Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
JCPC Annual Plan FY18-19 FINAL
Juvenile Crime Prevention Council County Plan , v 01, r� tz 52 , �4rt , � ACo+`fi4 Orange County FY 2018 - 2019 Table of Contents I . Executive Summary II . County Funding Plan III . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization IV . County Risk and Needs Assessment Summary V . County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals VI . Funding Decision Summary VII . Funded Programs Descriptions Attachments . Risk and Needs Graph Data Continuum at a Glance Executive Summary The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC ) , in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina, has completed the activities required to develop and update this County Plan for FY 2018 -2019 . The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, at-risk youth, and their families in Orange County . Further, the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior . It should be noted that the JCPC continues to support and embrace diversionary strategies , such as Teen Court , that effectively reduce and prevent delinquency . As noted in NC Gen . Stat . § 143 13 - 851 , the JCPC is legislatively mandated to evaluate the effectiveness of its funded programs and the Department of Public Safety , Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice , has provided the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ( SPEP ) Instrument to aide JCPCs with this task . However , the tool cannot be administered to all JCPC funded programs given that some programs are identified as structures or " settings within which program services are delivered" (Lipsey , 2005 ) . Programming such as Teen Court may be identified as a structure yet it offers vital diversionary programming to youth . Other services , including some residential programs and structured- day services , also offer vital intervention strategies to youth and families but may not be scored using the SPEP instrument . The JCPC recognizes that these identified structures offer critical prevention/intervention programming and the JCPC adheres to their utilization in its strategies to prevent and reduce delinquency . Priorities for Funding : Through a risk & needs assessment and a resource assessment , the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Orange County : • Restitution/Community Service • Parent/Family Skill Building • Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse , Trauma Based Therapy) • Interpersonal Skill Building • Mentoring • Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) • Teen Court • Tutoring/Academic Enhancement • Temporary Shelter ( specifically Emergency Shelter) Monitoring and Evaluation : Each program funded in the past year by the JCPC has been monitored . The monitoring results and program outcomes evaluations were considered in making funding allocation decisions . The JCPC continues to conduct implementation monitoring of its action plan and its funded programs . Funding Recommendations : Having published a Request for Proposals for needed services for a minimum of thirty ( 30 ) days , the JCPC has screened the submitted proposals and has determined which proposals best meet the advertised needed services . As required by statute , the JCPC recommends allocation of the NC Department of Public Safety (NC DJJ) Funds to the following programs in the amounts specified below for FY 18 - 19 ( see JCPC Funding Allocations page) : 1 . Boomerang 2 . Child and Adolescent Outpatient Services 3 . Family Advocacy Network 4 . Juvenile Community Service and Restitution 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution 6 . Teen Court 7 . Wrenn House 8 . Young Warriors Athlete Scholarship Program The JCPC further recommends that the following amount be allocated from the NC DPS DJJ funds for the administrative costs of the Council for FY 18 - 19 : $ 8 , 834 . 00 Respectfully Submitted , Meg McGurk, Chair Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council ORANGE County NC DPS - Community Programs - County Funding Plan Available Funds : $ $ 2779731 Local Match : $ $225 , 428 Rate : 30 % DPS JCPC funds must be committed witli a Program Agreement submitted in NC Allies and electronically signed by authorized officials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : �LOGAL' :FUNDING : : : : : : : • : : : OTH1✓R : : : - ' -OTHER : - : - t. a. m. . : l. l .t .ov. .id. . r. : . : . : . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 IVV11 : : : G : : State DPS-JCP C# : 1 : : : F: : : ?PS=dCFC uyi al aC . . . . . . . . .MStch : • : Program . . . , : Fund ing : . : : : : . . . . . . . . . I±;irid : : : : F4edeT al: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Revenues Boomerang Youth , Inc. 1 (Boomerang ) $28 , 131 $8 ,439 $55, 000 $241 , 342 $332 ,912 92% Freedom House Recovery Center (Child 2 and Adolescent Outpatient Services) $8 ,200 $2 ,460 $ 10 , 660 23% Freedom House Recovery Center 3 (Family Advocacy Network) $40 , 722 $12 , 217 $8 , 533 $613472 34% Volunteers for Youth , Inc. a (Juvenile Community Service and Restitution ) $90 , 870 $27 ,261 $34, 316 $ 152 , 447 40% Dispute Settlement Center s (Mediation/Conflict Resolution ) $40 , 500 $ 12, 150 $6 , 333 $585983 31 % Volunteers for Youth , Inc. r, (Teen Court) $40 , 330 $121099 $143426 $66 , 855 40% Haven House , Inc . 7 (Wrenn House ) $ 10 , 722 $3 ,217 $ 19 , 000 $32, 939 67% Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate h' (Young Warriors Athlete Scholarship Program ) $9 , 422 $2 , 827 $4 , 500 $3 , 000 $ 19 , 749 52% v JCPC Administration $ 8 , 834 $2 , 650 $ 11 , 484 23% 111 ! 1 12 213 14 15 16 ! 