Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda 06-18-19 Item 8-g - JCPC Certification for FY 2019-2020
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 18, 2019 Action Agenda Item No. 8-g SUBJECT: JCPC Certification for FY 2019-2020 DEPARTMENT: Social Services ATTACHMENT(S): 1. NC Department of Public Safety Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification 2. Juvenile Crime Prevention Council County Plan 2019-2020 INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Coston, 245-2800 Sharron Hinton, 245-2840 PURPOSE: To approve the Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) Certification for FY 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: Orange County receives $277,731 from the NC Department of Public Safety to provide program services to juvenile offenders through the JCPC. This amount has remained unchanged for the last six funding cycles. The County is required to provide a 30% match which totals $83,320, which is included in the Manager’s Recommended Budget. (Note: The attached funding grid reflects the County match as well as other local dollars awarded to the program agencies.) Every JCPC in the State of North Carolina must be certified to perform the legislated duties outlined in the North Carolina General Statutes. The certification verifies that the local JCPC has completed the following responsibilities in its efforts to function within the guidelines of legislation: • Membership: positions are filled and appointed by the Board of Commissioners with staggered terms; • By-laws: the JCPC has current bylaws; • Policies and Procedures: the JCPC has written policies and procedures for funding of programs and conflict of interest; • Leadership: the JCPC has a Chair and Vice-Chair at a minimum; • Minutes: minutes of meetings are recorded and maintained; • Meetings: the JCPC meets at least bi-monthly and a majority of members is required to conduct business; • Program Monitoring/Evaluation: the JCPC monitors and evaluates all funded programs; • Media and Requests for Proposal (RFP): the JCPC communicates through the media and by written RFP the availability of funding to all public and private non-profit agencies and interested community members that serve at-risk children and their families; 1 • Public Awareness: the JCPC announces meetings in advance to the public and makes the community aware of the results of the planning process; • Risk Factor Assessment: the JCPC documents prioritization of risk factors; • Comprehensive Strategy Assessment: the JCPC documents services available to meet prioritized risk factors and an assessment of gaps issues and barriers to needed services; • Needed Interventions: the JCPC documents the prioritized, needed interventions; • Outcomes and Strategies: the JCPC reviews juvenile justice data and develops specific outcomes and strategies for implementation; • Funding: the JCPC Annual Plan includes the Funding Plan FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Certification document must be received by the NC Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice by June 30, 2019 in order for local program funds to be disbursed beginning in the month of July. SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goal is applicable to this item: • GOAL: CREATE A SAFE COMMUNITY The reduction of risks from vehicle/traffic accidents, childhood and senior injuries, gang activity, substance abuse and domestic violence. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve the JCPC Certification for FY 2019-2020 and authorize the Chair to sign the associated documents. 2 093 B COPIWAw- NC Department of Public Safety Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification Fiscal Year: 2019 -2020 County: ORANGE Date: June 7, 2019 CERTIFICATION STANDARDS STANDARD #1 - Membership A. Have the members of the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council been appointed by county commissioners? YES B. Is the membership list attached? YES C. Are members appointed for two year terms and are those terms staggered? YES D. Is membership reflective of social-economic and racial diversity of the community? YES E. Does the membership of the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council reflect the required positions as provided by N.C.G.S. §143B-846? NO If not, which positions are vacant and why? Juvenile Defense Attorney - previous member unable to participate due to work schedule conflicts Member of Business Community- unable to find new representation STANDARD #2 - Organization A. Does the JCPC have written Bylaws? YES B. Bylaws are ® attached or ❑ on file (Select one.) C. Bylaws contain Conflict of Interest section per JCPC policy and procedure. YES D. Does the JCPC have written policies and procedures for funding and review? YES E. These policies and procedures ® attached or ❑ on file. (Select one.) F. Does the JCPC have officers and are they elected annually? YES JCPC has: ® Chair; ® Vice-Chair; ❑ Secretary; ❑ Treasurer. STANDARD #3 - Meetings A. JCPC meetings are considered open and public notice of meetings is provided. YES B. Is a quorum defined as the majority of membership and required to be present in order to conduct business at JCPC meetings? YES C. Does the JCPC meet bi-monthly at a minimum? YES D. Are minutes taken at all official meetings? YES E. Are minutes distributed prior to or during subsequent meetings? YES STANDARD #4 - Planning A. Does the JCPC conduct an annual planning process which includes a needs assessment, monitoring of programs and funding allocation process? YES B. Is this Annual Plan presented to the Board of County Commissioners and to DIPS? YES C. Is the Funding Plan approved by the full council and submitted to Commissioners for their approval? YES Form JCPC/OP 002(a)Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification Form structure last revised July 2014 NC Department of Public Safety Page 1 of 4 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification (cont'd) 4 STANDARD #5 - Public Awareness A. Does the JCPC communicate the availability of funds to all public and private non- profit agencies which serve children or their families and to other interested community members? (® RFP, distribution list, and article attached) YES B. Does the JCPC complete an annual needs assessment and make that information available to agencies which serve children or their families, and to interested community members? YES STANDARD #6 — No Overdue Tax Debt A. As recipient of the county DPS JCPC allocation, does the County certify that it has no overdue tax debts, as defined by N.C.G.S. §105-243.1, at the Federal, State, or local level? YES Briefly outline the plan for correcting any areas of standards non-compliance. The Council is working to identify a new representative for Juvenile Defense Attorney and Member of the Business Community. Having complied with the Standards as documented herein, the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council may use up to $15,500 of its annual Juvenile Crime Prevention fund allocation to cover administrative and related costs of the council. Form JCPC/OP 002 (b) JCPC Certification Budget Pages detailing the expenditure budget must be attached to this certification. The JCPC Certification must be received by June 30, 2019. JCPC Administrative Funds SOURCES OF REVENUE DPS JCPC Only list requested funds for JCPC Administrative Budget. $8,178 Local $2,453 Other Total $10,631 J airperson Date Chairman, Board of County Commissioners Date DPS Designated Official Date Form JCPC/OP 002(a)Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification Form structure last revised July 2014 NC Department of Public Safety Page 2 of 4 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification (cont'd) 5 ORANGE county FY 2019-2020 Instructions: N.C.G.S. § 14313-846 specifies suggested members be appointed by county commissioners to serve on local Juvenile Crime Prevention Councils. In certain categories, a designee may be appointed to serve. Please indicate the person appointed to serve in each category and his/her title. Indicate appointed members who are designees for named positions. Indicate race and gender for all appointments. Specified Members Name Title Designee Race Gender 1) School Superintendent or designee Sherita Cobb Director of B F Student Support Services(OCS) 2) Chief of Police Megan Johnson Crisis Unit W F Supervisor (CHPD) 3) Local Sheriff or designee Tina Sykes Lieutenant ® W F 4) District Attorney or designee Maren Hardin Assistant W F District Attorney 5) Chief Court Counselor or designee Peggy Hamlett Chief Court W F Counselor 6) Director,AMH/DD/SA,or designee Stephanie Jones System of Care ® W F Coordinator 7) Director DSS or designee Bernard Miles CPS Treatment ® B M Supervisor 8) County Manager or designee Sharron Hinton Human Services ® B F Manager 9) Substance Abuse Professional Carol Director of W F McClelland Outpatient Services 10) Member of Faith Community Kysha Pastor B F Thompson 11) County Commissioner Penny Rich County W F Commissioner 12) Two Persons under age 18 Matthew Hinton Student B M (State Youth Council Representative,if available) Jay Cole Student W M 13) Juvenile Defense Attorney 14) Chief District Judge or designee Beverly Scarlett District Court ® B F Judge 15) Member of Business Community 16) Local Health Director or designee Donna King Director, Health W F Prom&Ed Services 17) Rep.United Way/other non-profit Nick Allen Community B M Impact Director 18) Representative/Parks and Rec. Lee Barnes Recreation W F Manager Form JCPC/OP 002(a)Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification Form structure last revised July 2014 NC Department of Public Safety Page 3 of 4 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification cont'd 6 1 Supervisor 20) County Commissioner appointee Gayane Coordinator, W F Chambless Orange Partnership for Alcohol & Drug Free Youth 21) County Commissioner appointee Meg McGurk Community W F Safety Planner 22) County Commissioner appointee 23) County Commissioner appointee 24) County Commissioner appointee 25) County Commissioner appointee Form JCPC/OP 002(a)Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Certification Form structure last revised July 2014 NC Department of Public Safety Page 4 of 4 7 SECTION VI: BUDGET NARRATIVE JCPC Administration Fiscal Year FY 19-20 Item# Justification Expense In Kind Expense 220 Food for meetings ($375 x 6 JCPC meetings= $2,250; $200 x $2,650 1 funding committee meeting; $200 x 1 risk and needs committee meeting: totals $2,650) 260 General office supplies for meetings (paper, folders, name $1,484 tents, etc...) 310 Travel stipend to assist with training opportunties for JCPC $2,249 members and/or JCPC funded program providers 390 Registration/lodging stipend to assist with training opportunties $2,248 for JCPC members and/or JCPC funded program providers 430 Copier rental (—$166 x 12 months= $2,000) $2,000 TOTAL $10,631 Annual Expense Annual In Kind Job Title Wages Wages TOTAL Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application DRAFT Form structure last revised 12/31/2012 Department of Public Safety 8 SECTION VII Program: JCPC Administration Fiscal Year: FY 19-20 Number of Months: 12 Cash In Kind Total I. Personnel Services $0 120 Salaries&Wages $0 180 Fringe Benefits $0 190 Professional Services' $0 *Contracts MUST be attached II. Supplies & Materials $4,134 $4,134 210 Household&Cleaning $0 220 Food&Provisions $2,650 $2,650 230 Education&Medical $0 240 Construction&Repair $0 250 Vehicle Supplies&Materials $0 260 Office Supplies and Materials $1,484 $1,484 280 Heating&Utility Supplies $0 290 Other Supplies and Materials $0 III. Current Obligations &Services $4,497 $4,497 310 Travel&Transportation $2,249 $2,249 320 Communications $0 330 Utilities $0 340 Printing&Binding $0 350 Repairs&Maintenance $0 370 Advertising $0 380 Data Processing $0 390 Other Services $2,248 $2,248 IV. Fixed Charges &Other Expenses $2,000 $2,000 410 Rental or Real Property $0 430 Equipment Rental $2,000 $2,000 440 Service and Maint.Contracts $0 450 Insurance&Bonding $0 490 Other Fixed Charges $0 V. Capital Outlay $0 [This Section Requires Cash Match] 510 Office Furniture&Equipment $0 530 Educational Equipment $0 540 Motor Vehicle $0 550 Other Equipment $0 580 Buildings,Structure&Improv. $0 Total $10,631 $10,631 Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application DRAFT Form structure last revised 12/31/2012 Department of Public Safety 9 BY-LAWS ORANGE COUNTY JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL ARTICLE I: NAME AND PURPOSE Section 1. Name The name of this body shall be the Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) Section 2. Purpose The purpose of the JCPC shall be to: 2.1 Ensure that appropriate intermediate dispositional options are available and prioritize funding for dispositions of intermediate and community level sanctions for court adjudicated juveniles pursuant to minimum standards adopted by the Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice (NC DJJ). 2.2 Evaluate programs developed and supported by the JCPC for effectiveness and continued need. 2.3 Assess the needs of delinquent and at-risk juveniles in Orange County and report those findings to County Commissioners. 2.4 Plan for the establishment of a permanent funding stream for delinquency prevention services. ARTICLE II: MEMBERSHIP Section 1. Membership should include, if possible: 1. The local school superintendent or designee; 2. The chief of police in the county; 3. The local sheriff, or designee; 4. The district attorney, or designee; 5. The chief court counselor, or designee; 6. The director of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authority, or designee Adopted June 2015 10 7. The director of DSS, or designee; 8. The county manager, or designee; 9. The substance abuse professional; 10. A member of faith community; 11. A county commissioner; 12. A person under 18; 13. A juvenile defense attorney; 14. The Chief District Court Judge or judge designated by the Chief District Court Judge; 15. A member of the business community; 16. The local health director, or designee; 17. A representative of United Way or other non-profit; 18. A representative of local parks and recreation; and 19. Up to seven members appointed by the board of county commissioners. Section 2. Each member should serve a term of two years and may be reappointed. Section 3. Membership shall be no more than 25 members. Section 4. Any vacancy of office may be filled by nominations from the floor and election by the Board at any time throughout the year. Section 5. Three consecutive unexcused absences shall constitute grounds for replacement. Members are expected to notify the chairperson in advance of meeting if unable to attend. Section 6. A quorum shall be a simple majority of appointed memberships. ARTICLE III: OFFICERS Section 1. The offices shall consist of a chairperson and vice-chair person. Section 2. These officers should be elected on an annual basis and on or before the first meeting of the fiscal year and may succeed themselves. Chairperson—The chairperson shall call and preside at meetings of the JCPC. The Chair and/or Vice-Chair shall appoint all special committees and designate the persons to serve as committee members unless otherwise specified by the by-laws. Vice-Chairperson—The Vice-Chair shall exercise the duties of the Chairperson in his/her absence and such other duties as the Chairperson shall assign. Adopted June 2015 11 Section 3. Removal from office The Orange County Board of Commissioners,upon the recommendations of the Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council membership,may remove a member from office for any of the following reasons: 1. Absence, without excuse, from three (3) scheduled meetings, within one year. 2. Failure to participate in the work of the Orange County JCPC. 3. Conduct that demonstrates a lack of responsibility or is unbecoming of a member of the Orange County JCPC, or which causes embarrassment to the Council and/or Orange County. ARTICLE IV: MEETINGS Section 1. Orange JCPC shall meet at least bi-monthly or more often if a meeting is called by the Chair-person. Section 2. All meetings should be open to the public. Section 3. The membership shall be notified of all meetings, in writing, or by phone at least five days prior to the meeting. Section 4. Minutes shall be taken at every meeting and distributed prior to or at the subsequent meetings. Section 5. Special Meetings 5.1 The Chair-person may call special meetings as