HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-22-2001-hb2To: HeverIY BlYdae, Clerk to tlrc Omagc Cowry BOaN og Commissioners
Pram'. Margaret A. Heath, Planning Director
Date: October 16,2001
RE: October 221oint mccting
Attached is the information about Patriot's Pointe you cequest . The packet includes the
nexation and zoning request, the Town Manager's Financial Feasibility Report, a Traffic
Impact Study, and draft water and sewer extension agrxmem. Thavks got disco nfing thu
mfbtm unni to the Caanty Commissumm.
Please call me with my questions.
ATTACHMENPIO.0
a
TOWN OF HILL SBOROU"
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF"CONTI IIOUS PROPERTY
TO THE BOARD OF CogoUSSIONEM OF THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH:
M. F. L➢4'RD W2l¢'FI> Q" rs, I�gLY lawn rs KF.
imtaSdP. Ih1.1 arci IaIlffi" weir
h,, <gtsethotsuch)eofe el rest p,opito the Tcd Htheo eu dictcn inpua q two below
o .ndubutcd
e (x) Tl�c uee to be uaicned'ukontigaoua tot TOVm off Hr �u�QM. �
2lr m tae n-�ii a�r� M al ctl � xao sPtie,
essay xax a>, nCRcm ^ tgi deo�
O € man.Y= MIMP5 a.�.I toll a.�.re a a ccs' -11oo m gym. '�.
(3) Am of the farcgoiog property, showing its relationship to the editing eorNr&tc
limiu of the towq is en.nFed hcrcte.
(a) This Ntitioa u presented owder the authority contebed in O. S. IRAJ 1.
Aupntfully rubmitled Uiv �' day of
Attest
to A cr M.F, L Ucl eaztraA>iP rff
ttlltdmv�
Attest
NO Y wrcr Ie�ict's l�rdP, tic
Town of Hillsborough
Voluntary Annexation Worksheet
Development Name rQLCCO�'PoinJ-
cnmer (1 EL/ ,1PA'J riners(c_o J<le"am Tax Map 4. %A
Address 1 Phone__
Property Wcation `�raxl_6.�r ✓eO T -M5 T -40
licasonrequestingarmexation deueloprierit,
Zoning
Contiguous
Drasommals Nmeslexplanetlon:
Satellite
Acreage
Our
Acreage
3E.ges
Number ofpropeny
Numberofproperty
Manager's report rmuested by BOW
q u �_
e.
Manager's report presented to Board
Haw is property
Petition requested by BOW
Wlddn3 miles of
6.
contiguous to
u141a
cement city limits?
y<s
evrting municipal
8.
Board decision
limits?
ZoringofpmFerty,
10.
Notification of owner(s)
Closer to
Recordation of ordinance& maps
12.
Hillsborough than
any other
YL5
13.
Powell Bill information updated
municipality?
Drasommals Nmeslexplanetlon:
I.
Lana of interest received
flay ioo
2.
Lefler presented to Board
3.
Manager's report rmuested by BOW
q u �_
e.
Manager's report presented to Board
5.
Petition requested by BOW
nbead.. 'iNid.
6.
Petition received
u141a
].
Public headrrg held
h
8.
Board decision
9.
ZoringofpmFerty,
10.
Notification of owner(s)
II.
Recordation of ordinance& maps
12.
Notification of Orange County Tax office
13.
Powell Bill information updated
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT t�
Craig N. Benedict AICP, Director
Administration
306F Revere Road
(919) 245 -2576
P O Box 8181
(919) 64430021FAx)
Hillsborough,
vi xo.i range.ncros ••
North Carolina, 27278
�—
...... s, sit_
MP.MORANDUM
Tm Horace Jolmon, Mayor
Hillsborough Town Baum
From: Craig Benedict
Planning Director, Orange County
Dote: August 6, 2001
Re: Patriot Pointe Apartments Concept Plan
As part of the courtesy review process between the Town of Hillsborough and Orange County,
we have reviewed the concept plan for Pomiat Pointe. Our comments are as follows:
PLAN /SITE DESIGN
Due toone pour quality of the concept plum, a proper review is difficult. The following items, at
a minimum, should be added to the plan:
North arrow
• Scale
Details on adjohdng properties -
e Building height _
Upon a visual inspection of 6e proposed site, it was noted that an electric power easement and a
on the shewer might esdst io o sim- These are cot shown io the concept Plan. If they arc mot
on the site, don Heir location onpment sites should be noted since it seems Nat they may be
included in phase 2 of far development
Because of the steepness of Ne site, Noe is concern that the entire site would need to be
denuded in order to properly Wade the site.
Density higher Nov rune units per note may be appropriate at Us la rmion if the property does
not remain trader the cowry's jurisdiction, but such density allowances should be purchased
through conservation easmneMS(i.e. traasfcr ofmim from famdsad is saturated) in order to 5
keep overall density ofthe watershed in the county consistent with comprehensive plan goals. It
is suggested that such casements be purchased from lend in Hillsborough's Upper Eno
watershed. The county will assist in this matter.
Landscaping and architecture need to be upgraded.
ROAD ACCESS
I concept plan does not show access to flange Grove Road. Would access to the site be
through the existing Colonial Estates Aparlmcvts? This access if used should only be secondary
for emergencies. Would improvements be made to Cares Famr Road ifthat is to be the main
entrance point to the complex? Ifso. the appenc late traffic pattern is not shown. IfnoSwhere
will the new road be concocted? Greater devil on the access to Orange Grove Road is
necessary.
WATEMEWER
Recognizing the new development in the area,a comprefteensive water and sewer system is
imetwary in properly serve existing and new development in the afro for both Hillslearough and
Orange Comfy residents. In thins of potable water and fire suppression, there is concern that e
water line upgrade is necessary to provide ample water pressure to residents of the complex and
how the increased usage and demand affsts water pressure. 'Iles is not addressed in the
developer's proposal.
SOUND
Because of in proximity to [named gs, a sound study should be conducted to determine noise
levels at the proposed locations of the apartment buildings closestW the highway.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
Certain assumptions made by the developer seem to overstate the financial benefits of this
projectmtbe Town of FlillsbemugR Reforms to the memo Scotto Eric Peterson dated Camber
29,2000:
• Assuming that all income not withheld as income taxes is "disposable into nt is not
realistic. Other necessary payments sucb as property taxes will reduce this figure.
• The developer assumes that all °disposable income" will be spent within the community
oFlhe Town of Ilillsbnmugb_ This assumption is extremely qucsdomble, especially
rxsidwing the current status of retail options in Hillsborough.
• Ancillary benefits are implied as thou that will occur due to costs vie heal
purchases of materials and the hiring of local labor. The validity of this revenue is
dependent upon whether or not the developer decides to use locally produced or sold
materials and/or local contractors. If this is not the case, then this figure is overestimated.
The burden on county services is also not evaluated. these services include, but are not limited
to, EMS, schools, health and social services.
Ordinance Na.
The following consensus was introduced by Commissioner , and
duly seconded by Commissioner
ANORDINANCEANNEXING
NON- CONTIGUOUSPROPERTY
WHEREAS, a petition waa received requesting the amexation of the noncontiguous
area totaling 2822 acres in two tracts described in Section 2 below; and
wfff: dS, a public bearing On the question of the annexation was held on Tuesday,
July 24, 2001 following notice of such public hearing published in the News of Orange on July
I l end 18, 2001
NOW THEREFORE, THE ROARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR THE TOWN OF
HILLSBOROUGH ORDAINS:
Section 1. The Hoard efCommissiora m Ends that
a. The area described in Section 2 mats all of the standards eel forth in G.S. IMA-
58.1(b). More specifically:
1. The nearest point on the proposed satellite corporate limits is less then three miles
from the primary wtpmate limits ofthe Town;
2. No point in the proposed satellite arm is closer W the limits of my other city Lou
to the primary, corporate lintits of the Town;
3. The area described in Section 2 is situated such tat the Town will be able to
provide the sam e services with this area that it provides within its primary
cotpomte Ionics;
4. The area proposed for amexatim is not a subdivision;
S. The area described m Section 2, when added W the area MOM all other satellite
coryomte limits, does not exceed try/ Of the area within the primary corporate
Iimilsafte Town
J, The petition requesting amexation of the area described in Section 2 contains the
sigoehues of all of the owners ofreal pmpedy witWn deism (except properly awned
by those tax - exempt and other entities specified in G.S. 160A - 58.1).
Thepetition is Otherwise valid.
d. The public health, safety, and welf of Wo iNsabitmb of the Town and ofthe area
described in Section 2 will be beat served by the accentuation.
