HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 02-19-2002 - 9b L
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: February 19, 2002
Action Agenda
Item No. Q-I:)
SUBJECT: Mill Creek II Subdivision (Section One)— Preliminary Plan
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
1) Resolution of Approval INFORMATION CONTACT:
2) Application Craig Benedict, Director, ext. 2592
3) Planning Board Minutes Carla Bateman, Planner I, ext. 2603
4) Agency Review Robert P. Davis, Planner III, ext. 2580
5) Fiscal Impact Analysis
6) Vicinity Map TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
7) Approved Concept Plan Hillsborough 732-8181
8) Phasing Plan Chapel Hill 968-4501
9) Preliminary Plat Durham 688-7331
Mebane 336-227-2031
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Mill Creek II Subdivision (Section One).
BACKGROUND:
Request Preliminary Plan approval for a Conventional subdivision
Applicant: Brad Walker
Owner: Norman and Peggy Walker
e TMBL: 32.15 (part of) PIN: 9836-34-9111 (part of)
e 140.13 acre tract (Total Concept Approval of 65 lots)
e Twelve (12) single family residential lots on 42.99 acres in Section One
e Average lot size: 1.92 acres (83,635.2 square feet) (Excluding Open Space)
e Minimum to actual lot ratio (MTALR) = 2.09
Lots Average Lot % Open Space Acres Open
Size Gross Space
Conventional 12 3.5825 37.1 15.95
Location
• Cheeks Township
• East side of Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) approximately '/4 mile south of High Rock Road
(SR 1340) intersection
Existing Site Conditions
Zoning
• Rural Residential (R-1); Back Creek Protective Watershed (12% impervious surface)
• Minimum zoning lot size: 40,000 square feet
• Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, agriculture and undeveloped lots.
}
2
Physical Description
• Gently rolling
• Predominately wooded. (Mix of evergreens and hardwoods)
Proposed Site Conditions
Roads:
• The subdivision will be accessed from Mill Creek Road (SR 1343).
• All roads shall be public and built to NCDOT standards and in accordance with County
requirements.
• Proposed Pintail Drive will serve as a major local road with a Type A Land Use Buffer.
• Stub out to the eastern property line for future connectivity is provided.
• Access along Pintail Drive limited to six (6) lots with joint driveways required except for
Lot P10.
Open Space
• Open space areas in this phase are comprised primarily of evergreen forest.
• 15.95 acres (37.1% by this phase)
• Orange County Subdivision Regulations do not specify a minimum open space
requirement for conventional subdivision.
Homeowners Association required to maintain open space and land use buffers.
• Protection of the intermittent stream (on entire tract)with stream buffer to be provided on
the final plat.
• Connectivity exists between open space provided for Mill Creek 11 and High Rock Farms
Subdivision.
Water— Sewer
• Individual wells and septic tanks provided for each lot.
Recreation & Parks
• Cheeks District Parks
• No public recreational resources found on site
• Payment in lieu reasonable alternative to dedication. [12 lots x $455 = $5460]
Development Process. Schedule. and Action
• First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board (by unanimous vote)
November 2, 2000, with concerns raised about adequate ground water resources to
support additional houses without adversely affecting existing wells.
• The USGS Water Resources Report has been received.
• Planning Board asked that a disclosure be provided on the Final Plat that Pintail Drive
is subject to future extension. (Condition B. Roads 11 addresses this concern and will
also require disclosure on the development restrictions recorded along with the Final
Plat)
• Interconnectivity of open space was discussed. A question regarding Lot P10 intruding
into the open space area was raised.
• Second Action: Planning Board unanimously recommended Preliminary Plan
Approval. January 9, 2002 with concerns raised that additional condition be included on
Resolution of Approval that Final Plat include a statement the Pintail Drive has potential to
connect to adjacent development in future and will become a major local road. Applicant
was agreeable to this condition.
3
• Third Action: Board of County Commissioners to consider Preliminary Plan
1. The application shall be placed on the Board of County Commissioners agenda within
90 days of the Planning Board recommendation.
2. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time.
3. During deliberations and consideration of the application, the Board may defer
consideration at any point in time to pursue additional analysis and review.
4. If the Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners, the applicant shall
have one (1) year to prepare and submit a Final Plat or to request a one-year
extension from the Planning Director.
FINIANCIAL IMPACT: A Fiscal Impact Analysis is attached.
RECOMMENDATION: Administration
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Planning Board
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval.
Planning Staff
Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval
4
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date of Meeting: February 19, 2002
Name of Subdivision: Mill Creek II (Section One)
Owner/Applicant: C. Norman and Peggy Walker/Brad Walker
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Mill Creek II (Section One) Subdivision
Preliminary Plat, dated May 31, 2001, revised on 9/13/2001 and 11/02/2001 and containing 12
lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and constructed to standards of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The approval of this resolution
authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for the County on behalf of the
public generally, the offer of dedication of Teal Street, Pintail Drive and Widgeon Way. This
acceptance of dedication of the general public shall be without maintenance responsibility.
These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant (C. Norman Walker and Brad Walker)
until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by NCDOT or some other government
body.
Before the Final Plat of Mill Creek II (Section One) can be recorded:
A Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for well, septic disposal and repair
area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health.
2. Disclosure that the septic system location may require the size and location of
improvements shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to
be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that
information regarding the tentative location of septic systems and is available from the
Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health.
B Roads and Access
1. Teal Street, Pintail Drive and Widgeon Way shall be constructed to NCDOT standards
within a 50-foot right of way with 5-foot utility easements on each side. Construction
shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to secure
construction of Teal Street, Pintail Drive and Widgeon Way to NCDOT standards. An
estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or
grading contractor and submitted to the Orange County Planning Department and
verified by the County Engineer. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of
5
that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat
shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction
has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. An erosion control plan for construction of all streets shall be submitted by the
applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control Division prior
to any disturbance on the site.
3. Prior to any construction or any alteration of any existing access within the right-of-
way of Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) the developer/owner shall secure a driveway permit
from the NCDOT District Office. Submit a copy of the NCDOT-approved permit and
letter to the Planning Department at the same time as the request for Planning
Department signatures on the Final Plat. Sight distance triangles as prescribed by the
subdivision regulations shall be shown at all intersections within the subdivision, or
included within the right-of-way of the proposed street.
4. All lots shall secure access from an internal street within the subdivision. No comer lot
access shall be allowed within 50 feet of the right-of-way of an intersection. This
restriction shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required
in Section IV-13-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. The signs are
to be erected and approved prior to Planning Department signatures on the final plat.
6. Record a minimum five-foot, non-vehicular access (NVA) easement along the
subdivision frontage of Mill Creek Road, with the exception of Pintail Drive right-of-
way, and also along the Pintail Drive frontage of Lots P9 and P11.
7. Lots P5, P6, P7, P8, P10 and P12 shall be limited to one driveway. This restriction
shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to
be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
8. Temporary turnarounds built to NCDOT standards shall be constructed at the end of
Pintail Drive and Widgeon Way.
9. The platted right-of-way of Widgeon Drive shall extend to the southernmost boundary
of Lot P11 when Section One is recorded.
10. A twenty-foot temporary construction easement shall be shown on the final plat along
the northern side of Pintail Drive at Lot 03.
6
11.A statement shall be provided on the Final Plat identifying Pintail Drive as a Major
Local road subject to future extension and shall be disclosed in the development
restrictions recorded along with the final plat.
C Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and
must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department prior to
Planning Department signatures on the final plat. Landscaping shall be placed behind
the sight distance triangles at intersections.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan
shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements
to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along the entire subdivision frontage on
Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) exclusive of the areas designated as sight distance
easements. The required buffer width (i.e. minimum) is 30 feet and shall be
composed of deciduous and/or evergreen vegetation, forming semi-opaque
intermittent visual obstructions from the ground to a height of at least thirty (30) feet.
