Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-29-2004-ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS MEETING PROPOSED AGENDA Assembly of Governments September 29, 2004 7:30 — 10:00 p.m. Southern Human Services Center Chapel Hill, North Carolina 1. Briefing on Downtown Economic Development Initiative (Town of Chapel Hill) (7:30 — 7:50) 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Action Plan (Orange County ERCD and Towns) (7:50 — 8:15) 3. Morgan & Little Creeks Local Watershed Planning Initiative (North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources - Ecosystem Enhancement Program /Orange County Planning and ERCD) (8:15 — 8:45) 4. Identification of School Site Locations with Towns (Orange County Planning and Towns) (8:45 — 9:10) 5. Update on Orange County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and Transfer of Development Rights Activities (Orange County Planning) (9:10 — 9:30) 6. Potential Reports (limited or no presentations) (9:30 — 10:00) a. Unfunded Mandates (Orange County) b. School Resource Officers (Orange County) ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: September 29, 2004 SUBJECT: Assembly of Governments Discussion Items DEPARTMENT: County Manager ATTACHMENT(S): As noted in "Background" section PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) No INFORMATION CONTACT: Rod Visser or Greg Wilder, ext 2300 TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough 732 -8181 Chapel Hill 968 -4501 Durham 688 -7331 Mebane 336- 227 -2031 PURPOSE: To discuss topics of mutual interest among the governing boards of Orange County and the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Hillsborough. BACKGROUND: Briefing on Downtown Economic Development Initiative The Town of Chapel Hill has expressed an interest in providing a briefing on the Town's Downtown Economic Development Initiative. Town staff will make the presentation. Any materials related to this item will be provided at the meeting. No Attachments 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Action Plan At the April 2003 Assembly of Governments meeting, Chapel Hill, Orange County and Carrboro agreed to work together to develop a comprehensive greenhouse gas emissions inventory and action plan. As members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the Cities for Climate Protection initiative, each jurisdiction has committed to undertaking steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions known to contribute to global warming. Following another update on proposed activities in October 2003, a staff work group began meeting to develop a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Scope of Work for the inventory and action plan as part of ICLEI, Orange County's Environment and Resource Conservation Department was proposed as the lead agency for project coordination, with staff assistance from the Chapel Hill and Carrboro Planning Departments. Five proposals were received and reviewed by the Work Group, and after evaluation and follow - up questions, the joint staff work group recommends ICLEI Energy Services of Toronto as the consultant for the project. Funding for the project would come in part from monies appropriated by the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro MPO, and the three jurisdictions. A draft Memorandum of Agreement between the three parties is being drafted to outline roles and responsibilities and financial shares. The estimated total cost of the project would be $40- 45,000. Using a previously -used population based formula for joint Chapel Hill - Carrboro- Orange County projects of this type, Orange County and Chapel Hill would contribute 43% of the remaining costs, with 14% from Carrboro. Excluding the MPO funds (approximately $8,000), County and Chapel Hill portions are estimated at approximately $15- 16,000, with Carrboro's portion around $5,000. Staff proposes to provide an update tonight on the project, including the recommendation, and ask the County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill elected boards to consider in subsequent individual meetings the award of the contract to ICLEI Energy Services, Attachment 2 — 9129104 Memorandum (with three attachments) to Managers from Greenhouse Gas Emissions Joint Staff Work Group 3. Morclan & Little Creeks Local Watershed Planning Initiative In October 2002, the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), formerly North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program, initiated the Morgan & Little Creeks Local Watershed Planning Initiative, Since that time, a group of stakeholders has been meeting with EEP to discuss and plan potential wetland, stream and riparian buffer restoration efforts in the area, as well as stormwater and land use management strategies for the jurisdictions of the watershed (Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill), Through EEP funding, the stakeholders contracted with TetraTech, an environmental consulting firm, to draft a "Targeting of Management" report. This report is meant to be a guide for stakeholders to use in prioritizing stream restoration sites, BMP retrofits /up fits, and critical land preservation targets in the high priority sub - watersheds of the local watershed planning area. In addition, the report offers recommendations for how each jurisdiction can improve their land use /stormwater ordinances to continue to stay ahead of the curve in improving stormwater quality, The group held the final meeting of the initial planning stage on September 8, 2004, and would like to report its findings to the elected boards, before a proposed implementation process is pursued. Deborah Amaral from EEP will provide a brief presentation of the group's report. Attachment 3 — EEP Morgan & Little Creeks Local Watershed Plan Summary 4. Identification of School Site Locations with Towns Prompted by a proposal from BOCC Chair Barry Jacobs entitled 'Planning for Schools in the 21St Century,' Orange County's Planning Department has begun coordination of an informal "Smart Growth and Schools" staff workgroup. This workgroup is working on formalizing a process for new school site selection that will better integrate land use issues and school siting with the principles of "Smart Growth," The committee is comprised of the Planning Directors of Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough, the Superintendent of Orange County Schools (OCS), and a representative of the Chapel Hill — Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Superintendent's office, The workgroup is currently developing criteria based on "Smart Growth" concepts that should become a prerequisite to the school board's typical school siting criteria. The criteria will also assist the local governments with their procedures regarding school siting issues. Some of the potential criteria under consideration will be discussed at the meeting by Craig Benedict, Orange County's Planning Director. No Attachments 5. Update on Orange County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and Transfer of Development Rights Activities Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element — Orange County Planning Staff has completed community outreach meetings in the County's seven townships to receive public input on Staffs recommendations for the Update. Staffs recommendations focus on air and water quality issues and techniques to protect these valuable resources. Orange County Planning Staff will provide a brief update on recent activities related to the Land Use Element Update including: • Completion of "Report on Public Outreach Process" and its availability; • Orange County/Town of Hillsborough Urban Transition Area Task Force; • Efland /Mebane Small Area Plan; and • Next steps. Transfer of Development Rights — At the request of the Board of County Commissioners, Orange County Planning Staff has developed requests for qualifications (RFQs) to provide professional planning services for an Orange County Transfer of Development Rights program. The RFQs were posted on the national and North Carolina Chapter American Planning Association websites. Five responses were received by the August 13th deadline. A working group of County Department heads is presently interviewing the top three consulting groups and may make a recommendation to the BOCC to negotiate a specific scope of services with one, some, or none of the respondents later this fall. No Attachments 6. Potential Reports (limited or no presentations) a. Unfunded Mandates (Orange County) During preparation and discussion of Orange County's 2004 -05 operating budget and 2004 -14 Capital Investment Plan, it was repeatedly noted that the County's fiscal outlook is more frequently and more substantively being affected by factors beyond the County's control, including a marked increase in unfunded mandates. In response to the BOCC's request, County staff have compiled a list of impacts related to unfunded mandates and intergovernmental budget reductions that have affected the County's financial picture. Attachment 6 — Orange County Summary of Funding Cuts and New Mandates School Resource Officers (Orange County) During school collaboration discussions this summer among the Chairs and Vice Chairs of the two school boards and the BOCC, the two Superintendents, and the County Manager, the subject of school resource officers (SROs) was raised. For some years, SROs provided by the Sheriff and municipal police departments have generally been stationed at middle, high, and alternative schools. Given the collective budgetary constraints of the past few years, there have been changes in the way that SROs are funded, with more of the cost now covered through school system appropriations. The County Manager plans to meet soon with law enforcement officials and Town, County, and school staff to explore ways to enhance or expand the work that SROs perform in our two school systems. In particular, discussion will focus on how to explore grant funding opportunities that could be pursued to underwrite this function, and to discuss the best arrangement between law enforcement agencies for providing SROs throughout Orange County, No Attachments FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact associated with discussion of these topics. There are no action items requiring formal Board decisions. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Boards discuss the topics listed and provide appropriate direction to the respective staffs. 11_.11.aITER, =o To: John Link, County Manager Cal Horton, Chapel Hill Town Manager Steve Stewart, Carrboro Town Manager From: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Joint Staff Work Group Date: September 29, 2004 Subject: Status Report and Recommendation - Joint Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Action Plan Project At the Assembly of Governments meeting on the 29th, our joint staff work group' would like to provide a status report on our work toward identification of a consultant for the planned Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory and Action Plan. If the boards are ready to proceed, we would propose to bring back to each individual board a Memorandum of Agreement and a recommendation for contract to perform these services. Background In 2002 and 2003 Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County joined the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the Cities for Climate Protection program. As members of ICLEI, the local governments have committed to take steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming. Internationally, over 400 local and national governments are members of this organization. There are 66 member governments in North America - ranging from Annapolis, Maryland to Windsor, California - but Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Orange County are the only member local governments in North Carolina. The City of Durham is a member of the Clean Cities Coalition but not of ICLEI. (Information about ICLEI is provided as Attachment 1). One of the first actions toward reducing GHG emissions requested of member governments is an inventory of emissions and the development of an action plan. At the April 29, 2003 Assembly of 1 - The Joint Staff Work Group includes the following members - from Carrboro, Trish McGuire and Noah Ranelis; from Chapel Hill, Chris Berndt, Phil Hervey and David Bonk, from Orange County, David Stancil, Karen Lincoln, and Tina Moon; and from UNC, Cindy Shea. Governments meeting, the activities needed to development a GHG plan were outlined by staff, and the three elected boards agreed to work together on a joint plan for reasons of both consistency, comprehensiveness and economic