Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJCPC signed plan for FY 2019-20 Ju venile Crime Prevenflon Council County Plan Orange County For FY 2019 - 2020 Table of Contents I . Executive Summary II . County Funding Plan III . County Funding Plan Addendum IV . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization V . County Risk and Needs Assessment Summary VI . County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals VII . Funding Decisions Summary VIII . Funded Programs Descriptions (unless there is a JCPC approved Program Enhancement Plan) IX . Program Enhancement Plans (for each program which had a PEP approved by the JCPC) Attachments : Continuum of Services - At a Glance Executive Summary The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC ) , in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina, has completed the activities required to develop and update this County Plan for FY 2019 - 2020 . The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, at- risk youth , and their families in Orange County . Further, the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior . It should be noted that the JCPC continues to support and embrace diversionary strategies , such as Teen Court , that effectively reduce and prevent delinquency . As noted in NC Gen . Stat . § 143 B - 851 , the JCPC is legislatively mandated to evaluate the effectiveness of its funded programs and the Department of Public Safety , Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice , has provided the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ( SPEP) Instrument to aide JCPCs with this task . However, the tool cannot be administered to all JCPC funded programs given that some programs are identified as structures or " settings within which program services are delivered" (Lipsey , 2005 ) . Programming such as Teen Court may be identified as a structure yet it offers vital diversionary programming to youth . Other services , including some residential programs and structured - day services , also offer vital intervention strategies to youth and families but may not be scored using the SPEP instrument . The JCPC recognizes that these identified structures offer critical prevention/intervention programming and the JCPC adheres to their utilization in its strategies to prevent and reduce delinquency . Priorities for Funding : Through a risk & needs assessment and a resource assessment , the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Orange County : • Restitution/Community Service • Parent/Family Skill Building • Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) • Interpersonal Skill Building • Mentoring • Mediation/Conflict Resolution ( including School Based) • Teen Court • Tutoring/Academic Enhancement • Temporary Shelter ( specifically Emergency Shelter) Monitoring and Evaluation $ Each program funded in the past year by the JCPC has been monitored . The monitoring results and program outcomes evaluations were considered in making funding allocation decisions . The JCPC continues to conduct implementation monitoring of its action plan and its funded programs . Funding Recommendations : Having published a Request for Proposals for needed services for a minimum of thirty ( 30 ) days , the JCPC has screened the submitted proposals and has determined which proposals best meet the advertised needed services . As required by statute , the JCPC recommends allocation of the NC Department of Public Safety (NC DJJ) funds to the following programs in the amounts specified below for FY 19 - 20 (see Orange County Funding Plan) : l . Boomerang $ 28 , 131 2 . Juvenile Community Service and Restitution $ 69 , 870 3 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution $ 40 , 500 4 . Parent Teen Solutions $ 45 , 500 5 . Teen Court $ 619330 6 . Wrenn House $ 109722 7 . Unallocated $ 139500 The JCPC further recommends that the following amount be allocated from the NC DPS DJJ funds for the administrative costs of the Council for FY 19 - 20 : $ 8 , 178 . 00 Respectfully Submitted , tos4000 Bernard Mi es , Chair Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council ORANGE County NC DPS - Community Programs - County Funding Plan Available Funds : $ $ 277 , 731 Local Match : $ $2203312 Rate : 30 % DPS JCPC funds must be committed with a Program Agreement submitted in NC Allies and electronically signed by authorized officials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I : T.,a:CAL• : FUNDING : :E}THER: : : :OTHER . . . . . . . . . . : . : . : . : . . . . . : . P.rnvidef. : : : • : • : • : • : • : • : • : • - DP&�dCPC: - . Cot; I1ty -Ca$h : LOta1 :G�ski: Local :In= : Sttite/ : Funds : : : : : : Total : : : % Non . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DPS -JCPC 1Vlatch: • : : • . . . . Klatch • : • : • • : • : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fuiiding0P : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . • : : Kidd : : : : : Federal. : . : . . : . ; : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 : : : Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenues Boomerang Youth , Inc. r (Boomerang) $28, 131 $ 8 ,439 $553000 $249,300 $ 340 , 870 92 % Volunteers for Youth , Inc. 2 (Juvenile Community Service and Restitution ) $693870 $20 ,961 $29 ,494 1 $ 120 ,325 42% Volunteers for Youth , Inc. s (Teen Court) $ 61 , 330 $ 183399 $ 16, 158 $95, 887 36 % Dispute Settlement Center v (Mediation/Conflict Resolution ) $40 , 500 $ 12, 150 $ 1 , 100 $53,750 25% Haven House, Inc. s (Wrenn House) $ 10 ,722 $33217 $203581 $343520 69 % Exchange Club 6 (Parent Teen Solutions) $45,500 $ 13 , 650 $ 183710 $77 , 860 42% 7 JCPC Administration $ 83178 $2,453 $ 10 , 631 23 % 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 TOTALS : $264,231 $7%269 $ 1223333 $ 183710 $249 ,300 $7333843 64% The above plan was derived through a planning process by the ORANGE County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and represents the County ' s Plan for use a fu m F 19 .20 Amount of Unallocated Funds $ 13 , 500 Amount of funds reverted back to DPS ;rpers venile Crone Preventi cil (Date) Discretionary Funds added check t e initial Ian update / r YP ❑ P ❑ P ❑ final ' Ix -----DPS Use Only----- erson Boardof Con Co ssioners ate)unty Finance Offic Reviewed by Area Consultant Date Reviewed by Program Assistant Date Verified by Designated State Office Staff Date ver 03/0412016 ext Orange County Plan Addendum: "Raise the Age" Priorities The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) seeks to maximize available allocation funding by addressing the priorities of the Raise the Age legislation in the areas of targeted intervention programming for 16-17 year old offenders in the juvenile justice system by seeking to do the following (check all that apply): ® Increase the capacity of existing programming to address additional 16-17 year olds entering and/or being retained in the juvenile justice system; ® Provide funding for new programming to 16-17 year olds via additional components in existing programs or newly funded programs ❑ Seek collaboration from surrounding counties to provide funding for multi-county programming focusing on 16-17 year olds in a district or region. "Raise the Age" program priorities include: ❑ Mentoring Services ® Restitution/Community Service ❑ Sexual Offender Treatment ❑ Parent/Family Skill Building ® Teen Court ❑ Group Home ❑ Interpersonal