HomeMy WebLinkAboutPets for Life OCAS ReportAdam Wright
Michael Haskins
Pets for Life/Orange County Animal Services Report
Background on Poverty and Pet Ownership
The following key statistics show the importance of addressing the need for animal services
amongst lower income pet owners.
• 1 in 6 Americans live in poverty
• 1 in 5 Americans speak a language other than English
• 6 out of 10 U.S. households include at least one pet
• 87% of pets in these communities haven’t been spayed or neutered
Pets for Life Overview
Pets for Life is a program through the Humane Society designed to extend the reach of animal
services, resources, and information to under-served areas. In these areas, there is a critical need for
accessible and affordable pet care that the Pets for Life programs seeks to address. The program also
attempts to build relationships with people in these communities by establishing an ongoing presence in
the community, which will allow members of the community to develop trust in the person.
Additionally, a key component of Pets for Life is its ability to provide free services to pet owners. These
services range from vaccinations and pet supplies to the most important service of free spay and neuter
operations. The key measure of the program’s success is the ability to drastically impact the number of
animals that are spayed and neutered in the community. Finally, Pets for Life can also be done in
conjunction with another service such as the Coalition for Unchained Dogs.
Takeaways from Interview with Bennett at Charlotte Humane Society
We interviewed Bennett at the Charlotte Humane Society, who is responsible for running their
Pets for Life program. As one of the Pets for Life mentor cities, Bennett was able to provide us with the
following key points for successfully running the program.
1. Focus on a 1 block area (“hot spot”) within a zip code and then expand out from there. It is
important not to have multiple hot spots at once time and just focus on one area.
Additionally, when identifying the area you should focus on need, not poverty level or intake
rate.
2. Must be the same person going out in the community each time. This is vital to the success
of the program because the members of the community need to begin recognizing the
person’s presence and form relationships with them.
3. Providing transportation to the spay/neuter appointments is critical to the success rate of
people following through with their appointments. It is better to pick the pet up from the
owner’s home than having a central pick up location or having the owner bring the pet to
the appointment. In Charlotte, they provide the transportation service every two weeks.
4. If possible, try and become a mentee city, because then you receive a grant from the
Humane Society. To become a mentee city, it requires 500 surgeries per year.
Field Experience with Amanda Arrington
On January 31st, Michelle Walker, Michael, and I shadowed Amanda Arrington and her partner,
Lori Hensley, during a Saturday of community outreach. The day’s goal was to visit a neighborhood they
had frequently serviced in the past. During the visit, Amanda and Lori were focused on building existing
relationships within the area, building new relationships, administering medicine to pets, and convincing
owners to spay and neuter their pets. The outreach lasted about four hours, in which time we visited 10-
12 households. We administered de-wormer medication to almost 20 animals and set up multiple
appointments to pick up pets the following week to be spayed or neutered. The key takeaways from the
day with Amanda and Lori are as follows:
1) Members of the community were overwhelmingly receptive to the efforts of the Pets for Life
program. Everyone was willing to let us administer medication (de-wormer) to their pets
without much persuasion, and the vast majority were open to having their pets spayed and
neutered.
2) Every one of the community members we met were kind, respectful, and engaging. We did not
meet anyone who was rude, threatening, or unwilling to talk to us. This was in large part due to
the fact that Amanda and Lori had already done extensive outreach in the area, but the
stereotypical perception of lower-income neighborhoods was not justified in any way during our
community outreach.
3) The biggest obstacle to getting pets spayed and neutered was community members’ lack of
transportation. Lori and Amanda have regularly scheduled spay and neuter days (i.e. Wednesday
of every other week) in which they pick up pets from the community to be spayed and neutered
at a separate location.
4) Building strong relationships through consistent community outreach was the key to building
trust with its members. Lori and Amanda were known by name throughout the areas we visited,
and everyone was appreciative of their efforts. Lori and Amanda also knew everyone in the
community by name and remembered their pets’ names, which seemed very important.
5) Beginning relationships was most successful when Amanda and Lori offered items such as
leashes or small bags of food to pet owners. This opened people up and let them know they
were only trying to help and asking nothing in return.
6) Community members that did not want to spay or neuter their pets were much more willing to
do so when Amanda and Lori offered a fence for their yard. Amanda is also involved in the
Coalition for Unchained Dogs, which builds fences for people so they stop chaining their dogs.
7) The type of individual that performs community outreach must be extremely personable, non-
judgmental, able to handle detrimental living conditions for both pets and their owners, and be
dedicated to consistent outreach.
