HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC agenda 042298 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
306F REVERE ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH , NORTH CAROLINA 27278
64 fart f/ •
v
*f / � CltftP
MEMO UM
e
TO : Historic Preservation Commission
FROM : Donald R. Belk Preservation Planner
SUBJECT : Historic Preservation Commission Meeting , Apri122 , 1998
DATE : April 15 , 1998
COPIES : Gene Bell , Acting Planning Director
Emily Cameron, Planner II/Landscape Architect
ill something of a respite from our recent meetings , where. we ' ve had to This month ' s meeting w
meet deadlines for approvals , public hearings , and so on .
Good news on two of the Commission ' s major undertakings - St. Mary ' s Historic Corridor and
the Historical Architecture Manuscript . Orange County has been awarded a $4 , 000 CLG grant to
conduct a preservation planning study for the St . Mary ' s Corridor . I believe this award presents
an exciting opportunity for a multidisciplinary , interagency approach to cultural resource
reservation . Furthermore b engagingthe involvement of St . M ' s Road landowners we can
P � Y �'
` get it right ' - from the beginning ! We ' ve also been awarded a $ 5 , 000 grant from the Historic
Preservation Fund to publish the manuscript . This should enable us to expedite this project .
I look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, April 22 at 7 : 00 p. m. in the Planning and
Agriculture Center conference room .
/db
AGENDA
ORANGE COUNTY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
CONFERENCE ROOM ##1 - PLANNING & AGRICULTURAL CENTER
306 REVERE ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA
April 22 , 1998
TE 1E PAGE AGENDA ITEM
,I
7000 1 . CALL TO ORDER
2 . CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
7 : 05 3 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
01 a . March 25 , 1998
7 : 10 4 . CHAIR COMMENTS
5 . ITEM FOR DECISION
11 a . Proclamation : National Historic Preservation Week, May 1046 , 1998 - " Preservation Begins At
Home "
7 : 15 6 . ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
13 a . 1998 CLG Grant Award : St . Mary ' s Road Corridor Preservation Planning Study
b . Local Landmark Designations
23 ( 1 ) Designation Reports : Comments from SHPO
(2) Schedule for Landmark Designations
(3 ) Funding of Landmark Designations
29 c . White Oak Grove School , Cedar Grove
d . Orange County Historical Architecture Manuscript
31 e . Cedar Grove Rural Crossroads National Register Historic District
8 : 15 7 . ADJO
IF UNABLE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING , PLEASE CALL THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT EXTENSION 2594
(NUMBERS LISTED BELOW) , STAFF CAN THEN DETERMINE IF QUORUM WILL BE PRESENT FOR THE MEETING .
HILLSBOROUGH - 732 - 8181 CHAPEL HILL on 967-9251
MEBANE as 227 -2031 DURHAM - 6884331
001
Minutes
Historic Preservation Commission
March 25 , 1998
Members Present : Tom Allison , Chair
Jean Anderson
Todd Dickinson
Robert Rich
Cynthia Satterfield, Vice Chair
Members Absent : Carl Lloyd
Patricia Samford
Staff Present . Don Belk
AGENDA ITEM # 1 : CALL TO ORDER
Allison called the meeting to order at 7 * 00 p . m .
AGENDA ITEM -#2 : CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
Allison stated that Kathleen Turner from the Alliance for Historic Hillsborough is here tonight
g
and will lead the meeting with information of the discovery of an important African-American
site here in Orange County .
AGENDA ITEM #36 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. February 25 , 1998
MOTION : Dickinson moved that the minutes from the February 25 , 1998 meeting be
i
approved . Seconded by Rich .
VOTE : Unanimous .
At this point, Allison turned the meeting over to Kathleen Turner .
Ms . Turner stated that the Alliance for Historic Hillsborough works within the area of the Town
limits of Hillsborough . They have a Northern Orange County Black History Committee that has
been working with Ms . Turner to research African-American history and community historic
sites (people , places and events) in order to enhance their Heritage Tours Program as well as
further the preservation efforts here in Hillsborough . In Working with the community , they
turned their attention to historic African-American schools . The committee is not confined to the
Town limits of Hillsborough, but the entire county . The committee members got more and more
1
0041
4
information about these schools , predominately from the earlier part of the twentieth century .
One of them , the White Oak Grove School , is located off Carr Store Road - just west of Cedar
Grove . .They have turned up documents in the possession of Ms . Askew , who ' s father was the
president of the PTA . Ms . Askew has most of the materials from those meetings and established
the opening date of this school as October 17 , 1927 . The school has been changed somewhat ,
but still retains a good bit of its integrity . It has suffered from demolition by neglect, but is in
fairly stable condition . The property is still in the hands of the family who was involved with
starting this school . Ms . Turner stated that the committee will start focusing its attention on this
site in terms of research and in the long term , restoring it as a community facility , an exhibit
facility and a place to meet and further research efforts in African- American preservation and
heritage .
Ms . Turner stated they wanted to come to the meeting tonight and give as much information as
they could , but also find out what exactly they could do with the Orange County Historic
Preservation Commission . They are certainly very interested in having this school nominated to
the National Register ; it is not on the study list at this point . They would also like to move ahead
with a Preservation Plan and a Use Plan .
Ms . Askew then stated that one idea for the school is for a literacy program . There are a lot of
retired school teachers and community members in the area who may want to contribute .
Allison stated that the Historic Preservation Commission is in the process of naming sites for the
local landmark designation program . This certainly is a candidate to go to the head of that list .
Working within the National Register nomination would be helpful , but they also have funds
available for aiding that area. Certainly with that in hand, not only would it be more than
interesting to get it on the National Register, but also as a local landmark . This gives significant
tax breaks to the landowners and brings it to the forefront of community knowledge .
Allison also stated that they now have a vacancy on the Historic Preservation Commission , The
Historic Preservation Commission had talked about working with the African-American History
Committee and would love for someone to come and talk to the them about serving on this
Commission . If there is any interest, please contact Don Belk.
Ms . Turner asked what is the next step as far as this school is concerned?
