HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-27-2004-2 ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: September 27, 2004
Action Agenda
Item No. 2
SUBJECT: County/OCS/CHCCS Informational Reports
DEPARTMENT: Manager/Budget/Planning/ PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) No
Finance/Economic Development
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
As listed in "Background" Rod Visser, ext 2300
Donna Dean, ext 2151
Craig Benedict, ext 2592
Ken Chavious, ext 2453
Dianne Reid, ext 2326
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 336-227-2031
PURPOSE: To receive written reports from staff regarding several school related issues..
BACKGROUND: This portion of the meeting provides an opportunity for the three elected
boards to receive updates on the topics noted below. As time permits, the Boards may wish to
discuss some or all of these topics, and to identify any points that staffs may need to research
and bring back as the subject of subsequent reports.
a. 2003-04 Adopted School Budgets
As is usually done at the September joint work session each year, County and school staffs
have developed the accompanying tables that present the respective adopted school budgets
for the new fiscal year. These tables reflect major budget items requested by each school board
for the 2004-05 fiscal year and how each board decided to allocate the funds appropriated by
the Board of County Commissioners, as well as any additional school fund balance
appropriations.
Attachment 2a — 1 Table - CHCCS Current Expense Appropriation FY 2004-05
Attachment 2a — 2 Table - OCS Current Expense Appropriation FY 2004-05
2
b. 20th Day Student Membership for 2003-04
The accompanying tables reflect the number of students attending school in each school in
both school systems on the respective 20th day of classes for the 2004-05 academic year.
Other tables provide a historical comparison between annual State Department of Public
Instruction student projections (these are provided each March and statutorily become the basis
for County current expense appropriations to schools) and actual student membership for both
school systems.
Attachment 2b— I OCS Student Membership Tables
Attachment 2b — 2 CHCCS Student Membership Tables
Attachment 2b - 3 Table: OCS Comparison of DPI March Planning ADM and Actual
Membership
Attachment 2b - 4 Table: CHCCS Comparison of DPI March Planning ADM and Actual
Membership
c. Update on Economic Development Advances
Questions were raised at a recent school collaboration meeting about what economic
development activities were being pursued in Orange County. The accompanying report from
Orange County Economic Development Director Dianne Reid discusses progress that is being
made across the spectrum of economic development.
Attachment 2c 9/22/04 Report on Orange County Economic Development
d. School Fund Balance Policy
During the past budget cycle, the subject of school fund balance was discussed on a number of
occasions. Orange County and the two school systems have been working with a policy
developed in 1986 that calls for OCS to maintain a fund balance of 21% of prior year
expenditures and for CHCCS to maintain a fund balance of 5.5% of prior year expenditures. As
suggested by the governing boards, County and schools Finance Directors have discussed
whether these fund balance targets and other aspects of the fund balance policy are in need of
revision. The accompanying memo from County Finance Director Ken Chavious outlines some
recommendations and additional points that should be considered in developing an updated
school fund balance policy.
Attachment 2d 9/24/04 Finance Director Memo re: School Fund Balance Policy
e. 2004-14 School CIPs and Orange County Debt Issuance Schedule
Concerns have been raised recently regarding the likelihood that the current project budgets for
OCS Middle School #3 and CHCCS High School #3 will be adequate to build the schools to
their currently proposed designs. The accompanying tables are provided for reference to reflect
how pay-as-you-go, general obligation bonds, and alternative financing are presently earmarked
for specific OCS and CHCCS capital projects for the 2004-14 ten-year Capital Investment Plan
period,
3
Attachment 2e-1 2004-14 OCS CIP
Attachment 2e-2 2004-14 CHCCS CIP
Attachment 2e-3 2002-2008 County Debt Issuance Schedule
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact tied directly to the review/discussion at this
meeting of these reports.. However, any discussion is likely to influence future school operating
and capital budgets.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the boards receive the reports for
information only.
Chapel H,1ACaaboro City Schools , I I- il, -r rSI c9C 04N8N1
Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools
Current Expense Appropriation
FY 2004-05
Total Local Funds Total Per Pupil
General Fund Proceeds from the Received by CHCCS Equivalent(Including
Average Daily Current Expense CHCCS Special (General Fund and General Fund and
Per Pupil Allocation(General Fund Only)Pt Membership' Appropriation District Tax Special District Taxes) Special District Taxes)
03-04 BOCC Approved Appropriation $2,566 10,709 527,479,294 512,477,727 $39,957,021 $3,731
04-05 District Requested Appropriation $3,020 10,986 $33,177,720 $12,940,547 $46,118,267 $4,198
04-05 BOCC Approved Appropriation $2,623 10,986 $28,816,278 $12,940,547 $41756,825 53,801
Total Approved Increase Current Expense(General
Fund Only) 557 277
(1) CHCCS also receives additional operating
funds from the special district tax. 'As projected by Stale DPI
Local Revenue
2004-05
2003-04 BOE
Approved
Budget BOE Requested BOE Approved
Property Tax
A General Fund Budget(Supported by Ad Valorem
Tax Revenue) 27,479,294 33,177,720 28,816.278
6 District Tax Revenue 12,477,727 12,940,547 12,940,547
c Total Property Tax 5 39,957,021 $ 46,118,267 $ 41,756,825
Other Local Revenue
D Additional Prior Year Revenue from Special District Tax 85,000 85,000 75,000
E Fines&Forfeitures 300,000 300,000 300,000
F Miscellaneous Revenue 164,942 92.988 170.434
G Indirect Costs 75,000 75,000 100,000
H Investment Income 120,000 85,000 45,000
/ Tuition 470,000 470,000 340,000
.1 State Inventory Tax 70.000 70,000 70,000
1f ABC Revenue 39,662 42,525 52,040
1. Carol Woods Contribution Incl.in misc.revenue incl.in mist,revenue incl.in misc.revenue
M Sales Tax Refunds 260,000 200,000 180,000
O Total Local Revenue Adjustments $ 1,584,604 $ 1,420,513 $ 1,332,474
P Appropriated Fund Balance 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,641,633
Total Local Revenues(including Appropriated
o . Fund Balance) $ 43,041,625 $ 48,538,780 ':$ 44,730,932
R
Increase from 2003-04 S 5,497,155 $ 1,689,307
-
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools 06'10654
CHCCS Local Expenditure Request
2004-05
