Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 02-13-2001-2ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: February 13, 2001 Action Agenda Item No. 2 SUBJECT: Discussion of Remaining Additional Topics from Retreat As The Board Determines DEPARTMENT: County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No County Manager ATTACHMENT(S): Orange Cty. Soccer Participation Statistics INFORMATION CONTACT: Inter-governmental Parks Work Group John Link, ext 2300 Soccer Recommendations TELEPHONE NUMBERS: PLEASE BRING SOCCER TASK FORCE Hillsborough 732-8181 REPORT AND DECEMBER 9, 2000 Chapel Hill 968-4501 RETREAT NOTEBOOKS TO THE Durham 688-7331 MEETING. Mebane 336-227-2031 PURPOSE: To discuss, as the Board determines, the remaining additional tapirs which the Board did not have time to discuss at the December 9, 2000 BOCC Retreat or at the December 12, 2000 Continued Retreat meeting. BACKGROUND: The BOCC began discussion on multiple different topics at the Board's December 9, 2000 Retreat. Those discussions continued at the December 12, 2000 Continued Retreat meeting. However, time did not allow the Board to discuss all of the topics.. Staff has reviewed the discussions at those meetings and the following topics remain to be discussed: • Soccer Facilities • Proposed Land Legacy Action Plan • 250"' Anniversary of Orange County • Indicator Program • Definition of Bonafide Farm • Erosion Control Update • Transportation Services • County/NCACC Legislative Goals (see Appendix 6 in Retreat notebook) A summary of Orange County soccer participation statistics and soccer recommendations from the Inter-governmental Parks Work Group are attached. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact associated with discussion of the topics. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board that the Board discuss the topics and provide any necessary direction to staff. 2 Y C ~- _ (p a C° °'. ~ °oa ~~cc c~ U ~i,;~aarnrnu»Nt- ~~ ~ d' °- U M O ~ ~ c . '~ a Z ` Sao 0000 ~o~ ~ o'`-'Q ~~ o =~ ~~M~ U~~ ~Z 1 a~ o t~ v W a ~ ~ ~- a ~ W ~ ~Q ~~ vO ~~~~ooMO Qo ouch o~ca v~t- C~ 2 ~ "`~ ~ 'e ( ~ u7 E9 L Q~ ~ ~ _ C ~ ~ ~Mf~ O~f~04~N'L ~ ~p1~~ ~C~7f~ ~.._ ~ O C N N d C. O ~ '~ M ~ H C ~ OD .Q ~ r tq ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .7 d ~ ~ ~ to ~ V ~ ~ ~a'~~ N ~ N t N ~ C ~ 4l ~ ~ ~ C n7 ao~a m~~?wo H o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 SOCCER SYMPOSIUM TASK FORCE FOLLOW-UP RECOMMENDATIONS/NEXT STEPS The fallow-up recommendations and next steps which flow from the work of the Soccer Symposium Task Force include three activities: 1) Identify the capital required far land acquisition for soccer fields as part of active recreational areas developed pursuant to the upcoming bond issue. This activity should be completed within six months, in accordance with the timetable for bond development. As noted in the Soccer Symposium Task Farce report, fields should ideally be disbursed throughout the county, have multiple fields at each site, and be irrigated and lighted. The task farce suggested a field development model in which public entities provide basic fields and soccer organizations finish the facilities. It should be noted that staff of the Recreation and Parks Department and E.R.C.D. have identified properties that may be suitable for soccer field development and are pursuing possibilities of acquisition. 2) Convene representatives from the various private soccer organizations in Orange County (Rainbow, the Durham-Chapel Hill Strikers, and Triangle Futbol) along with representatives of the public recreation and parks departments and the public schools to: • establish and provide coordinated programming throughout the county; • establish agreements regarding the use of fields; and • develop mechanisms to ensure accessibility to soccer for all county residents regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or ability to pay. This body, Joint Orange County Soccer, should begin meeting within the next few months and continue indefinitely. 3) Explore the feasibility of developing a soccer tournament complex in Orange County, including identifying a possible location, other potential partners, such as the University, and potential sources of funding, including corporate donors. The Soccer Symposium Task Force Report was reviewed at the first meeting of the Intergovernmental Park Work Group on December 7~' 2000. There was much discussion about ways to improve the use of school facilities. Comments included the need to acquire larger tracts of land for school sites in order to develop more playing fields. The I.P. Work Group will discuss soccer fields along with other capital needs at future meetings when discussing the Bond Referendum. The next meeting of the Work Group will be on February 1 ~ 2001.