HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04-21-2020 Virtual Business Meeting 1
APPROVED 5/5/2020
MINUTES
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
VIRTUAL BUSINESS MEETING
APRIL 21, 2020
7:00 p.m.
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met for a Virtual Business Meeting on Tuesday,
April 21, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Rich and Commissioners Jamezetta Bedford,
Mark Dorosin, Sally Greene, Earl McKee, Mark Marcoplos, and Renee Price
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: John Roberts
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Bonnie Hammersley, Deputy County Manager
Travis Myren and Clerk to the Board Donna Baker (All other staff members will be identified
appropriately below)
Chair Rich called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Due to current public health concerns, the Board of Commissioners conducted a Virtual
Business meeting on April 21, 2020. Members of the Board of Commissioners participated in
the meeting remotely. As in prior meetings, members of the public were able to view and listen
to the meeting via live streaming video at orangecountync.gov/967/Meeting-Videos and on
Orange County Gov-TV on channels 1301 or 97.6 (Spectrum Cable).
In this new virtual process, there are two methods for public comment.
• Written submittals by email
• Speaking during the virtual meeting
Detailed public comment instructions for each method are provided at the bottom of this
agenda. (Pre-registration is required.)
1. Additions or Changes to the Agenda
NONE
PUBLIC CHARGE
The Chair acknowledged the Public Charge
Arts Moment
No Arts Moment will be available for this meeting.
2. Public Comments
a. Matters not on the Printed Agenda
Riley Ruske (sent in via email):
2
The citizens of Orange County have been able to dispose of ‘construction and demolition’
materials at the various recycle sites for years. The only constraint is published on the signage
at the sites allowing 4.5 cubic yards or 120 cubic feet per weekday or weekend. Suddenly we
are being told that the limit has been reduced to 3 cubic feet—the equivalent of about 2 Walmart
shopping bags!!! This will not even cover a minor yard clean-up of a tiny structure or other
debris. We are told to go to the Eubanks road site where we will have to pay tipping fees of $22
per pick-up or trailer or $5 per carload. This constitutes a 98% reduction in service to residents
and a new tipping fee ‘tax’ on top of the already high $142 Solid Waste Programs Fee for each
residence. Why has there not been public discussion of this change? Who authorized and
approved of this increase in fees to the citizens of Orange County? Will the Solid Waste
Programs Fee for residences be reduced to compensate for these new tipping fees?
This change is not only a costly inconvenience but creates a hazard as rural residents are
forced to travel down the interstate with construction and demolition materials in trailers and
pickup trucks. Of course, prudent persons properly secure their loads, but sadly, many do not
as demonstrated by the trash along the rural roads.
Please rescind this policy and return to the previous policy, which was safer and less costly to
citizens.
b. Matters on the Printed Agenda
(These matters will be considered when the Board addresses that item on the agenda
below.)
3. Announcements, Petitions and Comments by Board Members
Commissioner Bedford said at 5:00 p.m. today she had a conference call with the
Burlington Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). She said there is a projected
$300 million decrease in revenues from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) through June 30. She said this will lead to the postponement of projects. She said
the SPOT 6 for that MPO was delayed until May 19th.
Commissioner Bedford thanked all of the essential workers and County staff that are
keeping everyone safe. She also thanked the public for staying home.
Commissioner Greene echoed Commissioner Bedford’s comment.
Commissioner Greene said she attended the Partnership to End Homelessness
(PTEH) virtual meeting. She said all service coordinators are working together, water stations
are being maintained, and the InterFaith Council (IFC) kitchen and pantry have seen a 50%
increase in usage, and is need of shelf ready foods.
Commissioner Greene said there is a $20,000 grant from Cardinal Innovations for
those exiting prisons.
Commissioner Greene said Nate Broman-Fulks, Town of Chapel Hill Affordable
Housing Manager, reported that the Town is getting a new $245,000 CDBG grant to be used for
rental assistance, and other housing needs. She said the Town and the County are working
closely on housing.
Commissioner Greene said Corey Root, PTEH Coordinator, reported there is a new
emergency grant coming out in the amount of $5 billion nationwide.
Commissioner Greene said Emila Sutton, Housing Director, reported that the Housing
Choice program will be able to help people with rent payments, due to lost income.
