl $12,000, an $11,000 tax
exemption Is used In projecting the tax base.
Schagl District Employees Per Stutlent: The number of employees per student In a
specifrc sdpol district
SECTION3-DEMOGRAPHIC PRO]ECIIONS BASEDON PRO]ECI DATA
Demographic projections provide informadon about the number of new residents and school
chiltlren anticipatetl in Orange County resulting from project tlevelopment Projections also
provitle the number Of atltl'NOnal employees requlretl per service function antl schwl tlistriR
as a result of the new development
Total Housing Units: The cumulative Mtal of new housing units atltletl earn year by projett
development.
Total Population: The total population atltletl each year by a project dedvetl by multiplying
Ne number of hones to be construtted by the number of persons per household (see
Section Sy
School Populatlon: The total number of school chlltlren added each year by a projeR
tlerNed by multiplying Me number of homes conswctetl try the number of childm per
householtl (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of atltlltbnal employees required per service
category based on projett development
Tobl: Total of all atltlitional county empbyees requiretl based on projeR tlevelopment
School Distfict Atlditional EmDloyaes: The number of atltlitloral employees requiretl per
school tlismc[ basetl on the project development.
SECTION 4 - PRW EREO NET FISCAL IMPAR ON COUNTY
Tax base: The tax Case represents the increase in assessetl property value expected each
year resultlng ham project development. The values Shown are in $1,000'5 antl are tlerivetl
from a formula which Indutles the number aM sales price Of homes, antl the assessment
ratlo. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly untts ark elderly exemptlon are also
used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula whidr multiplies the per capita revenues
(Section 2J times the projected poWlatlon (SeNOn 3). The exceptlOn to this is me property
fax which multplies Me fax base times the munty gwemment tax rate.
Expendkures: All expendiNres are derived from a formula which multiplies me per
employee a<penditure (Section 2) times me number of atltlitional employees (Secdon 3).
Net Nscal Impact: The net balance Is the difference between pojectetl expenditures antl
pro]ectetl revenues. A negatlve net balance Intllca[es that k cosE Orange COUnry more m
provide serrices to a projeR than it receives in revenues. A positive n& balance indicates that
more revenues are received than 'd wsfs to serve a project. Positive net balar¢es in one
project may thus be usetl to offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 5 • PROIERED NET FISUL IMPAR ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: Tile County contributlon is derivetl by iransfemng etluwtlOn expentlitures tiY
COUnty government (SeNOn 4). Revenues derivetl (ram the xhool tlistrlct tax are tlerivetl by
multiplying the school distriR tax limes the tax base. State revenues are dedvetl W
multiplying me per student expentliture figure limes the total pmje¢ed number Of school
d~iltlren (Section 3).
ExDentlitures: FxDentlitures are tlerivetl fmm a formula which mulUplles each per stutlent
expentllture (SeNOn 2) tlrrws the total projected number of sNOOI children (Section 3) and
adtling the rewlts.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance W the tlifference between projeRetl expeMiNres and
projectetl revenues. A negative net balance indiates mat it casts the school Mtem more to
provide etluatlonal services far chldren in a project than it receives in revenues. A pos'NVe
net balance Indicates mat more revenues are receivetl than it costs to serve a projeG.
Ppsltlve net balances In one pro)e¢ may mus be usad m oHSe[ nega[rve balances in anoher.
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PRO]ECTED IMPACTS
SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROTECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL UPALITY IMPACTS
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Mptlllletl 8/22/01- Orange County, NC Planning Oeparhnent
SECTION 1 ~ PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATP FOR EACH PROJECT:
, F x~~v,~
. ..e -. - _ .° .
_~
TOWNSH
P
C
ON
STRUCTION PERIOD:
p
'
~.ypMllg Year .r.. ~ .'eS T~.m rv .~1„,-. ..: {a~:.
