The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - 05-15-2001-9b ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: May 15, 2001 Action Age d Item No. ~~ SUBJECT: Ashwick Subdivision -Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT; Planning $~ Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) ~ No ATTACHMENT INFORMATION CONTACT: 1) Resolution for Sewer Extension Approval Tina Moon Planner II ext. 2583 2) Resolution for Preliminary Plan Approval Robert P. Davis Planner III ext. 2580 3) Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 4) Agency Comments Hillsborough 732-8181 5) Planning Board Minutes Chapel Hill 968-4501 6) Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham 688-7331 7) Vicinity Map ~ Reduced Plans Mebane 336-227-2031 8) Preliminary Plat _ PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision. BACKGROUND: Request Applicant: Phil Post of Philip Post ~ Associates, agent for Perry's Construction Corporation • 50.93 acre tract +/- Fifty-eight (58) single-family residential lots on the conservation-cluster flexible development option Average lot size = 15,fi47 square feet Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site) Location • Cheeks Township • North side of US Hwy 70 West between Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) and Richmond Road (SR 1312) Existing Site Conditions Land Use: • 10 Year Transition Zoning: • Rural Residential (R-1 ); Upper Eno-Protected Watershed • Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, church, firehouse, undeveloped lots Physical Description: • Gently sloped land with a few scattered rock outcrops near high points on the site 2 • Approximately two-thirds (2/3) of the site is covered with 12-to 18-inch hardwoods • McGowan Creek flows diagonally across the northern end of the tract • There is floodplain associated with this section of McGowan Creek • A USGS blue-line stream meanders through the southern portion of the tract • An intermittent stream in the southeast portion of the site drains into the USGS blue-line stream Proposed Site Conditions Roads: • The subdivision will be accessed from US Hwy. 70 West • All seven roads (Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Farris Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court) will be public and constructed to NCDOT standards • Residential Lots: • Fifty-eight (58) single-family residential lots per the conservation-cluster flexible development option • Average lot size = 15,647 square feet; Gross average lot size = 38,243 square feet • Minimum lot size per R-1 Zoning District = 40,000 square feet (0.92 acre) • Minimum lot size for cluster option (a lot size reduction of up to 65%) = 14,000 square feet • Minimum to actual lot size ratio (MTAR) = 1.12 • Maximum number of lots permitted by R-1 zoning = 55 + 7 (density bonus**) = 62 _ • One additional lot is allowed per each additional acre of protected open space (Orange County Subdivision Regulations, Section IV-B-10, G, ,Flexible Development Standards) • Impervious Surface limit for Upper Eno PW = 12% Open Space: • Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site) • Most of the open space serves as a buffer for McGowan Creek • Minimum open space required for Flexible Development = 16.81 acres (33% of site) • Bonus open space = 7.23 acres** Buffers: • 100-foot open space or building buffer area along the site perimeter and between the subdivision and any off-site public street right-of--way (per Section IV-B-10, D2, Flexible Development Standards) • 75-foot Type-E Land Use Buffer is required along US Hwy 70 West • Type-E Buffer = a buffer composed of predominately (at least 75%) evergreen vegetation that is opaque to a height of at least thirty feet • 100-foot building buffer satisfies the Type-E Land Use Buffer (width) requirement • Typical lot landscape plan specifies primary and secondary tree protection areas Recreation ~ Parks: Public Recreatiion Space • Cheeks Township District Park (per the Recreation Service Area Boundaries Map) • All subdivisions (located within a floodplain) must provide a minimum of 1/20 acre of recreation space per lot (Section IV-B-7-b) • A minimum of 2.9 acres (126,324 square feet) of land is required for public recreation space • Or a payment in-lieu-of parkland dedication = $26,390 ($455 * 58 lots) 3 • The applicant has offered 4.46 acres (194,278 square feet) of land along the northern side of McGowan Creek. The location and amount of the proposed dedication is consistent with the County's objectives to preserve natural areas and provide public recreation space. Private Recreation Space • All subdivisions must provide a minimum of 0.028 square feet of recreation space per every square foot of land area dedicated far residential use (Articles 5.1.1 8~ 6.12 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, outline Land Use Intensity (LUI) requirements) • 0.028 * 46 = 1.29 acres (56,192 square feet), (46.03 =Total area (50.92) -rights-of- way (4.89)) • In those cases where the LUI calculation results in a larger amount than the public recreation space requirement of 1/20 acre per to#, the difference shall be established as private recreation space for the use of the residents of the development • No private recreation space is required (LUI calculation (1.29) is less than the public recreation space requirement (2.9)) Water-Sewer: • All lots to be served with Orange-Alamance water and Orange County sewer • Final number of proposed lots does not exceed the number approved with the concept plan Agency Comments • Requests for agency review were sent to: NCDOT, Recreation and Parks, Orange County Schools, Soil and Water Conservation, Erosion Control, the County Attorney, and the. Fire Marshal. Comments are attached. Development Process~Schedule, and Action • First Action: Planning Board to consider Concept Plan The Planning Board approved the flexible development concept plan for Ashwick on September 6, 2000 with the following conditions: 1. The size and boundary locations for both parent tracts shall be verified with Orange County Land Records and any discrepancies resolved prior to filing for preliminary plat approval: 2. A left turn lane, built to NCDOT standards, shall be required on US 70 to access the subdivision. . 3. All roads shall be public and proposed to be built to NCDOT standards with additional five (5) foot utility easements on each side. The right-of-way at street intersections shall be improved to NCDOT standards. Sight distance triangles (10' x 70') shall be delineated on the plat for each street at intersections, as appropriate. 4. The Benwich Lane right-of--way shall extend to the northwestern, external property line of the subdivision in the proximity of lots 31, 35, and 34. A conveyance of a 50-foot right-of- way with 20-foot construction easements on each side of this northwestern most portion of Benwich Lane is acceptable in-lieu-of construction. 5. Driveway access points shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the intersection of street rights-of--way. 6 All corner lots shall be designed to access from the street with lower traffic volume: i.e. lot 6 to Farnswick Place, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to Benwich Lane, and lots 48 and 58 to Chadwick Lane. 4 7. If an entrance sign is anticipated and will not be placed within the 100-foot building buffer, maintained by the Homeowners Association, a sign easement must be reserved within one of the residential lots. 8. All common areas (stream buffers, building buffers, landscape buffers) must be clearly identified on the preliminary and final plats and maintained by the Homeowners Associatian. The common areas cannot be subdivided or recombined with adjacent lots. Draft forms of the Homeowners Association documents, including restrictive covenants and conservation easements, that contain use and maintenance provisions for the open space and buffers must be submitted for review by the County Attorney as part of the preliminary plat approval process. The restrictive convenants or conservation agreement shall designate a backup grantee in the event that the Homeowners Association is eliminated. 9. The developer shall submit documentation granting the use of public water and sewer services prior to filing for preliminary plat approval. 10. The preliminary plat shall indicate areas for on-site infiltration of storm water that demonstrates compliance with Article 6.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. 11.The location of all drainage ways, stream. buffers and floodplains shall be delineated on the preliminary and final plats, along with appropriate information regarding restrictions. 12. The preliminary plat shall show a building footprint on the approximate location of each house site to ensure that there is sufficient buildable area on every proposed residential lot. 13. The preliminary plat shall show the location of tree protection fencing and contain a note requiring the installation of tree protection fencing prior to any grading to ensure the _ protection of vegetation within all buffers and open space. 14.The preliminary and final plats shall contain a note restricting further subdivision. 15.The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 2.9 acres (1/20 acre per residential lot) for public recreation space as part of the preliminary plat approval process. (Section IV-B-7_ b Recreation Sites, Orange County Subdivision Regulations) 16.A11 street names to be reserved with GIS section of Planning Department prior to submittal of preliminary plat subdivision request. • Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preliminary Plat The Planning Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Ashwick on December 6, 2000 in accordanc® with the attached Resolution for Approval. • Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider Preliminary Plat 1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time. 2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review. 3: If the Preliminary Plat is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall have one (1) year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-year extension from the Planning Director. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis (attached) RECOMMENDATION(S): Administration Recommendation The Administration recommends that the Board; 5 (1) Approve the Sewer Service Extension Agreement for Ashwick subdivision per the Orange County Sewer Collection and Treatment Service Rules and Regulations adopted on November 19, 1985 and Section IV-B-6-b of the Subdivision Regulations. (2) Approve the Ashwick subdivision preliminary plan with the Board of County Commissioners selected sewer system option and the conditions contained in the attached Administration Resolution of Approval. Planning_Board, Recommendation December fi, 2000 The Planning Board recommends approval in accordance with the attached resolution. (Vote: 6-1) Staff Recommends ion The Planning Department Staff recommends approval in accordance with the attached resolution. 