Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutField Statistics - 12-2014ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES FIELD SERVICES REPORT DECEMBER 2014 Animal Control Activities by Jurisdiction Orange County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro Out of County Unknown /Unassigned 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Animal Control Activities Number Percentage Carrboro 47 13% Chapel Hill 74 20% Hillsborough 23 6% Orange County 212 58% Other County 1 0% Unknown 0 0% Unassigned 6 2 % Total 363 100% ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES FIELD SERVICES REPORT DECEMBER 2014 Animal Control Activities by Jurisdiction Orange County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro Out of County Unknown /Unassigned 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Animal Control Activities Total 352 100% 1 This only includes activities where the township is known. Cheeks 6% I ittl P Rix/pr RinRk -, darGrove 8% Number Percentage Bingham 40 11% H i l l Cedar Grove 29 8% Chapel Hill 178 51% Cheeks 22 6% En( Eno 31 9% 9 Hillsborough 42 12% Little River 10 3% Total 352 100% 1 This only includes activities where the township is known. Cheeks 6% I ittl P Rix/pr RinRk -, darGrove 8% Animal Control Activities by Animal TVUe Total 348 100% 2 Vector species include bats, foxes, raccoons, skunks, and coyotes. Animal Control Activities by Call Type Number Percentage Dog 246 71% Cat 45 13% Livestock 15 4% Fowl 2 1% Wildlife 6 2% Other 2 1% Rabies VectorS2 32 9% Total 348 100% 2 Vector species include bats, foxes, raccoons, skunks, and coyotes. Animal Control Activities by Call Type Number Percentage Assistance: AC assistance provided to other agencies 8 2% Bite: Investigations of bites to humans by dogs, cats, ferrets 67 18% Canvass: AC dissemination of information to the public 1 0% Confiscate: Animal impounds due to legal order violation, cruelty, investigation 0 0% Cruelty: Investigations of animal cruelty 31 9% Exposure: Investigations of animals, people exposed to rabies vector species 35 10% Kennel: Inspections of permitted kennels in Orange County 1 0% Nuisance: Investigations of animals creating a public nuisance 47 13% Other: Activities that do not fall into other categories 38 10% Owned: Activities related to owned animals (e.g. surrenders) 11 3% Protective Custody: Animals impounded due to owners inability to provide care 0 0% Stray: Activities related to stray animals (animals without owners, off property, etc) 79 22% Tethering: Activities related to a tethered animal 8 2% Trap: Activities related to the trapping of an animal 22 6% Wildlife: Activities related to wildlife species 15 4% Total 363 Note: The figure represented by the number of activities may be greater than the number of requests for field services, as each call may generate multiple responses that are recorded as separate activities. Tetheri 2% Stray 28% Other, Site )osure .8% 3% Cruelty / - onfiscate 9% lance 13% Other Tethering Stray Owned Nuisance Cruelty / Confiscate Bite /Exposure 100% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Animal Control Impounds by Jurisdiction Total 62 100% Unknown Out of County County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro 0% Impounds by Jurisdiction Impounds by Township (Without Municipalities Number Percentage Carrboro 6 10% Chapel Hill 6 10% Hillsborough 2 3% County 48 77% Out of County 0 0% Unknown 0 0% Total 62 100% Unknown Out of County County Hillsborough Chapel Hill Carrboro 0% Impounds by Jurisdiction Impounds by Township (Without Municipalities Total 48 100% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Little River Hillsborough Eno Cheeks Chapel Hill Cedar Grove Bingham 0% Impounds by Township (No Municipalities) 31 65% 12 25% 5 10% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Number Percentage Bingham 2 4% Northern Orange Cedar Grove 4 8% Central Orange Chapel Hill 3 6% Southern Orange Cheeks 5 10% Eno 4 8% Hillsborough 3 6% Little River 27 56% Total 48 100% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Little River Hillsborough Eno Cheeks Chapel Hill Cedar Grove Bingham 0% Impounds by Township (No Municipalities) 31 65% 12 25% 5 10% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%