deemed necessary to carry out the duties of the JCPC. 5.2 Notice of special meetings shall be given to the JCPC members in writing, by phone, or by email at least two days in advance. Adopted June 2015 12 ARTICLE V: FUNDING PROCEDURES Section 1. Screening of Programs. Section 1.1 All proposed grants submitted to the JCPC will be screened by the Funding and Review Committee. Section 1.2 Proposed grants will be scrutinized according to whether they meet the needs as provided in the annual needs assessment, as well as for program effectiveness, staffing issues, amount requested and expectations of the program. Section 2. Voting to Fund. Section 2.1 The JCPC, except as hereinafter excluded, will vote on the recommended funding plan provided by the Funding/Review Committee, and may amend recommendations before a final vote. Section 2.2 No JCPC member who is paid with local grant funds, or who directly supervises someone paid with local grant funds, shall be eligible to vote in funding decisions. Section 2.3 Voting by Proxy will be allowed by approved designee; designee must be included on membership list. Section 3. Approved or Disapproved. Section 3.1 Programs that are approved for grants shall be notified immediately and the funded amount shall be disclosed. Section 3.2 Programs not approved for grants shall be notified in writing in a timely Manner and may: 1. Request an explanation of the funding decision, in writing, to the Chair, within five (5) business days of the funding decision notification. The Chair will respond, in writing, within 30 business days. 2. Request the funding process protocol followed by the JCPC, in writing, to the JCPC Chair within five (5) business days of receiving the funding notification. The request must specify which aspects of the funding process are in question. This will be reviewed by the Funding and Program Review Committee and presented to The Council at the next scheduled JCPC meeting following receipt of the request. The JCPC Chair or the Funding and Program Review Committee Chair, will respond to the applicant, in writing, within ten (10)business days following the JCPC meeting. Adopted June 2015 13 Section 4. Evaluation. Section 4.1 Funded grants shall be evaluated by the Monitoring Committee. Section 4.2 No JCPC member who is paid by or directly supervises someone paid by local grant funds, may serve on the Monitoring Committee. ARTICLE VI: CONFLICT OF INTEREST Section 1. The JCPC Chairperson shall have all JCPC members complete and sign .the disclosure form(form DJJ 13 001c)and inform all members of the conflict policy and review annually. Section 1.1 All members must disclose in writing the existence, nature and extent of any potential or actual conflict of interest using (form DJJ 13 001 c). Section 1.2 If a member directly or indirectly benefits from the disbursement of these state funds. They will not serve on the monitoring or funding committees, nor be able to vote re: funding decisions. Section 2 If a conflict is discovered after the fact,the JCPC Chairperson will inform the JCPC of the conflict of interest. Section 3 All conflict of interest disclosure forms must be filled out by all members. ARTICLE VII: EMAIL VOTING Section 1. The Initiator Section 1.1 Any active member or JCPC Coordinator can initiate mail voting by sending voting proposal via email. Section 1.2 The member who has initiated a vote can retract the voting proposal by sending an email to the membership list stating the intention to retract the proposal. Section 2. Email Voting Process Section 2.1 Email voting proposal is initiated by sending an email to the entire membership mailing list containing the words"Voting Proposal"in the subject line and explicitly stating the subject of the voting. Adopted June 2015 14 Section 2.2 The bodyof the email shall include exact and complete information on what is to P be voted upon; only information which is directly related to the subject of the voting may be contained in the email voting proposal. Section 3. Voting Period i Section 3.1 A proposal can only be retracted within the voting period. Section 3.2 The voting period starts when the email is sent out to the membership,unless specified otherwise in the voting proposal, and lasts for a period of two weeks. Section 3.3 During the voting period the members cast their votes. Only votes cast within-the voting period are considered for the results of the voting. Adopted June 2015 15 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Meeting Friday,August 3,2018 (12:OOnoon—2:OOpm) Hillsborough Commons Hillsborough,NC Proposed Minutes Attendees: Meg McGurk,Megan Johnson,Bernard Miles,Kysha Thompson,Donna King, Amanda Farris, Stephanie Jones,Maren Hardin, Carol McClelland, Gayane Chambless,Mia Burroughs, Sherita Cobb,Jay Cole,Linda Boldin, Susan Worley,Kelsey Mosley,Pam Weiden, Rebekah Rapoza, Denise Briggs (*Members in Bold) Absent: Jaime Lescinski, Dana Graves Excused: Charlos Banks, Tina Sykes, Peggy Hamlett, Sharron Hinton, Matthew Hinton, Beverly Scarlett,Nick Allen, Lee Barnes Welcome The meeting opened with a welcome from Chair, Meg McGurk and introductions. Minutes Review and Approval The Council reviewed the minutes from June 2018. Carol McClelland motioned for minutes to be approved and was seconded by Stephanie Jones. Motion carried unanimously. Agency Roundtable Wrenn House—Wrenn House is a 24-hour crisis shelter for runaway and homeless youth. Through Orange and Chatham they have one 30 day bed for a youth who is in crisis or transition. They have been having a pretty slow summer,but calls have been picking up and they anticipate with school starting back there will be an increase. They have just reapplied for their federal grant and are waiting to hear on the outcome,probably around the end of September. They just finally finished renovating the kitchen and it now matches with the rest of the renovated house. Volunteers° or Youth—VFY operates two JCPC funded programs: Community Service and Teen Court. The Community Service program is for youth who are court-ordered to serve community service and they help match up youth with work sites. The Teen Court program is an alternative to regular court for kids who are first-time offenders and is staffed entirely by teen volunteers. They have had 28 kids in Community Service and 13 in Teen Court so far in this fiscal year. Numbers were low last year for Community Service but there was an uptick towards the end of the fiscal year and that is continuing into this new fiscal year. VFY has lost the Hillsborough Farmer's Market for a community site because they are changing how they staff it. Freedom House—In FYI 7-18 FAN served 17 families one-on-one,held 13 Common Sense Parenting classes that served 77 parents and impacted 121 children. They had 269 phone contacts with over 400 contact hours. In FYI 8-19 they have served 11 families and 19 phone contacts. October Common Sense Parenting calendar will be coming out soon, but they need help identifying a location in Northern Orange. FAN wasn't funded by Durham County this year, but they continue to have lots of interest. They are currently recruiting for a bilingual advocate since Georgia and Anna are no longer with FAN. It is a preferred requirement that the advocate have experience navigating various systems for a child/grandchild with mental health diagnosis. Child and Adolescent program has received a referral and are expecting another one to be coming along soon. They are also working with Boomerang on making arrangements for the evening group. 16 With losing the FAN advocates, including the bilingual advocate, all Spanish-speaking referrals are on hold until the position is filled. They are reviewing cases that are appropriate to close and utilizing language resources to help translate/interpret for current Spanish-speaking cases. DJJData—June: 11 distinct juveniles, 15 complaints, 3 approved for court, 8 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles admitted to detention, 0 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House, 0 electronic monitoring activations, 0 days on electronic monitoring, and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. June's complaints received included disorderly conduct, communicating threats, and 3 felony charges for breaking into federal vehicles; all charges were taken out by law enforcement officers. When comparing FYI 6-17 and FYI 7-18 numbers,there were double the number of youth at intake and 58 more complaints, almost twice as many youth were diverted this past FY,the number of detentions dropped from 9 to 2 and the number of days also dropped from 61 to 10. There were about as many youth that utilized Wrenn House, but they utilized 50%more days this past FY than in FY16- 17. And the number of youth on electronic monitoring remained about the same,but the total number of days increased from 180 to 265. July- 1 distinct juvenile, 3 complaints, 3 approved for court, 0 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles admitted to detention, 1 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House for 29 days, 0 electronic monitoring activations, 0 days on electronic monitoring, and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. July's complaints received included simple assault,misdemeanor larceny, and injury to property that were all taken out by a parent. JCPC Business Conflict of Interest form—All council members need to sign a new COI form for the new fiscal year. If you have any questions about whether something may be a conflict of interest,please ask Rebekah or Denise at the end of the meeting. Membership Review—The Member of the Business Community seat is open and we are looking for recommendations. If anyone knows of someone,please let Rebekah know so we can reach out and gauge their interest. Some suggestions may be someone associated with a community service worksite, or a volunteer within your organization but is employed within the business community, or a parent of a former child served by one of our programs. Election of Officers—Donna King, Chair of the Nominating Committee,through communication with the council members,presents the following slate of officers: Chair—Bernard Miles (no challenge) Vice Chair—Sherita Cobb (no challenge). JCPC Chair called for a vote and the presented slate of officers was unanimously approved. Training Opportunity—JCPC funds are available to help pay for registration to attend the National Symposium on Juvenile Services that will be held in October in Greensboro at the Koury Center. Community Programs is also offering an opportunity for scholarships for cost of registration and rooms. There is a form that needs to be completed and submitted to the state. Sherita attended the Restorative Practices training in Seattle about 3 weeks ago and had an amazing time. In the schools they are trying to use the practice to help students learn to support each other and hold each other accountable—"our classroom"and"our learning environment"and help them take ownership of their environment. Sherita brought back lots of information on how to incorporate circles with students (and appropriate adults) involved with juvenile justice who offended within the school i i 17 system(i.e. fighting) and how they can work things out and be able to get along within the school setting moving forward. Sherita would like to start incorporate these circles within the schools and eventually become a trainer. I� Hot Topic Discussion The County has started a Reentry Council that is working with formerly incarcerated and there is a lot of energy and community involvement. It is being put out on our radar because at some point in the future it may intersect with the juvenile justice system and the JCPC. l Orange County Schools has contracted with Renaissance Center as the school-based mental health provider and this year they will have 6 full licensed therapists that will be housed in the schools Monday-Friday and will be divided between 2-3 schools that are in close proximity so that if an emergency happened they can get to a school within 10 minutes. The students do still have to have Medicaid or private insurance,but for every 10,they will give 1 or 2 pro-bono for the McKinney Vento students or those with financial hardships. The Partnership for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth is looking at their logic model and has addressed three different types of substances—underage drinking,prescription drug misuse, and marijuana. If anyone is interested in joining any of the workgroups please let Gayane know. Susan wanted to give a shout out to Denise for helping to expedite the July payments from the state to Orange County so that the programs could receive their July funds in July and not August, like has happened in the past. Consultant Update All program agreements have been approved and fully executed in DocuSign and all programs have received their July disbursements. Final accounting is now available and the deadline to be submitted in NCALLIES is August 15. Please do not wait until the last minute to complete. Failure to complete final accounting in a timely manner could hold up future disbursements. New this year, all signatures will be done electronically through DocuSign; no more hard copies to pass around. Denise will have the programs present their SPEP scores at the December meeting. This is an evaluation tool that the state uses to make sure that the funded programs are evidence-based, follow a curriculum, and have protocols in place for staff retention. Denise will be working with the programs to identify if there are any areas for improvement and the programs will report to the JCPC on this. Denise is going to start working on the Risk and Needs data in preparation for the January subcommittee meeting. All programs in Orange County have had a consultant monitoring,which is done every three years. Please add committee signups to the October agenda. Denise will provide a brief description of each one and a suggested number of members. Please use this opportunity to volunteer for something you are interested in; otherwise the Chair may appoint you to one. i 18 Announcements Health, Safety, and Wellness Resource Fair sponsored by Orange County Schools will be September 22 in the Walmart parking lot. I Sozo is hosting an event next Sunday from loam to 1pm at Fairview Community Park. There will be food, school supplies, games, and representation from community agencies. Please invite your families, and if you are interested in setting up a table,please let Kysha know. She will send a flyer to Rebekah to be emailed out. ➢ Next JCPC Meeting: Friday, October 5,2018; Location: Hillsborough Commons, 113 Mayo Street,Hillsborough NC 27278 19 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Meeting Friday, October 5,2018 (12:OOnoon—2:OOpm) Hillsborough Commons Hillsborough,NC Proposed Minutes Attendees: Bernard Miles, Sharron Hinton,Matthew Hinton,Amanda Farris,Maren Hardin, Meg McGurk,Megan Johnson, Carol McClelland, Stephanie Jones, Gayane Chambless,Jay Cole,Peggy Hamlett,Kysha Thompson,Pam Weiden, Tami Pfeifer, Susan Worley,Amy Kirshner, Linda Boldin, Patricia Cardoso,Rebekah Rapoza,(*Members in Bold) Absent: Charlos Banks, Sherita Cobb, Mia Burroughs, Jaime Lescinski, Dana Graves, Beverly Scott Excused.• Donna King,Nick Allen, Lee Barnes, Tina Sykes Welcome The meeting opened with a welcome from Chair, Bernard Miles, and introductions. Minutes Review and Approval The Council reviewed the minutes from August 2018. Amanda Farris motioned for minutes to be approved and was seconded by Meg McGurk. Motion carried unanimously. Agency Roundtable Wrenn House—To date they have served 2 youth for a total of 64 days. They are doing a big push this year around runaway prevention and letting youth know that Wrenn House is available as a resource. Freedom House—Common Sense Parenting classes continue with one being offered in Chapel Hill and one in Cedar Grove. FAN is having some challenges filling the advocate position; finding someone with personal experience navigating the system and that is also a native Spanish speaker. They are hopeful that the resume they just received may be a good fit. The Child and Adolescent program has a couple youth who are using the funds. Lzgo Dojo—They haven't received any referrals yet, but that isn't totally uncommon in the first quarter. They had a couple carry over students and have terminated some that have continued on as non-JCPC students. Volunteers for Youth—So far this fiscal year they have served 38 kids in community service and 19 in Teen Court. A girl in the community service program went to her worksite with not so great an attitude, but turned it around so well that they are now offering her a paid internship this summer. Her mom was so excited to hear that her daughter had such a great attitude because she knew she did, but hadn't seen it in such a long time. Boomerang—Alternative to Suspension has served 9 youth year to date—7 from CHCCS and 2 OCS. There have been more referrals than that but transportation has been an issue from Orange High. Fighting continues to be one of the highest reasons for fighting. This year Boomerang is working on partnering with the schools to provide in-school support to youth, combining their models with the schools' programming. DJJ Data—August: 6 distinct juvenile, 8 complaints, 2 approved for court, 2 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles admitted to detention, 1 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House for 5 days, 0 electronic monitoring activations, 0 days on electronic monitoring, and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. 