Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJCPC Annual Plan FY17-18 FINAL Juvenile Crime Prevention Council County Plan ION 49 t� ISW Eats Orange County FY 2017 - 2018 Table of Contents I . Executive Summary II . County Funding Plan y III . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization { IV . County Risk and Needs Assessment Summary V. County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals VI . Funding Decision Summary VII . Funded Programs Descriptions Attachments : Risk and Needs Graph Data Continuum at a Glance Il rr I �I 'I Executive Summary The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC), in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina, has completed the activities required to develop and update this County Plan for FY 2017-2018 . The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, at-risk youth, and their families in Orange County . Further, the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior. It should be noted that the JCPC continues to support and embrace diversionary strategies, such as Teen Court, that effectively reduce and prevent delinquency. As noted in NC Gen. Stat. § 143 13451 , the JCPC is legislatively mandated to evaluate the effectiveness of its funded programs and the Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, has provided the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Instrument to aide JCPCs with this task. However, the tool cannot be administered to all JCPC funded programs given that some f programs are identified as structures or "settings within which program services are delivered" (Lipsey, 2005 ) . Programming such as Teen Court may be identified as a structure yet it offers vital diversionary programming to youth. Other services, including some residential programs and structured-day services, also offer vital intervention strategies to youth and families but may ` not be scored using the SPEP instrument. The JCPC recognizes that these identified structures offer critical prevention/intervention programming and the JCPC adheres to their utilization in its strategies to prevent and reduce delinquency . E Priorities for Funding : Through a risk & needs assessment and a resource assessment, the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Orange County : 1 . Restitution/Community Service 2 . Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) I 3 . Teen Court 4 . Temporary Shelter (specifically Emergency Shelter) i 5 . Parent/Family Skill Building 6 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) i 7 . Interpersonal Skill Building 8 . Menioring 9 . Tutoring/Academic Enhancement Monitoring and Evaluation: Each program funded in the past year by the JCPC has been monitored. The monitoring results and program outcomes evaluations were considered in making funding allocation decisions . The JCPC continues to conduct implementation monitoring of its action plan and its funded programs . Funding Recommendations : Having published a Request for Proposals for needed services for a minimum of thirty (30) days, the JCPC has screened the submitted proposals and has determined which proposals best meet the advertised needed services . As required by statute, the JCPC recommends allocation of the NC Department of Public Safety (NC DJJ) Funds to the following programs in the amounts specified below for FY 17- 18 (see JCPC Funding Allocations page) . 1 . Boomerang $28 , 131 6 2 . Child & Adolescent Outpatient Services $ 4 , 030 3 . Family Advocacy Network $40,722 4 . Juvenile Community Service & Restitution $ 905870 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution $275718 6 . Psychological Services $ 85063 7 . Teen Court $40, 330 8 . Wrenn House $ 10, 029 9 . Young Warriors $ 1904 The JCPC further recommends that the following amount be allocated from the NC DPS DJJ funds for the administrative costs of the Council for FY 17- 18 : $ 8 , 834 Respectfully Submitted, r Meg McGurk, Chair Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council ORANGE County NC DPS - Community Programs - County Funding Plan Available Funds : $ $277, 731 Local Match: $ $2213250 Rate : 30% DPS JCPC funds must be committed with a Program Agreement submitted in NC Allies and electronically signed by authorized officials. LOtCAi: FUiNDNL3 : QTHE4R a ' a O�TRER ogrpir( ;ovidgi ; 3L )Pt' : ' Coon(yLaslr : ocatCasfi : > o¢al; ? q : ' f tetVCdgrial ; OpAQs ' ; � Qf4l: ; / Non :Fundrtie : : :�Ia(ch; : V5a(ch ; ' : Rmct : oPSJCPc Program Revenues Boomerang Youth, Inc. $28, 131 $8,439 $55,000 $235,367 $326,937 91 % Freedom House Recovery Center • Child & Adolescent 2 outpatient Services $4,030 $1 ,209 $2,418 $7,657 47% Freedom House Recovery Center - Family Advocacy 3 Network $40,722 $12,217 $2,000 $4,990 $49,000 $108,929 63% Volunteers for Youth, Inc. • Juvenile Community Service & 1 Restitution $90,870 $27,261 $28,159 1 $146,290 38% 5 Dispute Settlement Center • Mediation/Conflict Resolution $279718 $8,315 $7,497 $43,530 36% Freedom House Recovery Center - Psychological 6 Services $8,063 $2,419 $10,482 23% 1 Volunteers for Youth, Inc. • Teen Court $40, 330 $12,099 $12,867 $65,296 38% 8 Haven House, Inc, m Wrenn House $10,029 $35009 $193000 1 $32, 038 69% Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate - Young Warriors Athlete Scholarship Program $19,004 $5,701 $6,000 $39000 $33,705 44% 10 JCPC Administration Budget $8,834 $2,650 $11 ,484 23% 1( 13 13 11 15 16 17 18 TOTALS : $2773731 $833319 $1301523 $7,408 1 $287,367 $786,348 65% The above plan was derived through a planning process by the ORANGE County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and represents the County' s Plan for use of these funds in FP 2017-18 Amount of Unallocated Funds Amount of funds reverted back to DPS airperson, Ju en Crime P loll o oil (Date) �J Discretionary Funds added check type Elitist plan El update 0 final -----DPS Use Only----- Chairperson, Board of County ommissic s (Date) or County Finance Officer Reviewed by Area Consultant Date Reviewed by Program Assistant Date Verified by Designated State Office Staff Date ver 0310412016 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization FY 1647 Name Organization Title Chairperson Meg McGurk Executive Director Chapel Hill Downtown Partnership Vice=Chairperson Bernard Miles Orange County Social Services CPS Supervisor Accountability and Operations Chairperson Community Relations Chairperson Program Support & Accountability Chairperson Number of members : 20 List meeting dates during the current fiscal year and identify the number of JCPC members in attendance for each . Meeting Date Members in Quorum Present? Yes/No Attendance August 2016 12 Yes October 2016 13 Yes December 2016 13 Yes February 2017 14 Yes April 2017 14 Yes June 2017 10 Yes w/ rox ) SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE I . Risk Assessment Summary II . Needs Assessment Summary III . Resource Assessment Summary IV. Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Community Continuum V . Proposed Priority Services for Funding Part I. Risk Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Risk Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors after juveniles are referred with a complaint alleging that a delinquent act has occurred and prior to adjudication of the juvenile . The Juvenile Risk Assessment is an instrument used to predict the likelihood of the juvenile being involved in future delinquent behavior. For some youth, some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent(s) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under- reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Risk Factor Observations : FY 2015-2016 N=72 o Orange County experienced a 23 % decrease in the number of youth at intake as compared to FY 14- 15 . o 27% of youth were classified as medium or high risk, a 55 % decrease from FY 14 - 15 . o 10% of youth were under age 12, which remained the same as FY 14 - 15 . This is also lower than the state average of 15 % . o 32% of youth show having one or more prior referrals at the time of intake . o 8% have a prior class Im3 misdemeanors, lower than the state average of 13 % ; and 5 % have prior class f- 1 felonies, al misdemeanors or A-E Felonies, consistent with the state average. o 12% of youth had prior assaults, a decrease of 23 % . o 19% of youth have run away from home or placement. 1 o 25 % * of youth have some known substance use/abuse and need substance use/abuse { assessment and/or treatment, a 55 % decrease compared to FY 1445 . Of those youth, 44% * have known substance abuse and need assessment or treatment. �l l o 67% of youth demonstrate moderate to serious behavioral problems in school. However, when compared to FY 14- 15 there was a 3 1 % decrease in serious problems (from 52 to 36 youth) and a 48 % decrease in moderate problems (from 23 to 12 youth) o 71 % * of youth lack pro -social peers and/or regularly associate with others involved in delinquent activity which is above the state average of 64% . o 7% * of parents are willing but unable to supervise youth, consistent with FY 1445 , and significantly lower than the state average of 19% . Part II. Needs Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee also reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Needs Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors prior to court disposition of a juvenile . The Juvenile Needs Assessment is an instrument used to examine a youth' s needs in the various domains of his/her life : The Individual Domain, The School Domain, The Peer Domain, and the Community Domain. This instrument was designed to detect service intervention needs as an aid in service planning . As with the Juvenile Risk Assessment, some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent(s) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may Ir be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases, the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Elevated Needs Observations : FY 2015 -2016 N= 124 1 o 62% of youth were assessed as having medium to high needs . A 40% increase from FY 14155 it is above the state average of 40% . 10% of youth were assessed as having high needs , twice the state average of 5 % . o 22% of youth have healthy peer relationships, a slight decrease from FY 1445 . The number of youth with regular association with delinquent peers increased by 120% (from 15 to 33 ) . o 61 % of youth have moderate to serious school behavior problems, a 10 % decrease from FY 14- 15 and less than the state average of 68 % . o 16% of youth are functioning below grade level, the same as FY 14- 15 but above the state average of 11 % . This does not include students identified in the Exceptional Children' s program. o 35 % * of youth need substance abuse assessment or treatment which is slightly higher than the state average of 32% . o 49% of youth are reported to be abuse/neglect victims which is above the state average 22% . 