Section 2, Pursuant to Pont 4 of Article 4A of G.S. Chapter 160A, the fallowing coca is
hereby mmexad to and trade a part of the Town ofHillsbomuld:
Tract 1: Shown in Exhibit A as Lot A which contains 2.5 aces combined with Tract B
watch contains 22.16 acre; which local the following dwemiom: BEGINNING at
We uppermost Icft hand comer and proceeding W the right of the property are the
following distances: 29.18 feel. 300.91 fat, 195.53 feet, 302.9 Cat, 98.69 fect,
66.58 ha, 260.08 feet, 146.67 fee, 461X4 fan, 230.73 fat, 229.11 fed 606.3
EM 349.7 feet, 923.38 fee, and 329.6 her totaling 24.66 acres
Tract 2: Shown in Exhibit B as Lot 2 which contains 3.56 acres and hoe the following
dimension. BEGINNING at me left bond coma of the panel and proceeding to
the right of the property are the foLLOwing'diaWces: 285.61 feet, 220.2 feel,
106.35 feet, 150 fed, 16X58 fed, 188.1 feM 60 Ed, 99.68 fen, 229.84 fee[, and
260.08 feet.
Section 3. ThisONimance shall became eRative on adoption.
Section 4, The Town Clerk shill cause to be recorded in the Office of the Register of
Deeds of Omuge County and in the Office of the Secretary of State an accurate map of the
arrested territory described in Section 2 together with a duly entified copy of this ordinance.
Such a map shall also be delivered to the Orange County Boom of Elections as required by G.S.
163- 288.1.
The foregoing ordinance baying been submitted to a vote received the following vote and was
duly adopted flue l0° day of September 2001.
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent or Excused: Towmoff ffsbomugh.
Eric Pearson, Town Manager
SEAL Sown of Hillsborough
Dome F. Amtbuster, Tenn Clerk
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
E Julie V. Fogleman, allotary Public for said County and Sparc, do hereby certify that
Domes E Amrbristen Town Clerk, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged me
due aeecntion of the( going instrument.
witness my band and o6ici n seal, this the __ day of
(Official Seat)
Notary Public
My commission expires November 1, 2004.
EXHIBIT A
Lot A which contains 2.5 acres combined with Tract B which contains 22.16 acres
for a total of 24.66 acres has the following dimensions:
Beginning at the uppermost left hand comer and proceeding to the
right ofthe property are the following distances -29.18 feet; 300.91 feet; 195.53
feet; 302.90 feet; 98.67 feet and 66.58 feet; 260.08 feet; 146.67 feet; 461.04 feet;
230.72 feet' 229.11 feet; 606.30 feet; 349.70 feet; 923.38 feet and 329.60 feet.
LOT 4
111 r
nn�II si
°si:
a c
S
PR zMat
III
S
EXHIBIT B
Lot 2 which contains 3.56 acres has the following dimensions
Beginning at the left hand corner ofthe parcel and proceeding to the right of
the property are the following distances: 285.67 feet; 220.20 feet; 106.35 feet;
150.00 feet; 165.58 feet; 188.44 feet; 60.00 feet; 99.68 feet; 229.84 feet and 260.08
feel
�i
PH %/W
p
=
L07 A
7C
26 A
C
Y`
2.56 AC
\
J A
�i
PH %/W
p
=
I
C
�i
ATTACHMENT 10.6
�sN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP ID
OF THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
THE BOARD OF COMMISSTONERS OF THE TOWN OFt81 BOR0UGH ORDAINS'.
Section 1. no Zoning Map of the Town ofHillsbeough is hereby amended to rezone 2 8.22
Fean the. west aide of Orange Grove Road from County R -1 to town Multi -
mily (Tax Map 4.38A..1 and 1B). The arfecte men is shown on the attached
nup.
Suction 2. All provision ofany town Ordinance in conflict with this entrance we repealed.
Section3. ais ordinance shall become effective open adoption.
The foregoing ordinance having been conceded to a vote received the folowing vote and
was duly adapted this 100 day of3eplember 2001.
Ayes:
Noe
Absent or Exnused�
Dania F. Armbnsta, Town Clock
REZONING REQUEST
HILLSBOROUGH, NC
sject Titles PiMRIUC's[1ID+4^ B
PLF. t.Lintwdk Parmaro11P Ciff xt11•Exatlt (ea Tex Map
Owner H F. �tP, 1 1 mI PaRS 5 , I112
_ phone (Mid We
neamzz - - , rc n4aF
Applicant eLa WLlp R %rim, tit Phone 11.6) B sO
Address -y4ff R3rH RSi: 9 W 1P1, FrJt isont, M 2265 LYr<H lim �. 3T
Surveyor/Enginecr °T 9��" -> TK Fiona! (Ind ids
N
AtlVss 2401 ISM Rai; 9rtte 103 ltiAt lbi2, W ZIdS
LacaiioNStrccuncceesed te6OwrHe I-B5a I-40 gslt, mM erg fsce aal, I01L6ssa)h, 1'C
Curtcnr Zawag Rl (U 111t) Proposed Zotuag M lffuffdi yl
Acreage to berexoned 23X Dimensions aFk LAS B
Water /Sewer /Septic pra.iam tle 4nn � tn1L�1/�iy � MP �Dm az Ds iir.�
Setuctures: Exi.tin8 Proposed issu
Csiocal areas: Flood Dueina6elstrenn norse Pond
Stccpslopes se Ccmcicry sae Eucawn
Hislonc rve Othtt
ns far requesting the chm,ge (See Seedon 20.1.2):
itzo.: wt
Changing Conditions: 912 atrse reisar i pgat3' IS oasaa ty usl M ZadM clss�ilfu
id vz ores .flux pc7sstr dsirg to m� si a za0 Uj �a�sc mipter m rots laa el a dtla a a d;Y
Other M 9 uu6 lvr a¢e• wvld f�a111t6e d .l�at Ntis RoJeY >; <�
f xsx a y fisihl, r¢ fx d ]mad petsiAs ude ¢aaR r>aaAy's
ist aCy that I osn the proparry owner or rcu y represent Ole property awns and Uri 0e infoemalion provided
a / a /am
Dam P <rry ownm /reprcsrnmtivc
............................................................ ...............................
Requiremennfar Public Hearing
X sorvay showing: x peedcapy
x /00' -1 "ro 20' -1 "scale x Fee $20o
x ExiiNngSM1UrMrel
• Critical areas (ado")
•_ fthfzof- -way and width pang pme (fl' PW prtpasxl 12' ]efthm lece cif id Corsqs aae Hi/
• Driveways(uiating ands ,) odm]se rn`sarrE`desih is p'
I
a
s
-
I
,
27278
II
AAy y, r .a
gyp
�I::
!
gu
ANNLXA TION FINANCIAL FRASBILI ]YRBPORT
Proposed Pavioe's Points Apartment Complex
.March 28, 2001
Prepared By Eric Peterson, Town Manager
Introduction: The presentation and methodology used in dais report to analyze oho( 'bility of
the Patriot Pointe project is non-traditional in its approach. The standard method of analyzing
the financial impact of a proposed development, if annexed, is to prepare a list of assumptions
and formulas In help develop a cos Wenclit analysis that shows a "bottom line" loss or profit. In
most cases this approach, combined with same common sense amlysis, is the best way to
conduct a feasibility study of this type. This report provides a few basic numbers regarding
projected revenues, some amounts on service provision, but fxues m n posing
philosophical questions to assist the Board in evaluating the mans ofPamot Pointe on rite Town
of Hillsborough's short and long -term financial health in both the General Food add
Water (fewer Fund It is very important to note that the focus of Nis report is shortly financial
and ones not take into account other crucial issues that must be weighed when mnsidening an
ex'ptinn, such as learns and quality of life issues.
The Proposed Development: Patriot Pointe proposes to build 130 Due bedroom apartments,
I20 two - bedroom apartments, and a clubhouse associated with this project, If fully occupied, the
development would add approximately 430 maidans to Hillsborough. This estimate is based on
an coinage of 133 residents for oath ova- bMroom apartment and 2.25 residents for each two -
bedroom apartment The developer minions the project would be completed widin 12 months
of constructors stoup. Upon Protect completion, projected revenues to the Town of
Hillsborough would be as follows:
• Property Taxes for the $16,000,000 project $96,000 per year (based on a 60 tend tax
rate).
Additional General Fwd Revenues generated in sales tics: and state -shared noncoms by
increasing the Town's population by approximately 8 iuu and recessed valuation by
about 5.0% would generate at least an additional $25,000 - 30,000 per year.
