HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnimal Shelter Statistics - 11-2008Summary Statistical Report:
November 2008*
Animal Services Department, Orange County,
North Carolina
Introduction
This is the Animal Services Department’s monthly statistical report for the month of
November 2008. Each month a standard set of summary statistics are generated
regarding our core or essential services and activities. These are essential for purposes of
effective management and administration in different program areas, in both our Animal
Control and Animal Sheltering Divisions. At the same time, these statistics are an
invaluable tool in communicating to various stakeholders, the general public and our
elected officials and County management the scope and extent of animal services.
Notably, these monthly statistics provide a basis for thinking about sheltering practices in
a broader context. Adoption and euthanasia numbers must be understood in the context
of a multitude of other influential factors, including the number of animals that come into
Orange County’s Animal Shelter and the availability of medical and behavioral
resources. By far the greatest factor influencing sheltering practices in our own
community and others is that of “pet overpopulation,” a community-wide problem
consisting of a large number animals for whom there are no homes. As we continue to
push forward to find better and more innovative ways in which to improve, we must
remember that all of these factors work together to create the broader challenge we must
address as a department, a county, and a community.
Standard Statistics
Each of our monthly reports contains various statistics that summarize the various
activities of the County’s Animal Services Department. These are standard statistics
insofar as for a given month, such as November, they report on the same core or essential
services. They are all presented at the end of the narrative portion of this report.
Some statistics capture the overall effort of all staff as they work together to provide
integrated and coordinated animal services to the citizens of Orange County. These
include:
1. A.1 Monthly Demographics (which shows from where and how animals arrived at
Orange County’s Animal Shelter).
2. A.2 Monthly Shelter Activity (which shows total animal intakes and dispositions).
* Questions about the statistics or narrative discussion November be addressed to Andi Morgan, Administrative
Assistant, Orange County Animal Services at amorgan@co.orange.nc.us.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
2
Other statistics are more specific in summarizing the services and activities of our
department’s Animal Sheltering and Animal Control Divisions. These include:
Animal Sheltering
1. B.1 Monthly Dispositions (which reports the dispositions of all animals sheltered
in a given month)
2. B.2 Live Release for Placeable and Recovered Animals (discussed in detail in the
following sections).
3. B.3 Reasons for Euthanasia (which reports the specific reasons for which animals
were euthanized in a given month)
4. B.4 Volunteer Hours (reports volunteer hours and how they compare to previous
months and years)
Animal Control
1. C.1 Rabies Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases (which reports positive
rabies tests and related investigations conducted by Animal Control Officers).
2. C.2 Rabies Statistics (showing positive cases year-to-date and by comparison with
previous years).
3. C.3 Rabies Vaccinations (which reports the number of vaccinations given by area
veterinarians, at low-cost vaccination clinics organized by our department, and at
Orange County’s Animal Shelter).
4. C.4 Year to Date Rabies Vaccination Clinic Numbers (which shows the number
of dogs and cats vaccinated to date during the current year at the County’s low-
cost rabies vaccination clinics)
Together, these monthly statistics provide a convenient summary of our critical services
and activities. In a very transparent manner, they describe the efforts of our staff in
delivering field services, sheltering animals whose dispositions they must ultimately
decide, and programs such as our volunteer program that, among other things, is
responsible for public outreach activities and dog walking.
Statistical Development
The summary statistics provided in our monthly reports are not static. They must be
subject to change as our services are redefined, our practices evolve, and we produce the
most useful statistical information. A good example of change is table B.3 Reasons for
Euthanasia. Staff captured and encouraged the reporting of this information to make
adoption figures, as well as the reasons for euthanasia, more meaningful and transparent.
It does matter greatly whether a behaviorally sound and healthy animal is euthanized as a
result of space limitations or an animal is euthanized because it is aggressive or infirm.
In the month of November, for example, the most common cat euthanasia reason was
feral, with 35 cats euthanized for this reason. This number made up 41 percent of all cats
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
3
euthanized during the month and 23 percent of all animals euthanized. For dogs, the
primary reason for euthanasia for the month was behavioral, with 27 dogs euthanized for
this reason. This made up 41 percent of the dogs euthanized and 18 percent of all
animals euthanized for the month.