Dickinson asked that they have the Smith- Cole House , Pittard Place , Benjamin Duke House that
letters have already been sent asking the owners if they would like the Commission to move
ahead on local designation?
Belk replied that this is correct .
Dickinson asked how does this affect the funds that are available for this year for National
Register nominations ?
2
003
Belk replied that the funds for this year are committed to the priorities that the Commission has
selected and the landowners have been notified . They have not firmed up their involvement at
this time . However , a budget request has been made and as the Board of Commissioners
consider this budget , the Historic Preservation Commission has asked again for a $ 10 , 000
appropriation of funds for the purposes of prepanng National Register nominations . So , pending
approval of the budget , they would have money available July 1 , 1998 to start a new round .
Dickinson clarified that it would be after these three that already have funding available ? So for
the sites that they hope to have awarded in July , they would have more funds available ?
Belk replied that this is correct . A new priority list or the next round of priorities for National
Register could then be established and they could start working on them after July 1 , 1998 .
Satterfield asked if we could handle the study list procedure .
Belk replied that he wanted to bring that up because it is something that he and Ms . Turner could
handle . The State Office ' s policy is not to consider, at least in terms of grant funding , structures
that are not on the study list. So this would really be the first step . If that is something that the
private owners are comfortable with, they could proceed with that right away . The other concern
for Belk, is the physical condition of the building . It needs to be stabilized . Again, Belk feels
that they could get some technical advise from the State Office ' s Restoration Branch, but would
need permission of the landowner to be on the property before proceeding .
Dickinson stated that stabilization would mean boarding up the building to keep vandals out and
fixing the roof to keep water out so it isn ' t deteriorating from the elements . This should be done
as quickly as possible .
Ms . Askew feels that she will be able to work out an arrangement with the landowners for its
I'
future use .
Ms . Satterfield asked how long the school was in operation as a school ?
Ms . Turner replied that it is thought to have been in operation until 1949 .
Belk stated that at this point, Ms . Turner and he will make the first move and get the study list
application done . He asked Ms . Askew if there was someone in the family that could meet with
a restoration specialist to discuss stabilization of that building ?
She replied that she would .
Belk advised that Mitch Wilds , a restoration specialist, would then come out and advise ways to
stabilize the building . At that point, once the building is stabilized, they would proceed with
getting the study list application completed , prod the Board _of Commissions to approve money
for the next fiscal year, wait for that money to become available , and then start working on the
actual National Register nomination . They could also be of assistance to any private fund raising
3
004
efforts and advise of some of the needs to make sure they were within the County ' s planning and
building requirements in terms of making sure that this building could be used for a public
purpose .
Belk stated that when Ms . Turner and Ms . Chapman went to the site , their first thought was that
this was a Rosenwald School they had missed . An earlier survey stated that it was a house and
no one knew anything about it . As it turns out, it was not a Rosenwald School . The argument
could be made that it is much more significant than Rosenwald Schools because Ronsenwald
Schools were the brain child of a rich industrialist in Chicago . This school evolved from the
community . It was built by the community , funded by the community and the argument could be
made that it is of greater significance to this area than a Rosenwald School would have been .
There should be no question that this building would be eligible for National Register .
AGENDA ITEM #4 : PUBLIC HEARING ON A NOMINATION TO THE
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES .
a. HP - 1 - 98 DR. ARCH JORDAN HOUSE , OR 0931
1 . Chair Comments/Olen Public Hearing
Allison asked for those wishing to speak to come forward and be sworn in . He then
turned the meeting over to Don Belk.
2 . Staff Report
Belk stated that generally , sites that are brought forward for placement on the National
Register are done so through the resources of the County and at the recommendation of
the Historic Preservation Commission . It is not usual for a private landowner to take the
initiative to pay for the research that is required . That is the best way and it saves
taxpayers ' money and certainly private landowner initiative is the best way that the
County can proceed to meet its preservation goals . The Historic Preservation
Commission applauds that. They are very pleased tonight to have the opportunity to
provide for public comment on this nomination .
Belk stated that on February 5 , 1998 , the Orange County Planning Department received a
letter from the State Historic Preservation Office notifying them that a National Register
Nomination for the Dr . Arch Jordan House would be considered by the North Carolina
National Register Advisory Committee on April 9 , 1998 . In accordance with Certified
Local Government requirements , Orange County would have sixty day in which to
comment on the proposed nomination . Furthermore, the local Historic Preservation
Commission is required to provide an opportunity for public comment on the nomination
within that sixty day period . The Historic Preservation Commission discussed the
proposed nomination at its February 25 , 1998 meeting : On March 9 , 1998 notices of the
hearing on the proposed nomination were sent by certified mail to all property owners
within 500 feet of the property that contains the Dr . Arch Jordan House . On March 12
4
005
and March 18 , 1998 , notices of public hearing were published in the Chapel Hill Herald
and the News of Orange County . This hearing will fulfill the Historic Preservation
Commission ' s requirement for public comment on a proposed nomination .
Belk stated that the Dr . Arch Jordan House is located in the Little River Township , on the
east side of N . C . Hwy . 57 between the North Fork of the Little River and the Caldwell
Crossroads . Belk then presented a map showing a concentration of historic resources at a
crossroads and where the Dr . Arch Jordan House is within this area . The property is also
referenced as Lot 8 on Orange County Tax Map 15 .
Belk stated that the Dr . Arch Jordan House was placed on the National Register Study
List by the North Carolina Division of Archives and History on July 8 , 1993 . Placement
on the Study List implies that the site is potentially eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places . In 1994 , Orange County began the preparation of its Historic
Preservation Element, and its Long Range Comprehensive Plan , The Jaeger Company of
Gainesville , GA was contracted to develop the plan under the guidance of the Historic
Preservation Commission and County Staff. The Jaeger Company selected the Dr . Arch
Jordan House to be the cover illustration of the plan itself; so this structure came to the
Commission ' s attention early on . The National Register nomination form was drafted by
Dr . Keith Zahniser and this form was distributed to the Commission prior to its February
25 , 1998 meeting . According to the nomination form , the Dr . Arch Jordan House is
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places because it embodies
distinctive characteristics of an architectural type of period or method of construction .