11 % have NO support, a 250% (from 4 to 14) increase from FY 14- 15 and almost 4 three times higher the state average of 4% . o 6% * of youth have dangerous sexual practices . Six youth, or 5 %, had sexually victimized others, higher than the state average of 3 % . 4 o 45 % of youth need more mental health assessment, an increase of 30% from FY 1445 and above the state average of 35 % . a o 46% of youth have domestic discord or violence in the home, an increase of 43 % from FY 14- 15 . 26% of youth with conflict in the home are experiencing domestic violence . o 63 % of adjudicated youth come from homes where parents/guardians have marginal to inadequate family supervision skills . o 15 % of youth have a parent/guardian with a disability, an increase of 58 % from FY 14 - 15 and above the state average of 5 % . o 28 % * of adjudicated youth have family alcohol/drug abuse in the home, higher than the state average of 11 % . o 52% of adjudicated youth come from homes where family members have criminal history and an additional 7% are under active court supervision or have gang involvement. Part III. Resource Assessment Summary JCPC Funded Programs : FY 17 - 18 1 . Boomerang 2 . Child & Adolescent Outpatient Services 3 . Family Advocacy Network 4 . Juvenile Community Service & Restitution 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution 6 . Psychological Services 7 . Teen Court 8 . Wrenn House 9 . Young Warriors Community Resources Community resources are sometimes available but can be difficult to access . See Orange County Continuum of Services — At a Glance for a listing of available community resources . Part IV. Summary of Gans and Barriers in the Continuum of Services o While Orange County is not large, transportation is a barrier for many youth, especially those in Northern Orange County where public transportation is not available . Additionally, the cost of gas is an inhibitor to accessing services, including court ordered sanctions and therapy sessions . One of the major services providers has reduced services in the home . r I o Young people and families needing bi-lingual mental health and substance abuse services often experience waitlist for services due to the scarcity of bi-lingual therapists and language interpretation. There are limited mental health or substance abuse services available for undocumented youth. o While Orange County does have a domestic violence service provider, the services offered are limited and are targeted more towards adults experiencing it as victims . There are no services offered to children/youth who experience or witness discord or violence in their homes . Part V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding The committee compared the services needed to address the elevated Juvenile Risk Factors and Juvenile Needs with services currently available in the community. Services which are currently available in the community and sufficient to meet the needs of court involved youth or those youth most at risk for court involvement are not considered as a priority for JCPC funding. The Committee proposes that the following service be approved as the funding priorities for FY 1748 : 1 . Restitution/Community Service 2 . Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) 3 . Teen Court 4 . Temporary Shelter Services (specifically Emergency Shelter) 5 . Parent/Family Skill Building 6 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) 7 . Interpersonal Skill Building 8 . Mentoring 9 . Tutoring/Academic Enhancement 9 i I Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 201748 $ 277 , 731 30% February 8 , 2017 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at-risk youth for the state fiscal year 2017-18 beginning on , or after, July 1 , 2017 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed programs: * Restitution/Community Service *Interpersonal Skill Building *Teen Court * Parent/Family Skill Building *Mentoring *Tutoring/Academic Enhancement *Assess ment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured *Mediation/Conflict Resolution *Temporary Shelter Services (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) (including School Based) (specifically Emergency Shelter) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency : Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , associating with peers who lack pro- social behaviors and are delinquent. Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth : Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest that youth regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect. There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment. Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home. Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills, and family criminality, gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed. School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome-based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component. 