Commissioner McKee said a member of the public contacted him about the Solid
Waste Convenience Center (SWCC). He said this resident was told that the SWCC would not
be taking more than a wheelbarrow of household of C&D. He asked if he could receive more
information on hours and what the SWCCs will accept.
3
Commissioner Price said many thanks to all who are caring for each other.
Commissioner Price said the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners
(NCACC) and National Association of Counties (NACo) are lobbying for counties to get direct
funding during this pandemic, as opposed of the funding going through the state.
Commissioner Price said the Chamber of Commerce is doing what it can to help small
businesses apply for loans.
Commissioner Price said the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) has an item on
the ABC Board in its Information Items, and Commissioner Dorosin, not her, is now the Board
representative to the ABC Board. She said when the Board receives reports from the ABC
Board, she would also like to know the requested fund amounts versus the amounts that are
received.
Commissioner Price said she solicited information from Steve Brantley, Economic
Development Director, about how local farmers are doing and they seem to be doing quite well.
Commissioner Marcoplos said he and Chair Rich met with Sig Hutchinson from the
Wake County Orange County Board of Commissioners about greenways, as well as and
Charles Flynn, Owner, Greenways, Inc. He said many municipalities have signed a resolution
committing to connect intelligently with other greenways, which he would like the BOCC to
support as well. He said he will send the resolution to staff.
Commissioner Marcoplos referenced the community garden grant program, and said
the County should re-publicize it. He said he would like a report on this grant and its success.
Commissioner Dorosin said he had a petition and two reports.
Commissioner Dorosin said he thought the Board should consider an Orange County
Centralized Recovery Office, with a dedicated staff person to head it up to coordinate all of the
recovery efforts: tracking funds, prioritization of funds, etc. that will be made over the next 6-12
months. He said this could be useful for the County and for residents, and serve as a one- stop
shop. He suggested issuing Orange County recovery bonds: low interest yield bonds one
would buy from the County, and all the resources would go into these recovery funds. He said
this would need to be done quickly, and would be similar to war bonds. He said staff would
need to find out legally if the County can do this.
Commissioner Dorosin said he attended an ABC Board meeting today, and a question
was raised as to when the BOCC will be making appointments to the ABC Board.
Commissioner Dorosin said there has been an increase in alcohol sales in Orange
County during this pandemic. He said the ABC has made a lot of efforts toward safety and
cleaning of its stores, and the ABC Board approved a $2 raise for all employees, except the
highest tier.
Commissioner Dorosin said Durham Tech’s search for a new president is moving
forward, and he will be following up with the BOCC on some of the qualities that it hopes to see
in the new president for Durham Tech, which he will share with the search committee.
Chair Rich said there was a request to review the ¼ cents climate mitigation tax rubric,
and she asked Commissioner Price, Commissioner Greene and Commissioner Marcoplos to do
so by June 2nd.
Chair Rich said the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) minutes would be going out
as soon as she reviews them.
Chair Rich said the EOC is starting to talk about recovery, re-entry, homelessness and
food.
Chair Rich said she continues to talk with the Mayors and the School Board Chairs and
they are collaborating with their partners.
4. Proclamations/ Resolutions/ Special Presentations
NONE
4
5. Public Hearings
NONE
6. Regular Agenda
a. Proposed Orange County Five-Year Consolidated Plan, FY 2020-2021 Annual
Action Plan, and FY 2020-2021 HOME Activities
The Board will consider:
1) Adoption of a Resolution approving the draft Five-Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2020-
2021 through FY 2024-2025 and FY 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan;
2) Adoption of a Resolution approving the proposed HOME Program Activities for FY 2020-
2021 and authorize the Chair to sign; and
3) Authorizing the County Manager to implement the HOME Program as approved by the
BOCC, including the ability to execute agreements with partnering nonprofit
organizations after consultation with the County Attorney and based on the allocation
received from HUD.
BACKGROUND:
Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan
Every five years, state and local governments (“Participating Jurisdictions”) that receive HOME
Investment Partnerships Program funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (“HUD”) are required to complete a Consolidated Plan that assesses the housing
and community development needs of their jurisdiction, analyzes market conditions, and lays
out a strategic plan that identifies priority needs and associated goals and anticipated
allocations of federal and other funds. Additionally, Participating Jurisdictions must complete an
Annual Action Plan showing how they will work to fulfill the goals and address the priorities in
the Consolidated Plan in each program year.
