HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-20-2001-9cORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: March 20, 2001
Action Agenda
Item No. . C.
SUBJECT: Ashwick Subdivision -Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning ~ Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
1) Resolution for Approval Tina Moon Planner I I ext. 2583
2) Application Robert P. Davis Planner III ext. 2580
3) Agency Comments TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
4) Planning Board Minutes Hillsborough 732-8181
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis Chapel Hill 968-4501
6) Vicinity Map ~ Reduced Plans Durham fi88-7331
7 Preliminary Plat Mebane 33fi-227-2031
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision
BACKGROUND:
Request
Applicant: Phil Post of Philip Post S~ Associates, agent for Peny's Construction Corporation
• 50.93 acre tract +/-
• Fifty-eight (58) single-family residential lots on the conservation-cluster flexible
development option
• Average lot size = 15,647 square feet
• Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site)
Location
• Cheeks Township
• North side of US Hwy 70 West between Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) and
Richmond Road (SR 1312)
Existin Site Conditions
Land Use:
• 10 Year Transition
Zoning:
• Rural Residential (R-1 ); Upper Eno-Protected Watershed
• Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, church, firehouse, undeveloped lots
Physical Description:
• Gently sloped land with a few scattered rock outcrops near high points on the site
• Approximatelytwo-thirds (2/3) of the site is covered with 12-to 18-inch hardwoods
2
• McGowan Creek flows diagonally across the northern end of the tract -
• There is floodplain associated with this section of McGowan Creek
• A USGS blue-line stream meanders through the southern portion of the tract
• An intermittent stream in the southeast portion of the site drains into the USGS blue-line
stream
Proposed Site Conditions
Roads:
• The subdivision will be accessed from US Hwy. 70 West
• All seven roads (Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Fams Wick Place,
Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court) will be public and constructed to
NCDOT standards
Resid®ntial Lots:
• Fifty-eight (58)single-family residential lots per the conservation-cluster flexible
development option
• Average lot size = 15,647 square feet; Gross average lot size = 38,243 square feet
• Minimum lot size per R-1 Zoning District = 40,000 square feet (0.92 acre)
• Minimum lot size for cluster option (a lot size reduction of up to 65%) = 14,000
square feet
• Minimum to actual lot size ratio (MTAR) = 1.12
• Maximum number of lots permitted by R-1 zoning = 55 + 7 (density bonus**) = 62
• One additional lot is allowed per each additional acre of protected open space
(Orange County Subdivision Regulations, Section IV-B-10, G, Flexible
Development Standards)
• Impervious Surface limit for Upper Eno PW = 12%
Open Space:
• Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site)
• Most of the open space serves as a buffer for McGowan Creek
• Minimum open space required for Flexible Development = 16.81 acres (33% of site)
• Bonus open space = 7.23 acres**
Buffers:
• 100-foot open space or building buffer area along the site perimeter and between the
subdivision and any off-site public street right-of--way (per Section IV-B-10, D2, Flexible
Development Standards)
• 75-foot Type-E Land Use Buffer is required along US Hwy 70 West
• Type-E Buffer = a buffer composed of predominately (at least 75%) evergreen
vegetation that is opaque to a height of at least thirty feet
• 100-foot building buffer satisfies the Type-E Land Use Buffer (width) requirement
• Typical lot landscape plan specifies primary and secondary tree protection areas
Recreation 8< Parks:
Public Recreation Space
• Cheeks Township District Park (per the Recreation Service Area Boundaries Map)
• All subdivisions (located within a floodplain) must provide a minimum of 1/20 acre of
recreation space per lot (Section IV-B-7-b)
• A minimum of 2.9 acres (926,324 square feet) of land is required for public recreation
space
• Or a payment in-lieu-of parkland dedication = $26,390 ($455 * 58 lots)
3
• The applicant has offered 4.4G acres (794,143 square feet) of land along the
northern side of McGowan Creek. The location and amount of the proposed
dedication is consistent with the County's objectives to preserve natural areas and
provide public recreation space.
Private Recreation Space
• All subdivisions must provide a minimum of 0.028 square feet of recreation space per
every square foot of land area dedicated for residential use (Articles 5.1.1 8~ 6.12 of the
Orange County Zoning Ordinance, outline Land Use Intensity (LUI) requirements)
• 0.028 * 46 = 1.29 acres (56,192 square feet), (46.03 =Total area (50.92) -- rights-of-
way (4.89))
• In those cases where the LUI calculation results in a larger amount than the public
recreation space requirement of 1/20 acre per lot, the difference shall be established
as private recreation space for the use of the residents of the development
• No private recreation space is required (LUI calculation (1.29) is less than the public
recreation space requirement (2.9))
Water-Sewer:
• All lots to be served with Orange-Alamance water and Orange County sewer
• Final number of proposed lots does not exceed the number approved with the concept
plan
Agency Comments
• Requests for agency review were sent to: NCDOT, Recreation and Parks, Orange County
Schools, Soil and Water Conservation, Erosion Control, the County Attorney, and the Fire
Marshal.
Comments are attached.
Development Process. Schedule. and Action
• First Action: Planning Board to consider Concept Plan
The Planning Board approved the flexible development concept plan for Ashwick
on September 6, 2QOQ with the following conditions:
1. The size and boundary locations for both parent tracts shall be verified with Orange
County Land Records and any discrepancies resolved prior to filing for preliminary plat
approval.
2. A left turn lane, built to NCDOT standards, shall be required on US 70 to access the
subdivision.
3. All roads shall be public and proposed to be built to NCDOT standards with additional five
(5) foot utility easements on each side. The right-of--way at street intersections shall be
improved to NCDOT standards. Sight distance triangles (10' x 70') shall be delineated on
the plat for each street at intersections, as appropriate.
4. The Benwich Lane right-of--way shall extend to the northwestem, external property line of
the subdivision in the proximity of lots 31, 35, and 34. A conveyance of a 50-foot right-of-
way with 20-foot construction easements on each side of this northwestem most portion
of Benwich Lane is acceptable in-lieu-of construction.
5. Driveway access points shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the intersection of street
rights-of--way.
6 All corner lots shall be designed to access from the street with lower traffic volume: i.e. lot
6 to Farnswick Place, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to
Benwich Lane, and lots 48 and 58 to Chadwick Lane.
4
7. If an entrance sign is anticipated and will not be placed within the 100-foot building buffer,
maintained by the Hameowners Association, a sign easement must be reserved within
one of the residential lots.
$. All common areas (stream buffers, building buffers, landscape buffers) must be clearly
identified on the preliminary and final plats and maintained by the Homeowners
Associatian. The common areas cannot be subdivided or recombined with adjacent lots.
Draft forms of the Homeowners Association documents, including restrictive covenants
and conservation easements, that contain use and maintenance provisions for the open
space and buffers must be submitted for review by the County Attorney as part of the
preliminary plat approval process. The restrictive convenants or conservation agreement
shall designate a backup grantee in the event that the Homeowners Association is
eliminated.
9. The developer shall submit documentation granting the use of public water and sewer
services prior to filing for preliminary plat approval.
10. The preliminary plat shall indicate areas for on-site infiltration of storm water that
demonstrates compliance with Article 6.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.
11.The location of all drainage ways, stream buffers and floodplains shall be delineated on
the preliminary and final plats, along with appropriate information regarding restrictions.
12.The preliminary plat shall show a building footprint on the approximate location of each
house site to ensure that there is sufficient buildable area on every proposed residential
lot.
13.The preliminary plat shall show the location of tree protection fencing and contain a note
requiring the installation of tree protection fencing prior to any grading to ensure the
protection of vegetation within all buffers and open space.
14.The preliminary and final plats shall contain a note restricting further subdivision.
15.The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 2.9 acres (1/20 acre per residential lot) for
public recreation space as part of the preliminary plat approval process. (Section IV-B-7-
b Recreation Sites, Orange County Subdivision Regulations)
1G.All street names to be reserved with GIS section of Planning Department prior to
submittal of preliminary plat subdivision request.
• Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preiiminary Plat
The Planning Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Ashwick on
December 6, 2000 in accordance with the attached Resolution for Approval.
Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider Preliminary Plat
1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer
consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review.
3. If the Preliminary. Plat is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall
have one (1 } year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request aone-year extension
from the Planning Director.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis (attached)
RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff Recommendation
The Planning Department Staff recommends approval in
accordance with the attached resolution.
5
Plannin Board Recommendation December 6, 2000
The Planning Board recommends approval in accordance with the
attached resolution. (Vote: 6-1)
Administration Recommendation
The Administration recommends one of the following alternatives:
(1) approve per the Resolution of Approval with the added
condition that public sewer is made available by Orange County to
this project and that Orange County has made no commitment to
do so or;
(2) table the item until the Board of County Commissioners have
reviewed and updated the County's Efland Area Sewer Extension
Plan.
6
RESOLUTION
OF
THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONNERS
TO APPROVE
ASHWICK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN
Date March 20, 2001
Name of Subdivision Ashwick
Owner/Applicant Perry's Construction Corporation
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick
Subdivision as shown on the preliminary plat dated April 4, 2000 (last revised October 26, 2000)
and subject to fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The approval of this resolution
authorizes and directs the Orange ,County Manager to accept for the County and on behalf of
the public generally, the offer of dedication of Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court,
Fams Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court. This acceptance of
dedication to the general public shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall
be maintained by the owner/applicant (Parry's Construction Corporation) until such time as they
are accepted for maintenance by NCDOT or some other governmental body.