Mandates (Identified as "Impact of Anticipated State Actions" -'-'
by CHCCS) BOE Requested BOE Approved
1 Replace State Budget Reductions 620,000 0
2 Salary Increase(3%Across the Board(includes benefits]) 890.100 835.875
3 Health Insurance Increase(660 locally paid staff tat $125 each) 82,500 82,500
4 State Retirement contribution increase(increase from 3.42%to 5.77%) 147,425 147,425
5 Salary supplement for new state teacher positions(13 FTE's) 68,159 68,159
6 Salary increase for nationally certified nurses 46,700 46,700
5 Replace 2nd grade teacher assistant positions to keep full time assistants in all K-3 classrooms(9) 238,509 0
6 3rd Grade Class Size Reduction(4 teaching assistant positions) 106,004 0
7 Teacher assistants for 2nd grade(9 FTE) 0 238,509
a Teacher assistants for 3rd grade(8.5 FTE) 0 225,259
9 Total Funding for Mandates $ 2,199,397 $ 1,644,427
10
II
2004-05
12
Continuation of Current Services (Including Growth) BOE Requested BOE Approved
13 Transfer.5 FTE Technology Specialist from school budgets to the district budget 422,993 0
14 Increase in administrative supplies and postage for all schools 10,986 0
15 Increase in janitorial supplies for non-contract schools 11,278 0
76 Increase textbook allotment for two high schools 36,060 0
77 4th Assistant Principal position for Chapel Hill High School 77,048 77,048
16 Secretarial position for Chapel Hill High School 35,887 0
19 Full-time Guidance Counselor for Chapel Hill High School 56,399 0
20 Half-time media specialist position for East Chapel Hill High School 28,200 0
21 School Crossing Guard for Scroggs Elementary 4,000 0
22 Classroom Substitutes-50%of identified budget shortfall 140,000 0
23 PreK Program-teacher and teacher assistant salaries(underbudgeted) 145,000 0
24 PreK Program-operating budget shortfall 11.430 11.430
25 Additional ESL teacher position 56,399 0
26 Funding to continue AVID Program activities;previously grant funded 35,000 0
27 Funding for full-time LPN for a special student 31,500 0
25 Additional budget for Arts Education Program 103,449 0
29 Summer Opportunities Program for targeted students 25,000 0
30
CSMpact Survey 30,000 0
31 Board Compensation(increased stipends) 7,500 0
32 Districtwide Telecommunications-50%of identified budget shortfall 55,000 0
33 Districtwide Water-50%of identified budget shortfall 50,000 50,000
34 Districtwide Property Insurance(increased rates) 65,000 65,000
35 Other Employee Benefits: longevity,annual leave,bonus leave.S.T.disability 125,000 125,000
36 School Crossing Guards-$28,080 total cost less 524,948 budgeted 3,132 3,132
37 School Resource Officers-50%of identified budget need 113,105 113,105
35 Attorney Fees(Increased usage) 24,000 24,000
35 Auditing Fees(increased usage) 10,000 10.000
40 Increase in operating budget for Budget Office 1,250 0
41 Increase in supply budget for Registrar's Office 2.000 0
42 Temporary personnel budget for Registrar's Office 3,000 0
43 Supply budget for Benefits Specialist's Office 3,000 0
44 Increase in telephone budget for Transportation Department 2,000 0
45 CDL certification for bus drivers 1,500 0
46 Increase in printing budget for Transportation Department 1,500 0,
47 Two substitute bus driver positions 41,300 0
46 Increase Facilities Department's contracted services budget for code compliance 84,563 0
49 Operating budget for Community Alliance for Student Success(CASS)Office 14,875 0
60 Additional budget for middle school afterschool programs 35,000 0
51 Continue Blue Ribbon Mentor Advocate High School Specialist position 28,868 10,000
51 Continue afterschool program previously funded by the 1st and 2nd 21st CCLC grants 95,248 43,500
62 Drug/Alcohol prevention program(funded by increased ABC funds) 0 10,000
53 Total Continuation of Current Services(Including Growth) 2,027,470 542,215
Chapel Ha-Carrboro City Schools 06N8104
54
55 2004-05
56 Manager
Budget Impact of Charter Schools BOE Requested Recommended
57 0 0
Charter school students
5a Total Impact of Charter Schools < $ - $ tocmdedfnmralnou
59
60 2004-05
Manager
61 Expansion or New Initiatives Budget BOE Requested Recommended
62 Coordinator of Student Enrollment position 70,000 0
63 HRMS Clerk 35,887 0
64 Dual Language program operating budget 45,000 0
65 Additional funds for ESL translators/interprelors 50,000 50,000 Items 62 through 72
considered
66 Additional staff development funds for K-5 teachers 22,000 0 "Expansion of
67 Professional development in reading 10,000 0 Current Services"
items in the BOE
66 Mathematics Specialist for each middle school 225,596 0 budget
69 Restore two teacher assistant positions to each middle school 212,008 0
70 Staff development funds for Information Technology Technicians 20,000 0
71 Upgrade Information Technology staff positions 69,000 0
J2 Expansion of the Scroggs afterschool model to all elementary schools(4 mid-year) 554,722 0
73 High school reform planning funds 125.000 0 Items 73 through 74
considered"New
74 initiatives"in the
Leadership Academy and professional development opportunities for(potential)administrators 40,000 0 BCE Budget
75 Total Expansion or New Initiatives Budget $ 1,479,213 $ 50,000
76
2004-05
77 Budget Reductions/Reallocations BOE Requested BOE Approved
76 Telecommunications Reduction 0 (54,113)
79 Substitute Teacher Reduction 0 (54,000)
e0 Reallocation of one-time 5550 Bonus Pay from fiscal year 2003-04 (208,924) (208,924)
81 Non-instructional support reallocation 0 (107,482)
82 Instructional support reallocation 0 (24,500)
83 High Scholl Assistant Principal reallocation 0 (21,160)
64 Eliminate Grants Coordinator position 0 (77,156)
65 "'Total Budget Reductions/Reallocations c:: $ < (208,924) $ :; (547,335)
66
Total 2004-05 Local Expenditure Increases $ - 5,497,156 $ 1,689,307
. .a ' iotat21Yt14-tf5LocalExpendltura 5udge 48,538 7,83 4 73ta,J 2':
Tota12003 05 Lsxcat Expendi'8 re s PeCPtfF31n- 914 8 $ ? r a
Orange County Schools 09/20/04
Orange County Schools /`- r� I, .. .1 ', c?
Current Expense Appropriation
FY 2004-05
General Fund
Current
Average Daily Expense
Per Pupil Allocation Membership* Appropriation
03-04 BOCC Approved Appropriation $2,566 6,705 $17,205,030
04-05 District Requested Appropriation $2,852 6,832 $19,485,879
04-05 BOCC Approved Appropriation $2,623 6,832 $17,920,336
Total Approved Increase Current
Expense(General Fund Only) $57 127
As projected by state DPI
Local Revenue
2004-05
2003-04 BOE Approved BOE
Budget Requested BOE Approved
Property Tax
General Fund Budget(Supported by Ad Valorem Tax
A Revenue) 17,205,030 19,485,879 17,920,336
a District Tax Revenue 0 0 0
c Total Property Tax $ 17,205,030 $ 19,485,879 $ 17,920,336
Other Local Revenue
o Additional Prior Year Revenue from Special District Ta 0 0 0
if Fines&Forfeitures 183,150 182,000 182,000
F Miscellaneous Revenue 27,100 35,000 45,100
G Indirect Costs 135,000 125,000 125,000
H Investment Income 100,000 100,000 100,000