7 18 19 20 21 22 TOTALS : $277 , 731 $83 , 320 $ 133 , 575 $8 , 533 $244, 342 $747 , 501 63% The above plan was derived through a planning process by the ORANGE County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and represents the County ' s Plan for use of these funds in FY 18= 19 Amount of Unallocated Funds 4 ) 1 q C a 1 Amount of funds reverted back to DPS iiperson, Juv ii e Crime Prevention Council (Date) I 1 Discretionary Funds added t c check type ❑ initial plan ❑ update ❑ final r" �- ell -----DPS Use Only----- Chaiiperson, Board of Co4i6 Comm ioners ( Date ) or County Finance Office[ Reviewed by Area Consultant Date Reviewed by Program Assistant Date Verified by Designated State Office Staff Date ver 03/04/2016 ext Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization FY 1748 Name Organization Title Chairperson Meg McGurk Chapel Hill Downtown Executive Director Partnership Vice- Chairperson Bernard Miles Orange County Social Services CPS Supervisor Accountability and Operations Chairperson Community Relations Chairperson Program Support & Accountability Chairperson Number of members : 21 List meeting dates during the current fiscal year and identify the number of JCPC members in attendance for each . Meeting Date Members in Quorum Present? Yes/No Attendance August 2017 9 Yes (with 2 proxy) October 2017 12 Yes December 2017 14 Yes (with 1proxy) February 2018 14 Yes (with 1 proxy) April 2018 10 Yes (with 6 proxy) June 2018 15 Yes (with 2 proxy) i SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE I . Risk Assessment Summary II . Needs Assessment Summary III . Resource Assessment Summary IV . Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Community Continuum V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding Part I . Risk Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Risk Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors after juveniles are referred with a complaint alleging that a delinquent act has occurred and prior to adjudication of the juvenile . The Juvenile Risk Assessment is an instrument used to predict the likelihood of the juvenile being involved in future delinquent behavior . For some youth, some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent( s ) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under- reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Risk Factor Observations : FY 2016 -2017 N- 84 o Orange County experienced a 23 % decrease in the number of youth at intake as compared to FY 15 - 16 , (from 65 to 53 ) . o 18 % of youth were classified at Risk Level 1 or 2 , 40 % at Risk Level 3 , and 42 % at Risk Level 4 or 5 . o 15 % of youth were under age 12 , an 86 % increase from FY 15 - 16 (from 7 to 13 ) . While this is higher than our county numbers for the previous five fiscal years , it is consistent with the state average of 14 % . o 44 % of youth show having one or more prior referrals at the time of intake . o 18 % have a prior class 1 - 3 misdemeanors , consistent with the state average of 17 % ; and 12 % have prior class f- 1 felonies , al misdemeanors or A- E Felonies , a 150 % increase from FY 15 - 16 but consistent with the state average . o 20 % of youth had prior assaults , an increase of 89 % . o 25 % of youth have run away from home or placement, higher than the state average of 17 % . 0 3 8 % * of youth have some known substance use/abuse and need substance use/abuse assessment and/or treatment, a 78 % increase compared to FY 1546 . Of those youth, 47 % * have known substance abuse and need assessment or treatment . o 58 % of youth demonstrate moderate to serious behavioral problems in school . These numbers are consistent with FY 15 - 16 and lower than the state average of 74 % . o 79 % * of youth lack pro - social peers , regularly associate with others involved in delinquent activity , and/or is a gang member/associates with a gang . o 7 % of parents are willing but unable to supervise youth, consistent with FY 1546 , and significantly lower than the state average of 19 % . Part II . Needs Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee also reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Needs Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors prior to court disposition of a juvenile . The Juvenile Needs Assessment is an instrument used to examine a youth ' s needs in the various domains of his/her life : The Individual Domain, The School Domain, The Peer Domain, and the Community Domain . This instrument was designed to detect service intervention needs as an aid in service planning . As with the Juvenile Risk Assessment , some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent( s) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Elevated Needs Observations : FY 2016 -2017 N=90 o 53 % of youth were assessed as having medium to high needs , above the state average of 39 % . 10 % of youth were assessed as having high needs , twice the state average of 5 % . o 2 1 % of youth have healthy peer relationships , consistent with FY 15 - 16 . o 45 % of youth have moderate to serious school behavior problems , a 45 % decrease from FY 15 - 16 and less than the state average of 70 % . o 16 % of youth are functioning below grade level , the same as FY 15 - 16 but above the state average of 11 % . This does not include students identified in the Exceptional Children ' s program . o 40 % * of youth need substance abuse assessment or treatment which is slightly higher than the state average of 34 % . o 46 % * of youth are reported to be abuse/neglect victims which is twice the state average 23 % , and 10 % have NO support (higher the state average of 4 % ) . 