6 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE SEWER SERVICE EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR ASHWICK SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners established an Overall Sewer Policy far the County of Orange to determine the extent of future public sewer service, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Sewer Collection and Treatment Service Rules and Regulations on November 19, 1985, and WHEREAS, Provision IX of the Rules and Regulations, EXTE S NS OF THE SYSTEM, outlines six criteria to determine to whether or not the County shall extend the system to serve undeveloped land, and WHEREAS, the proposed Ashwick subdivision meets all six of the following criteria: A. Extending service to Ashwick subdivision is consistent with the overall System plan adopted by Orange County. Extension is subject to the County Engineer's approval. B. All regulations of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations have been met by the preliminary plat for Ashwick subdivision. The property is located within the transition area along the Highway 70 West corridor. The extension of public services within the 10-year transition area is consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and other long-term goals for county planning. The Orange Caunty Engineer has reviewed and approved the engineering components of the preliminary plat with regards to water and sewer service. The County Engineer has approved preliminary plans for the sewer service extension. C. Extension of the System around the Elfand community is consistent with Goal 9.3 of the Orange County Land Use Plan, which prohibits the establishment of public water and sewer services in the areas designated as water quality critical areas .except to address emergency situations. The proposed subdivision is outside of the Upper Eno Critical Area. D. The System extension shall be installed according to and in compliance with approved plans. E. The construction of the System extension will be inspected by Orange County at intervals determined by the County. Perry Construction Corporation agrees to permit access to the, System and the System extension for inspection purposed. 7 User connections to the System will only be permitted after the extension of the System is finally approved in writing by Orange County. F. Upon the completion of the System extension Perry Construction Corporation will convey to Orange County by deed or other appropriate instrument all portions of the System extension, including by not necessarily limited to right-of--way easements, collection lines, service lines, stub-outs, permits, pump stations and equipment. All System extensions will be at no cost to Orange County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the extension of the Orange County Sewer Collection and Treatment System serving the Efland areas of Orange County for Ashwick sudivision as shown on the preliminary plat dated April 4, 2000 (last revised October 26, 2000). The County agrees to extend public sewer service to Ashwick subdivision per the Orange County Water & Sewer Policy approved on April 3, 1989 (and last amended on September 3, 1991), and the Sewer Collection and Treatment Service Rules and Regulations adapted on November 19, 1985. This, the 15th of May, 2001 Stephen H. Halkiotis, Chair County of Orange Board of Commissioner; WITNESS: Beverly Blythe Clerk to the Board 8 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE ASHWICK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN Date May 15, 2001 Name of Subdivision Ashwick Owner/Applicant Perry's Construction Corporation The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick subdivision as shown on the preliminary plat dated April 4, 2000 (last revised October 26, 2000) and subject to fulfillment of requirements specified herein. All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for the County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer ofi dedication of Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Fams Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court. This acceptance of dedication to the general public shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant (Peny's Construction Corporation) until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by NCDOT or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Ashwick Subdivision can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal and Water System 1. Each residential lot shall be provided a sewer line stub out in accordance with Orange County sewer connection guidelines. 2. Sewer line construction drawings shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to submittal to NCDOT or any state regulatory agencies for permitting or approval. Sewer shall be designed in such a way to allow far future extension of lines to adjacent properties as outlined in Section IV-B-6-a and IV-B-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. The proposed 25-foot easement crossing McGowan Creek shall be dedicated for future sewer extensions and for temporary public access to the public recreation space until that future time when other forms of public access are available. Any changes in design to comply with requirements from either NCDOT or other agencies shall also be approved by County Engineer. Sewer lines and sewer system improvements shall be constructed as provided herein prior to final plat approval. OR A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to secure construction the sewer system to Orange County standards. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer and submitted to the Orange County Planning Department and County Engineer. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the sewer system construction has been inspected and approved by Orange County. 3. All existing and proposed sanitary sewer easements to be dedicated to Orange County shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats. The developer shall submit a copy of a letter from the County Engineer certifying that all sanitary sewer lines have been installed per the approved plans and dedicated to Orange County prior to the issuance of any building permits. As-built drawings shall be submitted to and approved by County Engineer prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 4. Each residential lot shall be provided water line stub aut in accordance with Orange-Alamance Water System connection guidelines. 5. Water line construction drawings shall be approved by the Orange-Alamance Water System, Inc. prior to submittal to NCDOT or any state regulatory agencies for permitting or approval. Any changes in design to comply with requirements from either NCDOT or other agencies shall also be approved by Orange- Alamance. Water lines and water system improvements shall be constructed as provided herein prior to final plat approval. OR A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to secure construction the water system to Orange-Alamance Water System standards. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer and submitted to the Orange County Planning Department and County Engineer. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the water system and hydrant construction has been inspected and approved by Orange- Alamance-Water System, Inc. and the Orange County Fire Marshal. 10 5. All fire hydrant locations, fire flow and water line pressures shall be approved by the Orange County Fire Marshal prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 6. Sewer tap, acreage. access, availability. capital facility fees Sewer fees based on an acreage or a per lot charge shall be paid to Orange County prior to Planning Department signatures on the final plat. Sewer fees based on house size shall be paid to Orange County when obtaining individual building permits.. B. Roads and Access 1. Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Farns Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane; and Straywick Court shall be constructed to NCDOT minor local standards with a 50-foot right-of--way and 5-foot utility easements on each side. Canstruction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to secure construction of Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Fams Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court to NCDOT standards. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Orange County Planning Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2. An erosion control plan for the entire project, including streets, shall be submitted by the applicant for review and shalt be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control Division prior to any disturbance on the site. The Erosion Control Plan shall include a stormwater management plan that meets the requirements of both the County and the Neuse River Basin rules. 3. Prior to any construction or any alteration of any existing access within the right- of-way of US Hwy. 70 West, the developer/owner shall secure a driveway permit from the NCDOT District Office. The applicant shall submit a copy of the NCDOT permit and approval letter to the Planning Department when requesting Planning Department signatures on the Final Plat. Sight distance triangles shall be shown at all intersections within the subdivision, or included within the right-of--way of the proposed street. This restriction shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 4. All lots shall secure access from streets internal to the subdivision. Lots with frontage on more thane one road shall be designed to access from the street with lower traffic volume: i.e. lot 1 and 6 to Farnswick Place, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to Benwich Lane, and lots 4$ and 58 to Chadwick Lane. Driveway cuts shall be a minimum of 50 feet from street intersections. These restrictions shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and 11 recorded concurrently with the final plat. Non-vehicular access easements (NVA)--areas where vehicles are prohibited from traveling--shall also be shown on the final plat. 5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the signs are in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning Department at time of request to record the Final Plat. 6. The applicant shall dedicate, in fee simple, an additional 20 feet or 50 feet from the centerline of the existing right-ofi way whichever is greater, along the entire frontage of US Hwy 70 West to the North Carolina Department of Transportation for future road improvements. The dedication shall be shown on final plat. Property lines to stop at new public right-of-way. 7. The Benwich Lane right-of--way shall extend to the narthwestem, external property line of the subdivision in the proximity of lots 31, 3A~, and 35. A conveyance of a 50-foot rightof--way with 20-foot construction easements on each side of this northwestern most portion of Benwich Lane is acceptable in- lieu-of construction. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on an approved landscape plan and shall be inspected and approved by the Planning Department prior to Final Plat approval and again prior to the transfer of control of the Homeowners Association from the developer to the home owners as provided by the recorded Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Highridge Subdivision. Landscaping shall include a 75-foot Land Use Buffer along US Hwy 70 West. OR A letter of credit or escrow agreement ar other security shall be submitted to secure the required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cast for required preservation, new plantings, and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and must be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina 2. Provisions for the protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Pla#. D. Drainage Impervious surface data for all lots, pursuant to Article 6.23 Extra Requirements for Watershed Protection Overlay Districts of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, shall be included in the development restrictions and requirements 12 document to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The impervious surface limitations for each lot shall indicate whether the impervious surFace includes or excludes one-half (1/2) of the roadway width in the calculations. 2. Drainage easements shall be located on the Final Plat as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. 3. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the Orange County Erosion Control Officer. E. Parkland (Public Recreation Space) and Open Space 1. The proposed fifty-eight (58) lot subdivision is located within the Cheeks Township District Park area.' Per Section IV-B-7-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations, subdivisions (located within a floodplain) must provide a minimum of 1/2Q acre of recreation space per residential lot. Based on the number of proposed residential lots, the applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 2.9 acres (126,324 square f®et) to the County for public recreation space or submit an in-lieu of payment. The applicant has offered 4.46 acres (194,278 square feet) of land along the northern side of McGowan Creek. The location and amount of the proposed dedication is consistent with the County's objectives to preserve natural areas and provide public recreation space. The 4.46 acres of public recreation space shall be dedicated to the County during the construction of Phase 1. The applicant shall maintain a minimum of thirty- three (33) percent open space during all phases of construction. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 Title Block and V-D-3 V_icini_ Mao of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. The building buffer, stream buffers, minimum building setbacks, easements, public (along US Hwy 70 West), public and private open space areas shall be stated on the plat and in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by section D. item 2. outlined above. 4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be. held invalid or void, the Resolution itself shall be void and of no effect. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 13 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D- 6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowners and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that all roads have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Orange County Commissioners, that the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick subdivision is approved in accordance with the above mentioned conditions and attached Preliminary Plat dated April 4, 2000 and last revised October 26, 2000. Upon motion of Commissioner ,seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing resolution was adopted this the day of , 2001. I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2001 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in Minute Baak No. of the minutes of said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of , 2001. Clerk to the Board of Commissioners APPI "~:ATION FOR PRELIlVLtNARY PL' V APPROVAL ~ • • MAJOR SITBDNLSIOIy • ORANGE COUNTY ' . ~ DATE I(7-~ Pl,Egg$ TYPE OR p~T (IIHIC ONL7q -~~ SLTBDNlSION NAME: ESN Wick. SUdpiv i S i a,~l LOCATION: U • 5 .?o • : ~-f ~q C~6,,~• was, ,o ,~ OWNER/DEVFLOPER: i eye ~ /lr~o C4i ~ro~ f5~ ADDRESS: 827 M~ D~FOt~ Q,OA,o TELEPHONE NO.: SG3 ~ 3 / on ' - I-{t~-t-s~~R-o~~r+ nlG ~7"z7$ pA-l~e~L: ~~6 - Y~ 76 AGENT/CONTACT': phi c.; f rJ . pnsr P~ , TELEPHONE NO.: 92. -1!-13 • ~ X9'3 -6rto A• suNn~rARY IIvFORMATI ~: • ~ ~ ~ • Orange: County Tax Map Block •,~~ Lot(s) Townshi - . Zoning District(s): -~-~~..~ p rhr.Ea~ . Total Number of Acxes: So••l Z,• Total Number of Lots: 5$ Average Lot Size;• lS~Baq Minimum Lot Size: )tt~t]ao ~ NumbexrTypa of Structu ~ (gig) wa,~~ - Linear Feet in Stre;ets• ¢ og (propeaseel) s8 5 i Ns+.rr Fyk~-i~ 1-l-art, Water Su 1 • oA.1~.r1~ Acres is Open Space: 23. SZ AP Y• 4~nl~Public (specify) Community Individual W~~wazer Disposal: a c~1- p~uo (sp~~,) Community Individual School District: Fire District: cA+~G General Land Uses is Area: Q.Ey ion rion. C ,c,~,.t ~ .~"S ~ ~ o~ Critical Acees• ~1e 6•pyva.i t,~,) stream/drainageways X . V , ~tQ , rW flood prone areas watershed (specify) NO>•1E historic sites other (eheplain) NO N~ ~ ~~ ProP~+ to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxadon*? Yes No x . 1£`~,es," pie contact We Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes and "f~ use value-taxation," . B• All plats must 6e submitted an sheet no smaller than one inch equalstwo-hundred feet (1"~Z00') and no larger one inch equals twe:aty gees (1"20') and must contain the following information: / subdivision name ~/ . ~% zoning of tract and adjacent properti name ~ address of owner(s) - ,/ building setback lines by notation name & address of subdivider ar typical lot layout ~/ (~O~ than °""ner) ~ location and width of existing and name of surveyor, engineer, landscape proposed easements (drainage:, utxliti~ architect or architee~ address, roads, ~) . ~ registzation # & seal ,/ existing, proposed and adjoining rigb ~' (~Q) ~~~ Plan of-way including dimensions and sire scale, north arrow names and State Raad aumbe:rs. Liar / date of plan preparation and revisions fed ofroad centerlines and approxim ~- • township, tax map-block-Iot re£ere:nce;s acreage of new streetrights-off way '! Parent Parcel Identification # / existing and proposed utilities, incluc deed book and page # of proper-ty to bo type, sizes, hydrant, valves, maalaal~ subdivided existing and proposed curbs, gutters • / ~..; boundary de~cn'bed with bearings and ~ culverts, including sizes and grades distances ~ / location and width of alleys, sidowall :..... • ~ total acreage of the tract grid acreage of ~ base lanes, transit systems, and bus s~ lots, including and excluding area within / typical street cross-sections and ~~i._ _ n -v J~ r' :~, . proposed lot lines with dimensions lot & block numbers Phasing litre(s) . tapag*aphy at ten (10) foot intervals water bodies, streams, floodways and floodplains .. stream buffers . • •. ~~. location and size of parcels dedicated for public use, recreational use ar reserved in common, with purpose noted impervious surface data (if located in . water supply watershed) vicinity trap showing general location of subdivision with streets and roads ideatifiad by State Road number sad name landscaping and bu$er requirements township, corporate and exts-aterritorial ' planning jurisdiction lines which cross the Prop~j+ ~ - C-• OT~IER SUBMITTAL REQLTREMENTg 1. Twenty-five (zS) copies of the Preliminary plat. • ~. / •:nf~.rN horizontal alignment, centerline radius and general curve data on all proposed ~11a > •>~ ..~... streets permanent features such a3 butldtngs, cemeteries, historic landmarks / adjoining lot layout names ofadjoinin~ ProP~'Y owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat name; plat book dt pad ~/~ number, and perimet:ei lot numbers, location and i f l ..} s ze o ots of restricted development potential and notation an plat regarding same stormwat d t i • d/ er c cat on aa orre~ention sites sad undisturbed areas for inf prat . purposes (if located is water supply ~~~ identified natrtral areas and wildlife • corridors 2. ';One fitll size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked). N~Ar 3, Where municipal or OwASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health DeP~ent approvaUdeaial far.each lotshowa•thereoa. 4. Where a pnvate road is PmPa~ a written statement by the applicant or hislher authorized representative ~~~ which sets forth the jusitifiratioa for a private road (see Section IY-H-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivisi~ Regulaeions). . S. Auxiliary documents, in draft forte, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance,which assure completion and/or maiatananca of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such dacumarts may include, but not be limited ta, a private road maintenance agreement and articles of incorporation sad restrictive covenants pataiaiag to a homeowners association. These document may be required as pecessary as evide: that the ordinance requirements are being met b. Fee - $470 plus 55.00 per lot (ono fee for Preliminary sad Final Plat). ~ 7 0 + Zq o ~ ¢ 7~O o. dro 7. If the subdivision contains 10 Iota or more, the following information shall be submitted with the applicado>: a, Number of years tsa buildvut b. Number of houses to be bunt during each year until buildout . c. Average price of houses including lots far each year to buildout . I, the applicant; hereby certify that tine foregoing application is complete and accurate. ~_~/ ~] ~ ~~ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ~ ~ . OWNER'S SIGNATVRE IOq~ ~ Ian ad >ATE DATE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director Administration (919) 245-2575 eoWn~r °i av Erosion Control Division ~~` f ~ A 306E Revere Road (919) 245-2586 ~ ~ P O Box 8181 (919) 644-3002 (FAx) ~,'~ Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us ~°~~4 ~a~~~~°° North Carolina, 27278 MEMORANDUM TO: Tina Moon FROM: Ren Ivies /Z, ~ DATE: 3 April, 2001 SUBJECT: Preliminary review of proposed Ashwick Subdivision The proposed subdivision is in the Upper Eno watershed and must therefore comply with the Counties Stormwater Ordinance in addition with the Erosion Control requirements. Acceptable methodologies for reducing nitrogen level by 30% aze on the Erosion Control Divisions webpage at www.co.oran~e.nc.us . (Planning/Stormwater.htm) Phase 1 encroaches in to a stream buffer regulated by the Neuse Rules and will require approval by the Division of water quality and Corp of engineers prior to our review of the erosion Control plan. Several lots, such as lot 6, 7 or bath will have to be used as trap locations in phase 1. These traps will stay in place and become the last lots sold to build on . Compazable lots will be temporarily lost in successive phases such as lots 22 and 5$. The developer needs to be aware that these traps can tie up a building lot for a year or more, depending on the speed of buildout. A slow buildout could require that the developer maintain control of these lots for yeazs. 1; :-~ .t MEMO T0: Tina Moon FROM: S. D. Dixon DATE: 11-16-00 Per your request, a review of the above mentioned subject has been completed by the NCDOT Graham District. Below for your file is a list of our recommendation and comments for the subject: - . 