Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 04-28-2005-2a3,~ s _ Orange County Environment and Resource Conservation Department Mew~.ora v,,d uwi. To: John Link, County Manager From: David Stancil, ERG Director Date: April 26, 2005 Re: Twin Creeks (Moniese Nomp) District Park and Educational Campus The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update far the April 28th Assembly of Governments meeting regarding the Twin Creeks project. Twin Creeks District Park and Educational Campus is a 193-acre site acquired by Orange County in 2001 with the intent of co-locating the planned Chapel Hill Township District Park and a future multi-school campus. From September 2002 - May 2003, a 23-member citizen work group (CHATPEC Work Group) with representatives from each elected board and parks advisory board in the County and Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro developed a proposed master plan, which was conveyed to the Board in August 2003. After initial reviews in late 2003 and early 2004, County staff was asked in the spring of 2004 to explore a series of questions and develop an alternative design far the site that focused even further on potential sharing of facilities and smart- growth principles, Review of this evaluation and alternative design in the fall of 2004 was conducted, along with receipt of a proposed redesign of the site submitted by a citizen group in the vicinity of the site, As a result of the fall 2004 discussions, the Board of Commissioners authorized a 6-member short-term work group including two Commissioners and two school board members to look at a possible limited scope redesign with the following charge: Utilize the October 2004 (Design #2) drajt Maser Plrnr jor Twin Creeks Park mrd Edvcntionnl Canrprrr to undertake only the folloming changes: a. Look at relocating/redesigning the proposed Elementary School #/0 to the southenstern portion of the site (east oJJoner Creek currently shown nr "FunneGducattona/Facility") b Keep the four soccer field configtn'ation intact in [he redesign c Consider locations jor action sports facilit7dactivi[ies in the park Erti~Gahruewtarmdnesaruceeoh evuaJtlarti [~O P.O.t 8181 ~.SOG-i7 ><'.e/el Z WJC7Li' Hitlsbarouyla, Nc zj-2; 8 (yzyl a.as-2 ~o d Look at the feas'ibiliq+ oJrelocaling dre "stadium freld" to the south with the pmk Addre-ss minor rrrodrfications needed ns n resrdt of the nbove inork, for dre locutions of odrer schools ividria the schools campus arrd pmk facilities within the pmk site After two meetings, the Work Group issued its findings: 1, Relocation of Stadium/track: While there might be benefits to locating the proposed stadium/track in the park, the Work Group felt that the need for keeping the stadium/track with the middle school that is planned for the northern part of the site was an overriding consideration, for programming reasons. Complicating factors based on topography and stream buffers were also noted. The Work Group did propose a proposed t/3-mile loop trail around the meadow as an alternative to meet the needs for a measured walking or running trail. 2. Action Sports: While there does appear to be a need for such a facility as a BMX bike trail, the Work Group noted that the other proposed park facilities have been identified as needs by both the original work group and individual parks advisory boards, and that these -plus the concept of a community gymnasium -would appear to be a higher priority. That said, staff identified a potential area within the Piedmont EMC powerline easement that might be able to serve as such a facility, and the Work Group forwards that concept to the Board to consider further, as desired. 3. Elementary School (ES) #10: The Work Group found that its current location adjacent to the proposed future middle school was preferable to the possible location in the southeastern corner of the site. In general, the Work Group feels that the benefits of co-locating the two schools together, which can only occur on the educational campus in the northern portion of the site, outweigh the benefits of possible increased walkability far ES #1 Q in a southeastern location. Keeping the elementary school and middle school together offers synergies for shared supervision, food services, media centers, and other possible advantages, 4, Other minor modifications to the Master Plan: a. A footprint of a possible Action Sports (BMX bike course) in the Piedmont EMC easement, which would need to be explored further with PEMC and the Board of Commissioners, if desired. Qn May 3rd, the Board is scheduled to consider adoption of a master plan, receipt of requested information about infrastructure costs and phasing, and authorize the submittal of a Conditional Use Permit application to the Town of Carrboro, Preparation of the permit materials is expected to take 4-6 months, with review and consideration of the CUP projected to take approximately one year, EvLViI ~H,vzcdh.E GlvrGl F2BSOttl2E COrhSCr'VLItiON. PO Sax 315'Y /s0G ,~} RCVZrZ 12oG7d Hill56or ocr~N; Nc ~,=2~1 ~Z~) 2 f5-25J0