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non-profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications (Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Ra oza at 919-245 -2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2017-2018 JCPC funding, you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link: https : //www. ncdps, gov/I ndex2, cfm ?a=000003, 002476, 002483, 002482, 002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clinking on the HELP tab. Private non-profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete: 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link), 2) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non-profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 (c)(3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant, at (919) 324-6391 , Deadline for Application is : March 9, 2017 by 5 : 00 P . M . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary Program Funded Reason for Funding Check all that apply) Boomerang ® Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other N Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Community Service and N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation Restitution component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances N Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other NWould increase funding to this service if funds were available Family Advocacy N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation Network component N Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances El Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other N Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Mediation/Conflict N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation Resolution component N Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other N Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Psychological Services N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other N Other Fills gap for needed service in community ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Teen Court N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions N Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances N Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other N Other provides a diversionary option for juvenile and distrcit court N Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Wrenn House N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions N Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other N Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Young Warriors Athlete N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation Scholarship Program component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Child & Adolescent N Meets funding priority N Compatible with research N Cost efficient N Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions N Has evaluation Outpatient Services component ❑ Addresses parental accountability N Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Program Not Funded Reason for Not Funding Check all that apply) Reintegration Support ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ® Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than Network another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Orange County 2017 =2018 Programs and Descriptions Boomerang Boomerang Youth, Inc. 825A North Estes Drive Chapel Hill NC 27514 Program Manager: Tami Pfeifer Phone : (919) 986-2146 Program Type : Juvenile Structured Day Brief Description : Boomerang is a resiliency-based program that engages youth ages 11 - 17 at risk for disconnection due to short-term suspension or court involvement, by providing support services to mitigate the risk of school dropout through brief counseling, tutoring, and life skills development during out- of-school time . Boomerang programming is strengths-based recognizing the assets of each individual student and building on those to create stronger connections to school, family and community. i Child and Adolescent Outpatient Services Freedom House Recovery Center 104 New Stateside Drive Chapel Hill NC 27516 Program Manager : Carol McClelland j Phone : (919) 942-2803 N Program Type : Assessments Brief Description : Freedom House will provide a comprehensive clinical assessment and psychiatric evaluation as needed for up to 10 children or adolescents who are uninsured or who have insurance, but whose families cannot afford their deductible . 1 Program Type : Individual Counseling j Brief Description : Consumers assessed with a mental health/trauma-related disorder will be connected to up to 10 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, a psychiatric evaluation and up to two psychiatric follow-up visits . Consumers assessed to have a substance use disorder will l also be connected to at least ten sessions of individual SUDs counseling using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a method of treating identifying thoughts, feelings and the impulses that lead to drug use and other illegal acts . Family Advocacy Network Freedom House Recovery Center 104 New Stateside Drive Chapel Hill NC 27516 Program Manager : Patricia Hussey Phone : (919) 942 -2803 Program Type: Parent/Family Skill Building Brief Description : Family Advocates work one-on-one and in group settings with parents of at. risk youth with mental health/substance abuse conditions . Goal is to strengthen parenting skills, reduce parent/youth conflicts, set family goals and teach parents skills to meet these goals for court-involved youth. FAN is a best practice program model utilizing evidence based curricula with clients . i' '�I Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Volunteers for Youth, Inc. 205 Lloyd St. , Suite 103 Carrboro NC 27510 Program Manager : Susan Worley Phone : (919) 9674511 Program Type: Restitution/Community Service Brief Description : The Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Program works with Orange County youth who have committed offenses and are assigned community service hours and/or restitution. Youth are assigned to nonprofit work sites throughout the county where volunteer supervisors oversee and evaluate their work. Through this program, youthful offenders learn important lessons in responsibility and accountability and often develop positive relationships with their adult supervisors . Mediation/Conflict Resolution Dispute Settlement Center 302 Weaver St Carrboro NC 27510 Program Manager : Valoree Hanson Phone : (919) 929- 8800 Program Type: Interpersonal Skill Building Brief Description: Program provides a holistic approach for conflict resolution and communications skills for youth and their families through mediation and interpersonal skill building classes . Trained facilitators provide family conflict intervention and youth/family skill building through a twelve-week curriculum while having the capacity to meet the needs of Low English Proficiency youth. Program Type : Mediation/Conflict Resolution Brief Description : Restorative Justice practices to facilitate mediation and accountability processes by trained facilitators and mediators . Program serves youth referred by Court Counselors, schools, and community partners . Psychological Services Freedom House Recovery Center 104 New Stateside Drive Chapel Hill NC 27516 Program Manager: Patricia Hussey Phone : (919) 942-2803 Program Type : Assessments Brief Description : Provides psychological evaluations and/or assessments for juvenile court involved youth to assist court in best recommendations for youth to minimize the likelihood of recidivism. F, h i i Teen Court Volunteers for Youth, Inc. 205 Lloyd St Carrboro NC 27510 Program Manager : Susan Worley Phone : (919) 9674511 Program Type : Teen Court k Brief Description : Teen Court is an alternative court program for middle and high school students based upon the principles of restorative justice. First-time offenders are tried and sentenced by a jury of their peers . Fellow students take the roles of defense attorney, prosecutor, clerk of court, bailiff, or juror to carry out these proceedings . Local attorneys volunteer to serve as Teen Court judges . Participants are sentenced to complete community service hours and jury duties on future Teen Court cases . Wrenn House Haven House Inc. 600 W. Cabarrus St Raleigh NC 27603 Program Manager : Kelsey Mosley Phone : (919) 832-7866 Program Type : Runaway Shelter Care Brief Description : Wrenn House is crisis shelter designed to provide safe environment for runaway, homeless and in-crisis youth. Wrenn House is open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Services are for youth ages 10- 17 . By offering temporary shelter, it eliminates need for illegal means of support by homeless and runaway youth and therefore reduces rate of juvenile crime . It also serves as alternative to detention. Services are provided within therapeutic F environment while promoting individuality and empowerment. Young Warriors Athlete Scholarship Program Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate 360 Weaver Dairy Road, Suite 107 Chapel Hill NC 27514 Program Manager: Nathan Ligo Phone : (919) 923 -6915 Program Type : Interpersonal Skill Building Brief Description: Challenge programming to promote interpersonal skill-building for at-risk and court-referred youth through disciplined karate instruction and training. Service delivery for court-involved youth is minimally 20 classes over a 12 week period. Program provides structured activity and skill building through health, self-discipline, and modeling appropriate behaviors in a group setting. 1 I RISK ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 11 =16 FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13=14 FY 14A5 FY 15-16 I State 1344 State 14ml5l State 15-16 Total Risk Assessments 158 134 102 93 72 1 14,218 1 13,956 13 187 Overall Risk Level FY 1142 FY 12A3 FY 13=14 FY 14-15 FY 15A6 1 State 13-141 State 14-15 State 15A6 Low Risk 63% 63% 74% 67% 72% 69% 70% 68% Medium Risk 32% 25% 20% 24% 19% 230/6 23% 24% High Risk 5% 11 % 7% 7% 8% 8% 7% 8% 80% 70% ■ FY 11 -12 60% ■ FY 12-13 50% FY 13-14 40% ■ FY 14-15 30% i ■ FY 15- 16 20% _ aState 13-14 10% oState 14-15 0% Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk 0 State 15-16 Observations: R1 - Age When First Delinquent Offense Allec FY 11 -12 FY 12=13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15=16 State 13-14 State 14=15 State 15-16 Under age 12 12% 13% 9% 10% 10% 16% 160/6 15% Age 12 or over 88% 87% 91 % 90% 900/0 84% 84% 85% 100% 90% ■ FY 11 - 12 80 % ■ FY 12- 13 70% ■ FY 13- 14 60% 50 % I ■ FY 14- 15 40 % ■ FY 15-16 30% oState 13- 14 20 % ❑ State 14- 15 10 % ❑ State 15- 16 0 % Under age 12 Age 12 or over Observations: R2 - Number of Undisciplined or Delinquent FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 1546 Current Referral Only 65% 60% 60% 58% 68% 62% 62% 60% One Prior Referral 15% 18% 220/. 200/6 18% 19% 18% 18% 2 or 3 Prior Referrals 13% 16% 110/. 100/6 130/. 