Entling Year: 2003
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/HDUSe BP! ?l
~~ 2.55
Chiltlren/HUUSe: ENTER"1"BESIDE APPL ICABLE SCHOOCOISTRICT BELOW. 0.52
% Eltl y^ ~ D000~
HOME SALEB DATA:
Overage DHtrlbution
Numher of Sales Prlce of Units
Year Homes (S1 by
Year
' 200{2 ~4'R3::':BM. fnw°Y'G: g
.A: .:4F'.VS.4$Po'
2003 A6 325,000 50.55%
2Dfl4 -3' ~ ~~
. .<n . .
2005 0 0 0.009
S 20WSv _ y,. _v... D.DD~
z6m 0 0 0.00%
zoos 0 o D.De%
zeu o 0 0.00%
SLXOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN O BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE BTUDENT DISTRIBUTION 0Y SCHOOL TYPE.
5<M1aol District: 5<hool AVendence:
OFaI~
..a,.
SdHDNe .'. k~,~ ..€w€ a s?%v
.
. Mltltlle S<FOOI 20%
Cba eV HIIfC~itk~ ' 26%
No[e'. All ralcule[lons below ere based upon Me developer's prp~ec[etl buildout The developer nas iM1e rlgbt to bu'Jc
Inan [ne amount H~snted.
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCNOOI DISTRICT DATA
COUNTY POPULATION: 11822'
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PFR CAPITA
General GRYejnmen("'' a „„_, ~„a±y'r.
PublicSafefy ,,e„~-
„1JJ.60
~ 0.0015
Public Works ~ x, `ti~ ~ '' + ' gS~B6' 9„S", -
Human Services 31636 0002)
Etluca[lon ($chopl. District] ; MTSVYF P.f>¢~
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PEP STUDENT
Total. .=wLt`L~ ~z.a..d i.. W. 0.0563
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUER ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes -.Other ThaFl P(ppeF@N:. '~ "
r~ ,#AC .,>..
InterEovernmental ~~
M13123958
... ,.,
~- ' 159.52
r 11 L01
Service;Gnages ... - v~A4L.:u~ir'.k>~ x .-~.
Miscellaneous 585]]88 69.55
COUNTY PEP WPITp E%PENDITURES $: EXPENDITURE: PER CAPITA
Public Safety 10619]80 88.13
Public W: ^,'"^.., "` -«,:. ,Fn _m b'9S/..•r~.at a'u~"rq
Human Services 25358802 223.Da
Etlucafi0n (Rmunin&GaM4Yk ~ ._....__ ~SEF.°°'"' kM ..'yg;~
NonDepartmental 234943)6 198J2
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE: PER EMPLOYEE
General,C,)Mq"~p)a~%:"y$Jg rApR+~~M ul ~ ,~ c L'_.. LR
Public Safety 10419J88 58J03.03
Public WalHy ~-,a
Human Services
26368802 ~ 2:02
8388fi.21
Educetlon (Recurring CeRiM~Nr"' °a*`~`bE~~ ~ih.='66F5:95
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): E%PENDITUflE: PER STUDENT
Launy GOVelpJge _;~8)3
5cbool Dishicf 0 0.00
State. us."_ ... 5fi
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): E%PENDITURE: PER EMPLOYEE
C
t
G
xF
'-~
~' `LY5122
90
'
~'
oun
y
pvemme
.
:.
-.,,._.
8abcol District 0 :
~~
.
<
~ 0.00
Tp%DATA: ENTER APPLICABLEA$SESSMENT RATIO ANp ELDERLY EXEMPTION'.
Cpu9g1.. .4~i~s;
^
$cM1001 Dls[rlct Tax Rafe
($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
Ass'. _-..