/ Tuition 6,500 16,500 16,500
.1 More At Four Grant 130,000 130,000 130,000
K Smart Start 17,500 22,543 22,543
f Head Start 120,000 120,000 120,000
M ABC Revenue 27,292 27,292 31,568
N Contributions and Donations 65,000 65,000 65,000
o Medicaid Reimbursements 110,000 110,000 110,000
P Textbooks 386,176 374,708 386,646
O County Reimbursement for School Nurses 94,076 94,076 94,076
R County Reimbursement for Social Worker 39,861 39,861 39,861
Transfer from Community Schools 0 340,125 400,000
s Sales Tax Refunds 270,000 270,000 270,000
T Total Local Revenue Adjustments $ 1,711,655 $ 2,052,105 $ 2,138,294
it Total Local Revenues $ 18,916,685- $ 21,537,984 $ 20,058,630
✓ Appropriated Fund Balance 751,066 410,616 1,724,609
Total Local Revenues(including
U Appropriated Fund Balance) $ 19,667,751 $ 21,948,600 $ 21,783,239
Increase from 2003-041$ 2,280,849I$ 2,115,488
Orange County Schools 0920/04
OCS Local Expenditure Request
2004-05
BOE
Mandates (as identified by OCS) Requested BOE Approved
1 Salary Increase(including benefits) 359,006 346,760
z Health insurance increase 50,115 50,115
3 State retirement contribution increase(from 3.42%to 5.77%) 259,311 264,272
3 Utility Increase 35,000 35,000
4 Total Funding for Mandates $ 703,432 $ 696,147
5
6 2004-05
BCE
7 Budget Impact of Charter Schools Requested BOE Approved
8 Charter Schools Growth 0 0 Charter school
students included
9 Total Impact of Charter Schools $ $ - In total ADM
to
11 2004-05
BOE
12 Expansion or New Initiatives Budget Requested BOE Approved
..�n........ .........................y.... .,r.,.,,........................,....�...,y.,...,..,....,rr,.,..,..-
budget included funding for 1 Spanish Teacher and 5 Spanish Teachers from"position
13 allotment") 318,766 53,128
Social Workers(Funding for 4 positions included in BOE Requested;approved budget
14 included funding for 2 positions) 212,511 106,256
Teacher Assistants(Funding for 5 positions included in BOE Requested;approved
1s budget included funding for 3 positions) 124,520 74,712
16 Increase.6 FTE School Nurse at Hillsborough Elementary to 1 FTE 21,251 21,251
Extra Months Associate Principals(BOE Requested budget included 7 additional
17 months;approved budget included 5 extra months) 45,500 32,500
to Programs and recognition 20,000 20,000
to Increase athletic/extracurricular supplements 10% 43,500 43,500
zo Central Administrative Salary Scale Adjustment 46,500 46,500
21 Classified Salary Scale Adjustment 50,000 50,000
zz Resource Officer Match 100,000 100,000
Increase Tenured&Non-Tenured Teacher Supplement(Approved budget increases
23 supplements from 5%to 10%) 330,000 276,500
24 Southern Association Annual Dues 6,500 6,500
25 SACS Review Expenses 6,300 6,300
26 Replace loss of instructional materials($10/ADM) 65,030 65,030
27 International Baccalaureate Prgram Coordinator(One-half time) 28,948 28,948
28 International Baccalaureate Program Staff Development 10,000 10,000
29 International Baccaulaureate Program Instructional Materials 32,200 32,200
30 International Baccalaureate Program and Exam Fees 17,864 17,864
31 Teachers and Scientist Collaborating(TADC)Staff Development 24,000 24,000
32 Grade 9 Transition/Academy Program Costs 20,000 20,000
33 Reading Recovery Teacher Leader 41,000 41,000
34 SIMS Coordinator 53,920 53,920
35 Systemwide Furniture Replacement 50,000 50,000
36 Systemwide Computer Time Keeper/FLSA 10,000 0
37 CWS Middle School After School Program 0 44,285
38 Printed Material for K-12 Media($20 per ADM) 0 133,340
39 Restore School Level Equipment dollars($25 per ADM) 0 162,500
40 Total Expansion or New Initiatives Budget $ ; 1,678,310 $ 1,520,234
Orange County Schools 0920/04
41
42 2004-05
BOE
43 Budget Reductions/Reallocations Requested BOE Approved
44 Drop Out Prevention(6 month positions) (35,344) (35,344).
45 Reallocation of one-time$550 Bonus Pay from fiscal year 2003-04 (65,549) (65,549)
46 -- Total Budget Reductions/Reallocations $ .::(100,893) $ (100,893)
47 Total 2004.05 Local Expenditure Increases $ 2,280,849 $ 2,115,488.
1 ( -�at EPediy1U !e ; - � ,4e : S IT�t 9 ,$9M
4g ~ t., ,f TAt gOQ4*115 6 EXpe idltttres ,!``POil e#"; = ]VW $Pr it ".l' ;, " 1-, 13
Orange County Schools
2004-05 School Year
20th Day (First Month)Student Membership
I20th Day
Total Membership
Kinderg First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth I Ninth Tenth Eleventh Twelfth Members School Year Increase/
School arten Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade i Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade hip 1 2003-04(1) (Decrease)
Cameron Park 73 73 70 54 66 86 - j 391 31
Central 37 48 55 46 45 42 273 293 (20)
Efland-Cheeks 83 71 74 67 76 67 436 411 27,
Grady Brown 81 83 73 87 67 88 i i 479 471 8
Hillsborough 71 73 61 63 60 69 ` ' l 3 h" 397 396 1
New Hope 82 65 70 74 69 89 I'( - r r ' , 449 467 (18)
Pathways 91 92 89 82 85 110 549 512 37
Total Elementary
Membership 518 I 505 I 492 473 468 551 3,007 2,941 66
A.L. Stanback '-. 5 220 230 275 j. „d . 725 816 (91)
C.W.Stanford ..) 282 296 287 e 865 854 11
Total Middle `1
School
Membership - , ' __ _ 502 526 562 _ • - 7iiii•ii 1,590 1,670 (80)
Cedar Ridge 396 273 234 154 i 1.057 938 119
Orange High 324 261 219 212 i 1,016 957 59
Total High School I
Membership ' = 720 534 453 366 � 2,073 1,895 178
Total 518 505 i 492 473 468 551 502 526 562 720 534 453 366 6,670 6,506 164
March 2004 NC Department of.Public Instruction f}�
(NCDPI)Certified ADM(Includes out-of-district
ni As included in September 29,2003 BOCC and School Boards Meeting Agenda Package students) 6,632.
Difference in Actual Membership and NCDPI
(Including out-of-district students) 38
March 2004 NC Department of Public Instruction
(NCDPI)Certified ADM(Does not include out-of- —,
district students) 6,578 h'""'
i
Difference in Actual Membership and NCDPI E
Projection(Not including out-of-district students) 92 3�"
Difference in 20th Day Membership for School Year 2003-04 and
20th Day for School Year 2004-05 164 I
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
2004-05 School Year
20th Day (First Month)Student Membership
2Uth Day
Total Membership
Kinder First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eighth Ninth Tenth Elevent Twelfth Member School Year Increase I
School garten Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade h Grade Grade ship 2003-04111 (Decrease)
Carrboro 99 94 109 94 98 92 S r r 586 553 33
Ephesus 64 60 72 61 72 78 11 si } i 4 1 �� 4 /r 427 453 (26)
p r t y e4 ry z 472 531 (59
Estes Hills 66 80 74 72 86 84 r i 2 r 1r i I ° rs _ (59)
I rri , 4,v-a eq L1a�rS ll1a 4
4
561 563 (2))FPG 94 95 95 93 89 95 t s 1 # 4j 4 „(15 y ) is ; (I 1
N £ r 4 4 4Glenwood 66 63 71 59 84 _ £I 4 iek-eff kzl1 i rr 427
84 { 1 s1 `qY 387 40
t 2i l 4u 2 f# 1 ) Y e i1 £ ' 595 595 0 85 111 104 87 110 14 � zr 44 0t 407 41 75 82 78 79 75 59 ° ° U °+`lv1' � e r 15114 " i 446.
