Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 08-17-2004-9c
1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: August 17, 2004 SUBJECT: Phase One DAVI-NET -Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING Action AgenQda Item No. Z C~_ (Y/N) ON ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: 1) Vicinity Map Eddie Kirk, Planner II 2) Resolution of Approval Extension 2582 3) Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 4) Agency Comments Hillsborough 732-8181 5) Fiscal Impact Analysis Chapel Hill 968-4501 li) July 7, 2004 Planning Bd. Minutes Durham 688-7331 7) Preliminary Plan Mebane (336)227-2031 8) CAPS Aooroval Letter PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Phase One DAVI-NET. BACKGROUND: Request -Preliminary Plan Applicant: Steve Yuhasz, agent for Crabtree Family Trust (Dorothy Bane) Subdivision follows the Flexible Option of Development. • Minimum lot size is 40,000 sq. ft. • g 22 88 acres including right-of-way. - -.. ota acrea a is-Lots Average Lot Size % Open Space !Acres Open Flexible _ 10 _ .92 39.8 of 22,88 ac. 9.11 __ _ Location North and South side of Old NC 10 (SR 1710) in Eno Township at intersection of Mount Hermon Church Road (SR 1713). Existing and Proposed Conditions Existing: • Zoning: Rural Residential (R1) (min. density = 40,000sq. ft. /dwelling) • The property is in the Lower Eno designated protected watershed. Physical Features: • There are no USGS designated streams on the tract. • The site is mostly wooded with a mixture of pines and hardwoods. Existing trees will be preserved to meet landscaping standards. Adjacent Land Use: • Properties to the east and west are undeveloped. • Properties to the north include the railroad and a mobile home park north of the railroad. • Properties to the south include an undeveloped tract and Residential Services group care facility. • This tract is adjacent to the Stoney Creek Overlay District. Proposed: Roads: • Access is from Old NC 10 Road (SR 1710), existing paved public road in Eno Township. • The main road pattern includes short cul-de-sacs with internal access for all lots. • All roads are to be public and constructed to NCDOT standards. • The stub out to the south property line will be constructed along with the internal subdivision roads and provide for future interconnectivity with an adjacent undeveloped 39 acre tract. Open Space/Buffers: • 9.11 acres (39.8%) of common area open space proposed of which 1.79 acres is in Duke Power right-of-way. Minimum to Area Ratio (MTAR) is 1.00 (i.e. all lots at minimum size). • Minimum to Area Density Ratio (MTADR) is 2.13(less R/W). Homeowners Association will be formed to maintain open space and buffers. Water-Sewer: Individual wells. • Individual septic systems. Recreation: • Eno, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough Community Parks • No dedication is warranted because no county recreation or resource area has been identified at this time. The payment-in-lieu option is viable. Development Process, Schedule, and Action Planning Board: First Action: Concept Plan approved by the Planning Board April 4, 2002 with the following conditions: 1. The intersection and road alignments on the Preliminary Plan shall meet NCDOT standards. NCDOT will review all access points to Old NC 10 for the Preliminary Plan. 2. Homeowners Association documents that provide for maintenance of the Open Space shall be submitted with the preliminary plan. 3. All lots shall access from internal subdivision roads. Show 10' non-vehicular access easements along Old NC 10. 4. Show proposed dedication of an additional 5 feet of right-of-way, or 35 feet from C/L of existing R/W whichever is greater along Old NC 10 (SR 1710) on the Preliminary Plan. 5. Show five-foot utility easements along both sides of all rights-of-way. 6. Show 75 foot buffer on each side of Old NC 10. Preliminary Plan addresses conditions of approval of the Concept Plan. A large portion of the area on the north side of Old NC 10, originally approved with 18 lots on the concept plan, is being reserved for Stonegate Mobile Home Park septic system repair area not including the 300 foot open space area proposed along Mt. Hermon Church Road (see attached May 27, 2004 letter). Second Action: Planning Board on July 7, 2004 unanimously recommended approval. Third Action: 1. The Board shall consider the application within a reasonable amount of time. 2. During deliberations and consideration of the application the Board may defer consideration at any point to pursue additional analysis and review. 3. If Preliminary Plan is approved by the County Commissioners the applicant shall have one (1) year to prepare and file a Final Plat or to request cone-year extension from the Planning Director. 3 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact Analysis included as an attachment. RECOMMENDATION(S): Administration Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. Planning Board Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. Planning Staff Approval, in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. Feet 0 700 US Interstate 1,400 2,800 ~^-~- USGS + Soils Survey Stream ~ Building 4,200 5,600 City((own Limits ^~ US Highway ~ Water Body ~ Parcel r? ~`a Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction ~~ NC Highway s FEMA Floodplain Zoning ~,., ` School System Boundary '~~ Major Road l~ Critical Area ~ _ ' Transitio n Area ~ : ~ Township /\/ Background ~ r~ Protected Watershed ~" +, , r Soils ~~'=u! 1~ ' ~~ Elevation Contou r CHICA (~ Unprotected Watershed ~ ~,~ County ~~ Elevation Contour OC ~'~~,~~ Piedmont Electric Utilities RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date Angnct 17,2(1(14 Name of Subdivision PhacP fine nAVi-NFT Owner/Applicant C'rahrrPP Ranr, T T C' The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Phase One DAVI-NET subdivision preliminary plat, dated April 2, 2004 and last revised July 30, 2004 containing 10 lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Egg Lane and Suze Drive shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Egg Lane and Suze Drive. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Egg Lane and Suze Drive shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Phase One DAVI-NET can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access Egg Lane, including its stubout area, and Suze Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way with 5 foot utility easements on each side, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. The pavement width for Suze Drive shall be a minimum of 18 feet and the pavement width for Egg Lane shall be a minimum of 20 feet. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Egg Lane and Suze Drive to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads. No driveways shall be permitted within 50' of a street intersection. Contemporaneously with the construction of Egg Lane a temporary turnaround shall be constructed within the right of way of the stubout area at the south end of Egg Lane to North Carolina Department of Transportation standards as provided for in B.1 above. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review and approval prior to any land disturbing activity on the site. 5. Approved double bladed street name signs shall be erected at all intersections prior to Planning Department signatures on the final plat. Prior to any construction or alteration of any existing access within the right-of- way of Old N.C. 10, the developer/owner shall secure a driveway permit from the NCDOT District Office. Submit a copy of the NCDOT- approved permit and letter to the Planning Department at the same time as the request for Planning Department signatures on the Final Plat. 7. Sight triangles (10' x 70') shall be shown on the Final Plat at each intersection. 8. Dedicate in fee simple, 5' additional right-of-way or 35 feet from the centerline of the existing right-of-way, whichever is greater, along Mt. Hermon Church Road and along both sides of Old N.C. 10 to meet collector roads right-of-way standards as identified in the Comprehensive Plan and required in Section IV-B- 3-c-1 of the Subdivision Regulations. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping Landscaping shall be installed and preserved to meet the requirements of Section IV-B-8-d-1, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department prior to signatures on final plat. Landscaping shall be placed behind the sight triangles at intersections. 7 OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of The estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. No clear cutting on individual lots per section IV-B-8-c of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations is permitted. 2. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Old N.C. 10 and along M[. Hermon Church Road as shown on the Preliminary Plan. The buffer shall be 75 feet in width along Old N.C. 10 and 30 feet along Mt. Hermon Church Road and shall be composed of deciduous and/or evergreen vegetation, forming semi- opaque intermittent visual obstructions from the ground to a height of at least thirty (30) feet. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. Easements for the portion of buffers within lots shall be conveyed to the Homeowners Association for enforcement and maintenance. D. Drainage 1. Locate drainage easements on the final plat as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. 2. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by both NCDOT and a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $4,220.00 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication prior to recordation of the final plat. 2. The second paragraph of Section IV-B-7-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations references the required minimum recreation space ratio in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, Article 5.1.1, which requires 0.028 square feet of recreation space per land area dedicated to residential use [0.028 * 9.24 _ .25 acres or 11,269 square feet]. In those cases where the required minimum recreation space results in a larger amount than the public recreation space requirement of 1/57 acre per lot, the difference shall be established as private recreation space for the use of the residents of the development (11,269 - 7,642 = 3,627 square feet (.08 acres). The developer has planned 9.11 acres of open space (39.8%) to be maintained by the Homeowners Association, which satisfies the County requirements for private recreation use. F. Miscellaneous The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by D.1. above. 3. The open space, which shall include a minimum 10 foot wide access between lots 6 and 7, shall be conveyed into the Homeowner's Association, which shall be formed and approved by the County Attorney prior to recordation of the final plat. All signs shall meet the zoning ordinance permitting requirements. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. A Certificate of Dedication and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that the platted portion of both Egg Lane, including its stubout and temporary turnaround, and Suze Drive have been entirely constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved prior to Planning Department signatures on final plat. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners that the Preliminary Plan for Phase One DAVI-NET Subdivision is approved in accordance with the above mentioned conditions and attached Preliminary Plat dated Apri12, 2004 and last revised July 30, 2004. Upon motion of Commissioner the foregoing resolution was adopted this the seconded by Commissioner , day of , 2004. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2004 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in Minute Book No. of the minutes of said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of , 2004. Clerk to the Board of Commissioners '4i ~ °~ 226 S. Chur`on Sfi., Hilisboroug h, NC 27278 (919) 732-6262 Fox (919) 644-1177 si?ve~s'c r,l~ndsurv ays.com April 5, 2004 Mr. Robert Davis Orange County Planning Department 306 F Revere Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 Deaz Mr. Davis: Davi-Net, located along Highway 10 to the intersection of Mt. Herman Church Road is being developed in conformity with the existing lots and homesites in the area. This flexible development plan implements some of Orange County's vazied goals by maintaining the rural wooded chazacter of these two collector roads and by buffering the only identifiable drainage feature on the site. The open space, to be owned by an incorporated Homeowner's Association, heavily buffers Mt Hermon Church Road on both the north and south sides of Highway 10. This heavy buffering continues west and upon reaching the homesites, surrounds the neighborhood with afifty-foot continuous wooded buffer providing visual separation between this property and the adjoining properties. The effect of these buffers is further enhanced by clustering houses in groups of four, which expands the visual open space in the core of the subdivision. Given the narrowness of this tract along Highway 10, we feel that this design maximizes the benefits of the open space to both the neighborhood and the public driving past the site. We hope you will agree that we have met the requirements set forth in the flexible development open space provisions. Sincerely, Steve F. Yuhasz P.L.S. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL MAJOR SUBDIVISION ORANGE COUNTY PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLS~ SUBDIVISIO] LOCATION: OWNER/DE~ ADDRESS: S)~r( AGE /CONTAC ~~N l l~ A. B. SUMMARY INFORMA Orange County Tax Map General Land Uses in Area: Critical Areas: L-t=tdt"J--4W other (explain) ~o DATE ~1~) Iou ~Lj TELEPHONE NO.: 5 ~5 ~ Q~ S ~~l , ~, z~~l~f ,~ ~~ ~. TELEPHONENO.: ~(i l 77JL'"~~IOT~ T .a S~- [ON: Block Lot(s) ~ Township ~ h l? Zoning District(s): ~-1 Total Number of Acres:~~ Total Number of Lots: ~_ Average Lot Size~Minimum Lot Size: ~t L Number/Type of Structures: (existing) ~]_pYl'e (proposed) tS'~ ~ r,r+: Lineaz Feet in Streets: 1L3I1~ Acres in Open Space: Ib Water Supply: Public (specify) Community ~_ Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community ~G Individual School District• Fire District Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes No _~. If "yes," please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation:' All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information: ` ~ ~ subdivision name name & address of owner(s) ': name & address of subdivider f ` (if other than owner) -:.;:._!: : ~~ name of surveyor, engineer, landscape architect or azchitect, address, registration # & seal =5":! i'i i= (title) Preliminary Plan ~ scale, north arrow / y ?`~ ~r __' date of plan preparation and revisions f/ ` township, tax map-block-lot references ~/ ,;:;.:.....:' Pazent Pazcel Identification # ..,.: deed book and page # of property to be / subdivided d ii`z">~ boundary described with bearings an ~:> distances total acreage of the tract and acreage of lots, including and excluding azea within rights-of--way control comer watershed (specify) flood prone areas historic sites t// zoning of tract and adjacent properties i ,/ ~ ? on building setback lines by notat or typical lot layout location and width of existing and proposed easements (drainage, utilities, / ~/ :,` roads, etc.) existing, proposed and adjoining rights- of-way including dimensions and street names and State Road numbers. Linear feet of road centerlines and approximate acreage of new street rights-of-way 1~ _.~:." existing and proposed utilities, including „ / type, sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes d i;><c( existing and proposed curbs, gutters an _ culverts, including sizes and grades p1~ _;_.-.~~ location and width of alleys, sidewalks, ~ bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops : ., typical street cross-sections and intersection details including design and width of travelway and shoulders (please complete reverse side) ' proposed lot lines with dimensions lot & block numbers i~/~ ,~ ; phasing line(s) ~ ; topography at ten (10) foot intervals _ / : i water bodies, streams, floodways and floodplains g.r~ ~ ; stream buffers /,.::,::.:i:' - : - location and size of pazcels dedicated for . . ._ public use, recreational use or reserved in / common, with purpose noted if l d i _~; ; ocate n impervious surface data ( water supply watershed) ~~ .:,m;,;~,' vicinity map showing general location of subdivision with streets and roads identified by State Road number and name landscaping and buffer requirements ~~ township, corporate and extraterritorial planning jurisdiction lines which cross the property C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the Preliminary Plat. ~ n ': horizontal alignment, centerline radius, and general curve data on all proposed streets ~, `permanent features such as bui]dings, / cemeteries, historic landmarks / ~ <j adjoining lot layout names of adjoining property owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat name, plat book & page number, and perimeter lot numbers. (J~ location and size of lots of restricted development potential and notation on / ,/ ,~. plat regarding same . stormwater detention and/or retention sites and undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) '~,1~ ;., identified natural areas and wildlife 'corridors 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved cleazly marked). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department approvaVdenial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed, a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the jusitification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowners association. These documents maybe required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. 6. Fee - $470 plus $5.00 per lot (one fee for Preliminary and Final Plat). 7. If the subdivision contains I O lots or more, the following information shall be submitted with the application: a. Number of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year until buildout. c. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout. I, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. ., ~.