Before the Final Plat of Ashwick Subdivision can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal and Water System
Each residential lot shall be provided a sewer line stub out in accordance with
Orange County sewer connection guidelines.
2. Sewer line construction drawings shall be approved by the County Engineer prior
to submittal to NCDOT or any state regulatory agencies for permitting or
approval: Any changes in design to comply with requirements from either
NCDOT or other agencies shall also be approved by County Engineer.
Sewer lines and sewer system improvements shall be constructed as provided
herein prior to final plat approval.
OR
7
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction the sewer system to Orange County standards. An estimate
of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer and
submitted to the Orange County Planning Department and County Engineer.
The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate and be issued
by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the sewer
system construction has been inspected and approved by Orange County.
3. All existing and proposed sanitary sewer easements dedicated to or proposed to
be dedicated to Orange County shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats.
The developer shall submit a copy of a letter from the County Engineer certifying
that all sanitary sewer lines have been installed per the approved plans and
dedicated to Orange County prior to the issuance of any building permits. As-
built drawings shall be submitted to and approved by County Engineer prior to
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Sewer shall be constructed in such
a way to allow for future extension of lines to adjacent properties.
4. Water line construction drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the
Orange-Alamance Water System, Inc. A letter indicating approval of the
construction drawings shall be submitted to the Planning Department and shall
include copies of all necessary State and local approvals. A copy of the State
permit approval to construct the system shall be submitted at the same time as
the request to record the final plat. A letter from the Orange-Alamance Water
System, Inc. indicating that the construction of the water lines meets its
specifications will be required prior to Planning Department signatures on the
Final Plat.
Prior to Final Plat approval, stub out lines shall be provided and constructed for
each lot. Prior to Final Plat approval, the main water service lines shall be
constructed and stubbed to the adjacent property line to the northwest.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of the water system with hydrants to Orange-Alamance
System standards. An estimate of the construction cost shall be prepared by a
certified/licensed engineer and submitted to the Orange County Planning
Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate
and be issued by an acuedited financial institution licensed to do business in
North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final
Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the water
system and hydrant construction has been inspected and approved by Orange-
Alamance Water System, Inc. and the Orange County Fire Marshal.
8
B.
5. All fire hydrant locations, fire flow and water line pressures shall be approved by
the Orange County Fire Marshal prior to issuance of the first certificate of
occupancy.
6. Sewer tap. acreage. access._a_v_ailability. capital. facility fees
Sewer fees based on an acreage or a per lot charge shall be paid to Orange
County prior to Planning Department signatures on the final plat. Sewer fees
based on house size shall be paid to Orange County when obtaining individual
building permits.
Roads and Access
1. Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Fams Wick Place, Chadwick
Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court shall be constructed to NCDOT minor
local standards with a 50-foot right-of-way and 5-faot utility easements on each
side. Construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement ar other security shall be submitted to
secure construction of Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Fams
Wick Place, Chadwick Lane, Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court to NCDOT
standards. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a
certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Orange
County Planning Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent
of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. An erosion control plan for the entire project, including streets, shall be submitted
by the applicant for review and shall be approved by the Orange County Erosion
Control Division prior to any disturbance on the site. The Erosion Control Plan
shall include a stormwater management plan that meets the requirements of both
the County and the Neuse River Basin rules.
3. Prior to any construction ar any alteration of any existing access within the right-
af-way of US Hwy. 70 West, the developer/owner shall secure a driveway permit
from the NCDOT District Office. The applicant shall submit a copy of the NCDOT
permit and approval letter to the Planning Department when requesting Planning
Department signatures on the Final Plat. Sight distance triangles shall be shown
at all intersections within the subdivision, or included within the right-of--way of the
proposed street. .This restriction shall be stated in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. All lots shall secure access from streets internal to the subdivision. Lots with
frontage on more than one road shall be designed to access from the street with
lower traffic volume: i.e. lot 1 and 6 to Famswick Place, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick
Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to Benwich Lane, and lots 48 and 58 to
Chadwick Lane. Driveway cuts shall be a minimum of 50 feet from street
intersections. These restrictions shall be stated in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the final plat. Non-vehicular access easements
(NVA)--areas where vehicles are prohibited from traveling--shall also be shown
on the final plat.
5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the signs are in place or a copy
of the receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning
Department at time of request to record the Final Plat.
6. The applicant shall dedicate, in fee simple, an additional 20 feet or 50 feet from
the centerline of the existing right-of-way whichever is greater, along the entire
frontage of US Hwy 70 West to the North Carolina Department of Transportation
for future road improvements. The dedication shall be shown on final plat.
Property lines to stop at new public right-of--way.
7. The Benwich Lane right-of-way shall extend to the northwestern, external
property line of the subdivision in the proximity of lots 31, 34, and 35. A
conveyance of a 50-foot right-of-way with 20-foot construction easements on
each side of this northwestern most portion of Benwich Lane is acceptable in-
lieu-of construction.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on an approved
landscape plan and shall be inspected and approved by the Planning
Department prior to Final Plat approval and again prior to the transfer of control
of the Homeowner; Association from the developer to the home owners as
provided by the recorded Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
for Highridge Subdivision. Landscaping shall include a 75-foot Land Use Buffer
along US Hwy 70 West.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to
secure the required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the
cost for required preservation, new plantings, and their installation must be
provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and
must be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in
North Carolina
2. Provisions for the protection of existing trees as shown on the approved
landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
D. Drainage
1. Impervious surface data for all lots, pursuant to Article I'a.23 Extra_Requirement5
for Watershed Protection. Overla~..Districts of the Orange County Zoning
Ordinance, shall be included in the development restrictions and requirements
document to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
10
Final Plat. The impervious. surface limitations for each lat shall indicate whether
the impervious surFace includes or excludes one-half (1/2) of the roadway width
in the calculations.
2. Drainage easements shall be located on the Final Plat as required following
review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan.
3. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the
Orange County Erosion Control OfFcer.
E. Parkland (Public Recreation Space)
1. The proposed fifty-eight (58) lot subdivision is located within the Cheeks
Township District Park area. Per Section IV-B-7-b of the Orange County
Subdivision Regulations, subdivisions (located within a floodplain) must provide a
minimum of 1/20 acre of recreation space per residential lot. Based on the
number. of proposed residential lots, the applicant shall dedicate a minimum of
2.9 acres (126,324 square feet) to the County for public recreation space or
submit an in-lieu of payment. The applicant has offered 4.46 acres (194,143
square feet) of land along the northern side of McGowan Creek. The location
and amount of the proposed dedication is consistent with the County's objectives
to preserve natural areas and provide public recreation space.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 Title Block and V-D-3 Vicini Ma of the Orange County
Subdivision Regulations.
2. The building buffer; stream buffers, minimum building setbacks, easements,
public (along US Hwy 70 West), public and private open space areas shall be
stated on the plat and in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by section D. item 2. outlined
above.
4. If any condition of this Resolution shall be held invalid or void, the Resolution
itself shall be void and of no effect.
G. Certifications
A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-
6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowners and
developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing
development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
11
3. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that all roads have
been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been
approved.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Richard Perry, Owner
Peny's Construction Corporation
Beverly A. Blythe
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
I, Richard Perry, representing Peny's Construction Corporation accept the above listed
conditions ofi subdivision approval and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation
of the Final Plat.
Richard Perry, Owner
Perry's Construction Corporation Date
APPI Tr=ATION FOR PRELIlKINARY PL " ri APPROVAL
INA,JOR SUBDIVISIOZy - - 4,
ORANGE COUNTY ~ -
. aATE Iv-z -a
. _.~._
PI.BAS$ T'Y'PS OR PRWf (IIdIC ONL1~
SUBDMSION NAME: ASH wick ~ stld0w iS ~ a ~l
LOCATION: U.S.'7a f-ftq.aq C wasr '
OWNEItlDEVELOPER: i c~ ~ /I~o Cr-i ~ro~1 ~
ADDRESS: 82"1 Mt Dt}p~ ~20~1o TELEPHONE NO.: SG3 - ~ Goy
I~Ir't.rs~y~a.a~u,,-f rJc 27z~o ~ PA-~s~2 ~ zi6 - 9, ~~
AGENTlCONTACT: a}7 ui f >v . ~poSr P. E . TELEPHONE NO.: 92 -1! 7 3
- fix r+93 -Gs"f8
A. SUMMARY INFORMATI ~I: ~ 9 .
Orange County Tax Map Block ~_ Lot(s) , ~ 3 _ Township
Zoning District(s): - I
.Total Number of Acres: S0,'1 Z-
Total Number of Lots; 58 Average Lot Size: lSL$dq Minimum Lot Size; IihpaQ F
NtunberPType of Structures: (existing) NONE (proposed) S8 5 i Nt~~ fr~rti b}~art~s
Linear Feet ~ Streets: q- oS Acres in Open Space: 23. SZ
Water Supply: 0~4r~b ae,prrblic (specify) Community Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community Individual
School District: Fire District: 'tc#Iw]0
General Land Uses in Area: IQF~'rDEr1Tl/-s, C ,t.ct1 - S 'a.-
Critical Areas: he (rDW~- crL,) stream/drainageways ~ X flood prone areas
V- lcnt0 - ~k! watershed (specify) n10~E: historic sites
other (explain) Noma
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes Na X . If `des," plea
contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under
"farm use value taxation."