20 September: 3 distinct juvenile 4 complaints, 0 approved for court, 3 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles P juvenile, P Pp admitted to detention, 0 juveniles admitted to Wrenn House for 30 days, 0 electronic monitoring activations, 0 days on electronic monitoring, and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. JCPC Business Conflict of Interest form—Please complete if you haven't yet for the new fiscal year. Membership Vacancy—Member of Business Community position is still vacant. Please share with any connections you may have and let Bernard or Rebekah know so they can follow-up. Committee Sign-Ups—We need volunteers for the different committees—Monitoring, Risk&Needs, and Funding. The sign-up sheet is being passed around. The Monitoring and Risk&Needs committees require commitments in the month of January and the Funding Committee is in March. Programs are able to serve on the Risk&Needs Committee, but Monitoring and Funding is available for council members without any conflict of interest. Hot Topic Discussion Service providers often have difficulty finding bilingual and culturally appropriate/aware job candidates. Someone mentioned looking at how the job openings are advertised;that maybe it isn't through channels that the ideal candidate would be looking. Transportation, especially for Northern Orange residents, continues to be a huge barrier to accessing services. Have there been any talks or plans to increase Orange Circular stops (number, frequency)? Are the Orange Circular services advertised appropriately? Services may be available,but individuals aren't aware. While appointments for transportation may be available, sometimes they don't have advance knowledge to be able to get on the schedule. Clients of most non-county service providers (Juvenile Justice, JCPC programs, etc.) are not served well by public transportation in northern Orange,whether it's lack of knowledge or lack of availability. Is JCPC able to advocate to the BOCC on this topic? Suggestion was offered about utilizing a volunteer transportation program, or creating their own. Volunteers for Youth uses this model and has had success transporting their youth to appointments and worksites. Affordable housing was also mentioned as a challenge, especially given the impact from the recent hurricanes that hit the eastern part of the state. Orange County already faces affordable housing challenges and some residents of the eastern part of the state are expected to relocate inland, quite possibly to our county. Many current residents, not just those who are low-income, are leaving the county because housing isn't affordable and moving to counties with a lower cost of living (Durham, Alamance, and Caswell). What little affordable housing that is available comes with challenges— f connectivity moves and loss o 0 flooding, income guidelines—and this can lead to disruptions (frequent y to the community). The Town of Chapel Hill will have a$10M bond referendum for affordable housing on the November ballot. It is to build and maintain 1,000 units of affordable housing (www.chapelhillaffordablehousing.org has more information). Sharron will speak with the new Housing and Transportation directors to see about the possibility of coming to speak at our February meeting. I� i 21 Announcements On October 11, Boomerang is hosting"The Talk" at Smith Middle School. It is a one man play by Sonny Kelly and was born from a painful conversation that Sonny had with his seven-year-old j son after confronting recent reports about multiple killings and beatings of black men by civil authorities. There will also be a panel of speakers following the show. The end of October is Prescription Medication Awareness week. There will be different drives happening during that time for the public to bring in their prescriptions that they no longer need/use. Steve Stadler retired last week and Juvenile Justice is in the process of hiring a new supervisor. ➢ Next JCPC Meeting: Friday,December 7,2018; Location: Southern Human Services Center, 2501 Homestead Rd, Chapel Hill NC 22 II Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Meeting Friday,December 7,2018 (12:00noon—2:00pm) Southern Human Service Center Chapel Hill,NC Proposed Minutes Attendees: Bernard Miles, Tina Sykes,Maren Hardin,Peggy Hamlett, Stephanie Jones, Sharron Hinton, Carol McClelland,Kysha Thompson, Gayane Chambless,Jay Cole,Amanda Farris, Amy Kirshner, Val Hanson, Lia Kaz, Linda Boldin, Tami Pfeifer, Susan Worley, Kelsey Mosley, Coby Kansen Austin,Angela Clapp,Raquelle Hawkins, Pamela Weiden,Denise Briggs, Rebekah Rapoza(*Members in Bold) Absent: Charlos Banks, Megan Johnson, Jaime Lescinski, Dana Graves, Beverly Scarlett,Nick Allen, Excused.• Sherita Cobb, Matthew Hinton,Donna King, Lee Barnes, Meg McGurk Welcome The meeting opened with a welcome from Chair, Bernard Miles, and introductions. Guest Speaker—Family Success Alliance Coby Kansen Austin&Angela Clapp) P Y ( About four years ago Orange County identified working on poverty as a priority and the Health Department stepped up and said that education,housing, employment all affected the population level downstream. The looked to the Harlem Children Zone model as a way to structure their approach. The model follows children from cradle to college/career and is structured within"zones". In order to determine which zones to target;the Health Department looked at data on where Medicaid and Housing Choice Voucher(for example)recipients lived and created an index of six zones where families struggling to make ends meet would most likely live. An advisory council was appointed by the county commissioners that worked with those six communities to identify a champion and then selected two zones to work with. The two zones selected were: Zone 4 (Gateway community to out Hwy 70 east towards Durham County line) and Zone 6 (in-town Chapel Hill and Carrboro encompassing some more affordable market rate apartments and public housing). The first program launched was a kindergarten readiness program that is 4 weeks and based at the elementary school for rising kindergarteners with the first cohort starting four years ago. The next program launched was the Navigator program which included hiring people from the community who had the lived experience of struggling to make ends meet,had learned themselves how to navigate the systems, and already had built trust and relationships within their respective community. The Navigators then started working with the parents and families of the children in the readiness program. There are currently four cohorts —kindergarten, first, second, and third graders. Even though the kids in the cohorts are elementary school aged,the Navigators are working with the whole family which often includes older siblings. Minutes Review and Approval The Council reviewed the minutes from October 2018. Carol McClelland motioned for minutes to be approved and was seconded by Gayane Chambless. Motion carried unanimously. Agency Roundtable Wrenn House—Currently has one youth in care from Orange and has had a total of five. Just completed federal monitoring and it went well with just some minor things that need to be addressed. They are still working on the last of the needed renovations for the house and should be completed by end of the fiscal year. 23 I Volunteers for Youth—Teen Court celebrated its 300t' session. Boomerang—Alternative to Suspension program has served 37 students. Top reason for suspension the last month was for fighting. They continue to run middle school group at Stanback and are in talks with two other middle schools. They are looking to increase their in-school work with the students. Freedom House—FAN has served 22 parents and currently has 14. Due to a change in Orange County outside agency funding process, FAN's overall program budget may be reduced drastically (by almost $40,000). If these funds are not awarded for this current fiscal year, FAN will have to do a JCPC program agreement amendment to change staffing structure (will need to reduce number of navigator positions) and it could impact their ability to hire a bilingual advocate. The CEO and CFO are currently investigating the issue with the county. In late September 2017 Freedom House became sole partner with Insight Human Services. In the spring of 2018, Trish Hussey retired bringing about significant change. In July 2018,they became sole partners with Daymark Recovery Services. While the three are stand-alone entities but are partnered in trying to achieve efficiencies and streamline services. In September 2017, Freedom Houses' accountant quite without notice and they had to scramble to figure out what she was doing and how. The CFO of Insight has stepped in to be the accounting person for Freedom House and is overseeing finances for Insight and Freedom House. Since the CEO and CFO are new, Carol has been doing her best to stress the importance of the funding streams and provide support where and when needed. Outpatient Services program had two youth carry over into the new fiscal year but have since dropped out and didn't complete all their sessions. They have had two new referrals this year and still have money to serve additional youth. They estimate they have the capacity to serve about six more. Dispute Settlement Center—Trying to get the new restorative justice program up and running and are very close to being at capacity to be able to run the first circle(s) in January. They are doing a lot of partnership work with Volunteers for Youth with Teen Court and Community Service. LL�,,o Doio—Have received one referral so far this program year from juvenile justice. In the new year they will expand their outreach to community partners to see if there are any additional referrals. DJJData—October: 14 distinct juvenile, 18 complaints, 3 approved for court, 7 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles admitted to detention, 1 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House for 8 days, 1 electronic monitoring activation, 30 days on electronic monitoring, and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. Charges included disorderly conduct at school,misdemeanor assaults and larceny. Referrals came from law enforcement, one from a victim, and one from a parent. November: 7 distinct juvenile, 11 complaints, 5 approved for court, 2 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles admitted to detention, 0 juveniles admitted to Wrenn House, 0 electronic monitoring activations, 30 days on electronic monitoring(carry over from previous month), and 0 juveniles committed to YDC. Charges included breaking in vehicles and simple assault. JCPC Business Membership Vacancy—Member of Business Community position is still vacant. Please share with any connections you may have and let Bernard or Rebekah know so they can follow-up. 24 Conflict of Interest form—Please complete if you haven't yet for the new fiscal year. Freedom House Final Accounting—There was a significant delay in Freedom House getting in their final accounting forms for FY17-18. There were several emails to the program fiscal officer, conference calls, and even one-on-one meetings and every time after the meeting/conversation Denise had the impression/commitment that it was going to be done by the end of the day. Several days to a week would pass and Denise would follow-up and nothing had happened. Denise didn't want final accounting to proceed as completed because there were a significant number of errors that would have created a$31,000 refund for FAN and they knew that wasn't correct. They knew the money had been spent but the information was just entered incorrectly. Since the fiscal requirement had not been met, Freedom House's current FY disbursements were placed on hold until it was completed. Because of this, Denise went in and completed the Final Accounting information(with permission from Freedom House). Within the last week, Final Accounting has finally gone through and been signed off on by all parties. With the number of delays and missing the deadline, Denise wanted to make sure that it was brought to the attention of the JCPC. As a result of all of this, Denise has some concerns about the fiscal oversight and control of the JCPC funds. The county has since been advised that it is okay to release all funds that were previously on hold. Executive leadership is aware of the problems and concerns and steps are being taken to address it. Subcommittees—Historically much of the subcommittee work and reporting has fallen on Rebekah to complete. This year the JCPC will be moving towards taking on much more of that responsibility and chairs will be appointed to committees as needed. Bernard will be reviewing with Rebekah the committee tasks and volunteers and may be asking JCPC members to step up to help out. Consultant Update Raise the Age—Handouts were shared with data on 16 and 17 year olds. Breakdown by districts and counties by number of charges, estimated number of new juveniles,projected number of new juveniles to be served by funded programming, number of school-based complaints, and percentage of complaints that were school-based. The Department is trying to prepare the JCPCs and counties for Raise the Age impact and is hoping that this won't be an unfunded mandate. The plan is that the legislature will approve funding that will go the local counties to make the decision on how to spend the funds—expand capacity of current programs or fund new programs. What's important right now is to get some grassroots efforts going to advocate for funding for this mandate. There will be an addendum to the FYI 9-20 County Plan that will identify a plan for the Tier II funding (i.e. Raise the Age funds). The Department is encouraging the JCPC Chairs to write a letter to their local county commissioners to adopt a resolution to support the JCPCs receiving extra funding to adopt the Raise the Age mandate. It is suggested to get on the commissioners to agenda to be able to explain what it is and why it's important. The Department would like to have a copy of the resolution by March. SPEP Scores—Handouts were shared that included an example Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP), definitions of SPEP terminology, SPEP service categories and targets for amount of service, and Program Optimization Percentage (POP) example. Some programs won't have a SPEP a score because they are short-term, structured programs that aren't designed to provide a therapeutic intervention. SPEP is important because it helps JCPCs determine if they are funding effective and/or evidenced-based interventions and programs. Denise reviewed the SPEP example and explained each category and how the score is calculated. SPEP score isn't the most important score (overall across all I i 25 program types); rather,the POP score is more reflective of program's effectiveness based on total potential (specific to program types). Programs were asked to complete a Program Enhancement Plan(PEP)to identify how they can enhance their respective programs and in which areas. Even though some programs won't have a SPEP Score,they will all have a PEP. Wrenn House—Review policies and procedures to see areas that can updated and improved; have on identified staff to be responsible for NCALLIES data entry; ongoing training for shelter staff; continue to support staff in effort to reduce staff turnover. Community Service & Teen Court—Looking at ways to improve staff training and plan in advance; evaluate/enhance program monitoring. Boomerang—Continue to develop written protocols for high quality service delivery as needed; continued staff training. FAN-Complete additional information in protocol manual for service; consistent documentation of training and staffing as applicable to JCPC services; outcome measures consistently completed and documented; correctly document services, enrollments, and completions in NCALLIES. Child&Adolescent Outpatient Services—Complete protocol manual for service; consistent, documentation of training and staffing as applicable to JCPC services; outcome measures consistently complete and documented. Victim Offender Mediation—Review and update manual; professional development and training; update program evaluation measures. Young Warriors—Enhance program protocol; enhance program evaluation; enhance staff evaluation. ➢ Next JCPC Meeting: Friday,February 1,2019; Location: Hillsborough Commons, 113 Mayo Street, Hillsborough NC 26 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Meeting Friday,February 1,2019 (12:00noon—2:00pm) Hillsborough Commons—113 Mayo Street Hillsborough,NC Proposed Minutes Attendees: Bernard Miles,Amanda Farris, Peggy Hamlett,Penny Rich,Donna King, Megan Johnson,Tina Sykes, Carol McClelland, Gayane Chambless, Stephanie Jones,Jay Cole,Maren Hardin,Judge Beverly Scarlett, Sharron Hinton,Kysha Thompson, Caraina Garris,Valoree Hanson, Lia Kaz, Lindo Boldin, Raquelle Hawkins, Susan Worley, Patricia Cardoso, Amy Kirshner, Tami Pfeifer, Jamie Jacobs, Denise Briggs, Rebekah Rapoza(*Members in bold) Absent: Charlos Banks, Jaime Lescinski, Dana Graves,Nick Allen Excused.