~~ APPLICAN SIGNATURE o4-os-v~- DATE ~~ c- ~--- OWNE SIGNATURE FEES: Amount ~ s~G . DO Date Paid OC.~. - U S- ~ SG DATE C- 9-Q~ Receipt# /t0~-O~Z~s7 ~, ~a =u ~, ~ _ r -- 226 S Ch~ur'on St., Hllisboroi.'gh, NC 27278 {919) 732-6262 Fax (919) 64a-1177 -..= -a- _ --._.i. May 27, 2004 Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning Department Revere Road Hillsborough, NC RE: Davi/Net subdivision. Dear Eddie: As you requested, we have increased the open space along Mt. Hermon Church Road north of Old N.C. 10 from 200' to 300'. We agree that the additional buffer will help to maintain the existing character of the intersection of Mt Hermon Church Road and Old N.C.10. The property between Old N.C. 10 and the railroad (identified as 23.72 acres) is part of the entire Crabtree Bane LLC property, and is not a separate lot for subdivision purposes. Septic repair areas to serve the Stonegate Mobil Home Park have been tentatively reserved as shown on the enclosed sketch (Exhibit A). More specific information as to the final repair sites will be developed as the septic systems are installed. Until that occurs, we are unable to commit any of the property to alternative uses. If there is future development of this portion of the Crabtree Bane LLC property for residential use, additional subdivision requirements will be met at that time. Given the anticipated requirements for septic system use by Stonegate, we do not believe that in any case there could be more than eight lots developed on the north side of Old N.C.10. Additional development of that scope would still keep us well within the 261ots approved with the original Concept Plan. Very Truly Yours, ~~ Steve F. Yuhasz for Crabtree Bane LLC 0 Y ClJ C'') 'o 0 0 3 I N Y (1J d' ~ C'7 ,~ ° III "' Y RJ C'') !'iii !ii ~ ~~ ( a ~ ~~~ n N,~„ '~B ~~. ~h - ~,~ _"~UF2C~ c.~Cid~rJ-t~L~~. 7bG. 226 5. Churion St., Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 732-6262 Fax (919) 644-1177 st ev er3'c ntl~_inds~r~ey scorn Davi-Net Phase One Build-out Schedule Year one -two units @ $215,000 Year two -four units @ $225,000 Year three -four units @ $235,000 June 28, 2004 SOIL/SITE Evaluation Summary for: Phase I, Davi/Net Eno Township, Map 26, Lot 35 Map Date Revised May 27, 2004 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rosemary L. Summers, MPH, DrPH Health Director Richard E. Whiffed Human Services Center 30D West Tryon Street Post Off ce Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Phone: (919) 245-2411 Fax: (919) 644-3007 www cv orange nc. us/health Lot # DESIGN FLOW 1 480 gpd 2 480 gpd 3 480 gpd 4 480 gpd 5 480 gpd 6 480 gpd SYSTEM TYPE Shallow Trench Conventional Shallow Trench Conventional Shallow Trench Conventional Shallow Trench Conventional Shallow Trench Conventional Shallow Trench Conventional 15 ~ 7 480 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional Animal Control Services 8 480 gpd Ultra Shallow Conventional w/ pump Central Administrative g 480 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional Services 10 480 gpd Shallow Trench Conventional Dental Health Services Environmental Health Services NOTES: Health Promotion and The design flow is based upon the number of bedrooms applied for by the property Education Services owner or developer. The design flow for a bedroom is 120 gallons/day (gpd). (e.g. 600 gpd = 5 bedrooms) Personal Health Services Proposed house locations are provided by the property owner or developer as required ~ by 15A NCAC 18A .1900 - .1969 (The Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems). v The design flow, type system, and pump requirement aze subject to change based upon the application and site plan or plat submitted-€or the Wastewater Construction v 306-C Revere Road N AUt110i1ZatlOn. POBox 8181 $ Hillsborough, ivc z7z78 ~ The blocked areas on the accompanying plat are the limits of the provisionally suitable s° soils as evaluated by the Orange County Health Department. Phone: (919) 245-2361 a~i FAX: (919)644-3006 ~ 0 c w I1~ It should be noted that all lots having aconventional-type drain field with pump aze reviewed at a minimum of every five years by the health department as required by I SA NCAC 18A .1961 (Maintenance of Sewage Systems). Ultra Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in areas with 24 inches or more of provisionally suitable soiUsite characteristics and a 6-10" soil cap is placed over the trenches. Shallow Trench Conventional Systems are placed in azeas with 30 inches or more of provisionally suitable soil/site chazacteristics. Conventional Trench Systems aze placed in azeas with 36" inches or more of provisionally suitable soil/site characteristics. Innovative Trench Systems can be used in azeas with 24-36 "of provisionally suitable soil/site characteristics. The annroved septic areas should be kept free of vehicular traffic, lo2gine. ¢radin2, and comnactine activities. It is the responsibility of the property owner or developer to maintain the integrity of the septic areas prior to system construction and installation. No pazking, cutting or filling shall be allowed in or around the drain field azeas. Drainage ways and easements should be utilized to convey storm water run-off to the storm water retention areas. These conveyances should not be located through designated septic drain field areas. This report is for planning purposes only and does not constitute any approval. Lot approval is granted by the health department only in the form of an Improvement Permit. r~ ~ c I ' i ~I ~\ I I ~_" I' ~ ' _~ ~ _~' ' ,C 1' .. J jl ~ ~~~' I1~I ~' ~ ~ pC ~ h'I~ ~ ~ y~l ~~ _ ~ ~ 1 `'I Q I I' j~' ~ u-- i ~~ s, .~ 2 ~ ~~ - I. I,~ ~ ' / I i ~ -_~ ~o _ !rv'I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~';~ 1 I ~j~ --, _ l ,. _ I 'I i o9-- ~ ,'~~=~ - i' i,'~ i ~ ~~ I, I _ ~ ' ~ `I x..rs~ C' I ~.` `J ~ib;h-a,1o ~ ~ ', -~ \. xs I~ ~,~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~, y' N Zo N~ SON C 90 K ___ _ CS. 7 ~. A L J ~_: -__ ; - .-:, ~~= __: GY __ c:. ". ~r. .~ _ _a LL_: ` ' wl ~~~__= 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 Q; ~_ -._.