HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-02-2021; 6-a - 203 South Greensboro Project – Southern Branch Library and Skills Development Center 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: March 2, 2021
Action Agenda
Item No. 6-a
SUBJECT: 203 South Greensboro Project— Southern Branch Library and Skills
Development Center
DEPARTMENT: County Manager
Asset Management Services
(AMS)
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 — Schematic Design Estimate Travis Myren, Deputy County Manager,
2 — Schematic Design Cost Reduction 919-245-2308
Summary Steven Arndt, Asset Management
3 — Schematic Design Construction Cost Services Director, 919-245-2658
Matrix
4 — Orange County Southern Branch
Library Page from Approved Capital
Investment Plan (CIP)
PURPOSE: To review options and authorize the approach necessary to reconcile the budget for
the 203 Greensboro Project which, at the completion of the Schematic Design phase, is estimated
to be $1,807,160 over the approved budget.
BACKGROUND: At the March 10, 2020 Orange County Board of Commissioners Business
meeting, the Board approved a final scope and budget for the construction of the 203 Project,
named for its address at 203 South Greensboro Street, Carrboro, NC. This project is a joint
venture between the Town of Carrboro and Orange County that is intended to construct an Orange
County Southern library branch as well as permanent facilities for the Skills Development Center.
The Town of Carrboro's portion of the project includes meeting spaces, a small theater, and office
space. The proposed site of the development is an existing Carrboro municipal parking lot.
The design process began in April 2020 and involved a series of interviews and meetings with the
proposed building occupants. This work continued through the year and culminated in the
development of a Schematic Design (SD) including a detailed cost estimate. As shown in the chart
below, the total SD cost estimate was $2,592,533 over budget. Orange County's portion of the
project was estimated to be $2,409,812 over the authorized budget of $15.6 million. Attachment
1 provides the detailed Schematic Design estimate for the project.
Approved Project Budget $22,282,000.00
Schematic Design Estimate $24,874,533.00
Deficit -$2,592,533.00
Of the total estimated deficit, $2 million can be attributed to parking deck costs that exceeded
initial budget assumptions. The approved budget anticipated the construction of a pre-cast
parking deck costing $25,000 per parking stall. However, the limited size of the building site
2
imposed constraints that required the construction of a "cast in place" parking deck costing
$36,170 per parking stall. In addition, the original budget was based upon the construction of 83
Orange County parking stalls while the deck design requested by the building occupants
increased that total to 112 stalls. The following chart summarizes this information.
#of stalls Cost per stall Parking Cost
Original Parking Budget 83 $25,000 $2,075,000
Schematic Design Estimate 112 $36,170 $4,075,274
During December 2020, the project team conducted a Value Engineering (VE) exercise in an
effort to close the funding gap. A number of reduction strategies were employed, resulting in a
reduction of Orange County's portion of the deficit to $1,807,160. Attachment 2, the 203
Schematic Design Cost Reduction Summary, provides details regarding the VE efforts taken to
date. Attachment 3 provides a cost allocation matrix that divides the VE savings between the
Town of Carrboro and Orange County.
Several strategies can be used to reduce the remaining $1.8 million deficit. The following table
outlines different strategy combinations in five different options.
203 Project Budget Options
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5
Eliminate 20 stalls from
parking deck to Town $ (401,970) $ (401,970) $ (401,970)
Ordinance minimums
Eliminate an additional 20
stalls from parking deck and
replace with offsite leased $ (780,788) $ (780,788)
spaces
Transfer FFE to construction $ (447,775) $ (375,000) $ (84,390)
budget
Reduce STC rating in window
glazing in 57% of windows, $ (117,827) $ (74,824)
opt 1 and 36% opt 3
Reduce Construction
Contingency from 5%to 4.5% $ (58,800) $ (58,800) $ (58,800)
Shell Out Library and
Eliminate Library FFE $(1,262,000)
Shell Out Orientation Room $ (63,000)
Remove Outdoor Terrace and
G $ (52,778)
Green Roof
Total Cost Reduction $(1,807,160) $(1,807,160) $(1,807,160)
Strategies
Debt Finance Total Project
$1,807,160
Deficit
Debt Finance with $950,000
in Project Offsets $857,160
3
Option #1
• Reduce parking stalls to the number required under the Town's Land Use Ordinance
- $401,970
Through the design process, the facility occupants requested 20 more parking stalls than
the number that would be required under the Town's Land Use Ordinance. This request
was made prior to knowing the very high cost of the cast in place structure. Since these
parking spaces would be considered excess, this reduction can be accomplished without
replacing those spaces.
