Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJCPC Annual Plan FY19-20 FINAL Juvenile Crime Prevention Council County Plan Orange County For FY 2019 - 2020 Table of Contents I . Executive Summary II . County Funding Plan III . County Funding Plan Addendum IV . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization V . County Risk and Needs Assessment Summary VI . County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals VII . Funding Decisions Summary VIII . Funded Programs Descriptions (unless there is a JCPC approved Program Enhancement Plan) IX . Program Enhancement Plans (for each program which had a PEP approved by the JCPC ) Attachments : Continuum of Services - At a Glance Executive Summary The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC ) , in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina, has completed the activities required to develop and update this County Plan for FY 2019 -2020 . The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, at- risk youth, and their families in Orange County . Further , the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior . It should be noted that the JCPC continues to support and embrace diversionary strategies , such as Teen Court , that effectively reduce and prevent delinquency . As noted in NC Gen . Stat . § 143 13451 , the JCPC is legislatively mandated to evaluate the effectiveness of its funded programs and the Department of Public Safety , Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice , has provided the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ( SPEP ) Instrument to aide JCPCs with this task . However, the tool cannot be administered to all JCPC funded programs given that some programs are identified as structures or " settings within which program services are delivered" ( Lipsey , 2005 ) . Programming such as Teen Court may be identified as a structure yet it offers vital diversionary programming to youth . Other services , including some residential programs and structured - day services , also offer vital intervention strategies to youth and families but may not be scored using the SPEP instrument . The JCPC recognizes that these identified structures offer critical prevention/intervention programming and the JCPC adheres to their utilization in its strategies to prevent and reduce delinquency . Priorities for Funding : Through a risk & needs assessment and a resource assessment , the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Orange County . • Restitution/Community Service • Parent/Family Skill Building • Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) • Interpersonal Skill Building • Mentoring • Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) • Teen Court • Tutoring/Academic Enhancement • Temporary Shelter ( specifically Emergency Shelter) Monitoring and Evaluation : Each program funded in the past year by the JCPC has been monitored . The monitoring results and program outcomes evaluations were considered in making funding allocation decisions . The JCPC continues to conduct implementation monitoring of its action plan and its funded programs . Funding Recommendations : Having published a Request for Proposals for needed services for a minimum of thirty ( 30 ) days , the JCPC has screened the submitted proposals and has determined which proposals best meet the advertised needed services . As required by statute , the JCPC recommends allocation of the NC Department of Public Safety (NC DJJ) funds to the following programs in the amounts specified below for FY 19 -20 (see Orange County Funding Plan) : 1 . Boomerang $ 28331 2 . Juvenile Community Service and Restitution $ 6 % 870 3 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution $ 40 , 500 4 . Parent Teen Solutions $ 45 , 500 5 . Teen Court $ 615330 6 . Wrenn House $ 10 , 722 7 . Unallocated $ 13 , 500 The JCPC further recommends that the following amount be allocated from the NC DPS DJJ funds for the administrative costs of the Council for FY 19 - 20 : $ 8 , 178 . 00 Respectfully Submitted , Bernard Mil es , Chair Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council ORANGE County NC DPS - Community Programs - County Funding Plan Available Funds : $ $ 277 , 731 Local Match : $ $220 ,312 Rate : 30 % DPS JCPC funds must be committed with a Program Agreement submitted in NC Allies and electronically signed by authorized officials. TO:CL• : L. NDIl !F .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1l � : :f}THEIi: : OHE: : : : : : : : : : . : :. . : :: . :. : : TR . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o : / Non DPS � ' Clpys oY : q : . : : : : : : : :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a :S : : : : : . :. : : : : : : : : : ' : ' ' : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . DPS 3cP c. . . . F atch • • • • . : K • • • : : : • : • : • • • • • u Kq1 * 4611411 . . . . : : : . . . . . . .. c : : : . a Program Revenues Boomerang Youth , Inc. 1 (Boomerang) $28 , 131 $ 8,439 $55, 000 $249,300 $340 , 870 92% Volunteers for Youth , Inc. 2 (Juvenile Community Service and Restitution ) $ 693870 $20 , 961 $293494 $ 120 , 325 42% Volunteers for Youth , Inc. 3 (Teen Court) $ 61 , 330 $ 183399 $ 16, 158 $95, 887 36% Dispute Settlement Center d (Mediation/Conflict Resolution ) $40 ,500 $ 123150 $ 1 , 100 $53,750 25% Haven House, Inc. 5 (Wrenn House) $ 103722 $3,217 $203581 $343520 69 % Exchange Club 6 (Parent Teen Solutions) $45, 500 $ 13,650 $ 18,710 $77,860 42% 7 JCPC Administration $ 83178 $23453 $ 10 ,631 23% 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TOTALS : $264,231 $793269 $ 122,333 $ 183710 $2493300 $733 , 843 64% The above plan was derived through a planning process by the ORANGE County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and represents the County ' s Plan for use a fu in F 19=20 Amount of Unallocated Funds $ 13 , 500 i Amount of funds reverted back to DPS 90fropers venile Crime PrevenZV e) i Discretionary Funds added check type ❑ initial plan ❑ update ❑ final -----DPS Use Only----- C ecson, Board of Co n Co ssioners ) ` 0 ounty Finance Offic Reviewed by Area Consultant Date Reviewed by Program Assistant Date Verified by Designated State Office Staff Date ver 03/0412016 ext Orange County Plan Addendum: "Raise the Age" Priorities The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) seeks to maximize available allocation funding by addressing the priorities of the Raise the Age legislation in the areas of targeted intervention programming for 16-17 year old offenders in the juvenile justice system by seeking to do the following (check all that apply): ® Increase the capacity of existing programming to address additional 16-17 year olds entering and/or being retained in the juvenile justice system; ® Provide funding for new programming to 16-17 year olds via additional components in existing programs or newly funded programs ❑ Seek collaboration from surrounding counties to provide funding for multi-county programming focusing on 16-17 