efficiency. Subsequently, at the September 29, 2003 Assembly of Governments meeting, Chapel Hill, Orange County and Carrboro formally agreed to work together to develop the comprehensive greenhouse gas emissions inventory and action plan, and staffs were asked to work together to develop a Request for Qualifications and a joint Memorandum of Agreement for the project, with evaluation of potential firms and a recommendation to follow. Orange County's Environment and Resource Conservation Department was proposed as the lead agency for project coordination, working with the Chapel Hill and Carrboro Planning Departments. During 2003, another air quality issue arose in terms of public awareness. The impending designation of the Triangle region as non - attainment for ground -level ozone (03) was announced by USEPA, and a potential joint Durham County- Orange County Energy Audit grant application was submitted (but not funded). Both of these activities commanded the attention of elected boards and staff in late 2003. It should be noted that while the compounds that contribute to ground -level ozone and those contributing to GHG are somewhat different (nitrogen oxides versus carbon dioxides), the issues are similar in terms of source and potential solutions or strategies (reduction in vehicular emissions, for example). Status Report In the fall of 2003, the joint staff work group began meeting to develop a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Scope of Work for the GHG Inventory and Action plan (Attachment 2). An initial RFQ yielded a limited number of responses, so a second RFQ was developed and released to a broader range of potential firms. During this time, the beginnings of a draft Memorandum of Agreement was also developed to outline the roles and responsibilities of each jurisdiction in working with the selected firm, and the funding portions for the project. Five proposals were received to the second RFQ and reviewed by the Work Group. Our Joint Staff Work Group met on several occasions in the spring and summer of this year to review the RFQ's, evaluate them, and ask follow -up questions of each firm. After completion of our evaluation, the Joint Staff Work Group recommends that ICLEI Energy Services (IES) of Toronto be selected as the consultant for the project. (The submittal from ICLEI is provided as Attachment 3). It was the opinion of the staff work group that IES had a substantial edge in familiarity and experience in producing inventories and action plans of this type. Staff was also cognizant of the advantage held by a research group affiliated with ICLEI itself, but felt that the capabilities of this firm outweighed any advantages gained by affiliation and familiarity with ICLEI. Funding for the project would come in part from monies appropriated by the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro MPO, and the three jurisdictions. A draft Memorandum of Agreement between the three parties is being drafted to outline roles and responsibilities and financial shares. The estimated total cost of the project would be $40- 45,000. The draft MOA assumes that the previously -used population based formula for joint Chapel Hill - Carrboro- Orange County planning projects would be applied here. In this formula, Orange County and Chapel Hill would contribute 43% of the remaining costs, with 14% from Carrboro. Excluding the MPO funds (approximately $8,000), County and Chapel Hill portions are currently estimated at approximately $15- 16,000, with Carrboro's portion $5,000 (note - these figures are estimates only). Next Steps No action is being requested at this time - this item is simply an opportunity to present the findings of the Joint Staff Work Group to the elected boards at the same time and assess whether the boards are ready to move forward. If the boards are ready, staffs would prepare a subsequent agenda item for each board, including the MOA and recommendation, and ask the County Commissioners, Board of Aldermen and Town Council to consider the award of the contract to ICLEI Energy Services (IES). Based on the scope of work and the preliminary proposal submitted by IES, the duration of the project is expected to be 4 to 6 months. There are seven projected phases to the project, all of which are subject to further refinement as desired: • Project Startup • Data and Information - Gathering • Receive /Vet Data and Information • Identify and Model Future Measures • Develop Model GHG Reduction Target • Report Preparation • Presentation of Final Report and Project Completion As noted in the IES response and the Scope of Work, two groups are proposed to work with the consultant to provide direction and ensure public participation. This would include the Joint Staff Work Group, either as it currently exists or augmented with other representatives, and an Air Quality Advisory Group, which would be appointed to include elected officials, citizens and other stakeholders. More information on the potential makeup of this group would be included in the MOA, which would be presented at the follow -up meetings. Please feel free to contact any of the staff members in this effort if you have any questions. Chris Berndt (968 -2728, cberndt0townofchapelhill.org) David Bonk (968 -2728, dbonk0townofchapelhill.org) Phil Hervey (968 -2728, phervey(n)townofchapehill.org) Karen Lincoln (245 -2594, klincoln(oco. orange. nc.us) Tina Moon, (932 -1073, cmoon0)co.orange.nc.us) Noah Ranells (918 -7324, nranellsOci.carrboro.nc.us) Cindy Shea (843 -5251, Cynthia .shea(@facilities.unc.edu) David Stancil (245 -2590, dstancilCcbco.orange.nc.us) * Trish McGuire is currently on maternity leave ICLEI Home Page Yicmbcrs Information Clearinghouse Campaigns & Projects Regional �Uebsites f \. i� �gORF ll Search: Agwlw4 I LEI Local Goverttlnents _ for Sustainability IN News Highlights & Publications Feature Story: Local Government Leaders Find Innovation in Climate Protection Reiterating their resolve to slow global warming, local government leaders from 60 cities representing 13 countries met in Mexico City on August 19 -21, 2004 ...MORE +30 Network to be Launched at World Urban Forum ICL.El, in partnership with the International Centre for Sustainable Cities, will be bolding the +30 Network side session at the World Urban Forum in Barcelona, Spain.... MORE Porto Alegre Awarded for Outstanding Commitment in Climate Protection During the Sixth Latin America Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) Workshop, the City of Porto Alegre, Brazil, received an achievement award for their exemplary performance in the CCP Campaign MORE s:e( ,� f helps c,pnta L40 US -Japan Exchange Takes Place Cities for Climate Protection participants and ICLEI Members completed the second study tour portion of the US -Japan Exchange and Research Program in August... MORE http: / /www.iclei,org/ 9/23/2004 ICLEI Home Page Triple Bottom Line Conference Brings Together Local Government Leaders On August 16 -17, 2004, local, state, federal, and private sector delegates from all over Australia and New Zealand gathered in Melbourne, Australia, for die Public Sector Leadership- Triple Bottom Line Conference_.. MORE Ist International Conference on Green Purchasing in Sendai, Japan The City of Sendai, in cooperation with ICLEI, will host the conference on October 6 -7, 2004. The conference will bring together a broad international audience and launch the international green purchasing network ... MORE, Members in Action: Adelaide, Australia As part of their action plan to reduce energy use, Adelaide City Council is retrofitting existing traffic signals with light emitting diodes. The changeover significantly reduces electricity and energy consumption MORE http://www.iclei.oig/ • City of Edmonton to Host International Waste Management Conference • Baguio City, Philippines, leads the Water Campaign in Southeast Asia Baguio City, Philippines, will be the first ICLEI Member in Southeast Asia to demonstrate water governance activity under ICLEPs Water Campaign MORE • City of Linz, Austria, Publishes Extensive Report on Air Quality ICLEI Member city Linz, Austria, recently published one of the most extensive available 9/2.3/2004 ICLEI Home Page archives on European urban air quality data MORE • Welcome to ICLEI's newest members! - Buenos Aites, Argentina - Yogyakarta, Indonesia - Ponferrada, Spain - Blue Mountains, Australia - Cambrils, Spain FICLEI Home page - Previously listed news items Copyright (D ICL.EI 1995 - 2004 http: / /www.iclei.org/ 9/23/2004 Cities for Climate Protection Home Page Members Information Clearinghouse Campaigns & pnilects Regional , ��'ebsites %IOtiiB hat:SneWIa1 G - r e , COI1faC,t, S l' sI p I j e " E s f r CK L m &7 � EPInc 'E r f S c Welcome to Cities for Climate ProtectionTM Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) is a campaign of the hiternational Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). The CCP is a performance - orient ed tPaPe campaign that offers a framework for local govermnents to develop a strategic agenda to reduce global warming and ajLpolhrtioil_emissigns, with the benefit of improving conununity livability. Five hundred local govermnents are participating the Campaign, representing 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and the Search: numbers are growing. I About the CCP • Background • Climate Chan eg_and Local Gov_er rents • Interational Recognition of the CCP • Current Activities (in ICLEI's Initiatives Newsletter) • Participants in the CCP Regional Campaigns • CCP Australia_ • CCP A_fiica • CCP Canada (Partners for Climate Protection) • CCP Europe • CCP Italy • CCP UIC Climate Protection Programme • CCP Mexico • CCP Southeast Asia • CCP US • CCP South America Prgjects /Programs • Green Fleets Program Conferences http: / /www, iclei.org /co2 /index.litni 9/23/2004 Cities for Climate Protection Home Page . October 2002: Eighth Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Summary of Proceedings [.2.3FiKB, pclf format) from the perspective of Local Government. Services The Campaign is designed to provide participating local goverrunents assistance in every step towards accomplishing the CCP five- milestones. ICLEI can provide the following: Technical Assistance • assistance in conducting emissions analyses • tools such as the CCP Greenhouse Gas Software, really designed for emissions analysis and reduction planning • assistance in identifying and quantifying measures • assistance in implementing measures Publications • ICLEI Publications_Catalogue - links to climate- related and other sustainable development publications for local governments • CCP Publications - list of climate- related publications available from ICLEI C(-'P TYebsite Re,soaroes • CCP Participants Club - free online publications for CCP participants, password required • CCP Cities in Action - information on CCP participants' activities • CCP City Hall - find out what your municipality can do about climate change • CCP Energy Arcade - interactive learning tools Information Booth Copyright CG ICLEI 1995 - 2004 http : / /www.iclei.oig /eo2 /index.htm 9/23/2004 A&Lo 4 a Joint Canboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan Request for Qualifications The Town of Chapel Hill, the Town of Carrboro and Orange County seek Requests for Qualifications to develop a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan for Orange County and municipalities in the County. The three local governments in Orange County are members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) Campaign. The local governments have committed to taking steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, known to contribute to global warming, through the development and implementation of a greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan, Development of the plan will include the execution of a base year emissions inventory. Chapel Hill, Carrboro and the urbanized area of Orange County, which includes the Town of Hillsborough, are members of the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro (DCHC) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that also includes The City of Durham, Durham County, and portions of Southern Granville and Northern Chatham Counties. The MPO anticipates that, in April 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency will designate areas within the metropolitan planning boundaries and extending throughout Orange County as non - conforming ozone areas under the new 8 -hour standards for air quality. The local governments in Orange County anticipate that part or all of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan can be used as an effort to attain conformity with the new federal air quality rules. Project Description and Components