• Reduce and replace an additional 20 parking spaces - $780,788
The Town's ordinance would allow the County to replace constructed parking spaces on
site with leased spaces in the surrounding area. The elimination of 20 additional spaces
in the parking deck would result in a construction cost savings of$780,778 and an addition
of approximately $6,000 to the annual operating budget to lease off site spaces.
• Reduce furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FFE) - $447,775
The total FFE budget is $1,250,000. A portion of the FFE budget ($447,775) could be
transferred to the construction budget. This reduction would leave $802,225 for FFE and
result in reusing some of the existing classroom furniture, office furniture, and AV
equipment.
• Reduce Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of the window glazing in 57% of the
windows - $117,827
Sound Transmission Class (STC) is an integer rating of how well a building partition or
window attenuates sound. A reduction in the STC rating of window glazing will make the
building noisier. The windows will transmit more outside noise from traffic into the building.
• Reduce construction contingency from five percent (5%) of construction costs to
four point five percent (4.5%) - $58,800
Reducing the project contingency to 4.5% would accomplish the remaining savings. Since
this project is using a Construction Manager at Risk construction method, the need for a
robust owner's contingency is slightly reduced.
Option #2
• Option #1 Parking Reductions - $1,182,758
Utilize the same parking reduction strategies contained in Option #1
• Smaller reduction of FFE - $375,000
A smaller FFE reduction would reduce the reuse of existing furniture and equipment. This
reduction would leave $875,000 for FFE.
• Reduce the STC rating of fewer windows - $74,824
This option reduces the STC rating on thirty-six percent (36%) versus fifty-seven percent
(57%) in Option #1.
• Maintain construction contingency reduction from five percent (5%) to (4.5%) —
58,800
4
This option maintains the same contingency reduction as Option #1.
• Shell out orientation room - $63,000
The facility design currently includes an orientation room that is intended to support the
Skills Development Office as they introduce new clients to services offered by the office.
This option would shell out that room meaning that interior mechanical, electrical,
structural, life safety, and finishes would not be constructed at this time. Rather, the space
would be ready for renovation should funds become available.
• Remove outdoor terrace and green roof - $52,778
The facility design currently includes an outdoor terrace that would be used for outdoor
social gatherings. Removal of the third floor outdoor terrace would eliminate a building
amenity, but it would not impair the services provided in the facility.
Option #3
The third reduction option would reduce the scope of the overall project that was approved by the
Board. It is included only to represent the full range of options available to eliminate the estimated
project deficit.
• Reduce parking stalls to the number required under the Town's Land Use Ordinance
- $401,970
This option only reduces the number of parking stalls to the minimum required under the
Town's ordinance. This option does not contemplate replacing an additional 20 spaces
with leased stalls.
• Shell out library and eliminate the library FFE budget - $1,262,000
This option would defer construction of the library portion of the facility but preserve the
buildout of the library at a future date when funds become available. Shelling out the space
would save $512,000. Since the library would not be functional, this option also eliminates
$750,000 associated with the library's FFE budget.
• Smaller reduction of FFE for Skills Development - $84,390
This reduction would leave $415,610 for FFE in the Skills Development Center which would
be sufficient to eliminate or minimize the reuse of furniture and equipment.
• Maintain construction contingency reduction from five percent (5%) to (4.5%) —
58,800
This option maintains the same contingency reduction as Option #1.
Option #4
This option would increase the budgeted amount for the project to accommodate the schematic
design cost estimate. It would add $1,807,160 to the project budget. This option would require a
budget amendment. Borrowing an additional $1,807,160 would add up to $160,000 in annual
debt service payments.
Option #5
This option increases the project budget by $1,807,160 but also provides $950,000 in offsetting
project reductions in the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) to reduce the overall impact on the
5
County's debt requirements to $857,160. Specifically, the Board could choose to eliminate the
conservation easement project budgeted in Year 1 of the CIP and eliminate the Justice Center
generator project. The conservation easement project is funded by $500,000 in debt financing
while the generator project is funded with $450,000 in debt financing. This option would also
require a budget amendment.
