HomeMy WebLinkAboutField Statistics - 04-2012Total 420 100%
ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
FIELD SERVICES REPORT
APRIL 2012
Animal Control Activities by Jurisdiction
Orange County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Out of County
Unknown /Unassigned
0%
10% 20% 30% 40%
Animal Control Activities
1 This only includes activities where the township is known.
Hillsboro
20%
Eno
5%
Cheek!
10%
I ittip River pi-k-
Grove
io
lapel Hill
50%
50% 60%
Number
Percentage
Carrboro
15
4%
Chapel Hill
128
30%
Hillsborough
48
11%
Orange County
229
54%
Other County
7
2%
Unknown
0
0%
Unassigned
0
0%
Total
427
100%
Total 420 100%
ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
FIELD SERVICES REPORT
APRIL 2012
Animal Control Activities by Jurisdiction
Orange County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Out of County
Unknown /Unassigned
0%
10% 20% 30% 40%
Animal Control Activities
1 This only includes activities where the township is known.
Hillsboro
20%
Eno
5%
Cheek!
10%
I ittip River pi-k-
Grove
io
lapel Hill
50%
50% 60%
Number
Percentage
Bingham
40
10%
Cedar Grove
14
3%
Chapel Hill
208
50%
Cheeks
42
10%
Eno
23
5%
Hillsborough
85
20%
Little River
8
2%
Total 420 100%
ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
FIELD SERVICES REPORT
APRIL 2012
Animal Control Activities by Jurisdiction
Orange County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Out of County
Unknown /Unassigned
0%
10% 20% 30% 40%
Animal Control Activities
1 This only includes activities where the township is known.
Hillsboro
20%
Eno
5%
Cheek!
10%
I ittip River pi-k-
Grove
io
lapel Hill
50%
50% 60%
Animal Control Activities by Animal TVUe
Total 427 100%
2 Vector species include bats, foxes, raccoons, skunks,
and coyotes.
Animal Control Activities by Call Type
Number
Percentage
Dog
291
68%
Cat
49
11%
Livestock
26
6%
Fowl
13
3%
Wildlife
9
2%
Other
2
0%
Rabies VectorS2
37
9%
Total 427 100%
2 Vector species include bats, foxes, raccoons, skunks,
and coyotes.
Animal Control Activities by Call Type
Number
Percentage
Assistance: AC assistance provided to other agencies
6
1%
Bite: Investigations of bites to humans by dogs, cats, ferrets
50
12%
Canvass: AC dissemination of information to the public
6
1%
Confiscate: Animal impounds due to legal order violation, cruelty, investigation
0
0%
Cruelty: Investigations of animal cruelty
50
12%
Exposure: Investigations of animals, people exposed to rabies vector species
14
3%
Kennel: Inspections of permitted kennels in Orange County
3
1%
Nuisance: Investigations of animals creating a public nuisance
65
15%
Other: Activities that do not fall into other categories
43
10%
Owned: Activities related to owned animals (e.g. surrenders)
26
6%
Protective Custody: Animals impounded due to owners inability to provide care
2
0%
Stray: Activities related to stray animals (animals without owners, off property, etc)
86
20%
Tethering: Activities related to a tethered animal
15
4%
Trap: Activities related to the trapping of an animal
21
5%
Wildlife: Activities related to wildlife species
40
9%
Total 427
Note: The figure represented by the number of activities may be greater than the number of requests for field services, as each call may generate multiple
responses that are recorded as separate activities.
Oth
23°
Tethering
3%
Str
25
Bite
/Exposure
lb- , 15%
Cruelty
FA /
Confiscate
12%
Nuisance
15%
Owned
7%
Other
Tethering
Stray
Owned
Nuisance
Cruelty / Confiscate
Bite /Exposure
100%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Animal Control Impounds by Jurisdiction
Total 47 100%
Unknown
Out of County
County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Impounds by Jurisdiction
Impounds by
Number
Percentage
Carrboro
2
4%
Chapel Hill
6
13%
Hillsborough
6
13%
County
31
66%
Out of County
2
4%
Unknown
0
0%
Total 47 100%
Unknown
Out of County
County
Hillsborough
Chapel Hill
Carrboro
Impounds by Jurisdiction
Impounds by
Township (Without Municipalities)
Number
Percentage
Bingham
8
26%
Northern Orange
Cedar Grove
2
6%
Central Orange
Chapel Hill
4
13%
Southern Orange
Cheeks
8
26%
Eno
2
6%
Hillsborough
5
16%
Little River
2
6%
Total 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Little River
Hillsborough
Eno
Cheeks
Chapel Hill
Cedar Grove
Bingham
100%
Impounds by Township (No Municipalities)
4 13%
15 48%
12 39%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%