Skill Building ❑ Psychological Assessments ❑ Temporary Shelter ❑ Vocational Skills ❑ Counseling ® Runaway Shelter ❑ Experiential Skills ❑ Home Based Family Counseling ❑ Specialized Foster Care ❑ Tutoring/Academic Enhancement ❑ Crisis Counseling ❑ Temporary Foster Care ® Mediation ❑ Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ Juvenile Structured Day Data reviewed by the JCPC as well as a county Resource Assessment focusing on the full range of juvenile jurisdiction proposed by Raise the Age indicates the following gaps that the additional programs indicated above will seek to address: increase of referrals for community service and/or restitution, an increase of referrals to teen court, to address a need for mediation (school based) and residential services for shelter care. Tier I Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs and RFP development based on the current Orange County allocation of $2775731. Tier II Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs to address RFP development with JCPC expansion funding. Tier II planning includes the development of the following identified expansion of services. Priorities for Expansion Funding_While conducting an additional needs assessment specifically related to the focus service expansion to meet the RtA legislation, the following service needs and cost associated with those services have been identified as follows: Program Funding Priorities JCPC $ Program Expansion Focus Amount Expand staffing needs for current program Restitution/Community Service $25,000 (worksite supervisors to provide direct supervision) Teen Court Expand staffing needs for current program $25,000 (additional teen court nights) Wrenn House $20,000 Expand staffing needs for current program Expand programming to include school based Mediation $25,000 mediation. TOTAL $955000 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization FY 19 -20 Name Organization Title Chairperson Bernard Miles Orange County Social Services CPS Treatment Supervisor Vice- Chairperson Amanda Farris NC Department of Public Safety Court Counselor Supervisor Number of members : 20 List meeting dates during the current fiscal year and identify the number of JCPC members in attendance for each . Meeting Date Members in Quorum Present ? Yes/No Attendance August 2018 13 Yes October 2018 13 Yes December 2018 12 Yes (with 2 proxies ) February 2019 15 Yes (with 2 proxies ) April 2019 13 Yes (with 2 proxies ) June 2019 15 Yes (with 1 proxy) SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE I . Risk Assessment Summary II . Needs Assessment Summary III . Resource Assessment Summary IV . Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Community Continuum V . Proposed Priority Services for Funding Part I . Risk Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Risk Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors after juveniles are referred with a complaint alleging that a delinquent act has occurred and prior to adjudication of the juvenile . The Juvenile Risk Assessment is an instrument used to predict the likelihood of the juvenile being involved in future delinquent behavior . For some juveniles , some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent( s ) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Risk Factor Observations : FY 2017-2018 2 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were at low risk (R1 ) for reoffending . 17 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R2 of reoffending . 36 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R3 of reoffending . 35 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R4 of reoffending . 10 % of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were high risk (R5 ) of reoffending . NOTE: RI — Risk Level 1 (0 points), R2 =Risk Level 2 () 1 -2 points), R3 =Risk Level 3 (3 -5 points) , R4 = Risk Level 4 (6- 12 points) and R5 =Risk Level 5 (13 + points) 13 % of juveniles were under age 12 , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 ( 16 % ) . 44 % of juveniles show having one or more prior referrals at the time of intake . 20 % of juveniles have a prior class 1 - 3 misdemeanor with 3 % having prior class f- 1 felonies or al misdemeanors/A - E Felonies . 11 % of juveniles had prior assaults , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 of 20 % . 25 % of juveniles have run away from home or placement which remained the same from FY 16 - 17 . * 30 % of juveniles have some known substance use/abuse and need substance use/abuse assessment and/or treatment , a 78 % increase compared to FY 1546 . Of those juveniles , 47 % * have known substance abuse and need assessment or treatment . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 73 % of juveniles demonstrate moderate to serious behavioral problems in school . These numbers increased from FY 1647 ( 58 % ) and consistent with the state average ( 75 % ) . 88 % of juveniles lack pro - social peers , regularly associate with others involved in delinquent activity , and/or is a gang member/associates with a gang ; an increase from FY 16 - 17 ( 57 %) while below the state average of 63 % . 3 % of parents are willing but unable or unwilling to supervise juveniles , a decrease from FY 16 - 17 ( 8 %) and significantly lower than the state average of 18 % . Part II . Needs Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee also reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Needs Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors prior to court disposition of a juvenile . The Juvenile Needs Assessment is an instrument used to examine juvenile needs in the various domains of his/her life : The Individual Domain, The School Domain, The Peer Domain, and the Community Domain . This instrument was designed to detect service intervention needs as an aid in service planning . As with the Juvenile Risk Assessment , some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent( s ) . For these items (represented by an asterisk) there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures . In those cases , the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence . Orange County Elevated Needs Observations : FY 2017 -2018 Juveniles were low (4701o) , medium (49 %) and high (5 %) with overall needs for services/interventions to reduce the likelihood of repeat delinquency. Juveniles with low and medium needs are able to be served in the community. 47 % of juveniles fall into the low needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed ; which is lower than the state average of 61 % . 49 % of juveniles fall into the medium needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed ; which is above the state average of 34 % . 5 % of juveniles fall into the high needs category which is consistent with the state average of 5 % . 24 % of juveniles report being rejected by positive peers , 64 % had some/regular association with delinquent peers or 2 % regularly associated with a gang in FY 1748 . Numbers remain steady with an increase of some association with delinquent peers ( 51 % ) in FY 16 - 17 . 73 % of juveniles have moderate to serious school behavior problems as compared to 45 % in FY 16 - 17 . Close to the state average of 72 % . * 32 % of juveniles need substance abuse assessment or treatment which is consistent with the state . * This statistic is possibly underreported. * 44 % of juveniles are reported to be abuse/neglect victims which is twice the state average 23 % , and 3 % of those having NO support . * This statistic is possibly underreported. * 3 % of juveniles have dangerous sexual practices . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 41 % of juveniles need more mental health assessment which is higher than the state at 35 % . * 26 % of juveniles have domestic discord in the home and 4 % of juvenile ' s violence in the home . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 59 % of juveniles come from homes where parents/guardians have marginal to inadequate family supervision skills which is higher than the state at 52 % 10 % of juveniles have a parent/guardian with a disability, above the state average of 4 % . * 18 % of juveniles have family alcohol/drug abuse in the home , higher than the state average of 12 % . * This statistic is possibly underreported. 54 % of adjudicated juveniles come from homes where family members have criminal history and an additional 11 % are under active court supervision or have gang involvement . Part III . Resource Assessment Summary Community resources are sometimes available but can be difficult to access . See the attachment titled Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance for a listing of available community resources . Part IV. Summary of GaAs and Barriers in the Continuum of Services While Orange County is not large , transportation is a barrier for many juveniles , especially those in Northern Orange County where public transportation is limited . Additionally , the cost of gas is an inhibitor to accessing services , is court ordered sanctions and therapy sessions . One of the major services providers has reduced services in the home . Young people and families needing bi - lingual mental health and substance abuse services often experience waitlist for services due to the scarcity of bi - lingual therapists and language interpretation . There are no mental health or substance abuse services available for undocumented juveniles . While Orange County does have a domestic violence service provider, the services offered are limited and are targeted more towards adults experiencing it as victims . There are no services offered to children/juveniles who experience or witness discord or violence in their homes . Part V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding The committee compared the services needed to address the elevated Juvenile Risk Factors and Juvenile Needs with services currently available in the community . Services which are currently available in the community and sufficient to meet the needs of court involved juveniles or those juveniles most at risk for court involvement are not considered as a priority for JCPC funding . The Committee proposes that the following service be approved as the funding priorities for FY 19 -20 : 1 . Restitution/Community Service 2 . Teen Court 3 . Tutoring/Academic Enhancement 4 . Temporary Shelter Services ( specifically Emergency Shelter) 5 . Mediation/Conflict Resolution (including School Based) 6 . Interpersonal Skill Building RISK ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 13 = 18 FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15mi 61 State 16 = 1 71 State 17 - 18 Total Adjudications 32 41 27 13 14 51053 1 4 , 338 1 4,415 Overall Risk LevelgRL3 FY 13 = 14 FY 14=15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 -18 State 15A6 State 16 = 17 State 17 - 18 6 % 2% 5 % 5 % 15 % 17% 15 % 14 % 30% 36% 32% 33%33% 35% 33 % 33%15% 10% 15 % 15 % 40 % 35 % ■ FY 13- 14 30 % ■ FY 14- 15 25 % ■ FY 15- 16 20% ■ FY 16- 17 15 % ■ FY 17- 18 10 % ■ State 15- 16 5 % 4R 0 % ■ State 16- 17 RL1 RL2 RL3 RL4 RL5 O State 1 7- 1 8 Observations: The risk assessment tool was renormed in April 2016 with new Risk Levels as: R1 =Risk Level 1 (0 points), R2=Risk Level 2 (1-2 points), R3=Risk Level 3 (3- 5 points), R4=Risk Level 4 (642 points) and R5=Risk Level 5 (13 + points) R1 - Age When First Delinquent Offense Alleged in a Complaint FY 13 - 14 FY 14A5 FY 15 = 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17A8 State 15A6 State 16A7 State 17 = 18 Under age 12 9 % 10% 10 % 16 % 13 % 15% 140/. 16% Age 12 or over 91 % 90% 90 % 85% 87 % 85 % 86 % 84% 100 % 90 % { ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % 60 % FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16- 17 40 % 1 ■ FY 17- 18 30 % j o State 15- 16 20 % D State 16- 17 10 % 0 % OState 17- 18 Underage 12 Age 12 or over Observations: R2 - Number of Undisciplined or Delinquent FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16A7 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 Current Referral Only 60% 58016 68 % 56 % 66% 60% 560/. 58% One Prior Referral 22% 20 % 18 % 20 % 21 % 18 % 20% 18% 2 or 3 Prior Referrals 11 % 10 % 13 % 18% 10% 13 % 15% 14% Four or More Prior Referrals 7 % 12% 1 % 6 % 3 % 9 % 10% 10% 80 % ■ FY 13 - 14 70 % ■ FY 14 - 15 60 % a FY 15 - 16 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 ■ FY 17- 18 40 % O State 15 - 16 30 % O State 16 - 17 20 % — OState 17- 18 � s:x 61 10 % r 0 % EE� q —fl FT Current Referral Only One Prior Referral 2 or 3 Prior Referrals Four or More Prior Referrals Observations: R3 - Most Serious Prior Adjudication FY 13 - 14 FY 14= 15 FY 15 - 16 FY 16 = 17 FY 17 = 18 State 15 -16 State 1 & 17 State 17 - 18 No prior adjudications 78 % 80% 86% 70% 75 % 78 % 70% 72% Prior undisciplined 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 2 % 2 % 3 % 3 % Prior class 1 -3 misdemeanors 19% 15 % 87/o 18% 20 % 13 % 170/6 15% Prior class f- 1 felonies or a1 misdemeanors 3 % 5 % 4 % 11 % 3% 60/. 9 % 9 % Prior A- E felonies 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 1 % 0% 0 % 1 % 1 % ■ FY 13- 14 100 % 90 % ■ FY 14- 15 80 % FY 15- 16 70 % FY 16- 17 60 % ❑ FY 17- 18 50 % 40 % ❑ State 1 5- 16 30 % ❑ State 16- 17 20 % ❑ State 1 7- 18 10 % 0 % No prior adjudications Prior undisciplined Prior class 1 -3 Prior class f- 1 felonies or Prior A-E felonies misdemeanors a1 misdemeanors Observations : R4 - Prior Assaults FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15- 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15- 16 State 16 - 17 State 17 - 18 No assaults 84% 86 % 86016 80 % 88% 81 % 78% 79 % Involvement in an affray 4 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 3 % 4% 3 % Yes , without a weapon 13% 8 % 8 % 16 % 9 % 13 % 15% 15% Yes , without a weapon , inflicting serious injury 0 % 3 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Yes , with a weapon 0 % 1 % 1 1 % 2 % 2% 1 % 2 % 2 % Yes , with a weapon , inflicting serious injury 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 100 % ■ FY 13 - 14 90 % ■ FY 14 - 15 80 % r FY 15 - 16 70 % P FY 16 - 17 60 % I ® FY 17- 18 50 % O State 15 - 16 40 % ❑ State 16- 17 30 % ❑ State 1 7- 18 20 % 10 % 0 % No assaults Involvement in an Yes , without a Yes , without a Yes , with a weapon Yes , with a weapon , affray weapon weapon, inflicting inflicting serious serious injury injury Observations: R5 - Runaway from Home or Placement FY 13A4 FY 14- 15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15- 16 State 16A7 State 17 - 18 No 890/0 78% 81 % 75% 750/. 860/6 83 % 83 % Yes 11 % 22% 19% 250/. 