Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAB minutes 0516181 Orange County Animal Services 1601 Eubanks Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 919-942-PETS (7387) ANIMAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD (ASAB) 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 16, 2018 Meeting Summary MEMBERS PRESENT: Maureane Hoffman (Chair), Molly Mullin (Vice-Chair), Edmund Tiryakian, Diane Obeid, Warren Porter, Susan Elmore, Michelle Walker, and Victoria Hudson MEMBERS ABSENT: Beth Grooms, Heather Payne STAFF PRESENT: Bob Marotto (Animal Services Director) and Andi Morgan (Asst. Animal Services Director) GUESTS PRESENT: Will Lang, Gina Hahn, and Evelyn Daniel _____________________________________________________________________________________ Call to order: 6:32pm Review and adoption of the Agenda: Molly Mullin made a motion to approve the agenda; seconded by Susan Elmore Mullin. The motion carried without dissent. Summary of March 21, 2018 meeting: Susan Elmore made a motion to approve the agenda; seconded by Molly Mullin. The motion carried without dissent. Review of public participation guidelines: Molly Mullin reviewed the participation guidelines. Pets in Adult Care Home Possibilities, Will Lang, Orange County Adult Care Home Advisory Committee: The ACHA Board is looking for opportunities to partner with other groups for the enrichment of the residents of adult care facilities. Will Lang pointed out that there are some facilities that already allow pets and therapy animals. He would like to explore opportunities to improve the lives of pets by bringing pets into the facilities. A pet therapy article on benefits was provided. Bob Marotto will enlist staff to look at opportunities and logistics with Mr. Lang. ASAB Applicants: (A) Gina Hahn was introduced as a candidate for the at-large non-municipal or animal welfare advocate vacancy. She has resided in Orange County for five years. She participates in foster programs, rescue programs, and equine programs. Though not currently a member, she has experience with the Hearing Panel Pool. (B) Evelyn Daniel was introduced for the Carrboro vacancy. She has been a resident of Orange County since 1985. She has served on various Boards, including several professional associations and the Orange County Parks and Recreation Board. (C) Recommendations were sent for the Town of Chapel Hill vacancy. (D) There is an applicant for pet business owner. Animal Services Advisory Board Updates (A) Report on Board of County Commissioner Work Session April 26, 2018: Molly Mullin reported on the work session where she presented the annual progress, the work plan, and compiling proposed edits for the UAO. There were a few questions about the easement that were addressed to and answered by Bob Marotto. 2 Old Business: (A) ASAB Communication About Animal Services Property Easements: There are no updates. Jeff Thompson, Orange County AMS, will address Duke Power to formalize plans. (B) Guidelines for Surrendered Animals Suffering from Cruelty or Neglect: Michelle Walker shared the last draft with Heather Payne. The proposed edits regarded policy on notification in writing and the specific explanation of the terms of the Notice, including the terms of the appeals procedure. There were questions from ASAB about the adjudication of appeals. The procedures will require the recommendations of the County Attorney’s office and a language amendment to include this in the scope of the Hearing Panel Pool. There was one statement that was requested to be removed, “ASAB welcomes input regarding staff's capabilities for providing such consultations in light of limited resources.” Susan Elmore made a motion to forward the final policy draft to the County Attorney’s office as edited for legal review and possible edits; Michelle Walker seconded. Edmund Tiryakian read a statement during discussion. The motion carried. Edmund Tiryakian voted in dissent. He requested his statement become part of the minutes: “Although I agree these Guidelines are a step in the right direction, they are fatally flawed: they fail to accord to Animal Services the necessary authority to permanently bar an individual who has displayed an egregious inability to treat an animal with due care. Merely placing someone on probation whose gross negligence may have resulted in severe, permanent and inexcusable harm, is wholly inadequate and trivializes the extent of their misdeeds. We should not be substituting our lofty good wishes for rehabilitation for the real world reality of people whose past behavior disqualifies them from adopting anew from Orange County Animal Services. Adoption is a privilege, not a right. I have never argued that every time a surrendered animal shows evidence of gross negligence the owner should inexorably be permanently banned from re-adopting; merely that we authorize Animal Services to make that judgment call after they investigate the matter fully, subject, as always, to the right of appeal by an owner who feels aggrieved. I note that many of my colleagues are worried about ruffling the sensibilities of certain members of the greater community. I believe in the process, we have ignored an equally important stakeholder in this debate, the abused pets, for which we are stewards. Agency is no excuse for responsibility. Finally, I find it regrettable that this protocol provides no guidance whatsoever to Animal Services for the predictably far more numerous instances of a surrendered animal which shows signs of mere negligent mistreatment? Does Animal Services have authority to impose any conditions on re- adoption, such as attending a course on animal hygiene, or disease prevention? The guidelines’ failure to instruct Animal Services on proper procedure leaves an unfortunate void, which they will have to contrive for themselves, without the requested input from the ASAB. For these reasons, Madame Chair, I must vote no.” New Business: (A) Ninth Annual Open House: Andi Morgan reported on the upcoming Open House Saturday, June 2. Monetary donations and pledges of snacks, balloons, face painting, and other activity supplies are being accepted. (B) Animal Services Updates: Bob Marotto reported that there is 100+ cat back log on the barn cat/ free- roaming cat work. There will be a barn cat SNAP spay and neuter day at OCAS. This will occur on May 21st. There will be an event on Saturday, May 19th at the Rogers Road Community Center to provide rabies and microchipping. Dr. Elmore will speak on pet health. There will be ACOs and AC vehicles on site. The Orange County Citizens “College” featured OCAS on May 15th. Regarding the seized dogs from the criminal investigation, Bob Marotto stated State law requires any dog that is harbored for dog-fighting be deemed a dangerous dog. Based on the forensic examination, the seized dogs have been sorted into groups. The dogs having signs that they have been fought will not be available for adoption (18 dogs). The other dogs (12 dogs) will be examined by the behaviorists to determine if they are adoptable. The dogs have now been 3 surrendered through the court to OCAS. The DA will make a final motion that establishes that the defendant does have the right to collect evidence from the dogs before they are disposed. (C) Ordinance considerations: Maureane Hoffman described the forthcoming changes, amendments, and edits to the UAO. A list of inconsistencies and unclear policy has been collected during hearings and public comments: 1. Bob Marotto presented an example of confusing language about landowner permissions as a factor during an animal attack. Sec.4-42. (b) (3) currently reads, “Without provocation has injured, maimed or killed a pet or domestic livestock, except where such animal has bitten or killed a pet or domestic livestock that is on the land of another without permission or is defending a person.” 2. Several issues have arisen from hearing experiences about whether the ordinance needs to be more flexible with respect to the declaration of an animal as dangerous. Specific examples were given where clear exceptions exist versus when propensities exist. 3. Appeals procedural deadlines are not clear to readers. 4. Public nuisance provision for cats as previously discussed was referred for change. 5. The issue of whether Sec. 4-42 needs to be amended to establish a different form of restraint for animals deemed dangerous is currently under discussion. 6. The scope of appeals needs clarification. Proposed ordinance edits will be on the June agenda. Bob Marotto will send the items to be discussed. Information Items (made available): (A) Monthly Sheltering Statistical Reports, April 2018 (B) Monthly Field Service Statistical Report, April 2018 Adjournment and next meeting: Michelle Walker made a motion to adjourn at 8:12 pm; Susan Elmore seconded. Motion carried without dissent. The next meeting is June 20, 2018 at 6:30 pm, Orange County Animal Services Center. Minutes taken: Victoria Hudson