The purpose of this project is to develop a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan that examines and inventories greenhouse emissions in Orange County and develops measures to reduce those emissions. The consultant will assist a Regional Inventory/Action Plan Working Group made up of staff from the participating local governments in establishing objectives and a timeline for action plan deliverables. Orange County will assume the lead role for coordination. A portion of the project is being funded by a grant from the regional Durham - Chopel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization, and as such, transportation - related components and tasks are to be separately accounted for. The consultant will facilitate the formation of an Air Quality Advisory Group, to be appointed by the local governments, to guide development of the plan. The following process, as outlined in the attached Scope of Work, will meet ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PAGE 2 requirements for fulfilling the local governments' commitments to ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign: Inventory greenhouse gas emissions during a selected base year; Forecast greenhouse gas emissions over a selected planning period up to a target year; Facilitate the Air Quality Advisory Group in selecting a Reduction Target; Identify actions that the local governments, business and industry, and the community could take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during the planning period; Develop the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Action Plan that includes: • Existing Measures • Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions of Existing Measures • Potential New Measures • Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions of Potential New Measures • Recommendation of Measures to Achieve Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target. The process should also develop connections between actions proposed in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Action Plan and the adopted Durham - Chapel Hill- Carrboro 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan to show how the Emissions Reduction Action Plan implements the DCHC 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan for achieving air quality conformity for ozone, All transportation- related tasks and components should be accounted for separately for grant reimbursement purposes, as previously noted. Requirements Responses submitted should be concise and shall be limited to a maximum of 25 pages. All respondents shall address the following, as a minimum, and should conform to the numbering system used below. I , Name, address and telephone number of the firm or individual, with contact name(s). 2. Statement substantiating firm's understanding of project objectives to include description of the final products your firm would provide. 3. Names of key personnel who would be available to work on the project, their titles, experience, professional licenses, professional affiliations and other qualifications, and years with the firm; total size of firm's staff. 4. Proposed project manager and written summary of two projects the proposed project manager has completed in the last five years. 5. Statement of qualifications of the firm. b. List of previous clients for work similar to this project conducted over the past five years, with project size, scope, cost, location, time adherence, and contact names and telephone numbers. 7. Three client references from local government agencies. ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PAGE 3 8. Description of current workload of your firm, including project quantity and magnitude, percent complete, completion dates, and impact on key personnel. 9. Date at which work could begin and proposed schedule for completion of the work. 10. Previous litigation or arbitration in which your firm has been involved during the past five years. 11. Any involvement that the firm, its employees, or its owner(s) have that may constitute a conflict of interest. Evaluation Criteria The Working Group will select the consultant based on but not limited to the following considerations: Competence, including technical education and training of key personnel, experience in previous undertakings of this kind of project and actual costs of such previous undertakings, availability of adequate personnel and equipment, familiarity with using models /modeling software, and ability to facilitate public input processes; Past record of professional accomplishments and list of references; Past record of performance for the County and /or for other governmental entities; and Demonstration that there is no conflict of interests of the firm or parties involved in this project. Submittal Requirements: Please submit 10 copies of the information described above by 4:00 p.m. November 26, 2003, to: David Stancil, Director Orange County Environment and Resource Conservation Department Post Office Box 8181 Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 -8181 (919) 245 -2590 dstancilOmco.oran ge.nc.us The Working Group will hold a pre - selection conference in December 2003. The contract is to be awarded by the end of February, 2004. Joint Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Orange County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan Scope of Work Purpose: The purpose of this project is to develop a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan that examines and inventories greenhouse gas emissions in Orange County and develops measures to reduce those emissions. Process: The process will correlate with objectives of the Durham - Chapel Hill- Carrboro 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for achieving air quality conformity for ozone. The following process will meet requirements for fulfilling the local governments' commitments to the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP. 1. Inventory greenhouse gas emissions during a selected base year; 2. Forecast greenhouse gas emissions over a selected planning period up to a target year; 3. Facilitate the Air Quality Advisory Group in selecting a Reduction Target; 4, Identify actions that the local governments, business and industry, and the community could take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during the planning period; 5. Develop the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Action Plan that includes: • Overview of implementation strategies included in the 2025 LRTP • Existing measures • Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions reductions of existing measures • Potential new measures and cost estimates of implementation • Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions reductions of potential new measures • Recommendation of measures to achieve greenhouse gas emissions target. In order to provide for grant accounting purposes, transportation - related tasks and activities should be separately accounted for ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN SCOPE OF WORK- PAGE 2 Tasl< 1. Inventory The consultant will develop a greenhouse gas inventory for the base year 2000.. This Community Inventory will be an estimate of emissions from all sources within the County as well as an estimate of the proportional amount of emissions from indirect from sources (outside the County) that can be attributed to activities within Orange County. The consultant will develop a separate detailed emissions inventory for publicly - owned facilities of all participating jurisdictions. This Corporate Inventory will be a subset of the overall Community Inventory and will aid in the identification of reduction measures that each jurisdiction could implement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at facilities directly under their control. The Corporate Inventory will provide a separate evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions by major government facility and will include buildings, vehicle fleet, street and traffic lights, water and sewer facilities. The emissions inventory will categorize emissions by the following sectors: • Residential, which includes emissions from the production of energy used within the home, and the residential combustion of fuels. • Transportation sector, which includes emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels for use in mobile sources such as motor vehicles • Commercial emissions from electricity production, and the combustion of natural gas, propane, heating oil for generators, and building heating and cooling. • Industrial sectors includes emissions from electricity production, on -site energy production, building heating and cooling, and industrial processes • Solid waste sector, which represents greenhouse gas emissions from the degradation of waste in landfills • Other sectors represented any large businesses or institutions, in particular, the University of North Carolina and UNC Hospitals. Greenhouse gas emissions will be estimated by examining energy use information (electricity, natural gas, propane, etc) and driving patterns such as Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Where data is not available, the consultant will simulate the data using commonly accepted estimation / modeling methods. Participating jurisdictions will provide the consultant with all available data pertaining to and necessary for the inventory of government facilities. Participating jurisdictions will also make available for the consultant's use, exclusively for this project, licensed computer software provided by ICLEI for analysis of the data ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN SCOPE OF WORK- PAGE 3 The software program, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Software developed by Torrie Smith Associates, estimates greenhouse gas emissions using US EPA emission factors and data such as follows. Energy consumption data lelectricity, natural gas diesel heating oil, coal and propane) • Electricity consumption data from any power suppliers to the region, including UNC's power generating facilities, • Base year natural gas consumption from Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc. • Statewide consumption data for heating oil, coal, propane, and non - highway diesel from the North Carolina Energy Outlook report produced by the NC Energy Division. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), average vehicle fuel economies and vehicle types • Transportation data such as Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and vehicle from the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). • Average vehicle fuel economy data from the US EPA Office of Mobile Sources. Solid waste production and composition • Solid waste generation data from the Orange County Solid Waste Management Department. • Composition data from the 1990 Regional Solid Waste Study conducted for Durham and Orange counties or more recent data, as available. Emissions data for maior or permitted emitters within the region. • Emissions data for other major sources in the County from the NC Division of Air Quality. Task 2. Forecasting: The consultant will project greenhouse gas emissions for the target year of 2025 based on the projected growth in population and the projected increase in employment in the region and the Research Triangle Park. The projection should differentiate the relative contribution of greenhouse gas emissions from each economic sector as referenced on page 2 and examine emissions on a per capita basis. ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN SCOPE OF WORK- PAGE 4 The consultant will use the most up to date, generally accepted socio- economic forecasts for Orange County and growth and development forecasts from the Triangle Regional Model (TRM).. Projections of housing units will be used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions for the residential sector in the target year. Employment projections will be used to forecast emissions for the commercial and industrial sectors. Greenhouse gas emissions for the transportation sector will be projected based on forecasts of VMT used in the development of the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro (DCHC) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Solid waste emissions will be projected using the population forecasts and waste generation data available from the County Solid Waste Management Department. Task 3. Reduction Target: After the emissions inventory and forecasting activities are completed, the consultant will facilitate public processes for discussing greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and establishing d reduction target from base year levels consistent with DCHC 2025 LRTP objectives and strategies. The consultant will analyze the effect of several potential reduction scenarios to assist the stakeholders in selecting the greenhouse gas reduction target for the Local Action Plan, The Air Quality Advisory Group will recommend a final reduction target. Task 4. Reduction Measures: The consultant will compile a list of potential emissions reductions measures that the community could implement in coordination with the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Local Action Plan proposed for the City of Durham, an adjacent jurisdiction. The reduction measures are to be selected, and their impacts determined based on data provided by ICLEI, case studies of other US cities, and accepted values published by various federal and state agencies, and nonprofit organizations.. The consultant will analyze each potential greenhouse gas reduction measure using the best technical information available regarding the expected reduction for a particular measure to quantify reduction results. Assumptions will be presented regarding the extent and success of implementation of these measures. Assumptions regarding implementation are to be based on case studies from other cities within the US, data from ICLEI, or estimates based on the applicability of the measure to this region. The consultant will develop an estimate of implementation costs for each measure, and present the most effective measure for reducing transportation - related greenhouse gas emissions. ORANGE REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND REDUCTION PLAN SCOPE OF WORK• PAGE 5 Any City, County, or regional programs, policies, or projects planned or ongoing as of January 1, 2004 that may have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions should be included as reduction measure for this analysis. Task 5. Action Plan: The consultant will develop a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan in coordination with the Air Quality Advisory Group that includes the following: 1. Existing Measures. 2. Quantification of GHG Reductions of Existing Measures. 3. Potential New Measures. 4. Quantification of GHG Reductions of Potential New Measures, 5. Recommendation of Measures to Achieve GHG Target. Timeline The consultant will assist the Regional Inventory/Action Plan Working Group in establishing a timeline for action plan deliverables to include the following: Project Start -up Formation of Air Quality Advisory Group Data & Information Gathering Report to Advisory Group on Data & Information Forecasting future emissions Report to Advisory Group on forecasts and assumptions / Advisory Group to select reduction target (Advisory Group makes status report to elected boards) Identify & Model Measures to reduce future emissions Report to Advisory Group on potential measures to reduce emissions Assist Advisory Group to select measures to meet reduction target Report Preparation Present Draft Report to Advisory Group Prepare Draft Final Report Present Draft Final Report to Advisory Group Present Draft Final Report to Transportation Advisory Committee of the DCHC MPO Present Draft Final Report to governing boards of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Orange County for adoption A-({ Wx4 3 JOINT CARRBORO, CHAPEL HILL & ORANGE COUNTY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY & REDUCTION PLAN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS C" L E I ENERGY SERYICES November 241h 200.3 Submitted By: ICLEI Energy Services City Hall, West Tower, I e Floor 100 _Oueen Street West Toronto, ON, M5H2N2 Phone: (416),392-1480 Fax. (416) 392 -1478 Web site: www. iclei. or g7ies 1.0 CONTACT INFORMATION 2,0 STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING 1 1 2.1 PROJECT APPROACH 3,0 KEY PERSONNEL 3 4.0 PROJECT MANAGER EXPERIENCE 4 4.1 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO 4 4 42 CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 4 43 CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 5.0 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 5 5.1 DESCRIPTION OF FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS 6 6 • Technical Knowledge 6 • GHG Emissions Inventory Experience 6 • Extensive Involvement with Local Government GHG Emission Reduction 7 wo of Municipal Best Environmental Practices • Access to Netr k 7 • Focus on Municipal Clients 6.0 PREVIOUS CLIENTS 8 6.1 CI I OF MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO 8 8 61 ary OF GREATER SUDBURY, ONTARIO 9 63 CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 9 6.4 CI TY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO 10 6.5 REGION OF PEEL, ON TARIO 10 6.6 YORK REGION, ONTARIO 11 6.7 CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 7.0 CLIENT REFERENCES 12 8. CURRENT WORKLOAD 0 12 9,0 BUDGET, TIMELINE & PROJECT SCHEDULE 1.3 13 BUDGET 91 13 92 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT (CAP) ANALYSIS 14 93 TIMELINE &PROPOSED SCHEDULE 10.0 LITIGATION & ARBITRATION STATEMENT 16 11,0 CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT 16 12,0 APPENDIX A - RESUMES OF PROJECT PERSONNEL 17 17 Kerr Robert 18 AlSeskus 19 Megan Jamieson P Bell Ryan 21 James J Yienger Main Contact: Megan Jamieson, Project Manager ICLEI Energy Services City Hall, West Tower, 16`h Floor 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Phone: (416) 392 -1480 Fax: (416) 392 -1478 Email: mjamieson @iclei.org This package contains ICLEI Energy Services' (IES) submission for the Joint Canboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan Request for Qualifications. The proposal contains a description of IES, our qualifications and a brief outline of similar projects we have undertaken. Also provided are resumes and a description of the roles of each staff person. The Project Approach section describes the Local Action Plan development process IES is proposing. The later part of the submission contains the project Timeline, Gantt Chart outlining the specific tasks, and a proposed Budget,. 2.1 Project Approach The proposed approached for the completion of a,joint GHG Inventory and Local Action Plan for Carborro, Chapel Hill and Orange County will fall into six phases. Each phase is described in detail below. Phase I —Project Start -Up Key staff from each municipality with be brought together to form the Regional Inventory /Action Plan Working Group. Municipal representatives will be comprised of staff from each department that have an influence over energy consumption within the Town, i.e.: facilities, fleets. These staff'will be key data providers for the inventory and measures quantification. Community representatives will be comprised of people from the community that have an influence over residential, commercial and industrial energy consumption, transportation patterns and waste disposal, i.e. public utilities, gr ass organisations, public transit. IES will collaborate with the main staff contact for this project in establishing a list of potential Working Group members. Once the Working Groups are established, a kick -off meeting will be held to review and confirm the project details and begin the data collection phase of the project, Phase 2 — Inventory Data Collection IES will work with members of the Working Groups to collection baseline GHG inventory data for the baseline year 2000 and the target year 2025. The inventory will be based on energy consumption and solid waste generation for the following community and corporate (local government operations) sectors: Community Corporate Residential Buildings Commercial Vehicle Fleets Industrial Streetlights Water & Sewage Operations Transportation Waste (from local government Waste operations) IES will follow the internationally recognised methods for collecting data, calculating GHG emissions, and projecting future GHG emissions outlined in the CCP Protocol. If pieces of'data are unavailable, IES will use established methods of'data simulation to ensure the project is not delayed,. At this point in the project the Working Group will receive an interim report outlining the GHG inventory and forecasting results and analysis. All transportation- related tasks and components will be reported separately to satisfy the requirements of the Durham- Chapel Hill- C_arrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization funding. Phase 3 — Determine and Quantify Historic and Existing Measures This phase of the project will involve reviewing the historic and existing GHG reduction measures the local governments have already put in place. Information about each of the projects (i.e. municipal building retrofit or community home audits) will be gathered and compiled by IES via the Working Group members. With this information, IES will utilize the CCP software and Protocol to quantify the GHG reduction impact of the measures. Once the review is complete IES will report the findings back to the Working Group members. Again, transportation - related reports will be tracked separately to satisfy funding requirements.. Phase 4 — Identify Potential New Measures Phase four of the project will identify potential new measures to be included in the Local Action Plan. The inventory and forecast completed in phase two will provide a basis from which to identify target GHG emission reduction areas /sectors. Additionally, the analysis of historic and current measures will reveal the GHG emission reductions accrued in each area/sector. With this information at hand, the Working Groups (or a subsection Advisory Group focussed on guiding the plan) will be gathered to brainstorm a list of potential new measures (or expansion of current measures) that could be implemented to help reduce GHG emissions. IES will feed this process by providing information about best practices within the ICLEI and CCP network, IES will then take this list of potential new measures (including strategies outlined in the 2025 LRTP) and determine the potential GHG reductions, energy savings and cost savings of each measure utilising the CCP Software and Protocol (transportation measures will be reported independently). Phase 5 — Identify a GHG Emission Target The previous phases will lead to the development of recommended GHG emission reduction targets for both the community and corporate operations. The historic, current and potential future measures will be analysed and compiled to create future GHG emission scenarios based on differing levels of investment on behalf of the Town. For instance, conservative and optimistic scenarios could be created to illustrate the level of future GHG emissions given different packages of potential measures. The scenario definitions and composition will be agreed upon by the Working Groups. By comparing the scenarios against the baseline inventory and Business as Usual (BAU) Forecast completed in phase 2, future GHG emissions targets can be established. At this stage in the project the Working Groups can consider the results of the measures quantification process and agree upon a recommended GHG emissions target. Phase 6 — Formulate and Approve Local Action Plan The last phase in the project will entail drafting a finalising the Local Action Plan. The report will be drafted by IES and then circulated to the Working Group for comment within a specified timeframe. The Advisory Group will be presented with the Draft Report. Comments will then be incorporated into the report and a final report will be produced. Should the report require approval by other staff, it will occur at this phase., The Final Report will be presented to the Advisory Group, the Transportation Advisory Committee of the DCHC MPO and the governing boards of Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange Country for adoption. The local governments will be provided with multiple copies of the final report as well as .pdf versions and copies of the CCP GHG software files. 3.0 KEY PERSONNEL " The following staff will be assigned to this project.. Their roles are outlined in the table below, and more detail about each staff person is supplied in their resumes attached in Appendix A. Project Personnel onnel Title Role ert Kerr j Director, ICLEI Overall project responsibility 3 Canada I • Overall communications with client estrus Manager, ICLEI Liaise with client aEnergy Services • Staffing + Leading data analysis & simulation "j Supervising project monitoring & control � • t.�,r rr�ww. au..