HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnimal Shelter Statistics 01-2010Summary Statistical Report:
January 2010*
Animal Services Department, Orange County,
North Carolina
Introduction
This is the Animal Services Department’s monthly statistical report for the month of
January 2010. Each month a standard set of summary statistics are generated regarding
our core or essential services and activities. These are essential for purposes of effective
management and administration in different program areas, in both our Animal Control
and Animal Sheltering Divisions. At the same time, these statistics are an invaluable tool
in communicating to various stakeholders, the general public and our elected officials and
County management the scope and extent of animal services.
Notably, these monthly statistics provide a basis for thinking about sheltering practices in
a broader context. Adoption and euthanasia numbers must be understood in the context
of a multitude of other influential factors, including the number of animals that come into
Orange County’s Animal Services Center and the availability of medical and behavioral
resources. By far the greatest factor influencing sheltering practices in our own
community and others is that of “pet overpopulation,” a community-wide problem
consisting of a large number of animals for whom there are no homes. As we continue to
push forward to find better and more innovative ways in which to improve, we must
remember that all of these factors work together to create the broader challenge we must
address as a department, a county, and a community.
Standard Statistics
Each of our monthly reports contains various statistics that summarize the various
activities of the County’s Animal Services Department. These are standard statistics
insofar as for a given month, such as January, they report on the same core or essential
services. They are all presented at the end of the narrative portion of this report.
Some statistics capture the overall effort of all staff as they work together to provide
integrated and coordinated animal services to the citizens of Orange County. These
include:
1. A.1 Monthly Demographics (which shows from where and how animals arrived at
Orange County’s Animal Shelter).
2. A.2 Monthly Shelter Activity (which shows total animal intakes and dispositions).
* Questions about the statistics or narrative discussion may be addressed to Andi Morgan, Administrative Assistant,
Orange County Animal Services at amorgan@co.orange.nc.us.
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
2
Other statistics are more specific in summarizing the services and activities of our
department’s Animal Sheltering and Animal Control Divisions. These include:
Animal Sheltering
1. B.1 Monthly Dispositions (which reports the dispositions of all animals sheltered
in a given month)
2. B.2 Live Release for Placeable and Recovered Animals (discussed in detail in the
following sections).
3. B.3 Reasons for Euthanasia (which reports the specific reasons for which animals
were euthanized in a given month)
4. B.4 Volunteer Hours (reports volunteer hours and how they compare to previous
months and years)
Animal Control
1. C.1 Rabies Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases (which reports positive
rabies tests and related investigations conducted by Animal Control Officers).
2. C.2 Rabies Statistics (showing positive cases year-to-date and by comparison with
previous years).
3. C.3 Rabies Vaccinations (which reports the number of vaccinations given by area
veterinarians, at low-cost vaccination clinics organized by our department, and at
Orange County’s Animal Services Center).
4. C.4 Year to Date Rabies Vaccination Clinic Numbers (which shows the number
of dogs and cats vaccinated to date during the current year at the County’s low-
cost rabies vaccination clinics)
Together, these monthly statistics provide a convenient summary of our critical services
and activities. In a very transparent manner, they describe the efforts of our staff in
delivering field services, sheltering animals whose dispositions they must ultimately
decide, and programs such as our volunteer program that, among other things, is
responsible for public outreach activities and dog walking.
Statistical Development
The summary statistics provided in our monthly reports are not static. They must be
subject to change as our services are redefined, our practices evolve, and we produce the
most useful statistical information. A good example of change is table B.3 Reasons for
Euthanasia. Staff captured and encouraged the reporting of this information to make
adoption figures, as well as the reasons for euthanasia, more meaningful and transparent.
It does matter greatly whether a behaviorally sound and healthy animal is euthanized as a
result of space limitations or an animal is euthanized because it is aggressive or infirm.
In the month of January, for example, the most common cat euthanasia reasons were
medical and feral, with 14 cats euthanized for these reasons. This number made up 67
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
3
percent of all cats euthanized during the month and 17 percent of all animals euthanized.