1. Prior to•any construction of any new access. or alteration of any existing ac within the right of way, the .developer/owner is required to .secure a permit this office. It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to obtain a pe 2. All utilities located within the right of way shall require an encroachment agreement. All services shall be flush with finished grade. Any utility ma service car-nection or lateral located within the dedicated right of way steal be maintained by the appropriate utility authority. 3. Any area w~.thin the State's right of way and/or easements disturbed during t construction and/or maintenance shall be repaired to the satisfaction of .the District Engineer or his representative., 9-1-1 Communications 24 lTaur Warning point 919-732-8161 ~ 933-2600 24-Hour Fax Machina - 919-967-9f~26 Orange ,County Emergency Management P.o. BMX 8zs1 . Hillsborough • North Cazolina 27278 A `~~~et w ~ ,~ r~ *w ~ • p ~ Emergency Medical Services Fire Marshal Disaster Response HaZa;'dOUS Meteriais 919-644-3030. 9b8-2050 Admiaistrattve Fax Machine 919-968066 TO: ROBERT DAMS, PLANNII~TG DEPARTMENT FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTORlFIRE MARSI3AI, . ~~ ASHWICK SUBDIVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2000 We have reviewed the preliminary plan of Ashwick Subdivision and offer the following comments. We would ask for more information on the water lines and fire hydrants for fire protection services. We also recommend a secondary means of ingress/egress for emergency rbsponse during times of emergehcies ar disasters. Please send us a copy of the plan, upon aPPm~ for distribution. . If you need additional information, please call me. Nov-15-00 03:gq.p Coleman GI~dF^~ill Hargraves 919 732 7997 19 u~r o~ic~s • Co~N, Gta~xxu. & ~a1~1~vE ~ risa~law+~ coaPOSr-~noiv 129 & 7R7UN STREET '. P. Q DMA 1539 }1t4LSDgR[7llGkl,• N4Rni GRc~l12aA37278 919.732.2194 a~x 919.7]2.7897 wwi:ssrr>: wwvvca~nripH.cnx November 16, zooo vtn >1nCsrnnrLE Tina Moog • Qrarlge CQlmty Planning Departsncnt P.o. sox slgl _ . llillsbaraugh,lVC 2727$' Re: Arelimil~at~- plan Far Ashwiclc Subdivlsioa Dear Tina; Ft1QM 7H1: AESK OF HARMONY WHALEN I have revicwcd the above referenced project per your October 18, 2QQA Request for Review, 1 have no comments at this time. ~. Sincerely. COLEMAN, GLY:DH,ILL & HARGItAVL+',, p.C. • Harmony Whalca ~hwiatcp~lmpllhw . A . v.s. n~>?ARTMIZrrr of Ac~ICnL1~ .NATCA2AL RE90VRC5S CCNS$BVATION SERVICE Sl1NITARX FACILITIES Aahwit.k Subdivision PAGE 1 OF 3 10/30/00 t. i ('the infoxmaEion'in Chia reporC indi a in+restigatian) '~ cates Che domiira ryC sail ceaditigri bu C drag noC eliminaC e Cha need Lqr ansiCe I Map aym>tig1 I Septic Carle I I Sewage ],agora I I Trench I I Area I I naily Dover and soil name I akfaorpCi,on I areas I saniGazy I sanitary I far landfill I. fields -` ~,-I I I I landfill I I landfill I I I I _ ApBe I I I . I I I Appling-^^».__^_IMOderate: IMederake: (Moderate: I.• ISSight I IFair: I peres alowl . Y I seepage, I Coo clayey I I tae clayey. I I I elope I I I hard to pack ce9:' I I I .. I I I . Georgeville--^--l~dexate: IMode1-aGa: I IMode~rates I 181i,ghC I IFair: I perca slowly I seepage, I too clayey I I Coo clayey, I I I slaps I I I hand to pack xrs: I I I I I I F~erndoa--^-'-^--lMOderates IMaderaCee I (Moderate: I IS11ghG I IFair: I Derca slowly I seepage, I tao clayey I I ton clayey, ( I I slope I I ( hard Co pack ~' I I I I I I I Lignum-^._____^-(severe: IMaderaee: (savers: I (severs: I . IFcor: I perca slowly, I depth Co reek ae Ch Co rock. I p I wetness I Cao clayey, i weCaeaa I I weraeaa, I I'vard to pack. • I ,. _I I I I Cao clayey . I I - I I wetness I , U.$. DEPARTMENT bF AGRICt]LTGRB ',NATURAL RESOURCES CONSEFLVATIgN SERVICE SANITARX FACILITIES Endaote -- SAN;TARP $ACILITIBS .,,~ PAG8 2 OF 3 10/30/00 This report shows Chn degree sad kind o! nail limiCaCiaaa ChaC affect septic tank abaorpCioa fie].da, sewage lagaos~, and eaaitary landlilla. The 1~mi.Cationa are considered "slight" i! soil properties sad ^ite leatuxea generally are favorable for the indicated use sad limitations are minor and easily overcome: "Moderate" i! soil pmpertiea or site leaCurCa are aoe favorable for the indicated use and special piaaairuj deal minimise Cho lin+i.taCions; " ~ ~• or maiateaaace is anedad Ce overcemn er end Severe" i! sail properties or vita features are eo imlaverable or ao difficulC to overcome chat special design, 8lgailicanC iacreasee is consCruction caeca, sad possibly iacreaaed maiatenaace era required. This reporC also ahgwe the suitability v! the aoiln for use as daily cover for landfill#. A racing a! "Good" iadicakea that soil properties and siCe leaCUree are favorable !or the use and good performance sad low mainteaaace can be~ expected: "Fa1r" indicates Chat sail preperciea and site fnaCurea are awderaCely lavorabla for the use acid one or more sail properties er cite leaturea make Cho nail leas desirable Clears the soils rated •Good": aAd rpoo;• in~vatea thaC one er morn soil prop~rCies ar site !encores era unfavorable for the use and avers . properties requires special deal °~g Cho unfavorable ga, e%t;a ma1aC°~+°~+^a• Or cesCly alteration. SEPTIC TANK 1-AS08.PTION PIELCS are arena is which OfflueaC !rem a•aepCic Cask is disCribtrCed late t17e soil thrCUgh . subsurface kilea ar perloraced pipe. only that part o! the soil between depths o! 2s to 71 iaohea is evaluaCed. The ratiage are bane on sail properties, site features, and observed poor,,,=^~e o! the aoila.• Permeability, a high warns Cable, depth to bedrock ox Co a cemented pan, and !loading affect absorption of the e!lluenC. and bedrock ex a Cem~t~ pgn iaCerfere with installation. UasaCislacCory performance o! eepCic Cask abaozpti~onslielda, including excessively slow absorption o! effluent, surfacing o! efflueaC, and hillside seepage, can affect public health. Groundwater can be polluCed i! highly permeable sand and gravel or fractured bedrock is leas than 4 feeC beloar Cho base of Cho absorption field, if slope is exceaeive, ar i! Cho wafer Cable is near the aurfaca. There moat be unsaturaCed soil material beneath the absorption held Ce lilCer the efllueat effectively. Many local ordlaancea require ChaC this material be a! a certain thiclazeas. sEWAG8 LAGObNS are shallow ponds c~tructed to hold sewage while aerobic bacteria decompose the solid sad liquid wastes. Lagoons should. have a nearly level floor surrounded by cut slopes or embanl®eACS o! compacted soil. Lagoons generally era desigand Co hold the sewage within a depth o! Z co 5 lest.- Nearly impervious soil material !or Clre lagoon floor and aides is required Co minimize seepage and c6aCaminaCioa of ground wafer. This report gives ratings !or the natural. soil ChaC makes up the lagoon floor. The 9ilrfaoe layer and, generally, 1 or Z feet of soil, material below Che eurlace layer are rxcavaCed Ca provide material !or the embaa)anenCa.- The ratiaga are based oa soil prapexCies, eiCe feaCUrCS, and observed performance of•the soils. 'Considered in C21e ratings era slope, ps~+~= iliCy, a high water Cable, depth to bedrock or to a cemeaCed pea, !1 , la E7CCC9aivn ae ~~g rge stones. sad coatetrC 4! orgaaiC maCter. epage dun Co rapid pewability o! Chn soil or a wafer table Chat is high enough Co salsa Cho level o! sewage in the lagoon causes a lagoon Co fvactiori+~atialaGCorily. PolluCioa results if seepage is exeeasive or if lloodwaCar overtopa the lagoon. A high coaCeaC o! organic maCCer is dntrimeaCal Ca proper luuetioairng et Cho lagoea because it inhibits aerobic activity. Slope, bedrock. sad cemaaCed pans eaa cause conatructiea preblesma, and large atones can hinder compaction o! the lagoon floor: ~T~Y LANDFILLS are areas where solid waste is disposed o! by burying LC in soil. Thorn are tae types of landfill, trench and area. Ia a Creacp landfill, the waste is placed is a Creech. IC is read with a thin la ap compacted, sad covered daily ynr o! soil excavated at the site. is as area landfill, Cho waste is placed in aueceasive layers as Cho surface o! Cho soil. The waeca is spread, compacted, sad coveted daily wiCh a Chia layer o! soil form a source away from the site. sorb types of load;ill muaC be ably to bear heavy veKicya,ar Craffic. BoCh Cypes iavelve a risk of grouadwatar pollution. Base of exaavaeioa and revegeCatioa aced Co be coaaidered. The rakiaga 1a Ch1a repoz~C are based U.S, DEPARTMENT 08 AGRICCILTCTRE '`tAZt7RAL RF.SOVRCES CONSERVATION ~vICE SANITARY FACILITSSS ErrdnoCe -- SANITARY FACILiTigg_-Coneinuedx` PALiE 3 CF 3 1D/30/00 an nail properties, site features, and observed performance o! the soils. PexmeabilitY. depr-h Co bedrock or Ee a cemented pas, a high wafer Cablb, slaps, and lleodiag a!leat boCh types a! laadLill. Texture, sConea sad boulders, highly organic layers, sail xeaotioa, and contest o! salts sad eadium a!lect trench type laadfilla. unless otherwise seated, Che ratisga apply only to that parC o! Cho soil within a depth a! about 6 leer. For deeper trenches, a limiCation.rate ^SlighC" os "Moderate" may sot be valid. Onaite i.meaCigatios is needed. DAILY COVER FOR LANDFILL is the•soil material that is used to sever oompacted gelid waste is as area type sanitary landfill. The soil material is obtained o!lsiCe, Crassported to the landi'i11, sad spread over Che waste. Sail texture, weCness, coarse fragments, and slops a!lecC Che sage oL removing sac! epseadirsg Che material during wet and dry periods. Loamy or Ailty sails that are free a! large'~aeenee or excess gravel are Che beaC cover Lor a landfill. C7,ayey soils may be stioky or cloddy sad are dilLieulC to ~read;.,sandy soils are sub~eaC Co soil blowing. Alter soil material has been removad, the soil material remaining in.Che borrow area musC be thick enough over bedrock, a oemeated Pas, or Che wafer table to permit revegatation. Tha soil material used as lisal cover !or a laadlill should be auiCable !or plants. The aurLaoe layer generally has Che beat workability, more organic matter Chan the reaC a! the prolila, and the Heat potential !or plaaka. Material from the au;Lace layer should be aCackpiled lor.use as the Lina7, cover. . v. S. nEPAR~scar as r-cRxctr~,xvas rrAruxi-r. RESOVxc~s coxssRVAxsnrr s~tvzcs . avsx.Drnrc Sirs nsvELOPr~rr Aahwick Subdiviai0a PAGE 1 08 Z 10/30/00 (rho 3nlarmatian is this report indicates,the dominant roil condition but does noC eliminaCe C2se need !ar waaiCe laveaCigatian) .~ I Map rymbol I Shallot and sail name I excavations I I Dweliinga I I th~rellings i I Small I I Local roads I I Lawns and I I yritbout I bast I with I eosmasrcial I and streets I landscaping I e i~ .- I hasemenCa _ I buildings I ~ i I APBs I i i I I I I ~l~g-^--._^--I~derates I IS1i hC I I I I I too clayey g I ISlighC IMOderate:~ Iraka: Islight I I I I elope I low strength I GeB: I I I I I Gebxgeville--._. IModeraCe: I Isligbt I ~ I I I • I too clayey I IS11 ht g I~deraCe: IModeraCe: 1811ght ( I . I I r1oBe I law strength I xra: I I I I I Herndon--_-__-,.-IModeraCe: I IS11ghC I I I I I too clayey I Islight - It~derate: I~derates IS11ghC I I I I elope I low strength I xg: I I I I Lignuta^=---~_---Issuers: ~ - I Iseveze: I Issuer I I I - I reCnesa I weenesa s: wetassa (several Issuers:' I~;ate: I I i I retneea I-. ._ I low atreagth .h .