Also, we anticipate further development of the euthanasia categories that are used to
report such information. Of special note is the generation of more specific information
concerning the medical and behavioral reasons for euthanasia—not only because this
clarifies the difficult decisions that staff must make on daily basis but because such
information enables us to discuss whether there are specific programs that may be offered
to reduce the rate of euthanasia of certain animals.
Finally, our intention is to link specific monthly reports such as this one to data about
trends in our services and activities. What we foresee is a related set of graphs showing
monthly data over time that enable us to identify and evaluate trends in key services and
activities in relation to policies, practices and our own mission. As allowed by time in
the coming year, these graphs will be prepared and they are expected to be presented
along with reports of standard statistics for a given month.
Adoptions and “Lives Releases”
The placement of healthy and behaviorally sound animal companions is one of the
foremost objectives of Orange County’s Animal Services Department. The direct
placement or “re-homing” of small animals, cats and dogs occurs through our own
adoption program. In addition, many companion animals are transferred to “placement
partners”—that is, non-breed as well as breed specific rescue organizations for cats and
dogs (as well as other animals)—for their final placement on the basis of additional effort
and evaluation by these various animal organizations.
Adoptions and transfer are two of the three elements of what can be referred to as “live
releases.” Animal companions recovered by their owners or a custodian—usually if not
always “stray” animals brought to Orange County’s Animal Shelter either by one of our
Animal Control Officers or a member of the public—form the third element of animals
that are released alive.
Using this basic formula, it is possible to calculate the total (or absolute) number of
animals that are released alive from Orange County’s Shelter.1 The figures needed to
make this calculation are provided by table B.1 Monthly Dispositions: November 2008.
1 It should be said that we are using “live release” rather than “placement” for two very specific reasons as well as
because it has become a convention in the field of animal welfare since the appearance of the Asilomar Accords
(http://www.asilomaraccords.org/). One reason is that it includes all animals that are not euthanized, i.e., transfers to
placement partners and returns to owners and custodians as well as direct adoptions. The other reason is that it does not
presume that an animal transferred to placement partners is, in fact, “re-homed.” In the absence of feedback data from
these organizations, which is desirable and an objective toward which we are working, there is no way to know what
decision they have ultimately made about the disposition of a particular animal.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
4
For the month, there was a total of 169 “live releases,” consisting of 90 adoptions, 47
transfers and 32 returns to owners or custodians.
Moreover, it is possible to determine the rate of live release for placeable animals and
animals that have been recovered for a given month. Placeable animals do not include
animals surrendered by their owner for euthanasia (usually due to illness, infirmity or a
behavior problem); feral cats (as these are typically not placed); animals that died before
arriving at the shelter or in our custody as a result of an “untreatable” injury or illness; or
animals that are being held for a bite quarantine or court case. The number of placeable
animals is determined by subtracting animals surrendered for euthanasia, feral cats,
deceased animals, and court and bite holds from the total number of animals
dispositioned in a given month.
For the month of November, there were 330 total animals dispositioned. When we
remove the animals on bite and court holds, animals surrendered for euthanasia, the feral
cats and those animals that arrived dead or died of an untreatable injury while at the
shelter, we are left with 272 “placeable” animals. To find the “live release rate,” we must
then divide the total number of “live releases” (169) by the total number of potentially
placeable animals whose disposition was decided in the month (272)—and as can be seen
in Table B.2 Live Release for Placeable and Recovered Animals, the rate is 62 percent for
the month of November.2
Finally, several observations can be made with respect to adoptions. By comparison with
October 2008, there is a decrease in the number of adoptions (90 vs. 128), and a decrease
in the number of “live releases” (169 vs. 206). When compared with November in 2007,
there was also a decrease in adoptions for the month (90 in November 2008 vs. 113 in
November 2007), as well as a decrease in the total number of live releases (169 vs. 216).
As noted in the Special Monthly Notes section, these numbers are somewhat expected
given the economic downturn in our own County and others.