For dogs, the primary reasons for euthanasia for the month was behavioral, with 32 dogs
euthanized for this reason. This made up 56 percent of the dogs euthanized and 38
percent of all animals euthanized for the month.
Also, we anticipate further development of the euthanasia categories that are used to
report such information. Of special note is the generation of more specific information
concerning the medical and behavioral reasons for euthanasia—not only because this
clarifies the difficult decisions that staff must make on daily basis but because such
information enables us to discuss whether there are specific programs that may be offered
to reduce the rate of euthanasia of certain animals.
Finally, our intention is to link specific monthly reports such as this one to data about
trends in our services and activities. What we foresee is a related set of graphs showing
monthly data over time that enable us to identify and evaluate trends in key services and
activities in relation to policies, practices and our own mission. As allowed by time in
the coming year, these graphs will be prepared and they are expected to be presented
along with reports of standard statistics for a given month.
Adoptions and “Lives Releases”
The placement of healthy and behaviorally sound animal companions is one of the
foremost objectives of Orange County’s Animal Services Department. The direct
placement or “re-homing” of small animals, cats and dogs occurs through our own
adoption program. In addition, many companion animals are transferred to “placement
partners”—that is, non-breed as well as breed specific rescue organizations for cats and
dogs (as well as other animals)—for their final placement on the basis of additional effort
and evaluation by these various animal organizations.
Adoptions and transfer are two of the three elements of what can be referred to as “live
releases.” Animal companions recovered by their owners or a custodian—usually if not
always “stray” animals brought to Orange County’s Animal Services Center either by one
of our Animal Control Officers or a member of the public—form the third element of
animals that are released alive.
Using this basic formula, it is possible to calculate the total (or absolute) number of
animals that are released alive from Orange County’s Animal Services Center.1 The
figures needed to make this calculation are provided by table B.1 Monthly Dispositions:
1 It should be said that we are using “live release” rather than “placement” for two very specific reasons as well as
because it has become a convention in the field of animal welfare since the appearance of the Asilomar Accords
(http://www.asilomaraccords.org/). One reason is that it includes all animals that are not euthanized, i.e., transfers to
placement partners and returns to owners and custodians as well as direct adoptions. The other reason is that it does not
presume that an animal transferred to placement partners is, in fact, “re-homed.” In the absence of feedback data from
these organizations, which is desirable and an objective toward which we are working, there is no way to know what
decision they have ultimately made about the disposition of a particular animal.
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
4
January 2010. For the month, there was a total of 166 “live releases,” consisting of 101
adoptions, 13 transfers and 52 returns to owners or custodians.
Moreover, it is possible to determine the rate of live release for placeable animals and
animals that have been recovered for a given month. Placeable animals do not include
animals surrendered by their owner for euthanasia (usually due to illness, infirmity or a
behavior problem); feral cats (as these are typically not placed); animals that died before
arriving at the shelter or in our custody as a result of an “untreatable” injury or illness; or
animals that are being held for a bite quarantine or court case. The number of placeable
animals is determined by subtracting animals surrendered for euthanasia, feral cats,
deceased animals, and court and bite holds from the total number of animals
dispositioned in a given month.
For the month of January, there were 256 total animals dispositioned. When we remove
the animals on bite and court holds, animals surrendered for euthanasia, the feral cats and
those animals that arrived dead or died of an untreatable injury while at the shelter, we
are left with 230 “placeable” animals. To find the “live release rate,” we must then
divide the total number of “live releases” (166) by the total number of potentially
placeable animals whose disposition was decided in the month (230)—and as can be seen
in Table B.2 Live Release for Placeable and Recovered Animals, the rate is 72 percent for
the month of January.2
Several observations can be made with respect to adoptions for the month. By
comparison with December 2009, there is a decrease in the number of adoptions (101 vs.