~
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 WM1ere Appllcabls
SECTION 3-DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 3A
2003
ONITS 91` 91
ON 232 232
CXDOL CHILDREN { ~,
Elementary t'~ 26 24
Middle 11 11
High SMaal %h 12 t2
OTAL 0) 6)
OUNTY GOVERNMENT
e
OOITIONAL EMPLOYEES
re
~
e
General Owernment ~ 030 030
5
Pubic Safety 03 ?e' 035
Publ'c WoMS 011 ' 011
Human Services 062 - '_~- 062#
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL EMPLDTEE3
SECTION 9 -PROJECTED fIECRL IMPPCT Of PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT
3fi
SECTION 5 ~ PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT Of PROJECT ON SCXOOL DISTRICT
YEAR - 2003 .:~„, 2005
~
Y
~I
REVENUES ($) ~~ 1 122581 ~(
y
fib( 129541
,
E%PENDITUPE$($) C~. 122912 i 1229]2 µ
Y ~
' fr~
~ r
u ~~
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($)
391
L
65]0 :.
YEAR ~,'~ 2008 2010 yx ~. ,_
a
REVENUES ($) 140]30 ']1 148]22
:
I
E%PENOITURES ($) d"' 1229]2 p
a~l`~! 1229]2
rs
I
5
.
J
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 1]]59 25]50
SECTION fi ~ SUMMARY 01 PROIECTEO OEMOORFPHIC/PISWL IMPACTS
3]
(USING UNITS 91 ~ 81
IPULATION 232 232
H60L CHILDREN y~r.
Elementary 24 24 '.
Mlddle I1 1.~1,-"~i' 11
High School ~ _ 12 12 -
iTAL 3: 4] 4] S~ ~ri
~
IUNTY EMPLOYEES 1.3) -8r 13> ~
NOOL EMPLOYEES 0.68 ~.:'ro- 0.68 -
% BASE ($1000) ~ 34424 353AJE 363)9 3)99
NNTY BUDGET ($) k.M, i~~"'
Revenues 385563 40]45] 418866
ExOentliNreS 323393 34V9 341326
,LANCE 6 621)0 -_ 65>00 6)540
HDOL DI3TRIGT BUDGET ($)
Revenues
13
140]30
148)22
Ex Pend tares 1229)2 I 1229)2 ~
,~, _ ~,
SECTION ] -SUMMARY Of PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT OATH:
$[X001 Oisbin: ScM1aal AHendance:
orange eou4tY i`~b~~ 5(~` •~ _~4IX . ....
.
.. >
. .
Mitltlle School 24ry,
Ch
{Iblf CV
bbw L •: ;Y.:~
' qY
:1 Hf'
' if:
° •. ,:•. `264
-
aPe
i
P . , . . .
YEAR 2002 2603 2064 2605 26q
SCHOOL CHILDREN ''" 'T'• n y~
ElemenrarY ~l~ 24 ~v ' 24 ~
`,~. i. 2N
Mldtlle Y% ]1 ~'~ Il ~ Fy. ES
Hlgh 6chool .jj ]2 yx 12 $vy. ~ ~L
TOTAL 4) '^-E' 0) ~'
y3 :: 98
. c
YEAR 200) 2004 2009 2010 201:
SCHOOLCHILDREN ~ ~-:•
Elementary
~f
24 aR 24 ~ •T•2C
Mlddle ${ 11 'Y~ 11 1F
HIgM1 School ; 12 . .il 12 ye 12
TOTAL Y. 4] -
T= !9~ 4) y
>"^e -~~~4$
SCHOOL CAPACITIES- ALL SCHOOLS WRRENT ENROLLMENL ALL SCHOOLS
Elemegt~y .
A•rd 1 ~,.. s X14
..
: f , u..
Mitltlle 1569 Mitltlle 1649
H gh'S`GhRdl°yi3 . .~-"k~ f :•. 'E ~"" 1540
TOTAL ]1]4 TOTAL 614!