Cf r a f 1 ' 't
96 ,- A ; t 4 r {} r J£ 633 632 1 99 111 99 120 113 91 1 r ` w Y iAj 1 y w1 510 16 78 61 86 89 96 r} > u ,z 'y i� 4 1 1 t r 526 tr t ' s I y '4 Yerr m1 r 4t t 1 r
Or ' i ; '4°41 x Y J rrs r � 1 1 14tmr i s 1c r Total Elementary r w 4 11 I v rz 21 £(Y 4 2$4 [ti' to _ c�ex r ff Y=i4r4._, rl4i4` 4,675 4,631 44 Membership 726 797 788
Membe rs
` s i w e a
S' y
r 610 4 i 215 183 216 1 7 $ y l £ 4e £
243 44 r"1r 4 1 i 1 11 643 662 (19
1 MCDougle ? i 4 I 4: i } ' 4e 192 208 } 44 l ) 4£r4 711 (34k 1j r� 4 } 207 221
7e 4 i ) r r r( 249 t x my 1 s
t > 't r *4 ' ' 4 626 637 (11)211 194 1 , }( , U r t }l Smith s 4 r ' 221
. .; 1r4 . r v 1t s e r yiY ry 1(4 4e434 ) ,11
Total Middle R e r ' s :i 1 i t r iP k,4 r 7 j 4 r 5 j j,1} 1 r 4 School 4 ti O a f }r 44440 4 I 4 k i fi " iI ,1 J"-4--/-P,.-9 5+. -a 835 823 902 1t . .ii .. , = z r 2,560 2,620 (60)
I i 4s i £ i rc s ro ) k'',-',,,,A,(''''..1,,,''''',''''.
534 421 454 399 1,808 1.785 23 Chapel Hill Hgh e tk i e o e r r r 4 I High 4 £ 4 211 'Chit I Sa i r s 1 r I 76 s4 x1 } r `r i 453 387 341 1,837 1,594 43
Total High ,1 kA `ker 24C0ti i 1h Ii-
School It v 1 4 ( < > ). r 3 rf
740 3,445 3,379 66 Membership 21il r ni g f4 , _ ,r 4 v "^: ` - 13 1010 874 821
Hospital School 1 1 5 2 4 5 2 1 3 6 5 4 2 41 23 18 l
r+
Total 727 - 798 a 793 756 827 792 837 824 905 1016 879 625 742 10.721 10,653 68 ,S---
March2004 NC Department of PubliclInstruction
(NCDPI)Certified ADM(Includes out-o(-district 'S—
ill As included in September 29,2003 BOCC and School Boards Meeting Agenda Package -students) 110,933 !.
Difference in Actual Membership and NCDPI
Projection(Including out-ofdistrict students) (212)
March 2004 NC Department of Public Instruction
(NCDPI)Certified ADM(Does not include out-of-
districtstudents) 10,869 •_'
Difference in Actual Membership and NCDPI
Projection(Not including out-of-district students). (148)
Difference In 20th Day Membership for School Year 2003-04
and 20th Day for School Year 2004-05 68
r )i^,% ... .^� L 3
Prepared by Orange County Budget Office
9/24/04
Comparison of DPI March Planning ADM and Actual Membership
Orange County Schools
Annual Annual Annual
Projected Actual Difference in
March DPI Increase in# Increase in #
School Year Actual DPI Approved
Planning Students Students
Ending ADM (2) From Membership From Projections Per Pupil
Previous Previous and Actual#
School Year School Year Students
1990-91 5,103 4,991 (112) $1,175
1991-92 5,148 45 5,088 97 52 $1,310
1992-93 5,204 56 5,256 168 112 $1,310
1993-94 5,444 240 5,354 98 (142) $1,363
1994-95 5,582 138 5,464 110 (28) $1,451
1995-96 5,617 35 5,561 97 62 $1,571
1996-97 (3) 5,680 63 5,918 357 294 $1,782
1997-98 6,081 401 5,993 75 (326) $1,889
1998-99 6,202 121 6,024 31 (90) $2,040
1999-00 6,250 48 6,148 124 76 $2,256
2000-01 6,342 92 6,167 19 (73) $2,395
2001-02(1) 6,302 (40) 6,186 19 59 $2,437
2002-03(1) 6,142 (160) 6,357 171 331 $2,516
2003-04(1) 6,451 309 6,506 149 (160) $2,566
2004-05(" 6,578 127 6,670 164 37 $2,623
Total Increase 1,475 1,679
Average Annual Increase 105 120
(1) Fourth month membership reflected in Actual Membership column for school year 2000-01; twentieth day
membership reflected in membership column for years 2002-03 through 2004-05; prior years reflect final
membership
(2) Does not include out-of-district or charter students
(3) Reflects Alamance County students transferring back to "home county"of Orange
AI' CIA I I y
Compiled by Orange County Budget Office
9/24/04
Comparison of DPI March Planning ADM and Actual Membership
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
Annual Annual Actual Annual
Projected Increase in # Difference in
March DPI Increase in #
School Year Planning Students Actual Students DPI Approved
Ending ADM (2) From Membership From Projections Per Pupil
Previous and Actual#
Previous School Year Students
School Year
1990-91 6,014 6,005 (9) $1,175
1991-92 6,293 279 6,300 295 16 $1,310
1992-93 6,791 498 6,822 522 24 $1,310
1993-94 7,218 427 7,133 311 (116) $1,363
1994-95 7,580 362 7,509 376 14 $1,451
1995-96 7,860 280 7,811 302 22 $1,571
1996-97 8,127 267 8,049 238 (29) $1,782
1997-98 8,317 190 8,181 132 (58) $1,889
1998-99 8,441 124 8,516 335 211 $2,040
1999-00 8,760 319 8,984 468 149 $2,256
2000-01 9,353 593 9,598 614 21 $2,395
2001-02(1) 10,063 710 10,071 473 (237) $2,437
2002-03n) 10,297 234 10,370 299 65 $2,516
2003-04w 10,592 295 10,653 283 (12) $2,566
2004-05") 10,869 277 10,721 68 (209) $2,623
Total Increase 4,855 4,716
Average Annual Increase 347 337
(1) Tenth day membership reflected in Actual Membership column for school year 2000-01; twentieth day
membership reflected in membership column for years 2002-03 through 2004-05; prior years reflect final
(2) Does not include out-of-district or charter students; does include Hospital students
i l :.
ORANGE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Prepared by Dianne Reid
September 22, 2002
Based upon the recommendation of a local committee of public and private sector leaders, the
Orange County Economic Development Commission (EDC) was formed in the mid-1980s as a
department of Orange County Government. The Commission is funded by investments from the
towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough, and from Orange County. As stated in its 2004 draft
Strategic Plan, Investing in Innovation, the EDC mission is as follows:
Our purpose is to make Orange County a smart, innovative place— a great place in which
to live and work. We encourage public-private investments to provide jobs for county
residents and to increase the non-residential tax base. Through these investments, we
enhance the financial well-being and quality of life of county residents, and the ability of
their local governments to provide high quality services.
Program of Work: To achieve its mission, the EDC pursues a mix of business recruitment, business
retention and expansion, and new business formation strategies.. EDC staff work in coordination with
a variety of other organizations, and often function as facilitators as business owners work through
issues at various stages of business development.
Recruitment—Through partnerships with the North Carolina Department of Commerce and the
Research Triangle Regional Partnership, the EDC markets available land and buildings within the
county to businesses inside the US and internationally, Examples of businesses that have moved to
Orange County in the past five years include:
• A Virginia-based manufacturer of windows and doors that purchased and renovated an
existing building in the Buckhorn Economic Development District;
• A textile manufacturers association which moved its headquarters to Chapel Hill from Atlanta;
• A software developer that relocated to Chapel Hill from San Francisco;
• An insulation company that relocated its headquarters to western Orange County from
Pennsylvania;
• A sporting goods chain that relocated its headquarters to California to Carrboro.