124), and a decrease in the number of “live releases” (166 vs. 187). When compared
with January in 2009, there was also a decrease in adoptions for the month (101 in
January 2010 vs. 130 in January 2009), as well as a decreased live release number (166
vs. 210).
Likely contributing to the overall decrease in adoption and live release numbers is the
overall decline of the economy. The Triangle area of North Carolina saw the effects of
this later than some other areas, but is beginning to see the results of economic decline
take effect throughout. This affects not only adoption rates, but the public’s ability to
reclaim animals as well. It also affects transfer numbers to placement partners, as many
of those organizations are volunteer-run nonprofit organizations that are also feeling the
effects of the economy and are therefore unable to move animals as quickly through their
organizations, and are even, in some cases, being forced to downsize.
2In earlier monthly reports, this was referred to as the “adoptable placement rate” versus the “gross placement rate,”
insofar as the latter was determined on the basis of all animals dispositioned in a given month.
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
5
Pet Demographics and Overpopulation
It is often said that pet problems are people problems, and that pet overpopulation is a
community problem. These insights very much apply to our own circumstances and they
help create a broader perspective in which to understand our own sheltering statistics.
More specifically, the number of animals that are sheltered in a given period of time is
itself not caused by or a direct function of our sheltering operations and practices. The
number of unwanted animals in our communities (sometimes referred to as “surplus”
pets); the extent to which cats, rabbits and dogs alike are spayed or neutered rather than
allowed to remain intact and reproduce; the strength of norms and customs of responsible
pet ownership; the scope and strength of animal regulations and their effective
enforcement; and other such “variables” are what affect the number of animals that are
sheltered in our own and other communities.
Monthly and Seasonal Variations
Month by month there are significant changes in the numbers of cats, dogs and other
animals that are sheltered at Orange County’s Animal Services Center. In very general
terms, there is a significant “spread” in the number of animals that are sheltered each
month, which reflect the seasonal nature of pet demographics and animal sheltering in
our own and other communities.
During the peak winter months, the numbers are traditionally much lower than in other
months of the year. In January, for instance, 357 animals were sheltered. Whereas this
is fewer than the number sheltered last January (479), it is much lower than the number
sheltered in June (686). Similarly, this January 242 animals were admitted to the
shelter—a large number that equates to nearly 8 animals per day over that thirty-one-day
period.
Moreover, it should be underscored that the “live release rate” for a given time period is
determined by the number of animals that are sheltered as well as the total number of
animals that are adopted, transferred, or recovered by their owner. It may well be that
there is a very high percentage of animals that are released alive in a given month but that
the absolute number is lower than in other months because of the number of animals that
come to the shelter.
Addressing Pet Overpopulation
To work toward the desideratum of ending euthanasia as a means of population control, it
is thus essential to positively impact the number of animals that come into Orange
County’s Animal Services Center in the course of the year. Essential to this is
progressive legislation that is enforced in an effective, fair and reasonable manner. A
starting point is what is sometimes referred to as “differential licensing”—that is,
licensing or registration fees that are much lower for spayed and neutered animals than
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
6
for intact animals. Orange County has had differential licensing for many years, and in
2007 that differential became $5 for sterilized dogs and cats and $30 for intact dogs and
cats.
Other legislative options include an extra redemption fee for intact animals recovered
from the Animal Services Center, which can be refunded if they are sterilized within a
given time period, and permit systems that require a permit for dogs and cats that are
going to be bred. Staff and the Animal Services Advisory Board expect to develop these
programs and others as part of a strategic spay/neuter plan that is being drafted and will
be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration.
No less essential is a community spay/neuter program for animal companions such as
dogs and cats that promotes responsible pet ownership and enables all community
members to spay and neuter their own pets. The development of the Community
Spay/Neuter Fund during the past year, in coordination with the Animal Services
Advisory Board, has been a major accomplishment for the Animal Services Department.
Funded by an increase in the differential licensing fee for unaltered pets, this fund will
allow the Animal Services Department to work with several existing programs to
promote Spay/ Neuter and responsible pet ownership throughout Orange County in the
coming months and years.