��. —. -- Project Manager, • Assembling & leading the project team ICLEI Energy • Overseeing the collection & management of data Services • Communicating & coordinating with clients Project monitoring & control • Preparing progress reports • Performing data analysis & simulation Preparing of final reports Technical Program Manager, ICLEI International CCP Ryan P. Bell. a Technical Iy Assistance 1 Associate, ICLEI — ��! US CCP 3 _•_ rresemauvun __ - - -� _ -_ —___ • Data collection & management Client communications • Assistance with data analysis & simulation e Assistance with preparations of final reports • Assistance with p resentations • Data collection & management e Client communications • Assistance with data analysis • Assistance with preparations of final reports • Assistance with presentations Megan .Jamieson will be the Project Manager assigned to this project. Below are summaries of three projects she has completed within the last five years. 4.1 City of Mississauga, Ontario Tluough the development of a Local Action Plan to reduce GHG emissions in municipal operations and in the community, this study resulted in a recommended GHG emissions reduction target. The plan included a comprehensive strategy to identify greenhouse gas emission reduction measures; highlight programs and partners to deliver those reductions; establish a community structure to co- ordinate programs delivering those reductions; and forecast local benefits and the future impacts of GHGs, The study also contained a communications plan, options for financing these activities, and a system to monitor and verify the community's progress, 41 City of Chicago, Illinois IES recently prepared a comprehensive, multi -year corporate inventory and compilation of emission reduction measures for the City of Chicago. The corporate inventory included a detailed analysis of energy consumption and cost data for 386 City buildings, 6,000 fleet vehicles, the City's entire stock of streetlights and traffic signals, and waste produced from over 400 of the City's facilities. The measures analysis focused on initiatives implemented by the City and other, agencies that reduced emissions of GHGs and criteria air pollutants in both the corporate and community sectors. IES identified and quantified a wide range of measures including energy efficiency initiatives, fuel switching projects, and outreach and incentive programs. 43 City of Santa Monica, California IE.S is currently in the process of finalising the City of Santa Monica's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan. The plan included a GHG emissions inventory, forecast and a strategy for achieving GHG reductions in both internal City operations and among the residential, commercial and industrial sectors of the community. A City staff Project team was established to provide energy and waste data and suggest strategies for new measures to be included in the Local Action Plan. The Local Action Planning process lead to the recommendation of a community and corporate GHG emissions reduction target to be approved and adopted by Council, ICLEI Energy Services (IES) is the technical service delivery arm of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). IES provides local governments with the expertise and experience to achieve their energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals. IES operates on a fee - for - service, cost - recovery basis. ICLEI is the international environmental agency for local governments. Its mission is to build and serve a worldwide movement of local governments to achieve tangible improvements in global environmental and sustainable development conditions through cumulative local actions. More than 430 cities around the world are members of ICLEI. In 1995, with funding from the Ontario provincial government, ICLEI created the Ontario Municipal Energy Collaborative and asked ten Ontario municipalities to identify the barriers to energy efficiency that existed in the municipal sector. Soon after, IES, a non- profit operating unit of ICLEI, was formed to address the barriers they identified. A cornerstone of ICLEI's activities is the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP). The CCP enlists and supports cities in the preparation and implementation of Local Action Plans that reduce energy consumption and the emission of greenhouse gases. The Campaign presently has over 600 participants worldwide. IES' energy efficiency and emission reduction work is targeted exclusively at local governments, complementing the CCP. IES also provides protocol and technical support to the members of the CCP working through the Milestone process. Located at ICLEI's World Secretariat in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, IES specializes in six core services: Greenhouse gas emission inventories and projections IES staff collect and compile energy consumption data in municipal operations or the community at large and quantify the resulting GHG emissions, as well as forecast fulto e energy use and emissions using the CCP protocol and software. Local Action Plan support As part of the development of a comprehensive plan to reduce nmmicipal and /or conrmnnity GHG emission, existing and potential futioe emission redaction measiu'es are identified and quantified. IES assists local governments in highlighting programs aid partners to deliver reductions, forming a com11771unications plan, determining financing opporhanities, and developing a system to monitor and verify results, GHG software technical assistance IES offers training and technical support to users of ICLEI's CCP greenhouse gas emissions software. We provide technical support over 110 CCP participants in Canada ■ Energy and GHG auditing of municipal facilities Detailed physical audits of municipal facilities are conducted by staff using ICLEI's Municipal Auditing Protocol (MAP) to obtain accurate energy consumption data and determine the efficiency potential for individual facilities, Co- benefits analysis By gnnarntifying the co- benefits of GHG emission reductions (such as job creation, health benefits, asset nianagenient, and criteria air pollutant emission reduction), IES provides its municipal clients with further evidence on the advantages of reducing their GHG emissions. ■ Emissions trading consulting IES provides consulting services on all aspects of emissions trading including policy developnient, Kyoto mechanisms, and the quantification and verification of emissions reductions,. 5.1 Description of Firm's Qualifications IES offers a unique set of skills and experience to its municipal clients. The firm's qualifications centre around five key assets: ■ Technical Knowledge IES staff have over 100 years cumulative experience in the areas of energy and water efficiency, renewable energy, utility issues, waste management, and transportation, Staff have previously worked for utilities, municipalities, and in the private sector, and have a thorough understanding of the municipal arena and the technical knowledge to help local governments implement their GHG emission reduction plans. ■ GHG Enissions Inventory Experience IES has completed corporate and community inventories for a range of local governments. Working with various municipalities has provided IES with vast experience in the collection, compilation, and analysis of energy data and the quantification of corporate and community GHG emissions. IES has gained significant expertise with GHG emission inventories across Canada by providing technical support to over 110 participants in the CCP. IES staff are also well- versed in estimation techniques to deal with data shortfalls. IES has completed GHG emissions inventories for city's such as Toronto, Sudbury, Ottawa, Burlington, Chicago and Santa Monica, ■ Extensive Involvement with Local Government GHG Emission Reduction Since 1997, IES staff have provided extensive support to over 110 Canadian participants in the CCP Campaign. The GHG emissions software that is provided to participants in the CCP was developed by ICLEI in partnership with Tonic Smith Associates, and IES provides training and support to software users, From technical software support to advice regarding the selection of an emissions reduction target, quantification questions, emissions inventory and Local Action Planning assistance, and protocol issues, IES has gained a great deal of insight into the issues faced by local governments that are reducing their GHG emissions, ■ Access to Nehvork of Municipal Best Environmental Practices IFS has access to the international ICLEI network of case studies and contacts, which provide concrete examples of best practices implemented by the 600 members of the CCP network, From emission reduction activities to public awareness and educational initiatives, IES draws on its experience with numerous local governments, IES is has worked with the Cities of Mississauga, Chicago, and Santa Monica and the Regions of York and Peel to prepare a Local Action Plans and set GHG emissions reduction targets. ■ Focaas on Municipal Clients By working exclusively with municipalities, IES is attuned to the challenges facing local governments and has the experience and ability to meet their needs. IES has worked with municipalities of all sizes, from Mount Rainier, Maryland (population 7,900), to Burlington, Ontario (population 144,000), to Chicago, Illinois (population 2.8 million), Since 1995, IES has completed dozens of projects for its municipal clients assisting them to meet their GHG emission reduction goals. From energy consumption analyses to corporate and community inventories to the development of Local Action Plans, IES has been involved in all facets of municipal energy efficiency projects. 6.1 City of Mississauga, Ontario Through the development of a Local Action Plan to reduce GHG emissions in municipal operations and in the community, this study resulted in a recommended GHG emissions reduction target. The plan included a comprehensive strategy to identify greenhouse gas emission reduction measures; highlight programs and partners to deliver those reductions; establish a community structure to co- ordinate programs delivering those reductions; and forecast local benefits and the future impacts of GHGs. The study also contained a communications plan, options for financing these activities, and a system to monitor and verify the community's progress. Cost: $45,000 Contact: Brenda Sakauye, Environmental Co- ordinator City of Mississauga Phone: (905) 61.5 -3217 E -mail. breuda .sakaatye@city.mississauga. oil ca 62 City of Greater Sudbury, Ontario The City of Greater Sudbury retained the services of IES to complete an emissions inventory and forecast of its corporate facilities and the community as a whole. The City's aim is to use the inventory's findings to gain a better understanding of its energy consumption, expenditures, and greenhouse gas emissions to support the development of EARTHCARE SUDBURY — the "made in Sudbury" Local Action Plan for a greener and more sustainable community future. IES is a partner in the development of the City's Local Action Plan and is also a member of its Community Energy Planning team ICLEI Energy Services has a long history of working with the City of Greater Sudbury, In 1997, IES carried out the City's Strategic Energy Plan, which called for a total of $7. million in investments resulting in an annual energy savings of over $1 million. The simple payback for this project was 7.1 years with a 32% reduction in the City's annual energy bill as well as a 28% annual reduction in GHG emissions, Cost: $45,000 Contact: Paul Graham, Plants Engineer City of Greater Sudbury Phone: (705) 671 -2489 E- mail: pawl, graham @city.greater °sudbury.on,ca 6.3 City of Chicago, Illinois IES recently prepared a comprehensive, multi -year corporate inventory and compilation of emission reduction measures for the City of Chicago. The corporate inventory included a detailed analysis of energy consumption and cost data for 386 City buildings, 6,000 fleet vehicles, the City's entire stock of streetlights and traffic signals, and waste produced from over 400 of the City's facilities. The measures analysis focused on initiatives implemented by the City and other agencies that reduced emissions of GHGs and criteria air pollutants in both the corporate and community sectors. IES identified and quantified a wide range of measures including energy efficiency initiatives, fuel switching projects, and outreach and incentive programs. Cost: $160,000 Contact: Joseph Deal, Coordinator of Special Projects City of Chicago Phone: (312) 742 -0461 E -mail: jdeal @cityofchicago.org 6.4 City of Toronto, Ontario IES completed a two -part study of over 900 of the City of Toronto's corporate facilities and selected agencies representing an annual energy bill of $64 million. The goals of the study were to analyze the efficiency performance in corporate operations and estimate the remaining energy efficiency potential within the facilities. It was determined that through the implementation of various measures, the