Pet Demographics and Overpopulation
It is often said that pet problems are people problems, and that pet overpopulation is a
community problem. These insights very much apply to our own circumstances and they
help create a broader perspective in which to understand our own sheltering statistics.
More specifically, the number of animals that are sheltered in a given period of time is
itself not caused by or a direct function of our sheltering operations and practices. The
number of unwanted animals in our communities (sometimes referred to as “surplus”
pets); the extent to which cats, rabbits and dogs alike are spayed or neutered rather than
allowed to remain intact and reproduce; the strength of norms and customs of responsible
2In earlier monthly reports, this was referred to as the “adoptable placement rate” versus the “gross placement rate,”
insofar as the latter was determined on the basis of all animals dispositioned in a given month.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
5
pet ownership; the scope and strength of animal regulations and their effective
enforcement; and other such “variables” are what affect the number of animals that are
sheltered in our own and other communities.
Monthly and Seasonal Variations
Month by month there are significant changes in the numbers of cats, dogs and other
animals that are sheltered at Orange County’s Animal Shelter. In very general terms,
there is a significant “spread” in the number of animals that are sheltered each month,
which reflect the seasonal nature of pet demographics and animal sheltering in our own
and other communities.
During the peak summer months, the numbers are traditionally much higher than in other
months of the year. In November, for instance, 562 animals were sheltered. Whereas
this is similar to the number sheltered last November (570), it is much lower than the
number sheltered last July (737). Other winter months typically show even larger
differences, as can be seen by the number we sheltered last March (398).
Similarly, this November 349 animals were admitted to the shelter—a very large number
that equates to more than 11 animals per day over that thirty-day period. During the last
twelve months, the number of animals admitted to the shelter has been as low as 233
(December 2007) and as high as 522 (July 2008).
Moreover, it should be underscored that the “live release rate” for a given time period is
determined by the number of animals that are sheltered as well as the total number of
animals that are adopted, transferred, or recovered by their owner. It may well be that
there is a very high percentage of animals that are released alive in a given month but that
the absolute number is lower than in other months because of the number of animals that
come to the shelter.
Addressing Pet Overpopulation
To work toward the desideratum of ending euthanasia as a means of population control, it
is thus essential to positively impact the number of animals that come into Orange
County’s Animal Shelter in the course of the year. Essential to this is progressive
legislation that is enforced in an effective, fair and reasonable manner. A starting point is
what is sometimes referred to as “differential licensing”—that is, licensing or registration
fees that are much lower for spayed and neutered animals than for intact animals. Orange
County has had differential licensing for many years, and this fiscal year that differential
became $5 for sterilized dogs and cats and $30 for intact dogs and cats.
No less essential is a community spay/neuter program for animal companions such as
dogs and cats that promotes responsible pet ownership and enables all community
members to spay and neuter their own pets. The development of the Community
Spay/Neuter Fund during the past year, in coordination with the Animal Services
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
6
Advisory Board, has been a major accomplishment for the Animal Services Department.
Funded by an increase in the differential licensing fee for unaltered pets, this fund will
allow the Animal Services Department to work with several existing programs to
promote Spay/ Neuter and responsible pet ownership throughout Orange County in the
coming months and years.
Other legislative options include an extra redemption fee for intact animals recovered
from the Animal Shelter, which can be refunded if they are sterilized within a given time
period, and permit systems that require a permit for dogs and cats that are going to be
bred.
Moreover, there is an overwhelming need to address the deep-seated problem of feral cats
in Orange County. Month after month feral cats (as defined by their community history
and/or observed behaviors in the context of the shelter) are one of the largest groups of
animals euthanized. In November, 35 feral cats were euthanized, and they comprised 41
percent of all cats euthanized during the month (and 23 percent of all animals
euthanized).
In fact, euthanasia of feral cats is not a “shelter problem,” but rather a community
problem, and it needs to be addressed as such. There is a great need for initiatives in the
area of public education to raise awareness insofar as euthanasia is the end result for most
of these creatures, and their presence must be considered in relation to the risk of rabies,
given the ongoing and endemic nature of so-called “raccoon rabies” in our County and
region. Thus addressing the problem of feral cats has also been a major objective for the
County’s Animal Services Department, and will be included in the Community Spay/
Neuter Fund’s program scope, beginning next fiscal year.