~~ I retaeaa I V.S. DEPARTMENT OH AGRIGVLTIIA$ NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE SAILDING SITS DBVELDPb03NT Endriate -- BVILZtING SITS DEVELOPMENT '~ PAGE Z OF 1 10/30/00 This report shows the degree a~ kirui c! sail limitakions tbaC affect ehallorr excavatioaa, dwellings wikh atsd without basements, small commercial buildiaga, lacat roads sad streets, sad lawns grid landscaping. The limikatione are "Slights, "Moderate", or "Severe^. The limitakiona axe eonaiderad "Slight" i! sail properties and site leakures are generally favorable for the indicated use and limitaieas are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" it eo31 properties OT site features are not favorable foe the indicated use sad special planning, design, oT maintenance is needed Co overcome or miniroiza the limikatiens; and "Severer if soil properties or site Leaturea are eo unfavorable oz as dift,icult to overcome that special design, aignificank increases in eonstsuokion cores, and possibly increased maintenalsce are required. 'gpeoial feaaibility studies may be reg+,±red whexe Cho sail 1lmitationa era severe. siO#LLOw' EXCAVATIONS are trenches ar holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 ar d Lace tar basements, graves, utility lines, open ditches, and other purpeaes. The Takings are based on soil properties, ales features, and observed perfo^•~~^e of the evils. The cane of digging, filling, and compacking is affected by the .depth to bedrock, a cemenkad pan, or a very firm dense layer; atone coatenk: soil texture; and slope. The time at the year that excavskiona eaa ba made is affected by the 'depth do a aeasenal high water Cable and the ausoeptibility of the soil to !leading. Ths reaiatance o! the excavakian walla or bands to sloughing or caving is affected by soil Cexkure and the depth to the Prater kable. ' DWEI'LxNGS AND SMALL COMt~RCIAL BUILDINGS are stTucturea built on shallow foundations on vadiatvrbed soil. The load limit is khe game ae Chat for single-family dwellings no higher than three stories. Ratings are made for small commercial buildings rikhouk basements, for dwellings with basements, and tar dwellings without basements. The rakiags are based on soil properties, site featuxea, and observed performance of the soils. A high water Cable, depth ko bedrock er to a cemented pan, large stoaea, slope, sad flooding affect the ease at excavaeion and conaeruetion. landscaping and grading that r sire outs and fills of moxe thaw 5 ar 6 Leer are wok considered. LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface sad carry automobile and light truck Craffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut oT !111 evil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or akabiliaed soil material, and a flexible or rigid surlaca. .Cuts and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed perfo~a.^ce of she` soils. Depeh to bedrock pr tq a eemeaeed pea, a high water table, flooding, large skoaea, and elope affect khe ease of excavating and•grading. Boil atreagth (aa inferred from the engineering classification o! the soil), shrink-swell potential, frost action potenkial, and depth'eo a high water cable affect the traffic-aupparting capacity. LA97l1S AND LANDSCAPINq require calla en which kart and eraamenkal trees and shrubs can be established and ' maintained. The ratings era based oa soil properties, site features, and abaerved perfo~~~ro of the soils. soil reaction, a high water r,rle, depth to bedroc]e oz to a cemented pea, the available water capacity is the upper a0 inches, sad the content of salts, aedium, a~ sultidic materials affect plant growth. Fleeding, wetaaaa, slope, aeoainesa, and the ameuat of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetatiaa is established. • U.9. DSPARTi~,2iT OF AGRICULTURE . • 'rA1TUP~-I, RESOURCES t~NSfiRVATION 9ERVIC8 PAGE 1 OF g 1tl/3tl/tl0 • sscRSaTxoNU. nn~saPr~ENT . Ashviek SubdivleioA ~~ (Thq iAlgxmatioA 1ri thl.a report 1ndiCatea Che dgmiASnC a011 CDAdiCiOA but dOOA AOt ellmfn3C lmteatigati.gn) •' e Ohe AOC$ !Or g1191t4 I Map gYmbgl I Camp areas and soil name I I I I I Pioniq areas I PlaygrouAds I I. I I Paths sad kraila I . I Galt laixwaya I I I ApB: - I I I I I- - I I ._,_.-~ I AppliAg-___----,Islighk I - ISlighC I I I IMgderate: _ ISlight IS1SghC I I I dope. I I I I I small atariea I I Genf I I I I ~ I Gegr4eville-----Islighk, • I I ISlight I I I IMgdezate: I,Sevexe: IS11ghC I I I.slgpe I I erodes easily I arB: I I I I FlexAdoA-------_-ISlight I I (slight I I I IMgderate: ISevexe: ISlight I I I slope I erodes easily I Lg: I I .. I I I Llgnum_--------- Isevere~ I I •Isevexe I I I wetAeas, : (severe: I Peres slowly I wetness Ir~oderate: I I~ndexate: I Perca slowly I , I I Peres slowly I I _ wetness I I I wetness I I U.s. DEHARTMENT OS AGRICVLTUR$ PAGE 3 OF 2 'rrAxvRAS, RESOURCES corzsERVATIOrr ssRVrc~ io/3o/ao RECltEATIOrlAL DES/EL,GPFOrNN'T Endnoke -- RECRFATIgNAt, DEVELDPM6NT . The evils of the survey area are rated is this report according to limitatieaa that affect theiz suitability !or recreation. The ratings are bdaed an restrictive Boil features, such as wetaeas, slope. and texture of the surface layer. 9uscepcibility to flooding is ceasidezed. riot considered in the raCiags, but impaxtant is evaluating a site, are the loeatign and accessibility o! the area, the aixe and shape of the area and iCa scenic quality, vegekatiaa, access ko water, potential 'water it sites, and access to public sewer lines. The capacity of the soil to absorb septic tank effluent sad the ability of the soil to euppoxt vegetation are also impoztaaC. Boiis subject to flooding are limited for recreakion uses by the duration and inkenaity o! tlaeding and khe aeaaen when flooding occurs. is planning recreation facilities, onnits asaeaament of the height, duration, inCenaity, sad Lrequency of flooding is essential. In this report the degree of soil limitation is exprenaed as ^Slight," "Moderate," or "severe.^ "911ght" means that soil propaztiea are geaeraliy lavorabin and that limitationa.are minor and easily. overcome. "Moderate" means that limitations can be overcome or alleviated by piaaning, design, or special•maiatenance. "9evere^ mesas thak sail properties aze unfavorable sad that limitations can be offset only by costly soil reclamation, special design, iataasive maintenance, limited usn, or by a combination of these measures. • The information in this report can be supplemented by information available in other reports, for example, interpretaCioiis.'tor septic tank absorption !ie],da in the Sanitary Faoilikies report and interpreEakiona !ax dwellings without basements and for local roads sad skreeta is the Building Site Development report. CAMP AREAS require site pzepazation; such as shaping and leveling. the tent and parking areas, stabilising roads and• intensively used areas, and installing sanitary facilities sad util3.ky lines. Camp azeas aze subject to heavy foot kxaffic sad acme vehicular traffic. Ths beat soils have mild slopes and are sot wet or aubjact to flooding during she period of use, The surface has few or ao atones or boulders, absorbs rainfall readily buk remains fixm, and is not dusky whesi dry. strong slopes sad atoaea or boulders can greatly increase the cost of Constructing campsites. PICNiC AREAS are subject to heavy foot traffic. Moat vehicular kraffic la confined Co access roads and parking areas. The beat soils for picnic areas are firm whoa wet, are not dusty when dry, are net subject to flaeding dozing the period of use, sad do net have elopes ar seance ar beul3era that increase the cook of shaping sites or of building aoceaa roads and parking areas.. _ PLAYGROUNDS require eoiis thaC can withstand iatersaive loot traffic. The beat soils ass almost laves and are nok weC or subjeck to !loading during this season of use. The surface is frees of atones and boulders, is firm after rains, and is not- dusty when dry. It grading is needed, the depth of t2ie soil over bedrock ar hardpan should be considered. PATHS ANO TRAILS for hiking sad horseback riding should require little ar no cutting sad tilling. The beat soils are ask wet, are 'firm after rains, and not dusty when dry, sad are sot subject to flooding more than once a year during the period et use, They have a~ey-aCe elopes and fir or ae etoaea or boulders oa the auxLaee. GOLF FASR9PAY9 are subject to heavy foot traffic and lama light vehicular traffic. Cutting or filling maY be required. The beat nails for use as golf fairways are firm whey wet, are aoC dusty whea•dry, sad are riot subject to prolonged flooding duri,ag the period of use. They have moderate slopes sad no stoaea oz boulders oa the aurfaee. The suitability et the soil for tees or greens is not considered is rating the soils. v. s. nEPARxr~rrs oP 1-GRICVLTVRE . •~NA?URi1Y. RS50v&CES 4DNSERVATICN SERVIt~ PAGE 1 OP I 30/30/00 PRIi~ PARMLANn Ashvick Subdivision Mdp ~ symbol ~ ~' .. So1I x~ama APS ~ADPlin9 sandy laam, 2 to 6 parceat slopes GeH ~GaorSeville Bile loam, = to 6 perceaC eiapaa Hr9 ~Sarndan ai1C loam, 2 Co 6 percene slopes Orange-Alamance Water System, Inc. P057 aFFICE BOX l87 MEBANE. NQRTH CAROLINA 27302 TELEPHGNE: (919) 563-6212 .~ July 28, 2000 Orange County Planning ~ Inspections Department P 0 Box' 8181 Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Attn: Ms. Tina Moon Dear Ms. Moon: This letter is in reference to your June 28, 2000 memorandum regarding the Ashwick Subdivision project. At the regular monthly meeting held on July 27, 2000, the Board of Directors approved for this subdivision to be served by Orange-Alamance Water System, Inc. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (919) 563-6212. Sincerely, O GE-AL CE WATER SYSTE1Vi, INC. rs. ra Faye e~ Manager MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Benedict, Planning Director COPIES: ~ Phil Post, PE FROM: Paul Thames, PE, County Engineer ~, DATE: July 26, 2000 SUBJECT: Sewer service from the Efland sewer system for the Ashwick Subdivision ' in Efland As per the request of Phil Post, PE, president and owner of Philip Post & Associates and consulting engineer for the above referenced subdivision, T am providing the following information and input relative to sewer availability at~the Ashwick subdivision site. The southern portion of site, as shown on the site aril utility plans date 4/4/2pOQ, is crossed by two branches of the sewer interceptor/outifall lines of the Eflarid sewer system. These lines may not be tapped for individual sewer services. However, new collector mains may be extended from existing manholes through the parcel to provide sewer service to individual lots. Furthermore, it may be possible in limited circumstances to connect individual service lines to existing manholes, although I discourage this practice and would allow this to occur only when other alternatives and connections are not practicable. The Post & Associates sewer utility site plan appears have followed the above criteria fairly closely. 