25% 14 % 17 % 17 % 100% ■ FY 13-14 80 % ■ FY 14-15 60 % [R - ` ■ FY 15-16 ■ FY 16-17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 20 % ■ State 15-16 0% o State 16-17 No Yes DState 17-18 Observations: R6 - Known Use of Alcohol or Illegal Drugs ( FY 13 - 14 FY 14= 15 FY 15= 16 FY 16 -17 FY 171,* 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 - 17 State 17= 18 No Known substance use 65% 57% 75% 62% 70 % 70% 68 % 68 % Some substance use , need further assessement 20% 26% 14% 20 % 17% 18% 19 % 20% Substance abuse , assessment or treatment needed 15 % 17% 11 % 18 % 13% 12% 12% 12% 80 % 70 % ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 o - � 50 /o I • FY 151FFI16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % 20 % ■ FY 17 - 18 10 % - EdFEED: 9 ® State 15- 16 0 % o State 16- 17 No Known substance use Some substance use , need further Substance abuse, assessment or assessement treatment needed O State 17- 18 Observations: R7 - School Behavior Problems ( prior 12 months ) FY 13 -14 FY 14= 15 FY 15 = 16 FY 16A7 FY 17 = 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 = 17 State 17 =18 No Problems enrolled , attending regularly) 20% 16% 28 % 35% 21 % 15 % 17% 17% Minor Problems 8 % 3 % 6 % 8 % 6 % 8 % 9 % 9 % Moderate Problems 29% 25% 17 % 17 % 25 % 28 % 26 % 25% Serious Problems 1 43 % 56% 50 % 41 % 48 % 48 % 48% 1 500// 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 50 % m FY 14- 15 40 % FY 15- 16 30 % r ■ FY 16- 17 3 M FY 17- 18 20 % off OState 15- 16 10 % _` ' 13State 16- 17 i 0 % oState 17- 18 No Problems (enrolled , Minor Problems Moderate Problems Serious Problems attending regularly) Observations: R8 - Relationships with Peers FY 13 - 14 FY 14- 15 FY 15 = 16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 -17 State 17 = 18 Peers are good support and influence 20% 19 % 29% 21 % 12 % 37016 36 % 37% Lacks prosocial peers or sometimes associates with delinquent others 55% 54% 49% 56% 74% 40 % 41 % 42% Regularly associates with others involved in delinquent activity 22% 25% 22% 20% 12% 18 % 16% 15 % Youth is a gang member or associates with a gang 2 % 2 % 0 % 2 % 2 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % r FY 14- 15 60 % FY 15 - 16 50 % — ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % 30 % ® FY 17- 18 2001,0 fs to State 1 5- 16 10 % ❑ State 16- 17 0 % Peers are good support Lacks prosocial peers or Regularly associates with Youth is a gang member ❑ State 17- 18 and influence sometimes associates with others involved in or associates with a gang delinquent others delinquent activity Observations: R9 - Parental Supervision FY 13 - 14 FY 14=15 FY 15 = 16 FY 16 - 17 FY 17 - 18 State 15 - 16 State 16 -17 State 17 = 18 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to supervise 92% 90% 93% 92% 97 % 80 % 81 % 83% Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to supervise 8 % 9 % 7 % 7 % 1 % 19 % 18 % 16 % Parent/Guardian/Custodian unwilling to supervise 1 0 % 1 % 0 % 1 % 2% 1 % 2 % 2 % ■ FY 13- 14 120 % ■ FY 14- 15 100 % • FY 15 - 16 80 % ■ FY 16 - 17 60 % ■ FY 17- 18 40 % 13 State 1 5- 16 20 % ❑ State 1 6- 17 6 0 % ❑ State 1 7- 18 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing & able to Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to Parent/Guardi to supervise supervise supervise Observations : NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 1 3 -1 8 FY 13 -14 I FY 14-15 1 FY 15 -16 FY16 -171 FY 17A8 State 15-16 State 16A7 State 17=18 Total Adjudications 32 41 27 13 14 51053 41338 41415 Overall Needs Levels FY 13A4 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16A7 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 Low Needs 56 % 53 % 38 % 47% 47 % 60 % 61 % 61 % Medium Needs 34% 41 % 52% 43 % 49% 35% 34% 34 % High Needs 10 % 7 % 10 % 10 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 70 % ■ FY 13- 14 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 50 % _ 40 % • FY 15- 16 ■ FY 16- 17 30 % Jj4 ■ FY 17- 18 20 % 13 State 15- 16 10 % © State 16- 17 0 % Low Needs Medium Needs High Needs DState 17- 18 Observations; Y1 - Peer Relationships FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 =18 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 Positive Peers 18% 25 % 22% 21 % 11 % 33% 35 % 37 % Rejected by Positive Peers 22% 22% 14% 29% 24% 14% 15 % 15% Some Association with Delinquent Peers 35% 38 % 44% 30% 51010 30010 29 % 27 % Regular Association with Delinquent Peers 220/. 13 % 190/. 17% 13% 16% 15 % 15% Gang Association 3 % 3 % 2 % 3 % 2% 7 % 7 % 6 % 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14- 15 50 % FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 s FY 17- 18 30 % D State 15 - 16 20 % — OState 16 - 17 i 13 State 1 7- 18 10 % 0 % mom Positive Peers Rejected by Positive Peers Some Association with Regular Association with Gang Association Delinquent Peers Delinquent Peers Observations: Y2 - School Behavior FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17- 18 No School Behavior Problems 20% 28% 28% 37% 21 % 21 % 20% 17% Minor School Behavior Problems 26% 14% 110/. 18 % 7 % 11 % 11 % 9 % Moderate School Behavior Problems 18% 28 % 17% 14% 24% 24% 24% 25 % Serious School Behavior Problems 37% 31 % 44% 31 % 49 % 44% 46 % 49 % 60 % ■ FY 13- 14 50 % ■ FY 14- 15 40 % ■ FY 15- 16 I 30 % ■ FY 16- 17 j ■ FY 17- 18 20 % (— ® State 15- 16 10 % o State 16- 17 0 % i - - o State 17- 18 No School Behavior Problems Minor School Behavior Moderate School Behavior Serious School Behavior Problems Problems Problems Observations; Y3 - Academic Functioning FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 1 5 =1 6 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15=16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 At Grade Level 82% 82% 84 % 84 % 84% 89% 89 % 90 % Below Grade Level 18 % 18 % 16 % 16 % 16% 11 % 11 % 10% 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % j I I ■ FY 14- 15 70 % ■ FY 15- 16 60 % 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % ■ State 15- 16 20 % o State 16- 17 10 % OLoState 17- 18 0 % j At Grade Level Below Grade Level Observations: Y4 = Substance Abuse FY 13w14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 =18 State 15-16 State 16 =17 State 17-18 No Known Substance Abuse 59% 61 % 65 % 60% 68 % 68 % 68 % 68% Some Abuse Assessment 20% 24% 20% 27 % 17 % 18 % 19 % 20% Some Abuse Treatment 22% 15% 15% 13 % 15% 14 % 13% 12% 80 % 70 % IN FY 13 - 14 60 % ■ FY 14 - 15 50 % ! ■ FY 15 - 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 IN FY 17- 18 30 % i WL IIMLi ® State 15 - 16 20 % ❑ State 16- 17 10 % } o State 17- 18 0 % No Known Substance Abuse Some Abuse Assessment Some Abuse Treatment Observations : Y5 = Juvenile Parental Status FY 13A4 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16 =17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State llBA7 State 17-18 Juvenile Not a Parent 99 % 100 % 99% 97 % 97 % 98 % 98 % 99 % Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody 1 % 0 % 0 % 10/0 10/0 0 % 00/0 0 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare 1 % 00/0 1 % 1 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care 00/0 00/0 00/0 1 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 120 % 100 % ® FY 13- 14 ■ FY 14 - 15 80 % ■ FY 15 - 16 60 % ■ FY 16 - 17 ■ FY 17- 18 40 % 0 State 15 - 16 20 % ❑ State 16 - 17 o State 17- 18 0 % Juvenile Not a Parent Juvenile is a Parent, No Custody Juvenile is a Parent, Expect childcare Juvenile is a Parent, Expect no child care Observations: Y6 - Abuse Neglect History FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15A6 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect 66 % 55 % 51 % 54% 56 % 78 % 77 % 77% Abuse Victim with Support 31 % 41 % 38% 36% 41 % 18 % 19 % 19% Abuse Victim but NO Support 3 % 3 % 11 % 10% 3 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 90 % 80 % ■ FY 13- 14 70 % ■ FY 14- 15 60 % ■ FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % _ ■ FY 17- 18 E] State 15 - 16 30 % o State 16 - 17 20 % o State 17- 18 10 % j 0 % All � nmmKE= _ 1 No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect Abuse Victim with Support Abuse Victim but NO Support Observations: Y7 - Sexual Behaviors FY 13 -14 FY 14A5 FY 15A6 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15=16 State 16 =17 State 17-18 No Problem Sexual Behavior 87% 90% 79 % 82% 92% 87 % 88 % 88% Sexual Behavior - Needs Assessment 6 % 5 % 10 % 8 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 4 % Dangerous Sexual Practices 5 % 5 % 6 % 7% 3 % 5 % 5 % 4 % Has Sexually Victimized Others 1 % 0% 5 % 3 % 0 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % 60 % � FY 15- 16 50 % ■ FY 16 - 17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % o State 15- 16 20 % ❑ State 16- 17 10 % o State 17- 18 0 % No Problem Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior - Needs Dangerous Sexual Practices Has Sexually Victimized Assessment Others Observations: Y8 - Mental Health Needs FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15- 16 State 16 - 17 State 17-18 No Mental Health Needs Noted 23% 23 % 21 % 13% 12% 30 % 28% 28 % Mental Health Needs Addressed 37% 40% 34% 47% 48 % 35% 38% 37 % Needs More Mental Health Assessment 40% 37% 45 % 40% 41 % 35 % 34% 35 % 50 % 45 % ■ FY 13- 14 40 % ! j ■ FY 14- 15 35 % — Le FY 15- 16 30 % 25 % ■ FY 16- 17 20 % ■ FY 17- 18 15 % I ® State 15- 16 10 % a State 16 - 17 5 % 0 % 13State 17- 18 No Mental Health Needs Noted Mental Health Needs Addressed Needs More Mental Health Assessment Observations: Y9 - Basic Needs/Living FY 13 -14 FY 14A5 FY 15 -16 FY 16A7 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17A8 Living with Parent & Needs Met 91 % 95 % 88 % 90 % 94% 90 % 90% 91 % Temporary Residence & Needs Met 8 % 5 % 10 % 9 % 5 % 9 % 9 % 9 % Living with Parent & Needs Unmet 1 % 0 % 0 % 00/0 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % Living Independently 0 % 0 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 1 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % FY 15- 16 60 % ! FY 16- 17 50 % 40 % ' ■ FY 17- 18 30 % o State 15- 16 20 % 13 State 16- 17 10 % 13 State 17- 18 Living with Parent & Needs Temporary Residence & Living with Parent & Needs Living Independently Met Needs Met Unmet Observations; Y10 - Health/Hygiene FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State 17-18 No Health Hygiene Problem 89 % 87 % 85 % 82% 86 % 90% 91 % 92 % Health/ Hygiene Problem but Unimpaired 11 % 11 % 12 % 12% 9 % 9 % 8 % 7 % Health/Hygiene Problem Limits Function 0 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 3 % 0 % 0 % 1 % Health/Hygiene Problem Untreated 0 % 2 % 2 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 100 % 90 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14- 15 70 % ■60 % FY 15 - 16 50 % ■ FY 16- 17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 30 % ■ State 1511, 16 20 % 0 State 16 . 17 10 % EITTI 0 State 17- 18 0 % No Health Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/ Hygiene Problem Problem but Problem Limits Problem Untreated Unimpaired Function Observations: F1 - Conflict in the Home FY 13 =14 FY 14=16 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17 -18 Supportive Home 75 % 66 % 54% 56% 70 % 74% 74% 75 % Domestic Discord 14% 26 % 34% 32% 26 % 21 % 21 % 20 % Domestic Violence 11 % 9 % 12% 12% 4 % 5 % 5 % 5 % 80 % 70 % ■ FY 13- 14 60 % ■ FY 14- 15 50 % FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % ■ FY 17- 18 20 % O State 15- 16 10 % o State 16- 17 0 % 0State 17- 18 Supportive Home Domestic Discord Domestic Violence Observations; F2 - Family Supervision Skills FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16A7 FY 17 -18 State 15-16 State 16 -17 State 17- 18 Adequate 39 % 48% 37 % 43% 41 % 43% 46% 48% Marginal 52% 47% 55% 48% 57% 53% 51 % 49 % Inadequate 9 % 5 % 8 % 9 % 2 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 70 % - 60 % ■ FY 13 - 14 50 % — ■ FY 14- 15 40 % FY 15- 16 ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % IN FY 17- 18 20 % [] State 15- 16 ° ❑ State 16 - 17 10 /o o State 17- 18 y 0 % Adequate Marginal Inadequate Observations: F3 - Disability of Parent/Guardian FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 -18 State 15AIB State 16 -17 State 17 -18 No Disabilities 86 % 90 % 85% 84% 90 % 95 % 95 % 96 % Disabilities Noted 14 % 10% 15 % 16 % 10% 5 % 5 % 4 % 120 % - 100 % ■ FY 13- 14 80 % ■ FY 14 - 15 60 % { ■ FY 15- 16 t ■ FY 16- 17 40 % ■ FY 17- 18 ■ State 15- 16 20 % ■ State 16 - 17 ■ State 17- 18 0 % No Disabilities Disabilities Noted Observations: F4 - Family Substance Abuse FY 13 -14 FY 14A6 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 FY 17A8 State 15 -16 State 16 -17 State VA8 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse 74% 76% 72% 72 % 82 % 89 % 88 % 88% Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse 26% 24% 28 % 28% 18 % 11 % 12% 12% 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % -- ■ FY 13 - 14 60 % I ■ FY 14- 15 50 % ■ FY 15- 16 40 % ■ FY 16 - 17 30 % j ■ FY 17 - 18 20 % cii State 15- 16 10 % State 16- 17 0 % State 17- 18 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse Family Alcohol/ Drug Abuse Observations; F5 - Family Criminality FY 13A4 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16 -17 FY 17 =18 State 15 =16 State 16A7 State 1 7-1 8 No Family Criminal History 51 % 46 % 40 % 36 % 35 % 55 % 51 % 52 % Family Criminal History 40% 45% 52% 57% 540/. 360/. 400A 39% Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement 10% 9 % 7 % 8 % 11 % 9 % 9 % 9 % 60 % - ■ FY 13- 14 50 % ■ FY 14- 15 FY 15 - 16 40 % FY 16- 17 ❑30 % FY 17- 18 o State 15 - 16 20 % State 16 - 17 State 17- 18 10 % 0 % No Family Criminal History Family Criminal History Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement Observations; Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 2019 -20 $ 277 , 731 30 % February 4 , 2019 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC ) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at- risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019 -20 beginning on , or after , July 1 , 2019 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed programs (see attached Program Descriptions) : * Restitution/Community Service * Interpersonal Skill Building *Teen Court * Parent/ Family Skill Building * Mentoring *Tutoring/Academic Enhancement *Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/ Underinsured * Mediation/Conflict Resolution *Temporary Shelter Services ( including Substance Abuse ; Trauma Based Therapy) (including School Based) (specifically Emergency Shelter) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency . Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement, have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent . Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency ( LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth : Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality, gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below : 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome-based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component . 