These are illustrations of the kinds of positive and proactive approaches that are needed
to address the problem of pet overpopulation as a community problem. In working to
reduce the number of unwanted animals that must be sheltered in our own communities,
we would also expect improvements in some of the outcomes of our sheltering practices.
We should all look forward to the day when there are very good numbers of adoptions
and “live releases” but no less notable ongoing decreases in the number of animals that
come to our shelter.
Rabies Cycle, Rabies Prevention and Rabies Control
With respect to rabies control—historically a core function of animal control—there is a
continuing concern about positive rabies tests based upon public reporting and our
surveillance of possible exposures of people and/or their pets. Table C.1 Rabies
Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases shows that this month there were two (2)
positive rabies tests in Orange County in November, bringing the total for the year to
twenty (20).3 There were nineteen (19) positive rabies tests in Orange County for 2007.
3There was a positive rabies results from October 2008 that is not counted in this total as there was no suspected human
exposure.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
7
Our own public education activities stress that pet owners not only need to be sure that
their pets are vaccinated and licensed but that a dog or cat with a current rabies
vaccination must receive a booster shot within seventy-two (72) hours of any exposure to
rabies. Unless an exposed pet with a current vaccination receives a booster shot within
that time frame, the requirements of North Carolina law is the same as for an
unvaccinated animal—namely, euthanasia or a six (6) month quarantine. In this regard,
staff stresses the immediate reporting of any possible contact to animal control and/or
public health authorities to ensure the health of all members of a household—human and
pet alike.
As can also be seen from the table on rabies exposures, Animal Control Officers
investigated ten (10) cases in which there were possible rabies exposures. Usually, these
are cases involving known or suspected contact between a domestic small animal such as
a dog or a cat and a wild animal such as a raccoon, as well as whether there is indirect
contact between a human and pet member of a household in these situations. But our
Animal Control Officers are also responsible for bite reports involving dogs and cats (as
well as other animals) and a human victim. In these cases, it is a legal requirement and
public health precaution that a dog or cat biting a human being be contained and observed
for a period of ten (10) days—thereby ensuring that the bite victim was not exposed to
the rabies virus.
Efforts to ensure current vaccination, for the welfare of pets and the people with whom
they come into contact, are ongoing and activities in this area are captured by vaccination
statistics compiled by our Animal Control Division. As is ordinarily the case, the
majority of these vaccinations—955 out of a total of 1021 vaccinations—continue to be
performed at veterinary establishments. In addition, another sixty-six (66) animals were
vaccinated at our Animal Shelter prior to their adoption or recovery.
No low-cost rabies vaccination clinics were held in November, but more are expected to
scheduled during the first part of 2009. In 2008, 1159 animals have been vaccinated at
nineteen clinics. Seventeen total clinics were held during 2007—and 1157 dogs and cats
were vaccinated as a result. Details and further information about upcoming low-cost
clinics will become available at http://www.co.orange.nc.us/animalservices.rabies.asp.
All of these activities—public education and outreach, investigations and enforcement,
and providing low-cost vaccination clinics—are critical given that Orange County
continues to be affected by the epidemic of “eastern raccoon rabies” that began in the
latter half of the 1990s.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
8
Special Monthly Notes
There have been events and challenges that have affected animal disposition numbers this
month, the most notable of which remains the overall economic downturn that North
Carolina and other regions have experienced. As has been discussed in professional
publications and reviewed on national news coverage, this economic burden has forced
many people to give up things they once were more able to afford, including pets. Our
impression is that this may not only be affecting not only adoption numbers, but also
reclaim rates and the ability for people to provide different levels of care such as spaying
and neutering pets. Despite the economy’s effects on businesses of all kinds, adoption
and reclaim numbers have stayed moderately level, in part due to staff’s dedicated work
in areas such as outreach, visibility, awareness, and education.