Implementation Plan
How to Select Area for Community Outreach
The Pets for Life website includes a “Community Outreach Toolkit” page that details the entire process
of selecting an area best-suited for the Pets for Life program. Both of these websites are listed at the
bottom of this section. There are a variety of factors that should be considered when determining the
best place to begin the program, all of which are detailed in the website. The most important factors are
% below poverty level, ethnicity breakdown, and average household income. Optimal areas will have a
high % below poverty (over 10%), lower household income than surrounding areas, and a diverse
ethnicity breakdown. The factors included in the analysis are:
• Geography
• Zip Code
• Total Population
• Total # of Households
• Estimated Dog-Owning Homes - (number of households * .46)
• Estimated Cat-Owning Homes - (number of households * .39)
• Total Number of Dogs
• Total Number of Cats
• Ethnicity Breakdown
• Average Household Income
• % Below Poverty Level
• Educational Attainment
• % of Renter-Occupied Residences
• Local Crime Rate and Statistics - (difficult to find)
• Shelter Intake and Euthanasia - (difficult to find)
An example of in a community analysis (excluding crime rate and shelter intake stats):
http://www.humanesociety.org/about/departments/pets-for-life/ - Pets for Life homepage
http://gateway.hsus.org/files/pfl_toolkit/toolkit.pdf - Community Outreach Toolkit
City-Data.com is the best resource for finding these statistics. After determining a broad area or zip code
that seems promising for outreach, identify a smaller area that representatives can personally visit in
order to determine whether it is an appropriate area. City-Data.com provides maps that break counties
down to smaller areas based on demographics and incomes. An example is listed below:
As you can see, the median household income in this area is $29,306. The population and number of
households is also small enough that the budge necessary for servicing the entire area would not be
overwhelming.
Recommended Areas to Begin Program
Michael and I followed the previously detailed steps for community analysis and visited the area
highlighted above to determine 2 streets that we believe are best-suited to begin the Pets for Life
Program. The streets are both in Hillsborough/Fairview, NC. The first is Torain Street, which is a
predominantly African-American community. It has a small number of houses and neighboring streets,
so the budget required for this area should be minimal. The second area we identified is Terrell Street,
which is a slightly rural area with a higher percentage of Caucasian individuals. We suggest beginning the
program on Torain Street and expanding it to Terrell Street if initial efforts are a success (and the budget
is sustainable).
A picture of each street is listed below.
Torain Street:
Terrell Road:
Necessary Personnel
The amount of personnel needed to implement a small-scale Pets for Life program is 1-2 dedicated
individuals. We would recommend 2 representatives to increase safety in the community and to keep
each other motivated and accountable. We also recommend that representatives spend 2-3 Saturdays in
the community per month for about 4 hours per trip, as well as any follow-up appointments that are
scheduled during visits. Community members needing services often need medicine administered, and a
regularly scheduled day to pick up pets to be spayed and neutered is also recommended. The time
commitment to the program is one of the factors that makes it difficult to find numerous volunteers, but
individuals that are committed to this schedule will likely be enthusiastic about the cause. There are a
number of challenges representatives will face when they do community outreach. These include subpar
living conditions for both humans and dogs, language barriers, and cultural differences. Representatives
should be comfortable with facing and overcoming these challenges.
Tentative Budget – First Year
Budget numbers are based on 36 weeks of outreach (3 outreach events per month):
Spay/Neuter – assuming 70 spays/neuters @ $40 - $80 per operation: $2,800 - $5,600
De-wormer medication – assuming 300 doses @ $2-5 per dose: $600 - $1,500
Dog food and leashes – 72 bags @ $10/bag and 72 leashes @ $4.00: $1,000
Miscellaneous/buffer expenses (gas, extra medication, spay/neuter, etc) $600
Total budget year 1: $5,000 - $8,700
The highest proportion of the budget (56 – 64%) is comprised of spay and neuter operations. We
recommend that OCAS develop relationships with veterinarians in the area that would be willing to give
1-2 weeks of pro-bono service per year in order to greatly reduce expenses. If 10 vets provide 2 weeks
of pro-bono services in year 1, the budget can be reduced to $2,600 - $6,300 (assuming 40 free
operations at $60 per operation).
In addition to potential savings from pro-bono spay/neuter operations, significant cost savings may be
realized by developing relationships with local pet retailers such as Petsmart, Petco, Phydeaux, The Pet
Pantry, and others. The medication and supplies budget of $1,600 to $2,500 can be greatly reduced or
even eliminated from forging strong relationships with retailers throughout the community, which could
result in a budget of less than $3,000 in year 1.
Recommended Timeline for implementing Pets for Life
Orange County Animal Services (OCAS) can successfully have the Pets for Life program up and
running within 9 months of starting. The following three key activities need to be completed.
Please note that this timeframe is just a recommendation, and that it will be largely contigent upon how
quickly OCAS can begin providing free spays and nueters, along with transportation to these
appointments.
Short-term activities
If OCAS decides that they are unable to implement the Pets for Life program or that they need to delay
starting the program, there are still activities that can be done in the short-term to improve their
perception in the local community.
1. Find one to two people that are fully committed to going out in the designated focus area
for four hours every other Saturday. It is crucial that it is the same person doing the
outreach each time so that the members of the community become comfortable with their
presence and develop trust in them.
2. As part of the outreach, the community members should be made aware of the services
that OCAS currently offers at their headquarters. Additionally, pet owners should be made
aware of the recommended vaccines for their pets, as well as which vets nearby that they
can visit.
3. Lastly, OCAS can offer minor free services that would cost little to provide, but would make
a strong impression in the community. A few examples of this are providing leashes and
collars, as well as animal bedding for pets kept outside in the winter months.