• Sherita Cobb,Matthew Hinton, Lee Barnes,Meg McGurk Welcome The meeting opened with a welcome from Chair, Bernard Miles, and introductions. Minutes Review and Approval The Council reviewed the minutes from December 2018. Donna King motioned for minutes to be approved and was seconded by Carol McClelland. Motion carried unanimously. JCPC Business Risk&Needs Committee—Subcommittee met, reviewed juvenile justice data for FY 17-18, and identified recommended program funding priorities for FYI 9-20. RFP Review & Vote—RFP FY date needs to be updated from 2018-19 to 2019-20 (Denise will correct and send to Rebekah). The anticipated county allotment is $277,731 with a 30% local/county match and projected advertisement date of February 4, 2019 and deadline of March 11, 2019. As you look down the announcement,the targeted program types are identified,and a supplemental sheet with program descriptions are attached. The county allocation amount remains the same as previous years. Any funding for Raise the Age (JCPC Tier II) expansion will be outside this RFP and county allocation. Amanda Farris motioned for the RFP to be adopted with one identified correction(update FY to 2019-20) and was seconded by Donna King. Motion carried unanimously with Carol McClelland and Stephanie Jones abstaining from the vote). "Raise the Age"—Every JCPC must submit an Annual Plan to their County Commissioners that addresses specific work of the council (Risk&Needs, Funding, etc.) and some of the documents that Denise will review are part of the Annual Plan. The "Continuum of Services—At a Glance"provides an overview of services available within Orange County for all youth, from at-risk to post-release youth. Please review the Continuum and bring updates/suggestions to the next meeting. The"Orange County Plan Addendum"is new this year to help each county start thinking about how "Raise the Age"will impact their community and programming. Counties and programs are encouraged to start thinking about where gaps in services may be and what the needs of this new population are. The addendum will serve as a"wish list"to help the Council identify where expansion should happen. When counties receive the Tier II (aka"Raise the Age") funds,they can either expand programs that are currently funded under the RFP or they can go through another RFP process. With North Carolina being the last state to raise the age, we have learned a lot from the others and are hearing that restorative justice 27 (mediation, community service/restitution, and Teen Court)programs are where they saw the greatest increase in youth. Another lesson learned from other states was that the numbers of 16-17 year olds didn't explode like they thought/expected. After December 1, only 16-17 year olds who have never been to district court and who have an eligible charge will be seen in juvenile court. Conversation around diversionary options for 16-17 year olds now that Misdemeanor Diversion Program will be raising their minimum age to 18 when"Raise the Age"takes effect. While Juvenile Justice can only refer a youth to Teen Court if they have never been,they are also able to place them on a diversion plan which could include ensuring they are accessing/attending specified services. Additionally, SROs are able to refer a youth to Teen Court multiple times (up to two times) if it would be appropriate to do so (for example, it's been months or years in between and the offense is minor). Others have raised concern about structuring a"scheme"that would help keep a youth out of court, especially if it would reinforce in the youth's mind that they can keep behaving/acting in a certain way without consequences. Eventually they will age out of juvenile court, and if they keep behaving the same way they will rack up charges and points. While we want to help,we need to be careful about what we do and how we do it so that we don't create an illusion and we don't cripple. Val reminded the group that she can work in tandem with other programs to help youth with restorative practices and/or accountability for their actions. Reviewed handout on"Total Number of Acts"committed on school property broken down by each school in Orange, Alamance, and Chatham counties so we can see how we compare within our district. Reviewed two other handouts that include risk and needs data for Orange County for FY 17-18 for 16-17 year olds who are currently in juvenile court. This will help when brainstorming for expected needs. This is the same type of data that is used in the normal risk and needs process that drives the regular(Tier I) JCPC RFP. The risk assessment helps the court counselors identify what risk factors may be present in a juvenile's life that could cause them to reoffend and the needs assessment helps determine which types of programming the youth could benefit from. Conversation around the number of youth with identified substance use issues and what treatment options are available and whether or not they are being utilized. Data supports the conclusion that there is a substance use problem among youth; however,while treatment options are available, youth and/or parents are not making use of those services. Some possible reasons for this may include a lack of accessibility and/or a belief that treatment isn't necessary. There also needs to be a focus on the family when addressing substance use because it isn't just an individual problem. Between now and the April meeting, program providers need to think about how"Raise the Age"is going to impact service delivery and/or budget and JCPC members need to begin thinking about whether there are any additional program types that may need to be funded in order to address the needs of the 16-17 year olds. At the April meeting we will review/update the Continuum of Services chart and complete the "Raise the Age"Addendum for the Annual Plan. As program providers begin to complete their FYI 9-20 applications they should consider addressing the impact of"Raise the Age"and keep in mind that the regular JCPC allocation has not increased; if additional funds are requested in preparation for serving the expanded population,those funds will need to be taken from another program. Also,programs should remember that most have been reporting that referrals continue to be low and while there may be an increase with the new population coming in, those new youth may make up the difference and programs may be back at normal capacity. It is also important to remember that JCPC funds are not meant to fix all problems and the Department is very specific in the types of programs and evidence-based curriculums that they will fund. 28 Agency Roundtable DJJData—December: 7 distinct juveniles, 10 complaints, 3 juveniles approved for court, 5 juveniles diverted, 0 juveniles in detention, 1 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House for 11 days, 0 electronic monitoring activations, and 0 admitted to YDC. January: 8 distinct juveniles, 10 complaints, 5 juveniles approved for court, 1 juvenile diverted, 0 juveniles in detention, 1 juvenile admitted to Wrenn House for 23 days, 0 electronic monitoring activations, and 0 admitted to YDC. Dispute Settlement Center—Youth circles are meeting at Stanback Middle School the second and third Wednesdays of the month from 6-8pm (dinner is provided) and there are still slots available so please send referrals. They try not to mix middle and high school youth, so in March they will be trying a middle school circle. Boomerang—They are not receiving referrals from Orange County Schools and feel that they are way underserving the youth in the northern part of the county that need the services. Transportation continues to be the greatest barrier, but there are also some new administrators in some schools and they have to build those relationships back up. They have talked about having another site but it would be a huge undertaking. Freedom House—There are spots available in the Child&Adolescent Outpatient program. FAN has received funding from a Duke grant to offer another men's only parenting course. Bonnie Farrell will be coming March 22-23 to do co-parenting and communication education. Hot Topics Transportation for northern Orange County youth to services continues to be an issue. Getting services in the schools could be a great solution to being able to deliver the needed services that are convenient while also being delivered within a healthy environment. Youth Risk Behaviors Surveys (YRBS) are a great tool to help identify the needs but there have been huge challenges to even getting them completed in the schools because hard(active)parental consent is required. There have been problems/concerns that were disclosed on the YRBS a few years ago that then resulted in school incidents that could have been addressed/avoided if they had been shared with the school board. But if a YRBS can't be completed and there are no school board representatives coming to meetings, it will be tough to get services into the schools. Consultant Update RFP will be advertised next week and program providers are encouraged to start working on them immediately and not wait until the last minute in case something happens or there are questions. Announcements Orange County Parks & Recreation summer camp registration opens Saturday. The Town of Chapel Hill just hired two new crisis counselors and will now have someone available until 1 1pm. They are also advertising for another position that will work loam-7pm,Master's degree is required but not licensure. CAY will be hosting some upcoming workshops around"Raise the Age". On March 27,the Orange County Collaborative will be hosting Ana Marshall, Community Engagement Representative, because Cardinal will be restructuring their governance body in a way to where the community partners meeting is going to be more of an advisory board. The new advisory board will inform the decisions for local government and then that will be how mental health funding will be awarded. The new model will be presented and will be more grass-roots focused. 29 ! Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Meeting Friday,April 5,2019 (12:00noon—2:00pm) Hillsborough Commons—113 Mayo Street Hillsborough,NC Proposed Minutes Attendees: Bernard Miles,Megan Johnson,Maren Hardin,Peggy Hamlett, Stephanie Jones, Sharron Hinton,Carol McClelland,Penny Rich,Beverly Scarlett, Donna King, Gayane Chambless, James Cole,Meg McGurk,Amy Kirshner, Linda Boldin, Lindsay Mosteller, Susan Worley, Patricia Cardoso, Lia Kaz, Raquelle Hawkins, Tami Pfeifer,Allyson Coltrane, Frances Henderson, Denise Briggs (*Members in bold) Absent: Charlos Banks, Sherita Cobb, Tina Sykes, Jaime Lescinski, Dana Graves,Nick Allen Excused: Kysha Thompson,Matthew Hinton, Lee Barnes, Amanda Farris Welcome The meeting opened with a welcome from Chair, Bernard Miles, and introductions. Minutes Review and Approval The Council reviewed the minutes from February 2019. Meg McGurk motioned for minutes to be approved and was seconded by Stephanie Jones. Motion carried unanimously. Agency Roundtable Freedom House—FAN has had 35 parents complete Common Sense Parenting and has another 3 pending. They just started another class and have another 2 referrals. There are still funds to serve youth in the Child and Adolescent Outpatient program. Dispute Settlement Center—Restorative Justice and Mediation program is currently working with 9 youth for a total of 17 youth(YTD)referred by DJJ,MDP, and Teen Court. Wrenn House—Currently have a bed available. YTD have served 6 kids and used 108 days,which is a large increase from this time last fiscal year when only 42 days had been used. They just completed their relicensing and are getting ready for a monitoring review with Denise this month. Boomerang—Served 94 students YTD with the majority coming from Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools; 3 of the students in March were court involved. The biggest reason for suspension last month was insubordination which isn't a reason they have seen recently. Volunteers for Youth—The Community Service program has served 57 kids so far but has about another 12 referrals that they just received and Teen Court has served 42 youth YTD. Teen Court is also scheduled for a monitoring review with Denise. DJJ Data Report/Update No update this month as their data system is being updated and they are unable to run reports at this time. February and March data will be presented at the June meeting along with April and May. Guest Speaker—Allyson Coltrane, TDM Coordinator, Orange Public Transportation(OPT) Within Orange County there are a few public transportation options—OPT(serves all Orange County), Chapel Hill Transit(serves Town of Chapel Hill), and GoTriangle (currently has two routes). Fares for OPT one-way are $2 for adults, $1 for youth(6-17), and seniors, children under 5, and persons with disabilities are free. Chapel Hill Transit is free to ride and GoTriangle fares and passes that vary based on the route. Youth between the ages of 13 to 18 can use a Youth GoPass to ride GoTriangle, GoRaleigh, GoCary or GoDurham buses free; and these passes are also accepted by OPT and Chapel Hill Transit. To 30 obtain a Youth GoPass,the parent/guardian is required to accompany the child to sign up for the pass and some type of ID will be required when applying. Youth 13 and older are allowed to ride unsupervised. OPT was just approved for the reverse circulator and expect to launch that route in late Fall 2019. Currently is takes 1 hour to make a full loop and with the new route it will only take 30 minutes. They are also working to get a stop at the Health Department in Hillsborough. Currently the Circulator operates M-F 8a-5p and makes stops at Walmart, DSS,Durham Tech Orange County Campus, apartment complex on the Hwy 70 corridor, Passmore Senior Center, etc. The Hillsborough Circulator is free. They also offer the Rural Operating Assistance Program(ROAP) for a fare of$12.75 one-way. It is required that either the beginning or ending destination be located within a rural portion of Orange County. There is also a Commuter Options Program which includes carpool and vanpool resources (Share the Ride NC), and biking and walking campaigns for people who live closer to work. If an agency or service provider would like to take a ride so that they know what their clients experience, please contact Allyson to set something up. They are also working on building an online, interactive commuter maps that should launch by September and will also have a print version available. JCPC Business Funding Committee Report—The Funding Committee has met twice this year and have had long, difficult conversations about funding requests compared to the needs of the youth as identified by the Risk and Needs Committee. The Funding Committee recommends the following for FY 2019-20: JCPC Admin $8,178 Young Warriors $0 Wrenn House $10,722 Teen