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals twahundred feet (1"~00') and no larger th
one inch equals twenty feat (I"~20') and must contain the following information:
subdivision name
~ name & address of owner(s)
~ name & address of subdivider
(lf other than owner)
/ name of surveyor, engineer, landscape
architect or architect, address,
/ registt'ation # 8c seal
~ (title) Preliminary Plan
scale, north arrow
/ date of plan preparation and revisions
/,a.._ ~ township, tax map-block-lot references
Parent Parcel Identification #
. deed book and page # of property to be
subdivided
/ boundary described with bearings and
:..~., distances
total acreage of the tract and acreage of
lots, including and excluding area within
rights-of--way
zoning of tract and adjacent properties
,/ building setback Imes by notation
or typical lot layout
-,,C, location and width of existing and
proposed easements (drainage, utilities
roads, etc.)
./ existing, proposed and adjoining rights
of--way including dimensions and stree
names and State Road numbers. Linea
feet of road centerlines and approximai
acreage ofnew streetrights-of-way
L/ existing and proposed utilities, include
type, sins, hydrants, valves, manholes
existing and proposed curbs, gutters as
culverts, including sins and grades
location and width of alleys, sidewalks
bike lanes, transit systems, and bus sto;
/ ~. ~ typical street cross-sections and
intersection details including design an
...:at ..o......_I...........a ~t,.,.,tAd.~
1
- ~ ~. . ~
/ proposed lot lines with dimensions
,:
/ lot & block numbers
. phasing line(s)
~! ~ topography at ten (10) foal intervals
'~ water bodies, streams, floadways and
floodplains
/ ~. ...: .
stream buffers
~ . `~~ y location and size of parcels dedicated for
public use, recreational use or reserved in
common, with purpose noted
i
mpervious surface data (if located in
:. > water supply watershed)
vicinity map showing general location of
• subdivision with streets and roads
idartified by State Road number and name
~... landscaping and buffer requirements
township, corporate and extraterritorial
Planning jurisdiction lines which cross the
P~Periy
C. ~ OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUREMEN'I'S
/ ~ .< . horizontal alignment, centerline radius,
and general curve data on all proposed
~ streets .
Ja permanent features such as buildings,
cemeteries, historic landmarks
/ ~ adjoining lot layout names of adjoining
property owners. If subdivided,
subdivision plat name, plat book dt page-
number, and periimetec lot numbers.
"l~!~ location and size of lots of restricted
development potential and natation on
plat regarding same
,~ ~ .. stormwater detention and/or retartion
sites and undisturbed areas for infiltration
Purposes (if located in water supply
/ watershed)
~/ identified natural areas and wildlife
corridors
1. Twenty-five (2S) copies of the Preliminary Plat
2. •: One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked).
N~Ar 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health
Department approvaUdenial for each lot shown•thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed, a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative
~~p, which sets forth the jusitification for a private road (see Section 1V-S-3-d-1 of tho Orange County Subdivision
Regulations).
S. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared is accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance which assure
completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documarts may include,
but not be limited ta, a private road maintenance agreement aad articles of incorporation and restrictive
covenants pertaining to a homeowners association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence
that the ordinance requirements are being met .
6. Fee -5470 plus SS.00 per lot (one fee far Preliminary and Final Plat). ~ 70 ~ zq o ~ a 7(vo.~
7. If the subdivision contains l O lots or more, the following information shall be suhmitted with the application:
a. Number of years to buildout
b. Number of houses m be built during each year until buildout.
c. Average price ofhouses including lots for each year to buildout.
I, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE
~~ ~ ~ ~ .
DATE
is 4 oa .
DATE
FEE°: Amount n~rn nn:.i
14
~,
ME[~ T0: Tina Moon
FROM: $. D. Dixon
DATE: 11-16-00
Per your request, a review of the above mentioned subject has been completed by
the NCDOT Graham District. Below for your file is a list of our recommendations
and comments for the subject:
1. Prier to any construction of any new access or alteration of any existing acce
within the right of way, the .developer/owner is required to secure a permit wi
this office. It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to obtain a perm
2. All utilities located within the right of way shall require an encroachment
agreement. All services shall be flush with finished grade. Any utility main
service connection or lateral located wa_thin the dedicated right of way shall
be maintained by the appropriate utility authority.
3. Any area within the State's right of way and/or easements disturbed during the
construction and/or maintenance shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer or his representative.
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
North Carolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications Emergency Medical Services
24 Hour Warning Point `,..~r a ~ Fire Marshal
919-732-8161 •933-2600 a~ ~ '' ; Disaster Response
v g Ha~rdous Materials
24-Hour Fax Machine _ 919-644-3030. 968-2050
919-967-9026
''~~r e•`•~''' Administrative Fax Machine
919-968-4066
TO: ROBERT DAMS, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTORIFIRE MARSHAL,
RE: ASHWICK SUBDIVISION
DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2000
We have reviewed the preliminary plan of Ashwick Subdivision and offer the fallowing
comments. We would ask for more information on the water lines and fire hydrants for fire
protection services. We also recommend a secondary means of ingress/egress for emergency
response during times of emergencies or disasters. Please send us a copy of the plan, upon
approval, for distribution.
If you need additional information, please call me.
Nov-16-00 03:54P Coleman Gladlyill Margrav~ 919 732 7997 16
LAW QFFICFS
COLEMAN, GLEDHIi1 & HARGRAVE
A MtOt~ONAL (50RPORATION
129 & TRYUN S1'RA1i7
R O DaAQV6R L519
FIiLL5DS7nUWK, NORTH C.~IAOLINA 27278
9L9.732.2196
GAX 919~7lZ.7997
WEESITE WWW.CGANOki.CON _
November 1G, 2000
VTA FAGSiMiLE
Tina Moon
Orange County Planning Department
P.O. Box 8181
• i lillsborough, NC 27278
Re: Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision
Dear Tina:
FROM 7I~ DESK OF
HARMONY WHALF]J
I have reviewed the above roterenced I3rnject per your October 18, 2000 Request
for Review. 1 have no comments at this time.
Sincerely,
COLEMAN, CLLrDHILL & HARCRAVL~, P.C.
Harmony Whalon
.~nM,;~l~-~u,TMlun„~
1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3
NATURAL RE5OU&C&$ CONSERVATION 3&RVICB 10/30/00
SANITARY FACILITIES
Aahwick Subdivision
lThe information in Chis report indicaCes the dominant soil condiCion buC does not eliminate the need for onaite
inveatigaCion)
MaP symbol I
I SepCic tank I
I Sewage lagoon I
I Trench I
I Area I
I Daily cover
and soil name I absorption I areas I sanitary I sanitary I for landfill
I fields
I I
I I landfill
I I landfill
I I
I
~B' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
Appling-----=-- -(Moderate: IMOderaCe: IModeraCe: (Slight IFair:
I perca slowly I seepage, I too clayey I
I too clayey,
I
I I elope
I I I I hard to pack
GeB:
I
I I
I I
I I
Georgeville----
-(Moderate:
(Moderate:
(Moderate:
I51ighC I
IFair:
I perca slowly I seepage, I too clayey I I Coo clayey,
I
I I slope
I I I I hard to peak
~B:
I
I I
I I
I I
xerndon--------
-(Moderate:
IModeraCe:
(Moderate:
ISlighC I
IFair:
I perca slowly I seepage, I Coo clayey I Coo cla
I ~~
I
I I elope
I I I I hard to pack
~~
I
I I
I I
I I
I
Lignum----=---- -(Severe: (Moderate: (Severe: (Severe: (Poor:
I perca slowly, I aepCh to rook I depth to rock, I retaeas I Coo clayey,
I wetness
~ I I wetness, I I hard Co pack,
I
I I
I I too clayey
I I
I I wetness
I
18
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/30/00
9ANITARY FACILITIES
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES
This report shows khe degree and kind of Boil limitation6 Chat affect septic tank absorption fields, sewage lagoons,
and saniCary landfills. The 1lmitakiona are considered "811ght" if soil properties and Bike features generally are
Favorable for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties or site
feakurea are not favorable fox Che indicated use and special planning, design, ar maintenance is needed to overcome or
minimize Che limitations; and "Severe" if Boil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome
thaC special design, signifieanC increases in conakrucCion coats, and possibly increased maintenance are required.
This report slap shows Che suitability of the soils for use as daily cover Por landfills. A rating o! "good" indicates
thaC soil properties and site features are favorable for Che use and good performance and low maintenance can be
expected; "Fair" indicates that soil properties and site feakuxes are moderately favorable for Che use and one or
more soil properties or site feaCUres make Che soil lees desirable Chan the soils rated "Good'; and "Poor" indicates
ChaC one er more soil properties or site features are unfavorable for Che use and overcoming Che unfavorable
properties requi'rea special design, extra maintenance, or costly alCeration.
SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION FIELDS are areas in which effluent from a'eeptic Lank is distributed into Che soil through
subsurface tiles or perforated pipe. Only Chat part of Che soil between depths of Sa Co 72 inehee is evaluated. The
ratings are base on soil properties, site feaCurea, and observed performance o! the eoile. Permeability, a high
wafer Cable, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, sad flooding affect absorption o! the effluenC. Large atones
and bedrock or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Uneatiafactory performance of eeptio Cask abaorpCioa Fields,
including excessively slow absorption of effluent, surfacing of elfluenC, and hillside seepage, can affect public healCh.
