HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Board - 050521 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
131 W. MARGARET LANE, SUITE 201
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
9� r�r4
t
�r •�z
xa
1 �q
;�Qrrri �aY tl'��o
AGENDA
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
Wednesday, May 5, 2021
Regular Meeting — 7:00 pm
Due to current public health concerns, the meeting will be virtual. Members of the Planning
Board and staff will be participating in the meeting remotely. Interested members of the
public can view and participate in the meeting by following the instructions at the end of the
agenda. (Please note that pre-registration no later than 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting is
required to speak at the meeting).
No. Page(s) Aggnda Item
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. 5 - 6 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. Planning Calendar for May and June
3 7 — 14 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 7, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
4. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
5. PUBLIC CHARGE
Introduction to the Public Charge
The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, appoints
the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB)to uphold the written land development laws of the
County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and harmonious
development. OCPB shall do so in a manner which considers the present and future needs of its
residents and businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to and promotes
the health, safety,and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every effort to uphold a
vision of responsive governance and quality public services during our deliberations, decisions,and
recommendations.
Public Charge
The Planning Board pledges its respect to all present. The Board asks those attending this
meeting to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner toward each other, County staff,
and Board members. At any time should a member of the Board or the public fail to observe this
charge, the Chair will take steps to restore order and decorum. Should it become impossible to
restore order and continue the meeting, the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a
genuine commitment to this public charge is observed.
The Planning Board asks that all electronic devices such as cell phones, pagers, and computers
should please be turned off or set to silent/vibrate.
Please be kind to everyone.
6. CHAIR COMMENTS
No. Page(s) • ' •. Item
7. 15 — 72 MAJOR SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW-To review and take action
on a Concept Plan application for a Major Subdivision called
Pyewacket. The proposal within Orange County is for a 2 lot
subdivision on 70.79 acres (PIN 9757-51-3504) located in Bingham
Township, south of the junction of Jones Ferry Road and Ferguson
Road, straddling the Orange-Chatham County line. An Orange County
major subdivision review process is necessary for this subdivision
because a new public road and open space are proposed to be
dedicated. The portion of the subdivision within Chatham County
contains 128.39 acres and all 93 habitable lots will be in Chatham
County.
Presenter: Molly Boyle, Planner II
8. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comments / Participation
There are two methods for public comment:
• Written submittals by email or drop-off
• Speaking during the virtual meeting
Written Public Comments
Members of the public are encouraged to provide written public comments by emailing
comments to plan ningboard _orangecountync.gov no later than 3:00 p.m. on the afternoon
of the meeting. Please include in the Subject line of the email the title of the agenda item
your comment pertains to.
Emails sent to this address are viewable on Google Groups:
https://groups.google.com/g/ocplanningboard
Written comments can also be dropped off at the Planning Department's offices at 131 W.
Margaret Lane, 2nd floor, Hillsborough, NC during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. Monday through Friday). If a staff member is not available, please leave your
comments in the drop-off box near the front counter. Written comments will be scanned and
sent by staff to the email address indicated above.
Verbal Public Comments
Members of the public must contact Planning Department staff via email at
ocpbpubliccomment(a�_orangecountync.gov no later than 3:00 p.m. on the afternoon of the
meeting and indicate they wish to speak during the meeting.
When submitting the request to speak, please include the following:
• The date of the meeting
• The title of the agenda item you wish to speak on
• Your name, address, email and phone number
o The phone number must be the number you will call in from if participating by
phone
During the meeting, speakers will be called upon in the order in which requests to speak
were received. Each speaker may speak once per agenda item and has 3 minutes to
address the board. Ceding time to another speaker is not permitted.
In the event a meeting is continued to a future date due to the length of public comments,
the date for the continued meeting will be announced before the meeting adjourns. No
additional requests to speak will be taken for the continued meeting, only the speakers who
signed up to speak at the original meeting and were not called upon will be able to speak at
the continued meeting. Written comments continue to be encouraged and can be sent to
the email address indicated in the "Written Public Comments" instructions above.
Zoom Meeting Registration
Both members of the public who wish to speak at the meeting and those who wish to only
view the meeting must register to receive a link to the meeting. Persons wishing to speak
must register with the same name provided in the email that notified staff you wish to speak.
The link to sign up for the meeting is:
https://orangecountync.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN MsKAPnpTT1 medZDN45vzgA
If you do not have internet access, you may participate in the meeting via phone. Please
call (919) 245-2575 during regular business hours to receive information on the number to
call-in to, the meeting ID, and a password.
Review Process
The Planning Board is an appointed volunteer advisory board which makes
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners (the elected officials). The Board
of County Commissioners holds a formal public hearing and makes decisions. Section 2.8
of the County's Unified Development Ordinance contains a flowchart depicting the entire
review process for rezoning and text amendment applications.
:\�I
5
1
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
BOCC Planning Board BOCC Budget
Business Meeting Work Session
Meeting 7:00 pm* 7:00 pm
7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
*Tentative*
Board of BOCC Budget BOCC Budget
Adjustment Public Hearing Work Session
7:00 pm 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
BOCC OUTBoard BOCC Budget
Business Meeting Work Session
Meeting 6:30 pm 7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
•
Notes:
*Planning Board Member Attendance Required
6
EW I W- oph§
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5
BOCC Planning Board BOCC Budget
Business Meeting Public Hearing
Meeting 7:00 pm* 7:00 pm
7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting
6 7 9 10 11 12
BOCC Budget
Work Session
7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting
13 14 16 17 18 1
Board of BOCC OUTBoard •
Adjustment Business Meeting
7:00 pm Meeting 6:30 pm
7:00 pm
Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting Virtual Meeting
20 21 23 24 25 26
27 28 30
Notes:
*Planning Board Member Attendance Required
7
DRAFT
1 MEETING MINUTES
2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
3 APRIL 7,2021
4 REGULAR MEETING
5 (Due to current public health concerns, this meeting was held virtually.
6 Members of the Planning Board, staff and public participated remotely)
7
8 MEMBERS PRESENT: David Blankfard (Chair), Hillsborough Township Representative; Adam Beeman (Vice-Chair), Cedar
9 Grove Township Representative; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Lamar Proctor, Cheeks Township
10 Representative; Randy Marshall, At-Large Representative; Alexandra Allman, At-Large Representative; Melissa Poole,
11 Little River Township Representative; Carrie Fletcher, Bingham Township Representative; Whitney Watson, At-Large
12 Representative; Charity Kirk,At-Large Representative
13
14 MEMBERS ABSENT:Glo Molllnedo,At-Large Representative, Kim Piracci, Eno Township Representative;
15
16 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator; Michael Harvey, Current
17 Planning Supervisor; Tina Love,Administrative Support
18
19 OTHERS PRESENT: Fiona Johann, Beth Bronson
20
21
22 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
23 Chair David Blankfard called the meeting to order.
24
25
26 AGENDA ITEM 2: INFORMATION ITEMS
27 a. Planning Calendar for April and May
28
29
30 AGENDA ITEM 3: INTRODUCTIONS—WITH THE ADDITION OF NEW MEMBERS TO THE BOARD, EACH PLANNING BOARD MEMBER
31 Will Be Asked To Introduce Themselves With A Brief Summary.
32
33 Each of the Planning Board members present introduced themselves to each other and gave some background
34 information
35
36
37 AGENDA ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF MINUTES
38 March 3, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
39 March 3, ORC Meeting Notes
40
41 MOTION BY Melissa Poole to approve the March 3, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes and ORC meeting notes. Seconded by
42 Randy Marshall.
43
44 ROLLCALL VOTE:
45 Lamar Proctor Yes
46 Susan Hunter: Yes
47 Charity Kirk Yes
48 Adam Beeman: Yes
49 Randy Marshall: Yes
50 Whitney Watson Yes
51 Alexandra Allman Yes
52 Melissa Poole: Yes
53 Carrie Fletcher Yes
54 David Blankfard: Yes
55 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
56
8
DRAFT
57
58 AGENDA ITEM 5: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA.
59
60 There were none
61
62
63 AGENDA ITEM 6: PUBLIC CHARGE
64
65 INTRODUCTION TO THE PUBLIC CHARGE
66 The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, appoints
67 the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB) to uphold the written land development law of the County.
68 The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and harmonious development.
69 OCPB shall do so in a manner, which considers the present and future needs of its citizens and
70 businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to and promotes the health, safety,
71 and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every effort to uphold a vision of responsive
72 governance and quality public services during our deliberations, decisions, and recommendations.
73
74 PUBLIC CHARGE
75 The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its citizens to
76 conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with fellow citizens. At
77 any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this public charge, the Chair will
78 ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual regains personal control. Should
79 decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment
80 to this public charge is observed.
81
82
83 AGENDA ITEM 7: CHAIR COMMENTS
84
85 There were none
86
87
88 AGENDA ITEM 8: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENTS—"160D"LEGISLATION —To make a
89 recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners on UDO text amendments related to State
90 legislation that is referred to as 160D(a reference to the statute section).The amendments are also
91 require changes to Appendix F of the Comprehensive Plan and to the Planning Board Rules of
92 Procedure. This item is scheduled for BOCC public hearing on May 4, 2021.
93 Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator
94
95 Perdita Holtz reminded the Board that the item was reviewed at the March 3, ORC meeting and at the conclusion of that
96 meeting the Board decided they did not need to see the presentation again. She reviewed the recommendations for the
97 Planning Board to consider.
98
99 Charity Kirk: I have a question about how you notify people; a half a page ad in a newspaper seems potentially ineffective
100 in this day of people not having newspapers subscriptions. I was wondering if you could talk about why that was chosen.
101
102 Perdita Holtz: We are not necessarily, choosing to do this. Currently, before 160D and for many years, statutes allowed
103 for local governments to place a half page ad in a paper for large scale amendments. Orange County never adopted that
104 provision. We have always done mailed notifications. However, our County Attorney's office feels that we need to include
105 the option in the UDO so that we are in conformance with the State regulations that allow local governments to do this.
106 We don't really anticipate that something like that would be used unless it's for a project that already had a public
107 participation component leading up to amendments so that people would be informed,they would already know that
108 something was going on.
109
110 Lamar Proctor: In terms of that notice, are these things put on the Orange County website? The notice in the newspaper
111 ad or the signage that appears next to parcels where there's a zoning amendment or letters, do those reference back to
112 the website. I have the same kind of concern that Charity has. I've looked at 160D and I know that it's an option for the 50
9
DRAFT
113 parcels or greater that you can do that with the newspaper. I guess the legislature thinks that people still get newspapers.
114 1 was wondering in terms of informational purposes whether we put that kind of stuff on the website.
115
116 Perdita Holtz: The Planning Department has a section on the website called Current Interest Projects where we put
117 projects that are currently being considered, not only for rezonings but also for Special Use Permits and things like Major
118 Subdivisions. When the notification letters go out, information is included in the letters on accessing the website to learn
119 more. Sometimes depending on the scope of the project, things go out in the weekly email that our Public Information
120 Officer does or depending on the scope of the project, he might also post something on Facebook.
121
122 Lamar Proctor: In terms of the days of notice, it's not more than 25 days and not less than 10. My concern is why can't
123 we just do 25? I've seen several examples of a 10 day notice for letters or whatever it is, it gets mailed on a Friday, postal
124 service has issues, people get it on a Thursday and then it references a meeting on a Monday or Tuesday. If they take a
125 long weekend then it's sorry, they don't know. I've seen examples in our community where people find out about things in
126 passing amongst neighbors and interested parties by a hair's breadth. So was there any talk or consideration of making it
127 the maximum that you are allowed, 25 days, to give people proper notice.
128
129 Perdita Holtz: We do almost always send out notices well in advance of 10 days. I think the County Attorney's office would
130 have a concern about saying we will do 25 days because statutes allow you to do 10 and they feel that our UDO should
131 conform to the language in the statutes. I also want to point out that Orange County sends out notices for the Planning
132 Board meeting which is not required by statutes,we send out meetings to property owners within 1000 feet of a parcel and
133 statutes require only abutting property owners be notified so Orange County already goes far beyond what statutes require
134 for notice. There would also be concerns about saying we are going to do 25 when we normally send them out about 15
135 days in advance because of the way our cycles work. There might be instances where an applicant is still trying to get
136 some things worked out and to hold up the notice because they were a day late from 25 days, as you suggest,would add
137 another month to the process.
138
139 Lamar Proctor: Personally, I'm looking at this as a community member, I would love to see it be at least 15 days. I think
140 the general language is notice shall be posted or mailed a minimum of 10 days prior. It's kind of permissive language,
141 meaning you can do it more. There were other notices,weren't there for 15 days?
142
143 Perdita Holtz: Yes,you can do it more than 10 days but it can't be more than 25 days in advance. Yes, I believe there
144 was one either for the Comp Plan or SUPs that required 15 days. We are now standardizing it all to be in conformance
145 with State statutes.
146
147 Lamar Proctor: I understand the conformity and I think the uniformity within our own UDO is to notice so you don't have to
148 say, it's 15 for this and 17 for that, 12 for that. That's ridiculous. My position is that I would like the minimum to be greater
149 than 10 days because I think there are instances where people don't get proper notice because of the timing of things.
150 That's one thought I had. My other concern was the exclusions being removed on page 158, 1 don't understand the history
151 of those exclusions. When I read about a non-residential Conditional Use District that is really a blank slate,other than
152 some limitations within the Rural Buffer,that combined with removing exclusions, makes me think that there could be a
153 Conditional District approved for a crematorium in somebody's backyard or something that clearly fell within the exclusions
154 previously and is now going to be game on for anything, anywhere other than what's specifically excluded in the NR-CD
155 list.
156
157 Perdita Holtz: I understand the concern but there's also another piece to the puzzle which is Appendix F of the
158 Comprehensive Plan that shows which land use classifications that NR-CD can be applied to. That is found on the very
159 last page of the amendment packet, page 348. NR-CD would be allowed for consideration in all of the land use
160 classifications because currently the Conditional Use District also is allowed for consideration in all those classifications. 1
161 understand that it is correct that you could now apply for these uses where previously,you could not. When Conditional
162 Use Districts were set up, at least in the '90s if not earlier,the people who set them up said we don't want these uses to be
163 considered.
164
165 Lamar Proctor: When I read this and I think about worst-case scenario, I see a 10-day notice requirement for a zoning
166 change with an NR-CD or Conditional District that allows anything. Anything is on the table unless it's in the Rural Buffer.
167 If there are a few landowners that are abutting or its homeowners that aren't concentrated around a parcel,they miss it
168 and they are out of luck.
10
DRAFT
169
170 Perdita Holtz: Conditional Districts, as they are now called, require a Neighborhood Information Meeting so there are
171 multiple steps that happen before notices for a Planning Board meeting or a Public Hearing ever goes out. For instance,
172 on page 68 there are the requirements for a Neighborhood Information Meeting for Conditional Districts. Notices for
173 Neighborhood Information Meetings are sent out 14 days prior and it is a 1,000 feet requirement and a sign is also
174 required to be posted on the property.
175
176 Lamar Proctor: My concern is notice, there are plenty of spots where notice gets sent but they seem to be shrinking under
177 these amendments. Is there a mechanism when there is an application for a zoning amendment that would include an
178 informational meeting in front of the County Commissioners prior to the Planning Board considering it? It feels like these
179 applications go out and come through the Planning Board and then we get surprised or even they get surprised at what is
180 being put in front of them. Is there any mechanism that could be initiated or put in place where there is an application and
181 then there is an informational session with the Board of Commissioners at a Public Hearing that says this is a zoning
182 change that's being applied for,the process has starting and we're letting you know this is coming and we are following the
183 process next where the Commissioners are put on notice and the public is put on notice. I feel like things kind of popped
184 up and then interested parties hear about them by word of mouth and I want to make sure the public is getting the proper
185 notice. Most people don't get newspapers anymore so those are some of my concerns regarding notice.