year olds in a district or region. "Raise the Age" program priorities include: ❑ Mentoring Services ® Restitution/Community Service ❑ Sexual Offender Treatment ❑ Parent/Family Skill Building ® Teen Court ❑ Group Home ❑ Interpersonal Skill Building ❑ Psychological Assessments ❑ Temporary Shelter ❑ Vocational Skills ❑ Counseling ® Runaway Shelter ❑ Experiential Skills ❑ Home Based Family Counseling ❑ Specialized Foster Care ❑ Tutoring/Academic Enhancement ❑ Crisis Counseling ❑ Temporary Foster Care ® Mediation ❑ Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ Juvenile Structured Day Data reviewed by the JCPC as well as a county Resource Assessment focusing on the full range of juvenile jurisdiction proposed by Raise the Age indicates the following gaps that the additional programs indicated above will seek to address: increase of referrals for community service and/or restitution, an increase of referrals to teen court, to address a need for mediation (school based) and residential services for shelter care. Tier I Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs and RFP development based on the current Orange County allocation of $2779731. Tier II Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs to address RFP development with JCPC expansion funding. Tier II planning includes the development of the following identified expansion of services. Priorities for Expansion Funding While conducting an additional needs assessment specifically related to the focus service expansion to meet the RtA legislation, the following service needs and cost associated with those services have been identified as follows: Program Funding Priorities JCPC $ Program Expansion Focus Amount Expand staffing needs for current program Restitution/Community Service $25,000 (worksite supervisors to provide direct supervision) Teen Court Expand staffing needs for current program $257000 (additional teen court nights) Wrenn House $20,000 Expand staffing needs for current program Expand programming to include school based Mediation $251000 mediation. TOTAL $957000 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization FY 19 - 20 Name Organization Title Chairperson Bernard Miles Orange County Social Services CPS Treatment Supervisor Vice - Chairperson Amanda Farris NC Department of Public Safety Court Counselor Supervisor Number of members : 20 List meeting dates during the current fiscal year and identify the number of JCPC members in attendance for each . Meeting Date Members inAttendance Quorum Present ? Yes/No August 2018 13 Yes October 2018 13 Yes December 2018 12 Yes (with 2 proxies) February 2019 15 Yes (with 2 proxies ) April 2019 13 Yes (with 2 proxies) June 2019 15 Yes (with 1 proxy) SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE I . Risk Assessment Summary II . Needs Assessment Summary III . Resource Assessment Summary IV. Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Community Continuum V . Proposed Priority Services for Funding Part I . Risk Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Risk Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors after juveniles are referred with a complaint alleging that a delinquent act has occurred and prior to adjudication of the juvenile . The Juvenile Risk Assessment is an instrument used to predict the likelihood of the juvenile being involved in future delinquent behavior . For some juveniles , some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent( s ) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under- reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Risk Factor Observations : FY 2017-2018 2 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were at low risk (R1 ) for reoffending . 17 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R2 of reoffending . 36 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R3 of reoffending . 35 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R4 of reoffending . 10 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were high risk (R5 ) of reoffending . NOTE: R1 =Risk Level 1 (0 points), R2 =Risk Level 2 01 - 2 points), R3 =Risk Level 3 (3 - 5 points), R4 =Risk Level 4 (642 points) and R5 =Risk Level 5 (13 + points) 13 % of juveniles were under age 12 , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 ( 16 % ) . 44 % of juveniles show having one or more prior referrals at the time of intake . 20 % of juveniles have a prior class 1 - 3 misdemeanor with 3 % having prior class f- 1 felonies or al misdemeanors/A- E Felonies . 11 % of juveniles had prior assaults , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 of 20 % . 25 % of juveniles have run away from home or placement which remained the same from FY 16 . 17 . * 30 % of juveniles have some known substance use/abuse and need substance use/abuse assessment and/or treatment , a 78 % increase compared to FY 15 - 16 . Of those juveniles , 47 % * have known substance abuse and need assessment or treatment . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 73 % of juveniles demonstrate moderate to serious behavioral problems in school . These numbers increased from FY 1647 ( 58 %) and consistent with the state average ( 75 % ) . 88 % of juveniles lack pro - social peers , regularly associate with others involved in delinquent activity , and/or is a gang member/associates with a gang ; an increase from FY 1647 ( 57 %) while below the state average of 63 % . 3 % of parents are willing but unable or unwilling to supervise juveniles , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 ( 8 % ) and significantly lower than the state average of 18 % . Part II . Needs Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee also reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Needs Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors prior to court disposition of a juvenile . The Juvenile Needs Assessment is an instrument used to examine juvenile needs in the various domains of his/her life : The Individual Domain, The School Domain , The Peer Domain , and the Community Domain . This instrument was designed to detect service intervention needs as an aid in service planning . As with the Juvenile Risk Assessment , some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent ( s) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Elevated Needs Observations : FY 2017 -2018 Juveniles were low (47%), medium (49 %) and high (S %) with overall needs for services/interventions to reduce the likelihood of repeat delinquency. Juveniles with low and medium needs are able to be served in the community. 47 % of juveniles fall into the low needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed ; which is lower than the state average of 61 % . 49 % of juveniles fall into the medium needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed ; which is above the state average of 34 % . 5 % of juveniles fall into the high needs category which is consistent with the state average of 5 % . 