Said buffer shall be so noted on the final plat, and described in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. Maintenance of the buffer shall be the
responsibility of the Homeowners Association.
4. A 30' Type A Land Use Buffer as described in above Condition # 3 shall be provided
along Pintail Drive. Said buffer shall be so noted on the final plat, and described in a
document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by
Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
D Drainage
1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3c.1 of the Zoning Ordinance
shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements
to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
2. Locate drainage easements on Final Plat as required following review and approval of
the Erosion Control Plan.
E Parkland
1. The payment in-lieu parkland dedication fee shall be paid prior to Planning
Department signatures on the Final Plat. The fee is $455 per recorded lot.
F Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-
D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat:
7
(a) Drainage easements as required by D.2 above.
1. The minimum building setback requirements and impervious surface maximums shall
be stated on the Final Plat, and in a document describing development restrictions
and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
2. If sign is anticipated, reserve a sign easement location on open space lot.
G Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be
notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Dedication and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of
the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer
shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. The Division of Environmental Health shall certify that each lot contains a suitable
area for septic disposal.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
5. NCDOT shall certify that Teal Street, Pintail Drive and Widgeon Way have been
constructed to NCDOT standards or that construction plans have been approved in
accordance with NCDOT standards.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners
that the Preliminary Plan for Mill Creek II (Section One) is approved in accordance with the
above mentioned conditions and attached Preliminary Plat dated May 31, 2001, revised on
9/13/2001 and 11/02/2001.
Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner
, the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of
, 2002.
I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North
Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings
of said Board at a meeting held on , 2002 as relates in any way to the
adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in Minute Book No. of the
minutes of said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of , 2002.
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL. 8
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
ORANGE COUNTY
DATE' T 31 Lo c
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) •
SUBDIVISION NAME: Gftr-,Y-
LOCATION:
OWNER/OEVELOPER: V1MN I�iQA �,ll�l4� -
ADDRESS: (,L24• GA,'SM '�OPlrq TELEPHONE NO.:
'�.C�uC�N 1v�ti\1'C
AGENT ONTACT J _1�C. TELEPHONE NO.: L
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map Z Block — Lot(s) Township -CALY.S
Zoning District(s): •9--1 :03� V-qy`l
Total Number of Acres: —.Phases:
Total Number of Lots: 11w 3 _Average Lot Size: I•U(o At.. Minimum Lot Size: 6 AL At,
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) (proposed) L9\s)C-,Lt:
Lineal Feet in Streets: ZWO' Acres in Open Space: r1.A2-A<_
Water Supply: Public (specify) Community Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community x IndiviL91
School District: Fire'Oistrict:
Genera!Land Uses in Area:
Critical Areas: streamldrainageways flood prone areas
;; s<� V-• watershed (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property to be subdivided currently under 'farm use value taxation'? Yes_No_. If "yes%
please contact the Orange County Tex Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of
deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation%
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet 0 2001 and
no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'=20') and must contain the following'information:
subdivision name I/ `?"�`�:�: zoning of tract and adjacent
name & address of owners) properties
/ name &address of subdivider building setback lines by notation
/ (if other than owner) or typical lotJayout
. may..•
name of surveyor, engineer, .....: location and width of existing and
C landscape architect or architect. proposed easements (drainage,
address, registration p and seal utilities. roads, etc.)
H ✓ (title) Preliminary Plan existing. proposed and adjoining
scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions
y ✓ "' dpts (including revision dates) and street names and state road
E .-+ township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal feet of road
C —� references centerlines and approximate
/ Parent Parcel Identification p acreage of new street rights-of-
c J deed book and page 0 of property way
to be subdivided ` s;'"'.:; existing and proposed utilities,
.�4 (o boundary described yvith bearings including type, sizes, hydrants.
E w / and distances valves. manholes :
c0 y <:r total acreage of the tract and '�!(� an—.9e existing And proposed curbs,
Y acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including
v excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades
i N way location and width of alleys,
control comer sidewalks, bike lanes. transit
systems. and bus stops
(please complete reverse side)
proposed lot fines with dimensions typical street cress-sections and
✓ lot & block numbers intersection details including
c udinQ
phasing lines design and width of travelwey and
>% / :;:ice topography at ten foot (10) ,�,,�',./ shoulders
'i intervals
�_Si� horizontal alignment and general
cc water bodies, streams, floodway / curve data (public roads)
CU and floodplains ++ ' centerline radius on all proposed
N _ stream buffers streets
location and size of parcels `1 permanent features such as
y U 5,j ;;:
E w dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic
4-3 recreational use or reserved in landmarks
4 common, with purpose noted f, !' adjoining lot layout names of
G _ , :_ impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If
in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name,
� ca ,;_ ! vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and
C. a) location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers.
E m and roads identified by State road _( � location and size of lots of
number and name restricted development potential
o landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding
<:
C co requirements same
U U3 `� :_ " township, corporate and extra- stormwater detention and/or
territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed
which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if
located in water supply
watershed)
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
�. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat.
IX One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in
pencil).
3. Where municipal or OWASA sower is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized
representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the
Orange County Subdivision Regulations).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of.this Ordinance
which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance.
Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance *Craa,nent, and
articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association.
These documents may be reel ired as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements t
are beina.met. '
8. Fee - S . .4plus $5.00 per lot (1 fee.for proliminary and final plat).
7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submittad with the
application: {
a. Number of years to buildout.
b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout.
C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout.
I, the applicant, hereby certify that the foredoinq application is co4platd accurate.
� +
t E'✓ �g
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE R'S SIG3NAX4FrE
DATE DATE
FEES: Amount Oats Paid Receipt
10
1 Katz asked if Mr. Lloyd could go to the Board of Adjustment for changes. For example,if he wanted to ask for a
2 variance on the 20-foot landscape buffer. Kirk said yes.
3
4 VOTE: Unanimous
6 AGENDA ITEM#9: SUBDIVISIONS
7 a. Preliminary Plans
8 (1) Mill Creek H(Section One)
9 (Cheeks Township— 12 Lots)
10 Bateman made this presentation.
11
12 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plat for Mill Creek H Subdivision(Section One)
13
14 BACKGROUND:
15 Request Preliminary Plat approval for a Conventional subdivision
16 Applicant: Brad Walker
17 Owner: Norman and Peggy Walker
18 • JMBL: 3.2..15 (part of) PIN: 9836-34-9111 (part of)
19 • 140.13 acre tract(Total Concept Approval)
20 • Twelve(12)single family residential lots on 42.99 acres in this phase
21 • Average lot size: 1.92 acres(83,635.2 square feet)
22 • Minimum to actual lot ratio(MTALR)=2.09
23
Lots Average Lot Size % Open Space Acres Open Space
Gross
Conventional 12 3.5825 37.1 15.95
24
25 Location
26 • Cheeks Township
27 • East side of Mill Creek Road(SR 1343)approximately '/4 mile south of High Rock Road(SR 1340)
28 intersection
29
30 Existing Site Conditions
31 Zoning
32 • Rural Residential(R-1); Back Creek Protective Watershed(12%impervious surface)
33 • Minimum zoning lot size: 40,000 square feet
34 • Adjacent Land Uses: Single-family residential, agriculture and undeveloped lots.
35
36 Physical Description
37 • Gently rolling
38 • Predominately wooded.
39
40 Proposed Site Conditions
41 Roads:
42 • The subdivision will be accessed from Mill Creek Road(SR 1343)
43 • All roads shall be public and built to NCDOT standards and in accordance with County requirements.
44 • Proposed Pintail Drive will serve as a major local road with a Type A Land Use Buffer.
45 • Stub out to the eastern property line for future connectivity is provided.