Elementary 3143 ' 3143
Mlddle 1460 1460
High $Lhe01 1592 1592
OIECTED ENPOLLMENT '-s:44 ~~
Elementary .• 3143 3143 ,
M ltltlle ~1 1460 ..~~ • 1460
Nigh School 1592 '6"`> 1592
oanfr loa-ok pl.grvrvxrvc soAxo nxrvurFs
39
b[oughl wel¢ m coral aub~tivisiovs and suggrnled Nat Newmment may M1eve beev a earzyvvu from same of
Ne secant pmjeu m areas wiN Vublip services.
the owm~, h4. HUmcr Davia raid lM1Sl IM1e wnvemional plan ~s sal up in respeaw Nemml eM1armttrof the
land. He aid that tM1e amventinnal plan wvs the only oleo Nat waz acecplablem Nalavtl.
Strayhom asked about fuMe ordiwnce changes and if Mr. Ovvis would Fe able m eccompliah hie plan ur i~
ends ngM1[now, if aPProved. Nnhert l)asna cxP~awcd Llwt uppliwvu M1ave M1Vp years [v mbM[tl¢Ir
prellmineryplw appllcatlon aflcr oonocp[plav approval. Gvotlvg-Rayexplained tM1e stare emN¢Provieians
Ms vested siglrls and asked Benevlivt m deaeribe IM1e Covnry's Policy mwaN veni~ subdivisions awing
upcuMUg chmges. Benedict aid IM1aI Cvr azch new regWanva tM1e Planving Rnvrd end BoeN v[fuvvry
wnw~aannnawm nare m maw a anermmanen on wNnM1 prp)ppts would by veema.
NUTIUN: gnvyhvm moved approval ofthe povventiwel dcvGupmevl wncvp[plan for Davis Fenn
subdmsion. Seconded by McAdams.
VOTE: Uvanimous
MOTION: McAdams movedmdmy Neoonsavarlon dvner flexble develvpmevt novicepl Vlan fw
tlaois Faem snbdicision. Seconded by Srieloel.
4OTE: D~unimoue
Kirk made vhis preremmion.
b. YrelimimryYlans
(q Eox Hill Farm-Cwdvl
(Lisle Rrvet'POwnsbip)
BACKGROUND:
R¢audt-FVtimwarv Play
AppECantl Bob Zlmwall, agrnl Cm Ravdolph D. Fax
Lacatlon
Be~ween Baldwin Road aM New Sharon ChmcM1Road N Eno Township.
Subdivision follows the CnnsefvationLlusler Option of kkxiblc llevelwmem
Lob Average Lo13iu % Opeo Spxe i, Acres Opeo spm
(Gran)
Eleuble 9I J3] l3 IbI A]
eanwa ana nnnaam capanions
eaabng:
• eprtenl amm~g is Apicmlmal ReaiaennaxlAR7emm. aepaity=ao.ooo aq. e.)awaupg7
• Minimum lot size is 40.000 squu<f<n.
• Totvl verevge is l0].0l scree
1 M1c progatY ie lerlially in IM1e Lower Cnoprorzcmd watershed.
• TM rntire nett is lowt<a in IM1e Neuse Ricer Basin.
• TM propesry is curtunlly under farm vse wWerixafion.
• Ybyalvl Eeanres:
• Tnere are aaveml aesig<,ama aaeama pn IM1e acct.
• ILe sim is mostly wooded wiNamixwc of pipesaM M1ardwoods.
Adjareva Lvvd Use:
• Ropertiea tv lM1eeaet and west are suMlvldeA
40
• Propwties la the north and south ere and<v<Icp<d.
Prnpvutl:
apse.:
• Acce is Gom BalJwi and New Slwron ChumM1 Road.
• the anbdivi oad loops WOaRh lht property wiN COhd<-'e ezrending GOm this rood.
• qll madx am mba oonsanarodm NCDOT Standards with 5'uhtiryeaumrn6 on eazhside.
Psnmv:ed trips per day is 952, (a.m peak= ]3; p.m. peak-98).
• All ac enonaareexpemedmaperem al level of rrviocBmbcita coda envoipa:ed tralilo dement
rce lntnu
Opeu Spuee/BvRers:
• 101.49 vaas(33%)oLwrmnon esm open apace proposed. The open span is rtwstlywwded and dcsi~x[cd
alream and law pee bam,;ng.