Conclusion
As a very young department that only came into existence in 2005, Animal Services
continues to develop new ways in which to better serve the animals and citizens of the
county. As suggested in our discussion of pet overpopulation, there are a number of
initiatives that must be taken to effectively address the underlying problem of pet
overpopulation. These include the creation of a spay/neuter fund and an effective
program to address feral cats, among others, and steps are being taken toward those goals
by the department in coordination with the Animal Services Advisory Board.
Also, on behalf of its citizens the County has committed itself to building a new animal
services facility. With the opening of this facility at the beginning of 2009, for the first
time Animal Control, the Animal Shelter, and Administrative staff will be housed under
the same roof. In addition to providing some true economies of scale, and better allowing
the coordination of animal services, it is expected that this facility will help to overcome
one of the major inhibitions to our placement efforts—namely, the inhibition that
members of the public have toward earlier generations of shelters which are often
perceived as dreadful places.
As it is being designed as a resource center that is an attractive public destination, the
new facility is expected to have a very positive affect on the number of adoptions,
transfers, community outreach programs, public visitors—and much more. With its
innovative and modern design, this new facility will become a community asset and help
further staff efforts to deliver integrated and coordinated animal services to the citizens of
Orange County. As well, it is intended and expected to enhance our adoption activities
and increase our average rate of “live releases” at the same time as it enables our staff to
work with community stakeholders to more effectively address and ultimately resolve the
pressing problem of pet overpopulation.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
9
STANDARD MONTHLY STATISTICS:
NOVEMBER 2008
A. Overview Statistics
A.1 Demographics: November 2008
(1) “Strays” under Animal Control Demographics also includes quarantined animals that have not been surrendered.
A.2 Shelter Activity: November 2008
Dogs Cats Others Total
In Shelter Custody
as of November 1, 2008 88 117 8 213
+
Total Admitted November 2008 170 166 13 349
Sheltered in November 2008 258 283 21 562
-
Dispositions for November
2008 (1) 162 156 12 330
Remaining in Shelter Custody
on December 1, 2008 (2) 96 127 9 232
(1) Includes corrections to previous month
(2) Within Shelter: 96 dogs, 105 cats, 8 other
In Foster Homes/ Pet Stores: 0 dogs, 22 cats, 1 other
Total Percent
Animal Control From Public Incoming of Total
Strays (1) Surrender Strays Surrender
Carrboro 6 0 5 5 16 4.6%
Chapel Hill 12 4 37 17 70 20.1%
Hillsborough 21 12 25 21 79 22.6%
Orange County 96 12 24 27 159 45.6%
Other County 0 1 7 8 16 4.6%
Unknown 0 0 9 0 9 2.6%
Total 135 29 107 78 349 100.0%
Strays 242 69.3% Animal Control 164 47.0%
Surrenders 107 30.7% Public 185 53.0%
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
10
B. Animal Sheltering Statistics
B.1Total Disposition: November 2008
Dogs Cats Others Total
% of Total
Dispositions
Reclaimed 27 5 0 32 9.70%
Adopted 43 44 3 90 27.27%
Transferred (1) 20 19 8 47 14.24%
Euthanized 66 86 1 153 46.36%
Died 6 2 0 8 2.42%
Other 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Totals 162 156 12 330 100.00%
(1) Transferred to Rescue Service
B.2 Live Releases for Placeable and Recovered Animals: November 2008(1)
Dogs Cats
Others Total
% of Total
Dispositions
Reclaimed 27 5 0 32 11.76%
Adopted 43 44 3 90 33.09%
Transferred (1) 20 19 8 47 17.28%
Totals 90 68 11 169 62.13%
(1) Live Releases include all animals that are not euthanized, i.e., transfers to placement partners, returns to owners and custodians, and direct adoptions.
The “live release rate” is calculated by dividing the live releases by the total number of placeable animals. To calculate placeable animals, we must
remove the animals surrendered for euthanasia, feral cats, animals that arrive dead or die in our custody, bite quarantine animals, and animals that have
been confiscated from the total number of animals dispositioned. For November, this number was 58, and removing these animals from the total number
dispositioned leaves 272 “placeable” animals.