The Orange County HOME Consortium (also called the Local Government Affordable Housing
Collaborative), consisting of the County and the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and
Hillsborough, completed the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan through extensive data
analysis and community engagement conducted in partnership with Apiary Community
Consulting and University of North Carolina researchers.
FY 2020-2021 HOME Program Activities
For FY 2020-2021, Orange County anticipates receiving the following HOME resources:
FY 2020-2021
HOME Funds $ 374,851
HOME Program Income $ 13,000
Local Match (25% of HOME) $ 93,712
Total $ 481,563
The above amounts are estimates and may be adjusted according to the actual allocation
received from HUD.
The HOME Consortium, comprised of one (1) elected official and staff members from Orange
County and the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Hillsborough, reviewed the received
applications for the FY 2020-2021 HOME Program on March 26, 2020 and made the following
funding recommendations for consideration by each of the jurisdictions’ elected bodies:
5
Habitat for Humanity – Homeownership Assistance $ 94,138
CASA – Rental Development $ 200,000
EmPOWERment – Rental Development $ 56,228
Local Match – Rental Assistance $ 93,712
Administration $ 37,485
Total $ 481,563
The above amounts may still be adjusted according to the actual allocation received from HUD.
In accordance with the Orange County HOME Consortium Agreement, approved in May 2011,
the HOME Program Design for each year must be approved by all jurisdictions prior to
submission to HUD. The HOME Program Design is scheduled for approval by the:
• Town of Carrboro on April 21, 2020;
• Town of Chapel Hill on April 22, 2020; and
• Town of Hillsborough on May 11, 2020.
The Board of Commissioners is therefore asked to consider approval of the attached HOME
Program Design Resolution.
The Consolidated Plan and FY 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan must be submitted to HUD on or
before May 15, 2020.
HOME Program Implementation
After approval of the FY 2020-2021 HOME Program Design by all Consortium participants,
authorization is requested to allow the Orange County Manager, based on the HUD allocation
received, to execute agreements with partnering nonprofit organizations as necessary to
implement the approved HOME Program Design. All agreements will be reviewed and approved
by the County Attorney’s Office.
Emila Sutton, Housing Director, made the following PowerPoint presentation:
ORANGE COUNTY HOME PROGRAM
2020 CONSOLIDATED PLAN, ACTION PLAN, & FY21 HOME PROGRAM
Orange County Board of Commissioners
April 21, 2020
AGENDA
• HOME Overview
• Consolidated Plan Overview
• Action Plan Overview
• FY 2020-2021 HOME Award Recommendations
HOME PROGRAM
Purpose
• Increase the supply of decent, affordable housing to low-income households
• Expand the capacity of nonprofit housing providers
• Strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing
• Leverage private sector participation
Uses
6
• Acquisition of real property, site improvements, & housing construction
• Housing rehabilitation & reconstruction
• Homeownership assistance
• Tenant-based rental assistance
CONSOLIDATED PLAN
• Five year planning document detailing the use of HUD grants
o HOME: Orange County
o CDBG: Chapel Hill
• Three main components: Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, & Strategic Plan
o Needs Assessment & Market Analysis look at housing, homelessness, and
community development
o Strategic Plan identifies priorities, sets goals, & earmarks resources
CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY
Needs Assessment
• Cost burden is the most common housing problem
• Homelessness in Orange County remains stubbornly high
• Orange County has many people with unique housing needs, such as seniors and
people with disabilities
Market Analysis
• The housing market in Orange County is high-cost
• There are some, but not enough, subsidized units
• Orange County’s economic base lies in healthcare, education, and professional
services, in addition to retail and service sectors that accommodate them
• CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY
Strategic Plan
• Based on the Needs Assessment, Market Analysis, and community and stakeholder
input, the Strategic Plan establishes the following priorities:
o Housing for People Experiencing Homelessness
o Housing for Low- and Moderate-Income Households
o Integrated Housing for People with Service Needs
o Community Development and Services (CDBG only)