• Ll6 acres of in-lot opm spaze.
• Mmimummacmel tlmaity mtlo (MTADRJ=3.67.
• 1001'ool building smbvek along perimeter required wdn flexible dearelapmenr is provitled.
• Hom ers ASSOCia4ian documems filW Grc mainleranoeofoprn spade end buffer.
WvurSew
• ma;~npal wdla.
• mdrvidual acpbc ayn<ma.
Ra cation
• r Forzhern DisNm Pmk (911amX5455 =g4L405).
• T"o dedication is wmrdnleJ bu:ause no counry recremion or resomve arevheshem idemifedmlhis time. ihi
paymen[tivJleu optlon Ls Wablr_
A¢enev Commenm'.
• Cgmmanls atmahed from NCDOT, Pnvironmrnml HeulN Und EmerRCncy ManaB<mcm
Dev<looment Prncns Schedule vvd A<HO•
emnninx sperm:
• Flm ACdan: Conapf Plan approved by fie Ylmming Board April4. 2001 with the following conditions:
L Tha mmrs¢thm and road eli~mmm mlhc Prclimmery Plan shell meat NCDDl smodartls.
1. Homro ere ASSmleaon doamunm stall be submiaed with Ne pmliminvryplan that provide fin
awtrnance of Ne Open 9paz
1. Anote sM1all beplscMwtbe plan smlingtM1ar Ne proposedvmthem by-ryas, whloh is part of the edoplei
Hillsborooph 1 horougM1fue Plaq meyh lonmtl near the northv'm property line of Nis Melopmm[. 1'h
precise aliRmnml M1as not been determined prim ro review o[rhia plat
Semvd A<Hw:
L Action wilhintwarcgWady scheduled Planning Rpardmutings, or exHnsims thereof; '
2. If Wa PW~mInS Boats Oile to ecf wiMiv the specified IimepenW, applioafiev 1'orweNed m pOCCwiN
Planning Boatd minueAand PlamWg Bmtfmco~mnrnmtions and cnndidons.
Prepmiovry Plen addrcsus conNtlons ofappmval oRM Cnncepl Plan. The cob&tdsion design lasnol clanged tro
Me Canuyt Plan.
pINANCIAL IMYACf: Pisal Impact Anelysia inclaJW as an atlechmevt.
R%CAhN1@VOA9ON(87: SmffRacommmdatlav
L Apprnvvl,w envrdavice with Ne vHaehW Raolvtlov o(Approval.
Tatld asked about Ne vumlxr ofbeAooms m each home. Mark O'NCaI from Pickett Spmuu Real Eames
mid Nat Ne houus wouldnnge from IlVec Ip nve bedrooms. ISdd u cmcemetl that Here arc only JO
schooFaRW children Irnjected for 91 homes. She mitl WI INS seems unlikely.
BenWim said Net Ne fisapl Impazl femplau was based on a motel from 1999 Rom the thiiversiry of Plonda-
Therehavebeevtudies by the sniff andby iiachla mtl Aeso usmdemmine the smdml genemdon cote.
Heaaidlhal aastudem generation retes for aivgle family homes came ow m rhisgmerel revge ofebom }I
m.JB. This i~ nnaaon will he reevWuamdbauJ on amens dvm.
al
Schofield smd Ne[Ne AspsSOV o[ops yak tMoughom Ne subdi~isim cma¢e gcm apaw ialmds,
whicF is less valuable opm space- He Kinks tMO a dushnng v(tRe oprn spore would be mvro beneficml.
Mark O'Neal pnimed am that iv ivx hill Form East there wss some catmectivity with the open space.
VOTE: Goodwin movedmapprme Ne HeGmNary Plmtot Fox Hill Fatm-Cmtrvl subdivision.
SecondeJ by 9choficld.