46 • Access along Pintail Drive limited to six(6)lots
47
48 Open Space
49 • Open space areas in this phase are comprised primarily of evergreen forest
50 • 15.95 acres(37.1%by this phase)
11
1 • Orange County Subdivision Regulations do not specify a minimum open space requirement for conventional
2 subdivision.
3 • Homeowners Association required to maintain open space and land use buffers.
4 • Protection of the intermittent stream(on entire tract)with stream buffer to be provided on the final plat.
5
6 Water—Sewer
7 • Individual wells and septic tanks provided for each lot.
8
9 Recreation &Parks
10 • Recreation dedication required: 1.20 acres(42.99 acres x.028)
11 • No recreational resources found on site;payment in lieu reasonable alternative to dedication. [12 lots x$455 =
12 $5460]
13
14 Development Process,Schedule,and Action
15
16 • First Action: Planning Board to consider Concept Plan
17 The Planning Board approved the conventional concept plan for Mill Creek H on November 2,2000 with the
18 following conditions:
19
20 1. All roads shall be public and proposed to be built to NCDOT standards with additional five(5)foot utility
21 easements on each side. The right-of-way at street intersections shall be improved to NCDOT standards. Sight
22 distance triangles(10' x 70') shall be delineated on the plat for each street at intersections,as appropriate.
23 2. Driveway access points shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the intersection of street rights-of-way.
24 3. If an entrance sign is anticipated and will not be placed within the 100-foot building buffer,maintained by the
25 Homeowners Association,a sign easement must be reserved within one of the residential lots.
26 4. All common areas(stream buffers,building buffers,landscape buffers)must be clearly identified on the
27 preliminary and final plats and maintained by the Homeowners Association. The common areas cannot be
28 subdivided or recombined with adjacent lots. Draft forms of the Homeowners Association documents,
29 including restrictive covenants and conservation easements,that contain use and maintenance provisions for the
30 open space and buffers must be submitted for review by the County Attorney as part of the preliminary plat
31 approval process. The restrictive covenants or conservation agreement shall designate a backup grantee in the
32 event that the Homeowners Association is eliminated.
33 5. The location of drainage ways,stream buffers and floodplains shall be delineated on the preliminary and final
34 plats,along with appropriate information regarding restrictions.
35 6. The preliminary plat shall indicate areas for on-site infiltration of storm water that demonstrates compliance
36 with Article 6.23.3a of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.
37 7. The preliminary plat shall show the location of tree protection fencing and contain a note requiring the
38 installation of tree protection fencing prior to any grading to ensure the protection of vegetation within all
39 buffers and open space.
40 8. All street names to be reserved with GIS section of Planning Department prior to submittal of preliminary plat
41 subdivision request.
42 9. Non vehicular access easements shall be shown on Preliminary Plan.
43
44 • Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preliminary Plat
45
46 Options: 1. Action(recommend approval,approval with conditions, or denial)within two
47 regularly scheduled meetings or;
48 2. Within such further time consented to in writing by the applicant.
49 3. If the Planning Board renders at tie vote, or fails to act within the specified period, approval of
50 the Preliminary Plat is directed to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning
51 Board's minutes and the Planning Department staff s recommendations.
52
53 FINIANCIAL IMPACT: A Fiscal Impact Analysis is attached.
54
12
1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommendation
2 The Planning Staff recommends approval in accordance with the attached resolution.
3
4 Triebel asked about the reasoning for no circular driveways. Bateman said that there is a potential for a major
5 collector and they want to limit as many accesses as possible.
6
7 Preston made reference to page 56 and the analysis. She asked why the figures did not add up. Bateman said that
8 this was a mistake and it was not the revised version. Benedict said that the numbers were due to rounding up.
9
10 Chair Gooding-Ray asked about the minutes for the concept plan. This was in November 2000. They were not
11 included in the agenda packet. Benedict said that the issues at that time had to do with water resources in the area.
12 The USGS Water Resources Report has been received. One of the projects this year is to look at some lot size
13 sustainability standards.
14
15 Chair Gooding-Ray asked if the concept plan was approved for all three phases and Bateman said yes. Chair
16 Gooding-Ray asked if it had changed from what was approved.
17
18 Steve Yuhasz, surveyor for the project, said that the plan has changed a little bit,but only in final arranged lot lines
19 to adjust to the soils. The overall concept is identical.
20
21 Schofield asked how subsequent phases might connect open space to create both recreation and an open space
22 corridor. He also asked about lot P 10. Yuhasz said that the concept plan has more lots on the west side of the main
23 road than on this plan. In order to reduce the number of driveways,the number of lots on the west side of the road
24 was reduced.
25
26 Schofield said that he would like to see a reconfiguration of lot P10 in order to make the open space more
27 consolidated.
28
29 Several other clarifying questions were answered by the staff and the applicant.
30
31 Preston said that we should make sure,as these lots are marketed, that people understand that the main road is
32 going to continue on and that they are not buying into a dead-end cul-de-sac. This can be a condition added to the
33 resolution of approval.
34
35 MOTION: McAdams moved approval of the preliminary plan for Mill Creek II Section One
36 with the additional language as suggested by Preston above. Seconded by Katz.
37
38 VOTE: Unanimous
39
40 AGENDA ITEM#10: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
41 a. January Calendar-distributed
42
43 AGENDA ITEM#11: - ADJOURNMENT
44
45 With no further items to discuss,the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. The next Planning Board meeting is
46 February 5,2002.
47
48 Nicole Gooding-Ray, Chair
49
50 Becky Butler,Minutes Preparer
51
1
42 3
66 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
["Shrink-swell" and some of the other terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the
Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry means
soil was not rated)
I Dwellings I Dwellings I Small {
Soil name and I Shallow ! without I with ! commercial I Local road:
map symbol ! excavations I basements ! basements { buildings { and street.
I I I S {
Altavista: {
Aa------------------!Severe: (Severe: !Severe: (Severe: !Severe:
I wetness, ! floods. I wetness, ( .wetness, ! floods,
I floods. ! I floods. I floods. I low strength
I I I I !
A lin
! I I
PP g'
ApB-----------------!Moderate: I Slight-----------!Slight-----------IModerate: ISlight.
I too clayey. I I I slope. I
I I I ! I '
ApC----------------!Moderate: Moderate: !Moderate: !Severe: IModerate:
I too clayey, I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope.
slope. I I S
1AuC: I I I I I
Appling part-----IModerate: ISlight-----------!Slight-----------!Moderate: ISlight.
I too clayey. I = I slope. I
Urban land part.
Cecil: ! ! I 1
CfH----------------!Moderate: ISlight-----------!Slight-----------!Moderate: !toderate:
I too clayey. I = ` slope. I low strengtt
• I
CfC----------------!Moderate: IModerate: IModerate: (Severe: Moderate:
I too clayey. ! slope. = slope. I slope. I low strengtt
Chewacla: ! ! I
Ch-----------------!Severe: ISevere: !Severe: (Severe: . !Severe:
I wetness, I wetness, ! wetness, I wetness, I wetness,
Ifloods. ` floods. { floods. I floods. i floods.
Congaree: I I I I I
Cp-----------------ISevere: ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: ISevere:
I floods. I floods. I floods. { floods. i floods.
Creedmoor: I I I I !
CrB----------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere:
;•too clayey. I shrink-swell. I shrink-swell, I shrink-swell. ! shrink-swel:
= wetness. 1
Enon: I I ! I '
EnB, EnC-----------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere:
too clayey. I shrink-swell, I shrink-swell, I shrink-swell, I shrink-swel
I low strength. I low strength. I low strength. i low strengt
I I I
Georgeville: I I I '
GeB, IGhC----------IModerate: ISlignc-----------!Slight-----------IModerate: !Moderate:
{ too clayey. i I slope. I low strengt
GeC----------- -!Moderate: IModerate: Moderate: ISevere: !Moderate:
- I ! low strengt
too clayey, ! slope. { slope. I slope.