0 10 % * of youth have dangerous sexual practices or have sexually victimized others ( 3 % ) . o 40 % of youth need more mental health assessment . o 44 % of youth have domestic discord or violence in the home and 28 % of those youth with conflict in the home are experiencing domestic violence . o 57 % of adjudicated youth come from homes where parents/guardians have marginal to inadequate family supervision skills . o 16 % of youth have a parent/guardian with a disability, above the state average of 5 % . o 28 % * of adjudicated youth have family alcohol/drug abuse in the home , higher than the state average of 12 % . o 57 % of adjudicated youth come from homes where family members have criminal history and an additional 8 % are under active court supervision or have gang involvement . Part III . Resource Assessment Summary JCPC Funded Programs : FY 1849 1 . Boomerang 2 . Child and Adolescent Outpatient Services 3 . Family Advocacy Network 4 . Juvenile Community Service and Restitution 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution 6 . Teen Court 7 . Wrenn House 8 . Young Warriors Athlete Scholarship Program Community Resources Community resources are sometimes available but can be difficult to access . See Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance for a listing of available community resources . Part IV. Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Continuum of Services o While Orange County is not large , transportation is a barrier for many youth, especially those in Northern Orange County where public transportation is limited . Additionally, the cost of gas is an inhibitor to accessing services , including court ordered sanctions and therapy sessions . One of the major services providers has reduced services in the home . o Young people and families needing bi - lingual mental health and substance abuse services often experience waitlist for services due to the scarcity of bi - lingual therapists and language interpretation . There are no mental health or substance abuse services available for undocumented youth . o While Orange County does have a domestic violence service provider, the services offered are limited and are targeted more towards adults experiencing it as victims . There are no services offered to children/youth who experience or witness discord or violence in their homes . Part V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding The committee compared the services needed to address the elevated Juvenile Risk Factors and Juvenile Needs with services currently available in the community . Services which are currently available in the community and sufficient to meet the needs of court involved youth or those youth most at risk for court involvement are not considered as a priority for JCPC funding . The Committee proposes that the following service be approved as the funding priorities for FY 1849 : 1 . Restitution/Community Service 2 . Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) 3 . Teen Court 4 . Temporary Shelter Services ( specifically Emergency Shelter) 5 . Parent/Family Skill Building 6 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) 7 . Interpersonal Skill Building 8 . Mentoring 9 . Tutoring/Academic Enhancement Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary Program Funded Reason for Funding Check all that apply) Boomerang H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions H Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Community Service and H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions H Has evaluation Restitution component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances H Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Family Advocacy H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision&convictions H Has evaluation Network component H Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Mediation/Conflict H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions H Has evaluation Resolution component H Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Child & Adolescent H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions H Has evaluation Outpatient Services component ❑ Addresses parental accountability H Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Teen Court H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions H Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances H Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other H Other provides a diversionary option for juvenile and distrcit court H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Wrenn House H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions H Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other H Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Young Warriors Athlete H Meets funding priority H Compatible with research H Cost efficient H Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision&convictions H Has evaluation Scholarship Program component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision&convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Program Not Funded Reason for Not Funding Check all that apply) ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 201849 $ 2775731 30 % February 5 , 2018 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at- risk youth for the state fiscal year 2018- 19 beginning on , or after, July 1 , 2018 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed programs (see attached Program Descriptions) : * Restitution/Community Service * Interpersonal Skill Building *Teen Court * Parent/ Family Skill Building * Mentoring *Tutoring/Academic Enhancement *Assess ment/Treatm ent Programs for Un/ Underinsured * Mediation/Conflict Resolution *Temporary Shelter Services ( including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) ( including School Based ) (specifically Emergency Shelter) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency . Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement, have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent. Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth : Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest that youth regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality, gang involvement , and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome - based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component . 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non - profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Ra oza at 919-245 -2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2018=2019 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link . https : //www, ncdps. gov/l ndex2 . cfm ?a= 000003, 002476 , 002483 , 002482 , 002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab . Private non - profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 ( c) (3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant, at ( 919 ) 324-6391 . Deadline for Application is : March 9 , 2018 by 5 : 00 P . M . Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 2018 = 19 $2775731 30 % February 5 , 2018 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC ) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS ) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at- risk youth for the state fiscal year 2018=19 beginning on , or after, July 1 , 2018 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed program . Temporary Shelter Services ( specifically Emergency Shelter) : Provides group home care and shelter (up to 90 days ) for juveniles who need to be temporary removed from their homes during a family crisis . Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency. Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re- offending . Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement, have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent . Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth . Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest that youth regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality , gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome - based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component . 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3 ) non -profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements ) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Rapoza at 919-245 - 2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2018=2019 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link : https • //www ncdps qoy/lndex2 cfm ')a =000003 002476 002483 0024824002514 You may find additional self-help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab. Private non -profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit' s Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 (c) (3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant , at ( 919) 324 - 6391 . Deadline for Application is : March 23 , 2018 by 8 : 30 A . M . SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 20769 NAME OF COMPONENT : Boomerang BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Boomerang is a resiliency - based program that engages youth ages 11 - 17 at risk for disconnection due to short-term suspension or court- involvement , by providing support services to mitigate the risk of school dropout through brief counseling , tutoring , and life skills development during out- of-school time . Boomerang programming is strengths - based , recognizing the assets of each individual student and building on those to create stronger connections to school , family and community . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21809 NAME OF COMPONENT : Individual counseling BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Consumers assessed with a mental health /trauma- related disorder will be connected to up to 10 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , a psychiatric evaluation and up to two psychiatric follow- up visits . Consumers assessed to have a substance use disorder will also be connected to at least ten sessions of individual SUDs counseling using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a method of treating identifying thoughts , feelings and the impulses that lead to drug use and other illegal acts . COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21810 NAME OF COMPONENT : Community Group Therapy BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Group therapy sessions with group content including DBT or Seven Challenges based on the needs identified of referred youth . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12 /31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21366 NAME OF COMPONENT : Community Service and Restitution BRIEF DESCRIPTION : The Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Program works with Orange County youth who have committed offenses and are assigned community service hours and /or restitution . Youth are assigned to nonprofit work sites throughout the county where volunteer supervisors oversee and evaluate their work . Through this program , youthful offenders learn important lessons in responsibility and accountability and often develop positive relationships with their adult supervisors . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21752 NAME OF COMPONENT . Family Advocacy BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Family Advocates work one- on - one and in group settings with parents of at- risk youth with mental health /substance abuse conditions . Goal is to strengthen parenting skills , reduce parent/youth conflicts , set family goals and teach parents skills to meet these goals for court- involved youth . Family Advocacy Network is a best practice program model utilizing evidence based curricula with clients . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21751 NAME OF COMPONENT : Comprehensive Youth and Family Conflict Resolution and Victim . Offender Mediation BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Restorative Justice practices consisting of mediated conferences , accountability processes , and group circles by trained facilitators . Program serves youth referred by Court Counselors , schools , and community partners . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21108 NAME OF COMPONENT : Orange County Teen Court BRIEF DESCRIPTION . Teen Court is an alternative court program for middle and high school students based upon the principles of restorative justice . First -time offenders are tried and sentenced by a jury of their peers . Fellow students take the roles of defense attorney , prosecutor , clerk of court , bailiff, or juror to carry out these proceedings . Local attorneys volunteer to serve as Teen Court judges . Participants are sentenced to complete community service hours and jury duties on future Teen Court cases . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 20813 NAME OF COMPONENT : Wrenn House BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Wrenn House is crisis shelter designed to provide safe environment for runaway , homeless and in - crisis youth . Wrenn House is open 24 hours per day , 365 days per year . Services are for youth ages 10 - 17 . By offering temporary shelter , it eliminates need for illegal means of support by homeless and runaway youth and therefore reduces rate of juvenile crime . It also serves as alternative to detention . Services are provided within therapeutic environment while promoting individuality and empowerment . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 21749 NAME OF COMPONENT : Young Warriors Program BRIEF DESCRIPTION : Challenge programming to promote interpersonal skill - building for at- risk and court- referred youth through disciplined karate instruction and training . Service delivery for court- involved youth is minimally 20 classes over a 12 week period . Program provides structured activity and skill building through health , self- discipline , and modeling appropriate behaviors in a group setting . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety RISK ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 12 - 17 FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 -17 State 14A 5 State 15 -16 State 16 - 17 Total Intakes 123 107 92 65 53 14, 570 13 , 438 12 , 417 Overall Risk Level FY 12- 13 FY 13 =14 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Low Risk 63 % 74 % 67 % 72 % 70 % 68 % Medium Risk 25 % 20 % 24 % 19 % 23 % 24 % High Risk 11 % 7 % 7 % 8 % 7 % 8 % 80 % ■ FY 12- 13 70 % 60 % - ■ FY 13- 14 50 % FY 14- 15 40 % - — — ■ FY 15- 16 30 % — - - © FY 16 - 17 20 % - --- o State 14- 15 10 % - - ❑ State 15- 16 0 /o Low Risk 111 Medium Risk High Risk ❑ State 1 6- 1 7 Observations: R1 - Age When First Delinquent Offense Alleged in a Complaint FY 12 -13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15A6 State 16A7 Under age 12 13 13 % 9 % 10 % 10 % 16 % 16 % 15 % 14 % Age 12 or over 71 87 % 91 % 90 % 90 % 85 % 84 % 85 % 86 % 100 % 90 % - ■ FY 12 - 13 80 % - ■ FY 13- 14 70 % J FY 14- 15 60 % 50 % ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % ❑ State 14- 15 20 % — ❑ State 15- 16 10 % — ❑ State 16- 17 Under age 12 ( 13) Age 12 or over (71 ) Observations: f R2 - Number of Undisciplined or Delinquent FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14A5 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State 14 - 15 State 15A6 State 16 - 17 Current Referral Only 47 60 % 60 % 58 % 68 % 56 % 62 % 60 % 56 % One Prior Referral 17 18 % 22 % 20 % 18 % 20 % 18 % 18 % 20 % 2 or 3 Prior Referrals 15 16 % 11 % 10 % 13 % 18 % 12 % 130/. 15 % Four or More Prior Referrals 5 6 % 7 % 12010 1 % 6 % 8 % 9 % 10 % 80 % ■ FY 12- 13 70 % ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % -- FY 14- 15 ■ FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16- 17 40 % -- to State 14 - 15 30 % ❑ State 15 - 16 20 % o State 16 - 17 10 % ! — 0 % Current Referral Only (47 ) One Prior Referral ( 17) 2 or 3 Prior Referrals ( 15) Four or More Prior Referrals (5) Observations: R3 - Most Serious Prior Adjudication FY 12 - 13 FY 13 -14 FY 14=15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16A7 State 14A5 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 No prior adjudications 59 74 % 78 % 80 % 86 % 70 % 81 % 78 % 70 % Prior undisciplined 0 2 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 2% 2 % 3 % Prior class 1 -3 misdemeanors 15 20 % 19 % 15 % 8 % 18 % 12% 13 % 17 % Prior class f- 1 felonies or a1 misdemeanors 9 5 % 3 % 5 % 4% 11 % 5 % 6 % 9 % Prior A- E felonies 1 0 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % ■ FY 12 - 13 100 % - ---- ■ FY 13 - 14 90 % - 80 % `- ■ FY 14- 15 70 % i -- ■ FY 15- 16 60 % ■50 % FY 16 - 17 - - 40 % ■ State 14- 15 30 % - oil ■ State 15- 16 20 % ❑ State 16 - 17 10 % - No prior adjudications (59) Prior undisciplined (0) Prior class 1 -3 Prior class f-1 felonies or Prior A-E felonies ( 1 ) misdemeanors ( 15 ) a1 misdemeanors (9) Observations : R4 - Prior Assaults FY 12 - 13 FY 13A4 FY 14- 15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 - 17 State 14 - 15 State 15 - 16 State 16A7 No assaults 67 87 % 84 % 86 % 86 % 80 % 82 % 81 % 78 % Involvement in an affray 0 1 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 3 % 3 % 4 % Yes , without a weapon 13 13 % 13 % 8 % 8 % 16 % 12 % 13 % 15 % Yes , without a weapon , inflicting serious injury ( 1 ) 0 % 0 % 3 