Retention and Expansion —The EDC works with other business assistance providers such as the
Small Business Technology and Development Center and the Durham Technical Community College
Small Business Center and with both Chambers of Commerce to help existing businesses expand in
the county, Examples include:
• The expansion of a specialty food retailer into a larger warehouse facility in Hillsborough, and
into a larger retail location in Chapel Hill;
• The development of an ice cream making and retail operation to complement a dairy farm and
milk bottling operation;
• The expansion of a mattress manufacturer into a large vacant textile facility in the Orange
County portion of Mebane;
• The expansion of the insulation company mentioned above as it expanded its product line last
year;
• The expansion of a wholesale sports equipment and clothing distributor in Hillsborough.
New Business Formation —Working in partnership with other groups, the EDC assists entrepreneurs
as they assess their business ideas and develop business plans. Two of the EDC's most popular
publications are directed to this group, a Business Start Up Guide and a Guide to Home Based
Business Regulations. Recently formed new businesses include:
• A manufacturer of camping equipment;
• An on-line training provider;
• A cheese making venture;
• A home repair service;
• An agri-tourism operation featuring a corn maze;
• A company providing in-home health services..
Other Efforts: In addition to these business-focused strategies, the EDC is involved in increasing
opportunities for future commercial growth and in helping all local businesses prosper.
Infrastructure Development
Approximately ten years ago, the county designated three Economic Development Districts (EDDs)
along the Interstate corridors that run through the center of the County. One, the Buckhorn EDD, is in
Efland in the western part of Orange County. A second, the Hillsborough EDD, is between the two
interstates south of Hillsborough. A third (the Eno EDD) is at the Durham/Orange County border,
near the intersection of Interstate 85 and Highway 70.
The zoning designation as EDDs was intended to preserve the three areas, totaling well over 2,500
acres, for future commercial development. Recent efforts have centered on extending water and
sewer infrastructure to these areas so that development can commence, and the county has
encouraged public projects to jump-start the development.
Through the efforts of Congressman David Price, the county secured a grant for developing a sewer
system in the Buckhorn EDD, The county has reached an agreement with the Town of Mebane to
provide water and sewer to the district and construction of the system has begun. The new Orange
County School District middle school is under development in this EDD,
The Town of Hillsborough recently approved a mixed-use project for 330 acres in the Hillsborough
EDD., The developers will extend sewer infrastructure to the 1-40 boundary, opening up two quadrants
of the district. The new Orange County campus of Durham Technical Community College will be
located in this EDD..
Finally, the county continues working with the City of Durham on a plan to provide sewer service to
the Eno EDD, Property owners in this area are also actively involved in pushing for services..
Promotion of Local Businesses
Throughout its existence, the EDC has worked in concert with other organizations to promote county
businesses and encourage consumers and other businesses to purchase locally. Examples of these
efforts include:
• The Orange County Business Expo, sponsored by the EDC in partnership with the Chapel
Hill/Carrboro and Hillsborough/Orange County Chambers of Commerce, Earlier this week, the
third annual Expo was held at the Sheraton Chapel Hill. All sixty exhibitor spaces were filled,
and over 700 people attended during the afternoon and evening;
• www.orangecountyfarms.orq was developed by the EDC's Agricultural Economic
Development Coordinator to promote local farms and farm products;
• A Buy Local campaign will be revived next spring, in partnership with the two chambers and
local media, featuring a published version and searchable on-line guide to products and
services available from county enterprises.
Planning for the Future: Over the past year, the EDC has engaged in a strategic visioning process
to guide the organization for the next five years. An Economic Development Summit for Orange
County was held on January 7, 2004, attended by 120 community leaders.. Based on small-group
work at the Summit, four key areas emerged:
> Business Climate
> Infrastructure
> Workforce Development
> Quality of Place
Work groups formed around the issue areas and met regularly during the months of February through
June. Volunteers in the planning effort have contributed over 1,300 hours of work to the planning
process, Over the next few months, the EDC and work group co-chairs will be bringing forward the
draft plan, whose overall goal is to create 5,000 new private sector jobs and increase the assessed
value of non-residential property by $125,000,000 by June 2009. We look forward to working with
elected officials, private businesses, civic and business groups, and interested individuals to refine
and finalize the plan, and to accomplishing our mission.
Orange County Finance Department
Committed to Fiscal Excellence
ORANGE COUNTY
208 South Cameron Street Tel Tel (919)
Post Office Box 8181 NORTH CAROLINA Fax (919)
"MAT MG'5o WA" 644-3324
Hillsborough, NC 27278 www.co.orange.nc.us
Kenneth L Chavious, Finance Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Ken Chavious, Finance Director
DATE: September 24, 2004
SUBJECT: School Fund Balance Policy
The Board has asked for a review of the school fund balance policy adopted in 1986. I recently
met with the Finance Directors of both school districts to discuss current fund balance issues and
the applicability of the 1986 policy in the current financial environment.
The 1986 policy establishes percentages of fund balance at 5.5% of expenditures for the Chapel
Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) and 2.7% of expenditures for the Orange County Schools
(OCS). Attached is a copy of the memo from Gordon Baker, County Finance Director in 1986.
The Baker memo states that the aforementioned percentages represent "fund balance available
but unappropriated." "Fund balance available" is defined as the sum of cash and investments
minus liabilities, encumbrances and deferred revenue arising from cash receipts as those figures
stand at the end of the fiscal year. This is the calculation used by the Local Government
Commission in calculating a city or county's fund balance relative to their 8% guideline. There is
no similar guideline for school districts. Orange County uses a more conservative approach by
also deducting the amount of fund balance appropriated for the subsequent year's budget, prior to
calculating the percentage.
Using a similar analysis to the Baker approach, which remains a valid approach as it relates to
fund balance as a cash flow or working capital tool, the 1986 percentage for CHCCS could remain
as this system's fund balance target. During the past several years the CHCCS fund balance has
been in the 2% to 3% range and the district has experienced cash flow difficulties sometimes to
the degree that the district has requested and the County has advanced monthly allocations On
the other hand, the OCS fund balance percentage target should be adjusted upward slightly in the
range of 3 to 3.5%, mainly for increased cash needs above the monthly County appropriation..
OCS receives approximately $2..1 million annually in revenues from other sources, excluding any
fund balance that they may have appropriated. If receipt of some or all of this income is delayed,
OCS could experience cash flow challenges with insufficient fund balance available. It is
important to note that the fund balance levels mentioned above and in the Baker memo are
relative to cash flow only.
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Aside from the significant dollar increase in County current expense funding allocated to the
school systems, the major difference between1986 and the current fiscal environment is funding
for capital projects. From the late 1970s up to the 1988 bond referendum there were no concerns
related to funding start up costs for new facilities. Capital Investment Programming was a new
concept for Orange County government. This issue is significant because fund balance has been
the major source of start up costs for new facilities for OCS. The CHCCS has used the district tax
as a source for start up costs related to new facilities. This practice could also become an issue if
the move toward funding equity gains momentum. The Finance Directors have identified three
major issues related to fund balance policy that must be given consideration prior to setting and
maintaining concrete fund balance targets.
• Funding for Start up costs —As mentioned above, OCS has historically used fund balance
as a source to pay the one time costs associated with opening new schools and the
CHCCS has mainly used district taxes. If concrete fund balance targets are established
and adhered to, an alternative source for start up costs would have to be identified for
OCS. Likewise, if the district tax is frozen or reduced and/or eventually eliminated in the
pursuit of equity funding, other funding sources would need to be identified.
• Emergencies and Unforeseen Events— In addition to cash flow considerations, units of
government also use fund balance to handle emergency situations and/or unforeseen
events. If fund balance targets are established and followed, a clear statement should be
made regarding response to emergencies or unforeseen events.