• One -time Capital Facility Fees for Water and Secret: $184,600,
• Annual Watcrand Sewer Usagc Revenue :$157,440
Key Service Provision Considerations
While it is uncertain at this time whether the Project would be a contiguous or satellit
annexation, it is really has no bearing the does concerning provision of municipal services. The
101 ascot (lone, 8mrvrt • PO. Box assay • Hill laver h Norse Como,, •evvra
Iq
proposed project is in a good Iecatiom from a service provision standpoint. The fallowing are
some general comments about this issues
Police officers regularly drive by the location as par[ of patrolling the south end of
FaillsbornogF_
• The addition of 240 units will certainly In calls for se o the police
department. Even if the additional calls are modest amount, It will still require
additional effort to serve those needs. Multi - family or apartment complexes are often
attractive targets for vehicle breaklnv
The location is well within the service area covered by the Firs Department.
• The project would not inquire garbage collection service,since it will require dumpster
alervica and the Town will be out ofthe dumpster collection business by July 1, 2002.
Theta would he few, if any, public theory that would require maintenance.
• The use of one (1) charter meter would make reading the monthly water usage for the
complex a simple matter,
• The addithend customers would likely have a negligible unpect on Water /Sewer
operating expenses.
GeteralFwd (perations: CosHBenefit Observations
Aaacldng a specific cost to the project is not aft easy task. Ultimately, me fJ dabi([zY of
momeracon Is greatly dictated by the levef carinceivicer the Town Boarsi Board cs necessary to serve
the asserted areal The manager looked at many different methodologieyservice levels in
evaluating the cost of this project on the General Fund, but believes the following policy
statement on the issue is a simple yet appr Oodure way to evaluate this project:
I own Manager's Observations on Genera! Fund Services: If ateseseed, the Town could likely get
by for at least several years without adding MY new pcmcmel are to this project ff the Town
chase to be very tight on expenditures it would likely ern a healthy surplus of tcvcauu over
expenditures during the first five yearn. In some aspects, from a financial incident , this
development is as ideal se it gets for annexing a multi -family development The development's
close . proximity to Hillaberough, the limited need for street and saturation expenses in this
development, and relatively high per acre assessed valuation (once developed) make the project
worthy of consideration for amtexahon The other aide office win is that while the project will
likely generate a healthy ampler in the eazlyy eas and cost little to seems, because the project can
be aeevieed with existing smfiResohtroes, the tme long-term cost of the project will increase as
the rut of the Town grew$. For example, while the addition of Patriot Pointe would likely not
require any new police ofawx5 in tho-first yearn the additional 240 units (coupled with other
development in the area) will cause the Town to hire a new officer much sooner. Key note: This
es chat manegement at Patriot Pointe does a reasonable job of providing a safe and
controlled living environment for its residents. S➢ rroarmly, the largest cost associated with arc
development will be fire proration. The manager has been unable to get an estimate for the
projected cost for fire protection, though it seems the same philosophy can be applied that was
used in the aforementioned' police" crumple.
)5
Watergiewer Fund Operations: Ca "ene ObObservations
The cost to provide water /sewer services to this project wand be uceptionelly low, especially
since only one (I) "mastxs'molar would need to be read each month. The additional treatment
costs at the two (2) plants would be negligible. Adding this project to the Towns watedsewer
system would clearly be a positive financial gain for the Water /Sewer Fund. In addition, to the
additional monthly /armad operating revenue generated, the Capital Facility Fees of 5184,600
would be quite helpful in paying for future expansions and assisting in paying a portion of the
existing debt capacity for the reservoir,
Clawing
Financially, annexing this project into the Town of Hillsborough appears to be a good decision in
that It would be 1) a clear short -term help in the General Fund (without any major long -term
problems projected), and 2) a big boost in the Water /Sewer Fond in the short and long -term.
Once again, these comments and analysis only address the financial impacts of this projad and
do not attempt to fanoT odan important issues like traffq quality of life, etc.
/6
O Ora 79, PAW
W. Rno paeesoa
Hillsb mLta. Town My cr
PO Box 429
H2lsb9mU8h NC 27278
Dear &k
I have been workN with the ewnee about mtrc Oftbe specificst tYOU mentnned In
Your anent Voice matt w ae rew"t; t thhd party study fir t pro]at. I fO,
comutld with tie ou tnt weplan the folbwiog:
1 - CNbhoLL < (3,5W aguere feet) ipool mi play area
120 - Ore be @nom units (850 sNme &,t ma)
ILD -Two laµOom ..La (1085 squve fiat each)
240 TOW U=s
She timing of this Y IOU wW be approximately 4 momhe flowing reaaning ell
OottO=ma TM wom IiOn schedule would M to dehvw tM elubhouwpool and four
buildl (96 utdla)wvhm6 moto5 with m addhioml Wking(24 unve each) tmn{
each month. Ba kMlly, eweweti9n of the entire complex stm42 be 12 mom,
(es Tg louO9 activity la mbfactoy).
The tfoa loot enaohed demhs the specific econpam bmefita the Ibwn WOYH m in
from this mlent. Tbvv are eddipooal hu is Lke then persOml Wffetty raves
dw from tM sesHmuaz wv:0 w the impravetpema W the e,,u n, Ihas;Mz ate
now needed. MY engi vrill W" to work woth Kemp Keel to detemdne dte mawt
ofdese nnpsnvemems but "Y arc not now kmwa.
We love cboseo not to inwryxate arzy µreabWOOm Un %am nmi tM prolect's
impactontheveayyOOlsYe Aa ILave map["vlrcd1 tlo not (osem @eq -aVyt Waits
GomuryoEµe era's law eWomement eosle Tows aspens a µ1s arrmwill be
negLg:bk to awoWv cis prolarn (ease wary similar damgmpbia all WBettmme
Profile) weheve GeLLe
if my trouble. 1 rm have Na mazvgemat company that vmvages
ow ecvplexea tO complle a liar ofussils if fou to desire.
1 Mvee ktmd a pMto of ow LaJ gthat u repre ,ttn ofWiwv, Plan Mina
Hill Mugk a wevmiary ate ploy �k floor play fir yOw me.
I hope that Ude lafommtionmd mal�is MM tfeatify tle p•OlemIs uepsm rgW the
Town. We azo �vedelnmtLa oPPOM1mvY avdlam eaga{IO respoMbeiy fuller
aeations you Wiry Mve. Pkese de rot lerhemW WI me at 336 %93980.
| |}
!,|q
;*R,•R``
\)
(!!�
-
;1666•
!m-
,tllylfa / rl
)s
7�,f
August 28, 2000
Mr. Eric Peterson
Hillsborough Town Manger
PO Box 429
Hillsborough, NC 29218
Deno Mr. Petemnn,
My name is Chns Dunbar, mrrunercial real eseate developer from High Point, NC, and I
represent the Falk Emily who wishs to have property, re -zo std and appeared into the
TownofHillsboroughbywayofassteffhevutexntion. Thepropettyiskundedby
Interstate 85, Interstate 40, and Orange Grove Road Tk propary consists of5 ppcols
and totals 52 acres. The Falk family wishes to develop an upscale multi -%milt' project
on this property. Feasibility studies show that Gip area lucks rental housing that is so
important to the economic health of Bee area
As background, the Falk family has owned real retire in Orange County dating back to
1967 when they established Falk Fabrics, a Hillsbomueh based texWe mantifactmer.
Comcideninlly, Falk Fabrics contributed a substantial sum ofmmies toward the
construction of the initial municipal water system. Tk company later contributed funds
used to build the sewage treatment plant as crap. The 20F000+ square bat building was
used by Falk Fabrics until 198 5 when the manufacturang assets were sold. The building
was hater leaaed to Flynt Fabrics which mcently amounted their inierrt to close the
facility. The Falk family and l are curwargy, looking st ways to utilize this buiLding going
forward to the mutual benefit of the Town and the Emily.
I have reviewed our pslimimry devebpmem pham with Knnny Keel, Town Engineer,
who her confirmed that water & wi corporally ie available W the site. Din project will
pay for significant improvements to the sews system that is already needed due to as
advanced age aal design These upgrades will reduce the Town's expense aasocwtM
with the maintetance aM repast oftk system.
Tha fuancial impact of this development is significant to tlac town ofHillsbomugh. Far
instance, we Peti rson But Pbaee I of the project to have m estimated value of
516,000,000. Annually, tidsvalue will generate mar dollars Wtk Tavw (0mvge Cowry
tax excluded) in the was unt of 199,200. ALSO, the estimated impact fees for water and
veer Por We connmctlon ofthe couriers will geurrare another $184,800 (6' miler).