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . ss Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non -profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Ra oza at 919- 245 -2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2019-2020 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link , https : //www. ncdps. gov/I ndex2 . cfm ?a= 000003 , 002476 , 002483, 0024829002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab. Private non - profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 (c) ( 3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant , at ( 919 ) 324 -6391 . Deadline for Application is : March 11 , 2019 by 5 : 00 P . M . Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019 - 2020 Program Type Descriptions including Dosage and Duration of Services Interpersonal Skill Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a Building positive way with others . The basic skill model begins with an individual ' s goals , progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social behaviors , and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment . Typical training techniques are instruction , modeling of behavior, practice and rehearsal , feedback, reinforcement . ( Length of Stay= Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications , Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Mentoring Provides opportunities for adult volunteers to be matched with delinquent or at risk youth on a one- on - one basis . The mentor is an individual providing support, friendship , advice, and/or assistance to the juvenile . After recruitment, screening and training, the mentor spends time with the juvenile on a regular basis engaged in activities such as sports , movies , helping with homework , etc . ( Length of Stay= Minimum 1 year, Frequency of Contact= should average 2 hours per week) Mediation/Conflict Programs offering a private process of negotiation conducted by a neutral , third party person, a Resolution Mediator. These programs offer immediate and short -term involvement with youth to focus on negative and/or offending behaviors . Mediation is a consensual decision -making process by parties who work towards a mutual understanding to resolve a problem or a dispute . Mediators do not counsel or give advice but facilitate communication among parties as the parties work to reach their own decision regarding resolution of their conflict . Services should be provided for diverted and/or adjudicated youth and may include victim/offender reconciliation . ( Length of Stay = No longer than 90 days , Frequency of Contact= Based upon the requirements of the program ) Tutoring/Academic Services intended to supplement full time academic program by providing assistance with Enhancement understanding and completing schoolwork and/or classes . May also provide trips designed to be an enrichment of or supplemental experience beyond the basic educational curriculum . ( Length of Stay= Minimum of 20 weeks , Frequency of Contact= No less than 2 hrs/week . ) Parent/Family Skill Services that focus on interactional or interpersonal issues faced by a parent( s)/family of a Building juvenile . This service works to develop parenting skills , communication skills , discipline techniques , and other related skills . May include sessions for parents only and/or sessions for parents and the referred youth . ( Length of Stay= Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications , Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Teen Court Provides a diversion from juvenile court where trained adult and youth volunteers act as officials of the court to hear complaints . These programs make recommendations for appropriate sanctions including but not limited to community service and restitution ( if applicable ) to be assigned to the youth who have admitted committing minor delinquency and undisciplined complaints . ( Length of Stay= Not to exceed 120 days , however 60 additional days may be approved to complete sanctions ; Frequency of Contact= Not Specified ) Page 1 of 2 Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019 - 2020 Restitution/Community Programs that provide opportunities for offender to be accountable for their actions to the Service community and/or victim( s ) through forms of payments or community service work that earns money to repay the victim ( s ) . Court supervision= one year unless otherwise ordered ; Frequency of Contact— minimum twice per month and no less than 8 hours per month) Temporary Shelter Care Provides group home care and shelter (up to 90 days ) for juveniles who need to be temporary removed from their homes during a family crisis . (Length of Stay = up to 90 days , Frequency of Contact=NA ) Clinical Clinical Evaluations and Assessments , including Psychological Evaluations to help court Assessments/Treatment counselors and judges recommend the most appropriate consequences and treatment for court involved youth . (Length of Stay= depends upon time needed to complete the assessment activity , Frequency of Contact=Not Specified ) Page 2 of 2 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 2019 - 20 $ 59 , 000 30 % April 8 , 2019 MENEEMEN Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals . The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety ( DPS) Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at-risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019= 20 beginning on , or after, July 1 , 2019 . The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above . The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed program . Interpersonal Skill Building : Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a positive way with others . The basic skill model begins with an individual ' s goals , progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social behaviors , and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment . Typical training techniques are instruction , modeling of behavior, practice and rehearsal , feedback , reinforcement . A curriculum that includes parent( s )/guardian ( s ) is preferred . ( Length of Stay= Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program & following model specifications . Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency . Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re- offending . Youth are generally age 12 or older & had no prior contact with Juvenile Services . Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances , exhibit anger management issues , run away from home/placement, have moderate to serious school behavior problems , associate with peers who lack pro - social behaviors and are delinquent . Due to the diversity of Orange County, the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency ( LEP) youth and their families . Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth . Peer Domain : Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships . Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers . Individual Domain : Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect . There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment . Family Domain : Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home . Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills , and family criminality , gang involvement, and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed . School Domain : Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school . Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below . 1 . Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders . 2 . Program services are outcome-based . 3 . The program has an evaluation component . 4 . Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation . Local public agencies , 501 (c) (3) non - profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications ( Program Agreements) for programs addressing the above elements . Rebekah Ra oza at 919 -245 -2869 MENEEMENE JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone # In order to apply for FY 2019=2020 JCPC funding , you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES . Please read and follow all instructions at the following link : https : //www. ncdps. gov/I ndex2 . cfm ? a= 000003 , 002476 , 002483 , 002482 , 002514 You may find additional self- help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab . Private non - profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete : 1 ) No Over Due Tax form (available at above link) , 2 ) Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template (avavilable at above link) , 3) The non - profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4) Proof of 501 ( c ) ( 3) status . NOTE : For further information , or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county , contact Denise Briggs , DPS Area Consultant , at ( 919 ) 324 -6391 . Deadline for Application is : May 10 , 2019 by 5 : 00 P . M . Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary Program Funded Reason for Funding Check all that apply) Boomerang ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ® Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Community Service and ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation Restitution component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Mediation/Conflict ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient ® Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation Resolution component ® Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Teen Court ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions ® Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ® Other provides a diversionary option for juvenile and distrcit court ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Wrenn House ® Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ® Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Parent Teen Solutions ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient® Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ® Has evaluation component ® Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision& convictions ❑ Has evaluation component❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Program Not Funded Reason for Not Funding (Check all that apply) Family Advocacy ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than Network another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ® Other To fill a gap of services, its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and arent(s)/ uardian(s). FAN only provides services to parents. Young Warriors Athlete ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than Scholarship Program another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ® Other To fill a gap of services, its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and parent(s)/guardian(s). Young Warriors does not utilize a curriculum to deliver services but skills are taught by services provided(discipline/decision making)through Karate. Life Skills for Youth and ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ® Lesser quality than Parenting - Botvin Life another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Skills Curriculum Reintegration Support ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ® Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than Network Interpersonal another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other Skill Building ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed ❑ Does not meet funding priority ❑ Not compatible with research ❑ Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type ❑ Greater cost than program of same type and quality ❑ Other 0 Other Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name&Type: Boomerang-Structured Day(STRUCTURE ONLY-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: A resiliency-based program that engages youth ages 11-17 at risk for disconnection due to short-terra suspension or court-involvement, by providing support services to mitigate the risk of school dropout through brief counseling, tutoring,and life skills development during out-of-school time. Boomerang programming is strengths-based, recognizing the assets of each individuai student and building on those to create stronger connections to school, family and community. Primary Service N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A Qualifying N/A Supplemental Services Quality of 1.Written protocols on student, 1. Executive Director Service 20/20 1. Continue to parent, and school follow-up and 2. Program Managers Delivery develop written sevice evaluation protocols for high 2. identify additional training quality service opportunties for direct service delivery as needed staff to develop and maintain 2_ Continued staff knowledge and skills in trauma-- training informed care, and restorative practices. Amount of Service: NIA Duration and ----- Contact Hours N/A Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 NIA Risk Tier 2 NIA TOTAL SPEP N/A SCORE I :W PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the 9CPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol(SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) POP NIA Score 1 S4-0�'j This plan is approved b 1 2 ,- - Program Man�er ante batel JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name & Type: Juvenile Community Service and Restitution - Restitution Brief Description: The Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Program works with Orange County youth who have committed offenses and are assigned community service hours and/or restitution_ Youth are assigned to nonprofit work sites throughout the county where volunteer supervisors oversee and evaluate their work Through this program, youthful offenders leam important lessons in responsibili and accountability and often develop positive relationships with their adult supervisors.___ Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service 10/30 N/A N/A N/A NIA Qualifying 5/5 - Supplemental Services '+l Quality of Yr�j4y�d F �-ra:,,�n� S��p� rn y t t� r a J,G:9- Service 18/20 � ��renw� rrnV•1 pwM jty:,t.�..l-. pi Jre., �; r�cy any. Amount of Service: 6110 Duration and Contact 0/10 Hours Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 5112 5113 Risk Tier 2 TOTAL SP EP 49/1 GO SCORE POP 61%/80% Score % This plan is approved by: 12- Program Manager Na Date JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates I �rrnvided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. Standardize Progam Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plant (PEP) Program Name &Type. Victim Offender Mediation - mediation (STRUCTURE - NO SPED SCORN Brief Description: Restorative Justice practices to facilitate mediation and accountabiijty processes by trained facilitators and mediators. Pm rar;c serves youth referred h Court Counselors, schools,and communi ens. - - :f_ Mir• .