24 % of juveniles report being rejected by positive peers , 64 % had some/regular association with delinquent peers or 2 % regularly associated with a gang in FY 17 - 18 . Numbers remain steady with an increase of some association with delinquent peers ( 51 % ) in FY 16 - 17 . 73 % of juveniles have moderate to serious school behavior problems as compared to 45 % in FY 16 - 17 . Close to the state average of 72 % . * 32 % of juveniles need substance abuse assessment or treatment which is consistent with the state . * This statistic is possibly underreported. * 44 % of juveniles are reported to be abuse/neglect victims which is twice the state average 23 % , and 3 % of those having NO support . * This statistic is possibly underreported. * 3 % of juveniles have dangerous sexual practices . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 41 % of juveniles need more mental health assessment which is higher than the state at 35 % . * 26 % of juveniles have domestic discord in the home and 4 % of juvenile ' s violence in the home . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 59 % of juveniles come from homes where parents/guardians have marginal to inadequate family supervision skills which is higher than the state at 52 % 10 % of juveniles have a parent/guardian with a disability , above the state average of 4 % . * 18 % of juveniles have family alcohol/drug abuse in the home , higher than the state average of 12 % . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 54 % of adjudicated juveniles come from homes where family members have criminal history and an additional 11 % are under active court supervision or have gang involvement . Part III . Resource Assessment Summary Community resources are sometimes available but can be difficult to access . See the attachment titled Orange County Continuum of Services — At a Glance for a listing of available community resources . Part IV . Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Continuum of Services While Orange County is not large , transportation is a barrier for many juveniles , especially those in Northern Orange County where public transportation is limited . Additionally, the cost of gas is an inhibitor to accessing services , including court ordered sanctions and therapy sessions . One of the major services providers has reduced services in the home . Young people and families needing bi - lingual mental health and substance abuse services often experience waitlist for services due to the scarcity of bi - lingual therapists and language interpretation . There are no mental health or substance abuse services available for undocumented juveniles . While Orange County does have a domestic violence service provider, the services offered are limited and are targeted more towards adults experiencing it as victims . There are no services offered to children/juveniles who experience or witness discord or violence in their homes . Part V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding The committee compared the services needed to address the elevated Juvenile Risk Factors and Juvenile Needs with services currently available in the community . Services which are currently available in the community and sufficient to meet the needs of court involved juveniles or those juveniles most at risk for court involvement are not considered as a priority for JCPC funding . The Committee proposes that the following service be approved as the funding priorities for FY 19 -20 : 1 . Restitution/Community Service 2 . Teen Court 3 . Tutoring/Academic Enhancement 4 . Temporary Shelter Services ( specifically Emergency Shelter) 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) 6 . Interpersonal Skill Building RISK ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 13 = 18 FY 13A 4 FY 14 - 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 = 17 FY 17 - 18 1 State 15A61 State 16A71 State 17 - 18 Total Adjudications 1 32 41 27 13 14 5, 053 4, 338 40415 Overall Risk LevelgRL3 IFY13 = 14 FY 14-15 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 6 % 2 % 5 % 5 % 15 % 176 15 % 14% 30 % 36% 32% 33 % 33 % 35 % 33 % 33% 15% I 0 % 150/0 150/0 40 % ■ FY 13- 14 35 % 3 % ■ FY 14A 5 25 % FY 15- 16 20 % ■ FY 16- 17 15 % ■ FY 17- 18 10 % 13 State 1 5-1 6 5 % o State 1 6- 1 7 0 % RL1 RL2 RL3 RL4 RL5 [3 State 1 7- 1 8 Observations : The risk assessment tool was renormed in April 2016 with new Risk Levels as: R1 =Risk Level 1 (0 points), R2=Risk Level 2 (1-2 points), R3=Risk Level 3 (3- 5 points), R4=Risk Level (642 points) and RS=Risk Level 5 (13 + points) R1 - Age When First Delinquent Offense Alleged in a Complaint FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15= 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 = 18 State 15- 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 Under age 12 9 % 10% 10% 160/6 130/. 150/. 140/. 16% Age 12 or Over 91 % 90% 90% 85% 87% 85 % 86% 84% 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % ■ FY 15- 16 60 % ! ■ FY 16- 17 50 % 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % i ■ State 15- 16 20 % o State 16- 17 10 % 13 State 17- 18 0 % '' Underage 12 Age 12 or over Observations : R2 - Number of Undisciplined or Delinquent FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 Current Referral Only 600 . 580/. 68% 56% 66 % 60 % 56 % 58% One Prior Referral 22 % 20% 18 % 20 % 21 % 18 % 20 % 18% 2 or 3 Prior Referrals 11 % 10% 13 % 18 % 10 % 13 % 15 % 14% Four or More Prior Referrals 7% 12% 1 % 6 % 3 % 9 % 10 % 10% 80 % ■ FY 13 - 14 70 % s FY 14 - 15 60 % FY 15 - 16 ■ FY 16 - 17 50 % ■ FY 17 - 18 40 % 13 State 15 - 16 30 % 13 State 1 6- 17 20 % O State 17- 18 10 % 0 % rf,i Current Referral Only One Prior Referral 2 or 3 Prior Referrals Four or More Prior Referrals Observations: R3 - Most Serious Prior Adjudication FY 13A4 FY 14= 15 gl5mU FY 16 - 17 FY 17 -18 State 1RStatel6mV State 17 - 18 NO riot ad ' udlCatlOns 78 % 80% 6% 70% 75% 72% Prior undisci lined 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 2% 3 % Prior class 1 -3 misdemeanors 19% 15% 8 % 18% 20% 15% Prior class f- 1 felonies or a1 misdemeanors 3 % 5 % 4 % 11 % 3 % 90/( Prior A- E felonies 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % ■ FY 13- 14 100 % 90 % ■ FY 14- 15 80 % FY 15 - 16 70 % ■ FY 16- 17 60 % M FY 17- 18 50 % o 40 % State 15- 16 30 % o State 16- 17 20 % 13 State 1 7- 18 10 % 0 % "No prior adjudications Prior undisciplined Prior class 1 -3 Prior class f- 1 felonies or Prior A- E felonies misdemeanors a1 misdemeanors Observations: R4 - Prior Assaults FY 13A4 FY 14A5 FY 15 - 16 FY 16A7 FY 17 - 18 State 15A6 State 16A7 State 17 = 18 No assaults 84% 86% 86 % 80% 88% 81 % 78% 79% Involvement in an affray 4 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 3 % 4 % 3 % Yes , without a weapon 13% 8 % 8 % 16 % 9 % 13 % 15% 15% Yes , without a weapon , inflicting serious injury 0 % 3 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Yes , with a weapon 0 % 1 % 1 1 % 2 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % Yes , with a weapon , inflicting serious injury 0 % 0 % 1 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 100 % ■ FY 13 - 14 90 % ■ FY 14- 15 80 % ■ FY 15 - 16 70 % ■ FY 16 - 17 60 % ■ FY 17 - 18 50 % ■ State 1 5- 16 40 % ® State 16- 17 30 % aState 17- 18 20 % 10 % 0 % _ .