In 2008, Animal Services, with assistance from the Department of Social Services,
partnered with AnimalKind’s “The $20 Fix” to offer low-cost and no-cost spay/neuter
surgeries to pets of qualifying households in Orange County. It is the hope of Animal
Services and Orange County that this program will increase the number of pets that are
spayed and neutered in the County, and in turn help eliminate the ongoing problem of pet
overpopulation we face as a community. More information and an application can be
found online at www.animalkind.org.
Moreover, there is an overwhelming need to address the deep-seated problem of feral cats
in Orange County. Month after month feral cats (as defined by their community history
and/or observed behaviors in the context of the shelter) are one of the largest groups of
animals euthanized. In January, 7 feral cats were euthanized, and they comprised 33
percent of all cats euthanized during the month (and 8 percent of all animals euthanized).
In fact, euthanasia of feral cats is not a “shelter problem,” but rather a community
problem, and it needs to be addressed as such. There is a great need for initiatives in the
area of public education to raise awareness insofar as euthanasia is the end result for most
of these creatures, and their presence must be considered in relation to the risk of rabies,
given the ongoing and endemic nature of so-called “raccoon rabies” in our County and
region. Thus addressing the problem of feral cats has also been a major objective for the
County’s Animal Services Department, and will be included in the Community Spay/
Neuter Fund’s program scope, beginning next fiscal year.
These are illustrations of the kinds of positive and proactive approaches that are needed
to address the problem of pet overpopulation as a community problem. In working to
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
7
reduce the number of unwanted animals that must be sheltered in our own communities,
we would also expect improvements in some of the outcomes of our sheltering practices.
We should all look forward to the day when there are very good numbers of adoptions
and “live releases” but no less notable ongoing decreases in the number of animals that
come to our shelter.
Rabies Cycle, Rabies Prevention and Rabies Control
With respect to rabies control—historically a core function of animal control—there is a
continuing concern about positive rabies tests based upon public reporting and our
surveillance of possible exposures of people and/or their pets. Table C.1 Rabies
Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases shows that this month there were no positive
rabies tests in Orange County in January. In Orange County, there were twelve (12)
positive tests in 2009, twenty (20)3 positive tests in 2008, and nineteen (19) positive
rabies tests in 2007.
Our own public education activities stress that pet owners not only need to be sure that
their pets are vaccinated and licensed but that a dog or cat with a current rabies
vaccination must receive a booster shot within one hundred and twenty hours (5 days) of
any exposure to rabies. Unless an exposed pet with a current vaccination receives a
booster shot within that time frame, the requirements of North Carolina law is the same
as for an unvaccinated animal—namely, euthanasia or a six (6) month quarantine. In this
regard, staff stresses the immediate reporting of any possible contact to animal control
and/or public health authorities to ensure the health of all members of a household—
human and pet alike.
As can also be seen from the table on rabies exposures, Animal Control Officers
investigated three (3) cases in which there were possible rabies exposures. Usually, these
are cases involving known or suspected contact between a domestic small animal such as
a dog or a cat and a wild animal such as a raccoon, as well as whether there is indirect
contact between a human and pet member of a household in these situations. But our
Animal Control Officers are also responsible for bite reports involving dogs and cats (as
well as other animals) and a human victim. In these cases, it is a legal requirement and
public health precaution that a dog or cat biting a human being be contained and observed
for a period of ten (10) days—thereby ensuring that the bite victim was not exposed to
the rabies virus.
Efforts to ensure current vaccination, for the welfare of pets and the people with whom
they come into contact, are ongoing and activities in this area are captured by vaccination
statistics compiled by our Animal Control Division. As is ordinarily the case, the
majority of these vaccinations—993 out of a total of 1087 vaccinations—continue to be
3There was a positive rabies results from January 2008 that is not counted in this total as there was no suspected human
exposure.
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
8
performed at veterinary establishments. In addition, another ninety four (94) animals
were vaccinated at our Animal Services Center prior to their adoption or recovery.