+: = slope.
slope.
Goldston: I ' { I
..:. ' Moderate:
G1D------------- -ISevere: IModerate: ISevere: ISevere:
I depth to rock. I depth to rock, ! depth to rock. ! slope. f depth to rc
I slope. ! ! 1
{ I {
G1F----------------ISevere: {Severe: ISevere: ISevere: {Severe:
depth to rock. I depth to rock, I depth to rock. ! slope. ! depth to rc
! slope. ; 1 slope.
I
Helena: { !
�? HeB----------------!Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ISevere: Severe:
;
I too clayey. I shrink-swell. I shrink-swell. i shrin k-swell. i shrink-sve
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 67 14
TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued
1 } Dwellings Dwellings Small
Soil name and ; Shallow } without ; with ; commercial ; Local roads I
map symbol { excavations ; basements } basements = buildings } and streets
i
Ina: 1 I 1 { 1
lA: I
ielena part------ISevere: (Severe: (Severe: ;Severe: ISevere:
too clayey. I shrink-swell. I shrink-swell. I shrink-swell. I shrink-swell.
Sedgefield part--jSevere: t ' ' I
,Severe: ,Severe: ,Severe: ,Severe:
} too clayey, ! shrink-swell, } shrink-swell, } shrink-swell, ; shrink-swell.
} wetness. I wetness. ; wetness. } wetness. '
I I ! I I
ndon:
8----------------;Moderate: I Slight-----------!Slight-----------;Moderate: (Moderate:
1 too clayey. I 1 i slope. I low strength.
C----------------!Moderate: IModerate: {Moderate: ISevere: ',Moderate:
I too clayey, } slope. I slope. I slope. I low strength,
{ slope.slope. { { ; I
! I = ; _
assee:
B--------------=-=Moderate: 1 Slight-----------ISlight-----------!Moderate: !Moderate:
} too clayey. i i ! slope. = low strength.
C----------------!Moderate: ',I.Ioderate: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate:
! too clayey, ! slope. ! slope. ! slope. I low strength,
! slope. slope.
dell:
B----------------ISevere: !Severe: !Severe: ISevere: !Severe:
I too clayey. ! shrink-swell. I shrink-swell. 1 shrink-swell. } low strength,
shrink-swell.
} '
uB:
; I
Iredell part-----ISevere: !Severe:
ISevere: ISevere: {Severe:
1 too clayey. ! shrink-swell. I shrink-swell. 1 shrink-swell. 1 low strength,
! t I 1
! I ` shrink-swell.
! 1 ! I
Urban land part. ! ! !
, I
,num: '
----------------!Severe: ISevere: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe:
I too clayey, ! 'wetness, I wetness, ! wetness, I low strength.
wetness. ! low strength. I low strength. ', low strength.
,i sburg: I I
,C----------------!Moderate: IModerate: 'Hoderate: 1:1evere: ltioderate:
I depth to rock. ! slope. ; depth to rock. ', slope. ! slope.
)t----------------1Severe: ISevere: !Severe: !Severe: ISevere:
I slope. I slope. } slope. I slope. ; slope.
I
Inge: I
------------------ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: ISevere: jSevere:
1 too clayey, ', wetness, j wetness, j wetness, 1 low strength,
! wetness. } shrink-swell. ! shrink-swell. ! shrink-swell. ; shrink-swell.
ts: } I 1
t. I I I ! I
tum:
aD----------------!Moderate: IModerate: 'Moderate: !Severe: !Severe:
I too clayey. I low strength. I low strength, 1 slope. I low strength.
I ! } depth to rock. I !
I !
aE----------------!Severe: {Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere:
I slope. I slope. (slope. } slope. ! slope.
ban land: I i
r• !
I
nce: I
aB----------------!Severe: ISevere: ISevere: !Severe: !Severe:
too clayey. I low strength. I low strength. j low strength. 1 low strength.
I 1 1 1 I
See footnote at end of table.
44
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA iS
TABLE T.--SANITARY FACILITIES
C3 slowly" and some of the other terns that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the
Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "severe" and other terms used to rate
soils. Absence of an entry means soil was not rated]
i
—�— Septic tank ; --p Trench
it name and ; absorption 1 Sewage lagoon ; sanitary ; sanitary 1 Daily cover
map symbol ; fields ; areas ; landfill ! landfill I for landfill
,ista: ! ;
' 1 I
ISevere: (Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Good.
wetness, I wetness, 1 wetness, I wetness, I
I floods. 1 floods. ! floods. ', -floods. I ,
' ! !
ing: I I ! ! !
----------------!Moderate: !Moderate: IModerate: !Slight-----------!Fair:
! Peres slowly. I slope, 1 too clayey. ! ! too clayey.
I seepage.
-- ------IModerate: !Severe: IModerate: !Moderate: IFair:
I slope, ! slope, I too'clayey. 1 slope. I too clayey,
! Peres slowly. ! seepage. 1 ! ! slope.
C: ! ! ! ! !
ppling part-----,loderate: 11,loderate: ',loderate: ISlll;lit-----------',Fair:
! Peres slowly. I slope, 1 too clayey. ! ! too clayey.
1 1 seepage. 1 ! !
! ! I ! !
rban land part. ! ! ! ! !
I ! I
l: ! I
----------------!Moderate: IModerate: ISevere: !Slight-----------IFair:
I Peres slowly. I seepage. 1 too clayey. I 1 too clayey.
1 ! !
----------------IModerate: !Severe: ISevere: llloderate: '.Fair:
1 Peres slowly. 1 slope. 1 too clayey. 1 slope. I too clayey.
I I I '
acla: It I ! !
------!Severe: ISevere: • ISevere: !Severe: !Good.
! wetness, ! wetness, I wetness, ! wetness, !
! floods. 1 floods. I floods. ! floods. !
! !
! ! !
;aree: I I ! ! !
.----------------!Severe: ISevere: !Severe: !Severe: !Good.
1 floods. I floods. 1 floods. ! floods. I
I I I I
tdmoor: I
s----------------!Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: ',toderate: 1Poor:
1 Peres slowly. I slope. 1 too clayey. 1 wetness. I too clayey.
' I
1----------------ISevere: ',Moderate: ,Severe: ',Slight-----------!Poor:
Peres slowly. slope. ! too ^!aYpY• I too clayey.
!Severe: !Severe: revere: IModerate: !Poor:
1 peres slowly. ! slope. 1 too clayey. ! slope. i too clayey.
rrgeville:
U. 1GhC----------!Moderate: ',Moderate: IModerate: !Slight-----------!Poor:
1 peres slowly. ( slope, 1 too clayey. ! ! too clayey.
! I seepage. I 1 I
C----------------IModerate: ISevere: ',Moderate: IModerate: (Poor:
I Peres slowly, ! slope. 1 too clayey. I slope. I too clayey.
I slope.
dston: I ` ! i
0, G1F-----------ISevere: ISevere: ;Severe: ;Severe: ,Poor:
depth to rock. 1 depth to rock. i depth to rock. ; seepage. 1 small stones,
1 1 thin layer.
I 1 i
ena:
B----------------!Severe: ;Moderate: ISevere: !Slight-----------!Poor:
Peres slowly. ! slope. I too clayey. I ; too clayey.
� S '
See footnote at end of table.
16
70 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 7.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued
I Septic tank ; I Trench { Area ,
Soil name and i absorption I Sewage lagoon = sanitary I sanitary ; Daily cover
map symbol ! fields ; areas ; landfill ! landfill I for landfill
Helena: ! I !
1HhA: ! I !
Helena part------(Severe: ISlight-----------ISevere: ISlight-----------!Poor:
peres slowly. 1 1 too clayey. 1 i too clayey.