The amnd usage lees Bom our tourist's water and sewer seMCeer will generate
$184,8 matdy $1 with an ($58/mh per mouth). gfa rwrad in the meantof$receive
($99,200 art pra with an avrwalpevenuss BoivgforwardThe amountorencedsua
reseiv00 by Town tax +$1antial waterlsewerspond.Thaakvercf need sums
received by the Tawnare substantial with few corresponding expenses.
The Fels are excit d about roe opportunity to improve theta IaM and set the standard for
new development m the area. If you have any questions or suggetiores please ( 1 Gee to
call me at 336.669.2980.
Please allow this letter to serve as our formal request for mmexation We plea to be m
attendance at the hearing on October 9n, 20W so that Ae can present the mints of our
development and answer any annex or s. Ir is nw Mpe m Attached approval from munch to
authorize staff ref perfor y an mbiexazion kssibility stably. Attached please SM a step of
the subject prefers, far your re�ricw.
Y"" &O&zz
Chris Dunbar
Easter & Eiseamart Inc.
ao
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
ORANGE GROVE DEVELOPMENT
Orange Grove Road
HlllsborougN North Carolina
Togs
prepmed lbr.
EASTER & EISENMAN, INC.
4045Prem rDAw. Suite 208
Nigh Pain, Non Cuol 27265
P pF by:
1"NEEL- SCHAFFER, INC.
ENGINEER PLANNERS
2303W.MemN "R
So v 130
Qrt bm,NC 2740
M(336)851 -1006
June 13, 2000
ai
APPENDICES
Appendix A- Traffic Dad
Appendix B - Sine Plan
Appendix C- Capacity Analyses
Neel-Schaffer, 1"c% TOC -I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
=E
PAGE
1.
ERCLTNE SUMMARY
1
2,
INTRODU=ON
2
3,
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDTHONS
6
OF FUTURE CONDITIONS WHHODT DEVELOPMENT
11
4,
ANALYSIS
5,
TRIPGENERA70N
14
6.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
15
7.
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
1'
ANALY515 OF FDTURE CONDITIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT
18
P-
9.
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
24
10,
CONCLDSIONS
24
11.
REFERENCES
26
APPENDICES
Appendix A- Traffic Dad
Appendix B - Sine Plan
Appendix C- Capacity Analyses
Neel-Schaffer, 1"c% TOC -I
as
LIST OF FIGDRB6
FIGURE
DESCRIPTION PACE
I
I VdlityMap
2 8xa ing Lane Cordiguratmos& Traffic Coruna 5
3 2030 Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Traffic
4 3006 Projected No -fluid AM & PM Peak Hour Traffic 13
5 Direction of A ppcoe dr and Departure 16
6 Proposed Development AM & PM Peak Hour Traffic 19
, 2006 Buddout AM & PM Peak Hour Traffic 13
8 Recommended Lam Configumdons I, Traffic Control 25
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE DESCRIFTON
PACE
1
Average Daily Traffic Proje<nom
2
Sec0on Crash Analysis Reaulta(1 /1/99- 12/31/99)
8
3
Interscclion Gash Arielyeis Results 0 /1/99- 12/31/99)
9
4
Year 2000 Capacity Analysis Results
10
5
Year 2006 No Proud Capacity Analysis Result
12
6
Trip Gemrefion5ummary
15
7
Leval of Service Criteria
19
8
Trat! Capacity Summary
20
9
Cnbcal Movement Volume m Capatlty Summary
21
10
Year 20068uild Out Capacity Analysis Result
22
TOC 2
Neel Schaffer, Inc.
a;
proposed Orange Grave Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
1.0 Executive Summary
The proposed Orange Grove Road apartment complex is located on the
northwest side of Orange Grove Rind, between Interstate 40 and Interstate 85 in
Hillsborough, North Carolina. Full build -out of the project is to cmwist of 240
apartment units. As currently envisioned, the development will be completed
(bullbaut) in Ayer
The analyses for the study area iumrsectlons were performed for existing traffic
conditions, 2006 ne-build conditions, and 2006 buLLd -out conditions.
The unsigrtansed imersection of Orange Grove Road /Oakdale Drive currently
operates at a level -of- service (LOS) A in the AM and I'M peak hours. With
predicted growth, the intersection will continue to operate at a LOS A during the
AM and pM peak hunts in 2006. With the site traffic in 2006, the intersection
will operate at a LOS B during the AM peak hour and a LOS A during the pM
peak hour with no roadway improvements.
The signalized imersection of Qlunnn Street /Oakdale Drive curren0y operates
at a LOS B during the AM peak hour and a LOS A during the FM peak hour.
With predicted growth, this intersection will operate at a LOS C in the AM peak
hour and a LOS A during the VM peak hour in 2006. With the addition of the
site traffic in 2006, the intersection will continue to operate at a LOS C in the AM
peak hour and a LOS A during the FM peak hour with no roadway
impeo ements.
The site entrance on Orange Grove Road will operate at a LOS A during the AM
and I'M peak hours in 2006. The developer should construct a northbound left
assn lane into the site on Orange Grove Road ro enhance safety in this area.
aN
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
icuffc Impact Study
2.0 Introduction
(-mneral
The proposed Orange Grove Road apartment complex is located on the
northwest side of Orange Grove Road, between Interstate 40 and Intestate 85 in
Hillsborough, North Caroline. Refer to Figure 1 for the general location of life
proposed development. I'he proposed 22.16 -acre development consists of 240
apartment units, AS currently envisioned, the development will be completed
(built -out) in 2006.
This report presents the results of a Traffic Impact Study (11S) of the future year
2006 traffic conditions for the proposed development. The purpose of dds study
is to evaluate the proposed development in terms of projected traffic eondid des .
evaluate the ability of the adjacent roadways to accommodate the additional
traffic volumes, and to recommend appropriate solutions to mitigate congestion
that may result from the additional site traffic.
The Orange County Planning Department staff was contacted to obtain
background hrformnfion and to ascertain the elements to be covered In this
traffic impact study.
Studt4Area
The proposed development is bordered by Interstate 85 to the north,
undeveloped land fronting Grange Grove Road to the southeast, the Timbers
mobile home complex to the southwest, and Colonial Extract, Apartment
Complex se the norlhezet. I
The change County Planning Department requested that any intcreatlons being
significantly affected be studied to determine the associated impacts resulting
from the proposed development. The fallowing Intersections were studied w
determine the impact of the proposed development
• Orange Grove Road / Oakdale Drive (muignalized)
• Oakdale Drive / Churton Street (SR 1009) (signalized)
• Craned Grove Road / Site Access (enshicalized)
Inc.
Z
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffle Impact Study
u f c I N arin Land Uses
The subject Is currently zoned rural residential. Nearby land uses include
single - family dwelling units, the Colonial Estates Apartment Complex, and the
Timbers mobile home complex.
Prooposed land Use
The proposed development is planned as an apartment complex. There will be
10 buildings with 24 units per building for a total of 240 units
E isNng ly"dol'iff G arier'sfics
Roads in the immediate ncreftV of the site include Orange Grove Road and
Oakdale Drive. Figure 2 illustrates the existing roadway lane configurations and
existng traffic control In the project area
Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) is a two -lane major urban thoroughfare There is
60 feet of right -of -way along this roadway. In the project vicinity, the roadway
bee a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The approximate 1997 ADT for Orange
Grove Road u 3,900 vehicles per day (vpd)..
Oakdale Drive (SR 1133) is a two -Sarre minor urban thoroughfare in the vicinity
of the proposed project. The right-of-way along this roadway varies treat 60 feet
to 90 feet. The posted speed limit le 45 mph. The approximate 1997 ADT for
Oakdale Drive u 2,000 vpd.
Ghurton Short (SR 1009) is a two-lane major urban thoroughfare in the vicinity
of the proposed project. it serves as a north-south om rLica between the town
of Hillsborough and blumaetes &5 and 40. In the project vicirriry, the Tonely
has a posted speed hin't,of 35 mph
Public r c, t Non Facilities
There are currently no scheduled public transportation routes that
have designated stops in this area.
w�
COOL d5 � r ! o • � $ �
4.
F
N
8 OL HS ? °
AUU 30NtlC iz
�6
N
s
e
z
V
W
0 II
as
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Trolled Impact study
3. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
E h, QTmf(ic Voiwnes
2000 turning movement traffic volumes were counted at the Following
intersections'.
• Orange Grove Road/ Oakdale lerive (May 2000)
♦ Oakdale Drive / Churmn Street (May 2000)
A sunmeary of the peak hour counts for each of these intersections is included in
Appendix A.