Next Steps
Assuming that the library space is constructed and fully functional, it will require an increase in
annual operating costs of approximately$538,000. This new resource may also shift library usage
from the Chapel Hill library to the County's Southern Branch site. Since FY 14-15, Orange County
has contributed $568,139 annually to support library services to Orange County residents who
live outside the municipal limits of the Town of Chapel Hill. When the Southern Branch Library is
open, County staff will evaluate the impact the new branch has on the demand for services at the
Chapel Hill Library. This analysis will inform funding decisions that will be necessary to operate
the Southern Branch Library.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The financial impacts of the Options are as follows
• Options #1 and #2 would impact future operating budgets with an increase of $6,000 to
$12,000 to accommodate the leasing of additional parking.
• Option #3, which involves the shell out of the Library, would also defer $537,668 in
anticipated library operating costs
• Option #4 would increase the County's debt by $1,807,160 and debt service payments by
up to $160,000.
• Option #5 would increase the County's debt by $857,160 or up to $85,000 in debt service
payments by eliminating $500,000 in conservation easements and $450,000 for Justice
Center Generator currently budgeted in Year 1 of the CIP.
SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goals are applicable
to this item:
• GOAL: FOSTER A COMMUNITY CULTURE THAT REJECTS OPPRESSION AND
INEQUITY
The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race or color;
religious or philosophical beliefs; sex, gender or sexual orientation; national origin or ethnic
background; age; military service; disability; and familial, residential or economic status.
• GOAL: ENSURE ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY
The creation and preservation of infrastructure, policies, programs and funding necessary
for residents to provide shelter, food, clothing and medical care.
• GOAL: ENABLE FULL CIVIC PARTICIPATION
Ensure that Orange County residents are able to engage government through voting and
volunteering by eliminating disparities in participation and barriers to participation.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The following Orange County Environmental Responsibility Goal
impacts are applicable to this item:
• ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND WASTE REDUCTION
6
Initiate policies and programs that: 1) conserve energy; 2) reduce resource consumption;
3) increase the use of recycled and renewable resources; and 4) minimize waste stream
impacts on the environment.
• CLEAN OR AVOIDED TRANSPORTATION
Implement programs that monitor and improve local and regional air quality by: 1)
promoting public transportation options; 2) decreasing dependence on single-occupancy
vehicles, and 3) otherwise minimizing the need for travel.
• RESULTANT IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND AIR QUALITY
Assess and where possible mitigate adverse impacts created to the natural resources of
the site and adjoining area. Minimize production of greenhouse gases.
The design of the 203 Project embraces many energy efficiency technologies and green
construction methodologies. The building site is located on a public transportation route and
includes a bus stop.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve one or more of the
203 Greensboro Street Project options outlined above to eliminate a projected $1,807,160 project
deficit.
If the Board chooses to increase the project budget and/or eliminate projects from the Capital
Investment Plan, the Manager further recommends that the Board authorize staff to present a
budget amendment at an upcoming meeting to appropriate the necessary funds.