'The site plan appears to show that sewer service will be provided via new gravity collector lines extended from existing manholes. The plan does not show any proposed sewer pumping/lift stations which, as you are.aware, would be at least somewhat problematic. There is or may ultimately be a minor final sewer design issue as to how service is extended to lots 8, 9 and 21, as these lots do not appear to front on the proposed collector lines; However, please be advised that, at this time and without sewer profile plans, I cannot verity or certify that the gravity sewer layout that is shown is actually a workable plan, In conclusion, I can state that: 1) the Efland sewer system can accommodate the sewer flow that can be projected from a 50 to 601ot subdivision; 2) the proposed sewer layout appears to conform to standard and acceptable engineering practice for gravity sanitary sewer layout; 3) nothing shown on the plans, as far as sewer layout is concerned, appears to be unacceptable in terms of general County or Efland sewer policies and practices; and 4) subject to all final design and state permitting requirements and approvals related to layout, materials, constriction and consnvction oversight practices, etc., and unless there is a significant flaw in the proposed collector layout, sewer service can be extended to the property as long as all County relative zoning, subdivision, land use, watershed, density, etc., ordinances and policies are satisfied. ~,, If I may provide additional information, please advise. ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT' MEMORANDUM To: ~ Tina Moon, Land Use and Preservation Planner . From: :Rich Shaw, ERCD Land Conservation Manage - Date: November 30, 2000 Re: Ashvvick Subdivision (Cheeks Township) (TMBL 3.32.A.9 and TMBL 3.31.A.23) Thank you for the opportunity to review a plat the proposed Ashwick Subdivision (dated October 30, 2000). The following comments are intended to address any concerns with respect to impacts ~on natural and :cultural resources, and to identify areas that may desirable for possible dedication to the County for public recreation and open space pursuant to County subdivision regulations. My comments are based on an August 2, 2000 site visit and a review of resource information available for this property, including aerial photography, topographic maps, FEMA floodplain maps and NWI maps. The subject property is located in Efland_ on the north side of US 70 in Cheeks Township. The property is zoned R1 and is within the Upper Eno Watershed. McGowan Creek flows through the northern quarter the property, essentially cutting off about five acres from the majority of the parcel. McGowan Creek is flooded in this area due to the Efland Mill Pond dam located just downstream. There is also a sizable beaver dam, which contributes to flooding of the property. Aside from some periodic downed trees (likely from the May 2000 windstorm) the woodlands are comprised of fairly mature mixed hardwoods, which slope gentry down toward McGowan Creek. A small tributary of McGowan Creek flows through the southern portion of the property in a northeasterly direction. The property slopes fairly gently (2 to 6%) with a narrow band of moderately sloped land (6 to 10%) draining to McGowan Creek. Away from the Creek, the soils are Geo~geville silt /oam~(Ge8 and GeC) and Herndon si/t /oam (Hr8), both quite suitable for residential development. It appears that the proposed lots are well outside of the floodplain and avoid the small area of Lignum soils, which are unsuitable for home sites. The Preliminary Plan shows 4.46 acres located in the northeast corner of the property proposed for dedication to Orange County for "public recreation space." This area is considerably larger than the minimum required dedication of land for recreation and open space. The subdivision regulations call far a minimum of 2.9 acres for a S~-~ snit ~~ ihrfivicinn l1 /7.0 acre for each unit). Such a dedication would be consistent with my earlier suggestions that this small area, which is cut off from the more developable section south of McGowan Creek, be set aside for wildlife habitat and future recreation/open space needs. This area would be ;accessible from the proposed McGowan Creek Subdivision, which is planning ta:dedicate an adjacent linear area along the north side of McGowan Creek. Fnally, the proposed site plan appears consistent with the County's desire to minimize adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of floodplains, wetlands, natural areas and wildlife,habitat, historic and cultural resources and prime farmland. Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss these findings. Attachments cc: David Stancil ~a~ ,,:, "" ~1 ;: ~I,~~ ApC ~`~~ - '•~ ''r . `. •I. ,~~ ~.`~ r _., s _ E9 ~.. ~. ••~-`•. ., G~ C . ~~ 9 .... ~, Ca';~9 Ap8 34 Ap I s w 35 1 MOTION: Preston moved to delay the decision about High Rock Farms until the water 2 table information is received. Seconded by Holtkamp. 3 4 Benedict said that there was a draft hydrological study out that ERCD is reviewing. This study is for projects 5 that are either using independent wells or a community well system. This subdivision is proposing a 6 community well that would offer its share of water to Qrange-Alamance, so it would be a different type of 7 system. 8 9 Whitaker said that he is concerned about delaying the decision because there would probably not be any 10 resolution to the hydrological issue in another month. Regarding the school impact issue, the impact fees are 11 not determined until the building permit stage. He urged the board to make a decision tonight. 12 13 Katz asked about the water system for this subdivision and if it affected the water table differently than 14 individual wells. Whitaker said that this was an issue that was raised in the concept plan stage and Orange- 15 Alamance wants the well that would serve this subdivision in a remote location elsewhere. He said that, as a 16 rule, it is better to have single-point discharges from deep wells. 17 18 Holtkamp asked Whitaker if he was saying that the board should ignore the concerns from EMS about water 19 pressure and fire protection. Whitaker said that there were two. different components of water supply -basic 20 daily water needs and fire protection. He said that.he was not proposing that the fire hydrants be installed 21 immediately because there is a concern about water pressure. 22 23 Chair Allison said that this subdivision meets all of the requirements in the standards. He said that the 24 Planning Board did not have the authority to set up a moratorium on development. He suggested moving 2S ahead with this subdivision. 26 27 Holtkamp said that the Planning Board was entitled to have the information needed in order to make the right 28 decision. She is very concerned about the issue of low water supply identified by Mike Tapp. 29 30 VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 4 . 31 -. 32 MOTION: McAdams moved to approve the Preliminary Plan for High Rock Farms 33 Phase One, in accordance with the Resolution ofApproval, which is 34 incorporated herein by reference. Seconded by Selkirk. This motion 35 includes the recommendation for pedestrian connectivity from this phase to 36 future phases. _ 37 _ 38 VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 2 39 40 ~.~,,,~,.., (2) Ashwick 41 (Cheeks Township - 58 Lots) • 42 . 43 44 Moon made the presentation. 4s 46 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision 47 48 BACKGROUND: 49 Re nest 50 Applicant: sl Phil Post of Philip Post~& Associates, agent for Ferry's Construction Corporation 52 ~ 50.93 acre tract +/- 53 ~ Fifty-eight (58) single-fatnily re~irlenti~l Intl nn the rnncarvar~nnr+l„arar 4lavihle rin~~nlnnmant nnrinn 36 1 • Average lot size =15,647 square feet 2 • Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site) 3 ' 4 Location 5 • Cheeks Township 6 • North side of US Hwy 70,West between Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) and Richmond Road (SR 7 13'12) 8 '1 . 9 Existing Site Conditions 10 Zoning: 11 • Rural Residential (R-1); Upper Eno-Protected Watershed 12 • Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, church, firehouse, undeveloped lots 13 Physical Description: 14 • Gently sloped land with a few scattered rock outcrops near high paints on the site 1S • Approximately two-thirds (2/3) of the site is covered with 12-ta 18-inch hardwoods 16 • McGowan Creek flows diagonally across~the northern end of the tract 17 • There is floodplain associated with this section of McGowan Creek 18 + A USGS blue-line stream meanders through'the southern portion of the tract 19 • An intermittent stream in the southeast portion of the site drains into the USGS blue-line stream 20 Proposed Site Conditions 21 Roads: 22 + The subdivision will be accessed from US Hwy: 70 West 23 • All seven roads (Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Farns Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, 24 Benwich bane, and Straywick Court) will be public and constructed to NCDOT standards 25 Residential Lots: 26 • Fifty-eight (58) single=family residential lots per the conservation-cluster flexible development option 27 • Average lot size = 15,647 square Feet; Gross average lot size = 38,243 square feet 28 • Minimum lot size per R-1 Zoning District = 40,004 square feet (0.92 acre) 29 • Minimum lot size for cluster option (a lot size reduction of up to 6S%) = 14,000 square feet 30 r Minimum to actual lot size ratio (MTAR) =1.12 31 • .Maximum number of lots permitted by R-1 zoning = SS + 7 (density bonus**) = 62 32 + One additional lot is allowed per each additional acre of protected open space (Or~ge County 33 Subdivision Regulations, Section IV-B-10, G, Flexible Development Standards 34 • Impervious Surface limit far Upper Eno PW = 12% 35 . Open Space: 36 • Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site) ~ - 37 + Most of the open space serves as a buffer for McGowan Creek 38 • Minimum open space required for Flexible Development = 16.81 acres (33% of site) 39 : Bonus open space = 7.23 acres** 40 Buffers: 41 • 100-foot open space or buffer area along the site perimeter and between the subdivision and any off-site 42 public street right-of-way (per Section IV-B-10, D2, Flexible Development Standards) 43 • 7S-foot Type-E Land Use Buffer is required along US Hwy 70 West 44 • Type-E Bu#~er = a buffer composed of predominately (at least 7S%) evergreen vegetation that is opaque 4S to a height of at least thirty feet 46 • 100-foot building buffer satisfies the Type-E Land Use Buffer (width) requirement ' 47 Typical lot landscape plan. specifies primary and secondary tree protection areas 48 Recreation & Parks: 49 Public Recreation Space SO • Cheeks Township District Park (per the Recreation Service Area Boundaries Map) 37 1 • All subdivisions (located within a floadplain) must provide a minimum of 1/20 acre of recreation space 2 per lot (Section IV-B-7-b) 3 • A minimum of 2.9-acres (126,324 square feet) of land is required for public recreation space 4 • Or a payment in-lieu-of parkland dedication = $26,390 ($455 * S81ots) S • The applicant has offered 4.46 acres (194,143 square feet) of land along the northern side of 6 McGowan Creek. The location and amount of the proposed dedication is consistent with the 7 County's objectives to preserve natural areas and provide public recreation space. 