186
187 Michael Harvey: When an application is submitted, staff has five business days to determine sufficiency. Once it's
188 sufficient and formally accepted, that's when our internal clock for the UDO starts. There is an internal review by Planning
189 Department staff and other County staff through our Development Advisory Committee(DAC),we then schedule the
190 Neighborhood Information Meeting. With Conditional District applications,the Neighborhood Information Meeting is
191 required to occur in a set timeframe before Public Hearing. Notices of the Neighborhood Information Meeting are sent to
192 property owners within 1,000 feet. The notices have to be sent 14 days prior to the date of the Neighborhood Information
193 Meeting and we post signs on the property. After the Neighborhood Information Meeting it then goes to the Planning
194 Board and there is a separate mailing required for Conditional District applications before the Planning Board, not required
195 by State law but something the County is going to continue to do. After the Planning Board, there is a Public Hearing with
196 a separate advertising component. There are three public meetings, Neighborhood Information Meeting, Planning Board
197 meeting and Public Hearing with three separate advertisings for each application.As for an initial public review, at last
198 night's meeting,there was a petition submitted by a County Commissioner to study whether or not we need to amend the
199 Unified Development Ordinance to create a concept plan meeting where a conditional application would be reviewed by
200 the County Commissioners before a Neighborhood Information Meeting is scheduled to offer comments to the applicant.
201 That is in an infant stage in terms that we haven't been given formal direction by the BOCC to investigate that process but
202 it is something that is being discussed. It was looked at several years ago but we were not authorized to submit the formal
203 procedure to amend the UDO to include it but it is something the BOCC is tinkering with having us look at again.
204
205 Craig Benedict: It did come up last night and it will be referred to BOCC Chair/Vice-Chair to be discussed and will include
206 the County Manager/Deputy Manager and myself on what modifications could be necessary to have such a process. The
207 reason it wasn't followed through with before was in the interest to have as much technical input on an application to offer
208 to the applicant before someone looks at an application that might not be fully vetted. It may be part of our process that
209 after all the various departments, NCDOT, Emergency Services, Fire,everybody makes their comments, and we let
210 everybody know that we are looking at the aspects of an application. Then maybe there's another opportunity for the
211 public to see it sooner rather than later. It might not—they thought having an un-vetted project by all those different
212 internal agencies would make it look like the work was not being done.
213
214 Lamar Proctor: Board of Adjustment is appealed to Superior Court and does not go before the County Commissioners?
215
216 Perdita Holtz: Correct.
217
218 Lamar Proctor: The minimum 10 days and the removal of the exclusions is a huge deal and I question that. It seems to
219 be something that is part of the history of our UDO and now it's wide open and those exclusions are removed. Those are
220 my concerns.
221
222 Perdita Holtz: Maybe it would help you to know, all of these uses are allowed somewhere already they just weren't going
223 to be allowed as a Conditional Use District but they are allowed in certain Zoning Districts if you look in the Table of
11
DRAFT
224 Permitted Uses. It's not like these uses were not allowed anywhere, all of these use types occur in the Table of Permitted
225 Uses as allowed somewhere.
226
227 Lamar Proctor: For some specific zoning, all of it is allowed?
228
229 Perdita Holtz: Correct. These were not prohibited Countywide uses.
230
231 Lamar Proctor: I saw on Special Use Permits,the Planning Director is allowed to modify those by,there's a list,for minor
232 changes and I think that's under 2.7.14; how many times can an applicant come back for a minor modification like that?
233
234 Perdita Holtz: There isn't a limit to how many times they can come back but I will say, it's exceedingly rare.
235
236 Craig Benedict: In my 22 years, less than five times. It is exceedingly rare because our SUP conditions that are approved
237 are very finite and specific to the project.
238
239 Lamar Proctor: Asking directly about the 10 days, could we just make it 15 days? Is that crazy?
240
241 Perdita Holtz: The Planning Board could vote to recommend that it be 15 days and it could go to the Board of County
242 Commissioners as the Planning Board's recommendation.
243
244 Lamar Proctor: The exclusions used to apply to Conditional Districts and the new LIDO would remove that exclusion list,
245 correct?
246
247 Perdita Holtz: It used to apply to Conditional Use Districts which no longer are allowed to be a zoning mechanism in North
248 Carolina. The whole construct of Conditional Use Districts is gone.
249
250 Lamar Proctor: Under 1.6.2 that whole section was stricken and I think the footnote says it's in policy documents, does
251 taking that out of the UDO change it in substantive way?
252
253 Perdita Holtz: No, unless you consider that changing it would currently require a UDO text amendment whereas changing
254 it in the future would only require an amendment to the Planning Board Rules of Procedures.
255
256 Craig Benedict: When the UDO was developed there was no separate policy mechanism for the advisory boards and over
257 the last 10 years the Commissioners and Attorneys' Office have put together policies for each of the advisory boards.
258
259 Lamar Proctor: Who can make the Planning Board amendments? If it's just a policy?
260
261 Perdita Holtz: It could start with staff,the Planning Board, or BOCC but the BOCC has to approve it.
262
263 Lamar Proctor: I would love to see that 10 days become 15 days, that's a motion by me. Instead of a uniform 10 days
264 make it a uniform 15 days.
265
266 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to require 15 days instead of 10 days for mailings. Seconded by Alexandra Allman.
267
268 Lamar Proctor Yes
269 Charity Kirk No
270 Adam Beeman: No
271 Carrie Fletcher No
272 Whitney Watson No
273 Randy Marshall: No
274 Susan Hunter: No
275 Alexandra Allman Yes
276 Melissa Poole: No
277 David Blankfard: No
278 MOTION FAILED 8—2
279
12
DRAFT
280 Whitney Watson: I want to go back to the notice question, especially any kind of posted signage,while the UDO had
281 plenty of places where it's very prescriptive, I'd like to add one more. Signage that's posted in a yard or the right-of-way
282 needs to meet standards for legibility and readability just like we expect billboards to be able to be read when someone is
283 driving by at 35 mph. There are a number that pop up around that western side of Orange County that I just can't read. If
284 that could somehow be specified. I'm sure the DOT folks could tell you how big the letters need to be to be seen at various
285 speed limits.
286
287 Perdita Holtz: If I could address that, the County does attempt to put a lot of information on those signs. I don't know if
288 you have seen other places in North Carolina where you'll see an 8'h x 11 yellow sign that just has a Z on it,which means
289 zoning, and it has the phone number for the planning department. That is how a lot of places advertise that something is
290 happening on the property. We could go to something like that. Having a sign with all the information that we attempt to
291 put on it could result in a 4 ft. by 8 ft. sign and staff puts those up and staff does it in a County vehicle or personal vehicle
292 and that would be pretty big to fit into those vehicles. If there is a general feeling that the sign needs to be larger,we
293 would need to take a look how much we actually try to put on the sign and whether we should try to emulate the Z signs
294 that so many other places use.
295
296 Craig Benedict: Maybe with a website address and a phone number and then with the big Z. That is what people are
297 using now for information gathering.
298
299 Adam Beeman: Maybe not even a bigger sign but taller poles to stand it on so it isn't so low to the ground. That may help
300 visibility.
301
302 Whitney Watson: I would be in favor of less information that is more readable and getting it up higher would be great.
303
304 Lamar Proctor: I agree with Whitney and I think this dovetails into my initial question about putting stuff on the website. 1
305 think it gives better notice to people to have a big Z and say look there's something going on, go here and you can read
306 about it. You're trying to put as much information as you can and I think the big point of the sign is to put people on notice
307 that something is going on. They are not going to get the details from their car but they will get the notice if it's a larger Z
308 than if it's a small signer that could be easily be confused with a work permit or something.
309
310 Perdita Holtz: Understood, the current way it came to be is because people complained that there wasn't enough
311 information on the sign and they had to go somewhere else.
312
313 David Blankfard: Can you also put the date of whatever is going to happen, like on April 10, 2021 and then people will
314 know something is happening that day and go find out what it is.
315
316 Michael Harvey: Just to remind the Planning Board that there are statutory minimum requirements you have to post the
317 date,time, location and nature of a public hearing. The problem is getting all that on a sign that the Department of
318 Transportation won't rip down. In the 16 or so years I've been here,we have attempted numerous different sign options
319 and as Craig and Perdita can attest,we've had several sign taken by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
320 over the years. We even had signs removed as part of the Efland Station project because the Department of
321 Transportation said they were too high or were too large and violated their sign policy. We have multiple avenues for
322 information being provided to local residents on the numerous projects that are reviewed by both the Planning Board and
323 the County Commissioners. We've been tasked with studying the issue again and we will do so. I'm not sure we can
324 come up with accommodations that will address everybody's concerns.
325
326 Carrie Fletcher: Since we have a lot of new members, can we go back to having the pre-meeting training sessions to help
327 get people more information on the conditional, non-conditional and some of the new terminology. Those kind of pre-
328 meeting instructional programs for people to learn some of the idiosyncrasies of the Planning Board.
329
330 Perdita: Holtz: Yes,what I did was a series of training sessions which I was planning to start again since we do have new
331 members. That's something that I'll look at doing,as soon as the 160D amendments are adopted. I want be able to give
332 the correct information.
333
13
DRAFT
334 MOTION by Whitney Watson to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency,the LIDO Amendments and the
335 Amendments to the Planning Board Rules of Procedure. as proposed by Planning Staff to forward to the Board of County
336 Commissioners for review and consideration. Seconded by Randy Marshall.
337
338 Lamar Proctor Yes
339 Charity Kirk Yes
340 Adam Beeman: Yes
341 Carrie Fletcher Yes
342 Whitney Watson Yes
343 Randy Marshall: Yes
344 Susan Hunter: Yes
345 Melissa Poole: Yes
346 Alexandra Allman Yes
347 David Blankfard: Yes
348 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
349
350 Craig Benedict gave the Board information about the Joint project with the City of Mebane on the study done by the
351 Piedmont-Triad Regional Council of Governments for the Buckhorn Area Plan to examine if there is viability for additional
352 Economic Development Zones and/or the viability of the existing zones. There will be upcoming meetings and an
353 outreach program that is likely to be scheduled for May 2021.
354
355 Randy Marshall: The Feds are thinking about changing zoning procedures because they felt in the past they have been
356 exclusionary to some and I didn't know if there was anything there that might filter down to us that we would need to take
357 into account of if you are familiar with it.
358
359 Craig Benedict: We'll monitor,we have heard chatter about the regulations both at the State level and the Federal level.
360 When they become law,we'll have to address how it affects our LIDO.
361
362 Whitney Watson: I was looking at a project being proposed around Mebane recently and it in there was information where
363 the Planning Department had considered the availability of sewer and water. With the current emphasis on broadband, it
364 seems like this would be a good opportunity for the Planning Department to ask the proposed developer how will they
365 provide access to broadband for all the residents within a new development and perhaps even adjacent properties.
366
367 Craig Benedict: The County has a program to try to get broadband penetration in rural areas and I agree that we should
368 work with developers too. They can help plug the holes that our master plan does not. I'll get a report about what we are
369 doing in the rural areas and then tie that into our interest to have the development community assist in that expansion. 1
370 think that is a good comment and I agree.
371
372
373 AGENDA ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT
374 Meeting was adjourned by consensus at 8:17 p.m.
375
376
377
378
379 David Blankfard, Chair
14
15
ORANGE COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: May 5, 2021
Action Agenda
Item No. 7
SUBJECT: Major Subdivision Concept Plan Application - Pyewacket
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections
ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Application Molly Boyle, Planner II (919) 245-2599
2. Site Assessment and Vicinity Maps Michael Harvey, Planner III (919) 245-2597
Craig Benedict, Director (919) 245-2592
3. Concept Plan (Orange County)
4. Concept Plan (Chatham County)
5. Public Meeting Materials and Notes
6. ITE Trip Generation Report
7. Staff Comments and Correspondence
PURPOSE: To review and take action on a Concept Plan application proposing a Flexible
Development Major Subdivision, referred to as the Pyewacket Subdivision, straddling the Orange-
Chatham County line within the Bingham Township.
As detailed in the submittal (Attachment 1), the applicant proposes to subdivide a 70.79 acre parcel
(PIN 9757-51-3504) within Orange County to create two (2) parcels, specifically an 11.24 acre parcel
and a 59.55 acre parcel.
The 11.24 acre parcel will be part of the Pyewacket Subdivision, a 93 lot single-family residential
subdivision proposed on 128.39 acres within Chatham County's planning jurisdiction. The remaining
59.55 acre parcel in Orange County is not part of the project (i.e., it will be a separate lot).
BACKGROUND: Per Section 7.2 Subdivisions- Classification of Subdivisions of the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), this Concept Plan application must go through the Major
Subdivision review process as it proposes development of a new public road, Pyewacket Trail. The
application is being reviewed in accordance with Section 2.15 Procedures- Major Subdivisions of the
UDO. The basic facts of the application are as follows:
Owner: Dr. Wyndell Merritt
7601 N. Courthouse Road
New Kent, VA 23124
Applicant: Warren Mitchell, PE
104 Amber Wood Run
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Developer: Griffith Capital, LLC
11312 US 15-501 N, Suite 107, Box 106
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
16
Consultant: Soil and Environmental Consultants
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Surveyor: Puckett Surveyors
1555 NC 56, Suite B2
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Location: The parcel is south of the junction of Jones Ferry Road and Ferguson
Road and straddles the Orange-Chatham County line. See the Site
Assessment and Vicinity Maps in Attachment 2.
Parcel Information (Orange County
a. PIN: 9757-51-3504
b. Size: 70.79 acres
c. Zoning: Agricultural Residential (AR), Haw River Protected
Watershed Overlay District
d. Township: Bingham
e. School District: Orange County Schools
f. Future Land Use Map Designation: Agricultural Residential
g. Growth Management System Designation: Rural Designated
h. Existing Conditions/Physical Features: The 70.79 acre parent
tract does not have steep slopes (i.e., slopes over 15% grade).
The proposed 11.24 acre project site has a high point of
approximately 538' and a low point of approximately 508'.
The parent tract is fully wooded with several jurisdictional
streams. Based on the preliminary Site Assessment staff
prepared (Attachment 2), the County will require 65' stream
buffers on both sides of these streams. Buffers are measured
from the top of the bank on both sides of the stream. The
Concept Plan denotes wetland areas as well.
i. Roads: The parcel has approximately 2,500 ft. of frontage on
Jones Ferry Road. The proposed public road, Pyewacket Trail,
would access Jones Ferry Road. Pyewacket Trail is the only
proposed means of ingress/egress for the Pyewacket
subdivision. The 128.39 acre parcel proposed for development in
Chatham County is landlocked.
j. Water and Sewer Service: The property is not located within a
primary utility service area. It is designated as "OWASA Long-
Term Interest Area" on the Water and Sewer Management
Planning and Boundary Agreement. The entire Pyewacket
project proposes three community wells, one of which is
17
proposed in Orange County. The applicant is proposing septic
systems in Chatham.
Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses:
a. NORTH: Single-family residential subdivision, Turkey Run. The
subdivision is split-zoned AR and RB (Rural Buffer). Lots adjacent
to the subject parcel are zoned AR.
b. SOUTH: Undeveloped acreage in Chatham County, which the
applicant is proposing to develop as the 93-lot subdivision,
Pyewacket. The Morgan Ridge subdivision in Chatham County is to
the southwest.
c. EAST: Undeveloped 119 acre parcel zoned AR.
d. WEST: Single-family residential subdivision, The Enclave at Jones
Ferry. All lots zoned AR.
PROPOSAL: The Concept Plan proposes two lots in Orange County, specifically an 11.24 acre
parcel and a 59.55 acre parcel. The 11.24 acre parcel involves the following:
• Preservation of 9.24 acres of land as dedicated Common Open Space,
• Location/development of a community well, and
• Development of a new public road, Pyewacket Trail, serving the proposed 93-lot single-
family residential subdivision within Chatham County.
STAFF COMMENT.-At this time, there are no single-family residential parcels
proposed within Orange County. Please refer to Attachment 3 for the Concept Plan for
the 11.24 acre parcel within Orange County.
The portion of the Pyewacket subdivision proposed within Chatham County, currently under review
in Chatham, contains 128.39 acres of land and is proposed to be subdivided to create 93 individual
parcels for development of single-family residences. Density for the proposed development in
Chatham County is 1 dwelling per 1.38 acres of land area. Attachment 4 contains a rendering of the
Concept Plan for the proposed development in Chatham County.
STAFF COMMENT.-As previously indicated, our review of the proposal is predicated
on the development of a new public roadway within Orange County's planning
jurisdiction. If a public road were not proposed, it would not be reviewed through the
Major Subdivision process.
Roads: The applicant proposes development of a new public road, Pyewacket Trail, in Orange
County to serve the 93 proposed lots in Chatham County. NC DOT will review the proposal to
ensure roadway design meets its standards for State maintenance.
STAFF COMMENT.-The proposed public road within Orange County is the only
means of ingress/egress to serve the development.