(2) Transferred to Rescue Service
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
11
B.3 Reasons for Euthanasia: November 2008
% of Total % of Total % of Total
Dogs
Euthanized
By Reason Cats
Euthanized
By Reason Others
Euthanized
By Reason
Age 16 24.24% Age 5 5.81% Age 0 0.00%
Behavioral (1) 27 40.91% Behavioral (1) 16 18.60% Behavioral (1) 0 0.00%
Feline Leukemia 0 0.00% Feline Leukemia 0 0.00% Feline Leukemia 0 0.00%
Feral 0 0.00% Feral 35 40.70% Feral 0 0.00%
Heartworm 0 0.00% Heartworm 0 0.00% Heartworm 0 0.00%
Medical (2) 9 13.64% Medical (2) 28 32.56% Medical (2) 1 100.00%
Pregnant 0 0.00% Pregnant 0 0.00% Pregnant 0 0.00%
Owner Request 3 4.55% Owner Request 2 2.33% Owner Request 0 0.00%
Space 11 16.67% Space 0 0.00% Space 0 0.00%
Totals 66 100.00% 86 100.00% 1 100.00%
(1) “Behavioral” includes a wide range of behavioral issues that November prevent an animal from being available for adoption to the public. These
issues vary widely between cats, dogs and other animals, and can include aggression, lack of socialization, severe kennel stress or other factors that make
the animal a risk if placed back into the community.
(2) “Medical” includes a wide range of conditions and diseases that November prevent an animal from being available for adoption to the public due to
unsound health. These conditions range in severity and differ greatly between cats, dog and other animals. Additionally, because we test animals for
certain diseases as a standard protocol, these are often more easily identifiable and thus can be separated as a specific condition statistic. For example, the
“Feline Leukemia” category above is listed separately, though it is a medical condition.
B.4 Volunteer Hours: November 2008(1)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2005
2006
2007
2008
(1) Information for March 2006 is not available.
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
12
C. Animal Control Statistics
C.1 Rabies Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases: November 2008
Dogs Cats Other Total
Exposures Investigated 0 4 6 10
Tested Positive 0 0 2 2
C.2 Rabies Statistics: November 2008
(1) One of the positive rabies cases did not include any suspected exposure and is therefore not shown on the map.
Total Rabies Exposures Jan 1- November 31, 2008: 20 (1)
Total Rabies Exposures Jan 1- November 31, 2007: 19
Animal Services Monthly Report November, 2008
13
C.3 Rabies Vaccinations: November 2008
Dogs Cats Other Total
Vaccinated at Shelter 35 31 0 66
Vaccinated at Vet Clinics 448 507 0 955
Vaccinated at Rabies Clinics 0 0 0 0
Total Vaccinations 483 538 0 1021
C.4 Year to Date Rabies Vaccination Clinic Numbers
Rabies Clinics 2008
# Date Dogs Cats Total Location
1 2/13/2008 13 5 18 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
2 2/16/2008 60 15 75 Chapel Hill (New Hope Fire Station #2)
3 2/20/2008 6 5 11 Hillsborough (Animal Control)
4 2/23/2008 50 27 77 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
5 4/16/2008 106 21 127 Hillsborough (Gov't Services Annex)
6 4/16/2008 17 9 26 Hillsborough (Animal Control)
7 4/19/2008 59 44 103 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
8 4/23/2008 34 17 51 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
9 6/11/2008 24 15 39 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
10 6/18/2008 26 7 33 Hillsborough (Fairview Park)
11 6/18/2008 71 38 109 Hillsborough (S. Cameron St)
12 6/21/2008 54 29 83 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
13 8/20/2008 32 14 46 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
14 8/27/2008 14 2 16 Rougemont (Paws and Claws Kennels)
15 9/24/2008 18 28 46 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
16 9/27/2008 41 44 85 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
17 9/27/2008 74 36 110 Hillsborough (Gov't Services Annex)
18 10/22/08 18 25 43 Chapel Hill (Animal Shelter)
19 10/29/08 44 17 61 Hillsborough (Animal Control)
Grand Total 761 398 1159
Percent 65.66% 34.34%