GroundwaCer can 'be polluted if highly permeable sand and gravel or fractured bedrock is lase than 4 feeC below the
base a! Che absorption field, if elope is excessive, or if the water Cable is near the surface. There moat be
unsaCurated soil material beneaCh the abeorpkioa.field to filCer Che eflluenC effectively. Macy local ordinances
require Chat this material be of a certain thickness.
SENAGE LAGOONS are shallow ponds constructed Co hold sewage while aerobic bacteria decompose Che solid sad liquid
wastes. Lagoons should have a nearly level floor 9+•~+^~•^~ed by CLiC slopes or embankmenCa of compacted soil. Lagoons '
generally are designed Co hold Che sewage within a depth of Z to 5 feet. Nearly impervious soil material far the lagoon
floor and aides is required to minimize seepage and costaminatioa of ground water. This report gives xaCings for
Che natural soil Chat makes up the lagoon floor. The surface layer and, generally, i or ~ feeC of soil material
below the surface layer are excavated Co provide material for Che emban]aoenCe. The ratings are based on soil
properties, siCe features, and observed performance of'the voila. Considered in Che raCinge are slope, pexmeabiliCy, a
high waken table, depth Co bedrock or tp a cemented pan, flooding, large atones, and coriCeriC of organic matter.
Excessive seepage due to rapid permeability of Che soil or a water Cable that is high enough to raise the level of sewage
in the lagoon causes a lagoon Co function ussaCisfacCOrily. Pollukion results if seepage is excessive or if floodwater
overkope Che lagoon. A high contest of organic matter is detrimental to proper functioning of Cha lagoon because it
inhibiCa aembic activity. Slope, bedrock, and cemented pans can cause construction problems, and large skones can
hinder compaction of the lagoon floor.
SANITARY LANDFILLS are areas where so11d waste is disposed of by burying iC in soil. There are two [ypee of landfill,
trench and area. In a trench landfill, Che waste is placed is a trench. IC is spread, compacted, and covered daily
wiCh a Chin layer of soil excavated at the site. In an area landfill, Che wasCe is placed in successive layers on Che
surface of Che Boil. The wasCe ie spread, compacted, and covered daily with a thin layer of soil farm a source away
from the site. ,Hoch types of landfill must be able to bear heavy vehicular traffic. Both types involve a risk of
groundwater polluCion. Ease of excavation and revegetation need to be considered. The ratings in this report are based
U.S. GEPARTNU'sNT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
SANITARY FACIL;TIES
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES--ConCinued
FAGS 3 OF 3
10/30/00
on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of Che voile. Permeability, depth to bedmck az Co a
cemented pan, a high wafer table, elope, and flooding affeeC both types of landfill. Texture, scones and boulders,
highly organic layers, soil reaction, and contenC of salts and sodium affect trench Cype landfills. Unless otherwise
stated, Che ratings apply only to Chat part of Che soil within a depth of about 6 leeC. For deeper trenches, a
limitation rate "Slight" or "Moderate" may not be valid. Onelte imeatigaCion is needed.
QAILY COVER FOR LANDFILL is Che -soil material thaC ie used to cover compacCed solid waeCe in an azea type sanitary
landfill. The Boil material is obCained affsite, Craneported to the landfill, and spread over the waste.
Soil texture, weCnese, coarse fragments, and elope affecC the ease of removing and spreading the material during wet
and dry periods. Loamy or silCy voila that are free of large atones or excess gravel are the heaC cover for a
landfill. Clayey soils may he sticky or cloddy and are difficult to spread; sandy soils are subject to soil
blowing. After soil material hoe been removed, Che soil material remaining in the borrow area must be Chick enough
over bedrock, a cemented pan, or the water Cable Co permit revegeCation. The soil material used as final cover for a
landfill should be suitable Poz plants. The surface layez generally has Che beat workability, more organic matter than
the zest of the profile, and the beet potential for plants. Material from the outface layer should be etoakplled for use
as Che final covet.
U.S. DBPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PAGE 1 OF 3
NATCiRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION S&RVICB 10/30/00
~uILDlrrc slxs nsvsLOT
Aahwick 8uhdiviaioa
(The informaCion in this report indicates the dominant sail condition huC does noC eliminaCe Che need for onaite
invesCigation)
Map symbol I
I Shallow I
I Dwellings I
I Dwellings I
I Small I
I Local roads I
I Lawns avid
and soil name I excavations I without I with I commercial I and atseeCa I landscaping
... I
I I basements
I I basements
I I buildings
I I
I I
I
'-pe: I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Appling_________
I~erate:
IS11ghC
(Slight
(Moderate:
IMOderatC: I
(Slight
I too clayey
I I
I I I elope
I low strength
I
Ges.
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Georgeville-----
(Moderate:
(Slight
(slight
IMOderaCe:
IMaderate: I
IslighC
I Coo clayey
I I
I I
I I elope I low strength I
Hr9:
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Herndon--------- IMOderaCe: (Slight (Slight IModeraCe= (Moderate: (slight
I too clayey
I I
I I I elope I low strength I
~'
I
I I
I- I
I I
I I
I
Lignum----------, I severe: (severe: (severe: (severe: (severe: (Moderate:
_. I wetness
I I wetntsa
I I wetaesa
I I wetness
I I low etre th
n9
I
I wetness
I
U.S. DRPARTM&NT OF AGRICULTURS
NATURAL RfiSOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
BUILDING SITS DEVEIAPMEN'P
Endnote -- 9UILDING SITE D&VELOPMENT
PAGfi 2 OF 3
10/30/00
This report shows the degree and kind o! eoil limitations that affect shallow excavations, dwellings with and aiChout
basements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations are
"Slight", ^Moderate", or "Severe•. The limitations axe considered •911ghC" if soil properties and Bite features are
generally favorable for Che indicated use and limitaiona are minor and easily overcome; "MOderaCe• if soil properties
or efts features are not favorable for Che indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to
overcome or minimize the limitations; and •Severe• if Boil px'operCiee or site features axe so unfavorable or eo
difficult Co overcome that special design, significant increases in construction costa, and possibly increased
maintenance are required. Special feasibility studies maybe required where Che Boil limitations are severe.
SHALLOW EXCAVAT2ON3 are trenches or holes dug Co a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for basements, graves, utility lines,
open ditches, and ocher purposee. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of
the soils. The ease of digging, filling, and compacting 18 affected by the depth to bedrock, a cemented pan, or a very
firm dense layer; atone content; soil texture; and elope. The Cime of the year that excavations can be made is
affected by the depth Co a aeaeonal high water table and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of
the excavation walla or bands to sloughing or Caving ie affected by soil texture and the depth to the water Cable.
DWSLLING$ ANC SMALL COFQ~RCIAL HUILDING$ are structures built on shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load
limit is the same ae that far single-family dwellings no higher Chan three stories. Ratings are made for small
commercial buildings without basements, !or dwellings with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings -
are based on soil properties, site featuree, and observed performance of the soils. A high water Cable, depth Co bedrock
ox to a cemented pan, large atones, elope, and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction. Landscaping
and grading that require cuts and fills of mare than 5 or 6 feet are nDC considered.
LOCAL, ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface and tarry automobile and light truck Crafffe all year. They
have a eubgrade of Cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed mek, or stabilized soil material, and a
flexible or rigid surface. Cute and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed performance of the
soils. Depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, a high water table, flooding, large stones, and slope affect Che ease oP
excavating and grading. Soil strength (ae inferred from the engineering ciaeaification of the soil), shrink-swell
potential, frost action potential, and depth to a high water Cable affect the traffic-supporting capacity.
LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING require soils on which Curf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and
maintained. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the voila. Soil
reaction, a high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40
inches, and the content of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth- Flooding, wetness, slope,
stoniness, and the amount o! sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer affect tra!licability after vegetation
is established.
z
U.S. DEFARThD;P1T OF AGRIC[7LTURE
PAGS 1 OF Z
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION S ERVICE 10/30/00
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Aahwick Subdivision
(The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition buC does not eliminate Che need for onsiCe
investigation)
~"~P symbol I
I Camp areas I
I Picnic areas I
I Playgrounds I
I Paths and trails I
I Golf fairways
and soil name I
I I
I I.
I I
I I
I
APB I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
Appling--------- ISlight ISlighC (Moderate: ISlight I81ighC
I I I elope, I I
I
I I I small stones I I
Ge$:
i I
I I
I I ..
I I
I
Georgeville----- ISlight ISlight IMaderate: ISevere: ISlight
I
I I
I I elope I erodes eaeilY I
xrE:
I
I I
I I
I I
I
Fierndan-------_- ISlight ISlfgh[
(Moderate:
ISevere:
ISlight
I
I I
I I slope I erodes easily I
~~
I
I I
I I
I I
I
Lignum---------_ I$evere: ISevere: ISevere: (Moderate: (Moderate:
I wetness, I.perce slowly I wetness, I wetness I wetness
I perca slowly
I I
I I peres slowly
I I I
I I
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CDNSFxiVATION SERVICE
RECREATIONAL AEVSLOPMENT
6ndnote -- RECREATIONAL DEVELOPM$NT
FAGS 2 OF 2
10/30/00
The soils of Che survey area are rated in this report according Co limitations that affect their suitability for
recreation. The ratings are based on restrictive soil features, such as wetness, slope, and.texCUre a! Che surface
layer. Susceptibility to flooding is considered. Not considexed in the ratings, buC important in evaluating a
site, are the location and accessibility of the area, the size and shape of the area and its scenic qualify,
vegetation, access to watex, potential watex impoundment sites, sad access Co public sewer lines. The capacity of
Che soil to absorb septic tank elfluenC and Che ability of the soil Co euppoxC vegetation axe also important. Soils
subject to flooding are limited fox recreation use by the duration and intensity of flooding and the season when
flooding occurs. In planning recreation facilities, onaite asaesament of the height, duration, intensity, and frequency
of !loading is essential.