NC DOT review and approval is not required at the Major Subdivision Concept Plan
phase. NC DOT's analysis, however, is required during Preliminary Plat review. The
Orange County Fire Marshal's Office has confirmed that the proposed road meets
emergency access requirements. See Attachment 7 for the Fire Marshal's comments.
18
After the Neighborhood Information Meeting, staff recommended that the applicant
submit trip generation data for the subdivision. Although not required for the Concept
Plan application, staff suggested that the data could help facilitate discussion about
traffic at the Planning Board meeting. See Attachment 6 for the applicant's ITE Trip
Generation Report.
Utilities: The Pyewacket project proposes three community wells, one of which is proposed in
Orange County. The proposed location is shown on the Concept Plan in Attachment 3.
According to the NC Department of Environmental Quality, its Public Water Supply Section must
review and permit public water systems. Public water systems are those that provide piped
drinking water to:
a) At least 15 connections, or
b) 25 or more people for 60+ days per year.
At this time, the community well proposed in Orange County is projected to serve approximately
31 lots (1/3 of the Pyewacket subdivision). Permitting of the well will go through the NC
Department of Environmental Quality, not Orange County Environmental Health. The application
in Chatham County proposes individual septic systems to serve proposed lots. No septic
systems are proposed in Orange County.
STAFF COMMENT: Approval of proposed well and septic areas typically occurs
during the Preliminary Plat review process as detailed within the UDO. Orange
County will have no regulatory/permit authority on well/septic systems developed
within Chatham County.
Stormwater Drainage: Overall drainage will be engineered according to applicable standards
when the applicant submits for development permits. The property is subject to adopted
erosion control and stormwater management guidelines.
STAFF COMMENT: Staff of the Orange County Erosion Control and Stormwater
Division did not identify any concerns with the proposed Concept Plan.
Open Space: Of the 11.24 acre parcel proposed as part of the project, 82% (9.24 acres) is proposed
to be Common Open Space, preserved through a conservation easement or other restrictions as
required by Section 7.12 Flexible Developments of the UDO. The Pyewacket Homeowners'
Association would own and maintain the open space.
The Concept Plan proposes both Primary and Secondary Open Space, specifically:
o Primary Open Space:4.24 acres, or 45.89% of the total proposed Common Open
Space. This area includes streams, required buffers, and wetland areas. Primary
Open Space areas are those that have sensitive environmental features or cultural
resource areas. These areas are for passive or low-impact uses (e.g., forests,
pastures, trails, nature observation).
o Secondary Open Space: 5 acres, or 54.11% of the total proposed Common Open
Space. Secondary Open Space areas do not have sensitive environmental or cultural
features and can support more active uses if desired (e.g., playground, clubhouse).
STAFF COMMENT: Staff has determined that the proposal meets the open space
requirements as detailed in UDO Section 7.12.
19
Land Use Buffers/Setbacks: The Concept Plan for Orange County does not propose structures or
habitable lots, so building setbacks and land use buffers do not apply. However, of the 11.24 acre lot
proposed as part of the Pyewacket subdivision, the majority (82%, 9.24 acres) is proposed as
Common Open Space. See the Concept Plan in Attachment 3.
STAFF COMMENT.- For public water system wells, the State requires a 100' setback
from the well. This setback is denoted on the Concept Plan.
PROCESS, SCHEDULE, AND ACTION: The UDO requires the following process for Major
Subdivision Flexible Development applications:
1. Neighborhood Information Meeting: Staff held this meeting on April 20, 2021. Please
refer to Attachment 5 for meeting materials and notes.
2. Planning Board (Concept Plan): The Planning Board reviews and takes action on the
Concept Plan application. This review begins on May 5, 2021.
The Concept Plan review is intended to allow Board members and the applicant to
discuss the proposal and identify possible solutions to any concerns with the proposed
plan. If approved, the Concept Plan serves as a "roadmap" for the applicant in
preparing their Preliminary Plat application submittal.
3. Planning Board (Preliminary Plat): Once a Concept Plan is approved, the applicant
submits a Preliminary Plat application to Planning staff. The Planning Board reviews
and makes a recommendation on the approval of the Preliminary Plat.
4. BOCC: The BOCC reviews and takes action on the Preliminary Plat application.
5. Final Plat: Once all construction is completed or appropriate bonds have been
approved, staff coordinates the recordation of a Final Plat legally creating the proposed
lots.
PUBLIC NOTICE: UDO Section 2.15.2 requires that staff mail letters to property owners within
1,000 feet of the subject property to notify them of the Neighborhood Information and Planning
Board meetings. Staff is required to post notification signs on the subject property as well. Staff
mailed notices and posted the subject property as required. See Attachment 5 for meeting
correspondence and staff's mailing/sign certifications.
Staff held the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on April 20, 2021. Ten residents,
Planning staff, and the applicant attended the meeting. See Attachment 5 for notes from the
meeting.
ANALYSIS: UDO Section 2.15.2 (E) requires that the Planning Director prepare and submit a
recommendation on the Concept Plan to the Planning Board for consideration. The Planning
Director offers the following information, analysis, and recommendation:
1. The application has been deemed complete in accordance with the requirements of UDO
Sections 2.2 and 2.15.2;
2. The County is, essentially, being asked to approve development of a new public road to
serve a residential development within Chatham County. Similar proposals have been
reviewed and approved by the County in the past for developments within both Durham
and Chatham counties;
20
3. Staff has determined that the proposal complies with UDO subdivision regulations found
in Article 2 Procedures and Article 7 Subdivisions.
4. The proposal appears consistent with the various goals of the Orange County
Comprehensive Plan concerning development, including:
a. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and
designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities
sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy
consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives.
b. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental
conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and
community character.
c. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program
and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes
land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system.
5. Staff supports the approval of the Concept Plan using the Flexible Development option as
detailed in the submitted Concept Plan and application materials.
Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the
Concept Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff has determined the project would not require augmentation of
County budgetary outlays.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Director recommends the Board:
1. Receive the Planning Director's report and recommendation,
2. Consider the Major Subdivision Concept Plan for the Pyewacket Subdivision, and
3. Take action on this proposal in one of the following ways:
a. Approve the Concept Plan
b. Approve the Concept Plan with Conditions
c. Deny the Concept Plan
21
Orange County Planning & Inspections Department
rR A A tre CO ��+�-Y 931 W. Margaret Lane,Suite 200, Hillsborough, NC 27278 • 919-245-2575
N0 VUC V0V1-tl Major Subdivision — Concept Plan Application
If completing by hand, please use black or i-ik.
Date: February 4,2021
CONTACT
1)r-
Property awner(s): Wyndell H. Merritt
Mailing Address: 7601 N. Courthouse Road Phone:
huntpeck@msn.com
Kent, Va 23124 E-mai[: tpeck@msn.com
Applicant(if different than property owner): Warren Mitchell
Mailing Address: 104 Amber Wood Run Phone: 919-593-1916
Chapel Hill,NC 27516 E-mail: warrendmitchellpe@gmail.com
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Parcel ID Number(PIN); 9757513504 Existing Structures? Yes ❑ No IGy
Location (Road Name): off]ones Ferry Road If yes, please list existing structures below:
Total Acreage: 11.4 ac of 70.79 acres total parcel
Zoning District. AR
Watershed:. Haw River Protected
Streams on lot? Yes No ❑
Floodplain on lot? Yes No ❑
SUBDIVISION INFORMATION NA
/.L'Z[7
Proposed Number of Lots: Water Supply: Well ❑ Public ❑ Community❑
New private road proposed? Yes ❑ NoC9 Wastewater: N Septic ❑Public ❑ Community ❑
If existing road, how many lots are using it?
Public road proposed? Yes N No ❑
TURN PAPER OVER
22
OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition to this application, please submit the following:
• A sketch vicinity map showing the location of the subdivision in relation to the existing street or highway system, which
can also be a GIS Map showing the surrounding area;
• A scaled copy of the Orange County GIS Map showing Contour Lines, Sails, Water Features, and any known
easements;
■ 25 Physical copies and 1 electronic copy of the Concopt Plan map, completed by a registered land surveyor, drawn to
scale containing the information required in Section 7.13,2 Major Subdivisions of the UDO (attached)
Application review fee per the adopted Orange County Planning Fee Schedule,
NOTE ON SUBDIVIDING FARM PROPERTIES
If the property to be subdivided is currently under farm use value taxation, please contact the Orange County Tax Office at
919-245-2100. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under farm use value taxation.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge the information contained above, and in the supporting documents, is a factual
representation of the proposed development.
I acknowledge that by signing this application, the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department is authorized,
pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. Section 153a-360, to make as many inspections of the subject property as may be necessary to
verify that the proposed work outlined herein is consistent with the provisions of all applicable State and local laws,
ordinances, and regulations.
By signing this application, I acknowledge and agree that inspectors, zoning officers, erosion control officers, and other staff
of the Orange County Planning & Inspections Department have a right, upon presentation of proper credentials, to access
the subject property at a reasonable hour for the purposes of inspection or other enforcement action,
Warren Mitchell
❑WN SIGNATURE(S) APPLICANT SIGNATURE (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNED)
February 4, 2021
DATE DATE
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIVED: Date By
FEES PAID,. Date Amount Receipt#
23
Orange County
57337L /�L 9 7 5743 3 53c 5753
s 57531 � 1 9757538511 544
9757430306 e
'743931
5 957534287
57336 9 574362 0
_ 975 521985
9757328971 9757434D43
757421800
975742868
9757421362 ,
9757425463+
574242
5�3225�
in
a
z
550 975742 67
9757618816
IL �WOMBLE IRIS M
9757315790 MER RITT WYN D ELL H lz 9757513504 �
9757306877
eg
5741213
i
�o
97573 1 9190
9757403964
9757402737 0 �A$
n ` d
to
March 5, 2021 1:4,800
0 0.04 0.08 0.16 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
24
Orange County
,`'' 41 r75 . y 764344 75 T x
4� 'i 9 5744 7 5744r97 744 14 I
57345E 54 l 97 76597 r14
9 573471 7 7574492 9 7547 96 97 646 85
975-1 243� 9757445058 575420 577399
-- 757535
97 7436 575317- r 577338
75X 97 7437 02 -
975�33561 7435 64 - 575376
9 573376 4
75 437 353 9 5753 4
ww %11% v 57538511
r 9 7531 42
975743030U 1 I. )I l) 5
- f Cl 15.
e 97 743 95 / 975753428
975733600997 743 70 975 17051
9757434 57521 85
9 '5732397
9757421800
9757428684
9757322597 975742136 U
� 1 74}546
"hlOMBLE ISM 9
K2 TCWERS LLG- 7424
O
4210 9757618816
MERRITTVVYNDELL H 540
9757315790 97575 3504u�
7213 . 6
_ Q
f
1 104 '* n7 7412
��731313
-.31 0 .�
o �
_ 757406��u
9757
8 324
75746737
9 70
9 7705
77034 6
577097 7705
565
March 5, 2021 1:7,200
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 km
25
PIN LAST NAME FIRST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPCODE SIZE Zonings
9757534287 &ETNA PIESCHACON PEDRO QUIBRERA 3607 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.84 AR
9757412139 &JUSTIN KOSAK D.KHAMPHASONG 2741 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.27 AR
9757421067 A.SORDEAN-MINTZER E.MINTZER& 3907 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 3.64 AR
9757425463 ATWATER ETAL JOANN&KENNETH 1011 NICKELBY STREET DURHAM NC 27703 3.92 AR
9757402737 BACA JAMES A 2750 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.92 AR
9757538511 BOOHER ADAM&HELEN 3515 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.84 AR
9757531442 CENCI JANICE S 3608 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165594 1.95 AR
9757535826 CHRISTOPHER DANKU MIRANDA& 3515 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165593 1.98 AR RB
9757537618 HAINES CHARLES&MELISSA 3510 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165592 2.19 AR
9757424223 HUGH TILSON GAYLIA HARRY& 3819 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275149381 2.26 AR
9757547296 JORDAN BETTY J 201 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.04 AR RB
9757521985 KATHLEEN HOLT JAMES PUTMAN& 3701 JONES FERRY ROAD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 5.35 AR
9757319190 LINVILLE RICHARD&TENA 2729 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.51 AR
9757315790 LTD PARTNERSHIP EVERETT PROPERTIES 2812 ERWIN RD SUITE 205 DURHAM NC 27705 22.504 AR
9757306877 LUCE CURTIS&CELESTINE 2720 KIERAN DR CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 5.26 AR
9757533544 LUCY HARBER TRUSTEE JOHN TULLO& 3520 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 1.31 AR
9757403964 M.V.MONTENEGRO RODRIGO SARRIA& 2761 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.16 AR
9757513504 MERRITT WYNDELL H 7601 N COURTHOUSE RD NEW KENT VA 23124 70.79 AR
9757428684 SEAMAN GUNTHER 3719 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275165591 6.07 AR
9757421362 SEMELKA RICHARD C 3901 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 5.207 AR
9757642045 TAYLOR CLIFTON LINWOOD 43 HICKORY POINT EXTENSION HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 2.44 AR RB
9757644050 VERONICA PFLUEGER STEPHEN TUTTLE& 3433 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516 2.25 AR
9757618816 WOMBLE IRIS M 311 PINERIDGE DR WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104 119.73 AR
26
PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Current Planning 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919)245- ORANGE COUNTY Suite 1
(919)644-3002 3002 P.O. Box 818181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
BILLING CONTACT
WARREN MITCHELL
104 Amber Wood Run
Chapel Hill, Nc 27516
INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION
INV-00013412 03/5/2021 03/5/2021 Due NONE
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL
SUB21-0017 CP Mailing Fee $23.00
CP Major Subdivision—Concept Plan Staff Review $310.00
CP Sign Posting(F) $30.00
SUB TOTAL $363.00
REMITTANCE INFORMATION
Orange County Planning&Inspections
131 W. Margaret Lane
P.O.Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
If mailing in your payment, please be sure to include the
reference number(SUB21-0017 ) on your check.
rpt_ALL_OC_ALL_InvoiceData 2021.3
Report created:3/5/2021 3:24,01 PM
Site Assessment for PIN: Land Disturbance Thresholds: 27
Site Data:
Notes:
1)Private Road Justifications,Recorded Declarations,Restrictive Covenants,Bona Fide
Farm status,use and building type(e.g.duplex units)will change subdivision and
development requirements.
Zoning Requirements:
2)Wetlands data is taken from Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
United States.U.S.Department of the Interior,Fish and Wildlife Service and does not
constitute a formal delineation(i.e.survey)of the property.All wetland areas are
approximate.
3)Flood boundaries are subject to change based on periodic amendments to flood maps.
Determination is based on current,best available,data.
4)This does not constitute a formal land survey.
Environmental Features:
University Lake y s�
6�� 66a Protected
Watershed
Soil: HrB so
Soil• HrC
696
6yq, ss6 6��` 6yA Soil:Or
6„�0 646 Soil• I g6�
<' Soil:Tau _.
6� '1
632 ., �` gg2 568
R
0 604 6 582 "�' h3
� 0?
h oNo � 572 R'O
p ch 580 �` O
600 hr �30 �o
�ry c Soil: HrB y3�` gA2
h ►� S �ti
Soil: HrC SO h�n,0 Soil:Or
�$ AR
558 Haw River s
Protected So
6 Watershed �6
0
Flood Panel:
9746J
Soil: IrB y�A Soil•Ch
M�
h
S36
S38
552
N � il• IrB
Soil:GeB h h� 51,6
Soil:ApB 0
Soil: HrC
R> � 60ti 600
S
Easements ED
N
LINE CODE
28
Vicinity Map
Soil: EnB
University Lake 4
Protected Watershed soil:ApB 1
HrB
oil: HrC Soil:
Soil:Ch FgSySl Soil:ApC
RB Soil: HrB
f CE
- t
voikl Soil: h11
__. .. y
O '
R
•s, � Soil:TaD "' ,R�'
Soil:Tal) 1 O
• vASCE S�f �� �� "" �'
SRCr
Soil: HrC ae•=� ��
r
Soil: HrB
ray, �(� '�t � ','..r$
„ n
r
Soil:Or
Soil:TaE
b-
Soil.
AR �+
x
Soil• HrC ff� cG
Haw River
Protected � ��r, �! �,x � _ �`�, '• ;
Watershed soil•c � �' �'.�� � ��"
-y
il• IrB
Soil• Ir
Soil:G-B
9. Soil:ApB
'roc Soil•WmC
R
J
PIN#:9757513504
WYNDELL H MERRITT Data shown on this map is obtained from Orange County
GIs and is for reference only.