• Activities to address these priority needs with HOME funds include: rental construction,
rental assistance, housing rehabilitation/preservation, home ownership construction, and
home buyer assistance
ACTION PLAN
• Annual “update” to Strategic Plan piece of the Consolidated Plan
• Includes information on HOME funding awards for the year in question
o Chapel Hill also creates a separate Action Plan for their CDBG funds
FY21 HOME PROGRAM
• Applications for FY20-21 HOME program were due on 2/17
• Applications are reviewed and scored by staff (Towns & County)
• Scoring based on:
1. Income targeting
2. Vulnerable population(s)
3. Long-term affordability
4. Project location relative to services & employment
5. Leveraging other funding
7
6. Cost effectiveness
7. Capacity to complete project
• Award recommendations made by HOME Consortium (Local Government Affordable
Housing Collaborative)
FY21 HOME APPLICANTS
Habitat CASA EMPME
Funding Request $390,000 $350,000
$200,00
Funding Award $94,138 $200,000 $56,228
Project Description Second mortgage
assistance for Habitat
home buyers
Gap financing for Merritt
Mill, a 48 unit rental project
with some units set aside
for people with disabilities
Financing for 107
Johnson Street, an 8
to 10 unit rental
project
Income Targeting 9 units for households
earning up to 50% AMI
and 4 units up to 80%
AMI
9 units for households
earning up to 3Poe0% AMI
and 39 units for households
earning up to 80% AMI
2 units for
households earning
up to 30% AMI, 7
units up to 50%
AMI, and 1 unit at
80% AMI
Population Targeting Low-income seniors and
people with disabilities
will be targeted in 15%
of units
People with disabilities will
be targeted in 9 units (19%)
None, but of their
existing portfolio,
48% of residents are
voucher holders
Project Location Fairview community in
Hillsborough and
Northside neighborhood
in Carrboro
Merritt Mill Road in
Carrboro/ Chapel Hill
Pine Knolls
neighborhood in
Chapel Hill
Leveraging Total non-HOME
project funding is $1.5
million
Total non-HOME project
funding is $8.6 million
Total non-HOME
project funding is
$2.4 million
FY21 HOME AWARD RECOMMENDATION
Funding Sources
FY 2020-2021 HOME Funds $ 374,851
HOME Program Income $ 13,000
8
Local Match (25% of HOME) $ 93,712
Total $ 481,563
Funding Uses
Habitat for Humanity – Homebuyer Assistance $ 94,138
CASA – Rental Development $ 200,000
EmPOWERment – Rental Development $ 56,228
Local Match – Rental Assistance $ 93,712
Administration $ 37,485
Total $ 481,563
Commissioner Price referred to the resolution under rental development, and said it says
84 units, but should say 48 units.
Commissioner Price asked if there are any guidelines as to how the Housing
Department determines the amount of funds per unit.
Emila Sutton said Commissioner Dorosin may be able to speak to that.
Commissioner Dorosin said the consortium meeting did not include a target, but with this
particular discussion, most of the funds were given to CASA is because it was doing rentals. He
said given that the Home Consortium had a limited pot of funds, the rentals were a big factor in
the discussion. He said CASA was also serving the highest number of people at the lowest
targeted AMI.
A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Bedford for the
Board to:
1) Adopt a Resolution approving the draft Five-Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2020-2021
through FY 2024-2025 and FY 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan;
2) Adopt and authorize the Chair to sign a Resolution approving the proposed HOME
Program Activities for FY 2020-2021; and
3) Authorize the County Manager to implement the HOME Program as approved by the
BOCC, including the ability to execute agreements with partnering nonprofit
organizations after consultation with the County Attorney and based on the allocation
received from HUD.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
b. Climate Action Tax Recommendations for FY 2019-20 – School Solar Update
The Board received additional information on the Solar for Schools Grant program that
could be funded through the FY 2019-20 Orange County Climate Action Tax in response to
Board members’ questions at the February 4, 2020 Board Business Meeting; and consider
voting to approve funding for the recommended Solar for Schools Grant program for FY 2019-
20 as outlined.
Travis Myren presented this item:
BACKGROUND: As part of the FY 2019-20 budget, the Board of Commissioners authorized an
additional ¼ cent property tax to provide an estimated $469,272 dedicated to accelerating
9
climate change mitigation through the new Climate Change Mitigation Project in the Capital
Investment Plan.