In thin report Che degree of soil limitakion is expressed as •Slight,• "Moderate," or "Severe." "Slights means thaC soil
properties are genexally favorable and the[ limitations are minor and easily overcome. "Moderate" means that
limitations can be overcome or alleviated by planning, design, or special maintenance. "Severe" means that Boil
properties are unfavorable and Chat limitations can be offset only by cosCly soil reclamation, special design,
intensive maintenance, limited use, ox by a combination q! these roeaeures.
The information in this report can be supplemented by information available in other reports, for example,
interpretations for septic tank abeorpCioa fields in the Sanitary Facilities report and interpretations for dwellings
without basements sad for local roads and streets in the Building 61te Development report.
CAMP AREAS require site preparation, such as shaping and leveling. the tent and parking areas, aCabilizing roads and
intensively used areas, and installing sanitary facilities sad utility lines. Camp areas are subject Co heavy looC
traffic and some vehicular traffic. The beet soils have mild slopes and are not weC or subject Co flooding during
Che period of use. The surface hoe few or no stones or boulders, absorbs rainfall readily buC remains firm, and is
not duaCy when dry. Strong slopes and atones or boulders can greatly increase Che coat of eonsCructing campsites.
PICNIC AREAS are subject Cp heavy fooC traffic. Most vehicular traffic is confined to access roads and parking
areas. The beat soils for picnic areas are firm when wet, are not dusty when dry, are not subject to flooding during
Che period of use, and do not have slopes or stones or boulders that increase the coeC of shaping sites or o!
building access roads and parking axeae.
PLAYGROUNDS require soils thaC can withsCand intensive foot traffic. The best soils are almost level and are not wet or
subject Co flooding during the season of use. The surface is free of stones sad boulders, is firm offer rains, and is
not duaCy when dry. If grading is needed, the depth of the soil over bedrock or hardpan should be considered.
PATHS AND TRAILS fox hiking sad horseback riding should require little or no cutting and filling. The beat soils
arc not wet, ors firm after rains, and not duaCy when dry, and are not eubjecC to flooding more than once a year during
the period of use. They have moderate elopes and few or no sconce or boulders on the euxlace.
GOLF FAIRNAYS are aubjecC Co heavy foot traffic and same light vehicular traffic. CuCting or filling may be
required. The beat soils for use as golf fairways are firm when wet, are noC dusty when dry, and are not subject Co
prolonged flooding during the period of use. They have moderate elopes and no atones or boulders oa Che surface.
The suitability of the soil for tees or gxeena is not considered is rating Che Boils.
:,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL R&SOURCE$ CONSERVATION SERVICE
PRIM FARMLAND
Ashrrick Subdivision
PAGE 1 DF 1
10/30/00
I
Map I Soil name
symbol) -
I
ApH IAppling sandy 1aam, Z to 6 percent slopes
GeH _ IGeorgeville silt loam, 2 Co 6 percent slopes
HrH (Herndon si1C loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
I
z
z~
Qrange-Alamance Water System, Inc.
POST OFFICE 90X 1$7 MEBANE, NORTH CAROLINA 27302 TELEPHpNE: (919) 563.6212
July 28, 2000
Orange County Planning & Inspections Department
POBox'8181
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Attn: Ms. Tina Moon
Dear Ms. Moon;
This letter is in reference to your June 28, 2000 memorandum regarding
the Ashwick Subdivision project. At the regular monthly meeting held
on July 27, 2000, the Board of Directors approved for this subdivision to be
served by Orange-Alamance Water System, Inc.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (91.9) 563-6212.
Sincerely,
O GE-AL CE WATER SYSTEM, INC.
rs. ra Faye e~
Manager
z
MEMORANDUM
TO: Craig Benedict, Planning Director
COPIES: Phil Post, PE
FROM: Paul Thames, PE, County Engineer
DATE: July 26, 2000
SUBJECT: Sewer service from the Efland sewer system for the Ashwick Subdivision
in Efland
As per the request of Phil Post, PE, president and owner of Philip Post & Associates and
consulting engineer for the above referenced subdivision, I am providing the following
information and input relative to sewer availability at the Ashwick subdivision site.
The southern portion of site, as shown on the site and utility plans date M4/2000, is
crossed by two branches of the sewer interceptor/outfall lines of the Efland sewer system.
These lines may not be tapped for individual sewer services. However, new collector
mains may be extended from existing manholes through the parcel to provide sewer
service to individual lots. Furthermore, it may be passible in limited circumstances to
connect individual service lines to existing manholes, although I discourage this practice
and would allow this to occur only when other alternatives and connections are not
practicable.
The Post & Associates sewer utility site plan appears have followed the above criteria
fairly closely. The site plan appears to show that sewer service will be provided via new
gravity collector lines extended from existing manholes. The plan does not show any
proposed sewer pumping/lift stations which, as you are aware, would be at least
somewhat problematic. There is or may ultimately be a minor final sewer design issue as
to how service is extended to lots 8, 9 and 21, as these lots do not appeaz to front on the
proposed collector lines. However, please be advised. that, at this time and without sewer
profile plans, I cannot verify or certify that the gravity sewer layout that is shown is
actually a workable plan.
In conclusion, I can state that: 1) the Efland sewer system can accommodate the sewer
flow that can be projected from a 50 to 60 lot subdivision; 2) the proposed sewer layout
appears to conform to standard and acceptable engineering practice far gravity sanitary
sewer layout; 3) nothing shown on the plans, as far as sewer layout is concerned, appears
to be unacceptable in terms of general County or Efland sewer policies and practices; and
4) subject to all final design and state permitting requirements and approvals related to
layout, materials, construction and construction oversight practices, etc., and unless there
is a significant flaw in the proposed collector layout, sewer service can be extended to the
property as long as all County relative zoning, subdivision, land use, watershed, density,
etc., ordinances and policies are satisfied.
If I may provide additional information, please advise.
z
ORANGE COUNTY
ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
To: Tina Moon, Land Use and Preservation Planner
From: Rich Shaw, ERCD Land Conservation Manager
Date: November 30, 200Q
Re: Ashwick Subdivision (Cheeks Township)
(TMBL 3.32.A.9 and TMBL 3.31.A.23)
Thank you for the opportunity to review a plat the proposed Ashwick Subdivision
(dated October 30, 2000). The following comments are intended to address any
concerns with respect to impacts on natural and cultural resources, and to
identify areas that may desirable far possible dedication to the County for public
recreation and open space pursuant to County subdivision regulations.
My comments are based on an August 2, 2000 site visit and a review of resource
information available for this property, including aerial photography, topographic
maps, FEMA floodplain maps and NWI maps.
The subject property is located in Efland on the north side of US 70 in Cheeks
Township. The property is zoned R1 and is within the Upper Eno Watershed.
McGowan Creek flows through the northern quarter the property, essentially
cutting ofF about five acres from the majority of the parcel. McGowan Creek is
flooded in this area due to the Efland Mill Pond dam located just downstream.
There is also a sizable beaver dam, which contributes to flooding of the property.
Aside from some periodic dawned trees (likely from the May 2000 windstorm)
the woodlands are comprised of fairly mature mixed hardwoods, which slope
gently down toward McGowan Creek. A small tributary of McGowan Creek flows
through the southern portion of the property in a northeasterly direction. The
property slopes fairly gently (2 to 6%) with a narrow band of moderately sloped
land (6 to 10%) draining to McGowan Creek. Away from the Creek, the soils are
Georgeville silt loam (GeB and GeC) and Herndon silt /oam (HrB), both quite
suitable for residential development. It appears that the proposed lots are well
outside of the floodplain and avoid the small area of Lignum soils, which are
unsuitable for home sites.
The Preliminary Plan shows 4.46 acres located in the northeast corner of the
property proposed far dedication to Orange County for "public recreation space."
This area is considerably larger than the minimum required dedication of land far
recreation and open space. The subdivision regulations call for a minimum of
2.9 acres fora 58-unit subdivision (1/20 acre for each unit).
Such a dedication would be consistent with my earlier suggestions that this small
area, which is cut ofF from the more developable section south of McGowan
Creek, be set aside for wildlife habitat and future recreation/open space needs.
This area would be accessible from the proposed McGowan Creek Subdivision,
which is planning to dedicate an adjacent linear area along the north side of
McGowan Creek.
Finally, the proposed site plan appears consistent with the County's desire to
minimize adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of
floodplains, wetlands, natural areas and wildlife habitat, historic and cultural
resources and prime farmland.
Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss these findings.
Attachments
cc: David Stancil
3
.~°~
~' B'~ ~~.
A~ ~ `~ p.~.~~, ~L ~
=-~
-.
-~
~~~ \
_ /~ ApC
Lg
GeB
\..
~.~ \ ~
G~ C
~/~ 9
ApB
w ~ i\ ~ ~ IGec
` 31
r~~
i
1
\ J '
ApC~
w \ \
G~ 9
_~~
0
32
I MOTION:. Preston moved to delay the decision about High Rock Farms until the water
2 table information is received. Seconded by Holtkamp.