1997 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts were provided by the Orange County
planning Department These counts indicated the following 24 -hour traffic
volumes on area roadways:
TABLE 1
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Average Daily Traffic Projections
euadwa 1997 ADT
Oran e Grove Road 3.900
Oakdale Drive 2'M
According to Daily Capacity fu+ Unh of 9erolm. "D ", as published by NCDOT
Statewide Planning Branch, the average daily traffic sot LOS D on a two-lane
Jane suburban fachity is 12,500 opt. Thus, the current traffic Operations on the
subject roadways am well below the LOS D threshold.
Figure 3 illustrates the 20M AM and PM peak hour turning movement traffic
counts, respectively, at the study area intersections.
Inc.
..moy,
u
Soa — �GB516W � � m
(06) el
# O•
UP)mJ
—)I_(-
(bW)
Dlm
h
vm 1
WNJ
M) mil_
Proposed orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
Crash Analwas
Crash analysis repots for the period from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999
were obtained for the following lecatiow
• Orange Grave Road - between Interstate 85 and Oakdale Drive
• Oakdale D rive - between Orange Grove Read and Churton Street
• The unsigea herd intersection Of Orange Grove Road and Oakdale Drive
• The slgnaliaed Intersection of Oakdale Drive and Churton Street
The results of these crash analysis reports included in Appendix A and are
summarized in the following table:
TABLE2
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Section Crash Analysis Results
Qanuary 1, 1997 - December 31,1999)
The statewide acreage crash rate per 100 million vehicle tr leas Is 262.91 for an
urban .secondary route (19961998 "Fear, year Crain Rotes, NCD07). According to
these results, the studied section of Orange Grove Road falls below the statewide
average while Oakdale Drive is about the same as the statewide average. Out of
the 9 crashes that wcurred in the last 3 years on Oakdale Drive, 5 of these
escorted at the Oakdale Drive / Churton Street inteesec5on.
Number of
Accidents 100 well
Location
Reported
per
Vehicle lvlil�
Crashes
Change Grwe Read - between
6
171.36
Interstate 85 avd Oakdale DN
_
Oakdale Drive - between Oange
q
�
26691
Gmve woad and Churton Shear
_. -
The statewide acreage crash rate per 100 million vehicle tr leas Is 262.91 for an
urban .secondary route (19961998 "Fear, year Crain Rotes, NCD07). According to
these results, the studied section of Orange Grove Road falls below the statewide
average while Oakdale Drive is about the same as the statewide average. Out of
the 9 crashes that wcurred in the last 3 years on Oakdale Drive, 5 of these
escorted at the Oakdale Drive / Churton Street inteesec5on.
31
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
TARLE3
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Intersection Crash Analysis Results
Ganuary 1, 1997 - December 31,1999)
Number of AmidemsperIMMillion
Location Reported Vehicles Entered
Crashes
Orange Grove R oad / Oakdale Drive 18 Ay[
intersection 1sihmifzed7 --
Oakdale Drive % Cnurmn street - s1 y2
Ivte[ee L I' dl ! -
There is no statewide average crash data available for intersections. Amnrding
to these results, There has only been one reported crash at the Orange Grove
Road /Oakdale Drive lntersecdonin the past timer years. Duringehe some three
pence, there were seven reported crashes at the Oakdale Drive / Churhm Street
Intersection. Although this u not a drastically high number of crashes, it may be
beneficial no review the crash history and intersection geemeny to determine if
any improvements can he made to lessen the chances for future crashes.
proposed Dane Grove Road Development
Tragic Impact Study
Fmsd C 'n Anahcsis
The resn u; of the capacity analysis for the existing conditions at the study area
inrecsecnons ace shown in the following table.
TABL64
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Year 2600 Capacity Analysis Results
This table shows that all of the study area intersections are camently operating at
an acceptable level-of-service. A sconum ry table of all capacity ara is results le
locluded in Table 7 in Section 7 Of this report. A description of" level -of- service"
is also included in Section 7.
Existing Oandi ions
Intersection
I
9:1ion
1acledeia
AM Peak
PM Peak
Olcnge Glove ROaO /OSktlaLie pave
Ail kl
p(t.8)
tuns nT""—Oa
CM1core Slreai l Oaktlale Onve
6(169)
AI &01
laIon dlZe[I)
This table shows that all of the study area intersections are camently operating at
an acceptable level-of-service. A sconum ry table of all capacity ara is results le
locluded in Table 7 in Section 7 Of this report. A description of" level -of- service"
is also included in Section 7.
3'
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
4. ANALYSIS
OF
FUTURE
CONDITIONS
WITHOUT
DEVELOPMENT
Projected Rased .Netivark
Review of the 203) -2006 J\CDOT T noularadw, Inmmrenent Pmnan� mvealed
that there are no planned or programmed roadway improvements in the
immediate vlchdty of the proposed development that will be complete by 2006.
Off -Sile Deoelo(nnent
consolation with Ne orange County Planning Department revealed that there
are several placated or prograirmted of -site developments in the vicinity of the
proproed project Some of these include Corbin Downs (a proposed multi -use
development on Old NC 86), a new High Calla al onNW,CWd eovaot non-
residential development), an igh
Since detailed beffic studies were not available for each of these future
developments, the background traffic (2000 existing traffic conditions) was
creased by 6% per year in order m accommodate for background growth plus
additional growth due to development 'Los very aggressive growth rate is
approximately twice as high as what is commonly seen in urbaNzed areas.
Therefore, by rising a 6% annual growth rate, the 2!1116 background traffic
volumes are more likely to be overestimated then underestimated.
2006 Pm'ected No -Build Try
The proposed development is planned for boldest by the and of 2006, therefore,
Year 2006 was chosen as the hours hori Yen year for traffic analysis purposes.
As stated iii the previous section, a 6% annual growth rate was used in order to
nmmoclate for background traffic growth in addition to growth caused by
new development Urban areas typically see a 2.5 % to R% armual growth mtei
therefore, using a 6% growth rate will more than account for normal growth plus
growth caused by suaounding developments.
Figure 4 illustrates the 2006 projected no build AM and lid peak hour traffic for
the study area.
3�
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
2006
Ccn0" NCI @
Capacity anayses fur the your 2006 "no- build" AM and PM peak hour
condinnns were performed with the existing roadway geometi and traffic
control. These analyses were done en determine the impact of background traffic
predicted to use the study axed intersections. The xesmits of the eapacim analyses
for the 2006 no -Wild conditions at the study area inersections are shown in the
following table
TABLE 5
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Year 2006 No -Build Capacity Analyeis Results
fhis tahle shows Uwe all of the study area
20M
will
No- uiltl
Intersection
acceptable level -of- service it y ser 2006.
LOS sedvahida role
AM Peak PM Peak
Oxnge Grove Roetl l Oakdale 011ve
p (3.3) A (26)
unvgnalized
ChUM SIU OaWalet C(23.6) A(87)
(signalized) —
fhis tahle shows Uwe all of the study area
intersections
will
operate
at an
acceptable level -of- service it y ser 2006.
\
E5(
}
/�
9!
» \�
,)
/}
)`
!
-
d§
/
tM LN
}
Qz/
�■
EA
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
5. TRIP GENERATION
An evaluation of anticipated traffic Impact an the sum sun ing roadway network
requires an estimation of site - generated traffic volumes, which are then added to
the projectad background traffic volumes. These combined volumes are used to
test the adequacy of the adjacent highway network. This chapter summarizes
this evaluation.
proposed Deoelayment
The proposed development Is planned as an apartment complex with 10
buildings consisting of Pk units each for a total of 240 ends.
Prorooeed Access Points
Access into the proposed development is planned via one full movement
driveway on G range Grove Road
Trip Generation
The amount of traffic generated by a new, development is a function of the size
and type of development. Once the proposed land use data for the site us
known, the number, of trips generated by the development can be estimated.
Trip generation data for Us report was determined in accordance with the
procedures outlined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Epe) report
entitled Trip Generation. Trip generation estimates were developed in arms of
vehicle nips per average weekday.
'gaffer Impact is determined by estimating the total number of daily vehicle
trips, as well as the number of peak hour velride hips. It should he recomy' red
Itat a percentage of these trips are "captured" trips while othcea are "new" trips
Captured" trips or "pass -by" hips refer to present momnsts who pass the site
that will probably patronize the development; thus, the driveway volumes at the
development is different from the total added to the adjacent street system.
Facilities such as retail establishments, restaurants, banks, service :tafloas, and
convenience stores attract motorists frmn the passing stream of traffic pass -by
trips and internally captured trips are not usually considered in this type of land
use
Table 4 illustrates the trip generatan for the proposed development for the
daily, morning, and mammon peak hours.