YI(JTION: Cnanimous
.4GENDATIEM PO: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARDVG (AUGUST ]1, 3001)
. Orange County Subdiviaivv AmeatlmenLL
L Nnmd S'ecnon lv-B3mClarify HVVisions for 5nenlti6htsof-
Way and Cumdiwlul Syamm
Lincoln snJ IM1at Nepueposeof Nis item was fonhebwrd to make a rcw~mnm:Wtion to forward to tk
tloerd ofCOOnty Commissioners regarding [M1e subdivision amendments. SreHis tecommevding Neuhe
Planning Board recmmnmd that Ne Board vfCVUnry Commissioners adopt Mese ammdmmts.
MOTION: McAdams mvvedm forwardaremmmrndativn far approval of the proposed ammdmetMro
ba vdopled by the Board of COnnty(.olIm11661OO0[s. 5eeavded by Tadd
VOTE: Cnenimws
2. Amendmenu CnreistennmrF PriceR Haed Slandudr AJvpLCJ
This item is m mvke the nw~ber of Ivy vn a priwre road on a Flexible development plan consistent witb whet
u s approved Iv[ Oclobu_ Iris was sv oversight
bIOTION: Echoneld movedmforwmd atecommendation fm appmwl of the pmpoaed amendmmnm
be adopced by the tloerd o[ County Commissioners. Seconded by Preston.
V(YIE: Cnenimnua
n. ~ mng alias amenemem
1. Am~MVssloyom, Elal
Gavin sail Inal Ih~e is in rzgardn W a piarof tat%I in Bluehary fhll mbmvisioq Me qok Ic4 wNCh is
vned EC-5. TMs EC-5 was in exis[enm when the condition was placed on the aubtlivis~on fm [he park. I M1e
requea is m remove the EGS desigvotion end tekc ii bmk m t~R-0 awing, wldah is uonsutmt wiN Ne
geveml atm.
MOTION: McAdams moved approval of[be pmitionwrezone [he LOSacre portion ofPM 9]A9-Re-
3fi22 (paninn of Lat IXt, Nlucbcrty HiII3aWivsivn), Gum EC-5 tv R-L Ewovded by
Ttiebel
VOI E: Unanimaua
AGENDA ITEM %10: LYFOAM.\TIONAC ITCMS
. Otlober Ctlentler-wcek sessiov witM1 tM1C BomJ of Camty
Commissioners nn the 22"°. Thence Plamiag BOazd mewing is
November ]1°. Nuvembm 26°i is the quarterly public hearing.
Hi Robert:
tjun warted k and ovc anose emfiming Nc amhse ofNe Fox Nitl Fmm Cmrsal Plm
As I msdas~d it shat ere eery swo omesmdiug ivuas: the sieh[nvn Imm m Baltlwio
RaW and the mcycliog~t. Dawahas ameenvg with Rmdy Fox maowwm sw if
newm egaerotaserve tbe ~kr ue acSCliuB cmme. ReB+sd'wg shcxigntt~leue;
Youwea bomemdiamethu won Cmig, NCDOT willms ellawa"mpa oN)", ITey
will requireafWl lOll'emrage eud 22o'tma. Thedevelapv is weblem beaz this
zdd"nioosl toss Pesdmlerly afra agtamgm Nc leftmm lave on New Shmm Chmch
Road. Algo, Please remits Craig that mly ] vMkla will he making aright lwn wk We
eamhem sik driveway dutingtlm peek boos. Tbn•s ov1Y me eeay 8.5 mimdcg. (]Le
riBhtaPUwlmm is Iowa mthe mdhan drive.) Fortbme rmmag wesa tequwlingthat
right nun lades mcbe tegwtN. Pkaa laure kmw
Ae You ivdirakd ro Ilam avd I, wa need to resubmit dw plm yy and of tna dry Tucgday.