+ No assaults Involvement in an Yes , without a Yes , without a Yes , with a weapon Yes , with a weapon , affray weapon weapon , inflicting inflicting serious serious injury injury Observations: R5 - Runaway from Home or Placement FY 13 - 14 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16A7 FY 17 -18 State 15= 16 State 16 - 17 State 17A8 No 89 % 78 % 81 % 75% 75% 86% 83 % 83 % Yes 11 % 22% 19 % 25% 25% 14% 17% 17% 100% - ■ FY 13-14 80% ■ FY 14-15 60% • FY 15- 16 ■ FY 16-17 40 % ® FY 17-18 20% C State 15-16 00/( o State 16- 17 No Yes OState 17-18 Observations: R6 - Known Use of Alcohol or Illegal Drugs FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 = 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 = 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 No Known substance use 650/. 57% 75 % 62% 70% 70 % 68 % 68 % Some substance use , need further assessement 20% 26 % 14% 20% 17% 18% 19% 20 % Substance abuse , assessment or treatment needed 15% 17 % 11 % 18 % 13% 12% 12% 12% 80 % 70 % ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 50 % ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % i ■ FY 16- 17 30 % 20 % ■ FY 17 - 18 10 % 13 State 15 - 16 r . 0 % oState 16- 17 No Known substance use Some substance use , need further Substance abuse , assessment or assessement treatment needed O State 1 7- 18 Observations: R7 - School Behavior Problems ( prior 12 months) FY 13 - 14 FY 14-15 FY 15 = 16 FY 16A7 FY 17 - 18 State 15 = 16 State 16 - 17 State 17A8 No Problems enrolled , attending regularly) 20 % 16% 28 % 35% 21 % 15% 17% 17 % Minor Problems 8 % 3 % 6 % 8 % 6 % 8 % 9 % 9 % Moderate Problems 29% 250yo 17% 17% 250/. 28% 26% 25 % Serious Problems 43% 56 % 50% 1 41 % 480/. 48% 48% 50 % 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 50 % ■ FY 14- 15 40 % FY 15- 16 ■ FY 16- 17 30 % ■ FY 17- 18 20 % O State 15- 16 10 % oState 16- 17 0 % oState 17- 18 No Problems (enrolled , Minor Problems Moderate Problems Serious Problems attending regularly) Observations: R8 - Relationships with Peers FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 = 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 State 17- 18 Peers are good support and influence 20% 19 % 29 % 21 % 12% 37% 36 % 37 % Lacks prosocial peers or sometimes associates with delinquent others 55% 54% 49 % 56% 74% 40% 41 % 42% Regularly associates with others involved in delinquent activity 22% 25 % 22% 20% 12% 18% 16 % 15 % Youth is a gang member or associates with a gang 2 % 2 % 0 % 2% 2% 6 % 6 % 1 6 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % ■ FY 14- 15 60 % FY 15 - 16 50 % ■ FY 1 & 17 40 % 30 % ■ FY 17- 18 20 % ..a to State 1 5- 16 10 % [] State 16- 17 Peers are good support Lacks prosocial peers or Regularly associates with Youth is a gang member ❑ State 17- 18 and influence sometimes associates with others involved in or associates with a gang delinquent others delinquent activity Observations: R9 - Parental Supervision FY 13 -14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to supervise 92% 90% 93% 92% 97% 80 % 81 % 83% Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to supervise 8 % 9 % 7 % 7 % 1 % 19 % 18 % 16% Parent/Guardian/Custodian unwilling to supervise 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 2 % 2 % ■ FY 13- 14 120 % ■ FY 14- 15 100 % ■ FY 15 - 16 80 % ■ FY 16- 17 60 % ■ FY 17- 18 40 % O State 1 5- 16 20 % : ❑ State 16 - 17 3 0 % - '� ❑ State 17- 18 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to Parent/ to supervise supervise supervise Observations: NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 13 -18 FY 13 =14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 .18 State 15A 6 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 Total Adjudications 32 41 J 27 13 14 53053 43338 43415 Overall Needs Levels FY 13 =14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 1 5=1 6 State 16 -17 State 17-18 Low Needs 56% 53% 38 % 47% 47 % 60% 610/o 61 % Medium Needs 34% 41 % 52% 43 % 49 % 35% 34% 34% High Needs 10% 7 % 10% 100/. 50/o 5 % 5 % 5 % 70 % _ ■ FY 13- 14 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 50% FY 15- 16 40% ■ FY 16- 17 30% j ■ FY 17- 18 20% i © State 15- 16 10 % 0 % I O State 16. 17 Low Needs Medium Needs High Needs o State 17- 18 Observations; Y1 - Peer Relationships FY 13A4 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17A8 State 15- 16 State 16 -17 State VA8 Positive Peers 18% 25% 22% 21 % 11 % 33 % 35% 37% Rejected by Positive Peers 22% 22% 14% 29% 24% 14% 15% 15% Some Association with Delinquent Peers 35% 38 % 44% 30% 51 % 30% 29% 27% Regular Association with Delinquent Peers 22% 13 % 19% 17% 13% 16% 15 % 15% Gang Association 1 3 % 3 % 2% 3 % 2 % 7 % 7 % 6 % 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14- 15 50 % FY 15 - 16 40 % ® FY 16- 17 ■ FY 17- 18 30 % o State 15- 16 20 % - oState 16- 17 o State 17- 18 10 % 0 % fp Positive Peers Rejected by Positive Peers Some Association with Regular Association with Gang Association Delinquent Peers Delinquent Peers Observations; Y2 - School Behavior FY 13A4 FY 14-15 FY 15A6 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15A6 State 16A7 State 17 =18 No School Behavior Problems 20 % 28% 28 % 37% 21 % 21 % 20 % 17% Minor School Behavior Problems 26 % 14% 11 % 18 % 7 % 11 % 11 % 9 % Moderate School Behavior Problems 18 % 28 % 17% 14% 24% 24% 24% 25% Serious School Behavior Problems 37% 31 % 44% 31 % 4 9% 44 % 46 % 49 % 60 % ^- ■ FY 13 - 14 50 % ■ FY 14- 15 40 % a FY 15- 16 30 % ■ FY 16- 17 o FY 17- 18 20 % IL ❑ State 15 - 16 10 % ❑ State 16 - 17 ' k ❑ State 17- 18 0 % No School Behavior Problems Minor School Behavior Moderate School Behavior Serious School Behavior Problems Problems Problems Observations : Y3 - Academic Functioning FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 At Grade Level 82% 1 820/o 84% 84% 84% 89 % 89 % 90% Below Grade Level 18% 18% 16% 16 % 16% 11 % 11 % 10 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13 - 14 80 % n FY 14- 15 70 % ■ FY 15 - 16 60 % 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % i o State 1 5- 16 20 % ❑ State 16 - 17 10 % ❑ State 17- 18 At Grade Level Below Grade Level Observations : Y4 - Substance Abuse FY 13 -14 FY 14A6 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 No Known Substance Abuse 59% 61 % 65 % 60% 68 % 68% 68 % 68% Some Abuse Assessment 20% 24% 20 % 27% 17% 18% 19 % 20 % Some Abuse Treatment 22% 15 % 15 % 13% 15 % 14 % 13 % 12% 80 % 70 % ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % e- ■ FY 14- 15 50 % ' FY 15 - 16 ■ FY 16- 17 40 % ® FY 17- 18 30 % -j ❑ State 15 - 16 20 % k ❑ State 16 - 17 10 % ❑ State 17- 18 0 % No Known Substance Abuse Some Abuse Assessment Some Abuse Treatment Observations; Y5 - Juvenile Parental Status FY 13 -14 