--2^Z~~ 1107 NC DOT GRRHRM 336 570 6873 P.01i01 ~g e ~. •Qr....• STATE OF NORTI~I CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _J~I HAEL F. EASLEX GOVERNOR LYNDO TIFFET'f SECRETakY tune 29, 2004 C.N'~1GE COUNTY Frdie Kirk _ =^c~ C*~unty Planning Department -- .may 8181 - slayrough, North Carolina 27278 ~U3~cCT; Preliminary Review of Davi-Net, Phase 1 located on Old NC 10 (SR 1710) __- "~.-. Kirk: This office has reviewed the preliminary plan submitted. Due to the number of lots, road improvements are not necessary. Egg Lane needs to have a cul-de-sac if it is not ~~~aa *o be extended. If the road is to be extended in the future a temporary ~_ -~~cu-d needs to be provided and must meet North Carolina Department of - ^_ortation standards. A driveway permit must be obtained from this office prior to ans~ruction. "~Te roads are to become state maintained, this office must review the horizontal and - _- '-~`crrnation to ensure that DOT standards are met, DOT personnel during -. ~ ::ien must also inspect it. Also, any utility work or sidewalk needs to be submitted on the proper encroachment agreement form and will need to be reviewed by the Dlstrict Engineer. -- , - _~ :,-ve any questions, feel free to call me at (336) 570-6833. Sincere) , Nanette Fogleman Asst. District Engineer 1'.O. Box 766 Graham, N.C. 27253 Telephone (336J-570-6833 TOTRL P.01 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ~q Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director co°atP °l ®'e Comprehensive Planning P 306E Revere Road ~` , (919) 245-2589 ° s ~ P O Box 8181 (919) 644-3002 (FAX) ~. Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us ~~„ a ,°<~°° North Carolina, 27278 MEMORANDUM Date: June 23, 2004 To: Eddie Kirk, Planner II CC: Craig Benedict, Planning Director Robert Davis, Orange County Current Planning Supervisor From: Karen Lincoln, Transportation Planner Subject: Comments Regarding Davi-Net Subdivision Application I would like to submit the following notes regarding the preliminary plan for Phase One of Davi-Net subdivision located on Old NC 10 (SR 1710) in Eno Township. An ideal site distance triangle at the intersection of Old NC 10 and Mt. Herman Church Road would be 150' X 150'. Old NC 10 is number two of the primary priority routes listed in the Orange County Bicycle Plan adopted in 1999. A February 3`d, 2004, amendment to Section 1 V-B-3- a-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations states that the subdivider "shall provide any improvements or other means to ensure construction recommended" in adopted plans or corridor studies "such as facilities for bicycles, sidewalks, and public transportation". The bicycle plan recommends a roadway cross-section of two 12' lanes with 4' paved shoulders to accommodate bicycles. Old NC 10, from New Hope Church Road to US Highway 70, is part of an east-west collector system from Alamance County line to US Highway 70 in eastern Orange County near the Durham County line. The system includes Bradshaw Quarry Road, Arthur Minnis Road, New Hope Church Road, and that portion of Old NC 10. The subject portion of Old NC 10 is classified as a major thoroughfare in the Durham- Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Area thoroughfare plan study dated September 1996. That study recommends atwo-lane shoulder section. One of the conditions of approval for the concept plan was to "Show proposed dedication of an additional 5 feet of right-of-way, or 35 feet from C/L of existing R/W, whichever is greater along Old NC 10 (SR 1710) on the Preliminary Plan". Seventy feet is adequate for the proposed cross section (two-lane shoulder section). There are no improvements planned for Old NC 10. Memorandum to BOCC June 23, 2004 Page 2 Mt. Herman Church Road is listed as a secondary priority bicycle route in the Orange County Bicycle Plan. Mt. Herman Church Road is not classified as a thoroughfare in the Hillsborough Transportation Plan. Mt. Herman Church Road is also classified as major thoroughfare in the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Area thoroughfare plan study dated September 1996. It is important to note that the thoroughfare plan was never adopted by the Transportation Advisory Committee. The recommended cross section is a two-lane shoulder section. Seventy feet is adequate for the proposed two 12-ft. travel lanes with 4' paved shoulders for bicycles. There are no improvements planned for this section of Mr. Herman Church Road. The 1999 and 2001 average annual daily traffic calculated for Old NC 10 (west of Mt. Herman Church Road) is 2,300. Current capacity for Old NC 10 (level of service D) is approximately 12,000. ao ORANGE CQUNTY ,e a, ,~ :r~ ~~ ~~.~ °° 2002 ,r n ;: NORTH CAROLINA o a 'ad Laf aaap, CELE6RATING 25o YSAR6 a~ ORANGE COUNTY TO: EDDIE KIRK EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT PO Box 8181 FROM: MIKE TAPP, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/FIRE MARSHAL I~"\ Hillsborough, NC 27278 RE: DAVI-NET PROJECT Emergency Medical Services Fire Marshal DATE: APRIL 27, 2004 Hazardous Materials Team Disaster Response i We have completed our review of the Davi-Net Preliminary Plan, Phase ons 9-1-1 Communicat One and the plans are acceptable. During Normal Business Hours: If you need additional information, please contact me. 919-968-2050 919-644-3030 24 Hour Warning Point: 919-933-2600 919-732-8161 Business Fax Machine: 919-968-4066 24-Hour Fax Machine: 919-967-9026 DIRECTOR Nick Waters nwatersna co orange.nc.us DEPUTY DIRECTOR/EMS/ADMIN[STRATiON C. Kent McKenzie kmckenzie~a co.oran eg nc.us DEPUTY DIRECTOR/FIRE MARSHAL Mike Tapp mtapp(a)co.oran eg nc.us DEPUTY DIRECTOR/COMMUNICATIONS Gwen Snowden gsnowden~a co oran eg nc.us ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Tammy Comar tcoma~co. orange.nc.us as FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PHASE ONE DAVI-NET RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department June, 2004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Phase One DAVI-NET subdivision contains 10 buildable lots and is located in Eno Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will intersect with Old NC 10. The current zoning is R1 -Rural Residential. The average lot size is approximately 2.1 acres including open space. Lots will be served by individual wells and individual septic systems. Project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 2004, with completion of the project scheduled for 2006. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be from $215,000 to $235,000, including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. a~ TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 -Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 -Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 -Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact Section 7 -Summary of Projected Public School Capacity Impacts a~- EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for aten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data and studies of the number of students per household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent studies include A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N.C. (1995) and Technical Report: Calculation of Proportionate Share Impact Fees for Financing Public School Capital Needs, Orange County, N.C. (1996). Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on studies of the number of students per household for the school district in which the project is located. The most recent study is A Study of Housing Characteristics and Student Generation Rates for Orange County, N.C. (1995). Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. as SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1996-97. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes -Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to a~ the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense '~unds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel, operating and capital costs. a~ Other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development. Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. a8 SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government (Section 4). Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD a ~ Modified 8122101 -Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Year: CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Children/House: ENTER "1" BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTR School District: School Attendance: Middle School 24% Note: All calculations below are based upon the developer's projected buildout. The developer has the right to build less than the amount granted. SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER "1" IN ( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA NTY POPULATION: 118227 COUNTY EMPLOYME3N~T POSITIONS PER CAPITAA ~y .,~apl(tA.6i m-~ d`5 t p ~`Y~4 t° ~. ~ f ~ I ~ }y ~' ~~~ ~~ ~Y ~S.e~~ ~ U~493: gi'e'~°~~~Q~~~~I Y~~ k ~~ ..c ! i.., 3 ~~ fi. .....-,.s,,... a r'~. e. ,._: ,w~mo ._., t..v .. ._, r _ ..... ..,. q .r~ ' 1 0 0015 Public Safety 77 50 a~IlCai)T~CS'~'e' . ~ ,; _ , , d., .._~ ,.. :..... ,..~ .« .,. _;... + ~ ~, 0~„ .,,.~. raY o- _-..... , sr - .:. ,.__ ... , ..... _ 314.34 0.0027 Human Services __. _. .~.:n,....~, ... ,... ~._ ..:;:.:.. , c:~...:.:.. ,..~ ,.: ._ s..:.; ., _ 'nr;n>3o SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT PER CAPITA REVENUES REVENUES PER CAPITA s~lvii~V~B'~ Vi1lGy~lJaYin v~.a ~.:~ ....v:v :: .mY'ii. ~..W .... .:: Intergovernmental ~~ ..,,~~ i F'~ '$'~Lh+'~"+~+i ~ ~eh ~:: 3 #'a''" tj' ~ ~. C~.v., ~ ~. .,:1.n s. ~m ti u~A.xfr.;R .. de .. ..xed i. cL,. ..... :.w b. ' .::. ..._ u..w®.-...m... ..._ 13123958 111 01 i ttt i ~4~19V5!i ~ t .' ~~ 3+T~ ~. 3 ,: .t: _v ...n ..,... ...ai . 5857788 49.55 Miscellaneous COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($) EXPEtdL11TURE PER CAPITA hover aye t ~-~ ~ ~ !'(0~7774U ! ~ 87 T8; ae-rx~m e~JRm.L~ 0.i~weA me.i..e e .. . ....m "`` '"" ` " ~ 10419788 88.13 Public Safety , ~~ ~ ~~~~ w~ ~5: ~t F~ ~ t 4471}6&1~ ` Y 3#9 Human Services 26368802 3 ::~~~at,4r~~~rY~ng~'Captat) ~~ w.... _, .::.~ .. __~ ~. ~ 198.72 Non-Departmental 23494376 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($) EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE °~~ebe~j}Cpv~ amertt~`„T .:..,... ! ~:'.,*.t f ~ ~~73~7740v .x a'.:.~ ' 6868'i 27!, ~ A y t ~ ~ ~t, ._.... _ ~_ rv.., 4 _ 10419788 58703.03 Public Safety Y7401~ 42. :r a ~- ,~ r -, ~ ~ ,z~ ~ 44661 ..,. _s__ . _ , .. ... - ~ "` '~ `""' ° '" 26368802 83886.24 Human Services _... CHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES -~. ate., !m, e~ a ~ School District EXPENDITURE PER STUDENT 16976972 _ , . _~~ ._ , . _ 2598 ~~s 0 0.00 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES School District _ _.~..- ,~.~ ,,.,. EXPENDITURE PER EMPLOYEE p 0.00 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION School District Tax Rate 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation tG: :^' ': I Y :.'~ ~t .l ~44~94 : u J Sa._.Ld x.{..:. ff ~t0lC ~ 3 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 2005 ~`~ ~~~~~ ~i306= 2007 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ~#~ ~; as ~pP ~ ~r' '°`~r~~~`"+~~! ++~$ `' 7 ~ "~. ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES r, '~: ~` +~+ ~ General Government ~, '~ i~ ° ~~ ~ _ ' ~ ` 0.02 „~ ~~ 4; ~~ ~ 0.03 04 0 Public Safety . ~' ~ ~ ~ . ~ 0.02 ~3w~ . Public Works ~ ~` 0.01 v ~1~ 0.01 Human Services a rw ~ ~'~1= 3~t13 ~ 0.04 '~, ~ ;,~~~ 3 0 09 ,15v 0.07 0.15 TOTAL ~~~~ ~~ , SCHOOL DISTRICT ~ ~`pr~~. rr n~ ,~ } 0 041 A 0~. 0.07 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ~4 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ . (COUNTY FUNDED ONLY) ~~,M~~ ~~x.`' ~~~ `#~~_._°_ ~~ SECTION 4 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 3a SECTION 5 -PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ~~ ~ F r ;~i i ~' a i~''i " 2007 ~ +. ~'r ~s~' ~, `~~2008 YEAR" ry~r ~~1)04 2005 ,,~,~~ 0.06`_: ~~u~x,~~r'-~i,tr+ ~ _y a~ ~ S !