3
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
Table 6
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
ITT Trip Generation Summary
(Vehicles)
6. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
In order to properly determine the impart of the traffic generated by the
proposed development, it is nmessary to determine the distribution of traffic to
and from the development. The trip distribution percentages shown on Figure 5
werre used for distributing the proposed development traffic. These percentages
are based on the existing traffic patterne; and population centers m the area
Primary trip distribution is estimated as follows:
♦ 41l% reflood the northeast on Orange Grove Road
e 5% to /from the southeast on Change Grave Read
♦ 40 %to /frmmthenorthan Churton Street
♦ 35 %to /frundin outhon Churton Stree[
Figure 5 illustrates the directions of approach and departure for the site traffic
generated by the proposed development.
7. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
Figure b shows the traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and
their iesigrmtencs to the adjacent roadway system. Traffic was assigned to the
driveways and roadway system tiling into account customary driving beaux as
well as minimum time and distance methodologies.
v'
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
LAp�ments
Density
hour
Two
Way
Enter
_
Exi[
Enter
Exit
40 Units
1591
19
103
101
48
6. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
In order to properly determine the impart of the traffic generated by the
proposed development, it is nmessary to determine the distribution of traffic to
and from the development. The trip distribution percentages shown on Figure 5
werre used for distributing the proposed development traffic. These percentages
are based on the existing traffic patterne; and population centers m the area
Primary trip distribution is estimated as follows:
♦ 41l% reflood the northeast on Orange Grove Road
e 5% to /from the southeast on Change Grave Read
♦ 40 %to /frmmthenorthan Churton Street
♦ 35 %to /frundin outhon Churton Stree[
Figure 5 illustrates the directions of approach and departure for the site traffic
generated by the proposed development.
7. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
Figure b shows the traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and
their iesigrmtencs to the adjacent roadway system. Traffic was assigned to the
driveways and roadway system tiling into account customary driving beaux as
well as minimum time and distance methodologies.
loo. )\
!; (_
\�
%\
. 9
O m W
r` a
aom O1tlH � 0 0 e =
133tl15 Nf1HO
ew�q`
O a
� SN
s g
e
gg
s
Aw WL
rW 9t V a
— I ?N
ML (OU9 UVUU 3 HS NVHO 2t
a
m
� z
S _ _
III
40
Proposed Orange Grave Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
g, ANALYSIS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH
DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development will consist of 10 apartment buildings with 24 units
in each building for a total of 240 units. proposed access into the site is via one
full movement driveway on Orange Grove Road. The unity will be cnretmcted
In clusters, therefore consolidating Lhe parking ink) specific areas and
zing conflicts throughout the development. A scaled drawing of rte silo
planisincluded in Appendix H.
The sway area intersecrioru were analyzed using the methods outlined In the
Highway Capacity Manuap. The manual defines capacity as "the maximum
rate of flow at which persons or vehicles can be reasonably expired to traverse a
point or uniform arctlon of a lane or roadway during a specified Here period
under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control amditions, usually expressed as
vehicles per hour or persons per hour ". The capacity analyses were performed
for Our following secretaries: existing year 2000, projected year 2006 "m build ",
and projected year 2006 "builefout". An analysis was performed for both the
AM and PM peak hours for each of the time periods being studied.
Level of service (LAS) re a terra used to represent different traffic conditions, and
In defined as a "qualitative ne asum describing operational conditions within a
traffic sheave, and their perceprion by motorist /or passengers". Level of Service
varies; from Level A. representing free Flow ro Level F where traffic breakdown
conditions are evident level 6 represents good pmgressiurh with minimal
congestion. At Level C, the number of vehicles stopping is significant, although
many still Pass through the intersection without stopping. Level D represents
more congestion, but the dresso f operations are acceptable. At Level E, freedom
to maneuver within the traffic sheave Is extremely difficult with driver
frustration being generally high. Generally. Level of Service D is acceptable for
signalized and ureigralizN intersections m suburban areas during peak
periods it should be noted that actual operating condifiovu might be better than
the calculated level of service due to an aggressive driver population
Table 5 presents emada of each level of service as indicated in the Highway
Capacity Man"P.
Table 6 represents a summary of uxHfc capacity, analyses for the study area
inimbectinns. Appendix C includes the specific capacity analysis worksheets for
each intersection analyzed.
N,
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
TABLES
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRTT MA
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of
Stopped Delay
service
Per Vehicle leer)
A
Q0.0
B
>10.0 and <20A
C
>20A and d5.0
D
>35.0 and <55A
E
>no aad <BB.o
F
>W.0
Source: Highway Capacity MamaR, Spinal Report 209, TraoOPQAMI0n
Rceanh Baud, Naeonel Resarch CouaA, WashingM D.C., 1998.
ONSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS'
Level of Average Total Delay
Stance
ae eh
A
_Q0
B
>10 and Q5
C
>15 and
D
>25and_<5
E
>35 and X50
F
>50
Source: Highway Capacity ManuaP, Special Report 209, Transportation
Research Bmw, National Resamh Council, Washington, D.C, 1996
NedScF /Rr, Inc. 19
is
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
Table 8
Proposed Orange Grove Read Development
Traffic Capacity Summary
Itils table illustrates drat all study area Intersecdone currently do and will
continue to operate at an acceptable level of service tluough year 2006 with m
without the proposed development.
pep
zoos-
2006
�reamon
EMSang COmNnna
no BUIW
Budd "t
OS
OS
OS
J NMI[I. dMx,
sec
IasdMn(de eels
znrwmele dsM 1
AM Pwk PM Pak
AM Peak PMPoak
AM Poak PM Peek
Okurnn St,
Oaadve 01111
8 V 6 A
Ais0)
C(235) A(8.])
O(0231
Ao1)
Nl z Gl
Orange Greve Fond /
Oakdale Coe
A(10)
AOA)
AC3)
A(16)
B(S])
A(6A)
Ono mean
change Grew FmL I
SiteEnlnnce
MIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
Nnna�—Ivwtl.
—
Itils table illustrates drat all study area Intersecdone currently do and will
continue to operate at an acceptable level of service tluough year 2006 with m
without the proposed development.
1;
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Tic Impact Study
In addinon to the level of service. a volume - [rapacity y /c) ratio was
calculated Inc the critical movements in the Churmn Sneet / Oakdale Drive
intersection. An overall intersection v/c ratio was not provided for the
unsignalized intersectiws. A v/c ratio represents the level of congestion at a
particular location. If an minsection is operating at a v/c equal to one, it has
eeatred its full capacity - Therefore, It is desirable for intersections; to have a v/c
ratio less than one. When calculating the v/c for the critical movemente, only
the lane groups that have the highest Flow ratio for each phase are considered. A
critical v/c of less Htzn t indicates that all the movements in the intersection can
be adequately accommodated with the given cycle length
The following table summarizes the v/c ratios for the critical movements in the
Cherish Street / Oakdale Drive lntersechon
Table 9
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Critical Movement Volume to Capacity Summary
zoao
W06
200
E:ietingc namars
No-awiM
Build out
Inhrsxtlon
.m ratio
VIC moo
via stir
PM sue
FM PeaM
AM Peak PM Puk AM Peak
PM Falk
IXmhon SVmV
OaMele diva
B9
6
43
87 57
84
Bt
(elgiall�
—
-
Z) 9
proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Taft Impact Study
2006 Ruildout Traffic
G]pacity aneiyscs for the year 2006 "build rule conditions were performed to
determine the impam the proposed development would bave on the adjacent
sueetsystem. Figure 7 shows the total M06 build out peak hour traffic volumes.
The results of the capacity analysis for the 2006 build out condt6orvs at the study
area intersections are shown in the fallowing table.
TABLE 10
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Year 2006 Build-Out Capacity Analysis Results
T61s table shows that a0 of the study area Intersections will operate at as
acceptable levebof- service in year 2006 with the addition of the site traffic
war
Mild out
Intersection
ws ae Jvenicle delay)
AM Peak
PM Peak
Orange Grove Rra] / Oakdale Dove
B (5 ])
A (3 9)
(ureignelood)
oburten Stood /Oakdale Dove
C(323)
A(g.1)
duanelieal
Orion" Grove Road I sca EMrence
A(ea)
A(g9)
nzgnar:ed)
—
T61s table shows that a0 of the study area Intersections will operate at as
acceptable levebof- service in year 2006 with the addition of the site traffic
�6� `Ie1L
J I � rfmq oz
w zvJ 1 I
'roer)eol— �E�
ceeu eL� � m
o�
w=
�y
gF
- Wo m
L(BU [x
(W aLi
IW vvl—
�I
U
S ?