4 Benedict said that there was a draft hydrological study out that ERCD is reviewing. This study is for projects
5 that are either using independent wells or a community well system. This subdivision is proposing a
6 community well that would offer its share of water to Orange-Alamance, so it would be a different type of
7 system.
9 Whitaker said that he is concerned about delaying the decision because there would probably not be any
10 resolution to the hydrological issue in another month. Regarding the school impact issue, the impact fees are
l 1 not determined until the building permit stage. He urged the board to make a decision tonight.
12
13 Katz asked about the water system for this subdivision and if it affected the water table differently than
14 individual wells. Whitaker said that this was an issue that was raised in the concept plan stage and Orange-
15 Alamance wants the well that would serve this subdivision in a remote location elsewhere. He said that, as a
16 rule, it is better to have single-point discharges from deep wells.
t7
18 Holtkamp asked Whitaker if he was saying that the board should ignore the concerns from EMS about water
19 pressure and fire protection. Whitaker said that there were two different components of water supply -basic
20 daily water needs and fire protection. He said that he was not proposing that the fire hydrants be installed
21 immediately because there is a concern about water pressure.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3l
32
33
34
3S
36
37
38
39
40
4l
42
43
44
4s
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Chair Allison said that this subdivision meets all. of the requirements in the standards. He said that the
Planning Board did not have the authority to set up a moratorium on development. He suggested moving
ahead with this subdivision.
Holtkamp said that the Planning Board was entitled to have the information needed in order to make the right
decision. She is very concerned about the issue of law water supply identified by Mike Tapp.
VOTE:
Ayes, 3; Noes, 4
MOTION: McAdams moved to approve the Preliminary Plan for High Rock Farms
Phase One, in accordance with the Resolution of Approval, which is
incorporated herein by reference. Seconded by Selkirk. This motion
includes the recommendation for pedestrian connectivity from this phase to
future phases.
VOTE:
Moon made the presentation.
Ayes, S; Noes, 2
(2) Ashwick
(Cheeks Township - 58 Lots)
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Ashwick Subdivision
BACKGROUND:
R~ eg uest
Applicant:
Phil Post of Philip Post & Associates, agent for Perry's Construction Corporation
• 50.93 acre tract +/-
• Fifty-eight (58) single-family residential lots on the conservation-cluster flexible development option
33
Average lot size = 15,647 square feet
Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site)
Location
• Cheeks Township
• North side of US Hwy 70 West between Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) and Richmond Road (SR
1312)
9 Existing Site Conditions
10 Zoning:
t 1 Rural Residential (R-1); Upper Eno-Protected Watershed
12 • Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, church, firehouse, undeveloped lots
13 Physical Description:
14 Gently sloped land with a few scattered rock outcrops near high paints on the site
15 Approximately two-thirds (2/3) of the site is covered with 12-to 18-inch hardwoods
16 McGowan Creek flows diagonally across the northern end of the tract
17 • There is floodplain associated with this section of McGowan Creek
18 • A USGS blue-line stream meanders through the southern portion of the tract
19 • An intermittent stream in the southeast portion of the site drains into the USGS blue-line stream
20 Proposed Site Conditions
21 Roads:
22 • The subdivision will be accessed from US Hwy. 70 West
23 • All seven roads (Ashwick Drive, Glenwick Drive, Norwich Court, Farns Wick Place, Chadwick Lane,
24 Benwich Lane, and Straywick Court) will be public and constructed to NCDOT standards
25 Residential Lots:
26 • Fifty-eight (58) single-family residential lots per the conservation-cluster flexible development option
27 • Average lot size = 15,647 square feet; Gross average lot size = 38,243 square feet
28 • Minimum lot size per R-1 Zoning District = 40,000 square feet (0.92 acre)
29 • Minimum lot size for cluster option (a lot size reduction of up to 65%) = 14,000 square feet
30 • Minimum to actual lot size ratio (MTAR) = 1.12
31 • Maximum number of lots permitted by R-I zoning = 55 + 7 (density bonus**) = 62
32 • One additional lot is allowed per each additional acre of protected open space (Orange County
33 Subdivision Regulations, Section IV-B-10, G, Flexible Development Standards
34 • Impervious Surface limit for Upper Eno PW = 12%
35 Open Space: -
36 Proposed open space = 24.03 acres (47% of site)
37 Most of the open space serves as a buffer for McGowan Creek
38 • Minimum open space required for Flexible Development = 16.81 acres (33% of site)
39 • Bonus open space = 7.23 acres**
40 Buffers:
41 • 100-foot open space or buffer area along the site perimeter and between the subdivision and any off-site
42 public street right-of--way (per Section IV-B-10, D2, Flexible Development Standards)
43 • 75-foot Type-E Land Use Buffer is required along US Hwy 70 West
44 • Type-E Buffer = a buffer composed of predominately (at least 75%) evergreen vegetation that is opaque
45 to a height of at least thirty feet
46 • 100-foot building buffer satisfies the Type-E Land Use Buffer (width) requirement
47 • Typical lot landscape plan specifies primary and secondary tree protection areas
48 Recreation & Parks: .
49 Public Recreation Space
50 • Cheeks Township District Park (per the Recreation Service Area Boundaries Map)
34
1 • All subdivisions (located within a floodplain) must provide a minimum of 1/20 acre of recreation space
2 per lot (Section IV-B-7-b)
3 • A minimum of 2.9 acres (126,32~t square feet) of land is required for public recreation space
4 • Or a payment in-lieu-of parkland dedication = $26,390 ($455 * 58 lots)
5 • The applicant has offered 4.46 acres (l9a,143 square feet) of land along the northern side of
6 McGowan Creek. The location and amount of the proposed dedication is consistent with the
7 County's objectives to preserve natural areas and provide public recreatiou space.
8 Private Recreation Space
9 All subdivisions must provide a minimum of 0.028 square feet of recreation space per every square foot
10 of land area dedicated For residential use (Articles 5.1.1 & 6.12 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance,.
11 outline Land Use Intensity (LUI) requirements)
12 0.028 * 46 = 1.29 acres (Sd,192 square feet), (46.03 =Total area (50.92) _rights-of--way (4.89))
13 • In those cases where the LUI calculation results in a larger amount than the public recreation space
14 requirement of 1/20 acre per lot, the difference shall be established as private recreation space for the
15 use of the residents of the development
16 • No private recreation space is required (LUI calculation (1.29) is less than the public recreation space
17 requirement (2.9))
18 Water-Sewer:
19 • All lots to be served with Orange-Alamance water and Orange County sewer
20 • Final number of proposed lots does not exceed the number approved with the concept plan
21 AQency Comments
22 Requests for agency review were sent to: NCDOT, Recreation and Parks, Orange County Schools, Soil
23 and Water Conservation, Erosion Control, the County Attorney, and the Fire Marshall.
24 Comments are attached.
25
26 Development Process, Schedule, and Action
27 • First Action: Planning Board to consider Concept Plan
28' The Planning Board approved the flexible development concept plan for Ashwick on September 6,
29 2000 with the following conditions:,
30 1. The size and boundary locations for both parent tracts shall be verified with Orange County Land
31 Records and any discrepancies resolved prior to filing for preliminary plat approval.
32 2. A left turn lane, built to NCDOT standards, shall be required on US 70 to access the subdivision.
33 3. All roads shall be public and proposed to be built to NCDOT standards with additional five (5) foot
34 utility easements on each side. The right-of--way at street intersections shall be improved to NCDOT
35 standards. Sight distance triangles (10' x 70') shall be delineated on the plat for each street at
36 intersections, as appropriate.
37 4. The Benwich Lane right-of--way shall extend to the northwestern, external property line of the
38 subdivision in the proximity.of lots 31, 35, and 34. A conveyance of a 50-foot right-of--way with 20-foot
39 construction easements on each side of this northwestern most portion of Benwich Lane is acceptable in-
40 lieu-of construction.
41 5. Driveway access points shall be a minimum of SO feet from the intersection of street rights-of--way.
42 6 All corner lots shall be designed to access from the street with lower traffic volume: i.e. lot 6 to
43 Farnswick Flace, lots 7 and 21 to Glenwick Lane, lot 31 to Straywick Court, lot 43 to Benwich Lane, and
44 lots 48 and 58 to Chadwick Lane.
45 7. If an entrance sign is anticipated and will not be placed within the 100-foot building buffer, maintained
46 by the Homeowners Association, a sign easement must be reserved within one of the residential lots.
47 8. All common areas (stream buffers, building buffers, landscape buffers) must be clearly identified on the
48 preliminary and final plats and maintained by the Homeowners Association. The common areas cannot
49 be subdivided or recombined with adjacent lots. Draft forms of the Homeowners Association
50 documents, including restrictive covenants and conservation easements, that contain use and
51 maintenance provisions for the open space and buffers must be submitted for review by the County
35
1 Attorney as part of the preliminary plat approval process. The restrictive covenants or conservation
2 agreement shall designate a backup grantee in the event that the Homeowners Association is eliminated.
3 9. The developer shall submit documentation granting the use of public water and sewer services prior to
4 ~ filing for preliminary plat approval.
5 10. The preliminary plat shall indicate areas for on-site infiltration of storm water that demonstrates
6 " compliance with Article b.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.
7 11. The location of all drainage ways, stream buffers and floodplains shall be delineated on the preliminary
8 and final plats, along with appropriate information regarding restrictions.