~ a34~ Z1' REVENUES ($) ~ ~, _ ~ ~J",9~ 6217~~ ~,~0~ ' 11010 ~ ~ ~ ~, EXPENDITURES ($) ~ ~~~ 8108 ~5~ s' 13513 ~„„~ ~"~- , , u ~, NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) ~,~~,,r,__ u2 i -1891 ~ r,~:€~r2$03,.. -2503 , ,~. ~ :..,~ ,F. ,.. YEAR € rs~, OD9 2010 y0 ~; 2012~~~ ~ ~~ ~`~~'f3`. ~-', ~~' ~~ m~ 12641 ~ ~ ~ ~r ~~~~" ~~~ 2~~ ~. REVENUES ($) G 11962 t . !~~ ~k s ~ -rr ~ 7~`~~~' ,s~ q` 13513 ~~ ~~ 3 ; 13513 "" ~ x _ ~~7 ~~$~ EXPENDITURES ($) ~~ ' ~~~~a 4 ~ ~ ~~~~ 'y e NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) ~ ~` t..~8. -1552 ~~v ~12~~m?' -873 „ kt ,. _ ~ r, ,:. ~+~i.r~~~~ ~ ~~ innnnnov nF aan.iFrrED DEMOGRAPHICIFISCAL IMPACTS 34 SECTION 7 -SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 35 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: stract Schoo l D i a nc e School Attend d ~` y ~ { m- ~, y y ~:F ~ ~~~~ ~^ ~~~~~y~~~ E 1S{511 ~1~~iS'~ ~if~ra v, .k. }Si-u..13 ul~~b' / + 5 GSE'3'L t ~ T' ~^ y~ ' Fl >~ mu.~acrrv ,..ry.F.u'r'in .. ,mtr...~~ „ M._ ng wiXQ~o'tH~~ S~2 7 ~a} ' 'i '~ ~ u . , ~ W tc v~ F. .,. f.RV'..iv T'C.,.e v_I(. ...c m.-m:'.:t..'Sn .4., S 3iv.. 24% Middle School ti t 'S x 9 tP"+r""rrt ', 3 ~e F t u4"Y'~r '1~`!" ~ 'E'~ C y~ y ~t~ .: ~w ~ SOYA. 533 .,nk S1 5 t et~rr++-°t e+ P ~ ~3 ,K[ -~•+fi £t r~" r ~ h, y~ `Y iP !&..,"'tv q t 4 aap~~~t111 iFr~~th {~ m? =~^ii3 ti, ... tt~k.. ~~t~~~ ~,'.x i ., io-» x'ss , ~_ `-1~u " ...e.. ..e__ Jr~, ~~rv.: 2 ,.st . AM .nZ41~=, .. 2008 YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 h.t3.. iYk~'d55~ a`; SCHOOL CHILDREN ~ _ ,~ ' [~ '~t~'4p~A xE ;zl: 2 ~~x FxAfi'~.~~ `'=i+,'nN.,. ~ ~~ 3~{ ~ , 3 ~~, ~ ' '' Elementary E r" ~ ~,~ q ~ ~~§~uSS ~~ t~ St _. ~~~~ ~ " i Middle ~ ~ l '~ 0. 1 ~3 ~„_~ 1 ;! r ~ 1 ~ : s3 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ High Schoo , 4 i3 ~ _ k ~ _ , ~ ' ~~ ?a TOTAL i~;1vE,,,: ~ ~x`~ 3 t'i ~;j= 5 e-~~.~ t ; YEAR 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SCHOOL CHILDREN ~y ~~~ -~s t ~; ~ ,~~ t E ~ ,-` ~~ ; ~ ~ ~~ arm r ,y~,~ ~~`~~~ ~c~> ~ ~~i~ ~~ a 5.'E -.~a'~~ ~ ~a. ~ 3 ',~T~~,r.`~'~-x„a ~+'`",~"~.. '~ ~ , , i~ 3 r~vt.*`..-r ~ ~ a6-u~ ~ ~ ~ ` Elementary 'F ~ t- Middle ~ ,; `~ :` ' ,~~ M~ ` 1 - ~0~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' 3 ~ High SCh001 ~~~~.. ~"w ~x~t 1 >t. ~ h r ~ 1 ~: s 1 ~~ ~~~- r~E _ ~S ' ~~ ~~ 5 ~ ', 5 ~t~. ~ tk~`; , ~ TOTAL ~;' ~_ ~ ~,rt ~:.: r , ., SCHOOL CAPACITIES ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT ALL SCHOOLS I 'i _Y ut tf 1: ~ Y~Y-"'v' j d ~Fl ,~4i1 3. E>:~erl4ar~ ~ ~€ . ~ v`mP '~ ~~' ~' ~ f `S'~ rah ~~ -a^ v~-ve } Fl4v~~.l'~W'~'=:~ysl l= d~, ~d ~,,,,, ,~_, k, .._ t,.m~ . ~,d~ -?tea.. ~<<~ ,~~ea,,: ~Y, _ .Fl,r_ „ _m , , ~ ,. ,, - ~ , 1449 Middle q15©©69 +?'°z?r.. tc, s"n-.?y'~td J=x ~ it~~f'. y~ ° r' ' ~I~' ~4 ~ 5'~ ' b 1 ~ Middle _ _ :fi:tg (~~'',`q.~?w ~'a,'i ~~~p,h;1 J~t1"y ~'1i$hQ{$~ 3 g l rn r ~~~.. .~ ~"~ _ ...~ „m_ r , : .3, ,.;=s. ~ a ,.r,....,:t , , . tl~:`~C~,lOL9 ig _ : MC ~ - , , __, . , - TOTAL 7174 TOTAL 6148 YEAR 2004 2005 2006 2007 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 9":~Ya=~~ ~~;'F ~~ s~'~-` ~~_ Elementary ~`R~~~~0"'= 3121 ~~ t,,~112~ 3122 Middle E ~~ 1450 '~ ~ '~o~ 1450 High School "~"'~1~1~ 1581 E ~ ~a8'~~ 1581 TI1TA 1 ~ ~'~ ~ S1'~z 6151 "` _.. S3~' 6153 YEAR 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 }- - a q}ad Ply hr IM t.ssv. ~," 4T-L ~$ di< PROJECTED ENROLLMENT ~~~„~ ~~,a ~~~~ `~~~; ~' ,~°~',,''~~>;i>~t,' Elementary ~~~~-39~,r 3122 ~~~~'~~~~ 3122 -~ ~~6~~~~~`~51~2= Middle ~~` , ~ a~ 1450 '~='!r ~~~1 1450 rE ~~ +~~~ ~ " 5~~ ~_ High School `"E & ~~' 1581 ~a. ~~ 1581 ~~ ~ k~~ gym`"' S ~:. TOTAL Ott? t d. 1T~3~ 6153 Ej;. _ ~t~ k 5 ,~, 6153 e.~ ~,~ ~,~ ~ ",1~3": Draft Planning Board Minutes D R A F T July 7, 2004 552 553 AGENDA ITEM #9: PRELIMINARY PLAN (PRESENTED BEFORE ITEM 8B) 554 a. Davi-Net Subdivision-Eno Township; 10 lots 555 Presenter: Eddie Kirk 556 557 Eddie Kirk: The Concept Plan was reviewed in 2002. This is property is at the corner of Mt. 558 Herman Church Road and NC 10. The Concept Plan was approved unanimously by this Board 559 on Apri14, 2002 with 26 lots. Since that time, the area north of Old NC 10 was determined to be 560 needed for repair area for the septic fields in the adjacent mobile home park. This application is 561 considered Phase I of Davi-Net. This is the area on the south side plus an area north of NC 10 562 including a 300 foot strip along Mt. Herman Church Road which will be used for open space. 563 There are only 10 lots proposed of the 26 on the Concept Plan. The proposal is for 2 roads 564 which will be public. Eaoh lot will have individual wells and septic tanks. Each lot is 565 approximately .92 acres. There is 39.8% of open space or about 9.11 acres. The Planning Staff 566 recommends approval of this preliminary plan subject to the Resolution of approval. 567 568 Nicole Graysmith: How many lots were in the original p]an on this side of the road? 569 570 Eddie Kirk: There were 8 and now there are 10. 571 572 lay Bryan: What is in the attachment 4 letter? 573 574 Eddie Kirk: What is reflected is an additional right-of--way on both Old NC 10 and Mt. Hermon 575 Church Road. 576 577 Barry Katz: You can't have repair areas on one side of the road and residents on the other but 578 with the railroad tracks, is it possible to connect those repair areas? 579 580 Eddie Kirk: Environmental Health said the owners have had approval from the railroad for a 581 long time to put this repair area in. 582 583 Steve Yuhasz: My understanding was that in conjunction with the approval of the mobile home 584 park there was approval for a boring under the railroad if access is needed. The Health 585 Department is aware of that. 586 587 Hunter Schofield: Does the railroad have easement? 588 589 Steve Yuhasz: If they don't own that property, they have almost exclusive control over it. I 590 believe it is just an easement. The current ownership of the property depends on what the 591 ownership of the property was in 1832. Is there an easement on record or a letter of approval of 592 that use? 593 594 Mrs. McBain: Yes. 595 596 Steve Yuhasz: This does not directly impact what we are discussing. 597 3~ 14 Draft Planning Board Minutes D R A F T July 7, 2004 3~ 598 Barry Katz: What type of houses are they going to build? 