No low-cost rabies vaccination clinics were held in January, but a total of 1084 animals
were vaccinated at the ten clinics held in 2009. There are ten low-cost clinics scheduled
for 2010 and all but two are being held at the new Animal Services Center. For
information about upcoming clinics, visit
http://www.co.orange.nc.us/animalservices.rabies.asp.
All of these activities—public education and outreach, investigations and enforcement,
and providing low-cost vaccination clinics—are critical given that Orange County
continues to be affected by the epidemic of “eastern raccoon rabies” that began in the
latter half of the 1990s.
Special Monthly Notes
The Center’s in-house spay and neuter suite, which began operation in December on a
part-time basis, went into full operation in January. The suite, which is designed to allow
the Center the ability to spay and neuter its own adoptable pets rather than send them to
other establishments for such service, will be beneficial to the department and animals in
many ways. It will not only save in transportation and staff time, but will also reduce the
risk associated with transporting animals for surgery (and potentially exposing them to
outside elements). Future plans also include educational opportunities for the public, as
the suite is designed with a picture window that will allow visitors to view surgeries in
process.
A notable factor in disposition numbers still again this month is the overall economic
downturn that North Carolina and other regions have experienced. As has been discussed
in professional publications and reviewed on national news coverage, this economic
burden has forced many people to give up things they once were more able to afford,
including pets. Our impression is that this may not only be affecting adoption numbers,
but also owner surrenders, reclaim rates and the ability for people to provide different
levels of care such as spaying and neutering pets. Despite the economy’s effects on
businesses of all kinds, adoption and reclaim numbers have stayed moderately level, in
part due to staff’s dedicated work in areas such as outreach, visibility, awareness, and
education.
Conclusion
Animal Services continues to develop new ways in which to better serve the animals and
citizens of the county. With the opening of the new Animal Services Center in June of
2009, the department expects to be able to better meet the needs of the community and
more effectively and efficiently in the long run. The creation of the new facility has been
a priority in the planning and time of the department since its creation, and this
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
9
realization will finally allow other activities to move further into the front as the
department fine tunes and adapts to meet the needs of the county and community.
Pet overpopulation continues to be a problem in Orange County and beyond, and one that
the Animal Services Department is dedicated to addressing on a long-term basis. As
suggested in our discussion of pet overpopulation, there are a number of initiatives that
must be taken to effectively address the underlying problem. These include the creation
of a spay/neuter fund and a strategic plan to remedy pet overpopulation, and steps are
being taken toward those goals by the department in coordination with the Animal
Services Advisory Board.
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
10
STANDARD MONTHLY STATISTICS:
JANUARY 2010
A. Overview Statistics
A.1 Demographics: January 2010
(1) “Strays” under Animal Control Demographics also includes quarantined animals that have not been surrendered.
A.2 Shelter Activity: January 2010
Dogs Cats Others Total
In Shelter Custody
as of January 1, 2010 47 64 4 115
+
Total Admitted January 2010 154 77 11 242
Sheltered in January 2010 201 141 15 357
-
Dispositions for January 2010
(1) 159 87 10 256
Remaining in Shelter Custody
on February 1, 2010 (2) 42 54 5 101
(1) Includes corrections to previous month
(2) Within Shelter: 42 dogs, 54 cats, 5 other
In Foster Homes/ Pet Stores: 0 dogs, 0 cats, 0 others
Total Percent
Animal Control From Public Incoming of Total
Strays (1) Surrender Strays Surrender
Carrboro 5 1 4 0 10 4.1%
Chapel Hill 7 4 32 19 62 25.6%
Hillsborough 9 0 13 0 22 9.1%
Orange County 60 8 25 39 132 54.5%
Other County 0 1 4 5 10 4.1%
Unknown 0 0 6 0 6 2.5%
Total 81 14 84 63 242 100.0%
Strays 165 68.2% Animal Control 95 39.3%
Surrenders 77 31.8% Public 147 60.7%
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
11
B. Animal Sheltering Statistics
B.1Total Disposition: January 2010
Dogs Cats Others Total
% of Total
Dispositions
Reclaimed 47 5 0 52 20.31%
Adopted 45 54 2 101 39.45%
Transferred (1) 8 4 1 13 5.08%
Euthanized 57 21 7 85 33.20%
Died 2 3 0 5 1.95%
Other 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Totals 159 87 10 256 100.00%
(1) Transferred to Rescue Service
B.2 Live Releases for Placeable and Recovered Animals: January 2010(1)
Dogs Cats
Others Total
% of Total
Dispositions
Reclaimed 47 5 0 52 22.61%
Adopted 45 54 2 101 43.91%
Transferred (1) 8 4 1 13 5.65%
Totals 100 63 3 166 72.17%
(1) Live Releases include all animals that are not euthanized, i.e., transfers to placement partners, returns to owners and custodians, and direct adoptions.