The house is considered to be the best-preserved and most stylish example of the
Italianate architectural style in rural Orange County . It is also eligible for the National
Register because of its contributions to broad patterns of our history . The Dr . Arch
Jordan House was closely associated with a rural medical practice under Dr . Jordan in the
late nineteenth century , and in the early twentieth century it came under the joint
ownership of three local Presbyterian churches . The House served as a manse for
ministers serving these churches from 1905 to 1929 .
Belk stated that the National Register of Historic Places is the Nation ' s official list of
buildings , structures , objects , sites and districts worthy of preservation for their
significance in American history, architecture , archeology and culture . The National
Register was established by the National Historic Preservation Act in 1966 . The purpose
of the Act is to insure , that as a matter of public policy , the properties significant in
national , state and local history are considered in the planning of Federal undertakings
and to encourage historic preservation initiatives by state and local governments in the
private sector . The listing of a property in the National Register places no obligation or
restriction on a private owner using private resources to maintain or alter the property .
Over the years , various Federal incentives have been introduced to assist private
preservation initiatives . A private owner of a National Register property becomes
obligated to follow these preservation standards only_ _ if Federal funding is used to work
on the property or if the owner seeks and receives a special benefit from National
Register designation, such as a grant or tax credit . The Dr . Arch Jordan House will be the
5
006
tenth National Register site in the unincorporated areas of Orange County . Staff finds
that the Dr . Arch Jordan House meets the criteria for eligibility for listing on the National
Register .
3 . Questions from the Commission
None .
4 . Comments from the Public
None .
5 . Close Public Hearing
With no one wishing to be sworn in for public comment, Allison closed the public
hearing portion of the meeting .
6 . HPC Discussion and Recommendation
Dickinson stated that he had an opportunity years ago to look at this house when it was
for sale and found it in very good condition inside , very intact. It was interesting that it
had the plank walls still surviving . The projecting front gable was typical in the last part
of the 1800 ' s . From his experience in Orange County, he definitely goes along with
Criteria C in which this house embodies a very high quality of Italianate architecture in
Orange County . Rarely, certainly in the Piedmont, is a house seen that is executed as
attractively as this one . It has quite nice vertical massing - most of the detailing is still
there . Dickinson has no trouble at all embracing it under Criteria C for architecture .
Also , the significance of the relationship of the Dr . Arch Jordan House to the school
certainly makes sense to also authorize this nomination under Criteria A .
Anderson stated that Dr. Jordan ' s son had told her that his father had a very good practice
and had devised a pill for his patients that was very effective . These patients happened to
be in Durham, so this was after he had moved . The drugstore was run by two men,
Council and Bernard, and when they saw that this medicine was so effective , that he gave
it to so many people and they kept coming back to have it filled, they asked if they could
patent it. Dr . Jordan said that they could , so they were the ones that started the BC
Headache Company that existed for so long . Anderson isn ' t sure if it still exists now .
But according to his son, Dr . Jordan is the originator of that formula.
Allison stated that they are in the process of doing local landmark designations into the
coming years and this certainly is a house that, once it is on the registry , he sees no
problem with going forward and is free to come back to the Commission for discussion of
landmark designation . There are some significant . tax benefits from local landmark
designation .
6
007
Allison called for a motion .
MOTION : Dickinson moved that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend
forwarding the nomination for the Dr . Arch Jordan House to the Board of
Commissioners ' Chair and to the State National Register Committee for
acceptance into the National Register under Criteria A and C . Seconded
by Satterfield .
VOTE : Unanimous .
AGENDA ITEM #5 : ITEMS FOR DECISION
a . Recommendation for Public Hearing on Landmark Designation Proposals : ( 1 )
Bingham School ; (2) Chatwood ; (3 ) Moorefields ; (4) Rigsbee ' s Rock House
Allison stated that comments from the State Historic Preservation Office are not available
tonight, but the Commission will proceed with its recommendation assuming that no negative
comments will be received . This is the second of three meeting with the last meeting scheduled
as a public hearing . Allison then asked for comments/recommendations from the Commission
members .
Belk reminded the Commission members that this public hearing will be held on May 26 , 1998 ,
being a joint public hearing with the Historic Preservation Commission and the Board of
Commissioners . The Historic Preservation Commission ' s May meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday , May 28 , 1998 , so it will be a Monday night Board of Commissioners meeting and a
Wednesday night Historic Preservation Commission meeting . Belk asked the Commission
member to please note this on their calendars .
MOTION : Dickinson moved that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend for
public hearing landmark designation proposals for the Bingham School ,
Chatwood, Moorefields and Rigsbee ' s Rock House . Seconded by Satterfield .
VOTE : Unanimous .
b . Consideration of Comments from State Historic Preservation Office
AGENDA ITEM #6 : ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
a . Landmark Designation Priority List .
1 . Smith- Cole House
2 . Pittard Place
3 . Benjamin Duke House
7
008
Belk stated that he has only heard from one property owner - the owner of the Benjamin Duke
House . They have indicated that they do not wish to pursue local landmark designation at this
time . Belk asked them to reconsider and he intends to follow- up with them again .
Satterfield asked if they gave reasons for not wanting to pursue local landmark designation ?
Belk replied that he reminded them of the tax break and they stated that they simply had plans for
the property , plans for the house and did not wish to " encumber their plans in any way by
bringing on additional requirements " . Belk stressed that their goals for preserving the property
be consistent with the goals of the Commission, but he was unable to get them to change their
minds .
Dickinson asked if they had goals for preserving the property ? Or goals for doing something
else ?
Belk replied that the owner indicated that they have every desire to " improve " the house . He did
not get a thorough explanation, but they do intend to keep the house and indicated a desire to
modernize it . They also intend to keep the land in the family .
Belk stated that he has not heard from the Smith- Cole Pittard owners , but will follow up until he
gets an answer .