9 12. The preliminary plat shall show a building footprint on the approximate location of each house site to
10 ensure that there is sufficient buildable area on every proposed residential lot.
1 l 13. The preliminary plat shall show the location of tree protection fencing and contain a note requiring the
12 installation of tree protection fencing prior to any grading to ensure the protection of vegetation within
13 all buffers and open space.
14 14. The preliminary and final plats shall contain a note restricting further subdivision.
15 15. The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 2.9 acres (1/20 acre per residential lot) for public recreation
16 space as part of the preliminary plat approval process. (Section IV-B-7-b Recreation Sites, Orange
17 County Subdivision Regulations)
18 16. All street names to be reserved with GIS section of Planning Department prior to submittal of
19 preliminary plat subdivision request-
20 • Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preliminary Plan
Z 1 Options: 1. Action (recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial) within two regularly
22 scheduled meetings, or
23 2. Within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant.
24 3. If the Planning Board renders a tie vote, or fails to act within the specified period, approval
25 of the Preliminary Plat is directed to the Board of County Commissioners with the
2b Planning Board's minutes and the Planning Department staff s recommendations.
27
28 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis (attached)
29
30 RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff Recommendation
31
32 The Planning Department Staff recommends approval in accordance with the attached resolution.
33
34 Moon went through the various points of the staff report.
35
36 Holtkamp asked if the project had sidewalks or street signs to encourage safe driving. Moon pointed out (on
37 the plan) that the proposal provided an internal pedestrian corridor system including designated crosswalks.
38
39 Allison asked how this project would match up to the subdivisions to the west of the site such as Richmond
40 Hills, and asked about the potential road connection from Benwich Lane to the Tinnin Road network.
41 McAdams also asked about the Benwich Lane stubout. Benedict said that there were no plans to extend
42 Tinnin, but that the Ashwick design provides for a future link from Benwich to a private road to the
43 northwest.
44
45 Selkirk asked about access to the McGowan Creek public recreation area. Moon explained that access would
46 be from the north and would not interfere with the daily activities at the subdivision.
a7
48 Phil Post, the project engineer and agent for Perry's Construction Company, said that they were in total
49 agreement with the staff stipulations. Post offered to answer any technical questions, particularly about
50 water lines and fire hydrants.
51
52 Holtkamp asked for a list of all of the developments in the Cheeks area, approved and proposed. This will be
53 provided at the next meeting.
36
1
2
3
a
S
6
7
8
9
to
ll
12
13
14
1S
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2b
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Preston commented on the overall layout for Ashwick, and complimented staff and the developer for
working together to achieve a good design that maintained parks and pedestrian areas while preserving
important natural areas.
MOTION: McAdams moved approval of the Preliminary Flan for Ashwick Subdivision
in accordance with the Resolution of Approval, which is incorporated herein
by reference. Seconded by Gooding-Ray.
VOTE: Ayes, 6; No, 1 (Holtkamp -commented that she could not recommend a
project far approval without sidewalks.)
AGENDA ITEM #9: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. Planning Calendar -December (for later distribution)
b. Next Planning Board Meeting -Special Public Hearing on. December
12, 2000. Next Planning Board Meeting on January 10, 2001 (most
likely).
Gooding-Ray and Selkirk will not be able to attend the special public hearing on December 12`h.
AGENDA ITEM #10: ADJOURNMENT
With no further items to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Becky Butler, Minutes Preparer
t~la 0
Nico odin ay, C it
~ ~~ Z~4
Date
_ RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD -
Bureau of Economic ~ Business Research -University of Florida
Modified 4/15/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Ashwick
~ TOWNSHIP: Cheeks
~I
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year: 200
Ending Year. 20D:
Inflation Rate: 2.500
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOU5EHOLDS:
Persons/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.4.
Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APP LICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.3:
Non-Elderly: 100.00%
HOME SALES DATA: '
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
2002 21 200,000 36.21
2D03 15 200,000 25.86%
2004 17 220,000 29.31
2005 5 220,000 8.62%
2006 0 0 0.00%
2007 0 0 0.00°k
2008 0 0 O.DD%
2009 0 0 0.00%
2010 0 0 0.00%
2011 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SC HOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County ( 1) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17°/<
Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0) High School 19%
a'rnhprF/Ficral Analvcic/Rirhmnnri Nillc vlc/~A~.iln
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
BUDGET YEAR: 1996-9i
COUNTY POPULATION: 105891:
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5680
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety,
Public Works
Human Services
Education (School District)
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT:
Total 818.00 0.1440
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes -Other Than Property
Intergovernmental
Service Charges
Miscellaneous 4653250
9007481
3388055
1738939 43.94
85.06
31.99
16.42
(COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital)
Non-Departmental 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000
3163481 64.25
68.69
27.12
161.60
7.08
29.87
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEI^ EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURE ' PER EMPLOYEE
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
Education (Recurring Capital) 6804231
7274334
2871690
17112641
750000 62654.06
50887.26
57433.80
64803.43
916.87
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 1782.00
0.00
3789.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE
County Government
School District
State 10121760
0
21523177 12373.79
0.00
26311.95
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate ($) 0.9190 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
Assessment Ratio 100.00
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
POSITIONS PER STUDENT
108.60 0.0010
142.95 .0.0013
50.00 0.0005
264.07 0.0025
818.00 0.0077
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR
HOUSING UNITS
POPULATION
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary
Middle
High $Chool
TOTAL
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
TOTAL
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
2002 2003 2004 2005 200E
21 36 83 58 58
52 89 131 143 143
4 8 11 12 12
1 2 3 3 3
1 2 3 4 4
7 12 17 19 19
0.05 0.09 0.13 0.15 0.1
0.07 0.12 0.18 0.19 0.1G
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.07
0.13 0.22 0.33 0.36 0.36
0.28 0.47 0.70 0.77 0.77
0.40 0.69 1.01 1.11 1.11
YEAR
HOUSING UNITS
POPULATION
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary
Middle
High School
TOTAL
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Services
TOTAL
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
58 58 58 58 58
143 143 143 143 143
12 12 12 12 12
3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4
19 19 19 19 19
0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11
a:rohert/Fiscal Analveia/Rirhmnnri Nillc Yle/MaN1n
4
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT
YEAR 2002 2003 2004. 2005 2001
TAX BASE ($1000) 4200 7305 1122$ 12608 12924
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 38595 67133 103182 115870 118767
Other Taxes 2279 4005 6044 6779 6948
Intergovernmental 4412 7752 11699 13122 13450
Service Charges 1660 2916 4400 4936 5059
Miscellaneous 852 1497 2258 2533 2597
TOTAL ($) 47800 83303 127583 143241 146822
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 3333 5856 8837 9913 10160
Public Safety 3563 6261 9448 10597 10862
Public Works 1407 2472 3730 4184 4288
Human Services 8382 14728 22225 24930 25553
Education 12717 22345 33719 37823 38768
Non-Departmental 1550 2723 4109 4609 4724
TOTAL ($) 30951 54384 82068 92055 94357
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 16850 28918 45515 51186 52465
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 201'
TAX BASE ($1000) 13247 13578 13917 14265 14622
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 121736 124780 127899 131097 134374
Other Taxes 7122 7300 7483 7670 7862
Intergovernmental 13787 14131 14485 14847 1521$
Service Charges 5186 5315 5448 5584 5724
Miscellaneous 2662 2728 2796 2866 2938
TOTAL ($) 150493 154255 158111 162064 166116
EXPENDITURE$ ($)
General Government 10414 10675 10942 11215 11496
Public Safety 11134 11412 11698 11990 12290
Public Works 4395 4505 4618 4733 4852
Human Services 26192 26847 27518 28206 28911
Education 39737 40731 41749 42793 43863
Non-Departmental 4842 4963 5087 5214 5345
TOTAL ($) 96715 99133. 101612 1D4152 106756
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 53777 55122 56500 57912 59360
,..,,t,ewic:~..~i e~a~„~:~~c:..h.,,,,.,,~ w:u~ ~i~inn~rnn
SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
REVENUES ($)
County 12717 22345 33719 37823 38768
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State ~ 26260 46142 69630 78104 80056
TOTAL ($) 38976 68487 103349 115926 11$$24
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 12717 22345 33719 37823 38768
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 26260 46142 69630 78104 80056
TOTAL ($) 38976 6$487 103349 115926 118$24
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
REVENUES ($)
County 39737 40731 41749 42793 43863
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 82058 84109 86212 88367 90576
TOTAL ($) 121795 124$40 127961 131160 134439
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 39737 40731 41749 42793 43863
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 8205$ 84109 86212 88367 90576
TOTAL ($) 121795 124840 127961 131160 134439
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 0 0 0 0 0
n•rnhprt/Fisral Analvsis/Richmond Hills xls/Mar00
SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 200
HOUSING UNITS 21 36 53 58 5>;
POPULATION 52 89 131 143 143
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 4 8 11 12 1
Middle 1 2 3 3
High School 1 2 3 4 ~
TOTAL 7 12 17 19 19
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0..28 0.47 0.70 0.77 0.T
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.40 0.69 1.01 1.11 1.1'
TAX BASE ($1000) .4200 7305 11228 12608 12924
COUNTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 47800 83303 127583 143241 146822
Expenditures 30951 54384 82068 92055 94357
BALANCE 168¢0 28918 45515 51186 52465
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 38976 68487 103349 115926 118824
Expenditures 38976 68487 103349 115926 118824
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 86777 151790 230932 259167 265646
Expenditures 69927 122872 185417 207981 213181
BALANCE 16850 28918 45515 51186 52465
:AR 2D07 2008 2009 201Q 2011
)USING UNITS 58 58 58 58 58
)PULA710N 143 143 143 ~ 143 143
~HOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 12 12 12 12 12
Middle 3 3 3 3 3
High School 4 4 4 4 4
)TAL 19 19 19 19 19
)LINTY EMPLOYEES 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.7i
:HOOL EMPLOYEES 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11
1X BASE ($1000) 13247 13578 13917 14265 14622
)LINTY BUDGET ($)
Revenues 150493 154255 158111 162064 166116
Expenditures 96715 99133 101612 104152 106756
1LANCE 53777 55122 56500 57912 59360
:HOOL DISTRICT BUDGET ($)
Revenues 121795 124840 127961 131160 134439
Expenditures 121795 124840 127961 131160 134439
\LANCE 0 0 D 0 0
)MBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 27228$ 279095 286072 293224 300555
Expenditures 21$511 223973 229573 235312 241195
GLANCE 53777 55122 56500 57912 59360
a:rob®rt/Fiscal Analysis/Richmond Hills.xls/Mar00
• SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County YES ) Elementary School 64°/
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 19°/
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 4 8 11 12 12
Middle 1 2 3 3 3
High School 1 2 3 4 4
TOTAL 7 12 17 19 19
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 12 12 12 12 12
Middle 3 3 3 3 3
High School 4 4 4 4 4
TOTAL 19 19 19 19 19
SCHOOL CAPACITIES -ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary 3328 Elementary 2822
Middle 1522 Middle 1240
High School 1520 High School 1457
TOTAL 6370 TOTAL 5519
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2826 2830 2833 2834 2834
Middle 1241 1242 1243 1243 1243
High School 1458 1459 1460 1461 1461
TOTAL 5526 5531 5536 5538 5538
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2834 2834 2834 2834 2834
Middle 1243 1243 1243 1243 1243
High School .1461 1461 1461 1461 1461
TOTAL 5538 5538 5538 5538 5538
n•rnF~ortlFicr~1 Gnalvcic/Rirhmnnii 4.lillc vlc l~AarAA
44
PHILIP .