� H
#�O•
Ud
Proposed Orange Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
9. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the foregoing analysis, it o apparent that the existing roadway network
will be able to accommodate the development The following improvement
should be made to improve the level of safety th the project area:
Mill ation Recommusnufatiom Needed for
Proposed D 1 (Iry1eRt Traffic
The pmposed development will add a minor amount of additional traffic to the
roadway network. Therefore, it is recommended that the developer make the
following roadway imprcvemem. if approved by Orange County and /or
NCOOT:
Orange Grove Road/ Site Entmnee
♦ Construct a northbound, left tarn and on Orange Grove Road at the site
entrance
Figure s illustrates the recommended roadway lane continuations and traffic
control for the roadway and driveway access that adequately mitigates the site
traffic impacts.
10. CONCLUSIONS
All of the study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level
of service and are presorted to continue to operate at an acceptable level of
service in the shady' year, 2006. The proposed Orange Grove Road Development
will add a minimal amount of new trips to the roadway network The
additional trips will have a slight effect the operations at the study area
lntereardons. Overall, all the 3n2rseetions will operate at a COS C or better in
ulf>h with the addition of the site traffic. Construction of the recommended
northbound left on Orange Grove Road into the site will mitigate the traffic
impacts aworeatudd with the proposed development This improvement will
benefit the development and the motoring public by increasing the safety in the
evaa
b j°e
o�
Ua
=W
.i
3
d
N
6
W
W
Z
N
xW
�n
Ng
Proposed Omnge Grove Road Development
Traffic Impact Study
11. REFERENCES
1 Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers,
Washinglou,D C.,1999.
r Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research
Board, Naterml Research Council, Washington, D C, 1998.
X4ghAFFACHM£NT I0.B
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor JOMson &Hit Wrough Town Board Members r�
From: Kenny Kesel, PE, Town EngirrterAJtilities Drec[or
Date; Septanber 6,2W1
Subject: Consideration of Water /Sewer Eshenhon Contract for Patriot's Pointe
Apartments Project
A proposed WaterSewcr Extension Confrect for the Patriot's Pointe Apartments Project
is included in the agenda packet for your consideration. This document should he
considered prior to voting on annexation of the property, s'uwe it affe' is the lees W he
paid for water and seven service ad details Ofprovid'mg smh service.
The regnvcmcros of the contract provide several upgrades to the existing Town sewer
system in this area the existing lunh:rs Pmnp Station will be upgraded or replaced,
and the new /upgraded station will include a seandley power gearator, new pumps, better
materials of construction, perimeter chain link hearing, and telemetry to enable the station
to notify Town personnel Sthe staton falls.
Improvements will also include piping the Ming Colonial Estates Aparmerns sewer
into the new /upgraded pump station. Colodal Estntes currently has a substandard
connection to one system that's From to clogging small overflow. Thus improvemcat li
reduce the chance of sewage overflows acl line clogging.
In addhion, the mmract rcluires that water and sewer mmccliov @es be paid at tbe Out -
of-Town razes, regardl s of Use annexation decision. The fore, the WaterSewer Ftmd
will not lose Capital Facilities Fee money as a result ofannexation. The ware /sewer
usage fees will, however, be at In -Town rater ifthe dewelopment is avre al. The
Perpetual Maintenance Fee for tint sewage pump station will also be assesserh at a For-
rated cost that conside rs the capacity, of the existing pump station- The Town water and
sewer system has adequate capacity in Ina area to serve the development.
I recommem that the Board approve the WaterSewer Edeshom Contract for the
Portico's Pointe Apartments Project.
cc: Enc Peterson, Town Manager
File
To: Ms. Lynda HJ1, D & M BHILDFRS, LLC, 4045 Prcarver Drive, ude 208, High
Point, NC 27265
Form: Kenny Keel, PE, Town EngineerNtlhties Director II,11 ^rye
Date: September 6,2001
Subject ESTIMATED Water/Sewer Fee Calculations her the Patriet's Pointe
Apartments Project
1 have estimated the water and sewer hers to be assessed for contention of the Patriot's
Pointe ApartmenS Project 10 the Town of Hillsborough Waterl5ewer System. These
calculations are oely an estimate, and are based on our current ke schedule and
approavmtions regarding the details of the required sewage pump station
WoerlSinver Capical F ilites Fees
Water CFP(6" Winer SexvicelMeta) $1]8,600
Sewer CFF(0 Water SavicNMeter) $11RIMO
TOTAL CFF= $277,200
P rr I A&ggirAcoice Feev isewaacL Swvlrn)
25 Hp Pumps, 175 gpm Q 206 A TDH $205,610
Thu is not an invoice. These fees will be 1'nn'iM after final construction drawings are
subrailted and approved for the project.
cc: Mayor Hoare Johnson
Hillsborough Town Board Members
Fric Peterson. Town Manager
File
6)
NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
ORANGE COUNTY W.4TEIUSEWER EXTENSION CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entemd into tl,ia _day of ML by"KI
between Patriot's Pointe, LIZ (hereiraRer the "Dercbpet') aM [M Town aTHJlsborough, e
North Caroms municipal corporation (hereinafter the "Town"):
WHEREAS, the Developer proposes m emend the Town water ands rsystem to serve
Patriot's ftom A2iiq is (hereinafter the 'Project'); and
WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed m pay molato costs associated with the proposed
emension; and
WHEREAS, a its meeting lwld , 2001, the Hillsborough Town
Coarrcil authorieM the proposed extension mbject to execution of this agreenent art
campllence with its terng
NOW, THEREPORE, the Developer and the Towo, unit lire hens, succesmrs, and assigns
of each eftlem agmc:
(1) Subjcet to Developers compliance wrth the mums and conditions set forth herein,
and subject to Developer obtatwig any receasmy approval firm the State of North Cmolbn or
any other egmey or authority, the Town will jarim lire connection of improvements rumtmcted
for the projeom to the Town water and sewer systems.
a) The Town reserves the night to refuse to allow connection to or use ofthe
Town water anaVOr sewer system (i) when such connection would cause the
Town's system or the operation thereof to he n violation ofarrya Iimlblc state
or federal requirement; or (u) fir reasons not known or foreseen by the Town at
the time this Wartact was executed that Would create a ohar and present danger to
the public health or satiety. Reasons fur refusal to allow correction shall include,
but our be formed to, tact of water supply or lark of capacity of one or more
comporents of the water or sewer system.
b) The Town's aulhorhatiou to connect to the Town's water anal sewer
system rusher this agrecrrevt shah expire A(i) submmttial (i.e. more then mken)
Construction of the project has out began within two years them the date upon
which this contract oos executed; (h) after construction begins, cormructbn
ceases for a continuous period of at lean one yeut (uNcss a result ofaa action by
the Towv); or (iii) the extension to be constmrted prusamt to this contract has not
hew cormxted to the Town's sysem in accortlance whh the requmormats set
foM herein within three (3) ycam Sum the dote upov which this contract was
executed.
ga
(2) Nothing in thus; contract shall be consnaed as consrinrdrig express or implied
approval of the Pmject by the Town under any applicable Town zoning, subdivision, or other
hand use ordinance.
as (3) these Developer agrcea to A and oc ad or dlges that fllowing teens and conditior s
wallas thousetdceenAppendix AaMssyste jasp[hatdlycowe'sent upein compliance
with tared aiproposed the se. to the Town's system not naorrahle comnsion upon camwilli
wad re ii add road v o£tlre same. If these will io d are not met the extension on agreement will n
o fswvk null and void aM the developer will need to re- rcegorinte a new, contract for extension
of service from the Town.
A. Gennei CoMitiovs:
1. Dales otherwise explicitly and apacifically stated, Developw shall Mar the costs
and expenses of all of the obligations and duties created by this contract,
iarbabOg without limitation, engi rwring and legal bass incurred by the Town in
cormxtion with the proposed extension
2. The Town will permit the physical connection of the extension to the Town's
water or sewer system only abO sill of the cand'aions set firth or ScCdQ= H aM C
antl say addieoral coaditions appeMed hereto have Men satisfied.
3. The Town shall maintain the improvemame consb ided carder this contract after
day are dedicated. however, if within one year of the date that the offer of
dedication of the extension awaroned pursuant to this contract b accepted,
de acts lo worlcmmaNp or aretmials are discovered in work done pursuant to this
contract by or for the Developer, the Developer slab we that Such debars are
promptly contacted at tM Dcveloptt's experae.
4. The Town may make or eatheriow extensions or cotoectfm to or firm arty of the
hnprovempats onatructed pureuma to this contract without permission of the
Developer.