Allison stated that he tried to contact Carl Lloyd to see if he would contact Mr. Cole . He will try
him again and let Belk know.
b . Grant Award from NC Department of Cultural Resources
Allison stated that he received a letter from the N . C . Department of Cultural Resources stating
that Orange County has been awarded $ 5 , 000 . There was no indication what this grant money
was for . After speaking with Belk, it turns out that it is a non-matching gift grant for publication
of the manuscript .
Belk stated that Allison simply has to fill out a form and turn it in . The proposal was that the
County put up $ 5 , 000, the Commission obtain a federation loan for $ 5 , 000 and attempt to raise
$ 5 , 000 in the community . So the Commission how has 1 /3 of what is needed . The other $ 5 , 000
is before the Board of Commissioners now.
Anderson made a resolution of thanks to Todd Dickinson for all of his years of work, including
chairing the Commission .
The Commission was in total agreement .
Satterfield and Allison both credited Dickinson with their being on the Commission.
8
i
00
AGENDA ITEM #7 : ADJOURNMENT
MOTION : Satterfield moved to adjourn . Seconded by Anderson .
VOTE : Unanimous .
i
9
010
Oil
f 8130
oLoaa 13 IIJ ~
PRE MVAHON
BEGINS AT
HOWNIE
Preservation Week May lI-;; wv�
l6, � q9�
National Trust for Histonc Preservation Ge�%AGPA
� OY7
PROCLAMATION
OF
THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION WEEK
WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth, revitalizing neighborhoods , fostering local
pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability , and
WHEREAS , historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for
Americans of all ages , all walks of life and all ethnic backgrounds ; and
WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated
individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a peoples and
I
WHEREAS, "Preservation Begins at Home " is the theme for National Historic Preservation Week 1998 , cosponsored
by the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission and the National Trust for Historic Preservation :
NOW, THEREFORE , the Orange County Board of Commissioners does hereby proclaim
May 10= 16, 1998 , as National Historic Preservation Week
and calls upon the people of Orange County to join their fellow citizens across the United States in
recognizing and participating in this special observance .
This the sixth day of May, 1998 .
Margaret Brown, Chair
Orange County Board of Commissioners
012
d QP 013
y
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B . Hunt Jr. , Governor
Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain , Secretary Jeffrey 1. Crow, Director
April 6 , 1998
Mr . Donald R . Belk
i,
Preservation Planner
Orange County
306F Revere Road
Hillsborough , NC 27278
Re : St . Mary ' s Road Corridor Preservation Planning Study
Grant Amount : $ 41000
Dear Mr . Belk :
I
I am pleased to inform you that your application for a 1998
Certified Local Government ( CLG ) grant is one of twelve selected
for funding from among twenty - four proposals . Grant funds are
made available to CLGs through the State Historic Preservation
Office , Division of Archives and History , from the Historic
Preservation Fund ( HPF ) administered by the National Park
Service , U . S . Department of the Interior .
This year approximately $ 70 , 000 will be awarded to county and
municipal governments participating in the CLG program . Funding j
is targeted for archaeology , architectural survey , commission
training , design guidelines , restoration , and nominations to the
National Register of Historic Places , j
i
The enclosed Grant Project Outline , based on your grant
application , will provide a brief summary of anticipated
activities and costs related to your project . To indicate your
acceptance of the grant , with its related conditions , please sign
both copies of the enclosed Grant Agreement and the Certification
of Matching Share Form and return them by April 30 , 1998,to
Linda Harris Edmisten , grants administrator , State Historic
Preservation Office , Division of Archives and History , 109 East
Jones Street , Raleigh , NC 27601 - 2807 , Ms . Edmisten may be
contacted by telephone at 919 / 733 - 4763 .
_ _ II
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 -2807
014
Mr . Donald R . Belk
Page Two
April 6 , 1998
I also enclose our Grantee Handbook for Federal Historic
Preservation Fund Grant Projects for your review . Let me urge you
to set aside some time to read through the booklet . It will help
answer your questions concerning the responsibilities of the
Project Coordinator . The booklet also provides information on
contracts and a sample reimbursement letter . If you have further
questions about the administration of grant funds , please call
Ms . Edmisten at the number listed above .
I finally enclose the Equal Opportunity Poster and a Primary Tier
Debarment Form . Kindly return the completed poster receipt form
and debarment form by April 30 also .
After all initial documents have been received , the HPO staff
specialist assigned to your project will contact you about
project initiation , including the open selection of a qualified
consultant , and preparation of a Project Description and
Contract . Parties to the contract will include you , as Grantee ;
the Division of Archives and History ; and the consultant .
Attachments to the description / contract will specify the services
and goods provided by each party and standards to be followed . No
reimbursement from grant funds will be available until the final
contract has been executed .
Thank you for participating in the North Carolina historic
preservation program . My staff and I look forward to working with
you through the successful completion of your project .
Sincerely ,
Jeffrey . Crow
State Historic Preservation Officer
JJC : ro
Enclosures
cc . Secretary Betty Ray McCain
Linda Harris Edmisten
01. 5
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
GRANT PROJECT OUTLINE
March 25 , 1998
i
PROJECT NAME & TYPE : St . Mary ' s Road Corridor Preservation Planning Study
CONTACT PERSON/ADDRESS/PHONE : Donald R . Belk, Preservation Planner
Orange County
306F Revere Road
Hillsborough , NC 27278
STAFF SPECIALIST (S) : Debra K . Bevin
GRANT FY : 1998 BEGINNING /ENDING DATES : 7/ 1 /9 & 9 -/ 30 / 99
TOTAL COST : $ 121000 FEDERAL SHARE : $ 4 , 000 MATCH : $ 8 , 000
BUDGET Grant Funds Cash Match In-Kind Match Total Cost
Consultant $ 4 , 000 $ 62000 $ $ 102000
t $ 1 000 $ 1 000
Pro ec ,
J
Coordinator
Mapping/GIS $ 1 , 000 $ 1 , 000
Coordination
TOTALS
i
$ 4 , 000 $ 6 , 000 $ 29000 $ 129000
i
PROJ
ECT DESCRIPTION :
ill conduct a preservation planning study of the St. Mary ' s Road Corri
Orange County w dor. The study
of the area and assessment of possible reservation options . such as
will involve an intensive evaluation p p p
scenic byway designation, open spate easements , National Register listing , and local historic district or
landmark designation. Examination of the area will include consideration of historic architectural and
known archaeological resources . In lieu of intensive archaeological survey , background research will be
conducted to determine the possibility that historic archaeological resources exist. The county will hire a
consultant who meets the qualifications outlined in 36 CFR 61 to conduct the study . The study will be
completed on or before September 30 , 1999 .