Attachment 1 - Schematic Design Estimate
SD Estimate Variance 7
■ BARINHILL November 11, 2020
CONTRACTING The 203 Project
COMPANY Carrboro, NC
TOTAL COSTS
Barnhill Bree Delta to Previous
Division 1: General Work - $ 1,082,067 $ 1,050,000.00 $ (32,067)
Division 3: Concrete $ 5,541,323 $ 5,576,030 $ 34,707
Division4:Masonry $ -1,257,050 $ 1,283,803 $ 26,753
Division 5:Steel $ 447,325 $ 423,549 $ (23,776)
Division 6:Wood&Plastics $ 248,240 $ 191,339 $ (56,901)
Division 7:Thermal&Moisture $ 1,241,655 $ 1,032,687 $ (208,968)
Division 8:Doors&Glass $ 1,712,425 $ 1,632,365 $ (80,060)
Division 9: Finishes W $ 1,766,474 $ 1,727,426 $ (39,048)
Division 10:Specialties $ 148,655 $ 95,073 $ (53,582)
Division 11:Equipment $ 35,400 $ 35,000 $ (400)
Division 12:Furnishings $ 56,280 $ 20,000 $ (36,280)
Division 14:Conveying Systems $ 400,000 $ 465,000 $ 65,000
Division 21:Fire Suppression $ 320,006 $ 337,422 $ 17,416
Division 22:Plumbing $ 275,500 $ 309,738 $ 34,238
Division 23:Heating,Ventilating,Air Conditioning $ 1,919,148 $ 1,948,383 $ 29,235
Division 26:Electrical $ 2,982,219 $ 2,902,216 $ (80,003)
Division 31:Earthwork $ 363,633 $ 467,974 $ 104,341
Division 32:Exterior Improvements $ 195,577 $ 445,283 $ 249,707
Division 33:Site Utilities $ 36,201 $ - - 137,880 $ 101,680
SUBTOTAL TRADE PACKAGES $ 20,029,177 $ 26,081,169 $ 51,992
SUBGUARD BONDING $ 280,408 $ 240,974 $ (39,434)
SUBTOTAL COST OF WORK $ 20,309,585 $ 20,322,143 $ 12,558
CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY $ 406,192 $ 406,443 $ 251
DESIGN/ESTIMATE CONTINGENCY $ 11015,479 $ 1,016,107 $ 628
ESCALATION $ 1,015,479 $ 1,016,107 $ 628
SUBTOTAL $ 22,746,735 $ 22,760,799 $ 14,064
CMAR GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 700,000 $ 682,824 $ (17,176)
CMAR INSURANCES $ 495,003 $ 261,749 $ (233,254)
BONDS $_ - $ 191,191 $ 191,191
CM FEE 11 $ 932,795 $ 853,530 1 $ (79,265)
TOTAL $ 24,874,533 1 $ 24,750,094 1 $ (124,439)
Building Gross Area 131,696 sgft $ 131,696 $ -
Attachment 2- VE Design Cost Reduction Summary g
THE 203 PROJECT:SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST REDUCTION SUMMARY
1212&2WO
Project Budget(based on precast parking deck) $22,292,000
Schematic Design Estimate(based on LIP parking deck) $24,974,533
Delta ($2,592,533)
%Delta -11.6%
Premiums Associated with CIP Deck $2,207,580
9.9%
tterng Desc iption Total Pending Rejecleci Accepted 1 Accepted 2 Remarks
SITE WORK VE ITEMS
Site Options to use brush finished concrete sidewalk ILO ($30,142) 1330,1421 ($30,142)
Riverstone Paver at Around level entrances
Site Option to use segmented block site wall (56,360) ($6,360) Technically not feasible
SITEWORK SUBTOTAL ($36,502) $0 ($6,360) ($30,142)
FINISHES VE ITEMS
F 1 Option to utilized lower cast ACT ($40,591) ($40,591) (S40,591) Per Barnhill,allows for 2'X2'tegular'Optima grade tile
F2 Option to utilized lower grade Quartz ILO Premium ($5,084) ($5,084) ($5,084)
F3 Option to utilized lower cost porcelain tile ($15,457) ($15,457) �$15,4571
F4 Option to utilized lower cost brick ($861907} ($86,907) ($86,907) Pending final hrick selection
F 5 Option to replace curtain wall with storefront by ($134,557) (520,194) ($114,373) ($114,373) Acwpted but exact savings pending further study
addine steel&brickto seduce spans
F6 Option to utilize ptd_pert.mti.railings for ($101,555) ($101,555) ($101,555)
monumental stair ILO&lass
r7 Options to utilize painted picket railing at terrace ($38,759) ($38,7S9) {$38,759)
1LDelass
F 8 Option to remove skylights ($80,847) ($80,847)
F9 Remove terrazzo and utilize polished concrete ($228,156) (S228,156) ($228,156) Pending further study
r 10 Reduce SLC ratings in glazing ($206,715) ($206,715) Pending CM clarifications
F11 Use gyp.lad.cgsILOmetal-ffk ($37,555) (537,555) ($37,555)
F 12 Reduce gyp bd c}gs from 9,805sf to 8,129sf and add ($25,682) ($25,682) ($25,682) Trish confirming internally
1,676st ofdrvfail to exposed clas
F13 Reduce ACt from 24,3944to 9,335s€,add 15059sfof (567,869) ($67,869) ($67,869) Trish confirming internally
dryfall paint to exposed clgs