Exact locations and boundaries should be verified.
7601 N COURTHOUSE RD w; Map prepared by Orange County Planning&Inspections.
NEW KENT,VA 23124 04/25/2021-mboyle
Easements —USGS Stream Streets N
LINE CODE —•Soils Survey Stream OZoning
_ I-
Road Easement
OC Updated Stream 0 Water Body 1 inch=500feet
Soils [:3ParcelS Watershed 0 130 260
Feet
29
GgntherBeaman �� Pyewacket subdivision
PIN:Oa 159-8684 SITE DATA
OB/591
PG 567 CONCEPT PLAN
Owner: Wyndell H.Merritt flexible development
Joann and Kenneth Atwater Address: Jones Ferry Road
PIN:9757-42-5463 Parcel PIN:9757-51-3504 major subdivision
DEW
PG 485 DB 5914,P 252
Gaylia Hany and Hugh eons Q EX.POWER POLE(TYP) Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat
Richard Semelka PIN:9757-02-0223 •PB 39-145
\•\ PIN.9757-42-1362 DB730 / • Zoning:AR Orange and Chatham Counties NC
• Parcel Size(parent): 70.788 acres
\ PGP89 PG 141 s�,i , 10'x 70'SIGHT TRANGLE February 19.2021 (revised April 9,2021)
ry; • Proposed Subdivision including JFR r/w=+/-11.58 acres(504,316 sf)
9 0 Proposed Subdivision excluding JFR r/w=+/-11.24 ac(489,589 sf)
\ •\ % :s Length of road: +/-1450 LF(60'public r/w) ma
Area within Pyewacket Trail r/w:+/-2.0 ad(87,043 sf)
Eliotand Andrea Miner / PROPOSED COMMUNITY . All land will become open ace and owned b the HOA S-
` PIN:9757-42-1067 I— _/ P p Y °e
DB 4457 / WELL LOCATION • Steep slopes:0 acres(no slopes over 15%grade) mP,
` PG 474 // �� / • Soil types: Iredell,Georgeville,Chewacla
�•. / / \ �/' :?;:; Watershed: Haw River Protected Carrboro
\ `�—1DoltSy / I Township: Bingham site
Everett Prop.Limited Ptnrshlp •,•\` 'a•-
PIN:9 75 7-31-5 790 _,.p'. / OPEN SPACE CALCULATION Orange County
DB ry
PG 586 �,o Primary Open Space Areas(yellow shading)
•• , o Stream Buffers+Wetlands:+/-4.24 acres(184,670sf)
/ •`\7�,- ` Secondary Open Space Areas(pink shading) a Chatham
/cafe \N•`, �z. ' c'Yi I w g property: +/-5.0 acres(217,440sf) Q.o° County
Proposed Road
ON,• 1_,, g Remainin right-of-wav Fe
gI f Pyewacket Trail: +1-2.0 acres(87,043sf) ores
Curtis and Celestine Luca. _ - z TOTAL FOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORANGE COUNTY
PIN:9757-30-6877 \7, o v. I
DB 6269 r I 100%Open Space
/ PG35 ;� I �� Vicinity Map
Lot 1 '`, t. :
The (septic field) i' :: tiff :::•
LEGEND
Enclave I
L°`5 Subdivision ` \ ,I.....
I �. t Primary Open Space
(existing) (Orange County)
Lot z �r• I l
`'` Secondary Open Space
/ onovan Khamphason (septic) I I �� 1- Developer Environmental consultant
and Justin Kosak I / I and County)
PIN:9757-41-2139 I k •/ ' Griffith Capital LLC Soil and Environmental Consultants
i / P Proposed Conservation Space
DB 6324 / 11312 US 15-501 N 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104
Richard and Tens Linville PG 402 �/I i J;\ Suite 107; BOX 106 Raleigh,NC 27615 (Chatham County)
PIN:9757-31-9190 Lot 4 //; \ Chapel Hill,NC 27517 ball-691-2114 Perennial Streams
D86649 Lot3 'X ' P 919-691-2114 ,,1^"
PG 1959 ' _ CAf?�� ''•,,
J ! . C�� Intermittent Streams
Rodrigo Sarria i
/ sprveyor :`c ems, �y Wetlands
Maria Victoria Montenegro /' Civil Engineer r�r Of 01;•.
PIN:975740-3964 5 9 --
DB 6617 / Wyndell H Merritt Puckett Surveyors Warren D.Mitchell,PE ° s c Stream Buffer/� i PIN:975751-3504 1555 NC 56 Suite B2 104 Amber Wood Run
PG 412 z / DB 5914 Chapel Hill,NC 27516 22547 J
i
Lot 1 James Baca - i \' PG 252 Creedmoor,NC 27522 warrendmitohell i.com- F'YGINEE�'•�'
\r 919-528-8900 PeQgmai % •.,• N
PIN:9757-'02737 ,A \-��i :� 200 0 200
DB 6262 - 919-593-1916 "V
Lot z
Oran e PG3 ssra.07 w I' ` a/e/21 1„ = 200'
g unty \r GRAPHIC SCALE
Chath m - 60'PUBUCRIGHT-OFWAY
County -
27.956 f°t° - g•.0^ PO.EPAVEDROAOWAY
Lot 7
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH
J.Fuller Homes,LLC f / \ \ /T - -__ 0,� 6.az o.oz 0.08
AKPAR y—/ / _ _ C ✓y �pP�
PIN:DB 2 60--2737 / / / - A 2"se.5s surtace course
PG 1023 / / � � P� 10•ABc easecourse
Typical 20'Edge to Edge Section(nts)
Plan prapared 6y: `o\ pyewacket subdivision
30
Warren D.Mitchell,PE SITE DATA
104 Amber Wood Run \, Concept plan
Chapel Hill,NC 27516 Owner:Wyndell H.Merritt
rt ndmi[chellpe chatham county, nc Address:Jones Ferry Road
919-593-1916 ` 1 1
. Parcel ID:90267
g\` December 28, 2020 Zoning:R1
ob r'^' Parcel Size: 138.4 acres
250 0 250 500 �o \`•�'� Orange County=10.01 acres
,\, proposed lots=0
1" = 500' Fm / Chatham County:(gross ac)=128.391 acres
GRAPHIC SCALE ! f Floodplain=0.95 acres
Streams=0.24 acres
The m \ total lots allowed:
Enclave 128.391-0.95-0.24=127.201 acres
Subdivision - �� /+ 127.201/1.5=84.8 acres
84.8 x 1.1=93.28 lots
total lots proposed=93
maximum lot size:+/-0.9 ac
ewse r \I minimum lot size: +/-0.4 ac
n average lot size: +/-0.6 ac
length of roads: + (60'public r/w)
area within road r/w:+/-/-12.1.1 ac
Water provided by Community Well
Sewer provided by private septic systems
\ /Oran a County ` °
Lot 6 Cha
1111
tham County �. � \ °c ona
\"w Lot 7 / 1 oe se CONSERVATION SPACE
01i1 c / '\' \J Oran a Co Conservation Space Required=40%
/ rnmary a�a Chatham Co 128.391 ac x 0.4=51.35 acres
3 \ ° _-_ Q Fidd f$Plfl- Natural Space Required=32
/ re for mt:
7,e,46.47 128.391 ac x 0.32=41.08 acres
\ j Open Space Required\ / =8.0%
Lot 4 I /'\ 2 / I 128.391 ac x 0.08 =10.27 acres MORGA� \ 0
Natural Space Provided=41.20 ac
RIDGE 7 ' ® 3 ` Open Space Provided= 20.10 ac
Lot 5 0\ PH 1 / Po\O Total Conservation Space Provided=61.30 ac
Conservation Space=47%of total site area
........y/
/ ' ® 50 ' /� \OO cngarden Oauildiq ° ' \ Carrboro
\ nd Pool rc nsos
/ t \O o„^�'-v
Lot 43 42 41 QO „'sand ppe0
I I O t-t[d f�f62 'ok57 `` pMs4 SIfC ^,Y
Lot 16
vn°sae+„a.� \ \ y t Q
\ \ \ O� /�� 6 \ VicinityMa
\ s 0 \10O Q� Q LEGEND
ors Lot 9 � O Pp \
Lot 15 Conservation Natural Space
F\ Conservation Open Space _
\ 7 \ \ 12 \ Perennial Streams
\I I O •V \O k �5^7� ® Intermittent Streams
26 — —
Lot is 'c Q5 �O 00 73 O oQ \ Ephemeral Streams
� 2 1 v/) Wetlands`Lot 10 C Stream+Wetland Buffer
Septic system area _
Lot 13 \ � F � 400 ft Boundary Offset —
Lot1, �� �,:��a� _ - wt N
:::< norea.0 32 e3��s 16 A
Lot 12 °q'j C 17 \
6 _2A.a�.Ktiasaaee o ��\l 5 W \ �7
3 36 Morgan RidgePartners,LLC 17A DQ� �O /. i�. 93 \ ;�
4 O PIN:DB 207-89 g O/20 D 92 Q�
Morgan Ri Partne C AI 35 Da 2099 2°A �1 °
PIN9 -37-7676 OI`ml 34 21A 5A aP,r / _/ 91 /F �\ \O °o0-
PG g6 26A for 1-11 / �'/� O O
3 P
3 vA 9p\
�7 1(p yr f1wdpWo
O31 g\acK G, 330 ��\ / 89
O / 16 17 18 00.��.�� 30 29 ( _ /_ 88 1 1\ 82 8� SW ! j 39.e.r
9 O 9 O 00��yy0�y0�y11,��yy.. 29 > \ / D 1 O 76 ) 536
Z �ZV V VV VV V ('�
O
1 (MU shsAN0'1 \ 2 � 6 533 1a3 (MORGAN 9QQ \ \ as 1
rRIDGE n0, 0r�, 20 \moo z7 �
d Ae�r
13VS PH J�V O SqV \ .`- -� SW POND
12 Ovvvvv \tea. 26 �410 \ )
MORGAN' O ' \ __ . ' 3 rc,oea
RIDGE .10*0 22 / / �\ /
1l 1�1 ENA TURAL:�0> MORGAN i
ro ,
F".
SPACE 23 RIDGE
l 14 13 �� O 2 CONSERVATI
SPACE .. o-s R� �
1/ a�^
1I ° P.\ °�a,.
A Re='
P.
°
Da
-a„1 Poo,
&ems
o
m
en,il�L ° z
art
ro xos�z ° P1
ad) 11,ro,
°ew7,
31
Orange County
5
April 9, 2021 1:12,000
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 mi
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 km
32
OWNER LAST (OWNER FIRST (ADDRESS ICITY ISTATE IZIPCODE
A. SORDEAN-MINTZER E. MINTZER & 3907 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
AMEZ M. & L. 313 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
BACA JAMES A 2750 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
BIDDLE II W.R. 209 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
BOOHER A. & H. 3515 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
C/O PROPERTY TAX K2 TOWERS LLC PO BOX 723597 ATLANTA GA 31139
CENCI JANICE S 3608 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165594
DANKU MARIO & CHRIS 3515 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165593
E. PIESCHACON P. QUIBRERA & 3607 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
EVANS ELIZABETH A 3722 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
FULLWOOD P ANDREW 3716 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165596
H. WEISERT J. SANDERS & 2522 SOLSTICE TRAIL CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
HAINES C. & M. 3510 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165592
HARRIS JESSAMYN 302 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
HAWKS GREGORY& LYN 310 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
HUGH TILSON GAYLIA HARRY& 3819 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275149381
J. BRYANT X. PAGE & 4165 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
J. KOSAK D. KHAMPHASONG & 2741 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
JENKINS RUFUS & MARTHA 3615 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165595
JOHNSON SHARI MILLER 3605 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165595
JORDAN BETTY J 201 FERGUSON RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
K. HOLT J. PUTMAN & 3701 JONES FERRY ROAD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
K.E. ATWATER, ETAL J.U. ATWATER 1011 NICKELBY STREET DURHAM NC 27703
L. HARBER TRUSTEE J.TULLO & 3520 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
LINVILLE RICHARD &TENA 2729 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
LUCE CURTIS & CELESTINE 2720 KIERAN DR CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
M. V. MONTENEGRO R.SARRIA& 2761 KIERAN LN CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
M.C. COUTS J. P. WILLIAMS & 101 SIDNEY GREEN ST CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
MCCLANING KEVIN 8823 HAWKINS LN CHEVY CHASE MD 20815
MCGEE GEORGE & WENDY 121 FAWN RIDGE RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
MERRITT WYNDELL H 7601 N COURTHOUSE RD NEW KENT VA 23124
MEWBORN SYLVIA&ANCEL 3706 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165596
MUNSEE TRUSTEE WILLIAM &JO ELLEN 109 FAWN RIDGE RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275160547
33
OWNER LAST (OWNER FIRST (ADDRESS ICITY ISTATE IZIPCODE
PARTNERSHIP EVERETT PROPERTIES LTD 2812 ERWIN RD SUITE 205 DURHAM NC 27705
PENASKOVIC KENAN & BRIDGET 124 FAWN RIDGE RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
R. KNIGHT K. BALDWIN & 3616 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165594
SEAMAN GUNTHER 3719 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 275165591
SEMELKA RICHARD C 3901 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
TAYLOR CLIFTON LINWOOD 43 HICKORY POINT EXTENSION HAMPSTEAD NC 28443
V. PFLUEGER S. TUTTLE & 3433 JONES FERRY RD CHAPEL HILL NC 27516
WOMBLE IRIS M 311 PINERIDGE DR WINSTON-SALEM NC 27104
WOOD KAREN S 3622 MOONLIGHT DR CHAPEL HILL NC 275165594
34
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919) 245-2575 Suite 201
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING AND SIGN POSTING-
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
SUB21-0017 (Pyewacket)
PIN 9757-51-3504
I, Molly Boyle, Planner II with Orange County, North Carolina, D❑ HEREBY CERTIFY
that in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.15.2 (D) of the Orange County
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), I mailed, or caused to be mailed, via first class
mail a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) notice on April 9, 2021.
This notice informed those property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property that
the applicant submitted an application for a Major Subdivision Concept Plan in Orange
County, which would be discussed at a neighborhood meeting on April 20, 2021.
The property owners within 1,000 feet were identified according to the Orange County
Tax Records as required by the UDO. The mailed notice included the date, time, place,
and subject of the meeting and provided information on the review process.
A sign was also posted on the subject property in accordance with UDO Section 2.15.2
(D) (3). The posted sign informed passersby of the date, time, place, and subject of the
meeting, as well as the Planning Department's telephone number.
WITNESS my hand, 261h day of April 2021.
Molly Boy
Planne
35
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919) 245-2575 Suite 201
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
MAUI
April 9, 2021
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM)
Major Subdivision Concept Plan Application: SUB21-0017 (Pyewacket)
To Whom It May Concern:
Orange County Planning staff has received a Concept Plan application proposing to subdivide a
parcel on Jones Ferry Road at the Orange/Chatham County line. Per Section 2.15 Major
Subdivisions of the Unified Development Ordinance, you are receiving this letter because property
you own is within 1,000 ft. of this parcel. The parcel is further described below:
Property Information
Parcel ID Number(PIN) 9757-51-3504
Owner Dr.Wyndell Merritt
Applicant Warren Mitchell, PE
South of the T-junction of Jones Ferry Road and
Location Ferguson Road at the Orange/Chatham County line
(see attached maps)
Acreage 70.89 acres
Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR)
Watershed Designation Haw River Protected
What is being proposed?
The application proposes a subdivision creating 9.24 acres of open space and a public road,
Woodstock Lane, off of Jones Ferry Road in Orange County. The road and open space will serve
the Pyewacket subdivision in Chatham County.
This proposal is considered a"major subdivision"because it proposes to dedicate a new public
road. All habitable lots in the Pyewacket subdivision will be on the Chatham County side.
What is this meeting for?
This Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)will allow you and other nearby property owners
to meet with the applicant and discuss the proposal. It also gives Planning staff the opportunity to
answer any questions regarding the subdivision process.
36
When and where is the meeting?
We will conduct the meeting online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Here are the details for the
Pyewacket Subdivision NIM:
Meeting Information
Date Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Time 6:30 p.m.