0 1 b STA OTE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
GRANT AGREEMENT
This Grant Agreement is entered into this 6th day of April , 1998 , by the State Historic
Preservation Office (HPO ) , hereafter known as the HPO , and Orange County , Grantee , for
and in consideration of a federal grant in the amount of $ 4 , 000 ( four thousand dollars ) , for the
purpose of a preservation planning study of the St . Mary ' s Road Corridor . The project will
end no later than September 30 , 19996
GRANTEE STAINDAR.DS : The Grantee agrees to have a satisfactory record of performance ;
comply with the required completion schedule .for the project ; conform with debarment
requirements ; and be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive a grant award under applicable
laws and regulations .
GENERAL CONDITIONS : The Grantee agrees to match the grant with funds or services
from nonfederal sources within the grant period , to use grant and matching funds or services
for the purpose specified above , and to furnish such reports and documentation , financial or
otherwise , as may be specified by the HPO . Project activities shall be performed according to
the Secretary of the Interior 's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation , under the
guidelines and professional supervision of the HPO .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CONTRACT : The Grantee agrees to enter into a detailed.
Project Description and Contract with the Division of Archives and History and a qualified
Consultant openly selected to carry out objectives for non -construction projects , including
architectural surveys , survey manuscripts , archaeological investigations , preservation planning ,
design guidelines , and the preparation of nominations to the National Register of Historic
Places . Attachments to the description/ contract will specify the services and goods provided by
each party , a project budget , and standards to be followed . No reimbursements from grant
funds will be available until this final contract has been executed .
APPENDIX FOR GRANT AGREEMENTS ; The Grantee agrees to the stipulations
contained in the attached " Appendix for Grant Agreements " . The Grantee further agrees to
incorporate reference to the Appendix in all contracts and attach a copy of the Appendix to all
contracts involving project activities .
PAYMENT OF GRANT FUNDS : The HPO agrees to payment of grant funds on a
reimbursement basis . Reimbursements will consist of a maximum of 60 percent of allowable
project costs , documented by invoices . and canceled checks , and timesheets or other evidence
of in4dnd contributions as applicable . Upon request the HPO may advance the Grantee up to
25 percent of the grant funds . After satisfactory documentation of this advance , along with the
required matching share , additional advances may be requested for up to 75 percent of the
grant award . The final 25 percent of grant funds will be payable only after satisfactory project
completion .
GRANTEE STATE HISTORIC
PRESERVATION OFFICE
Signature and title Deputy State Historic
• Preservation Officer
Date Date
017
APPENDIX
for
GRANT AGREEMENTS
The following stipulations apply to all projects funded in part by federal Historic Preservation
Fund (HPF) moneys awarded to the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources ,
Division of Archives and History , State Historic Preservation Office ( HPO) , by the U . S .
Department of the Interior , National Park Service .
Questions about the application of these conditions to specific projects are available from the
HPO project specialists or from the grants administrator , State Historic Preservation Office ,
109 East Jones Street , Raleigh , NC 27601 - 2807 , telephone : ( 919 ) 73347631 FAX ( 919 ) 733 -
8653 .
1 . PROCUREMENT : Grantees must forward to the HPO evidence of compliance with
federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and
subcontracts prior to reimbursement , if applicable .
2 . RETENTION OF RECORDS : Acceptable federal and nonfederal share - supporting
documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement , if applicable . Documentation
includes : copies of contract , time sheets , front and back of canceled checks , invoices ,
etc .
3 . CHANGES IN SCOPE : The approved scope of work , products , budget , and
performance/ reporting milestones included in the contract cannot be changed without
prior written approval from the HPO .
4 . LOBBYING PROHIBITED : Grantees must conform with the following text of 18
U . S . C . 1913 , which prohibits the use of the grant funds for lobbying : No part of the
money appropriated by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of e.Cpress
authorization by Congress , be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal
service , advertisement, telegram , telephone , letter, printed or tivritten matter, or other
device , intended or designated to influence in any manner a Member of Congress , to
favor or oppose by vote or otherwise , any legislation or appropriation by Congress ,
whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such
legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the
United States or its Department or agencles from communication to Members of
Congress on the request of any Member or to Congress , through the proper official
channels , requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the
efficient conduct of the public business .
5 . NONFEDERAL AUDIT : Grantees that receive $ 300 , 000 or more in federal financial
assistance are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act
of 1984 and the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 , and OMB Circular A - 133 . The
audit shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted
government auditing standards covering financial and compliance audits .
V
6 . PUBLICATIONS . Acknowledgment of federal grant assistance should be made in
f any material based on , or developed under , any
connection with the publication o
activity supported by HPF grant funds , as follows : The activity that is the subject of
this (type of publication) has been financed (in pan/entirely) with federal funds from
the National Park Service , Department of the Interior. However, the contents and
opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the
Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior.
NOTE : The design and content of any publication produced from a survey of
architectural or archaeological resources must be reviewed and approved by the HPO
prior to its printing .
7 . SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF GRANT : Voluntary and involuntary
suspension or termination of the grant , in whole or in part , by either the state or
grantee may occur at any time prior to the date of project completion .
8 . STANDARDS FOR FINAL PRODUCTS : Final products that do not conform to the
terms and conditions of the grant Agreement or which do not meet the applicable
Secretary of the Interior ' s Standards will not be reimbursed .
9 . EQUAL OPPORTUNITY . Grantee must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 .