• Use of Fund Balance for Operating Expenditures—This is another policy issue related to
use of fund balance. Both school systems have used fund balance to pay for recurring
operational initiatives in the past. The most recent example of this is the OCS use of$1.2
million in fund balance in their 2004-2005 budget to fund several operational initiatives. In
addition, CHCCS appropriated $1.6 million. Use of fund balance to pay for ongoing
operating costs could present funding challenges for these types of expenditures in future
years as reserves become scarce (note the last full paragraph in Superintendent
Carraway's September 22, 2004 memo on school fund balance). A sound fund balance
policy should also address when and under what circumstances fund balance should be
considered for funding ongoing operational expenditures
As mentioned above, the 1986 memo from Gordon Baker that resulted in the current policy only
addressed fund balance as a cash flow tool, The Finance Directors agreed that a sound fund
balance policy should be more comprehensive and include not only percentage targets related to
the levels required to meet cash flow needs, but also address issues involving the how and when it
can be accumulated and used.
15 v
; B= sq-
- V.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT " u '" 6
af.
ORANGE COUNTY
GORDON R. BARER
DMECT0R
To: County Commissioners
From: Finance Director
Subject: Recommended Policy on Fund Balance of-School SystPn .
Date: February ,
During the 1985-86 budget process, it was decided that a policy should be
developed regarding the appropriate amount of fund balance available but
unappropriated that each school system should maintain. This policy would
be agreed upon by the County Commissioners and the Boards of Education.
This recommended policy regarding the fund tbalance
euapapplies
liesnto available but
current
expense fund and addresses the max m dub
unappropriated that each system should have at the beginning of each fiscal
year.
The school systems should maintain only the fund balance 'necessary to meet their
cash flow.needs and to make relatively minor adjustments in their appropriations
during the year.
The Local Government Commission monitors the fund balahce•of the General. Fund of
all tax levying units of government in North Carolina. They have established a
policy that such-units of.. government should maintain each fiscal year a General
Fund fund. balance available in an amount equal. to it least 8% of the total
expenditures of the General Fund for the year. The expenditures on which this
87.-i.s..computed includes the County's expenditures for the school systems' local
current expense as well as for their capital outlay. Thus, in meeting the Local
Government Commwcsion's minimum standard of 8%, the County's fund balance avail-
able for the General Fund includes a substantial amount that is related to expen-
ditures for the school systems. The Local Government Commission does not have
such a minimum standard for the school systems themselves. One can conclude
from this that they rely on the counties to maintain an adequate fund balance
leve1_ for the school systems.
The superintendent and the finance director for Orange County Schools have
expressed their desire to build the fund balance available but unappropriated.
in the local curren se fund to a level of $120,000. This amount would
equal approximatel, 2. 7%)of the budgeted expenditu=es in this fund for 1985-86
as originally adopcetf -- Based on the fact that Orange County Schools receive
the.:major- portion of their local current expense revenue from the County in
an':egial amount each month, and using the County's 8% minimum standard as a
-gauge; ad2.7X=fund-balance-lever-should-be adequate.
Cavil
•
The Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools rely on the supplemental school district tax
in addition to the monthly County appropriation. The supplemental tax is
approximately 1/3 of their local current expense fund revenues and is received
primarily during the months of January and February. Because of this reliance
on the district tax and again, using the County's 8% minimum standard as a gauge,
a 5.5% fund balance level should be adequate for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools.
In addition to my own analyses of the above percentages, I have discussed the
fund balance level appropriate for school systems with others in state and
local government who are familiar with school and county finances. The consensus
was that the fund balance level for school systems should be somewhat lower than
that of the County's 8% standard and that a system relying on a supplemental tax
would need. a higher level than otherwise necessary.
Based on my analyses and discussions, I recommend that the following policies
be established:
1. Orange County Schools begin each fiscal year, to the extent possible,
with fund balance available but unappropriated in the local current
expense fund that is equal to no more than 2.7% of the budgeted
expenditures in that fund for that year, and;
2. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools begin each fiscal year, to the extent
possible, with a fund balance available but unappropriac- + n he
local current expense fund that is equal to no more that 5.5% o the
budgeted expenditures in that fund for that year. •
It must be noted that, based on the local current expense budgets as originally
adopted for 1985-86, Orange County, Schools fund balance level was approximately
$86,000 short of the level recommended in this draft, polidy. Also, Chapel Hill--
Carrboro Schools fund balance level was approximately $204,000 short of the
recommended level. Considering the federal cut-back in assistance to local
governments, the County should not be expected to build-up the school systems
fund balance levels in one fiscal year. I recommend that this be accomplished
gradually over a period of several fiscal years.
llinb-W7j-ii-wetrwesnw w .. - - - -
A aiesi_ mg4
ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2004-2014
Through ; YEAR 1 1 YEAR 2 I YEAR 3 + YEAR 4 1 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 I YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10
Project Title 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 1 08-09 09-10 10-11 I 11-12 11 12-13 I 13-14 I TOTAL
L25I UNFUNDED
_ 312,225; '
Asbestos School I ! 1 � 1 I 1 I i 600,000
Alternative School ! 200.0001 400,0001 1 I 1 I 1 200,000
Bus Garage I 200,0001
I � I 400,000! 750,0001 800,000 800,0001 800.0001 3,820.000
Cameron Park Renovation 270,000! 1 ( I I 1 28,617,000
Cedar l Ridge lmHigh School _ ( 28,890,0001 -218,6001
, i i 400,000 750,0001 800,000 800.0001 890,0001 3,640,000
Central Elem.Renovation ! 90,000! - I 1,650,000
Central Office Addition ! i ! 1,650,0001 ! ! I 1 1,840,000
1
CW Stanford Renovation I 1,450,0001 , 400,000 750,0001 800,000 800,0001 800,0001 4,000,000
E9and Cheeks Renovation _ 1 450,0001 1 -� ( I 575,000
Electncal SVS,Upgrade 575,000: I I - 500,000
Energy Mgmt,Systems 500,0001 t t ( 1 142,604
142,6041 i 1
Environmental a Testing 50,0001 50.0001 774;000 582,000
Grady Brown own Renovation 00.000! 325,0001 55,0001 42,000 109,0001 36,000 53,000 100,0001 800,0001 800,0001 800.0001 2.600,000
Grady Brown Renovation 100.000! . I 69,5261 100,0001 50,9001 50,0001 939,526
Handicapped Accessibility 670,0001 ! i (
Hillsborough Elem.Renovation I 1,161,250! 1 1 1 1 1 1,161,250 857,500
1 1. 2,257,5001
*Hillsborough Elem.Renovation 1,400,0001 ' I 857,5001 � 1 150,0001 150.0001 1,242,3171 213,098
HVAC _- 107,902! 1 ! 172,43fi1 90,598! 451,0001 120,3811 1 7_-__.__
Indoor Air Quality Improvements _ - 163.307; I I I 1 ! 163,30 405,0001
Kitchen Projects 405,000. I 1 155,0001
1 155,0001
Maintenance Shop 1 18 500,0001
New Middle School 1,000,0001 4,500,000! 9,500,000: 3,500,0001 _-- _
1,658,0091 240,000; i 1 I 189,000 489,0001 800,0001 800,0001 4176,0001
Orange High Renovation ! --- 1 ! 1 1 I 11.672,7201
Pathways Elementary School ! 11,672,720! =- i 1 ; 340,0001
140,000! I 200,0001
Playground Projects _
Re-Roofing Projects 656,6351 1 333,4401 280,900; 698.6711 879,393 217.860 43,2591 371.7831 34,5271 34,5271 3,550,095; 147,077
Technology Application 7,975,0001 625,0001 456,8401 625,0001 625,0001 625,000 625,0001 625,0001 625,0001 625,0001 625,0001 14,056,8401 233,502
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENSE I 60,015,9361 5,671,4001 13,416,0871 4,619,4361 1,723,2691 1,991,393 2,571,2411 3,276,7851 4,785,7831 I 4,909,5271 4,909,5271107,890,3841 2,033,177
1 1 1
I 1
REVENUE PLAN: ' I I I _ 12408.8741
County Pay-As-You-Go _ I 12,408,874: 1 I ' ! ! 1,010,3301--,._-_
746,350; 263,9801 1 1
OReallocated ales Tax from PY's j 856,567! 1,607,5461 13,390,301!