When the tax was authorized, the BOCC stated that it would decide the final prioritization of
projects to be funded, and the Board requested that the Commission for the Environment (CFE)
provide feedback on prospective projects in advance of BOCC review.
The CFE completed its initial scoring, and the BOCC reviewed a report that outlined the
recommended projects at its Business meeting on February 4th. At that meeting the Board
approved funding for two of the four recommended projects, and at the request of school
leadership, temporarily deferred taking any action on the two projects which make up the
proposed Solar for Schools grant program. Attachment 1 is a copy of this report revised in
accordance with the comments received from the BOCC.
During the discussion of the Solar for Schools grant program, Board members asked several
questions in preparation for additional discussion in the future. In response, staff revised the
report and had discussions with staff in both school districts. Attachment 2 is a list of the Board
members’ questions and follow-up responses on the recommended Solar for Schools Grant
Program.
The Board considered the item again at its April 7, 2020 Business meeting. However, some
additional concerns were raised by both school systems. The Board once again deferred action
on the two proposed Solar for Schools projects to allow additional communication between both
school districts and County staff, and also to allow both Boards of Education to consider the
proposed rooftop solar projects.
The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Board of Education met on April 16, 2020 and
expressed support for its rooftop solar project. The Orange County Schools (OCS) Board of
Education is scheduled to meet on April 20, 2020 to discuss its rooftop solar project, and County
staff will provide an update to the BOCC on any actions taken at that OCS meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Climate Action Tax is projected to generate $469,272 in funds in FY
2019-20. The top two recommended projects have already been approved to use $169,272 of
these funds, and the remaining $300,000 is recommended to fund two Solar for Schools grants
for $150,000 each.
Chair Rich said both school districts have indicated that they would like to move forward
on these solar projects.
Travis Myren reminded the Board that they discussed this item on April 7th and additional
questions were raised, and staff was asked to see if the school districts would like to use these
funds.
Travis Myren said both Boards of Education (BOE’s) accepted these grant funds, and he
circulated both action items from both districts to the Orange County Board of Commissioners
earlier today.
Commissioner McKee said he had concerns about the differences between leasing and
purchasing. He said there may be a lower up front cost with leasing, but if they actually use the
funds to leverage a larger system, it may be cheaper over the long term to own. He asked if
staff has any figures on long-term costs. He said there were some answers in the abstract, but
there were not a lot of numbers and the Board does not know what their long term costs are.
He said he would have liked to have seen the costs of leasing versus ownership.
10
Travis Myren said the grant would allow the districts to do whatever they think is in their
best interest.
Commissioner McKee said it would have been more helpful to have had the long term
costs, and would have been interesting to see these numbers.
Commissioner McKee asked if anyone contacted local solar providers about how much
the systems would cost. Commissioner McKee asked if staff knows the efficiency downgrades
on these systems.
Travis Myren said staff has these calculations, and he can get them to the Board.
Commissioner McKee said there is no need at this point, but it would have been helpful
to have numbers that are verifiable.
Commissioner McKee referred to page 13, and read:
Solar panels have a 25-year life expectancy, and the leasing company often only
owns the panels for the first 5-10 years. The schools have the option to write into the
lease agreement that the solar company will manage any repairs and maintenance
either during the time the system is owned by the solar company or for the entire life
of the panels. After an agreed-upon period of time, the lease agreement should allow
the Schools to make one of the following choices:
1.) Purchase the panels at a much reduced cost;
2.) Renegotiate a new lease agreement;
3.) Ask the solar company to remove the panels at no cost.
Commissioner McKee asked if these solar companies are willing to write in any of these
points into a lease agreement.
Travis Myren said he can find out this information.
Commissioner McKee said it would have been nice for both the Board and the schools
to know the situation that would be facing them after 5-10 years.
Travis Myren said determining what to do with the panels at the end of a lease, or their
usefulness, will be at the discretion of the school districts.
Commissioner McKee referred to page 11, item 2, and read the following excerpt.
2. Are there Duke Energy Solar Incentives that apply to this project?
Duke Energy will provide up to $75K in incentives for public entities to install solar
energy systems >100kW. Assuming these potential projects offset a school’s total
energy demand, these projects are likely to eligible for that level of incentives (see
this fact sheet for more info).