The “live release rate” is calculated by dividing the live releases by the total number of placeable animals. To calculate placeable animals, we must
remove the animals surrendered for euthanasia, feral cats, animals that arrive dead or die in our custody, bite quarantine animals, and animals that have
been confiscated from the total number of animals dispositioned. For January, this number was 26, and removing these animals from the total number
dispositioned leaves 230 “placeable” animals.
(2) Transferred to Rescue Service
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
12
B.3 Reasons for Euthanasia: January 2010
% of Total % of Total % of Total
Dogs
Euthanized
By Reason Cats
Euthanized
By Reason Others
Euthanized
By Reason
Age 0 0.00% Age 0 0.00% Age 0 0.00%
Behavioral (1) 32 56.14% Behavioral (1) 6 28.57% Behavioral (1) 0 0.00%
Feline Leukemia 0 0.00% Feline Leukemia 0 0.00% Feline Leukemia 0 0.00%
Feral 0 0.00% Feral 7 33.33 Feral 0 0.00%
Heartworm 7 12.28% Heartworm 0 0.00% Heartworm 0 0.00%
Medical (2) 13 22.81% Medical (2) 7 33.33 Medical (2) 7 1000%
Pregnant 0 0.00% Pregnant 0 2.56% Pregnant 0 0.00%
Owner Request 5 8.77% Owner Request 1 4.76 Owner Request 0 00.00%
Space 0 % Space 0 0.00 Space 0 0.00%
Totals 57 100.00% 21 100.00% 7 100.00%
(1) “Behavioral” includes a wide range of behavioral issues that may prevent an animal from being available for adoption to the public. These issues vary
widely between cats, dogs and other animals, and can include aggression, lack of socialization, severe kennel stress or other factors that make the animal
a risk if placed back into the community.
(2) “Medical” includes a wide range of conditions and diseases that may prevent an animal from being available for adoption to the public due to unsound
health. These conditions range in severity and differ greatly between cats, dog and other animals. Additionally, because we test animals for certain
diseases as a standard protocol, these are often more easily identifiable and thus can be separated as a specific condition statistic. For example, the
“Feline Leukemia” category above is listed separately, though it is a medical condition.
B.4 Volunteer Hours: January 2010
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Animal Services Monthly Report January, 2010
13
C. Animal Control Statistics
C.1 Rabies Exposures Investigated and Positive Cases: January 2010
Dogs Cats Other Total
Exposures Investigated 0 0 9 9
Tested Positive 0 0 0 0
C.2 Rabies Statistics: January 2010
C.3 Rabies Vaccinations: January 2010
Dogs Cats Other Total
Vaccinated at Shelter 52 42 0 94
Vaccinated at Vet Clinics 491 502 0 993
Vaccinated at Rabies Clinics 0 0 0 0
Total Vaccinations 543 544 0 1087
C.4 Year to Date Rabies Vaccination Clinic Numbers
Total Rabies Exposures Jan 1- January 31, 2009: 0
Total Rabies Exposures Jan 1- January 31, 2008: 0