\. ti_tin,':: �v•_ }` . e. .�..:. a -a: e. - ''' si =Comm r�� rl`ance�- >�. �Pv ri�erit�°��� -A =Cat li = P - - lac�� Primary Service NIA NIA N/A NIA NIA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Qua]fty of - Update program manual to Program Manager, Val Service 20120 -Review and reflect additional programming, Hanson Delivery update manual best practices for peer circles, evaluation ccrnponents, and -Professional volunteer protocol. Development) -Attend National R.i conference Training in June 2019 -- Revise program evaluation Update program component to include peer evaluation circles and as welf as pre-circle measures pre-termination evaluative components Amount of Service: NfA Duration and - - Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier I MIA Risk Tier 2 NIA TOTAL SPED NIA - .w ,�'n, ... „' ' `� "{, "'' a Av ~ ems SCARE �, .�F - L PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) ?'-=�ffiW , POP N/A l v 04 Score j i 4` Cr mil] This plarz is approved by: 9l / I � —lz Program Manager Name Date J C Ch 'r Day 9 9 e PEP Progress Updates wilt he provided to the1CPC no later than March 31,,2-939. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name &Type: Teen Court-Teen Court (STRUCTURE-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: An alternative court program for middle and high school students based upon the principles of restorative justice. First-time offenders are tried and sentenced by a jury of their peers_ Fellow students take the roles of defense attorney, prosecutor,clerk of court, bailiff,or juror to carry out these proceedings. Local attorneys volunteer to serve as Teen Court judges. Participants are sentenced to complete community service hours and jury duties on future Teen Court cases. Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service NIA NIA N/A NIA NIA Qualifying N/A - Supplemental Services Quality of Service 20120 Delivery Amount of Service: N/A Duration and Contact N/A Hours Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 NIA N/A Risk Tier 2 .r%TTSPEP NIA - - _ =i t. SCORE POP NI _ - i,k i - Score to > _ This plan is approved by_ -7 Program Manager N e Date P Chair Date PEP Progress Cpdat II be provided to the 1CPC no later ttiarf March 31,2Q39. Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Prograrn Name &Type: Wrenn House -- Runaway Shelter (STRUCTURE - NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Descripfion: Wrenn Mouse is crisis shelter designed to provide safe environment for runaway, horneless and in-crisis youth. Wrenn House is open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Services are for youth ages 10-17. By offering temporary shelter, it e6 mirtates need for illega4 means of support by homeless and runaway youth and therefore reduces rate of juvenile crime. It also serves as alternative to detention. Services are provided within therapeutic envimnmernt while promotin individuaW and empowerment Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service NIA NIA N/A N/A NfA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of 1. COO Service 20120 1_ Continue to 1. identify any new training 2. Program [director Delivery enhance staff topics that would bent the training program 2. Continue to 2_ Update policies as new trends review and arise that may be best fit or best entrance policy and practice for youth in care. procedures as trends change. Arnount of Service: NIA Duration and --- Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 9 NIA Risk Tier 2 NIA TOTAL SPED NIA SCORE PEP Progress Updates arill be provided to the 1ePC no later than March 31, 2019. Standardize program Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plan(PEP) POP N/A Scare% This plan is approved by: P grarn Manag&Name Date JCPC Chair- Date PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March Blip 2039. ..+N'-�.rs._:...i.��w......+��........�.�.�...u...�r-n....�ryuw\��rwwrNftT+Mrw�wwr+.�.�.� wWM`4't'�!�'ili.•K�fT.ar•+.�.A�•Y.�'��f.:.uFWT?l�n����¢�i4G+�x��vc��u:e+n�—•.�_. a�.�.�....ir�...�.ww...rrv�..rW.w.' .�+r.�ww•r.w^.•�+++�� SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 25627 NAME OF COMPONENT : Parent Teen Solutions Group BRIEF DESCRIPTION : The program is provided to at- risk and delinquent youth ( 10 - 17 ) and their parents . The program is designed to maintain youth in the home , while reducing recidivism , improving parent-child relationship , school motivation , problem -solving skills , interpersonal skills , and parenting skills . Families participating in the program participate in peer group sessions for 2 hours that include group discussion and peer and family practice . COMPONENT ID # COMPONENT INFORMATION 25769 NAME OF COMPONENT : Parent Teen Solutions Home Visitation BRIEF DESCRIPTION : The home visitation counseling program provided to at- risk or delinquent youth ( 10 - 17 ) and their parent ( s ) 3 hours per week from 3 to 6 months . Most families will average 150 days . Program is designed to maintain youth in the home environment while reducing recidivism , improving parent-child relationships , school motivation , problem - solving skills , interpersonal skills , and parenting skills . Families are also offered the option to participate in group services along with this component . Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31 /2012 Department of Public Safety Orange County Continuum of Services - At a Glance Instructions : Adjust arrows to cover target populations JCPC funded Available in Community Comprehensive Strategy Needed Services Available but difficult access Prevention Graduated Sanctions DPS funded/Non JCPC Tar et Populations Prugraln Services & Instructions : Pre - Delinquent- Delinquent- Delinquent- Structures Adjust arrows to cover target Youth at Adjudicated Level I/ Prot. Level II Level III Post Release Categories populations All Youth Greatest Risk Youth Supervision Youth Youth Youth Parent Teen Solutions (Exchange Club) Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate Boys & Girls Club Jr. Police Academy Citizens Academy GED Josh ' s Hope - Tools for Hope Structured ANNA ( Spanish Speaking) Activities YMCA 4- 1­1 Youth Services Girls & Boys Scouts of America Recreation Department Youth Scholarships ( DSS ) Behavior Skills Counseling Experiential Education Job Corps . WIOA NextGen Program Restitution (VFY) Youth/Family Team Coordin , Restorative Community Service (VFY) Services Teen Court (VFY) Victim-Offender Mediation ( DSC ) Truancy Mediation ( DSC ) Conflict Resolution DSC Alternative to Suspension Structured ( Boomerang ) Day Phoenix Academy .Partnership Academy Multi-Systemic Therapy ( MST) AMI Kids (FFT) MH Services SLID Services Freedom House Clinical Sex Offender Treatment Treatment Intensive In-Home Intensive Wrap-Around (Youth Villages) High Fidelity Wrap-Around (Youth Villages El Futuro Court Psychologist Assessment Juvenile Crisis & Assessment Ctr Services Substance Abuse Sex Offender Assessment Therapuetic Foster Care Craven Transitional Living ( Males ) North Hills Transitional Living ( Girls ) WestCare Residential ( Girls ) Residential Eckerd Residential ( Males ) Sub . Abuse Residential Treatment Wright School Whitaker School Emergency Shelter (Wrenn House ) Tarheel Challen e Updated April 2018