Meeting Link https://global.gotomeeting.com/4oin/691676957
To dial in via phone 1 (646) 749-3122
Access Code 691-676-957
After the NIM, this proposal will go on to the Orange County Planning Board for review. You will
receive a letter notifying you of that meeting once it is scheduled.
I have enclosed some documents to help you better understand the proposal. If you have any
questions,please contact me at 919-245-2599 or mbo le&oran e�ync.gov.
Best Regards,
M. Bo�te
Molly Boyle, MPA, CZO
Planner II
Orange County Planning and Inspections
Enclosures: Pyewacket Subdivision Concept Plan
Site Assessment
Site Assessment for PIN:9757-51-3504 Land Disturbance Thresholds: 37
1)Erosion Control Application/Permit required if disturbing more than
Site Data: 20,000 sq.ft.
Zoning:Agricultural Residential(AR) 2)Stormwater Management Application/Permit required if disturbing
Acreage:70.79 acres more than 43,560 sq.ft.(1 acre)for residential structures.
Overlay Districts:Haw River Protected Overlay District
Notes:
Plat/Legal Description:E/S SR 1942;Plat PB 113/PG 107 1)Private Road Justifications,Recorded Declarations,Restrictive Covenants,Bona Fide
Other:Deed DB 5914/PG 252 Farm status,use and building type(e.g.duplex units)will change subdivision and
development requirements.
Zoning Requirements:
Max.Density:1 unit per 40,000 sq.ft. 2)Wetlands data is taken from Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
Min.Lot Size:40,000 sq.ft. United States.U.S.Department of the Interior,Fish and Wildlife Service and does not
Min.lot width:150' constitute a formal delineation(i.e.survey)ofthe property.All wetland areas are
Maximum height:25' approximate.
Building Setbacks: 3)Flood boundaries are subject to change based on periodic amendments to flood maps.
Front(and Comer lots)=40' Determination is based on current,best available,data.
Side Setbacks=20'
Rear Yard Setback=20' 4)This does not constitute a formal land survey.
Max.Impervious Surface:24%of 70.79 acres=740,066.98 sq.ft.
(Date Site Assessment Completed:03/05/2021 by mboyle)
Environmental Features:
Streams/Water Bodies:Streams on lot
SFHA(Flood plain):N/A
Wetlands:N/A
Buffers:65 ft.(Method A;Slope=4-7.2%)
yti University Lake
618 66d Wate hed RBN��GN�
Soil:HrB i3`O
0 Soil:HrC
h
6gL ss8 6�Q 6ytx Soil:Or
Soil:TaD
6d0 646 Soil•TaE
0 80q s0? - 582 yyb
m
O N r�o 572 6
to 01
�a
6p0 hr �g0 �b0
Soil,Hir y3� 5A2
0 m Soil:ni SSp I hnti
� �� hn�0 Soil•Or
�$ AR
558 Haw River
r Protected Sso
N '�' Watershed o pus
y�y� Flood Panel: �+ Ss8
yob 9746J
Soil:IrB yryQ Soil•Ch
h
S36
S38
552
fo � il:IrB
Soil.•Gen
� 5�0
N
Soil:ApB �
Soil•HrC 5�A �, 6p
5�0 N 54
0 � bp`L bp0
PIN#:9757513504
WYNDELL H MERRITT Data shown on this map is obtained from orange County
GIS and is for reference only.
Exact locations and boundaries should be verified.
7601 N COURTHOUSE RD S Map prepared by orange County Planning 8 Inspections.
NEW KENT,VA 23124 03/O5I2021-mboyle
Easements y;;soils pParcels (FIRM
LINE CODE —USGS Stream Streets ®Watershed
—Road Easement —'Soils Survey Stream Zoning f inch=400feet
/Stream Buffer 65ft— 2'Contours(NCDOT)M Water Body o 100 200
ENEEK==Feet
38
SITE DATA pyewacket
/ 1 j Owner: Wyndell H.Merritt conservation subdivision
Address: Jones Ferry Road
Parcel PIN:9757-51-3504 Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat
/ DB 5914,P 252
"oa'15 Orange and Chatham Counties,NC
PGsa/
•PB 39-145 February 19.2021
•Zoning: AR
JOennenOKen"`"'""""" •Parcel Size(parent): 70.788 acres as
PIN:9De7592�9
•Parcel including JFR r/w=+/-11.58 acres(504,316 sf) e°
cen.aNe eMN-0 EX.POWER POLE(TYP) •Parcel excluding JFR r/w=+/-11.24 ac(489,589 sf) ay°e
PI"g57so •Length of road: +/-1450 LF(60'public r/w) Q0A
\ oe •Area within Woodstock Lane r/w: +/- 2.0 ac(87,043 sf)
10'x70'SIGHTTRANGLE Carrboro
/ \ \ �• •All land will become open space and owned by the HOA
\ \ / 9s�9 •Steep slopes:0 acres(no slopes over 15%grade)
\ Eb eMA"4reeMl"� •Soil types: Iredell,Georgeville,Chewacla Oran
___ PROPOSED COMMUNITY I 9e Count
915�°�^°`� � ' Watershed: River Protected y
' a474 WELL LOCATION p: e
V °°"° ��- �� Township: Bingham
c
ErerercP g.umlma PNrehly \Op \/ 1to r�I ��� .:?*;� )o�g5�°t R site hatham County
PI" l s,a ,2 530�_�!- I, 500 ft Boundary Offset Total Conservation Space Provided:
sea �, If •.
Chatham County
Conservation Space Provided=61.71 ac
p ° Vicinity Map
Conservation Space=48/o of total site area
m1 \��'\o /. / / Orange County LEGEND
(septic field) \`�\ `:1 !-$ ::`•:`•:. / / / Open Space Provided=9.24 acres
/ The TOTAL FOR CHATHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES Proposed Common Open Space
/ \ Tzc; c ......:... �,. /Enclave \\ :;.;;;;;r;;;;;;; . / 61.71 ac.+9.24 ac.=70.95 acres (Orange County)
Lot 5 1 f.i:L:••:•::::::::..
Subdivision \ \
(existing) / 70.95 1139.63 acres=50.8%Open Space Proposed Conservation Space
�/ Lett o\\\ (Chatham County)
Y I I_
an Khamphaso (wept; ,'I \ , / / / D...,par E-ir-nn-tai conarcuanl Perennial Streams
and Justin Kosak
PIN:9757-01-2139 / Soil and Environmental Consultants Intermittent Streams
DB 6324 // / / Griffith Capital,LLC O
\Richard and Tena LlnYllle PG402 0 11312 US 15-501N 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104 Wetlands
PIN:9757-31-9190 / Raleigh,NC 27615
\ of a / / Suite 107; Box 106 9'
OB 6649 Lots , \ Y / ball(j a dec.com Stream Buffer
P 919-691-2114
PG 1959 N I I Chapel Hill,NC 27517
Radrign Bama - \�\�� �;� I .�;�N'c;y��,,, 500 ft Boundary Offset f�
\ \ Maria victoria Montenegro /\
1 PIN:9757-40-3964
/ DB 6617 1 I IN.97ll-MemR 3UfVeYDf Civil Engineer
Curtis and Celestine Luce PG 412 - �-1 \ I PIN DB 591g3504
- !
PIN:9757-30.6877 James Baca I Puckett Surveyors Warren D.Mitchell,PE
DB 6269 PIN:9757-00.2737 - '- ` PG 252 1555 NC 56 Suite B2 104 Amber Wood Run 22547
PG 35 DB 6262 Loll \V \ Chapel NC 27516 - �' 250 0 250 50
PG 31
Orange Creedmoor,NC 27522 8 el Hill I rrendmitchellpeQgmail.com '1'GINEv°
Count �' \ \ I 919-528-8900 919-593-1916 '' " �
Y S52'31'17"W � �•.;...:..��-.. \ D"Mt'� 1. = 250'
,LLc Chatha
aa m Count C............... 3:i6yo \ z i-J 21 GRAPHIC SCALE
64.4
g y ,E T427.956' '. —
✓
/ \ 1Lot 7 \ \ \\- �� 80'PUBLIC RIGHT-0FWAY
J.Fuller Homes LLC / 20'WIDE PAYED ROADWAY W.' 8'A"
, - -
AKPAR � // 6NOULOER MOULDER DITCH
/
PIN:9757-00-2737 1
DB 2167
PG 1023 / // i 1 /� 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.08
/ A
2"S9.5B Surhee Course M1
10"ABC Baaec°arse
Typical 20'Edge to Edge Section(nts)
li
7
JI/69)67695.. Zia
OR
71
40
Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Notes
SUB21-0017: Pyewacket Major Subdivision
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
6:30pm-7:53pm
In attendance: Laura Beghein;Janice Cenci;Lucy Harber; Gaylia Harry;Albert and Lyn
Lauritano; Eliot Mintzer and Andrea Sordean-Mintzer; Bridget and Kenan Penaskovic;Molly
Boyle and Tyler Sliger (OC Current Planning); Warren Mitchell, PE(applicant/engineer)
Molly Boyle (OC Planning) gave a general overview of Orange County's major subdivision
review process. She explained that this project is considered a major subdivision because it
proposes public right-of-way dedication in Orange County. The proposed habitable lots for the
subdivision, Pyewacket, are all in Chatham County(93 lots total).
Warren Mitchell (applicant/engineer)reviewed the Concept Plan and discussed what is being
proposed on the Orange County side and the Chatham County side.
Q&A Session: At this point, Planning staff opened the floor for questions. Tyler Sliger with
Current Planning managed the speaking requests. The neighbors expressed their concerns, which
are summarized below. You can find the full recording of the Q&A session here:
https://www.oran eg countync.gov/CivicMedia?VID=47
Theme 1: Proposed Community Well
Questions:
1. The neighbors wondered why the Concept Plan proposes a community well in Orange
County to serve lots in Chatham County. Couldn't the well be in Chatham County?
2. Some neighbors said wells in the area have run dry in the past. What will the County do
to protect the neighbors' wells?
3. Will the 93 lots in Chatham be allowed to have individual swimming pools,which could
further impact wells nearby?
Answers: Warren Mitchell explained that there are two other community wells proposed in
Chatham County. The third well is proposed in Orange County to distribute the three wells as
evenly as possible. The well in Orange County would serve about one third of the subdivision
(+/- 31 lots).
Mr. Mitchell said he hadn't considered a prohibition on individual pools, but that he would
consider it. The plans for the Pyewacket neighborhood include a community pool already, plus
the proposed lots are small enough (+/- 0.66 acres) that individual pools might not be practical.
Some neighbors were glad to hear about the possibility of prohibiting individual pools but still
1
41
expressed concern about the subdivision's potential impact on wells for Orange County
residents.
Molly Boyle explained that well permitting is done through Orange County Environmental
Health and that the well would need to be permitted prior to subdivision approval. Ms. Boyle
was not sure of the exact permitting requirements since she works in a different department, but
she said she would follow up with Environmental Health.*
*Post-Meetinz Note: OC Environmental Health permits individual private wells. Since this plan
proposes a community well, it will be reviewed by the Public Water Supply Section of the NC
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ):
• You can find general information for the Public Water Supply Section here:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/drinking-water
• You can find specific plan review and permitting requirements here:
httes:lldey.nc.jzovlaboutldivisionslwater-resourcesldrinking-wate /plan-review
• And you can find a user-friendly guide for the Public Water Supply Section's
requirements here:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Resources/files/pws/planreview/EPD_Guidance_
July2019.pdf
Theme 2: Traffic Impacts
Questions:
1. The neighbors expressed concern about the increase in traffic. The Concept Plan for the
development in Chatham County proposes 93 lots. Is the proposed public road, now
tentatively called Pyewacket Trail, the only point of ingress/egress for the subdivision?
2. Why isn't access proposed in Chatham County?
3. Will there be any road improvements to Jones Ferry Road to handle the increase in
traffic?
Answers: The proposed public road onto Jones Ferry Road, tentatively called Pyewacket Trail, is
the only proposed ingress/egress for the Pyewacket subdivision.
Warren Mitchell said that the parcel on the Chatham County side is landlocked. Wyndell Merritt
owns both parcels proposed for development: one in Chatham and one in Orange. The Orange
County parcel fronts onto Jones Ferry Road. That's why the access is proposed in Orange
County.
Mr. Mitchell said he has not formally submitted anything to the North Carolina Department of
Transportation(NC DOT)yet. Since Pyewacket Trail is proposed as a public road, it will need to
2
42
be reviewed and approved by NC DOT. NC DOT approval is not required at the Concept Plan
phase of Orange County's major subdivision review,but it is required during the next phase
(Preliminary Plat Review).
Molly Boyle asked Mr. Mitchell is a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would be required for the
development. Mr. Mitchell said he didn't believe so but that would be determined by NC DOT.
Even if a full TIA is not required, the applicant would still need to submit data to NC DOT, and
the proposed road would need to meet NC DOT subdivision road construction requirements,
which can be found here: https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Asset-
Management/StateMaintOpsDocs/January%202010%20 Subdivision%20Manual%20-
%20Revised%2OJuly%202020.pdf.
Molly Boyle explained that both Jones Ferry Road and the proposed public road, Pyewacket
Trail, are/would be maintained by NC DOT. So NC DOT will be the agency reviewing and
possibly compelling road improvements.
Other Questions
1. What value will this proposal provide to Orange County?
2. What is the anticipated value of the homes in this subdivision? Will this help address
affordable housing issues in and around Orange County?
3. What safety precautions will be taken when constructing the road over the existing
natural gas line/easement?
Answers:NC DOT may require road improvements to Jones Ferry Road in Orange County; NC
DOT will be reviewing the road proposal during the Preliminary Plat phase, and their comments
will be available to the public at that time. The 9.24 acres of open space proposed in Orange
County will be dedicated and preserved. However, Orange County will not see tax revenue from
the 93 homes in Chatham County.
Mr. Mitchell said affordable housing development was not required with this project. He said
that the gas company would have employees present during road construction to make sure
safety protocols are followed in relation to the existing gas line.
Molly Boyle showed attendees where to find Pyewacket project information on the Orange
County website. She also explained that the Planning Board meeting was scheduled for May 5th
at 7:00 pm and notification letters would be mailed out soon. Warren Mitchell thanked the
attendees for their comments.
The meeting adjourned at 7:53 pm.
3
43
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919) 245-2575 Suite 201
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING AND SIGN POSTING-
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
SUB21-0017 (Pyewacket)
PIN 9757-51-3504
I, Molly Boyle, Planner II with Orange County, North Carolina, ❑O HEREBY CERTIFY
that in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.15 of the Orange County Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), I mailed, or caused to be mailed, via first class mail a
Planning Board meeting notice on April 21, 2021.
This notice informed those property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property that
the applicant has submitted an application for a Major Subdivision Concept Plan in
Orange County, which would be reviewed by the Orange County Planning Board on
May 5, 2021.
The property owners within 1,000 feet were identified according to the Orange County
Tax Records as required by the UDO. The mailed notice included the date, time, place,
and subject of the meeting, as well as details on how to register and access agenda
materials.
A sign was also posted on the subject property in accordance with UDO Section 2.15.
The posted sign informed passersby of the date, time, place, and subject of the
meeting, as well as the Planning Department's telephone number.
WITNESS my hand, 26t" day of April 2021.
Molly Boyle
Planner 11
44
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919) 245-2575 Suite 201
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
Aa
Fa M1
'uu
April 21, 2021
NOTICE OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Major Subdivision Concept Plan Application: SUB21-0017 (Pyewacket)
To Whom It May Concern:
Orange County Planning staff has received a Concept Plan application proposing to subdivide a parcel
on Jones Ferry Road at the Orange/Chatham County line. Per Section 2.15 Major Subdivisions of the
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), you are receiving this letter because property you own is
within 1,000 ft. of this parcel. The parcel is further described below:
Property Information
Parcel ID Number(PIN) 9757-51-3504
Owner Dr.Wyndell Merritt
Applicant Warren Mitchell, PE
South of the T-junction of Jones Ferry Road and
Location Ferguson Road at the Orange/Chatham County line
(see attached maps)
Acreage 70.89 acres
Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR)
Watershed Designation Haw River Protected
What is being proposed?
The application proposes a subdivision creating 9.24 acres of open space and a public road, Pyewacket
Trail, off of Jones Ferry Road in Orange County. The road and open space will serve the Pyewacket
subdivision in Chatham County. The Orange County Planning Board is reviewing the Concept Plan for
this proposal on May 5, 2021.