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Yes , with a weapon 2 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 2% 1 % 1 % 2 % Yes , with a weapon , inflicting serious injury 1 0 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 100 % ■ FY 12 - 13 90 % ■ FY 13 - 14 80 % FY 14 - 15 70 % ■ FY 15 - 16 60 % ■ FY 16 - 17 50 % E3 State 14- 15 40 % - a State 15- 16 30 % ❑ State 16- 17 20 % 10 % 0 % No assaults (67) Involvement in an Yes, without a Yes , without a Yes, with a weapon Yes, with a weapon , affray (0) weapon ( 13) weapon , inflicting (2) inflicting serious serious injury ( 1 ) injury ( 1 ) Observations: R5 - Runaway from Home or Placement FY 12 = 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14A5 FY 15A6 FY 16A7 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 = 17 NO 63 87% 89 % 78 % 81 % 75 % 88 % 86 % 83 % Yes 21 13 % 11 % 22 % 19 % 25 % 12 % 14 % 17 % 100 % ■ FY 12- 13 80% — ■ FY 13- 14 60% i ■ FY 14- 15 ■ FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16- 17 20% ■ State 14- 15 0% - - o State 15- 16 No (63 ) Yes (21 ) O State 16- 17 Observations : I R6 - Known Use of Alcohol or Illegal Drugs FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 No Known substance use 52 60 % 65 % 57 % 75 % 62 % 71 % 700/. 68 % Some substance use , need further assessement ( 17) 12% 20 % 26 % 14 % 20 % 18 % 18 % 19 % Substance abuse , assessment or treatment needed ( 15 ) 28 % 15 % 17 % 11 % 18 % 11 % 12 % 12 % 70 % ■ FY 12- 13 60 % — --- -- ■ FY 13 - 14 50 % ■ FY 14 - 15 ■ FY 15- 16 20 % ■ FY 16 - 17 10 % ■ State 14- 15 0 % o State 15 - 16 No Known substance use (52) Some substance use , need further Substance abuse, assessment or assessement ( 17) treatment needed ( 15) a State 16- 17 Observations: R7 - School Behavior Problems ( prior 12 months ) FY 12 -13 FY 13 = 14 FY 14= 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 N State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 No Problems enrolled , attending regular) 29 16 % 20 % 16 % 28 % 35 % 15 % 17 % Minor Problems 7 6 % 8 % 3 % 6 % 8 % 8 % 9 % Moderate Problems 14 29 % 29 % 25 % 17 % 17% 28 % 26 % Serious Problems 34 49 % 43 % 56 % 50 % 41 % 48 % 1 4807/ 60 % ■ FY 12- 13 50 % ■ FY 13 - 14 40 % FY 14- 15 30 % � FY 15- 16 20 % ❑ - 1 FY 167 ❑ State 14- 15 10 % ❑ State 15- 16 0 % AL ■ State 16-17 No Problems (enrolled , Minor Problems (7) Moderate Problems ( 14) Serious Problems (34) attending regularly) (29 ) Observations: I R8 - Relationships with Peers FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 = 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Peers are good support and influence 18 19 % 20 % 190/0 29 % 21 % 38 % 37 % 36 % Lacks prosocial peers or sometimes associates with delinquent others (47 ) 47 % 55 % 54 % 49 % 56 % 41 % 40 % 41 % Regularly associates with others involved in delinquent activity ( 17) 31 % 22 % 25 % 22 % 20 % 17 % 18 % 16 % Youth is a gang member or associates with a gang (2) 3 % 2 % 2% 0 % 2 % 5 % 6 % 610 60 % ■ FY 12 - 13 50 % - --- — ■ FY 13 - 14 40 % - - - — FY 14- 15 ® FY 15- 16 aFY 16- 17 I a State 14- 15 10 % - LLL mom ❑ State 15 - 16 20 % 1 it 0 % Peers are good support Lacks prosocial peers or Regularly associates with Youth is a gang member ❑ State 16 - 17 and influence ( 18) sometimes associates with others involved in or associates with a gang delinquent others (47) delinquent activity ( 17) (2) Observations : R9 - Parental Supervision FY 12- 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14-15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to supervise ( 77) 87% 92 % 90 % 93 % 92 % 81 % 80 % 81 % Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to supervise (6 ) 13 % 8 % 9 % 7 % 7 % 18 % 19 % 18 % Parent/Guardian/Custodian unwilling to supervise ( 1 ) 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 1 % 1 % 2% ■ FY 12- 13 100 % z FY 13 - 14 80 % FY 14- 15 60 % - ■ FY 15- 16 ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % - lo State 14 - 15 ❑ State 15 - 16 0 % ❑ State 16 - 17 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to Parent/Guardi to supervise (77) supervise (6) supervise ( 1 ) Observations: NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 12A7 FY 12 - 13 1 FY 13 = 141 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16A7 State 14 - 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Total Intakes 123 107 92 65 53 143570 135438 12 , 417 Overall Needs Levels FY 12 = 13 FY 13A4 FY 14- 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16A Low Needs 42 45 % 56 % 53 % 38 % 47 % 67 % 60 % 61 % Medium Needs 39 47 % 34 % 41 % 52 % 43 % 30 % 35 % 34 % High Needs 9 8 % 10 % 7 % 10 % 10 % 3 % 5 % 5 % 80 % rF 12- 13 70 % 13- 14 60 % 50 % 14- 15 40 % ir FY 15- 16 30 % ❑ FY 16- 17 20 % ❑ State 14- 15 10 % - o State 15. 16 Ap 0 % Low Needs (42 ) Medium Needs (39) High Needs (9) ❑ State 16- 17 Observations: Y1 - Peer Relationships FY 12= 13 FY 13 ,, 141 FY 14- 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Positive Peers 19 24 % 18 % 1 250/. 220/- 21 % 37 % 33 % 35 % Rejected by Positive Peers 26 18 % 22 % 22 % 14% 29 % 14 % 14 % 15 % Some Association with Delinquent Peers 27 37 % 35 % 38 % 44% 30 % 32 % 30 % 29 % Regular Association with Delinquent Peers 15 18 % 22% 13 % 19 % 17 % 12 % 16 % 1506 Gang Association 3 3 % 3 % 3 % 2% 3 % 5 % 7 % 1 7 % 50 % FY 12 - 13 45 % e ' FY 13- 14 40 % — FY 14 - 15 lee 35 % FY 15- 16 30 % - ❑ FY 16- 17 25 % ❑ State 14 - 15 20 % -- ❑ State 15- 16 15 % - 10 % I ❑ State 16- 17 I 5 % 0 % Positive Peers ( 19 ) Rejected by Positive Peers Some Association with Regular Association with Gang Association (3) (26) Delinquent Peers (27) Delinquent Peers ( 15) Observations: Y2 - School Behavior FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15A6 FY 16 = 17 State 14 - 15 State 15A6 State 16 - 17 No School Behavior Problems 33 25 % 20 % 28 % 28 % 37 % 25 % 21 % 20 % Minor School Behavior Problems 16 13 % 26 % 14 % 11 % 18 % 13 % 11 % 11 % Moderate School Behavior Problems 13 25 % 18 % 28 % 17 % 14 % 25 % 24 % 24 % Serious School Behavior Problems 28 37 % 37 % 31 % 44 % 31 % 370/. 