HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-29-2001-7
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: March 29, 2001
Action Agenda
Item No. - - -~
SUBJECT: Possible Waiver of County/Municipal/Utility Development Fees for School
Construction
DEPARTMENT: County Manager/Budget PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
3/22/01 Budget Director Memo
Table: New School Construction Permits
and Fees
Chapel Hill
Durham
Mebane
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rod Visser, ext 2300
Donna Dean, ext 2151
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
968-4501
688-7331
336-227-2031
PURPOSE: To continue discussion of a proposal to pursue the waiver of local government
and public utility fees related to the development and construction of new school sites and
facilities.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Commissioners and Boards of Education share an interest in
constructing high quality school facilities at reasonable cost. To that end, the Commissioners
have expressed a willingness to support the school boards in approaching the municipalities
and public utilities with requests that they waive or minimize the fees that they impose for
development review activities associated with school construction projects. County and school
staffs have collaborated to compile figures that reflect development-related fees that have been
paid (or are anticipated) by both school systems for school construction projects in recent years.
The boards may wish to discuss steps that could lead to reductions or waivers in development
related fees that would lower the direct casts of new school construction projects.
This topic was scheduled for discussion at the joint work session on March 28, 2001, between
the Board of Commissioners and the two school boards. The BOCC may wish to continue that
discussion at this March 29 work session, as needed, depending on how the topic was
concluded at the March 28 work session.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact directly related to the discussion of this
proposal. However, if successfully implemented, the proposal could lead to lower upfront
capital construction cost for school projects. It could also lead, in some cases, to lower County
fee revenue for school projects where County fees are waived or reduced.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board discuss the proposal
further, as needed, and provide appropriate direction to staff.
ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICE
2
Donna Dean, Budget Director
208 South Cameron Street, Post Office Box 8181 • Hillsborough, NC • 27278
Phone: 919-245-2151 • Fax: 919-644-3324
E-Mail: ddean@ca.orange.nc.us
To: Board of County Commissioners
Jahn M. Link, Jr., County Manager
From: Donna Dean, Budget Director
Subject: Development Related l=ees for School Construction
Date: March 22, 2001
At the December retreat, the Board raised concerns about the amount of money
that local school districts are required to expend far local review fees and other
requirements they plan and construct new schools. It is important to make the
distinction between (1) fees that the County, the Towns and OWASA may charge
for particular inspections or services and (2) costs for additional requirements to
meet particular local ordinances or codes.
Most local governments and public utility companies assess user fees to offset
costs of providing those services -the majority of which are State mandated.
Examples of these fees include plan reviews, use and building permits, and
connection or tap fees. In addition, entities may also require that a construction
project meet particular local codes or ordinances. Examples of these types of
requirements include construction of sidewalks, road improvements, and
installation of building sprinkler systems.
Fees Assessed for Project Review and Approval
I recently contacted representatives from local government entities and OWASA
regarding typical fees that potentially could be assessed to a school system
during a construction project. I am currently compiling this information and will
have it available at the meeting with the School Boards next Wednesday night.
Attachment 1 of this memorandum provides, by recent school construction
project, the fees that each district has paid to local and State agencies.
Additional Requirements to Meet Local Initiatives
As stated earlier, in addition to review and permit fees, local, state and federal
agencies may require each school system to meet particular requirements or
codes. The requirements and costs for these elements vary with each
construction project. Both school systems have provided specific examples for
recent projects. Examples of local requirements associated with CHCCS Smith
Middle School include $23,265 for upgrading existing sewer lines (required by
OWASA) and $28,497 for roadway improvements required by NC Department of
- 2 - March 26, 2001 3
Transportation. It is interesting to Hate that the Town of Carrboro requires that
applicants reimburse the Tawn for 8p percent of its engineering services, and this
cost is included in the Smith Middle School project. For East Chapel Hill High
School, the Town of Chapel Hill required CHCCS to increase the number of
parking spaces in order to accommodate potential overflow from a Town park
located across the street. In addition, the school system was required to
construct a pedestrian walkway located on property adjacent to the high school.
While the school district did incur additional costs for these items, staff was not
able to identify the specific costs of these additions. Other examples required
during construction of new schools in both systems include installation of
sprinkler systems, removal of site clearing debris (instead of burning), and
installation of storm water management systems.
Feel free to contact me if you have additional comments or questions.
W
±_+
L
A~
li
O
V
L
N
O
U
^O
y
'V
V ~
Z
-I~.1
U
N
.O
L
4
-F~
U
a~
d o~o~ oo~o~a~alo~ ao
01 d3j64i (fl~fA~tD~69jEA~ N
i i ~i i~i i i ~
1 1 ~ 1 I r l 1 1
a
~
L ~ I 1 ff31 1 M 1 1 1 C'7
-gyp T i i i iii i i ~
41
U i i
i i i i i
i i i i i
i
i Oi0i0iai0i tp
H ~+ O
O
~16g1 C
~1(~}Id Iyg14Fy1 r
A ~ ~ i Ni iii ~ ~ N
!p ~,
~
,~, ~
i i N M
64i i6FJi i i K1
4f?
~ G1 i i i i i i i
a W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
`~
~ g
:° o'o'
1 1
1 I 1 1 1
~o'
'~'~' e
o„
o
~ n
~ ~ ~~~,~
1 1 I
~~~ ~
1 1 1 I 1 ~
~ 1 I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
W 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
a;u~; a;a;a~o;o; u~
Q~ ~11Yj1
1 1 Efl101FA1a1Lti1
1 1 1~;~1 ~
w ~ CPiMi i~i i~i~i N
~ ~i~i iii i i i
i ~
~
y ~ i i
I 1
1 1 i i i i
i
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
~' 1 1
1 1
o,u7, 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
o,a,O,o,o,
~n
N ~ u7~ti~
~ lf1 H4~O~Ff}~a~N~
O OD lfl C
O
~i C u71N' Iii i~i~i ~
~ ~i~i iii i i i ~
~
t1
~
~ i i
i i i i i i i
i i i i i
W i i i i i i i
m 1 1
ao;rn; 1 1 1 1 1
o;o;o;a;o;
n
U = TN"i~i i0i i i6N4i N
'N
~ _
~
= ~I 1
1 1
1 1 IYI 1 1 1
1~1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 ~
~
W
1 1 1 1 ~
1 1 to 1 1 1 1 1
L
• O
L
i 1 ~ 1 i 1~ 1 1
L
a as
~
as ~
~~ ~ ~
1 l 1
~ ~ 1 1 1+~ 1 +
,^
1 1 ~
1 1 1 1
~ ~-
31 ~1 R ~~~~ ~~~ 1 ~~~
CI 1 1 1 ~1
"' '~
o
~ m
' ~ 3'W
~•
~
_ ~
~ ~~~
rn
j~i
~ 7 Ci i DiDi`p
~
~
i it
a CI ~I ~` Ci i~il~iGi
~
C1 1 NI ~1 ~1
J
~
.e a~a~ o
U
/• ~
~~ ~_~ L~
1 I
, ,
V w/;
a .1 1~
° CA~
~
a ~' ~~~? °w~W
n
~ l L1
--- ~
~
3 ~; ~;~ ..
1 Ir
'~ ~'~' 'Q'V~
H 5~ii;0 m m~O~H~~:Z;