Court $61,330 Restitution& Community Service $69,870 Mediation&Conflict Resolution $40,500 Boomerang $28,131 Family Advocacy Network $0 Child&Adolescent Outpatient Services $0 (did not request funding) Unallocated $59,000 Additionally,the Funding Committee is proposing a second RFP be published for the unallocated funds for an interpersonal skills building program that has a parent and child component. The Funding Committee identified this as a need that isn't currently being addressed in the community and for which no program application wasn't received. If approved by the JCPC,the RFP will be posted Monday. All services providers, including those currently receiving JCPC funding, are encouraged to submit an application in response to the second RFP. A question was asked about FAN and why they are not being recommended for funding for next year. The Funding Committee had a discussion about the needs of the community and wanting to attract a program that has some increased nuisances that would help identify and support parent child interactions in a way that they aren't currently be supported. FAN's funding through JCPC is to provide Common Sense Parenting curriculum only, and not for the additional services that FAN provides. The other services that FAN(Linda)provides within the court system are supported by other funds received by Freedom House. Judge Scarlett expressed how vitally important those other(non-JCPC funded) services are that FAN provides and doesn't want to see them go away. Denise stated that taking away JCPC funds doesn't have anything to do with the other services that she mentioned and that it would be up to Freedom House to still make that other piece work. JCPC is not un-funding FAN,but rather Common Sense Parenting; FAN is much broader than just Common Sense Parenting. The JCPC Funding Committee is 31 looking for a program to provide a curriculum that includes both the parent and child that FAN does not currently do through Common Sense Parenting. Prior to making the decision to not recommend FAN for funding,the Committee asked Freedom House if they would be able to switch curriculum to one that includes the child, but they were not able to answer definitively without approval from executive leadership first. Funding Recommendations Vote— The Funding Committee motioned that: • JCPC Admin be approved for$8,178 and was seconded by Donna King • Wrenn House be approved for$10,722 and was seconded by Beverly Scarlett • Teen Court be approved for$61,330 and was seconded by Gayane Chambless • Restitution&Community Service be approved for$69,870 and was seconded by Gayane Chambless • Mediation& Conflict Resolution be approved for$40,500 and was seconded by Stephanie Jones • Boomerang be approved for$28,131 and was seconded by Donna King Motions carried with 12 votes; Carol McClelland and Gayane Chambless abstaining from the vote. RFP Review and Vote— The anticipated county allotment is $59,000 with a 30% local/county match and projected advertisement date of April 8, 2019 and deadline of May 10, 2019. As you look down the announcement,the targeted program type is for Interpersonal Skill Building only and curriculum must include parent(s)/guardian(s) and youth. If no programs apply for these funds, or if no programs are selected for funding,then the $59,000 can remain unallocated until December 31, 2019. At any point until that time,the JCPC can decide to release another RFP or to allocate the remaining funds to currently funded programs. The Funding Committee motioned for the RFP to be approved and was seconded by Carol McClelland. Motion carried unanimously. Continuum of Services Review and Update— Denise provided a brief overview of how to read the document and explained that this chart is meant to show a possible continuum of services for youth who are at-risk, committed to a YDC, and post-release from YDC. Denise has asked that everyone review the document and email Rebekah and/or Denise with any notes. A question was asked about substance abuse residential treatment being classified as "available but difficult to access". There are currently only three providers in the State where youth can go for residential substance abuse treatment. Recently there has been some Medicaid reformation/transformation where insurers have the ability to do behavioral health as well as physical health, and five have been selected. Currently there are lawsuits pending about the selection process and until those have been settled, no changes will go into effect. But until 2021, Cardinal will be managing services as is; after 2021 they will manage only the complex cases and everyone else will manage the standard plans. For example, if a youth is assigned to the standard plan and is receiving outpatient services but requires something more intensive services under the enhanced services (such as in-home), there is a process that will need to happen to get the youth transferred into the new plan. County Plan Addendum— Reviewed Risk and Needs data of 16 and 17 year olds that have been involved in juvenile court in Orange County. Risk and needs data is collected by court services at intake and every 90 days for youth on 32 probation. The data that is shown in the chart is pulled from the most recently completed risk assessment; the majority of youth served by JCPC fall within risk level 3. Youth that are seen by juvenile court for the first time under the age of 12 tend to stay in the system longer, often have more mental health issues and commit more serious offenses. Being the last state to implement Raise the Age,they have seen that mediation and restorative justice, community service and restitution, and teen court programs have seen the greatest increase in referrals. In preparation of"Raise the Age"which takes effect December 2019,the Department wants county JCPCs to begin thinking about the impact it will have on service providers. When the money comes,the Department will utilize a formula to decide how much each county receives. The JCPCs then have to decide how they plan to use that money: 1) increase funding to existing programs to increase their capacity; 2)provide funding for new programming through an RFP process for additional components in existing or newly funded programs; and/or 3) collaboration with surrounding counties to provide funding for multi-county programming. Denise has created a draft of the Addendum for review by the JCPC, selecting some program priorities based on the risk and needs data and the experiences of the other states: mediation,restitution/community service,teen court, and runaway shelter. On the second page,the currently funded programs that fall within those priorities have been listed along with an estimate of how much it would cost to be able to increase capacity to serve the expanded population. However, she noted that since juvenile crime is down across the state and that as a result,programs have been under capacity for a while. So when referrals start coming in for the older juveniles, they will help bring the numbers back up to original capacity, and possibly over. This addendum will not drive any funding decisions, but will help the department know what the county's priorities are and what the plan is. 33 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council County Plan Orange County For FY 2019-2020 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. County Funding Plan III. County Funding Plan Addendum IV. Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization V. County Risk and Needs Assessment Summary VI. County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals VII. Funding Decisions Summary VIII. Funded Programs Descriptions(unless there is a JCPC approved Program Enhancement Plan) IX. Program Enhancement Plans (for each program which had a PEP approved by the JCPC) Attachments: Continuum of Services - At a Glance 34 Executive Summary The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC),in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina,has completed the activities required to develop and update this County Plan for FY 2019-2020. The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, at-risk youth, and their families in Orange County. Further,the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior. It should be noted that the JCPC continues to support and embrace diversionary strategies, such as Teen Court,that effectively reduce and prevent delinquency. As noted in NC Gen. Stat. § 143 B-851,the JCPC is legislatively mandated to evaluate the effectiveness of its funded programs and the Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice,has provided the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Instrument to aide JCPCs with this task. However,the tool cannot be administered to all JCPC funded programs given that some programs are identified as structures or"settings within which program services are delivered" (Lipsey, 2005). Programming such as Teen Court may be identified as a structure yet it offers vital diversionary programming to youth. Other services, including some residential programs and structured-day services, also offer vital intervention strategies to youth and families but may not be scored using the SPEP instrument. The JCPC recognizes that these identified structures offer critical prevention/intervention programming and the JCPC adheres to their utilization in its strategies to prevent and reduce delinquency. Priorities for Funding: Through a risk&needs assessment and a resource assessment,the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Orange County: • Restitution/Community Service • Parent/Family Skill Building • Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured (including Substance Abuse; Trauma Based Therapy) • Interpersonal Skill Building • Mentoring • Mediation/Conflict Resolution(including School Based) • Teen Court • Tutoring/Academic Enhancement • Temporary Shelter(specifically Emergency Shelter) Monitoring and Evaluation: Each program funded in the past year by the JCPC has been monitored. The monitoring results and program outcomes evaluations were considered in making funding allocation decisions. The JCPC continues to conduct implementation monitoring of its action plan and its funded programs. 35 Funding Recommendations: Having published a Request for Proposals for needed services for a minimum of thirty(30)days,the JCPC has screened the submitted proposals and has determined which proposals best meet the advertised needed services. As required by statute,the JCPC recommends allocation of the NC Department of Public Safety(NC DJJ) funds to the following programs in the amounts specified below for FY 19-20 (see Orange County Funding Plan): 1. Boomerang $28,131 2. Juvenile Community Service and Restitution $69,870 3. Mediation/Conflict Resolution $40,500 4. Parent Teen Solutions $45,500 5. Teen Court $61,330 6. Wrenn House $10,722 7. Unallocated $13,500 The JCPC further recommends that the following amount be allocated from the NC DPS DJJ funds for the administrative costs of the Council for FY 19-20: $8,178.00 Respectfully Submitted, Bernard Mi es, Chair Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council 36 ORANGE County NC DPS - Community Programs - County Funding Plan Available Funds: $ $277,731 Local Match: $ $220,312 Rate: 30% DPS JCPC funds must be committed with a Program Agreement submitted in NC Allies and electronically signed by authorized officials. ........... ................................................... ........... .........:::Co . . .................................... �. IiIifV : ::::-'t04al:::::: %No. . ........... ............................................ ..... ... .... ........................................ ... ................ DP&JCPC tcli ................. :-:-Fu . ..... Program ........................................ . .. .......... .......... ..................... .............................................. .. . .......... .......... ........... ............ Revenues Boomerang Youth,Inc. I (Boomerang) $28,131 $8,439 $55,000 $249,300 $340,870 92% Volunteers for Youth,Inc. 2 1(Juvenile Community Service and Restitution) $69,870 $20,9611 $29,494 1 $120,325 42% Volunteers for Youth,Inc. 3 (Teen Court) $61,330 $18,399 $16,158 $95,887 36% Dispute Settlement Center 4 (Mediation/Conflict Resolution) $40,500 $12,150 $1,100 $533750 25% Haven House,Inc. 5 (Wrenn House) $10,722 $3,217 $20,581 $34,520 69% Exchange Club 6 (Parent Teen Solutions) $45,500 $13,650 $18,710 $77,860 42% 7 JCPC Administration $8,178 $2,453 $10,631 23% 9 9 10 if 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TOTALS: $264,231 $79,269 $122,333 $18,710 $249,300 $733,843 64% The above plan was derived through a planning process by the ORANGE - County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council and represents the County's Plan for use e f9 in n19-20 Amount of Unallocated Funds $13,500 Juvenile Crime P Amount of funds reverted back to DPS Zerson,Juve2rcvention Council (Date) YYY Discretionary Funds added check type Elinitia plan El update El final -----DPS Use Only- Chairperson,Board of County Commissioners (Date) or County Finance Officer Reviewed b Area Consultant Date Reviewed b Program Assistant Date Verified b Designated State Office Staff Date ver 0 310 412 01 6 ext 37 Orange County Plan Addendum: "Raise the Age" Priorities The Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC) seeks to maximize available allocation funding by addressing the priorities of the Raise the Age legislation in the areas of targeted intervention programming for 16-17 year old offenders in the juvenile justice system by seeking to do the following (check all that apply): ® Increase the capacity of existing programming to address additional 16-17 year olds entering and/or being retained in the juvenile justice system; ® Provide funding for new programming to 16-17 year olds via additional components in existing programs or newly funded programs ❑ Seek collaboration from surrounding counties to provide funding for multi-county programming focusing on 16-17 year olds in a district or region. "Raise the Age" program priorities include: ❑ Mentoring Services ® Restitution/Community Service ❑ Sexual Offender Treatment ❑ Parent/Family Skill Building ® Teen Court ❑ Group Home ❑ Interpersonal Skill Building ❑ Psychological Assessments ❑ Temporary Shelter ❑ Vocational Skills ❑ Counseling ® Runaway Shelter ❑ Experiential Skills ❑ Home Based Family Counseling ❑ Specialized Foster Care ❑ Tutoring/Academic Enhancement ❑ Crisis Counseling ❑ Temporary Foster Care ® Mediation ❑ Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ Juvenile Structured Day Data reviewed by the JCPC as well as a county Resource Assessment focusing on the full range of juvenile jurisdiction proposed by Raise the Age indicates the following gaps that the additional programs indicated above will seek to address: increase of referrals for community service and/or restitution, an increase of referrals to teen court, to address a need for mediation (school based) and residential services for shelter care. 38 Tier I Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs and RFP development based on the current Orange County allocation of $277,731. Tier II Planning for FY 2019-20 includes priority service needs to address RFP development with JCPC expansion funding. Tier II planning includes the development of the following identified expansion of services. Priorities for Expansion Funding: While conducting an additional needs assessment specifically related to the focus service expansion to meet the RtA legislation, the following service needs and cost associated with those services have been identified as follows.. Program Funding Priorities JCPC $ Program Expansion Focus Amount Expand staffing needs for current program Restitution/Community Service $25,000 (worksite supervisors to provide direct supervision Teen Court Expand staffing needs for current program $25,000 additional teen court nights) Wrenn House $20,000 Expand staffing needs for current program Expand programming to include school based Mediation $25,000 mediation. TOTAL $95,000 39 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Organization FY 19-20 Name Organization Title Chairperson Bernard Miles Orange County Social Services CPS Treatment Supervisor Vice-Chairperson Amanda Farris NC Department of Public Safety Court Counselor Supervisor Number of members: 20 List meeting dates during the current fiscal year and identify the number of JCPC members in attendance for each. Meeting Date Members inAttendance Quorum Present? Yes/No August 2018 13 Yes October 2018 13 Yes December 2018 12 Yes (with 2 proxies) February 2019 15 Yes (with 2 proxies) April 2019 13 Yes (with 2 proxies) June 2019 15 Yes (with 1 proxy) 40 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY RISK AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE I. Risk Assessment Summary II. Needs Assessment Summary III. Resource Assessment Summary IV. Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Community Continuum V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding Part I. Risk Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Risk Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors after juveniles are referred with a complaint alleging that a delinquent act has occurred and prior to adjudication of the juvenile. The Juvenile Risk Assessment is an instrument used to predict the likelihood of the juvenile being involved in future delinquent behavior. For some juveniles, some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent(s). For these items (represented by an asterisk)there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures. In those cases, the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence. Orange County Risk Factor Observations: FY 2017-2018 2% of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were at low risk (R1) for reoffending. 17% of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R2 of reoffending. 36% of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R3 of reoffending. 35% of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were R4 of reoffending. 10% of juveniles coming to the attention of Juvenile Services were high risk(R5) of reoffending. NOTE: RI=Risk Level 1 (0 points), R2=Risk Level 2 01-2 points), R3=Risk Level 3 (3-5 points), R4=Risk Level 4 (6-12 points) and R5=Risk Level 5(13+points) 13% of juveniles were under age 12, a decrease from FY 16-17 (16%). 44% of juveniles show having one or more prior referrals at the time of intake. 20% of juveniles have a prior class 1-3 misdemeanor with 3%having prior class f-1 felonies or al misdemeanors/A-E Felonies. 41 11% of juveniles had prior assaults, a decrease from FY 16-17 of 20%. 25% of juveniles have run away from home or placement which remained the same from FY 16- 17. * 30% of juveniles have some known substance use/abuse and need substance.use/abuse assessment and/or treatment, a 78% increase compared to FY 15-16. Of those juveniles,47%* have known substance abuse and need assessment or treatment. *This statistic is possibly underreported. 73%of juveniles demonstrate moderate to serious behavioral problems in school. These numbers increased from FY 16-17 (58%) and consistent with the state average (75%). 88% of juveniles lack pro-social peers,regularly associate with others involved in delinquent activity, and/or is a gang member/associates with a gang; an increase from FY 16-17 (57%) while below the state average of 63%. 3%of parents are willing but unable or unwilling to supervise juveniles, a decrease from FY 16- 17 (8%) and significantly lower than the state average of 18%. Part II. Needs Assessment Summary The Orange County JCPC Risk and Needs Assessment Committee also reviewed data gleaned from the Juvenile Needs Assessment instrument administered by Juvenile Court Counselors prior to court disposition of a juvenile. The Juvenile Needs Assessment is an instrument used to examine juvenile needs in the various domains of his/her life: The Individual Domain, The School Domain, The Peer Domain, and the Community Domain. This instrument was designed to detect service intervention needs as an aid in service planning. As with the Juvenile Risk Assessment, some of the individual item ratings may be heavily dependent upon information reported by the juvenile or the parent(s). For these items (represented by an asterisk)there is a likelihood of under-reporting the incidence of a particular behavior and the actual incidence may be higher than suggested by these figures. In those cases,the figure should be interpreted as a measure of the minimum level of occurrence. Orange County Elevated Needs Observations: FY 2017-2018 Juveniles were low (47%), medium (4901o) and high (501o) with overall needs for services/interventions to reduce the likelihood of repeat delinquency. Juveniles with low and medium needs are able to be served in the community. 47% of juveniles fall into the low needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed; which is lower than the state average of 61%. 49% of juveniles fall into the medium needs category of having indicators that there are needs not being addressed; which is above the state average of 34%. 42 5% of juveniles fall into the high needs category which is consistent with the state average of 5%. I 24% of juveniles report being rejected by positive peers; 64% had some/regular association with delinquent peers or 2% regularly associated with a gang in FY 17-18. Numbers remain steady with an increase of some association with delinquent peers (51%) in FY 16-17. 73%of juveniles have moderate to serious school behavior problems as compared to 45% in FY 16-17. Close to the state average of 72%. *32%of juveniles need substance abuse assessment or treatment which is consistent with the state. *This statistic is possibly underreported. *44%of juveniles are reported to be abuse/neglect victims which is twice the state average 23%, and 3% of those having NO support. *This statistic is possibly underreported. *3%of juveniles have dangerous sexual practices. *This statistic is possibly underreported. 41%of juveniles need more mental health assessment which is higher than the state at 35%. *26% of juveniles have domestic discord in the home and 4%of juvenile's violence in the home. *This statistic is possibly underreported. 59% of juveniles come from homes where parents/guardians have marginal to inadequate family supervision skills which is higher than the state at 52% 10%of juveniles have a parent/guardian with a disability, above the state average of 4%. *18%of juveniles have family alcohol/drug abuse in the home,higher than the state average of 12%. *This statistic is possibly underreported. 54%of adjudicated juveniles come from homes where family members have criminal history and an additional 11%are under active court supervision or have gang involvement. Part III. Resource Assessment Summary Community resources are sometimes available but can be difficult to access. See the attachment titled Orange County Continuum of Services—At a Glance for a listing of available community resources. 43 Part IV. Summary of Gaps and Barriers in the Continuum of Services While Orange County is not large,transportation is a barrier for many juveniles, especially those in Northern Orange County where public transportation is limited. Additionally,the cost of gas is an inhibitor to accessing services, including court ordered sanctions and therapy sessions. One of the major services providers has reduced services in the home. 1 Young people and families needing bi-lingual mental health and substance abuse services often experience waitlist for services due to the scarcity of bi-lingual therapists and language interpretation. There are no mental health or substance abuse services available for undocumented juveniles. While Orange County does have a domestic violence service provider,the services offered are limited and are targeted more towards adults experiencing it as victims. There are no services offered to children/juveniles who experience or witness discord or violence in their homes. Part V. Proposed Priority Services for Funding The committee compared the services needed to address the elevated Juvenile Risk Factors and Juvenile Needs with services currently available in the community. Services which are currently available in the community and sufficient to meet the needs of court involved juveniles or those juveniles most at risk for court involvement are not considered as a priority for JCPC funding. The Committee proposes that the following service be approved as the funding priorities for FY 19-20: 1. Restitution/Community Service 2. Teen Court 3. Tutoring/Academic Enhancement 4. Temporary Shelter Services (specifically Emergency Shelter) 5. Mediation/Conflict Resolution(including School Based) 6. Interpersonal Skill Building 44 RISK ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 13-18 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-171 State 17-18 Total Adjudications 32 41 27 13 14 5,053 4,338 1 4,415 Overall Risk Level FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 RI-1 6% 2% 5% 5% RI-2 15% 17% 15% 14% RI-3 30% 36% 32% 33% RL4 33% 35% 33% 33% RL5 15% 10% 15% 15% 40% ■FY 13-14 35% 30% ■FY 14-15 25% ■FY 15-16 20% ■FY 16-17 15% ■FY 17-18 10% ®State 15-16 5% 0 State 16-17 0% RL1 RL2 RL3 RL4 RL5 0 State 17-18 Observations:The risk assessment tool was renormed in April 2016 with new Risk Levels as:R1=Risk Level 1(0 points), R2=Risk Level 2(1-2 points),R3=Risk Level 3(3-5 points),R4=Risk Level (6-12 points)and R5=Risk Level 5(13+points) R1-Age When First Delinquent Offense Alleged in a Complaint FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Under age 12 9% 10% 10% 16% 13% 15% 14% 16% Age 12 or over 91% 90% 90% 85% 87% 85% 86% 84% 100% 90% _ ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 70% +FY 15-16 60% ■FY 16-17 50% 40% ■FY 17-18 30% o State 15-16 20% o State 16-17 10% 13State 17-18 0% mmffm&e�r�—11—— I Underage 12 Age 12 or over Observations: 45 R2-Number of Undisciplined or Delinquent F FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 1647 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Current Referral Only 60% 58% 68% 56% 66% 60% 56% 58% One Prior Referral 22% 20% 18% 20% 21% 18% 20% 18% 2 or 3 Prior Referrals 11% 10% 13% 18% 10% 13% 15% 14% Four or More Prior Referrals 7% 12% 1% 6% 3% 9% 10% 10% 80% ------ ■FY 13-14 70% ■FY 14-15 60% I •FY 15-16 ■FY 16-17 50% ■FY 17-18 40% ■State 15-16 30% ■State 16-17 20% — ■State 17-18 10% 0% Current Referral Only One Prior Referral 2 or 3 Prior Referrals Four or More Prior Referrals Observations: R3-Most Serious Prior Adjudication FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 NO prior adjudications 78% 80% 86% 70% 75% 78% 70% 72% Prior undisciplined 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 3% 3% Prior class 1-3 misdemeanors 19% 15% 8% 18% 20% 13% 17% 15% Prior class f-1 felonies or a1 misdemeanors 3% 5% 4% 11% 3% 6% 9% 9% Prior A-E felonies 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% ■FY 13-14 100% — 90% ■FY 14-15 80% ■FY 15-16 70% ■FY 16-17 60% ■FY 17-18 50% 40% ■State 15-16 30% oState 16-17 20% oState 17-18 10% 0% _ No prior adjudications Prior undisciplined Prior class 1-3 Prior class f-1 felonies or Prior A-E felonies misdemeanors a1 misdemeanors Observations: 46 R4-Prior Assaults FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No assaults 84% 86% 86% 80% 88% 81% 78% 79% Involvement in an affray 4% 2% 1% 0% 1% 3% 4% 3% Yes,without a weapon 13% 8% 8% 16% 9% 13% 15% 15% Yes,without a weapon,inflicting serious injury 0% 3% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Yes,with a weapon 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% Yes,with a weapon,inflicting serious in'u 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% ■FY 13-14 90% ■FY 14-15 80% ■FY 15-16 70% ■FY 16-17 60% ■FY 17-18 50% ■State 15-16 40% ■State 16-17 30% � o State 17-18 20% 10% 0% — — No assaults Involvement in an Yes,without a Yes,without a Yes,with a weapon Yes,with a weapon, affray weapon weapon,inflicting inflicting serious serious injury injury Observations: R5-Runaway from Home or Placement FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No 89% 78% 81% 75% 75% 86% 83% 83% Yes 11% 22% 19°% 25% 25%1 140/6 17% 17% 100% -- — -- ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 60% ■FY 15-16 ■FY 16-17 40% ■FY 17-18 20% ■State 15-16 0% ■State 16-17 No Yes ■State 17-18 Observations: 47 R6-Known Use of Alcohol or Illegal Drugs( FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Known substance use 65% 57% 75% 62% 70% 70% 68% 68% Some substance use,need further assessement 20% 26% 14% 20% 17% 18% 19% 20% Substance abuse,assessment or treatment needed 15% 17% 11% 18% 13% 12% 12% 12% 70% ■FY 13-14 60% ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 30% 20% z�— ■FY 17-18 10% ■State 15-16 0% ■State 16-17 No Known substance use Some substance use,need further Substance abuse,assessment or assessement treatment needed ■State 17-18 Observations: R7-School Behavior Problems(prior 12 months) FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Problems enrolled,attending regularly) 20% 16% 28% 35% 21% 15% 17% 17% Minor Problems 8% 3% 6% 8% 6% 8% 9% 9% Moderate Problems 29% 25% 17% 17% 25% 28% 26% 25% Serious Problems 43% 56% 50% 41% 48% 48% 48% 50% 60% —_ _ ■FY 13-14 50% ■FY 14-15 ■40% FY 15-16 ■FY 16-17 30% ■FY 17-18 20% ■State 15-16 10% u State 16-17 0% MState 17-18 No Problems(enrolled, Minor Problems Moderate Problems Serious Problems attending regularly) Observations: 48 R8-Relationships with Peers FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Peers are good support and influence 20% 19% 29% 21% 12% 37% 36% 37% Lacks prosocial peers or sometimes associates with delinquent others 55% 54% 49% 56% 74% 40% 41% 42% Regularly associates with others involved in delinquent activity 22% 25% 22% 20% 12% 18% 16% 15% Youth is a gang member or associates with a an 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 6% 6% 6% 80% ■FY 13-14 70% ■FY 14-15 60% ■FY 15-16 50% 40% ■FY 16-17 30% ■FY 17-18 20% MM ■State 15-16 10% LLI ®State 16-17 0% Ak . ��- I Peers are good support Lacks prosocial peers or Regularly associates with Youth is a gang member aState 17-18 and influence sometimes associates with others involved in or associates with a gang delinquent others delinquent activity Observations: R9-Parental Supervision FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16.17 State 17-18 Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing&able to supervise 92% 90% 93% 92°% 97% 80% 81% 83% Parent/Guardian/Custodian willing but unable to supervise 8% 9% 7% 7% 1% 19% 18% 16% Parent/Guardian/Custodian unwilling to supervise 0% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1%1 2°/ 2% ■FY 13-14 120% ■FY 14-15 100% ■FY 15-16 80% ■FY 16-17 60% ■FY 17-18 40% ■State 15-16 20% IML I FAW ■State 16-17 0% ■State 17-1 8 ParenUGuardian/Custodian willing&able to ParenUGuardian/Custodian willing but unable to Parent/Guardi to supervise supervise supervise Observations: 49 NEEDS ASSESSMENT COMPARISION DATA Orange for FY 13-18 FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 1 State 16-171 State 17-18 Total Adjudications 32 41 27 13 14 6,063 4,338 4,415 Overall Needs Levels FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Low Needs 56% 53% 38% 47% 47% 60% 61% 61% Medium Needs 34% 41% 52% 43% 49% 35% 34% 34% High Needs 10% 7% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 70% ■FY 13-14 60% ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 30% ' ■FY 17-18 20% now ■State 15-16 10% ■State 16-17 Low Needs Medium Needs High Needs ■State 17-18 Observations; Y1-Peer Relationships FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Positive Peers 18% 25% 22% 21% 11% 33% 35% 37% Rejected by Positive Peers 22% 22% 14% 29% 24% 14% 15% 15% Some Association with Delinquent Peers 35% 38% 44% 30% 51% 30% 29% 27% Regular Association with Delinquent Peers 22% 13% 19% 17% 13% 16% 15% 15% Gang Association 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 7% 7% 6% 60% -- — --- ■FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 30% III State 15-16 20% — ■State 16-17 e State 17-18 10% 0% ---��4 Positive Peers Rejected by Positive Peers Some Association with Regular Association with Gang Association Delinquent Peers Delinquent Peers Observations: 50 Y2-School Behavior FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No School Behavior Problems 20% 28% 28% 37% 21% 21% 20% 17% Minor School Behavior Problems 26% 14% 11% 18% 7% 11% 11% 9% Moderate School Behavior Problems 18% 28% 17% 14% 24% 24% 24% 25% Serious School Behavior Problems 37% 31% 44% 31% 49% 44% 46% 49% 60% ■FY 13-14 50% ■FY 14-15 40% ■FY 15-16 30% ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 20% o State 15-16 10% a State 16-17 oState 17-18 0% No School Behavior Problems Minor School Behavior Moderate School Behavior Serious School Behavior _ Problems Problems Problems Observations: Y3-Academic Functioning FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 At Grade Level 82% 82% 84% 84% 84% 89% 89% 90% Below Grade Level 18% 18% 16% 16% 16% 110/. 