44 % 46 % 50 % — 45 % - ■ FY 12 - 13 40 % — -. . - — - - ■ FY 13- 14 35 % -- ■ FY 14- 15 25 % _ ■ FY 15 - 16 20 % r - --- ■ FY 16 - 17 15 % — - ■ State 14- 15 10 % ❑ State 15- 16 5 % ❑ State 16- 17 0 % _ No School Behavior Problems Minor School Behavior Moderate School Behavior Serious School Behavior (33) Problems ( 16) Problems( 13) Problems (28) Observations: Y3 - Academic Functioning FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State UA5 State 15A6 State 16 - 17 At Grade Level 76 81 % 82 % 82 % 84 % 840/. 910/- 89 % 890/ Below Grade Level 14 19 % 180/. 18 % 16 % 16 % 9 % 11 % 11 100 % 90 % - ■ FY 12 - 13 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % ■ FY 14 - 15 60 % 50 % _ ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % ■ State 14- 15 20 % ❑ State 15- 16 10 % ❑ State 16- 17 0 % - —BEL, At Grade Level ( 76) Below Grade Level ( 14) Observations: i A Y4 - Substance Abuse FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14A5 FY 15A6 FY 16 - 17 State 14 = 15 State 15 = 16 State 16A7 No Known Substance Abuse 54 59 % 59 % 61 % 65 % 60 % 71 % 68 % 68 % Some Abuse Assessment 24 18 % 20 % 24 % 20 % 27 % 18 % 18 0 19 % Some Abuse Treatment 12 24 % 22 % 15 % 15 % 13 % 11 % 14 % 13 % 80 % 70 % - - -- ■ FY 12- 13 60 % ----- - -- - ---- ■ FY 13 - 14 50 % - -- - ----- -- - ■ FY 14 - 15 40 % ------ ■ FY 15 - 16 e FY 16- 17 ❑ State 14- 15 20 % - - ❑ State 15- 16 10 % - fia State 16- 17 0 % _ No Known Substance Abuse (54 ) Some Abuse Assessment (24) Some Abuse Treatment ( 12 ) Observations: Y5 - Juvenile Parental Status FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15- 16 FY 16A7 State 14- 15 State 15 = 16 State 16 - 17 Juvenile Not a Parent 87 99 % 99 % 100 % 990/. 97 % 99 % 98 % 98 % Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody 1 1 % 1 % 0 % 00/. 1 % 00/0 0 % 0 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare 1 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Juvenile is a Parent , Expect no child care 1 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 120% 100% — -- — ■ FY 12- 13 ■ FY 13 - 14 80% - FY 14- 15 ■ FY 15- 16 60 % d ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % o State 14 - 15 ❑ State 15 - 16 20 % y, ❑ State 16- 17 0% - Juvenile Not a Parent (87) Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody ( 1 ) Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child (1 ) care ( 1 ) Observations: Y6 - Abuse Neglect History FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 - 17 State 14-15 State 15 = 16 State 16A No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect 49 65 % 66 % 55 % 51 % 54 % 81 % 780/- 770 Abuse Victim with Support 32 30 % 31 % 41 % 38 % 36 % 17 % 18 % 19 % Abuse Victim but NO Support 9 4 % 3 % 3 % 11 % 1061. 3 % 4 % 4 % 90 % 80 % ■ FY 12- 13 70 % - ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % a FY 14- 15 50 % ■ FY 15 - 16 ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % ` [] State 14- 15 30 % ❑ State 15 - 16 20 % ❑ State 16 - 17 10 % - T 0 % No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect (49) Abuse Victim with Support (32) Abuse Victim but NO Support ( 9) Observations: Y7 - Sexual Behaviors FY 12- 13 FY 13 =14 FY 14A5 FY 15 - 16 FY 16A7 State 14= 15 State 15- 16 State 16 - 17 No Problem Sexual Behavior 74 84 % 87 % 90 % 790/- 820/- 88 % 87 % 88 % Sexual Behavior - Needs Assessment 7 3 % 6 % 5 % 10 % 8 % 4 % 5 % 5 % Dangerous Sexual Practices 6 11 % 5 % 5 % 6 % 7 % 4 % 5 % 5 % Has Sexually Victimized Others 3 3 % 1 % 0 % 50/6 3 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 100 % 90 % — - ■ FY 12 - 13 80 % -- ■ FY 13 - 14 70 % ( a FY 14- 15 60 % 50 % ■ FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16- 17 30 % - - ® State 1 4- 15 20 % ❑ State 15- 16 10 % i - [] State 16- 17 0 % No Problem Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior - Needs Dangerous Sexual Practices Has Sexually Victimized (74) Assessment (7) (6) Others (3) Observations: I I Y8 - Mental Health Needs FY 12A3 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State 14-15 State 15A6 State 16A7 No Mental Health Needs Noted 12 13 % 23 % 23 % 21 % 13 % 33 % 30 % 28 % Mental Health Needs Addressed 42 40 % 37 % 40 % 34 % 47 % 34 % 35 % 38 % Needs More Mental Health Assessment 36 48 % 40 % 37 % 45 % 40 % 33 % 35 % 34 % 60 % -- ■ FY 12 - 13 ■ FY 13 - 14 40 % - 30 % ■ FY 14- 15 - - -- ■ FY 15 - 16 WT ■ FY 1 & 17 20 % — - ❑ State 14- 15 10 % o State 15- 16 0 % ❑ State 16- 17 No Mental Health Needs Noted ( 12 ) Mental Health Needs Addressed (42) Needs More Mental Health Assessment (36) Observations: Y9 - Basic Needs/Living FY 12 - 13 FY 13 -14 FY 14- 15 FY 15- 16 FY 16A7 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 Living with Parent & Needs Met 81 91 % 91 % 95 % 88 % 90 % 93 % 90 % 90 % Temporary Residence & Needs Met 8 9 % 8 % 5 % 10 % 9 % 7 % 9 % 9 % Living with Parent & Needs Unmet 0 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 00/0 0 % 0 % Living Independently 1 0 % 0 % 0 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 100 % 90 % — ■ FY 12- 13 80 % ■ FY 13 - 14 70 % ■ FY 14- 15 50 % ■ FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16- 17 30 % ■ State 14- 15 20 % ■ State 15- 16 10 % ❑ State 16- 17 0 % Living with Parent & Needs Temporary Residence & Living with Parent & Needs Living Independently (1 ) Met (81 ) Needs Met (8) Unmet (0) Observations : Y10 - Health/Hygiene FY 12 - 13 FY 13 = 