PueHalf Cent Sales I 636,9281 308,7701 309,7701 1.02E8701 1,307.7701 1,108,770) 1.304,7701 t,308,770 1308,770 i 308,770! 308,7701 3,087,7001 _-
308,]701 3087701 308,7]0; 300,770! 308,7701 308,7701 308,7701 ,
Impact School Building Funds ! 0001 970,0001 11,257,645 -.-
Peak Debts _ 1.557.645' 970,00 o1 270 5811 460,418 741,430 970,000 306,6491 109,3021 970,000 995,
Peak Debt Service _! 0! 275,5811 460,418 741,4321 1,029,4891 1306,6491 1,109,302 1.399,533 1.695,3351 1919,351! 9,937,0901
Oi 0 664,3621
Less:New High School Debt Service 11,767,099' -1.772,4521 -1.711369 -1,649,602, -1.587,153 -1,524,1931 -1,460.8911 -1,397.077 0 5,664,362 -__
State Bonds 1 2.000,100; ! i -- 1 I 22,004000;I 2,00E0001
Local Bonds 92 2.000,000; -- 1 I _ ' ----- n
Local Bonds 97 23,000.000! ._ - j 1 ! 18,5000001_ �.�
Local Bonds 2001 1,900,0091 3,600,0001 9,500,0001 3,500,000, _ i 1 I ! 1.650,000,
Alternative Revenues Funding ! 1,2 6,061
Total Revenues 59,260.7061 4,771,400! 12,226,0061 4,618,456 1.491,0261 1892,1861 2,349,1931 2,424,8001 4,226,3501 4,830,6721 4,805,6671 101.650.000] 0
**Unfunded - -765,230! -900,0001 -1,190,081; - -9801_ -232,243] -99,2071 -222,0481 -851,985] -559,4331 -78,8551 -103,8601 -5,003,9221 -5_003,922 ' ,I-r- R
-Hillsborough Elementary Renovation will be funded with the 5900,000 from the 2001!Bond passage,and 5500,000 from the accumulation of Impact Fees Funds. ! i 1`7
--_ I I ' 1 1`
"Funds remaining m completed prior year projects f _ '- - _---- - 1 1 1 I -- -
'-'The unfunded$657,500 for 2000 sq ft addition to Hillsborough Elements School Cafeteria(650_000)and alternative add ons(207,500). 1 I - -" - �'"''
CHAHEL HILL-CARREICIRO CRY SCHOOLS
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS PLAN 2004-2014
' .
PRIOR Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year s Year 6 Year? Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 TEN YEAR PROJECT
PROJECT TITLE YEARS 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010.11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 TOTAL TOTAL
ADA Requ1remen13 263.150 25.000 50.000, 50.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75.000 575.000 838,150
Abelernera Prolects 160,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 60.000 70,000 70,000 70,000 80,000 00,000 100,000 680,000 840.000
Pram Repface Roar it
311,468 311.468 311,486
01115 ReHaa,That 114 325,000 325,000 325.000
....
A9116119 Facifilies ImIxovernents
crixekTrack Retain,Meater.Gym Flax 1.357.387
..i
100,000 200,000 .. 300.000• , 1.357.387
300.000
arceetuah MHO,:Tent Con.Basketball Goat; 11)5,000 185.000 195,000
Maroc Crane=Maarten a4 Rea 150.000 150,000 150,000
Carlit Reid 1rap..Meazhers.Gym Fir 300,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 600.000 600,000
Sams and 60(115 PM/Imgalnerlsr a 150,000 300,000 450,000 450.000
. ,
.
Classr000Vt3uil6n9 Improvements 120,000 120,000
Etteaus.PPG.tenet Banton Irrerawarega 175.000 150,000 200.000 200,000 230000 955.000 955,000
FP GralLsre Caorcom Cerro&Primary BM 200.000 150,000 350.000 350,000
Philips:Suomi Alva ... 250.000 , 250,000 250.000
CMS Coen Ails S talky-Lott",Renown Inv. 250,000 250.000 250.000
. ...
. '
DoortarnarclwarerCanories 195,000 50,000 100,000 200,000 200.000 100,000 650.000 845,000,
t ...
Etas Hitt Cann Caropies,Dean.Hanraa 40,000, - 40,000 40.000
. .
Cultretliz Dam and Hate's. 50.000 50000 50.000
Priam Mors ad Matra" 25,000 25.000 25,000
0415:IkonMactarre art Casroy 120,000 65,000 185,000 185,000
1 . -
.Electrical Systems 125.000 • 125.000
. „ . .
FP Gramm Ircease Etrarkal Disteuren . . , , 180.000 180,000 180,000
_
14,444,krona Elected Distrbutbn I 150.000, 150.000 150.000
CHH5:61ea1 tal upgrades rd Irceast 01st 200.000 200.000 200.000
— .
Energy Effidencyflignling larpmvements
Carlton:Revise tight Fbiases 251.316 251,316
Eater=Rer44:4 Liam shares , - , 210,000 210,000 210.000
PP Gina Re$n Liam Passes - 200.000 200,000 200,000
Searad:Reelaos Ham Firma — 166,000 168,000 166,000
—
Cant,Rein INN Rana . , 100,000 330,000 430,000 430,000
Mips:Rrolace HON Sharer 320,000 100.000 420,000 420,000
0016 Replace HON Anna 220.000 387,000 38,344 625,344 625.344
-
,
Fire/SafelyrSeturily 1,114,400 . 1.114400
Crtora,lawman amain 7,500 , I 7,500 7,500
maleupe Eimer:arr.Stony Careen 25,000 25.000 25,050
"Cacoille Moll,:Iritream/Putac Adthen 85.000 65,000 65,000 -.4---
—4----
. Wean Etymon omit r..,Panel 112,489 , — 112,489 112,489
1%)
- -
_
Inborn'Air Capably 150,000 40,000 40.000 40.000 40,000 40.000. _ 40.000 40.000 75.000 75.000 100,000 530.000 680.000,
MCI°Brim US Leaks.PILICIMI Foca% 25.000 25,000 25,000 40,000 70,000 70,000 255.000 255.000 -,4_ _
Caret Parroval EenerucFPG.Hrer 185,000 7,540 185.000_ 175.000_ 175,000 175.000 200,000 1,102,540 1,102.540
CINJ
rt-
.