That incentive is locked in after the design phase once Duke approves an
interconnection agreement, so projects could be designed with a budget of
$225,000. Some project money would be spent on design before the incentive was
guaranteed, but there could be a clause that would allow the remainder of project
funds to be contingent on Duke solar incentive approval.
Commissioner McKee said this wording leads him to wonder why one would design a
project before having a commitment from Duke.
Travis Myren said Duke will not approve an incentive unless they know certain criteria
about the project. He said there would be some engineering to do before one can apply for the
Duke incentive.
Commissioner Price referred to the issue of leasing, and asked if the school boards
wanted to negotiate a longer lease, do these companies provide upgrades during the lease
period.
11
Travis Myren said not to his knowledge. He said leasing becomes an option when you
face technology obsolescence.
Commissioner Price referred to page 7, “Supplemental Weatherization for Low Income
Households-weatherizations up fits,” and asked if staff can provide a list of the funding and what
is allowed.
Travis Myren said yes.
Commissioner Marcoplos pointed out that they are not on the frontier of solar
technology, and the information regarding ownership and leasing is readily available. He said it
is up to the schools to make that decision, and both districts have experience with solar arrays,
so there is little risk. He said leasing is typically much cheaper, and includes maintenance.
Commissioner Greene referred to page 8, and the three grant requirements and
signage:
1.) That the solar projects maximize the purchase power of the grant funding by
considering leasing of the solar panels in the arrangement laid out in 2017 by
H.B. 589, and report to the County on the decision that was made to purchase or
lease.
2.) The grantees must report the total solar energy generated as well as the percent
of each facility’s energy use that was served by the solar system. This would
provide pressure for continued focus on energy efficiency along with the
renewable energy.
3.) The grantees must have a monitor showing the live energy performance of their
systems in a public location with a sign noting that the system was paid for by
proceeds of the Orange County Climate Action Tax.
Commissioner Greene said, in the interest of education, she would want the signage to
say more. She said this solar array will reduce carbon emissions, which could be quantified,
and the signage could also list the benefits for climate action.
Chair Rich said the County is granting the money to the schools, and asked if Orange
County has a role thereafter. She said she would like Brennan Bouma, Sustainability Director,
to stay involved with these projects to assist the schools in the best way to utilize these funds.
Commissioner Bedford agreed with Commissioner Greene’s suggestion about the
signage.
Commissioner Price read the following from point 10:
Are there any relevant restrictions on solar in our Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO)?
A third-party review of the solar regulations within Orange County’s UDO was
conducted in 2017 when the County was being certified as a SolSmart community at
the Silver Level. According to that review at that time, there were several sections
that might influence the design, function, and aesthetics of a school solar array
depending on its size, type, and location. Orange County Sustainability staff plans to
reach out to Planning staff for an updated review during the creation of the County’s
climate action plan.
Commissioner Price asked if staff could follow up on this point. She said she had
brought this up before.
Travis Myren said staff would follow up.
Travis Myren said he wanted to confirm the two points to include in creating the grant
report: the signage showing wattage, energy savings, education signage, etc.; and the County’s
on-going participation and on-going reporting by Brennan Bouma (per Chair Rich)
12
Travis Myren asked if an annual review of the projects, how they have performed over
time, would be sufficient.
Chair Rich said everything the County spends this ¼ cent tax on should be measured.
Commissioner Marcoplos referred to page 8, and read the following: “The rooftop solar
projects proposed for each school district is proposed to work through a grant to provide the
schools with flexibility while preserving the ability of the County to track progress and impact.”
He said this says the grantee must provide a reference of sharing information in a report.
Commissioner Marcoplos said it is the Climate Council’s practice that everyone at the
table is sharing information about their projects, and it is important to learn collectively.
Commissioner Dorosin said suggested that a quarterly report come back on all of these
projects, such as weatherizations.
Commissioner Dorosin reflected on the process of this particular issue. He said two
weeks ago the schools did not want these projects, and now the schools have reviewed and
accepted the projects. He said the process worked very well.
Chair Rich said the timeframe was good.
Commissioner McKee said he has no doubt the solar projects will be beneficial in the
long run, but he did have an issue with the process. He said he believed the Board could have
addressed, and reduced, school capital projects already in the queue that have equal climate
value, thus killing two birds with one stone. He said the Board set an expectation and backed
the schools in a corner, and he does not blame the schools for taking the project at this point, if
the alternative was to refuse it and complete no projects. He said he will vote against this item.