5. Developer r s construction of improvements pursuant to this mattact shall not
relieve Developer of the obligation to pay applicable Eees under the Town's water
and sewer policies
6. Developers wmtreation of improvemcmta puraumt to for cerebral does rat
eR tthe Town's policy with msped to the fees to be paid to the Town by
property owners other than Developer for connection to the improvemats
constructed by Developer parsueM to this wntmct. Nor shall Developer have any
rippt to rolled fees draw persons connecting ado or etmnd'mg the improvemcNa
coretruded under this contract except as specified herein Appendix A.
R.
7. Water and sewer services which ncet mamam Sam standards mnu be provided
to this development. The Town hostess vo other warranty as to airy particular
water quality, quantity or pressure to be Provided.
8, All foes and charges to be paid pursuant to this contract shell he calculated in
accordance with Elmo fee schedWc in effort when the fees ad charges are paid.
9. This contract may be esa agnet by the Developer, but such successor or asogaee
shall obtam no rights hereunder until after it has provided the Town wth a wntten
aclamwledamenl of its obligedors and rcspa bililies under this agreement.
However, due contract is specific to the Project deunbW above and any change
or sheration in the approved imersied use, i.e. residential and cotumemial
development, of such project shall, absent the wanton consort or the Town, void
this contract.
10. The words `iiae" or " lives" shall include "rein or "mains" ardess the corm ett
otherwise requires "Sewer" means "smdmry sewer.,
It. Tlds contract shell he deemed made in and shah be construed in heardmce ondh
the law ofNorth Caroline- Airy dispute hetwcen the parties of this agrearrat may
be referred, a the request ofthe Town, for bmdat arbitration though the private
AdjodidatlonC Ier at Duke University.
P c,conshaction Cooditions
I. The Developer shall eeage a r=nsed Profecsiorol Engineer to Mate pions and
specifications for the construction of water improvements and/or smitary sewer
Inprsomme ns t0 a t the Project.
2. The Developer shall secure approval of the constmniou platy by the following
age cries or authorities, to the extent applicable
Town En o lira D Maas Pvccror
North Carolina Depvmiem of P vvomnenr and Natural Resources
North Coroliru Department ofTrereportadon
I. The Developer shall obtain wry necessary eneroehmem agreements or cammmis
for use ofpropeny not owned by the undersigned developer or poject owner.
C All wale: and sewer capial facilities hers for residential projects shall he pod
before comtructum of the extension begins except as provided herein Appardie
A.
53
5q
C. Cowtiuefon Comlituns.
I. Unless otherwise provided or this Contract, ao construction shall be in accordance
with Town policy, standards and spoeifications.
a) The Town shall sn"guene the scra arW type of material for all water and
sewer Wes.
h) AH work shell be subject to inspection "c Town. No fine may be
overal up until such inspection has taken place and ifatry We or IacHity
is covered up prior to inspection, the Town hery quire such Hne or
ficility to be uncntmred or exposed to view at the developer's mmetsse to
faciWate such Inspection-
0) The Town will gaire auy testing to determine that the work w np lUwi
with Town standards and specdcations. All such testing shill be at We
Developers exp reso.
d) The Developers Engineer shall provide construction stake out anci
supervision.
e) An Engineer's representative slWl be prone each day that work is
performed and shall prepare daily logs to be subasitted weekly to the -
Town Engirvo.
Alt conaraction shall be performed by a contractor licensil to perform
this type of work in North Cara[ma
g) The Contractor shalt have a field superintendent onsite at of times during
construction.
2. The Developer shall bear the total cost of all water and/or sewer construction
within the Pmjcet and the total cost of all water hall sewer construction
rhquired toe tend service or the project.
D. Lost Construction Corditions:
Be ore the Town will allow water to How to the project ar permit use ofthe Town sewer
system to serte the project, Developer shall:
1. Furnish the Town two Copies of the record drawings, together with:
a) the corAraztoes andavit tut the drawing auwately represent the an-built
impmvertents, arW
4
55
b) aortificete ofcompliertce executed by the Pro sinvl Eogvreer of
record indicar ing That work has been performed in substantial compliance
with the approved plans and specifwaiona.
C) a Connectors AffdasB and Release of Liens fiom all subcontractors and
meteriahoen
d) a Warranty, from a viable Surety in the name mfthe Town ofHWsWmugh
for a period of I year from the date of acceptance.
2. Convey to the Town and record or cause to have rocorded in the Orange County
Registry W deeds of easement and piers showing all water aM/or sewer
wseutents required w serve the project.
3. Formally dedicate to the Town all Physical improvements wrutruc[ed to serve the
project that is the subject of this cant ac[ wldch improvements slug became pan
oftic Town water anal sewer system and win thereafter be owmcd and nmmorm 1
by the Town
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed tins Contract m duptiretc
originals, as of the day aM year frost shove written.
PATRIOT'S POINTE LLC TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
By: BY
Harry, Talk Ede Peterson
President Town Manager
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Town Clerk
Dona F. Armbrister
This untrnaman has peen preardaed in tho rrtemer required by erovermrcnt Budget and Fiscd
Control Act.
Finance Director
List Arnagadiges
AppendusA
MR
Project: PATRIOT'S POEJTE APARTMENTS
TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH WATEWSEWER EXTENSION CONTRACT
APPENDIX A
Developer agues to satisfy the following conditions in addition to those set forth in the
WATERISEWER EXTENSION CONTRACT before the Town will permit the connection of
Improvemnts constructed for the above reinstated project to the Town water and sewer system:
1) The Project shall tumid of 1 Pease having a total of 240 residential unhs(Apmtments)
on approximately 28.22 acres The apa9nert buJdiugs shed be served by orefi
(mh boon) compound water metes, art an additional meter shall be installed (if necessary)
for a site clubhouse. The capital fatilit f shall be massed at thi prevzJm¢ fetesgee Residemial sise(518')
meters for the project shall be punctuated rfrom the Town at the prove" rate at the time
meters are purchased, plus cog for redid read capability. Larger raters shall be purchased
by the Developer From the Town's supplier and shall tort to the Town's meter
sardards, including redid read capability. The Developer span pay su capital facilities fees
prior to any omhe conrtruction or within 12 months from the execution ofthls agreement.
2) Developer sheS design, permit, gain McManus, and comlrvel ell off -site utitily
improvements prior to corecarding new usable utilities as described below. These facilities
may execute, but act Ise limited to, _b tart g .hah water lance, one sewage pump station
with standby power (see details listed in hem 4), 2 barnstorm) sewage face men W
needed), and a -inch gavity sewer to the Town's sysa Mhdmmn 8- inch dinmetal'fe-
r e shah be made to the Town's water and sewer systems at various locations to include. but
not be limited to:
a) Seuxr: 8 -i tio-e to proWse upgraded sewage P=P smtior.
b) Water: S -arch riedr to existing Town water We at O2nge Grove Road,
3) As For ofthe utilities work to be done for the project, the Colandal Estates apartment
complex sewage utilities shall be modified to direct all sewage Row ham Colonial Estates
to theproposcd/upgraded sewage Pun@ station for the project
4) Sewage service for the project tees 2 optiom:
(a) The exutirg Timbers MHP sewage pump station shad be upgraded to handle
existing flow, art additional flow &am the project and Colonist Estates
Apartments, and shall be upgmded to most cartml Town Specifications,
including, but out Fruited to, non-clog contrifttgal warps, Wetter valve vault,
staudess steel internals, yard hydrate, pcernment on-site standby power with note-
burger, SCADA telemetry, art pedometer fexeg.
(b) Now asest Pump station curatruded to serve the pmject, CUladal ESatess
Apmrrcnte, mW Timbers hdFlp, complying with cunem Town Specifcmiau,
with gravity sewer installed to direct existing Timbers sewage Flow to the new
smtlort and abatdomnent oftbe existing Timbers sewage pump station.
s�
Option chosen shall depend upon.siee conditions. cast, sound rngineer'mgjudgmem, and
approval by the Town Enghea.
5) All off -site aul or-site utilities sWll be inland per Town.Speci &otiose& Deteds; after the
plans are appnuved by the Town Engineer.
6) A perpnuel Maiatenace Fee for the proposed/upgraded sewage pump station atoll he due
prwr to the Town's acceptance ofd a station for ownership and mamtenne (new station),
oruponwmmencementofupgmdemo (upgradedstation). The Perpetual Maintenance
Fee SW he calcuWtd using the fomrula listed in the Town Code, and shall be per-rated
based on the iacrtase in eopecity of the misting Timbers Pump Starwn The pump station
shall be designed mW installed in with the Town Specifications & T]emilc