total City energy usage had dropped by 1 %, representing $13 million in avoided utility costs annually and 56,000 tonnes of avoided greenhouse gas emissions per year. The study found that the City of Toronto currently has the opportunity potential to reduce its operating expenses by $15 -$22 million per year - potentially in excess of $100 million over a five -year period. The total investment required to realize these savings was determined to be between $68 million and $106 million, providing a simple return on investment of 20% per year. Cost: $20,000 Contact: Phil Jessup, Director Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) Phone: (416).392-0271 E -mail: pjessup @city.tororito.on.ca 6.5 Region of Peel, Ontario The Region of Peel hired IES to conduct a GHG emissions inventory and Local Action Plan for corporate operations and analyze the available waste related emissions trading credit potential. The GHG impact of historic and potential measures were modelled in each corporate sector and two GHG forecast scenarios were developed to reflect different levels of GHG reduction measure uptake.. It is estimated that the potential annual GHG savings through the implementation of measures in their Local Action Plan range from 12,000 tonnes to 32,000 tonnes. The Local Action Planning process has led to the recommendation of a GHG emissions reduction target, which is currently being reviewed before going to Council for formal adoption. This report also outlines the opportunities for GHG reductions and potential Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) from the Region's incineration processes, landfill gas flaring, composting programs, and waste reductions programs. Cost: $35,000 Contact: Joe Vieira, Technical Analyst, Program Planning, Waste Management Region of Peel Phone: (905) 791 -7800 ext. 4.379 E -mail: vieiraj @region.peel.on ca 6.6 York Region, Ontario IES is currently under contract to develop the Region of York's corporate inventory and Local Action Plan. An interdepartmental team was established to act as data providers for the development of the baseline inventory and provide information about the GHG reduction measures currently being implemented under the Region's Corporate Clean Air Committee. The team is also providing input on the scope of measures to be included in the Local Action Plan and the suggested GHG reduction target. Cost: $30,000 Contact: Tracey Forrest, Finance Department Region of York Phone; (905) 830 -4444 ext. 17.2.5 10 E- mail: tracey forrest @region.york.on, ca 6.7 City of Santa Monica, California IES is currently in the process of finalising the City of Santa Monica's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Local Action Plan. The plan included a GHG emissions inventory, forecast and a strategy for achieving GHG reductions in both internal City operations and among the residential, commercial and industrial sectors of the community. A City staff project team was established to provide energy and waste data and suggest strategies for new measures to be included in the Local Action Plan. The Local Action Planning process lead to the recommendation of a community and corporate GHG emissions reduction target to be approved and adopted by Council. Cost: $32,000 Contact: Dean Kubani, Senior Environmental Analyst, Sustainable City Coordinator City of Santa Monica Phone: (310) 458 -2127 E -mail: dean- kubani @santa- monica.o"g I 70 CLIENT REFERENCES .. For client reference, please see section 6.0, Previous Clients. 80 „CURRENT WORKLOAD IES is prepared to start this project as soon as February 2004, Fitting this project into our current workload will not cause a problem. The table below describes our' current workload. Civrrnnt Wnrklnatl Project j % Expected Daie Key Personnel Z. Corn lete o Cone letzor: j City of Santa Monica; Inventory & LAP 95% January 2004 Al Seskus & „.. Megan Jamieson Regron of York, Inventory & LAP 85% December 2004 Al Seskus & Megan Jamieson Town of Richmond Hill, LAP. 65% February 2004 Al Seskus & Megan Jamieson Canadian International Development 85% December 2004 Rob Ken Agency (CIDA), International CCP , Technical Support Partners for Climate Protection j ongoing Rob Kerr & Canada, (aka CCP), Technical Support Megan Jamieson AlbertnUnio'n of Municipal ` ongoing Rob Kerr & Al Authorities, Municipal Energy System 3 " Seskus Audit 12 9.1 Budget Because of the investigative nature of the proposed work, it is recommended that the proposed budget be presented as an upset limit as opposed to a lump sum, It is estimated that ICLEI's involvement in the process would amount to 76 days — subject to the outcome of the investigative stages in the project as well as the requirements for filling data gaps. Therefore, IES proposes a budget of $40,000 USD as maximum limit subject to per diem rates for three levels of staffing. The following chart illustrates the estimated allocation of roles. Final role allocation is subject to final reconciliation within the upset limit. Proposed Conditions 1, Monthly activities submitted for approval. 2. Cancellation clause available subject to compensation to IES for work completed up to date of notification. 3. Activities to be pre - approved prior to commencement of work on a monthly basis. 9.2 Criteria Air Pollutant (CAP) Analysis ICLEI Energy Services would also like to offer Orange County the option of including criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions quantification (e.g., NOx, SOX, VOC, CO, PM -10) in the GHG inventory and action plan. While not requested in the RFP, reporting air emissions co- benefits of GHG actions in the Orange County Climate Action Plan will help the county meet its objective of linking the plan to ozone - related strategies such as the LRTP and /or, to any Early Action Compact (EAC) processes underway in the region. In addition, air emissions co- benefit information will provide the Air Quality Advisory Group further information for selecting climate action plan strategies maximize impact on air emissions. 13 Rate (er diera) 1 Days ' USD t Sta SemoiAanager . ' j $650 I 10 $6,500 Prglectmanager $450 I 31 $1,3,950 Protect Assrstarits �� $450 35 $16,650, Sub Total 76 $37100, Expenses; ,j � I $2,900 TravelI Sub TotaT.� :$2,9q0' Total $40,000 Proposed Conditions 1, Monthly activities submitted for approval. 2. Cancellation clause available subject to compensation to IES for work completed up to date of notification. 3. Activities to be pre - approved prior to commencement of work on a monthly basis. 9.2 Criteria Air Pollutant (CAP) Analysis ICLEI Energy Services would also like to offer Orange County the option of including criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions quantification (e.g., NOx, SOX, VOC, CO, PM -10) in the GHG inventory and action plan. While not requested in the RFP, reporting air emissions co- benefits of GHG actions in the Orange County Climate Action Plan will help the county meet its objective of linking the plan to ozone - related strategies such as the LRTP and /or, to any Early Action Compact (EAC) processes underway in the region. In addition, air emissions co- benefit information will provide the Air Quality Advisory Group further information for selecting climate action plan strategies maximize impact on air emissions. 13 Computing criteria air emissions are more complicated than GHG emissions because of their dependence on technology. If Orange County is interested in this option, IES will collect and document the additional activity data, emission factors, and assumptions required to report the emissions. IES, where possible, will use the new Clean Air and Climate Protection Software (CACPS), an upgraded version of the CCP GHG software. This new tool, developed by ICLEI and STAPPA/ALAPCO with funding from EPA, was demonstrated in August 2003 at EPA RTP campus, Adding the CAP Analysis onto this project would involve an additional fee of $15,000 USD. The total project cost with the addition of CAP analysis would be $55,000 USD. The project timeline would be expanded by approximately one month to account for the additional data collection and analysis requirements. 9.3 Timeline & Proposed Schedule ICLEI Energy Services (IES) is prepared to begin this work as early as February 2004. It is anticipated that the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan would take 4 months to complete with a February start , CAP analysis would extend the timeline by an additional month. Attached is a proposed Gantt Chart outlining the proposed project schedule and associated key tasks. If IES is hired to undertake this project, the schedule will be reviewed, adjusted to incorporate accepted starting time, scope of work (CAP option) and submitted to the Working Group and Advisory Group approval and acceptance. 14 �o wo ET 5, WS 51 .5 5.L 7R 5 6 E3 O E-L ET I m -91 m 0 0 0 00 �ls 1,O 0 LITIGATION,& ARBITRATION ICLEI Energy Services has never been involved in litigation or arbitration of any sort. 11 0. _.CONFLICT LNTEREST,S OF TATEMENT _..._ .. ICLEI Energy Services and its employees do not have any involvement that may constitute a conflict of interest. 16 12 0 APPENDIX A RESUMES. OF PROJECT PERSONNEL '; Robert Kerr ICLEI World Secretariat Director, ICLEI Canada City Hall, West Tower, 16 "' Floor 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON, M5112N2 Phone. (416) 392 -0238 Fax.- (416) 392 -1478 rkelT @iclei,o g Job Description Responsible for overseeing all of ICLEI's activities in Canada. Overall responsibility for ICLEI Energy Services: • Maintain communications with ICLEI members and IES clients • Responsible for staff and program/project delivery , • Represent ICLEI and IES at conferences and presentations to committees, councils • Facilitate information sessions on the spectrum of ICLEi's Sustainable Cities activities Education Spring 1979 B Sc , Physics /Environmental and Resource Science, Trent University. Past Experience 1995 — present Director, ICLEI Canada, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives 1990-1995 Energy Management Coordinator, City of Mississauga 1989— 1990 Technical Consultant, Econoler Inc, Hydro Quebec 1986-1989 Energy Management Analyst, Honeywell Ltd.. 1985-1986 Energy Auditor, Gov't of Canada, Energy Mines and Resources 1983-1984 Technical Writer, Maran Graphics 1982— 1983 Research Assistant, Ontario Ministry of Energy 1982— 1985 Consultant, Delta Consulting 1979— 1982 Energy Analyst, Solaquair Corporation Al Seskus Manager, ICLEI Energy Services ICLEI World Secretariat City Hall, West Tower, 16" Floor 100 Queen So eet West Toronto, ON, M5H2N2 Phone: (416) 392 -0294 Fax: (416) 39.2 -1478 aseslacs @iclei.org Job Description As the Manager for ICLEI Energy Services, Al is responsible for managing IES with the following key duties: • Overseeing all IES projects • Staffing • Leading data analysis & simulation • Supervising project monitoring & control Education Spring 1989 M.B.A, General Management, University of Toronto. Spring 1983 M.Sng., Project Management and Building Science, University of Toronto Spring 1979 B A. Se, Civil Engineering, University of Toronto Professional Development Registered Professional Engineer, Professional Engineers of Ontario Marketing Management, Executive Development, York University P.Eng. Fall 1994 Past Experience 1996 —2002 1996— 1997 1990— 1995 1988-1990 1981 — 1988 President, Building Dynamics Incorporated Partner, Energy Partners Senior Program Design Specialist, Marketing Department, Ontario Hydro Consultant, affiliated with University of Toronto Research Officer, Centre for Building Science, University of Toronto Megan Jamieson Project Manager, ICLEI Energy Services ICLEI Wald Secretariat City Hall, West Tower, 16 °i Floor 100 _Oueen Street West Toronto, ON, M5H2N2 Phone: (416) 392 -1480 Fax (416) 392 -1478 mjamieson @iclei. org Job Description As the Project Manager for ICLEI Energy Services, Megan is responsible for the day -to -day management of projects, with the following key duties: • Assembling & leading the project team • Overseeing the gathering & management of data • Communicating & coordination with clients • Project monitoring & control • Preparation of progress reports • Performing data analysis • Preparation of final reports Education Winter 2004 M.A in Environment & Management - Candidate, Royal Roads University Fall 1999 B.Sc. in Environmental Science, Royal Roads University Fall 1997 Environmental Engineering Technology Diploma, Georgian College of Applied Arts & Technology Professional Development Spring 2003 Volunteer Management, Evergreen Fall 2002 Excelling as a First Time Manager, SkillPath Seminars Winter 2001 Fundamentals of Successful Project Management - SkillPath Seminars Winter 2001 Microsoft Access 2000 — Level 2, New Horizons Computer Learning Centers Spring 2000 Conversational French —Level 2, University of Toronto Past Experience 1998-1999 Learning Resource Centre Assistant, Royal Roads University 1999 Instructor, Mad Science Elementary School Education Program 1998 Client Services Personnel, Norwest Labs 1996-1997 Assistant Horticultural Technical, University of Guelph, New L.iskeard Agricultural Research Station Ryan P. Sell Technical Assistance Associate, ICLEI -US Cities for Climate Protection (D Job Description ICLEI - US Cities for Climate Protection`o l5 Shattuck Square, Suite 2/5 Berkeley. CA 94704 Phone (510) 540 - 8843010 Far (510) 540 -4787 I brlAu.it lei. orc As a Technical Assistance Associate with the U.S. Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP), Ryan supports CCP participants efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with research and coordination of initiatives aimed at implementing best practices for climate protection. Key duties include: • Consulting on the development of greenhouse gas and air pollutant quantification software • Coordinating the Urban Heat Island Mitigation, Policy adoption and Peer Exchange Initiative • Researching transportation, land —use, and urban heat island related climate protection strategies • Quantifying greenhouse gas reduction measures • Organizing orientation and software training workshops • Providing general technical assistance to campaign participants Education Spring 2001 M E Environmental Studies, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA Spring 1996 B.S. Conservation Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT Professional Development Fall 2001 Presenter. Investing in Natural Capital: 2001 National Urban Forestry Conference, Washington D.C. Fall 2000 Presenter, 4" International Conference on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling, Banff, Alberta Spring 2000 Participant, Symposium on Clean Energy: The Next High Tech Resolution, Seattle, WA Spring 2000 Presenter, National Geographic Alliance Annual Workshop, Auburn WA Past Experience Spring 2001 Consultant— Eastern European Climate Protection Conference, ICLEI 1995 -2001 Program Associate, Environmental Geography, The Evergreen State College 1999 -2000 Sustainability Intern, City of Olympia 1996 -1995 Environmental Manager, Peace Corps, Bulgaria 1995 -1996 Teaching Assistant — National and International Environmental Policy, Brigham Young University James J. Yienger Technical Program Manager 1CLE'1lnternational CCP 1CLE1 -US 215 Shattuck Sq. Berkeley, Ca 94709 plane (510) 540 -8843 entai1Jyienger @ic1ei org Qualifications Jim Yienger has been assisting local governments in developing emission reduction action plans for three years. He specializes in quantifying criteria air pollution emissions, and has been managing the upgrade of ICL.EI's CCP GHG inventory tool to include analysis of criteria air pollutants In addition he has authored 10 peer - reviewed papers on topics such as trans- boundary air pollution modeling, air pollution and food security, emissions modeling, and climate policy. Education University of to MS Civil Engineering, May 1999 (Iowa City, Iowa) University of Maryland, BS Civil Engineering/Water Resources, May 1993 (College Park, Maryland) Experience INT'L COUNCIL FOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES, (Jan 2001 — Present) International Program Manager, Cities for Climate Protection Campaign • Managing ICL,EI's efforts to upgrade the CCP GHG software tool air pollutants (with funding from EPA through STAPPA/ALAPCO). Designing and implementing testing and rollout strategies, and managing contracts with associated parties. • Provides regular technical support to local authorities for measures design and selection, and paining on GHG quantification Developing associated training materials • Developed and implementing ICL.EI's India Cities for Climate Protection project, a USAID - funded project to develop and implement GHG reduction strategies in 5 Indian municipalities. Facilitated the multi - stakeholder CCP action planning to reduce GHG emissions in all cities UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, Iowa City, Iowa (Aug 1996 — Dec 2000) Research Assistant, Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research • Developed a theory to explain the seasonal nature of tropospheric ozone chemistry in the NH midlatitudes. Invited to present this work at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) during planning of the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) experiment. • Conceived, performed, and published cutting -edge research on the episodic nature of trans - Pacific transport of East Asian air pollution to North America, Work presented at the millennium 2000 NATO /CCMS conference, and at the First International Conference on Trans - Pacific Transport of Atmospheric Contaminants in July, 2000. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY. Princeton, New Jersey (May 1993 - Aug. 1994) Technical Staff, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (NOAA/GFDL) • Examined the role of natural and fertilized soils in global air pollution. Developed a model of global soil - biogenic NO, emissions that will now be used in the new BEIS -3 biogenic emissions module being developed by the US EPA This inventory has set an international standard, having been accepted by the Global Emissions Inventory Activity (GEIA) since 1995. • Collaborated on research published in Science illustrating the threat of rising air pollution to food security in heavily populated areas such as China and India This work spawned a multi - million dollar research program in China to investigate the socio- economic consequences of rising air pollution Publications: Yienger, J, J., Lizbeth Brown, Nancy Skinner, Experiences of ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign in Asia, Kitak3;ushu Sympo.siunt on Urban Environmental Management, Proceedings, July 2002 Yienger, J. J„ G. R. Carmichael, H. Levy, II, The episodic nature of air pollution transport from Asia to North America., J Geoohvs. Res., 105, 26,931- 26,945, 2001. Yienger, J. J., A.A , Klonecki, and H. Levy II, Evaluation of chemistry's role in the winter - spring ozone maximum found in the northern Hemisphere mid- latitude flee troposphere, J Geoohvs. Res., 104, 3655 -3667, 1999 Yienger, J. J., and H. Levy II, Empirical model of global soil- biogenic NO,, emissions, J. Geophvs. Res., 100, 11,447 - 11,464, 1995. Yienger, J. J„ Global and Regional Scale Ozone Photochemistry: the Impact of Asian Pollution, Masters Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, May 1999. H, Levy, II, J. J. Yienger, W. J Moxim, P. S. K.asibhatla, and W. J. Chameides, Increase of pollutants in the summertime Midwest (chapter 2), Global Change' A W western Perspective, SBP Academic Publications, 1995. Corr, A. H, and J. J. Yienger, Observed interannual variability in the Hadley circulation and its connection to ENSO, J. Climate, 9, 2751 -2767, 1996, Chameides, W. L., P. S Kasibhatla, J. J. Yienger, H. Levy II, and W. J. Moxim, The growth of continental -scale Metro- Agro- Plexes, regional ozone pollution, and world food production, Science, 264, 74 -78, 1994 -- Response to Specific Questions Regarding RFQ Submission -- Joint Carrboro, Chapel Hill & Orange County GHG Emissions Inventory & Reduction Plan March 9, 2004 Megam.Janrieson, ICI,EI Energy Services, niiai)iiesoii(a iclei.oi (416) 392 -1480 Below are each of the questions you had regarding ICLEI Energy Services' response to the Joint Carrboro, Chapel Hill & Orange County RFQ for a GHG Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan. Please don't hesitate to contact Megan Jamieson at the phone number above if there are any additional questions or points of clarification. 1. Please expand on how you would address the linkages between the GHG Inventory /Action Plan and the Metropolitan Planning Organization's 2025 Transportation Plan. Ideally, we would meet with the Durbam - Chapel -Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) at the onset of the project, This would give ICLEI, the DCHC MPO, and the Regional Inventory/Action Plan Working Group the opportunity to discuss the two plans to see how they can be brought together for the benefit of both plans, We anticipate that the DCHC MPO has already implemented some projects that have had an impact on transportation and therefore GHG emissions within the region. ICLEI would want to capture these projects in Phase 3 —Determine and _Onantify Historic and Existing Measures of the Project Approach outlined in our RFQ submission (see Page 2) The 2025 L.ong - Range Transportation Plan (2025 LRTP) also has measures planned for the future, such as the Bus Transit Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Plan. These Plans will reduce the generation of GHG emissions and therefore will be captured in Phase 4 — Identify Potential New A9easiaes of the Project Approach outlined in our RFQ submission (see Page 2). Greenhouse Gas emissions from dre transportation sector are a large contributor to the region's overall emissions profile Therefore, it is essential to focus on this sector when designing a plan to reduce overall GHG emissions, ICLEI plans to invite members of the DCHC MPO to participate in the Air Quality Advisor Group to help guide and implement the GHG Emissions Inventory and Reduction Plan 2 List up to 6 projects most similar in scope to the Joint Carrboro, Chapel Hill, & Orange County GHG emissions inventory and reduction plan. Include hours required to fulfill contract requirements, total cost and stage of implementation 3 For each of the six selected projects, indicate clearly what software programs and versions were used to perform the analyses. If the ICLEI Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP) software was not used, please indicate what aspects of analysis were provided by the software employed that is not provided by CACP. The following table addresses the questions in bullets 2 and 3. Table 1: Summary of Similar Projects Project Hours Total Stage of Implementation Software Programs* (approx.) Cost City of Santa Monica 510 $32,000 ICLEI report is 97% complete. CCP GHG Emissions GHG Emissions USD The implementation of the Local Software — Version 5 0, Reduction Local Action Action plan is ongoing US Edition Plan CACP Software — Beta Version City of Chicago 2,410 $160,000 The ICL EI report is 100% CCP GHG Emissions Emissions Inventory and USD complete. The implementation Software — Version 5.0, Compilation of Emission of the Local Action plan is US Edition Reduction Measures ongoing. CACP Software — Beta Version City of Mississauga 710 $45,000 The ICI El report is 100% CCP GHG Emissions Corporate Local Action CAD complete. The City us currently Software — Version 5.0, Plan and Community considering funding options to U S. Edition Emissions Inventory and begin implementation of the Consultation Plan Local Action Plan. Region of Peel Corporate 550 $35,000 The ICLEI report is 100% CCP GHG Emissions GHG Inventory, Local CAD complete. The Town is Software — Version Action Plan, and Waste currently developing a phase -in 3.63, Canadian Edition Measures O portundties plan. Region of York 480 $30,000 The ICL.EI report is 90% CCP GHG Emissions CAD complete Portions of the Local Software — Version Action Plan are already 3 63, Canadian Edition underway. _ City of Sudbury GHG 1100 $69,000 The ICL.EI reports are 100% CCP GHG Emissions Emissions Inventory, City CAD complete. The Local Action Software — Version of Sudbury GHG Target Plan is ongoing and they are 3.63, Canadian Edition Analysis and monitoring and verifying its Recommendation progress * The CCP GHG Software was used to calculate GHG enuissionns The CACP Software was used to calculate God: the criteria air contaminant emissions (i e NOx, SOx, VOC, CO, PAd 10) and GHG emissions lichen the CACP Software was in its Beta form, both of the software programs were utilized so the client would have the standard GHG Software version of their work and the Beta CACP Softrva e version (The CACP Software has the sa ie capacity to calculate GHG emission -s as the CCP GHG Software, with the added capacio+ to calculate criteria air contaminants) 4. Generally, how many local meetings do you anticipate to accomplish the project? At what points in the process would you hold meetings, and for what purpose? Typically, we begin these projects with a Kick -Off Meeting. At the Kick -Off Meeting we discuss the wmkplan and the schedule for subsequent meetings. Our past experience with this type of work has involved three on -site meetings, therefore we have scoped this work with three meetings in -mind. However, we