Pleaselm me kamv Cmig's opivion mthe+ightnuv Imes m Wet we cm makethe
cbmgesmsheplan ASgP,
Thaoka fm Yom ha1Pl
Sad
Fox Hill Farm Central-Prellminarv Plen
TM1e BCaM COnsitleretlapreliminary plan for FOx Hill Fartn Cenral. Craig
BenedlG made tM115 pR3entatlOn, I(I6a VJnaeNBGOe GUSIEf pdn and is OCated
between Baltlwin ROatl and New SM1aron CM1urdr RCatl In Eno TOwnsM1lp. There are 8l
lots in the plan The total acreage is 3W.43 eves antl Ne entire Subtlivision Is locatetl
In the Neuse RNer Basin. The average lot size Iz 337 acres antl there is 33%open
space, which is aver 100 acres. There is some mmmbn area open space that will be
tletlicatetl to Oe homeownelsasspciation. TM1ere is someintermnnectlviry beck into
Hillsborough Mrough Ne subtlivision. Th0re are twn primary issues wiN the
administretion rcmmmentlation. Ona Is that this prolaG will ba developed In phazes.
Phase one is only 101ots. TM1e fitlminisVedbn suggesb Nat within phase two, Ne
'mtermnnedivity t0 Bamwin Road be provided. Tha developer has agreed m adtl Nis
setlion of Fax HIII Fertn Drive. The Second eugge3tiw is Mat at Ne Intersection of New
Sharon Church Roatl antl Fox Hill Farm Drive, that a northbound left Wm lane be
'msWlled. A ttaffc sWtly was done by Igmley-HOm antl Asemlafes antl h wds fountl that
the level of service for New SM1amn CM1UroJt Road woultl no[ pmmp[Me neUSSM1y lOr a
IeH mm lane. The staff thinks Nat, based on Ne siu of this development and Ne
proximity of Ne dreinage way, Me sight visibility woultl be wmpromised on New Sharon
LM1UrcM1 Roatl. An additional recommendation was to atltl fin access roatl into the phase
four area while phase ASO is undemay for fire mntrol. The staff remmmend3 approval
Of Na aUhtllVlfilOn WIVI gle3¢ LOndltoa3.
Dawn Herd<k, Planhing Diredorfor John R. McAdams Company, was
representing Rantly Fax, Ne developer. She tnanke0 the emtl IBr all IN Ne hartl work
done on this process. She saitl that they were somewhat cencemetl when they
tllsWVeretl the additional COmm¢nts from the stall antl ware ueeble to diPILSS tFese
RCOmm¢bddllobs. TIIBy ag100 wlVl Ne RcommeneatlOn Of hl¢ IBf1 Wm lane a1M tM1e fire
safely Issue. She saitl Nat the atltlition of Ne mnnecror in phase [wp wmultl be a
substantial axpentliWre of tlevelopntaM funds be®use Here are two stream crossings.
They are also wncemetl about the access m Ne pon0 in phase two because (here i3
some farming operation In that fires. They went m make sure Mat Ne operation IS not
impaired by cpnatmtling Ne road TM1ay are also cpncamed about the new
requirements for the lantlscape buffers. They wantmuMersGnd what needs to be
done to be In compliance wiN the County's regulation. What is lndutle0 in the staff
report Is not vfiet Ney ware mid originally m eo in Nelr lanescape plan. They woum like
m know what Ne new mquirements mean far Fax Hill Fartn Central.
One of Ms. Hemck's colleagues got up [c speak but I did not get his
name. He pointedou[Nat Nere waultl only be 331ot6 in phase N.o, wTicM1 is wM1en tM
atltlitional mnneGOr roatl is being 5u99astetl. The Oaveloperwould preferlowfiit late
in the project m provide this connector, suN as in phase Nree.
Domm1551War JaCObs made raferanCO m 60114 Wa3ta c0¢Cllon 8hd a3ked II
Ne tleveloperwould consider wodc'm9 wiN Ne Planning and Solid WaAe sbHto
possibly locate one or Wro recycling colledien points. Dawn Herrick said Nat Ne
developer would probably be happy IB talk m the Lbunry about Nis possibility
Commissioner Jambs asked same clarifying puestlms, wMCh were
answ0retl by Creig Beneeict.