Commissioner Dorosin said Commissioner McKee’s characterization of the process was
not accurate. He said if the schools had other projects, the Board invited the schools to submit
them to the Board for evaluation.
Commissioner Bedford said she is glad there is going to be a subcommittee to work on
the process of how projects are bought forward in the future.
Chair Rich said there is a difference between efficiency projects and climate mitigation
projects. She said the solar panels project is a climate mitigation project, which is what the tax
is for.
Commissioner Marcoplos said it is his understanding that every school board member
voted in favor of these projects.
Commissioner McKee said he has had off line conversations with the school board
members, and he stands by his comments and vote.
Commissioner Dorosin said this process started in January, and not two weeks ago. He
said if Commissioner McKee has other information he should share it in the BOCC meetings, as
it would be good to know.
Commissioner Price said she had conversations with school board members and chairs,
who initially felt out of the loop on this project, but now all seem to be on the same page. She
said she is glad the process will be reviewed.
Chair Rich said this project was discussed at school collaboration months ago, and the
schools had more than two weeks.
Commissioner McKee said he had conversations with school board members, and he
feels the two-week notice did back the schools into a corner. He said individual school board
members did not know details about these projects, nor did their staff. He said County staff
should have done a better job of raising it up the seniority ladder.
A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin
for the Board to approve funding for the recommended Solar for Schools Grant program for FY
2019-20 as outlined in the attached report in the abstract with revisions.
13
VOTE: Yeas, 6; Nays, 1 (Commissioner McKee)
7. Reports
NONE
8. Consent Agenda
• Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda
Commissioner Price asked to remove items 8-f and 8-h.
Commissioner Dorosin asked to remove item 8-b to be read aloud
• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Bedford to
approve the remaining items on the Consent Agenda.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda
8-b Fair Housing Month Proclamation
The Board considered voting to approve a proclamation designating April 2020 as Fair
Housing Month in Orange County, North Carolina.
Commissioner Dorosin read the resolution:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PROCLAMATION
FAIR HOUSING MONTH
WHEREAS, April 11, 2020 marked the 52nd anniversary of Title VIII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1968 (formally known as the Fair Housing Act) and the 37th
anniversary of the North Carolina Fair Housing Act prohibiting
discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, sex, religion,
national origin, disability and familial status; and
WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners enacted the Orange County
Civil Rights Ordinance on June 6, 1994, which affords to the residents of
Orange County the protections guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act and
additionally encompasses the protected classes of Veteran Status and
Age; and
WHEREAS, Orange County and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development as well as concerned residents and the housing industry
are working to make fair housing opportunities possible for everyone by
encouraging others to abide by the letter and the spirit of fair housing
laws; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development annually
declares the month of April as National Fair Housing Month, designating
Call HUD: Because Sexual Harassment In Housing is Illegal as the
14
national theme and Orange County has designated Closing the Door on
Housing Discrimination as its theme in 2020; and
WHEREAS, despite the protections afforded by the Orange County Civil Rights
Ordinance and the Fair Housing Act, illegal housing discrimination still
occurs in our nation and within our County; and
WHEREAS, by supporting and promoting fair housing and equal opportunity, we are
contributing to the strength of our County, State and Nation;
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County North
Carolina, do proclaim April 2020 as FAIR HOUSING MONTH and commend this
observance to all Orange County residents.
This the 21st day of April 2020.
A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Greene to
approve the proclamation.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
8-f Fiscal Year 2019-20 Budget Amendment #8
The Board considered voting to approve budget and grant project ordinance
amendments for fiscal year 2019-20
Commissioner Price commended Animal Services for getting the $20,000 grant.
Commissioner Price said she also wanted to commend the Friends of the Orange
County Library for providing additional funding for its summer reading program.
A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin to
approve budget and grant project ordinance amendments for fiscal year 2019-20
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
h. Change in BOCC Meeting Schedule for 2020
The Board considered voting to change the Board of Commissioners’ meeting calendar
for 2020 to make all scheduled meetings in May virtual meetings
Commissioner Price said she was not aware of the stay at home orders being extended
into May, and asked if there is a reason that the BOCC will meet virtually until the end of May.