10 . OTHER REQUIREMENTS : In addition to the terms detailed in this grant Agreement ,
all federal requirements governing . grants are applicable . ( OMB Circulars A - 87 or A -
121 , A - 102 or A- 110 , and A - 128 . )
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
CERTIFICATION OF MATCHING SHARE FORM
for
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND GRANTS
PROJECT :
GRANTEE :
CERTIFYING OFFICIAL / TITLE :
ADDRESS / PHONE :
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT :
As the official representative of the GRANTEE listed
above , I certify that the required nonfederal funds ,
consisting of $ in cash , and ( if applicable )
$ of in -kind services , are available to match
the Historic Preservation Fund grant which is reserved
for the project noted above .
I further certify that this matching share has not been
designated for any other purpose .
I understand that all costs charged to the grant
project will be in payment of budget items approved by
the State Historic Preservation Office , and which occur
during the project period . An adequate f inancial
management system ( and audit procedure when deemed
applicable ) will be maintained which provides efficient
and effective accountability and control of all
property , funds and assets
Notice to non - governmental grantees : please attach a
statement of deposit from a local bank ( prepared on
bank letterhead ) ` verifying that funds are available .
Signed :
Date :
U . S . Department of the interior
TO BE COMPLETED
BT : GR.ANTEE
Certification Regarding
Debarment , Suspension , and Other
Responsibility Matters
Primary Covered: Transactions
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order
12549 , Debarment and Suspension , 43 CFR Part 12 , Section 12 . 510 , Participants '
responsibilities . The regulations were published as Part VU of the May 25 , 1988 Federal
Register ( pages 19160. 19211 ) . Copies of the regulations are included in the proposal
package . For further assist i ancen
obtaining
a copy of the regulations , contact the U . S .
Department of the Interior, Acquisition and Assistance Division , Office of Acquisition aad
Property Ma.nagement, 18th and C Streets , N .W. , Washington , D . C . 20240 .
( BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION , READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE )
( 1 ) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief,
that it and its principals:
( a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared
ineligible , or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal
department or agency,
( b ) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of
or had a civil judgment rendered against theses for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain , or
performi
ng a public ( Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction , violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or
commission of esabezzleaneat, theft, forgery, bribery , falsification or
destruction of records, making false statements , or receiving stolen property ;
( c ) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise cri, =nally or civilly charged by a
govern mental entity ( Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the
offenses enumerated in paragraph ( 10 ) of this certification ; and
( d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had
one or more public transactions ( Federal, State or local) terminated for cause
or default.
( 2 ) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the
statements in this certification , such prospective participant &hall attach an
explanation to this proposal.
gnature . o Grantee Date
Name and Title of Authorized Representative
Name of Project
O1. 19S3
(9418 )
a • a • a a '
Goa
• a • a • . _ • a s : • • . • • a a . . . : • : • • •
• • • . . • . : • . f • • • . • . •
• • • • • • • • • • • • . • A • • • : • 91 • •
• • • • • r . • •rZTG 1 as • • w a f • f r s . •
• f . • a • • • • a • • w • • • • • • • • : . • • •
f • • • w • ai : i A i : • • : • • • • • • • • • • • • •
to
: LFojQ1Ks) 4r%j4W. Sol * a
• • • • • M • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • Is
• • w : • • • a • : w • • • • • • • • : a. • • a in limp • •• • •
• • mass • Too • ful •L go a _ • • • • • a ■ • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • f • • • • • • . • • a •
• • • • • A • asev.1 % • : / i • • ..w • f • • / • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • now • A • : w i • • • • • i • r • • f • • a •
• • w rf s A Rio a • : Tot • f • • • : • • • •11V I • • • DAL • • _ • • •
• • • • • a • • • i . • • : w w • ; w • • • • a. • IL
• • • A • •
• • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • w • • •
• • • • • • • t • is Irbil • . • • : ►: • • a • • • a • • a • •
• s • A b C. A t A • r . • f • • a • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • r 81W • • • • • • • • • w • • • • • • •
• • • • • w • • • • w _ • • ' • w • . • Aa • • 411
• : A • • i • '
• a • • • two _ • • • • a • • • • • • r • •• : / • • • • • • •
• iIrmo 4 • : 15 • • • wtml • • • A • A • • • : . • • • : • - • - • • •
a • • • • • MESETTNTO MF• • a • • b • • A • : • • • Who • • •
• • GNP
• _ • • a • • • • •
•
• • • • • • • • • • A • • • • : • •J . • • • • • • _ • •
• • • • • • _ • a : - • • • • _ • • : • • • • • • • r • _ • • _ •
• gas •
• • w • • • • : • • • • • • : • • • • �. • • a a •
• A •a • : • • •. • • • • A • • • • • _ • • • • _ A _ r • •
• • • • • • : • • • • •Imm • • • : • • • • • • • a • . i a is - •
• • • a a • I k go IroXe •
02 '
E nn
do I
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B . Hunt Jr. , Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain , Secretary Jeffrey J . Crow, Director
March 27 , 1997
Donald R . Belk , AICP
Preservation Planner
Orange County Planning Department
306F Revere Road
Hillsborough , NC 27278
Re : Landmark designation reports for properties in Orange
County -
Bingham School , NE corner of NC 54 and SR 1007
Chatwood , S side of SR 1328 ( Faucett Mill Road ) on
E side of Eno River
Moorefields , SR 1135 , . 1 mile from junction with
SR 1134
Rigsbee ' s Rock House , NW corner of intersection of
Lawrence Road and Highway 70 West Bypass , E
of Hillsborough
Dear Done
Thank you for the reports for landmark designation of the
referenced properties . We have reviewed the information in the
reports and offer the following comments in accordance with
N . C . G . S . 160A - 400 . 6 .
idually listed in the National
All four properties are indiv
Register of Historic Places ; and the National Register
nominations , which document the significance and integrity of
each property , serve as the designation reports .
We concur that the changes that have occurred since the
nominations were prepared have not been major and that each
property substantially retains integrity ( intactness ) . All four
properties are excellent candidates for landmark designation and
are most worthy of the recognition and protection designation
will bring .