are open to revisiting this matter (as well as others), if we are selected to fulfill the contract For instance, there may be the opportunity to add more on -site visits coinciding with ICL.EI USA's work in the region, A general description of die anticipated meetings, tinning and purpose is provided below: Kick- offA4eeiine— within a month of the stmt date I" meeting of the Regional Inventory /Action Plan Working Group Review and finalize projected workplan and timeline Schedule subsequent meetings One -on -one meetings with key data - providers to begin data collection phase Meet with Durham - Chapel - Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Mid - Process A4eeting— mid -way through the contract Report back to Regional Inventory /Action Plan Working Group on progress to date Brainstorming session with Regional Inventory /Action Plan Working Group to model future measures and potential targets One -on -one meetings with key data - providers to follow -up on any data collection or clarification matters Final Meeting — new the end of the contract Presentation of report to Regional Inventory/Action Plan Working Group and any other suitable audiences Submission of report hard copies �+ t i MORGAN AND LITTLE CREEKS T.Ecosystern I Local Watershed Plan PItOGHAM This local watershed planning initiative addresses the need for action in the Upper New Hope arm of .Jordan Lake, a local watershed area including the towns of Carrboro and Chapel Hill in Orange County, and in Durham, NC. The focus of this local watershed planning activity is on upper Morgan Creek (30 square miles, potential habitat degradation), lower Morgan Creek (19.9 square miles, 6.5 miles impaired stream), and Little Creek (Booker and Bolin Creeks, with 24 ..6 square miles, 12.7 miles of impaired stream). These creeks exhibit or are threatened with habitat degradation, sediment, fecal coliforrn bacteria, toxicity, and low dissolved oxygen. All of these creeks, with the exception of upper Morgan Creek, were on the Section 303(d) list for year 2000 and are within a water supply watershed. They are in the Jordan Lake Watershed, for which NC is currently developing a nutrient management strategy, and the Upper Morgan Creek watershed, which supplies University Lake. Urban runoff and effluent from wastewater treatment are possible sources of degradation. In upper Morgan Creek, agriculture is also a possible source of degradation. The N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) combines an existing watershed restoration initiative (previously referred to as the NC Wetlands Restoration Program) within the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources with ongoing efforts by the N.C. Department of Transportation to offset unavoidable environmental impacts from transportation - infrastructure improvements. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ,joined as a sponsor in the historic Memorandum of Agreement that established the program's procedures on July 22, 2003. In a two -year study of the Morgan and Little Creeks Local Watershed, the EEP partnered with TetraTech, Inc., the Cape Fear River Assembly, the NC Division of Water Quality, and local stakeholders to identify priority opportunities for watershed restoration and protection . The Local Watershed Plan recommends restoration and preservation projects through the implementation of: • 25 Best Management Practices to treat water quality in 600 acres of priority subwatersheds • 11 stream restoration projects to gain 28,000 linear feet of restored stream • 137 priority preservation parcels to protect over 600 acres of priority habitat In addition, proposed changes to local rules are advocated to support Low Impact Development and prevent future degradation from occurring in the watershed. These recommendations are detailed in the Preliminary Findings Report, the Detailed Technical Assessment Report, and the Targeting of Management Report, which can be downloaded from the Internet at the following web address: http:uh2o onrstatc nc mrmp; p l tms lvll_.CC&MIC /MI C1Ionic III III Also available at this web address are summaries and presentation materials from the stakeholder meetings, and more detailed information about the project participants. www nceep, net 9/2:3/2004 'R °a N m O i rot LJ C) O t6 0 o N } Q LL Z w a N d cu co j U � C � N � U Q1 N Q y LL t� VJ N C ✓ C O N O O d N m O) LL C C E p p L O LL CO M M co M w Ui r VT O O N 6f) N O H C U oO aCj C N •O N N C O 0. O C C O O O y .0 O U Q O) N> -O o f p O C U o m p. m U O m V c c a) p. o N oa O , } LL Q m 0 . U E N C O LL 0 w o� - im L N U EC�oo am Q) Tc E E m N Z:, a) N m N N m 0 O U O. O. = C O N o O m E N .00 C U a) °_C °�@�w� o, 9M �s a 0 -L T L C C O C A@ O) p ,_ i O L Q U LO N a c O N O .�' N c T .E V- C U 0 • c E= 'rn E c 'NO o) o c m N o w-p. N c N C m �- m 0 m G Q 0 0 0 0) ° a 0 0 O .L.. •O °L a N a)v o a) a m m a) aE) a) 'D Lm � aN N E o N> rn �E m p w p �oIy-.?nN mm N` oa`c Z, C c s A a) ?r.N L o 0 o U' O O N N a) V N 0 m m j 0 C O �- +L• O y N O C = m p V M N a) O O U N O O N = O 00 O N N _.'C.. E 'G N O C 0 'O u. N ^'' +'C-• C m LD N (O N ° y 0 •O "' T 0 0 o m =m- c 0 o >2 aia) a) c o C N L r o OLLL 3 No N ` M O w f "T 10 , )f "C U U U m N N j. > N M O O L6 N— >"o NO O w E C, N :3 U Y M U Y N 1 O i6 0 N a) N O c 0 N v cc E m a) o 2 oo �' D- .E Q• o p o a) O N C a) c> 'O �o y o N d O a) d w O m N c m N O C N m O U O.Q w e Lo in o 0 U O O m O@ O N m N a) L z 0 E C 3 n w N N L LL O_ v- o N a i m ' o U Vi i» C U C E C C O c m U m Q r o d •@ Cn 'O U. C I aN CD CD Q 0 1 10, C a °a N a cz Zi Z �a � R3 0 Cl) �U �a O z U- 4- O l� VJ O N O h W W M O O) I�r 0) 06 00 a m 0) N 0 C O c @ `o w EO .� c o 'a) m a) @ rna`) a w U a) O C m y w U .c cam.+ Q N@ Z U 2° O a) C L y C « (0 m0 =O O) Q m N C d C a) E O .'C-• O LL w m C .G O LL w ++ O° m C Co — 0 U m '� N °_ w U a m O M@ L .@O C N 0)' "O C 0) W a) o a 0) m m C X 3_ C p F C a C o o > c C) m w E o c° .> @ C m o. > E c m O c .o m o m . o@ 3 o @ Z O p m C vi o c@ a) o .�. `m m? o @ o vN U L m n c° a 3 w p° c X o w e c o w o a o m 0 >¢ o° p E °° E w z T U c= O O 0 'C ° CD -0 m O L L E 3 d@ 'N C o LL ,o N •N > p O ,)4a Q v v N ~ 3 °cam c s E o W c N m U o @@ o° F m E •- C o� °y(D aci 3 E�a`yc 0 0) o 0) o s aa)) -o°ocn m a) o C m 0 oS0 o F- @ w m cm a) 30 a)c c WU E- a) @o 0) O m oLo ° C mo ?'v �aow O @ a rn� �U 3 o O,c m � m U) 0 m $.�.`� aci coo @a a�i m a ��02 o aNU �' m tM @ a) m O O O) m .p O N E c@ m N X w O@ 'O c d o a) c0 r @ "O O 4= 'O O Z U a) .�„ E N U? 69 @ o° o@ E m m° a a m O C M 0@ O U) O m C 202 api V F O_ N L m C@ 0)j 'O o E E= c E@ C N m L p 0@ N , N w( o N@ U° o o O_ m v tl- m o o? O E m p m@ m w C c >° c 7' O O yj @ a) O 4.• c E m a) @C n d - U T m_� .�` @ w 7 Z o o> p 0' E d N C N Co C m E o 0� O E S U V- O d 'O � U O) l0 U @ C U O C N�omco�� .o ���NO'�Um �.3oi�� om Q E' o a> °. d o o 'v w o c c 0 0 @ E N "@ U X E "@O N 2 N L 0— W 0 C (n e Z m w c E d d m C) m~ 0 w o E c Cl m 0 o 0 ° o L C E n LL .N 0 L@ L o 0 12 m N 3� N 0 y (O N O m � a) to M ate) C °p_'t C U m .... m w C Y7 N U a) .0) p) p T N C@ O 0) W O E U @ .Z` O N@ > O @ O O Zp O E N U co O ) o i U a E aw U o. w a KD c w w o c •N •V C C @c aC) w U) s m > U ? m d rn ` (. d O C } O 0 Q 0 a °a N a O v� U "~ mU 0 C L � Oa LL 0 O O co O O r 6 O h O O [t O 0) O Gs 1 r to � N N V' 69 N N IT � to a0 �. Cl) 63 R 0 o C T ..., N VL-. 0 0. 'o w c 07 c y o c= °c c m m C O E CL 0 yt 0 s O O) O R 0 o _ ... a 'G o 0 R E> m m C I- 3 m E V (a G L c o o m m o 0 2 c o v R m a) >- D co o u a a) p c° 3 o c a`) co c m a U 1 o rn 0 d 3 O Q C y n. G 0 R E> o vi v F m k .c R 0) o °o m a c c E a) w .N F- d E w ° o) N C E= E 0 2 ° c o y V 'T "� o v d E O o o C R to O V R 'C O d c —co O >> 'O >� a) O .�` O N S 'C O p a+ a) R R= 0 C O V d U O 'a-1 R 0 C 'O O 0= N C_ S ° '3 c O i, o c l— d= L doh Co 0 W VN-_ a) ° E o a) N c O o (n o .° c V- dO) R.� .� E p O N— N p c N CL 0 0 V R a) U c N L 0 0 o ?= O 'O w �•�- O p V) O d �.- 0) O R 0 CL 2 R O>, 0 a) 'D d N 0 U E O) U C lL °- jp O) c C U) C N 'O N '> L C 'O O a) R E c �m v °Ecvo ~ 0 -My00W M °off �m LN�°� N H d m m o iN L S-0 R a) E c R D V.O.. E c ow c R O O 3 v o L,t-t� c c V= o) Roo_ c O) m c an. > C at$ G O d 0 0 Q a) N O a) o 'y a L.L.. CA O R C t0 p R O c c '0 O a) O D W N C •p O D. =° �+ ..N. L V O E 0 p, VO 0 O) w R O N ..LO.� o p R a) o d R` V O C V O :3 0 O N d 0 Co C p ,C D O m Z. C 'D = .tn. O v`m >Ro = 0 Co 'O V O Q. 0c V o = p N M N ovcn' 0 `J_ R a) E >EU)v p- U N N 'O L C N 'O = R 00 v C O O Z, > R 'C a) R 0 L 0 N N W 'O C 'O t R O C c R O E o. N N c CL CD t°)Z.O \�F.W UO c v dR�0p)0o m .> p `o 0)w RUC °° O N 0 •COON E m o V w o c a) = �' = O 0 ~ 'a w N W a)- ¢ E E w N °. w N N c O o w E R m Q d R D fY0 p>, a) R U O .� N 0) Z O H O N N 'O = c '6 C O (— 0 -> N c o C Ip V R Od 0° O E O O M N a) N �+ d O O C C O a) t G C E N U > O N R [? N p) N ` "' 0 R C d d O` 0> C y fA N = p )O •L' R N G E S a N o N C R C N a 4) Cn N O O K .L-• t- 0 `t U E c a) O p L o >o E w a o 0 O C W C) m N o Co c M 'a CO 0° c E m " 2) E T 01 0 °, O •C N c0 EO L m'EC a ` � L C = ca C E .0 R p LL .RG a) L) V`o= �c`�°Q °oc°a E0trWa)�coMFD0M mNV ao)o'Eo•in> o Z U- VO- .rO- 4= O.R.. N W U) n. d U) U R a) 0 C 0 E CL 0 'm a>i 0 E 0 C s ++ N O d O O W = _ a a CO a C U 42 dU Oa 4- O EE co y 0) 0 V O O. m E N O R) � C N C } c U. O N EA O O N UR O O O b9 O O to 64 O O G O LO FiT l0 M EA N c r - l0 U) V% N m O C N C c O O W _ (a 0 O 0 ""6 'O _ C' m- >, r v ,� U }¢ w 3 0 o y c w m o °c pow o o c a- E p o O N m C 'O 0 0- E O = -O N 4 0 N E mom oQ� y a) a E�aU a O u)cmE'ma Lacv E0 - O y0 'O O to O G O -_ N O) U 0 O U) 4-' C N >O U m N 3 > O0 'C ) O ca .�` U H x .� O ,N LO O .,L_. N O) M C (D O a v .m U O> - a) N« cu LU Iq E d ,C 'o m Ut N D .0 m �a CA CO = m d° c 0 in m rn �� ur o ao) ate) 3 m v °o. m 0 O o T v ca 0 v o m a> w O o E o m ,__ a) d W aD m 0 m o �` N :8 aE o a a O 0 � 0-w .L-. 3 N O N O .0 U �- L.Z'c0 N U toL G C d' >.0 C LL N 00 !A 00 c o =O E E m L N N .0 Q 't 0 0 O O ?� aa)) L cNV LO_, .. m 0 0 a) �'' a) U a j (a 20 L E O N V !G "X � U C O� N y > � (V1 O wC=- w C 64 C. p a) �' >LO. j U0.1 V Z.' >0 m N O ♦�,. N N Oi N m N E N L Q N c T N O U O, 0) d > E o7 Od. N Q to C� o m c m mF 'm c�� c n. c m Z E m o c o cm o 3 °' 'O N �- X N d ~ t N- �- L a E y C c U m U) ` C W to C C d'C -N0 _ (� ~ O N O= a) O 7 C E 0 U (7 ``K N N a) N C O 62 ` E O m O N m �' co j @ E m N❑ o 4) "� O.N. T 'O N Ell a) E >` L c m a= N E c G '� N C d f6 Qo o O to E moot N X -`o '00` w3 o N N E a a)���' O N O :c.va)mm a O O N L o y L 0 m � o m E (D `m c c a m E ai 0` O o m d .c N ,0 m c d U N T N c 0 L a) m 2 n m p V a) E N UFO p) N m w C 0 noo�v3b)nm'oma� C O C O �.. L v,C U °owU - o -C -p ? 0) a)d >� d M ca �' U m C 'd' a) Q) o 0 a) V = U y U N 0 N U T O U N rn 0 U d w0 m O) w U E N 3 0 0 m E o 0 N N �"" p a 0= W �; (0 0 T E L y `) E 0 C W c U) E N E L N Q N O N V O `O 'U- U (n E m �. C V O L'` L.+ 0 0 O Q a) N O j a W 0 G C 00 N N .p a 0) N 'c E O� U c ..L.. al a) >. E 0 �. •` O a a) (� 0 a) a) 0 O N C O C.L.. 'C N :«. [P = 0 U m a) N C .� N t0 d > N la O 'O c> cli CL a) .0 .c d- 0 0 N Q1 EN(A U CL N 'O d UOj 0. 0 N E N o C> > O a m N X mL.. 0 0 E L O VI L O tr W m m w Q w a w U '00 L = N U Un C C R CO E C U .L.. 6 C d y Cl) to L p w M a °a N 4 V • C N O � dU L Oa v.. U ll�^ vJ d' of V M » UV7 N » M 0 (,% M N N er, N M t0 75 0 o N m C O C m 0 'O O N d O U E > a) E N a) Co m;C >. EO a C N m N U O U N O 'O E o 0 L o r9 c E O W ui v! L m 0 0 O` "' d w S N '� N E 'C y W 0 U m m a) N> - C N 'U m0 a) C -O m O o �n d C Y p !n W m W p C m c W C p m N C � "O O .� 'O E 0 0 O mn C U d N N m °sm Lm EHm `ocy =ovm°o L C U o N U O f/j 'C 'O u- N m m p (D N Un co C m U) o c ° E cD W r o m CL m c N Z cr c °° 01 0 o E ,C p O y m H U °' m E 0 'O °/.N E m o E ai = m> I- m N ;= y°). O c m 0 v) m 0 L� U C c O O` ry 0 c° _ °o. co o E E m a) N U L mri to O 3 a E O o O C0 N OO w U m c t0 d L m O N O U N 'O L w ce) )n d 0 0 0 L w W m m N C L' 04 -C RS C L 'd N L D m v m ' m m `m � d d v I E d O c o aa, ~ v V! m N '(D O C d �.. U .L.. N N C d E Z L C 'O ,�0 U o (� Z Y m mp C m .O .`d. �' N adn :-0 ?. C a) O O �_'vmEwE o "" m m v �omnoM m -o a) v -- wM ov'F °� 0 v o _co CO c Y m M " m m `o 0 S p E N° 3 o N 0 c o -E o m d v m E .n p o m o m c .O m= m kC )C) U '_' m m a) (0 Lam. O` N ° ca 0 C O O >' C N C p," m0 � 7 C m U N C C C m m E U � N O C p L = � 0 C9 O N a U U a m° U d Z R C O� C d C"0 c c E m w e c c in o c O 0 m m m U o> L - U L !!) a) E N V1 E al N _ ,> W (0 U C O C U O m m m m y OF `m c v E H 0 .- r 0 0 75 2 0 (D w v i m-OO `'O r w �2 E E W ' a m m° U- v C7 S mo ca O a `U c.o U N N h C Y a) C N Cr) T x 0 w ) N N C aN d a E m E d 0 (D c v U a" ° m � m m 0 E E o p o -o -o O a c v -m o o O C; I= U > O. .X X o -a o o m °" D (D h m 0 U a) O m N m 0 °- c m m °- o E ° m e m m E o 5 E v E O V C V N O .00 U N