599 600 Steve Yuhasz: I believe they will be stick built houses. 601 602 Barry Katz: What is the purpose of the request for open space? Is it for preserving natural land 603 or recreational use? Are there any criteria to include or exclude any land that is not developed as 604 pertinent to open space? 605 606 Robert Davis: This is defined in the Flexible Development Plan. In some cases it is to preserve 607 farmland and others to preserve natural areas. This will most likely fall under "preserve rural 608 character". 609 610 Steve Yuhasz: There is also a small creek that runs west of the intersection that will be 611 protected. 612 613 Barry Katz: Are there any plans to use this land for recreational purposes? 614 615 Steve Yuhasz: No specific plans for active recreation. 616 617 Hunter Schofield: We have seen this before. It is a departure from the original concept. 618 619 Steve Yuhasz: We call this Phase 1 because, at the present, there is not much likelihood we will 620 develop a Phase 2. As the repair area is developed we may find that not all the area in that white 621 space (on map) will be required so we may come back in the future with another pod of lots. 622 623 Hunter Schofield: I noticed that your open space allotment exceeds our open space requirement 624 for the Flexible Plan. 625 626 Steve Yuhasz: We looked at what we could reasonably develop from this property. Certainly 627 we could add a little to each lot and reduce the amount of open space but this fits this property as 628 well as we could fit it without squeezing it in. 629 630 Noah Ranells: It appears that further development would be onto the repair area. Was that 631 considered? That was prudent organization of the road. 632 633 Steve Yuhasz: As far as the road location, that was the best from a sight distance perspective. 634 As each repair system is put in, we use part of the area. As the repairs actually occur, the Health 635 Department asked for updates. 636 637 Craufurd Goodwin: If you go to municipal sewer, can you reconvert the repair area? 638 639 Steve Yuhasz: That is a possibility but I do not anticipate it. 640 641 Renee Price: Where does Alex Road go? 642 15 Draft Planning Board Minutes DRAFT 38 July 7, 2004 643 Steve Yuhasz: The property that is directly to the south is about 35 acres and is not land locked 644 but its access is through a long corridor to Mount Herman Church Road. This would provide an 645 alternate access. 646 647 Brian Dobyns: It is owned by Rupert Clayton. There is 81' current access and it would be 648 difficult to access. 649 650 Hunter Schofield: The County required the stub out to the south. 651 652 Noah Ranells: Are there any plans for bridging those lot lines for greenway access? 653 654 Steve Yuhasz: All the lots now don't have a lot of extra room. We may look at the possibility of 655 opening a small corridor from the cul-de-sac to the green space between lots 6 and 7. 656 657 Hunter Schofield: In the open space along Old NC 10 and Fleet Drive is 7Y? 658 659 Steve Yuhasz: There is a 7S land use buffer on Old NC 10. 660 661 Hunter Schofield: That could serve as pedestrian access. 662 663 Renee Price: If there are no plans for development, would Alex Road become a dead end? 664 665 Steve Yuhasz: It was shown on the Concept Plan. 666 667 Hunter Schofield: How far from the property line will the stub out stop? 668 669 Steve Yuhasz: Stub out will actually go to the property line. We need to cut beyond the open 670 space for North Carolina Department of Transportation. This creates a guarantee for a future 671 road to be built. 672 673 Robert Davis: It should be shown on the final fiat that the road could possibly be extended. 674 675 MOTION made by Barry Katz to accept the revisions preliminary plans and to recommend 676 approval of the Staff proposed conditions. Craufurd Goodwin seconded the motion. 677 VOTE: Unanimous 678 679 AGENDA ITEM #IO: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS REQUESTED AT JUNE 9, 2004 SPECIAL 680 PLANNING BOARD MEETING 681 a. Sustainability Flowchart and Urban-Rural Density Progression 682 Presenter: Tom Altieri 683 b. Existing Flexible Development Options: Cluster, Estate and Village 684 and Brief Overview of Subdivision Activity/Trends 685 Presenter: Robert Davi s 686 c. American Farmland Trust (AFT) Tools; Level of Use Presently in 687 Orange County; Advantages/Disadvantages; Feasibility 688 Presenter: Tom Altieri 16 3q .,..~ ~ i E ~ ~ R~ = ~ i f ~~~ ~: ~~~ ~ !r w w • •r ~ -. ~ ~~ } '~ ~ ~ , fr ~. ~ _ ~ - ~'-- --•_.._ .P ~ ~ +, ' ~. ~~ i ; { \ ,,~. 1 ~ I O'~ le' t \ ~ ~ {~ i , l' C ~; t ~__, ~ I ig x, ~' i t~ r a ~ , f 1 r_ __: ~__; , ,~ ~ ,i , k ~ , i -- w ; -- ~ _ ~ ~~ ~i :\ 'r ~ ' ~ ~ ~ t~ ~- ' ~ f ~ rage i ui ~ „~~• •~ a Orange County, NC e~_ - Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) ~; Certificate of Adequate Publis Schools (CAPS) This document certifies that the above school district has (or anticipates future) capacity to accommodate the projected number of students to be created from the above developmentlsubdivision in the years as noted. This certificate is required after final government approval but before final plat recordation can be performed or as deemed by the specific local ordinance. Any residential structure on a lot in the above development/subdivision may not receive a certificate of occupancy until or after the date of effect and/or the phasing proposed as shown in the table, unless modified by local government action. 5/3/2004 School I?istricf: Orange County Schools ~ ~ ~~,-~ - CAPS Certificate Number: 0004-8-04 Page 2 of 2 This CAPS expires pursuant to the timing specified in the local government for the validity period of the respective development permit. ~' Date of Issue: ~- Date of Effect (School Year): Signature, Developer Signature, cool Boazd Official Seal Date ~~ Date Note: The original is forwazded to the local govenunent, one copy is forwarded to Orange l'ounty, one copy is retained by the school district, and one copy is retained by the develper. 5/3/200