11% 10% 100% -- 90% ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 70% ■FY 15-16 60% 50% ■FY 16-17 40% ■FY 17-18 30% ®State 15-16 20% oState 16-17 10%0% oState 17-18 At Grade Level Below Grade Level Observations: 51 Y4-Substance Abuse FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Known Substance Abuse 59% 61% 65% 60% 68% 68% 68% 68% Some Abuse Assessment 20% 24% 20% 27% 17% 18% 19% 20% Some Abuse Treatment 22% 15% 15% 13% 15% 14% 13% 12% 80% - ---- -. 70% ■FY 13-14 60% ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 30% ■State 15-16 20% — m State 16-17 10% o State 17-18 0% ' No Known Substance Abuse Some Abuse Assessment Some Abuse Treatment Observations: Y5-Juvenile Parental Status FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Juvenile Not a Parent 99% 100% 99% 97% 97% 98% 98% 99% Juvenile is a Parent,No Custody 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Juvenile is Parent,Expect childcare 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% Juvenile is a Parent,Expect no child care 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 120% 100% — ■FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 80% ■FY 15-16 60% ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 40% OState 15-16 ❑State 16-17 20% 13 State 17-18 0% Juvenile Not a Parent Juvenile is a Parent,No Custody Juvenile is a Parent,Expect childcare Juvenile is a Parent,Expect no child care Observations: 52 Y6-Abuse Ne lect History FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect 66% 55% 51% 54% 56% 78% 77% 77% Abuse Victim wi upport 31% 41 0 38% 36% 41% 18% 19% 19% Abuse Victim but NO Support 3% 3% 11% 10% 3% 4% 4% 4% 90% --------- - 80% ■FY 13-14 70% ■FY 14-15 60% ■FY 15-16 50% ■FY 16-17 40% ■FY 17-18 ■State 15-16 30% ■State 16-17 20% ■State 17-18 10% 0% No Evidence of Abuse/Neglect Abuse Victim with Support Abuse Victim but NO Support Observations: Y7-Sexual Behaviors FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Problem Sexual Behavior 87% 90% 79% 82% 92% 87% 88% 88% Sexual Behavior-Needs Assessment 6% 5% 10% 8% 5% 5% 5% 4% Dangerous Sexual Practices 5% 5% 6% 7% 3% 5% 5% 4% Has Sexually Victimized Others 1% 0% 5% 3% 0% 3% 3% 3% 100% 90% ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 70% ■FY 15-16 60% 50% ■FY 16-17 40% t ■FY 17-18 30% ■State 15-16 20% ®State 16-17 10% aState 17-18 0% No Problem Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior-Needs Dangerous Sexual Practices Has Sexually Victimized Assessment Others Observations: 53 Y8-Mental Health Needs FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Mental Health Needs Noted 23% 23% 21% 13% 12% 30% 28% 28% Mental Health Needs Addressed 37% 40°/u 34% 47% 48% 35% 38% 37% Needs More Mental Health Assessment 40% 37% 45% 40% 41% 35% 34% 35% 50% -- - 45% ■FY 13-14 40% ■FY 14-15 35% ■FY 15-16 30% ■FY 16-17 25% 20% ■FY 17-18 15% ■State 15-16 10% ■State 16-17 5% 0% ■State 17-18 No Mental Health Needs Noted Mental Health Needs Addressed Needs More Mental Health Assessment Observations: Y9-Basic Needs/Living FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Living with Parent&Needs Met 91% 95% 88% 90% 94% 90% 900/( 91% Temporary Residence&Needs Met 8% 5% 10% 9% 5% 9% 9% 9% Livingwith Parent&Needs Unmet 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Living Independently 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 0% 100% — 90% ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 70% ■FY 15-16 60% ■FY 16-17 50% 40% ■FY 17-18 30% o State 15-16 20% oState 16-17 10% Una 0% oState 17-18 Living with Parent&Needs Temporary Residence& Living with Parent&Needs Living Independently Met Needs Met Unmet Observations: 54 Y10-Health/Hygiene FY 13-14 FY 14-16 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-171 State 17-18 No Health Hygiene Problem 89% 87% 85% 82% 86% 90% 91% 92% Health/Hygiene Problem but Unimpaired 11% 11% 12% 12% 9% 9% 8% 7% Health/Hygiene Problem Limits Function 0% 0% 1% 1% 3% 0% 0% 1% Health/Hygiene Problem Untreated 0% 2% 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 100% 90% ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 70% ■FY 15-16 60% 50% ■FY 16-17 40% ■FY 17-18 30% ■State 15-16 20% ■State 16-17 10% ®State 17-18 0% ' No Health Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Health/Hygiene Problem Problem but Problem Limits Problem Untreated Unimpaired Function Observations; F1-Conflict in the Home FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 1 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 1 State 15-16 1 State 16-171 State 17-18 Supportive Home 75% 66% 54% 56% 70% 74% 74% 75% Domestic Discord 14% 26% 34% 32% 26% 21% 21% 20% Domestic Violence 11% 9% 12%1 129/b 4% 5% 5% 5% 80% --- ------- -- ------------------ ■FY 13-14 70%60% ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 30% - ■FY 17-18 20% ■State 15-16 10% ■State 16-17 0% ®State 17-18 Supportive Home Domestic Discord Domestic Violence Observations; I I III 55 F2-Family Supervision Skills FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 Adequate 39% 48% 37% 43% 41% 43% 46% 48% Marginal 52% 47% 55% 48% 57% 53% 51% 49% Inadequate 9% 5% 8% 9% 2% 3% 3% 3% 70% 60% IN FY 13-14 50% ■FY 14-15 ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 30% ■FY 17-18 20% o State 15-16 13State 16-17 10% ❑State 17-18 0% Adequate Marginal Inadequate Observations: F3-Disability of ParentIGuardian FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Disabilities 86% 90% 85% 84% 90% 95% 95% 96% Disabilities Noted 14% 10% 15% 16% 10% 5% 5% 4% 120% 100% ■FY 13-14 80% ■FY 14-15 60% ■FY 15-16 ,f ■FY 16-17 40% ■FY 17-18 In State 15-16 20% m State 16-17 0% -State 17-18 No Disabilities Disabilities Noted Observations: 56 F4-Family Substance Abuse FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse 74% 76% 72% 72% 82% 89% 88% 88% Family Alcohol/Drug Abuse 26% 24% 28% 28% 18% 11% 12% 12% 100% --- 90% 80% ■FY 13-14 70% ■FY 14-15 60% ■FY 15-16 50% 40% ■FY 16-17 30% ■FY 17-18 20% ®State 15-16 10% State 16-17 0% -- State 17-18 No Alcohol/Drug Abuse Family AlcohoUDrug Abuse Observations: FS-Family Criminality FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 State 15-16 State 16-17 State 17-18 No Family Criminal History 51% 46% 40% 36% 35% 55% 51% 52% Family Criminal History 40% 45% 52% 57% 54% 36% 40% 39% Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement 10% 9% 7% 8% 11% 9% 9% 9% 60% -- ■FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 50% ■FY 15-16 40% ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 30% o State 15-16 i 20% a; State 16-17 L State 17-18 10% 0% No Family Criminal History Family Criminal History Family Active Under Court Supervision or Gang Involvement Observations: 57 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 2019-20 $277,731 30% February 4, 2019 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council(JCPC)has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals. The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety(DPS)Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at-risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019-20 beginning on,or after,July 1,2019. The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above. The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed programs(see attached Program Descriptions): *Restitution/Community Service *Interpersonal Skill Building *Teen Court *Parent/Family Skill Building *Mentoring *Tutoring/Academic Enhancement *Assessment/Treatment Programs for Un/Underinsured *Mediation/Conflict Resolution *Temporary Shelter Services (including Substance Abuse;Trauma Based Therapy) (including School Based) (specifically Emergency Shelter) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency: Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older& had no prior contact with Juvenile Services. Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances,exhibit anger management issues,run away from home/placement,have moderate to serious school behavior problems,associate with peers who lack pro-social behaviors and are delinquent. Due to the diversity of Orange County,the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency(LEP)youth and their families. Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth: Peer Domain: Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships. Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers. Individual Domain: Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect.There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment. Family Domain: Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home. Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills,and family criminality,gang involvement,and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed. School Domain: Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school. Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below: 1. Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders. 2. Program services are outcome-based. 3. The program has an evaluation component. 4. Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation. Local public agencies,501(c)(3)non-profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications(Program Agreements)for programs addressing the above elements. Rebekah Rapoza at 919-245-2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone# In order to apply for FY 2019-2020 JCPC funding,you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES. Please read and follow all instructions at the following link: https://www.ncd ps.gov/lndex2.cfm?a=000003,002476,002483,002482,002514 You may find additional self-help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab. Private non-profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete: 1)No Over Due Tax form (available at above link),2)Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template(avavilable at above link),3)The non-profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4)Proof of 501(c)(3)status. NOTE: For further information, or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county, contact Denise Briggs, DPS Area Consultant, at(919)324-6391. Deadline for Application is: March 11,2019 by 5:00 P.M. 58 Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019-2020 Program Type Descriptions including Dosage and Duration of Services Interpersonal Skill Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a Building positive way with others. The basic skill model begins with an individual's goals,progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social.behaviors, and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment.Typical training techniques are instruction,modeling of behavior,practice and rehearsal,feedback,reinforcement. (Length of Stay=Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program&following model specifications,Frequency of Contact=no less than 2 hours weekly) Mentoring Provides opportunities for adult volunteers to be matched with delinquent or at-risk youth on a one-on-one basis. The mentor is an individual providing support, friendship, advice, and/or assistance to the juvenile.After recruitment,screening and training,the mentor spends time with the juvenile on a regular basis engaged in activities such as sports, movies, helping with homework,etc. (Length of Sta =Minimum 1 year,Frequency of Contact=should average 2 hours per week Mediation/Conflict Programs offering a private process of negotiation conducted by a neutral,third party person,a Resolution Mediator.These programs offer immediate and short-term involvement with youth to focus on negative and/or offending behaviors.Mediation is a consensual decision-making process by parties who work towards a mutual understanding to resolve a problem or a dispute.Mediators do not counsel or give advice but facilitate communication among parties as the parties work to reach their own decision regarding resolution of their conflict.Services should be provided for diverted and/or adjudicated youth and may include victim/offender reconciliation. (Length of Stay=No longer than 90 days,Frequency of Contact=Based upon the requirements of the program) Tutoring/Academic Services intended to supplement full time academic program by providing assistance with Enhancement understanding and completing schoolwork and/or classes.May also provide trips designed to be an enrichment of or supplemental experience beyond the basic educational curriculum. (Length of Stay=Minimum of 20 weeks,Frequency of Contact--No less than 2 hrs/week.) Parent/Family Skill Services that focus on interactional or interpersonal issues faced by a parent(s)/family of a Building juvenile. This service works to develop parenting skills, communication skills, discipline techniques, and other related skills. May include sessions for parents only and/or sessions for parents and the referred youth. (Length of Stay=Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program&following model specifications,Frequency of Contact=no less than 2 hours weekly) Teen Court Provides a diversion from juvenile court where trained adult and youth volunteers act as officials of the court to hear complaints.These programs make recommendations for appropriate sanctions including but not limited to community service and restitution(if applicable)to be assigned to the youth who have admitted committing minor delinquency and undisciplined complaints. (Length of Stay= Not to exceed 120 days, however 60 additional days may be approved to complete sanctions;Frequency of Contact=Not Specified) Page 1 of 2 59 Orange County JCPC Request for Proposals (RFP) Program Descriptions FY 2019-2020 Restitution/Community Programs that provide opportunities for offender to be accountable for their actions to the Service community and/or victim(s) through forms of payments or community service work that earns money to repay the victim(s). Court supervision=one year unless otherwise ordered; Frequency of Contact= minimum twice per month and no less than 8 hours per month) Temporary Shelter Care Provides group home care and shelter(up to 90 days)for juveniles who need to be temporary removed from their homes during a family crisis. (Length of Stay=up to 90 days,Frequency of Contact=NA) Clinical Clinical Evaluations and Assessments,including Psychological Evaluations to help court Assessments/Treatment counselors and judges recommend the most appropriate consequences and treatment for court involved youth. (Length of Stay=depends upon time needed to complete the assessment activity,Frequency of Contact=Not Specified) Page 2 of 2 60 Orange County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Request for Proposals for FY 2019-20 $69,000 30% April 8, 2019 Anticipated County Allocation Required Local Match Rate Date Advertised The Juvenile Crime Prevention Council(JCPC)has studied the risk factors and needs of Juvenile Court involved youth in this county and hereby publishes this Request for Proposals. The JCPC anticipates funds from the Department of Public Safety(DPS)Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice in the amount stated above to fund the program types specified below. Such programs will serve delinquent and at-risk youth for the state fiscal year 2019-20 beginning on,or after,July 1,2019. The use of DPS funds in this county requires a local match in the amount specified above. The JCPC will consider proposals for the following needed program: Interpersonal Skill Building:Services that focus on developing the social skills required for an individual to interact in a positive way with others. The basic skill model begins with an individual's goals, progresses to how these goals should be translated into appropriate and effective social behaviors, and concludes with the impact of the behavior on the social environment. Typical training techniques are instruction, modeling of behavior, practice and rehearsal, feedback, reinforcement.A curriculum that includes parent(s)/guardian(s)is preferred. (Length of Stay=Minimum 12 weeks unless implementing a model program &following model specifications. Frequency of Contact= no less than 2 hours weekly) Proposed Program Services should target the following Risk Factors for Delinquency or Repeat Delinquency: Indicators suggest youth coming to the attention of Juvenile Services are at risk for re-offending. Youth are generally age 12 or older& had no prior contact with Juvenile Services. Indicators suggest youth are using/abusing substances,exhibit anger management issues,run away from home/placement,have moderate to serious school behavior problems,associate with peers who lack pro-social behaviors and are delinquent. Due to the diversity of Orange County,the JCPC is particularly interested in funding programs that offer culturally appropriate services with accomodations for Limited English Proficiency(LEP)youth and their families. Programs should address the following concerns as reported in the Needs Assessments for Adjudicated Youth: Peer Domain: Youth are in need of development of prosocial peer relationships. Indicators suggest youth have some association with and/or regularly associate with delinquent peers. Individual Domain: Indicators suggest youth are victims of abuse/neglect.There is a strong need for individualized mental health and substance use/abuse evaluations and treatment. Family Domain: Indicators suggest youth are exposed to domestic discord or violence in the home. Parents have marginal or inadequate supervision skills,and family criminality,gang involvement,and substance abuse are areas that need to be addressed. School Domain: Indicators suggest youth having moderate to serious behavioral problems at school. Applicants are being sought that are able to address the legislatively mandated items below: 1. Program services compatible with research that is shown to be effective with juvenile offenders. 