Donna Baker said the stay at home order has not been extended, but staff thought it
more efficient to change the BOCC Meeting calendar for the month of May to virtual meetings,
so as not to have to constantly to publicize meetings back and forth. She said most other
governmental entities are doing the same.
A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner McKee to
approve to change the Board of Commissioners’ meeting calendar for 2020 to make all
scheduled meetings in May virtual meetings
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
15
a. Minutes
The Board approved the draft minutes from the April 7, 2020 BOCC Virtual Business Meeting as
submitted by the Clerk to the Board.
b. Fair Housing Month Proclamation
The Board approved a proclamation designating April 2020 as Fair Housing Month in Orange
County, North Carolina.
c. Refunding a Portion of the Solid Waste Programs Fee for Residents Being Provided
Curbside Recycling Service by the City of Mebane
The Board authorized providing refunds for the last three years for the portion of the Solid
Waste Program fee allocated to curbside recycling to single family homes in the City of Mebane
that pay for and receive curbside recycling from the City of Mebane.
d. Approval of a Grace Period for the Registration and Renewal Process for Orange
County Beverage Licenses through July 15, 2020
The Board approved a resolution, which is incorporated by reference, establishing a grace
period for the registration and renewal of Orange County Beverage Licenses through July 15,
2020 due to the Covid-19 Pandemic and the State of Emergency issued by Governor Roy
Cooper on March 10, 2020, and the Declaration of an Orange County State of Emergency to
Order the Public to Stay at Home in order to slow the further spread of COVID-19.
e. Adoption of the Final Financing Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of $40,750,000 in
Installment Purchase Financing for Various Capital Investment Plan Projects
The Board adopted the final financing resolution, which is incorporated by reference, authorizing
the borrowing of approximately $40,750,000 in installment financing to finance capital
investment projects and equipment for the fiscal year, including amounts to pay transaction
costs.
f. Fiscal Year 2019-20 Budget Amendment #8
The Board approved budget and grant project ordinance amendments for fiscal year 2019-20
for Animal Services; Social Services; the Health Department; Library Services; New Hope
Volunteer Fire Department; and the Planning and Inspections Department.
g. Approval of a Lease for a Section of the Roof and Wall of the Sportsplex to Cellco
Partnership (Verizon Wireless) for Installation of a Mini Cell Phone Tower
The Board approved a five year lease agreement with Cellco Partnership (dba Verizon
Wireless) for space on the wall and roof of the Sportsplex, located at 101 Meadowlands Drive in
Hillsborough, for the installation, operation and maintenance of communications equipment; and
authorize the Chair to sign the Resolution for Lease, and the Manager to sign the Non-
Disturbance and Attornment Agreement, and Lease Agreement upon final review by the County
Attorney.
h. Change in BOCC Meeting Schedule for 2020
The Board voted to change the Board of Commissioners’ meeting calendar for 2020 to make all
scheduled meetings in May virtual meetings.
9. County Manager’s Report
Bonnie Hammersley said staff is currently putting together a recovery team with the
jurisdictions and towns.
Bonnie Hammersley said staff is monitoring all situations and documenting all funding.
She said she is awaiting information from the towns as to their proposed members.
Bonnie Hammersley said there is a virtual BOCC work session on April 23rd and she
reviewed the agenda.
Bonnie Hammersley said there will be a joint virtual meeting on April 28th with the BOCC
and both school boards of education.
16
10. County Attorney’s Report
John Roberts said the General Assembly (GA) is planning to convene for a short session
on April 28th, and will discuss a lot of Covid-19 issues. He said the GA is looking at a virtual
meeting bill, which may include that closed sessions may not be held virtually. He said he will
keep the Board posted on any changes.
John Roberts said the County has suspended its collection accounts.
John Roberts referenced an email, received earlier today, from Annette Moore, Human
Rights and Relations Director, on the eviction diversion program.
11. *Appointments
NONE
12. Information Items
• April 7, 2020 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
• April 1, 2020 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board Letter to Board of Commissioners
• Memorandum - Financial Report for Third Quarter of FY 2019-20
13. Closed Session
NONE
14. Adjournment
A motion was made by Commissioner Greene, seconded by Commissioner Marcoplos
to adjourn the meeting at 8:31 p.m.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Penny Rich, Chair
Donna S. Baker
Clerk to the Board