F 14 Add 2,161sf of baffled reilcing at$25/sf $511943 $51,943 $51,943
FiNiSHESSUBTOTAL ($1,017,791) 1$313,806) ($80,847) ($623,138) ($710,045)
MEP VE ITEMS
MEP Use compact aluminium conductors lLO copper ($4,807) ($4,807) ($4,807)
conductors
MEP 2 Use ME cable where approved by engineers ($13,220] ($13,220) ($13,220)
MEP 3 Decrease AVAC spec,possibty negating LEED Gold ($120,193) ($220,183) ($120,183) Per Barnhill:we can maintain VRF but don't over design
Status sytsems(controls/difiusers/etc)
MCP Look for savings in lighting and elec.Gear,TRD ($120,183) (560,092) (560,092) ($60,092) Savings pending moredetailed lighting package
amount of potential VE savings
MEP 5 Conduittoj-hooks (526,080) ($26,080) 1$26,080)
MEP Move cost offiber duct bankto otherfunding source ($76,917) (576,917) Trish confimingwRh internal IT(Andy Vogel and lirn
Northrup)
MLP SUBTOTAL ($361,390) ($137,009) ($4,307) ($219,575) ($219,575)
GENERAL VE ITEMS
61 Eliminate top partial ramp of parking deck,east side ($401,970) ($401,970) ($401,970)
reducing Dwkinc by 20 spaces
G 2 Use barrier cable ILO precast spandmis at parking ($40,021) (W,021) Pending Trish's feedback.Renderings provided with and
deck without harrier cable
G3 Remove banner hangers at precast in parking deck ($33,741) ($33,741) 1$33,741)
G4 Reduce parking by an additional 20 spaces-4th floor ($780,788) ($780,7881 ($780,788)
(ill additoin to Gil
G5 Reduce parking by an additional 20 spaces-3rd Floor ($494,809) ($494,809)
(in additain to(;l+G4)
G 6 Reduce building height by 2ft-reduce rlty of brick ($128,296) ($128,2961 ($128,296)
CIP,Blazing and sosnic]W panel
G7 Reduce core height by 4 ft--reduce qty of brick and ($50,958) 1$50,9581 ($50,958)
CIP
68 Remove Terrace and green foors and prelace with ($94,266) ($94,266)
MP,ular roo#with no slap fold
G9 She only ILO finish-performance space ($318,726) (5318,7251
G10 Shen only ILO finish-WCOM ($58,842) ($5$,842)
G11 Shell only ILO finish-Multipurpose room ($153,152) 15153,152)
G12 Shot!onlylLO finish-East halfofground floor ($359,589) ($359,589)
G 13 Shell only ILO finish-6,256sf of Level 3 Offices ($450,OD0) \ ($450,000) Maintain penmter wa0,code minimum lighting,sprinklers,
fire alwarm,etc
GENERALSUBTOTAL ($3,365,158) ($40,021) ($2,662,142) ($212,995) ($1,845,753)
9
ALTERNATES
ALTS Use MassTimber(CLT)for building only KO post $1,009,540 $1,009,540
tension--parking deck mmains❑P pot tension
ALT2 Option to use steel for building l€O post tension $471,119 $471,119
ALT 3 Option to ad efectrochtomic glass at west£made on $226,684 $226,684 Manual shades in base bid;maintain as alternate
levels 2/3 curtainwall
ALT 4 Optipon to use motomzid shades ILO M--wd $147,826 $147,825 Manual shadesin base bid;maintain as alternate
ALTERNATE55UBTOTAL $1.855,169 $374510 $1,480,659 $0 $0
TOTAL DEDUCTS ($4,832,784) ($490,835) ($2,754,156( ($1,137,793) ($2,827,316)
TOTAL ADDS $1,907,112 $374,510 $1,480,659 $51,943 $51,943
[TOTAL ($2,925,6721 ($116,325( ($1,273,4971 ($1,085,8501 ($2,775,373)l
Attachment 3- Construction Cost Allocation Matrix 10
THE 203 SCHEMATIC DESIGN CONSTRUCTION COST ALLOCATION MATRIX
112112021
Town WCOM County Shared Bldg Site Site Parking
Percent of Space 42.62% 1.76% 55.62%
#of cars 56 3 111 3
Cars In Excess of LUO
portion of shared parking 1.28 0.05 1.67
Shared Costs 11,212,039 1,290,170 6,257,58
Dedicated 2,340,455 143,028 2,555,097
Shared 4,778,571 197,332 6,236,136
Site 549,870 22,707 717,593
Parking 2,071,824 110,423 4,075,335
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST* $9,740,720 $473,490 $13,584,160
of Base Cost 40.93% 1.99% 57.08%
BUDGETS $10,505,000 inc w/Town $11,777,00
delta-(over)/under $290,790 {$1,807,160)
BUDGET%ASSUMPTIONS 44% inc w/Town 56%
1.08% -1.OS%
NOTES:
Construction Costs The construction costs are for all base construction costs.This does not include furniture,AV
equipment,specialized performance space seating and equipment,IT fiber,parking management
system,rooftop photo voltaic panels,land acquisition,and soft casts.Construction costs include
just over$1M in accepted value engineering(VE)options.