2. Program services are outcome-based. 3. The program has an evaluation component. 4. Program services detect gang participation and divert individuals from gang participation. Local public agencies,501(c)(3)non-profit corporations and local housing authorities are invited to submit applications(Program Agreements)for programs addressing the above elements. Rebekah Ra oza at 919-245-2869 JCPC Chairperson or Designee Telephone# In order to apply for FY 2019-2020 JCPC funding,you must complete and SUBMIT your application online by accessing NC ALLIES. Please read and follow all instructions at the following link: https://www.ncd ps.gov/l ndox2.cfm?a=000003,002476,002483,002482,002514 You may find additional self-help videos to assist you on the NCALLIES webpage by clicking on the HELP tab. Private non-profits are also required to submit the following forms or your application is considered incomplete:1)No Over Due Tax form (available at above link),2)Notorized Conflict of Interest Statement Template(avavilable at above link),3)The non-profit's Conflict of Interest Policy and 4)Proof of 501(c)(3)status. NOTE: For further information, or technical assistance about applying for JCPC funds in this county, contact Denise Briggs, DPS Area Consultant, at(919)324-6391. Deadline for Application is: May 10,2019 by 5:00 P.M. 61 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary Program Funded Reason for Funding Check all that apply) Boomerang ® Meets funding priority ®Compatible with research®Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Community Service and ® Meets funding priority ®Compatible with research®Cost efficient®Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation Restitution component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances®Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Mediation/Conflict ® Meets funding priority ®Compatible with research®Cost efficient®Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation Resolution component®Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Teen Court ® Meets funding priority ®Compatible with research®Cost efficient®Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances®Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ®Other provides a diversionary option for juvenile and distrcit court ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Wrenn House ® Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research®Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Parent Teen Solutions ® Meets funding priority ®Compatible with research®Cost efficient®Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions®Has evaluation component®Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ®Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available 62 Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Meets funding priority ❑Compatible with research❑Cost efficient❑Addresses reductions of complaints,violations of supervision&convictions❑Has evaluation component❑Addresses parental accountability❑Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances❑Addresses restitution to victims❑Addresses gang participation ❑Other ❑Other ❑Would increase funding to this service if funds were available Program Not Funded Reason for Not Funding Check all that apply) Family Advocacy ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than Network another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ®Other To fill a gap of services,its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and arent(s)/ uardian(s).FAN only provides services to parents. Young Warriors Athlete ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than Scholarship Program another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ®Other To fill a gap of services,its the interest of the JCPC to fund an interpersonal skill building program that utilizes an evidence-based curriculum to youth and parent(s)/guardian(s).Young Warriors does not utilize a curriculum to deliver services but skills are taught by services provided(discipline/decision making)through Karate. Life Skills for Youth and ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research®Lesser quality than Parenting-Botvin Life another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other Skills Curriculum Reintegration Support ❑Lack of funding, addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority®Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than Network Interpersonal another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other Skill Building ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other ❑Lack of funding,addresses priority need and would fund if resources allowed❑Does not meet funding priority❑Not compatible with research❑Lesser quality than another program funded of it's type❑Greater cost than program of same type and quality❑Other ❑Other 63 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name&Type: Boomerang-Structured Day (STRUCTURE ONLY-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: A resiliency-based program that engages youth ages 11-17 at risk for disconnection due to short-term suspension or court-involvement, by providing support services to mitigate the risk of school dropout through brief counseling, tutoring,and life skills development during out-of-school time. Boomerang programming is strengths-based, recognizing the assets of each individual student and building on those to create stronger connections to school, -family-and community. Primary Service NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of 1.Written protocols on student, 1. Executive Director Service 20120 1. Continue to parent, and school follow-up and 2. Program Managers Delivery develop written sevice evaluation protocols for high 2. Identify additional training quality service opportunties for direct service delivery as needed staff to develop and maintain 2_ Continued staff knowledge and skills in trauma- training informed care, and restorative practices. Amount of Service_ NSA Duration and -- - Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 NIA Risk Tier 2 NIA TOTAL SPEP N/A SCORE PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2019. 64 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol(SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) pop NIA Score This plan is approved b ' 12 -7 t.v Program Man I Ir me batel JCvu Chair Date PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,2a19. 65 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plan(PEP) Program Name&Type: Juvenile Community Service and Restitution-Restitution Brief Description: The Juvenile Community Service and Restitution Program works with Orange County youth who have committed offenses and are assigned community service hours andfor restitution_Youth are assigned to nonprofit work sites throughout the county where volunteer supervisors oversee and evaluate their worst. Through this program,youthful offenders learn important lessons in responsibility and accountability and Often develop positive relationships with their adult supervisors._ Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunitv Primary Service 10/30 N/A NIA NIA N/A Qualifying 5/5 - Supplemental Services $ Quality of � `�s a 4'T +r4:, 3k { �� Service 1g/Z fG. r�r�r O k ale ininwr c+nv:� I++:aNjs it :'ewe�i� ,} !' +lurt A Delivery 1^0 6;i Amount of Service: 6110 Duration and --- ---- Contact 0/10 Hours Risk Level of Youth RisK Tier 1 5/12 5/13 Risk Tier 2 TOTAL SPEP 491100 SCORE POP 61%/80% Score /o This plan is approved by: Program Manage;rprovided Date .lCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates to the]CPC no later than March 31,2019. 66 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPED) Program Enhancement Plan(PEP) Program Name&Type: Victim Offender Mediation-Mediation (STRUCTURE-NO SPED SCORq Brief Description: Restorative Justice practices to facilitate mediation and accountabifsty processes by trained facilitators and mediators. Pro rarer serves youth referred Court Counselors,schools,and commun partners. r _ .•7>- h.:.. y .•Yy. /''��� r.{ °G..: fty ICI P"Dose`'Rest' p. P.. �:a7 Primary ; Service NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of -Update program manual to Program Manager,Val Service 20120 -Review and reflect additional programming, Hanson Delivery update manual best practices for peer circles, evaluation, components, and -Professional volunteer protocol. Development( -Attend National RJ conference Training in June 2019 -Revise program evaluation Update program component to include peer evaluation circles and as well as pre-circle measures pre-Termination evaluative components Amount of Sel&e: NIA Duration and --- - Contact Hours N/A Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 NIA Risk Ter 2 NIA TOTAL SPEP NIA SCORE : PEP Progress itpdateswll be provided to theJCPC no laterthan March 31,2019. 67 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SP£P) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) POP NIA �� •< ,- .. _.. -., Scores Tt is p€art is approved by: Program Manager Name Date J C Ch 'r ©aLe PEP Progress Updates will he provided ito the.lCPC no laterthan March 31,2433. 68 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) Program Enhancement Plan (PEP) Program Name&Type: Teen Court-Teen Court (STRUCTURE-NO SPEP SCORE) Brief Description: An alternative court program for middle and high school students based upon the principles of restorative justice. First-time offenders are tried and sentenced by a jury of their peers. Fellow students take the roles of defense attorney, prosecutor,clerk of court, bailiff,or juror to carry out these proceedings. Local attorneys volunteer to serve as Teen Court judges. Participants are sentenced to complete community service hours and jury duties on future Teen Court cases. Category SPEP Enhancement Action Steps Responsible:Party. Comments Score Opportunity Primary NIA N/A Service NIA NIA ._� N/Ar�__�__ --------- --- Qualifying NIA Supplemental Services Quality of Service 20120 Delivery Amount of Service: N/A Duration and ----__— - ------_ Contact N/A Hours Risk Level of Youth Risk Tier 1 N/A _-_-- NIA Risk Tier 2 -: T TAL SPEP NIA : :_; .•... . .:: . _.:: ,._,:.,:. .::: :sir` '��: - 4� y SCO RE = l` Y 1y:j POP N/A -r - Score /o Viu This plan is approved by: / - YJ Program Manager N e Date P Chair Date PEP Progress updat II be provided to the 1CPC no later than March 31,2019. 69 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol(SPED) Program Enhancement Plan(PEP) Program Name&Type: Wrenn house-Runaway Shelter (STRUCTURE-NO SPED SCORE) Brief Description: Wrenn Mouse is crisis shelter designed to provide safe environment for runaway,homeless and in-crisis youth. Wrenn House is open 24 hours per day,365 days per year.Services are for youth ages 10-17. By offering temporary shelter,it eliminates need for illegal:means of support by homeless and runaway youth and therefore reduces rate of juvenile crime.It also serves as alternative to detention.Services are prodded within therapeutic environment while Prom2t 22 indhridual' and empowerment Category SPED Enhancement Action Steps Responsible Party Comments Score Opportunity Primary Service N/A N/A NIA NIA NIA Qualifying NIA _ _ — Supplemental Services Quality of 1.COO Service 2O12O 'I. Continue to 9. Identify any near training 2. Program Director Delivery enhance staff topics that would benefit the training program 2. Continue to 2. Update policies as new trends review and arise that may be best flit or best enhance policy and practice for youth in care. procedures as trends change. Amount of Service_ NIA Duration and Contact Hours NIA Risk Level of Youth Risk Ter I NIA Risk Ter 2 NIA TOTAL SPED NIA SCONE PEP Progress Updates%till be provided to the 1CPC no later than March 31,zo3.9. 70 Standardize Program Evaluation Protocol (5PEP) Program Enhancement Plan(PEP) PQP NIA Scare /. �' f ( This plan is approved by: U P669ram Mana r Name Date JCPC Chair Date PEP Progress Updates will be provided to the JCPC no later than March 31,20n. 71 SECTION I B PROGRAM COMPONENT DESCRIPTION COMPONENT ID# COMPONENT INFORMATION 25627 NAME OF COMPONENT: Parent Teen Solutions Group BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The program is provided to at-risk and delinquent youth (10-17) and their parents. The program is designed to maintain youth in the home, while reducing recidivism, improving parent-child relationship, school motivation, problem-solving skills, interpersonal skills, and parenting skills. Families participating in the program participate in peer group sessions for 2 hours that include group discussion and peer and family practice. COMPONENT ID# COMPONENT INFORMATION 25769 NAME OF COMPONENT: Parent Teen Solutions Home Visitation BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The home visitation counseling program provided to at-risk or delinquent youth (10- 17) and their parent(s) 3 hours per week from 3 to 6 months. Most families will average 150 days. Program is designed to maintain youth in the home environment while reducing recidivism, improving parent-child relationships, school motivation, problem- solving skills, interpersonal skills, and parenting skills. Families are also offered the option to participate in group services along with this component. Form JCPC/PA 004 JCPC Program Application Form structure last revised 12/31/2012 Department of Public Safety 72 Orange County Continuum of Services -At a Glance Instructions: Adjust arrows to cover target populations EmmmmmOm-JCPC funded Available in Community Comprehensive Strategy Needed Services Available but difficult access Prevention Graduated Sanctions DIPS funded/Non JCPC Tar 3et Po ulations Services& Instructions: Pre- Delinquent- Delinquent• Delinquent- Structures Adjust arrows to cover target Youth at Adjudicated Level I/Prot. Level II Level III Post Release Categories populations Greatest Risk Youth Supervision Youth Youth Youth Parent Teen Solutions(Exchange Club) Ligo Dojo of Budo Karate Boys&Girls Club Jr.Police Academy Citizens Academy GED Josh's Hope-Tools for Hope Structured AA/NA(Spanish Speaking) Activities YMCA 4-H Youth Services Girls&Boys Scouts of America Recreation Department ilk, Now—] Youth Scholarships(DSS) Behavior Skills Counseling Experiential Education Job Corps. WIOA NextGen Program Restitution(VFY) Youth/Family Team Coordin. Restorative Community Service(VFY) Services Teen Court(VFY) Victim-Offender Mediation(DSC) Truancy Mediation(DSC) Conflict Resolution DSC Alternative to Suspension Structured (Boomerang) Day Phoenix Academy Partnership Academy Multi-Systemic Therapy(MST) AMI Kids(FFT) MH Services SUD Services Freedom House Clinical Sex Offender Treatment Treatment Intensive In-Home Intensive Wrap-Around(Youth Villages) High Fidelity Wrap-Around(Youth Villages EI Futuro Court Psychologist Assessment Juvenile Crisis&Assessment Ctr Services Substance Abuse Sex Offender Assessment Therapuetic Foster Care Craven Transitional Living(Males) North Hills Transitional Living(Girls) WestCare Residential(Girls) Residential Eckerd Residential(Males) Sub.Abuse Residential Treatment Wright School Whitaker School Emergency Shelter(Wrenn House) Tarheel Challenge Updated April 2018