120/6 120/6 13% Four or More Prior Referrals 7% 6% 7% 12% 1 % 8% 8% 9% 80% ■ FY 11 -12 70% a FY 12-13 60 % FY 13-14 50 % ■ FY 14-15 Ia FY 15-16 40 % oState 13- 14 30 % aState 14- 15 20% oState 15- 16 10 % 0 % ![� . Current Referral Only One Prior Referral 2 or 3 Prior Referrals Four or More Prior Referrals Observations: R3 - Most Serious Prior Adjudication FY 11A2 FY 12-13 FY 13A4 FY 14-15 FY 15=16 State 1344 State 14-15 State 15-16 NO prioradjudications 73% 74% 78% 80% 86% 80°/o 81 % 78% Prior undisciplined 3% 2% 0% 00/. 00% 2% 2% 2% Prior class 1 -3 misdemeanors 19% 20% 19% 15% 8% 13% 120/6 13% Prior class f-1 felonies or a1 misdemeanors 4% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% Prior A-E felonies 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% 0% 0% 100 % ■ FY 11 - 12 90 % ■ FY 12- 13 80 % FY 13- 14 70% ■ FY 14- 15 60 % ■ FY 15- 16 50% 40% oState 13- 14 30% ❑ State 14- 15 20% 10% ❑ State 15- 16 0% No prior adjudications Prior undisciplined Prior class 1 -3 Prior class f-1 felonies or Prior A-E felonies misdemeanors at misdemeanors Observations: R4 - Prior Assaults FY 11 =12 FY 12-13 FY 13=14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13=14 State 14=15 State 15-16 No assaults 91 % 87% 840/. 860/ 86% 83%o 820/ 810/ Involvement in an affray 2% 1 % 40/. 2% 1 % 3% 3% 3% Yes, without a weapon 6% 13% 13% 8% 8% 12% 12% 13% Yes, without a weapon , inflicting serious inU 1 % 0% 0% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Yes, with a weapon 1 % 0% 0% 1 % 10/0 10/0 1 % 1 % Yes, with a weapon, inflicting serious injury 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0 . 002 0% 0% 100% ■ FY 11 - 12 90 % ® FY 12- 13 80 % FY 13- 14 70 % i- Y FY 14- 15 60% ■ FY 15-16 50% oState 13-14 40% oState 14-15 30% ,, Stale 15-16 20% 10% 0% No assaults Involvement in an Yes, without a Yes, without a Yes, with a weapon Yes, with a weapon, affray weapon weapon, inflicting inflicting serious serious injury injury Observations: R5 - Runawayfrom Home or Placement FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-1EN State 13 -14 State 14-15 State 15-16 No 85% 87% 89% 7 88% 88% 86% Yes 15% 13% 11 % 2 12% 12% 14% 100% ■ FY 11 -12 80% ■ FY 12-13 60% a FY 13-14 ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15-16 20% oState 13-14 0% oState 14-15 No Yes oState 15-16 Observations: R6 - Known Use of Alcohol or Illegal Drugs FY 11 -12 FY 12=13 FY 13A4 FY 14=15 FY 15=16 State 13-14 State 14=15 State 15=16 No Known substance use 66% 60% 65% 57% 75% 71 % 71 % 70% Some substance use, need further assessemen 13% 12% 20% 26% 14% 16% 18% 18% Substance abuse, assessment or treatment nee 22% 28% 15% 17% 11 % 13% 11 % 12% 80% 70% ■ FY 11 -12 60% ■ FY 12-13 50% FY 13-14 40% s 30% • FY 14-15 20% ■ FY 15-16 10% oState 13-14 0% a State 14-15 No Known substance use Some substance use, need further Substance abuse, assessment or assessement treatment needed 0 State 15- 16 Observations: R7 - School Behavior Problems ( prior 12 mor FY 11 -12 FY 12=13 FY 13=14 FY 14=15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 15=16 No Problems enrolled , attending regularly) 17% 16% 20% 16% 28% 16% 16% 15% Minor Problems 11 % 6% 8% 3% 6% 90/0 90/0 80/0 Moderate Problems 29% 29% 29% 25% 17% 29% 290/a 28% Serious Problems 44% 49% 43% 56% 50% 46% 46% 48% 60% ■ FY 11 -12 50% UoState 40% 30% 20% 14 10% flR 15 0% it -16 No Problems (enrolled , Minor Problems Moderate Problems SerioVProblems attending regularly) Observations: R8 - Relationships with Peers FY 11 -12 FY 12=13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15=16 State 13=14 State 14-15 State 15-16 Peers are good support and influence 25% 19% 20% 19% 290/6 390/6 38% 37% Lacks prosocial peers or sometimes associates 44% 47% 550/. 540/. 490/6 390/u 41 % 40% Regularly associates with others involved in delit 31 % 310/6 22% 25% 220/6 17% 17% 180/6 Youth is a gang member or associates with a ga 0% 30/6 2% 2% 0% 5% 5% 6% 60% ■ FY 11 - 12 50% ■ FY 12- 13 40% FY 13- 14 30% ■ FY 14- 15 20% ■ FY 15- 16 10% oState 13- 14 MU ❑ State 14- 15 0P U] % Peers are good support Lacks prosocial peers or Regularly associates with Youth is a gang member ❑ State 15- 16 and influence sometimes associates others involved in or associates with a gang with delinquent others delinquent activity Observations: R9 - Parental Supervision FY 11 -12 I FY 12-13 IFY13m14 - 1 FY 14=15 1 FY 15-16 I State 13 =141 State 14=151 State 15=16 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to sup 82% 87% 92% 90% 93% 81 % 81 % 80% Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to 15% 13% 8% 9% 7% 18% 18% 19% Parent/Guardian/Custodian unwilling to su ervis 37/. 