Sedgefield part--(Severe: (Slight-----------ISevere: jModerate: IPoor:
I peres slowly, ! I too clayey. I wetness. I too clayey.
Iwetness. i I 1 !
Y Herndon: I ! I I I
:.
:.: HrB----------------(Moderate: (Moderate: !Moderate: ,Slight----------- Poor:
K; I peres slowly. I seepage. I too clayey. I I too clayey.
HrC----------------(Moderate: !Severe:' (Moderate: (Moderate: IPoor:
I peres slowly, I slope. I too clayey. I slope. 1 too clayey.
I slope. I I I I
Hiwassee: { I I I 1
I I 1
HwB----------------jModerate: Itoderate: ISevere: !Slight-----------'
Fair:
I pares slowly. I slope. i too clayey. ` I too clayey.
HwC----------------!Moderate: ISevere: ISevere: (Moderate: (Fair:
1 peres slowly, I slope. 1 too clayey. I slope. I too clayey.
! slope. I ! !
,
' I ! I !
Iredell: 1 1 ! I !
r. IrB----------------ISevere: !Moderate: ISevere: !Slight-----------!Poor:
I peres slowly. ! slope. ! too clayey, 1 I too clayey.
! ! ! ! depth to rock. ! I
1IuB: I ! 1 ! !
i; Iredell part-----1 Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Slight-----------!Poor:
! ! too clayey
peres slowly. I slope. , too clayey,
1 { ! depth to rock. !_ !
r Urban land part. I 1 !
• I ! I ! I
Lignum: ! I ! !
Lg-----------------!Severe: ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: !Poor:
I peres slowly, I wetness. 1 depth to rock, 1 wetness. I too clayey
wetness. I I wetness. I
Louisburg:
LoC----------------jModerate: ISevere: !Severe: ISevere: (Fair:
I depth to rock. I seepage. 1 seepage. 1 seepage. 1 slope.
I I I r
LoF--------- ------1 Severe: ISevere: !Severe: !Severe: !Poor:
I slope. I seepage. I seepage. I seepage. I slope.
,
Orange: ! ! I ! !
'^= ' Or--------.---------ISevere: (Moderate: ISevere: !Severe: !Poor:
?; I peres slowly, ( depth to rock. ' depth to rock, = wetness. i too claye
wetness,
{ wetness. ! I
1 1 I clayey.
ey. I !
rV: !
ei. Pits:
�_. :. Tatum: ► 1 {
.. }. TaD----------------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: Itioderate: !Poor:
' ! depth to rock. 1 slope. depth to rock. 1 slope. I too claye
TaE----------------j Severe: ISevere: ISevere: !Severe: !Poor:
y• I slope. I slope. I depth to rock. I slope. I slope.
! ! ! I !
Urban land:
Ur.
Vance:
Vae--____-__
-------!Severe: !Moderate: ISevere: !Slight-----------l Poor:
! peres slowly. I slope. 1 too clayey. ! 1 too clay
CPO fnntnnte at end of table.
46
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE 10.--RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 17
-eres slowly" and some of the other terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the
Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe". Absence of an entry
Indicates that the soil was not rated]
Soil name and { Camp areas ( Picnic areas I Playgrounds { Paths and trails
map symbol
I !
I { { 1
-av13ta: = I { {
i-------------------!Severe: (Moderate: {Moderate: (Slight.
wetness. 1 wetness, I wetness, I
I I floods. ! floods. {
i 1 1 I
ding: I
.7B------------------might---------------{Slight---------------!Moderate: ISlight.
I I slope. I
I ! ! I
pC------------------!Moderate: {tiod era to: ',Severe: I Slight.
I slope. 1 slope. = slope. ;
{
AuC: I i I ', ►
Appling part-------ISlight---------------;Slight---------f------!Severe: ISlight.
I I I slope.
I I I
Urban land part. I I 1 1
ail: I
fB------------------ISlight---------------ISlight---------------IModerate: ISlight.
I 1 I slope. I
I i 1 1
fC------------------{Moderate: ;Moderate: ISevere: ISlight.
slope. ( slope. ! slope. ;
1
ewacla:
:h-------------------!Severe: ISevere: ISevere: llloderate:
wetness, 1 floods. ' ! wetness, I wetness,
floods. ; S floods. I floods.
! ! ! !
-ngaree: I I ! 1
:p-------------------!Severe: lttoderate: .!Severe: IModerate:
I floods. I floods. 1 floods. ! floods.
I
' I
•eedmoor: I I 1 I
:rB-----.------------IModerate: !Slight---------------!Moderate: ISlight.
1 peres slowly. ; I peres slowly. . I
ion:
;,,u------------------(Moderate: I:.t il•I�L----___ --_--__IMnfloratr.: ISllrht.
{ peres slowly. i ! peres slowly,
I slope. I
1 1
EnC------------------IModerate: ',Moderate: !Severe: Slight.
peres slowly. 1 slope. ! slope. It
eorgeville: lNoderate: ISlight.
CeB------------------!Slight----- ---,Slight--_-------_----�
I I ! slope.
GeC------------------(Moderate: IModerate: ISevere: ISlight.
I slope. I slope. I slope. _
' I
l Ch C-----------------ISlight--•-------------;S l i g h t---------------!Severe: i Slight.
I I 1 slope. I
I I '
:otdston: . 1 1 1 '
G1D------------------!Moderate: IModerate: ;Severe: IModerate:
I small stones, ! small stones, ', depth to rock, 1 small stones.
I slope. 1, slope. = slope.
G1F------------------ISevere: jSavere: ISevere: ISevere:
I slope. I slope. depth to-rock,, I small stones,
I I ! slope. I slope.
I
1
See footnote at end of table. '
18
18 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 10.—RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT--Continued
}
Soil name and { Camp areas I Picnic areas { Playgrounds } Paths and trails
map symbol
Helena: _
I 1 I
HeB------------------}Moderate: IModerate: Moderate: IModerate:
peres slowly. i wetness. 1 peres slowly. I wetness.
1HhA: I I I {
Helena part--------IModerate:' IModerate: IModerate:. {Moderate: .
Iperes slowly. ; wetness. i peres slowly. j wetness.
Sedgefield part----IModerate: IModerate: !Moderate: ',Moderate:
I peres slowly. I wetness. I peres slowly, I wetness.
I i I wetness. I
Herndon: ' } I I
HrB------------------!Slight---------------`Slight--------------- Moderate: !Slight.
slope. j
HrC------------------jModerate: !Moderate: !Severe: ISlight.
} slope. I slope. ! slope. I
I {
Hiwassee: I I j
HwB------------------ISlight---------------ISlight----------------IModerate: !Slight.
I I I slope. I
---
HwC-------- -~-----jModerate: IModerate: (Severe: ISlight.
I slope. I slope. I slope. I
Iredell: I 1 I 1
IrB------- ----------IModerate: I Moderate:
{Moderate: ,Moderate:
I peres slowly, I too clayey. { Peres slowly, I too clayey,
I
too clayey. ! slope. ! slope.
11uB: I I I
Iredell ! '
part----.--!Moderate: IModerate: !Moderate:
{Moderate:
I peres slowly. I too clayey. I peres slowly, I too clayey,
I too clayey. I ! slope. I slope.
Urban land.part. ! ! ! !
L1 num: I i
} !
g
Lg~~~`~--~-----------
!Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate:
I peres slowly, I peres slowly, I peres slowly, I wetness.
! wetness. I wetness. ! wetness. I
Louisburg:
LoC---- !Moderate: IModerate: !Severe: ISlight.
I slope. I slope. I slope. !
! } !
LoF------------------!Severe: (Severe: ISevere: ISevere:
I slope. { slope. I slope. slope.