8 Private Recreation Space 9 • All subdivisions must provide a minimum of 0,028 square feet of recreation space per every square foot 10 of land area dedicated for residential use (Articles 5.1.1 & 6.1Z of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, 1 I outline Land Use Intensity (LUI) requirements) 12 • 0.028 * 46 = 1.29 acres (56,192 square feet), (46.03 =Total area (50.92) -rights-of--way (4.89)) 13 • In those cases where the LUI calculation results in a larger amount than the public recreation space 14 requirement of l/20 acre per lot, the difference shall be established as private recreation space for the 15 use of the residents of the development 16 No private recreation space is required (LUI calculation (1.29) is less than the public recreation space 17 requirement (2.9)) _ I8 Water-Sewer: 19 • All lots to be served with Orange-Alamance water and Orange County sewer 20 ~ Final number of proposed lots does not exceed the number approved with the concept plan 21 Agency Comments , 22 • Requests for agency review were sent to: NCDOT, Recreation and Parks, Orange County Schools, Soil 23 and Water Conservation, Erosion Control, the County Attorney, and the Fire Marshall. 24 Comments are attached. 25 26 Develo went Process Schedule and Action 27 • First Action: Planning Soard to consider Concept Plan 2$ The Planning $oard approved the flexible development concept plan for Ashwick on September 6, 29 2000 with the following conditions: 30 1. The size and boundary locations for both parent tracts shall be verified with Orange County Land 31 Records and any discrepancies resolved prior to filing for preliminary plat approval. 32 2. A left turn lane, built to NCDOT standards, shall be required on US 70 to access the subdivision. 33 3. All roads shall be public and proposed to be built to NCDOT standards with additional five (5) foot 34 utility easements on each side. The right-of--way at street intersections shall be improved to NCDOT 35 standards. Sight distance triangles (10' x 70') shall be delineated on the plat for each street at 36 intersections, as appropriate. 37 4. The Benwich Lane right-of-way shall extend to the northwestern, external property line of the 38 subdivision in the proximity of lots 31, 35, and 34. A conveyance of a 50-foot right-of-way with 20-foot 39 construction easements on each side of this northwestern most portion of Benwich Lane is acceptable in- 40 lieu-of construction. 41 5. Driveway access points shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the intersection of street rights-af--way. 42 6 All corner lots shall be designed to access from the street with lower traffic volume: i,e, lot 6 to 43 Farnswick Place, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to Benwich Lane, and 44 lots 48 and 58 to Chadwick Lane. 45 7, if an entrance sign is anticipated and will not be placed within the 100-foot building buffer, maintained 46 by the Homeowners Association, a sign easement must be reserved within one of the residential lots. 47 8. All common areas (stream buffers, building buffers, landscape buffers) must be clearly identified on the 48 preliminary and final plats and maintained by the Homeowners Association, The common areas cannot 49 be subdivided or recombined with adjacent lots. Draft forms ofthe Homeowners Association 50 documents, including restrictive covenants and conservation easements, that contain use and 51 maintenance provisions for the open space and buffers must be submitted for review by the County 38 1 Attorney as part of the preliminary plat approval process. The restrictive covenants or conservation 2 agreement shall designate a backup, grantee in the event that the Homeowners Association is eliminated. 3 9. The developer shall submit documentation granting the use of public water and sewer services prior to 4 filing for preliminary plat approval. 5 10. The preliminary plat shall indicate areas for on-site infiltration of storm water that demonstrates 6 " compliance with Article d.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. 7 11. The location of all drainage ways, stream buffers and floodplains shall be delineated on the preliminary 8 and final plats, along with appropriate information regarding restrictions. 9 12. The preliminary plat shall show a building footprint on the approximate location of each house site to 10 ensure that them is sufficient buildable area on every proposed residential lot. 11 13. The preliminary plat shall show the location of tree protection fencing and contain a note requiring the 12 installation of tree protection fencing prior to any grading to ensure the protection of vegetation within 13 all buffers and open space. 14 14. The preliminary and final plats shall contain a note restricting further subdivision. 15 1S. The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 2.9 acres (1/20 acre per residential lot) for public recreation 16 space as part of the preliminary plat approval process. (Section IV-B-7-b Recreation Sites, Orange 17 County Subdivision Regulations) 18 16. All street names to be reserved with GTS section of Planning Department prior to submittal of 19 preliminary plat subdivision request. 20 • Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preliminary Plan 21 Options: 1. Action (recommend approval, approval with cgnditions, or denial) within two regularly 22 scheduled meetings, or 23 2. Within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant. 24 3. if the Planning Board renders a tie vote, or fails to act within the specified period, approval 2S of the Preliminary Flat is directed to the Board of County Camrnissioners with the 26 Planning Board's minutes and the Flanning Department staffs recommendations. 27 28 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis (attached) 29 30 RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff Recommendation 31 32 The Planning Department Staff recommends approval in accordance with the attached resolution. 33 34 Moon, went through the various points of the staff report. 35 36 Holtkamp asked if the project had sidewalks or street signs to encourage safe driving. Moon pointed out (on 37 the plan) that the proposal provided an internal pedestrian corridor_system including designated crosswalks. 38 39 Allison asked how this project would match up to the subdivisions to the west of the site such as Richmond 40 Hills,'and asked about the potential road connection from Benwich Lane to the Tinnin Road network. 41 McAdams also asked about the Benwich Lane stubaut. Benedict said that there were no plans to extend 42 Tinnin, but that the Ashwick design provides for a future link from Benwich to a private road to the 43 northwest. 44 45 Selkirk asked about access to the McGowan Creek public recreation area. Moon explained that access would 46 be from the north and would not interfere with the daily activities at the subdivision. 47 48 Phil Post, the project engineer and agent for Perry's Construction Company, said that they were in total 49 agreement with the staff stipulations. Post offered to answer any technical questions, particularly about 50 water lines and fire hydrants. 51 37 Holtkamp asked for a list of all of the developments in the Cheeks area, approved and proposed. This will be 53 provided at the nest meeting. 39 1 Preston commented on the overall layout for Ashwick, and complimented staff and the developer for 2 working together to achieve a good design that maintained parks and pedestrian areas while preserving 3 important natural areas. 4 5 MOTION: McAdams moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision 6 in accordance with the Resolution of Approval, which is incorporated herein 7 `;. by reference. Seconded by Gooding-Ray. 8 `~ 9 VOTE: Ayes, b; No, 1 (Holtkamp -commented that she could not recommend a 10 ,~ ~ project for approval without sidewalks.) 11 12 AGENDA ITEM #9: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 13 a. Planning Calendar » December (for later distribution) 14 b. Next Planning Board Meeting -Special Public Hearing on December 15 12, 2000. Next Planning Board Meeting on January 10, 2001 (most 1 ~ likely). 17 18 Gooding-Ray and Selkirk will not be able to attend the special public hearing on December 12~'. 19 20 AGENDA ITEM #10: ADJOURNMENT 21 22 With no further items to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 1b:20 p.m. 23 24 _ . 2S Becky Butler, Minutes Preparer 26 27 C+~R 28 29 Nico odin Ray, C air 30 ~ ~ ~QO 7.~] 31 32 - Date 33 RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 40 Bureau of Economic & Business Research -University of Florida Modified 4/15/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1-PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Ashwick TOWNSHIP: Cheeks CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: 200; Ending Year: 200 Inflation Rate: 2'50' CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.4 Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.3 % Non-Elderly: 100.00 HOME SALES DATA: Average D istribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes ($) by Year 2002 21 200,000 36.21 2003 15 200,400 _ 25.86' 2004 17 220,000 29.31 2005 5 220,000 8.62' 2006 0 0 0.00' 2007 0 0 0.00 2008 0 0 0.00 2009 0 0 0.00 2010 0 0 0.00 2011 0 0 0.00 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: School District: Orange County Chapel Hill-Carrboro ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TU tit LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School Attendance: 1) Elementary School 0 Middle School High School 64 17 1G SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 41 - BUDGET YEAR: 1996 ~ COUNTY POPULATION: 1058 SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 568 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT; POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government 108.60 0.001 Public Safety 142.95 0.001: Public Works 50.00 0.000! Human Services 264.07 0.002! Education (School District) 818.00 0.007; SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT Tota I 818.00 0.144( COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUE5 ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes • Other Than Property 4653250 43.9 I ntergovern menta I 9007481 85.0E Service Charges 3388055 31.9 Miscellaneous 1738939 16.4 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE; PER CAPITA General Government 6804231 64.2E Public Safety 7274334 68.Ei~ Public Works 2871690 27.1 Human Services 17112641 161.6( Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 7.0~ Non-Departmental 3163481 29.81 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE: PER EMPLOYEE General Government 6804231 62654.0E Public Safety 7274334 50887.2E Public Works 2$71690 57433.