401 Providence Road .
POST Chapel HIII, NC 27514 - _ _ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ti~~ ~ ~~ - - "- •
(919) 929-1173~J~-Ih/1CK ~ V~~! ~ S I Qi.L ~
(919) 493-2600
F9AX (919493-6548 ~ „Soa' ~ 5100 ~ 4- r$ - ao
ASSOCIATES phi PlcsMcompuserve.eom
ENGINEERS ~ ~ l
PLANNERS "' ' -~-
l ~ ,~ r
Ixn M
laaw ~~ xn
~ r 1 t „~ ~~
ryf I M1 ~ .
1~~
1!N IAIA /1.iY 1fM ~ _ ~ 6
- ~
• ~]fi ?37i~ ~ Sit ~ - \,'~,y1 ~.
1 7V~-
~ Y S °1 8 M1
` ~ m~ usn nu+ r ~ ~ ~
' `` ` ~~ I
I
- ~` - ~ S~,g3Ac i ` _
- Z ` - ~ _
- ' rr
f ~
- i ..
- I - •
- Z; - ~ _ -
p' - ( ~
- 1 Q -~ .~
~, "7~• -
Z .~ n ~ ~_ - - ~ ~' -
~im~ Q FORRES A +
I • '~ 1
.~•~ ~ u~. 'I' I ... {. 1
.~..~. ~. S.,,s
.~..~ .. _ ~ ~N ~ _ •
11 ...•... _ .-c~~
~~ ~, :~~~
~~ 9 ~~~ ~ ~
u~ '. il~ #~ ~ a
~~ ~--~--r. _.~~ ~ .~... •sw( ~ Tarr ~` • /.w
_ ~; ~ ~§ !"`fir _,~ ~{~ -'~. L / ~.I fi
33~ I I ••[` ~ I~~~ ~ . ~~~~' E/ r~ "r~ I_ a.j ~ ~;~rn'°"1 °~~ •~"'~ ~y`ay~~'
! I i I C •i ~ r ^\
it ,- -.... sib ~ -~ • 1 y C • r.~~ / ~
I . N~ f i ~ ~~ ~ • rte • s~6 ! cs I I I
' _.` J _
4. ~ grol;<a ~ a 3'~_ I . ~ /S 5 / ti,.E `r.s • / ~ ~ s~Y ~,~,,,~
.,;:IS*'.:q`$t-wear 3'i~c~ z ~. \ ~.7 / I .,~'~.~+"
-1~ "~ae=x3l se."-~ :~~Yp3;.ef a Q / ~„ ~ ~ ~' ~~ . ..~. I,...~.~.-rw•~wl
;alai ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~r` ';p~~SSi~i; I ~ ~ // 1\ , "--1~ '~ § I,..:~
..~ .~-.-
_. ~ .
P
~a i a ~ :'Q ro 6E 6'~ ~ - s' a~~~
~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ sv ~; P ~ ~ ~ xK8°~ CON5ERVATION CLUSTER CONCEPT I
Ne
~ "~ ~ ~ ' "!%~~~" PRELIMINARY PLAN
o ~ ~ ~ °""~ ° ~ FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN %~``°~
I I • urim ~.nra ~rerue : n.wr ww. v:. ~; '^~i.~~..~...Q+y~ pNILIP ..Ks
,~
J~
~ Z
,.~ k y
~~ f€
s~~ '~ i~_ a~~y~~
~~ ~.. ~ __ ~rrr ,~.e «-fir.
as :~~ ~~'' - ~ ~~ r
I h ~ ~ ,
Y
C
_ ~ ~ ~
§g r~
F. n q .~., ..:. e l
_ ~'
.i . ~
ra9i
.,
e ~ ~ - •~
\ ~.. k ~
~`\ w a_~ 1
~~ ~ ~. ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~~~u~9p r~ ~R `R ~ ~ ~I ,~ ~~ fur i
~ ~„ -!-_
-mot ~~,..... • ~ . `-:s ~ ~. .•.,,'.~`~ "•
III 1 ! ~ ....~ ~•~ ~ ~ \ ~~.R.:.i i ~ ~ ~ y~
~ ~ 4
! \
a" A / J I
%~ ` ! ^ ~ I
~ CONSERVATIQN CLUSTER CONCEPT
PRELIMINARY PLAN
ron ~A1Y1 ~k ppl'~AQ, W~'IHIP R ^iFQ RAM .,y=i+°;q~+y PHIl1~ ^"~
^.~ear
~ wea a_w t( n~i
M w*+~Ftl« l POSE a. wwr...
rrs ar~.ee~.+.pl7e1.~ ~dC ^.... ~.. 1 's~c`'x'r'e~` i mwiru~- ii mw
e
_ ~
~~~~
e-si-:a.e -- :~- -~ rte. ~,,.m:- -
.~-r _~ ~ 5
1
~ '~ ~ ~
~ ire C~ ~ rr_ ~ ~ ~A
~ ~ ~ ~ :r, =r. F ~ and ~ ~r~
~_ ~ ~ ~.~; sib is~ ~ ~ f ~..i \~- ~ ~
!0 pal "I ~r iN ~~ ..~ • y E
J \ ~
e o rR ~ 1
.G~
A# i -------------~-
Y3
A~§ 6~5
ire tlrw 6r~
ti 9y5
~~III sl ~
®~~~ ~~~ ~
~~ ~ ~g~g~gg ~
~ a \
~a
~ ~-
=~e-----W- a ~...~ \
6iF~~8$F$~~ A
rrrrrrrear ~~~~
~I~l~Il~! ~ ~ ~ 1
aaa i i ~~
~~~ I' I ~A ~
~a a ~A
!I
9
C
i „~~~~
~ ~~
~~~ c a ~ :
~~ ; ; ~
~~ aa~
4 ~ ecsw '°"~~
2,y,#~q~y~ ave. m ww~ ^
I ~~ e.~ ~ ,:e.,:~ a.e.
..~,e...~.,~a..._4,
~~ •.t
r e.w.r
z~s aw irlt . g -_ ~
~~ ~ r8 eri :,q
• .~„
~~ ~ ~,, G
6~5
_._ --
® ~ sag ~: ~ ~_ ~ I___
..~
i `~ .~.~
-..~
,_ r ~~ ........
~~"~` I
~- - ~ . ,
~ ; . ~~.
R s ~ .,.
~ ... 1 ~ .r"....
r•
~ I
i
sft• wv~ • ~ ~~ ~ 1111 F
~~"~` ~ I
~ ~~
~ w~~
UTILITY do DRAINAGE PLAN ~„~"~ ,,
e
~•i
1
II~
P
gg~
~ 1 ~ ~'g~~
` ~:E~~
. ~~~+
'17 ~ + .
~~
~~
a
a
~~~
i
1
~ ~ ! ~~
~ ~ I ~~
~ •~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~
~~~ ~
j
~ ~ r t ~~ F .ISp-- €
~ I ~ ~~ ~
°°i°"~~ D~AIW PN141 R~""y°'
~ ` ~..~ ~ ~ POST ~m n.r~ r..
~~ A911MICK SiIBGMSgN R ~s~o~o~~yieo-~w
~_~ __
...~_~.....~.~ ~ ~ ---- -- m...e.....