This proposal is considered a"major subdivision"because it proposes to dedicate a new public road.
All habitable lots in the Pyewacket subdivision will be on the Chatham County side.
What is the Planning Board?
The Planning Board is a volunteer advisory board that makes recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners (the elected officials) on various proposals, including major subdivisions.
45
When and where is the Planning Board meeting?
The Orange County Planning Board will review and make a recommendation on this proposal on
Wednesday,May 5, 2021 at 7.00 pm. Consistent with the County's COVID-19 protocol, the meeting
will be held online.
How can I participate?
You can attend the meeting(online or via phone) or submit written comments to the Planning Board.
1. To attend the meeting(online or via phone):
On April 28, 2021, staff will post the full agenda for the upcoming Planning Board meeting
online. You will be able to access the agenda on the Agenda Center page here:
hgps://www.oran e�ync. og v/AizendaCenter/Planning-Board-26
From there, click on the agenda packet for May 5, 2021 (once posted), which will include the
agenda and instructions on how to sign up and attend the meeting online.
If you do not have internet access, you can call into the meeting instead. After April 28t'',please
contact Ms. Tina Love at(919)245-2575 for the meeting call-in number and access code.
2. To submit written comments:
You can send written public comments via email to plannin_bg oardgoran eg c� c._ov by
3:00 pm on May 5, 2021. Please include "Pyewacket Concept Plan"in the subject line of your
email. Emails sent to this address are viewable on Google Groups at
htlps:/�ps.aooale.com/ ocplannin bg oard.
You can also mail or drop off written comments at the Planning Department,which staff will
scan and post to the Google Group listed above. The address is in my signature line below.
After the Planning Board reviews the Concept Plan, the applicant can submit a Preliminary Plat
application,which will need to be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Board of County
Commissioners. You will receive letters notifying you of those meetings/hearings once they are
scheduled. You can also track the application on our Current Interest Projects page:
https://www.oran.eg c�tync.gov/1722/Current-Interest-Projects
If you have any questions,please contact me at 919-245-2599 or mbo legoran_e�, n�c.gov.
Best Regards,
)K. BOLJ l8
Molly Boyle, MPA, CZO
Planner 11
Orange County Planning and Inspections
131 W. Margaret Lane, 2nd Floor
Hillsborough,NC 27278
Enclosures: Pyewacket Subdivision Concept Plan(Revised 04-09-21)
Flow Chart of Major Subdivision Review Process
Site Assessment
46
GgntherBeaman �� Pyewacket subdivision
PIN:Oa 159-8684 SITE DATA
OB/591
PG 567 CONCEPT PLAN
Owner: Wyndell H.Merritt flexible development
Joann and Kenneth Atwater Address: Jones Ferry Road
PIN:9757-42-5463 Parcel PIN:9757-51-3504 major subdivision
DEW
PG 485 DB 5914,P 252
Gaylia Hany and Hugh eons Q EX.POWER POLE(TYP) Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat
Richard Semelka PIN:9757-02-0223 •PB 39-145
\•\ PIN.9757-42-1362 DB730 / • Zoning:AR Orange and Chatham Counties NC
• Parcel Size(parent): 70.788 acres
\ PGP89 PG 141 s�,i , 10'x 70'SIGHT TRANGLE February 19.2021 (revised April 9,2021)
ry; • Proposed Subdivision including JFR r/w=+/-11.58 acres(504,316 sf)
9 0 Proposed Subdivision excluding JFR r/w=+/-11.24 ac(489,589 sf)
\ •\ % :s Length of road: +/-1450 LF(60'public r/w) ma
Area within Pyewacket Trail r/w:+/-2.0 ad(87,043 sf)
Eliotand Andrea Miner / PROPOSED COMMUNITY . All land will become open ace and owned b the HOA S-
` PIN:9757-42-1067 I— _/ P p Y °e
DB 4457 / WELL LOCATION • Steep slopes:0 acres(no slopes over 15%grade) mP,
` PG 474 // �� / • Soil types: Iredell,Georgeville,Chewacla
�•. / / \ �/' :?;:; Watershed: Haw River Protected Carrboro
\ `�—1DoltSy / I Township: Bingham site
Everett Prop.Limited Ptnrshlp •,•\` 'a•-
PIN:9 75 7-31-5 790 _,.p'. / OPEN SPACE CALCULATION Orange County
DB ry
PG 586 �,o Primary Open Space Areas(yellow shading)
•• , o Stream Buffers+Wetlands:+/-4.24 acres(184,670sf)
/ •`\7�,- ` Secondary Open Space Areas(pink shading) a Chatham
/cafe \N•`, �z. ' c'Yi I w g property: +/-5.0 acres(217,440sf) Q.o° County
Proposed Road
ON,• 1_,, g Remainin right-of-wav Fe
gI f Pyewacket Trail: +1-2.0 acres(87,043sf) ores
Curtis and Celestine Luca. _ - z TOTAL FOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORANGE COUNTY
PIN:9757-30-6877 \7, o v. I
DB 6269 r I 100%Open Space
/ PG35 ;� I �� Vicinity Map
Lot 1 '`, t. :
The (septic field) i' :: tiff :::•
LEGEND
Enclave I
L°`5 Subdivision ` \ ,I.....
I �. t Primary Open Space
(existing) (Orange County)
Lot z �r• I l
`'` Secondary Open Space
/ onovan Khamphason (septic) I I �� 1- Developer Environmental consultant
and Justin Kosak I / I and County)
PIN:9757-41-2139 I k •/ ' Griffith Capital LLC Soil and Environmental Consultants
i / P Proposed Conservation Space
DB 6324 / 11312 US 15-501 N 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104
Richard and Tens Linville PG 402 �/I i J;\ Suite 107; BOX 106 Raleigh,NC 27615 (Chatham County)
PIN:9757-31-9190 Lot 4 //; \ Chapel Hill,NC 27517 ball-691-2114 Perennial Streams
D86649 Lot3 'X ' P 919-691-2114 ,,1^"
PG 1959 ' _ CAf?�� ''•,,
J ! . C�� Intermittent Streams
Rodrigo Sarria i
/ sprveyor :`c ems, �y Wetlands
Maria Victoria Montenegro /' Civil Engineer r�r Of 01;•.
PIN:975740-3964 5 9 --
DB 6617 / Wyndell H Merritt Puckett Surveyors Warren D.Mitchell,PE ° s c Stream Buffer/� i PIN:975751-3504 1555 NC 56 Suite B2 104 Amber Wood Run
PG 412 z / DB 5914 Chapel Hill,NC 27516 22547 J
i
Lot 1 James Baca - i \' PG 252 Creedmoor,NC 27522 warrendmitohell i.com- F'YGINEE�'•�'
\r 919-528-8900 PeQgmai % •.,• N
PIN:9757-'02737 ,A \-��i :� 200 0 200
DB 6262 - 919-593-1916 "V
Lot z
Oran e PG3 ssra.07 w I' ` a/e/21 1„ = 200'
g unty \r GRAPHIC SCALE
Chath m - 60'PUBUCRIGHT-OFWAY
County -
27.956 f°t° - g•.0^ PO.EPAVEDROAOWAY
Lot 7
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH
J.Fuller Homes,LLC f / \ \ /T - -__ 0,� 6.az o.oz 0.08
AKPAR y—/ / _ _ C ✓y �pP�
PIN:DB 2 60--2737 / / / - A 2"se.5s surtace course
PG 1023 / / � � P� 10•ABc easecourse
Typical 20'Edge to Edge Section(nts)
Article 2: Procedures 47
Section 2.15: Major Subdivisions
2.15.1 Review and Decision Process Flow Chart
The review and approval process for a Major Subdivision is shown in the procedure's flowchart.
Major Subdivisions Pre-application Conference
Determination of the correct application venue of the division of
land: Exempt Subdivision, Minor Subdivision, Class "A" Special Use
Permit, Conditional Use District, or a standard Major Subdivision
Finding of Concept Plan Application Completeness and issuance of a
letter to the applicant
-*F Referral to the Development Advisory Committee of the Concept Plan
Public agencv review of the Concept Plan
Neighborhood Information Meeting
Planning Board Review & Approval of Concept Plan
Preliminary Plat Application
Finding of Application Completeness and issuance
of a letter to the applicant
Referral to Development Advisory Committee of the Preliminary Plat
Planning Board Review and
Recommendation of the Preliminary Plat
Board of County Commissioner's acceptance of the Planning Board
recommendation(s) and action regarding the Preliminary Plat
Applicant completes all required public improvements or posts
acceptable financial security to ensure installation
Final Plat Application
LE Planning Director Review/Approval of Final Plat
Recordation of Final Plat
Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-51
Site Assessment for PIN:9757-51-3504 Land Disturbance Thresholds: 48
1)Erosion Control Application/Permit required if disturbing more than
Site Data: 20,000 sq.ft.
Zoning:Agricultural Residential(AR) 2)Stormwater Management Application/Permit required if disturbing
Acreage:70.79 acres more than 43,560 sq.ft.(1 acre)for residential structures.
Overlay Districts:Haw River Protected Overlay District
Notes:
Plat/Legal Description:E/S SR 1942;Plat PB 113/PG 107 1)Private Road Justifications,Recorded Declarations,Restrictive Covenants,Bona Fide
Other:Deed DB 5914/PG 252 Farm status,use and building type(e.g.duplex units)will change subdivision and
development requirements.
Zoning Requirements:
Max.Density:1 unit per 40,000 sq.ft. 2)Wetlands data is taken from Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
Min.Lot Size:40,000 sq.ft. United States.U.S.Department of the Interior,Fish and Wildlife Service and does not
Min.lot width:150' constitute a formal delineation(i.e.survey)ofthe property.All wetland areas are
Maximum height:25' approximate.
Building Setbacks: 3)Flood boundaries are subject to change based on periodic amendments to flood maps.
Front(and Comer lots)=40' Determination is based on current,best available,data.
Side Setbacks=20'
Rear Yard Setback=20' 4)This does not constitute a formal land survey.
Max.Impervious Surface:24%of 70.79 acres=740,066.98 sq.ft.
(Date Site Assessment Completed:03/05/2021 by mboyle)
Environmental Features:
Streams/Water Bodies:Streams on lot
SFHA(Flood plain):N/A
Wetlands:N/A
Buffers:65 ft.(Method A;Slope=4-7.2%)
yti University Lake
618 66d Wate hed RBN��GN�
Soil:HrB i3`O
0 Soil:HrC
h
6gL ss8 6�Q 6ytx Soil:Or
Soil:TaD
6d0 646 Soil•TaE
0 80q s0? - 582 yyb
m
O N r�o 572 6
to 01
�a
6p0 hr �g0 �b0
Soil,Hir y3� 5A2
0 m Soil:ni SSp I hnti
� �� hn�0 Soil•Or
�$ AR
558 Haw River
r Protected Sso
N '�' Watershed o pus
y�y� Flood Panel: �+ Ss8
yob 9746J
Soil:IrB yryQ Soil•Ch
h
S36
S38
552
fo � il:IrB
Soil.•Gen
� 5�0
N
Soil:ApB �
Soil•HrC 5�A �, 6p
5�0 N 54
0 � bp`L bp0
PIN#:9757513504
WYNDELL H MERRITT Data shown on this map is obtained from orange County
GIS and is for reference only.
Exact locations and boundaries should be verified.
7601 N COURTHOUSE RD S Map prepared by orange County Planning 8 Inspections.
NEW KENT,VA 23124 03/O5I2021-mboyle
Easements y;;soils pParcels (FIRM
LINE CODE —USGS Stream Streets ®Watershed
—Road Easement —'Soils Survey Stream Zoning f inch=400feet
/Stream Buffer 65ft— 2'Contours(NCDOT)M Water Body o 100 200
ENEEK==Feet
ell
- .-� - - - "r;:fix - -'•�. L - „ ; --.
r, r� ;
•fir• - .,f. uy .. i ?, •{. - - �� �, a mot.
lk
tk
nAz
'}if.. '�- •:RK '".die�i /��ti1^L-•'RrT',..���..::�:Y'..5'71'r. Rq: _ �:�•' w
�:.x:: � _� -•�.: - _ .�,-: ��_ -'�_ .-ate,a;•��}•��� c.��•- - _�i�y ,;'? .-. - L
',•v'�,.�y}':, :t;.ti� _ ..�.4f:..r Sw'S e E�.per;:�'rl�'="pr.:�-- .}��.�. _ V�- T:� _ �.�*'7`
r'1,' .:.3�•! �- •..y: .'>Y'c-.�.-:7�•ywr'.i4'• .-�'.. 'Src�-"?t Y� 7......e. E'.� -::
if _"�"^`•• •' r- "a-%!h::!.:�.: �4 � rc. ��r ir.� �_ ti ��^ram" � -Cd�r- �
•� •�"� - `�ra`-. ��Y4n�.-��' Y¢g'�• I "_ -"r.�7`p •. A..` �'.�il�'IC�• °•"�• n�
- - ;„ `Y�a9-,P•. ��'_ y`` d".�� :fir.
1
'. .�;,fit ' !f �•..� r - � .� i•.-• � � �'•.:.�- `t •
�,: = s
51
Community Meeting Report Form
REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT INPUT MEETING REQUIRED BY
THE CHATHAM COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
To: Kimberly Tyson, Chatham County Subdivision Administrator/Planner II
Subdivision Name: Pyewacket Subdivision
Approximate Location (or Address): across from 3907 Jones Ferry Road
Proposed Number Lots: 93 Residential (Y/N): Y
The undersigned hereby certifies that the required sign(s) was posted on the property proposed
for subdivision, on each road frontage of said subdivision on (date) Thursday Jan 07, 2021
A photo of the sign posted is recommended to be attached to this form.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: January 28, 2021 : zoom call from 2:00 to
3:OOpm and physical mtg. at Briar Chapel Park (1015 Andrews Store Rd) from 4:00 to 7:OOpm
The persons in attendance at the meeting: See attached Attendance sheet
The following issues were discussed at the meeting (Attach additional sheet(s) if needed):
See attached
As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the subdivision proposal (Attach
additional sheet(s) if needed):
Date: Ja januqLy 2 2 1
Applicant:
By: W . Warren Mitchell
Please submit this Report to the Chatham County Planning Department located at 80-A East
Street or mail it to Kimberly Tyson, Subdivision Administrator, PO Box 54, Pittsboro, NC 27312-
0054. If you have any questions, please contact Kimberly Tyson at (919) 542-8283 or
kimberly.tyson _chathamnc.org.
52
The following items were discussed at the meeting:
1. Neighbors said they would like high speed internet. They asked if we could make the request and
try to get ATT or Spectrum high-speed/ fiber optic to Emily Lane.
2. Neighbors requested that no pedestrian or vehicular access be made to the greater Emily Lane
neighborhood.
3. Wells—aquifer—will the new wells affect the water table for wells on and around Emily Lane. A
few wells in the neighborhood have low yield already.
4. One neighbor on Jones Ferry Road near the proposed entrance is looking forward to having the
new subdivision roads to walk in where it will be safer than walking on Jones Ferry Road.
5. What will be the price point of the proposed homes?
6. Is there any way to ask the NCDOT to post a lower speed limit than the current 55 mph for Jones
Ferry Road?
Developer Response:
1. We will continue to make the request and work with ATT or Spectrum to bring high speed internet
to the Emily Lane neighborhood through the proposed Morgan Ridge Subdivision. ATT and
Spectrum have indicated that they will carry their service to Emily Lane in an easement being
proposed. The HOA president for Emily Lane is talking with these utility providers.
2. There is no plan to connect to Emily Lane and there is no access currently. No connection
(pedestrian or vehicular) can be made without approval of all Emily Lane residents since Emily
Lane is a private road.
3. We have proposed a community well+ distribution for the subdivision. The main proposed
community well near the community clubhouse is approximately 2000 feet away from the
common property boundary with the closest existing neighbor. A second well must be provided
(which is shown closer to the existing neighbors). Two wells are required for a community system
serving more than 49 homes.
4. Yes, it seems like a positive result for many.
5. The price of the homes will probably start in the $500K's and the average size of the homes will
probably be about 2600sf—2800sf.
6. We can ask NCDOT to review this issue but we don't expect any revision to the speed limit for
Jones Ferry Road.