Orange: }
Or-------------------(Moderate: jModerate: IModerate: !Moderate:
I Peres slowly, } wetness. I peres slowly, I wetness.
I wetness. { ! wetness. !
Pits: S _
Pt. ! { ! I
Tatum: _ !
TaD------------------!Moderate: IModerate: !Severe: !Slight.
I slope. ! slope. I slope. !
I I } I
TaE-----------------~!Severe: ISevere: !Severe: It•loderate:
I slope. I slope. I slope. 1 slope.
Urban land: I t i
Ur. ! ! { I
Vance:
• I I
VaB------------------!tloderate: ISlight------ ------IModerate: ISlight.
I peres slowly. I j peres slowly. j
{ !
48 19
ORANGE COUNTY
ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
To: Carla Batem
From: Rich Shaw
Date: September 6, 2001
Re: Proposed Mill Creek II Subdivision (Section 1)
Thank you the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed subdivision
referenced above. My comments are generally intended to a) address any concerns
that ERCD may have with respect to potential impacts on important natural and
cultural resources, and b) identify any areas that could be desirable for possible
dedication to the County for public recreation/open space pursuant to current
subdivision regulations.
The preliminary plat for Mill Creek II (Section 1) shows that over 17 acres (40%) are
to be set aside as permanent open space and deeded to a homeowners' association.
From the 1998 orthophoto it appears that that open space is comprised of mixed
hardwoods and pine, while most of the areas to be developed are younger pine.
From a natural resource protection standpoint, the proposed subdivision does a nice
job of providing open space (more than what is required!) and protecting portions of
the more mature, wooded section of the property. There does not appear to be any
streams flowing through this section, however a future section of the subdivision will
need to address-a perennial stream in the Back Creek protected watershed.
In conclusion, the plan appears consistent with the County's desire to minimize
adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of floodplains,
wetlands, natural areas and wildlife habitat, historic and cultural resources and
prime farmland. I do not recommend that any land be considered for possible
dedication for public recreation/open space.
Let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further.
cc: Dave Stancil
Environment and Resource Conservation
PO Box 8181/306-A Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
(919)245-2597
20
Orange County Emergency Management
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough
North Carolina
27278
9-1-1 Communications Emergency Medical Services
24 Hour Warning Point �,..*« •�e, Fire Marshal
919-732-8161 •933-2600 ��` Disaster Response
Hazardous Materials
24-Hour Fax Machine 919-644-3030. 968-2050
919-967-9026
Administrative Fax Machine
919-968-4066
TO: CARLA BATEMAN,PLANNINq DEP .
FROM: MIKE TAPP,DEPUTY DIRECTORIFIRE MARSHALW
RE: MILL CREEK II SUBDIVISION, CONCEPT PLAN
DATE: JULY 27,2001
We have completed plans review of the Mill Creek H Subdivision, Concept Plan and offer the
following comments:
1. We would recommend a secondary means of ingress/egress,if possible, for secondary
access during times of large fires, severe weather events or other disasters.
2. Additional staffing for 9-1-1 and emergency response agencies will have to be identified.
As new subdivisions are approved, additional population and growth may require
additional staffing in order to effectively provide public safety services to the citizens.
3. The site plans does not address water supplies for fire protection. The developer should
provide some type of proposal for or identify usable water sources for fire protection.
If you need additional information,please contact us.
l
' 21
50
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Current Planning Division 306F Revere Road
(919) 245-2575 Hillsborough,
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) J :- North Carolina, 27278
REQUEST FOR AGENCY REVIEW: SEP !0
N. C. DRAT, OF Tryt:�tS?�.^„;T ATiv
DATE: July 19, 2001 DIV1SiC'N OF H!GH'NAYS
DiSTR?CT 1
FROM: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMER
TO: Derek Dixon; Assistant District Engineer
We have received the attached plat/plan for consideration:
Project name: Mill Creek II Subdivision, Section 1
Applicant: Norman Walker/Brad Walker
Type: Preliminary #Lots/Units Proposed: 13
Township: Cheeks Tax Map: 2 Block: Lot: 15
Location: East side of Mill Creek Road, % mile south of High Rock Road
Project Summary: The Preliminary Plan was just received by the Planning Staff and
will go to the Planning Board.
Planning Department Comments:
Please submit any comments to the Planning Department by: September 20
If you have any questions, please contact: Carla Bateman
At 732-8181, extension: 2603
MM ZD: Carla Batensn
FILM: S. D. Dixon
MAZE: 10/05/01-
Per yar request, a review of the above ma rimed subject has been affpletad by NMOT(.ham District. Below for your
file is a list of air re=mr&tiazs and cammts for the sLbject:
1. Prior to arty crnst rmdm of any riew access or alteratirm of any a dstirg access within the riE it of way, the
develr.per/akr7er is required to secure a pendt with this office. It is the responsibility of the aa-er/demlioper
to obtain a pandt.
2. All utilities located within the right of way shall require an armachT t agrewimt. All services shall be flush
with finished grade. Any utility Rain, service corrrrct:Lm cr lateral hated withun the dediicatsi right of way
shall be nainWried by tine qTrqriate utility aud-crity.
22
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director
Administration (919) 245-2575
Erosion Control Division 306F Revere Road
(919) 245-2586 �t° a u P 0 Box 8181
(919) 644-3002 (FAX) Hillsborough,
www.co.orange.nc.us elate North Carofina, 27278
'r.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carla Bateman, Current Planning
FROM: Ren Ivins, Erosion Control Supervisor
DATE: September 18th, 2001
SUBJECT: Mill Creek it Subdivision
Orange County Erosion Control has reviewed the above referenced subdivision and
found the concept plan is in compliance with the County's Stormwater Ordinance and the
Neuse Rules.
It is likely that a 30 ft. wide storm water easement will be required along the property line
between lots P4 and P3 or possibly P2 and P3. A sediment trap will be required at the
end of proposed pintail drive.
52 23
....tr
Orange County Health Department e a°
Jonathan Klein,MD,Chair Rosemary L. Summers,MPH,DrPH lanuSoutherland,DDS, Vice-Chair c 0"
x.14 e..•"'' Orange County Board ojHealth Health Director Orange County Board ojHealth
Environmental Health Division
Ron Holdway, Division Director
306-C Revere Road,P.O.Box 8181 Phone: (919)245-2360 FAX: (919)644-3006
Hillsborough,HC 27278 Betty Borland Barbara Stokes Chapel Hill Durham Mebane
wwwco.orange.nc.us/oraneelenvhlth/ Administrative Assistant Wee Assistant (919)9684501 (919)688-7331 (919)227-2031
November 6,2001
SOIL/SITE Evaluation Summary for:
Mill Creek II
Cheeks Township Map 2 Lot 15
Map Date Revised November 2,2001
Lot# DESIGN FLOW SYSTEM TYPE
P1 360 gpd Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
P2 360 gpd Conventional w/pump
P3 360 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional
P4 360 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
P5 360 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional w pump
P6 360 gpd Conventional w/pump
P7 360 gpd Conventional
P8 360 gpd Conventional w/pump
P9 360 gpd . Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
P 10 360 gpd Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
P 11 360 gpd Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
P12 360 gpd Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional w/pump
NOTES:
The design flow is based upon the number of bedrooms applied for by the property owner or developer. The design
flow for a bedroom is 120 gallons/day(gpd). (e.g. 360 gpd=3 bedrooms)
24
Proposed house locations are provided by the property owner or developer as required by 15A NCAC 18A .1900 -
.1969 (The Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems).
The design flow, type system, and pump requirement are subject to change based upon the application and site plan c
plat submitted for the Wastewater Construction Authorization.
The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the limits of the provisionally suitable soils as evaluated by the
Orange County Health Department.