Commissicner Jambs saitl that M1e was glatl to see Ne recommentladon fw
Ne tum lane because DOT's standaNS are not nece6serily me "be all antl eM ell' He
asketl why Nere is not a right tum taper at Baldwin Road Cmig Senedld Sa10 that Ne
stag Ncught Na[ Ne right rum movement would be fast enough Into Pe subdivision
road.
Craig Benedict suggested Me possibility of waiting until posse Mree for the
center Nm lane m allow mampre unib m mme online m rover Me ewense of the Wm
lane. Commissionenlambs azketl the lantlscape aroMted about his reasoning for
Nela[kMmntiguous naNre Mthe open space. Ha said that it seems Nat Ne open
spare is more designetl to separate residential units than it is to provide a Olodc M
mndguous open space Mat promotes wildltle habitat The landscape archtled saitl Mat
they were trying to keep Ne open space in the stream mrtidore where wildlife might
travel.
Chat/ Halkia[is encouraged Me Fox HIII Farm developer m consider puRNg a
entml¢etl recycling center somewhere in the subdivision, because it costs so much
m nay to provide recycing services.
Chair Halkiotis saitl that Ne Fire Marshall has raised some very serious
concern wiN Nis subdivision because [here is no munldpel water orrre hytlrents.
a Commissioner GONOO esketl about the tizcelimpac[analysis and asked why
mere was s net loss rorthe County since me nome9 were going m avenge 5325,oog.
Craig Benetlict explained Nat mis flsral impact swtly used some uptletetl
s[atistlas (Le., new butlget tlaN, new acnool tlievict populations). He would like m
disc more wiN Ne BOartl ebout[he fismlimpaM Of resitlentialtlevelopmentto Ne
County.
Commissioner Brown aeketl about the comments frcm the Envilnnmental
HeaIN Depadment on the 10 IMS along Fox Hill Farm Otlve that woultl require clearing
of mature naMwootls itlentifietl as prime forest wiltlirfe habitat Caig Eenedmt polnte0
OW ine 9899 an NB map rind e%pbinad NIS m her 98t1bf0ctlnn.
Commissioner Rmwn BskOtl Environmental HeaIN erecter Ron Holdwey if all
of Ne non-conventional sepgc systems were due m ine soils. She asketl ahouttne
lager lots. Ron Holdway said foal ne did not know, Dul all M Ne systems are
conventional-based technology.
Dawn Hertick said Nat the larger IMS had always Deen a part M the plan and
it was Me desire of Ne developer m nave a variety M Ict types.
Dawn Herfick made reference to the lot deanng and Me preservation of
ire05. N MB nomOOWllaf9 LpvMdntz, Nele a 8 RbinCflon WM19R any V6a over(oYr
Inches in dlameterthat Is going m be removed must be approved by the ArchitecWRl
Review BoeM. Also, any deanng MM ocmrs outside Me huild'mg envelope nos m be
reviewetl antl approved by Ne ArchitecW al Review BoeN.
Commissioner Brawn asked about Me mmplaint of Me developer about the
design far Melendsmpe song Ne roadway. Dawn Hertick saitl Nat ine main mmplaint
was Net the language Nat is now appearing In Ina remlution M approval is nM specific
to what is requlretl In the eminence. It is her untlerstanding Nat the 100.foMwitlN on
New Shoran Church Raatl and Ne ]E-foot wimn on Baldwin Reed are actually setbacW
and not butfem. The plant materials tnatare requiretlmbe plantetl in ine lypeA duffer
woultlmt be wren suitetl for Mat wICN.
Craig Benedict sell Nat Nere are repulred buffers along New Sharon Church
Read antl Beldwln Road Tne duffers are a type A style. The 100.mot wide landscape
buffers are Ic<ated within Na 1gl}bot buffers roar are requiretl for setbacks for a daxible
development suDdlvisicn.
Chair Helkiods suggasmd Mat mere be a postponement m December 11'" so
that all parties can wolk together In omen to know exactly what Is being presented mr
Board approval.