53
Working Draft Design Standards Manual Private Street Update Revised: October 17, 2018
ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition
DailyPeak Hour of Adjacent Street Rate
ITE
No. Land Use Description •
Industrial/Agricultural
110 General Light Industrial ksf 4.96 0.70 88% 12% 0.63 13% 87%
e m p. 3.05 0.52 83% 17% 0.49 22% 78%
130 Industrial Park ksf 3.37 0.40 81% 19% 0.40 21% 79%
e m p. 2.91 0.44 86% 14% 0.42 20% 80%
140 Manufacturing ksf 3.93 0.62 77% 23% 0.67 31% 69%
ac. 35.02 4.62 90% 10% 4.54 43% 57%
150 Warehousing ksf 1.74 0.17 77% 23% 0.19 27% 73%
e m p. 5.05 0.61 72% 28% 0.66 36% 64%
151 Mini-Warehouse ksf 1.51 0.10 60% 40% 0.17 47% 53%
160 Data Center ksf 0.99 0.11 55% 45% 0.09 30% 70%
Residential
210 Single-Family Detached Housing DU 9.44 0.74 25% 75% 0.99 63% 37%
220 Multifamily Housing(Low-Rise) DU 7.32 0.46 23% 77% 0.56 63% 37%
231 Mid-Rise Residential w/1st-Floor Commerci DU 3.44 0.30 28% 72% 0.36 70% 30%
240 Mobile Home Park DU 5.00 0.26 31% 69% 0.46 62% 38%
251 Senior Adult Housing-Detached DU 4.27 0.24 33% 67% 0.30 61% 39%
252 Senior Adult Housing-Attached DU 3.70 0.20 35% 65% 0.26 55% 45%
253 Congregate Care Facility DU 2.02 0.07 60% 40% 0.18 53% 47%
254 Assisted Living beds 4.24 0.39 78% 22% 0.49 30% 70%
255 Continuing Care Retirement Community units 2.40 0.14 65% 35% 0.16 39% 61%
270 Residential Planned Unit Development DU 7.38 0.57 22% 78% 0.69 75% 25%
Lodging
310 Hotel rooms 8.36 0.47 59% 41% 0.60 51% 49%
311 All Suites Hotel rooms 4.46 0.34 53% 47% 0.36 48% 52%
312 Business Hotel rooms 4.02 0.39 42% 58% 0.32 55% 45%
320 Motel rooms 3.35 0.38 37% 63% 0.38 54% 46%
330 Resort Hotel rooms n/a 0.32 72% 28% 0.41 43% 57%
Recreational
411 Public Park ac. 0.78 0.02 59% 41% 0.11 55% 45%
416 Campground/Recreational Vehicle Park occ.sites n/a 0.21 36% 64% 0.27 65% 35%
444 Movie Theatre screens 220.00 n/a n/a n/a 14.60 44% 56%
445 Multiplex Movie Theatre screens 292.50 n/a n/a n/a 13.73 51% 49%
488 Soccer Complex fields 71.33 0.99 61% 39% 16.43 66% 34%
490 Tennis Courts courts 30.32 n/a n/a n/a 4.21 n/a n/a
491 Racquet/Tennis Club courts 27.71 n/a n/a n/a 3.82 n/a n/a
492 Health/Fitness Club ksf n/a 1.31 51% 49% 3.45 57% 43%
495 Recreational Community Center ksf 28.82 1.76 66% 34% 2.31 47% 53%
July 12,2012
Design Standards Manual Chapter 3: Transportation T-17
54
PLANNING& INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict,AICP, Director
Current Planning 131 W. Margaret Lane
(919) 245-2575 Suite 201
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8181
www.orangecountync.gov NORTH CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27278
March 30, 2021
Warren Mitchell,PE Dr. Wyndell H. Merritt
104 Amber Wood Run 7601 N. Courthouse Road
Chapel Hill,NC 27516 New Kent, VA 23124
Staff Review of Major Subdivision Concept Plan Application:
SUB21-0017 (Pyewacket)
Dear Mr. Mitchell and Dr. Merritt:
On March 5, 2021,the Orange County Planning Department formally accepted your Major
Subdivision Concept Plan application for processing. Here is further detail on the subject property to
be subdivided:
Property Information
Parcel ID Number(PIN) 9757-51-3504
Acreage 70.89 acres
Zoning Agricultural Residential (AR)
Watershed Designation Haw River Protected
Impervious Surface Maximum 740,066.98 sq. ft. (24%)
Streams/Floodplain Streams with 65' buffers, measured from the top of
bank on both sides of the stream
Subdivision Proposal
The application proposes a subdivision creating 9.24 acres of open space and a public road,
Woodstock Lane, off of Jones Ferry Road(SR 1942) in Orange County. The road and open space
will serve the Pyewacket subdivision in Chatham County.
Staff Review Process
In accordance with Section 2.15 Major Subdivisions of the Orange County Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO), the Development Advisory Committee(DAC)met on March 18, 2021 to review
your application. The table below lists the contact information for each relevant DAC member and
external agent so you can contact them directly with any questions. I have included members'
specific comments and revisions, if any, after the table.
1
55
DAC and External Agency Contacts
Environmental Thomas Privott, Soil Scientist
Health 919-245-2374 or tprivott(aborangecountvnc.gov
Erosion Pat Mallett, EC/Stormwater Supervisor
Control/Stormwater 919-245-2577 or pmallett(cDorangecountync.gov
Jason Shepherd, Fire Marshal Elizabeth Farnan, Asst. Fire Marshal
Fire Marshal 919-245-6151 or 919-245-6153 or
i shepherd(cDorangecountvnc.gov efarnan(cDorangecountvnc.gov
NC DOT Jennifer Britt, Asst. District Supervisor(Chatham)
336-318-4004 or ilbritt(c�ndcot.gov
Michael Harvey, Supervisor Molly Boyle, Planner II
Planning 919-245-2597 or 919-245-2599 or
mharvev(Qorangecountvnc.gov mbovle(@orangecountvnc.gov
Solid Waste Jeff Scouten, Environmental Enforcement Supervisor
Lm 919-918-4905 iscouten(a�orangecountvnc.gov
Comments and Requested Revisions
You will need to submit the revised Concept Plan, inclusive of the following edits,to Planning staff
no later than April 23, 2021 to get on the agenda for the May 5th Planning Board meeting.
1. The Fire Marshal requests the following road data be denoted somewhere on the Concept
Plan:
• The road will not be less than 20' in width.
• There will be 13' 6"of vertical clearance as required by the NC Fire Prevention Code
2018 edition.
• The roadway shall be an all-weather surface and capable of withstanding an imposed
weight load of 75,000 lbs.
2. Contact Orange County Environmental Health about permitting for the community well
shown on the plan. The proposed location is fine for the Concept Plan,but Environmental
Health will need to review and approve the well location before approving the
Preliminary/Final Plats.
3. Per the Erosion Control and Stormwater Division,you will need an Erosion Control permit
when disturbing 20,000 sq. ft. of land or more and a Stormwater Management permit when
disturbing 43,560 sq. ft. (1 acre) or more. For stormwater, land disturbance is cumulative for
the parent tract.
4. The NC DOT highway division that oversees Chatham County will be reviewing the
proposed roads for Pyewacket, including the portion of Woodstock Lane on the Orange
County side. Please refer questions for NC DOT to Jennifer Britt(see table above).
5. Please see the attached copy of the Concept Plan for Planning's comments and revisions.
2
56
Next Steps
Please refer to UDO Section 2.15 Major Subdivisions for additional detail.
1. On-Site Visit
Per UDO Section 2.15.2 Major Subdivisions—Concept Plan, staff must conduct an on-site
visit of the property so as to better understand the parcel and the proposal. Staff will contact
you to arrange this site visit.
2. Neighborhood Information Meeting
The UDO requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM) for major subdivision
proposals. Planning staff will coordinate this meeting, and we will hold it online in keeping
with COVID-19 pandemic protocol. Staff will send meeting invitations to Orange County
property owners within 1,000 ft. of the subdivision property via first class mail.
As the applicant,you will need to attend this meeting. Staff usually schedules neighborhood
meetings at 6:30 pm or 7:00 pm on weekday evenings. Please let staff know which of these
potential meeting dates you prefer:
• Wednesday,April 14th • Tuesday,April 20th
• Thursday,April 15th • Wednesday,April 21'
• Monday, April 19th
3. Planning Board Meeting
The first available Planning Board meeting date is Wednesday, May 5, 2021. If you need
more time,we can schedule you for the Planning Board meeting on June 2nd instead. You can
move forward with your Preliminary Plat application after the Planning Board approves the
Concept Plan.
Upcoming Proiect Milestones
In summary,here are the project milestones leading up to the Planning Board meeting:
1. Staff site visit(to be scheduled soon)
2. Neighborhood Information Meeting(April 14th—April 21st, official date TBD)
3. Concept Plan revisions due to Planning no later than April 23'd
4. Earliest available Planning Board meeting date is May 5, 2021
Please contact me at(919)245-2599 or mbo le&oran e�tync.gov with any questions.
Sincerely,
X5y bade
Molly Boyle
Planner II
Orange County Planning Department
Enclosure: Concept Plan with Planning Staff Comments
3
57
SITE DATA pyewacket
/ 1 j Owner: Wyndell H.Merritt conservation subdivision
Address: Jones Ferry Road
Parcel PIN:9757-51-3504 Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat
/ DB 5914,P 252
"oa'15 Orange and Chatham Counties,NC
PGsa/
•PB 39-145 February 19.2021
•Zoning: AR
JOennenOKen"`"'""""" •Parcel Size(parent): 70.788 acres as
PIN:9De7592�9
•Parcel including JFR r/w=+/-11.58 acres(504,316 sf) e°
cen.aNe eMN-0 EX.POWER POLE(TYP) •Parcel excluding JFR r/w=+/-11.24 ac(489,589 sf) ay°e
PI"g57so •Length of road: +/-1450 LF(60'public r/w) Q0A
\ oe •Area within Woodstock Lane r/w: +/- 2.0 ac(87,043 sf)
10'x70'SIGHTTRANGLE Carrboro
/ \ \ �• •All land will become open space and owned by the HOA
\ \ / 9s�9 •Steep slopes:0 acres(no slopes over 15%grade)
\ Eb eMA"4reeMl"� •Soil types: Iredell,Georgeville,Chewacla Oran
___ PROPOSED COMMUNITY I 9e Count
915�°�^°`� � ' Watershed: River Protected y
' a474 WELL LOCATION p: e
V °°"° ��- �� Township: Bingham
c
ErerercP g.umlma PNrehly \Op \/ 1to r�I ��� .:?*;� )o�g5�°t R site hatham County
PI" l s,a ,2 530�_�!- I, 500 ft Boundary Offset Total Conservation Space Provided:
sea �, If •.
Chatham County
Conservation Space Provided=61.71 ac
p ° Vicinity Map
Conservation Space=48/o of total site area
m1 \��'\o /. / / Orange County LEGEND
(septic field) \`�\ `:1 !-$ ::`•:`•:. / / / Open Space Provided=9.24 acres
/ The TOTAL FOR CHATHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES Proposed Common Open Space
/ \ Tzc; c ......:... �,. /Enclave \\ :;.;;;;;r;;;;;;; . / 61.71 ac.+9.24 ac.=70.95 acres (Orange County)
Lot 5 1 f.i:L:••:•::::::::..
Subdivision \ \
(existing) / 70.95 1139.63 acres=50.8%Open Space Proposed Conservation Space
�/ Lett o\\\ (Chatham County)
Y I I_
an Khamphaso (wept; ,'I \ , / / / D...,par E-ir-nn-tai conarcuanl Perennial Streams
and Justin Kosak
PIN:9757-01-2139 / Soil and Environmental Consultants Intermittent Streams
DB 6324 // / / Griffith Capital,LLC O
\Richard and Tena LlnYllle PG402 0 11312 US 15-501N 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104 Wetlands
PIN:9757-31-9190 / Raleigh,NC 27615
\ of a / / Suite 107; Box 106 9'
OB 6649 Lots , \ Y / ball(j a dec.com Stream Buffer
P 919-691-2114
PG 1959 N I I Chapel Hill,NC 27517
Radrign Bama - \�\�� �;� I .�;�N'c;y��,,, 500 ft Boundary Offset f�
\ \ Maria victoria Montenegro /\
1 PIN:9757-40-3964
/ DB 6617 1 I IN.97ll-MemR 3UfVeYDf Civil Engineer
Curtis and Celestine Luce PG 412 - �-1 \ I PIN DB 591g3504
- !
PIN:9757-30.6877 James Baca I Puckett Surveyors Warren D.Mitchell,PE
DB 6269 PIN:9757-00.2737 - '- ` PG 252 1555 NC 56 Suite B2 104 Amber Wood Run 22547
PG 35 DB 6262 Loll \V \ Chapel NC 27516 - �' 250 0 250 50
PG 31
Orange Creedmoor,NC 27522 8 el Hill I rrendmitchellpeQgmail.com '1'GINEv°
Count �' \ \ I 919-528-8900 919-593-1916 '' " �
Y S52'31'17"W � �•.;...:..��-.. \ D"Mt'� 1. = 250'
,LLc Chatha
aa m Count C............... 3:i6yo \ z i-J 21 GRAPHIC SCALE
64.4
g y ,E T427.956' '. —
✓
/ \ 1Lot 7 \ \ \\- �� 80'PUBLIC RIGHT-0FWAY
J.Fuller Homes LLC / 20'WIDE PAYED ROADWAY W.' 8'A"
, - -
AKPAR � // 6NOULOER MOULDER DITCH
/
PIN:9757-00-2737 1
DB 2167
PG 1023 / // i 1 /� 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.08
/ A
2"S9.5B Surhee Course M1
10"ABC Baaec°arse
Typical 20'Edge to Edge Section(nts)
58
Warren D Mitchell, PE
April 8, 2021
Orange County Planning Department
Molly Boyle
131 W. Margaret Lane
Suite 201
P. O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Re: Pyewacket Subdivision
Concept Plan Comments
Dear Molly:
Thank you for your comments on the Pyewacket Subdivision Concept Plan. You had some written
comments and additional comments that you made on the plat itself. I have addressed the comments in
that order. Please take a look at my revisions and let me know if you have any questions or comments:
Comments and Requested Revisions
You will need to submit the revised Concept Plan, inclusive of the following edits, to Planning staff
no later than April 23, 2021 to get on the agenda for the May Sth Planning Board meeting.
1.The Fire Marshal requests the following road data be denoted somewhere on the Concept
Plan:
• The road will not be less than 20' in width.
• There will be 13' 6" of vertical clearance as required by the NC Fire Prevention Code
2018 edition.
• The roadway shall be an all-weather surface and capable of withstanding an imposed
weight load of 75,000 lbs.
The proposed roadway will be constructed to Public DOT standards and will comply with all of
the 3 conditions mentioned above.
2. Contact Orange County Environmental Health about permitting for the community well
shown on the plan.The proposed location is fine for the Concept Plan, but Environmental
Health will need to review and approve the well location before approving the
Preliminary/Final Plats.
The community well shown on the plan is permitted through the State and Orange County
Environmental Health does not get involved with the placement or design of that well. 1 will forward
the plan to them so they can confirm what 1 am saying.
104 Amber Wood Run Chapel Hill,NC 27516 919-593-1916 warrendmitchellpe@gmail.com
59
3. Per the Erosion Control and Stormwater Division, you will need an Erosion Control permit
when disturbing 20,000 sq. ft. of land or more and a Stormwater Management permit when
disturbing 43,560 sq. ft. (1 acre) or more. For stormwater, land disturbance is cumulative for
the parent tract.
Thank you for reminding me of these standards.
4.The NC DOT highway division that oversees Chatham County will be reviewing the
proposed roads for Pyewacket, including the portion of Woodstock Lane on the Orange
County side. Please refer questions for NC DOT to Jennifer Britt (see table above).
1 will be sending the plans to Jennifer Britt at NCDOT. The roadway has been designed to the
NCDOT standards.Also, Chatham County has a condition that the name of the subdivision must be
used in the entrance road. 1 wasn't aware of that when 1 named the entrance road Woodstock Lane. 1
have renamed the entrance road Pyewacket Trail and the Chatham County 911 operations
administrator has checked with Orange County and that name is acceptable.
5. Please see the attached copy of the Concept Plan for Planning's comments and revisions.
I have reviewed your comments on the Concept Plan and made the following revisions to that
plan:
1. The Chatham County Concept Plan is being sent to you for your records.
2. The Subdivision Data has been revised as recommended.
3. The 500 foot boundary line has been removed.
4. We did not previously shade the stream buffer area outside of the parcel being subdivided, but
we have now shaded all stream buffers and verified that they are all 65 feet from the top of
the stream bank. Intermittent streams are jurisdictional and sometimes they have a different
buffer width than perennial(outside of Orange County). 1 realize that they have the same
stream buffer width in Orange County.