Dedicated:The construction costs associated with the building out of dedicated tenant areas.
Shared:The construction costs associated with shared areas of the builing.This includes structure,building
envelope,central utilities,stairs,elevators,risers,common lobby,cirtulation spaces,etc.Shared
costs are allocated to tenants on a prorated basis based on percentage of net area in the building.
Site:The construction costs associated with site including street utilities,hardscape,landscape,site
lighting lighting,etc.Shared costs are allocated to tenants on a prorated basis based on percentage
of net area in the building.
Parking:The construction costs associated with the parking structure allocated on the spaces required by
each tenant.The costs of shared parking spaces are allocated to tenants on a prorated basis based
on percentage of net area in the building.Spaces above and beyond the LUO required parking
spaces is allocated to the Town of Carrboro as a Town decision to include the additional parking.
Subject to Change As the design progresses and plans are modified,there may be small adjustments to the percent of
net space allocated to each tenant.
Owners'Budgets Owners's budgets are per the"Option 1-budget Allocation with Skills Development"table provided
by Orange County.There is a$1.114M owner's contingency that is not included in the above noted
budgets.
11
Orange County Southern Branch Library
Project Category County Project Status: Active Project Type
Functional Service Area: Support Services Proposed Bid Date: TBD New x
Department: Asset Management Services Starting Date: 7/1/2018 Expansion
Project Number: 10050 Completion Date: 6/30/2021 Renovation
Replacement
Project Description/Justification:
In October 2017,the County entered into a development agreement with the Town of
Carrboro to collaborate on a building project at 203 S Greensboro Street that would house the
Orange County Southern Branch Library and Town of Carrboro offices. Funding for
construction was originally approved in FY2018-19. In early 2020,the Board of Commissioners �.k }
endorsed expanding the original project scope to include a replacement for the Skills
Development Center, its associated parking facilities, and other costs related to completing the
project. These changes increased the total project budget to$15.6 million.Additional design
services will be incurred in FY 2020-21 while construction costs will start to be incurred in r
FY2021-22, as well as additional professional services. This location will replace the Cybrary
and McDougle facilities and permanently house the Skills Development Center. ii
- r
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Five Year 6
Prior Years Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Year to
Project Budget Funding 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Total Year10
Appropriation
Professional Services 1,172,500 400,000 414,993 814,993
Construction/Repairs/Renovations
Skills Development 3,969,000 3,969,000
Common Area Construction 1,008,000 1,008,000
Library Construction w/Contingency 4,625,000 688,850 688,850
Parking Construction 1,000,000 1,075,000 1,075,000
Equipment/Furnishings 1,250,000 1,250,000
Appropriation Total 6,797,500 400,000 8,405,843 8,805,843
Revenues/Funding Source
Debt Financing 6,533,500 400,000 8,405,843 8,805,843
Available Project Balances 264,000
Revenues/Funding Source Total 6,797,500 400,000 8,405,843 8,805,843
Impact on Operating Budget
Personnel 514,054 514,054 514,054 1,542,162 2,570,270
Operations 145,000 145,000 145,000 435,000 725,000
Impact on Operating Budget Total 659,054 659,054 659,054 1,977,162 3,295,270