Two of the nominations are more that twenty years old , and while
they form good bases for designation reports , they do not contain
adequate information to constitute full, " strong reports . Many
older nominations are sketchy in this respect and must be
supplemented for local designation purposes . Even the more
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh , North Carolina 27601 -2807
094
Mr . Belk
March 27 , 1998 '
Page 2
recent nominations usually need some updating and expanding . We
have the following suggestions .
All four reports :
It is very important to describe and justify the boundary of
a proposed landmark . Each report needs to be strengthened
in this regard . To each report , add a property map with the
exact boundary of the proposed landmark clearly marked .
Cite the tax map , block , and lot numbers . Add a statement
of the exact acreage . If the boundary is different from the
National Register nomination , explain and justify the
difference .
Many numbered highways and roads have been given proper
names since early National Register nominations were
written . Please give the property ' s current address in
addition to that given on the nomination .
Give the name and mailing address of the current owner .
Chatwood :
The historical name of this property is Faucett Mill and
House , and it is actually listed in the National Register as
a district because of the variety of the resources and the
fact that the mill tract and the house tract comprised two
separate parcels , each having a different owner , at the time
of the nomination in 1988 . It is unclear to us whether both
tracts are intended to be included in the proposed landmark .
If they are still under different ownership , they should be
designated as two separate landmarks . If the two tracts
have now been consolidated under one owner , a single
landmark is appropriate . If only the house tract , and not
the mill tract , is proposed for designation , this should be
stated in the cover memo . Whatever the case , the memo
should address and clarify the matter .
Although the National Register nomination does not include
archaeological resources , they may very well be present .
The mill and surroundings would be of greater concern , but
we are not sure this area is included in the proposed
designation . In any case , mention should be made of the
potential for archaeological resources .
State the current use .
Include current photographs of all the buildings within the
proposed landmark boundaries . -
02 �
Mr . Belk
March 27 , 1998
Page 3
Moorefields
The landscape and setting should be described . A fuller
description of the changes should be given , such as the
addition of the fixed canopy extending from the rear
enclosed porch .
Add a few sentences about any changes in use and ownership
since the 1972 nomination was written . Clarify the current
use .
Rigsbee ' s Rock House
State the current use .
Bingham School
The addendum should be expanded to describe the changes that
have been made to the ell porch and the addition of the
small greenhouse - like structure .
The nomination mentions " several other outbuildings . " These
should be described and their locations specified . The
setting and landscape features should also be more fully
described . A site sketch map , showing the footprint of the
house and all the outbuildings would be helpful .
Summarize any changes of ownership or use since the 1977
nomination was written and before the current use as a bed - j
and - breakfast .
i
For a good example of the elements that should be included in a
local designation report , I am enclosing a copy of a designation
report from Mecklenburg County . °
I would appreciate your sending me copies of any material added
to the reports so that our files will be complete .
Thank you for giving • us the opportunity to comment . Our comments j
are advisory only . Once the preservation commission and the
idered our comments and have held
local governing board have cons
a public hearing , jointly or separately , the local governing
i
alb
Mr . Belk
March 27 , 1998
Page 4
board may proceed with the designation decision . Should you have
any questions , please feel free to contact me at 919 - 733 - 6545 .
Sincerely ,
N44 L amtw�
Melinda Coleman
Preservation Commission Services Coordinator
State Historic Preservation Office
enclosure
cc : Norma White , Chairman , Wake County Historic Preservation
Commission
oaf y 0
J •QJ�'
1 /:' , Z ti
pm, k � r Vio '�
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B . Hunt Jr. , Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty • Ray McCain , Secretary Jeffrey J . Crow, Director
REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION CONFIRMATION
To : Orange County Historic Preservation Commission
From : Melinda Coleman , Preservation Commission Services Coordinator
Date : March 27 , 1998
When the local governing board has concluded its action on the designation
ordinances for the Bingham School , Chatwood ; Moorefields , and Rigsbee ' s Rock House ,
please inform me via either :
1 * the form below , or
2 . call me at 919 / 733 - 6545 with the information requested below . .
Also , please let me know of any provisions in the ordinances that are different from
those specified in the reports .
Thank you for your cooperation .
To : Melinda Coleman , Preservation Commission Services Coordinator
From : Orange County Historic Preservation Commission
Date :
The landmark designation ordinances for the Bingham School , Chatwood , moorefields ,
and Rigsbee ' s Rock House , have been adopted by the local governing board .
Yes No Date
Ordinance provisions different from designation reports :
O
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh , North Carolina 27601 -2807 gj�
02S
TO : Northern Orange County Black History Committee
FROM : Cathleen Turner C �
DATE : April 6 , 1998
SUBJ : Next Meeting , Minutes
The next meeting of the Northern Orange Counly Black History Con » i: iitlee is Monday , April 13 ,
1. 998 at 7 p . m . at the Burwell School.
The following were present at the last meeting on March 9 at the Burwell School : Iris Chapman, Ella
Askew, Gertrude McDade, Edwina Newman, Peter Wood , and Cathleen Turner .
Corrections and additional information were shared on the White Oak Grove School visited by Chapman,
Turner, and Don Belk in January . Ms . Askew reported that some of the people active in the school were
Bume " Doc" Corbett, his brother Ben Corbett , Ally Mae Thompson, Eli Rogers, and Will Oliver . There
were many others . Doc Corbett served as president of the PTA. Mr . Trayham was a white teacher at the
school . His wife, Ruth trayham, is believed to be one of the few people who can tell of the organization of
the school .
According to ) Ms . Askew, the school building becam a house in the 1950s afer Cedar Grove School was
opened . It was during this time that many of the smaller schools were consolidated . Iris ' s parents went to
WOG School , as did Ms . Askew . She attended I st - 7th at the school , than went on to Pleasant grove Schol
in Alamance County off Hwy . 49 ,
Ms . McDade recounted that she attended Hillsbroough High School located at the site of the present
Hillsbrough Elemenary . HHS burned in the 1960s . The first known kindergarten in Hillsboroough was run
by Miss Agnes Whitted . It was a tin- roofed, white clapboard building built c . 1940s and torn down ont eh
1970s . By 1970 there was full integration of schools .