fl,
PRIOR Years Year2 Year3 Yoar4 Years Year6 Year? Year8 Year9 Year10 TEN YEAR PROJECT
PROJECT TITLE YEARS 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 TOTAL TOTAL
Mechanical Systems ¶,745490 1.746490
Eprewa Replace Wad Heaps and Sot/ 35,000 - 35,000 36000
FP Carden Reds Bohr,C00t9 Ten..Heaps 15000 ¶ 150,000 150.000
Selma Beams Hem adHawaer 175.000 175.000 175,000
O#etr UVAC an Redaamn4 350,000 350,000 350,000
44d0094 Carta:Convert Cameo b 0I beEMS 350.000 350.000 350.000
Peaces:HYAC Restaxneb ad EMS 800000 800.000 800.000
CnUS:Oiaer CA 814.re$aaapa Ma B Bp. 0,000 471,075 234,134 785209 785,20
Semen AC Spans:7 eddob 3000 340.000 640,000 640.000
Mobile Classrooms 450,00 , 40,000
Hon° unb,qmn sun Space 720.000 110,000 110,000 110,00 350.000 140,00 1.400.000
Paving/Parking Lots 804,50 - 894,50
Ephesus:Repaiae DM...4v and tas 80,803 277,740 I 384.543 364,543
Seawec ResaIParo G4.ewan ad IS 10.982 150.982 10,982
Mc0agb Carps RePalaro 04ew4444 Loa 305,594 305,594 305,594
Meta RepasPare GHewys ad IS • 235,466 235.466 235,466
•
CMS:Rtpa,Paee 5eder1 and Teadntaa 7600 378.709 453.709 453.709
urab Caner RepalPee PBeaaya and IS 87.000 67,000 67.000
Planning for Future Prelecis 1.039,747 200.000 100,000 150.000 200.000 650.00 1,889.747
Roofing Projects 1,372,128 • 1.372,126
Bars xb Ebner4ar Sepal • 519.000 519.000 519.000
Gbn.wO Elementary-Prknay 8t *ice 356269 356.269 356.269
FP Cahalan Ebnedar School 580,000 580,000 580.000
Sea.ee EprarvrSdpol - 154,316 154.316 154,316
GAWP Reef Rpbarad 905.000 05,000 005,000
McComb woe-Sea adRewee 60,00, 396,127 1.046.127 1,048.127
P*apafld reoaaras-Hen WegrAptttm 213.765 213.785 213,765
04H5:Rod Repaeneda•CA MI _ 455,000 300,000 755.000 755,000
E04H5:544adRrptie _ 414,535 414,535 414,535
drab Caner:Wateorw Rah , 300,000 300,000 300.000
Technology 8.957.502 8,957,02
trnumaao-uaaNw. 150.000 150,00 380,000 300,000 250.000 250.000 10.000 150,000 10,00 200.000 2,050.000 2.050,000
ns,Ctdpmbds 320.000 200,000 0.00 100.000 10,00 140,000 140,000 10,00 160.000 175,000 1,545.000 1,545,000
veep Pmpas 0,00 0,00 60,000 5,000 5.000 5.000 5.000 10.00 10000 1000 230.000 230.000
Corridor/AV xac.ae 375.000 425,00 426000 450.000 500.000 600,000 70,000 80,060_ 80,000 80,000 5.875.000 5,875,000
Camases Services _ 45,000 45.000 55,000 55,000 55.000 105.000 105,00 105.000 105000 125.000 800.000 0
.000 8 ,000
Rae Sydene 80,000 0.00 90.000 0.000 20.000 20.000 20,000 30.000 20,000 30.000 40,00 450,000
Haw AP= 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40.000 0,000 0,000 h 10.000 10,000 175.000 695,000 695,000
E44arb9 10.000 10.000 10000 10,000 20,000 30.000 40,000 50.000 000 100.000 30.000 360,000
WinOow Replacements 870.00 • 870,000
Epesus Rama victor,is Onbssa Bd&P 245,000 245,000 245,000
Stawet Repass CUmmnad Germs Amps 150,000 10,00 10.00
Ufaem:Replan aassoan ad Ceres Area 400,000 400.000 400.000
` Pat RSaaa COmmn ad Genes Attu - 450,000. 450,000 450,000
CHHS:Wades Repaarreda _ 40.00, I 4760001 925,000 025,000
PRIOR Years Year2 _ Year3 Year) Year5 Year6 Year? Year8 Year9 Year10 TEN YEAR PROIECO�
PROJECTTRLE YEARS 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 TOTAL TOTAL
Renoyatipr157Adcfitions
Rem eaa.opnc CPb.m,wow*.P1 0. 875.000 675,000 675,000
Menace Uwe Setonu ose - , 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Ostrom Mme Sd.ei Sdero Lae. 700.000 800000 1,500,000 1,500.000
New Facilities:
leen Scheel 43-open 2007/06 3,638,700 4,700,000 10,464,300 9,352.000 1.845.000 28.361.300 30,000.000
F3arenuy Sled al0-opens 210708 • 950,000 4,390.000 8.160,645 2.430,695 13.931.540 13,931,540
Ranh Elementary SCded 12,800,000 - 12.800,000
CHHS HVAC Project 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
r A6ee*c FarR6nr for Hitt'Soled 43 322.000 660,000 982,000 082,000
Reserve 1,000,000 500,000. 1.500.0001 1 1.500,000
TOTAL 37,504,408 9,244,500 19,931,300 20,405,334 6,117,983 3,663,343 4,049,513 4,383,594 4,566,064 5058,915 4.661,127 64,261,694 121,766.102
REVENUE •
Pry-Aa-YpuGo Funds 19.065,708 1,050,614 2,056,506 2,134,750 2.163245 2,263,343 2,449,513 2,753,594 2,964.064 3,455,918 3,061,127 25,319.694 44,385,602
Impact Fess
Annual Impact Fee COWL-nom 1.600,000 • 3200.000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1.600.000 1.600,000 1.800000 18,000000 17.600,000
Impact Fee Balance(Identified 2(25,93) 2.038.700 • 4,061.300 - - , • - • , • 4,061.300 8.100,000
Total Impact F*as 3,635,700 - 7,281,300 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,509.000 1,600,000, 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 20.061,300 23,700,000
AhanuOv*Financing(In accordant*with the 2001 Bond Education Campaign and most mint cash flow projections)
High School 93 2.500,000 2.500.000 2.500.000
High School 63(Smart Growth initiatives' 2200.000 2,200,000 2,200,000
Elementary 910 - 950.000 3,258.460 6,160845 2.430.695 12,800,000 12,800000
Renovations of older schools • 1.6333.686 3,852,032 2.755239 350,043 8,600,000 8.800.000
Total Attarnaltvs Financing - 7253,586 7,110,492 8,116,084 2,789,738 - - - - - - 26.100.000 26.100,000
-
2001 Bond Funds
Hign School 93(clgmany intended for .
Elementary 9101 • 3,503,000 1,752,500 1,545.000 12.800.500 12,800.500
Rash*is Elementary School 12,800.000 • 12,600.000
CHHS HVAC Prowl 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
Total 2001 Bond Funds 14000,000 - 3,503,000 7,752,500 1045,000 • _ - 12,600,500 27,600.500
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 37,504,406 9244,500 19,931.300 20,405,334 8,117,453 3.663,343 4,049,513 4,383.594 4,565,084 5,056,916 4,661,127 64261,694 121,786,102
UNFUNDED PROJECTS:
Elem.410 Sile{18tities and Connector Road 2,620.000 2,820000 2,820,000
Middle School 95-Wens in 2009-10 400,000 4,600,000 13,190.300 2.000.000. - 20.700,300 20.100.300
New Central Ol5ce-opens 2008-09 300000 3.666.880 2.330.800 6.207.280 8.297.260
Conversion of Uncdn Center to HS-2010 500.000 3.300,000 7079,550 1.000,000 11.870,550 11,879,550
Schad Sites:Elam Sit.Future 900.000 1,800,000— 2.700,000 2,700,000
Elementary School al fapens 2012-13 975,000 3.926.598 0,301,750 2,000.000 18211,348 16.211.348