$( Human Services 17112641 64803.43 Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 916.87 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE; PER STUDENT County Government 10121760 1782.00 School District 0 0.00 State 21523177 3789.29 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE: PER EMPLOYEE County Government 10121760 12373.79 School District 0 0.00 State 21523177 26311.95 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: County Tax Rate ($) 0.9290 Per $100 Assessed Valuation School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation Assessment Ratio 100.00 Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 42 f EAR HOUSING UNITS POPULATION SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Middle High School TOTAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services TOTAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES YEAR HOUSING UNITS POPULATION SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Middle High School TOTAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services TOTAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OD~ITIONAL EMPLOYEES 2002 2003 2004 2005 200 21 36 53 58 5f 52 89 131 143 14: 4 $ 11 12 1~ 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 4 7 12 17 19 1! 0.05 0.09 0.13 0.15 0. ] 0.07 0.12 0.18 0.19 0.] 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.( 0.13 0.22 0.33 0.36 O.c 0.28 0.47 0.70 0.77 0. i p.40 0.69 1.01 1.11 1.: 2007 2008 2009 2010 20: 58 58 58 58 5 143 143 143 143 14 12 12 12 12 1 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 19 19 19 19 1 0.15 '0.15 0.15. 0..15 0• 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0• 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0• 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0• 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0. 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1~ SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT YEAR TAX BASE ($1000) REVENUES ($) Property Tax Other Taxes Intergovernmental Service Charges Miscellaneous TOTAL ($) EXPENDITURES ($) General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services Education Non•Departmental TOTAL ($) NET FISCAL IMPACT YEAR TAX BASE ($1000) REVENUES ($) Property Tax Other Taxes Intergavern mental Service Charges Miscellaneous TOTAL ($) EXPENDITURES ($) General Government Public Safety Public Works Human Services Education Non-Departmental TOTAL ($) NET FISCAL IMPACT ~ 2002 2003 2004 2005 20( 4200 7305 11228 1Zfi08 1292 39018 67563 104305 117131 12006 2279 4005 6044 6779 6947 4412 7752 11699 13122 1345 1660 2916 4400 4936 505 852 1497 2258 2533 259: 48220 84033 128706 144502 14811e 3333 5$56 $837 9913 1016( 3563 6261 9448 10597 10$6 1407 2472 3730 4184 428E 8382 14728 22225 24930 2555: 12717 22345 33719 37823 3876E 1550 2723 4109 4609 472 30951 54384 82068 92055 94351 17270 29649 46638 52447 5375E 2007 2008 2009 2010 201 13247 13578 13917 14265 1462e" 123061 126138 129291 132523 13583E 7122 7300 7483 7670 786 13787 14131 144$5 14847 1521E 5186 5315 544$ 5584 5724 2662 2728 2796 2$66 2931~ 151817 155613 159503 163490 167578 10414 10675 10942 11215 11496 11134 11412 1169$ 11990 12290 4395 4505 461$ 4733 4852 26192 26847 2751$ 28206 28911 39737 40731 41749 42793 43$63 4$42 4963 50$7 5214 5345 96715 99133 101612 104152 106756 55102 56479 57891 59339 60822 44 SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 200 REVENUES ($) County 12717 22345 33719 37823 3876E School District 0 0 0 0 State 26260 46142 69630 78104 8005E TOTAL ($) 38975 68487 103349 115926 11882 EXPENDITURES ($) County 12717. 22345 33719 37823 3876E School District 0 0 0 0 ~ S#ate 26260 46142 69630 78104 8005 TOTAL ($) 38976 68487 103349 115926 11882 NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 ~ YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 207 REVENUES ($) County 39737 40731 41749 42793 4386 School District 0 0 0 0 State 82058 84109 86212 88367 9057 TOTAL ($) 121795 124840 127961 131160 13443 EXPENDITURES ($) County 39737 40731 41749 42793 438E School District 0 0 0 0 Sta#e 82058 84109 86212 88367 905 i TOTAL ($) 121795 124840 127961 131160 1344-' NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 1 SECTION 6. -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 4 YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 201 HOUSING UNITS 21 36 53 5$ 5 POPULATION 52 89 131 143 14 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 4 8 11 12 1 Middle 1 2 3 3 High School 1 2 3 4 TOTAL 7 12 17 19 1 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.28 0.47 0.70 0.77 0.; SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.40 0.69 1.01 1.11 1.7 TAX BASE ($1000) 4200 7305 11228 12608 1292 COUNTY BUDGET ($) Revenues 48220 84033 128706 144502 14811 Expenditures 30951 54384 82068 92055 9435 BALANCE 17270 29649 46638 52447 5375 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($) Revenues 38976 68487 103349 115926 11882 Expenditures 3$976 6$487 103349 115926 118$2 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 ~ COMBINED BUDGETS ($) Revenues 87197 152521 232055 26042$ 26693! Expenditures 69927 122872 185417 207981 ~ 21318: BALANCE 17270 29649 46638 52447 5375! YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 201: HOUSING UNITS 58 58 58 5$ 51 POPULATION 143 143 143 143 14: SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 12 12 12 12 1: Middle 3 3 3 3 High School 4 4 4 4 ~ TOTAL 19 19 19 19 1~ COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.7 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.1 TAX BASE ($1000) 13247 1357$ 13917 14265 14G2e COUNTY BUDGET ($) Revenues 151$17 155613 159503 163490 16757E Expenditures 96715 99133 101612 104152 10675E BALANCE 55102 56479 57891 59339 60822 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($) Revenues 121795 124840 127961 131160 13443 Expenditures 121795 124840 127961 131160 13443 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 D COMBINED BUDGETS ($) Revenues 273612 280453 287464 294651 302017 Expenditures 21$511 223973 229573 235312 241195 BALANCE 55102 56479 57891 59339 60822 SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS L SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: School District: School Attendance: Orange County YES ) Elementary School 64~ Middle School 17~ Chapel Hill•Garrboro NO ) High School 19~ YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 200 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 4 8 11 12 1~ Middle 1 2 3 3 High School 1 2 3 4 ~ TOTAL 7 12 17 19 lc YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 201 iCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Middle High School roTaL SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS Elementary Middle High School TOTAL YEAR 12 12 12 12 1: 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 19 19 19 19 1! CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS 3328 Elementary 282: 1522 Middle 124' 1520 High School 145 6370 TOTAL 55] 2002 2003 2004 2005 20t PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2826 2830 2833 2834 ,283 Middle 1241 1242 1243 1243 124 High School 1458 1459 1460 1461 146 TOTAL 5526 5531 5536 5538 553 YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 20: PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary Middle High School TOTAL 2834 2834 2834 2834 1243 1243 1243 1243 1461 1461 1461 1461 5538 5538 5538 5538 283 124 14E 553 , ~ PHILIP ~ • I • POST ~~ Provldenge Road Chapel VIII, NC 27514 _ _ _ , , _ _ ' . • -Ad..n_.~ ,. '~ ~~T~r'T` . ~ (91 ~ 929-1173 ' ~ ~ -~ 1'Tr _ (919) 493-2600 (919 cC1C 511~ip1 1 S I Ofd , • • ASSOCIATES ) 830-9862 ~~19) 493-6549 ~ a 5ap~ ~'rr100~Fs 4- ~$ - 00 ~ PhilPastdBcomp~e,~m i E1VGlNEEAS ~ PLANNERS - . - _ `._ c'. ~ ~ SURVEYORS _ • ~ ~~ = ~ 1 ~~ ~ :~ ~ ;~~ ~ ,_ ~ .... ti .. ~ 1 _ ti ~ _ f i, j ~~~ ` ~ y, nrn r xw = ~ I •` ,i : . • Mid ~~ ,~ I • iw ,~ , \~ ~ ~ ~ / f• \ ~~• ~ y 7ssn .s+i7i ~~ ~, l ~ -" ` a ~~ `.•~'\ti " ~ ; ors ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ti; a .' ~ ~ ~ .I ___ ~ I ~ ~ 50.~3Ac ~ - Z ` - - ~ _ ,; `_. • ~: .; ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ © _ _ I ~ w . .~ :~~ ' m - • ~ _ ~• ' n i ~~ .._ - ar~ m~ a ~ ~ _~ F~RRES A - 1 - ~ _ .1.1 - ._ .. i - _ _ #~ -~ P\ i ~ ~' ~13~+ '~ i:.9i ;sd5 ~'~. t bii~ ~s ~ ~~I~ ~e--snw_~~-~ +- r~ . ~...w.~~ 8' t~ . ~ `t ` • ` ~ ke bMi ~ h ~` ~~'. I ~ ~ •~' ~4~ ~ ~~A~ ' ~ i ` ~ ti~. .~''~.~ ~~ - ~ lads ~ l""~ , I t I.i ~ ~ I ~I .. 1` 1~ I f I ~ f I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. 11 s '~" L. •a 1 •\ , j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C S ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ -_~ 7_a~n ~~ =gym ! ~~ ~~'`~ :: ~ ~ ~ ; l3 ~ ,~ .~•. ,.~I' ~ - is r ~ r~~ Y; +' _~ .... T' ~ r~w.r~ .- ~i ~{ ~6 I ~VaG~ 7• "i~ ~~. s:sa s~ ~ ~ ~ ~~y 8 ~ ~ aq a ° ~ ~ +~.a ~~ ~ ; s. ~IpP~na ~ ~ :.xsxa ~, .~ s a.axana A ~•~ ~w .` _ r I `~ E~7, ~ 1 ~ . I ~M ~ \ L ~~ ~ irr asp r' ~` ~ f r ~ \~~``. rt'1 ` d~ ~ ~ I ~.... '..." I ~..+.~., I '~~ ~; li ~. . w,,.. ` ~~' q~ ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ k r r .., .'t,. L ...~ 8 ~ ~ r~ q 3-. ~ F e~ ~ ~ I l ~ ~. . ~ . 9 ~~ "° •xr:~l ~gj I • ` / ~,... r Anf' ~ ~ ~ afi3~. ~ ~~ ~•) ~i~ Ri~ j ' yN T / iii' j y r w+~ . I 4 .w+ „~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ++MJ ~ ~ Ir^ rNr ` ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ; ~ + ~ r ~ 3 ice. ~ ~~ , ~ ~ _r.. era ~ 9 I ~ S ,, ,~ rw'+ w I I rrsr ~` ~ f`~~e+aTr I ;o ih I \ ~ ~~ . ~ ~~~~~_. ~ ~ ..-~•~ .__~'... _......_ ~,.~_ I ?+~7~~~a ~Nn CON5ERVATIQN CLUSTER CONCEPT PRELIMINARY PLAN i ~. +~ , _ ~,~ _ _ i~ 3 n ~~~ r ~_ ~r ~ •r T;~ . y ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 4~ ~ ! ~~~ .~ ~ ~~ ~~ , ~ I ~ ~ .~~~ ~ nr ~ .. ~ f •T,ry I! r• .. Mr A w. ~ ~ , l :~ -~~. 3 ~ ~ ~~ f ~. •~w~w.2p- ,r r w. 9:~ '' ~~ •:1 .~ b 1 % i •R ~ F J ~ ~ ___~- ! ~ ~ . ~r ~ "°III ~ t ~1: C i®I• 1 `I~ "~r \ \ 1 r -~ a.,. = ~ ~ ~ - -~ 1 ~ I j •~~~ f ~- _ ~, _-~-== ~~ / f r ^ \ R ~ \~ ~,~ 3 ~... ' • t ;~ ~ • ,.,,;,,,, ..~. I,~ ..,..r. ~ ~ ~~ r ~~~4~ nv r'1jr 5 ~^"~~`~`yI '{ ~- ~4a r • r..~ .y ~ ~k- I • \ ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ' r r ~ ~ . ~ ~ rr.4 M..r ~r.v • ~ ~ ` w. ~sn• 5 1 ~_ ~+ 1 ~r ,r..,r,.~ ter.., I ' ... ~ r, auu• •~ s •~ r ~ ( _`~ ~•1 ~ ~~ .• ~ N ~ .,,o. , i ~ - -. ~ ~....,,e ,~. r_ --__ ~ I _ CONSERVATION CLUSTER CONCEPT I PRELIMINARY PLAN ~ I~t'Af~l !~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IIIN _il Hi~fi9.~~ ne..... C~ it ' ~~~ ~ *Qn~ _ .-~:.r-- -. ~rwi ~ t'S%Mvc~r--rte- =,~rr•~~. ':~.mr_ _. ~~ ~~ 1 .~Q~rT • ; 1 1 w wl R ~, rya ~~ 6~y i~ ""~~"~' \ 3 "~' ~~~ ~ tr 66~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~~ P :o ~ ~ ~ ~ ._.,...; .~~ Ash ` ~ • ~ ~ ,~..~ ~~,. ICI ~ ~ - ~~ 1 i spa ~ ~• ~. k,,..,a., I ~~~ _., AnN ~R~ i ~ ~ I I ~. a~~I I I ;I „ ~~^ G®i~i i~'I ~ ~; ~ ~ ~•, t~igg~S~~ ~ ~~~. ~I2 ~ = p~ ~~~ ~ i w ~ ~~ m s ~ ~ ~; R , ~ ~--~-..a- -~, - ~ .•» ~ ~ •~ E . ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~~. ~ :: ~~ e~~~ t,w er+ .,o ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ..., / C~~ ~~ i~ ~ 6~ ~ era r~ t~y 4 ~ ~~~~ I ~3~ iii ~ j~ p ~d i~ 7,. nv ~g I ens s~ s e ~ 3 ~ - , ~ s~ . _.~ _,~ i~Y ~M~yr 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ e~ 6~5 ~ ~~ ~ ~.- i~71 . . ~ ~-Mew ~ ....~ ,....., ~ ~.., r ~. ~. ' .~ ~ ~ ! ~. ,r..;..... I .......... .•. ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y • ~~ • .. .\ t ~~~ - E~~ ~~ ~~ :~~ . ~~v» • ~A~ ~ z }~~ .~ • e . - ~ • _~ ! L ~ • . ~~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ # •~ - ;a ~ ~ ~3.f ~ r ° .r ~. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~•~ # ~ ,~. --~~ ~'~~~ DE7AIIS _ ~ p~u ,,~