0% 0% 1 % 0% 1 % 1 1 % 1 1 % 100% ■ FY 11 - 12 ■ FY 12-13 80% e FY 13-14 60% ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 oState 13- 14 20% oState 14-15 0% MITI I oState 15-16 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to Parent/Guardi to supervise supervise supervise Observations: NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 11 -16 FY 11 =12 FY 12=13 1 FY 13=14 FY 14-15 FY 15.16 State 13-14 State 14=16 State 16A6 Total Needs Assessments 192 159 147 116 124 18,189 18 ,053 17,334 Overall Needs Levels FY 11 -12 FY 12.13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 1b-16 Low Needs 54% 45% 56% 53% A52 62% 67% 60% Medium Needs 35% 47% 34% 41 % 33% 30% 35% Hi h Needs 10% 8% 10% 7% 5% 3% 5% 80% 70% ■ FY 11 -12 60% aFY 12-13 50% 1. FY 13-14 40% ■ FY 14-15 30% ■ FY 15- 16 20% OState 13- 14 10% OState 14- 15 0% Low Needs Medium Needs High Needs OState 15- 16 Observations: Y1 - Peer Relationships FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15A6 State 13-14 State UA6 State 15-16 Positive Peers 29% 24% 18% 25% 22% 34% 37% 33% Rejected by Positive Peers 15% 18% 22% 22% 14% 13% 14% 14°/u Some Association with Delinquent Peers 32% 37% 35% 38% 44% 32% 32% 30% Regular Association with Delinquent Peers 23% 18% 22% 13% 19% 15% 12% 16% Gang Association 1 % 3% 3% 3% 2% 6% 5% 7% 50% ■ FY 11 - 12 45% ■ FY 12- 13 40% FY 13- 14 35% ■ FY 14- 15 30% ■ FY 15-16 25% t OState 13- 14 20% — ( OState 14- 15 15% E oStat 10% e 15- 16 5 % 0 % Positive Peers Rejected by Positive Peers Some Association with Regular Association with Gang Association Delinquent Peers Delinquent Peers Observations: Y2 - School Behavior FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15=16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 15-16 No School Behavior Problems 25% 25% 20% 28% 28% 22% 25% 21 % Minor School Behavior Problems 21 % 13% 26% 14% 11 % 13% 13% 11 % Moderate School Behavior Problems 25% 25% 18% 28% 17% 24% 25% 24% Serious School Behavior Problems 29% 37% 37% 31 % 44% 420/a 37% 44% 50% 45% ■ FY 11 -12 40% ■ FY 12- 13 35% FY 13- 14 30 % ■ FY 14- 15 25% 20% ■ FY 15- 16 15% oState 13- 14 10% ❑ State 14- 15 5 %0 % NMI ❑ State 15- 16 No School Behavior Problems Minor School Behavior Moderate School Behavior Serious School Behavior Problems Problems Problems Observations: Y3 - Academic Functioning FY 11 =12 FY 12-13 FY 13=14 FY 14A5 FY 15-16 State 13A4 State 14-15 State 16A6 At Grade Level 96% 81 % 82% 82% 84% 90% 91 % 89% Below Grade Level 4% 19% 18% 18% 16% 10% 9% 11 120% ® FY 11 - 12 100% FY 12-13 80% ■ FY 13-14 60% ■ FY 14-15 ■ FY 15-16 40 % aState 13- 14 20 % ❑ State 14- 15 0% [] State 15-16 At Grade Level Below Grade Level Observations: Y4 - Substance Abuse FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13=14 State 14-15 State 15A6 No Known Substance Abuse 68% 59% 59% 61 % 65% 68% 71 % 68% Some Abuse Assessment 120/u 18% 20% 24% 20 0 17% 18% 18% Some Abuse Treatment 21 % 24% 22% 15% 15% 15% 11 % 14% 80% 70% ■ FY 11 -12 60% m FY 12-13 50 % FY 13- 14 40% ■ FY 14- 15 30 % ■ FY 15- 16 OState 13- 14 20 % a State 14- 15 10 % Ld 1 ❑ State 15- 16 0 % No Known Substance Abuse Some Abuse Assessment Some Abuse Treatment Observations: Y5 - Juvenile Parental Status FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13.14 State 14-15 State 15-16 Juvenile Not a Parent 99% 99% 99% 100% 99% 98% 99% 98% Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody0% 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare 10/0 00/0 10/0 00/0 10/0 1 % 1 % 1 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care 6% 6% 00/o 00/o 0°/u 00/o 00/o 0% 120% 100% ■ FY 11 - 12 ■ FY 12- 13 80% FY 13- 14 60% ■ FY 14- 15 ■ FY 15- 16 40% aState 13- 14 20% ❑ State 14. 15 ❑ State 15- 16 0% Juvenile Not a Parent Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care Observations: Y6 - Abuse Neglect History FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13 -14 FY 1445 FY 15-16 State 13.14 State 14-15 State 15-16 No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect 67% 65% 66% 55% 51 % 80% 81 % 78% Abuse Victim with Support 26% 30% 31 % 41 % 38% 17% 17% 18% Abuse Victim but NO Support 7% 4% 3% 3% 11 % 3% 3% 4% 90% 80% ■ FY 11 - 12 70% ■ FY 12-13 60% , FY 13-14 50% ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 oState 13- 14 30% oState 14- 15 20% , oState 15- 16 10% 0 % No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect Abuse Victim voth Support Abuse Victim but NO Support Observations: Y7 - Sexual Behaviors FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 1445 FY 15-16 State 13=14 State 14=16 State 15-16 No Problem Sexual Behavior 80% 84% 87% 90% 79% 88% 887/b 87% Sexual Behavior - Needs Assessment 30/0 3% 6% 5% 10% 4% 4% 5% Dangerous Sexual Practices 15% 11 % 5% 5% 6% 5% 4% 5% Has SexuallyVictimized Others 2% 3% 1 % 0% 5% 3% 3% 3% 100% 90% ■ FY 11 - 12 80% ■ FY 12- 13 70% 60% FY 13- 14 50% ■ FY 14- 15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 30% oState 13- 14 20% ❑ State 14- 15 10% o State 15- 16 0 % No Problem Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior - Needs Dangerous Sexual Practices Has Sexually Victimized Assessment Others Observations: Y8 - Mental Health Needs FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 1344 State 14-15 State 15-16 No Mental Health Needs Noted 21 % 13% 23% 23% 21 % 32% 33% 30% Mental Health Needs Addressed 39% 40% 37% 40% 34% 33% 34% 35% Needs More Mental Health Assessment 41 % 48% 400/. 370/. 