Those present discussed their interests as far as goals of the Committee in the short term. Consensus was to
focus on the restoration of the White Oak Grove School which will be used for a public purpose ( community
facility ) . This will create momentum in efforts to preserve the African American history and places of
northern Orange County .
Turner would contact Don Belk, Orange County Preservation Planner, to check on National register
eligibility of the site, as well as being added to the County ' s historic landmark priority list . Turner also
suggested looking into applying for a feasibility study grant that would result in a preservation and use plan
of the site . There was discussion of the community ' s willingness to contribute to the restoration of the site,
but that the County and other organizations would need to assist with National Register listing and feasibility
study costs .
.Y
�-iE NOS OBSERIDORTH kOLNA
_ MONDAY,APRIL 13, 1998 J6. 3 _
. l
In 1928, Sears magnate -was stocking th state with schools
eventy years ago this month,the Americans here.Rosenwald schools are to build black schools if local What they didn't have in money,black Rosenwald's trip to Method was the
president of Sears,Roebuck and Co. in 86 of North Carolina's 100 counties. communities would match them with parents supplied in wagon teams to haul first time he attended the dedication of
came down from Chicago to Raleigh Wake County alone had 26 Rosenwald public and private funds—a combination bricks and timber,and they offered their any of the 4,200 schools he helped build in
to get his fast look at one of the hundreds schools,five of which are still standing. of white noblesse oblige and black self- skills in painting,bricklaying and cacpen- the South and gave credit to the black
of schools he helped build in North Rosenwald,born to determination. try. leaders and school officials.
Carolina. - Jewish emigre par- At the time,funding for North "As one school official noted at the time, Touring the school,an emotional
This was when Sears was the merchan- ents from Germany, Carolina's segregated schools was gross- the money and labor given by black Rosenwald commented:"It shows you
dising behemoth,and every family had a could draw certain ly unequal.The daily expenditure for school builders appear all the`more what these Negroes will do for themselves
copy of its catalogue in their house—and , t parallels between his white students throughout the state was remarkable when we consider the(condi- if you give them the opportunity."
maybe their outhouse.This was when ,"•_,� family's struggle and 19 cents,while the average spent on tions oft poverty'in which those people All of this is not ancient history to Nora
Sears was Wal-Mart,Kmart and J.C. those of blacks, black children was 11 cents.White teach- lived,"Leloudis writes."In order to Lockhart,a member of the school's first
Penney all rolled into one. '% according to Univer- ers earned$800 a year,while black teach- secure their contributions,old folks graduating class.She remembers Berry
- So it was a big occasion when,on April sity of North Caro- ers earned$436 a year.The average value scraped together`pennies,nickels and O'Kelly,a black civic leader,hauling,at
4, 1928,Julius Rosenwald arrived to dedi- DD,�, lina historian James of white school houses per child was$155, dimes,'while schoolchildren sacrificed his own expense,black children from
Cate the 11-room Berry O'Kelly High 1WB Leloudis,who gives compared with$39 for black schools. their`lunches and other things children Apex and Holly Springs to attend the
School in Method,a small,black CHRISTENSEN an account of the Most black children attended schools in love."' school.
settlement started by former slaves on Rosenwald schools* hovels that state education official N.C. Rosenwald donated roughly$55U,000 "It produced doctors,lawyers,preach-
the western outskirts of Raleigh. in his book"School- Newbold once described as"a disgrace to for schools in North Carolina.Black par- ers,school teachers and principals,"says i
Rosenwald provided a big wad of the ing the New South." an independent,civilized people." ents put up$590,000.And local school offi- Lockhart,now 93,a retired Raleigh
money to build the school.In fact,the Rosenwald witnessed a mass migration Rosenwald's offer galvanized black cials contributed$2.4 million in tax school principal with a master's degree
O'Kelly High School was the 4,000th to the South Side of Chicago of backs communities across North Carolina to money. from Columbia University.
school in the rural South that Rosenwald from the South,tripling the city's African- raise matching money. North Carolina's effort drew visits by Berry O'Kelly High School was the
had helped build. American population between 1910 and In Aberdeen,a small farming commu- the British Colonial Office,which was state's first black accredited high school.
The state he helped the most was 1920. nity in Moore County,for example, looking at programs it might adopt in its It was closed in 1967 and is now a Raleigh
North Carolina.Rosenwald was At the urging of his friend Booker T. parents collected$425 among themselves African colonies. park.Only the gymnasium is still stand-
instrumental in building a stunning 813 Washington,Rosenwald set out to as matching money for a new school— The News&Observer's story on ing.But its legacy,like all the Rosenwald
secondary and elementary schools in improve the education of young black no small feat in an area where no black Rosenwald's visit ran on the front page schools,will last.
Jiorth Carolina between,1917 and 1931, Southerners.He formed the Julius resident owned more than$500 worth of next to a story on the Teapot Dome Rob Christensen can be reached
transforming education for African- Rosenwald Fund in 1917,providing grants property. scandal. of 8294S32 or of robcQnando.com
tSA
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. HVnt Jr. , Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain , Secretary Jeffrey J . Crow, Director
DIST B ED
March 19 , 1998
The Honorable Moses Carey , .Jr
ale 90�
Orange County Government
Service Center
200 South Cameron
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Re : Cedar Grove Rural Crossroads Historic District
Dear Chairman Carey :
It is a pleasure to report that the above - named nomination to the National Register of
Historic Places has been approved by the North Carolina National Register Advisory
Committee for submission to the U . S . Department of the Interior .
You will be notified when the property is approved by the Department of the Interior for
ister . This will require approximately two to three months .entry in the Reg
Sincerely ,
oxf9 y
Itl lip
j f
Jeffrey J . Crow
State Historic Preservation Officer
JJC /hlb
109 East Jones Street • Raleia.h , North Carolina 27601 - 2407 �- �