It should be noted that all lots having a conventional-type drain field with pump are reviewed at a minimum of every
five years by the health department as required by 15A NCAC 18A .1961 (Maintenance of Sewage Systems).
Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 24 inches or more of provisionally suitable
soil/site characteristics and a 6-10" soil cap is placed over the trenches.
Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable soil/site
characteristics.
Conventional Trench Systems are placed in areas with 36" inches or more of provisionally suitable soil/site
characteristics.
The approved septic areas should be kept free of vehicular traffic, lowing, grading, and compacting activities
It is the responsibility of the property owner or developer to maintain the integrity of the septic areas prior to system
construction and installation. No parking, cutting or filling shall be allowed in or around the drain field areas.
Drainage ways and easements should be utilized to convey storm water run-off to the storm water retention areas.
These conveyances should not be located through designated septic drain field areas.
This report is for planning purposes only and does not constitute any approval. Lot approval is granted by the heald
department only in the form of an Improvement Permit.
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic& Business Research - University of Florida 25
Modified 4/15/97 - Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Mill Creek II (Section One)
TOWNSHIP: Cheeks
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year. 2002
Ending Year: 2003
Inflation Rate: 2.50%
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/House ENTER"1"BESIDE APPUCABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.47
Children/HOUSE ENTER"1"BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. % 0.33
%Non-Elderiy: 100.00%
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
2002 6 125.000 50.00%
2003 6 140,000 50.00%
2004 0 0 0.00%
2005 0 0 0.00%
2006 0 0 0.00%
2007 0 _ 0 0.00%
2008 0 0 0.00%
2009 0 0 0.00%
2010 0 0 0.00%
2011 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER 9" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County l ) Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0 ) High School 19%
SECTION 2- LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 26
BUDGET YEAR: 1996-97
COUNTY POPULATION: 105898
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5680
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government 108.60 0.0010
Public Safety 142.95 0.0013
Public Works 50.00 0.0005
Human Services 264.07 0.0025
Education (School District) 818.00 0.0077
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
Total 818.00 0.1440
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes-Other Than Property 4653250 43.94
Intergovernmental 9007481 85.06
Service Charges 3388055 31.99
Miscellaneous 1738939 16.42
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES (S): EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA
General Government 6804231 64.25
Public Safety 7274334 68.69
Public Works 2871690 27.12
Human Services 17112641 161.60
Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 7.08
Non-Departmental 3163481 29.87
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
General Government 6804231 62654.06
Public Safety 7274334 50887.26
Public Works 2871690 57433.80
Human Services 17112641 64803.43
Education(Recurring Capital) 750000 916.87
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT
County Government 10121760 1782.00
School District 0 0.00
State 21523177 3789.29
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
County Government 10121760 12373.79
School District 0 0.00
State 21523177 26311.95
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate (S) 0.9290 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
School District Tax Rate (S) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
Assessment Ratio 100.00
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
27
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 15 30 30 30 30
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 3 g 3
Middle 0 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 4 4 4 4
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Safety 0.02; 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
TOTAL 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
HOUSING UNITS 12 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 30' 30 30 30 30
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 4 ` 4 4 , 4 4
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government - 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Public Safety 0.04 0.04 0.04; 0.04 0.04
Public Works 0.01' 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.07! 0.07 0.07:. 0.07 0.07
TOTAL 0.16- 0.16 0.16f 0.16 0.16
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.23 0.23 0.23; 0.23 0.23
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 4- PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT' 28
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
TAX BASE ($1000) 750 1609 1649 1690 1732
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 6968 14945 15319 15702 16094
Other Taxes 651 1335 1368 1403 1438
Intergovernmental 1261 2584 2649 2715 2783
Service Charges 474 ` 972 996 1021 1047
Miscellaneous 243 499 511 ' 524 537
TOTAL($) 9597 20335 20844 21365 21899
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 952 1952 2001 2051 2102
Public Safety 1018 2087 2139 2193 2247
Public Works 402 824 844 866 887
Human Services 2395 4909 5032 5158 5287
Education 3633 7448 7635 7825 8021
Non-Departmental 443 908 930 954 977
TOTAL($) 8843 18128 18581` 19046 19522
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) 754 2207 2262 2319 2377
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
TAX BASE ($1000) 1776 - 1820 1866 1912 1960
REVENUES($)
Property Tax 16497 16909 17332 17765 18209
Other Taxes 1474 1510 1548 1587 1627
Intergovernmental 2852 2924 2997 3072 3149
Service Charges 1073 1100 1127 1155 1184
Miscellaneous 551-, 564 579 593 608
TOTAL($) 22446 23008 23,583 24172 24777
EXPENDITURES($)
General Government 2155 2209 2264 , 2320 2378
Public Safety 2304 2361 2420 ' 2481 2543
Public Works 909 932 955 979 1004
Human Services 5419 5555 5693 5836 5982
Education 8222 8427 8638 8854 9075
Non-Departmental 1002 1027 1053 1079 1106
TOTAL($) 20010 ' 20510 21023 21549 22087
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) 2436 2497 2560 2624 2689
1 -
SECTION 5- PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 29
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
REVENUES ($)
County 3633 7448 7635 7825 8021
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 7503 ' 15381 15765 16159 16563
TOTAL(S) 11136 ` 22829 23400 , 23985 24584
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 3633 7448 7635 7825 8021
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 7503 15381 15765 16159 16563
TOTAL($) 11136 ` 22829 23400 23985 24584
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) 0 ` 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
REVENUES($)
County 8222 8427 8638 8854 9075
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 16977 17402 17837 18283 18740
TOTAL(S) 25199 25829 26475 27137 27815
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 8222 8427 8638 8854 9075
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 16977 17402 17837 18283 18740
TOTAL($) 25199 25829 26475 27137 27815
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) 0 0 0 0 0
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 30
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 15 30 30 30 30
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 3 3 3
Middle 0 1 1 1 T
High School 0 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 2 4 4 q 4
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.08- 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
TAX BASE ($1000) 750 1609 1649 1690 1732
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues 9597 20335 20844 21365 21899
Expenditures 8843 18128 18581 19046 19522
BALANCE 754 2207 2262 2319 2377
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)
Revenues 11136 22829 23400 23985 24584
Expenditures 11136 22829 23400 23985 24584
BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 20733 43164 44243 45350 46483
Expenditures 19979 40957 41981 43031 44106
BALANCE 754 2207 2262 2319 2377
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
HOUSING UNITS 12 12 12 ' 12 12
POPULATION 30 " 30 30 ' 30 30
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School
TOTAL 4 ' 4 4; 4 4
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
TAX BASE ($1000) 1776 1820 1866 1912 1960
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues 22446 23008 23583 24172 24777
Expenditures 20010 20510 21023 21549 22087
BALANCE 2436 2497 2560 2624 2689
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)
Revenues 25199 25829 26,475 27137 27815
Expenditures 25199 25829 26475 27137 27815
BALANCE 0 = 0 0 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS ($)
Revenues 47645 48836 50057 51309 52592
Expenditures 45209 46339 47498 48685 49902
BALANCE 2436 2497 2560 2624 2689
SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 31
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County YES } Elementary School 64%
Middle School 17%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 19%
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 3 3 3 3
Middle 01 1 1 1 1
High School 0 1 1 ! 1 1
TOTAL 2 4 4 4 4
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 4 4 4 4 4
SCHOOL CAPACITIES- ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT- ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary - 3328 Elementary 2822
Middle 1522 Middle 1240
High School 1520 High School 1457
TOTAL 6370 TOTAL 5519
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2823 2825 2825 2825 2825
Middle 1240 1241 1241' 1241 1241
High School 1457 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5521 5523 5523 5523 5523
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 2825 2825 2825 2825 2825
Middle 1241 1241 1241 1241 1241
High School 1458 1458 1458 1458 1458
TOTAL 5523 5523 5523 5523 5523
�Zaot Cru �t Cr VMS4o►�•t
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Modified 8/22/01 - Orange County, NC Planning Department 32
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Mill Creek II -Section One
TOWNSHIP: Cheeks
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year: 2002
Ending Year: 2003
Inflation Rate: 2.80%1
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/House ENTER"1"BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 2.55
Children/HousE ENTER"1"BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW. 0.52
%Non-Elderly: 100.00%
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
2002 6 125,000 50.00%
2003 6 140,000 50.00%
2004 0 0 0.00%
2005 0 0 0.00%
2006 0 0 0.00%
2007 0 0 0.00%
2008 0 0 0.00%
2009 0 0 0.00%
2010 0 0 0.00%
2011 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1" IN ( ) BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County 1 ) Elementary School 51�
Middle School 24%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro ( 0 ) High School 26%
Note: All calculations below are based upon the developer's projected buildout. The developer has the
than the amount granted.