5. The map title has been revised.
6. 1 revised the vicinity map but 1 don't know if is what you were looking for.
7. 1 revised the legend and used 2 different colors to contrast primary and secondary open space.
8. The scale and map have been changed to 1"=200'.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
r
Warren D. Mitchell, PE
919-593-1916
104 Amber Wood Run Chapel Hill,NC 27516 919-593-1916 warrendmitchellpe@Rmail.com
60
Molly Boyle
From: Tyler Sliger
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:11 AM
To: Molly Boyle
Subject: FW: [External] DAC items
Best regards,
Tyler Sliger, CZO
Planner I
Phone: (919) 245-2598
Email:tsliger@orangecountync.gov
"Working Remotely"
From:Jones, DeAngelo J <djjonesl@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 10:56 AM
To:Tyler Sliger<tsliger@orangecountync.gov>
Cc: Chuck Edwards Contact<cnedwards@ncdot.gov>; Britt,Jennifer L<jlbritt@ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] DAC items
Hello Tyler,
I have reviewed the items for DAC.
Pyewacket Major Subdivision
NCDOT submittals of the internal roadway and an NCDOT driveway permit for review are required. However, this
subdivision crosses County lines and NCDOT jurisdiction.This subdivision has been discussed among the two different
Districts internally and it was decided that Division 8, District 1 would handled the review, processing and approval.
You can contact Jennifer Britt, El, Assistant District Engineer at (336)318-4004.
Greenbrae Minor Subdivision (Parker)
An NCDOT driveway permit for a Class A Private Drive will be required.
If you have any additional questions or comments please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
DeAngelo J. Jones
Senior Assistant District Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Division 7, District 1
336 570 6833
diiones1(a)ncdot.gov
61
115 East Crescent Square Drive
P. O. Box 766
Graham, NC 27253
From:Tyler Sliger<tsliger@orangecountync.gov>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 12:28 PM
To:Jones, DeAngelo J <diionesl@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] DAC items
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hey DeAngelo,
Attached are all the DAC items for March 181n
Best regards,
Tyler Sliger, CZO
Planner I
Phone: (919) 245-2598
Email: tsliger@orangecountync.gov
"Working Remotely"
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2
62
Molly Boyle
From: Britt, Jennifer L <jlbritt@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:32 AM
To: Molly Boyle
Cc: Jones, DeAngelo J; Chuck Edwards Contact; Monroe, Roosevelt J
Subject: RE: [External] Pyewacket Subdivision - Orange County Planning Review
Molly,
Please see below bulleted responses:
• The NCDOT has not yet received subdivision plans for review.We received a concept map on 3/8/21.
• I would refer you to the NCDOT driveway permit manual for entrance specs.We review the two aspects(driveway
entrance and internal roadway design)in tandem during a subdivision plan review if the internal roadways are planned
to be public.The driveway review includes need for roadway improvements according to trip gen,etc.
• No TIA has been submitted.NCDOT has not been consulted about whether a TIA is required yet.
• No official subdivision plan has been submitted for NCDOT review and comment.
If you have any other questions,please call or email me.
All my best,
Jen Britt, El
Assistant District Supervisor
Division 8, District 1
300 DOT Drive
Asheboro, NC 27204
336.318.4004 office
336.402.3490 cell
From: Molly Boyle<mboyle@orangecountync.gov>
Sent:Thursday,April 15, 2021 2:38 PM
To: Britt, Jennifer L<jlbritt@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Pyewacket Subdivision - Orange County Planning Review
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hello Jennifer,
I'm the planner reviewing the Pyewacket subdivision on the Orange County side. We have a community meeting
scheduled for April 201", and the Concept Plan will go to our Planning Board on May 51n
I'm assuming our board and citizens will have questions regarding traffic impacts and road requirements, so I have a few
questions I'm hoping you can help me with:
63
• To date, what has the applicant submitted to you for review of the subdivision roads?
• 1 know the proposed roads must comply with the Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards Manual.
Are there any regulatory requirements for NC DOT(other than this document)that I should be aware of?
• Has the applicant submitted trip generation details and/or a TIA? If so, could you please forward that
information to me?
• If you have issued preliminary comments to the applicant, would you please send those to me as well?
Thank you in advance for any information you can provide. If there's anything I can do to assist you, please let me know.
Best Regards,
X514 F601 Wry e5o
Planner II
Orange County Planning& Inspections
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2
64
Molly Boyle
From: Jason Shepherd
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:09 PM
To: Molly Boyle
Cc: Elizabeth Farnan
Subject: FW: project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
See below thread for your records.
Thank you,
Jason
From:William Judson <william.judson@chathamcountync.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 10:24 PM
To: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>; firemarshals<firemarshals@orangecountync.gov>;Jason
Shepherd <jshepherd@orangecountync.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL MAIL!] RE: project
Good evening all,
Thank you for our conversation this afternoon about the proposed "Pyewacket" subdivision located off of Jones Ferry
Rd, it is a great achievement when 2 jurisdictions can work together towards code compliance as well as public safety.
To summarize our conversation, a road of not less than 20 feet in width and provide 13 feet 6 inches of vertical
clearance shall be provided, as required by the North Carolina Fire Prevention Code 2018 ed.This roadway shall be an
all-weather surface and capable of withstanding an imposed weight load of 75,OOOlbs. This would include the road area
located within your jurisdiction (Orange County)from the connection at Jones Ferry Rd to the beginning of the true
development located within Chatham County. Our coordination and agreement on these standards will provide
adequate roadways throughout this new development.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Have a blessed evening.
Billy Judson
Chatham County Fire Marshal
80-D East St.
Pittsboro NC 27312
919.548.1770-c
In keeping with the NC Public Records Law,e-mails,including attachments,may be released to others upon request for
inspection and copying
From:William Judson
Sent:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 1:48 PM
To: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>;firemarshals<firemarshals@orangecountync.gov>;Jason
1
65
Shepherd <jhepherd@oran�ecountync. ov>
Subject: RE: project
Billy Judson
Chatham County Fire Marshal
80-D East St.
Pittsboro NC 27312
919.548.1770-c
In keeping with the NC Public Records Law,e-mails,including attachments,may be released to others upon request for
inspection and copying
From: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:13 AM
To:William Judson <william.iudson@chathamcountync.gov>; firemarshals<firemarshals@orangecountync.gov>
Subject: RE: project
Attached are screenshots and documentation on the project for tomorrow's discussion.
Tomorrow, I am only available after 1PM.
Thank you!
2
66
Permit and Inspection Information is now available online! Click here to access our portal
ILzaket�i Varnan
;6sistant Pire Marsreaf
Oran9,,,,epp-county�meryency�ervices
Pire cJVGarsrrafbivision
C�'zce: 919-245-6153
`cell fraone: 919-537-2149
Pax: 919-732-8130
&maif- efarnan@orangecountync.goy
*'Oe6.- Lttp://orangecountr c yoy
rr. ---gram me th-e serenity to accept tnepeoyfe Ycannot c"nye,
trre couraJc e to Irian,ye tree one f can,
anrCtnf e w'isdom to tow it s me.
utrior unknown
From: William Judson<william.Judson@chathamcountync.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 9:27 AM
To:Jason Shepherd <jhepherd@orangecountync.gov>; Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL MAILI] RE: project
Hey Jason,
I am good with that, what time works best for y'all?
Billy Judson
Chatham County Fire Marshal
80-D East St.
Pittsboro NC 27312
919.548.1770-c
In keeping with the NC Public Records Law,e-mails,including attachments,may be released to others upon request for
inspection and copying
From:Jason Shepherd<jhepherd@orangecountync.gov>
Sent:Saturday, March 13, 20218:24 AM
To: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>
Cc:William Judson <william.ludson@chathamcountync.gov>
Subject: project
age originated from outside the Chatham County email system. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and kni
There's a dac proposal that starts in Orange and goes into chatham. I want to make sure we talk with Billy J first of next
week so we are on the same page for road widths. Orange is serving the development into Chatham. Billy we need to
send you the proposal but you may have seen it from your people.
5
67
Let's talk about it Tuesday morning.
Permit and Inspection Information is now available online! Click here to access our portal
Jason B. Shepherd
Fire Marshal
Orange County Emergency Services
510 Meadowlands Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919-245-6151 Office
919-257-8316 Cellular
6
68
Molly Boyle
From: Elizabeth Farnan
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:37 PM
To: Molly Boyle
Cc: Jason Shepherd; William Judson; Michael Harvey
Subject: Re: Question about Pyewacket comment
Thank you, Molly. Him confirming the road standards in writing is fine and we accept that.
Thank you!
Elizabeth
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 21, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Molly Boyle<mboyle@orangecountync.gov>wrote:
Hello Elizabeth and Jason,
Please see the attached letter and revised plan from the engineer for Pyewacket.
I requested that he put your info on the Concept Plan itself, but he confirmed the road standards in
writing instead. Please see#1 on the attached letter.
Is this sufficient for you guys?
Best,
Molly
From: Molly Boyle
Sent:Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:28 PM
To: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>;Jason Shepherd
<jshepherd@orangecountync.gov>
Cc:William Judson <william.judson@chathamcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: Question about Pyewacket comment
Thankyou!
From: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:27 PM
To: Molly Boyle<mboyle@orangecountync.gov>;Jason Shepherd <jhepherd@orangecountync.gov>
Cc: William Judson <william.iudson@chathamcountync.gov>
Subject: RE: Question about Pyewacket comment
Hey Molly,thank you for reaching out for a clarification. So there's no confusion, he will need to include
the following in the site data block per Chatham County's FM and us:
1
69
This would include the road area located within Orange County from the connection at Jones Ferry Rd to
the beginning of the true development located within Chatham County.
• a road of not less than 20 feet in width
• 13 feet 6 inches of vertical clearance shall be provided, as required by the North Carolina Fire
Prevention Code 2018 ed.
• Roadway shall be an all-weather surface and capable of withstanding an imposed weight load of
75,000lbs
Let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you.
Permit and Inspection Information is now available online! Click here to access our portal
lAzaketh Varnan
�sistant Pire Marsreaf
VranJc e'County 26meryency_4ervices
Pire Marsfiafbivision
Office: 919-245-6153
-Geff"Hone: 919-537-2149
Pax: 919-732-8130
Zmaif efarnan@orangecoun� c.2oy
Voe6.' &L:11orangecountync qoy
ocCJc rant me trre serenity to accept trrepeo,pfe fcannot cri w e,
the couraJc e to change tree one f can,
ancCtrie u^isdom to knowit sme.
—Aut"for unknown
From: Molly Boyle<mboyle@orangecountync.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, March 30, 2021 3:42 PM
To:Jason Shepherd <jhepherd@orangecountync.gov>
Cc: Elizabeth Farnan <efarnan@orangecountync.gov>
Subject: Question about Pyewacket comment
Hi Jason,
I saw your comment in Energov about needing the road width shown on the Pyewacket Concept Plan
(SUB21-0017).The engineer has a cross section of the road in the bottom right hand corner(see
attached). Is that what you need, or do you want a note included under the site data block as well?
Thank you!
Molly
<Orange County Concept Plan Comment Response Pyewacket Subdivision.pdf>
<Pyewacket SD Concept Plan Orange Co Rev. 4.8.21.pdf>
2
70
Molly Boyle
From: Kimberly Tyson <kimberly.tyson@chathamcountync.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 12:54 PM
To: Molly Boyle
Subject: [EXTERNAL MAIL!] RE: Orange County Review of Pyewacket Subdivision
Attachments: Community Meeting Report - Pyewacket Subdivision.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Molly,
Answers below in red:
• What stage of the review process is this project in with Chatham County now? Currently, Warren is working
on submitting for First Plat. He has turned in an EIA, fragmentation and on-site inventory
maps Is it going to your Planning Board on May 41h? No, this project will not be going to May 4
Planning Board
• Other than the Concept Plan (which I already have), are there any other project documents you could share with
me? I don't believe we have anything currently, the EIA submitted was peer review and was
Incomplete For example, if Warren or NC DOT has submitted anything regarding traffic impacts, something like
that would be helpful.
• How did the community meeting go? The county doesn't attend the community meeting, this
meeting is between the public and the developer. The developer provides staff a report of the
meeting. What kind of questions and/or concerns were expressed? I've attached the community meeting
report.
I hope this helps, please let me know if you have additional questions. Have a great weekend.
Sincerely,
5Z�69de 70"
Planner II/Subdivision
Chatham County
P.O. Box 54
80 East Street
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Office: 919-542-8283
Fax: 919-542-2698
In keeping with the NC Records Law, emails, including attachments, may be released to others upon request
for inspection and copying.
From: Molly Boyle<mboyle@orangecountync.gov>
Sent:Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:10 PM
1
71
To: Kimberly Tyson <kimberly.tyson@chathamcountync.gov>
Subject: Orange County Review of Pyewacket Subdivision
age originated from outside the Chatham County email system. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and kni
Hi Kimberly,
I'm the planner reviewing the Pyewacket major subdivision on the Orange County side. Even though no habitable lots
are proposed on our side of the line,we're still processing it as a major subdivision because public road dedication is
involved.
I figured I should touch base with you and let you know where we're at in our review process.We've scheduled a
neighborhood meeting for the Concept Plan on Tuesday,April 20t". It'll be held online. Here are the meeting details in
case anyone asks about it:
Neighborhood Meeting Information (Pyewacket)
Date Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Time 6:30 p.m.
Meeting Link https://global.gotomeeting.com/'oin/691676957
To dial in via phone 1 (646) 749-3122
Access Code 691-676-957
After that,the Concept Plan will go on to our Planning Board for review and decision on May 51h. Assuming it's approved,
Warren will then begin the Preliminary Plat application process, which will go to the Planning Board and then the County
Commissioners for decision.
We haven't received many calls from the public on this item yet.The questions we've received as mostly about traffic
impacts. It's my understanding that Jennifer Britt is the NC DOT contact for this project on both sides of the County line,
so I'll be reaching out to her as well.
I'm assuming our Planning Board will want information on the review process in Chatham County for context. I see from
your website that you had a neighborhood/community meeting on January 28t". I have a few other questions about the
project you may be able to answer:
• What stage of the review process is this project in with Chatham County now? Is it going to your Planning Board
on May 4tn.
• Other than the Concept Plan (which I already have), are there any other project documents you could share with
me? For example, if Warren or NC DOT has submitted anything regarding traffic impacts, something like that
would be helpful.
• How did the community meeting go?What kind of questions and/or concerns were expressed?
If there's anything you need from me, please let me know. I'll be happy to assist.Thanks in advance for any information
you can provide.
Best Regards,
7/1"f ry 611&1 Wry e5o
Planner 11
2
72
• • — .r
�,. F
Plan Details Name DAC Review Description Receive 5umbittal - DAC Review
Status Approved Action PHorlty Order �1
■ id Concept Plan V.1 + Received Date 3/11/2021 ® Due Date 4/10/2021
ld Application Completeness Check v,1 1 . Needs Resubmit .I Completed Auto Receive
4 Concept Plan Fees Paid v.l
Site Assessment v.I
■ Concept Plan Review v,i Item Review / Note
—
tid DAC Review v.I Drag a column header and drop It here to group by that column
N IM v.1 Name � Department[;lame � Assigned User � Status
Issue DAC (Decision Letter v.l
> r OC Stormwater Erosion Control/Stormwater EC, Christopher - Approved - L
Planning Board Preparation v.1 -
Planning Board Recommendation v.1 441 OC Fire Marshal Fire Marshal FNI, Jason Shepi Approved t ti
■ Preliminary Plat u.1 Solid Waste Management Solid Waste SK Jeff Scouter Approved -
Application Completeness Check v.1 Building Inspectlons Building Inspectlons 13I, Michael Real = t, Not Required - ?
Preliminary Plat Fees Paid v,1 OC Erosion Control Erosion Control/Stormwater CC, Patrick Mall( - Approved - 4
■ Preliminary Plat Review v.1
OC Health Department Environmental Health I:H, Phil Vilaro `�. Approved - "
DAC Review v.l -- - �
aJanminn Rnmrr' Pranarahnn v 1 OC Planning Planning/Zoning C-P, dolly Boyle - Approved