45% 35% 33% 35% 60% ■ FY 11 - 12 50% ■ FY 12- 13 40 % FY 13- 14 30% ■ FY 14- 15 ■ FY 15- 16 20% oState 13- 14 10% ; oState 14- 15 i 0 % ❑ State 15- 16 No Mental Health Needs Noted Mental Health Needs Addressed Needs More Mental Health Assessment Observations: Y9 - Basic Needs/Living FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14=16 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 1 6=1 6 Living with Parent & Needs Met 92% 91 % 91 % 95% 88% 90% 93% 90% Temporary Residence & Needs Met 80/0 90/0 8% 5% 10% 9% 7% 9% Living with Parent & Needs Unmet 0% 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Living Independently 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 100% 90% ■ FY 11 -12 80% ■ FY 12-13 70% FY 13- 14 60% 50% ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 30% oState 13- 14 20% o State 14- 15 10% o State 15- 16 0 % Living with Parent & Needs Temporary Residence & Living vnth Parent & Needs Living Independently Met Needs Mel Unmet Observations: Y10 - Health/Hygiene FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14=16 State 15-16 No Health Hygiene Problem 89% 86% 89% 87% 85% 90% 91 % 90% Health/Hygiene Problem but Unimpaired 10% 13% 11 % 11 % 12% 10% 8% 9% Health/Hygiene Problem Limits Function 1 % 1 % 00/0 0% 10R. 0% 0% 0% Health/Hygiene Problem Untreated 00% 1 % 00A 2% 2% 00% 0% 1 % 100 % - 90 % ■ FY 11 -12 80% ■ FY 12- 13 70% FY 13- 14 60% 50% ■ FY 14- 15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 30% oState 13- 14 20% o State 14- 15 10% 0% ❑ State 15- 16 No Health Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Problem Problem but Problem Limits Problem Untreated Unimpaired Function Observations: F1 - Conflict in the Home FY 11 =12 FY 12-13 FY 13=14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 I State 14=161 State 15-16 Supportive Home 67% 69% 75% 66% 54% 76% 77% 74% Domestic Discord 140% 15% 14% 26% 34% 19% % 21 % Domestic Violence 20% 16% 11 % 9% 12% 5% 418% 5% 90% 80% ■ FY 11 -12 70% ■ FY 12-13 60% FY 13-14 50% ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15-16 30% oState 13- 14 20% 10% oState 14- 15 0 % ❑ State 15- 16 Supportive Home Domestic Discord Domestic Violence Observations: F2 - Family Supervision Skills FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15=16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 15-16 Adequate 45% 39% 39% 48% 37% 44% 47% 43% Marginal 43% 53% 52% 47% 55% 52% 50% 53% Inadequate 13% 8% 9% 5% 8% 4% 3% 3% 60% 50% ■ FY 11 - 12 rFY 12- 13 40% FY 13- 14 30% ■ FY 14- 15 IN FY 15- 16 20% 13State 13- 14 10% o State 14- 15 ❑ State 15- 16 0% Adequate Marginal Inadequate Observations: F3 - Disability of ParentIGuardian FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 State 13-14 State 14-15 State 15-16 No Disabilities 86% 86% 86% 90% 85% 96% 96% 95% Disabilities Noted 14% 15% 14% 10% 15% 5% 4% 5% 120% 100% ■ FY 11 - 12 80% ® FY 12-13 60% FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14- 15 40% IN FY 15- 16 a State 13- 14 20% State 14- 15 0 % State 15- 16 No Disabilities Disabilities Noted Observations: F4 - Family Substance Abuse FY 11 -12 FY 12-13 FY 1344 FY 14-15 FY 15 .16 State 13=14 State 14-15 State 15=16 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse 67% 77% 74% 76% 72% 89% 90% 89% Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse 330% 23% 26% 24% 28% 11 % 10% 11 % 100% 90 % 80 % ■ FY 11 - 12 70% 60% w FY 12- 13 50% - FY 13- 14 40% In FY 14- 15 30% ■ FY 15- 16 20% [] State 13- 14 i 10% State 14- 15 p% State 15- 16 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse Observations: F5 - Family Criminality FY 11 -12 I FY12=131 FY13w14j FY14A51 FY 15-16 I State 13-14 1 State 14=16 State 15-16 No Family Criminal History 49% 47% 51 % 46% 40% 60% 59% 55% Family Criminal History 47% 45% 40% 459% 52% 32% 33% 36% Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvemen 4% 8% 10% 9% 7% 1 80/0 80/u 90/0 70% ■ FY 11 - 12 60% ■ FY 12- 13 o FY 13- 14 50% ■ FY 14-15 40% ■ FY 15- 16 30% [] State 13- 14 20% State 14- 15 State 15- 16 10% 0% MML No Family Criminal History Family Criminal History Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement Observations: Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance Instructions : Adjust arrows to cover target populations mmmmmOOD� JCPC funded Available in Community Comprehensive Strategy 000=0lllll00I Needed Services Available but difficult access Prevention Graduated Sanctions DPS funded/Non JCPC Tat et Populations Services & Instructions: Pre- Delinquent- Delinquent- Delinquent- Structures Adjust arrows to cover target Youth at Adjudicated Level I/ Prot. Level II Level III Post Release Categories populations All Youth Greatest Risk Youth Supervision Youth Youth Youilt Young Warriors Boys & Girls Club Jr. Police Academy Citizens Academy Communities in Schools GED Family Advocacy Network (Freedom House) Structured Josh's Hope - Toots for Hope Activities AA/NA (Spanish Speaking) YMCA 4-H Youth Services Girls & Boys Scouts of America Recreation Department Youth Scholarships (DSS) Behavior Skills Counseling Experiential Education WIOA Building Futures Program Restitution (VFY) Youth/Family Team Coordin. Community Service (VFY) Restorative Teen Court (VFY) Services Victim-Offender Mediation (DSC) Peer-to-Peer Mediation (OC Middle Truancy Mediation (DSC) Conflict Resolution DSC Alternative School ( For Non- Susp Students) Community Alternative to Suspension Day ( Boomerang) Programming Phoenix Academy Partnership Academy Multi-Systemic Therapy (MST) AMI Kids (FFT) MH Services SLID Services al Parent Education Skills (FAN) Treatment Sex Offender Treatment Intensive In-Home Intensive Wrap-Around (Youth Villages) High Fidelity Wrap-Around (Youth Villages , El Fuluro Court Psychologist (MHAT) Assessment Juvenile Crisis & Assessment Ctr Services Substance Abuse Sex Offender Assessment Therapuetic Foster Care Job Corps . Craven Transitional Living (Males) North Hills Transitional Living (Girls) WestCare Residential (Girls) Residential Eckerd Residential (Males) Sub. Abuse Residential Treatment Wright School Whitaker School Emergency Sheller (Wrenn House) Tarheel Challenge Updated 3/21 /17