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 = 17 State 14- 15 State 15 = 16 State 16 - 17 No Health Hygiene Problem 74 86 % 89 % 87 % 85 % 820% 91 % 90 % 91 % Health/ Hygiene Problem but Unimpaired 11 13 % 11 % 11 % 12 % 12 % 8 % 9 % 8 % Health/ Hygiene Problem Limits Function 1 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Health/ Hygiene Problem Untreated 4 1 % 0 % 2 % 2 % 4 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 12 - 13 80 % ■ FY 13 - 14 70 % FY 14- 15 60 % - FY 15 - 16 50 % 40 % - — ❑ FY 16 - 17 30 % -- ------- ❑ State 14 - 15 20 % - -- ❑ State 15 - 16 10 % ❑ State 1 6 - 1 7 0 % - No Health Hygiene Health/ Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health /Hygiene Problem (74 ) Problem but Problem Limits Problem Untreated Unimpaired ( 11 ) Function ( 1 ) (4) Observations: F1 - Conflict in the Home FY 12 -13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15- 16 State 16 = 17 Supportive Home 50 69 % 75 % 66 % 54% 56 % 77 % 74 % 74 % Domestic Discord 29 15 % 14 % 26 % 34% 32% 181. 21 % 21 % Domestic Violence 11 16 % 11 % 9 % 12 % 120/. 40/. 5 % 5 % 90 % 80 % ■ FY 12 - 13 70 % __ ■ FY 13- 14 60 % ■ FY 14 - 15 50 % -- --- ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 1 & 17 30 % - ■ State 14- 15 20 % - —10 % ❑ State 15- 16 0 % - ❑ State 16- 17 Supportive Home (50) Domestic Discord (29 ) Domestic Violence ( 11 ) Observations: it i i I F2 - Family Supervision Skills FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 = 16 State 16 - 17 Adequate 39 39 % 39 % 48 % 37 % 43 % 47 % 43 % 46 % Marginal 43 53 % 52 % 47 % 55 % 48 % 50 % 53 % 51 % Inadequate 8 8 % 9 % 5 % 8 % 9 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 60 % — 50 % — ----- ■ FY 12 - 13 . I ■ FY 13- 14 40 /o o — - - - - FY 1 FY 14 - 15 - 30 % - - - - ---- 5 - 16 ❑ FY 16- 17 20 % __-__ --- --- - - — - ❑ State 14- 15 ❑ State 15- 16 10 % - ❑ State 16- 17 0 % - Adequate ( 39) Marginal (43) Inadequate (8) Observations: F3 - Disability of Parent/Guardian FY 12 - 13 FY 13A4 FY 14- 15 FY 15- 16 FY 16 = 17 State 14- 15 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 No Disabilities 76 86 % 86 % 90 % 850/. 840/. 96 % 95 % 95 % Disabilities Noted 14 15 % 14 % 10 % 15 % 16 % 4 % 5 % 5 % 120 % 100 % - - ■ FY 12 - 13 80 % ■ FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 ■ FY 1 & 16 -_-- - ■ FY 16 - 17 o State 14- 15 20 % - - —-- -- State 15- 16 State 16 - 17 No Disabilities (76) Disabilities Noted ( 14) Observations: F4 - Family Substance Abuse FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15-16 FY 16 - 17 State 14- 15 State 15 = 16 State 16 = 17 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse 65 77 % 74 % 760/. 72 % 720A 90 % 89 % 88 % Family Alcohol/ Drug Abuse 25 23 % 26 % 240/. 28 % 28 % 10 % 11 % 12% 100 % ■ FY 12 - 13 ----------- 7 0 ■ FY 13- 14 60 % - . - - ■ FY 14 - 15 50 % — ----- - 40 % ■ FY 15- 16 30 % - __ _ ■ FY 16- 17 20 % ■ State 14- 15 10 % - -- ■ State 15- 16 0 % _ --- ■ State 16- 17 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse (65) Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse (25) Observations: F5 - Family Criminality FY 12 - 13 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 -17 State 14A5 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 No Family Criminal History 32 47 % 51 % 46 % 40 % 36 % 59 % 55 % 51 % Family Criminal History 51 45 % 40 % 45 % 52 % 57 % 33 % 36 % 40 % Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement (7 ) 8 % 10 % 9 % 7 % 8 % 8 % 9 % 9 % 70 % ■ FY 12 - 13 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 FY 14 - 15 50 % - - - ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 16- 17 - 1 o State 14 5 30 % - - j - State 1 5- 16 20 % State 16 - 17 10 % ! - 0 % No Family Criminal History (32) Family Criminal History (51 ) Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement (7) Observations: Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance Instructions : Adjust arrows to cover target populations JCPC funded �J Available in Community Comprehensive Strategy Needed Services Available but difficult access Prevention Graduated Sanctions DPS funded/ Non JCPC Target Populations Services & Instructions : Pre - Delinquent- Delinquent- Delinquent- Structures Adjust arrows to cover target Youth at Adjudicated Level I/ Prot. Level II Level III Post Release Categories populations All Youth Greatest Risk Youth Supervision Youth Youth Youth Young Warriors Boys & Girls Club Jr. Police Academy Citizens Academy GED Family Advocacy Network ( Freedom House) Josh' s Hope - Tools for Hope Structured Activities ANNA ( Spanish Speaking ) YMCA 2-1 4- H Youth Services Girls & Boys Scouts of America Recreation Department Youth Scholarships ( DSS ) Behavior Skills Counseling Experiential Education I WIOA NextGen Program Restitution (VFY) Youth/Family Team Coordin . Restorative Community Service (VFY) Services Teen Court (VFY) Victim-Offender Mediation ( DSC) Truancy Mediation ( DSC ) Conflict Resolution DSC Alternative to Suspension ( Boomerang ) Phoenix Academy Partnership Academy Multi-Systemic Therapy ( MST) AM [ Kids ( FFT) MH Services SUD Services Clinical Parent Education Skills ( FAN ) Treatment Sex Offender Treatment Intensive In-Home Intensive Wrap-Around (Youth Villages) High Fidelity Wrap-Around (Youth Villages El Futuro Court Psychologist Assessment Juvenile Crisis & Assessment Ctr Services Substance Abuse Sex Offender Assessment Ell ! Therapuetic Foster Care Job Corps . Craven Transitional Living ( Males) North Hills Transitional Living ( Girls ) WestCare Residential ( Girls) Residential Eckerd Residential ( Males ) Sub . Abuse Residential Treatment Wright School Whitaker School Emergency Shelter (Wrenn House) Tarheel Challenge - Updated April 2018