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 33
BUDGET YEAR: 2001-02
COUNTY POPULATION: 118227
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 6148
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government 151.10 0.0013
Public Safety 177.50 0.0015
Public Works 55.00 0.0005
Human Services 314.34 0.0027
Education (School District) 346.40 0.0029
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
Total 346.40 0.0563
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes-Other Than Property 22406615 189.52
Intergovernmental 13123958 111.01
Service Charges 5428502 45.92
Miscellaneous 5857788 49.55
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA
General Government 10377740 87.78
Public Safety 10419788 88.13
Public Works 4070661 34.43
Human Services 26368802 223.04
Education (Recurring Capital) 2222832 18.80
Non-Departmental 23494376 198.72
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
General Government 10377740 68681.27
Public Safety 10419788 58703.03
Public Works 4070661 74012.02
Human Services 26368802 83886.24
Education (Recurring Capital) 2222832 6416.95
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT
County Government 15976972 2598.73
School District 0 0.00
State 30352422 4936.96
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
County Government 15976972 46122.90
School District 0 0.00
State 30352422 49609.24
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate ($) 11 0.8050 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
School District Tax Rate (S) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation
Assessment Ratio 100.00 -
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 34
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 15 31 31 31 31
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 3 6 6 6 6
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Public Safety 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
TOTAL 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.04' 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
(COUNTY FUNDED ONLY)
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
HOUSING UNITS 12 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 31 31 31 31 31
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1` 1 1
High School 2 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 6 6 6 ' 6 6
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government - 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Public Safety 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Public Works 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Human Services 0.08' 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
TOTAL 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.09 0.09 0.09; 0.09 0.09
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
(COUNTY FUNDED ONLY)
SECTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 35
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
TAX BASE ($1000) 750 1611 1656 1702 1750
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 6038 12969 13332 13705 14089
Other Taxes 2900 5962 6129 6300 6477
Intergovernmental 1698 3492 3590 3690 3794
Service Charges 703 1444 1485 1526 1569
Miscellaneous 758 1559 1602 1647 1693
TOTAL($) 12096 25425 26137 26869 27621
EXPENDITURES($)
General Government 1343 2761 2839 2918 3000
Public Safety 1348 2772 2850 2930 3012
Public Works 527 1083 1113 1145 1177
Human Services 3412 7016 7212 ` 7414 7622
Education 8396 ' 17262 17745 18242 18752
Non-Departmental 3040 6251 6426 6606 6791
TOTAL($) 18067 37145 381 85 39255 40354
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) -5971 -11720 12048 -12386 -12733
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
TAX BASE ($1000) 1799 1850 1901 1955 2009
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 14483 14889 15306 15734 16175
Other Taxes 6658 6844 7036 7233 7436
Intergovernmental 3900 ` 4009 4121 4237 4355
Service Charges 1613 ' 1658 1705 : 1752 1801
Miscellaneous 1741. 1789 1839 1891 1944
TOTAL($) 28395 29190 30007 30847 31711
EXPENDITURES($)
General Government 3084 3170 3259.,' 3350 3444
Public Safety 3096 3183 3272 3364 3458
Public Works 1210'" 1243 1278 1314 1351
Human Services 7835 8055 8280 8512 8751
Education 19278 19817 20372 20943 21529
Non-Departmental 6981 7177 7378 7584 _ 7797
TOTAL($) 41484 : 42645 43839 45067 46329
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) -13089 -13456 13832` -14220 -14618
SECTION 5- PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 36
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
REVENUES (S) 4415 9280 9540 9807 10082
EXPENDITURES ($) 8108 16216 162.16 16216 16216
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) -3693 -6936 -6676 -6409 -6134
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
REVENUES($) 10364 10654 10953 11259 11574
EXPENDITURES($) 16216 16216 162.16 16216 16216
NET FISCAL IMPACT($) -5852 -5562 -5264 -4957 -4642
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 15 31 31 31 31
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 2 _ 2 2 2
TOTAL 3 6 6 6 6
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
TAX BASE ($1000) 750 1611 1656 1702 1750
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues 12096 25425 26137 26869 27621
Expenditures 18067 37145 38185 39255 40354
BALANCE -5971 -11720 -12048 -12386 -12733
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)
Revenues 4415 . 9280 9540 9807 10082
Expenditures 8108 16216 16216- 16216 16216
BALANCE -3693 -6936 -6676 -6409 -6134
YEAR 2007 , 2008 2009 2010 2011
HOUSING UNITS 12 ' 12 12 12 12
POPULATION 3l 31 31 31 31
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 3 3 3 3
Middle
High School 2 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 6` 6 6 6 6
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
TAX BASE ($1000) 1799 1850 1901 1955 2009
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues 28395 29190 30007 30847 31711
Expenditures 41484 , 42645 43839 45067 46329
BALANCE -13089 -13456 13832 -14220 14618
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)
Revenues 10364 10654 10953 11259 11574
Expenditures 16216 16216 16216 16216 16216
BALANCE -5852 -5562 -5264 -4957 -4642
SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 38
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA:
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County YES ) Elementary School 51%
Middle School 24%
Chapel Hill-Carrboro NO ) High School 26%
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 2 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 1 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 3 6 6 6 6
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary - 3 3 3 3 3
Middle 1 1 1 1 1
High School 2 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 6 6 6 6 6
SCHOOL CAPACITIES - ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT- ALL SCHOOLS
Elementary 4011 Elementary 3119
Middle 1569 Middle 1449
High School 1594 High School 1580
TOTAL 7174 TOTAL 6148
YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 3121" 3122 3122 3122 3122
Middle 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450
High School 1581 1582 1582 1582 1582
TOTAL 6151 6154 6154 6154 6154
YEAR 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
Elementary 3122 3122 3122 3122 3122
Middle 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450
High School 1582 1582 1,582 1582 1582
TOTAL 6154 6154 6154 6154 6154
. ■
'�• 1
!,� s
FIL
r dW - •-
IA
-� -- ,�.��\►ice � � 1�;, G���//� p���°!�►�c'�
40
Poor ido
PRWWHARY PLAT
Not for reawdeftM
"In or eeewyeeee.
`\ r
•��,;. AV
AND It A�
ylAt M' � w
At?, \
Art
Aly
•\ �\ \
AN
"
e Q
4 , �•i11
Ai M/
Cq
�.iw S.W
� ,, 4 r'y'w'i � •raw+
► 1•0r is
An
N/ M7 dw A At to r trt
w IM �•r 4 r \ ab •n'*POK
.•V
i '
46 Ab
f' W
ANN AW \\
COMM"PUN
MILL. GREEK II
JRYf R}/
: • ]� r UW
woo"4�/r� ENT
Y��i- 11 s•w�+�r.r.w as
xmstw>a
yAn A
or
v � . rte
42
jig
c
Y
fit 0's
r
�\
1 � f
0! 3
C •\ xv