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 Juvenile Not a Parent 99% 100 % 99% 97% 97 % 98 % 98 % 99% Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care 0 % 0 % 00/0 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 120 % 100 % ■ FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14 - 15 80 % ■ FY 15 - 16 ■60 % FY 16 - 17 ■ FY 17- 18 40 % ■ State 15- 16 ❑ State 16- 17 20 % ❑ State 1 7- 18 0 % Juvenile Not a Parent Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care Observations: Y6 - Abuse Neglect History FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 - 17 State VA8 No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect 66% 55 % 51 % 54% 56 % 78 % 77% 77 % Abuse Victim with Support 31 % 41 % 38 % 36 % 41 % 18 % 19 % 19 % Abuse Victim but NO Support 3 % 3 % 11 % 10 % 3 % 4% 4% 4 % 90 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % ■ FY 14- 15 60 % a FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 ■ FY 17 - 18 40 % o State 1 5- 16 30 % ❑ State 16 - 17 20 % o State 17- 18 10 % No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect Abuse Victim with Support Abuse Victim but NO Support Observations; Y7 - Sexual Behaviors FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 16A6 FY 16 -17 FY 17 =18 State 15-16 Statel6A71 State 17= 18 No Problem Sexual Behavior 87 % 90% 79% 82% 92% 87% 88% 88% Sexual Behavior - Needs Assessment 6 % 5 % 10% 8 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 4% Dangerous Sexual Practices 5 % 5 % 6 % 7 % 3 % 5 % 5 % 4 % Has Sexually Victimized Others 1 1 % 0 % 5 % 3 % 0 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13 - 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % ■ FY 15- 16 60 % ■ FY 16- 17 50 % 40 % ■ FY 17 - 18 30 % ■ State 15 - 16 20 % ❑ State 16 - 17 10 % o State 17- 18 0 % No Problem Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior - Needs Dangerous Sexual Practices Has Sexually Victimized Assessment Others Observations: Y8 - Mental Health Needs FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 No Mental Health Needs Noted 23 % 23% 21 % 13 % 12 % 30 % 28% 28 % Mental Health Needs Addressed 37% 40% 34% 47% 48 % 35 % 38% 37% Needs More Mental Health Assessment 40% 37% 45 % 400/- 41 % 35% 340/0 350/0 50 % 45 % ■ FY 13 - 14 40 % ■ FY 14- 15 35 % FY 15 - 16 30 % dd m FY 16- 17 25 % 20 % Ile FY 17- 18 15 % r o State 1 5- 16 10 % I o State 16 - 17 5 % 0 % ❑ State 1 7- 18 No Mental Health Needs Noted Mental Health Needs Addressed Needs More Mental Health Assessment Observations; Y9 - Basic Needs/Living FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17A 8 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 Living with Parent & Needs Met 91 % 95 % 88% 90 % 94% 90% 900/0 91 % Temporary Residence & Needs Met 8 % 5 % 10% 90/. 50/. 90/. 9 % 9 % Living with Parent & Needs Unmet 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Living Independently 0 % 0 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 100 % -- 90 % IN FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % v FY 15 - 16 60 % ■ FY 16 - 17 50 % 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % ® State 15 - 16 20 % o State 16 - 17 10 % o State 1 7- 18 0 % Living with Parent & Needs Temporary Residence & Living with Parent & Needs Living Independently Met Needs Met Unmet Observations; Y10 - Health/Hygiene FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State 17- 18 No Health Hygiene Problem 89 % 87 % 85% 82% 86% 90% 91 % 92% Health/Hygiene Problem but Unimpaired 11 % 11 % 12% 12% 9 % 9 % 8 % 7 % Health/Hygiene Problem Limits Function 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 3 % 0 % 0 % 1 % Health/Hygiene Problem Untreated 0 % 2 % 2% 4 % 2 % 1 % 10/. 1 % 100 % — 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14 - 15 70 % ■ FY 15 - 16 60 % 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % ■ FY 17 - 18 30 % i ElState 1 5- 16 i 20 % ! a State 16 . 17 10 % 1 o State 17- 18 0 % No Health Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Problem Problem but Problem Limits Problem Untreated Unimpaired Function Observations: F1 - Conflict in the Home FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15- 16 State 16- 17 State 17-18 Supportive Home 75% 66% 54% 56 % 70 % 74% 74% 75 % Domestic Discord 14% 26% 34% 32% 26 % 21 % 21 % 20 % Domestic Violence 11 % 9 % 12% 12% 4 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % I 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % 30 % ■ FY 17- 18 20 % I El State 15- 16 10 % H7 1 o State 16- 17 0 % OState 17- 18 Supportive Home Domestic Discord Domestic Violence Observations: F2 - Family Supervision Skills FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 - 17 State 17-18 Adequate 39 % 48 % 37 % 43 % 41 % 43% 46% 48 % Marginal 52% 47% 550/. 48% 57% 53 % 51 % 49 % Inadequate 9 % 5 % 80/. 9 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 70 % 60 % ■ FY 13 - 14 50 % ■ FY 14- 15 i FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 16- 17 30 % a FY 17- 18 20 % j o State 15- 16 o State 16- 17 10 % i o State 17- 18 0 % Adequate Marginal Inadequate Observations: F3 - Disability of Parent/Guardian FY 13 -14 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17A8 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 No Disabilities 86% 90% 85 % 84% 900/. 95% 95 % 96% Disabilities Noted 14% 10% 15 % 160/. 10% 5 % 5 % 4% 120 % 100 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 ■60 % FY 15 - 16 ' ■ FY 16- 17 40 % h IN FY 17- 18 t ■ State 15- 16 20 % a, ■ State 16- 17 F7- ■ State 17- 18 0 % No Disabilities Disabilities Noted Observations: F4 - Family Substance Abuse FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16A7 FY 17 =18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse 74% 76% 72% 72% 82% 89 % 88% 88% Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse 26% 24% 28 % 28% 18% 11 % 12% 12 % 90 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % 60 % ■ FY 14 - 15 FY 15 - 16 50 % 40 % FY 16 - 17 30 % ® FY 17- 18 20 % 1 ■ State 15- 16 10 % ■ State 16- 17 0 % ■ State 17- 18 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse Family AlcohoUDrug Abuse Observations : F5 - Family Criminality FY 13 -14 FY 14=15 FY 15A 6 FY 16 -17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 No Family Criminal History 51 % 46% 40% 36 % 350/. 550/. 5 1 % 52% Family Criminal History 40% 45% 52% 57% 54% 36% 40% 39% Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement 10% 9 % 7 % 8 % 11 % 9 % 9 % 9 % 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14- 15 50 % ■ FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 ■ FY 17- 18 30 % I o State 15- 16 20 % i State 16- 17 State 17 - 18 10 % No Family Criminal History Family Criminal History Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement Observations; Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 20M20 $ 2773731 30 % February 4 , 2019 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at- risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019-20 beginning on , or after, July 1 , 2019 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed programs (see attached Program Descriptions) : * Restitution/Community Service * Interpersonal Skill Building *Teen Court * Parent/Family Skill Building * Mentoring *Tutoring/Academic Enhancement *Assess ment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured * Mediation/Conflict Resolution *Temporary Shelter Services ( including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) ( including School Based ) (specifically Emergency Shelter) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency . Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re -offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement , have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent. Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth : Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality , gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome- based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component. 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non -profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Rapoza at 919 -245 -2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2019-2020 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link : https : //www, ncdps . gov/I ndex2 . cfm ?a= 000003 , 002476 , 002483 , 002482 , 002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab. Private non - profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2 ) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 ( c) ( 3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant , at ( 919 ) 324 -6391 . Deadline for Application is : March 11 , 2019 by 5 : 00 P . M . Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019 - 2020 Program Type Descriptions including Dosage and Duration of Services Interpersonal Skill Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a Building positive way with others . The basic skill model begins with an individual ' s goals , progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social . behaviors , and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment . Typical training techniques are instruction , modeling of behavior, practice and rehearsal , feedback, reinforcement . (Length of Stay= Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications , Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Mentoring Provides opportunities for adult volunteers to be matched with delinquent or at -risk youth on a one-on -one basis . The mentor is an individual providing support, friendship , advice , and/or assistance to the juvenile . After recruitment, screening and training, the mentor spends time with the juvenile on a regular basis engaged in activities such as sports , movies , helping with homework , etc . (Length of Stay= Minimum 1 year, Frequency of Contact= should average 2 hours per week) Mediation/Conflict Programs offering a private process of negotiation conducted by a neutral , third party person , a Resolution Mediator . These programs offer immediate and short -term involvement with youth to focus on negative and/or offending behaviors . Mediation is a consensual decision - making process by parties who work towards a mutual understanding to resolve a problem or a dispute . Mediators do not counsel or give advice but facilitate communication among parties as the parties work to reach their own decision regarding resolution of their conflict . Services should be provided for diverted and/or adjudicated youth and may include victim/offender reconciliation . (Length of Stay= No longer than 90 days , Frequency of Contact= Based upon the requirements of the program ) Tutoring/Academic Services intended to supplement full time academic program by providing assistance with Enhancement understanding and completing schoolwork and/or classes . May also provide trips designed to be an enrichment of or supplemental experience beyond the basic educational curriculum . (Length of Stay= Minimum of 20 weeks , Frequency of Contact= No less than 2 hrs/week . ) Parent/Family Skill Services that focus on interactional or interpersonal issues faced by a parent( s)/family of a Building juvenile . This service works to develop parenting skills , communication skills , discipline techniques , and other related skills . May include sessions for parents only and/or sessions for parents and the referred youth . ( Length of Stay= Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications , Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Teen Court Provides a diversion from juvenile court where trained adult and youth volunteers act as officials of the court to hear complaints . These programs make recommendations for appropriate sanctions including but not limited to community service and restitution (if applicable) to be assigned to the youth who have admitted committing minor delinquency and undisciplined complaints . (Length of Stay= Not to exceed 120 days , however 60 additional days may be approved to complete sanctions ; Frequency of Contact= Not Specified ) Page 1 of 2 Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019 - 2020 ide opportunities for offender to be accountable for their actions to the Restitution/Community Programs that prov Service community and/or victim( s ) through forms of payments or community service work that earns money to repay the victim ( s ) . Court supervision= one year unless otherwise ordered ; Frequency of Contact— minimum twice per month and no less than 8 hours per month) Temporary Shelter Care Provides group home care and shelter (up to 90 days ) for juveniles who need to be temporary removed from their homes during a family crisis . (Length of Stay= up to 90 days , Frequency of Contact=NA) Clinical Clinical Evaluations and Assessments , including Psychological Evaluations to help court Assessments/Treatment counselors and judges recommend the most appropriate consequences and treatment for court involved youth . (Length of Stay= depends upon time needed to complete the assessment activity , Frequency of Contact=Not Specified) Page 2 of 2 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 20M20 $ 59 , 000 30 % April 8 , 2019 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at-risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019-20 beginning on , or after , July 1 , 2019 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed program : Interpersonal Skill Building : Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a positive way with others . The basic skill model begins with an individual ' s goals , progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social behaviors , and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment . Typical training techniques are instruction , modeling of behavior , practice and rehearsal , feedback , reinforcement. A curriculum that includes parent(s )/guardian (s ) is preferred . ( Length of Stay = Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications . Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency : Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending . Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement , have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent . Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency ( LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth : Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality, gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome- based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component . 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non -profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Ra oza at 919 -245 -2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2019 -2020 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link : https : //www. ncd ps . gov/l ndex2 . cfm ?a= 000003 , 002476 , 002483, 002482 , 002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab . Private non - profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2 ) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 ( c) (3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant, at ( 919 ) 324 -6391 . Deadline for Application is : May 10 , 2019 by 5 : 00 P . M . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary Program Funded Reason for Funding Check all that apply) Boomerang ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision &convictions ® Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Community Service and ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation Restitution component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims El Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Mediation/Conflict ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient ® Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ® Has evaluation Resolution component® Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Teen Court ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ® Other provides a diversionary option for juvenile and distrcit court ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Wrenn House ® Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ® Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ® Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Parent Teen Solutions ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation component ® Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Program Not Funded Reason for Not Funding (Check all that apply) Family Advocacy ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research❑ Lesser quality than Network another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ® Other To fill a gap of services, its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and arent(s)/ uardian(s). FAN only provides services to parents. Young Warriors Athlete ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research❑ Lesser quality than Scholarship Program another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ® Other To fill a gap of services, its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and parent(s)/guardian(s). Young Warriors does not utilize a curriculum to deliver services but skills are taught by services provided(discipline/decision making) through Karate. Life Skills for Youth and ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ® Lesser quality than Parenting - Botvin Life another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Skills Curriculum Reintegration Support ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ® Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than Network Interpersonal another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Skill Building ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type 0 Greater cost than program of same type and quality 0 Other 0 Other Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name&Type: Boomerang-Structured Day (STRUCTURE ONLY-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: A resiliency-based program that engages youth ages 11-17 at risk for disconnection due to short-term suspension or court-involvement, by providing support services to mitigate the risk of school dropout through brief counseling. tutoring,and life skips development during out-of-school time. Boomerang programming is strengths-based, recognizing the assets of each individuai student and building on those to create stronger connections to school, family and community. Primary Service NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of 1.Written protocols on student, 1. Executive Director Service 20120 1. Continue to parent, and school follow-up and 2. Program Managers Delivery develop written sevice evaluation protocols for high 2. Identify additional training quality service opportunties for direct service delivery as needed staff to develop and maintain 2_ Continued staff knowledge and skills in trauma-- training informed care, and restorative practices. Amount of Service_ NIA Duration and -- Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier I NIA Risk Tier 2 NIA TOTAL SPEP NIA SCORE PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 91,2029. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol(SP£P) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) POP N/A Score% This plan is approved b 121 4j, Program Mafibter rkame batel JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name & Type: Juvenile Community Service and Restitution - Restitution Brief Description: The Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Program works with Orange County youth who have committed offenses and are assigned community service hours and/or restitution_ Youth are assigned to nonprofit work sites throughout the county where volunteer supervisors oversee and evaluate their work. Through this program, youthful offenders team important lessons in responsibifi and accountability and often develop positive relationshi s with their adult supervisors.__ Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service 1 0/30 N/A N/A N/A NIA Qualifying 5/5 - Supplemental Services Quality of like-r445z $ 4 +rA;Aif S i P6 t r � ��: '.tc _ La.�,�r,�,: �.�:c� AiT Service 18120 '1�IscJ ej"ie MiX40- C.MV:1i �ourv.. rVvfly �i 1 fJe�.1 A-- MG,:Ie�,.x� L�i.". (t :TCac�e.t .. �CrrAwr SaVTt S�ftr Delivery1^0�,.r� 1 r.4w�"ei, Amount of Service: 6110 Duration and Contact 0/10 Hours Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 5fI2 5113 Risk Tier 2 TOTAL SPED 49/1 GO SCORE POP Eat%/80°fo Score % This plan is approved by. Program Manager Na Date JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates I provided to the 3CPC no later than March 31, 2019. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name &Type-, Victim Offender Mediation - Mediation (STRUCTURE - NO SFEP SCORE) Brief Description: Restorative Justice practices to facilitate mediation and accountabifity processes by trained facilitators and mediators. Program serves youth referred P muni y Court Counselors, schools,and com Partners. Eh'CafGornme P. Primary Service N/A MIA N/A N[A N/A Qualifying N/A Supplemental Services Qua]fty of Update program manual to Program Manager, Val Service 20f20 -Review and reflect additional programming, Hanson Delivery update manual best practices for peer circles, evaluation components, and -Professionai volunteer protocol. Development( Attend National RJ conference Training in June 2019 - Revise program evaluation -Update program component to include peer evaluation circles and as welf as pre-circle measures pre-termination evaluafive components Amount of Service: NIA Duration and Contact Hours N/A Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier I MIA Risk Ter 2 NIA TOTALSPEP NIA 711 01 SCORE ME PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Frograrn Evaluation Protocol(SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) POP NIA �' .�. 3�1 _ , , f- WONr � Score°Jo �;-WL14 'his p€arz is approved by: Pro Manager Name Date J C Ch r D Program g a e PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the 1CPC rio l,aterthan March 3:1,2a:19. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name&Type: Teen Court-Teen Court (STRUCTURE-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: An alternative court program for middle and high school students based upon the principles of restorative justice. First-time offenders are tried and sentenced by a jury of their peers. Fellow students take the roles of defense attorney, prosecutor,clerk of court, bailiff,or juror to carry out these proceedings. Local attorneys volunteer to serve as Teen Court judges. Participants are sentenced to complete community service hours and jury duties on future Teen Court cases. Category SPEP . Enhancement Action Steps Responsible-.Party Comments 9 Score- Opportunity Primary NIA NIA Service NIA NIA N/A Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of Service 20/20 DeliverT Amount of Service_ NIA Duration and Contact N/A Hours Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier I NIA _ N/A Risk Tier 2 TOTALSP •'••- .'`.? ter'. '•r••. �r 1C r EP NIA f.; SCO RE E _ A _ ,k N � OP p _ Score% This plan is approved by_ Program [Manager N e Date P Chair Date PEP Progress Updat II be provided to the 1CPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name &Type: Wrenn House Runaway Shefter (STRUCTURE - NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: Wrenn House is crisis shelter designed to provide safe environment for runaway, homeless and in-crisis youth. Wrenn House is open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Services are for youth ages 10-17. By offering temporary shelter, if eliminates need for illegal means of support by homeless and runaway youth and therefore reduces rate c f juvenile crime. It also serves as alternative to detention. Services are provided wrtffin therapeutic environment wlOe p rnoting ind'rviduafi and empowerment Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service N/A NIA NIA NIA NfA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of 'l. COO Service 20l20 1_ Continue to 1. identify any new training 2. Program Director Delivery enhance staff topics that would benefit the training program 2. Continue to 2. Update policies as new trends review and arise that may be best fit or best enhance policy and practice for youth in care. procedures as trends change. Amount of Service_ NIA Damfi<>n and --- Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Ter 1 ILIA Risk-ier 2 NIA TOTAL SPEP NIA SCORE PEP Progress Updates Mill be provided to the 1CPC no later than March 31, zoi9. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (STEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) POP N/A Score % This plan is approved by: � P gram Managkr Flame Date JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress updates wili be provhied to the JCPC no later than March 31,2039. SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 25627 NAME OF COMPONENT : Parent Teen Solutions Group BRIEF DESCRIPTION : The program is provided to at- risk and delinquent youth ( 10 - 17 ) and their parents . The program is designed to maintain youth in the home , while reducing recidivism , improving parent-child relationship , school motivation , problem -solving skills , interpersonal skills , and parenting skills . Families participating in the program participate in peer group sessions for 2 hours that include group discussion and peer and family practice . COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 25769 NAME OF COMPONENT : Parent Teen Solutions Home Visitation BRIEF DESCRIPTION : The home visitation counseling program provided to at- risk or delinquent youth ( 10 . 17 ) and their parent ( s ) 3 hours per week from 3 to 6 months . Most families will average 150 days . Program is designed to maintain youth in the home environment while reducing recidivism , improving parent- child relationships , school motivation , problem . solving skills , interpersonal skills , and parenting skills . Families are also offered the option to participate in group services along with this component . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance Instructions : Adjust arrows to cover target populations JCPC funded Available in Community Comprehensive Strategy Needed Services Available but difficult access Prevention Graduated Sanctions DIPS funded/Non JCPC Tar let Po ulations Services & Instructions : Pre - Delinquent- Delinquent- Delinquent- Structures Adjust arrows to cover target Youth at Adjudicated Level I/ Prot . Level II Level III Post Release Categories populations All Youth Greatest Risk Youth Supervision Youth Youth Youth Parent Teen Solutions ( Exchange Club ) Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate Boys & Girls Club Jr. Police Academy Citizens Academy GED Josh's Hope - Tools for Hope Structured AA/NA ( Spanish Speaking ) Activities YMCA 4-H Youth Services Girls & Boys Scouts of America Recreation Department Youth Scholarships ( DSS ) Behavior Skills Counseling Experiential Education Job Corps . WIOA NextGen Program Restitution (VFY) Youth/Family Team Coordin . Restorative Community Service (VFY) Services Teen Court (VFY) Victim-Offender Mediation ( DSC ) Truancy Mediation ( DSC ) Conflict Resolution DSC Alternative to Suspension Structured ( Boomerang ) Day Phoenix Academy Partnership Academy Multi-Systemic Therapy (MST) AMI Kids (FFT) MH Services SUD Services Clinical Freedom House s. •. -•. t . � ..�.. • , . -. , . �.. Sex Offender Treatment Treatment Intensive In-Home Intensive Wrap-Around (Youth Villages) High Fidelity Wrap-Around (Youth Villages El Futuro Court Psychologist Assessment Juvenile Crisis & Assessment Ctr Services Substance Abuse Sex Offender Assessment Therapuetic Foster Care Craven Transitional Living ( Males ) North Hills Transitional Living ( Girls) WestCare Residential ( Girls ) Residential Eckerd Residential ( Males) Sub . Abuse Residential Treatment Wright School Whitaker School Emergency Shelter (Wrenn House) Tarheel Challenge Updated April 2018